“We do not believe any group of men adequate enough or wise enough to operate without scrutiny or without criticism. We know that the only way to avoid error is to detect it, that the only way to detect it is to be free to inquire. We know that in secrecy error undetected will flourish and subvert.” –J. Robert Oppenheimer
There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.
Do not forget to LABEL AI articles video and such.
With PANIC comes MISTAKES. With PANIC comes BETRAYAL. With PANIC comes TESTIMONY. With PANIC comes …………. These people are STUPID. FISA GOES BOTH WAYS. + HOOAH! Q
I am going to start with Jeff Childer’s June 3rd article.
Last week, Keven Warsh was sworn in by Justice Clarence Thomas as our newest Fed Chair…. Yesterday, Warsh placed his first two hires on the chessboard. Their credentials provide what we might call a ‘signal’… Paul Winfree is one of the “Project 2025” authors, which is bad enough, but he also wrote the chapter on the Federal Reserve…
..Bill Pulte is uniquely positioned to watch money move around the world, and to connect those flows to the people and groups behind them.
As FHFA director and chairman of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, Bill already oversees institutions that touch or guarantee a large share of U.S. mortgages, giving him access (directly or via agency tools such as anti‑fraud analytics) to extraordinarily detailed, often nonpublic financial and property data on elites and institutions.
Layer on top of that his new ODNI role, which coordinates foreign‑intelligence collection and analysis, including programs that sometimes sweep in the communications and financial dealings of U.S. citizens talking to foreigners, and suddenly the same hard‑charging operator willing to wield mortgage records against the Administration’s political enemies can, in principle, cross‑reference housing, credit, and ownership patterns with intelligence‑grade information about foreign contacts, shell structures, and illicit funding streams.
There’s a lot of potential there. But more, if an administration seeks leverage on powerful actors who thought their finances were opaque or hidden safely offshore, putting a fiercely loyal bulldog at the junction of Fannie/Freddie’s data firehose and ODNI’s surveillance and analysis capabilities is about as close as you can get to a purpose‑built leverage machine. I’m not saying that’s what’s happening. I’m just saying…
Jeff has zeroed in on a major chess move by POTUS Trump and there are a lot more dots that connect to that hypothesis.
Now let’s step back in time.
A nurse, Liz Harris, who refused the Clot Shot, ran for office in AZ and was elected to the state legislature. She invited Jacqueline Breger, a forensic investigator for Attorney John Thaler, to testify at a legislative hearing in February 2023. Breger presented allegations of election fraud, cartel bribes, and money laundering via land deeds. The Arizona House of Representatives responded by expelling Harris in a bipartisan vote after the hearing, as the committee determined she had engaged in “disorderly behavior” and violated the chamber’s rules.
People that follow me know that I am regularly a cautionary check against hopium. The strength of Thaler’s investigation is not rooted in theory, equations, or statistical deviations, but rather thousands of documented falsified transactions…
My intuition was informed by a drug trafficking organization I helped dismantle. During my office’s investigation, we located bogus deeds of trust, that facilitated money laundering in sham real estate deals. This led to racketeering convictions of organization members. Our team went on to secure six 1st degree murder convictions of the crime organization that were tying up loose ends that threatened the organization.
The investigative work of John Thaler that I’ve reviewed over the past 24 hours is textbook in its approach to exposing racketeering, and of crucial importance.
The fact that his work led him directly to election corruption and bribes is not shocking. His account needs to be shared to everyone.
Let’s remember where Venezuela is. It borders the Caribbean. What else is in the Caribbean? The origin point for the infamous system of offshore banking established directly by the British. Back in 1960, the largest banking houses in London, working in partnership with the government and the ex-checker, established 14 completely separate secret jurisdictions. These are the offshore banking centers that now hold between 50 and 75 trillion dollars with all 50 of the world’s largest banks operating within them. These offshore centers exist outside the control of sovereign governments. They’re secret, they’re unregulated, and they facilitate illegal activity. What we once had, a legitimate regulated banking system, has been transformed into a criminal enterprise.
Interestingly, the Russians have known this for years and have been more vociferous about it than any Western government. In a 2014 speech, Viktor Ivanov, then Russia’s top drug enforcement official, laid it out clearly in a Moscow conference. He said,
“This allows us to confidently assert that narco money is the foundation of the modern financial system. It is not surprising that during the first peak of the financial crisis of 2008 2009, Antonio Costa from the UN announced that the top banks in the world dumped in around $352 billion of narco dollars to use for interbank borrowing to address the critical shortage of liquidity. And he goes on to make clear that the global financial system needs drug money to survive. The very existence of the global financial bubble, he said, is based on precisely this opportunity for banks to attract liquid narco money. In fact,this garbage fertilizes the present economic system…
…Treasury Secretary Scott Bessant recently commented that 50% of his job involves issues of national security.
ROUGH PARTIAL TRANSCRIPT
48 minutes Josh: ..Now you were talking about Scavino? Every journey has an end? … Hold on because this is important. So Scavino, by the way Trump shows the three phases and the last phase is the last one the completion right? So now you have Dan Scavino. “Every journey has an end.” Well this is really, really interesting .. [Discus relevant Q posts]. That’s contextual reference frame that it correlates directly to what you’re just talking about. And then what do you have? You have the White House posting on the same day that the DOW [Dept of War] CTO posted “Trust in Trump. Sit back and relax. It’ll all work out in the end. It always does. President Donald J. Trump.” So, another trust in Trump. Now, I didn’t look at the time stamp of this one. I can check it out [on the Q board] real quick. .. [ __ ] “Now, here comes the pain….
Cuz you said that the quote that Scavino put up was from Endgame, right? Or Enders Game. The one that I put, “part of the journey is the end”, which is the back half of that quote…
.. And it’s from Endgame. “He thought that was part of the plan. (Endgame)?So many questions. who has full control? These people are stupid. Indictment(s) coming.”
52 minutes Josh: ….I want to get into something else that happened today. So, we got the Q. So, something big is about to happen. Now, isn’t it interesting that today Trump nominated his new director of national intelligence?
Alpha: And you know, he did it on the same day that BB formally declared the new director for Mossad….
53 minutes Josh: Now why Bill Pulte? Why? Why did Donald Trump put the trust fund Bill Pulte as director of national intelligence? It’s actually very simple.
Number one, Bill Pulte is a Trump loyalist through and through. The guy won’t cross Trump.
Number two is he tells Trump everything that’s going on. He’s very good at delivering Trump’s orders. In other words, Trump basically has someone in the DNI that he knows is 100% absolute loyal to him.
Why is that important? Because you have Devin Nunes who is in a senior consulting position directly at ODNI who’s basically going to be guiding Pulte through everything that comes about from DNI Tulsi Gabbard’s declassification and investigations that she’s leading. Pulte is simply pointing a finger. Do this, do this, do this. Devin Nunes is controlling it and Trump is controlling it. This is actually highly strategic of Donald Trump to do this.
It scares the living shit out of the DC freaking panicans.
[Think refusal to renew their beloved FISA all of a sudden and threatening to pass a law preventing Bill Pulte taking the position. So yes some are freaking out. — GC]
Now, I want people to understand that there are people in the Senate, so when DNI Tulsi Gabbard resigned and said that she’s coming out on the 30th, what happens then is John Thune and various different Senate leaders, they go and meet with Donald Trump and they say, “Hey, this is who we we would want to go in as director of national intelligence. This is who we’re suggesting.” This is how it works in DC.” And typically 85% of the time, the president would go with those recommendations because you’re going to guarantee Senate approval.
Tom Cotton was one of the lead people that was being proposed by the Senate, by the way, so APEC right there.
Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas — one of the Republican Party’s more hawkish members — received tens of thousands of dollars in campaign cash from a hedge fund investor who’s reportedly made millions of dollars from commodity speculations that have paid off since Russia invaded Ukraine, according to federal campaign finance records.
Federal Election Committee records show that Soroban Capital Partners LP founder Eric Mandelblatt and his wife, Danielle Mandelblatt, last year spread $43,000 in political contributions between political action committees that support Cotton…
………..
53 minutes Josh: Well, guess what? Trump rug pulled them with Pulte. Now, why Pulte?
Pulte is already in a Senate confirmed position. So, he can get Senate confirmation. [Maybe -GC] DNI is a little bit different. He’s got to go through the Senate Intelligence Committee, but I’m pretty sure Pulte is going to get it. He’s already been Senate confirmed. So they know they can get the votes for him. But also, I think that this might be an interim rug pull. I don’t think that this is going to be Donald Trump’s final selection. He’s just going to be the interim.
You got to remember because you had the acting DNI after Tulsi Gabbard, was supposed to be the assistant DNI, Lucas, who by the way is a deep stater. He’s a holdover. And I think that a lot of people got to Trump’s ear and said, “You need to get rid of this And that’s why Bill Pulte is going in there as acting, but we will see if that comes about. I think that there’s going to be a rug pull down the road. I would say after July 4th and Trump will move Pulte out. I think that that was just to get Tom Cotton and the other Senate guys out of the running and Trump has a plan. I think it’s going to be Devin Nunez at the end of the day.
[I disagree, Pulte has a major job to do connecting Mortgage Fraud to the Drug Cartels. –GC]
56 minutes Alpha: I do think you’re right. I think Trump is going to run with a lot of acting positions until he gets his new House and Senate in January. And when that new House and Senate in January swears in, then it’s break glass time. He’s going to have a super majority and he’s going to appoint everyone that is going to make jaws drop in all these different positions and that’s going to be the A team. I think what he’s doing right now is he’s going to roll with some of these acting positions for a while.
57 minutes Josh: So, there’s also something else here and I think that this is very interesting… So I’m going to pull this up. I want to take people through my thinking here.
Josh pulls up a Trump Truth Post at 57:28:
I am appointing the Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency and Chairman of Fanny Mae/ Freddie Mac, William J Pulte, to serve as Acting Director of National intelligence. William has deep experience managing sensitive matters in America, the safety and soundness of the Markets, and over 10 Trillion Dollars at Fanny Mae/ Freddie Mac, a substantial increase from where it was just 12 months ago. During this period, he will remain Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency and Chairman of Fanny Mae/ Freddie Mac. Congratulations to Director Pulte. President DONALD J. TRUMP
… during this period he will remain director of the federal housing finance agency. That’s interesting.
Now here’s something interesting. The federal housing finance agencies already went after Adam Schiff. They went after Leticia James. Why? Because they’re the ones that investigate all the mortgage fraud claims, right?
Did you see what else Donald Trump did today? He signed an executive order. [Executive Order 14406 The critical phrase“…it has long been the policy of the United States to adopt tailored measures to safeguard our financial system from illicit use and promote safe and sound lending and other practices by financial institutions. My Administration will not tolerate national security and public safety risks caused by illicit cross-border financial activity…” GC] Let me pull this up. [A truth post]
SECURING AMERICA’S FINANCIAL SYSTEM: Today, President Donald J. Trump signed an Executive Order to protect America’s financial system from illicit activity, strengthen customer identification requirements for financial institutions, and address the credit risks posed by extending financial services to non-work authorized illegal aliens.
[Josh reads part of the Truth]
Illegal Immigrants and Foreign Fraudster steal BILLIONS every year from the American taxpayer. As part of my administration’s historic effort to end FRAUD and reverse MASS ILLEGAL IMIGRATION, I recently signed a powerful new Executive Order which will be led bythe Treasury Department to stop Banks, Credit Cards, and Financial Institutions from being used to facilitate Human Trafficking or Human Smuggling, Drug Trafficking, Illegal Immigration, and the Criminal Cartels who orchestrate the activities. Access to our nation’s financial systems must be limited to those who have a legal right to be here and who are engaged in lawful and legitimate commerce. Bank accounts being used to enable illegal immigration or to store the welfare received by illegal aliens will be shut down….
Josh: Then he says, “My executive order will also allow us to stop billions in leaving our country in a matter of criminal activity.” But there’s a part here I want to point out.
Those engaged in lawful or legitimate commerce are the only ones who can use it. Then he says bank accounts being used to enable illegal immigration or to store the welfare received by illegal aliens will be shut down. You remember we talked about citizens on paper only. How the Democrats were basically creating employee agencies through Congress funded at $5 million. They had 20 employees but there’s actually two people that work there. They were actually collecting paychecks that were going through bank accounts. Well, what else are we finding out? A lot of this stuff with illegal immigrants. Think about how it works on the illegal immigrant side. All you have to do is have an illegal immigrant come in and open up a bank account or someone say that they’re an illegal immigrant and guess what happens now? They are put into the system and they can have benefits deposited, SNAP, welfare, so forth. Well, this is what he’s talking about because that is nothing more than an operation by the left, by the socialists to basically collect taxpayer dollars without ever actually being somebody meeting the benefit criterias. So, SNAP, Medicaid, and welfare fraud is massive. So, keep this in mind because he [Trump] just signed an executive order. Basically, if a bank goes out there and does business with one of these fictitious, fake people or an illegal immigrant, they are now going to come under federal scrutiny and they’re going to be investigated.
Now, remember the senior Act Blue executive in Texas was just tried for mortgage fraud. 65 million dollar worth of loans on one mortgage [ home worth] $300,000. Now, here’s the thing. How are they able to do that? They were able to do that because this is the kickback mechanism that they do. This is why Leticia James has multiple primary residences. Adam Schiff has multiple primary residences.
This is why all of the Arizona Senate and Congress are real estate brokers buying up and fixing and flipping houses out there because what they’ll do is they’ll buy a house for $250,000. They’ll put $50,000 into it and then the cartels will come out there through ancillary business organizations and give them $4 million cash for the house and they clear that money outright. This is how they have been basically getting paid off for all these transactions. Well, now you have the one man who’s going to be the acting director of national intelligence as well as the head of the housing finance office who can investigate all the mortgage fraud and everything like that. But now he’s the director of national intelligence as well. So now he has a back-end view of the classified aspects of all this operation, how it works with the cartels, with the NGOS. Do you understand what I’m saying?
1 hour 2 minutes Alpha: I think I’m picking up on something. You at least made me think of a strategy that Trump’s pulling out. Yeah, with Tulsi Gabbard as DNI working the RICO aspect of the Russia, Russia, Russia hoax and all that other stuff. With that position, you now have access to certain clearances. She’s got everything that she needs. So now she moves into an advisory role. She gets put on the sidelines.
Now the next RICO case that’s being worked on is all the mortgage fraud and everything that’s going on. So now you bring him [Pulte] in, make him the acting head of DNI. Now he gets those security clearances. He gets the access of it. And then down the line, til we see the next person that gets put into the DNI who’s working the next [RICO case] is Trump strategically putting these people in as these heads of positions to give them clearance and access to things to complete the respective investigations that they’re doing. That’s F..King GENIUS!
1 hour 3 minutes Josh: Well, not only that, but think about Bill Pulte. He could only deal with the American side of it. He doesn’t have all the information. He doesn’t know why these people are committing mortgage fraud or how that mortgage fraud is operating on a grander scale. But now as a Director of National Intelligence, he’s going to see the movement of cartels and foreign intelligence agencies and foreign militaries and how they’re moving the money around from various different banks. And how those are funding ancillary and shell corporations that then flow in to these mortgage companies and buy these houses up. And he’s going to be like, “OH!”This is to take down their [the globalist’s] massive funding mechanism.”
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
There are plenty of other financial tracks showing illegal activity, but I think this is the specific money laundering method that scares the crap out of the politicians who are on the take.
There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.
Do not forget to LABEL AI articles video and such.
Jeff points out the major failure feature of the Fake News.
…Editors should have: separated real evidence from allegations, resisted parroting the framing of biased sources, brought in neutral independent forensic and archaeological voices, and updated headlines as the picture changed. In other words, basic journalism vanished like the alleged mass graves.
It was a complete failure of what is supposedly the media’s most important function: to separate interested gossip from facts. Maybe I should say, that used to be media’s most important function. Now, corporate media’s most important function appears to be distributing clever propaganda that destabilizes countries, spurs stochastic terrorism, and permits politicians to effect massive wealth transfers…
…Government researchers enrolled extremely vulnerable infants in an experimental RSV trial, did not obtain informed consent, continued dosing even as severe cases emerged, and two children died. Nobody was prosecuted or even fired. This is serious iatrogenic harm (injury caused by medical treatment) and a research‑ethics failure on its face, full stop.
The Times did its absolute best to cloak that very disturbing and all-too-familiar story in race. The two boys were black. “Most, if not all,” of the 31 kids in the trial group were black. Thus, the Times concluded: racism. What the Times didn’t say was that by the late 1950s and into the 1960s, Washington, D.C. had become a majority‑black city; black residents were the single largest racial group, and by 1970 had peaked at about 71% of the entire population.
That’s one problem for the Times’ unfounded racial hypothesis. Second, the NIH’s RSV trial was deployed through government-run or funded clinics. Both because blacks were in the majority in DC, and because of basic economics, most patients at these public clinics were also black. So we needn’t dream up some conspiratorial racial animus to explain the trial’s demographics.
Black folks were just unlucky enough to be living in DC in large numbers at the time. That’s it.
So, once again, the NYT’s dumb, woke narrative collapses with the most trivial inspection. But more interesting is why the Times leaned so hard into the race angle, despite having not a scrap of evidence. It’s because the last thing the big health agencies need right now is more scandals.
This is exactly the institutional reform RFK Jr. and Jay Bhattacharya were hired to deliver.
🔥 At some point during the Cold War, our big health agencies contracted a deadly disease. They are infected with a mind-virus called utilitarianism. The scandal here is not that the NIH gave experimental RSV shots to black infants without informing their black parents. The real scandal is that the NIH believes you can’t make a public health omelet without breaking a few babies.
In other words, the NIH’s secret trials of experimental vaccines would not have been more acceptable if the babies had been white, orange, or green.
Classic ethical philosophy based on Judeo-Christian principles says: “You may not use people purely as a means, not even for a huge benefit to others.” Utilitarianism rudely inverts that: if the benefit is big enough, and the expected risk is small enough, almost any use of human bodies as means can be rationalized.
At some point in the recent past, our public health agencies quietly slid from “we are here to protect people” to “we are managing a herd, sorry, a population,” and those are not the same posture. In other words, instead of thinking of themselves as healers, they think they are ranchers.
The Lot 100 episode illustrates this problem perfectly. Severe harms and even deaths of infants were tolerated by elite managers because the perceived collective value of “staying the course” was so high. Even fudging the numbers to hide the harms was considered virtuous.
Stalin’s stats were great too, until they weren’t.
In classic public‑health utilitarian fashion, the stated good was enormous —preventing a leading cause of infant mortality worldwide— so the “cost” of experimenting on a few dozen vulnerable infants in D.C. could be rationalized as small in comparison.
The reason progressives and public health types (but I repeat myself) stick like limpets to utilitarianism is that it is technocratic. The philosophy —which is a necessary foundation for communism— presumes it is possible to quantify, in hard numbers, the numeric value of human lives and flourishing. That makes it possible to compare political policies: which ones produce on balance the most human flourishing?
It is both sensationally attractive and completely perverted…
In the Lot 100 case, we find scientists who explicitly or implicitly calculated that infants were less valuable than adults, and that poor folks were less valuable than more economically privileged ones. After all, the NIH investigators recruited from public children’s clinics, not from the private practices their own children or colleagues might have used.
Put even more simply and uglier: the NIH bureaucrats didn’t experiment on their own kids.
🔥 I will say it: utilitarianism is an evil, reprehensible ideology that all good people should root out and shun.
Utilitarianism isn’t a neutral “science of compassion.” It’s a license for elites to convert other people’s lives into numbers and then quietly decide which ones are expendable. Once you agree that it’s acceptable to harm a few innocents to buy hypothetical benefits for the many, you haven’t elevated morality— you’ve simply replaced “thou shalt not” with “let’s run the model and see who dies.”
Lot 100 was not a tragic mistake; it was utilitarianism doing exactly what it promises: sacrificing powerless babies in a D.C. clinic for the supposed good of a population they never got to join. [It continues]
Jeremy Bentham (1748–1832), the “Father” of Modern Utilitarianism and progressive saint. His preserved head, anyway.
What is interesting is I had already put the following together about the philosophies of ‘value’ because I like Mises and Gary North. Gary passed away in February of 2022, at the age of 80 due to complications from prostate cancer.
…He was by training an economic historian and had a strong commitment to Austrian economics. He greatly admired Mises and Rothbard. He once asked Mises how he had been able to publish his famous article of 1920 on socialist calculation in a journal edited by Max Weber. Mises answered, “Well, I knew him, and I sent it in.” Gary wrote a notable study of Marx, Marx’s Religion of Revolution, and a long and learned commentary on biblical economics. He was also a founder of the Christian Reconstruction movement, along with his father-in-law, R.J. Rushdoony.
He was on Ron Paul’s staff in 1976, and he and Dr. Paul were close friends. For many years, he spoke at Mises Institute conferences, and he was the best debater I have ever heard. In his speaking style, he was highly organized and relentless; but he was in conversation kind and friendly. When I saw him at conferences, we would exchange stories of the old days. Now, alas, I cannot do that anymore.
Gary’s Mises on Money is well worth the read. I featured it in an article called APRIMERONMONEY. The following article by Gary is another excellent read as he identifies the problems that are metastasizing in American thought.
The philosophical bases of Marx’s thought were laid early and remained unchanged throughout his life. As a student, Marx accepted the philosophy of Hegel as the only sound and adequate explanation of the universe. According to this philosophy, “the only immutable thing is the abstraction of movement.” The one universal phenomenon is change, and the only universal form of this phenomenon is its complete abstraction. Thus, Hegel accepted as real only that which existed in the mind. Objective phenomena and events were of no consequence; only the conceptions of them possessed by human minds were real. Ideas, not objects, were the stuff of which the universe was made.
If Objective Reality does not exist, than a little girl can become a boy or a cat or a dog. The people pushing this insanity are not going to tell you that it is based on Marxism but that is where it comes from.
Old timers will recall this title as a memorable line in a memorable comedy album, Stan Freberg Presents the United States of America, Volume 1….
WHAT EVER HAPPENED TO “PROPERTY”?
The phrase, “life, liberty, and property,” does not appear in the Declaration. The phrase is incorrectly attributed to John Locke. It was implied in Locke’s Second Treatise on Government (1690), but it does not appear. Locke used the word estate rather than property. He subsumed all three words under property.
Man being born, as has been proved, with a title to perfect freedom and an uncontrolled enjoyment of all the rights and privileges of the law of Nature, equally with any other man, or number of men in the world, hath by nature a power not only to preserve his property, that is, his life, liberty, and estate, against the injuries and attempts of other men, but to judge of and punish the breaches of that law in others, as he is persuaded the offence deserves, even with death itself, in crimes where the heinousness of the fact, in his opinion, requires it (Sect. 87).
Protection of all three — life, liberty, property — is guaranteed in writing by the United States Constitution. This guarantee appears in Article 5 of the Bill of Rights, which was ratified in 1791. It has proven as reliable as other government guarantees of its own performance.
A similar phrase appears in Edmund Burke’s Reflections on the Revolution in France (1790). Burke wrote this of the revolutionaries:
To those who have observed the spirit of their conduct it has long been clear that nothing was wanted but the power of carrying the intolerance of the tongue and of the pen into a persecution which would strike at property, liberty, and life.
But there is no question that Jefferson substituted “the pursuit of happiness” for the more common term, “property.” Was there something ideological in this substitution? Was Jefferson a proto-socialist, as numerous contemporary historians argue?
Had he inserted “property,” this would have saved defenders of private property a lot of time and trouble when dealing with statist scholars, who are always searching for support for their position in the writings of famous defenders of democracy.
The pursuit of happiness is for modern academic man what the pursuit of truth is: a way to avoid the responsibility for discovering anything final. There is no objective truth for modern academic man, other than the truth against objective truth. Similarly, there is no objective happiness. There is only the subjective pursuit of such lofty goals by individuals. In this, as in virtually everything else, academics substitute process for objectivity. Defending the process is holy communion for modern academics. There is officially no holy grail, which would be much too objective.
Why this commitment to pursuit, trivial or otherwise? I suggest two reasons. First, academics do not officially believe in objective truth, which implies objective responsibility, which is decidedly old fashioned and even vaguely suggestive of the Christian doctrine of final judgment. The concept of objective responsibility implies objective standards and objective performance. Academics prefer to avoid both.
Second, modern academics control access to salaried participation in the process of the great search, especially in higher education. They control the implementation of the officially objective standards of tenure, institutional accreditation, and the flow of departmental funds. What Daniel Klein has described so well in the closed, self-certified world of Ph.D. economists operates in every academic discipline.
In contrast, “property” implies enforceable titles to identifiable units of ownership. This is altogether too objective for modern defenders of the political defense of the pursuit of happiness. They defend the democratic process, which affirms, “Thou shalt not steal, except by majority vote.” They want to believe in Jefferson the democrat, not Jefferson the defender of free market capitalism. They want to eradicate political restrictions on the confiscation of property by the State. The suggestion that politics exists so as to defend private property is only marginally less welcome than the suggestion that the Second Amendment to the Constitution actually means that civilians possess the right to keep and bear arms.
JEFFERSON WAS NOT ALONE
It was not only Jefferson who neglected to spell out in official detail his personal adherence to the private property social order. It was also Adam Smith, whose Wealth of Nations (1776), four months earlier, had placed the division of labor at the forefront of its economic attack on mercantilism, an attack that Jefferson made political in the Declaration. Smith’s pedagogical strategy backfired for the next 150 years. By failing to specify in Wealth of Nations the moral and philosophical foundations for private ownership, Smith handed the seemingly high moral ground over to Godwin and the socialists. The consequences of this decision have been chronicled in considerable detail by Tom Bethell in Chapter 7 of his book, The Noblest Triumph: Property and Prosperity Through the Ages (1998).
Jefferson was the supreme follower of Adam Smith among the American Revolutionaries. But by failing to specify property as the third pillar of the justification for civil government — a mistake Locke had not made — he made more difficult his ideological heirs’ defense of the private property order.
The pursuit of happiness is open-ended and non-specific. Liberty is just too vague to be defended systematically. What was needed in 1776 in both of those legendary documents was the insight made by Frederic Bastiat in 1850, in the midst of a European revolution that had begun in early 1848, a few weeks before Marx and Engels’ anonymous tract appeared, Manifesto of the Communist Party. Bastiat wrote in The Law, “Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” Or, in the words of a previous defender of objective private property, “Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat: But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die” (Genesis 2:16b-17)
Gary North Mentions Bastiat. Here is part of an article about Bastiat and his philosophy.
Frédéric Bastiat (1801-1850) was one of the leading advocates of free markets and free trade in the mid-19 century. He was inspired by the activities of Richard Cobden and the organization of the Anti-Corn Law League in Britain in the 1840s and tried to mimic their success in France. Bastiat was an elected member of various French political bodies and opposed both protection and the rise of socialist ideas in these forums. His writings for a broader audience were very popular and were quickly translated and republished in the U.S. and throughout Europe. His incomplete magnum opus, Economic Harmonies, is full of insights into the operation of the market and is still of great interest to economists. He died at a young age from cancer of the throat.
LAW, Spoliation by
LAW, Spoliation by. What is law? It is the collective organization of the individual right of legitimate defense. Every man certainly has received from nature, from God, the right to defend his person, his liberty and his property, since these are the three constitutive or conservative elements of life, elements which complement one another, and which can not be understood, one without the other. For what are our faculties but an extension of our personality? And what is property but an extension of our faculties? If every man has the right to defend, even by force, his person, his liberty and his property, a number of men have the right to concert together, to agree and to organize a common force in order to provide regularly for this defense. The collective right has its principle, and its reason of being, and bases its legitimacy upon the individual right, and the common force can not legitimately have any other end or any other mission than the isolated forces for which it is substituted. Thus, as an individual can not legitimately make any forcible attempt against the person, liberty or property of another individual, so, for the same reason, a community can not legitimately make use of force to destroy the person, liberty or property of individuals or of classes. For this perversion of force would be, in the latter case, as well as in the former, in contradiction to our premises.
Which brings us to capitalism which TradeBait2 discussed yesterday. This is looking at Capitalism from the point of view of an Atheist. For those who may not know Ayn Rand grew up in the Soviet Union.
Laissez-faire capitalism, according to Ayn Rand, is not just an ideal but an unknown ideal. Few grasp its meaning, history, economics, or moral justification. In Capitalism, Rand sets out to remedy that.
Rand argues that capitalism is “a social system based on the recognition of individual rights, including property rights, in which all property is privately owned.” In practice, this means that a capitalist society is one in which the government performs a single function: it protects individual rights by banning “physical force from human relationships.”
Pure capitalism, she concludes, has never existed: but in the countries that approached it, with America in the second half of the nineteenth century leading the way, the individual was able to flourish. This is because capitalism is the only system that fully recognizes that man is the rational being who “has the right to exist for his own sake,” free from coercion by others.
There are, in essence, three schools of thought on the nature of the good: the intrinsic, the subjective, and the objective. The intrinsic theory holds that the good is inherent in certain things or actions as such, regardless of their context and consequences, regardless of any benefit or injury they may cause to the actors and subjects involved. It is a theory that divorces the concept of “good” from beneficiaries, and the concept of “value” from valuer and purpose — claiming that the good is good in, by, and of itself.
The subjectivist theory holds that the good bears no relation to the facts of reality, that it is the product of a man’s consciousness, created by his feelings, desires, “intuitions,” or whims, and that it is merely an “arbitrary postulate” or an “emotional commitment.”
There are, in essence, three schools of thought on the nature of the good: the intrinsic, the subjective, and the objective. The intrinsic theory holds that the good is inherent in certain things or actions as such, regardless of their context and consequences, regardless of any benefit or injury they may cause to the actors and subjects involved. It is a theory that divorces the concept of “good” from beneficiaries, and the concept of “value” from valuer and purpose — claiming that the good is good in, by, and of itself.
The subjectivist theory holds that the good bears no relation to the facts of reality, that it is the product of a man’s consciousness, created by his feelings, desires, “intuitions,” or whims, and that it is merely an “arbitrary postulate” or an “emotional commitment.”
The intrinsic theory holds that the good resides in some sort of reality, independent of man’s consciousness; the subjectivist theory holds that the good resides in man’s consciousness, independent of reality.
The objective theory holds that the good is neither an attribute of “things in themselves” nor of man’s emotional states, but an evaluation of the facts of reality by man’s consciousness according to a rational standard of value. (Rational, in this context, means: derived from the facts of reality and validated by a process of reason.) The objective theory holds that the good is an aspect of reality in relation to man — and that it must be discovered, not invented, by man. Fundamental to an objective theory of values is the question: Of value to whom and for what? An objective theory does not permit context-dropping or “concept-stealing”; it does not permit the separation of “value” from “purpose,” of the good from beneficiaries, and of man’s actions from reason.
GOOGLE AI: Ayn Rand intrinsic value
Value Requires a Valuer and a Purpose
Rand asked the fundamental question: Of value to whom and for what? [1]
Because she rejected intrinsic value, she maintained that an object cannot have value without someone to value it.
For a thing to have value, it must play a specific causal role in achieving a goal for an individual. [1, 2, 3]
The Ultimate Standard of Value
Rand argued that the concept of “value” only makes sense because living organisms face the alternative of life or death. Therefore, the ultimate standard of value is an individual’s own life. An object or action is considered “good” or “valuable” if it serves to sustain and further that specific individual’s life. [1, 2, 3]
Explore the Intrinsic Theory of Values in the Ayn Rand Lexicon to read her exact definitions and arguments. [1]
With the support of the Democratic Socialists, his prediction is coming true.
Also, I remember him beating his shoe on the desk in the UN saying,”We will bury you”….
A reminder of Khrushchev comments September 29, 1959: THIS WAS Russian Prime Minister Nikita Khrushchev’s ENTIRE QUOTE from that day:
“Your children’s children will live under communism, You Americans are so gullible. No, you won’t accept communism outright; but we will keep feeding you small doses of socialism until you will finally wake up and find you already have Communism. We will not have to fight you; We will so weaken your economy, until you will fall like overripe fruit into our hands.” “The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not.”
Do you remember or know all of what Russia’s Khrushchev said in 1959?
How do you create a Socialist State?
There are 8 levels of control; read the following recipe:
1) Healthcare – Control healthcare and you control the people.
2) Poverty – Increase the poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them.
3) Debt – Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty.
4) Gun Control – Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state.
5) Welfare – Take control of every aspect (food, housing, income) of their lives because that will make them fully dependent on the government.
6) Education – Take control of what people read and listen to and take control of what children learn in school.
7) Religion – Remove the belief in God from the Government and schools because the people need to believe in ONLY the government knowing what is best for the people.
8) Class Warfare – Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. Eliminate the middle class This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to tax the wealthy with the support of the poor.
Fast forward to 2021.
Is this parallel to the Democrat Socialist Agenda????
With an open mind, you can draw your own conclusions.
One last historical fact that needs to be remembered: In 1964, on the floor of the U.S. Senate, Democrats held the longest filibuster in our nation’s history, 75 days. All trying to prevent the passage of one piece of legislation. You guessed it: THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT.
Amazing how the CIA reading room hides all of this:
There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.
Do not forget to LABEL AI articles, video and such.
The second and last part of the Kash Patel transcript.
45:00 – 58:30: The FISA Fraud: How the Spying Began — CONTINUED
58:30 – 01:10:00: Modernizing the Bureau: AI vs. Terrorist Threats
First I want to draw attention to this new disclosure. I had not heard of this operation before and Google says it does not exist.
.@jsolomonReports predicts that the SPLC case is only the beginning of what's to come from this DOJ:
“I think we’re about to enter into a period of MAAA. Make America Accountable Again. I think with Pam Bondi moved aside, the speed at which the Justice Department will move on… pic.twitter.com/qM5mKne2Cj
@jsolomonReports predicts that the SPLC case is only the beginning of what’s to come from this DOJ:
“I think we’re about to enter into a period of MAAA. Make America Accountable Again. I think with Pam Bondi moved aside, the speed at which the Justice Department will move on things that have been working in the system for months is picking up.
I think in the summer and fall, we are going to talk a lot more about a case called “Operation Round River. Its goal was to neutralize anyone who would dare suggest there was a corrupt relationship between Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, and the Ukrainian Government or the Ukrainian company Burisma.
All the people I’ve talked to in government think that Round River may be the most JAW-DROPPING of the four codename investigations that targeted Donald Trump and his followers.”
The four investigations Kash IDed are, Arctic Frost, Plasmic Echo, Round River and of course Crossfire Hurricane.
….
ROUGH TRANSCRIPT:
51:30 — Kash Patel: They lost the election. And so what they wanted to do was kneecap the presidency of Donald Trump and set him up to fail. And so they breathlessly put out that false narrative about Russia and collusion over and over and over again. Remember these same people in Trump one, the Rosensteins and Comeys and McCabes of the world were the ones that proposed wearing a wire under the 25th amendment to record Donald Trump. That’s not me saying it. That’s the documents we found. Again, their arrogance. They wrote it down. We put it out. Can you imagine if Obama or Biden’s FBI or DOJ proposed to wear a wire in the Oval Office to record the president of the United States? Would we not still be talking about that?
Sean Hannity: Well, think back again. Donald Trump is running and Hillary is paying for this dirty dossier. Unverified, unverifiable. And James Comey looks at it. Didn’t know anything about the authenticity of it. Then he makes this famous trip to Trump Tower.
First of all, I’ve known Donald Trump for 30 years. It made me laugh when I heard it because I knew it was complete utter BS. Well, there was a report, sir, that you might have been in the Ritz Carlton in Moscow and you might have had hookers in your room urinating on you. Okay, if anyone knows Donald Trump, he is the biggest germaphobe. Him and Howard Stern, the biggest germaphobes in the world. And so it wasn’t true. But Comey knew it wasn’t true.
Kash Patel: There’s something more basic to it than that. The dossier, which now everyone has seen, when I first saw it, I said, “Let’s just do some investigative 101.
