As I documented in the article, GREENHOUSE, ICEHOUSE OR CLIMATIC MADHOUSE?, the late 1960s & early 1970s were a pivotal time period. The Milankovitch Theory of glaciation was confirmed, there was a world grain crisis due to the cold weather, and Kukla and Matthews alerted President Richard Nixon the present interglacial might be ending.
Well almost all of us have been pretty sure that there were only four ice ages, separated by relatively long warm intervals. But now we know that there were twenty in the last two million years. And the warm periods are much shorter than we believed originally. They are something around 10,000 years long. and I’m sorry to say that the one we are living in now has just passed its 10,000 year birthday. That of course means that the ice age is due now any time.
This is EXACTLY the type of crisis the Malthusians and Eugenicists were looking for.
They needed a crisis that was world wide and nasty enough to light a fire under all the world leaders and in the late 1960s and early 1970’s they got it.
From: The 1974 CIA Report: A Study of Climatological Research as it Pertains to Intelligence Problems
One of the most serious challenges to human destiny in the last third of this century will be the growth of the population. Whether man’s response to that challenge will be a cause for pride or for despair in the year 2000 will depend very much on what we do today. If we now begin our work in an appropriate manner, and if we continue to devote a considerable amount of attention and energy to this problem, then mankind will be able to surmount this challenge as it has surmounted so many during the long march of civilization. — Richard Nixon, July 18, 1969
In addition to the Rockefeller Commission Report, the 1974 CIA Report, you also had the 1974, U.S. National Security Council report NSSM -200 written under Henry Kissinger It was a classified 200-page study: “National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests.”
…General Goals and Requirements for Dealing With Rapid Population Growth
23. The central question for world population policy in the year 1974, is whether mankind is to remain on a track toward an ultimate population of 12 to 15 billion — implying a five to seven-fold increase in almost all the underdeveloped world outside of China — or whether (despite the momentum of population growth) it can be switched over to the course of earliest feasible population stability — implying ultimate totals of 8 to 9 billions and not more than a three or four-fold increase in any major region.
24. What are the stakes? We do not know whether technological developments will make it possible to feed over 8 much less 12 billion people in the 21st century. We cannot be entirely certain that climatic changes in the coming decade will not create great difficulties in feeding a growing population, especially people in the LDCs who live under increasingly marginal and more vulnerable conditions. There exists at least the possibility that present developments point toward Malthusian conditions for many regions of the world.
25. But even if survival for these much larger numbers is possible, it will in all likelihood be bare survival…
THE SCHILLER INSTITUTE: Henry Kissinger’s 1974 Plan for Food Control Genocide by Joseph Brewda, Dec. 8, 1995
NSSM 200 was the U.S. Government’s formal response to the feverish effort in the private sector, especially in the latter part of the 1960s, to depopulate the earth or else we would all die. Most of these advocates for population control are forgotten, but one that is still known today is Paul Ehrlich. His 1969 book, The Population Bomb, popularized a viewpoint that already had wide currency among the sophisticates and elites across the world. Political pressure was piled high and population ‘experts’ clamored to have their expertise acknowledged and implemented. Finally, in 1969, Richard Nixon gave a speech which called for a national population policy. Federal funding for domestic population control began in earnest with the 1970 passage of Title X, which began funneling millions and millions of dollars into ‘family planning’ (a euphemism for ‘population control’) and established the Office of Population Affairs. This office still exists.
In 1972, Nixon called for a report to be given to him by what would become called the Rockefeller Commission Report. This commission consisted mostly of private sector individuals and organizations, and included men like Bernard Bereleson (president of the Population Council) and Frederick Jaffe Memo (Vice-president of population for Planned Parenthood). The commission’s report was submitted to the President in 1972, but to the chagrin of the elites, he did not act on it–at least, not publicly, and not domestically.
NSSM-200 – The Kissinger Report
As a separate article I am going to put up the excerpts I extracted from that NSSM-200 report… Once my eyes uncross! Who ever wrote that thing always used two pages when one sentence would do. I wonder if he was paid by the word… Anyway, even if you do not read the whole thing look at the table of contents AND DO LOOK AT THE BOTTOM, that is where the ‘Recommendations’ are and shows the direction planned.
