KMAG DAILY THREAD 20260729 DATA CENTERS

Site rules stolen from our good friend PAVACA

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.


Do not forget to LABEL AI articles, video and such.

I want to take another look at Data Centers because POTUS Trump and others indicated they are a vital security and economic concern. I am starting with this video because he has an excellent easily understandable explanation of the SCAM the City of London Financiers have been playing on the USA.


ROUGH PARTIAL TRANSCRIPT:

The economy, the real physical economy that enabled hardworking people like you to really thrive 30 years ago. Well, that’s gone. It’s been systematically eliminated. This all really started because of an owl. The spotted owl. Just look behind me. That closed mill means nothing to you right now. But I’m going to show you where your money is disappearing to and how that closed mill is the very reason you can’t get ahead anymore. Here’s the simple loop.

The timber industry used to create revenue for the government. That revenue paid for the government to operate. When the industry was destroyed, the revenue stopped. The government spending increased at the same time. And they printed money to fill the black hole of the new spending. Printing that money cut the value of dollars in your bank account, which made everything you buy cost more. You didn’t change. The system did. Now, you may understand the basics of inflation, but what you may not understand is that someone got rich and is still getting rich off of that very system. And I’m going to show you who that is so that you never let it happen to you again.

When this mill was running, it produced physical wealth. And that wealth paid the taxes that you now have to pay. And it funded a reality where a single inome family could do just fine. But in the 1990s, elites in the highrises decided they couldn’t control independent producers. So they used emotion to stop them. But here’s what you need to understand. The money didn’t just disappear. It went to someone. It went to someone sitting in a boardroom in a high-rise. It was an engineered transfer of wealth from you to a global elite. We’re going to call him Arthur. Arthur is a high-powered lawyer for a massive environmental NGO, which we’ll call the Evergreen Defense Fund. Arthur realized he could weaponize the Endangered Species Act, to make money for himself. So, he stirred up anger in the public over a perceived injustice to a cute little owl. Then he used that same injustice to file thousands of lawsuits to stop the logging on public land under laws like Equal Access to Justice Act.

When Arthur’s NGO sues the federal government and wins, the government is legally required to pay Arthur’s attorney fees with your tax dollars. Arthur got rich from donations and then got paid from your taxes to get even richer. Arthur didn’t save the environment. He stopped the flow of real wealth that paid to keep our public lands and our wild places open and well kept. So, every time you feel the sting of inflation at the grocery store, just remember that you’re paying Arthur’s bonus. Now, to really wrap your mind around this, let’s go through an economic example to show you how the money flows from you to Arthur.

Before Arthur’s lawsuits, federal law required that 25% of all timber revenue from timber sales on federal land to go directly back into the local counties. In a prime timber county in the 1980s, that meant 20 to 30 million a year of pure debt-free cash pouring straight into your public schools and county road departments. On top of that, the logging companies maintained thousands of miles of mountain roads entirely for free just so they could run their trucks. The Forest Service budget was green, filled with cash from an American made product that went directly to consumers all over the country. Remember, there’s two silos that always have to be filled. The local county budget, then there’s the Forest Service itself. If the Forest Service decided to sell standing timber for $10 million, a timber company would come along and pay it. 7.5 million of that would go directly into the Forest Service budget to help keep our campgrounds clean and our trail heads open and pay the people who take care of our Forest Service. 2.5 million of that went directly into our counties to fill their budget to take care of our school funding, keep our roads graded and maintained. When Arthur used a spotted owl to shut down the woods, that $30 million vanished overnight. The free road maintenance stopped, but the county still had to keep the schools open. So the federal government stepped in with bailout programs like secure rural schools, which is SRS, and PILT, which is payment in lie of taxes. And they replaced real physical timber wealth with your tax dollars and printed money. And the bleeding didn’t stop there. When these mills closed, hundreds of men lost their jobs. The local cafe went out of business because no one was buying lunch. But worst of all, the mill was the largest single taxpayer in the county. With them gone, who makes up the difference to fix the crumbling schools? You do. Government spending overall skyrocketed. Not only did they lose revenue, but they literally created a county welfare program that caused us to pay even more.

Arthur flipped the system upside down.

He got rich and all the hardworking people in the West are still paying the bills. Sadly, all of those people who held up a spotted owl sign or screamed in the face of a logger are paying, too. All of us paid to make Arthur rich. Whether you gave money to Evergreen Defense Fund or fought against it, we all lost. Add in the hundreds of millions that the government has to spend fighting Arthur and the millions that we pay him when he wins. It’s a massive black hole of spending, entirely funded by raising your taxes and printing more money. Bankrupting the American West wasn’t enough for Arthur because what he left behind was not a pristine wilderness. It was a ticking time bomb…

6:30: The people who engineered this transfer of wealth are relying on your ignorance. They want you to think that the economy is just very complicated so you don’t realize that you’re being robbed…

[Description of old decayed forests, forest too thick to feed wild life and massive out of control fires.]

16:51: When a mega fire breaks out now, the government has to fight it. The federal fire suppression budget was a fraction of what it is today. Now it is a multi-billion dollar black hole on top of all the other expenses. Who pays for the fleets of helicopters? Who pays for the thousands of firefighters? You do, of course. Your tax dollars are drained to fight a fire that never should have happened.

And Arthur, his lungs are perfectly fine. He’s sitting in a high-rise with hospital-grade air filtration. Arthur sells you the cure to the disease that he created. Your kids get to breathe in toxic ash every summer. And more of your tax dollars go up in smoke for fire suppression. While Arthur and his buddies each bought another vacation home. Arthur burned the system down. He bankrupted the counties and he scorched the timber. But he’s just a lawyer. He doesn’t want to actually own anything. But what he did was create a county system that is desperate enough to sell. And that’s when the vultures come in from Wall Street. You thought that was it? That was all the money and power and rights that they were going to strip from you. Well, if that’s the case, you don’t understand how the world works because there’s always someone left to pick up the scraps. To understand who’s taking from you now, you have to understand the concept of a mob boss takeover. How does a mob boss takeover work? Well, the first guy comes in to a perfectly healthy business and he breaks the kneecaps of the owner and then he drives away every one of the customers and makes it impossible for them to come back until that owner is literally in debt up to his eyeballs. Cannot make a dime. That’s when the second guy comes in and offers him pennies on the dollar for his business. Now, Arthur and his lawsuits are the first guy.

They have really driven everybody to the edge of insolvency. They have siphoned out a whole bunch of the industry. Anything that’s real economy has been removed, which opens the door for the second guy, the one who’s going to make the offer to make it all right. We’re going to call that second guy Eleanor. Eleanor works for a firm called Green Rock and they’re rolling out a new product. They’re going to buy the ecosystem services off the land that is now on the edge of bankruptcy in the name of protecting the environment and saving the ecosystem. They’re going to take the one thing you have left. Your access.

Do you understand what they’re doing here?

Arthur burned it down. Eleanor is buying it up for Wall Street. The trees and wildlife are no longer nature. They’re now a highly regulated financial asset. and Eleanor can’t afford to have you or your children hiking, recreating, or hunting on her asset. Arthur burned the system down. He bankrupted our counties and then he handed you an inflation bill. And now Eleanor is coming in to buy up the resources, what’s left on the dirt, to lock you out of the American West forever. If you want to understand the real mechanisms behind natural assets, nature credits, and the ecological services that they’re selling off the land, and how it’s going to really affect you and your children.

You need to learn the playbook. Go to the link in the description and join the high lonesome society. Now you know the reason you can’t go forward. It’s not about the spotted owl. It’s not about saving the timber. Every time you earn a dollar, it’s being taken from the back end. It’s all about extracting money from you to them. And they’re not going to stop there. The more we give, the more they take. And now you know about Arthur. You need to look out for Eleanor.

Until next time, I’m Trinity Vandenaker. God bless.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

This video starts at 2:30 minutes with a speech by POTUS Trump. It is about Data center companies pledging to build electric generation and promises no rate increase. In some communities the rate have gone DOWN and now they have NO PROPERTY TAXES! Critical comment on foreign Propaganda.

11 minutes — They have also agreed to invest heavily in communities where data centers are built ,supporting job training and local services.

11:40 — Other countries are trying to get us to slow down.

Badlands Media Special Coverage: 7/23/26 – Trump Expands Ratepayer Protection Pledge at EPA

POTUS Trump mentions foreign propaganda. Is this an example?

TEXT:

China has spent roughly $100 million on influence operations inside the United States, DOJ records show — spanning state-run propaganda networks, corporate lobbying and efforts to shape American policy at every level.

The spending includes $66.8 million funneled to CGTN America, Beijing’s flagship English-language media operation, between February and November 2025 alone. Dozens of American lobbyists have signed new contracts with Chinese-owned companies, including firms the Pentagon has designated as Chinese military companies. Tencent alone has spent over $10 million on lobbying since 2025.

And that’s just what’s on the books. Campus groups linked to the Chinese government and organizations under China’s United Front Work Department — a global network of CCP loyalists — don’t file disclosures at all.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/chinas-influence-machine-federal-records-expose-beijings-push-sway-america


President Trump Expands Historic Ratepayer Protection Pledge to Protect American Ratepayers, Lower Electricity Prices – epa.gov

This article covers parts of the President’s speech.

President Trump’s Ratepayer Protection Pledge Will Now Cover 80 Percent of All Power Delivered to American Homes and Businesses

President Trump first announced the Ratepayer Protection Pledge in his State of the Union address on February 24, 2026.  On March 4, 2026, seven leading AI companies and hyperscalers — Amazon, Google, Meta, Microsoft, OpenAI, Oracle, and xAI — signed the Ratepayer Protection Pledge at the White House. Companies that sign the pledge are committing to build, bring, or buy all of the energy needed to power their facilities and to pay the full cost of that energy and its supporting infrastructure, no matter what. Ratepayer Protection Pledge extends those obligations across the full chain of parties whose decisions determine what a family pays each month: the electric utilities that set rates, the developers that build the facilities, and the States that regulate both.   

“The United States never settles for second, and we don’t under this administration… we live by the motto ‘America First,” said President Donald. J Trump. “Thanks in part to this incredible [AI] technology boom, investments are pouring into the United States from all over the world.”  

“The global race for AI is underway, and America must win it — but not by asking working families to pay for it,” said EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin“Communities that welcome these facilities deserve every fact in front of them and every protection behind them. That is what the Trump EPA has delivered, and that is what Ratepayer Protection Pledge builds on. Our Team at EPA is honored to host President Trump, Secretary Wright, and many other distinguished guests, for today’s important announcement.” ….

EPA has advanced this work by making the rules of the road public and accessible before a shovel goes in the ground. In December 2025, EPA’s Office of Air and Radiation launched the Clean Air Act Resources for Data Centers webpage, giving developers, local communities, and Tribes a single location for the regulatory information, permitting guidance, and air quality modeling tools relevant to these facilities. In May 2026, EPA launched the Permitting Authority Map, a public interactive tool that allows anyone to select a location and identify which agency — EPA, State, territorial, Tribal, or local — issues each environmental permit. EPA also published reuse considerations and a Redevelopment Mapper to help communities and developers evaluate Brownfield and Superfund sites for industrial reuse. Together these resources advance two pillars of Administrator Zeldin’s Powering the Great American Comeback initiative: making America the AI capital of the world, and permitting reform through cooperative federalism. 

A facility that generates its own power, returns what it does not use to the grid, hires from the community it joins, and stands ready to keep the lights on when the system is under strain gives back to its community. The States and localities welcoming these facilities are building new generation their regions did not have before, putting their own residents to work, and ensuring that the infrastructure of the next century is built here at home — by American workers, powered by American energy. 

I also want to add a Tweet by Barbara Boyd of Promethean Action. In a recent Question and Answer session she mentioned she lives in Virginia and that you can not drive a mile without tripping over an AI Data Center. She said nothing about noise or any other problems.

TEXT:

Barbara M Boyd @BarbaraMBoyd Jul 18

I know this will set some of my friends hair on fire but Sacks is right and I don’t want my nieces and nephews to be speaking Chinese. When you walk across Hoover Dam do you think about how many men died there constructing it. There were lots but they signed up for it because it was such a grand undertaking to provide both water and electricity to an entire area of our country for generations.

David Sacks @DavidSacks Jul 17

This is concerning. For the first time, a Chinese model Kimi K3 has taken #1 on the Frontend Code Arena and is scoring at or near the frontier on other benchmarks. Meanwhile America is tying itself in knots: politicians and bureaucrats are banning new data centers, piling on state regulations, and pushing for new federal agencies to pre-approve frontier models. This is how you lose the AI race. The rest of the world won’t play by our rules if we bog ourselves down. Permissionless innovation is how America won the internet and became the technological envy of the world. We can do it again with AI — while addressing risks in a targeted way — or we’ll watch our lead evaporate

1:42 The RAM chip shortage story

2:15 Who shut the memory lines down

3:13 The hyperscale data centre narrative

4:07 The collapse has already happened

5:11 Seven companies propping up the market

6:16 The alchemy engine and rehypothecation

6:55 Manufacturing a key dependency

8:36 Gödel, Goebbels and the chipset proof

9:46 Why the hyperscaler future isn’t coming

11:06 Hydraulic despotism and the debt

12:09 The TLDR: holding the general price level

13:08 What gold bugs and Bitcoiners miss

Generally I like Rich and his guests but this one has me doing suspicious cat. However there are a lot of interesting nuggets so I am bringing it to the QTree for discussion.The lead speaker is

EM Burlingame – 蒲 奕 言

The Chinese characters seem to indicate the last emperor of China.

Much of this is over my head but we do have these data points. We are already aware of ‘Managed Decline’ and the off shoring of our manufacturing, mining and REAL wealth producing industries. Some of us are aware of the gambling casino called the derivatives market — 81 Abstract notes “Some market analysts estimate the derivatives market at · more than 10 times the size of the total world gross domestic product, or GDP.”

EM Burlingame who starts off the following discussion, thinks the City of London’s Ponsi scheme has already collapsed and AI and data centers are the next Green-Swindle like wind turbines, that they are being used to drain the last wealth from targeted countries. I do not have the expertise to have an opinion on the information presented. However Burlingame mentioned physics when he talked. He also mentions Oracle being valued really low. That makes me thing of Game Stop and the Wall Street Apes. He says the flock cameras are not connected to anything but there are the cops caught stalking women.

There is also this Qtree discussion about the ‘new’ physics LINK:

Last night you [Wolf] posted a tweet with:

 …Physicists are rewriting the 200-year-old mathematics of heat and work, placing daily thermodynamics on a rigorous footing traditionally used for quantum fields…

a pioneering effort by physicist Bryan Roberts at the London School of Economics and Political Science 

Fabian LSE???

Boy does that stink of Psy-op. Smells like the Global Warming scientific diversion, especially when you are talking thermo and cooling and Quantum Computers.

Wolf responded:

YES!!! “nEt ZeR0 is QuANtuM!” LOL.

Thank you for taking a look at that. Yes, it sounds like they’re trying to spin science in a direction that might be more useful to their plans. At the very least, they are clearly trying to fertilize a “you cannot understand this science but you must respect it” position – one that is against “money follows science follows truth” – and into the much more dangerous realm of “science follows money controlling truth” which has created this phony “carbon economy” that was about to enslave all of humanity.

They may even be reacting directly to Trump’s highly Americanized “quantum” stuff by spinning this guy’s work into media focus right now.

“More work is needed” – yes – BY US.

ROUGH PARTIAL TRANSCRIPT:

Chapter 1: There is no RAM shortage

EM Burlingame:

My sense is that the financialist step seven collapse has already happened and the only thing that is preventing us from collapse, [a] sudden implosion is the illusion of the future value of technologies. For all intents and purposes, there are seven high technology companies that are propping up the markets. And over 80% of the companies in the exchanges are debt companies that only exist anymore because they can borrow money against their stock valuations. So what you do is you find a key dependency upon which all things are dependent. You create an artificial scarcity in it.

If we were having a real chip shortage, we would not be expanding the drone warfare in Russia. Every one of those drones gets blown up, blows up chips that you don’t get back. There is no RAM shortage. If there was an actual RAM shortage, we could deal with it in very short order.

Chapter 5: The hyperscale data centre narrative

3:14: Over in Idaho there’s some things happening but part of this is a story about this massive push for hyperscaler AI data centers. Another one of those narratives that’s out there that’s not real. It’s mostly been like the hypers scale data center threat is already in the past because we’re going to get to distributed workloads and a variety of other things that just don’t really matter. So a lot of this is just narrative control and that’s the way Dexter White and I have been seeing it. He’s been following the story a lot more closely than I have. I would say actually, at some point in the future if you really want to talk that kind of stuff, you might want to hit up Dexter because he’s written about it for the newsletter a couple times and it’s a focus of his. And he’s been following it very closely…

Chapter 7: Seven companies propping up the market

5:12 So let me just say for people who don’t know FANGS is Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Nvidia, Google, and there’s more. There’s Tesla and those kind of companies. So yeah, so terribly sorry, you know, there is for all intents and purposes, seven high technology companies that are propping up the markets and over 80% of the companies in the exchanges are dead companies that only exist anymore because they can borrow money against their stock valuations. And this is very well demonstrated.

Maverick of Wall Street does a great job. I haven’t listened to him in a while, but he does a great job modeling this stuff. So you have an illusion of an economy going all the way back to 2008, 2012 area. We have the illusion of an economy that is sustained by two things. Government spending. So inflation of government debt and inflation of stock valuations of these high-tech companies….

Chapter 11: Why the hyperscaler future isn’t coming

10:00 …We have vastly unused capacity right now in all of our computing personal AI. Personal AI is on your phone correct? I worked on how do you do distributed, I don’t understand hyper scale future. All these data centers, all these massive data centers. That was my first funded company. It was building out data centers. That’s what I did in the banking industry etc before. This hyper scale massive data center build-out future isn’t going to happen and it isn’t necessary. We’re not giving up that future productivity capability by getting rid of that. Tom’s exactly right. What’s going to wind up happening is it’s all already moving into here. [Points at phone] We will do the compute, the storage, the process and everything. And oh, by the way, you don’t need RAM here because you do what’s called a system on a chip and it’s edged right into this, the chip itself.

Burlingame then gets technical. You can go to his Substack and see the steps.

The Financialist Kill Chain: A Predatory Blueprint

The Financialist Kill Chain is a calculated strategy of exploitation:

  1. Infiltration and Influence: Financialists embed themselves in a nation’s leadership and economic systems.
  2. Debt Entrapment: Countries are enticed into unsustainable loans with punishing terms.
  3. Asset Identification: Valuable resources—oil, infrastructure, or industries—are marked for takeover.
  4. Economic Destabilization: Markets are manipulated to deepen crises and erode resistance.
  5. Debt-for-Asset Swaps: Assets are surrendered in exchange for debt relief, stripping national wealth.
  6. Extraction and Exploitation: Wealth is funneled offshore to enrich the Financialists.
  7. Abandonment and Collapse: The nation is discarded, its economy a hollowed-out shell.

Chapter 13: The TLDR: holding the general price level

12:30 Tom Luongo:

So, yes, all what Em just said is a thing here... I’ve been saying this for a while because I mean, it’s a great note. What you said was great. I just want to make sure that the layman audience [understands] because Rich looks confused

Which is the following. We have a general price level that we need to maintain in order to maintain credit markets around the world. Okay. that general price level, that inflation, all the deflationists need to get it out of their heads. We’re not going to have a 90% stock market crash. No one wants that. No one wants the the societal collapse that goes along with a 90% correction. Our enemies do, but we’re not going to allow it….

Chapter 15: The Austrian structure of production

13:35 – The point being is that the general price level of credit based assets, assets that derive their value from the credit markets, that’s the mortgage industry, the meaning your home price, that is your insurance, your life insurance, your homeowners insurance, your cars value, all of this stuff, all of those credit based assets that are at the long end of the structure of production, meaning the 20th or 30th order good, not the first order good like crude oil. Crude oil is a first order good. The basic refined oil is second and tertiary order goods. You know, plastics are a fourth order good. Pharmaceuticals are a fifth order good. Blah blah blah blah blah. Houses are a 40th order good. They’re at the far end of the structure of production if you were doing this from an Austrian perspective. Therefore, they’re also the most interest rate sensitive. Okay?

So in order to maintain the general price level while you convert the economy from 90% fraud, let’s just pick a number, it’s probably 90%, let’s call it 50% fraud, to 20% fraud, which is a massive paradigm shift. Yes, you’re trying to do that and maintain the general price level to maintain the general level of civilization.

14:52 EM Burlingame: Yes. Okay. without also giving your enemy an entry point with which to destroy and buy up all your real assets at 5 cents on the dollar.

Tom Luongo: Step number seven, which is what they’ve done to Argentina, you know, & everybody else.

So this is what we, Ian and I have both identified as what the general plan is. It’s what Trump has articulated. It’s what Bessant has articulated. It’s what others have articulated that’s what they’re going to do. And they’re willing, in the case of Donald Trump, to drop bombs on people who are the enemies to that plan. And they happen to be named things like the IRGC, Hezbollah, soon to be the Cuban Communists if necessary, the Sinaloa cartel, this one, that one, all of those people. And what we like to put under the big rubric of City of London. Okay. Now with all that said that is the framework for the war. Here’s one for you. My friend Matt Dyn.. who’s a bond trader and is watching all of this with the same eye that we are is noticing that oracles 10 year debt is trading at 6.1% and rising.