” Does that hotel with that room even exist in Moscow? It doesn’t. It literally doesn’t exist.
Sean Hannity: Whoa, whoa, whoa. This is the first I’m hearing it. What? Come on.
Kash Patel: Serious. So, we looked it up. Doesn’t exist. A hotel exists. Not with that room. Not in that location. It’s available on the internet. Anybody at the FBI could have verified that. They didn’t do it on purpose because the narrative, the salacious and fake narrative against Donald Trump was what they wanted out there to kneecap his presidency because they knew we were uncovering their FISA fraud. So once we caught them doing that, what’s the next best thing? Continue the narrative anyway. Continue the narrative to make sure President Trump doesn’t succeed. And thankfully to your reporting and just a select few others, and we were vilified for it then, we got the truth out. And now the American people, when you fast forward across the four years that President Trump was out of office and now that he’s back in office for the first year, it’s right to be focused on this. It’s right to be pissed off about it because what law enforcement should be doing is what we talked about at the top of the show, doing cop work.
Sean Hannity: I want to read Dan Bongino’s famous tweet and I first I want to know what you thought. Did he talk to you before he sent it out?
Kash Patel: The..
Sean Hannity: The infamous Bongino Holy Shit… All right, let me read it to you.
Kash Patel: Yeah, read it to me.
Sean Hannity: It says, “During my tenure here as the deputy director of the FBI, I’ve repeatedly relayed to you that things are happening that may not be immediately visible, but they are happening.” He said, “The director and I are committed to stamping out public corruption and the political weaponization of both law enforcement and intelligence operations. It is a priority for us. But what I have learned in the course of our properly predicated and necessary investigations into these aforementioned matters has shocked me down to my core. I’ll continue in a minute. I’ve known Dan like I’ve known you for years. This is not written lightly.
Kash Patel: No, we talked about it.
Sean Hannity continuing to read: We cannot run a republic like this. I’ll never be the same after learning what I’ve learned. We’re going to conduct these righteous and proper investigations by the book and in accordance with the law. We are going to get the answers we all deserve. And as with any investigation, I cannot predict where it will land. But I can promise you an honest and dignified effort at truth. Not my truth or your truth, but the truth. God bless America
Sean Hannity: I’ve known this guy forever. He did not write that lightly.
Kash Patel: No, we talked about it.
Sean Hannity: Look, he talked to you about it before he sent it out. And you said send.
Kash Patel: We were the best partners. Dan was easily the best hire I’ve made or I’ll ever make. He told me he only wanted to go a year. That was the agreement. I said, “Hey, man. We need you.” When we were first talking about he said, “I can give you a year.” I said, “Give me a year. We’ll take it.”
Here’s the difference. We are doing it by the book. That’s why it takes time. That’s why it takes time to build a prosecution team in different jurisdictions to look at this, to get the grand jury subpoenas out, to put witnesses in the grand jury. We’ve put a ton of witnesses in the grand jury. That’s what they don’t do. They don’t play by the rules. They don’t play by the book, but we do because, as Dan said, we got to do this right. We got one shot at it. We’re not going to do it fast just to get the headline. We’re going to take our time and get it done right and get everybody that was involved under the microscope.
Sean Hannity: When you say, the amount of corruption, this is a priority and that we cannot run a republic like this. I interpret that to mean and I want your impression. Tell me about Comey. as Trump always refers to him as a bad dirty cop. Is he right?
Kash Patel: Yeah. Look at Russia Gate. You can’t do that if you’re stupid. He’s not dumb. You can’t go out and give that Hillary Clinton press conference if you’re stupid or dumb. It’s intentional to seed the narrative and to cover up their dirty work. And so he built a team around him, which we obviously got rid of, that would advance that narrative that crippled the credibility of the FBI. And that’s the one thing we’ve been fixing. It’s not me saying it. The FBI’s credibility before Donald Trump got back into office was cratering. Cratering because of THIS, because they didn’t tackle violent crime and didn’t tackle national security issues. I mean, just look at how fast it changed.
Sean Hannity: Well, how could they be if they’re involved in all this political intrigue and sabotage?
[From the Sundance]
Kash Patel: And that’s what hurt the mission the most. The heroes of this mission under President Trump and this FBI are in the field. That’s why we’re giving them the resources. That’s why we’re bringing in things like AI. AI was never used at the FBI till we got there. Literally, I’m using it everywhere. I’m using it in places like our criminal justice information system database so we can pop fingerprints immediately and get fugitives and arrest warrants out. I’m using it in places like our national threat operations center.
I’ll give you an example. They wanted to do it human by human. Can you imagine how many tips the FBI gets a week? Thousands. If we had just humans look at it, we would never sift through them all. I put AI in there. We stopped a school massacre in North Carolina because we got a tip and we were able to triage it with artificial intelligence. We stopped a school shooting in New York because we got a tip from our private sector partners who are building our AI infrastructure. I mean just think about the old school movies. Remember they get the fingerprint screens up and they’ll say we’ll see you in a couple days when we get a hit. Now those hits are instantaneous because we are welcoming in artificial intelligence.
The former FBI rejected that notion because they knew that wasn’t their focus. Their focus was on weaponization, not modernization. My predecessors didn’t spend one second modernizing the FBI. They kept calling it the premier law enforcement agency in the world, but they failed to give the people in the field the resources that they need. They failed to give our SWAT operators, our tactical operators, our hostage rescue teams the tools they needed.
Sean, our guys, just to give you an example, are doing dynamic hostage rescue operations on a weekly basis with night vision goggles that don’t work. That’s not that’s not hyperbole. That’s a fact. So, I called my partners at DOW and I said, “I need an assist.” They were like, “Roger that. We got you covered.” Why? The question the American people should be asking is, “Why didn’t this so-called premier law enforcement agency of the world, why didn’t they resource it? Why didn’t they build a backbone infrastructure? Why didn’t they go out to the private sector and say, “Hey, we need your help.” Donald Trump kicked that door open. I’ve got every major tech company in the world embedded in the FBI rebuilding our internet capabilities, our classified systems, and the ability for artificial intelligence to be in our counterterrorism program so we can get instantaneous results. What’s the point of collecting terabytes of data if you can’t sift through it?
They never answer that question. And the mainstream media doesn’t ask the question as to why our predecessors kept putting a band-aid on a gunshot to attempt to triage the broken system of the FBI. We spent the last year, this is one of the things I’m most proud of, rebuilding our entire backbone infrastructure because an agent in the field in Omaha should have the exact same toolkit as a guy in New York City. No different. Our SWAT operators should be using machines. They didn’t have Bearcats in the field. We got them Bearcats in the field. You guys want these guys kicking down doors and dropping fast roping off helicopters and things like that and rescuing kids like we just did in Alabama the other week in the middle of a night from a guy who’s holding a young woman at gunpoint. We got to give them the tools that they need. And none of them bothered to do it. They just kept repeating the past hyperbole and resting on the history of the FBI saying we’re great and we’re going to get there.
How come Chris Wray didn’t fight for a budget for this FBI in his five years and saw decline in funds year-over-year for his entire directorship?
Sean Hannity: If Comey is a dirty cop, I know this issue in the indictment 8647. Okay, I think he’s completely full of shit when he says that. Oh, I just thought it was an interesting shell formation. Okay, every American knows what 8647 means. What an interesting shell formation. My wife suggested that I put it on Instagram. I’m like, okay, good luck with that. But to me, that’s the low-hanging fruit for him. Which is why I want to get into what the grand conspiracy will be.
But first, if Comey was a dirty cop, Director Wray used to always warn about some type of apocalyptic meltdown in the country, but then he never did a thing to secure the borders and he kept letting these millions of people come from 200 plus countries and that frustrated me. I felt that that those were all CYA appearances before Congress or the Senate. So my question is, how do you describe Director Wray?
Kash Patel: Look, I don’t spend my days thinking about Director Wray. He paid lip service to the American people to say we have all these investigations but didn’t reduce crime. That’s the result. The results speak for themselves. In one year, in 14 months with President Trump, this FBI has done more than the prior two guys combined. That’s that shows that the mandate of the FBI has been restored by President Trump.
Sean Hannity: That shows you’re not playing politics. You’re not out to screw the next Democrat. You there to stop crime.
Kash Patel: That shows the breadth of cooperation we’re getting from people like the government of Mexico, the government of India, China, Russia even. We’re getting these fugitives from all over the world and we’re sending our people to go get them. I was there on the ground in Mexico when we got the Ryan Weddings of the world. When they said you couldn’t get them, you couldn’t find them. We created operations to go and flush these guys out and we’re getting them all in record speed. We went to the government of India and said, “Hey, there’s a gal over there on our top 10 most wanted list who murdered her handicapped 5-year-old son. They found her in a week for us and we went and brought her back.” They could have done that in the Biden administration. They could have gotten Ryan Wedding. They could have gotten the rapist in North Carolina who was our most wanted fugitive. They could have done all that work. They didn’t because they were focused on keeping the status quo. That’s what the American people hated the most. That’s why I believe they voted Donald Trump back into office again because they wanted to change the status quo in Washington DC on Capitol Hill and the way this FBI represents itself across the country.
Sean Hannity: Walk through the next level. We got all the way through 2016. They set him up like a bowling pin because they took a career senior intelligence officials assessments about there was no Russian interference. They used the dirty dossier to backdoor spy on candidate Trump, transition team Trump, and then later the Trump administration. Carter Page is a nice guy. My understanding is he was a hero. He used to work with three-letter agencies. Is that your assessment of him, too?
Kash Patel: That’s the public information that’s out there. That’s correct.
Sean Hannity: I mean, that’s public and he’s told me directly that he would always help out our government. He was a patriot. Trump has to deal with that for three years. But there’s more to the story. It’s a bigger broader case. The reason that the grand conspiracy, if which you have said you’re looking into is so critical, is because the small the low-hanging fruit on Comey 8647 while important for sure is not the worst of what this guy did. And unfortunately the statute of limitations ran out because you had the intervening Biden years. They were never going to investigate the guy that did all this work for them. However, if there is a grand conspiracy, there are no statutes of limitations.
Kash Patel: Well, and also if they did it again, right? The win here is not just holding these people accountable. The win here is making sure that the FBI, DOJ, and the entire government are never able to do this again to anyone else. That’s what President Trump has said repeatedly. He was the ultimate target, but he wants to make sure that this can never happen to anyone ever again. That is the ultimate win for our republic. And it’s not just this statute of limitations thing. These people, as I said earlier, are so arrogant that they ran back the same playbook. That’s what we uncovered.
Sean Hannity: Isn’t it then important then that those that were involved in it be held accountable?
Kash Patel: All of them. Every single one of them.
Sean Hannity: Okay. So, how do we get from it began here in 2016, July, the press conference, all the way through the setup for 2017, and Trump’s coming in and explain how it continues from there.
Kash Patel: That’s the part that I’ve got to be a little careful about. What I was saying earlier is they ran it back again. I don’t mean in 2016 and 17. I don’t mean in 2021. I mean they ran it back just now.
Sean Hannity: Explain.
Kash Patel: In the last election. In the one that just put Trump back in office. They ran the same playbook of getting regurgitated bogus information funded by political operatives seeded into the intelligence community. And that’s what we figured out and unlocked. And that is where I spend most of my time when it comes to the deweaponization of government. Focused on, collecting those bad actors, getting grand juries, getting prosecutors, and building teams around the country, not just in one location to look at that because these people haven’t stopped. The same actors were involved yet again.
And so that, when you say grand conspiracy, I think the American public thinks one thing. When I hear it, I’m talking about the breath of the entirety of it. And we are putting it all in one place and that’s the crux of what we’re doing right now.
Sean Hannity: Explain how it goes out further. My understanding is you brought Joe diGenova in?
Kash Patel: DOJ did.
Sean Hannity: He’s one tough kick-ass prosecutor.
Kash Patel: He’s been around a long time.
Sean Hannity: I would not want to go up against him. One of the few people I’m like, UH No. But I think he’s also truth oriented and he’ll want to get to the the bottom line. So there really is an effort to just… what do you think it stems from? Is it they hate him? They hate his politics. They hate what he stands for. They hate his style. What is it?
Kash Patel: They hate that he [Trump] did everything they said they were going to do and didn’t get done. Everything from ending the forever wars to securing the border to reducing crime to historic low proportions. He’s accomplished all that and so much more. And if an Obama or Harris or Biden had done it, they would be building monuments for them. But he did it. They talked about it. They ran on it. They weaponized government. He exposed it. Trump then got back into power and said, “We’re going to fix it forever. So do it the right way. Don’t go fast. Get it done and get everybody. And that’s what we’re doing. We’re only 14 months in. I know people think it should have happened yesterday. But look at the public corruption cases we’ve already brought. The work that we’re already doing, the fraud. We haven’t even talked about the fraud in Minnesota or the scam centers overseas that are plaguing the United States of America. We’re doing all of this work. At the same time, we’re doing what you and I are talking about.
Sean Hannity: So, and this is what I guess frustrated me knowing you for a long time. You walk in the door and like people are immediately like slamming you with, “Oh, wait a minute. Where are the JFK files? RFK files with MLK files and are there UFOs?” Which, by the way, I’m going to ask you all of that. I’m fascinated with the UFO part. But you’re slammed with that. But then you’re also slam with getting to the bottom of this, keeping Americans safe and secure, dealing with narco terrorists, dealing with child trafficking operations. All this has taken place in our country. It’s kind of hard to absorb that.
Kash Patel: Well, President Trump not only promised to restore law enforcement and make it better than it’s ever been, he’s also the most transparent president in the history of the United States. All the things you talked about are things other presidents could have put out but didn’t. He did. And let me give you another example of what this FBI is doing. Our constitutional oversight comes from the United States Congress. I’m a big proponent of that. The prior two directors released a total of 14,000 pages of documents to Congress in a total of 10 years. 14,000 pages of documents to oversight committees in Congress.
Sean Hannity: How many [have you released] And if if you listen to your critics, they would think that you’re hiding everything.
Kash Patel: 41,000 pages in 14 months, I don’t do math, but I think it’s like a 350% increase. And that’s just in 14 months because President Trump is driving the transparency initiative. And the documents are the best work. And whether it’s JFK or RFK or UFOs or what have you, it’s also the underlying [stuff] and that’s the balance we got to strike. People are like, “Where are the rest of the Russia gate?” You know, conspiracy documents. My balance is to release what we can while maintaining the integrity of the investigation. If we put everything out, then we jeopardize the integrity of the prosecutions that we will bring. That’s the balance that I have to strike. And I get it. We take a lot of incoming for it. Why don’t you just put it out? Why don’t you just put it out? Well, we want accountability, too, right?
Sean Hannity: But you can’t. But people don’t understand either. You take in voluminous amounts of information. A lot of it is not verified and a lot of it’s not vetted. It’s raw intel that could hurt innocent people. You have redactions that would go along with it. I would urge anyone to go through 500 pages and try to redact what you have to redact and the amount of the intensity of that work alone would be insane and you’re talking about hundreds of thousands of documents. That’s a lot. [Just editing these transcripts is a (euphemism) and I can only handle about 5 to 10 pages a day! –GC]
A random question and then we’ll get back more focused but what keeps Kash Patel awake at night
Kash Patel: Missing something. Did we miss a national security threat? Did we miss the chance at protecting another kid or another community? And I can tell the American public that just look at the month of December alone last year. We stopped four terrorist attacks in four weeks during the holidays. Four.
Sean Hannity: Slow down a second. Most Americans don’t know that.
Kash Patel: Yeah. Everything from the pumpkin tape plot all the way through the attacks that were going to happen in Texas, Florida, and New York. And we stopped them all. We, this FBI.
Sean Hannity: When you say terror attack, do you mean a real attack, a terrorist organization, [and you] stopped it? That’s got to give you a lot of personal job satisfaction and then scare the hell out of you about what else may be out there.
Kash Patel: It’s a two-edged sword, right? Like, thank God that this FBI is on mission doing it. We put it out as much as we can because the work of this FBI should be known to the American public and it should be advertised. Their wins, the sleepless nights that the agents, the intel analysts and professional staff put in. The time away from their families. We are the folks that are responsible for safeguarding America. What keeps me up at night is we’re trying to do everything we can not miss anything.
Sean Hannity: So, you have to be perfect every time.
Kash Patel: Yeah. Well, they only have to get through once.
Sean Hannity: Do you fear a 911 style attack could happen again?
Kash Patel: We’re always on the watch for that given the current circumstances we’re in. And as I said earlier, the thing about terrorists is they’re exceedingly patient. After the disastrous withdrawal in Afghanistan, which led directly to the deaths of 13 of our brave soldiers at Abbey Gate. And by the way, in the first two weeks on the job, Johnny Ratcliffe and I went to the Pakistanis and got the Abbey Gate bomber who just got convicted last week. The question the American public should be asking is what was the Biden administration doing for four years not finding this guy that killed 13 American soldiers. That’s how fast we moved. And that’s how fast you can move.
The problem is, the way that Afghanistan was left by the Biden administration, allows al-Qaeda and ISIS K [ISIS-Khorasan – Terrorist Groups – GC] specifically to rejuvenate. ISIS K, which is the worst of the worst pretty much outside of the Iranian terror regime. And so they are rebuilding slowly. That’s what we’re watching. And we’re watching to see if they are moving people across continents into Africa into South America. And we’re working with our intelligence community partners, CIA, NSA overseas, and of course the DOW running targeted operations overseas, going after the drug traffickers. And the big shift that we had here was we finally equated terrorists to being terrorists. What do I mean by that? Muslim Brotherhood, they’re terrorists. Donald Trump did that. Drug trafficking organizations in Mexico, they’re terrorists. Donald Trump made them FTOs. [Foreign Terrorist Organizations] So that unlocks authorities that we have to traditionally manhunt al-Qaeda and ISIS and ISIS K on these organizations. That is a critical win that is never talked about. Moving the machine to designate these organizations as foreign terrorist organizations so the FBI the CIA the NSA and DOW can do what you’re seeing.
Sean Hannity: Are there sleeper cells… do you believe? And what degree of certainty do you have that there are sleeper cells in this country?
Kash Patel: So we can only work off the intelligence that we have and currently we are looking at that with our partners across the IC. I’m not saying there aren’t. I’m saying the intelligence that’s been produced so far doesn’t show credible information to support that. That’s the assessment of the IC.
Sean Hannity: I don’t know if I’d want to read the presidential daily briefing every day. I think that would be a pretty long when I look at all of this. I want to go back to your interpretation when you had the burn bags ‘cuz that was a big story. When I heard they left burn bags behind. I’m like, either they’re dumb — And then Dan was the one that opened my eyes by saying, I think somebody probably left them there hidden on purpose, hoping we’d find it and maybe even tipped you off that it was there. ‘Cuz you said this is in a room that nobody knew existed. Was it like a safe room?
Kash Patel: Literally, it was in a safe room.
Sean Hannity: And so you told WHO[???] go look in this room.
Kash Patel: First, we had to find it. Remember, it goes back to the arrogance. The people that authored Russia Gate and the ultimate weaponization of government and law enforcement, we caught them because we used their documents. We found their documents. I knew they had done that again. What we found was just a chunk of it. So, I knew it was elsewhere. So, I said, “We’ve got to go comb through the entire building and find a combination of two things. Their arrogance coupled with good people in the FBI who were smart enough to make sure that the material that the arrogant people assumed would be destroyed was not and that was the key for us.
Sean Hannity: We got Dan’s reaction. What was your reaction when you read it?
Kash Patel: It was something I anticipated. I wasn’t surprised by it.
Sean Hannity: Well, you were more deeply involved because you were working with Devon. So, it was just confirmation of what you already knew with more information.
Kash Patel: Yeah. That we hadn’t seen yet. with more information.
Sean Hannity: How do you explain that they put it down on paper? Because that seems pretty dumb to me.
Kash Patel: The arrogance. Why would you put down on paper that you had information that exonerated Carter Page and President Trump’s campaign? ‘Cuz they thought, “No one’s ever going to see this. Hillary’s going to win. We’re never going to see this.”
Sean Hannity: Are you convinced that there’s enough evidence that the DOJ in the future will be able to bring real strong cases against the people that are involved here?
Kash Patel: Yes. I can’t start saying names.
Sean Hannity: … [story about cops in his family] …restoring the FBI to its former greatness and restoring our intelligence community to its former greatness. Are you confident in this 4-year period, assuming we just have four years? I’m hoping longer. That’s possible?
Kash Patel: Yes. That’s what we’re doing. That’s what President Trump’s leading out on. people should really take a hard look at the last 14 months and some of the things we’ve talked about.
They said that none of that was possible. There’s no way you could reduce robberies in this country by 20%. There’s no way you could drop the murder rate in this country by 20%. We did all that. There’s no way you could tackle fraud in Minnesota. What did you see last week? FBI agents along with the inter agency executing 21 search warrants and raiding locations across Minnesota. Not just the fraud here, but the fraud that’s being manufactured and stood up by the CCP overseas in places like Cambodia, Thailand, and Burma. They’re standing up those scam center compounds that are defrauding senior citizens in America by the billions. Just last week, because of President Trump’s ability to have countries in the Middle East, Dubai specifically, the FBI, the Dubai police, and the MPS were on the ground. We shut down nine scam centers, freed 2,000 trafficked enslaved laborers, sent them back home, and shut down a $5 billion scam center fraud that was being perpetrated in the United States of America.
Sean Hannity: It’s crazy this level of crime, especially coming from abroad, is here.
Kash Patel: And [where] they headquartered it. So you have to root out the fraud like we’re doing on the ground in Minnesota. This is our operational plan that we’ve been executing the last year and go to places like Cambodia, Thailand, and Burma where the CCP is standing up villages of scam center compounds and work with our private sectors to annihilate them.
Sean Hannity: Is China the worst of all our geopolitical foes?
Kash Patel: Yeah, by far.
Sean Hannity: Let me ask you about this. So you know I work closely with John Solomon. We know about Arctic Frost. The summary I would give and maybe you can give yours. They actually spied without a warrant, without any basis. You talk about unreasonable search and seizure on congressmen and senators and others.
Kash Patel: Yeah. And others.
Sean Hannity: How’s that investigation going?
Kash Patel: It’s far down the track.
Sean Hannity: You feel you’re getting where you need to be?
Kash Patel: Yeah
Sean Hannity: Here’s the reporting of John Solomon. It’s not just Arctic Frost. What about Round River [Google denies it even exists! – GC], which deals with Ukraine. What about Plasmic Echo, which has to do with classified documents? And then of course, Crossfire Hurricane.
Kash Patel: All of it. All of it collectively is run on the same MO that was stood up by a weaponized law enforcement. And all of it is being uncovered and exposed by the same MO that President Trump came into office again with to root out corruption and weaponization of law enforcement. But how?
Get the documents, then get the witnesses, then get the grand jury subpoenas out, then put people in the grand jury, then build a case with our prosecutors at the same time to collectively hold these people responsible and find jurisdictions where we can prosecute them based on the law. That’s what we’re doing across the board.
Sean Hannity: Relatively speaking, things that have happened to me, like I had Jim Jordan come on my TV show once and say, “Oh, by the way, the government suppressed your social media account for the 2020 election. Or my own my private personal text messages are released publicly with people like Paul Maniffort, Mark Meadows, Jim Jordan, Kayleigh McEnany, I mean, I would think I have a right to privacy. I’ve never committed a crime in my life except speeding and I don’t speed anymore. Nobody ever gets held accountable for that stuff. And nobody in the media ever cared ‘cuz it was me.
Kash Patel: Yeah, I know the feeling. Mine too.
Sean Hannity: And by the way, your FBI contacted me at least a couple of times through my lawyer, and said, “Oh, by the way, we think your client got hacked by Russia, China, and Iran.” My phone. First of all, why do Russia, China, and Iran want to hack my phone?
Kash Patel: Well, you got a pretty big audience, Sean. I don’t know if you noticed that. And our adversaries, look, but in all seriousness, our adversaries aren’t stupid. Why wouldn’t they target you? You’re one of the most powerful messengers of truth that there is.
Sean Hannity: They want him.
Kash Patel: So, they want you and me. I’m a sitting FBI director and I just figured out that the prior FBI illegally surveilled and collected my information.
Sean Hannity: Is there any way to keep your phone safe? ‘cuz I learned through the Nancy Guthrie case that you could think everything is deleted and you have equipment that can actually retrieve it, which I don’t think you guys want it out there . For example, if you delete your cloud, you delete your text, you delete your email, you wipe it clean and it’s still out there like hanging out in the air and it can be retrieved.
Kash Patel: Well, that’s that’s a whole separate conversation when it comes to how do we use technology and how do we use these tech companies, phone companies, social media companies, cloud services. Everybody wants the best of both worlds. They want to be able to use that and rightfully so. But they also want everything protected and that’s why it takes an act of Congress to come in with laws that we can utilize to safeguard these American citizens. I mean, China, Russia, Iran, and DPRK are never going to stop their espionage activities.
Sean Hannity: Ever.
Kash Patel: Ever. We shouldn’t expect them to.
Sean Hannity: We spy on them.
Kash Patel: But what we can do. What this FBI has done is turbocharge how we go after them. I mean, Sean, you cannot have a 43% increase in espionage arrests in 13 months unless you actually turbocharge and do what the president wants you to do, which is safeguard American citizens. So, we’re on that mission set. We’re also working with the private sector to say, “Hey, you guys and us have to work on a couple of things. Ultimately, safeguarding, you know, free speech and everybody’s right to it. But at the same time, our job in law enforcement is to safeguard your privacy.” That’s a tough balance because people want it both ways and it’s really hard to strike that balance.
Sean Hannity: So, a friend of mine who is pretty high ranking in the FBI, he’s now retired. I’ll never forget this conversation I had with him and I brought this up with with Dan. We were talking about the FBI and he volunteered to me, said if the FBI ever comes to your house, don’t talk to them. That goes against every instinct in my being, my natural reaction would be this is the FBI. I want to help the FBI. You know, if they need my assistance, how can I help you? He said, nuh-uh.
Kash Patel: That’s the ultimate goal we’re working towards, to go back to that. But that’s what we want our FBI and our law enforcement to get back to. That’s the degradation of trust that has happened.
Sean Hannity: This is a guy who loves his country. This guy was an agent’s agent. This guy risked his life all the time, was undercover for years in his life. And for him to say, “Whatever you do, don’t talk to them.” It’s probably a perjury trap. That’s what he told me. Well, look at what they did. I mean, he’s saying that because of the examples you and I have talked about. He left because of it.
Kash Patel: And here’s the other thing. I’ve got so many FBI agents. We created a new program for them to come back in. They were so fed up that they left. They’re all coming back in and helping us. And so the ultimate goal of not just holding everyone accountable for the past that we’ve talked about is, the law enforcement community you and I grew up in, me in New York too, that if a cop shows up or an agent shows up, you invite them in and say, “How can we help? We’re getting there. When I go across this country, when I visit the field offices, when I’m in the community, every single agent, analyst, and civilian tells me the same exact thing. We are feeling more safe under President Trump’s leadership than we ever have before. And we’re finally starting to trust the FBI again when they show up because look at what we’re doing. We’re responding in record speed. You see things like political violence. We’re taking that on. You see things like a political system that was used to target individuals. We took on the SPLC. Why do you think they started coming after me so hard just around the time we indicted the SPLC?
Sean Hannity: Weren’t you on their list? I know I’ve been mentioned by them a million times.
Kash Patel: The hate list. Yeah, I’m sure. These are things that Americans have wanted for a long time and we’re doing it with facts, and every time, and this you know this better than anyone, when they’re coming after you, they’ve come after President Trump and the louder the cauldron of baseless reporting is in Washington DC, the more you’re over the target. The only thing left to do is keep pummeling the target. And that’s what we’re doing with everything from the fraud investigations in Minnesota to SPLC to supporting and defending people’s right like those individuals that we just arrested for throwing a girl to the floor for expressing her freedom of speech right and basically attacking her. We got them too. We’re doing that across the country. That’s just one example. And so that’s what the American public wants. And that’s why we stood up our national mission center in the FBI. We literally, made another transformational change. What we did was we have 10 agencies in the FBI headquarters that have stood up just to ingest all of the information on social media and everywhere
else about people being attacked. We are responding to that in record time and go talk to the folks on social media and see, if when they’re being threatened, how fast this FBI responds. We’re running that and quarterbacking that operation out of this FBI.
Sean Hannity: So, we mentioned immigration, unfettered immigration. The president closed the borders. Those 12 million plus un-vetted illegals from over 200 countries, many with terror ties. I’ll tell you my other big fear is we now lived through the third assassination attempt of President Trump. [more like 5 or more with 25 incidents — GC] I know it’s outside of the FBI’s purview, but I’m concerned because I see three common traits in each example. And I’m not being critical. I mean, we saw the best in Secret Service that night at the White House correspondence dinner. You were there.
As a matter of fact, I was in touch with you. You were with the guy, I think, within probably less than 3 minutes, 5 minutes, but here’s what bothers me. I think we have a perimeter problem. In other words, I thought the perimeter in this case was too close to the venue. I think you need multiple perimeters. And if I’m wrong, tell me. I know it’s separate from the FBI. I am concerned that the whole entire hotel was not swept. I was concerned that Trump International, If you know that golf course where the treed areas are known for paparazzi, they would congregate there. They never swept that area. You have to sweep, secure, and then hold it. Make sure nobody goes in after you sweep it. And then Butler, how does somebody get within 130 yards of a president with a rifle and use a ladder to get on a roof? I’m concerned that while the agents themselves, the rank and file are doing a great job, and I’m not being critical of management. I’m just critical of, do we need a an examination or re-examining how we’re protecting our president?
Kash Patel: Well, look, Mark Wayne and I work closely, you know, every day together.
Sean Hannity: He just started, too.
Kash Patel: We’re getting better and better. But just going back to the White House correspondents dinner. You know what the American public should also be proud of is the inter agency showing up. We were all there, the media was all there, and in record time, we had the suspect subdued. I had a mobile command center stood up at the Hilton Hotel. I launched our NC3, our national crisis coordinate center at Hoover and I stood up our command center at the Washington field office. And you’re right, I was on scene. We stayed on scene. We made sure all the civilian population was safely exited from the building after the individual was secured, processed that individual immediately. The FBI agents are the ones that took him to the hospital and interrogated him on the way. And that’s why again with transparency while protecting the integrity of the investigation, we put out more information than any FBI would have on this individual in our investigation.
That night, we stayed up through the night. I stayed up with my leadership team, and got back early the next morning to make sure that we had adjudicated and, safeguarded the integrity of the investigation to make sure there’s accountability, but also to learn what we could. We’re always looking for what we can be doing better, especially when it comes to safeguarding the president of the United States.
Sean Hannity: I just think we need more perimeters further away from venues. And if you can’t sweep an entire hotel, then we can’t have our president there. Especially with the assassination culture. Three attempts against him. Charlie Kirk is dead. Charlie Kirk, you knew him. I knew him. Can’t have it.
All right. Now, let me ask you the fun questions. You know, one thing I want to ask you is about the Nancy Guthrie case. I got frustrated because I knew from my sources they were trying to keep you guys out.
Kash Patel: They did.
Sean Hannity: And look, time matters in an investigation.
Kash Patel: Look, the first 48 hours of anyone’s disappearance are the most critical. And here’s how these cases works. It is a state matter. It’s a state and local law enforcement matter. What we, the FBI, do is say, “Hey, we’re here to help. What do you need? What can we do?” And for four days, we were kept out of the investigation. And when we were finally let in, Sean, look what we did. We went in and got the Ring doorbell and we said, “Hey, is anyone talking to Google?” I called the leadership at Google and I said, “Look, we know that there was not a subscription service to capture all of the data that would have been captured had there been a subscription service. But can we go into the cache? Can we go into the data before it’s deleted and see what we can find?” That’s why you have that image because the FBI worked with Google to put that image out. Another thing we asked to do..
Sean Hannity: You guys got that tape which was the biggest breakthrough during that case.
Kash Patel: We could have gotten it days before. We could have also maybe gotten more data had we..
Sean Hannity: Why wouldn’t they want your help? Why did they send the DNA to a lab in Florida, not Quantico?
Kash Patel: That’s the other thing that you hit on, right? Again, we were saying we’ll process it. I launched hundreds of agents and intel staff to Phoenix and to Tucson just for this case, just to be on stand-by, just to do the canvasing. And we said we’ll take the DNA. And again, it’s a state and local matter, so it’s their call on where to send the DNA. We have Quantico, best lab in the world. I had a fixed wing aircraft on the ground ready to move it immediately through the night.
Sean Hannity: Did they just say no?
Kash Patel: And they said we’re sending it to Florida and and then I don’t know.
Sean Hannity: They have jurisdiction, so it’s their call. Bad call.
Kash Patel: Well, that’s for the American public to decide. And what we can do is continue to offer support. We would have analyzed it within days and maybe gotten better information or more information. Our lab’s just better than any other private lab out there and we didn’t get a chance to do that. So, I understand everybody’s frustrations on that.
Sean Hannity: No, I’m not frustrated with you. If I was the sheriff and you the FBI was willing to help me and time is of the essence, I would want all the help I can get. Okay. Let me ask you about this. And I think this is really important. You’re going to hate me, but I’m obsessed with it. The JFK files, some have been released. But not all of them. If you go back and watch any documentary of the doctors that took care of JFK at Parkland Hospital, They all said the entrance wound was here, the exit wound was here. All of them. That never changed. Then you came up with the Warren Commission. This whole idea of a magic bullet that goes from here to here, hits him, hits him, hits the, you know, okay, never made sense to me. Every time there’s been an attempt to release those files, there’s opposition. There’s got to be a reason.
Kash Patel: Yeah. And that opposition isn’t with the FBI. We don’t control.
Sean Hannity: Have you ever looked at them?
Kash Patel: We’ve examined and fully un-redacted everything that’s within our purview, but there are other agencies that have equities in that, that I can’t speak to. And so the opposition doesn’t come from this FBI or us. As I said, most transparent administration ever under President Trump, put out more documents on JFK, RFK than ever before. I can’t address the reasons why other agencies said we can’t release X for Y.
Sean Hannity: It’s seems crazy to me. I it just doesn’t seem possible. You know, when the Warren Commission comes up with this magic bullet theory and the doctors at the hospital that are.. that was the leading trauma hospital in Dallas and they all said the same thing. They think the entrance wound was here came out the back which exploded. Makes sense based on my knowledge of ballistics. Did the ballistic side of it tell you a story?
Kash Patel: So here’s the thing. It’s a tragic example of what the FBI does and can do. And then when individuals want to be allowed to target someone, they’ll target the FBI. And that’s okay. That’s their right to do that. But we work with the inter agency. We don’t have a unilateral decision point on that. We don’t. We have to respect their equities. we have to respect whatever they have that is ongoing sources or otherwise that have nothing to do with what actually happened but they’re doing something else later. And so that’s the decision making process that goes into it. As you said, and as I’ve said earlier, I’ve been more transparent than any FBI director literally ever and so has President Trump.
Sean Hannity: So the previous 10 years 13,000 documents they released and in less than a year or a little over a year you’ve been in office 41,000 in a year. Do you have a personal interest in like JFK, RFK, MLK that you would just say let me just take a look at it? Not that you have a lot of spare time on your hands.
Kash Patel: I got a lot of personal interests, but I’ll get to those on the other side of this. On another Saturday.
Sean Hannity: Okay. Then I got to get to the question of either it’s true, these people that I’ve interviewed, these documentaries that I’ve watched. I’m more and more convinced. Have you watched Agent Disclosure?
Kash Patel: I haven’t seen it.
Sean Hannity: Okay. You’re busy. You have a full-time job. I’m more and more convinced that probably and my faith tells me you know we have universes within universes. There’s no limit to God’s imagination. So the idea that there would be life on other planets that may have visited here would not at all shock or surprise me. Have you ever looked into it?