TAKEAWAYS FROM NSSM 200
The Cabal came up with a multi-prong attack. Curbing the birth rate in the USA and EU was not going to take care of the over population problem. The installation of Communism and the One Child Policy in China certainly helped. (And adds more weight to my theory the City of London aka Banksters were somehow behind the communists winning in China.)
If you look at the Table of Contents you find the ‘Action Items’ This is not the entire table of contents which is in my excerpt article.
- World Population Conference
- UN Organization and Specialized Agencies
- Action to Create Conditions for Fertility Decline: Population and a Development Assistance Strategy <== (This was US AID’s mandate)
- Encouraging Private Organizations (Think Gates Foundation among others)
- Utilization of Mass Media and Satellite Communications System for Family Planning
- Action to Develop Worldwide Political and Popular Commitment to Population Stability
- Research to Improve Fertility Control Technology
- Development of Low-Cost Delivery Systems (Think food and vaccines)
World Population Conference
Focusing on population issues and development
The Third World Population Conference was held in Bucharest, Romania, from 19 to 30 August 1974. The Conference was attended by representatives of 135 countries. The debate focused on the relationship between population issues and development. The Conference adopted the World Population Plan of Action, which stated, among other principles, that the essential aim is the social, economic and cultural development of countries, that population variables and development are interdependent and that population policies and objectives are an integral part (constituent elements) of socio-economic development policies.
World Population Plan of Action recommended that all countries:…
…. In 1974, David Rockefeller III keynoted the Club of Rome/UN World Population Conference in Bucharest stating “There is a need to revise the concept of economic growth. Particularly in recent years, the limits of growth have come into our consciousness. The depletion of resources, pollution, and the energy crisis have made all that very clear. The character and purpose of growth must be changed.”
…While James Carter became America’s 39th president in 1977, the Trilateral Commission was actually created in 1973 under the nominal head of David Rockefeller III (president of Chase Manhattan Bank) and a coterie of international financiers and imperialistically-minded ideologues who believed religiously in the utopian doctrine of global governance under a master-slave ethic….
A leading figure in the Trilateral Commission who later became Carter’s National Security Advisor was named Zbigniew Brzezinski who referred to this agenda as the “Technetronic era” which he described in 1970 as an age involving “the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values.” Who would these specialists represent? In his Between Two Ages, Brzezinski made it very clear:
“The nation-state as a fundamental unit of man’s organized life has ceased to be the principal creative force: International banks and multi-national corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the political concepts of the nation-state” ….
[THINK World Economic Forum founded in 1971. G.C.]Matthew Ehret August 12, 2019
In the last article we already covered UNESCO run by the Eugenicist, Julian Huxley. We are already aware of the WHO and there is the FAO and OIE dealing with plants and farm animals. I am sure there are a heck of a lot of others under the UN umbrella but I am not going to cover them here. You can go to my food series for some of the information on the FAO & OIE.
U. S. AID was the primary mechanism for implementing control over third world countries. Think Carrot and Stick.
Or as Catherine Bertini, Executive Director of the United Nations World Food Program, and former U.S. Assistant Secretary of Agriculture, stated in 1995:
The United States Agency for International Development is an independent agency of the U.S. federal government that is primarily responsible for administering civilian foreign aid and development assistance. With a budget of over $27 billion, USAID is one of the largest official aid agencies in the world and accounts for more than half of all U.S. foreign assistance—the highest in the world in absolute dollar terms. — Wikipedia
Except US AID actually never did provide real assistance INSTEAD it was all about fertility control as NSSM 200 outlines. (Time to DEFUND!)
From ChiefIO: Leucaena leucocephala collection of links
A story about reversing desertification, description of a legume tree that helps, and of an Agronomy System that can change poor rural lives.