Chapter 17: Oracle’s debt and the junk bond signal

👉 We talked about this on episode 252 of the gold and guns podcast. Matt and I went through all this and he brought up Oracle’s debt and I’m like you do realize that JNK which is the junk bond ETF only pays 6.7. Now when junk bonds are trading 50 basis points higher than tier one capital company like Oracle at the core of the data center and database story, you have a problem in that market, not in the junk bond market, but in the AI market. Meaning the market is beginning to figure out that the future that EM just said is not going to happen. It’s we’re starting to see market signs of it. That’s the point, that’s why I’m bringing up.

17:00 EM Burlingame: Absolutely, Tom. Absolutely. So very much to your point, in the tech sphere, if we look at the very same articulation you did about oil, tier one, two or three, tier five product, layer, whatever you want to call it, Igen value mode. Oracle is one, two. You can’t run any of these other things without Oracle, You just can’t. So, it was chosen. It was chosen, He [Larry Ellison] was a made man….

There is a lot more that is quite interesting but I will leave it at that. Tomorrow I will do a look at POTUS Trump’s national security strategy which includes science.

KMAG DAILY THREAD 20260722 AI DATA CENTERS

Site rules stolen from our good friend PAVACA

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Do not forget to LABEL AI articles, video and such.

Again this is going to be very rough since I do not have time to do any editing, however I wanted to look at AI Data Centers since I have run into a massive anti-AI campaign. Many of the wild stories I am hearing sound like a Chinese (or British) Disinfo-op.

I view AI like I do nuclear. It can be a blessing (power stations) or a curse (bombs.) However there is no putting the genie back into the box so we need to harness it for good.

https://post.substack.com/p/against-claudefishing

I find this a balanced approach to AI. H/T barkerjim(@barkerjim): “Building trust in the AI age”

From President Trump.

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/116924979201330474

TEXT:

Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump

One of the biggest Driving Forces in the Future for Jobs, are Data Centers. They are big, strong, bold, and Money Machines for the State in which they are built. Governor Kathy Hochul, for political reasons, has terminated all Data Centers being built, or to be built, in New York State. These Companies are now being sought in Alabama, Florida, Texas, Arizona, and many other States. Both the Taxes and the Jobs amount to LIQUID GOLD! New York State has made a terrible decision. All of this Income, and other Benefits, will be going to Red States, and some Blue, where Data Centers are sought as Cash Cows, with Lower Taxes and Record Setting Jobs. They must pay for their own Water and Power, and any leftover goes back to the State and local Community. Data Centers are tremendous WINS for the States and Communities that are lucky enough to get them. New York should change its Policy, IMMEDIATELY. The Radical Left Dumocrats must not be allowed to cause us to lose Data Centers, AI, and all of this incredible new Technology, to China, and other countries!

President DONALD J. TRUMP

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/116938511106455297

TEXT:

Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump

Newly declassified documents show that over a period of years starting during the 2020 election cycle, the People’s Republic of China carried out what is believed to be the largest compromise of election data in history — resulting in China’s illicit acquisition of 220 million U.S. voter files.

That information includes names, addresses, phone numbers, political party preferences, and other sensitive data that would be needed to register to vote, and engage in other nefarious activities.

This data loss presents an unprecedented election security nightmare. The intelligence even shows that China assigned a data exploitation unit specifically to this new project.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/election-integrity

This is important because 220 million voter files is pretty much the entire US voting base. According to Brave AI “..the U.S. Census Bureau estimates about 168 million registered voters, while the U.S. Election Assistance Commission reports more than 209 million active registrations on state rolls…”

Why do I bring up these stolen voter rolls? Because China is now using AI to analyse them and no doubt using other stolen data to build a profile of every American voter.

From Badlands:
China Preps Massive AI Buildout Plan, Framed as Part of a US-China Technological Arms Race

China is preparing a roughly 2 trillion yuan ($295 billion) investment over the next five years to build a nationwide network of interconnected data centers and computing hubs.

The effort is designed to rapidly scale domestic AI infrastructure, support the development of frontier AI models, and position China to lead in a technology widely viewed as strategically decisive for economic productivity, surveillance, military applications, and industrial competitiveness through the 2030s.

The plan prioritizes Chinese suppliers—including Huawei—for at least 80 percent of core technology, notably AI chips, explicitly aiming to displace foreign providers such as Nvidia and AMD and accelerate the maturation of domestic alternatives.

This data-center push forms a central element of Beijing’s broader “Six Networks” infrastructure mobilization, which integrates computing capacity with power, water, and other foundational systems under state direction and financing.

It represents an aggressive, centrally coordinated response to U.S. advantages in AI hardware and hyperscale investment, seeking to lock in long-term technological self-reliance and shift the global balance in advanced compute resources.

Burning Bright: Beijing’s move to mobilize roughly 2 trillion yuan — nearly $300 billion — over the next five years for a nationwide network of interconnected AI data centers is being sold, predictably as the opening barrage of the next great power contest.

The plan, we’re told sits inside a larger ‘Six Networks’ mobilization that fuses computing power with electricity, water, communications and logistics, while on the American side, the hyperscalers are answering with their own staggering numbers, with Amazon, Google, Meta and Microsoft alone guiding toward $600–700 billion in combined capex for 2026, much of it pouring into data-center and AI infrastructure, even as power constraints seem readily apparent.

The surface-level narrative suggests an arms race between Washington and Beijing for frontier models and the industrial base that will deploy them, and yet, I believe this apparent contradiction actually ratifies the Sovereign Alliance between Donald Trump and Xi Jinping, with each leader deliberately leaning into the rivalry narrative because it supplies the other with the precise Narrative Shielding required to accelerate down a path whose true destination is not model supremacy, but the build-out of the infrastructure of the Golden Age itself.

What the Collective Mind can presently grasp — and what capital markets can price in — is ‘AI versus AI.’

But the deeper architecture requires energy abundance at sovereign scale and the physical rails that will carry human extension and augmentation into the next civilizational epoch, with the current generation of models is simply the rudimentary, investable endpoint that justifies pouring sovereign and private capital into that larger paradigm.

Trump’s AI Action Plan and related executive orders (most of them from 2025) are framing the effort in national security terms while simultaneously advancing the nuclear and permitting reforms that make AI-scale power possible.

Xi’s parallel national push is doing the same in keeping with China’s own sovereignty doctrine.

Both are executing Warp Speed buildouts.

In other words, the models are the justification layer; the energy and computing mesh is the actual payload.

Again, an AI infrastructure sprint demands one resource above every other: abundant, reliable and ultimately decentralized power.

That is also the non-negotiable precondition of the Age of Abundance the Sovereign Alliance has been telegraphing for years — replete with a nuclear renaissance, gargantuan data centers and the on-shoring of critical manufacturing, all set against the backdrop of the broader disentanglement from scarcity-based control systems narratives like the Iran War and the collapse of the Green New Deal in the West are facilitating.

The ‘AI Arms Race’ between the world’s two largest economies therefore functions simultaneously as both Narrative Shielding and as a Translation Layer.

I am not so sure I agree with Burning Bright. I do not trust China AT ALL!

And to go along with it in the same Badlands substack:

DOE Releases Finalized Fusion Science and Technology Roadmap to Accelerate Commercial Fusion Power

The U.S. Department of Energy has released its finalized Fusion Science and Technology Roadmap, a comprehensive national strategy to accelerate the development and commercialization of fusion energy.

The plan targets the deployment of fusion pilot plants and commercial fusion power in the mid-2030s through coordinated efforts across science, technology, infrastructure, workforce development, and commercialization.

The roadmap was developed with input from more than 800 scientists and engineers from over 15 private companies, 10 national laboratories, and 70 universities.

It is organized around three core pillars: building critical infrastructure to close materials and technology gaps; driving innovation through advanced research, high-performance computing, and artificial intelligence; and expanding the domestic fusion ecosystem via public-private partnerships, supply chain strengthening, workforce growth, and commercialization pathways.

It will be implemented through DOE’s newly established Office of Fusion and aligns with the department’s Genesis Mission.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

TRANSCRIPT


Doug in Exile: Ladies and gentlemen, this is the brilliant lady who got her urgent message to Trump. Katherine Herridge is the one who did the investigative reporting that exposed China, but not just exposing China and their involvement in the election, how they’re using AI. They’re using high technology to massively affect our elections. This has very long-reaching repercussions going forward. Here’s Katherine Herridge, watch this.

Katherine Herridge: China is one of the biggest collectors of data on the planet. So, if you take that 220 million voter rolls and you combine it with something called the SF86, those are the security clearance applications that were compromised back in 2015, 22 million files, and then you combine it with all of the health information that’s been hacked, you can really build this kind of digital composite of an individual, and you can use that for you know, voter registration fraud, you can use that for identity theft, and significantly, you can also use it to recruit American citizens to your efforts. So, it’s not just about the collection of the data around the vote.

Doug in Exile: It’s espionage. That is huge, guys. This is terrifying. I’m going to show you First of all, don’t be scared, cuz the answer is, of course, America has to beat China on the AI war, which now you can see how it affects our elections. You want us to have powerful AI. Here’s Dave Sachs, watch this. Dave Sachs is kind of making the logical conclusion out of the stuff. He says, “This is concerning. For the first time, a Chinese model, the Kimi K3, has taken number one on the front-end code arena and is scoring at or near the frontier on other benchmarks.” So, I’ll just translate this for you. It is the smartest compute in the world, the smartest AI in the world. That makes it the most effective, most aggressive is now China, the number one list. I’ll show you the list in just a minute. Let me finish this up.

Meanwhile, America is tying itself in knots. Politicians and bureaucrats are banning new data centers. You guys have heard this. You can’t let these data centers in, it’s ruining our water, our farmland, not in my neighborhood. China’s the one funding all of that sentiment to get you to think that it’s dangerous. Piling on state regulations, pushing for new federal agencies to pre-approve frontier models. This is how you lose the AI race. The rest of the world won’t play by our rules if we bog ourselves down. Permissionless innovation is how America won the internet and became the technological envy of the world. We can do it again with AI while addressing risks in a targeted way, or we’ll watch our lead evaporate. And remember guys, the only way you can fight Chinese AI with all of your social security, all of your login codes for your email, credit card information, the dossier they build about you, the only way you can fight it is with a more powerful AI generated in America to defend us. AI beats their AI, but right now they’re winning.

Here’s big news, Kimi K3 is now number one in the front-end code arena with 1679 points, surpassing Claude Fable 5. So, look, all this is, it shows the arena here. Number one AI in the world is this Kimmy K3. This is the Chinese one. Next one down, Claude Fable 5. These are like owned by Microsoft, Google, you know, Chat GTP and all those. Here’s Chat GTP 5.6, GLM, Claude Opus, and then here’s Grok owned by Elon Musk down here. Number six, in the amount of compute they can actually do. And I’ve used most of these programs. I do a ton of AI I work. It’s how I was able to beat the internet on all the Mitch McConnell stuff.

Now, I’m just going to show you one more time. This is the I have the link in the description if you guys want to do your own research on these documents that were released. You’re going to go here to the whitehouse.gov. There’ll be a link down there. And like you go down here to this is vulnerabilities in electronic voting and ballot counting systems. And you can go down here and you can download these files in a zipped-up folder. And you can look at the PDFs that were released by Trump yourself. Let’s keep going.

Here’s Liz Harrington. According to the CIA in 2020, Venezuela created virtual machines to replicate legitimate voting machine results, then substitute manipulated data while making votes appear to originate from legitimate machines. This sounds exactly like what happened in Fulton County in 2020. So, now do you see how manipulating data can affect our elections? And it’s too bad we didn’t have better AI. Here’s a guy who actually sits on the board of of AI and making the case why our elections have to be secured by better technology. Watch this.

” I don’t think the president left any gray area or area for interpretation. This was about getting the save act passed. It was the last thing he said. But let me just address some of what you said, Brian. It is a different era now than it was in 18 or in 20. This is massively different. I sit on the advisory board of two quantum cybersecurity companies and know something about this. AI and the threat of hacking using modern AI technology has made all of our systems, both public and private, more vulnerable than they have ever been. We know, it’s been proven both by our own intelligence agencies as well as the private sector, that China has been data farming, harvesting data, both public and private, from the United States, from US citizens. Data they cannot even access yet until their cyber techniques enable them to do so. It is a different threat today than it was in 2020, in 2018, and that’s part of why the president was so forward-looking. We didn’t hear the moaning and complaining and kvetching, if you will, to use a very New York term, about what happened in the past. This was raising alarms about what could happen in the future. The threat is different. The threat is very real.

Doug in Exile: Well, and a big way around this really would be voter ID. On paper really would resolve a lot of this. But wait, there’s more. Remember the Democrat Party is trying to convince you the opposite of what this guy just said. They’re trying to convince you that your elections are secure because they want them to be insecure. This is Chris Krebs from 2020. He said former United States Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, he said the 2020 election was the most secure in American history. There was no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised. We now know, through this evidence, that’s a lie. Here’s John Solomon on the big breakthrough. He was the big one who really figured this out, that on our presidential daily briefs, Trump, all the information about China was hidden from Trump.

John Solomon: Well, listen, I talked to the intelligence chiefs in the last few days as we got prepared for this. It’s very important to understand, the president said this tonight, every intelligence chief vetted this speech. They made sure it was accurate. They told me they had never had been briefed on the size of the breaches, the 230 million Americans, the 220 million Americans whose data was stolen, that they considered a security breach. How many times have you on your network ever reported that five countries are capable of hacking our election machines? When is the last time you reported that Venezuela actually succeeded in breaching a machine which has implications for our future security? You haven’t because it was never made public. It has not been made to Congress, has not been told to the president in the past. We checked the presidential daily briefs. Our president was kept from this information. Now we have a chance to fix a glass chin of election security, make the ’26 election more secure.

Doug in Exile: Yeah, this is future-minded stuff, gang. Now here’s Secretary Mark Wayne Mullen talking about what he’s going to do.

Mark Wayne Mullen: I’ll be giving remarks on DHS’s efforts to support election security in the Indian Treaty Room at the EEOB at 11:00 Eastern time today. And then finally, we’re going to wrap up with Catherine Herridge who started this whole show. Big picture, China and the Communist Party collects massive amounts of data buying, stealing, or hacking to exploit vulnerabilities. President Trump said tonight the CCP’s operations obtained 220 million voter records. This is a security breach. This can be used for fraudulent voter registration, identity theft, targeting US citizens for recruitment by China.

Doug in Exile: Now you guys know the AI tech angle that no one else, no other channel is covering, so I hope you’ll reward us with a subscribe to get more of this kind of need-to-know information. If you want to know more about this information, then make sure that you check out this video on the unexpected twist that Mark Wayne Mullen reveals about the media working with China.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Promethian Action’s Section on Data Centers.

ROUGH TRANSCRIPT I tried to get the speakers correct but I did not have time to go back and check on either of these videos.

PLEASE READ! I think this is the best discussion of AI that I have seen.

88:00

Adam: Thank you, Susan. Thank you, Barbara. And thank you, Susan Hogan, for joining us every week. I’m sure you’re getting our newsletter already. Thank you. , I’m jumping around in the super chats here. I want to take this one on data centers and flock cameras because this is coming up. So, thank you Eevee Funk. And I’m going to take this one here from number eight from our email newsletters. So, Eevee says, “Data Center Trump’s post, people not happy. very unpopular with both sides here in the here in Georgia. Georgia power [is] using eminent domain, seizing land, increasing costs, sucking up all the power, water, environment, and noise. Can you all provide some clarity?

And I’m going to pull this one from Streamyard … Ann says, “Americans do not want the data centers or flock cameras. Why does Trump not do anything to protect our freedom to move about the country without surveillance? This looks bad for him and all these tech companies and other billionaires belong to the group that means to control our country and our world. People are losing hope in Trump.”

Well, not everyone. “He needs to stand up and make this right and get rid of the surveillance data centers and tracking cameras are every move. And don’t let big tech control our country.” Thank you for your questions and concern and thank you Eevee Funk. Barbara and Susan your thoughts on this very popular issue at the moment.

Barbara Boyd: Well flock cameras will be litigated in court. I’m sure that’s what’s going to happen. Because to the extent that you have criminal cases based on the ability to see someone going somewhere to do something bad most certainly the lawyers for that criminal are going to be raising that on fourth amendment grounds. These are local decisions. And the police power in our country except for federal crimes actually exists with the state and that’s something people don’t take into account.

They assume the president can just do something on a national basis and overrule a state’s decision in the area of criminal justice or something else. That’s not so easy to do. We gave the states a whole lot of power for these particular situations. The same thing is true in terms of the architecture, I’ll put it, of the data centers. How eminent domain functions. How your electric bills are charged. The regulatory aspect of that primarily rests with the states. I live in the data center capital of the world uh Virginia, you can’t go an inch here without seeing a data center. Something that used to be pure country, 5 years ago is now data center, data center, data center, data center.

There’s a couple of myths out there. One is they’re not using a whole lot of water. Two, the way that Trump is talking about it, he wants them to actually be built, with their own power sources, i.e. They’ve got to set up their own electrical plant to get the permitting for this on a large basis, not on a state basis, but on a federal basis. Whether he can override what a state is deciding in terms of how they’re going to do this around the enforcement of eminent domain and other things, that’s again a legal question which he’s going to have to look pretty hard at. But his idea of doing this is to have the data centers actually build their own electrical inputs and take it off the grid because he says if we do this on a national basis, the grid isn’t even capable of handling it. That’s the result of of complete lack of infrastructure which has gone on for years and years and years. [Thanks to the Global Warming Psy Op. meant to hamstring the USA. – GC] So I understand that this is a big issue.

I think the key issue, the most critical issue which I think the president is fixated on is how is this going to all impact jobs? You know, what is the shift going to be in terms of jobs? Obviously, people who went to school and were told to learn to code as their future are probably going to be driven out of jobs in what was called by Obama the knowledge economy. That was the whole paradigm which we had during the Obama administration. People were laid off in manufacturing. We killed everything sent everything that was building something overseas to be built. And essentially what’s now happening is all the people who are were engaged in writing software or engaged in other [parts of] the knowledge economy so-called are being directly challenged by AI, because AI can in some respects do that a little bit better in that particular area of the economy.

So the question then becomes what are the jobs of the future? And that’s really depends on how we’re envisioning the future economy. And I look at all of this stuff as basically a kind of a way of generating fear in the population so that they get blinded to the real problem which is how does this actually impact the workforce of the future and what should my kid be doing now to assure that he makes a living. That’s the real challenge of the transition we’re going through. It’s a huge transition. People compare it to the industrial revolution. Those of us who are optimists also look at that and see that each of these major economic revolutions actually end up creating more jobs and more creativity if we actually navigate it the right way. So that’s how I’d answer this relatively complex field between state power under the constitution and federal power and how these things are actually going on right now.

Susan Kokinda: Yeah. Let me address another aspect of this because there’s an implicit assumption well it’s explicit I think in in the other question that we had, [That] data center equals surveillance state therefore all data centers mean we’re going to fascism. Well honestly to me that’s like saying this is a gun you can use it to shoot your wife therefore all guns will be used to shoot your wife. it’s just not the way that it works. Data centers [like] any technology can be used for good or ill.

The question is what what is the direction of your country? What is the intention of your president? You know, and the idea that because Donald Trump thinks that we need to have data centers so that we don’t fall behind China, which is a very real issue, means that he supports a complete surveillance state right out of 1984. It is just a it’s just a lazy argument.

I mean, people really have to sort of take a beat and put themselves in the real world because what the essence of psychological warfare again is in this sort of one-dimensional world where this equals that, therefore, if you’re for this, you are that, and your hair catches on fire. Rather than what is the world we’re actually living in? We’re living in a world where artificial intelligence is not going to be put back in the genie bottle. And as this president and JD Vance and many other people have made very clear, imagine a world in which China is way ahead of us in artificial intelligence. Think of that in terms of our defense. Think of that in terms of cyber attacks on our economy. Think of that in terms of the more positive side, you know, which is your ability to produce more, which you can if used properly. [If] you use artificial intelligence for advanced machine tooling, you still have a trained machine toolist who has to know how to use that. And by the way, those trained machine toolists make a quarter of a million dollars, right? Using AI to be more productive, to have greater dominion over nature. Now, is there a layer of the population of the people in that business who probably have a very different idea in terms of what to use AI for in terms of the surveillance state? Of course, there is. But, you know, and someone in the in the chat said, “Well, why doesn’t Trump express his concerns on this?” He has. [laughter] You’re just not, paying attention to what he’s saying. you’re paying attention to the explosion on the internet.

He’s made clear you can’t have data centers if they’re going to suck off local power. He’s made clear there are dangers and challenges in terms of AI, which is why he’s got whole sections of his administration working on this to make sure that there are the proper guard rails where it can actually be used in a way that benefits the country as opposed to not. Now, in terms of data centers, and again, these are direct local decisions. No, I don’t think it makes any sense to put one in some suburban area’s backyard, like here in Michigan, we have lots of brownfield sites, old industrial sites, which probably cost a little bit to clean up, which is maybe why some of your AI companies don’t want to do that. But, you could put through zoning kinds of things. you’re going to build one of these things, you got to provide your own power and you build it in a brownfield site, not in some suburban backyard or completely destroying the entire rural area of a county. But those discussions, to the extent that the federal government is involved in those discussions, they’re taking place to the extent that the state governments are in charge. [So] you better pay attention to your midterm elections and make sure that you have serious people who are getting elected to your legislatures your governor’s offices and so on so that they can make serious decisions not we’re banning all data centers forever and ever, in which case we’re all going to be speaking Chinese probably in a generation.