Kash Patel: We’re looking at it. Here’s the thing again.
Sean Hannity: Okay. I want all the details.
Kash Patel: Here’s the thing. Every other president before President Trump could have said, “Hey, let’s look at that and get the American people the information.” What did he do? He stood up an inter agency process with Department of War leading that effort to get out the documentation related to everything that you’re talking about, not just from the FBI, from the IC and everywhere else. And so what do we do? We already delivered our first tranche of information to that committee and they’re going to be publicly releasing this information very soon. We are all for it. There’s nothing in this subject that we’re talking about that we don’t want released. Our job at the FBI is to work with the White House and DOW, give them the information, and then they’re going to put that out in a methodical process and you’re going to start seeing those releases literally happening in the very near future. We just met on it.
Sean Hannity: Do you think we’ve ever recovered alien forms?
Kash Patel: I don’t have any information on that specific.
Sean Hannity: So, you know, Donald Trump is kind of verbose. He talks a lot.
Kash Patel: I’m going to let you tell him that.
Sean Hannity: Oh, I tell him anything I want. I have no hesitation. But he clams up on this issue and I don’t know why. I’ve never been interested in it. I’m like, I want you to get interested in it.
Kash Patel: Well, it’s just another example of President Trump listens to what the American public has an interest in. He’s got a a job that’s a billion times more busy than mine. I’m just focused on law enforcement, national security, and crushing violent crime. He’s got to do a million different things at once, and he still has the time to say, “Stand up an organization. The American public wants the documents. We’ve already delivered the documents. They’re coming out. That’s it.”
Sean Hannity: All right. My last thing I want to reiterate for people is in the what 14 months you’ve been the FBI director, what a dramatic shift. And the statistics speak for themselves. And you never get credit. Do you care about not getting credit?
Kash Patel: I don’t want me to get the credit. I don’t care about that. I care about restoring the FBI’s credibility, which is what President Trump is driving for. And I think at some point in the future, people are going to look back and say, “Look at what President Trump and the FBI did. Restored safety to communities across America.” We’re going to start hearing from all these families just generally speaking, not in the media. I mean, saying, “My kid didn’t have access to these illicit drugs in their school, and there was not an overdose. Our communities and playgrounds are safe. They’re back out there doing what they need to be doing. These kids are getting to go to college. There’s not senseless murders and robberies. Gang violence is at an all-time or getting to an all-time low.
These are things that take time to message from the American populace. And I think there’ll be a point in time where that starts meeting the statistics that we’ve laid out here. And that’s the ultimate win. That’s the job. It’s not about me. It’s about these guys and gals doing the work out there. And again, putting the mission first and giving the credit to the heroes in the field and not the monstrosity that was created in Washington DC by my predecessors, which we’ve taken a wrecking ball to. We didn’t come up with some super creative way on how to retool law enforcement. We just took what President Trump said, back the blue, and let good cops be cops. And you’re seeing the results. And we’re doing things like the FBI field manual. I’ll leave you with this. The FBI field manual, our operations guide book used to be like this. [hands one foot apart]
Approvals, requirements, authorities. I slashed that by 40%. I let all the state and local officers that came up to me over the last year and change said, “Hey, I want to be a task force officer with the FBI.” I’m like, “Great. Let’s do it.” I’ve been waiting 14 months. Why is that? Because the FBI had an internal policy that didn’t allow it. Gone. Now you can be a task force officer in 60 days. We cleared a 700 task force officer backlog. Gone. So now if you want the job, which we want you in on, now they’re coming. State and locals, they’re thrilled with that. Little things like the cross deputization, we no longer have to wait for the inter agency to deputize our task force guys. the FBI field offices where the power is in the field and the special agents in charge are now on their own for the first time ever allowed to deputize their own task force officers. Why didn’t the FBI do that before? The institution prevented it because the bureaucracy was so bloated.
Sean Hannity: You know what one of the saddest things Dan said to me in in his interview is that he thinks if they get back in power again, they’re going to want to arrest people like him and you, me probably, and anybody else they disagree with politically. That’s pretty scary. I mean, this is the US.
Kash Patel: It is scary.
Sean Hannity: That shouldn’t happen in our country.
Kash Patel: It shouldn’t. And that’s why we’re making sure we build this place into something that lasts forever. And that’s the job. That’s the behind the-scenes job. All the things we talked about, I probably haven’t ever talked about 80% of it before today. What we’re doing behind the scenes. Because it’s not the sexy changes that people, advertise, but it’s us listening to the guys and gals in the field that said, “I want this. We want intelligence to drive ops in the field. We don’t want intelligence driven Catholic memos from Washington DC.” And so we listen, Dan and I, and their current leadership. So we listen. We want task force officers. We listen. We want cross deputizations. We listen. We want more intel folks in the field. We listen. We want more agents in the field. We listen. We want to be able to get promoted in the field and not have to come back to Washington DC. We listened. We shrunk the dialogue. The operational guide book by 40%. We listened. And that is why we are moving at the speed with which we are moving because that is what President Trump promised the American people.
Sean Hannity: You know what? If we restore the FBI, our intel community, and we embrace law and order and safety and security, how can we not be a greater, safer country? And that prerequisite that I discussed earlier of law and order, safety, security to pursue happiness, then Americans will be better off.
Amazing story untold sadly. It needs to be told more. I know you don’t have a lot of time to do a lot of media. We really appreciate your time coming out and hanging out with us.
Kash Patel: Thanks for letting me hang out, Sean. I appreciate it.
There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.
Do not forget to LABEL AI articles, video and such.
But NOTHIN’ HABBINING…🐸
Since the Fake News refuses to cover any good news out of the Trump Admin, I thought I would do a rough transcript of this Sean Hannity interview of Kash Patel. I was pleasantly surprised by Sean’s knowledge and interview style. Since it is two hours I am going to do it as a 2 part series.
In this episode of Hang Out with Sean Hannity, FBI Director Kash Patel details the massive shift in Bureau operations since taking the helm. Patel breaks down the staggering 112% increase in violent crime arrests and the strategic dismantling of 1,800 localized street gangs. But the mission doesn’t stop on the streets; it extends to the very halls of the FBI headquarters. Patel reveals the discovery of a “secret room” containing unburnt bags of evidence and hard drives that point toward what he describes as a “Grand Conspiracy” to weaponize law enforcement against political opponents. From the “Russiagate” origins to the modern-day “Arctic Frost” and “Plasma Echo” investigations, this is the definitive account of how the FBI is being restored to its former greatness. Director Patel further explains the truth about the 40,000 violent criminals arrested in 2025 and how the FBI is using AI to stop school massacres and terrorist plots. He also provides updates on “Operation Not Forgotten” in [American] Indian Country and why the “Grand Conspiracy” investigation has no statute of limitations.
00:00 – 05:15: The New FBI Mandate: Crushing Crime
05:15 – 10:30: 40,000 Arrests: The 112% Surge Explained
10:30 – 17:45: Operation Gangster Paradise: Wiping Out 1,800 Gangs
17:45 – 22:00: Protecting Indian Country: Operation Not Forgotten
22:00 – 30:45: Fighting China: Stopping the Purchase of U.S. Farmland
When President Trump appointed me to be the FBI director, he said, “Kash, you got a mandate to do two things. Crush violent crime and defend the homeland and also level the institution that has become the weaponization of law enforcement in this country.” … The FBI agents have come to me time and time again and said, “We have been waiting 15 to 20 years to be able to do our job on the streets of America, and they’re doing it cuz President Trump gave us the authority to do it.” The win here is not just holding these people accountable. The win here is making sure that the FBI, DOJ, and the entire government are never able to do this again to anyone else.
Kash Patel
Sean Hannity: …..it’s hard to fathom that in the last four years under Biden, Harris, Mayorkas , that they allowed in over 12 million un-vetted illegal immigrants from over 200 countries, many with terror ties. We have known terrorists in the country, murderers, rapists, child molesters, cartel members, gang members, and other violent criminals. And this is the mess on top of the corruption that Donald Trump inherited and handed off to the guy that’s hanging out with us today, our FBI director, Kash Patel.
Mayorkas has also been lauded online in places like the Fed News subreddit for his generous granting of administrative leaveto DHS employees around the holidays. His affinity for giving extra time off to staff has even led some to jokingly dub him the “Patron Saint of Admin Leave.” — LINK
I guess when you do not want the border protected you can hand out leave like candy. 😡
…
Sean Hannity: … I got to introduce you to President Trump. Do you remember?
….I just want to freeze frame what you inherited. Okay. Just illegal immigration alone. I understand a lot of it falls under the purview of DHS, Tom Homan, who I admire a lot. They’ve done a great job. Known terrorists, murderers, rapists, child molesters, other violent criminals, cartel members, gang members. …and then everybody’s screaming, “Where’s the JFK files?”
Kash Patel: …When President Trump appointed me to be the FBI director, he said, “Kash, you got a mandate to do two things. crush violent crime and defend the homeland and also level the institution that has become the weaponization of law enforcement in this country. We’ll get to the second part later. When it comes to crime in this country, President Trump secured the border. He had the audacity to do it and he did it. Then he came back in and said, “We’ve had four years of open border. We’ve got criminals running around this country.” And I know we rifle off statistics all the time, but if your audience takes away nothing else from this show, then it’s the following. Because behind statistics are real people.
Sean Hannity: Highlight that, I don’t want to interrupt. Behind statistics are real people. That is like Laken Riley’s family, Rachel Morin’s family, Jocelyn Nungaray’s family. Democrats wouldn’t stand for them and honor them at that joint session
Kash Patel: ….In 2025, in one year under President Trump’s leadership, this FBI arrested 40,000 violent criminals. That’s not the total arrest the FBI had. That number is closer to 80,000. But the 40,000 violent criminals we arrested,was 112% increase from 2024.
….Break that down by state. 50 states. You do the math. We’re talking murderers, rapists, pedophiles, gangbangers, terrorists, everybody that wants to harm our way of life. That President Trump stood up and ran on and said, “We are going to crush violent crime.” That’s what we did. That number alone is emblematic of two things. One, President Trump is the absolute most successful president in US history in reducing crime in the history of America. And two, why are there so many violent criminals in the United States of America? …The open borders policy and the lax rules laid out by the opponents of President Trump to be pro- crime. Remember these are the defund the blue movement people…
Sean Hannity: …In four years, they got four of the FBI’s 10 most wanted under Biden. You’ve been in office a year when you eventually got sworn in. ..14 months. [And you got] Eight of the 10 on the FBI most wanted list. That is an insane number. …In some cases, fugitives that have been on the run 70 years.
In DC, where the president put a surge of police instead of defund, you have motor vehicle theft down 56%, homicides down 52%, robbery down 23%, burglary down 21%. That should be a big story,
Kash Patel: Especially in our nation’s capital. What President Trump did was to bring in the inter agency and unlock the FBI’s greatest partners, state and local law enforcement authorities. And he went into DC and he said, “Not in the nation’s capital.” We also did it in cities across America, whether it’s Memphis or Miami or Dallas or San Francisco or LA. But DC with the president’s backing and with the backing of local law enforcement there, we were able to completely annihilate violent crime in the nation’s capital… If President Kamala Harris had done this, it would be the only story that the mainstream media would be talking about.
Here’s the theme that I think has been leveled by the mainstream media against President Trump. He did everything they wanted done. It’s just that he did it so they’re pissed off at him. He shattered violent crime. He safeguarded American communities. We got eight of the top 10 most wanted… We went around the world and found these animals … guys that have been on the run for 60, 70 plus years in total and put them in American prisons. You can’t do that unless you have a commander-in-chief that says law enforcement is supreme and law enforcement is going to be supreme across the country because that’s what Americans voted for in record numbers when they put President Trump back in office.
Sean Hannity: So, besides myself, have many other media outlets cover this? Outside of Fox?
Kash Patel: And they won’t touch it because President Trump did it.
Sean Hannity: I’m going to put up another screen. Operation Gangster Paradise. 30 pre-dawn raids, 30 alleged members of the Mexican mafia in Southern California. You’ve also gone after the hate groups that go after synagogues and target specific groups. Tell us about that.
Kash Patel: So, two things, Sean. When I got to the FBI, I said, What is the one thing that is causing crime across the country, not just the influx of illegal criminals and violent actors from everywhere in the world? It was localized street gangs. And I’ve never talked about this because you simply can’t on a three minute show at night. Localized street gangs that were supported. And I’m not talking TDA and MS-13. We’re handling that, too. Localized street gangs in LA, in Miami, in Denver, in New York, in Chicago. Do you know how many gangs, street gangs we dismantled last year? 1,800 localized street gangs have been eliminated from the streets of America through Operations Gangster Paradise, Operation Viper, and other things that we do. 1,800. That number, Sean, is a 20% increase from 2024. When you wipe out not just the head shed [Command Post], the overseas components, the TDAs of the world, the MS-13s of the world, and you go down to the root level in the streets of LA and elsewhere and wipe them out as we did in Philadelphia. I was there on the ground. We literally took out an entire city block in West Philadelphia of a localized street gang. And they’re all in prison. They’re the ones dealing dope. They’re the ones getting illegal firearms. They’re the ones holding up everyday Americans as hostage and stealing their money and jacking their cars.
That was a power that had not been unleashed. And this is what happens when you let good cops be cops. The FBI agents have come to me time and time again and said, “We have been waiting 15 to 20 years to be able to do our job on the streets of America.” And they’re doing it because President Trump gave us the authority to do it.
Sean Hannity: Maybe this is a good moment to pause and get into this whole ideology philosophy. It’s being pushed by the left. Defund, dismantle, no bail, re-imagine the police. That’s some of the dumbest stuff I’ve ever heard in my life.
Kash Patel: I mean, just look at the tragedies of this cashless bail policy. Every month we read about some violent offender who gets bail on a violent crime and goes out and does what? Murders a young American, deals fentanyl to young school children and they overdose and die. And that had never been highlighted except by President Trump. He is turning every democratic weaponized institution of justice on its head and challenging them to say, “Why are you passing these laws that are leading to the aimless deaths of young Americans?” He’s the one centering the focus point on law enforcement.
We have to have state and local legislators fix that problem. President Trump can’t do it at the federal level, but what we can do is make sure we roll these guys up, which we’re doing in record numbers, and put them behind federal bars so they don’t ever get out.
..You’re talking to a kid, this son of parents who fled a genocidal dictatorship in East Africa. Immigrated here lawfully and watched their son become the director of the FBI. That is the American dream. But it’s not about me. It’s about capturing that lightning in a bottle and handing that American dream to every single kid out there. That’s what President Trump’s driving…
Sean Hannity: Every weekend you can predict with pinpoint certainty in Chicago how many people will be shot. How many people will be shot and killed. I’ve asked Democrat after Democrat on my shows, can you name one person shot in your city? They can’t name one because they can’t weaponize it and use it to bludgeon Donald Trump or use it politically. I thought every life mattered?
Kash Patel: Let’s just look at Chicago for a second, Sean. How many times does a kid under the age of 10 have to be shot, caught in the cross-hairs of gang fire, before they’ll do anything? How many stories of that, double-digit stories from just last year alone, — that if it had happened under any other administration would be the only headline — saying why is law enforcement failing its citizen, its most vulnerable citizens? But they wash over it because it’s President Trump . And this FBI even without Chicago’s help, Sean, we’ve reduced violent crime in Chicago by 25 points. By 25 points. We’re doing it anyway. And if they let us in like they did in DC, like they did in Memphis under the president’s task force, those numbers would be doubled. We’d be saving twice as many lives.
Sean Hannity: It really is amazing. Explain, and I’ll put this up on the screen, the 400 FBI agents that are dedicated to [American] Indian country. Three brand new task forces that you put together. That was a big deal that didn’t get any press.
Kash Patel: I’m so glad you brought this up. This is one of my passion projects. I think everybody in the United States of America deserves the same brand of law enforcement. Our 575 dedicated Indian tribes across the land deserve the same brand of justice. If you go onto any reservation, and I’ve been on more reservations as FBI director than anyone before me combined, and you talk about missing kids, you talk about murders, you talk about unsolved violent crimes, they are plagued by it. Just last week, I was in Montana on the Crow Reservation. It’s the size of Rhode Island and Connecticut combined. They got five cops. Five cops. And so what we’re doing is we did a durational program last summer called Operation Not Forgotten. We just launched Operation Steadfast Promise, which is going to dedicate 400 plus agents and intel analysts across Indian country for the entire year. We solved, I think, 2,000 cases on Indian country last year alone. I want that number doubled this year. We’re going to solve the mysteries behind the gruesome murder of the Emily Pikes of the world. We’re not going to forget Indian country. And I’m so glad you brought it up because this is representative of millions of people across the country who think they’ve been forgotten by law enforcement, but when I go and see them, they say, “President Trump’s the first guy to send law enforcement here and show up and ask for a partnership, and we’re going to continue that.”
Sean Hannity: … Dan Bongino sat in that seat and told me that there are two FBIs . A lot of people had to go and a lot of people were working against both of you but then there were other good agents that wanted to do their job. More importantly there seems to be a systemic targeting of pro-life Americans, peaceful protesters or moms and dads that show up at school board meetings .They just care about the curriculum that is being taught their kids and they were being investigated as domestic terrorists.
Kash Patel: This is the best example I can see right now to highlight the transformation of this FBI. …All the FBI did before Donald Trump and I was grow the size of the Washington DC footprint. When I came into office, one third of the entire FBI workforce was located in the national capital region in and around Washington DC. The prior directors and presidents, they loaded Washington DC for bear so that they could put out things like the Catholic memo. They could go to school board meetings and terrorize parents. Threaten them, their way of life and have the audacity to tell them it’s the government and not the parents who know how your child should be educated and brought up.
What did we do? I said a third of the crime doesn’t happen in the national capital region. We’re putting the mission first in the field. I took a thousand FBI agents out of the National Capital Region last year and permanently moved them across all 50 states. On top of that, I took 500 intel analysts, took them out of the Washington DC. The directorate of intelligence that we had seen built up by my predecessors to sat in Washington and produce quote unquote intelligence? And I said, I don’t need that weaponization. What I need is intelligence to drive operations in the field. And I sent hundreds of intelligence analysts permanently to the field along with support staff. Then I took another 500 FBI employees and moved them down to Redstone Arsenal, [ Alabama] our premier advanced law enforcement training facility. I said, “Go train everyday cops from around the country on how to be better partners ‘cuz they want us and we want them.” So I reduced the footprint in Washington DC. This is maybe the biggest transformational change that President Trump asked for and we delivered on. And I shrank that one-third footprint in DC by half.
Sean Hannity: You have Operation Fighting China. I have read about Chinese nationals buying up massive quantities of American farmland, American ranch land, and land near our military installations. Now, I can’t imagine for one second that President Xi is going to allow Sean Hannity to go in and buy land near their military installations. Why would we ever do that?
Kash Patel: So, there’s two things you highlight. One, there needs to be a congressional legislative fix ‘cuz right now the only prohibition is one mile in and around military installations in America. So, we got creative. We said, “Okay, while Congress works to fix that, while we work with them to fix that, what can the FBI do?” So, we called our state & local partners. I’ll give you two examples. Down in Louisiana, they were buying up oil rigs off the coast of Louisiana, but it was outside that one mile zone. So, I called Governor Landry and I said, “Hey, this is illegal under state law. The FBI is going to help you.” You know what he did? Shut down those oil rigs. In Texas, a Chinese national had bought thousands of acres of farmland in Texas and was traveling back and forth between China. He had direct contacts and connections to the Chinese government, the CCP. We couldn’t get him under the current law because it was outside of a mile. So, what did we do? We found out that he had been stock piling illegal firearms on his ranch. We went in and seized every single firearm and the entirety of that ranch and he’s still sitting in China because they won’t give him back to us. But now we own it and the US government has it. So we’re doing things like that.
Sean Hannity: Common sense would dictate that if this is happening over and over again that this has got to be some subversive plot by the communist Chinese. They’re doing it for a reason. They are, as far as I’m concerned, our number one geopolitical foe. Why do they want ranch land, farmland and land near our military installation if they’re not trying to spy on us?
Kash Patel: Sean, that’s just it. That’s what they’re doing. If you look back at the last year, this FBI has arrested 47% more Chinese espionage actors to include people that they have co-opted in every branch of the United States military. We are indicting and arresting at least multiple people a month for stealing secrets providing classified information back to mainland China and we are imprisoning them including US Navy sailors. You saw we just charged the individual in Delta Force. And it’s not just connected to China, but it’s also Russia and other entities as well. But that’s how they get their tentacles across the US government enterprise. And so what we’re doing is seeking out those bad actors wherever they are, including within the United States government.
Sean Hannity: I mean, that to me is one of the scariest things. And now we’re talking about national security. I don’t think China has our best interest at heart. I think they view us as an enemy. I think they’ve proven it over and over again. Look, if President Xi’s for China first, I get it. Putin’s for Russia first. I get it. I’m for America first. Fine. However, they don’t get to come into America. They would never allow Americans to do to them what we’re allowing them to do to us. And I’m not saying that every person from China is bad. I’m just saying that maybe you need to buy your property a little further away from military installations. And why farmland? Why ranch land?
Kash Patel: Because it allows them to get large swaths of property, import material and equipment and also use that equipment to go spy on our military bases, our fixed wing and rotary aircraft and our personnel. But let me put out something that’s unorthodox that was led by President Trump. Protecting national security is of the utmost importance. and we’re doing that against these bad actors and spies.
President Trump in his historic meeting with President Xi in Busan S.Korea last year said we have to engage where we can and law enforcement has a unique opportunity to do that. The fentanyl precursors coming out of mainland China were the ones that were killing tens of thousands of young Americans. So he kicked the door open. You know what I did? I was the first FBI director in over a decade to go to Beijing last year. And under President Trump’s authority, in agreement with President Xi, we shut off all 17 illicit precursors that were being delivered to the Mexican drug nationals down in Mexico and then shipped up here. That is a huge win because we worked with the MPS, which is the Ministry of Public Security, their equivalent of the FBI. And since that time, in this law enforcement space, we have sent working groups to China. They have set working groups here and we are tackling money laundering, scam center compounds, which I’m sure we’re going to talk about, the fentanyl and counter narcotics crisis. For the first time ever in the history of the FBI, there is a daily communication between our agents and their agents in mainland China because President Trump kicked open the door.
Now, like you said, their spy services are doing unimaginable harm to our national security. We’re on that mission. But where we can work with them because of President Trump, we are working with them and we’ve seen a drastic reduction in the production of fentanyl by the Mexican drug trafficking organizations down south. We see it in the intel. It’s not classified.
Sean Hannity: Haven’t they been sending the raw ingredients to Mexico?
Kash Patel: That’s what they were doing. And there’s very specific ingredients that make fentanyl as lethal as it is. Those were shut off thanks to President Trump and our engagement. So now they’re struggling to find the ingredients. How do we know it’s working? Last year alone, the opioid overdose rate, the death rate in America dropped 20 points. If any president had done just that alone, save 20% more kids, it would be banner news year round.
Sean Hannity: This is the most frustrating thing to me because it’s our national treasure and they’re being targeted by these cheap street drugs and they have no idea what they’re taking and they’re dying in droves. The deaths now are coming down.
…This should be a big story that, hey, law and order works. Safety and security works if you put the resources in place. They don’t want to talk about that part of it.
…
…I’ve got to imagine within a week you realize you’re drowning because of what you inherited. Known terrorists in the country. We still know there are terrorists here, but we don’t know where they are.
Kash Patel: That’s the scary part. We’re looking for them every single day because the last administration, as you highlighted, let in criminals by the thousands, violent criminals, to include terrorists, and they’ve been sitting around and embedding themselves in our country for the last four years. And as we know from the al-Qaeda and ISIS of the worlds, the one thing those folks have is patience.
Sean Hannity: But they came from Egypt, Muslim Brotherhood. People from Iran were let into this country and let loose by Biden, Harris, Mayorkas. I mean, is it really far-fetched in the middle of a war with Iran to think that we have sleeper cells in this country?
Kash Patel: That’s what we’re monitoring 24/7, 365. We’re going into communities. We’re using our undercover resources. We’re using our online covert employees to root these folks out. And that’s why you’re seeing terrorist prosecutions skyrocket in terms of numbers and people we are expelling from the country with our partners in DHS. I think President Trump has struck the right tone. If you are a violent criminal actor, violent, the worst of the worst, then we’re going to put you down here. We’re going to arrest you. We’re going to put you down. Everybody else, if you’re here illegally and committing crimes, we’re going to send you back to where you came from. That two-fold parallel approach is securing America and safeguarding America. And this FBI continues to have the responsibility with our intelligence community partners to make sure that all the sleeper cells are rooted out.
Sean Hannity: Okay. You walk in the door, get confirmed by the Senate. You get to the the infamous Seventh floor. What did you look at? When did you realize, “Wow, this place is a mess.” When did it dawn on you how bad it was?
Kash Patel: I knew before getting in there. I think the worst thing that could have happened to the institution of weaponization, and the mainstream media, is the combination of President Trump and myself running the law enforcement of this country. Because, as you said, 10 years ago, I led the charge to expose the Russia Gate conspiracy.
Sean Hannity: I need you to go back and explain that to people because you worked on the House Intel Committee and I love Devon Nunes. He’s been a friend for a long time. I spent years of my life on TV night after night after night.
Kash Patel: You were one of a few.
Sean Hannity:Me, John Solomon, Sarah Carter, Greg Jarrett. I mean, there was a small group of us. Catherine Herridge there was not a lot of us. We ended up being vindicated. However, you were on the inside and Devon got vindicated and that congenital liar Adam Schiff was not. So, let’s go back to the main point. You walk in the door, you already know things are bad. You know you have work to do in foundationally within the bureau. You had to feel like you’re drowning, did you not? I would have felt that way.
Kash Patel: You can have that feeling and at times I certainly did. But what you can’t have happen, once you become the FBI director, is allow it to actually drown you. And so what we did, let’s hit the reset button, and what we put out and proved through facts in 2016, 2017, 2018. It took me two years of my life to prove the following:
That a political party in the United States of America in the 21st century would go overseas and hire some bogus intelligence asset to manufacture fraudulent, fake, unverified information, funnel that to not just the intelligence community, but the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and then take those packaged lies, that they had paid for with campaign finance funds, and go into a secret surveillance court and illegally spy on your opponent to be the president of the United States.
That took two years of my life. And what do we find out? The FISA court themselves came back and said these warrants were illegal. That the FBI did not provide exculpatory evidence and innocence and that the FBI essentially lied in those applications and all the information was unverified. So that was step one.
But I knew that it didn’t stop there. I knew in the four years that we were out of office that they continued to regenerate that institution of weaponization. So when I walked in the door, I said we only got a bit of it. We only got maybe half of it. Because what did we learn in those four years, right? That I was illegally spied on by the likes of Rod Rosenstein and Chris Wray.
Sean Hannity: And me.
Kash Patel: And you and 10 other staffers on the hill and people who were elected to serve this country in the halls of Congress.
They were actually continuing the weaponization that Donald Trump and I had exposed during Trump one and we caught them. So I knew walking in the door the following: These individuals, these purported leaders of law enforcement and government are so arrogant that they write the stuff down themselves to memorialize how great they are. That’s how we caught them in Russia Gate. It wasn’t my documents. It was their emails. It was their FISA application. It was their bogus Steele dossier. It was their unverified reporting that was documented in FBI holdings that we put out and that you covered. So I knew there were other places that information was hidden. So day one I set out to find it and we found it.
Sean Hannity: Dan said something that blew me away when he was sitting in your chair on this show, but I want to go back ‘cuz some people didn’t go this deep in the weeds as we did. So we can start with Hillary Clinton’s top secret classified information on her servers. Which by the way I’m — I keep hearing rumors. Maybe you can confirm that information may still exist and we may have a copy. Any truth to that?
Kash Patel: We’re working on a lot of things.
Sean Hannity:You’re smiling. I don’t know. I like that smile. The smile is very revealing, Kash. All right. We’ll save that for a different show.
But let’s go back. And then of course the infamous July 2016 presser by James Comey. No reasonable prosecutor would prosecute.
Kash Patel: Can I just stop you right there?
Sean Hannity: Go.
Kash Patel: The mandate of the FBI and the director is to investigate. It is illegal per the constitution for any FBI director to make a decision on prosecutions. That is the sole province of the department of justice and the attorney general. The fact that he held that press conference and unilaterally made that decision by his own admission without informing the attorney general is a bastardization of our version of law enforcement. He did it because he knew the mainstream media would help him get away with it.
Sean Hannity: So, I’m gonna get your thoughts on Comey and Wray in a few minutes, but I want to stay focused on this. So, he exonerates Hillary that way. And then what do we discover? Hillary Clinton. The reason this is important is because you have said publicly you’re investigating a grand conspiracy.
Would you define a grand conspiracy as the minute Donald Trump came down the escalator till today?
Kash Patel: Yeah.
Sean Hannity:That there has been a coordinated effort to destroy this man.
Kash Patel:Yes, there has. And it’s not me saying it. Look at the documents. Just flip the tables, Sean. Let’s say President Trump unleashed his FBI to go and illegally surveil his opponents. What would happen? The media cycle would stop. It would be the only thing that the mainstream media [would cover. They] would be screaming for accountability. But because President Trump’s the one, that delivered a record reduction in law enforcement under this FBI, because it was him, who was attacked unlawfully and his surrogates and his campaign, they cover it up.
So, I learned as a lead investigator on House Intel that it’s not my words that are the best evidence, it’s theirs. Go find the documents. So what we did was when we walked in the door, I said, “Hey, this conspiracy continued.” It didn’t end because the documents we released under the House Intel days showed that there were individuals who are continuing the work of the Steel Dossier. And I said, “These documents, computer hard drives have to exist somewhere.” And this is a part that’s frustrating to me too. People are are saying, rightfully so, where’s the accountability? Where are the arrest? We are undoing 30 years of weaponization. We are doing that while delivering record results on crime reduction in America. And we’ve got to get it right. So we found that room that Dan Bongino talks about the burn room.
Sean Hannity: Explain a burn bag.
Kash Patel: It’s basically a large paper bag that you use to destroy and literally shred and burn classified information. So we not only found burn bags in a room that was locked away and they weren’t burned, but the room was also off the map. It wasn’t on our blueprint, and nobody had access to it.
Sean Hannity: So, how’d you find it?
Kash Patel: Well, that’s what we do. That’s what I do. I know that these people put it in places for us to never find, but I also know what Dan talked about, and you talked about. There are a lot of good people at the FBI. Now, we got rid of a lot of bad people since Trump
Sean Hannity: What percentage is gone?
Kash Patel: Every single one of the people that weaponized law enforcement is gone. who identify them, threw them out, and they’re terminated.
Sean Hannity: Okay. So Dan’s theory, and I’d love to get your thoughts on it, was he believes that people purposely saved this information, left little crumbs in a trail like Little Red Riding Hood, [It’s actually Hansel and Gretel.] wanting you to find it. That it was saved by design, by good people, special agents, you know, the rank and file good guys that want to do good. You believe that?
Kash Patel: I think there’s a lot of truth to that because I think the rank and file wanted the FBI to be restored to what it used to be before the weaponization of law enforcement. And so what we have to do is methodically catalog this stuff. We’re triaging computer hard drives from previous directors and deputies. We’re looking at the totality of information. We’re finding jurisdiction. And by the way, I’m not looking at it in one jurisdiction. I’ve launched this investigation in multiple jurisdictions. And I can tell you that ‘cuz I got the permission of the attorney general to tell you that. And I can tell you the following too because it’s of such importance. Russia Gate 1.0, they did it again and we found them. We found the documents.
Sean Hannity: … I want to get to the bottom of it still. We’ve all been vindicated at different times, be it the Mueller report or the Durham report or whatever came out. We were right and the rest of the legacy media mob was wrong. Adam Schiff is a congenital liar. Sue me, Adam. He’s a congenital liar.
So we started with the Comey, that press conference. Here’s where things get very interesting. This becomes, I think, the beginning of this grand conspiracy that continues. And I want you to explain it, not me. Start with Hillary Clinton’s bought and paid for dirty Russian disinformation dossier. She uses money. They hire Fusion GPS. Fusion GPS hires Christopher Steele. He has a series of documents that he puts together. They’re all complete bull shit in the end, but that becomes the dossier. Okay?
Kash Patel:And the media was in on it. Remember, they use circular reporting. They leaked that information to the media. Remember then deputy director Andy McCabe, who’s constantly on TV talking about the integrity of the FBI. As deputy director of the FBI, he impermissibly and without permission leaked information about the Hillary Clinton investigation to the media.
Then on top of that, when he was investigated by the Department of Justice, he lied to them. So, I’m not going to be taking any lectures on ethics and how to run the FBI from a then deputy director who abused his position to continue the weaponization of justice. And we’re looking at that. And the scheme you just laid out, is the exact same scheme they replicated when Donald Trump decided to run again. And that’s the investigation I’m tying everything to.
Sean Hannity: I would argue there may be three, but we’ll get to that. Let’s go in chronological order. So they knew, even Brennan knew, the dossier was political hack and he was warning the administration at the time. That’s Obama. That she’s putting together this dossier on Donald Trump. Bruce Ohr, a little interesting his wife worked for Fusion GPS, put it together. Didn’t he warn that it was political and shouldn’t be trusted in August of 2016?
Kash Patel: John Brennan and Bruce Ohr? They all knew it was bogus. I mean, just think about this, Sean. take a step back. The then director of the CIA, the then associate deputy attorney general of the Department of Justice for the United States of America along with other bad actors that we’ve identified, including the media and fusion GPS got together and continued that narrative anyway because then President Obama said, “We have to be able to say” What? — the one thing that they needed, to be able to say, to take a wrecking ball to President Trump’s presidency, before he even got in the door — That there was Russian collusion.
Sean Hannity: So now take it a step further. That becomes the basis of not one but four FISA warrants even though it was unverified and unverifiable because it wasn’t true.
Kash Patel: And when we first informed the FISA court of that when I was working on House Intel, they wrote us a letter back and said, “You guys are dead wrong.” Fast forward
Sean Hannity: The FISA court wrote that to you ? I didn’t know that.
Kash Patel: And fast forward later on in our investigation, the FISA court would quietly put out an opinion themselves stating that we are rescinding — I don’t think that’s ever happened before — We are rescinding the FISA warrants that were used to illegally surveil President Trump.
[REMEMBER BOASBERG: Chief Judge Boasberg served a seven-year term on the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court beginning in May 2014. Appointed by Chief Justice John Roberts, he was the Court’s Presiding Judge from January 2020 to May 2021. LINK]
Sean Hannity: When was this?
Kash Patel: This was about a year after investigation was completed. Probably 2018.
Sean Hannity: Okay. So by that time the year of spying was over. Carter Page’s life was ruined and they had a back door to the Trump campaign in Trump world.
Kash Patel: Yeah. Many lives. [ruined]
Sean Hannity: You can’t even write this in a spy novel…
We’re going to go in a little bit deeper. Of the four FISA applications, ‘cuz they have to get renewed every 3 months, three of the four of them were signed by James Comey. He signed the first three. And [Deputy AG] Rod Rosenstein, I think signed the fourth one.
Kash Patel: So FISAs have to be signed by two people. On the Department of Justice side, the attorney general, or the deputy attorney general. And on the FBI side, either the director of the FBI, or the deputy director of the FBI.
Sean Hannity: Now, when you fast forward a couple of years later and Lindsey Graham was doing the questioning and everyone that signed those FISA warrants was asked, “Knowing what you know now, would you sign the FISA warrant?” Every one of them said, “Oh, no. Not knowing what I know now.” Here’s the problem I have with that.
Kash Patel: Hang on. Let me hit pause on that for a second. Knowing what you know now. Why didn’t they bother to figure it out then? Why didn’t the FBI under Comey. And why didn’t the FBI and DOJ under Rosenstein and company and McCabe and all those people bother to do the verification work? They didn’t want to do it because they knew if they did it, they would find the same thing we proved, which it was completely bogus.