Back in the ’70s or so I saw an article. I’ve forgotten where and I’ve forgotten “about whom”. (Frankly, I don’t think I ever caught the name. It was an Indian (as in India) name, and they tend to ‘runtogetherforme’ into some long hypnotic rampathrathimatripiaticrythm kind of thing that just doesn’t “click”, nor “stick” for me.) I think the article might have been in Mother Earth News, or perhaps something more technical. Again, “Title” is not one of the things I used to notice.
The basic thrust of the article was about a place in India where there was a lot of “Desertification” happening. They had photographs of a Dr. Rmamumblemumblemumble who had ‘fixed it’. What “stuck in my brain” were the method, and a strong visual of the location. They had “before” and “after” pictures of the same location with The Good Doctor seated in the same place. Just “night and day”….
From phoenixrising showing, even though the technique was KNOWN in the 1970s, — and I also saw it in something I read in the 1970s — IT WAS NEVER IMPLEMENTED!
This was done, NOT BY US AID but by an individual.
28 July 2002 – EAT GMO OR STARVE, AMERICA TELLS AFRICA
…George Bush’s recent increase in the US aid budget specifically for the purpose of encouraging the uptake of biotechnology. As the article below makes plain, the US also seems to be tying in economic assistance to acceptance of GMOs, “Zambian Vice President Enock Kavindele told Reuters in Lusaka that his country had declined a $50 million (31 million pounds) line of credit from the U.S. Department of Agriculture because of provisions that it would have to purchase GMO commodities.” And the kind of ‘eat GM or starve’ rhetoric coming out of USAID, an organisation advised by biotech industry stalwart CS Prakash, also appears less than helpful. Working with the governments concerned to rapidly resolve the problems, where possible, has to be the most constructive response….
Encouraging Private Organizations
During the ‘Farm Wars’ a couple decades ago, one of our group received a letter from an African farmer. It was heartbreaking.
It was about Heifer International, a ‘Charitable Organization’ to “Help Lift Families Out Of Poverty.”
Only what they do not tell you is, to receive the heifer (female calf) the African farmer must KILL ALL HIS NATIVE cattle! Since the heifer they are given is a northern animal it never survives the diseases and climate of Africa. Heifer International is still active today.
If that is not bad enough, he tells of powdered baby formula. One of the goals of US AID according to NSSM 200 is to educate women and get them into the work force. Part of that is to replace nursing mothers with bottle feeding. But again they never bothered to tell the Africans to BOIL THE WATER and so the babies died. The African letter writer said once they figured this out they do not use the powdered formula. They either feed it to their animals or toss it.
Gates Foundation and Vaccines.
There have been “Reports” that allege various other methods of sterilization including vaccines. A list of them is HERE. (Loads fine in Yandex)
A covert-sterilisation programme using vaccines such as tetanus, rubella and what looks to be Gardasil (1), also the use of mercury in third world country vaccines (even after they have removed most of it it from Western countries) is suspected of being a birth control ploy (1). They have form with 60,000 Americans coercively sterilized , and between 1963 and 1965 more than 400,000 Colombian women were sterilized in a program funded by the Rockefeller Foundation which also helped found and fund the German eugenics program; and even funded the program that ultimately sent Josef Mengele into Auschwitz (1, 2, 3).]
And to top it off with real world data, and I always want real world data to back an allegation up, this interesting report from the UN on African fertility: Demographic Change in Sub-Saharan Africa.
Barney Cohen reviews levels, differentials, and trends in fertility for more than 30 countries from 1960 to 1992. He finds evidence of fertility decline in Botswana, Kenya, and Zimbabwe, confirming the basic results of the DHS. What is new here though is his finding that the fertility decline appears to have occurred across cohorts of women at all parities, rather than just among women at middle and higher parities, as might have been expected on the basis of experience in other parts of the world. He also presents evidence that fertility may have begun to fall in parts of Nigeria and possibly in Senegal….
Report: Vaccines Have Likely Been Primary Cause Of Illness For Past 50 Years – Washington Standard
“It’s interesting when you can connect the dots and begin to understand an underlying problem and what many people thought was the solution is actually the cause of the problem. Recently, Rhoda Wilson of The Daily Espose wrote:”
In 1979, the WHO and the CDC redesigned the International Classification of Diseases coding list and erased any possibility for the world’s coroners to label a cause of death related to vaccination. A coroner has no code to input if he/she believes someone died of a vaccine.