But how do we actually manage this important new technology in a way that does not hurt your population but still benefits the needs of the nation?

100:05 Adam: Thank you Barbara. Thank you Susan. . I have a few things to say on this because I am a computer native person. I think first off everyone says people don’t want data centers. Well, you know, people’s habits don’t really support that idea at all. The fact is that people are just spending more and more time on these devices.

There’s your data center.

Anything connected to the internet means data center. And we’re only increasing the amount of internet connected devices we have in the world. And that means we simply need more data centers. I’m always talk about Boston Dynamics, but I want to bring up Boston Dynamics again because again, first off, it’s an American company that’s 100% American ingenuity, but also they have really cool tech demos, probably the best robotic tech overall in the world right now. I know there are other players doing different things but let me just play this because all the data center infrastructure is also going to be supporting this which is literally robotics, and is about to be hitting society like a huge wave. Let me just play this one here for the spot robot.

[GO TO AROUND 101:00 for some really cool robot videos… I WANT ONE! -GC]

Don’t. All right. And one more really short clip here. [snorts] >> [applause] >> I mean, look at that first one. Isn’t that better than some poor Amazon or UPS driver having to sweat their balls off? [laughter] You know, it was 117 degrees real feel here yesterday in Michigan and there’s poor people out there delivering crap to people’s doors.

Yeah, you see the people just throwing boxes or Amazon packages across the thing. [laughter] Um, so thank you uh Ebie, thank you very much for sending

Liberty Bell says and I’m with her. It would nice to have a robot that cleans windows and scrub floors. Amen, [laughter]

Guys. That’s coming soon. So right now the work is being done on the dexterity of the hands. I could pull up other tech demos. So you have these companies that like have done all the tendons like the the arm works like on a tendon system like your fingers and the dexterity of these things are wild. So yeah, this is all coming very soon and it all has to be powered by data centers….

KMAG DAILY THREAD 20260715 RICO CASE(S)?

Site rules stolen from our good friend PAVACA

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Do not forget to LABEL AI articles video and such.

This is going to be very rough since I do not have time to do any editing and I had to transcribe by hand from the video.

I have mentioned a few times that I think the Trump administration is planning a major can of Whoop Ass. Every once in a while we see signs such as the indictment of Comey and Brennan’s freaking out.

Josh and Alpha had a recent conversation about just this subject, but before I get into that I want to point to a few shark fins surfacing.

TradeBait explains our continuing frustration.

TradeBait2  July 11, 2026 09:04 1628706

Here we are 6 years later with the evidence of voter fraud by tens of thousands in just one blue city that have been held under lock snd key while the propagandist media declares the election steal to be fantasy. Multiply by literally thousands of locations to some undetermined extent. We know Fulton County, GA is going to be worse as an example..

Method explained in the article. One of many methods for cheating for the record.

We know the perpetrators are unlikely to see one day behind bars. We know even SCOTUS acted in defense of the perpetrators at the time. We now know with ample evidence that J6 was Fedsurrection. Yet, the perpetrators continue to walk free and pretend they did something great for America.

We also know that any person in America that opposes the provisions of the SAVE America Act self identifies as a criminal or complicit in seditious and perhaps treasonous behavior. All you have to do is ask any person where they stand on that issue and you know who they are.

There can be no peace and trust in government until justice is fully served.


After what was done to POTUS, there is no way he is going to let these monsters get off Scott free. They really blew it when they went raided his home in Florida. Makes you wonder if he moved there, to a friendlier legal environment on purpose.

The Badlands Brief: White House Task Force Gathers Intelligence Documents on 2020 Election for Declassification

A White House task force is gathering documents related to the 2020 presidential election for declassification from the CIA, the National Security Agency, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the FBI, and the Justice Department.

The task force, which operates in addition to ongoing Department of Justice probes into the 2020 election, consists of 

Just The News’ John Solomon and former Trump administration officials including former national security aide Derek Harvey. Lawyers on the team have been reviewing gathered documents for months.

The documents focus on areas including ballot irregularities, potential voting machine issues, and possibly other topics. Members of the task force have been encouraged to limit redactions in declassified documents, even if that means retaining the names of government officials or other individuals, according to two people with knowledge of the effort.

The initiative involves gathering thousands of pages from US intelligence agencies, with plans to declassify some of them. The team has been quietly reviewing materials for months, sometimes late into the night.

President Trump told reporters Wednesday that acting DNI Bill Pulte will serve for only “a month or two” but is authorized to “declassify almost everything.”

Ashe in America: This is one of those anticipated disclosures that will serve as a check on whether we’re actually winning.

We can’t have a Golden Age without a Justice Phase and the core of any Justice Phase has to be elections. And we can’t have real elections without accountability and honesty for how fake they’ve been.

This ODNI thing could be a rug. Or, it could be the exact catalyst for change we desperately need.

I’m also awaiting disclosure (and indictments) on weaponization of government. They weaponized the government to prevent the truth about fake elections from coming out. A real investigative effort on the 2020 election would yield both of those change-making revelations.

I hope it drops before the 250th birthday. If it’s not a rug, that would be quite the victory to celebrate. And, if it is a rug, then we should probably declare independence again. Either way, July 4th is going to be epic!

Happy Independence Day, everyone!


And speaking of Election Fraud Badlands (Ghost) dropped this. For background see my article on Petro and Columbia LINK

….Petro is asserting that the recent Colombian presidential election was stolen using computer servers that are based in California.

My favorite excerpt is this part:

“From my phone conversation with Trump, I was able to confirm that he didn’t know I didn’t support de la Espriella because of his old ties to drug trafficking and the genocide in Colombia.

I hope that amid his concerns h
e has time to call his intelligence agencies so they can tell him who Abelardo de la Espriella is and why he is a US citizen and who his partners are, including alias “Boliche”.

Colombia’s current president is faced with evidence of an electoral fraud via algorithms and with prohibited foreign financing in our constitution.”

Wew, lad….

H/T Duchess

RNC unleashes ELECTION LAWSUIT to STOP Illegal Votes!

eilert(@guest_1629079)  July 12, 2026 12:28

TEXT:

HOLY SMOKES. The FBI has just FLOODED Fulton County, Georgia with hundreds of agents to ramp up the 2020 election investigation, following a raid that seized ballots

Material that was seized is being reviewed, including DATA taken from ballot tabulation machines

Over 200 AGENTS were just deployed to Georgia, and the investigation “appears to be accelerating” — Atlanta News First

Field offices NATIONWIDE are reportedly zeroing in on this probe

HERE WE GO! KEEP PUSHING, 

@FBIDirectorKash

From TradeBait2

FBI Fires Husband and Wife Analysts Who Refused to Assist Georgia 2020 Election Investigation

H/T Marica

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Streamed on: Jul 7, 10:32 pm EDT

Very Rough TRANSCRIPT:

28 minutes Elon posts Taylor Swift AI by an Anon on July 4th and then on July 5th. There is in the background 4559 Jul 1, a Q drop.

46:30 Josh: Now going back to that video for a second. Did you notice all the presidents were carrying Something? A RED FOLDER…

Does anyone know where the Red Folder Came from?

I have been talking about the Red Folder since Jan 2nd 2021 and you [Alpha] started talking about it in the beginning of the Trump administration. Well before that back in 2024 because this actually was when we referred to what was happening with the Mar-a-Logo raid. Hey, they are looking for the Red Folder.

What is in the Red Folder? Well it is the Crosfire Hurricane binder and other various secrets that Trump declassified and took with him before he left including information pertaining to Nancy Pelosi’s laptop. We started it and it spread to the whole anon community because, well we had talked to somebody and they said, they are after the red ‘bull’

48 minutes Josh Reads Trump Truth about Reconciliation 3.0, the $350 billion for defence plus Save America Act… Why is this interesting?

So if you understand that Trump doesn’t really want the Save America Act passed as Alpha and I have been saying. There are a multitude of reasons. Trump knows what we are about to say. If it is passed, Mark Elias and all the Lawfare lawyers will innediately put injunctions on it in court. You will have lawfare judges immediately stop it from being implemented. In other words you will not have implementation of the Save America Act prior to the midterms. There is a chance it could go th the Supreme Court but the scary part is the Supreme Court could vote either way.

So the idea is if we want the Save America Act to secure the midterm elections, it is just improbable. It is not going to happen. This means Trump most likely does not want the Save America Act to happen.

Now Reconciliation 3.0 is the National Defense Authorization Act. Now why is this crazy. Because Trump has come out and made a declaration. “I will sign ZERO bills until the Save America Act is passed.” I think he has 90 days before he has to send them back.

So now we have the National Defense Authorization Act coming up. Sp what else is in the the National Defense Authorization Act?

You remember last week all the talk about the various different sections? One section where there is a convergence of Israel and the US military complex. Where there is information sharing, technology sharing of inovation thru the 2 military industrial complexes on the commecial viability side. And there is a merging of US and Israeli intelligence in the middle east. Those 2 things are in the National Defense Authorization Act.

Did Donald Trump just squash the National Defense Authorization Act by attaching the Save America Act to it by saying I’m not going to sign it unless this bill actually gets passed?

Here is my theory, I think John Thune is intentionally not bringing it up because Trump ordered him not to. We are going to act like we really want to get this passed by we really do not want to. Why?

You have DNI Poulti who is working with John Solomon. John just joined ODNI as a special contractor to go in there and help locate classified records pertaining to Crossfire Hurricane,Russia Russia Russia, 2020 election fraud

DNI Poulti inherited DNI Gabbard’s task force on election integrity & infrastructure. We are waiting for a report to come out on that. I think John Solomon [an excellent journalist] is actually coming in to help finalize that report with other types of declassified information. And where did they get these declassified files from? A lot of these are coming from the quote unquote burn bags that were found in the SCIFs of the FBI building that were set to be destroyed but never were. In other words it was the military that had it all along and somehow injected it.

How do you enter evidence legally? [Q quote] You put someone in the military in DNI who can find and retrieve these records where ever the military put them and then bring them out thru points of declassification.

[Could have been hidden during Trump 1.0 or perhaps in 2.0 –GC]

And I think Poulti is going to be the one who is going to release this information pertaining to the 2020 election fraud. And that is going to show that a foreign adversary was definitely involved. Probably a few different ones. I think you’re going to see Great Britain, Ukraine, China, Cuba [Karen Bass?] Venezuala Iran, all involved in stealing the 2020 election, as well as the mail-in ballot scheme.

And this is where it gets really really interesting, Alpha with the conversations that Donald Trump is bringing about. The last week he has been seeding the narrative against Communists. Commie, Comie, he is talking about Communists all the time. I get that communists may have just won. In Washington DC you have a gun bomb. Mandummi in NY, but what I also want to point people to. Go with the constructed narrative.Both sides construct the narrative and they seed that narrative along the way.

This is one of the ways that I have become incredibly accurate with what I do.

Donald Trump started talking about the Communists on the same day it was announced that there is a Grand Jury in NY that has subpoenaed Neville Roy Singham, the founder philanthropist of an NGO who lives in Bejing China.That collaborates directly with the Chinese Communist Party, is a self-proclained

Maoist, funded the ICE riots and protests, funded the No Kings riots and protests, funded BLM and ANTIFA. The guy is a billionaire. The same day the subpoena comes out Trump starts talking about Communists.

Why is it important?

Now go back to the whole infrastructure of what the US Attorney, Joe DeGeneva, is doing in the Southern District of Florida. Joe is obviously running the investigation into, basically, you’ve go to think 20216 and the 2020 Fisagate, Russiagate, Crossfire Hurricane & all that.

Well his team came out last week and they said that they are taking a different approach.

54:40 Alpha: there is something in that article that is very specific.

54:45 Josh: I have it right here. It is Paul Sperry BTW… [Can not find it]

Well basically Joe is investigating the Grand Conspiracy, the RICO investigation. One of the things his team has done is they have broken it down into smaller component parts… what they are likely talking about here is instead of one grand conspiracy with 50 people, and one trial with 10 to 15 years of court. Because of that they are looking at segregating this down into various different parts. Now one of the things that we got an indication of is PRE 2016. This is very interesting because if you ever listen to Patrick Byne, he says how he was recruited by the Obama administration, by the FBI, his FBI handler at the CIA, Cia/FBI handler, to actually infiltrate the early Republican candidates prior to the primaries including Trump. That began in 2015. He talked about this and said it began actually in Las Vegas. So we know they are looking into that part.

#2 is FISAgate, right? This is where you start to enter into the NGO infrastructure.

DNI Tulsi Gabbard released the classified email between Lenny Bonardo of the Open Society Foundations and another executive director at the Open Society Foundations, talking about Julianne Smith who is Hilary Clinton’s foreign campaign manager or foreign affairs campaign manager and how Julianne Smith had gotten back to him and confirmed that HRC was going to move forward with the Russian compromised story on Donald Trump but they did not have the evidence. But they said do not worry we will get it thru our verious different partners of ThreatConnect and Crowd Strike, which I found kinda interesting. So that was Open Society foundation. They enter on stage left right there early on 2016. This is pre-primaries, pre-election.

57:13 Then obviously you have FISA Gate. That email was the day before Bill Clinton met with Loretta Lynch. Clinton offered a seat on the Supreme Court if she dropped the case against hillary.

Then Hillary spent the July 4th weekend with James Comey while she was under investigation by the FBI. On July 7th she gets on Airforce One with Obama and flies to NC for a rally.

Late in July the Lead FBI Investigator drops the case against Hillary and 3 days later opens a case on Donald. Peter Strozk was the guy investigating the hilary Clinton email scandal

Starting 58:30 to 1:05:30 go over highlghted sections

1:05″30 to is discussion:

John Durham was about preserving evidence and not prosecuting. Admiral Rogers got position on recommendation of General Flynn. Bill Clinton & lynch met in the wee hours of the morning in what was supposed to be a private meeting. Reporter Christopher Sein was tipped off by old friend high in Intel community. He played football for Univ of Alabama. Trump was given a jersey #17 from the Univ of Alabama. And Jeff Sessions who also went to UofA was in the same farternity. Chistopher ‘commited suicide’ via hung by dog leash from door knob. A favorite of the CIA.

1:08:30 — 1:12:00 Josh explains why a video crew was needed so NSA could listen in to the conversation. Admiral Rogers according to Q misfiled that conversation…. The conversation was used to threaten Comey into re-opening Hillary server case…. Many more dots connected.

Josh brings up article Real Clear Investigations by Paul Sperry June 25, 2026. It is well worth the read.

Russiagate Prosecutor Calls Audible on ‘Grand Conspiracy

1:12:00 – Backing up a bit. Joe DeGenova has not only broken up the RICO case but has TWO grand juries. The second one, operated by Jasson Reddy-Kionas, is in Miami and targeting Obama’s re-written 2016 IC assessment and John Brennan. Josh goes into what he knows of that case. (Do not miss the Mark Warner & Adam Schiff connections)

1:13:15 there is a whistle blower Thomas Speciali the Third. [Google & brave never heard of him — SURPRISE!]

1:13:30 — 1:15:00 Thomas Speciali, a cooperating witness, was hired by the Intel community to go out there and discover Russian interference in the 2016 election so he had full access to every state’s election system. The Dominion voting machines and everything. One of the things he said is that there was no Russian intrusion. There was no evidence but there were some foreign IPs that had touched our servers, basically pinged them. Some APPEARED to be Russian

Then Josh goes into Victoria Nuland, Ukraine, the Perfect Phone call, the 2nd impeachment and Eric Ciaramella who has been indicted in the Eastern District of Virginia. Eric Ciaramella ran the money aspect of the Maidan Massacre  and hired the Wagner Group out of Russia.. Josh covers the firing of Shokin, who was investigating money laundering and trafficking by Burisma… Josh goes into how money laundering works in Ukraine

1:15:00 to 1: The Perfect Phone Call. Most important part when POTUS asked “DO YOU HAVE THE SERVER? YOU KNOW CROWDSTRIKE, BURISMA, I want to have my Dept of Justice take a look at it.” [This is why they went after Rudy so hard BTW – GC]

That was PANIC IN DC.

Why did Crowdstrike a DNC IT company have a server in Burisma?

Burisma from circa 2014 was one of the heads for Human trafficking, arms trafficking, Money laundering for that region. [I wonder if this is where Justice Roberts adopted kids came from? They were supposedly Russia. -GC]

The server was a proxy server doing all the messing with the Alpha Bank server to compromise Trump. Second it was running Hammer and Scorecard which was meant to steal the 2016 election for Hilary.

Why was the server in Burisma? Because it was very close to the Russian border so you could spoof Russian addresses. Remember Thomas Speciali, saying the pings APPEARED to be from Russia? However someone shut them down. Josh thinks it was Russia and really pissed off the Deep State.

1:19:30 This is where it gets really interesting because in 2018 the elections were stolen at the STATE LEVEL. Red States all of a sudden flipped blue. It was almost like Trump let it happen because of what is going to happen now with all this information comming out. George Soros & the Open Society Foundation and other NGOs [Like Arrabella – GC] funded Act Blue from various private shell companies, spoofing credit card numbers and funding all of these candidates. They funded 3 of the primary state candidates thru all the states, These were, the governor, Sec of State and the State Attorney General. Back in 2018 we really did not know why. When you look back at it it makes complete sense. At the same time Soros, father & son and Bill Gates were investing in different types of companies.

Hunter Biden’s company Rosemont Senaca invested in Metabiota a Disaster and pandemic preparedness company in 2014. (In eastern Ukraine) In 2018 & 19 & 20, Soros & Gates join collaborative efforts and start investing in zoological virus research companies investigating how to detect them if they spread to humans. Such viruses were not around in 2018 & 2019. They were also investing in Crisper-Cas9 companies, genetic modification companies, mRNA companies, AND companies dealing with pandemic response and pandemic testing.

1:22:50 in 2020 we learn the reason for stuffing the top state offices. In Sept of 2019, a level 4 biocontainment plant burns down in Russia on the eastern [obviously Western -GC] border of Russia which I find kinda sketchy… Then 3 days later POTUS standing with Fauci & Brixs signed an EO authorizing the creation of mRNA vaccines.

Josh discuses Event 201 (Oct 2019)

POTUS does a state of emergency.

Secs of State change rules on how mail-in ballots are handled… This is where the NGO infastructure comes in. The whole point was to get as many people on the voter rolls as humanly possible because the number of ballots PRINTED are based on that number.

That is why the Trump admin wants those rolls and the states are refusing to turn them over.

Basically you have a conspiracy forming in 2014 to 2016. The NGO infrastructure. Remember it is the NGOs, it was Neville Roy Singham, Soros, Weiss, Gates, Zuckerburg. They funded NGOs that went out and got people to sign up to vote. And then these same NGOs were running ballots to the Drop boxes.

in 2021, Citizens sued their states and the Supreme Courts of the states ruled in their favor, saying the Sec of state DID NOT HAVE THE AUTHORITY to change mail-in ballot laws but since the elections had already happened there was nothing that could be done…. So that right there is the prerequisite for everything that we are going to see with Joe DeGeneva.

1:27:00 we haven’t even gotten into 2021 when they start to flood the border..

There is another 1/2 hour but I think that gives a good look at the information and actions.

A couple of references. With this first reference ONLY Yandex had the article. Google/Brave buried it and come up with nothing on Thomas Speciali the Third.

PF1 Minisode: John Brennan and The Dirty 51.

November 3, 2025

Miranda Devine zooms in on a pivotal and controversial event in recent U.S. political history: the October 2020 “Dirty 51” letter, signed by former intelligence officials, including ex-CIA Director John Brennan. The letter—claiming that the Hunter Biden laptop story had “all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation”—is dissected for its role in influencing the 2020 election and shaping public perception. The episode centers on a dramatic confrontation between Brennan and whistleblower Thomas Speciali, unpacking the latest developments in calls for accountability, including current DOJ investigations.

This one is really interesting.

The Radicalizing of Eric Ciaramella | The American Spectator

November 9, 2019,

It starts at Yale and a professor of Arabic who romanticizes terrorism.

Eric Ciaramella was radicalized at Yale by professors like Bassam Frangieh. He was quickly recognized as a fellow traveler and became an insider in the Obama  administration.

KMAG DAILY THREAD 20260708 MK Ultra & the CIA

Site rules stolen from our good friend PAVACA

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Do not forget to LABEL AI articles video and such.


Just for fun: (Looks like the wild horses are a better solution.)

The following information validates some of the information I learned from Colonel Towner.

Rough Transcript from an Economic Times video. 15 minutes

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna: What did you learn about MK Naomi, and do you believe its activities were even more serious than what we know about MK Ultra?

Dr Kinzer: The MK Ultra project was aimed at seizing control of the minds of individuals. The Army was interested in something different, which was trying to use biological agents in warfare against entire populations. So, MK Naomi is the place where these two goals overlap.

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna: Did you find direct documentation between Paperclip scientists and the development of MK Ultra’s experimental protocols, specifically the use of mescaline, hypnosis, and sensory deprivation?

Dr Kinzer: I found what I think might be the first secret CIA prison or black site. It’s a nice chalet in Germany. These were the cells where the MK Ultra officers, working side by side with Nazis, uh carried out those gruesome experiments.