Sean Hannity: And what was “you” is the House Intel Committee, Devon Nunes, you were his lead guy and and that’s when I first got to really know you.
Well, here’s the interesting part because I went back and Greg Jarrett actually walked me through the statute. The FISA statute actually says that if at any point information — now again it was unverified and unverifiable — If at any point you find out information you presented to a FISA court is not true, you have an obligation at that moment to go back to the court. So they’re telling, a Senate committee, knowing what I know now, I wouldn’t have signed that warrant. However, why didn’t they go back? They did not follow the statute of the law. How did they not get held accountable for that?
Kash Patel: Well, that’s what we are literally in the process of doing right now. That’s what I’m saying. I want accountability yesterday and the American people deserve it. But to peel back. To get to that point. To be able to have the FBI and DOJ do that in the 21st century of the United States of America, it takes decades of layering on and creating this diseased temple of corruption. We exposed it. That’s step one, right? And then I can’t speak to why folks in previous administrations didn’t do that. I wasn’t in the job that I am in now. But that’s what we’re doing now. And that’s why President Trump and we, me and you are the targets because they know the truth. So they are breathlessly going on TV and radio every single day and just making personal attacks.
Note what they’re not doing, Sean. They’re not attacking the FBI for reducing the murder rate by 20 points. They’re not attacking the FBI.
Sean Hannity: How could they attack that anyway?
Kash Patel: They’re not. And this stat, I’ve never released before. Again, we say stats, and some of my team doesn’t love it when I use stats because it’s a quick hit, but there’s people behind these stats. State by state, this FBI has reduced violent crime in every single state by an average of 10 percentage points.
Sean Hannity: So, so there’s another part to this. After the 2016 election, in spite of the dirty dossier, FISA warrants, the lying, the break that Comey gave Hillary Clinton to keep her in the race. Obviously, he had a dog in that race. He wanted Hillary to win. Then we have senior career intelligence officials. They do an assessment, an ICA, it’s called, after the 2016 election. They determined beyond any doubt Russia played no part in the election. That was senior career intelligence guys, from the Obama administration.
In a meeting in the Oval Office in December after that assessment came out. It had, correct me if I’m wrong, Obama, Biden, I believe Brennan was there, Clapper was there, you know, all the players are in there. Obama, according to reports, if you know more, please tell me, says he doesn’t like that assessment, demands another one. They get another assessment. It contradicts the senior career intelligence assessment. So at that point then, they get the assessment that said, “Oh, Russia did interfere.” Is that not the predicate to set up Donald Trump for his first term? Russia, Russia, Russia, which went on for years and you were a big part of investigating it.
Kash Patel: That’s it. You summed it up perfectly. That’s what happened.
There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.
Do not forget to LABEL AI articles video and such.
You ever see a dog do a summersault? Well.. Now you have..
I am sure that POTUS Trump would much prefer that the Senate finish passing the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act, but I very much doubt he is betting on it
Palestinian Chuck Schumer is hiring Eric Holder, famous for handing guns to Mexican cartels under the Barack Hussein Obama administration, as part of a Democrat-led “Election Integrity Group” that will no doubt try to suppress Republican voters, and interfere in our Elections. Furthermore, Marc Elias, a terrible lawyer with a horrible track record, is also involved. This is the same disgusting individual who was responsible for the fake Russia dossier from a foreign nation to meddle in the 2016 Election, which I won in historic fashion. The Democrats are totally unhinged and we will not allow them to threaten the integrity of our Elections.
During my Historic Election in 2024, when I won every single Swing State, and decisively won both the Electoral and Popular votes by wide margins, the Republicans had an Election Integrity Army in every single State to preserve the sanctity of each legal vote. We will be doing the same again in 2026, but it will be much bigger and stronger. All Americans should have their voices be heard by casting a vote. Be assured this Election will be fair!
President DONALD J. TRUMP
This is from a year ago. It has a 6 minute video.
HOLY CR*P 🚨
– Democrats did give MILLIONS of illegals Social Security Numbers – They were REGISTERING TO VOTE – Elon Musk has confirmation THEY DID VOTE – Democrats qualified illegals for MAX SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS – They enrolled in Medicaid with their new Social Security… pic.twitter.com/ixWAObSyoL
– Democrats did give MILLIONS of illegals Social Security Numbers
– They were REGISTERING TO VOTE
– Elon Musk has confirmation THEY DID VOTE
– Democrats qualified illegals for MAX SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS
– They enrolled in Medicaid with their new Social Security Numbers
See graph in video:
“Then you’ll notice there’s a strange, what jumped out at us when we saw these numbers. We’re like, what is this? In 2021, you see 270,000 people, it goes all the way to 2.1 million in 2024. These are non-citizens that are getting social security numbers.
This is a mind-blowing charge. This literally blew us away.”
“If I hadn’t seen this myself, I’m not sure I believed it. I went through it myself and mapped it. And Elon is right. This is true. The defaults in the system from social security to all of the benefit programs have been set to max inclusion, MAX PAY for these people and minimum collection.
We found 1.3 million of them already on Medicaid as an example. We’ve gone through on every benefit program we went through, we found groups from this particular group of people, this 5.5 million people in those benefit programs.
And then what was really, really disturbing to us was why we’re asking ourselves why.
So we actually just took a sample and looked at voter registration records and we found people here registered to vote in this population. Yes.
Who did vote? We found some by sampling that ACTUALLY DID VOTE.
We have referred them to prosecution at the Homeland Security Investigation Service. Yeah. Already, already. That is already happening right now. The truly disturbing thing though, I just want you to know this, a truly disturbing thing to me, and the darkest thing about this, to me, the voter fraud is terrible.”
…Under the Constitution, State governments must safeguard American elections in compliance with Federal laws that protect Americans’ voting rights and guard against dilution by illegal voting, discrimination, fraud, and other forms of malfeasance and error. Yet the United States has not adequately enforced Federal election requirements that, for example, prohibit States from counting ballots received after Election Day or prohibit non-citizens from registering to vote.
Federal law establishes a uniform Election Day across the Nation for Federal elections, 2 U.S.C. 7 and 3 U.S.C. 1. It is the policy of my Administration to enforce those statutes and require that votes be cast and received by the election date established in law. As the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently held in Republican National Committee v. Wetzel (2024), those statutes set “the day by which ballots must be both cast by voters and received by state officials.” Yet numerous States fail to comply with those laws by counting ballots received after Election Day. ..
Several Federal laws, including 18 U.S.C. 1015 and 611, prohibit foreign nationals from registering to vote or voting in Federal elections. Yet States fail adequately to vet voters’ citizenship, and, in recent years, the Department of Justice has failed to prioritize and devote sufficient resourcesfor enforcement of these provisions. Even worse, the prior administration actively prevented States from removing aliens from their voter lists.
Additionally, Federal laws, such as the National Voter Registration Act (Public Law 103-31) and the Help America Vote Act (Public Law 107-252), require States to maintain an accurate and current Statewide list of every legally registered voter in the State. And the Department of Homeland Security is required to share database information with States upon request so they can fulfill this duty. See 8 U.S.C. 1373(c). Maintaining accurate voter registration lists is a fundamental requirement in protecting voters from having their ballots voided or diluted by fraudulent votes.
Federal law, 52 U.S.C. 30121, prohibits foreign nationals from participating in Federal, State, or local elections by making any contributions or expenditures. But foreign nationals and non-governmental organizations have taken advantage of loopholes in the law’s interpretation, spending millions of dollars through conduit contributions and ballot-initiative-related expenditures. This type of foreign interference in our election process undermines the franchise and the right of American citizens to govern their Republic.
Sec. 2. Enforcing the Citizenship Requirement for Federal Elections. To enforce the Federal prohibition on foreign nationals voting in Federal elections:
(a)(i) Within 30 days of the date of this order, the Election Assistance Commission shall take appropriate action to require, in its national mail voter registration form issued under 52 U.S.C. 20508:
(A) documentary proof of United States citizenship, consistent with 52 U.S.C. 20508(b)(3); and
(B) a State or local official to record on the form the type of document that the applicant presented as documentary proof of United States citizenship, including the date of the document’s issuance, the date of the document’s expiration (if any), the office that issued the document, and any unique identification number associated with the document as required by the criteria in 52 U.S.C. 21083(a)(5)(A), while taking appropriate measures to ensure information security.
(ii) For purposes of subsection (a) of this section, “documentary proof of United States citizenship” shall include a copy of:… [And a lot more]
Christopher Krebs, the former head of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), is a significant bad-faith actor who weaponized and abused his Government authority. Krebs’ misconduct involved the censorship of disfavored speech implicating the 2020 election and COVID-19 pandemic. CISA, under Krebs’ leadership, suppressed conservative viewpoints under the guise of combatting supposed disinformation, and recruited and coerced major social media platforms to further its partisan mission. CISA covertly worked to blind the American public to the controversy surrounding Hunter Biden’s laptop. Krebs, through CISA, promoted the censorship of election information, including known risks associated with certain voting practices. Similarly, Krebs, through CISA, falsely and baselessly denied that the 2020 election was rigged and stolen, including by inappropriately and categorically dismissing widespread election malfeasance and serious vulnerabilities with voting machines. Krebs skewed the bona fide debate about COVID-19 by attempting to discredit widely shared views that ran contrary to CISA’s favored perspective…
I further direct the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with any other agency head, to take all appropriate action to review Krebs’ activities as a Government employee, including his leadership of CISA. This review should identify any instances where Krebs’ conduct appears to have been contrary to suitability standards for Federal employees, involved the unauthorized dissemination of classified information, or contrary to the purposes and policies identified in Executive Order 14149 of January 20, 2025 (Restoring Freedom of Speech and Ending Federal Censorship). As part of that review, I direct a comprehensive evaluation of all of CISA’s activities over the last 6 years, focusing specifically on any instances where CISA’s conduct appears to have been contrary to the purposes and policies identified in Executive Order 14149…
Brave AI goes into other moves Trump has made to secure elections HERE.
……….
We are all aware that early attempts to prove the 2020 election was stolen were blocked by the cabal. POTUS has not given up.
I am no lawyer, however I would think there is ordinary (D-Rat) election fraud vs the much more serious FOREIGN interference in American Elections. FINDLAW has written an article on this very subject. It includes a lot of information.
…Protecting U.S. Elections From Foreign Interference
Democracy can’t function properly if citizens don’t trust the election results. The U.S. uses a combination of laws, regulations, and executive actions to protect elections.
Let’s examine some of the protections in place to safeguard the integrity of U.S. elections.
Executive Order 13848
President Donald Trump issued Executive Order 13848 on September 12, 2018. It declared a national emergency under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, citing the threat of foreign interference in U.S. elections.
Assessments of foreign interference after every federal election
Reports from intelligence agencies
Possible sanctions against foreign actors
The national emergency has been renewed every year since 2018. The most recent renewal extends the national emergency until September 12, 2026….
So there already is a national emergency already in place.
…..
More recent headway on securing our elections.
Sharyl Attkisson: “There is a Venezuelan engineer whistleblower that has provided your administration with a lot of information and documentation alleging vote rigging in the U.S. elections, including in 2020, through an operation engineered in part by our foreign adversaries and… pic.twitter.com/0h5aCh8H6j
Maria: "But the specific question I asked you was on election integrity, and whether or not you have any information to verify what President Trump's says all the time which is the election was rigged.
Maria: “But the specific question I asked you was on election integrity, and whether or not you have any information to verify what President Trump’s says all the time which is the election was rigged.
Kash: Yes. So, what we are doing is folding that into our entire conspiracy case and we will let the prosecution speak for him. But we have the information that backs President Trump’s claims, but because it’s an ongoing prosecution investigation I can’t get ahead of the DOJ and the President. But President Trump speaks truthfully when he says that..
A 30-year US Navy and CIA veteran Gary Berntsen has blown the whistle on highly suspicious activities involving electronic vote counting companies worldwide.
…In 2020 Cairns News reported on the IT bomb dropped by Sky News presenter Peta Credlin, revealing the Queensland Electoral Commission and its election contractor Konnech, had outsourced its election coding to China.
This gave the Chinese Communist Party access to the electoral roll and revealing the 1,826,613, names, addresses and dates of birth of Queensland residents. In 2022 the US news site Gateway Pundit reported members of the US voting watch group True the Vote also uncovered evidence that the US-based Konnech was storing election-related data on servers in China…
The concerns over international election companies has not gone away – particularly with Queensland going to the polls again and the US election. Berntsen says Smartmatic (which operates in Australia) built an election machine plant just outside of Beijing and ships the hardware to a warehouse in Taiwan where it is marked “Made in Taiwan” in order to bypass US law.
Bernsten says this hardware is then shipped to the US for use by both Smartmatic and Dominion in US elections and he and associates have evidence and witnesses that the source codes for the machines of both companies and others are owned by the Venezuelan Cartel del Sol aka the Venezuelan regime of Nicolas Maduro…
Do you trust the CIA (Brennan) to tell us the truth or is CIA agent Gary Bernstein setting up another Rug pull?
NY Times Bestselling Author Ralph Pezzullo Reveals 19-Year Plot to Steal Elections Worldwide
In 2019, two U.S. government whistleblowers, renowned former CIA operations officer Gary Berntsen and Venezuelan transnational crime expert Martin Rodil, were investigating drug trafficking and money laundering when they uncovered something far more alarming: A global plot to influence elections in the United States and more than 70 countries worldwide.
The scheme traces back to the early 2000s, when international conspirators developed and deployed a virtually undetectable system of election fraud. Before long, the same malicious software made its way north. Working with election software companies that utilized variations of the original source code, and voting machines containing parts manufactured overseas, the conspirators embedded themselves deep within U.S. electoral infrastructure..
Were these CIA tales of Venezuelan Software engineers who developed hackable voting machines and turned whistle-blowers nothing more than Brennan’s BAIT used to ensnare Sidney Powell and Rudy Guiliani? Quote from Stolen Elections.
“We conducted this as a criminal investigation. We have focused on collecting evidence and witnesses which is the opposite of what Trump’s Lawyers Sidney Powell and Rudy Guiliani did after the 2020 election when they made claims without conducting an investigation.”
The Colonel points out there were investigations. Rudy flew to Ukraine and got statements. Sidney had a pile of affidavits. However there remains a question of the authenticity of the material Rudy and Sidney found. What is the provenance of that information? Might it have been garbage transmitted through these CIA connected whistleblowers? Perhaps bait used in order to destroy their credibility? When Sidney made claims to Tucker Carlson and then could not back them up, Tucker trashed her reputation.
Tucker Carlson SLAMS Sidney Powell for not Providing Evidence Election was Taken from Trump (10 minutes)
[This is a very important point. It would explain Sidney’s guilty plea in the Fulton case, would it not?]
Getting back to the book, Martin writes he has 15 yrs experience working in the DOJ as a consultant for criminal investigations and Gary has worked 25 years for the CIA. They also say “On our own and with outside resources, we decided to launch our own investigation.” Except they had Patrick Byrne, another long time CIA asset, funding them and Jerry Nadler’s son as their attorney so not exactly detached from ‘Authority’ [or at least the Deep State.] The Colonel has also been saying the Cartel de los Soles does not exist. It was CIA.
The fact is, Cartel De Los Soles was always shorthand for high-level government corruption in Venezuela. The Colonel then says these people were trained by the CIA in the School of America
Ralph Pezzullo is not an investigator. He’s supposedly a journalist or author. His dad was a foreign service member five at State that just so happens to show up at all the coups in South America. He decided to write a book with a “former” CIA officer who also happens to be in… https://t.co/Fghp2nymaJ
— ColonelTowner-Watkins (@ColonelTowner) May 12, 2026
Everyone needs to understand what they’re seeing…there are so many ppl out right now pointing at everyone as interfering in the US election. Notice who almost no one is pointing to? The agency that has interfered in elections since 1948? Pay attention.
Here it is: Italy-Gate: Barack Hussein Obama and Matteo Renzi, former Prime Minister of Italy, orchestrated the overthrow of the U.S. government on November 3, 2020.
The single most damning testimonies of the 2020 Presidential election.
Maria Zack: “Today, I’m going to play an audio tape that should shock you all. It will shock America.
Stephen Serrafini, along with General Claudio Graziano, a board member of Leonardo Aerospace, were involved. Italian intelligence provided the U.S. with documents, calls, and photos of CIA agents—all funded by Barack Obama, who diverted $400 million in cash sent to Iran, funneling it through the Dubai to operatives in Italy and Merrill Lynch in Switzerland.
Affidavits and Evidence:
1.An affidavit delivered to the U.S. Congress from an Italian defense company employee, confessing on November 3, 2020.
2.An affidavit provided to Congress stating: “Work to change the results of the United States election.” Audio evidence was also acquired from within the CIA and the State Department—Larry Johnson.
Maria Zack “Italian Intelligence Services. She said, uncle, Arturo came home and said he doesn’t understand why we’re stealing America’s election.”
“The Italian Intelligence Services reached out to us on November 18. They said something happened. We’re watching a coup d’état in the United States of America. They were fearful of meeting with anyone. Two affidavits were delivered to Congress, and they came from Italian citizens.”
“Intelligence agencies had been trying to reach out because their country had already fallen. That is what is happening around the world. Intelligence agencies are watching corruption enter their countries, buying off politicians, hiding evidence, and using fraud to seize property—and, in some instances, entire countries.”
“Today, I’m going to play an audio tape that should shock you all. It will shock America.”
“A defense contracting firm experienced unusual activity, with people coming in and out that the intelligence services witnessed—people traveling from Frankfurt into the Italian U.S. Embassy in Rome on Via Veneto. This allowed individuals to come forward and, according to Italian intelligence services, work with Leonardo to change the results of the United States election.”
“Even more frightening, they claim there were 47 to 52 presidential elections worldwide affected. They now have over 200 telemetry experts who speak multiple foreign languages. What you are witnessing is a calculated attempt to take down presidencies and control countries.”
“The audio you are about to hear (audio recording, 4:27 mark) comes from an individual who is a member of the CIA and State Department. His name is Larry Johnson. Many of you may not know, but I personally hand-delivered a letter to Donald Trump on Christmas Eve 2020, detailing who stole the election, where, and how. My primary goal was to bring one of the people from the satellite center, Arturo Della, to America because he was willing to testify.”
“There were people who refused to assist, whom I thought would. But what was most shocking was this voice recording, which I will play now.”(audio recording, 4:27 mark)
📝 In other words; You thought 2016 was bad—wait until @DNIGabbard declassifies—2020. 2016 was just an attempted overthrow; 2020 was the overthrow.
Three articles from PRAVDA DENMARK. The first is connected to the above tweet.
The FBI has obtained election-related records tied to Maricopa County, Arizona, as part of a federal criminal investigation into election administration going back to 2020 and through 2024, according to the reports.
Just the News reports that the records were obtained through a grand jury subpoena seeking “terabytes of data” and other materials connected to voting systems and election procedures in Maricopa County, Arizona. The scope of the subpoena and the specific materials obtained have not been publicly disclosed.
The investigation follows concerns raised by House Administration Committee observers during the 2024 election who inspected a third-party ballot processing facility used by Maricopa County. According to a memo cited in the report, observers reported that completed mail ballots and blank ballots were stored in the same room at the facility – Runbeck Election Services, a private contractor was hired by Maricopa County to process ballots. They reported no state government officials were present while ballots were being handled, and that some pallets of blank ballots appeared to have torn wrapping with ballots missing or removed at the facility.
According to the report, Rep. Abe Hamadeh (R-AZ) previously asked the US Department of Justice to investigate Runbeck Election Services and the handling of ballots during the 2024 election, and the Arizona action is part of an ongoing federal investigation into election issues in multiple states…
Back in January, CannCon and I had former Maricopa County Clerk and Recorder Stephen Richer on Why We Vote.
The conversation was constrained to Fulton County, GA, but at one point Richer downplayed Runbeck’s role in Maricopa County elections in 2022 — that was the “drawer three” election.
Runbeck Election Services is so specialized it requires waiving competitive contracts in certain contexts — like country-level contract and funding approvals. (see: El Paso County, CO)
In other contexts — like efforts to verify ballot chain of custody and obtain loading dock footage — it’s so basic that it’s just like the Staples or the UPS store. (See: Maricopa County, AZ)
This is the essence of the of public private partnerships in elections — plausible deniability via ever-moving goal posts.
It can’t be both. It can’t been so specialized it deserves a waiver of the standard bid requirements but, also, so unspecialized that the government can’t compel transparency in “our democracy.”
That’s been the narrative landscape for Runbeck to date — but that elusive transparency is now the substance of a federal investigation.
About that… remember the Maricopa audit? I made a timeline in 2021 of all times the county obstructed justice, overlaid with audit findings and other notable moments:
A source with direct knowledge of the investigation confirmed that the event in May did happen, but it was not tied to any specific claim of Venezuelan interference, nor was the scope of the investigation specific to foreign interference. However, there was evidence of foreign involvement discovered, but no country was pointed out specifically by our source.
Further, authorities in Puerto Rico requested the investigation into the voting systems in the American territory following the “software issues” from the previous elections.
Our source did confirm that “ODNI found extremely concerning cyber security and operational deployment practices that pose a significant risk to U.S. elections,” however, that can be said for most black box voting systems with proprietary software and source code….
The US Department of Justice is pursuing multiple criminal cases involving election fraud in New Jersey, DOJ announced Friday.
In one case, a former mayoral candidate admitted to forging voter registration applications, acknowledging the submission of falsified documents during a local election process. In a separate federal matter, prosecutors allege that multiple non-citizens unlawfully participated in federal elections and made false statements regarding eligibility.
In Ohio, the Department of Homeland Security has been
investigating election fraud since January, according to recently released public records.
In New Mexico, a clerk
committed a misdemeanor violation of election law when she released election results early, but the state is declining to bring changes and, instead, treating the matter as a “a teachable moment for all county clerks.”
The Pennsylvania Department of State issued a directive in April prohibiting counties from cooperating with federal election investigations, according to reporting from local public radio last week. In Washington, hundreds of ballots spanning multiple election cycles were
“We have been very aggressively going after anybody in this country who is in any way voting illegally…It should be a priority of every American, but it’s certainly a priority of this Department of Justice,” Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said in an interview with Fox News.
There is much to investigate. (And shout out to Jennifer Asper who faithfully tracks and reports local election and voter fraud stories.)
Some of these stories are encouraging for the cause of real elections, like Wyoming and New Jersey, while others are beyond frustrating — like Pennsylvania and New Mexico…
The system is designed to defraud the voters and fabricate their consent.
Inasmuch as these stories underscore the election fraud RICO, then we should celebrate them. But the election fraud RICO is the only election case that matters.
We cannot have real elections until we are honest about how fake they’ve been. And we cannot have a golden age without a justice phase and real accountability.
I’m cautiously optimistic for both.
FULTON COUNTY
There has been quite a bit of activity in Fulton county recently.
During a December 9 hearing before the State Election Board (SEB), the attorney for Fulton County’s Board of Registration and Elections (BRE), Ann Brumbaugh, “did not dispute” the fact that over 315,000 ballots in Fulton County were missing signatures on the poll tapes, as required by Ga. Comp. R & Regs. 183-1-14-.02(15) and O.C.G.A. § 21-2-483(h).
This was in response to a complaint submitted to the SEB in March 2022, 33 months prior to the SEB hearing.
In addition to the poll tapes being unsigned, another egregious and concerning discovery was made: the poll tapes didn’t even come from the ones at the precincts where the ballots were originally scanned at, as required by Georgia election rules…
…Last month, Judge Scott McAfee lifted a protective order on the special grand jury transcripts from the case of State of Georgia v. Trump, et al.
One particular transcript contains a concerning claim made by former U.S. Senator David Perdue..
This is well worth the read because Brian (CannCon) gets into deeper stuff than he does in his following Gateway Pundit Articles. He ties the statements by Perdue to information about True the Votes ‘mules’
The district court held that the county failed to meet the extremely high standard under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(g), which allows a court to exercise “equitable jurisdiction” with regard to an ongoing criminal investigation.
Petitioners argued that the actions taken by the FBI equated to an “unlawful search and seizure,” and that the petitioners’ constitutional rights were violated. The DOJ, however, argued that governments are not afforded the same constitutional rights as citizens.
“The Court finds that Petitioners have not shown that Respondent’s alleged interference with principles of state sovereignty demonstrates a callous disregard for their constitutional rights,” Judge Boulee wrote.
The judge did note that portions of the 18-page affidavit were “problematic” and, in some instances, misleading. But he ultimately concluded that the warrant included both inculpatory and exculpatory information, stating that in the affidavit, “Special Agent Evans presented the Magistrate Judge with facts that both hurt and helped him.”
“This is not a situation where an officer left out all the facts that might undermine probable cause or where an officer intentionally lied,” he wrote.
“This Court acknowledges that the events leading up to this case are, in a variety of ways, unprecedented. But the ‘Richey test has been in place for nearly fifty years’ and ‘its limits apply no matter who the government is investigating,’” Judge Boulee wrote in his ruling. “To apply the law differently here because of what this case is about, or whose records are at issue, would ‘defy our Nation’s foundational principle that our law applies to all, without regard to numbers, wealth, or rank.’”
The U.S. Department of Justice has issued a grand jury subpoena seeking the names, positions, residential and email addresses, and phone numbers of thousands of people who worked in Georgia’s Fulton County during the 2020 presidential election. This includes county employees, bus drivers operating mobile voting sites, volunteers, and temporary poll workers.
The subpoena, dated April 17 and served April 20 on the county’s director of elections, prompted Fulton County to file a motion on May 4, 2026, to quash it.
The request follows former President Donald Trump’s repeated claims that Fulton County, a Democratic stronghold, committed widespread voter fraud that cost him victory in Georgia against Joe Biden (Trump lost the state by 11,779 votes).
County officials say the subpoena is part of an effort to harass and intimidate perceived political opponents amid broader Trump administration actions to obtain 2020 election records from swing states, including a January 2026 FBI seizure of ballots from a Fulton County warehouse.
In the motion to quash, county lawyers argued the subpoena is “grossly overbroad and untethered to any reasonable need” and “cannot yield any evidence that could result in a criminal prosecution” because the statute of limitations for related federal crimes has expired.
Fulton County Board of Commissioners Chairman Robb Pitts called the move “outrageous federal overreach designed to intimidate and chill participation in elections,” stating, “Fulton County will not be intimidated.”
A Grand Jury has subpoenaed everyone involved in the 2020 election in Fulton County.
The subpoena includes Election Day and night workers — including volunteers — as well as those in the risk limiting audits and recounts and signature verifications.
Everyone who was given an order … and everyone who gave an order.
Abbe and Norm and their band of merry men filed a motion to quash — a subpoena from a grand jury — and Brian and I had a good laugh about it on last night’s Why We Vote. Generally speaking, motions to quash grand jury subpoenas are hard to win because the grand jury’s role is to investigate, not adjudicate. So courts give prosecutors and grand juries broad latitude.
They can — and do in their motion — argue that the subpoena is overly broad or burdensome. It is broad. It’s everyone in the crime scene as Brian said last night.
But last time I checked, the accused criminals don’t get to dictate the prosecution’s witness list…
Remember when we learned that election fraud was part of the treasonous grand conspiracy?
the subpoena requests that the Fulton County BRE bring specific documents and electronically stored information. That information includes information regarding election staff/members who served in the November 2020 General Election. The records must identify their name, position/function, residential and email addresses, and personal telephone numbers.
The records include those who were performing the following functions and duties:
Individuals assigned to review Mail-In Ballots
Individuals assigned to the Voter Review Panel/Board
Individuals assigned to Mobile Voting Locations
Individuals assigned to transfer results to or from media or transport ballots, ballot stock, or media
Individuals employed or contracted by the Fulton Board of Registrations and Elections
Individuals who worked or volunteered for the Risk Limiting Audit
Individuals who worked or volunteered for the Recount
Individuals who served as precinct managers and assistant managers
Many of these individuals could potentially have pertinent information about numerous anomalies uncovered over the last several years. The Gateway Pundit has previously reported that Fulton County did not properly perform signature verification on mail-in ballots in Fulton County, according to testimony under oath from then-Fulton County BRE member Mark Wingate during the disbarment hearing for former Deputy Attorney General Jeff Clark.
Wingate also testified that he was prevented from viewing chain of custody documents prior to certifying the 2020 election. Both issues could potentially be explored with the above witnesses.
From Last year.
THERE IT IS.
Testimony today, under oath, from Fulton County Registrations and Elections Board Member Mark Wingate.
Fani Willis now KNOWS that NO signature verification was done in Fulton. That 147,000 ballots that, BY LAW, are invalid.
The Gateway Pundit also reported that the risk-limiting audit performed in Fulton County was subject to intense scrutiny from the UC Berkeley professor who invented the Risk Limiting Audit, Dr. Philip Stark. In Curling v. Raffensperger, he submitted a sworn declaration that criticized hundreds of thousands of missing ballot images that would make it impossible to perform a valid risk-limiting audit.
The Gateway Pundit covered many of these anomalies in this four-part series (parts 1 thru 3 linked here).
The grand jury subpoena was submitted on April 17, 2026, but was not known until a motion to quash the subpoena was filed by Fulton County attorney Y. Soo Jo, in conjunction with Abbe Lowell and Norm Eisen, among others.
The motion to quash calls the subpoena the DOJ’s “latest effort to target and harass the President’s perceived political enemies” as he “perpetuates his false claim that they ‘stole’ the 2020 election.”
The motion further states that the subpoena is “unprecedented and harassing” and would identify “thousands of Fulton County election workers and volunteers.”….
Strong evidence shows that corrupt FBI officials and George Gascón deliberately covered up CCP infiltration of U.S. election software—because exposing it would have politically benefited Donald Trump.
There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.
Do not forget to LABEL AI articles video and such.
Just for fun: Otxi the Iceman
I decided to go into an Alpha Warrior – Colonel Towner discussion on the Southern Poverty Law Center. In chasing down a reference the ‘rabbit trail’ led to this info.
A recent landmark Jamestown Foundation report maps Chinese United Front operations, the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP’s) effort to co-opt and weaponize civil society against the CCP’s enemies.
The report, titled “Harnessing the People” and authored by researcher Cheryl Yu, identifies more than 2,000 such organizations operating in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Germany. More than 1,000 are operating in the United States.
They span a wide range, including student, business, professional, cultural, and “friendship” groups as well as media outlets.
In this episode, I sit down with Peter Mattis, president of The Jamestown Foundation. Few understand this complex web of Chinese influence and espionage operations as well as he does…
The 116th U.S. Congress held meetings in 2019 that included discussions about the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), with Laird Wilcox, an expert on fringe political movements, providing testimony or commentary. Wilcox critiqued the SPLC’s approach to labeling groups as “hate groups,” suggesting it was incautious and politically motivated.
His remarks were part of a broader congressional examination of extremism and the role of organizations like the SPLC in monitoring far-right activity.
Key points from the context:
On April 9, 2019, a House Judiciary Subcommittee meeting included documents referencing Wilcox’s analysis of the SPLC’s practices.
Wilcox argued that the SPLC used broad and potentially misleading labels, such as “hate group,” without rigorous standards.
The SPLC responded through spokesperson Mark Potok, who dismissed Wilcox as having “an ax to grind” against anti-racist organizations.
These discussions occurred amid growing scrutiny of both extremist movements and the institutions tracking them.
One of the papers linked to the Subcommittee meeting, that was not mentioned is this:
ALPHA: We are on chapter 93 and going to be talking about the Southern Poverty Law Center. It’s been in the headlines and of course we will have a Gladio perspective on that.
Colonel, I reached out to you this morning and you said we should probably talk about this.
06:15
COLONEL: I had looked into the Southern Poverty Law Center probably about a year and a half ago um somewhere in a thread somewhere. And what um what immediately stood out to me is if you go back in writings about the Southern Poverty Law Center, almost every article that someone would write about and um specifically a guy by the name of Laird Wilcox, what I found fascinating is on a regular search engine, number one, you almost cannot find any of his material. And archive.org has almost all of his references dead on archive.org, which was kind of like a red flag to me. But you can go through Yandex and do some digging to find some of his old articles about the Southern Poverty Law Center I posted a bunch of them today and all through the day. Of course everybody ignored him like usual, but he was on to this decades ago.
…During college, Wilcox joined the radical left, a political tradition he inherited from his father. He founded the Student Peace Union and the Kansas Free Press at the University of Kansas. He was active in Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) and the civil-rights movement. Then something happened.
What started out as a noble cause turned ugly. “When it came to the left,” he now says of that time, “I’d never seen such hate in my life.” He quit the movement as he saw it sliding into “mindless nihilism, self-destructiveness, and craziness.”
In 1965, before leaving the university and joining forces with the right to complete his intellectual journey, he sold his collection of political literature to the university for $1,000, thus beginning the Wilcox Collection.
For a time he waltzed as an observer through such organizations as the Ku Klux Klan, the John Birch Society, and some fundamentalist Christian groups. He participated to the fullest and built his collection of literature of the right.
Then Wilcox began to straddle the line. One week he could be seen at a Socialist Workers Party meeting and the next marching with the Nazis. He became plugged in at the highest levels…
“….Recently, [2010] The Social Contract’s contributing editor Peter Gemma [TSC] went to Kansas City to tour the Wilcox Collection and interview Laird Wilcox….”
page 183
TSC: In the course of your research and cataloging work, when did you first become aware of the Southern Poverty Law Center?
Wilcox: About the time they emerged on the scene. Initially, the ideas implied by the name “Southern
Poverty Law Center” sounded kind of appealing, like an organization that would help poor people deal
with their legal problems. After a few years it became apparent that it was nothing like that.
TSC: How did you realize that it’s all a facade, that the SPLC has its own political agenda?
Wilcox: In looking over their fundraising stuff, I could see that they were sensationalizing racial conflict issues, and when their reports on “extremist” groups began appearing it was obviously a bogus fundraising scheme that was into demonizing and blacklisting. It reminded me so much of similar operations that were aimed at leftists during the fifties and sixties, that I concluded it was basically modeled after them…
Laird Wilcox lectures widely on the psychology of ideological belief systems and these topics. — LINK
The above articles are all from Yandex.
….
COLONEL: But what struck me when I was looking at it before, and today, was how often the Southern Poverty Law Center is attached to the ADL, the Anti Defamation League. In almost every article, there’s some tie between the two as far as them tag teaming issues, which again to me is a red flag. So, let’s start off by introducing a couple of the characters we’re going to talk about.
The first one is Morris, and you don’t ever see his middle name used. It’s Seligman, which is a very notorious German Jewish surname. [“Seligman is a surname of German and Ashkenazi Jewish origin, primarily derived from the root word selig (or Yiddish zeleg), meaning “blessed,” “happy,” or “prosperous” — Brave AI– GC] His last name is Dees. So, he’s from an area that’s just east of Montgomery, Alabama. All of the descriptions of him say that he’s the son of a farmer.
09:25
And what’s interesting is that area has been known for a school there just outside of that little town, Mount Meigs. Mount Meigs, had at the beginning of the 1900s, a school there that was a reformatory for black children. Unreformed: the Story of the Alabama Industrial School for Negro Children – GC] And they had young children there. They had middle-aged children there. And basically it was a prison camp and they were starved. I mean there was horrific stories, They were sexually abused there. I found it rather ironic that he grew up in that area while that school was in operation. I just want to explain to people how Orwellian the name is, Southern Poverty Law Center. And that’s going to come back multiple times when I talk about some of the lawsuits that this guy was involved in because he’s a multi, multi, multi-millionaire.
