There are obvious counterpoints to Wyatt’s comments. It would seem wise to consider them, and if this becomes a bigger issue going forward, come up with valid responses to them, rather than just repeat Wyatt’s talking points.

.

From point #1: “Trump had no choice but to release the vaccines in order to stop their great reset.”

____________

This is a naked assertion without substantiation. There is no reasoning, no logic, no evidence presented to support this naked claim. It’s pure narrative.

Worse, it’s beyond naive to claim that the most powerful man on the planet “had no choice”. The POTUS always has options. He picked one. We can argue whether it was the right one (or not), but to suggest that he “had no choice” is simply disingenuous.

.
.

Point #2: “The original plan was to keep nations shut down until a vaccine was made. Multiple deep state leaders told us this.”

______________

So the source is literally enemy leadership. On the outside chance that enemy leaders were not engaging in misdirection, lies, propaganda or other self-serving leakage, assuming that the “deep state leaders” were telling the truth, Trump had no obligation to go along with their plan.

Also from Point #2: “A central element of the cabal strategy was to hide all treatments.”

And as I have pointed out numerous times, DJT was in a position to expose all of the better treatments. He actually did expose HCQ as a perfectly good alternative treatment.

It would have been a simple thing to say:

A) Apparently I am required by an executive order signed by Obama, which for some odd reason I don’t simply repeal or revoke, to accept the conclusions of Obama’s chosen mouthpieces, Fauxi and Brix.

B) So I will make their conclusions available to the American People, as required by Obama’s executive order, and since I believe in competition and transparency, I am also personally funding, out of my own pocket, to the tune of $50+ million dollars, a concurrent research group of world renowned doctors and scientists, many of whom are volunteering their time for the benefit of mankind, unlike Dr. Fauxi, the highest paid employee in the entire federal government of the United States of America, with numerous financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry.

The team will be conducting their work while being recorded and broadcast online in real time. They will be testing every claim made by Fauxi, Brix, the CDC and the WHO with regard to vaccine development, Covid treatment protocols like ventilators and Remdesivir, and alternative treatments like HCQ and Ivermectin.

The public will be able to see with their own eyes the testing procedures and test results. If the CDC or WHO or Fauci or Brix would like to be similarly transparent, in the interest of their own credibility, I’m sure the American People would welcome that.

If the federal government agencies won’t be transparent, the American People should ask themselves what are they hiding, and why? This would only be natural and right to ask.

Either way, the American People will have the benefit of credible, timely and professional research results, research conducted by world renowned doctors and scientists, and the American People can then decide and choose for themselves whom to believe and what treatments are right for them.

They can decide to believe government agents with zero transparency and all sorts of conflicts of interest, or they can choose to believe world renowned scientists and doctors who conduct all of their research in full view of the American Public.

Americans who choose treatments and protocols recommended by the group I am funding on behalf of the American People will have open and transparent research results with which to demand from their Representatives and the courts that such treatments be made available — and not withheld from the American People by those who shroud their conclusions and recommendations in secrecy and deceptive manipulation of data.

.
.

Point #4: “4. Essentially Trump removed the need for a vaccine by saying there were cures. 

Who needs a rushed vaccine if there are proven drugs? He promoted these drugs for many months.

The significance of this evades most of us.”

______________

True but practically irrelevant. The ‘significance’ evades most of us because most of the American People cannot even be aware of those 26 tweets — and even if the public was aware, does the gravity of the situation not require vastly more public attention than what might be achieved by six tweets and twenty retweets?

As a daily reader here, and having followed sites like CTH and Political Moonshine and others, along with much of the content linked here each day, it is almost certain that I am better informed on this subject matter than the average American, certainly better than those who get the majority of their news from the MSM and the censored Big Tech social media platforms.

And yet even with all of that, I was not aware of and/or had no recollection of all those Tweets (mostly retweets) by POTUS.

Trump clearly had concerns about the vaccine route. And yet, as someone who consumed a large amount of information during that period, the best recollection I had of Trump promoting HCQ was during a press conference, where he said publicly that he had taken HCQ himself, almost as an aside.

It is true that he personally endorsed HCQ at least once publicly (which I remember seeing), and now I have seen the series of 26 Tweets spanning from March 21st of 2020 to August 24th, 2020.

March 21: two tweets
March 22: one tweet
March 24: one tweet

April 4: two tweets
April 10: one tweet
April 18: one tweet

May 18: four tweets

July 6: three tweets
July 26: one tweet
July 27: eight tweets

August 23: one tweet
August 24: one tweet

POTUS has the biggest megaphone on the planet.