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna: These experiments were happening after the Nuremberg trials, correct? So, the CIA would have known that these were crimes against humanity. Um my first question is for Mr. O’Neill. MK Naomi, the joint CIA Army program that ran parallel with MK Ultra at Fort Detrick, appears to have been run with deliberate minimal documentation. Um Army records on Special Operations Division have apparently been destroyed. In your investigation, what did you learn about MK Naomi, and do you believe its activities were even more serious than what we know about MK Ultra?

Mr. O’Neill: I’m sorry. I didn’t learn anything about those operations. I kept my focus mostly on Dr. West and his work. I do know that the only reason I found the documents I found was cuz Dr. West accidentally left them in his papers, and he probably did that because he corresponded with Gottlieb under Gottlieb’s assigned alias, which was Sherman Grifford, and he addressed all his mail to a post office box here under Foss Cut Corporation.

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna: Thank you, Mr. I’m just going to real quick go to Dr. Kinzer. Are you aware of anything that exists with MK Naomi in your research? And if you could please press the button.

Dr Kinzer: My understanding My understanding of MK Naomi is that it was a joint project between the military and the CIA. And there’s a big difference because the MK Ultra project was aimed [music] at seizing control of the minds of individuals. The army was interested in something different, which was trying to use biological agents in warfare against entire populations. So, MK Naomi is the place where these two goals overlapped.

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna: And that was the 1953 Frank Olson death. Was that in a way tied to that? from some chatter that we had seen in

Dr Kinzer: Exactly what the motivation was behind the decision about Frank Olson, if there was such a decision, is unknown.

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna: My next question is also for you, sir. Operation Paperclip brought over 1,600 German scientists into the United States government after World War II, including individuals who had conducted human experimentation in concentration camps. The CIA and military were aware of their backgrounds and recruited them anyways. In your research, did you find direct documentation between Paperclip scientists and the development of MK Ultra’s experimental protocols, specifically the use of mescaline, hypnosis, and sensory deprivation, which were techniques also documented at Dachau?

Dr Kinzer: Absolutely. Um Kurt Blome, who was the chief of biological weapons development for the Nazi government, came to work for the CIA. So did Walter Schreiber, who was the surgeon general of the Nazi army. Um I can just tell a a brief story. When I was researching my book, I found what I think might be the first secret CIA prison or black site. It’s a nice chalet in Germany. And the guy who now owns it took me into the basement. He said these were the cells where the MK Ultra officers, working side by side with Nazis, uh carried out those gruesome experiments, which were actually just continuations of the experiments that those Nazis had been conducting just a few years earlier right down the road.

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna: Just for timeline and clarification, these experiments were happening after the Nuremberg trials, correct? So, the CIA would have known that these were crimes against humanity.

Dr Kinzer: [4:20] I looked for an episode in which the Nuremberg doctrines were posted on the wall in some MK Ultra or CIA office, and I was never able to find any indication that those Nuremberg principles ever were even consulted, much less obeyed.

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna: Thank you. My next question would be for either witness to comment, Dr. Kinzer or Mr. O’Neill. Both witnesses have written about the site psychiatrist Louis Jolly West. Sydney Gottlieb ran MK Ultra program for the CIA, hired West as a contractor to conduct research for sub-project 43, combining hypnotism, drugs, and sensory deprivation to create dis-associative states in which, to quote Mr. Kinzer in his book Poisoner in Chief, the human mind could be pulled away from its moorings. Following the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, West psychiatrically examined Jack Ruby, then in prison for murdering… Lee Harvey Oswald, the assassin accused um of murdering President Kennedy. A report emerged from West’s examination said that Ruby had suffered an acute psychotic break. Can you explain why Dr. West in particular was chosen to conduct an examination of Jack Ruby alone in his jail cell with no other psychologist present?

Mr O’Neill: Be happy to. West inserted himself into the case of Ruby.. the day after the shooting, West approached the judge in the preliminary hearings and asked to be assigned to the case. He was refused by the judge. After Ruby was convicted at his first trial, an associate of West, Dr. Hubert Winston Smith, who was a psychiatrist and an attorney, took over Ruby’s defense for his appeal, and he had already discussed appointing.. West to the case. And as you said, West examined Ruby alone at the jail cell and emerged to announce that in the preceding 48 hours he had had a acute psychotic break from which he would never recover. He had been declared incompetent to stand trial in his the first time by a panel of I think eight psychiatrists. This psychotic break lasted until his death in 1967. Two months after West examined him, Ruby testified for the first time, and only time to the Warren Commission, and it was the first time he ever publicly was supposed to say what his reasons were for his shooting Oswald. The testimony had to be halted cuz he was babbling incoherently. As Allen Inspector, who was a counsel to the commission, wrote in his memoirs, he pulled him aside and said that they were cutting off the arms and legs of children in Albuquerque and El Paso, and he said he was making no sense whatsoever. West in his letters to Gottlieb from 1953 discussed experiments where he would induce specific mental disorders in people without their awareness. A year before the Kennedy assassination, he publicly spoke in Oklahoma City and talked about his LSD experiments inducing psychiatric breaks and psychosis in people with the use of LSD, which he of course later contradicted, when he told the New York Times he never used LSD in animal experimentation.

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna: What an interesting connection. I might have time but I’ll be now recognizing Mr. Burlison from Missouri for 5 minutes.

[7:54]

Mr. Burlison: Thank you Madam Chair. Thank you for your diligent work on this and hopefully we will hear back from the CIA on those boxes of documents that have so many questions about. Dr. Kinzer and Mr. O’Neill the CIA created MK Ultra in 1953 supposedly out of fear that the Soviet Union and China had developed mind control capabilities. Let me go back a little bit further. So one of my questions has to do with the event that happened in 1951 in August in France. There was a bakery that I guess the people that lived in that community over 250 some say 300 people were poisoned from the bread. It was determined that that was LSD that was causing all of these people to hallucinate. Some people died. Is there any connection Dr. Kinzer to that event and was that something that either inspired the MK Ultra program or the MK Naomi program or is that something that we were involved in even that early on?

Dr Kinzer: I would turn that question back to you. I don’t think anybody really knows the full story of what happened at that time in that town in France. That the United States could have been involved, that this could have been part of what was then called Operation Artichoke, the predecessor for MK Ultra seems to me not beyond the realm of possibility. There’s a lot of overlap between the ergot enzyme that is the basis of LSD and certain rye and wheat fungus that can be used in breads. Was that something intentional? Was it something the Americans were involved in? I have my suspicions, but just based on my background as a journalist, I don’t operate on suspicions. So, I would love to see more investigation of that episode.

…..

Comment on Ergot Poisoning. It is worth a quick look because it describes the symptoms.

Debunking the “Moldy Bread” Theory – Salem Witch Museum

In her excellent lecture “The Salem Witch Trials and Ergot, the ‘Moldy Bread’ Hypothesis,” historian Margot Burns describes a conversation with Linnda Caporael about the publication of this article.

…..

Mr. Burlison: My next question has to do with once the program began. I think one of the most shocking things that we determined is that Operation Midnight Climax that occurred in the early 1950s, ’60s, where the CIA had safe houses. And there was Dr. Kinzer, I mean this obviously extremely disturbing behavior that was happening where you had American citizens who were being lured into these brothels and then dosed with a hallucinogenic and then filmed during their sex acts. Was there anyone prosecuted for this for these crimes?

Dr Kinzer: No, there have been no prosecutions for any crime related to MKUltra as far as I know. To me, the remarkable aspect of Operation Midnight Climax was that there wasn’t even the pretense of scientific experimentation. The person watching behind the one-way mirror was a grossly overweight drug officer sitting on a portable toilet and drinking cocktails out of a pitcher. There was nobody there that was a scientist or somebody who had understood sexual behavior or human psychology. So, there was no science involved in it at all. I can add a little footnote. When I was researching Poisoner in Chief, I came across a document in which one of the officers involved in setting up that program, Operation Midnight Climax, said that Sidney Gottlieb himself used to fly from Washington out to inspect the project regularly and always asked that women be provided for him. So…. [Interrupts]

Mr. Burlison: That was my next question. Do you think that the agents were involved in the sexual encounters?

Dr Kinzer: Well, could that have actually been the reason why the bordello was opened? There was no prospect of any serious scientific result out of that project given the personnel who were overseeing it. So, those CIA officers, particularly Gottlieb, involved in overseeing Operation Midnight Climax, certainly were able to take advantage of what it offered.

Mr. Burlison: Thank you. And my my last question, first I want to say thank you to Mr. O’Neill. The book Chaos, I checked it out from the Library of Congress. and [I] greatly appreciate your work there. I was intrigued by one of the statements that you made based on your research that the MKUltra program, they were actually successfully able to replace memories. And because of that, I’m wondering if And Dr. Kinzer, you can chime in if you have any knowledge of this. Did the program continue? And do you think that the program in some aspect is still continuing today?

Mr O’Neill: You’re asking if the program continued after 1973 when it was halted supposedly. That’s a question I’m asked at almost every appearance I do. Is it happening today? Did it continue? I don’t know. I can’t imagine that it didn’t though because the technology that they worked to establish over 20, 25 years and spent more money on than any operation the CIA ever conducted was successful. I imagine it’s being used. I have no evidence of it being used, so it’s a complete assumption.

Dr Kinzer: I would just add that one of the letters to which Mr. O’Neill referred contains a quote from Mr. Gottlieb saying that these experiments were necessary quote in these times. I think it’s important to put yourself back in that mindset where the United States felt that it was under such overwhelming threat that the loss of a few lives or a few hundred lives was a small price to pay. Commitment to a great cause is one of the most fundamental justifications for committing immoral acts, and patriotism is among the most noble of causes. It can be twisted, and it can be used as an excuse to carry out research under the guise that this is simply research we’re doing to protect ourselves against others, and I think that is a mindset that may still be active in some parts of our government.

Mr. Burlison: Thank you, gentlemen. Thank you, Madam Chair. My time has expired. I yield back.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

FULL MKULTRA HEARING: 1 hour 27 minutes

The House Oversight Committee’s Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets held a hearing entitled, “Mind Control and Accountability: Uncovering the Truth of the CIA’s MKULTRA Project.”

INTRODUCTION:

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna: Task force on declassification of federal secrets will come to order. Welcome everyone. Without objection, the chair may declare a recess at any time.

I recognize myself for the purpose of making an opening statement. This hearing is about the crimes committed by the Central Intelligence Agency against the American citizens and the decades of secrecy used to conceal them. The American people deserve a complete and truthful record. The victims and their families deserve acknowledgment, and this Congress has a constitutional obligation to ensure that full declassification is not delayed any longer. Project MK Ultra was not a policy failure or an overzealous program that got out of hand. It was a deliberate systematic governmental operation that subjected American citizens, prisoners, hospital patients, veterans, ordinary people to LSD, electroshock, hypnosis, sensory deprivation, psychological torture without their knowledge or consent. This went on for 20 years on American soil, funded by American taxpayer dollars, and authorized by the very top of US intelligence apparatus. And this program, when it did end, the men who ran it did not cooperate with investigators. They did not come forward. They committed another crime. They destroyed evidence.

The documents this task force has reviewed are unambiguous. In January 1973, the director of the CIA, Richard Helms, prepared to leave office. He personally ordered the destruction of MK Ultra records. The CIA official document in writing states, “Over my stated objectives, the MK Ultra files were destroyed by the order of DCI Mr. Helms shortly before his departure from office. A separate internal account confirms that Helms telephoned Dr. Gottlieb directly and instructed him to destroy quote all files pertaining to drug research and associated activities. Gottlieb compiled. Four people spent an entire day tearing burning down 152 files. Then Gottlieb had his personal papers destroyed by his secretary before he retired. The head of the CIA own records center protested the destruction in writing, but he was overruled. That is obstruction of justice. That is criminal destruction of federal records.

And neither individuals were ever charged with a crime for it. Helms received a $2,000 fine for lying to Congress about an unrelated manner and collected his government pension until he died. Gottlieb retired in rural Virginia and wrote poetry. No one went to prison.

No victim was ever formally compensated by the government for the harm that they caused. By 1975, the Church Committee and the Rockefeller Commission had already established through sworn testimony and the surviving 1963 Inspector General report that MK Ultra existed and that the CIA had run a program of human experimentation on unwitting Americans. The scope and detail of what we know today is largely because of an accident. In 1977, an archivist diligently complying with a foyer request discovered seven boxes of MK Ultra financial records that had been misfiled and escaped the bonfire. Those seven boxes included the names of institutions, the name of sub projects, the researchers who participated, the specific operation that the CIA had funded, and without them, the vast majority of MK Ultra would only be a rumor, just as Helms and Gottlieb intended. Those seven boxes revealed the MK Ultra comprised at least 149 sub projects, operated across more than 80 institutions, and involved 185 non-government researchers.

They revealed that the CIA covertly contributed $375,000 to a hospital research wing, which was approved directly by DCI Allen Dulles, with Richard Helms concurrence, so the agency could use unwitting patients as experimental subjects in what their own documents called a hospital safe house. The CIA’s own inspector general said in 1963, his classified report concluded that the program had exceeded the agency’s legal chapter and covert testing on unwitting subjects placed the rights and interests of US citizens in jeopardy. The program ran for a decade that we know of and they ignored their own watchdog.

Let me be clear [about] what I believe that we are dealing with here. Administering drugs to people without their knowledge or consent, subjecting humans to psychological torture and using prisoners and hospital patients as nonconsenting research subjects. These are crimes against humanity. The Central Intelligence Agency committed them and then the director of the CIA ordered the destruction of evidence. Today we will hear from two witnesses who have spent years unraveling the cover up that our government ordered. Steven Kzer documented the life and crimes of Sydney Gottlieb in his uh book prisoner of chief and Tom O’Neill spent over 20 years investigating what the CIA buried and what they obscured that in my mind constitutes some of the worst notorious crimes against humanity in the 20th century. Their persistence in the research in this hearing is possible simply because they are patriots. The American people deserve the complete record. The victims and their families deserve acknowledgment, accountability, and justice. And this Congress has a constitutional obligation to make sure that the CIA never does this again.

With that, I’m going to be opening up first questions, and I’ll hold my question to the end, to Representative Berles. Before I do pass it, I did want to just note a few weeks ago, we did receive reports. There was some back and forth regarding the CIA and ODI pertaining to new MK Ultra boxes that were discovered. Myself and Representative Berles did go down to Langley. We did meet with the CIA and the CIA is currently in the process of declassifying newly found documentation. although the documents, and I feel comfortable enough to share it here, pertain specifically to a forgery program that was being housed under MK Ultra. So as soon as those files are released, we will be putting out notification with your help to also comb through some of the newly released documents, but I did want to give you a quick update.

There were three witnesses:

Dr Elizabet Ginexi,

independent Consultant and former Senior Program officer at the National Institute of Health

Dr Kinzer author of: Poisoner in Chief, Sydney Gottlieb and the CIA’s Search for Mind Control

Mr. O’Neill author of: Chaos, Charles Manson, the CIA and the Secret history of the 60s

At 8 minutes Dr Stephen Kinszer’s opening statement.

Thank you very much, Madam Chairman. Let me begin by expressing my gratitude to this task force for confronting the enormous issue of over classification of government documents and the culture of secrecy that enables it. I’m especially gratified by your interest in MK Ultra, the project the CIA carried out through the 1950s in an attempt to find the secret of mind control. MK Ultra was one of the most secret government programs in American history. The chemist who directed it, Sydney Gottlieb, lived in total anonymity. My book, Poisoner and Chief, may be the most complete account of MK Ultra that exists in public, but I’m painfully aware that I have discovered only a small portion of what MK Ultra was and what Sydney Gottlieb did. In 1951, the CIA hired Gottlieb and directed him to launch what became MK Ultra. Gottlieb believed that in order to find a way to implant a new mind into someone’s brain, you first had to find a way to destroy the mind that was in there already.

In its search for ways to destroy a human mind and body, MK Ultra conducted the most extreme experiments on human beings that have ever been carried out by a US government agency. By any standard, they qualify as medical torture. These experiments took place in prisons, clinics, and safe houses in the United States, in Europe, in Asia, and even in Latin America. Officers of MK Ultra were authorized to travel to foreign countries, preferably those under formal or informal US occupation, and ask the local CIA station to provide them with expendables, human beings who would not be missed if they disappeared. Gottlieb had what amounted to a license to kill issued by the US government. Neither the number of MK Ultra victims nor the number of those who were experimented to death is known.

Gottlieb as a result of this license to kill might have been the most powerful unknown American of the 20th century. Some information about MK Ultra spilled out during the 1970s, but senior CIA officers had intentionally let Gottlieb operate without supervision. So they were able to claim that they knew nothing about his excesses. This was a way for the CIA to deny its institutional role in MK Ultra and to portray it misleadingly as the product of one man’s sadism or excessive zeal. Investigating MK Ultra is challenging because when Gottlieb and his mentor Richard Helms left the CIA in 1973, they illegally ordered that its records be destroyed. Soon afterwards, under DCI Stansfield Turner, a CIA analyst, as you pointed out, Madame Chairman, discovered a cache of MK Ultra documents hidden among financial records. Turner credited that analyst with doing a very diligent job of Sherlock Holmesing. That same diligence I believe could bring results today.

One of the great mysteries of MK Ultra has to do with the death in 1953 of an MK Ultra scientist Frank Olsen who had announced his intention to quit the project. His plunge from a New York hotel room was described in the press as the suicide of an army scientist. He was not an army scientist. He worked for the CIA and evidence suggests that his death may have not have been a suicide. So there could be hidden documents that could illuminate this case.

I would also point out that in addition to searching for unknown documents, this committee could do a tremendous service by simply asking for the end of redactions on the documents that we now have. There are reams of documents about MK Ultra that have heavy sections redacted. In the 1970s, this was justified by the argument that it had only been 20 years since these terrible things had happened and revealing details might affect national security. Now, 70 years have passed. That argument can no longer be valid. So, I would urge this committee to try to fill out all the blank spaces in the documents that we have because we know that is there. This task force could also consider trying to determine whether some new incarnation of MK Ultra exists today. When the main phase of MK Ultra drew to a close in the early 1960s, Sydney Gottlieb concluded that it had failed. That in fact there is no such thing as mind control. Even if he was right, however, he may have been right only at that time. In the many decades since then, there have been enormous advances in cyber technology, in artificial intelligence, in neuroscience. Covert agencies may have access now to tools for mind control that Sydney Gottlieb could not even have imagined. It may well have been true in 1963 that mind control is a myth, but whether it’s still true is uncertain. And that question of whether mind control might now be possible under our new circumstances is something that has presumably occurred to scientists who work for secret services, including our own.

This task force has a chance to connect the past to the future. A renewed effort to find MK Ultra documents from the 1950s and to fill out the redactions of those that have been released might shed new light on how the CIA operated during that period. It could also inform a new inquiry into whether any mind control projects are now underway inside the US security apparatus that might help prevent the emergence of a 21st century MK Ultra that could be even more destructive than the original. Thank you.

Tom O’Neill’s opening statement.

Thank you, Chairwoman Luna and members of the committee. It’s a privilege to be here today. Almost 50 years ago, the last congressional hearings into MK Ultra took place just a short walk from here in the Dirks Senate Office Building. At those hearings convened in August and September of 1977, representatives of the CIA told Congress and the American people that its 25-year effort to control human behavior had been a colossal failure. I believe Congress was never told the truth about what this program actually achieved. In fact, I believe the agency misled Congress in 1977 when it characterized MK Ultra as a failure. My name is Tom O’Neill and in 1999 I accepted a magazine assignment to write a story about murders committed by a group of hippies called the Manson family. For those unfamiliar with this horrific episode of American history, in the summer of 1969, four young people acting on the orders of a cult leader named Charles Manson, went to the home of movie director Roman Polanski and murdered everyone they found there, including his eight and a half month pregnant wife, the actress Sharon Tate. The victims were complete strangers to their killers. The following night, Manson’s followers murdered another couple in the same grizzly fashion. At the time I accepted the assignment, I’d never heard of MK Ultra, and I wouldn’t for another two years. After I’d missed countless deadlines, lost the assignment, and fall fallen down a nightmarish rabbit hole trying to answer the question I couldn’t quite shake. How had Manson, a barely literate ex-con, acquired the ability to persuade ordinary young people to murder complete strangers simply because he had told them to?

The pursuit of the answer to that question led me to Dr. Lewis Jolian West, known to his friends as Jolly. West was one of the most influential psychiatrists in America. During his career, he crossed paths with some of the most controversial events of the 20th century, including the Patty Hurst kidnapping case and the aftermath of the John F. Kennedy assassination investigation. In 1977, West was one of seven academic researchers named in a front page New York Times story alleging that the CIA had used American universities, hospitals, and prisons as secret laboratories for experiments involving LSD and other drugs on unwitting human subjects. West vigorously denied the allegations. He acknowledged that the agency had approached him but insisted he had refused because he said LSD was too dangerous and unpredictable to be used on humans. He added that he limited all of his research with LSD to animals. The revelations in the Times led directly to the congressional hearings held later that year. West denials, however, were effective. He was never investigated and his name never came up at the hearings.

I’ll spare you the long and tedious story of how my Manson reporting led me to West except to say that I eventually learned that in 1967 when Manson transformed into the cult leader we are familiar with today, he and his followers were receiving free medical care at a clinic in San Francisco where West had established a base of operations for a research project he was conducting nearby. After becoming intrigued by the allegations against West, I learned that UCLA, his last academic home, had inherited his paper following his death in 1999.