For over fifty years, WHO and CDC have been forcing coroners to mislabel vaccination deaths. Beyond the fact it is likely a crime, this suppression means that “informed consent” has been totally corrupt for decades.NEXUS NEWS FEED
Research to Improve Fertility Control Technology
GM corn set to stop man spreading his seed – UK Guardian
Scientists have created the ultimate GM crop: contraceptive corn. Waiving fields of maize may one day save the world from overpopulation.
The pregnancy prevention plants are the handiwork of the San Diego biotechnology company Epicyte…
A USDA grant funded Epicyte who developed a GM corn with a “rare class of human antibodies that attack sperm.”
Announcing his success at a press conference, the president of Epicyte, Mitch Hein, pointing to his GMO corn plants and announced, “We have a hothouse filled with corn plants that make anti-sperm antibodies.”
Shortly after the 2001 Epicyte press release, all discussion of the breakthrough vanished. The company itself was taken over in 2004 by Biolex [of Pittsboro NC] and nothing more was heard in any media about the development of spermicidal corn….
REMEMBER the Bush US AID directive about GMO???? This corn was developed in 2001 and the Bush directive was in 2002.
But it gets even darker than that.
By Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz
… years ago, most of you can recall, the highly publicized case of the Florida dentist who infected his patients with AIDS–the case of, the beautiful teenager, Kimberly Bergalis, who died shortly after testifying before Congress in a wheel-chair. At the time I was serving as the chief professional advisor to the largest dental and medical catalog supply company in the world. The day the story broke I was assigned to develop patient and professional educational materials to help allay the public’s growing fear of visiting dental and medical offices in the age of AIDS. You may recall how terrified most people became about a routine trip to the dentist at that time. So I began by investigating the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDCs) official investigation reports on the case. And to make a long story short, I found the reports to be scientifically bogus. I later learned that the government had covered-up key evidence in the tragedy in an effort the maintain the case an unsolvable mystery.
In essence they had committed scientific fraud and misconduct and, in the process, concealed the most incriminating evidence against the dentist–a very bright, scientifically trained, ex-military dentist, who believed he was dying of a virus that the government had created. Yes, you heard me correctly, a virus that the government had created.
Now, the problem I had was reconciling the fact that the dentist, though a psychopath, was no fool. And he held in his possession one of the most incriminating documents I had ever seen. A 1970 Department of Defense Appropriations request for $10 million for the development of immune system ravaging viruses for germ warfare. In fact, the document, which I lay before you today, reads like this:
“Within the next 5 to 10 years, it would probably be possible to make a new infective microorganism which could differ in certain important aspects from any known disease-causing organisms. Most important of these is that it might be refractory to the immunological and therapeutic processes upon which we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease. . . A research program to explore the feasibility of this could be completed in approximately 5 years at a total cost of $10 million. . . . It is a highly controversial issue and there are many who believe such research should not be undertaken lest it lead to yet another method of massive killing of large populations.”
In fact it was the National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council (NAS-NRC) that had informed the Defense Department that this research was possible.
Now, according to legal testimony given to government officals, this knowledge enraged the Florida dentist so much it moved him to intentionally inject his patients with HIV-tainted anesthetics….