He goes to law school at the University of Alabama and the first thing he does is open a direct mail sales company. He also publishes books and he creates an organization called Fuller and D’s Marketing Group. That’s what he was known for. It grew to be one of the largest publishing companies in the south. And you can’t find any evidence that this guy was concerned about poverty at all, even in his own backyard. No reaching out to any of those people that went through that torture of growing up in that [school.] As a matter of fact, many of the people later on in life resorted to violence and ended up, with life sentences in prison because they were psychologically tortured in that place. There was no legal representation for any of those people. He never went back and revisited any of their sentences, nothing. So to me that’s very noteworthy.
11:59
He gets approached by the Los Angeles Times to buy his publishing company. Now, those of you who followed me long enough understand that the media basically is all part of this [CIA] operation, right? So they offer him something like a million dollars for his publishing and direct sales company. I think that’s the point in which this guy is compromised. Of course he is given all of the normal awards from the establishment. The National Education Association, heaps awards on him. He gets all kinds of accolades like they’re building a portfolio for him. The USJC’s [U.S. Justice Coalition -GC] gives him awards, blah blah blah. In 1967 is the first time he started taking on controversial cases. He filed a suit to stop construction of a white university in an Alabama city that had a black state college there. He also sued to integrate Montgomery’s YMCA, which of course we all think is a great idea.
His partner’s last name is Joseph J. Levin, Jr. They both go to the same school. They graduate from the same law school and go in a business called the Southern Poverty Law Center with a civil rights activist by the name of Julian Bond. So now we’ve got the Southern Law Poverty Law Center. And again, he is heaped with rewards by the likes of the American Bar Association, which is corrupt as hell. [Boy don’t we know it! – GC] It gives him an award. The American Civil Liberties Union, ACLU, gives him an award. I already mentioned the National Education One. So in 1972, he becomes the finance director for George McGovern’s presidential campaign because he’s a whiz at direct mailing, he raises over $24 million for George McGovern using his technique. He also served as President Carter’s national finance director in 1976. He served as the national finance chairman for Senator Kennedy’s 1980 presidential campaign. Now, you won’t be surprised at all if I tell you that if you go to the Southern Poverty Law C Center’s website and want to donate, do you know who runs their donations? Act Blue.
So Dees becomes the chief trial council at the Southern Poverty Law Center and he participates in creating that hate map. He’s infamous for suing quote unquote hate groups that he also funds. Kind of like the self-licking ice cream cone. And every case that he takes he uses as a marketing tool. So he says that he’s representing John Doe and then he advertises and uses direct mailing to get millions of dollars, donations from everybody. BUT while he’s representing these people, he doesn’t share any of that money with the victims of the lawsuits. And I’ll come back to that in a minute.
17:00
So he writes books. And one of the first books he writes is A Season for Justice. He also writes a book called Hate on Trial: The Case Against America’s Most Dangerous Neo-Nazis that was published in early 1990s. And it basically talks about a trial and a $12.5 million judgment against a quote unquote white supremacist Tom Mezer and his white Aryan resistance group for beating up a young black student in Portland, Oregon. His third book was called Gathering Storm: America’sMilitia Threat. Of course then he goes out and creates his own militia. So he has now combined all of those aspects.
I need to also say this guy was married four times that I could track. In his last divorce, the woman accused him of being a pedophile for trying to go to bed with her daughter from another marriage and being gay and having sex with somebody that he tried to get into a threesome with his wife. He also was accused multiple times of sexually harassing females at Southern Poverty Law Center. Now, you can discount the divorce stuff cuz that came out in the divorce, the stuff about him being a pedophile and gay. You can take that for whatever it’s worth. There are charges made in divorces that are not necessarily true, but that’s part of this whole guy’s persona. So, just putting that out there.
So let me go back and talk about Joseph Levin, his law partner. As I said before, he graduated from University of Alabama with a law degree as well. He spent two years in the US Army and he goes into business at the Southern Poverty. They had a law firm and then that law firm basically becomes Southern Poverty Law Center.
20:10
I want to get to this other guy because he’s very interesting. He had a couple of things to say. He was one of the original guys that Dees was in business with. His name was Millard Fuller. He’ was Dees marketing guy. He allows Dees to buy him out from that marketing firm and donates all of that money to charity and he then goes on to establish Habitat for Humanity. So apparently he’s a good guy. But one of the articles that quoted Fuller that I saw basically said that his complaint and why he wanted out of that business was that Dees had said to him that he was only in it for the money. He was going to do whatever it took to get rich. And Fuller being more of a humanitarian was in it for the right reasons. So at that point I’ve made my assessment of what type of a person Dees is. I think that’s critical background for understanding the Southern Poverty Law Center.
So, one of the first things that struck me is that the Southern Poverty Law Center, their big famous thing that they produce is called an intelligence report, which of course for me is like what? Who does that? Who writes an intelligence report at a nonprofit NGO? Like nobody, unless you’re in it for other reasons. So the intelligence report is the crux of the whole thing. The people that are in this intelligence group inside the Southern Poverty Law Center monitors hate groups and racial extremists throughout the United States and exposes their activities to law enforcement agencies, the media, and the public. They are quoted as saying, “We publish our investigative findings online in the intelligence report. our award winning quarterly journal.” Of course, this intelligence report is used by law enforcement all over the country.
If you were the CIA, hypothetically, and you wanted to operate inside the United States and target groups, would you not use an organization like the Southern Poverty Law Center who has their own intelligence body inside of it?
ALPHA: Absolutely, I would.
COLONEL: And when you look at the production of the identification of hate groups, do you think 764or Transtifa or any of those are on there as a hate group or the Muslim extremists? No. No, they’re not. They’re not on there anywhere. The only ones that are really on there are basically the more patriot focused organizations. You’ll find one or two, but it’s primarily focused at exactly the same people, the nationalists, that the CIA targets overseas. So if you go into any of the 90 plus countries that we’ve talked about, the focus is always on the people that don’t play ball, right? So you go to the Tupamaros en Chile, they are the ones that are the nationalist that don’t want the CIA operating and wants their government as a representative democracy. So, I have a sneaking suspicion that we’re going to find out that there are direct ties domestically. And these are one of the exact same organizations that we’ve looked at overseas multiple times in our Gladio series because they fit the exact footprint. So, let me transition here.
25:50
ALPHA: I like what you said there and I hope people caught it. You know, that it mimics the exact same footprint because that’s what matters. For those of you that saw last week’s show, you know, one of the organizations that Colonel was talking about and I was like, “Hey, this really sounds like Red Seat Ventures” Well, this is that situation what we’ve been talking about, you know, on all these different countries. Now you look at the behavior of the Southern Poverty Law Center and it mimics the same behavior. So I hope people caught what you said right there.
26:16
COLONEL: Let’s go over a little bit. We all know that there was an indictment that was released. It indicates that there was fraud and money laundering going on inside. Again this is another part of the whole footprint because that’s exactly what was going on in overseas vehicles that were used by the CIA to destabilize countries. So, when you look at them through your Gladio glasses, SPLC does not appear to be a civil rights watchdog. I’m going to go through a couple of cases in just a second, but it’s an institutionalized center for strategy of tension. So, if I can fund raise off of hate, I have to have hate. So if I don’t have enough hate, I just create the hate and I fund raise off of exposing the hate that I actually funded. And so I’m I’m going to get to a couple of examples of that, too.
I was trying to put all of this into words. What I came up with was it is the foundational logic of Gladio operations throughout Europe and around the world. Intelligence services and their proxies infiltrate extremist factions on both the far right and far left. The objective was never to eliminate dissent, but to facilitate and control chaos by funding, guiding, and radicalizing groups that were already pre-disposed to violence. These actors created a perpetual state of fear, justifying the expansion of state powers, the suppression of political enemies, and the validation of existing elite narratives. The indictment confirms that this model has been imported and institutionalized in American nonprofit sectors which is again exactly how USAID does it overseas using NOS’s. They do that by funneling millions of dollars to highly placed figures in the Ku Klux Klan and neo-Nazi movements. The SPLC ensured that these groups stayed active, visible, and violent when they might have otherwise withered into irrelevance. This provided a steady state of quote unquote racism, even if it’s manufactured, that served as raw material for their fundraising apparatus. It’s the perfect system, generate the problem, weaponize the problem, and secure tax-exempt funding and use the money to fuel the problem further. And of course, we know the Southern Poverty Law Center material is used by the FBI. It’s used by police departments. And they use it as part of congressional testimony.
29:40
ALPHA:I told you before the show that I referenced them in a search warrant that I did many years ago. You think the data, because it’s used by these other entities and it’s referenced and you’re like, “Oh, this is legitimate.” And then you get over here and you’re just like, “Well, yeah, the numbers might have been real, but only because they created them.”
COLONEL: Right? So, the indictment also says that they created entities and potentially shell accounts that mirror all of the organizational structure used in Gladio overseas. They paid informants to stoke racial hatred or coordinated logistical support for rallies such as the 2017 Charlottesville event. Did you know that they were intimately involved in Charlottesville?
30:49
ALPHA: I do now and have been over the last 24 hours. i don’t know what you’ve researched, but a lot of the information that’s circulating, I have not vetted it, but a lot of the information circulating is that Charlottesville event is one of the events that helped launch Nick Fuentes’s notoriety.
COLONEL: Correct.
ALPHA: Interesting.
COLONEL: Yes. Isn’t it? and they provided logistical support. You know, if you read through it, it looks almost like they were controlling it. They talked about it and they even had several days before scenarios about using vehicles to run over people. So this is the textbook example of agent provocateur tactics used by the CIA and their European counterparts to ensure geopolitical and social outcomes are steered exactly where they want them to head. They didn’t act in a vacuum. They were deeply integrated in the FBI and political establishments, which allowed its quote unquote hate group list to act as a de-facto policy manual for domestic security. It created a feedback loop where the government and the quote unquote watchdog acted as a unified unaccountable superstructure that defined who the domestic enemy was in order for them to take action against them. SPLC’s role in this destabilization project goes beyond just money. It centers on the American heartland by demonizing the identity of historic white Christian population and labeling their legitimate political concerns as extremism.
The SPLC has been the primary engine for managed decline, and racial tension. By equating American nationalism with violent fringe groups they essentially subsidized, they effectively de-legitimized any serious attempt at organizing any type of national interest or conservative preservation in the United States. They criminalized being a patriot. That’s the bottom line. They criminalized being an American first patriot.
Now, this goes back to when we were talking about the three events with the Ruby Ridge, Waco, and Oklahoma, right?
33:45
ALPHA: Correct.
COLONEL: Also, there were SPLC infiltrators in the Aryan Nation all, over, to include the Oklahoma location where Timothy McVeigh hung out. Where we also found Strassmeir who I track back to Germany whose dad [the Chief of Staff to Chancellor Helmut Kohl per WIKI –GC] was intimately involved as Germany’s what they call the Department of interior guy during the Gladio operations where there were bombings all over Germany. So his dad was the government entity in Germany responsible for preventing those but they happened everywhere and included killing several US service members in those bombings. That guy’s son was at the Aryan Nation location in Oklahoma where Timothy McVeigh was hanging out. He’s the guy that was, after the bombing, escorted out of the country. Kind of like the JFK, OAS agent was escorted out of the country by the Dallas Police Department. So, the Southern Poverty Law Center, like I said, had infiltrators inside, if not paying for some of the rabble rousing that was going on in the Aryan Nation location in Oklahoma. It’s all connected.
So, they basically provided The Hegelian Dialect. They provided the thesis i.e. extreme manufactured racism and the anti-thesis of globalist multi-cultural establishment, which they fully endorse. Keeping the public locked into this dialectical conflict that prevents any serious discussion of the collapse of the nuclear family or the erosion of national sovereignty or anything else. Because as soon as you broach those subjects, you’re called a racist, right? So, obviously this indictment exposes the administrative state here in the United States and their reliance on a controlled opposition. If you’ve got to create hate groups, you really don’t have hate unless you manufacture it.
A couple of key points on the indictment. The Southern Poverty Law Center and its affiliated financial entities constituted a massive indictment that is far worse than racketeering or state sponsored disruption. They talk in the indictment about racketeering and fraudulent conduit schemes. They alleged that they functioned as an expansive racketeering enterprise. It’s accused of utilizing pass through entities and domestic NGOs to move millions of dollars to fringe extremist organizations. It’s documented through a series of quote unquote consulting fees and research grants that were in practice salaries and operational subsidies for leadership figures in self-styled white supremacist and separatist groups. This goes back to your comment about Nick Fuentes, right? How many of these people that are spewing this garbage are on the SPLC’s pay list?
ALPHA: It’s absolutely important because you made me spawn a thought and that thought led to another one and I’m trying to find it right now to verify some information. I’m going to look a little deeper before I mentioned the second one. But one of the things that came to mind was, you remember the Sedition Hunters?
38:50
COLONEL: Oh yes.
ALPHA: Because they were targeting a bunch of us.
COLONEL: I know they targeted my neighbors.
ALPHA:Exactly. And a lot of people might remember ‘Maga Granny’ , the one that ended up flipping on Trump? She tried to out me but didn’t realize that I keep everything recorded and long story short, she started working with the Sedition Hunters. People that are, very loyal to this show and cared about me took it upon themselves to go do investigations and were like, “Hey, look at this brand new car she’s driving after she’s talking about doing all these fundraisers, and It was just very interesting. So I’m very curious to what kind of connections the Southern Poverty Law Center had to the Sedition Hunters. But another organization I’m curious to if there’s any connections and I found one I’m trying to verify it right now as well, it is The Lincoln Project. And so you got my mind going because like you just said, it’s this this big circle of organizations. it’s the intelligence apparatus saying let’s just create these other organizations that don’t have to submit to FOIA. they don’t have to submit to different things that are out there.
COLONEL: They’re fronts.
ALPHA: They’re fronts, but here’s the other part. It is knowing that the FBI starting with them is something that would mimic a very large RICO case because you’re building your way up to the way this works. So, anyway, my mind’s going wild and I hope people are paying attention, because for all the people out there that have been screaming nothing’s happening. I think this is going to be freaking huge. I think this is Pandora’s. Colonel Please continue.
41:47
COLONEL: Okay. Also in the indictment, they were accused of sending direct payments from SPLC linked accounts to bank accounts of identified extremists by the SPLC. So they identify them, then they pay them. These funds were used for tactical gear, travel, and logistics for rallies intended to draw mass media attention and public outrage. The indictment alleges a revolving door between radical group leadership, [and] the SPLC consulting roles. By paying these figures to maintain their visibility, the SPLC ensured a constant supply of inflammatory imagery and audio to sustain high levels of fear, to encourage donations and to add legitimacy to a increasingly bigger surveillance state. The indictment challenges the SPLC’s tax-exempt status by demonstrating that its core activity was not educational or legal advocacy but political warfare. Which is huge. It also says that they had tracked hundreds of millions of dollars to offshore accounts. And again, how ‘Gladio’ is that? They argue that they were not legitimate endowments, but a war chest intended to influence internal political outcomes, probably used for overseas as well. Allegations include a systemic filing of false financial disclosures with the IRS, failing to disclose the true nature of the expenditures and misidentifying political activities as civil rights legal defense.
44:06
ALPHA: So, let me plug in a little information here because it ties into legal defenses. I told you I was looking at Southern Poverty Law Center and the Lincoln Project to see if there’s any connections. Now, this is cursory level just so folks understand. I haven’t gone deep into it. And here’s one of the ones that we have. First, the breakdown January 5th, 2021. This is from the Lincoln Project, the their program listed Nancy Abudu as a guest. Separate sources identify Abudu at the time as an SPLC voting rights
leader and later a strategic litigation leader. That is a documented personnel crossover in a media appearance. So there’s one. The second one, and this comes in 2024, the Georgia election case. The court filing hosted on SPLC’s site shows SPLC lawyers representing one group of Amichi while the same filing certificate of service separately lists councils for Georgia First Incorporated and the Lincoln Project Incorporated. That shows that SPLC and the Lincoln Project were at least in line on the same side of that litigation.
45:46
COLONEL: It fits the pattern.
ALPHA: This is gonna be big.
COLONEL: That’s a great find. So obviously they have a monopoly on the watch list or terrorist list. The prosecution for the indictment argues that the information used by the SPLC to lobby federal law enforcement both at DHS and FBI was often derived from individuals that the SPLC was funding. Talk about a self-licking ice cream cone! It alleges that SPLC provided evidence of domestic threats to federal agencies that they themselves had manufactured via their network of informants and subsidized radicals. This is framed as a breach of federal law regarding the manipulation of intelligence and the subversion of internal security processes. Because they’re basically passing off fake information. Oh, who else does that? Oh, I don’t know. the CIA who actually creates intelligence as opposed to gathering intelligence? That’s exactly what SPLC is doing. They’re acting as a mini CIA domestically. That’s exactly what the indictment says. They are part of Operation Gladio in the United States.
ALPHA:100%. Because it’s my opinion that’s what Sedition Hunters were. They were doxing all of us and they were doing that at the behest of the corrupt side of the intelligence agencies.
COLONEL: Well, there’s there’s I wouldn’t even say they were doxing. They were literally tracking people down.
So, just so you guys know, I’ve told this story a couple of times. I had a friend of mine that was running for political office in the local area here and she knew a lot of people and she talked to all the cops and the fire department blah blah blah cuz she was running for mayor. She called me one day and said I needed to meet her immediately. I had made it well known that my neighbors were the three people in my hometown here that were implicated in January 6th and they were tracking one of them down. They couldn’t find him. The other two had on electronic monitors so they could try to find the third one since they all are related. So I drove over and met her and she just handed me a piece of paper. In the note that she handed me, because she didn’t want to even say it out loud, was that the sedition hunters had been to all of the local businesses here asking about that guy. The one that got away. That they couldn’t find. And so I went to my friend who is the aunt of the one that they couldn’t find and walked out in the woods and had a conversation with her husband about that. I just handed him the note. We had a conversation talking about just how ridiculous the whole thing was. But they were actively combing the area, talking to every business owner, trying to find him. They were conducting a manhunt. It was crazy.
So the prosecution claims that SPLC’s actions were intended to spark civil unrest by intentionally facilitating high-profile confrontations. The SPLC created an environment where the state could justify their surveillance of political dissident, which is exactly what they’ve [CIA] done in every country. This is the Phoenix Program, people. The censorship of alternative media and the expansion of de domestic counter-terror authorities. SEE: The CIA’s ‘Phoenix Program’ in Vietnam: Practice run for the “war on terror”
The filing also argues that SPLC utilized these manufactured tensions to prevent any broad based consensus among American citizenry, specifically by weaponizing the quote unquote hate group label to shut down any legitimate debate regarding immigration, demographic shifts, or the erosion of the traditional American values.
50:37
Now let’s talk about Patriot Front. Do you remember them?
ALPHA: Oh, I do.
COLONEL: And everybody kept saying that they were basically FBI agents, right? >>
Well, the indictment of the Southern Poverty Law Center addresses Patriot Front, characterizing the organization not as an independent grassroots entity, but as a critical node in an SPLC managed controlled opposition network. It provided a detailed breakdown of the institutional and financial intersections which aligned with operational patterns observed in many of the overseas operations. It says that the operational capacity of Patriot Front was significantly enabled by funds originating from SPLC linked entities like direct wire transfers. Supposedly they conducted forensic accounting and it presented consistent masked wire transfers from NGOS’s under the SPLC umbrella to private accounts owned by key Patriot Front leadership. The indictment links SPLC funds to specific logistical expenditures. Remember all those vans? Those U-Haul vans? Those expenditures included the leasing of those vans, the procurement of uniforms, and the purchasing of communication equipment used during high profile demonstrations. No wonder they all got away all the time and nobody tried to unmask them except for a few times. They also said that documents indicated that the timing, locations, and specific messaging of Patriot Front marches was coordinated to coincide with political moments where white supremacist threat narrative needed to surge. The indictment says that SPLC pushed for the use of mask face coverings for Patriot Front members. This was not a security measure for the members, but a deliberate tactical decision to prevent personal identification and ensure they remained viewed by the public as a monolithic threat to individuals.
ALPHA:Now, can you see the screen Colonel?
COLONEL: Yep.
53:19
ALPHA: So, this flag here to the left, one of the first things that caught my attention, there were so many obvious signs here, but I want you guys to pay attention what our star where our stars would normally be. And any of you that have followed any of the coverage that I’ve been doing, you know, over the last couple years on the Azov battalion and the Nazis and Ukraine and all that stuff going on, you will recognize that symbol [Used by the Patriot Front – Wiki –GC] because it is also known as the black sun. And so I’ll just read just the first two sentences. “The black sun is a type of sun wheel symbol originating in Nazi Germany and later employed by neo-Nazis and other far-right individuals and groups. “WIKI
THE BLACK SUN
“Former badge of the Azov Brigade,
which uses a Black Sun and the
National Idea symbol in the forefront”
COLONEL: No, they’re trying to create them. They’re trying to create a narrative. It was a Psyops. It was a psychological operation conducted on the American people.
54:14
ALPHA: So this way you remember. You make it look organic but it’s synthetic. That way once you do get ordinary people sucked into it emotionally and make the mistake then those people are going to get hammered. It’s the whole thing in Michigan with Gretchen Whitmer. And the brothers and all that stuff that went out there. It’s 90% FBI agents, 10% people. That was the operation. That’s ridiculous. And and and there’s no tactical leader in the world that would have ever allowed a legitimate operation like that to go through. If they were legitimate. If I would have went to my police chief and said, “Hey, chief, you know, there’s these two guys and I think we can bust them being part of an organization.” How big’s the organization? Well, 12 members. Well, ain’t 10 of you guys in there, though. That’s besides the point. He would have looked at me like, “You’re crazy. What’s wrong with you guys?” But yet, that’s what they did.
55:21
COLONIAL: It also suggests that SPLC researchers were the ones providing the guidance for Patriot Front rhetoric. When Patriot Front would subsequently release a manifesto or make a provocative statement, the SPLC would then discover. in air quotes and highlight this rhetoric to the FBI or DOJ and media, thereby validating their own manufactured feedback loop. So, I’m going to give you the script, you read it, and then I’m going to act outraged. The indictment claims that SPLC personnel served as a clearing house for information provided to federal agencies regarding Patriot Front activities, effectively curating which extreme groups the government would focus on and which ones they would allow to operate unhindered, which again is exactly what the CIA does overseas. The indictment further contends that the Patriot Front was maintained purposely to erode the legitimacy of the broader American nationalist movement by keeping the group active, well funded, and highly visible. They created a psychological lightning rod. Every action taken by the Patriot Front was used to broaden the definition of hate to cover mainstream patriotic and pro-Western sentiment. The indictment says that SPLC used these stunts to pressure corporations, social media platforms, and political representatives to de-platform and suppress nonviolent legitimate desenters by associating them with the manufactured optic of the Patriot Front, which they themselves created. So it basically functioned as a part of the strategy of tension serving as a foil that SPLC could manipulate to justify suppression of the historic American population. The indictment represents the group as a modern-day iteration of a false front organization utilizing intelligence operations to ensure legitimate political opposition remains trapped by characterized by radical optic and damaging. That’s crazy.
58:12
Now, let me go back to the comparison of the SPLC and the anti-defamation league, the ADL…
I started doing a side-by-side comparison of the tactics used by the ADL for their agenda and the SPLC for their agenda. And it’s weird just how closely they mirror each other. They basically are operating like a two-headed monster within the administrative state. They actually share intelligence data between the intelligence project of the SPLC and the ADL’s center on extremism. They function as a private sector CIA for domestic social management. They share files on political dissident, coordinate de-platforming campaigns against journalists and activists and trade information with the federal law enforcement to ensure that their version of hate becomes codified in state sanctioned policy. By having two massive tax-exempt organizations reporting on the same threat, they create an echo – system. If the SPLC identifies an individual as dangerous, the ADL echoes it and vice versa. This creates a feedback loop for media outlets themselves often staffed by people with similar ideological commitments and they can then treat it as objective truth with independent verification of the other. It provides a cover of legitimacy that destroys people’s livelihood and reputations.
Both the SPLC and the ADL have been the tip of the spear for advocating for mass migration, the eraser of heritage-based identities for the majority population and the active promotion of multiculturalism. The globalist agenda. It’s a deliberate strategy, a form of social engineering that effectively functions as a survival mechanism against perceived threats. The ADL pioneered this industry obviously with the historical trauma of the Holocaust as a political cudgel to shield its own political agenda from criticism. And what does the SPLC use? Slavery. It’s the same thing. Their tactics are identical to each other. Almost like they share it.
62:54
ALPHA: Well, what you’re looking the timing of this exposure is good. really really good because and I mentioned this on on my show earlier this week, Colonel, the Carmela Anthony case is coming into play. And I’ve had been warning people since last year, keep your eyes on this case. They’re going to use it. If the religious tribalism is not getting the results they want, they’re going to default to back to the one that they know always works. Black versus white in these crimes. I go, “So, keep an eye on the Karmelo Anthony case.” and that, you know, the judge came out and and had some choice words about not letting people exploit it. But seeing that these institutions are getting exposed now, that’s a good thing because it can probably rug-pull any event that they probably had planned for that trial. >>
63:48
COLONEL: Yep. I couldn’t agree with you more. So both groups are currently acting as enforcers of post-Christian globalist regime and in our case regime change. they basically are trying to set the agenda of what’s acceptable politically to talk about. They also thrive on the existence of domestic conflict, which of course destabilization, which is what the CIA is known for. Without an extremist boogeyman, their funding evaporates, their influence declines, and their reason for existence vanishes. They have successfully embedded themselves as recognized experts into the FBI, the DOJ, the Department of Homeland Security, and many other organizations to include the military when the government produces domestic terrorism briefings. They are often essentially citing reports generated by the SPLC or the ADL. This is basically a private public outsourcing of state power.
…The other thing. The SPLC was intimately involved in a lawsuit with the Women’s League of Voters, .. they joined up with the Women’s League of Voters to thwart the lawsuits that happened about the 2020 census. They challenged whether or not you could count illegal immigrants. They both got together and if you look over the list of people that donate large large sums of money to the SPLC, it’s a very interesting list that looks exactly like the oligarchs that we’ve talked about in the past.
66:41
ALPHA:Here’s some names right here.
COLONEL:Oh, look, JP Morgan and George Soros. What? That’s crazy. You mean the same JP Morgan that funds all of this Gladio shit and George Soros that funds all of this Gladio shit more recently? They would be funding the SPLC. Yes. Yes, they would.
ALPHA: I’m very shocked.
67:04
COLONEL: Yeah. Isn’t that interesting? There’s a ton more, but I think we’ve pretty much made the case that this is definitely Operation Gladio inside the United States.
ALPHA: It is. I want to just highlight my brother Shawn Taylor. He sent me this. “Share this I got to help make it go viral. So I will be posting it It comes from the pamphleteer out in Nashville. I haven’t had a chance to verify this story, so I want to be very clear about that. The SPLC is a recurring character in the Phil investigation. If you guys remember, this is Phil Williams. We’re talking NC5 News out there in Tennessee. This is the one that came after brother Shawn Taylor, the Millersville PD when they were looking into the cases that involved some of the corruption there, the human trafficking there, the child trafficking there. But they had also stumbled upon a gentleman, I don’t remember his name, so I don’t want to get inaccurate, but they had a drone contract with our department defense to train the guys out in Ukraine over this. And it was a large contract. And when the TBI raided them because they said this investigation that they’re doing into human and child trafficking went beyond the scope of their duty. One of the things in their search warrant that they asked the judge for was files related to that guy, which had nothing to do with those other cases. But on the heels of yesterday’s indictment, Williams Confronting Hate Series, which builds its authority off the SPLC’s work, is worthy of further scrutiny. So, looks like there might even be some connections coming out of there, folks. And I think you’re going to see this on a lot of things. I think this is the rugpull of that. call me excited cuz I am, Colonel. And for those that have been tracking my other shows, I told everybody, and this lines up in that window, that we were going to see some people that were just going to start disappearing off of social media. Not violent stuff, just their accounts were going to start vanishing. I think related to that because once the funding is removed from all these inorganic accounts that are out there that are pushing this propaganda they’re going to disappear. The only reason they’re doing it is money or something that might be leveraged on them and I think we are going to see social media heads that are going to find themselves if not charged at least named in the indictments, Things like what they did with Patriot Front. I think we are going to see that broaden into some of these other third party applications. They try to use shell companies to conceal everything. And so when these influencers.. then you find out who was paying them and before you know it, you’re just like, “Oh, so it was money that just got washed a few times in in laundry before it made its way to these influencers.” I really do believe that we’re going to see stuff like that, Colonel.
70:34
COLONEL: Oh, 100%. You definitely need to be looking at that exact thing because they apparently have been doing this for a very long time. I did want to mention when I was talking about some of the lawsuits they were involved in. So, this black woman had her son killed by what was alleged to be a Klu Klux Klan hit .They the SPLC sue and she got a single digit million dollar settlement, but the people that were involved involved had $52,000 to their name. So that was what the grieving mother was going to receive from the lawsuit. Meanwhile, thanks to Mr. Dees’ direct mailing, he got double digit millions of dollars frpm being involved in that lawsuit. And that woman saw not a penny of it. Not a penny. And she got like a $6 million award during the trial, but of course the people didn’t have the money, so she didn’t get that. She got like $50,000. This is repeated throughout their very selective taking of cases. [example of another case.]
And that so that brings in a completely different line. These are the same people, the ADL and the SPLC that were the backing of hate crimes. Just like they tried to do with the terrorism charge on January 6ers, right? So, you can you convict them of something and then you up-charge them with a terrorism enhancement. That’s what hate crime is. There’s no such thing as a hate crime. That’s BULLSHIT. And you know who created that? The SPLC and the ADL. And so if you kill somebody and that somebody happens to be a minority, they can upcharge you for that. It’s still murder. If it even is murder and not self-defense, it’s murder. It has nothing to do with the race of the victim, but thanks to these people and all of their nefarious bullshit and they will encourage hate crimes because they profit off of them. They turn everything into a hate crime to profit off of them.
75:25
ALPHA: I know what it’s like being on the law enforcement side of this. In the area where I was working, we had a a a larger than average demographic of people from the LGBT community. You would get the news trying to influence investigations, trying to say that this was against somebody’s sexuality. We know the facts of the case had nothing to do with that. This was just a robbery. There needs to be people held accountable… But again, it’s one of those things where on the law enforcement side, if you are the good guys and you’re honest investigators, you can see the media manipulation. Now, granted, if you got some good administration, good chiefs like we did, they’ll pull back the radios. “Hey, these encrypted radios we gave you guys, we’re going to take those back.” And it’s the the politics, right? That tug-of-war went back and forth. If you’re going to go out there and try to influence our investigations, well, these, , extra things that we’ve given you that we don’t have to give you, well, we’re going to pull that back. But imagine areas where you got corrupt law enforcement administration, you got corrupt media, and then you have entities like this. You’re screwed.
77:02
COLONEL: I also think it’s very very important to look at everything that has happened since the 2015 time frame of this massive ramping up. So today when I was looking into this was looking at the numbers of alleged KKK. So back in the day, in the 60s or 50s time frame, you saw like tens of thousands of estimated KKK members. The number had dwindled down to like under 5,000 and that’s lumping a whole bunch of people in that may or may not have been KKK members but you see the significant drop off. It was reported as 50 or 60,000 and you’re down to 4,000. But they can’t let it die. You know that whole thing of David Duke and his association and they’re talking to Trump about oh my god he endorsed you well let’s go back and look how much David Duke got paid from the SPLC wouldn’t that be an interesting number to know because you have to have somebody like that to create that narrative right? And that was their go to thing to denounce him… I’ll give you this money so I can use you as a statistic in my Hate Map.
And I also came across something where somebody said that the SPLC put Charlie Kirk and Turning Point [on their Hate Map] l right before he was assassinated.
ALPHA: Wow. Well, this is how it works. If you go back to The ‘Seditious Six? They did that. Five of them excluding the the military dude, five of them all had training from the same activist organization. All of this all of this is is them.
80:23
COLONEL: But again so we were just doing the Lebanon thing. How MI6 had created that training to deploy in Lebanon to create those activists. [mi6-plots-with-islamistsclosest I can come –GC]
It’s the exact same thing. This has been done all over. They did it in Chile. In all of these different coups that we’ve looked at. They basically just train people in those stay-behind units to create havoc. It wasn’t a more sophisticated destabilization. But that started changing in the early 1970s. The first one that I noticed significantly with the training aspect of actually teaching people how to be the agitators was in the Chile in 73-74 time frame. So from then on it gets progressively more sophisticated and you get to 2004 when they did the first coup in Ukraine and then up to the 2014 one for the Maidan coup and it’s much more sophisticated as far as training the people. The whole Serbian and Croatia destabilization with the Albert Einstein Institute. So now they have actual entities that are making their livelihood on setting up these regime change destabilization efforts.
And the SPLC is doing in the United States is the same thing the Albert Einstein Institute did overseas. They’re doing the exact same thing. I hope that came across today. They have very nefarious beginnings as far as I’m concerned when he sells his direct mail order business to a media company called the LA Times. And he then uses that money to launch the SPLC. This just stinks of CIA all over.
82:45
ALPHA: 100% agree with you on on that, Colonel. And you know, we knew the timing window. I don’t know if you’ve heard me say in some other shows, but we’re approaching that choke point. Trump and them are. I always knew they’re going to weaponize. I kept telling everybody, you’re going to see all kinds of stuff happen in a very small window. How do I know? Because it’s what they were trying to do to Trump and the good guys. Overwhelm them with everything. Impeachments, you know, this is going on. That investigation, did he declassify?
You overwhelm everybody with this. So, nobody knows where to even begin to fight. And that’s exactly what’s happening to the deep state right now. That’s exactly what’s happening to the globalists and all their funding apparatuses. Trump is brilliant.
COLONEL: I meant to say this earlier. The first black lawyer that worked for the SPLC quit. He was disgusted with the SPLC. And that to me says everything. He was absolutely disgusted with what he saw on the inside of the SPLC. There were numerous people that were alleged to have sexual relationships with Dees during his tenure there. That’s probably why he was married four times. It certainly was an allegation in the last divorce proceedings. but there were lots of accusations and workplace shenanigans going on in the SPLC.
84:50
ALPHA: There was. And then I don’t know if you saw this when I brought this guy up from one of the founders from the SPLC. You brought him up. Joseph Levin. Talk about limited info. It is Like they scrape this guy’s digital footprint very, very well. That what you see on the screen for a cursory search. Obviously, if you start using some of these other sites like Yandex and all that, you’ll probably get more, but
COLONEL: No, no, there’s almost nothing out there on him.
ALPHA: Wow. So, that in and of itself tells you a lot. Colonel.
There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.
Do not forget to LABEL AI articles video and such.
Lurking Lawyer here. Follow up to a late subcomment on a previous thread, with more clarity. If the supposed presser is timed to IG report release, then based on Sessions comments, McCabe firing, and Nunes memo, here is what is going on. Sessions explicitly said had brought in an experienced non-DC DoJ prosecutor. That means somewhere in flyover country. Inference is to work alongside IG, who can only refer crimes for prosecution. We know there were crimes, because McCabes firing was for ‘lacking candor—including under oath’. That is codespeak for criminal federal perjury 18USC1621. McCabes Saturday statement shows Comey also committed perjury—same statute. Trumped tweeted this weekend, just left out the legal part (but he surely knows). We know from the Nunes memo on FISA court abuse plus Comey’s sworn testimony about the dossier being unverified plus McCabes sworn testimony that without it there would have been no FISA warrant or renewals that Loretta Lynch, Sally Yates, Comey, and probably McCabe made false attestations about the Steele dossier to FISA. Those are all felonies under 18USC1018 (and diGenova says there are a total of six felonies—one suffices for this comment). We know from Comey’s mid 2016 announcement about Hillary and her email server that Hillary is guilty under 18USC798, which does not require intent and is the same statute used to send the navy submariner to prison for year (who Trump just pardons, which means he and Sessions know a lot more about what I am saying than they are letting on… And just to round up, it is highly likely that Strzok, Page, both Ohrs, and others gave false statements to the IG early in his investigations, in violation of 18USC1001 — the same felony to which Mueller forced Flynn to plead guilty. Now, where does this lead? The flyover country prosecutor has impaneled a secret grand jury. He is presenting them with this evidence. There is no need for the grand jury to hear witnesses on any of this. They are returning sealed indictments on all of the above named. Remember, Trump rally chants of ‘lock her up’ were more of a campaign promise to be kept. The DNC and Hillary’s campaign paid Fusion GPS to pay Steele for the dossier, when OHR met Steele in London and reported back to FBI in writing that Steele was rabidly antiTrump (per Nunes memo). More than enough reason formTrump to direct his white hat team to proceed on HRC. Only thing I don’t know is whether they can also get Obama. The Susan Rice CYA email about the Jan 5 WH meeting (especially if there were priors) written as Trump was being inaugurated suggests maybe yes.