Nearly two months and more than 200 boxes later, I found the proverbial needle in a hay stack, correspondence between West and Dr. Sydney Gottlieb, the architect of MK Ultra. The letters begin in 1953, just two months after CIA director Alan Dulles authorized the program and while West was stationed at the Lackland Air Force Base in San Antonio, Texas, where he was chief chief psychiatrist at the base hospital. In his first letter to Gottlieb, West proposed conducting experiments on unwitting human subjects, including military personnel, prisoners, and psychiatric patients at the base hospital. He then outlined the experiments themselves in six more pages that could have been written by Josef Mengele Using LSD in combination with hypnosis, West purposed inducing confusion, amnesia, and specific mental disorders in people who would remember nothing of their interaction with him afterward. He sought to develop techniques to extract true information and implant false information in unwilling subjects and to alter the attitudes and beliefs of quote previously loyal individuals. In other words, to completely switch their allegiance from one group or leader to another.

But it was another sentence at the end of that letter that stopped me cold. These experiments, he wrote, must eventually be put to test in practical trials in the field. Gottlieb’s response could hardly have been more enthusiastic. My good friend, he wrote, I had been wondering whether your apparent rapid and comprehensive grasp of our problems could possibly be real. You have indeed developed an admirably accurate picture of exactly what we are after. West replied that there was no more vital undertaking conceivable in these times. There was another document in West papers that had even more significant implications. It was a 14-page report that West wrote in 1956, just three years after he contracted with the CIA. In the report, West described administering LSD and other drugs in conjunction with hypnosis on unwitting human subjects. And then he made a remarkable claim. He announced that he had learned how to replace true memories with false memories on people without their knowledge. In other words, he clarified, it has been found to be feasible to take the memory of a definite event in the life of an individual and through hypnotic suggestion bring about the subsequent conscious recall to the effect that this event never actually took place, but that a different fictional event actually did occur. If West report was accurate, this was not the failure agency officials described in 1977. Quite the opposite. It was in fact the central ambition of the MK Ultra operation, the means of gaining the ability to seize the control of a person’s perceptions, memories, and ultimately their behavior.

But there was still one more discovery, and this time I found it in the National Security Archives at George Washington University. the official repository of the CIA’s MK Ultra records, which were released to Congress after the 1977 hearings. In those holdings was a different versions of West 1956 report. The original paper had been replaced by a four-page summary that did not exist in West files and appears to have been written by someone else. Here his claims about replacing memories were gone. in their place was a theoretical discussion of LSD and disassociative states. The versions supplied to Congress concluded that the effects of LSD and similar drugs on disassociative states had, and I’m quoting, never been studied. Never been studied. In the original report, West discusses observations from his own experiments, including detailed descriptions of using LSD to, as he wrote, speed the induction of the hypnotic state and deepen the trance in subjects. Those passages have been removed in the report turned over to Congress. The discrepancy could not have been more stark. Nearly 50 years ago, another congressional committee believed it had been given the truth about MK Ultra. It had not. In conclusion, I respectfully submit that these records, some newly available, and others that remained outside the government’s disclosure for decades, weren’t a thorough re-examination of what the program accomplished, what Congress was told, and what may still remain hidden. I’m happy to provide the documents I’ve referenced today and I’ve provided many additional details in my written testimony.

Dr Elizabeth Ginexi opening statement. [BOY is she angry her cushy job got smacked!] I debated on whether or not to add her opening statement since I do not see how it has anything to do with MK Ultra … What is glorious is at 47:20 she gets called out on just that AND Covid.

Chairman Luna, and distinguished members of the committee, thank you for the opportunity to testify today. I’m a health research scientist with a master’s and doctoral degrees in psychology from the George Washington University. I spent 22 years from 2003 to 2025 as a scientific program official at the National Institutes of Health, managing more than $132 million in health research grants and co-authoring 18 federal funding programs. I left the NIH in April of 2025. I’m here today because what is happening to NIH right now is not reform. It is the replacement of scientific judgment with political control. [She is talking about Robert Kennedy]

For 80 years, US federal investment in biomedical research produced outcomes that no private market would have funded. Heart disease is the leading cause of death in the United States. NIH funded research on blood pressure, cholesterol, and smoking drove a 56% decline in heart disease between 1950 and 1996. Cancer has been transformed. treatments for breast, lung, prostate, and childhood cancers along with immunotherapies that converted previously fatal diagnoses into manageable conditions traced directly to NIH funded research. HIV AIDS were a death sentence in 1981. No pharmaceutical company saw a profitable market for treatment. NIH ran the trials that no one else would run. The result was antiretroviral therapy and preexposure prophylaxis. Global AIDS deaths have fallen 54% since 2010.

Rare diseases that affect 30 million Americans get studied at the NIH because no market will fund that research. Every dollar that’s appropriated to the National Institutes of Health generates $246 in economic output. NIH supported work contributed to 354 of the 356 new drugs that the FDA approved between 2010 and 2019. Cutting the funding source of that pipeline does not slow it. It ends it. The proposed OM federal financial assistance rule would give political appointees authority to terminate funded grants at any time without cause, including ongoing clinical trials with enrolled patients. This is not a hypothetical. NIH has already terminated or frozen thousands of grants, including hundreds of ongoing clinical trials since January 2025, concentrated in infectious disease, vaccine, and health disparities research. This proposed rule will make that authority permanent. The NIH director has eliminated the merit score thresholds that once protected peer review and political appointees are right now overriding peer review outcomes to screen grants for alignment with administrative pri priorities.

The proposed OM rule will also severely restrict international research. We’re managing an H5N1 blue bird flu outbreak that has more than 70 documented human cases. We recently concluded a hivirus response that required CDC scientists working alongside Argentine counterparts. The current Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo is now the third largest on record and is outpacing containment efforts. This rule will curtail exactly that kind of cooperation that we need. NIH lost 1,112 PhD trained workers from 2025 to early 26. More than half of the NIH institutes right now are operating without permanent scientific leadership. The majority of its advisory councils required by statute to provide independent oversight have lost more than half of their members. The fundamental choice before this Congress is between a system where scientists make scientific judgments through accountable processes and one where political appointees make those calls instead. That choice will determine whether the next breakthroughs in cancer, Alzheimer’s, antibiotic resistance, and pandemic defense will happen here, somewhere else, or perhaps not at all. I urge this committee to support a joint resolution of disapproval to block the proposed OM financial assistance rule. that authority to replace peer review with political approval has not been granted by Congress…

This is a congressional hearing that is worth checking out.

KMAG DAILY THREAD 20260701 & LUNG HEALTH

Site rules stolen from our good friend PAVACA

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Do not forget to LABEL AI articles video and such.

This is a compilation of the research I have done for myself, Pgroup and any others with breathing problems. Given the Supreme Court decisions and other stuff, it is going to be a lot shorter than my normal articles.

Just for fun: 15 STRANGE AND RARE BIRDS YOU HAVE NEVER SEEN! (and boy are they weird.)


I saw a video on a concoction for improving lung health. LINK

At the bottom of the link is a list of 20 references.

Product (That I have not tried. I am researching it first.)

LungExpand Pro: Review the Unique Lung Clearing Breathing Solution for Healthy Respiratory System


Ingredients:


Umckaloabo Extract

Science Direct — Chapter: Umckaloabo/South African Geranium ()

…The elucidated mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects of umckaloabo in bronchitis include immunomodulatory and cytoprotective effects, inhibition of interactions between pathogens and host cells, and an increase of ciliary beat frequency in the respiratory tract. By similar mechanisms umckaloabo appears effective for the common cold.

Clinical research indicates that umckaloabo, alone or in combination formulas, may be beneficial for reactive airways, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, upper respiratory infections, pharyngitis, acute sinusitis, acute bronchitis, and immune function.


Hedera helix


Bioactive phenolics fraction of Hedera helix L. (Common Ivy Leaf) standardized extract ameliorates LPS-induced acute lung injury in the mouse model through the inhibition of proinflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress

A double blind, placebo-controlled, randomized cross-over study was carried out on 30 children suffering from partial or uncontrolled mild persistent allergic asthma. Patients either received ivy leaves dry extract for four weeks in addition to their inhaled corticosteroid therapy or placebo, followed by a wash-out phase before switching to the other treatment. There was a significant improvement of MEF(75-25), MEF25 and VC after treatment with ivy leaves dry extract (MEF(75-25) change in the mean 0.115 l/s, p=0.044; MEF25 change in the mean 0.086 l/s, p=0.041; VC change in the mean 0.052 l, p=0.044), but not after treatment with placebo.


Pharmacological and therapeutic activities of Hedera helix- A review

Abstract:

The phytochemical analysis of Hedera helix revealed that the plant contained unsaturated sterols, oils, tannins, phenolic compounds, terpenoids, glycosides, alkaloids, flavonoids, carbohydrates, reducing sugars, saponins, vitamins and minerals. The pharmacological studies showed that Hedera helix possessed respiratory, anti-inflammatory, analgesic, immunological, anticancer, antimutagenic, antimicrobial, anti-parasitic, gastrointestinal, and antithrombin activity. The current review discussed the chemical constituents, pharmacological and therapeutic importance of Hedera helix.


Hedera


Hedera helix. (100 mg/kg, once daily for one week) on lung histopathology was evaluated in a murine model of chronic asthma in mice sensitized with ovalbumin.


Mullein extract


Mullein Extract for Respiratory Health: Reviews, Studies, and Dosage Tips

According to studies of mullein’s pharmacological and chemical aspects, mullein contains various chemical constituents like saponins, iridoid and phenylethanoid glycosides, flavonoids, vitamin C and minerals [2]. 

Mullein provides:

  • Saponins that contribute to its expectorant properties by loosening phlegm.
  • Mucilage that soothes irritated tissues both in the throat and lungs.
  • Flavonoids that provide antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects.
  • Glycosides that help relax smooth muscle tissue in the respiratory system.
  • Antimicrobial compounds that help with many lung infections.

A number of pharmacological activities such as anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, anticancer, antimicrobial, antiviral, antihepatotoxic and anti-hyperlipidemic activity have been ascribed to mullein. The plant is used to treat tuberculosis, earache and bronchitis [2].

Sources:

[1]https://www.mdpi.com/2079-7737/10/7/618, Searching for Scientific Explanations for the Uses of Spanish Folk Medicine: A Review on the Case of Mullein (Verbascum, Scrophulariaceae)

[2]https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0102695X13701261, ​​Common mullein, pharmacological and chemical aspects

[3]https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308991417_Assessing_the_Effectiveness_of_Mullein_on_Respiratory_Conditions_Such_as_Asthma Assessing the Effectiveness of Mullein on Respiratory Conditions Such as Asthma

[4]https://www.icliniq.com/articles/cancer/mullein-for-lung-cancer Mullein for Lung Cancer – All You Need to Know


Coltsfoot


Coltsfoot | Encyclopedia Of Herbology (I did not know there was such a source online)

Coltsfoot combines a soothing expectorant effect with an antispasmodic action. There are useful levels of zinc in the leaves. This mineral has been shown to have marked anti-inflammatory effects.


A review of the ethnobotanical value, phytochemistry, pharmacology, toxicity and quality control of Tussilago farfara L. (coltsfoot)

Abstract

Ethnopharmacological relevance

Tussilago farfara L. (commonly called coltsfoot), known as a vital folk medicine, have long been used to treat various respiratory disorders and consumed as a vegetable in many parts of the world since ancient times…

Coltsfoot has diverse uses in local and traditional medicine, but similarities have been noticed, specifically for relieving inflammatory conditions, respiratory and infectious diseases in humans. Regarding its pharmacological activities, many traditional uses of coltsfoot are supported by modern in vitro or in vivo pharmacological studies such as anti-inflammatory activities, neuro-protective activity, anti-diabetic, anti-oxidant activity. Quantitative analysis (e.g. GC-MS, UHPLC-MRMHR) indicated the presence of a rich (>150) pool of chemicals, including sesquiterpenes, phenolic acids, flavonoids, chromones, pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PAs) and others from its leaves and buds. In addition, adverse events have resulted from a collection of the wrong plant which contains PAs that became the subject of public concern attributed to their highly toxic.

Conclusions

So far, remarkable progress has been witnessed in phytochemistry and pharmacology of coltsfoot. Thus, some traditional uses have been well supported and clarified by modern pharmacological studies. Discovery of therapeutic natural products and novel structures in plants for future clinical and experimental studies are still a growing interest. Furthermore, well-designed studies in vitro particularly in vivo are required to establish links between the traditional uses and bioactivities, as well as ensure safety before clinical use. In addition, the good botanical identification of coltsfoot and content of morphologically close species is a precondition for quality supervision and control. Moreover, strict quality control measures are required in the studies investigating any aspect of the pharmacology and chemistry of coltsfoot….

4.1. Use for infection

Yakammaoto (射干麻黄汤), as a classic formula of traditional Chinese medicines, is used in the treatment of asthma, flu-like symptoms and cough with wheezing in the throat in China and Japan and is a formulation comprising nine various herbs as follows: Ephedra sinica, Pinellia ternate, Zingiber officinale, Tussilago farfara, Aster tataricus, Ziziphus jujube, Belamcanda chinensis, Asarum sieboldii, and Schisandra chinensis….

Globally, the world is scrambling to cope with the COVID-19 pandemic, which caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Recently, a paper report on lung cleansing and detoxifying decoction (LCDD) widely was used in treating COVID-19 patients in China. LCDD is based on four formulae described in the classic TCMs text treatise on cold pathogenic and Miscellaneous Diseases by Zhang Zhongjing (AD 150–219) (Weng, 2020). Further investigated the buds of coltsfoot mechanism in LCDD mechanism against COVID-19 by network pharmacology and molecular docking. The resulted indicated that 14 compounds in coltsfoot may combined with SARS-CoV-2 3CL hydrolase and ACE2, thereby acting on many targets to regulate multiple signaling pathways, thus exerting the therapeutic effect on COVID-19 (Jian-xin et al., 2020)…

6. Pharmacology

There are some biological activities in the extracts or compounds of coltsfoot. Anti-inflammatory, anti-microbial, antiviral and anti-cancer are similar with traditional uses. In addition, many new biological activities have been discovered in modern research, such as anti-diabetic, neuro-protective activities, immunostimulating activities, anti-oxidant activity and cardiovascular. These biological activities are described in the table (Table 4, Table 5, Table 6, Table 7 ) and briefly described in below…


Serratiopeptidase

Serrapeptase is also known as serratiopeptidase. I take it and nattokinase daily and my lung health has improved.

Effect of the proteolytic enzyme serrapeptase in patients with chronic airway disease.

Abstract

Objectives: The proteolytic enzyme serrapeptase (SER) is widely used in clinical practice in Japan. We investigated the effect of SER on sputum properties and symptoms in patients with chronic airway diseases.

Methods: This study was an open-labelled trial with a non-treatment control group. Patients were randomly assigned to oral treatment with (n = 15) and without (n = 14) SER 30 mg/day for 4 weeks. Patients collected sputum samples for about 4 h in the morning on the day the trial began and 4 weeks later. We measured the amount of sputum by weighing. Part of each sputum sample was weighed and then completely dried and reweighed. The percentage solid component, viscosity and elasticity of the sputum were measured. Mucociliary transportability index was measured using ciliated bovine trachea ex vivo. Sputum smears were also prepared to count sputum neutrophils. Patients’ symptoms were assessed by a questionnaire that used a visual analogue scale.

Results: After 4 weeks of SER treatment, sputum weight in the morning, percentage solid component, viscosity and elasticity of sputum, sputum neutrophil count, frequency of coughing and frequency of expectoration significantly decreased. The mean mucociliary transportability index increased from 13.3 +/- 1.8 to 24.4 +/- 2.5 (P = 0.0103).

Conclusions: SER may exert a beneficial effect on mucus clearance by reducing neutrophil numbers and altering the viscoelasticity of sputum in patients with chronic airway diseases.

Serrapeptase: Further Reading | Vitacure

Serrapeptase side effects and potential risks are few. No serious or adverse side effects have been reported from taking Serrapeptase; however, there are a few potential cautions. A very small number of isolated cases of gastrointestinal irritation mostly in patients with gastrointestinal ulcers have been reported with use. A smaller population described in medical literature, developed pneumonia. Although rare, it was theorized that removing scar tissue from the lungs (as Serrapeptase does) can increase the chance of infection due to airborne pathogens (52), this is mostly in elderly individuals with compromised lung function. For this reason Serrapeptase is not recommended for those people with advanced lung cancers or those that smoke. Discontinue smoking if beginning Serrapeptase, and consult your doctor if you are taking blood thinners as Serrapeptase can also enhance or amplify their effectiveness. In addition, always consult a physician before replacing prescriptions with natural supplements…

Serrapeptase for Mucus Build-up

In addition to being able to digest and break down dead tissues, Serrapeptase also has the ability to reduce the elasticity and thickness of nasal mucus as well as lower the number of neutrophils in mucus samples (24). Also, some studies have shown that patients have found Serrapeptase to be highly beneficial in cutting down the thickness of mucus and reducing recurring coughing compared to many of the common treatment methods (15). Similarly, patients with respiratory issues have also benefited from using Serrapeptase merely because it prevents the increased production of mucus and makes the mucus less thick.

Serrapeptase, unlike most medications, does not completely impede the product of mucus. Instead, it works on the elasticity and thickness of the mucus….

Letter writen by Dr. Hans Nieper featured in April 1997 issue of Townsend Letter for Doctors and Patients.

I informed you some years ago that Serrapeptase is apparently active in the cleaning of coronary arteries from occluding layers. The results are so spectacular that even Tom Valentine reported on this progress in the US (DC) press after speaking to several parties here.

Serrapeptase is an enzyme produced by serratia bacteria living in silkworms. With this enzyme the worms melt a hole out of the cocoon. Unlike other enzymes in the field of biology, Serrapeptase dissolves ‘dead’ tissue, but not the silk and apparently also fibrinoid layers in the arteries which chemically could be compared to silk.​

A special problem in today’s civilized society is occluding processes in the carotid arteries of the neck. Very often we see patients where surgeons were reluctant to operate or to apply drill or laser technology to such occluded carotids. The reason for this is the potential risk that surgical debris will be pushed into the smaller cerebral vessels.

We have, therefore, started to apply Serrapeptase treatment to cases of severe narrowings of the carotid arteries, mostly in patients showing severe symptoms due to the narrowing, including amaurosis fugax (intermittent blindness). The therapeutic results are excellent, certainly lifesaving. It is, however, mandatory that the therapy be conducted for a very long time. The first reliable results can be expected after 6-8 months. Even up to 18 months after the onset of Serrapeptase therapy, patients have still displayed improvement.

I have also found Serrapeptase to be an extraordinary substance for safely removing fibrous blockages from coronary arteries, particularly the carotid arteries found in the neck, which supply blood to the brain….

Healthline — Serrapeptase: Benefits, Side Effects, and Dosage

Common ones include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, pulmonary fibrosis, and pulmonary hypertension..

Serrapeptase may increase the clearance of mucus and reduce inflammation in the lungs in people with chronic respiratory diseases (CRD).

CRDs are diseases of the airways and other structures of the lungs. Common ones include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, pulmonary fibrosis, and pulmonary hypertension — a type of high blood pressure that affects the vessels in your lungs. While CRDs are incurable, various treatments can help dilate the air passages or increase mucus clearance, improving quality of life. In one 4-week studyTrusted Source, 29 people with chronic bronchitis were randomly assigned to receive 30 mg of serrapeptase or a placebo daily.

Bronchitis is one type of COPD that leads to coughing and difficulty breathing due to the overproduction of mucus. People who were given serrapeptase had less mucus production compared to the placebo group and were better able to clear the mucus from their lungs. A 2021 studyTrusted Source also showed symptom improvement in subjects with pulmonary fibrosis who took serrapeptase. However, further studies are needed to support these findings.


Serratiopeptidase: A systematic review of the existing evidence

Pharmacodynamics
Serratiopeptidase is thought to work in three ways.

  1. Anti-inflammatory: serratiopeptidase reduces swelling by the process of decreasing the amount of fluid in the tissues, thinning the fluid, and by facilitating the drainage of fluid. In addition, its enzyme activity dissolves dead tissue surrounding the injured area so that healing is accelerated.5,6 It may also act by modifying cell-surface adhesion molecules that guide inflammatory cells to their target site of inflammation. These adhesion molecules play an important role in the development of arthritis and other autoimmune diseases.6
  2. Analgesic: it may help alleviate pain by inhibiting the release of pain-inducing amines like bradykinin from inflamed tissues.1
  3. Fibrinolytic/caseinolytic: it may be beneficial in atherosclerotic disease as it acts by breaking down fibrin and other dead or damaged tissue without harming living tissue. This could enable the dissolution of blood clots, and atherosclerotic plaques.22

Effects of Systemic Enzyme Supplements on Symptoms and Quality of Life in Patients with Pulmonary Fibrosis—A Pilot Study

5. Conclusions

The present study suggests that the oral supplements Serracor-NK and Serra Rx improve symptoms, the ability to perform activities of daily living, and mental and physical well-being, thus enhancing overall quality of life in patients with pulmonary fibrosis. While there is no drug to cure IPF, these supplements can help to alleviate symptoms and improve quality of life in PF patients. This study was performed as a proof of concept. Further assessment in randomized, placebo-controlled trials with larger populations and for longer durations are warranted.

Living with Pulmonary Fibrosis

…Though doctors in the United States are only recently becoming aware of the benefits of added enzymes, doctors in Europe and Asia have been administering enzymes for decades.