Among Henry Kissinger’s most influential patrons as he worked his way up the ladder of success to become Nixon’s Deputy to the President for National Security, was Nelson Aldrich Rockefeller, the son of Standard Oil, that is Exxon, heir John D. Rockefeller, Jr. …
Following the war, Henry Kissinger, who had become General Alexander Bolling’s German translator and principle assistant (Bolling, of course, was the ‘Godfather’ to the Joint Intelligence Objectives Agency that ran “Project Paperclip,” the secret exfiltration of approximately 2,000 high level Nazis, about 900 of whom were military scientists and medical researchers, including Erich Traub, Hitler’s top biological weapons developer and virus expert. Bolling also served as a high ranking member of the Inter-American Defense Board, a Washington based group that delivered Walter Emil Schreiber, Hitler’s chief medical scientist, the “Angel of Death” Joseph Mengele, and his assistant, “the butcher of Lyon,” Klaus Barbie, among others, to safe havens in South America where they worked on CIA projects.) In fact it was Henry Kissinger’s job to seek and find such Nazi’s that might be of service to America, and Kissinger became the chief of Army Counter-Intelligence in this regard. He trained other agents to hunt down Nazis at the European Command Intelligence School in Oberammergau, not to be tried for war crimes necessarily, but rather to serve U.S. military rather than Russian interests….
Note the connections: Rockefeller ==> Kissinger ==> Klaus Schwab ==> World Economic Forum ==> Great Reset.
The Russian accused us of developing AIDS and I saw in passing information about the locations of the Ebola outbreak in Africa during the Obama years, that made it look fishy.
Given Ralph Baric’s Gain-of-function research on Covid, plus the recent vid of Rand Paul accusing not only CDC but also the State Dept. of hiding funding for Chinese Covid research, I am no longer as quick to consider articles like that above to be pure fiction.
DEVELOPMENTS IN THE USA
Starting with: PLANNED PARENTHOOD HISTORY
….In 1956, the first large-scale human trial of the birth control pill was carried out in Puerto Rico….
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the sale of pills for contraception on May 9, 1960….
In 1965, in the landmark case Griswold v. Connecticut, the Supreme Court ruled that states couldn’t deny the sale of contraception to married couples. That led ten states to legalize birth control.
Seven years later, in 1972, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a Massachusetts law that banned the distribution of contraceptives to unmarried people in Eisenstadt v. Baird. So by the early 70s anyone — single or married — was allowed to get birth control from their doctor.
In 1970, Title X of the Public Health Services Act became law. It established public funding for family planning and sex education programs in the U.S. That meant Planned Parenthood and other reproductive health organizations were able to provide birth control and sex education services for more people, especially in low-income communities. To this day, Title X funding is critical to accessing sexual and reproductive health care.
Why does the U.S. government have an ‘Office of Population Affairs’?
Again using WIKI, 2016 version
The Office of Population Affairs (OPA), a part of the United States Department of Health and Human Serviceswithin the Office of Public Health and Science, serves as the focal point to advise the Secretary and the Assistant Secretary for Health on a wide range of reproductive healthtopics, including adolescent pregnancy, family planning,  and sterilization, as well as other population issues. Created by an Act of Congress in 1970 (Public Law 91-572, 84 Stat. 1504, Dec. 24. 1970), the Office of Population Affairs, under the direction of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Population Affairs (DASPA), has three component offices responsible for the oversight of program functions: Office of Family Planning, Office of Adolescent Pregnancy Programs, and Office of Research and Evaluation.
So the Office of Population Affairs was formed by a law in 1970
The Office of Population Affairs (OPA), in the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, administers the Title X family planning, Teen Pregnancy Prevention, and Embryo Adoption Awareness and Services programs. OPA advises the Secretary and the Assistant Secretary for Health on a wide range of reproductive and adolescent health topics, including teen pregnancy prevention, family planning, and sterilization, as well as other population issues.
“The Title X Family Planning program is administered within the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health by the Office of Population Affairs (OPA).”
The Title X Family Planning program [“Population Research and Voluntary Family Planning Programs” (Public Law 91-572)], was enacted in 1970 as Title X of the Public Health Service Act. Title X is the only federal grant program dedicated solely to providing individuals with comprehensive family planning and related preventive health services.
In 2016, before Donald Trump became president, more than 4 million people a year relied on the affordable birth control and reproductive health care services that were provided through Title X. Many of these people didn’t even know Title X exists, but without it, they wouldn’t have been able to access this essential care. The basic primary and preventive health care services provided by Title X include:…
The Gag Rule That Undermined Title X
In 2019, the Trump administration implemented a harmful Title X gag rule. The rule banned doctors in the Title X program across the country from telling people how they could safely and legally access abortion. This made it impossible for patients in the program to get birth control [Notice how they conflate the term ‘birth control’ with ‘abortion’ – G.C.] at places like Planned Parenthood — and prohibited doctors and nurses from giving people full information about all of their sexual and reproductive health care options.