So my quite educated guess is that the rumored presser will be Trump and Sessions unsealing all these prebaked indictments (the Big Ugly unveiled), with diGenova then to unpack it all to stunned Dems and MSM. And that will nicely set the midterms table for Crumbs Pelosi, Shutdown Shumer, the Dem stiffed DACA deal (a brilliant Trump gambit), and a lot more.
2. Durham ‘take-over’ Huber [select parts re: CF-i]? What if there’s another prosecutor (outside of DC) assigned by SESSIONS w/ the same mandate/authority?
Sometimes you need to ‘take one for the team publicly’ before you are vindicated as a hero.
Q
Hopefully we will soon see if Q is correct about Huber, Durham and Sessions.
The Debriefing 17
In 2017, Trump began laying the legal minefield. In 2019, he pulled the trigger — reissuing Executive Order 13224 under EO 13886 and quietly upgrading it into a global financial kill switch.
🤔Imagine the U.S. government has four big legal "kill switches" sitting on a shelf. Each one was built at a different time, by a different president, for a different reason. But they all work the same way: the president flips the switch by declaring a national emergency, and… https://t.co/tTKA8AZyHs
🤔 Imagine the U.S. government has four big legal “kill switches” sitting on a shelf. Each one was built at a different time, by a different president, for a different reason. But they all work the same way: the president flips the switch by declaring a national emergency, and once it’s flipped, the Treasury Department gets superpowers.
What the superpowers actually are:
👉 Freeze anyone’s money. Any foreign person, anywhere in the world, who fits the category. No trial. No warning. No Congress vote needed for each one.
👉 Block their property. Houses, bank accounts, crypto wallets, yachts, businesses frozen.
👉 The “you helped them, you’re next” rule. If you did business with someone on the list your bank, your lawyer, your shipping company, your crypto exchange you can get added to the list too. This is the cascade. One name becomes ten. Ten becomes a hundred.
👉 The secret list. There’s a public list everyone sees, and a classified list nobody sees. We don’t know how many names are on the secret one.
The four switches:
Switch #1 Terrorists (built 2001 after 9/11, upgraded 2019). Originally for al-Qaeda. The 2019 upgrade made it cover way more people anyone who “trains,” “leads,” or “supports” a terror group, defined broadly.
Switch #2 Corrupt people and human rights abusers (built 2017). Cartels, kleptocrats, traffickers, dirty officials anywhere on Earth.
Switch #3 Hackers and election meddlers (built 2015, upgraded 2016 and 2018). Russian troll farms, ransomware gangs, foreign election interference.
Switch #4 Sketchy foreign tech (built 2019). The one used to ban Huawei.
Here’s the part that matters:
Every single one of these switches was flipped on and never flipped off. Not by the president who came after. Not by the next one. Every year, each president has to sign a piece of paper saying “yep, still an emergency, keep it running.” Every president has signed. Every year. For up to 25 years on the oldest one.
That means the legal machinery to freeze assets, blacklist networks, and unravel criminal organizations worldwide has been quietly running in the background the entire time through Bush, Obama, Trump, Biden, Trump again. It doesn’t matter who’s in the White House. The machine keeps running.
Why this matters for the framework:
When you see a giant crypto seizure ($15 billion from Chen Zhi), or a cartel boss arrested, or a Russian oligarch’s yacht impounded, or a crypto mixer shut down that’s not random. That’s one of these four switches being used. The switches were built years before the enforcement wave started. The enforcement wave is just the switches being used the way they were designed to be used.
The simple bottom line:
The legal weapons were loaded over 20 years, by presidents from both parties. Now they’re being fired. The fact that they keep getting renewed no matter who’s president is the strongest evidence that this isn’t one administration’s project. It’s an institutional one that survives elections. That’s what the four-pillar table will show on one page: the weapons, who built them, when they were built, and the fact that nobody has put them back on the shelf.
I think, like the Patriot Act, they were NOT intended for good but as weapons to be used against Patriots. Now they are being used in the service of the USA.
2/2 And for everyone complaining, "oh, another letter," @GrassleyPress is spoon feeding the DOJ & FBI evidence of obstruction. https://t.co/fxpBIZTuCt
Wow. This new release from Chuck Grassley on the Clinton Foundation is a staggering 91 page treasure trove. I just skimmed it, and it is all there, Uranium One, Russia, Boeing, Haiti, Hillary’s brother, and all the other stuff. And the FBI did not even open a full investigation,… https://t.co/S6q3YEoTn5pic.twitter.com/mSR3HsIuBg
Wow. This new release from Chuck Grassley on the Clinton Foundation is a staggering 91 page treasure trove. I just skimmed it, and it is all there, Uranium One, Russia, Boeing, Haiti, Hillary’s brother, and all the other stuff. And the FBI did not even open a full investigation, whereas with Trump they had one false tip about barroom gossip from three months earlier and they immediately launched a full enterprise investigation. Absolute travesty that Comey, Strzok, Atkinson (who shows up here as well), and others have not been held to account.
VIA ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION Mr. Todd Blanche Acting Attorney General Department of Justice The Honorable Kash Patel Director Federal Bureau of Investigation
Dear Acting Attorney General Blanche and Director Patel: For over a decade, I’ve raised concerns regarding alleged actions taken by former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, including her use of non-government email for official business, mishandling of highly classified information, potential campaign finance violations, and dubious Clinton Foundation financial dealings.1 For instance, on May 17, 2016, I wrote a letter to then-Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director James Comey raising concerns that many of the emails found on her non-government server blurred lines between the actions taken on behalf of the State Department, Clinton Foundation, and Teneo, a private firm founded by a former counselor to President Clinton.2 Then, on July 6, 2016, I requested information from then-Director Comey regarding public corruption issues and the Clinton Foundation and questioned the Director on whether the FBI investigated the Clinton Foundation regarding former President Clinton’s speaking fees from foreign governments while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State.3 Further, on August 8, 2016, I wrote to the Department of Justice (DOJ) asking the Department to explain its reported decision to drop reported inquiries into Clinton Foundation and State Department interactions; specifically, allegations that the State Department, during Secretary Clinton’s tenure, took favorable actions for Clinton Foundation donors….
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Joe Lange had more information to add. These are the most recent of a long series.
Iran will give up the uranium “dust” that will be tested, to PROVE the uranium that Iran was using to develop nuclear weapons, was provided by the “Uranium One Deal.”
The U1 deal is one of the biggest coverups in American history.
It was a KEY part of Alwaleed’s 16 year plan to destroy the U.S.
The U1 deal connects a lot of dots.
….
Pakistan is playing a KEY role.
Iran will give up the uranium “dust” that will be tested, to PROVE the uranium that Iran was using to develop nuclear weapons, was provided by the “Uranium One Deal.”
The U1 deal is one of the biggest coverups in American history.
It was a KEY part of Alwaleed’s 16 year plan to destroy the U.S.
The U1 deal connects a lot of dots. [Worth a read]
…Bill and Hillary Clinton were the ones, who “organized and planned” the U1 deal.
This goes back much further than most people realize.
How is it connected to Pakistan?
The CIA?
The Clintons have been working hand in hand, with the CIA, to not only fund our enemies, but to help arm them with weapons.
Including nuclear weapons.
U1 was planned years in advance.
Peace doesn’t sell.
War sells.
Taxpayers dollars are easily stolen based on perceived “threats.”
Anybody remember OPERATION MERLIN?
“Deep in the bowels of the CIA, someone must be nervously, but very privately, wondering: “Whatever happened to those nuclear blueprints we gave to the Iranians?”
“The story dates back to the Clinton administration and February 2000, when one frightened Russian scientist walked Vienna’s winter streets. The Russian had good reason to be afraid. He was walking around Vienna with blueprints for a nuclear bomb...
“The Russian, who had defected to the US years earlier, still couldn’t believe the orders he had received from CIA headquarters. The CIA had given him the nuclear blueprints and then sent him to Vienna to sell them – or simply give them – to the Iranian representatives to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). With the Russian doing its bidding, the CIA appeared to be about to help Iran “leapfrog” one of the last remaining engineering hurdles blocking its path to a nuclear weapon.”
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
MORE – Department of Energy and Department of War will coordinate with the FBI. National Nuclear Security Administration officials called the pattern at high-security labs "eyebrow raising," adding that staff do risk becoming targets of foreign espionage.https://t.co/yIaKWZZ0rb
SPLC is a domestic terrorist organization that issued a fatwa against Charlie Kirk and Turning Point USA earlier this year. They put a target on Charlie’s back and all but called for his assassination.
Who remembers this? SPLC lawyer charged over Antifa terrorist attack in 2023.
Guess what happened, by the way? He faced no consequences.
I contacted SPLC spokesman @MichaelEHayden at the time to inquire if the nonprofit denounces political violence. They refused to. Now it… pic.twitter.com/jyg4YSq9T3
In early 2025, the law firm, Covington & Burling out of Washington DC, raised legal concerns that ActBlue’s CEO lied to GOP investigators in a 2023 letter explaining how the organization vetted donations to ensure that they were not illegally coming from foreign citizens.
This shocking development was published in The New York Times this week….
The ActBlue fundraising scandal is heating up in the Lone Star State.
In October 2024, the Gateway Pundit reported that Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton called for the Department of Justice to investigate the Democrat fundraising powerhouse for “circumstances surrounding highly suspicious campaign contributions made through political committee online contribution platforms.”
The state’s own investigation confirmed evidence showing that donations were being made in people’s names without their knowledge or consent. This was in line with discoveries made by Peter Bernegger and reported by James O’Keefe regarding smurfing activities involving ActBlue.
Today, AG Paxton announced on X that he has filed a lawsuit against ActBlue “for deceiving Americans by lying about its donation processes that allow fraudulent and foreign donations.”…
On Monday, The Gateway Pundit reported that Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sued ActBlue, the Democrat fundraising platform, for “deceiving Americans by lying about its donation processes that allow fraudulent and foreign donations.” This was following an internal investigation that “prove[d] that ActBlue continues to process gift card donations” without proving identification of the donor.
The same day, the House Judiciary Committee deposed five employees after subpoenas were issued to two employees in June 2025 by Reps. Jim Jordan, Bryan Steil, and James Comer. The recent depositions included “top staff responsible for fraud prevention” and sought to “learn more about the platform’s acceptance of illegal donations – and the subsequent cover-up,” according to a post on X by the House Judiciary GOP….
The Committees deposed five ActBlue employees, including top staff responsible for fraud prevention, to learn more about the platform’s acceptance of illegal donations—and the subsequent cover-up.
The U.S. Justice Department said Friday it is expanding federal execution procedures to include firing squads as part of a broader effort to strengthen and accelerate use of the federal death penalty. The department said it acted to restore its duty to carry out lawful capital sentences once condemned inmates have exhausted appeals.
The department said it directed the Federal Bureau of Prisons to broaden execution protocols to allow additional methods, including the firing squad, and to readopt the lethal injection protocol used during President Donald Trump’s first administration.
It also said internal processes would be streamlined to expedite capital cases.
Reuters reported the administration also intends to add electrocution and gas asphyxiation as alternative federal execution methods.
There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.
Do not forget to LABEL AI articles video and such.
Various groups are suggesting “the Storm is upon us.” I certainly think I see it approaching. I am going to try and put things into some semblance of order. It least that was my original intent until I went looking for a piece of information and got yanked sideway. Oh well.
It has been my thesis that the Brits never really conceded defeat after the US Revolution and have been trying to get control of the USA ever since. I think for all intents they actually got some control in 1913 and have been working slowly, Fabian Society style, to consolidate their grip and impose a world government. The UK has been the home of the Globalists since William and Mary brought the Dutch banking system to England and the City of London was set up.
8:00 Brady: But the cool thing is William… [He] brings all these great ideas with him. Things like a stock exchange. A central Bank. In fact the Bank of England would be founded 6 years later. And we know where that lead us to.
Col Towner: So he is just transferring the Dutch Empire to the English Empire.
Brady: Yeah, We talked about how the Dutch securitized their entire industry. They stopped producing goods and services, and they just basically speculated all over the world. It is exactly what Wall Street became. They [the Dutch] have already been investing in the British pounds because it pays bigger interest… So they are subsidizing their own enemies.
THAT IS WHY THE DUTCH FELL. THEY HAD STRETCHED TOO THIN AND THEY WERE FINANCIALLY SPECULATING ALL OVER THE WORLD.
Col Towner: Which is what you see happening today.
Brady: Well that is why we are telling the story so we do not repeat it too.
Iran wasn’t the target. The British imperial system was. And on April 16th, Scott Bessent walked into a room with the British Chancellor of the Exchequer and said it out loud. Here’s the Treasury readout… During their discussion, Secretary Besson underscored the US Treasury’s commitment to Economic Fury, leveraging all tools and authorities against those who continue to support Iran’s terrorist activities. He’s underscoring the mission of Economic Fury to Britain’s top financial officer. In essence warning of a new reality… The Trump administration has the empire’s number and is systematically dismantling its power. Which is why the Hudson Institute is now pinning its hopes on a royal visit. They want King Charles to save ‘the special relationship’… Here’s what they’re all missing. Iran wasn’t the target. The British imperial system was and is the target.
The strait was never just Iran’s weapon.
It was London’s leverage. And Trump’s target was never the strait itself. It was the system that monetized it. That system is what is being dismantled. And that holds regardless of what happens in the next 48 hours. In fact, if you look at Trump’s post about no longer being used as a weapon against the world, you can read it in two ways. The Strait won’t be used as a weapon by Iran and Iran won’t be used as a weapon by the British. And because the president understood that, he is bringing an end to the 47 year-old extortion racket.
06:31
The president himself named it back on April 11th in a truth social in all caps, WORLD EXTORTION. That’s not rhetoric. That’s a precise description of how the City of London has run the global financial system for over a century and Bessent is now systematically dismantling it. Here’s how the architecture works.
Think about what London actually prices:
* The global gold fix and other metals through the London Metal Exchange and the IC, the Intercontinental Exchange.
* The price of oil through the Brent crude benchmark since 1988.
* Shipping rates on every barrel of oil that moved through the strait determined by Lloyd’s war risk premiums.
And every regional crisis sent traders to London and allowed them to manipulate prices.
Managed conflict wasn’t just a geopolitical tool. It was a revenue stream. Trump called it world extortion. He’s right….
07:41
But before that, even bigger moves were going on that most people didn’t notice. Vivify Mariposa pulls the curtain back in an important post entitled The System That Owns You, How It Was Built, and Why It’s Breaking. She describes how Trump’s tariff offensive has caused a dramatic shift in the economic balance of power. Because of Trump’s moves, physical gold has been moving from London vaults to New York. Copper pricing is migrating from the London Metal Exchange to American markets and London’s own exchange has publicly conceded that the shift is permanent. Now, Mariposa concludes by saying the pricing authority is moving gold to American vaults, copper to comics, LNG contracts referencing American benchmarks. London is not being replaced by Qatar. London is being bypassed by New York…
[Makes you wonder if the election of Mandani as NYC mayor was because the Cabal saw this coming. -GC]
However Susan and the rest of the crew at Promethean Action are ‘Keeping it Simple Stupid’ Oil is indeed a factor, just not the only one. They are:
TRADE ROUTES OIL and DRUGS
At this point I went looking for the info (on the Chinese) that I wanted to document. I remembered it was in Conspirators’ Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of Three Hundred — CIA library by Dr John Coleman who is still alive BTW. The CIA document is 169 pages so I am going to quote it as well as asking readers to read PAGE 103 – 107 where Dr Coleman quotes H. G. Wells, co-founder of the British Fabian Society.
What I find interesting is the fact Colonel Towner’s Gladio Series information dovetails with this information about the CIA, NATO,‘The Criminal Syndicate’ and drugs.
I am going to start with Dr Coleman’s H. G. Wells quotes and then go back and look at the Iran & China information.
[BEGIN QUOTE]
PAGE 103
What then are we looking at? A loosely-knit gathering of people with weird ideas?
Certainly not. In the Committee of 300, which has a 150-year history, we have some of the most brilliant intellects assembled to form a completely totalitarian, absolutely controlled “new” society only it isn’t new, having drawn most of its ideas from the Clubs of Cultus Diabolicus. [or formal religion of the devil, the existence of which, in the middle ages, is registered by the known facts of the Black Sabbath – GC] It strives toward a One World Government rather well described by one of its late members, H. G. Wells, in his work commissioned by the Committee which Wells boldly called: “THE OPEN CONSPIRACY– PLANS FOR A WORLD REVOLUTION.” [written in 1928 — GC]
…There will be no middle class, only rulers and servants. All laws will be uniform under a legal system of world courts practicing the same unified code of laws, backed up by a One World Government police force and a One World unified military…
Only one religion will be allowed and that will be in the form of a One World Government Church, which has been in existence since 1920 as we shall see. Satanism, Luciferianism and Witchcraft shall he recognized as legitimate One World Government curricula with no private or church schools. All Christian churches have already been subverted and Christianity will be a thing of the past in the One World Government…
Each person shall be fully indoctrinated that he or she is a creature of the One World Government with an identification number clearly marked on their person so as to be readily accessible, which identifying number shall be in the master file of the NATO computer in Brussels, Belgium, subject to instant retrieval by any agency of the One World Government at any time. The master Files of the CIA, FBI, state and local police agencies, IRS, FEMA, Social Security shall be vastly expanded and form the basis of personal records of all individuals in the United States.
Marriage shall be outlawed and there shall be no family life as we know it. Children will be removed from their parents at an early-age and brought up by wards as state property…
At least 4 billion “useless eaters” shall be eliminated by the year 2050 by means of limited wars, organized epidemics of fatal rapid-acting diseases and starvation. Energy, food and water shall be kept at subsistence levels for the non-elite, starting with the White populations of Western Europe and North America and then spreading to other races. The population of Canada, Western Europe and the United States will be decimated more rapidly than on other continents, until the world’s population reaches a manageable level of 1 billion, of which 500 million will consist of Chinese and Japanese races, selected because they are people who have been regimented for centuries and who are accustomed to obeying authority without question…
[I want to insert here, that I think the original plan was Orientals would be the high functioning intelligent workers and the black/brown would be the lower intelligent grunt workers, that is if they are not replaced by robots. The only whites will be the rulers, thus color coding people so they are easily IDed by sight. –GC]
The United States will be flooded by peoples of alien cultures who will eventually overwhelm White America, people with no concept of what the United States Constitution stands for and who will, in consequence, do nothing to defend it, and in whose minds the concept of liberty and justice is so weak as to matter little. FOOD and shelter shall be the main concern.
Rival factions and groups such as Arabs and Jews and African tribes shall have differences magnified and allowed to wage wars of extermination against each other under the eyes of NATO and U.N. observers. The same tactics will be used in Central and South America. These wars of attrition shall take place BEFORE the take-over by the One World Government…
It is obvious from the foregoing that much work remains to be done before the dawning of the New World Order can occur. The Committee of 300 has long ago perfected plans to destabilize civilization as we know it, some of which plans were made known by Zbignew Brzezinski in his classic work “THE TECHNOTRONIC ERA” and the works of Aurellio Peccei who founded the Club of Rome, especially in his book, “THE CHASM AHEAD.” [pg 107]
[END QUOTE]
I am going to stop here and take a quick look at a couple of Russian articles on Brzezinski.
…Brzezinski in an article published in Foreign Affaire (1970), explains his vision of the “New World Order” stating that “it is necessary a new and bolder vision (the creation of a community of developed countries can deal effectively with the broad problems of humanity”, outlines a theory fleshed out in his book “BetweenTwo Ages: America’s role in the era technetronic” 1971), explaining that the era has come to rebalance world power, power that must be passed on to a new global political order based on a trilateral economic linkage between Japan, Europe and the United States.
In the book “Between Two Ages,” (1971), he also calls for control of population by an elite through “cyber manipulation”, by stating: “The technotronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled and dominated society by an elite without the restrictions of traditional values, so it will soon be possible to ensure the monitoring almost continuous over every citizen and maintain complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen, files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities, “what would herald the subsequent implementation of the PRISM program. Also, in a recent speech at a meeting of Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the former Carter adviser warned that “U.S. domination was no longer possible due to an acceleration of social change driven by instant communication that caused the awakening of a universal political consciousness of the masses (Global Political Awakening) and which is proving detrimental to foreign domination as prevailed in the era of colonialism and imperialism”, so after the failed attempt to control the cloud (PRISM Program), in the coming years will see the end of the democratization of information, with the impossibility of direct access to the network using the steps of restrictive policies implemented by countries like China, Russia or Iran.
According to the Financial Times, Brzezinski in a hearing before the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate in 2007, said:
“One possible scenario for a military confrontation with Iran means a terrorist act in American soil of which would Iran be responsible. This could culminate in a U.S. military action “defense” against Iran in which would be included Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan,”
What follows is the possibility of a new attack in the U.S. that would be falsely attributed to Iran to bring its invasion and a subsequent totalitarian derived USA, similar to that recorded with George W. Bush after 11- S, 2001. So, a month after the attack of 11-S, George W. Bush secretly decided to cancel a major constitutional protection in this country (habeas corpus) by-law known as the USA Patriot Act under the justification of its “fight against” terrorism “according to official documents revealed in late 2005 in a series of reports in the New York Times…
Especially given the date is just before Trump’s first election: 28.10.2016
Recently, the US has begun to lose its strategic positions in the Middle East. When some say that the US Empire is collapsing, this no longer sounds like an exaggeration. It definitely looks like this is what is going to happen in front of our very eyes. Failed regime-change attempts in Syria revealed to the whole world the true nature of the so called Arab Spring, and only those who still want to remain stooped in illusions take the Western MSM as a source of reliable information. The Arab Spring served a much bigger purpose of maintaining and expanding US world domination by imposing the Western way of life and, in fact, Western ideology on the Arab World. Western values and way of life have been exposed as the devil in disguise when the US imposes soft power on smaller countries.
Western values are far from being good. They are essentially nothing but Milton Friedman’s utopian neoliberal economic ideas (Naomi Klein’s The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism is one of the best written documentations of this topic). Free-market or liberal, capitalism is a doctrine that demands that everything must be sacrificed on the unholy altar of commerce, including traditional and religious values. This is why nation-states and religious values are seen as a threat in Western corridors of power – a threat that must be destroyed by supranational and secular powers. The US has been the front man and a driving force in this “progress.” So, if US will lose its positions, will this progress stop? Or,if Trump will be elected, can he change this course and stop its progress? Will the world find a new way of life? Together? Or will the world go back to nation-states and religious values? I have no answers to these questions, but what is sure is that there must be a new value system or ideology to fill this vacuum if the Western system is going to collapse. Ideally, this would be a loose context for different religions and political ideologies to integrate – a spiritual multipolarity that combines nations rather than dividing them…
Back to Dr Coleman’s book.
CHINA and IRAN [QUOTE]
…it is hardly likely that the U.S. would make any real effort to stop the production of opium in the Golden Triangle which is under the control of the Chinese military, a serious war would erupt if any country tried to interdict the trade. A serious attack on the opium trade would bring Chinese military intervention.
The British know this; they have no quarrel with China, except for an occasional squabble over who gets the larger share of the pie. Britain has been involved in the China opium trade for over two centuries. No one is going to be so foolish as to rock the boat when millions upon millions of dollars flow into the bank accounts of the British oligarchists and more gold is traded on the Hong Kong gold market than the combined total traded in London and New York… Every British monarch since 1729 has benefited immensely from the drug trade and this holds good for the present occupant of the throne…
In later years the Chinese appealed to Britain for help with their immense problem and received it. Thereafter respective Chinese governments realized the value in cooperating instead of fighting with Britain–and this held good during the bloody rule of Mao Tse Tung–so that today, as I have already mentioned, any quarrels that come about are only over the share of the opium trade each is entitled to.
To advance to more modern history, the Chinese-British partnership was solidified by the Hong Kong agreement which established an equal partnership in the opium trade…
Rowntree’s book, “The Imperial Drug Trade”[1903] gives a fascinating account of how Prime Minister Gladstone and his fellow plutocrats lied, cheated, twisted and turned to keep the astonishing truth of the involvement of the British monarchy in the opium trade from being exposed…
The Eastern Liberal Establishment families of the United States were just as deeply involved in the China opium trade as were the British, indeed they still are. Witness recent history when [President] James Earl Carter toppled the Shah of Iran. Why was the Shah deposed and then murdered by the United States government? fn a word, because of DRUGS. The Shah had clamped down and virtually put an end to the immensely lucrative opium trade being conducted out of Iran by the British. At the time that the Shah took over in Iran, there were already one million opium/heroin addicts.
This the British would not tolerate, so they sent the United States to do their dirty work for them in terms of the “special relationship” between the two countries. When Khomeini took over the U.S. Embassy in Tehran, arms sales by the United States, which had begun with the Shah, were not discontinued. Why not? Had the United States done so, Khomeini would have canceled the British monopoly of the opium trade in his country. To prove the point, after 1984, Khomeini’s liberal attitude toward opium had increased the number of addicts to 2 million, according to United Nations and World Health Organization statistics. [That certainly puts a different light on the Khomeini – Carter communications. GC]
Both President Carter and his successor, Ronald Reagan, willingly and with full knowledge of what was at stake, went on supplying arms to Iran even while American hostages languished in captivity. In 1980 I wrote a monograph under the title, “What Really Happened in Iran,” which set out the facts. The arms trade with Iran was sealed at a meeting between Cyrus Vance, a servant of the Committee of 300, and Dr. Hashemi, which resulted in the U.S. Air Force beginning an immediate airlift of arms to Iran, carried on even at the height of the hostage crisis the arms came from U.S. Army stockpiles in Germany ….
The demise of the Shah of Iran was run to a plan devised by Bernard Levin and Richard Falk, and supervised by Robert Anderson’s Aspen Institute. Levin was the author of a work entitled “Time Perspective and Morale” which is a Club of Rome publication concerning how to break down the morale of nations and individual leaders. Here is an extract of the document:
“One of the main techniques for breaking morale through a strategy of terror consists in exactly this tactic: keep the person hazy as to where he stands and just what he may expect. In addition, if frequent vacillations between severe disciplinary measures and promise of good treatment together with the spreading of contradictory news make the structure of the situation unclear, then the individual may cease to know whether a particular plan would lead toward or away from his goal. Under these conditions, even those individuals who have definite goals and are ready to take risks are paralyzed by the severe inner conflict in regard to what to do.”
This Club of Rome blueprint applies to COUNTRIES as well as to individuals, particularly the government leaders of those countries. We in the U.S. need not think that “Oh well, this is America, and those kinds of things just do not happen here.” Let me assure you that they ARE happening in the U.S., and perhaps more so than in any other country. Remember that Khomeini was groomed for years by British intelligence, especially during his time in Paris, before he suddenly appeared as the savior of Iran. Boris Yeltsin is from the same M16-SIS stable...
The route taken by the raw opium carriers of the Golden Crescent goes through Iran, Turkey and Lebanon. When the Shah of Iran was in control of the country, he refused to allow the heroin trade to continue and it was forcibly discontinued-up until the time that he was “dealt with” by the Committee of 300. Raw opium from Turkey and Lebanon finds it way to Corsica, from where it is shipped to Monte Carlo with the connivance of the Grimaldi family. Pakistani laboratories, under the guise of “military defense laboratories” are doing a bigger share of refining than they were two years ago, but the best refining is still done along the French Mediterranean coastline and in Turkey. Here again, banks play a vital role in financing these operations.
Let us stop here for a moment. Are we to believe that with all the modern and vastly improved surveillance techniques, including satellite reconnaissance, available to law enforcement agencies in these countries, that this vile trade cannot be pin-pointed and stopped? How is it that law enforcement agencies cannot go in and destroy these laboratories once they are discovered? If this IS the case, and we still cannot interdict the heroin trade, then our anti-narcotics services ought to be known as “The Geriatrics” and not drug enforcement agencies.
Even a child could tell our alleged “drug watchers” what to do. Simply keep a check on all factories making acetic anhydride, THE most essential chemical component needed by laboratories to refine heroin from raw opium. THEN FOLLOW THE TRAIL!…
For some strange reason the Cali cartel, which is equal in size to the Medellin cartel, has been–at least up until now–largely ignored by the DEA. Cali differs from the Medellin cartel in that it is run by BUSINESSMEN, who eschew all forms of violence and never break agreements. Even more significant is that Cali does virtually no business in Florida. My source told me that the Cali cartel is run by shrewd businessmen unlike any seen in the cocaine business. He believes that they were “specially appointed,” but does not know by whom. “They never call attention to themselves,” he said. “They do not go around importing red Ferraris like Jorge Ochoa did, attracting immediate attention, because it is forbidden to import such cars into Colombia.”
Cali cartel markets are in Los Angeles, New York and Houston, which closely parallel the heroin markets. Cali has not shown any signs of moving into Florida. A former DEA operative who is a colleague of mine said recently, “These Cali people are sure smart. They are a different breed to the Ochoa brothers. They act like professional businessmen. They are now larger than the Medellin cartel and I think we are going to see a lot more cocaine get into the United States than ever before. The kidnapping of Manuel Noriega will facilitate an easier flow through Panama of cocaine and money, what with so many banks there. So much for President George Bush’s Operation Just Cause. All it did was make life a great deal easier for Nicolas Ardito Barletta who used to be run by the Ochoa brothers and who is fixing to front for the Cali cartel.”
Based on my experience with the heroin trade I believe that the Committee of 300 has stepped in and taken over full control of the South American cocaine trade. There is no other explanation For the rise of the Cali cartel which is coupled with the kidnapping of Noriega. Did Bush take his orders from London regarding Noriega? There is every indication that he was literally PUSHED into invading Panama and kidnapping Noriega, who had become a serious impediment to “trade” in Panama, especially in the banking business.
Several former intelligence agents have given me their opinions which coincide with my own. Like the Gulf War that followed in the wake of Panama, it was only after several calls from the British Ambassador in Washington that Bush finally plucked up enough courage to make his totally illegal move on General Noriega. That he was supported by the British press and the New York Times, a British intelligence run newspaper, speaks volumes…
[END QUOTE]
So President Trump is attacking trade routes, drug running AND oil. I certainly do not envy Trump’s job in unraveling this mess! It makes you wonder just how many ‘American Politicians’ are actually agents of the City of London.
I DIDN’T WRITE THIS BUT A VERY SMART PERSON DID!!! This should be read by every news station and every single person that is against what president Trump has done, not just for America, but for the world!!!
Paul White Gold Eagle @PaulGoldEagle I DIDN’T WRITE THIS BUT A VERY SMART PERSON DID!!! This should be read by every news station and every single person that is against what president Trump has done, not just for America, but for the world!!!
WRITTEN BY MICHAEL HUNTSMAN
I keep hearing “Trump doesn’t have a plan”.
First off, it doesn’t seem like the greatest idea to tell everyone what your plan is. (Especially when so many from within want you destroyed.)
However, for those of you who are unable to see it. Let me remind you. One of Trump‘s biggest campaign promises was not only to make America energy Independent, but also to be the energy leader worldwide.
Take a look at the moves he’s already made. If you can’t see his plan, it’s because you refused to.
He told us from the start exactly what he would do when he said “America Will Lead the World in Energy”
He started almost immediately. On February 9, 2025, he began his energy dominance plan by changing the name of the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America. He did this to circumvent policies designed to stop American oil drilling, refining, and shipping in the Gulf. (The crazy half of the country lost their mind and called it racism)
Then with no delay at all, he went after the Panama Canal and regained its passage rights. (Again, the lunatics lost their mind and claimed it was about stopping innocent refugees, and therefore, ‘Racist’.)
Next came Venezuela. In a matter of minutes he captured a dictator, freed millions of people, and secured the absolute largest oil reserves in the world. (Suddenly the crazies poured into the streets, waving Venezuelan flags and demanding the dictator be returned)
Greenland came and went before their tears over the Venezuelan dictator even hit the floor.
With Greenland, he secured not only northern shipping lanes but strategic defensive positioning and mineral rights to one of the largest deposits of rare earth minerals in the world. (Think batteries, electrical components, semiconductors, etc..)
After gaining control of North and South American shipping lanes, oil, and rare earth minerals. He sets his sites on the Middle East.
Which brings us to Iran. So far he has decimated their highest leaders and military, while protecting their infrastructure of oil distribution (And the people of Iran are ecstatic).
At this very moment the U.S. is blockading the Gulf of Oman.(Arguably, more strategic than the Strait of Hormuz itself.)
In the meantime (while waiting out Iran in the Gulf of Oman) He has secured the strait of Malacca, and guaranteed control of shipping rights to the Eastern Seaborg. (Who knows how the Looney Tunes will spin that one when they find out.)
If you haven’t figured it out yet, this was the plan all along. Just like he said, “America Will Lead the World in Energy”
Keep your eyes open, because it ain’t over yet. Next on his list will be to secure the shipping lanes around Cuba then the straits of Bosporus and Gallipoli. Completing his plan and making America the world‘s leader in energy. Just like he said he would.
If you still fail to see the plan? Forget I mentioned any of this. Wait for the newest outrage, or stick with your most recent “Orange man bad, he has no plan”.
Whether you march in the streets waving some other countries flag, or protest a King that doesn’t exist. His plan is being executed and is working beautifully.
America will be the Leader in World Energy.
The truth is: You, Me, and the rest of the free world will benefit greatly from his plan for generations to come.
God bless the President and God bless the United States of America. 🇺🇸
…………
The above quotations are reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.
Do not forget to LABEL AI articles video and such.
This is a typical portrait of POTUS Trump by the Fake News. I thought I would put together a more accurate portrayal on one page to show the glimpses we get are not one offs but the real man hidden behind the caricature.
H/T to patfrederick who gave me the idea for doing this.
Trump Girl @MAGA__Patriot BREAKING | USA… news channels never told you this. And today I am ashamed of every single one of them. Because they kept this truth about Trump hidden from you. Deliberately. And once you find out what they never showed you… you will question everything they ever said about this man. 2008. Ed McMahon. Johnny Carson’s legendary sidekick. 30 years of making America laugh. 86 years old. And facing the most humiliating ending imaginable. Losing his home to foreclosure. The whole world knew. Every news channel covered it. And every single one of them watched. And reported. And moved on. And nobody helped. Nobody stepped up. Nobody did anything. Except Trump. Who picked up the phone. Quietly. Without any camera invited. Without any press release. Without any announcement. He personally bought Ed McMahon’s property. And let him stay in his own home. For the rest of his life. No bill. No conditions. No expectation of anything back. Just a man who decided that an American legend should not spend his final years losing everything he worked for.
And the news channels never told you this. Not once. Because this story does not fit the Trump they wanted you to see. Today… I am telling you. Because you deserve to know the real Trump. Not the one they built for you. The real one. Who showed up for an 86 year old legend. When the whole world looked away. Drop a https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/svg/2764.svg right now if you never knew this story. Type “THIS IS THE REAL TRUMP” below. Tag every American today who deserves to know the truth that news channels never told them.