Among the best enzymes for removal of scar tissue are serrapeptase and nattokinase. Chymotypsin and pancreatin are considered to be especially valuable against cancer tumors, especially pancreatic cancer tumors.

An especially powerful enzyme is serrapeptase, which is a proteolytic enzyme derived from a species of bacteria originally found in the intestines of silkworms. The bacteria Serratia mercesans E1 produces Serrapeptase, an enzyme that enables the silkworm to dissolve its silken cocoon and emerge after metamorphosis. Serratia is produced by fermented cultures. Studies have shown that serrapeptase reduces scar tissue, improves tissue healing and significantly reduces inflammation.

Serrapeptase also has the unique ability to digest non-living tissue that is a by-product of the healing response without harming living tissue. Serrapeptase is used to dissolve non-living tissues to include: scar tissue, fibrosis, blood clots, cysts and arterial plaque. It is also used as an anti-inflammatory agent against Sinusitis and for thinning mucous secretion and as an agent against varicose veins and fibrocystic breasts. It is believed that serrapeptase can play a key role in dissolving the outer protective layers of cancer cells and tumors to enable the immune system and other cancer fighters to better attack the cancer…

Vitamin D3 and Peppermint are the other ingredients.

Since none of these can be patented the scientific studies are going to be scarce.

KMAG DAILY THREAD 20260624 PROTEINS & THE GUT

HGVvZJrXkAAFlzN

Site rules stolen from our good friend PAVACA

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Do not forget to LABEL AI articles video and such.

This is a compilation of the research I have done for Hubby. His legs are getting weaker and weaker and he now has trouble getting out of a chair or walking without a cane.

Since I switched to Firefox I have been inundated with ads. One is by a Dr Gundry who sells high priced supplements. One is Muscle Defense from ApexLabs. I am not interested in the supplement but he did have interesting information.

It seems as we get older, our bodies no longer use proteins to make muscle. Or at least not as easily. So here is what I have found.

First Question: Is there actually the problem Gundry stated?

Anabolic Resistance of Muscle Protein Turnover Comes in Various Shapes and Sizes

Abstract

Anabolic resistance is defined by a blunted stimulation of muscle protein synthesis rates (MPS) to common anabolic stimuli in skeletal muscle tissue such as dietary protein and exercise. Generally, MPS is the target of most exercise and feeding interventions as muscle protein breakdown rates seem to be less responsive to these stimuli. Ultimately, the blunted responsiveness of MPS to dietary protein and exercise underpins the loss of the amount and quality of skeletal muscle mass leading to decrements in physical performance in these populations. The increase of both habitual physical activity (including structured exercise that targets general fitness characteristics) and protein dense food ingestion are frontline strategies utilized to support muscle mass, performance, and health. In this paper, we discuss anabolic resistance as a common denominator underpinning muscle mass loss with aging, obesity, and other disease states. Namely, we discuss the fact that anabolic resistance exists as a dimmer switch, capable of varying from higher to lower levels of resistance, to the main anabolic stimuli of feeding and exercise depending on the population. Moreover, we review the evidence on whether increased physical activity and targeted exercise can be leveraged to restore the sensitivity of skeletal muscle tissue to dietary amino acids regardless of the population.


Protein Requirements and Recommendations for Older People: A Review

Abstract

Declines in skeletal muscle mass and strength are major contributors to increased mortality, morbidity and reduced quality of life in older people. Recommended Dietary Allowances/Intakes have failed to adequately consider the protein requirements of the elderly with respect to function. The aim of this paper was to review definitions of optimal protein status and the evidence base for optimal dietary protein. Current recommended protein intakes for older people do not account for the compensatory loss of muscle mass that occurs on lower protein intakes. Older people have lower rates of protein synthesis and whole-body proteolysis in response to an anabolic stimulus (food or resistance exercise). Recommendations for the level of adequate dietary intake of protein for older people should be informed by evidence derived from functional outcomes. Randomized controlled trials report a clear benefit of increased dietary protein on lean mass gain and leg strength, particularly when combined with resistance exercise. There is good consistent evidence (level III-2 to IV) that consumption of 1.0 to 1.3 g/kg/day dietary protein combined with twice-weekly progressive resistance exercise reduces age-related muscle mass loss. Older people appear to require 1.0 to 1.3 g/kg/day dietary protein to optimize physical function, particularly whilst undertaking resistance exercise recommendations.


Evidence-Based Recommendations for Optimal Dietary Protein Intake in Older People: A Position Paper From the PROT-AGE Study Group

Abstract

New evidence shows that older adults need more dietary protein than do younger adults to support good health, promote recovery from illness, and maintain functionality. Older people need to make up for age-related changes in protein metabolism, such as high splanchnic extraction and declining anabolic responses to ingested protein. They also need more protein to offset inflammatory and catabolic conditions associated with chronic and acute diseases that occur commonly with aging. With the goal of developing updated, evidence-based recommendations for optimal protein intake by older people, the European Union Geriatric Medicine Society (EUGMS), in cooperation with other scientific organizations, appointed an international study group to review dietary protein needs with aging (PROT-AGE Study Group). To help older people (>65 years) maintain and regain lean body mass and function, the PROT-AGE study group recommends average daily intake at least in the range of 1.0 to 1.2 g protein per kilogram of body weight per day. Both endurance- and resistance-type exercises are recommended at individualized levels that are safe and tolerated, and higher protein intake (ie, ≥1.2 g/kg body weight/d) is advised for those who are exercising and otherwise active. Most older adults who have acute or chronic diseases need even more dietary protein (ie, 1.2–1.5 g/kg body weight/d). Older people with severe kidney disease (ie, estimated GFR <30 mL/min/1.73m2), but who are not on dialysis, are an exception to this rule; these individuals may need to limit protein intake. Protein quality, timing of ingestion, and intake of other nutritional supplements may be relevant, but evidence is not yet sufficient to support specific recommendations. Older people are vulnerable to losses in physical function capacity, and such losses predict loss of independence, falls, and even mortality. Thus, future studies aimed at pinpointing optimal protein intake in specific populations of older people need to include measures of physical function.

So yes there is evidence of the problem.

Gundry said he found the KEY protein that ‘unlocks’ the repair and rebuild signal. An amino acid named leucine. Well he is sort of correct but there is a lot more to it. I found an excellent paper and have provided excerpts at the end of this article. It is a very long paper. Before I found that paper I found other information of interest.

Before I go any further into Amino acids and muscle building, I want to point out something that I think the researchers are missing. A Qtreeper handed this information to us.

Exposing The Great Acid Reflux Scam — Why Stomach Acid Is Critical For HealthA Midwestern Doctor


This is the important part for this article.

Why Stomach Acid Is Essential for Your Health

Subtle distortions frequently occur in science, creating a false conception of reality that conveniently allows a profitable industry to exist. For example, stomach acid is largely viewed as unnecessary and thus frequently possible to justify eliminating with acid suppressing medications. In reality, it has numerous vital functions:

Protein Digestion: Amino acids, the building blocks of the body, are obtained from protein. Without sufficient acid, proteins can’t be properly digested, leading to significant nutritional deficiencies, impaired energy levels, mood or cognitive function, and food sensitivities from undigested foreign proteins entering the bloodstream…

Since GERD [Gastroesophageal reflux disease] is so common, that suggests there is also a widespread deficiency in stomach (hydrochloric) acid. Presently, I believe a few factors are responsible:

Aging: Stomach acid production decreases with age, particularly after 60. This decline is linked to various health issues, making amino acid and B-12 supplementation crucial for older adults. The increasing prevalence of GERD with age suggests that doctors often misattribute symptoms to excess acid rather than considering a deficiency…


If the proteins are not being digested, then the amino acids will not be available for muscle building.


How to Get 2.5 gr of Leucine

The Importance of Leucine

Leucine is one of the three branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) essential for muscle protein synthesis. Unlike other amino acids, the body cannot produce leucine, so getting it from your diet is vital. Understanding the leucine content in foods can help you make informed dietary choices to support your fitness and health objectives.

One reason many people refer to 30 g of protein as the minimum amount per meal is that that’s the amount typically required to get 2.5 g of leucine from most foods. Professor Don Layman’s research emphasises leucine for muscle growth, showing that older adults require at least 2.5 g of leucine to activate muscle protein synthesis, which is vital for muscle building and repair. 

With less than this, the protein you eat is used only to maintain your vital organs, which are a higher priority than your muscles.  While leucine is required to activate muscle protein synthesis, you need all the essential amino acids to build and repair your body, so it’s not as simple as supplementing with leucine. 

How Much Leucine and BCAAs Do You Need?

This article has references to several papers.

….In order to get the most from your time in the weights room, you might want to start thinking about adding more Branched-chain Amino Acids (BCAAs) and Leucine to your diet. But what are they? What will they do for you? Do you even need them? Here’s everything you need to know…

Nine of these are essential for humans to consume in our diets as they can’t be created from other amino acids, and these are known as Essential Amino Acids (EAAs). Three of these are categorised as Branched-chain Amino Acids – so-called because of their structure – and these are leucine, isoleucine and valine.

Different protein-rich foods vary in their protein quality, and you can read more about this in our Guide to Protein Quality, Digestion and Absorption.

3 Amino Acids That Promote Muscle Growth (and the Foods You’ll Find Them In)

…Our bodies need 20 amino acids overall to develop and function, but the nine essential amino acids we get from our food are histidine, isoleucine, leucine, lysine, methionine, phenylalanine, threonine, tryptophan, and valine. Foods that contain adequate levels of these amino acids and can be easily digested and absorbed are considered “complete proteins.” They typically come from animal sources, so you can get a good dose of them from a juicy steak or pan-seared salmon…

Many plant proteins are considered incomplete, with a handful of exceptions such as tofu and edamame…

Leucine, isoleucine, and valine are the three branched-chain amino acids, and they’re your best friends when trying to build muscle. 

Leucine is the most powerful amino acid for muscle growth because it’s thought to stimulate the actual muscle protein synthesis process, but isoleucine and valine also play important supporting roles along the way…

1. Leucine

Leucine acts as a sort of “green light” to muscle growth. It triggers muscle protein synthesis “by signaling to pathways that other amino acids are available to start the muscle repair process post-exercise,” explains Samuel, adding that you need at least 2–3 grams of leucine to stimulate the process. 

Research also illustrates leucine’s role in promoting muscle growth and metabolic health. A small 2020 study published in the journal Nutrients, for example,found that leucine helped moderately reduce muscle damage in young men after a short bout of resistance exercise. This amino acid also helps heal wounds and balance blood sugar levels, according to the Cleveland Clinic.

2. Isoleucine

Isoleucine also contributes to muscle protein synthesis, playing a vital but not quite as influential role as leucine. It appears to increase muscle mass by promoting myogenesis, the process by which we actually form muscle tissue, according to a 2021 study in mice published in Food & Function.

BCAAs, especially isoleucine, also help increase the uptake of glucose into cells, according to Samuel. Because glucose is your body’s main fuel source, isoleucine may indirectly help boost your energy (although more research is needed). And the more energy you have, the harder you can hit your muscle-building workouts.

3. Valine

Valine acts as a complement to the other two BCAAs: It’s used to make glucose in the body and helps improve muscle protein synthesis when paired with leucine and adequate levels of other amino acids, Samuel says.

Plus, a 2023 study published in Bioscience, Biotechnology, & Biochemistry indicates that valine improves mitochondrial function, aka the body’s ability to generate energy from the food we eat…

Leucine: The Amino Acid That Matters Most for Muscle

“Originally it was thought that all three BCAAs play a direct role in muscle building,” says Paul Falcone, principal scientist at BODi. “But research indicates that much of the effect of branched-chain amino acids is really driven by leucine.”

That’s because leucine is key in the process of muscle protein synthesis, which enables muscle hypertrophy (growth).

Leucine has the ability to directly signal mTOR, one of the major nutrient sensor molecules and master regulators in the body that’s known for anabolic (growth) signaling. This helps make muscles absorb protein, which is key for their preservation and growth.

In this way, leucine is both a building block at a construction site and the contractor directing the process, Falcone says. Because it plays this dual role, it’s the most important amino acid for muscle building.

According to the USDA FoodData Central, some of the foods that contain the most leucine per serving include:

  • Chicken
  • Beef
  • Pork
  • Tuna
  • Milk
  • Cheese

“The amount of leucine that you have in protein is important,” Falcone says. “But leucine is not going to be effective on its own. It’s effective in the right amount, as a part of an essential amino acid blend or protein supplement. The leucine content of your protein is a major driver of its effect on muscle building.”

According to a 2017 position stand by the International Society of Sports Nutrition, your protein supplement should contain 700 to 3,000 mg of leucine per serving, in addition to a balanced array of essential amino acids.


What is Leucine? | Leucine Benefits, Dosage and Sources

Leucine dosage and when to take

Most research supports that between 20-40mg/kg body weight per day is adequate for supporting ideal levels of leucine in the body. One study showed that the timing of leucine supplementation did not make a difference (unlike BCAAs, which are recommended before or during a workout).2,4 Keeping a consistent intake of leucine is key, especially for the effects it can have for preventing muscle breakdown on rest days.

Leucine Food Sources

Food Leucine content (g per 100g) 
Beef 2.9 
Chicken breast 2.7 
Tuna 2.4 
Seeds 2.4 
Pork 2.2 
Nuts 1.5 
Tofu 1.4 
Eggs 1.1 


I am including the following because it has alternate food sources and other info.

Top Foods High in Leucine — WebMD

Recommended Daily Amounts of Essential Amino Acids
Amino AcidRecommended Daily Allowance
Histidine14 milligrams
Isoleucine19 milligrams
Leucine42 milligrams
Lysine38 milligrams
Methionine19 milligrams
Phenylalanine33 milligrams
Threonine20 milligrams
Tryptophan5 milligrams
Valine24 milligrams

There are many dietary sources for leucine and other BCAAs. Consider these healthy sources of amino acids: 

Salmon

Get your amino acids from salmon, and you’ll also get omega-3 fatty acids. There are some health concerns about farmed salmon. Choose wild-caught or limit your servings per month.

Chickpeas

These nutritional superstars contain 7 grams of protein and 6 grams of fiber in just half a cup, and they are high in iron, too. Enjoy them as hummus or add them to soups, stews, curries, and salads.

Brown rice

Try brown rice instead of white. It has a nutty taste and a slightly chewy texture that many people enjoy.

Eggs

Even the American Heart Association says that an egg a day is okay. You’ll get 6 grams of protein in one egg. 

Soybeans

This versatile legume is available in a variety of forms, including tofu, tempeh, edamame, and roasted soybeans. Today, texturized soy protein is readily available in supermarkets. It can substitute meat in many dishes.

Nuts

Almonds, Brazil nuts, and cashews are good sources of essential amino acids. So are peanuts, although they are technically legumes instead of nuts.

Beef

Beef is one of the best sources of amino acids. To reduce your intake of fats and cholesterol, choose a lean cut or try grass-fed beef.

Protein Requirements and Recommendations for Older People: A Review

Abstract

Declines in skeletal muscle mass and strength are major contributors to increased mortality, morbidity and reduced quality of life in older people. Recommended Dietary Allowances/Intakes have failed to adequately consider the protein requirements of the elderly with respect to function. The aim of this paper was to review definitions of optimal protein status and the evidence base for optimal dietary protein. Current recommended protein intakes for older people do not account for the compensatory loss of muscle mass that occurs on lower protein intakes. Older people have lower rates of protein synthesis and whole-body proteolysis in response to an anabolic stimulus (food or resistance exercise). Recommendations for the level of adequate dietary intake of protein for older people should be informed by evidence derived from functional outcomes. Randomized controlled trials report a clear benefit of increased dietary protein on lean mass gain and leg strength, particularly when combined with resistance exercise. There is good consistent evidence (level III-2 to IV) that consumption of 1.0 to 1.3 g/kg/day dietary protein combined with twice-weekly progressive resistance exercise reduces age-related muscle mass loss. Older people appear to require 1.0 to 1.3 g/kg/day dietary protein to optimize physical function, particularly whilst undertaking resistance exercise recommendations.

And finally the LONG paper I mentioned at the beginning.

Anabolic Resistance in the Pathogenesis of Sarcopenia in the Elderly: Role of Nutrition and Exercise in Young and Old People

The term “sarcopenia” (from the Greek words “sarx”, i.e., flesh, and “penia”, i.e., loss) was first proposed by Rosenberg in 1989 to describe the age-related loss of muscle mass [1]. Later, this term referred to the decrease in muscle mass and/or strength with ageing.

Abstract

The development of sarcopenia in the elderly is associated with many potential factors and/or processes that impair the renovation and maintenance of skeletal muscle mass and strength as ageing progresses. Among them, a defect by skeletal muscle to respond to anabolic stimuli is to be considered. Common anabolic stimuli/signals in skeletal muscle are hormones (insulin, growth hormones, IGF-1, androgens, and β-agonists such epinephrine), substrates (amino acids such as protein precursors on top, but also glucose and fat, as source of energy), metabolites (such as β-agonists and HMB), various biochemical/intracellular mediators), physical exercise, neurogenic and immune-modulating factors, etc. Each of them may exhibit a reduced effect upon skeletal muscle in ageing. In this article, we overview the role of anabolic signals on muscle metabolism, as well as currently available evidence of resistance, at the skeletal muscle level, to anabolic factors, from both in vitro and in vivo studies. Some indications on how to augment the effects of anabolic signals on skeletal muscle are provided.

….

2.1. The Molecular Mechanisms behind Muscles Growth in Young Subjects: Exercise, Nutrients, and Hormones

Muscle growth, or muscle hypertrophy, is a complex process regulated by several molecular pathways. The primary pathways that promote muscle growth in response to exercise, nutrients, and growth signals include the IGF-1/PI3K (phosphoinositide 3-kinase)/Akt/mTOR pathway and hormones like testosterone and GH (Figure 1).

The IGF-1/PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway is a vital signaling cascade in muscle growth that involves various interconnected mechanisms. Its activation increases protein synthesis, reduces protein degradation, and improves cell growth. The molecular mechanisms and interactions within this pathway are still being studied in human muscle physiology. When activated, mTOR promotes muscle hypertrophy by stimulating protein synthesis and cell growth [13]. The mTOR kinase is the main regulator of muscle protein synthesis and responds to the availability of nutrients, particularly amino acids and growth factors. Indeed, resistance exercise and nutrient intake, especially leucine-rich amino acids, activate the mTOR pathway essential for exercise-induced muscle protein synthesis and are, thus, necessary for increasing muscle protein synthesis following resistance exercise in young men…

The timing of exercise and protein intake also affect Akt activation and subsequent muscle protein synthesis. While exercise alone did not increase Akt and mTOR phosphorylation, protein ingestion afterward did so in a dose-dependent manner. As a matter of fact, Akt activation is a complex process influenced by exercise, nutrition, and specific amino acids, and further research is being conducted to fully understand its role in muscle growth and adaptation [18].

The upstream controller in this axis is the insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), which is crucial in promoting growth and anabolic processes in skeletal muscles [13]. IGF-1 is a key growth factor that regulates both anabolic and catabolic pathways in skeletal muscle…

Testosterone is one of the most potent naturally secreted androgenic-anabolic hormones, and its biological effects include promoting muscle growth. In muscle, testosterone stimulates protein synthesis (anabolic effect) and inhibits protein degradation (anti-catabolic effect) [25,26,27,28,29]. Testosterone plays a crucial role in muscle growth in response to exercise and nutrition. Various studies have shed light on this topic. Vingren et al. (2010) explored the physiological aspects of testosterone in resistance exercise and training, highlighting its upstream regulatory elements [28]. They found that testosterone enhances muscle protein synthesis, stimulates satellite cell activation and proliferation, and modulates anabolic signaling pathways such as mTOR and IGF-1. These findings suggest that testosterone plays a key role in mediating the anabolic response to resistance exercise…

2.2.1. Effects of Proteins and Amino Acids

…Leucine is particularly important as a key metabolic regulator of MPS through its activation of the mTOR pathway, and it acutely enhances skeletal MPS both in vitro [45,47,48,49,50] (also above) and in vivo [51]. In addition to the protein or the amino acids, other variables or factors, such as the coexistence of exercise, the pattern and/or the timing of nutrient administration, the age of subjects, the presence of comorbidities, etc., are important. Most reports have investigated the combined effect of protein and exercise…

Leucine, isoleucine, and valine, i.e., the branched-chain amino acids (BCAA), account for about one-third of all amino acid residues in muscle protein, and have been extensively studied regarding their direct regulatory role (due to leucine) on protein synthesis (see also above). Nevertheless, the demonstration of a clear-cut effect of BCAA alone, on skeletal muscle hypertrophy (i.e., a long-term effect) in humans is not sound. In a meta-analysis, leucine supplementation was reported to increase the muscle protein fractional synthesis rate, however, without changing either body lean mass or leg lean mass [61]. The effect of another amino acid, glutamine (non-essential), on skeletal muscle in humans, is yet uncertain and/or unwarranted…

The structure/form of nutrient intake (free AA vs. intact protein) with respect to the timing of administration (either before, or 1 to 3 h after, exercise) on the stimulation of skeletal muscle protein accretion is relevant too. While net amino acid uptake by skeletal muscle (measured by means of femoral arteriovenous sampling) was greater when free essential amino acids plus carbohydrates were ingested before, rather than after, resistance exercise [84], the ingestion of intact whey protein was similar irrespective of the administration time [85].