Until the Title X gag rule was imposed, Planned Parenthood health centers served 41% of the 4 million patients — or more than 1.6 million people — who got care [‘care’ OR Abortions? – G.C.] through the Title X program. The new rule forced Planned Parenthood health centers, along with many others, to withdraw from the Title X program. According to the Guttmacher Institute, the gag rule has slashed the program’s national family planning network’s patient capacity in half…..
Notice the gag is NOT about health screenings or other health issues! If it slashed in ½ that seems to indicate ½ of title X money went to abortions.
Trump Administration’s Domestic Gag Rule Has Slashed the Title X Network’s Capacity by Half (A pro-abortion article by the Guttmacher Institute mentioned above.)
…The Trump administration finalized its targeted dismantling of the Title X program by overhauling the program’s administrative regulations in March 2019, after nearly two years of laying groundwork. Collectively known as the domestic gag rule, these regulations include a prohibition on abortion referrals, coercive counseling standards for pregnant patients, and unnecessary and stringent requirements for the physical and financial separation of Title X–funded activities from a range of abortion-related activities.
On the ground, these changes have the potential to subvert the nationwide network of family planning providers that Title X supports, translate into coercive care for patients, and drastically reduce access to crucial and comprehensive reproductive health care…
Planned Parenthood announced Monday it’s formally exiting the Title X federal family planning program over a rule enacted by the Trump administration preventing clinics that receive Title X funds from referring patients for abortion….
Biden got rid of the Gag order BTW.
So how does Roe vs Wade fit in to the overall timeline?
Roe v. Wade, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on January 22, 1973, ruled (7–2) that unduly restrictive state regulation of abortion is unconstitutional. In a majority opinion written by Justice Harry A. Blackmun, the Court held that a set of Texas statutes criminalizing abortion in most instances violated a woman’s constitutional right of privacy, which it found to be implicit in the liberty guarantee of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment ….
The case began in 1970 when “Jane Roe”—a fictional name used to protect the identity of the plaintiff, Norma McCorvey (1947–2017)—instituted federal action against Henry Wade, the district attorney of Dallas county, Texas, where Roe resided. The Supreme Court disagreed with Roe’s assertion of an absolute right to terminate pregnancy in any way and at any time and attempted to balance a woman’s right of privacy with a state’s interest in regulating abortion. In his opinion, Blackmun noted that only a “compelling state interest” justifies regulations limiting “fundamental rights” such as privacy and that legislators must therefore draw statutes narrowly “to express only the legitimate state interests at stake.” The Court then attempted to balance the state’s distinct compelling interests in the health of pregnant women and in the potential life of fetuses…. With regard to the fetus, the Court located that point at “capability of meaningful life outside the mother’s womb,” or viability, which occurs at about 24 weeks of pregnancy….
So again the moves by the Eugenicists were made around 1970.
Shortly after assuming office in 1977, I directed the Council on Environmental Quality, the Department of State, and other Government agencies to study the profound changes that may take place in our world’s population, natural resources, and environment through the end of the century. [This is very similar to the NSSM 200 focus – G.C.] The Global 2000 study is now complete. Its report projects global conditions which could develop by the end of this century, assuming that present trends and patterns around the world continue. Many of the report’s findings must be of great concern to all of us. These findings point to developments related to the world’s peoples and resources that our prompt attention can begin to alleviate. We will make use of the information from the Global 2000 report in carrying out public policy wherever possible. In addition, we must continue to analyze the serious issues it raises.
It is important to understand that the conditions the report projects are by no means inevitable. In fact, its projections can and should be timely warnings which will alert the nations of the world to the need for vigorous, determined action at both the national and international levels.