🚨BREAKING | USA… news channels never told you this. And today I am ashamed of every single one of them. Because they kept this truth about Trump hidden from you. Deliberately. And once you find out what they never showed you… you will question everything they ever said about… pic.twitter.com/7v1TJBmvVQ
“one cannot understand the importance of preserving the future for their children, grandkids, and beyond.”
That is the reason PDJT left his posh life in Trump Tower and entered the vicious world of politics. He desperately wanted to at least try to make a difference. He would not have really been happy with himself if he sat back and did nothing while the country (as we older folks know it) went down Satan’s globalist sewer.
This was relayed to me by a friend who was dining with DJT in Trump Tower, I believe it was in the summer of 2015 shortly after he announced. This friend has first hand experience with the vicious world of politics.
Trump has shown he has a heart of gold over and over. If something touches him he will do what he can.
For example the little girl with the bone disease. [VIDEO REMOVED BY YOUTUBE Trump donated $$$ to this little girl who was featured on a TV show see Frankenstein@breitbart.combelow – GC]
The private Boeing 727 of real estate tycoon Donald Trump arrived from Los Angeles at LaGuardia Airport Tuesday morning, carrying aboard an Orthodox Jewish child with a rare and still undiagnosed breathing illness.
The child, Andrew Ten, age 3, arrived with his parents — accompanied by three nurses who attend to him around the clock — to try to seek medical help in the New York area.
Trump made his plane available for the special trip to New York after the boy’s parents, Judy and Harold Ten, called Trump and told him of their plight.
Commercial airlines refused to fly the child because he could not travel without an elaborate life-support system, which includes a portable oxygen tank, a suction machine, a breathing bag and an adrenaline syringe.
“Mr. Trump did not hesitate when we called him up. He said ‘yes, I’ll send my plane out,’” 29-year-old Harold Ten recalled shortly after he landed here Tuesday morning….
So much for the anti-semite claim.
A Man Was Being Beaten to Death with a Bat, The Trump’s Limo Rolls By
…Donald Trump never sought attention for this story, but during his trip he noticed a man on the sidewalk being brutally assaulted by a “big guy” with a baseball bat. Trump noticed the victim taking “5 or 6 whacks” and knew he was about to be killed.
Without hesitation, Trump told the driver to pull the car over and he leaped out of the car. His ex-wife Marla Maples was tugging at his arm trying to stop him….
UPI reported in 1995 how Trump was credited with ‘saving’ the New York Veterans Day Parade. The parade that year was marking the fiftieth anniversary of the end of World War II….
Police estimated 500,000 people attended the largest military parade ever held in New York. Organizers, who placed the turnout at closer to a million, said the parade would not have been a success if it hadn’t been for real estate developer Donald Trump, who contributed $200,000 and raised another $300,000.
“Donald Trump saved the parade,” said parade director Tom Fox, himself a Vietnam veteran. “We had asked for donations from 200 corporations, and none of them came through,” he said.
“This donation is the single most important thing I’ve ever done,” said a beaming Trump. “This is more important than all of my buildings and my casinos. This is my way of saying thank you to all the men an women in the armed services who have made it possible for me to become a success. Without them freedom and liberty would be gone.”
.Organizers received no contributions from the 200 corporations they asked, among them military contractors to whom they presented documentation of profits made on weapons used in World War II.
“Zippo, dada, zilch,” Mr. Fox said. “Nothing from Northrup, United Technologies, none of them. To me, it’s a sin.”
By mid-August, organizers had a bank account of exactly $1.21….
This was not Trump’s first time supporting the New York Veterans Day Parade. In 1987 Trump gave $1 million to help the parade when it was in transition, according to a history of the parade reported by Business Insider in 2013.
And this is not the first time Trump helped the people of NYC. At the Republican National Convention,
…” Giuliani admitted he was letting out a secret about Trump at the Republican National Convention on Monday.
“Every time New York City suffered a tragedy, Donald Trump was there to help. He’s not going to like my telling you this, but he did it anonymously,” Giuliani said, calling Trump a “man with a big heart.”
“When police officers were shot, when firefighters were hurt, when people were in trouble, he came forward and he helped, and he asked not to be mentioned. Well, I am going to break my promise to him. I am going to mention it,” he added. as the crowd cheered.
“I am telling you this because I am sick and tired of the defamation of Donald Trump by the media and by the Clinton campaign,” Giuliani said in a rebuff to accusations about Trump’s charitable giving.
“This is a good man and America should be sick and tired of their vicious nasty campaign,” he said. “You deserve to know this about your next president.”
Any surprise the Democrats went all out to destroy Rudy Giuliani?
Trump INSISTED on including Jews and blacks at Palm Beach golf course in 1990s
“When Donald opened his club in Palm Beach called Mar-a-Lago, he insisted on accepting Jews and blacks even though other clubs in Palm Beach to this day discriminate against blacks and Jews. The old guard in Palm Beach was outraged that Donald would accept blacks and Jews so that’s the real Donald Trump that I know.”….
Sometimes, in judging the character of an individual, it pays to see what people actually do when nobody’s really paying attention. When it came to segregation in the South at private, all-white country clubs, it might have been in Trump’s business interests to simply look the other way. Instead, Trump did the right thing and insisted on desegregation at his golf resort.
And he won.
Members at Mar a Lago get privileges at a large handful of Trump golf courses. Mar a Lago is only 20ac and is a club not a course. Seems fact escape journalists all the time.
When Nathan posted his message to his Trump discussion thread last month, he was smothered by a wave of positive responses, each a variation on a familiar theme. “I’m also quitting booze for many reasons, Trump being one of them,” commented one user. Wrote another: “It might sound lame, but trying to be more like Donald has led to positive changes in my life.” A commenter described his own years-long drug habit, chiming in, “After reading 2 of Trump’s books I decided it’s time to quit.” And then, about two-thirds down, the prevailing leitmotif appeared:
“I just tell myself ‘it’s time to make myself great again.’”
In gargantuan, all-capital letters: “MYGA!”
MYGA, of course, stands for “Make Yourself Great Again,”
Trump at a book signing at Trump Tower in November 2015. | Todd Heisler/The New York Times/Redux
However, what caught our attention and shook us from within was the letter of Melissa Consin Young to Mr. Trump that she published on her facebook profile with pictures. It just proves that there is lot more to Miss Universe, Miss USA and even to Mr. Donald Trump than those 2-3 hurtful sentences that were spoken by him out of some serious bad mood, may be. [No doubt his calling members ofthe cartels animals that got twisted by the Fake News — GC] I am not justifying or taking his side. I am just choosing to be what God has taught us to be. I am being kind.
Have a look at what Melissa Consin Young wrote to Mr. Trump: Dear Mr. Trump,
As my body is getting weaker, I am unsettled by the fact that I have never been able to directly thank you. Because of you and your efforts, my son Jack who is Mexican-American, has a chance at a better future and a solid education. You and the Miss USA pageant played a tremendous role in my life. It was the BIGGEST honor of my life to compete on your Miss USA stage in 2005 representing the state of Wisconsin. As a little girl that grew up homeless and in extreme poverty, it was my dream come true to stand on that very stage. Winning Miss Congeniality was beyond anything I could’ve ever imagined. I don’t know if I can even accurately describe to you how much it meant to me to even be there in light of the circumstances in which I grew up in. The bonds that were formed during the pageant, molded a best friendship with my sister-in-life, Chelsea Cooley Altman – who just happened to win Miss USA that year. About 3 years ago, Chelsea was in NYC and attended one of your many functions at Trump Tower, where you debuted FundAnything.com. This turned out to be a life changing event for my son and I. I am forever indebted to you. It’s been almost 7 years since my world was turned upside down while giving birth to Jack. Because of a lack of care during my pregnancy by my doctor I was stricken with an incurable disease that left me unable to physically care for my son. I fight every day with every fiber of my being to have simple, but lasting moments with him. Living in fear as a result of the horrific lack of care and negligence from my doctors and medical professionals, kept me silent, where I was too scared to share the cause of my illness with anyone.
A year and a half ago, when Chelsea found out about my disease, she immediately took it upon herself to start a scholarship fundraiser for Jack through your organization, FundAnything – so that neither he nor I would have to worry about college for him – especially since I won’t be here when he crosses that milestone in life. At the same time, since I am now uninsurable for life insurance, Chelsea was adamant I allow her to do this for Jack. Within days, the fund soared. Where by the end of the campaign, thousands of dollars were donated for the fund for my 6 year old son – a Mexican-American. I cannot tell you how incredible the outpouring of support, donations and thousands of letters from around the world have been. There came a day during the campaign, that I will never forget. I was VERY ill and out of the blue, a package showed up, hand-delivered from you. Even while traveling, you took the time to send such a wonderful message of hope and support. I was going through some very dark times and this was unbelievable that not just anyone – but Donald Trump himself – took the time to think of my son and me. I have looked up to you my entire life. The scholarship fund is more than what it entails. This ultimately gave me the gift of peace. I will not be here to walk Jack through that stage of his life. As a mother, knowing that his education is taken care of, is the most special gift anyone could ever give me. And because of your organizations – Miss USA and FundAnything.com– you have given me the greatest gifts of all – peace of mind, heart and soul. I have been writing letters to Jack so that he can read them when I am in heaven, explaining how you, your organization and the snowballing effect of support from people all around the world have forever changed our world. With this, I have explained to Jack that a great responsibility has been instilled in him to pay it forward just as you have done for us. Yours is a gift that will keep on giving.
I am forever grateful,
Melissa Ann Young-Miranda
Miss Wisconsin USA 2005
PS. You have my vote.
“At a Donald Trump campaign event in Janesville, WI, Mr. Trump took a question from 2005 Miss Wisconsin USA, Melissa Young. Young was in tears and thanked Mr. Trump for all his support and love during a time she’s been battling a devastating illness” — SUNDANCE
Melissa Consin Young won Miss Congeniality in Miss USA 2005
“The National Border Patrol Council is the official organization representing our nation’s Border Patrol Agents. We represent 16,500 agents who selflessly serve this country in an environment where our own political leaders try to keep us from doing our jobs. The NBPC has had a longstanding practice of not endorsing presidential candidates in the primaries. We will not, however, shy away from voicing our opinions as it pertains to border security and the men and women of the United States Border Patrol. As such, we are breaking with our past practice and giving our first-ever endorsement in a presidential primary. We think it is that important: if we do not secure our borders, American communities will continue to suffer at the hands of gangs, cartels and violent criminals preying on the innocent. The lives and security of the American people are at stake, and the National Border Patrol Council will not sit on the sidelines... [They certainly had that prophecy correct! — GC]
And with such a great man – like Trump – running, why even bother with a candidate under criminal investigation, like Hillary?
(1) In 1986, Trump prevented the foreclosure of Annabell Hill’s family farm after her husband committed suicide on the day of the auction. He personally called to stop the sale and gave Hill $77,000.00 to pay off the mortgage. Trump decided to do this after seeing her pleas for help in the news. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new…
(2) In 1988, a commercial airline refused to fly Andrew Ten, a sick Orthodox Jewish child with a rare illness, cross-country for medical care because he had to travel with an elaborate life-support system. His grief stricken parents contacted Trump for help and he didn’t hesitate to send his own plane to take the child from L.A. to New York so he could get treatment. http://citizenanalyst.net/meet…
(3) In 1990, Ryan White (18), died of AIDS. Trump called his family at home after his death. http://www.nytimes.com/1990/04…
(4) In 1991, 200 Marines who served in Operation Desert Storm spent time at Camp Lejeune in North Carolina before they were scheduled to return home to their families. However, the Marines were told that a mistake had been made and an aircraft would not be able to take them home on their scheduled departure date. When Trump got wind of this, he sent his plane to make two trips from North Carolina to Miami to safely return the Marines to their families. http://www.hannity.com/onair/t…
(5) In 1991 Trump saved a man from a mugging. He told his limo driver to pull over and he confronted the mugger, who was beating the other man with a baseball bat. After that, the mugger recognized Trump and ran away. http://www.thegatewaypundit.co…
(6) In 1995, a motorist stopped to help Trump after the limo he was traveling in got a flat tire. Trump asked the Good Samaritan how he could repay him for his help. All the man asked for was a bouquet of flowers for his wife. A few weeks later Trump sent the flowers with a note that read: “We’ve paid off your mortgage.http://www.thepoliticalinsider…
(7) In 1996, Trump filed a lawsuit against the city of Palm Beach, Florida accusing the town of discriminating against his Mar-a-Lago resort club because it allowed Jews and blacks. Abraham Foxman, who was the Anti-Defamation League Director at the time, said Trump “put the light on Palm Beach“ not on the beauty and the glitter, but on its seamier side of discrimination.” Foxman also noted that Trump’s charge had a trickle-down effect because other clubs followed his lead and began admitting Jews and blacks. http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB…
(8) In 1997, Trump & Mel Farr teamed up to help young Detroit artists appear at Carnegie Hall. http://www.prnewswire.com/news…
(9) In 2000, Maury Povich featured a little girl named Megan who struggled with Brittle Bone Disease on his show and Trump happened to be watching. Trump said the little girl’s story and positive attitude touched his heart. So he contacted Maury and gifted the little girl and her family with a very generous check. https://www.youtube.com/watch?…
(10) After 9/11, Trump sent over 200 of his own people to look for survivors in the wreckage. https://www.youtube.com/watch?…
(11) After 9/11, Trump “learned about Clyde Frazier Jr., who ran the Harlem Hoops tournament in the inner city and was killed in the 9/11 attacks” and “searched down the family and donated the money to keep that tournament going.”http://conservativetribune.com…https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cc…
(12) In 2007, Trump sued the city of Palm Beach for fining him for having a tall flagpole w/ the American Flag. The case settled. Trump donated the $100,000 settlement proceeds he received to Iraqi War Veterans and his local VA hospital. [While we were in Iraq, he also let military members use his Mar-a-Lago resort for free every Monday]. https://news.google.com/newspa… https://www.youtube.com/watch?…
(13) In 2008, after Jennifer Hudson’s family members were tragically murdered in Chicago, Trump put the Oscar-winning actress and her family up at his Chicago hotel for free. Trump even hired extra security for her “ he said: “She’s a great girl. And we’re protecting them well. They are very safe.” http://citizenanalyst.net/meet… https://www.accesshollywood.co…
(14) In 2008, Ed McMahon’s house went into foreclosure. Trump purchased it and allowed Ed to continue living there. http://www.businessinsider.com…
(15) In 2011, Trump & his siblings gifted $1 million to a hospital that treated their parents. https://www.hss.edu/newsroom_h…
(16) In 2013, New York bus driver Darnell Barton spotted a woman close to the edge of a bridge staring at traffic below as he drove by. He stopped the bus, got out and put his arm around the woman and saved her life by convincing her to not jump. When Trump heard about this story, he sent the bus driver a $10,000 check simply because he believed his good deed deserved to be rewarded. http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013…
(17) In 2014, Trump gave $25,000 to Sgt. Andrew Tamoressi after he spent 7 months in a Mexican jail for accidentally crossing the US-Mexico border. President Obama couldn’t even be bothered to make one phone call to assist with the Marine’s release; however, Trump opened his pocketbook to help this serviceman get back on his feet. http://www.thepoliticalinsider…
(18) In 2016, Melissa Consin Young attended a Trump rally and tearfully thanked Trump for changing her life. She said she proudly stood on stage with Trump as Miss Wisconsin USA in 2005. However, years later she found herself struggling with an incurable illness and during her darkest days she explained that she received a handwritten letter from Trump telling her she’s the bravest woman, I know.” She said the opportunities that she got from Trump and his organizations ultimately provided her Mexican-American son with a full-ride to college. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new…
(19) Lynne Patton, a black female executive for the Trump Organization, released a statement in 2016 defending Trump against accusations that he’s a racist/bigot. She tearfully revealed how she struggled with substance abuse/addiction for years. She said Trump and his entire family loyally stood by her through “immensely difficult times” and helped her keep her job. http://www.breitbart.com/2016-…
Additionally: – Trump helped Maytag keep some of its stores in the U.S. by buying items from them that could be used in his hotels. http://conservativetribune.com…
– Trump saved an ice skating rink in Central Park by taking over the project, and finishing the rink by Christmas time for free. He was two months ahead of schedule, and $750,000 under budget. He also operated the rink for a year, and donated all profits to charity. https://regated.com/2016/05/gr…
– Barbara Res, at 33 years old, became the first women to ever be put in charge of supervising the construction of a skyscraper, when Trump hired her in 1980. http://www.nydailynews.com/opi… – Trump donated $100,000 to a large Christian ministry after Jerry Falwell Jr. told Trump the ministry needed help. http://citizenanalyst.net/meet…
– Trump has donated his money to several health organizations including the American Cancer Society, American Diabetes Association, Alliance for Lupus Research, Autism Speaks, Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation of America, and many more. http://www.insidephilanthropy….
It happened in 1986, in the midst of the worst farm crisis since the Great Depression. In Burke County, on Georgia’s eastern border, farm after farm was folding.
On Feb. 4, Lenard Dozier Hill III, a third-generation occupant of his cotton-and-soybean acreage, was about to have his land sold out from under him. ”That morning, it was going to be auctioned off at the courthouse steps, so he committed suicide,” said Betsy Sharp, his daughter. In the bedroom of the Hill home, along with the .22-caliber rifle that did the work, was a neat stack of life insurance policies and other papers on the nightstand.
Hill had intended for the life insurance payout to cover most of his $300,000 debt and so save the family farm for another generation. It was a grievous miscalculation. Most, if not all, life insurance policies include a clause that prohibits payment in cases of suicide. “He didn’t realize all that,” Sharp said.Hill’s desperate act struck a chord.
Reporters and TV crews descended on the Waynesboro church where the funeral was held. Vandals painted “farmer killer” on the door of the local bank. Once the family realized the financial futility of Hill’s suicide, the burden of saving the farm fell on his widow, Annabel Hill, a 66-year-old teacher and social worker with gray hair and large glasses.
~~~~~~~~~~~
Money poured in, but Trump and a Texas oilman — a real one, this time — provided the last $78,000. A “mortgage-burning” ceremony was scheduled for two days before Christmas. The Hill family was again flown to New York, at Trump’s expense.
“I had just graduated from high school. He flew us to New York, and we went to Trump Towers and had breakfast with him,” said Betsy Sharp, who is now 49 and lives in Augusta.“We saw a whole different side of him that was kindhearted, to reach out to us, to help us,” the daughter said. “Most people don’t know and see that side. All they see is just the ‘blurt’ that people put on the TV. They don’t see the other side of him, and that’s what my family got to experience.”Argenbright feels likewise. “He couldn’t have been nicer. He took care of them and stayed in touch with them after that,” Argenbright said. “He had no ulterior motive.”
AND for all the idiots who think POTUS is DUMB and doesn’t know what he is doing…
Whenever I hear someone complain that Donald Trump is “not presidential,” I reply, “Compared to whom? Which president are we talking about? How ‘presidential’ was Barack Obama in 2008 when he said of the Republicans, ‘If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun’?”
And just what are the qualities that really matter in a president?
The overwhelming majority of Mr. Trump’s detractors have never sat across the table from him to hammer out a multimillion-dollar business deal. I have. So I think I’m in a better position than they are to judge his effectiveness as a top-level executive.
Because of the duty of confidentiality that I owe to my clients and to the other members of the negotiating team, I can’t give specific details on the project that was discussed at the meeting. But I can share my own impressions on what it was like to deal directly with Mr. Trump.
The first thing I noticed about Mr. Trump was that he was a stickler for detail. As a politician, he may affect a breezy platform style, but in the office, he was all business. Right off the bat, he corrected my team’s estimates of future financing requirements. He must have phoned an expert minutes before the meeting, because he said that by the latest market information he had, our current interest rates were off by 0.1%.
That was for openers. He went through every element of our proposal with a gimlet eye, challenging our assumptions, forecasts and business models with an exactitude and a level of expertise that was most impressive. It was as if he had a Wharton business professor whispering in his ear.
He wasted no time on civilities. He was brusque, impatient and dismissive of any information that he thought was inadequate, or any detail that he thought did not bear directly on the matter at hand. He cut right to the heart of things.
The senior members of my negotiating team were the products of privilege and Ivy League schools, and were highly successful executives in their own right. They were not used to this kind of treatment.
But for my own part, I had not only been an attack flight officer in the first Gulf war, I had also driven a truck through some of New York’s roughest neighborhoods. So I took it all in stride. Mr. Trump is a New Yorker, I reasoned. Fine. So am I. We can speak the same language—even if that language is rather coarse to some ears. We understand each other.
In the end, I can say that Mr. Trump drove a hard bargain. But he was honest, and he was a square dealer. When we were through—in less time than we had expected—we had reached an agreement that was ethical, profitable and fair to all parties concerned. It was also an agreement that meant good jobs for working people and healthy tax revenues for the local government.
If we didn’t come away from the table liking Mr. Trump, there’s no question that we came away with a lot of respect for him. He was a tough, shrewd, no-nonsense executive who knew how to get things done, and done quickly. He was also an adversary whom no one would want to mess with.
Isn’t that what really matters in a president?….
And from our own daughnworks247 September 30, 2019 (Worth rereading the whole article.)
…Remember the story told by Former FBI Agent Michael Moore? Back in the 90’s Moore wass hired by Steve Wynn. Trump and Wynn were in competition for …. some big deal. Wynn lost, yet 2 decades later, Moore still marveled at how Donald Trump was always one step ahead of his team. Moore couldn’t get over the strategy of Donald Trump, and realized he was a superior opponent. Does anyone thing a man like Donald Trump would suddenly change his method of preparation to accomplish goals, after 50+yrs of success? Nah, Trump is not lucky, Trump is well-prepared.
Trump is “a tough, shrewd, no-nonsense executive who knew how to get things done, and done quickly…. an adversary whom no one would want to mess with.“ But he is also a man with a heart of gold who loves his country and the American people. If the Fake News & Globalists showed Trump as he really is he would be the best loved President in my life.
Now you have a bit of ammo to refute all the psy-ops our enemies spew.
There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.
Do not forget to LABEL AI articles video and such.
This cartoon is the perfect representation of Josh Reid. However if you are talking aliens and space travel…. If you have Matt Gaetz saying space aliens are real and Tim Burchett backing him up. If you have Tim Burchett saying Trump is NOT being briefed on this because some bureaucrat say the president has ‘No need to know’ AND General Flynn says that during the first Trump Admin when national security adviser he was also denied access…
And on top of that Josh comes out with a statement like this and you sit up and go WTF?
I’ve done an extensive amount of research on Epstein. And one of the things that you get is tying Epstein into — human trafficking isn’t the right word — Child sex trafficking isn’t the right word — Child procurement is the right word for it. And a lot of this was being pushed into biomedical research and genetic research information. I tend to categorize this as human genetic modification programs or hybridization.
Epstein actually wrote about, alien chimerization. Hybridization of human and alien DNA and he was actually trying to get hybrid alien DNA. One of the reasons he was looking for ancient civilizations off the coast of Cuba and why he lived in the Caribbean was so they could dive down there, find the remnants of the ancient human civilization, find DNA to then replicate that DNA and integrate it into our current DNA because he believed that human beings once possessed superhuman powers on this planet. Now, when you go into the idea of the CIA finders program, when you go into people like Epstein, child procurement, you go into John of God running a baby farm in Brazil with thousands upon thousands of children being born each year. We come back to the same question that nobody ever asks…
I wonder if this is the rabbit hole that Steve Bannon was trying to explore when he became so friendly with Epstein. Just a thought.
I am adding this video because Josh references it in the following video that I did the transcript for. Also General Kwast goes into the various manufacturing that can be done more easily in space. His company already has an AI computer on the south pole of the moon. He mentions another company making fiber optic cables and so on. THIS IS THE FUTURE THOSE BASTARDS CHEATED US BOOMERS OUT OF! 😡
At 14 minutes General Kwast also mentions this:
I will give the example of the invention of the airplane.
If you take a look at the front page of the New York Times on Oct 3 1903, Congress had gotten so upset over pouring millions of dollars into Samuel P Langley, the superior Aviation Expert of the time. And he was trying to build an airplane. And the government chose him to do it and they poured tons of money. But every aircraft he built crashed into the Potomac River… So finally Congress said we are going to charter a study. We are going to ask the best scientists and engineers in the world to see if we should keep wasting our money trying to build a flying machine… And they came out with a study and on the Front page of the NYT (10/3/1903) was the result of the study. And it basically said, if we poured all of our money it would take between one million to ten million years to build…
Now if you look up the log book of Orville and Wilbur Wright, on that same day (10/3/1903) there was only one entry.
“We begin building today.”
What they were building was the kitty hawk kill devil. And 2 1/2 months later, after the experts of the age proclaimed we would never build an aircraft, they flew the first aircraft.
Because of examples like that, and my own observation of 3 jets chasing a UFO during the same time frame and in the same area that Josh says he had his encounter, I am not going to automatically dismiss Josh as a complete kook. I am just going to have a large salt cellar handy.
Space Revolution Ep. 12: A 500 Year Giant Leap for Mankind (1 hour 18 minutes)
Lt. Gen. (Ret.) Steven L. Kwast and Josh Reid dive into the idea of a “500 year leap” and why humanity may be on the verge of unprecedented technological acceleration. From the Artemis mission launch to breakthroughs in AI, space manufacturing, and energy, the conversation explores how innovation is shifting from slow progress to exponential change.
They unpack how space unlocks entirely new scientific capabilities, why past power structures may have suppressed innovation, and how emerging technologies could democratize knowledge and opportunity worldwide. The discussion also challenges long standing scientific assumptions, explores the role of mindset in discovery, and examines how future breakthroughs in propulsion, energy, and even consciousness could redefine reality itself.
The episode blends history, physics, geopolitics, and philosophy into a forward looking conversation about abundance, truth, and the future of humanity in space and beyond.
This Week’s Guest: Josh Reid
Book Recommendation: Breakout, by Newt Gingrich
This is an enjoyable upbeat look at Trump’s Golden Age.
…..
OVERWATCH & THE GUARDIAN – U.S GOVERNMENT IS MAKING HYBRID HUMANS?!?- EP.008 (2 hours)
WARNING: Josh uses the word occult, look passed that to the idea he is trying to get across about how our minds work. Very out of the box, but so was that darn UFO I watched! Our current knowledge frame doesn’t work for that UFO so we need out of the box thinking. I considered cutting this part out, however I think the lesson he is trying to teach is important. Also Josh, a Christian, considers the occult and secret societies to be part of the enemies weapons against us.
PARTIAL TRANSCRIPT
22:24 – Josh Reid
— So one of the things that I’ve been doing a lot of research on over the last 15 to 20 years is early 20th century occultism . You can’t even really call it occultism. Call it the rebirth of awakening. And the reason is because it was really a reinterpretation of 19th century ideas that came about through a lot of occult and esoteric societies and authors in the 1900s… Now, we’re not going to get into the seven principles of natural law, but I want to give everybody the gist of it. Basically, the seven principles described in the Kybalion, they’re not telling you what the universe is. It’s not telling you what God is or meaning is. It’s not even telling you how it works. What it’s describing is the framework of how consciousness, your mind, your awareness, your soul interacts with reality.
And that interaction is what we call the the foundations of natural law. Natural law deals with how man interacts with reality. What are the laws that dictate how you interact with your reality? … Your mind is the key component.
And if my mind is here, then God’s mind is outside of me. So everything that I’m interacting with is God’s mind…
Now we tend to believe that the law of cause and effect is, if for every action there’s an equal and opposite reaction is truthful, right?….. so when we talk about the law of cause and effect. What realm is it operating in? It’s operating in the realm of mind. So cause and effect. It’s telling you that as a mind, as a conscious interactor within our reality. You can be in one of two states of existence. You can be in the state of effect or you can be in the state of causation.
Think about it like this. There’s a a quote I used to tell people all the time, specifically when they were wanting to create their own business. And I said, “You know, you go to work every day for eight hours a day and you receive a paycheck. And what you don’t realize is that paycheck is nothing more than a bribe for you to forget about your dreams and to work for somebody else’s.” Because that’s the truth. The person who owns that company, you’re working for them and they’re paying you with that bribe of a paycheck to work for their dreams, not yours. In other words, for that eight hours or 10 hours, however you work in a day, you are a slave to that system. You are bound to that system that you are reacting all day long to that system that controls you. Therefore, you’re creating no causation for the benefit of yourself. You’re completely in a state of reaction.
And this is another prime example of this. Think about social media. How do people react in the world? If you go out there and you say something, have you ever had a Karen react or ever had a lefty react to you? They react emotionally. They don’t react from a point of creative knowledge or understanding or intelligence. They simply react to the world outside of them. So our environment is continuously bombarding us with all different types of things.
If you strip away the human aspect of it when you just look at the electromagnetic waves that are interacting within our reality, you have light and you have air and you have temperature and you have noises and you have trees and you have birds and you have houses. I mean, you have so much stuff that you’re interacting with. What’s happening is that your body, your brain is taking it in and your brain is processing it and then it goes through a filtration system. Then your brain dictates and says, “Hey, this is what I believe is out there, right? And then from there, you begin to interact with that environment.”
Well, here’s the thing. How much influence does that environment have over the perceptibility of your reality? It has massive amounts of control over your perception of reality because the brain itself is very regimented. We know how the brain operates in this construct. So in understanding that if you begin the process of kind of draining yourself out of the system and understanding exactly what I just said, you can begin to train your mind and your body to not react to the environment around you, but instead interact with them.
Have you ever seen a yogi? A yogi can sit there and meditate for 72 days non-stop in the same position through rain and snow. The temperature can drop 80 degrees to negative 10 and he can just sit there and not move one bit, not disturb his breathing. Why? Because he’s not reacting to the environment around him. He’s interacting with the environment around him because he understands the profound law of cause and effect that he becomes a creator in the interaction of reality and not a causation due to the effect of the reality on him.
35:07 – Alpha:
I know one of the principles at least that you’re talking about here but then the reality itself at some point says no you’re going to face what I’m putting in front of you. You can’t mental game your way out of this. How does that apply to what you’re saying in real life?
35:26 – Josh:
A few years ago, I was listening to this guy talk. He was a doctor, an anesthesiologist. He was talking about the mental realm and and the world that you live in. He said “do you know what kinesiology is?” The study of kinesiology of like you know if you’re if you have pains in your left shoulder that means you got women problems and stuff like this. And the reason is is there’s a real science behind this. And he said, he goes, “Imagine people, one of the tests that we do for people in the context of longevity is we ask them if they can touch their toes.” Okay? And he says, “A lot of people, they can’t touch their toes.” And he says, “Listen, this has nothing to do with flexibility and and stretching out. And let me tell you why.” He goes, “Have you ever been under anesthesia?” And the person’s says, “Yeah, I have.” And he says, “You ever seen doctors manipulate somebody who’s under the influence of anesthesia? It doesn’t matter what their body type is, how overweight they are, what shape they are in, if they stretched out that morning or not. They can move their body and contort it in any different way, shape, or form. Your hamstring is twice as long as your actual hamstring, which means that you don’t have to stretch your hamstring out.” He says that the tension and stress that’s actually in your muscles and your tendons is mentally derived.
I want you to think about that for a second because that means that the reactions that are coming from your body in that coldness, your body is entrained within a system, right? Cold is cold, hot is hot. Yeah. Things that are hot will burn you. Things that are cold will burn you and put you into hypothermic hyperbaric shock or hypothermic shock. Right?
Absolutely. For long exposure and duration. But have you ever seen the monk that goes up into the Himalayas and then sits there for 17 days in 30° degree weather with nothing but underwear on and he meditates and he walks out completely fine with no frostbite? That’s real. It’s scientifically studied. How does he do that? How how does he not die? How does he not get hypothermia? Because he is mentally in control of his autonomous nervous system. In other words, he is controlling the reactions of what’s happening into his body and increasing the biological functions within his cell cellular metabolism to increase the heat within his body. And he’s doing that consciously. Now, what does that mean? Is he superhuman? No. He’s just learned how to hack the system. The reason that it gets cold for you and you have to fight through it with pure sheer will is because you have not had that level of training that that monk in Tibet has had. And I haven’t either and I would cry like a little baby for 30 seconds into cold water, right? But this guy has had that level of training. But what has he trained? He didn’t train his body. He trained his mind. He trained his mind how to control cellular metabolism to increase the heat of his body instantaneously so he could survive for four or five days in 10° degree weather and be completely warm and melt snow on his skin anytime it touched it.
As a student, Marx accepted the philosophy of Hegel as the only sound and adequate explanation of the universe… Thus, Hegel accepted as real only that which existed in the mind.Objective phenomena and events were of no consequence; only the conceptions of them possessed by human minds were real. Ideas, not objects, were the stuff of which the universe was made.
….
38:47 – Alpha:
This is a perfect segue into setting up the main topic tonight.
Is it only Josh, because he’s trained his mind? Or is there a secret DNA out there that has given some of us the ability to have different attributes, whether it be the attributes the yogi has, whether it’s someone, like you who have this brain that works, far faster than than than most human beings that are out there.
Josh:
Are you trying to say I’m genetically engineered by aliens?
Alpha:
It was a compliment, you know. It’s made me a fine looking specimen, like Zeus, I’ll go for it. Thank you. but no, is there a secret DNA out there? Has there been a modification? And as we get into this conversation, I want to play a quick short clip here that goes back to July 26th of 2023. This is Rep. Nancy Mace and and she’s asking some questions here. Then we have a series of clips that we’re going to show to you guys tonight. Because the the narrative is telling us we’re not alone. So take a listen to this. Tell me what you think.
TRANSCRIPT OF THE CLIP
Nancy Mace:
Do we have the bodies of the pilots who piloted this craft?
David Grusch:
As I’ve stated publicly already in my News Nation interview, uh biologics came with some of these recoveries. Yeah.
Nancy Mace:
Were they human or non-human biologics?
David Grusch:
Non-human. And that was the assessment of people with direct knowledge on the program I talked to that are currently still on the program.
40:42 – Alpha:
So, we we’ve referenced that video clip on a lot of different episodes and there are people have seen it. A lot of people still haven’t seen it and our audience is growing. I want to make sure everybody’s seen it. Doesn’t say aliens. Doesn’t say the Pleiadians. Doesn’t say reptilians. Doesn’t say the green guys. Doesn’t say the yellow guys. Do you have some clips lined up for you guys where those guys are referenced? He says nonhuman biologics. Now, back in July of 2023 when this was said, there was a certain way I took it. Did you hear what they just reported on what went up with the astronauts on Artemis 2?
Josh:
Oh, I I got it. I got it right here… So, I can pull this up. It’s not a clip. It’s just a a visual.
That’s it. NASA is flying a groundbreaking experiment called Avataron Artemis 2 that could change health care for astronauts and people on Earth. The project uses a tiny organ on a chip device made with bone marrow tissue from the actual Artemis 2 crew. These USB sized chips will study how radiation and microgravity affect human tissue in deep space. The data could help create personalized medical kits for future moon, and Mars missions while also advancing faster safe drug testing and treatments back on Earth.
TRANSCRIPT OF THE CLIP
42:22 — Reporter:
Now, a period of about 40 minutes when you will be out of contact with the Earth.
“That’s when we will be closest to the moon, farthest from the Earth. But it also is a human moment, you know, and I would love for us to have a a moment of togetherness for humans to just go. “Hey, there’s a part of humanity that’s not in touch with the rest of us and let’s just get them all back and then we can go back to the hustle and bustle.”
Josh:
Interesting enough, first black man to be furthest in space, seriously, that’s really cool. First Canadian, first woman. That’s actually really cool. ” And people are like, “Space is fake ‘n gay.”
Guys, if you watch Space Revolution [Ep. 12 linked above — GC] the other day with General Kwast, he said something that I hope you paid attention to. I said, “General Kwast, what do you say to the people in the chat that are calling space fake and gay and NASA fake and gay?” He goes, “Well, we got an AI organized supercomputer on the southern pole of the moon. I log into it. I can see it. I put it there.” He goes, “My team put it there. We launched it. It’s there.”