2.2.3. Effect of Other Substrates

Protein synthesis is an energy-requiring process [86]; therefore, energy-providing substrates such as glucose and fat may affect protein turnover too. The activities of the cellular pathways controlling protein turnover are bio-energetically expensive and therefore depend on intracellular energy availability (i.e., macronutrient intake) [87].

Glucose

Glucose increased muscle protein synthesis in vitro [88]. Testing glucose-induced or derived substrates separately, tissue ATP decreased during incubation with lactate, and lactate + pyruvate supported protein synthesis better than pyruvate or glucose. The data on the effects in humans of either glucose or fat on protein metabolism, specifically on skeletal muscle, are scarce, complex, and not univocal [42]. Enteral glucose administration did not affect either duodenal mucosal protein FSR or the activities of mucosal proteases [89]. An oral glucose load, and the simultaneous glucose-induced stimulation of insulin secretion, did not alter the rate of whole-body protein synthesis or breakdown [90]. Similarly, glucose ingestion added to a protein dose that maximally stimulated MPS, despite greater insulin increments, did not show either additive or synergistic effects on either the stimulation of MPS or the inhibition of muscle protein breakdown [91]. The co-ingestion of carbohydrates with protein did not further augment the post-exercise stimulation of muscle protein synthesis

Lipids and Ketones

The effects of either lipid or ketone infusion/administration in humans are complex. Lipid infusion in humans did not affect proteolysis [96]. In contrast, medium-chain fatty acid infusion apparently increased leucine oxidation and, therefore, net protein catabolism [97]. Thus, the effects on whole-body protein degradation may depend on the fatty acid length [98]. The increase in FFA decreased basal muscle protein synthesis, but not the anabolic effect of leucine [99]. When associated with dietary protein ingestion, neither acute nor short-term dietary fat overload impaired skeletal MPS in overweight/obese men in the post-prandial phase, thus excluding a role by dietary accumulation of intramuscular lipids on the anabolic response to meal ingestion [100]. The infusion of 3OHButyrate decreased both whole body and forearm protein turnover (measured by phenylalanine/tyrosine tracers), as well as phenylalanine catabolism, in post-absorptive conditions, whereas it did not modify the insulin-induced effects following an euglycemic clamp [96]. In another study, 3OHButyrate infusion did not change whole-body leucine turnover, decreased leucine oxidation, and increased the non-oxidative portion of leucine disposal, while muscle PS increased, demonstrating an anabolic effect of 3OHButyrate at this level [101].

[There is a whole lot more info. And then they get into us old folks. — GC]

3.2. Anabolic Resistance in Ageing: Human Studies

Elderly subjects exhibit many abnormalities in protein metabolism in respect to younger subjects, here concisely summarized:

  1. An increased splanchnic “trapping” of the ingested substrates, henceforth reducing amino acid delivery to peripheral tissues, such as skeletal muscle. Google AI — Aging and Clinical States: In older adults or those with certain metabolic conditions, splanchnic uptake can become hyperactive (a process called splanchnic sequestration). This means too many amino acids get trapped in the gut/liver, leaving less available for the muscles. This contributes to age-related muscle loss (sarcopenia)
  2. A decreased amino acid utilization by muscle, and/or the requirement for a greater AA load/delivery to stimulate appropriately PS in muscle, compatible with an anabolic-resistant state. In other words, the skeletal muscle in ageing might be less sensitive to lower (normal) levels of amino acids than that in young adults, and may thus require more protein to acutely stimulate muscle protein synthesis above rest, to achieve the required accretion of muscle proteins.
  3. A decrease in energy production otherwise required to sustain the energy-expensive PS.
  4. Altered protein digestion.
  5. A decrease in transluminal AA transport.
  6. An intestinal microbiota different from that of younger people.

Any of the above-listed potential factors could explain why elderly people would require, and/or are recommended to assume, at least ≈ 50% more protein than either young or mature subjects [66]. In the following sections, we report the literature data on protein turnover in ageing, both in basal and “post-absorptive” conditions, and following nutrition, exercise, and response to hormones.

However, at variance with these earlier reports, more recent studies consistently failed to confirm the earlier findings of decreased basal muscle protein synthesis in elderly subjects, showing little or no differences between young and old adults…

It should, however, be recognized that basal muscle protein turnover could particularly be altered in frail, elderly subjects, being potentially associated also with a chronic, subtle, systemic inflammatory state and/or other co-morbidities [198,199]. Indeed, inflammatory mediators, such as cytokines, particularly TNFα, may impair skeletal muscle protein FSR, by interfering with the phosphorylation of the mammalian target of the rapamycin (mTOR) pathway [150], critically involved in the regulation of mRNA translation, muscle protein synthesis, and growth [200]. Therefore, it is currently accepted that basal skeletal muscle protein turnover is near-normal in healthy elderly subjects. In contrast, a different, complex picture can emerge when studying the response in ageing of skeletal muscle protein turnover to anabolic stimuli, such as substrates (i.e., mixed meals, protein, amino acid mixtures, other metabolites), exercise, anabolic hormones, or their combinations.

Elderly subjects exhibit some peculiarities in the handling of oral feeding. Using the essential amino acid leucine as a tracer, a greater first-pass splanchnic uptake of ingested amino acid(s) was reported in the elderly rather than in young people, suggesting that a lower proportion of ingested amino acid reached the peripheral circulation [195]. Such a greater splanchnic extraction could limit the amino-acid-mediated stimulation of muscle protein synthesis in peripheral tissues such as skeletal muscle. Consequently, sustaining splanchnic vs. muscle protein synthesis could indicate a “metabolic priority” during recovery from metabolic stress in healthy elderly persons. Such a mechanism might become more relevant in older individuals suffering from chronic diseases and/or subjected to poly-medications [201]. However, in contrast with the above report, it was also reported that oral amino acids stimulated muscle protein anabolism in the elderly, despite the higher first-pass splanchnic extraction [202].

A protein pulse rather than a spread (or continued) oral feeding stimulated the best protein accretion in the elderly [203]…

Generally speaking, dietary protein supplementation can augment the gains in skeletal muscle mass and strength mediated by resistance exercise… Verdijk et al. compared the increment(s) in skeletal muscle mass and strength following 3 months of resistance exercise training, with or without protein ingestion, either prior to or immediately after each exercise session in elderly males who habitually consumed about 1.0 g protein/kg per day [210]. They concluded that timed protein supplementation prior to and after each exercise bout did not further increase skeletal muscle hypertrophy…

No impairment of muscle protein synthesis to protein intake was detected in elderly subjects after ingestion of large amounts of carbohydrates and proteins [211], or of either moderate (≈115 g) [212] or large (≈300 g) amounts of beef [213]. By comparing sarcopenic (≈80 y) and healthy (≈70 y) older men, the ingestion of ≈20 g of a leucine-enriched whey protein load, increased muscle protein synthesis rates to the same extent in both groups [214].

In older adults, following the ingestion of mixed meals containing combinations of animal (beef) and vegetal proteins, the whole-body anabolic response linearly increased with increasing protein intake, primarily due to the suppression of protein breakdown. Notably, muscle protein synthesis (i.e., one factor contributing to the net protein accretion, or balance, together with the suppression of protein degradation) was further stimulated by a protein dose (70 g) above that previously considered as “optimal” in the elderly (≈35 g/kg BW) [215], yet attaining the same maximal response as that of young subjects. However, at the 40 g dose, the stimulation of muscle protein synthesis in the elderly was lower than that observed in the young volunteers, therefore compatible with anabolic resistance in the former group at a “lower” (i.e., 40 g) mixed protein dose (see also below). The above-reported protein dose(s) stimulating MPS in older subjects were, however, greater than the 20 g high-quality, whey protein dose that produced the maximal effect on MPS in young people, either exercising or not [72]. The muscle protein synthetic response to the combined ingestion of protein and carbohydrate (i.e., an additional energy source) was not impaired in healthy older men [216]. Similarly, the co-ingestion of carbohydrates with protein and free leucine stimulated muscle protein synthesis to the same extent in young and elderly lean men [217]…

A ten-day administration of a supplement containing fast-digestive proteins (soluble milk proteins compared to casein alone) could overcome muscle anabolic resistance in the elderly [205]. Furthermore, oral EAA ingestion exhibited a retarded albeit still sustained response of MPS in the elderly as compared to young subjects [58].

In older men, skeletal muscle was also less responsive to the anabolic effects of leucine in the postprandial phase than in the young controls [219]. Also, a higher proportion of leucine within an essential amino acid mixture was required for the optimal stimulation of muscle protein synthesis in the elderly, rather than in young subjects…

3.2.6. Deleterious Effects of Bed Rest in the Elderly

A condition opposite to exercise is bed rest, an undesired situation very common in hospitalized older subjects, as well as in those old persons in whom, for a variety of factors, physical activity is restrained and/or abolished, either voluntarily or not [156,225,226,227]. In older adults, bed rest significantly restrained the EAA-induced increase in MPS, through a reduction in mTORC1 signaling and amino acid transport [228]. EAA supplementation above RDA may help to preserve muscle function in the elderly during inactivity

3.2.7. Effect of the Inflammatory State

Acute and chronic inflammation retain undesired effects on skeletal muscle mass and protein metabolism. Thus, age-associated inflammation (either subtle or overt) may negatively affect the anabolic sensitivity of skeletal muscle in the elderly. Toth et al. reported a strong relationship exists between MPS and circulating concentrations of several markers of immune activation [199]. At the mechanistic level, cytokines, in particularly, TNF-α, may impair MPS by blunting the phosphorylation of proteins in the mammalian target of the rapamycin (mTOR) intracellular signaling pathway…

3.3.1. The Effect of Complex Nutritional Supplements

Although natural foods rich in high-quality protein (dairy products, meat, and egg) can adequately stimulate protein anabolism as efficiently as that of protein-rich supplements and/or of specifically designed amino acid mixtures, the advantage of using specific nutritional supplements remains questionable…

3.3.2. Specific Effects of Leucine Addition

The addition of leucine to other nutritional products may be a valid supplement to be used in the elderly, although with somehow limited effects [240]. Older subjects consuming a leucine supplement showed a greater increase in MPS rates from baseline than the controls, but not in lean body mass or muscle function [61]. In a recent study in older men (74 y), co-ingestion of 2.5 g leucine with 20 g casein resulted in a 22% higher muscle protein synthetic rate compared with ingestion of casein alone [241].

The leucine effect seems to be dose-dependent. Leucine added as a supplement (3–5 g) to either whey protein or EAA solutions in either younger or older men, showed comparable increments in skeletal muscle myofibrillar protein synthesis (MyoPS), at variance with no sustained stimulation observed in control subjects receiving only 1.8 g leucine [242,243]. However, the leucine effect in skeletal muscle of aged people might be impaired, as mTORC1 activation is defective, and sensitivity and responsiveness of muscle protein synthesis to amino acids decreased [50]. Conversely, the basal activation of mTOR seems to be higher. A combined effect of age-related impairment of muscle signaling and insufficient availability/delivery of nutrients and growth factors to the muscle might contribute to sarcopenia. Thus, whether ageing per se affects mTORC1 signaling is yet uncertain, because of the common association between poor protein assumption, reduced/absent physical activity, and concurrent diseases. In studies in which habitual protein intake exceeded 1.0–1.1 g/kg/day, and included a moderate/high proportion of dairy protein, prolonged leucine supplementation (2.5 g daily for six months) did not increase muscle mass or strength in healthy type 2 diabetic older adult

3.3.3. Exercise Strategies

The primary target(s) of sarcopenia prevention/amelioration is the reduction in the risk of falls and fractures and the maintenance of independence in everyday tasks. The interventions applied to attain these targets look very similar to those aimed at the amelioration of general health status with ageing, such as improvements in muscle mass and strength, bone density, cardiovascular fitness, maximal oxygen consumption, endurance, and energy metabolism, in addition to the reduction in insulin resistance and the associated risk of diabetes mellitus, coronary heart disease, hypertension, and obesity [245]. In other words, the benefits of regular exercise translate into an improvement in the quality of life of elderly populations. Practicing regular exercise is a prerequisite to attain and maintain these benefits over time. In order to attain these key objectives, much attention has to be devoted to the implementation of specific exercise programs, aiming at increasing the awareness of their safety, required constancy, and compliance.

Following regular training, older subjects can increase muscle strength as much as that of younger control subjects, even by threefold, over a few months. This result is initially accomplished by neural adaptation(s) and greater muscle fiber recruitment, while more prolonged resistance training leads to an increase in muscle mass/size too, (partially) restoring the loss of the cross-sectional area of type II muscle fibers occurring with ageing [246]. Resistance training contributes to improvement in the functional capacity of the levels of physical activity and allows participation in daily living activities to be maintained, thus being motivationally efficient too. Specific protocols for the implementation of exercise to combat sarcopenia in ageing, in the old [247], as well as the oldest-old (80–85 y) [248] and the physically frail [249], have been proposed.

Both resistance/strength/weight exercise and endurance/aerobic training of skeletal muscles may be useful in the prevention and treatment of sarcopenia. Strenght training can positively affect the neuromuscular system, and increase hormone concentrations and the MPS rate [250]; however, from a recent meta-analysis, the benefit of combining dietary supplements and exercise is not so straightforward among different populations [251].

Exercise training has been consistently shown to be highly effective in slowing down and possibly preventing the insurgence of sarcopenia in older people, counteracting the loss of muscle mass, and strength, and an increase in intramuscular fat infiltrations. While stressing the importance of a personalized approach, general physical activity guidelines suggest that a combination of aerobic exercise, progressive resistance training, and balance training might be the ideal intervention for a sarcopenic population. Of note in a mixed training involving aerobic, strength, and balance exercises was effective in improving or preserving motoneuronal health and neuromuscular junction (NMJ) stability, together with muscle mass, strength, and functionality in an old, sarcopenic population [252]. These sarcopenic subjects were trained three times per week for 2 years with a mix of aerobic, strength, and balance exercises matched with nutritional advice [252]. The same group of researchers followed older dancers for 6 months, reporting a major stability in neuromuscular junctions and a superior functional performance despite no differences in muscle size…

New exercise technologies, and supplementation by antioxidants, vitamin D, eicosapentaenoic acid, or ursolic acid, as well as activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ coactivator-1α (PGC-1α), may be considered too…

A number of reports have also investigated the optimal daily distribution of food protein, as well as the timing of the administration with respect to exercise performance (see also above).

In regard to food protein distribution over the three main daily meals, it was reported that non-frail elderly subjects consume dietary proteins more evenly than pre-frail and frail subjects, thus suggesting that the daily protein load should be consumed as ≈30 g protein (in a representative 75 kg subject) at each of the three daily mealtimes [264]. Conversely, in a subsequent randomized-controlled trial, the pattern of meal-protein intake (i.e., even vs. not even) over the day did not affect lean body mass, muscle strength, or other functional outcomes, as well as whole-body protein kinetics and MPS over 8 weeks in older adults [265].

With respect to the timing of food protein food administration with exercise (i.e., before, at the beginning, i.e., at t = 0′, or after exercise performance), in the only published study in the elderly, the early intake of a protein supplement immediately before (at t = 0′) each bout of resistance-type exercise in a 12-week intervention study in the elderly sustained skeletal muscle hypertrophy, as opposed to having no effect with the supplement intake taken 2 h after exercise [266]. Notably, protein ingestion in the evening/night before sleep increased Muscle Protein Synthesis throughout the night in healthy older men [267].

A list and the quantities of common foods providing ≈ 30 g of protein are reported in Table 4. (data compiled from ref. [268]) The quantities of animal foods are lower than those of vegetal foods (except for soybeans and quinoa), because of their balanced content of essential amino acids. The reported quantities are only indicative, because most of these foods have not been specifically tested in controlled studies of stimulation of skeletal MPS with exercise in the elderly.

The image will not load so here is the LINK.

KMAG DAILY THREAD 20260617 IRAN DOT CONNECTING

bolton-war-stache-toon

Site rules stolen from our good friend PAVACA

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.


Do not forget to LABEL AI articles video and such.


Just for fun.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hl8vErrqjKY


BTW Hubby was corresponding with a Russian scientist doing similar studies in Siberia using domesticated Russian horses.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

In my opinion Iran was never just about the Middle East, it was about world peace and breaking the grip of the Cabal. That is why there is such a stark contrast between how the press and the rest of the world views the Ukrainian war vs the military op against Iran.

LIVE Q&A: Iran, Lawfare, and Why the Establishment Is Going All-In Against Trump

PARTIAL ROUGH TRANSCRIPT

32:00 Barbara Boyd: On a bill in Congress about merging Israeli & US technological intelligence: “ Well Hey. It’s already pretty effectively merged in terms of the Mossad and the COA and has been ever since James J Angleton created in essence the Mossad from the CIA. To me none of this has any magnitude equivalent to the complete merger of our intelligence community with MI6 and Five Eyes and NATO. Which is far, far, far more dangerous, more disgusting and more off the mark in terms of a native US-Based intelligence compared to anything Israel could think about…

36:20 Iran having a nuclear weapon is a threat to the world. Iran started off negotiations with Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff by saying, we have enough nuclear material for nine bombs right now. That is a genuine threat to the world. You are seeing how the IRGC operates before your eyes. It has been that way for a very, very long time. There is no terrorist operation in the world which doesn’t benefit in some fundamental way. They are not independent. And most of what the IRGC is and everything else comes from the City of London’s long time control of every single terrorist operation in the Middle East. Be they Shiite or Be they Sunni.

Trump stopped that at the beginning of his very first term with his visit to Saudi Arabia. Trump said, the USA is out of this game PERIOD. And that in part is the long history of what this is really all about.

37:50 Mike Steger: The Middle East is the cockpit for escalated war on a Global scale. Iran was set up as part of that agenda. We have documented this. Bernard Lewis, Brzeziński, this was radical Islam used as a basic weapon to threaten the world. [And push it] into a kind of chaos which then Lloyds and others would control and profit and monetize.

Trump realizes that [and] he has dedicated more time in his presidency to stabilizing the Middle East. And there is no doubt that the situation in the Middle East on October 7th which escalated into this horrific war in Gaza came out of Iran and Iran’s interests – Largely British – but through Iran to destabilize the Middle East AND PREVENT THE ABRAHAM ACCORDS, TO PREVENT LONG-TERM PEACE AND STABILITY IN THE MIDDLE EAST. [Ghost in the last video on this page goes into the actual play-by-play of how the Abraham Accords were de-railed. -GC]

38:40 The reality is you have a military cult in the IRGC which controls upward of 50% of the entire Iranian economy. I do not think the clerics or the so-called democratically elected political representatives have had any real control in that country for quite some time if ever… I think the situation is far more dangerous than Iran. And I will point to just one clear evidence of that.

[Ghost goes even further and thinks Iran was all about starting a nuclear war. As I wrote in THE CASE FOR NUCLEAR WAR I think the Cabal is crazy enough to want to start one. –GC]

Kim Jong-un and Trump could have one-on-one direct dialogue. They are having ongoing letter and other correspondence as we speak. He has had that since he came back in. There was NEVER a chance to have dialogue with the clerics or the Ayatollah because the reality is the Ayatollah has not really been holding real power. I think that is the fundamental difference. You can’t trust Iran because you actually don’t have a sense of who is really in power. That is why the negotiations have been hung up. Because there is not a real center of power in Iran to give it a coherent nation state status. [So WHO and WHERE is that center of power? In the UK where the Ayatollah and top IRGC commanders have property?? GC]

43:00 Mike Steger: I think there’s been a kind of a fight in China and it’s not been maybe a balanced one per se. What the communism of Mao was set up, largely by kind of British and globalist interests, to play, is the exact role China was beginning to play in this kind of globalist globalized economy. They became the kind of sweat shop of the world. Cheap labor supply, cheap manufacturing, and what you saw was a rise of billionaires dominating China. And that’s been a kind of corruption that China now is trying to confront and clean out.

What Trump’s challenging China is to say, look, that doesn’t function. That doesn’t work. And there are some people in China at various political levels who recognize that that is not the pathway to go. That it’s led to intrinsic corruption in China, that it leads to political instability. But China’s got a difficult problem. They’ve got to try to hold the nation together. And it’s been a 2,000-year-old problem in China. The Chinese like to break off into their own separate provinces, their own separate princedoms and kingdoms. It’s hard to hold the nation together. So that’s kind of an underlying threat that China constantly faces. And they’ve tried to nationalize with the Mandarin language. There’s all kinds of things they’ve had to do that most people wouldn’t have any idea of, to try to rectify this lack of real national unity inside China… [This agrees with the little I have learned of China. Ghost & Alpha Warrior distinguish between the CCP and Xi. The CCP being the Chinese Deep State. Also given the amount of trouble Xi has handling China, I doubt he wants to actually control anymore land except as tribute states (Belt & Road). –GC]

45:00 Trump has shown in Iran that we are killing the old system. The vestiges of this kind of divided world, this kind of a new cold war era of China, Iran, Russia, North Korea as a block. He’s saying, “We’re killing that system. You’re not going to benefit off of cheap Iranian oil, but we’re going to have a much longer term stable system led by the United States, founded on the US dollar-based system, but based on nations having the right to industrialize, build up, and to thrive. A system of nation states.” And I think there are some in China. I think probably this is the dialogue President Trump is having with Chairman Xi that this is where he’s taking the world and that chairman Xi is well aware that that would be best long-term for China because it really doesn’t have the ability to play the role of a global economic hegemon. That’s just British imperial thinking that’s made its way into China through various aspects including Maoism. So, I think that’s the presentation Trump is making. And I think he’s got to be forceful because if you don’t kill the old system, it’s very difficult for people holding on to the status quo to ever leave it and jump into the new one. I would just add that, China was essentially manipulated based on the WTO — this whole idea of globalization — to become the sweat shop of the world. That’s not really what any nation wants to be….