The United States is not alone in responding to global population, natural resource, and environmental issues. The recent Venice summit declaration committed the Western industrial nations to cooperate with developing countries in addressing global food, energy, and population problems. The summit nations agreed on the need for a better understanding of the implications of resource availability and population growth for economic development. In the United Nations many of the key issues raised in the Global 2000 report are being included in the formulation of a new international development strategy….
So Carter just carried on with Nixon’s (Rockefeller/Kissinger) policies. NSSM-200 identified as a problem, not only ‘Rapid population growth’ but ‘depletable resources (fossil fuels and other minerals) Translation. The Cabal doesn’t want to give the ‘Great Unwashed’ access to energy and other resources. THIS IS THE ACTUAL REASON BEHIND THE GLOBAL WARMING HOAX AND DEMONIZATION OF CO2. No energy = no industry = no use of resources.
Mineral and Fuel
8. Rapid population growth is not in itself a major factor in pressure on depletable resources (fossil fuels and other minerals), since demand for them depends more on levels of industrial output than on numbers of people. On the other hand, the world is increasingly dependent on mineral supplies from developing countries, and if rapid population frustrates their prospects for economic development and social progress, the resulting instability may undermine the conditions for expanded output and sustained flows of such resources.
WIKI: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
The Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy is an office within the United States Department of Energy. Formed from other energy agencies after the 1973 energy crisis, EERE is led by the Assistant Secretary of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, who is appointed by the President of the United States and confirmed by the U.S. Senate. Alejandro Moreno currently leads the office as the Acting Assistant Secretary. – Wikipedia
Superseding agency: Office of Conservation and Renewable Energy
THIS was the reason for the OPEC oil crisis, and if you do not think the Rockefellers were behind it, I have a used bridge for sale.
…In return for US aid and support for the House of Saud, King Ibn Saud granted Aramco a monopoly over the production of Saudi oil at the end of World War II. Aramco is a consortium of companies, with Exxon, Mobil, and Socal – all Rockefeller-connected – granted 70 percent ownership, and Texaco granted the rest. A premier example of crony capitalism, the Rockefeller-Saudi alliance translated into multi-millions in subsidies through the Export-Import Bank, so that the King could build his own personal railroad from his capital to the summer palace.
Franklin Roosevelt took money out of the war budget to prepare the way for Rockefeller’s pipelines. In return, the Saudis granted the US an airbase at Dharan, conveniently near the oil fields. Smalltime capitalists hire private security guards to protect their property, but the big boys – or, at least, some of them – have the use of the American military. [Shades of the Biden’s et al. G.C.]
AN ENDURING ALLIANCE
The Saudi-Aramco relationship has endured a lot. There was a phony “nationalization” of Aramco in the 1970s, when Nasserite and Baathist socialism were all the rage on the Arab “street”: the Saudi government took over Aramco, formally, but then immediately turned around and granted the Aramco-Rockefeller consortium the exclusive contract to “manage” the operation. Under this new deal, the consortium would get the lion’s share of Saudi oil, with the rest going to Petromin, the state-owned company.
As Murray N. Rothbard succinctly summed it up:
“It all boils down to a happy case of the ‘partnership of industry and government’ – happy, that is, for the Saud family and for the Rockefeller oil interests.”
EERE’s mission is to accelerate the research, development, demonstration, and deployment of technologies and solutions to equitably transition America to net-zero greenhouse gas emissions economy-wide by no later than 2050, and ensure the clean energy economy benefits all Americans, creating good paying jobs for the American people—especially workers and communities impacted by the energy
I did the math. Net Zero = SLAVE LABOR. So yeah full employment but I am not sure about the wages.
There is More to BlackRock Than You Might Imagine by F. William Engdahl
A virtually unregulated investment firm today exercises more political and financial influence than the Federal Reserve and most governments on this planet. The firm, BlackRock Inc., the world’s largest asset manager, invests a staggering $9 trillion in client funds worldwide….
Commenter John Smith writes:
This network effectively controls the banks, the media, and the governments, and there is no agency which could “impound the capital” and no court where “legal reprisal” is actually possible….