What do you say to that? You really can’t argue with that. And if people want to, we can get into the whole illusion of the space program, why NASA is quote unquote fake. But I want to go back to what you’re talking about, the DNA part here, because this is actually really interesting in the context of the conversation we’re about to get into.
43:54 – Josh:
So, number one is a few years ago, I had Dr. Michael Salla on one of my shows. He’s the founder of exopolitics.org and has got a lot of good information. I think a lot of some other fringy information, right? But he was talking about how Antarctica is utilized as a basically a trade and exchange for humans and extraterrestrials and that human beings, children primarily, are traded with extraterrestrials. We trade a lot of the kidnapped children with extraterrestrials and then they’re shipped off with alien species and we don’t care what they use them for. At least that’s what he was saying. And my co-host at the time asked, “Well, what currency? What do they trade for them?” And he looked back at us and he said, “DNA.”
He goes, “Think about DNA as the blockchain of the universe. Every single thing on this in in this universe that has DNA has a unique strand of the representation of life that exists in the blockchain of life. And that DNA becomes the most valuable asset in the entirety of the universe because it’s one of the things that’s the most diverse amongst everything and completely unique unto itself. And I found that really profound. And and we’ve learned a lot about DNA since Watson and Crick discovered it in the 1960s.
[Remember Q said to guard your DNA.- GC]
A few things that we learned about DNA is that we used to believe that DNA was hard coded. You ever heard, oh well, that’s hereditary, so you need to be careful. That world doesn’t even exist anymore. That’s just nonsense these days. That science is obsolete.
What we now learn is something known as epigenetic control factors. And what epigenetic control factors truly means is that your DNA is expressed through variations of how your body is affected by the environment. In other words, environmental phenomena express your DNA. So what happens in the womb when a fetus is is first born after that spark and begins to develop. What’s happening in the environment of that mother is actually incredibly relevant to how that DNA is going to express within this baby. That’s why in one of the episodes we talked about listening to opera music and listening to classical music as a mother who is pregnant with an infant in her belly is so profound because it has profound effects on the DNA expression. So when you go into the context of maybe Josh is a modified alien hybrid, maybe, or maybe Josh has just had a lot of different things in his environment that have produced different genetic variations of expressions that is different from everybody else when he started with genes from his mother and his father. 23 chromosomes from each but configured in such a unique way that there’s no other match to that DNA in the entirety of the universe. And then you put them into an environment with complete invariance throughout its whole structure. And now you get expressions of those gene types that are profound that can be genius that can be savant level or you can get ones that are disastrous that are cancer causing. You never know. So that’s my kind of my thought on the whole DNA thing.
Now do I believe that is actually the topic of the show. Is the US government making hybrid humans as declared by Matt Gaetz? If you want to pull that clip up we can watch that clip and this will begin the conversation.
48;00 – Alpha:
Let me share two clips before we get to the the main clips. They’re short so let me go with this one first. And I believe this one’s also with David Grusch as the whistleblower.
Uh these are retrieving non-human origin technical vehicles. You know, call it spacecraft, if you will. It’s probably not the right parlance, but no kidding. Nonhuman, exotic origin vehicles that have either landed or crashed.
News Nation Reporter:
We have spacecraft from another species.
David Grusch:
We do. Yeah.
News Nation Reporter:
How many?
David Grusch:
Quite a number.
48:50 — Alpha:
So, quick comments on this one before we go to the next one. He was very selective with his words and you caught what he said about the spacecraft.
Josh:
So, there’s a few different things and I’m intimately familiar with the story of David Grusch. If people don’t know, Game Tech Politic and myself actually met on a XSpace the night before the debrief article and the David Grusch story actually broke and we talked about all the stuff that was talked about in the congressional hearings and we actually had contacts that knew the people that David Gush was talking to. I’ll leave it at that and I’m not gonna go much further into that part, but this is what I want to point to you is when you understand that David Grusch is not a firsthand experiencer. David Grusch did not go into these black programs. David Grusch did not see the craft. David Grusch was not somebody who was in WUSAPS or USAP projects. He is a secondhand information. He is being told information from certain people and then relaying that into his reporting and then he whistleblows. And he says the world needs to know about this and then reports on his reporting from secondhand information. So that’s the number one thing that we have to keep in context. Okay. The number two is the credibility of the people that came to David Grusch.
The thing is I, we know quite a few people that have talked to David Grusch. They’ve been out there and their credibility is actually pretty good. The psychic spies and stuff like that that came and were working with the Air Force for craft retrieval. These types of guys and there’s other ones that you know Jason Sans is another one.
He talks about his experiences. I know Jason Sans and I believe Jason Sans. and you know there’s another one, Pabon that was just on Clayton Morris’s show “Redacted” a few months ago. I don’t know if I believe his story but this is another one that’s in that context. But David Grusch has also talked to people that are actually in the USAP and WUSAP programs that are currently active in them that have dealt with the technology. That have dealt with the crash retrievals, that have dealt with the entities and beings, the non-biologics that were recovered and one thing that he said that is correct only in correlation to certain parts of this is that I don’t know if spacecraft is the right word and he says it’s kind of like not the right parlance and he’s right on that. This is why a lot of people actually condemn Bob Lazar. Bob Lazar was on Joe Rogan again.
….
Apr 3, 2026 The Joe Rogan Experience [3 hours]
Bob Lazar made headlines in 1989 during an anonymous interview with journalist George Knapp, where he described working with extraterrestrial technology at a site near Area 51. He is the subject of the documentary directed Luigi Vendittelli “S4: The Bob Lazar Story,” now streaming on Amazon Prime Video.
un 20, 2019 The Joe Rogan Experience [2 hours]
Bob Lazar is a physicist who worked at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico, and also on reverse engineering extraterrestrial technology at a site called S-4 near the Area 51 Groom Lake operating location. Jeremy Corbell is a contemporary artist and documentary filmmaker. Watch the documentary “Bob Lazar: Area 51 & Flying Saucers” streamed on Netflix.
….
51: 30 — Josh:
He’s got his movie releasing and he calls it anti-gravity and he tries to explain this anti-gravity phenomena that he experienced at S4 Area 51. Number one, I believe Bob Lazar story. I don’t think that Bob Lazar [who is a physicist] has the the educational background or understanding to actually understand what he was dealing with. And so when we say anti-gravity or spacecraft, we’re not in the right mind context to understand what we’re talking about here.
[I think Josh also has a degree in physics or is at least well read in the field, but he has also explored a lot of far out stuff, and that is the type of ‘educational background or understanding’ he is talking about. Lt. Gen. Kwast talked about the Wright brothers and why they made the breakthrough when all the highly educated guys could not. The Wright brothers were not held back by what they KNEW to be true. — GC]
When Representative Luna or Nancy Mace says interdenominationals, I love it when Eric Weinstein always interjects and goes, you know, I got a PhD in mathematics from Harvard and I understand inter-dimensionality and what are you trying to define inter-dimensionality as? And that’s where things get obscure because the word inter-dimensionality in the spiritual community or the physics community and the math community are all different things. But what David Grusch is trying to say is we don’t have words to really describe how these craft operate, how they travel, or where they come from. The only concepts that we can begin to understand with that is the idea of inter-dimensionality. And people begin to think about multiple dimensions of space-time and folding space on top of each other. That’s not how it works. And I’m going to tell you that right now. That is not how it works. But even the term inter-dimensional that David Grusch has used multiple times is not the right term.
We can get into this in a little bit because it’s going to actually make a lot more sense.
Alpha:
Well, if we need to do a part two, we can do a part two, too, because I want to make sure we get into this conversation, too. But I also did make note that he said they either crash or landed here.
Josh:
Yeah, I love this part.
Alpha:
In other words, like they didn’t they didn’t originate from here. They crash or they landed here. But he also doesn’t describe, what that journey may have looked like. Was it a portal? Was it, from outer space into our atmosphere? Obviously we don’t have much more information in that conversation, but I did note that, he’s a smart person. He’s one of those people that I listen to and it’s not just listening to what they say, but how they choose to get you there.
Josh:
I actually want to comment on what you just said, but I also want to address two comments I saw in the comments on YouTube. One is “It’s an interdimensional vehicle and another person says transdimensional. And I asked these people something that we talked about the other night, define that. What do you mean? How do you define an interdimensional vehicle?
If you say, we have the three dimensions, length, breath, and width, and time and that there’s this fourth mysterious dimension, and it somehow curves all space. No, that that’s not how it works.
And we know this because that whole geometric perspective comes from General Relativity. General relativity for anybody out there who’s never studied Einsteinian physics. General relativity, takes three different geometries that were mathematical geometries. They don’t even really exist. They’re just mathematical constructs of geometries and he converges them together. That makes no sense. Okay? And here’s the thing is, it doesn’t make any sense and he converges them together. In other words, general relativity only works within a constructed geometry that doesn’t exist in the real world. And this is what I was talking to General Kwast about. General relativity states that mass distorts space and time. But space and time have zero attributes to them. They have no attributes whatsoever. They’re just a geometry. And that mass somehow distorts that geometry. And every time that you look at this within the physics books, the book that I have up there, the two that I have over there, it talks about in a singular planer dimensionality. Okay. Now that that is completely the antithesis of any logic or thought of how gravity actually works.
Now, General Kwast, and people you got to understand that man knows way more than he’s letting on to. He said, “Well, I describe gravity as compression.” And I said, “Oh my god, that was it.” And I went on like a 20-minute rant on why it is compression. And if you want to understand gravity, think about a pebble being dropped into the ocean. Okay? A pebble being dropped into the ocean. The moment that pebble hits the ocean, the ocean displaces from the mass, right? But not only does the ocean displace, the ocean pushes back on the pebble with the equivalent proportional amount of force of displacement. That’s a compression onto the pebble. That’s gravity. That’s gravity a perturbation or mass perturbation moving through this field we call the ether or space-time that actually has attributes.
And this is why in the 19th century it was called the luminiferous aether. And Michelson–Morley experiment – Wiki is said to have disproved it. No, no the Michelson–Morley experiment didn’t have the right conceptuality of the experiment. It was reproduced in 1992 because they had a derivative shift in the orbits of GPS satellites over Earth that were experiencing some type of decline in their orbit.
Did you know about this? In 1992, we had the first GPS satellites go up. And they used regular general relativity to, you know, calculate what they would need to do to maintain orbit. And they kept on drifting out of orbit. They said, “What the hell’s going on?” Well, there was a drift that the satellites were incurring that they never calculated, that they didn’t account for, which when you start to look at that drift, it’s exactly what was predicted by Michelson–Morley in 1902 to confirm the luminiferous aether. In other words, that the vacuum of space actually has various attributes that affect the the median of space or the trans medium of space. And once you start to integrate that into kind of general relativity’s theoretical framework, you can start to begin to pull out electromagnetism. You can pull out the strong and the weak nuclear force. You can pull out the gravitational force. And then you can develop ideas on how to manipulate them.
But then it also brings about what is this field of existence? And you realize that in order for that field of existence to actually be there, there has to be a counter field. And that counter field — there’s a great book out of there. It’s called Space and Counterspace.
….
Space and Counterspace: A New Science of Gravity, Time and Light by Nick Thomas an electrical engineer in the Royal Air Force, Rudolf Steiner (1861–1925) was trained as a scientist who studied mathematics, physics, and chemistry at the Technical University in Vienna.
…..
It’s written by a physicist [electrical engineer — GC] that never really got much recognition in the world, but it’s a great read. And what he basically says is that we live in the expressed expanded universe. And the antithesis of this is the planck scale which is a compressed or a replicate universe of which is in an oscillation pattern back and forth. And that these inter-dimensional beings how they travel from one point or another is actually by going into this counter space which is basically a compressed version of the universe.
And then if you think about it, a 100 billion light years here is a 100 billion light years, but in a compressed space it’s two miles. And so they would go into this counter space to actually transit the universe and move massive distances. And this is where you get into the idea of star-gates and all these things. Now in the idea of inter-dimensionality, I think that the concept that we’re trying to talk about is phase transitions. And if you think about this in the context of frequency, imagine you have the full spectrum dominance of the universe. The universe is a scale of frequencies that has a full range that we can’t even fathom. And that right now we only can interact and exist within a very, very small little sliver of that spectrum. Right? But if you increase that spectrum, if you have a being that can see much more of that spectrum compared to us, they can exist and operate outside of the inter-act ability of us because their frequency range is much wider. They live in a different phase transition of the universe…
But when we talk about inter-dimensionals, this is what it’s talking about is phase transitions of reality We are existent right now in in a very very sliver of inter-actability of the universe. And when you expand that, that’s how they’re traveling. This is where they’re coming from. When they say inter-dimensional, that’s what they, at least is what I believe. That’s what they mean. If that makes sense to everybody out there…
1:01:50 — Alpha
So, as as we get into this Matt Gaetz one and and I wanted to show these three quick shorts… But so these shorts, [there have been] a lot of these over the last couple years, they just set us up for they have just accelerated, you know, we were like in cruise control, you know, soft disclosure, drip drip, and this last 10 days, it’s mind-blowing. And here’s the thing that tells me they’re on a timeline. When you have to accelerate information, that’s because you’re trying to pull the court of public opinion and if you’re trying to pull the court of public opinion that means you have a timeline. That means they know where they’re going and they’re trying to get us there. So here’s the last short. Now this one’s creepy. This is not a good one. So just be prepared, folks. All right.
Josh:
And I’ll tell you more about what I believe this timeline is or at least what I’ve heard.
Alpha:
All right. This one’s going to give you the heebie-jeebies, folks.
1:04:00 TRANSCRIPT OF THE CLIP
Eric Burlison REP MO
At one point you said there has been harmful activity or aggressive activity. Has any of the activity been aggressive,been hostile in your reports?
David Grusch
I know of multiple colleagues of mine that got physically injured. And the activity.
Eric Burlison REP MO
By UAPs? Or by people within the federal government.
David Grusch
Both
Eric Burlison REP MO
So there has been activity by alien or non-human technology and or beings that has caused harm to humans.
David Grusch
I can’t get into the specifics in an open environment. But at least the activity that I personally witnessed and I have to be very careful here because you don’t… they tell you never to acknowledge trade craft. So what I witnessed, myself and my wife, was very disturbing.
Alpha:
GOVERNMENT? and the little green people right that’s very interesting So now with that, I’ll go straight into the Matt Gaetz clips and then when you’re ready for the other ones, you tell me.
Yeah, I was going to say it’s it’s not old at all. So here you go. This is the Matt Gaetz one.
TRANSCRIPT FROM THE CLIP [Benny Show]:
Matt Gaetz:
I mean, I had someone come and brief me who was in a military uniform, worked for the United States Army that was briefing me on the locations of hybrid breeding programs where captured aliens were breeding with humans to create some hybrid race that that could engage in intergalactic communication. An actual uniform member of the United States Army. Brief me on that.
Benny:
Non-human biologics, interracial alien mating. What the f is going on? Like, wait a second. You had whistleblowers tell you this kind of thing. Can you please unpack?
Matt Gaetz:
Yeah. I had a I had a guy who was in uniform. He was a a senior enlisted with the United States Army, came into my office at Crestview, Florida in a non-classified setting. I had members of my staff there. And what they explained is that the military ran a very secret program where aliens that were living were in forced breeding programs with humans that had been abducted from war zones and
from even the caravans of migrants. Now again, I didn’t verify this, but what the whistle blower was
telling me is that there were between six and 12 locations around the country where this happened. And what he wanted was a group members of Congress to all show up at the same time at all of these different locations so that any of those activities could not be moved. And of course, it’s a physical impossibility to get members of Congress to simultaneously show up at like eight locations at one time. And so that never occurred.
1:07:32 — Josh:
So I know who this guy was that talked to Gaetz. At least I believe I know who this was that talked to Matt Gaetz. Number one is he is the first and I’m going to preface this because I like Matt Gaetz and I don’t think that he’s trying to mislead people. He says a few words that I would rephrase. He says he was briefed. He’s not briefed. This wasn’t official military briefings. Okay. This was a whistle blower who walked into his congressional office that was former army that sat down with him. So I want to preface that. Number two is the guy wasn’t senior enlisted. He was an NCO, non-commission officer, E5s. You and I know that E5s aren’t crap. And when you’re in the enlisted ranks, you really ate crap. Especially when it comes to secret knowledge and stuff like that, right? I believe it was Jorge Paban. He was a sergeant in the United States Army. He was recruited by the intelligence agencies, or at least this is from his story. He had a whole life of alien contact. Very similar story to Chris Bledsoe. Aliens had been interacting with him his whole life. The intelligence agencies got a hold of this. They recruited him, asked him to join the army. He joined the army. And kind of went to the moon and did all these other things, right? At least this is who I believe it was.
Why do I say that? Because he lives in Florida around Crestview in Matt Gaetz’s district at that time.
and he came out about six months ago on Redacted did an interview with Clayton Morris and basically correlated a lot of what Matt is saying. So pretty sure it’s Jorge Pabon. Does that discount what Matt’s saying? No, because there’s another clip that gets more into this and you got to remember this is an active member of Congress and there’s a lot more going on than meets the eye.
You want to bring up that next clip?
…….
This is a longer clip (7 minutes) than what was shown, although I think the 2nd part was shown as a separate clip.
[WTF??? The US President is on a NEED to KNOW BASIS as to WHAT the bureaucrats tell him??? –GC] ….
TRANSCRIPT FROM THE CLIP
Rob Finnerty of Newsmax
I don’t have the tinfoil hat on just yet, Congressman, but I’m wondering, you know, kind of how you react to that because you are connected. You’re on the UFO subcommittee. I mean, I’m just wondering
what you make of that. Have you heard anything like that?
Tim Burchett:
Well, I’m still a member of Congress, so I I can’t really comment too much on what Matt said. Uh, but I I will say this.
Rob Finnerty:
Wait, seriously? Are you being serious or is that time?
Tim Burchett:
I’m being 100% serious. I’ve been 100% serious. I’ve been briefed by just about every Alphabet agency there is. And I’ll just tell you this, if they would release the things that I’ve seen, you would stay up you you’d be up at night worrying about or thinking about this stuff. We just need to disclose it all. I’m sick of it. You’re Well, I was brief. I’ll just tell you this. I was briefed last week on an issue or excuse me two weeks ago and it would have set the earth on fire. This country would have come unglued I think if they would have heard all that I heard. They would they would demand answers and they and we need to but you know it’s it’s never going to get unfortunately it just keeps getting covered up and covered up and the people that know are dying or disappearing as the case may be.
Rob Finnerty:
Wow.
Tim Burchett:
And for the record, I’m not suicidal and I don’t take risks.
Rob Finnerty:
I’m glad you said that. I’m speechless, Congressman. We should be back.
Tim Burchett:
You should be. And I told the president, release it all. And the problem is the people that are around the president don’t know and the president doesn’t know the questions to ask. A few of us are going to have to get with the president and tell him what he needs to ask and where he needs to look. I mean, you know, we’re we’re in meetings and they give addresses and tell locations of items, I’ll just say. And um the public has a right to know, Dad Gum. But it’s your tax dollars.
Rob Finnerty:
Absolutely. You got my attention, Congressman. I appreciate you being as forthcoming as you have been tonight, and we look forward to having you back.
Tim Burchett:
Look, I know Donald Trump wants to disclose something. He hasn’t done it yet, but I think he wants to be the president to do that.
Rob Finnerty:
Tim Burchett, thank you. He does.
…..
Another interview with Tim Burchett from a year ago. (4:30 min)
…….
Josh:
Okay. Finnerty’s reaction. Did you see that? The moment that he goes, “Wait, wait, hold on. Are you serious? Are you serious?” Did you see his face after that? He’s like, like, “This is like holy crap. This is real.” Now, Tim Burchett, we’re going to talk about that clip, but I want to talk I want to play this one. This was today. Listen to this.
TRANSCRIPT FROM THE CLIP
Reporter for OAN:
Roswell, Area 51, Wright Patterson down in Dayton, my home state of Ohio. We’ve been hearing about this stuff now for 70 years. That we have it, we don’t have it. That we’ve re-engineered it. No, we haven’t. I know you can’t talk about much because you’re an active member, but just give me a wink. Are we alone?
Tim Burchett:
No. No, we’re not. We’re not. [Reporter is staring with mouth open -GC]
Reporter:
Holy, Wait a minute. [laughter] Did you, Did I just Guys, did we just break that? Wait a minute. Is that April Fools today, Tim?
Tim Burchett:
No. Second. Nope. We We are not alone.
Reporter:
We don’t make all them….
…..
Josh:
What did he just say?
Alpha:
We’re not alone.
Josh:
So, take those two clips.
Tim Burchett just said, “I’ve been briefed by every three-letter agency on this topic. If people saw and knew what I saw, what was shown to me, the world would burn, America would come unglued.” On another show, he comes out and says, “We are not alone.”
Alpha:
Now, I want to just provide a very controversial question. I’m not saying that this is true. I just want us to consider this. And you definitely are one of the people that got me to look in this direction.
When we think Epstein, we think human trafficking, child trafficking, blackmail, and leverage. But we know that this goes way into a much darker science. Especially with kids and you know him wanting to breed. Now we also know that there’s been some disclosure into the Epstein files but not a lot. Is it too far-fetched or maybe too tinfold hat or extremist to think our government, even though it’s been very corrupt for many, many decades, it still knows that it has to operate within the confines of certain types of laws and policies. And this is why you get contractors and agents and assets that can kind of do things that limit the government or military or DARPA. Is part of the reason and the hesitation and the slow rolling out of the Epstein thing? Is this because we keep looking at Epstein was a blackmail operation but what if it was far greater than that. What if Epstein’s operation was actually part of this military hybrid operation that was acting in the behest of the military. Whether the military was paying for it through black accounts or whether the military was covertly providing assets and income and data to make sure that it happened but with some plausible deniability.
Am I am I going too far out of balance with this man?
1:14:44 — Josh:
I’ve done done an extensive amount of research on Epstein. And one of the things that you get is tying Epstein into — human trafficking isn’t the right word — Child sex trafficking isn’t the right word — Child procurement is the right word for it. And a lot of this was being pushed into biomedical research and genetic research information. I tend to categorize this as human genetic modification programs or hybridization. Epstein actually wrote about, alien chimerization. Hybridization of human and alien DNA and he was actually trying to get hybrid alien DNA. One of the reasons he was looking for ancient civilizations off the coast of Cuba and why he lived in the Caribbean was so they could dive down there find the remnants of the ancient human civilization, find DNA to then replicate that DNA and integrate it into our current DNA because he believed that human beings once possessed superhuman powers on this planet. Now, when you go into the idea of the CIA finders program, when you go into people like Epstein, child procurement, you go into John of God running a baby farm in Brazil with thousands upon thousands of children being born each year. We come back to the same question that nobody ever asks.
Because when you say when you say child sex trafficking or human trafficking, the why is very easy. It’s money. It’s about money, power, and control, and influence and compromise. But when you start to enter this new caveat into it, and ask why. Why were they doing this? And that Why is why people like Todd Blanche stepped in and stopped it. That Why is why people like Dan Bongino were given false information which he believed true and correct that Epstein didn’t kill himself or that Epstein killed himself. It’s the reason why that people like Kash Patel go down these these rabbit holes and can’t progress further down them.
Because that Why is so profound that it relates directly back to what Tim Burchett said. That the earth would burn and America would come unglued. Now in part of that conversation he says I was briefed two weeks ago on something that’s happening right now. And I got the clip on that part that was further on in that clip. And the thing is he goes and talks about retired General William Neil McCasland who’s missing and these scientists who are missing. My belief is a lot of people in these black projects who have operated in it for a long time have been trying to blow the whistle on this and they’ve been disappeared, removed from the chessboard, or just vanished…
You can also align it that it’s technological security and superiority right? That people are competing in factions of technology and corporate contracts. Who’s going to get the contracts for all this stuff? You want to eliminate any competition. I got my scientist over here. Here’s the other scientist. If he gets hired at this company then we’re screwed. so let’s take him out. Right? You get this whole idea that comes out of this as well.
That’s not what this is about. There is something that is happening right now. And I believe that the reason that Donald Trump is doing what he is doing globally, why the Iran war is coming about, why we are securing, reallocating the resources of the world back towards the United States of America.
Remember Chuck Schumer came out and you and I had never seen Chuck Schumer say anything like that. “This is very, very serious and this administration has got to convince the American people.” [I was unable to find this. I think it was related to Iran. GC]
Alpha:
First time I’ve ever seen him act like a real politician.
Josh:
That’s right. We talk about the geopolitical front China and Iran and all these things and that’s a big part of it from what I gather. This is a crazy scenario.
Alpha:
Somebody in the chat brought it up here, so if they brought it up, other people are probably thinking it, too. The Save America Act does have specific text referencing it shall be unlawful for any alien to vote. Now, we’ve always thought of alien as in an illegal from another country. What if alien doesn’t just include someone from another country, but someone who’s not completely human?….
Josh:
Jordan Maxwell was a friend of mine and we used to have these long conversations on Saturday afternoons going into Saturday evenings. Jordan Maxwell, when asked this question. Do they walk among us and do they look like us. And he says, “No, you have that wrong. They don’t look like us. We look like them.”
Now, if anybody can take the ontological shock of what I just said and understand it fully, then the next parts are going to make a lot more sense. This isn’t Anunnaki 9 foot god beings, okay? This is very real, From what I gather, this is talked about at high levels of of classified congressional hearings. And I know because we have flies on the wall….
This is Secretary of the Army Dan Driscoll on the 250th anniversary of the US Army’s birthday. And I want you to listen to what he says here. “As young Americans across the country get to see all of the amazing things that the Army has done, whether it’s helping with floods in North Carolina or wildfires in California or we talked to an astronaut yesterday who’s on the moon who’s a soldier, including…”
I’m going to replay that last part.
…
[It is during the first minute of this 4 minute video]
….
Josh:
I asked General Kwast about this the other day. He said “What was said was said for a reason. … Those Apollo missions? They were taking stuff up there to build a moon base. And the US military has had a presence on the moon since the 1970s”…
Alpha:
…..Is that why there’s no point in searching for the missing scientists on Earth?
Josh:
I think that the missing scientist on Earth is more of an Earth phenomena. I don’t think it has to deal with what’s going on around us and up there,. I think McCasland is in hiding. So, the timing was impeccable. Right after Trump says disclosure, he takes off. I think that he’s in hiding by himself and he’s doing it on purpose. I think these other scientists were killed because they try to be whistleblowers.
NASA astronaut Mike Fincke suffered a mysterious medical emergency on the ISS earlier this year while he was prepping for a space walk when he suddenly lost the ability to speak. You remember this back in January… Next, we’ve had 31/Atlas [Comet] and then all of a sudden we have mysterious standards of deviation higher meteors hitting the planet over March. They’re now gone. It was a very short time frame. Almost like we went through the debris field of something . That’s what I believe just happened. 31/Atlas was most likely some type of long distance alien probe that probably shot some things off towards the planet and we blew the crap out of them and then we went through the debris field. I’m going to tell you the reasoning behind all of this. Now there’s some other context to this in the sense of interdimensionality.
This is a little bit more that’s a little bit more fringe stuff. I don’t know necessarily think I want to get into. There was something I was told two days ago about all this…And I say that I was told because I mean, crap dude. I talked to a lot of people. MJ Truth goes, “As US astronauts head back to the moon, let’s remember what Space Force has said about the moon. When foreignpowers can build bases on the dark side of the moon, when private companies are inventing a new economy beyond our planet…. I have often felt like there has been a war raging above our heads the last several years. The falling debris, the odd fireballs in the skies, so much more is happening than we are being told.” I can’t tell you how spot-on he is right on that comment.
This is the framework that I’ve developed over the years for understanding what’s going on. Thousands of years ago, human civilization was absolutely annihilated. Any idea of an advanced civilization was destroyed by something, someone or something. It wasn’t human.
They implemented mechanisms of control on this planet. Overseers, bloodline families to rule and monitor over humanity, whether it’s for harvesting, whatever. We’re not the top of the totem pole on the food chain. And these overseers are meant to to watch over the planet and secure their property.
The new world order, the one world government, the secret societies, the the occult were preparing the world for their arrival. They were getting everything ready. This is what the control systems and structures were all about. This is what the suppression of technology has been about for the last hundred years. They suppressed technology so that we would never have the capability to defend ourselves against what they would consider to be their gods.
2016 changed that. When Donald Trump came in, he started dismantling all of those systems. Think about people as maybe even alien human hybrids, maybe derived through bloodline affiliation or association that have ruled and controlled this world for a very, very long time, and they are being systematically dismantled.
At the same time, remember how I told you that if you go back to the 1950s and Eisenhower’s military-industrial complex statement and how these black programs were hidden through DSRT and the CIA, they were hidden through Lockheed and all of these defense contractors. But remember when I told you that the deep state never had access to them? That’s confirmable. Obama, Clinton, Podesta, they never had access to these things. The Rothschilds never did. You want to know why? If they did, we’d already be dead. We’d already be controlled. We’d already live in the slave matrix and we don’t. Which tells you that they never had control of it. Which tells you that the reason why these reverse engineering projects, these black budget projects were all hidden, not to keep them from humanity, but to keep them from the enemy. To keep the enemy from knowing that we had this advancement. This is what the psychological warfare operations are all about in the context of all this information. And the reason being why is because of what someone said to me the other day. That we now have the technology that is hidden away that is being brought back into executive authority under President Donald Trump, to fight them if they ever come back. And they’re coming back. They’re coming back. And we have the capability to destroy them when they get here.
Alpha:
Which is why we have this limited time window of disclosure has to be accelerated because they knew once the cat comes out of the bag that means it comes out of the bag for the bad guys as well.
1:31:00 — Josh:
That’s right. And so when we start looking at accountability and justice and all…
1:34:00
What I’m trying to say is that just because maybe they came in here and beat the crap out of us 5,000 — 6,000 years ago, maybe because they’ve had force and dominance over our planet for a 6,000 year period, it doesn’t mean that they’re more technologically advanced. It doesn’t mean they’re more societal or structurally advanced. It doesn’t mean they’re more intelligent than us. It just means that at one point in time they had the upper hand. And now I think we do….
1:36:00 — Alpha
And the other thing is, I saw someone in the chat bring up Yuval Noah Harari, and that takes us to a certain bioweapon that was engineered during that 2019, 2020 at least according to the narrative. [A bioweapon] that people had to put in their bodies and we saw it affected the immune system. Why was there such a desire to to weaken the human immune system? Is it because of the concept of big pharma or depopulation or was it because there’s someone that’s in route to pick a fight with us and our immune system is one of our greatest attributes one of the greatest weapon systems that we have…
1:36:30 — Josh:
[Or] Maybe it was something to actually protect us….
1:37:50 – Alpha:
…. I just want to present questions. I have speculations and I have thoughts. What I do know is we’re on the brink of something and no one is going to convince me otherwise. I recognize the patterns in the military operations. I recognize the patterns in mainstream media. I recognize the patterns of the propaganda. Listen, there’s all the stuff that me and Josh do share from people that we trust, there’s a list of things that are not shared for many different reasons. And I tell myself, why is that?
I know I’m not the only one that got that info because I’ll see which people do go out and post it. And so I know that there is information that is being put out there purposeful, not by accident. And so all that tells me is what? There’s a war. There’s a war that is unfolding right now. It’s informational. It’s psychological, but it’s also not human. And that’s the part we don’t talk about enough.
1:38:50 – Josh:
I want to give a shout out to somebody because I find this really interesting. Anybody knows the Shadow of Ezra.? He just reposted army whistleblowers once visited a secret civilization on the moon and it’s the Jorge Podon interview on with Clayton Morris which he posted
…..
Clayton Morris’ 2-part interview with Jorge Pabon, a former U.S. Army paratrooper (See above)
Part One: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4avDJSNB4c
Part Two: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ee2fvD2h3IY&t=42s
Clayton Morris also interviewed Natalie Isley: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EP-5tLp5xv8
and has UFO testimony w Dr. Steven Greer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hvgozjVhATI
Alien bodies discovered in Brazil, UFO Technology in U.S. hands, Trump’s disclosure: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UAImmEMPu7M
……
1:43:30 – Alpha:
Here’s what I’ll say, Representative Burchett has become one of my favorites. And when he comes out and he starts saying, I ain’t suicidal, is he being hyperbolic? I don’t think so. When you look at the
context of the recent headlines surrounding the scientists, the missing and the dead, even with the MIT stuff and all that stuff, there’s legitimate reason to be concerned. But with that understanding is. President Trump knows. If Tim Burchett knows, Trump knows. He said it. I briefed the president on this. So if Trump knows and he’s making moves the way he is. Think about this in every flank that we’re fighting on Iran, the economy, you know, everything, how many of those moves are not about the headline, but have to do with what Rep Burchett is actually talking about? How much stuff is being set up that we’re thinking, Oh this is for no kings or this is for Antifa or this is to secure elections. But is that what it is? Is the army QRF teams, the quick reaction forces, that have been set up in every nation [for that?] … But is it just that or is there another reason that there would be unrest if information comes out that there are these green guys and gray guys and others? Do you need quick reaction forces to maintain society so anarchy doesn’t break out? We’ve all seen the movies Independence Day and all these other things. And I’m curious. Here’s the other thing and and I’ll give it right back to you Josh.
When one of the first markers I saw that something’s going on was, and we’ve talked about this before, we have the largest US military presence along our southern border in the history of the United States. And we were told that this is because of the immigration crisis, the the narcotics trafficking crisis. But then Trump comes and tells us that within the first 10 days he shut down to nearly 98 to 100%. Yet the military presence kept increasing and I started thinking, okay, well, we got the cartels. Cartels present a threat. We know that a lot of Chinese special forces were moved into Mexico. That presents a threat. But now part of me starts wondering what if there’s a different threat and because and the reason I bring this up is because you said what exists underground? Well, that brings us into the conversation for another show, I’m sure, of deep underground military bases, and they don’t just exist in the United States. What if there are things in these deep underground military bases in countries that are neighbors like Mexico and Canada that warrant us executing caution? I don’t know. I’ll give it to you for your thoughts
1:46:50 – Josh:
Yeah. How about this goes back to that idea that they walk among us and they look like us and they have overseers on this planet who control finance, money, power and governments. And what have those same people done over the course of the last hundred years? They’ve developed mercenary armies through various different ancillary infrastructures. And so if they wanted to ensure that their side wins the war, what are they going to do? they’re they’re going to bring about that war destabilization to ensure that their side does win. I’ll leave it with one thought here. And you remember Tim Burchett’s video that we just watched?
So here’s Tim Bashett’s video that we just watched. And I’m going to bring this up [on X].
I’m going to zoom in a little bit on this and then I’m going to scroll down below it.
And look what General Michael Flynn says. [In a reply tweet. -GC]
“I believe Tim Burchett He’s not a man to mince words or to short sell the normal political crap but be aware of false flag alien operation by rogue elements inside the US government.”
Did you know that General Flynn was actually denied access to a lot of this stuff? I did not know. There are certain reports out there that state that General Flynn was trying to get access to this stuff during the first Trump administration. And he was denied. Now, I want to go back and play a clip real quick that I’m going to bring up right here of an interview.
“Oh my god. What he’ll be able to discover. And frankly, I already knew a lot. I already knew a lot of the things that I wanted to dig into and I wanted to shut down or expose. Okay. And then of course, you know, now it’s now do I work with the president to maybe hold certain people or certain institutions accountable, right? They couldn’t have that. Couldn’t have that. And that’s our problem. That’s what I talk about in the movie. This is our problem is that we have these, this, this extraterrestrial government that is running.”
Josh:
Have you ever heard that man say that word before?
Alpha:
That’s a no, bro.
Josh:
Me either. And it’s interesting how he says it.
I want this extraterrestrial talk about in the movie. This is our problem we have these, this, this extraterrestrial government. I think that tells everybody exactly what is going on here.