One might reasonably expect that on a subject of such national importance — the potential life or death of 330+ million Americans — that multiple addresses to the public, at least on the same level as Roosevelt’s “Day of Infamy” address to the nation after Pearl Harbor, would have been expected and appropriate.

No doubt there must be good reasons why this did not happen.

Do those reasons outweigh the life and death of at least 70% or 231,000,000 Americans who were harangued, coerced and pressured to take a clot-shot?

Maybe the reasons do.

Maybe Cabal has nuclear weapons and threatened to set them off in American cities. Maybe space aliens took over the bodies of military generals and top administration officials, and they threatened to nuke the world. Maybe a Terminator sent back in time from 2029 warned him that if he tried to stop the Cabal vaccine plan, humanity would be wiped out several years later.

Maybe lots of things.

The problem is that until or unless a credible explanation is provided, there is only speculation, and speculation is just not something upon which a strong defense can be made.

So we are left with:

A) an enormous public threat / danger

B) a real, verifiable but effectively minimalist warning to the American People about that danger, without explanation why

Point #5 from Wyatt’s list:

“5. The vaccines were not his idea. They were the cabal’s plan.”

____________

Agreed.

.

“He released them 1.5 years sooner to end lockdowns, which saved the world.”

____________

This doesn’t really make sense. If the vaccines:

A) did nothing to prevent or cure Covid, and

B) endangered the lives of anyone who took the vaccines

Then releasing them 1.5 years sooner is not the answer. Stopping them from ever being released at all is the answer. And if anyone was in a position to do it, is it not the POTUS?

It is not an unreasonable premise that the clot-shot will eventually be (or lead to) the cause of death for everyone who took it, unless they die from something unrelated to their bodily health beforehand (e.g., car crash).

That is not necessarily the case, and hopefully it’s not the case. Some people may have received saline instead of vaxx. Some people may be naturally immune to the vaxx for one reason or another. But it was still wildly irresponsible (criminally negligent) and undeniably dangerous to attempt to inject the entirety of the human race with an untested, experimental vaccine.

Speeding up the process (or slowing it down) is irrelevant to the people who took the clot-shot. Some 231,000,000+ Americans are now part of a medical experiment. Those whose health becomes seriously impacted by the clot shot (or worse, die as a result of it), did not avoid any threat to their life from accelerating or decelerating the release.

The only people who avoided the threat (as far as we know, not counting ‘shedding’ issues, blood transfusions and other means of transmission) are those who did not take the clot-shot.

.

“That was the key to the original plan. Under the guise of a public health crisis, shut down the economy long enough to kill it completely.”

______________

Whether it was or it wasn’t (how do we know what “the original plan” was, without conjecture?), who besides POTUS was in a better position to STOP that plan?

If one of us was POTUS, and we knew the Cabal’s plan, and we knew or could reasonably assume that the clot-shot was a biological weapon designed as a genocide weapon against the population of the whole world, what would we do?

No one can really answer that question without knowing the factors that went in to POTUS’s decisions.

While he was POTUS, he had the authority to declassify anything he wanted to, even if the only way to do it (because of treasonous obstruction by subordinates) was to declassify documents personally on live TV.

Since he is not currently POTUS, he could address those factors and a whole host of other explanations for actions which, on their face, did not make much sense.

Maybe he will, as part of the presidential campaign.

So far, he has not.

Point #7 of 8:

“7. If he had come out against the vaccines, they would have simply used it to destroy him and still introduced it but on their own timeline.”

______________

This, again, is a naked assertion without foundation or substantiation, it is purely speculative, an “if / then” hypothesis, but presented as fact.

.

“It was the only option.”

______________

How does he know it was the only option?

What rational foundation for this assertion can withstand basic scrutiny?

.

“Nothing could prevent the vaccines. Mankind demanded them.”

______________

Well… did you try?!? 😂

I mean, this is a ridiculous assertion.

.

“They would have been released anyway.”

_____________

Maybe so, maybe that was a better option.

Go ahead and let them release whatever they want, don’t even try to prevent it, but in the meantime, put enough fear and factual information in the hands of the public that NOBODY would touch the vaccines with a 10-foot pole.

You have to empower the People, give them a LEG to stand on, SOMETHING with which to challenge the full-court press ‘narrative’.

Give the People information to defend themselves, and most of them will, especially if they had more reason to fear the vaccine than they had to fear Covid (which they did!).