Is there evidence of manipulation by the World Bank and IMF?
Structural Adjustment Policies are economic policies which countries must follow in order to qualify for new World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) loans and help them make debt repayments on the older debts owed to commercial banks, governments and the World Bank. Although SAPs are designed for individual countries but have common guiding principles and features which include export-led growth; privatisation and liberalisation; and the efficiency of the free market.
SAPs often result in deep cuts in programmes like education, health and social care…
By devaluing the currency and simultaneously removing price controls, the immediate effect of a SAP is.. that riots are a frequent result.
Sure looks like a great way to increase the living standard in third world countries. /sarc
Developing Countries Debt are loans from outside the country, much of this debt was incurred following the 1973 Oil Crisis.
With the 1944 Bretton Woods Agreement member countries had accepted the obligation to treat gold, the dollar and the pound alike. When President Nixon took the dollar off the gold standard,that meant third world countries could argue that the IMF’s reason for existence evaporated. Thanks to the Oil Crisis, the problem for big banks like Chase Manhattan, Citicorp and Bank of America were two-fold: Third world countries defaulting on their loans and no one credit worthy in the USA to lend to.
A former respected member of international banking, John Perkins, said in “Confessions of an Economic Hit Man” and interviews, the American banks and IMF solved both of these problems by having the IMF lend countries the money to pay off the American bank loans.
JOHN PERKINS: Basically what we were trained to do and what our job is to do is to build up the American empire. To bring – to create situations where as many resources as possible flow into this country, to our corporations, and our government, and in fact we’ve been very successful. We’ve built the largest empire in the history of the world. It’s been done over the last 50 years since World War II with very little military might, actually. It’s only in rare instances like Iraq where the military comes in as a last resort. This empire, unlike any other in the history of the world, has been built primarily through economic manipulation, through cheating, through fraud, through seducing people into our way of life, through the economic hit men. I was very much a part of that….
Q. How closely did you work with the World Bank?
JOHN PERKINS: Very, very closely with the World Bank. The World Bank provides most of the money that’s used by economic hit men, it and the I.M.F….
Two links to the above information.
‘Confessions of an Economic Hit Man’ -lewrockwell
Self-Described Economic Hit Man John Perkins: “We Have Created the World’s First Truly Global Empire” – Democracy Now This has the video and transcript.
John Perkins states he was initially recruited by the National Security Agency, yeah the SAME agency that wrote: “National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests.”
…JOHN PERKINS: I was recruited by the National Security Agency… Well, while I was a senior in business school at Boston University, they came to me and suggested that I take their test. I had connections through my wife with people in the agency, and they put me through a series of tests, personality tests, lie detector, several days, and concluded that I would make a good economic hit man, and they also discovered a number of weaknesses in my character, which they could use then to hook me into the business, and then I ended up working for a private corporation.
AMY GOODMAN: Why didn’t you work for the N.S.A.?
JOHN PERKINS: Because these days it’s not done that way. Nobody wants to be able to connect the dots. So the N.S.A., the C.I.A., these types of organizations often recruit economic hit men and the jackals, the assassins, the 007 types, but they will recruit us, maybe train us, and then turn us over to a private corporation, so that you really can’t make the connection, so that if I were caught at what I was doing in one of these countries, it would not reflect on our government; it would only reflect on the corporation that I worked for….
Perkins graduated from the Tilton School in 1963. He subsequently attended Middlebury College for two years before dropping out. He later earned a Bachelor of Science degree in business administration from Boston Universityin 1968. He was a Peace Corps Volunteer in Ecuador from 1968 to 1970. He spent the 1970s working for the Boston strategic-consulting firm Chas. T. Main; he claims to have been screened for this job by the National Security Agency (NSA) and subsequently hired by Einar Greve, a member of the firm (alleged by Perkins to have been acting as an NSA liaison, a claim that Greve has denied)…
So it looks like he was recruited during the same time frame NSSM -200 was written.
I am not going to go any further down the prevention of third world resource development rabbit hole because it is MASSIVE.
ATS sources I used in the above article. There are a lot more links.