Steve Bannon and others who continue to insist that we have to go to war with China are not understanding what the president is actually doing and that’s why Mike is quite right…

51:00 Adam: And then here’s one from Cool Cool Roy which I think is actually a much more important question than people realize. “Would you agree that playing the hate and blame game is one of the greatest forms of self- oppression and government oppression on earth?” Before I open it up, let me just say yes. And the way that people describe it sometimes is the victim mentality. Become victimized by some other group or some other ideology, some other identity. Barbara and Mike, your thoughts on this super chat here.

51:30 Barbara Boyd: I think this is a good one. Mike’s pointing to me, so I’ll start.

Okay. Aristotle and Carl Schmidt, the German legal theorist and Nazi, basically had this idea that you don’t know who you are unless you have an enemy. In other words, you define yourself by your enemy. By something terribly negative. You don’t define who you really are, what your mission is here on this earth, and what reality actually is in terms of of how you deal with it. That is human. What Carl Schmidt and Aristotle believed is best deal because you end up in a cycle of endless wars out of all of that and kind of tribal policing of yourselves based on tribal ideas and identities rather than superseding them to actually fulfill our mission here on earth. Genesis tells us what it is. Go forth, multiply and subdue the earth. I really think that’s completely different than either Aristotle or Carl Schmidt.

Carl Schmidt, — I just went and reminded myself, his entire thesis was based on the friend – enemy distinction. That was kind of like the central thesis to it. This kind of issue of building these gangs and encounter gangs of different varieties and then having that kind of gang counter gang warfare play out in the public sphere. That in my mind is basically what’s been controlling essentially all of modern politics. It is using that control mechanism in one way or another for sure. Mike, any thoughts?

53:42 Mike Steger: Yeah, Let’s just take it into the British question, because this is how they tried to control their empire. They did it n East Africa. 👉But probably the most famous case is in India. Where Hindus were the majority, the British power would back the Muslim minority and to aggravate the sense that the Hindus had a right if they had the majority to direct where they wanted to go. But in the Muslim controlled areas near the Indus in West India which is now Pakistan they would back the Hindu minority and aggravate the Muslim majority to the point where you would get this kind of potential for a major backlash👈… It’s not parody in terms of the kind of conditions, but you get this emotional backlash that creates civil war. And that’s exactly what happened in India when the British left in 1947. A civil war broke out on religious lines, killing up to two million people. And that’s the kind of thing you see them attempting to provoke, whether it’s in Belfast or the Henry Nowak: case or the George Floyd dynamic in the United States. They’re trying to create and instigate this kind of reaction. [Crypto Rich, a Muslim, informed Mike of this in a lot greater detail in his recent podcast. -GC]

You can see this if you go to X because it’s so visceral so guttural that it dominates a lot of the social media discussion. That’s why, on Promethean Action, we focus on unifying the country. Our strength is unity and orienting towards the redevelopment of the nation. To rebuilding it just like you want to unify the church as an ecumenical mission, as a good Christian, you want to unify the nation towards a mission of industrial and scientific advancement…


AI DATA CENTERS

1:02:07 Mike Steger: I think there’s a number of things. It’s clear that this data center AI comes out of Silicon Valley. There’s very little to trust about a lot of these institutions. The way they’ve run the social media process, what they’ve run with social control, what they did with censorship, how they were back doors to the intelligence community. All of that’s true. All of that’s worth not trusting. But at the same time, there is a real viability to AI applications, but not necessarily the way that a lot of these AI firms are talking about it.

So, there’s a lot of this idea that we can deliver it to personal consumers and it’s going to be some big financial gain based like social media was broad-based consumption on every phone, every young person. The reality is that AI is probably going to be far more profitable and useful as it’s integrated into the re-industrialization of the United States because there’s real applications connecting it to an industrial robotic and high-tech process of manufacturing of logistics. So there’s real benefit to these kinds of advancements. It’s always a double-edged sword. How do you apply it? Do you apply it towards social control which has been the IC Silicon Valley modus operandi for 25, 30 40 years or is it going to be applied towards a new re-industrialized United States? There are certainly very clear aspects of Trump, of the JD Vance, of this new Republican party, who see that they’re building up the industrial firms, they’re broadening out the defense contractor base with new firms who are looking to apply these things, to integrate it into real manufacturing and production, to increase the kind of broad-based wealth of the country.

Now that said, how we deal with data centers is something that we’ve got to think through as a country. Doing it in big farmland areas doesn’t make a lot of sense. There was a proposal to do it in Buick City up in Flint, which was prior to River Rouge where Ford did the largest factory at the time. It was Buick City up in Flint. That was a massive start to finish raw material to finish automotive product in one plant.

Now that’s been laid waste for a long time and there was proposal to put data centers there. Now Flynn has knocked it out. Like to me it makes a lot more sense to put them into brown fields where you have connected water and power supply than to do it into open farmlands. Much like power centers should be integrated into city centers and industry, not just, solar panels all over our corn fields. So, I think we’ve got to think this thing through. I think that there’s plays on both sides as Barbara’s pointed out. Maybe she wants to go into more depth today.

There’s clearly other aspects. There was a lot of propaganda push from Russian news networks to target our fracking industry. You know, 15, 20 years ago, they really tried to undercut the idea of fracking. They got the whole left in America to be anti-fracking even though that’s what’s created all of this natural gas that these green environmentalists have been obsessed with. The same thing is true today with China because there is a real race for AI that’s real and largely because China sees it. China knows even maybe better than a lot of Americans that this AI is going to be a boon towards their manufacturing and productive sector and they sought to have global control of that. So I think the question is re-industrializing thinking about how we use these AI data centers. Even as Trump said making sure that these AI companies are treated like pharmaceutical companies. You can’t just release these new models. We have to know what they’re actually going to be doing. What kind of effect they have….

so we’ve got to regulate it. We might have to integrate it, but we have to be smart about it. It’s a double-edged sword. We can’t become anti-technology, but we can’t allow the model of Silicon Valley and social control to continue to dominate the way we let these companies become big major firms in the United States. And I think that’s a political question. It’s a question of political power. And it’s the kind of challenge that self-government creates because we can just either hand it to the experts and be ruled by oligarchy or if we’re going to deal with it, we’ve got to deal with it in a smart way and not just react because there are certain forces that want to control our reaction. They want us to react and shut this thing down and we’ve got to be smart about it. So that’s kind of how I think about it.

1:06:40 Barbara Boyd: I had pointed out I think last week that Kevin O’Leary who you know is famous from TV, is actually building a data center in Utah and started getting all sorts of strange stuff that he wasn’t doing in terms of zoning and everything else. Big attacks on him. He hired a firm to actually track down where all this was coming from. Unsurprisingly he proved that it was coming from China. Which makes a whole lot of sense. Okay, We’re in a race as to who is going to actually develop the useful aspects of this first and foremost. Data centers are a requirement of that. That said, you’ve got to take into account environment. You shouldn’t be building it on, farmland, which should be in agriculture at this point. And is a really big deal out there because we have problems with our farmers, which have nothing to do with AI. [Goes into food Cartels]

POLITICAL ISLAM

1:50:00 Adam: Sha says “I think you are missing the plan of Islam.” Barbara and Mike your thoughts on this one? Are are we missing the plan of Islam?

Barbara Boyd: No, we’re not missing it. You got to understand a little bit about Islam as a religion. All right? There’s two sides to it. There is so-called political Islam, which was largely an invention. And you know, some of my Muslim friends will actually get mad at me at this point, but that was actually an invention of the Arab Bureau of British Secret Intelligence for purposes of using Islam as a weapon in this whole dynamic in the Middle East to have gangs and counter gangs. Basically, revisionist Zionism versus political Islam. The Muslim Brotherhood being the biggest example of that. Obviously the Muslim Brotherhood and those who are looking to have a re-founding of the caliphate, even Turkey wants that, are looking towards proselytizing other people in the world to become part of Islam or they’re considered to be enemies of the religion that is essentially what you’re talking about when you talk about the Plan of Islam. Most Muslims do not subscribe to this at all. So, you got to be very careful here and make the distinction and figure out whether you’re being pushed into something that really is not all that big a deal. I think the last time I looked demographically, the Muslims constitute about 1% of the United States total in various areas of the country. [Google says 1.3% to 1.5%GC] They obviously have settled, because of immigration patterns and family patterns and the religion and everything else. People get freaked out about it because they think oh my god this group of people is here and they’re not adhering to anything in the community and they haven’t been absorbed into the community. That’s a problem. It’s a problem we face across the board in terms of immigration in our country.

👉But, in order for people to actually integrate into a culture, you got to be able to define the culture they’re integrating themselves into.👈

And if you look at our culture in the United States at this point, and you asked yourself, if I was coming here and I actually am being told you need to integrate into American culture, what would I see? What would I see? Would I see Graham Platner and think that I got to integrate with that? That’s kind of a problem. It’s not as simple as the plan, which everybody’s kind of attached to at this point of, oh my god. they’re going to come here and essentially take us all over. It is a source of tension in various communities in the United States around this question of, you know, becoming an American and identifying being an American as your essential identity. But in order for people to do that, we got to do a much better job of actually defining what a citizen and citizenship in the United States actually means. So that’s how to answer your question.…

118:16 Mark Steger: And let me just go back to the last question because I think what people are missing, I mean Islam has been radically altered by a lot of the foreign funding [and] British operations over the last 50 years. What Trump’s message to a lot of these Gulf Kingdoms, the Saudis, the entire Islamic world is in 2017, knock it off. We’re not going to be funding ISIS and al-Qaeda any longer as we did under Obama. We’re not going to be funding Hamas in this operation. You guys have got to change the orientation away from this caliphate.

But the bigger question is for too long people in the United States and in Europe have taken Christian civilization for granted. There’s not a clarity of what it is, what its principles are, how it manifests as a worldview, what we’re committed to developing, what our role in the universe is. We don’t have a people [who] might go to church. They might want to oppose the kind of cultural decadence and destruction of Hollywood and the elites, the liberal elites in this country. We have not fortified in a theological and deeper cultural way, a worldview that expresses the kind of strength and beauty and the kind of power of scientific discovery that Christian civilization really means. And I think people have to have a sense that that’s what’s needed. That’s what we’re doing with Promethean Action. That’s what we’ve recognized for a long time. And we’re developing it from the standpoint of how this kind of cultural outlook has got to be strengthened and made more conscious in the minds and hearts of the American people. And if we have that, as Barbara said, we’re going to recruit a lot more of the people that are here towards a real sense of what our civilization is based on. And we’re going to counter probably the most insidious effects which has been things like the rap culture. This rap music culture, this anti-American materialist kind of culture which has recruited a lot of the immigrant communities.

Parents come in hoping to maybe integrate and be part of it, but they’ve got their traditions and cultures. It’s their children. You’ll see this in France. the second & third generations have become less and less assimilated and integrated because the culture that’s been promoted has largely been anti the very principles of our civilization. So the question is are we making clear the real principles of what a western Christian civilization represent. And I think that’s what we’ve got. That’s what Trump’s looking to revive….

Speaking of Iran, and Obama’s ‘Agreement’ There is Obama’s Handler, Valerie
Jarrett.


Flashback: Who is Valerie Jarrett?

….According to FBI files obtained by Judicial Watch, Jarrett’s father, Dr. James E. Bowman, a pathologist and geneticist, “had extensive ties to Communist associations and individuals.”

The files also show that “in 1950, Bowman was in communication with a paid Soviet agent Alfred Stern, who fled to Prague after getting charged with espionage.”

Alfred Stern and his wife, Martha Dodd Stern, “were indicted in absentia on espionage charges on Sept. 9, 1957, The New York Times reported. The indictment charged them with conspiring to act as Soviet agents, receiving American military, commercial and industrial information and transmitting it to the Soviet Union. The indictment charged that they used their house in Ridgefield, Conn., for meetings with Soviet agents.”

Dr. James Bowman “was also a member of a Communist-sympathizing group called the Association of Internes and Medical Students,” reported Judicial Watch. “After his discharge from the Army Medical Corps in 1955, Bowman moved to Iran to work.” Valerie Jarret was born in Iran on Nov. 14, 1956.

The Association of Internes and Medical Students, according to the FBI files, is a group that “has long been a faithful follower of the Communist Party line.” Bowman had “deep ties to Chicago,” reported Judicial Watch, “where he often collaborated with fellow Communists.”

Judicial Watch further stated that the Jarrett family Communist ties “also include a business partnership between Jarrett’s maternal grandpa, Robert Rochon Taylor (1899-1957) and [Alfred] Stern, the Soviet agent associated with her dad.”

Valerie Jarrett’s father-in-law, Vernon Jarrett (1917-2004), “was also another big-time Chicago Communist,” according to the FBI files. “For a period of time Vernon Jarrett appeared on the FBI’s Security Index and was considered a potential Communist saboteur who was to be arrested in the event of a conflict with the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR),” Judicial Watch said.

According to the FBI documents, Vernon Jarrett’s job was to “write propaganda for a Communist Party front group in Chicago that would ‘disseminate the Communist Party line among … the middle class.”

“Faithful to her roots, [Valerie Jarrett] still has connections to many Communist and extremist groups, including the Muslim Brotherhood,” said Judicial Watch. “Jarrett and her family also had strong ties to Frank Marshall Davis, a big Obama mentor and Communist Party member with an extensive FBI file.”


Discover the NetworksValerie Jarrett

…The federal government placed Bowman [ValJar’s Dad — GC] under special surveillance because of his involvement with the European Recovery Program (ERP)—i.e., the Marshall Plan. Historian Paul Kengor explains: “This ERP/Marshall Plan association is very intriguing, and troubling. One of the most insidious forms of Communist Party agitation in the 1940s and 1950s was to frame the Marshall Plan as a form of vile American imperialism. It was the Kremlin line, pushed by Stalin and Molotov and mimicked by [the] Communist Party USA. One of the worst peddlers of this line was Frank Marshall Davis, who characterized the Marshall Plan in his columns as a ‘device’ to maintain ‘white imperialism.’ The plan, by Davis’s rendering, was a disgusting ‘oppression of non-white peoples everywhere,’ a slavery purchased by Secretary of State Marshall’s ‘billions of U.S. dollars … to bolster the tottering empires of England, France, Belgium, Holland and the other western exploiters of teeming millions of humans.’ … Was James Bowman [promoting the same notions about the Marshall Plan]? I cannot tell from … his FBI file, but I can say that Bowman’s work for, or position on, the Marshall Plan was the item of special concern to the FBI.”

Bowman was also a member of the Association of Internes and Medical Students, a group that, according to Bowman’s FBI file, engaged in un-American activities and “has long been a faithful follower of the Communist Party line.” …

Bowman was also very active with the communist student group American Youth for Democracy as well as the International Labor Defense and the American Committee for Protection of Foreign Born (ACPFB), three of Frank Marshall Davis’s favorite organizations. Paul Kengor writes the following about ACPFB:

“This group had been so extreme that the Democratic Congress’s huge ‘Investigation of Un-American Propaganda Activities in the United States’ (published in 1944) devoted a lengthy 15-page section just to ACPFB, atop innumerable added references elsewhere in the report. Key members included prominent African-American communists Langston Hughes and Paul Robeson, the gushing admirer of Joe Stalin, plus the usual assemblage of duped liberals/progressives, ranging from theologian Reinhold Niebuhr, to the great Orson Welles, to famed movie actor Edward G. Robinson.

“As the Congressional report noted, ACPFB ‘was founded by the Communist Party in order to exploit racial divisions in the United States for its own revolutionary purposes.Its modus operandi was to polarize Americans along racial lines in order to advance the Soviet agenda. Closely linked to International Labor Defense, the primary (concealed) intention of ACPFB was to protect foreign communists who came to America and agitated for the Soviet Comintern. The core objective was to prevent deportation of these foreign-born communists living in America. One such figure was German communist Gerhart Eisler, who became a major CPUSA cause, and whose name was omnipresent throughout Frank Marshall Davis’s Chicago Star….

1961-1983

When Valerie Jarrett was five, her family relocated to London for one year before settling in Chicago’s elite Hyde Park neighborhood in 1963.

For additional Information on Valerie Jarrett, click here.

Why did Jarrett’s family go to London for a year?

How the British Invented Communism (And Blamed It on the Jews) — The Untold Story of Karl Marx, Leon Trotsky, MI6, and the Russian Revolution

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

A different take on the Middle East situation.

The Republican War mongers and Israel are NOT happy about the possibility of peace in the Middle East. Is Israel going to get Greece to fight Turkey? Israel cannot fight directly because Turkey is in NATO. Also the Israeli Draft of people into the IDF is having repercussions. It is very disruptive of business and commerce. Dual citizens are leaving Israel to escape the Draft and the Ultra-Orthodox Jews are now praying for the fall of Israel.


WARNING: Ghost does not like the expansionist plans of Israel or the Zionists. However he has facts and background not normally available. Much of it complements the information from the Promethean Action video above. The video is 1 ½ hours.

KMAG DAILY THREAD 20260610 FINANCIAL DOT CONNECTING

Site rules stolen from our good friend PAVACA

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.


Do not forget to LABEL AI articles video and such.

With PANIC comes MISTAKES.
With PANIC comes BETRAYAL.
With PANIC comes TESTIMONY.
With PANIC comes ………….
These people are STUPID.
FISA GOES BOTH WAYS.
+
HOOAH!
Q


I am going to start with Jeff Childer’s June 3rd article.


☕️ BUGS ☙ Wednesday, June 3, 2026 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠

Last week, Keven Warsh was sworn in by Justice Clarence Thomas as our newest Fed Chair…. Yesterday, Warsh placed his first two hires on the chessboard. Their credentials provide what we might call a ‘signal’… Paul Winfree is one of the “Project 2025” authors, which is bad enough, but he also wrote the chapter on the Federal Reserve…

..Bill Pulte is uniquely positioned to watch money move around the world, and to connect those flows to the people and groups behind them.

As FHFA director and chairman of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, Bill already oversees institutions that touch or guarantee a large share of U.S. mortgages, giving him access (directly or via agency tools such as anti‑fraud analytics) to extraordinarily detailed, often nonpublic financial and property data on elites and institutions.

Layer on top of that his new ODNI role, which coordinates foreign‑intelligence collection and analysis, including programs that sometimes sweep in the communications and financial dealings of U.S. citizens talking to foreigners, and suddenly the same hard‑charging operator willing to wield mortgage records against the Administration’s political enemies can, in principle, cross‑reference housing, credit, and ownership patterns with intelligence‑grade information about foreign contacts, shell structures, and illicit funding streams.

There’s a lot of potential there. But more, if an administration seeks leverage on powerful actors who thought their finances were opaque or hidden safely offshore, putting a fiercely loyal bulldog at the junction of Fannie/Freddie’s data firehose and ODNI’s surveillance and analysis capabilities is about as close as you can get to a purpose‑built leverage machine. I’m not saying that’s what’s happening. I’m just saying


Jeff has zeroed in on a major chess move by POTUS Trump and there are a lot more dots that connect to that hypothesis.

Now let’s step back in time.

A nurse, Liz Harris, who refused the Clot Shot, ran for office in AZ and was elected to the state legislature. She invited Jacqueline Breger, a forensic investigator for Attorney John Thaler, to testify at a legislative hearing in February 2023. Breger presented allegations of election fraud, cartel bribes, and money laundering via land deeds. The Arizona House of Representatives responded by expelling Harris in a bipartisan vote after the hearing, as the committee determined she had engaged in “disorderly behavior” and violated the chamber’s rules.

Sure smells like they were running scared to me.

Corrupted By Drug Cartel Money Laundering Scheme And Election Theft | Frank Speech the Home of Free Speech

The use of land/houses to launder money is not unknown.

The Professor’s Record – David K. Clements (Attorney)

People that follow me know that I am regularly a cautionary check against hopium.
The strength of Thaler’s investigation is not rooted in theory, equations, or statistical deviations, but rather thousands of documented falsified transactions

My intuition was informed by a drug trafficking organization I helped dismantle. During my office’s investigation, we located bogus deeds of trust, that facilitated money laundering in sham real estate deals. This led to racketeering convictions of organization members. Our team went on to secure six 1st degree murder convictions of the crime organization that were tying up loose ends that threatened the organization.

The investigative work of John Thaler that I’ve reviewed over the past 24 hours is textbook in its approach to exposing racketeering, and of crucial importance.

The fact that his work led him directly to election corruption and bribes is not shocking. His account needs to be shared to everyone.


At 36:30 in the following video Gregg Phillips mentions some of the NGOs have off-shoots that are into real estate and funnel money back and forth. Gregg says, If what Thaler says is true, it is one of the most explosive stories in history. From: https://rumble.com/v2bbfa0-live-1205p-a-conversation-with-john-h-thaler-and-jacqueline-s.-fine-breger.html


pgroup2, in response to my April comment on this said

We found evidence of exactly what is described here:

we located bogus deeds of trust, that facilitated money laundering in sham real estate deals.

So a method for laundering major amounts of money has been IDed and tied to election fraud.

Next we have Maduro being snatched and the possibility he is a cooperating witness. SEE:


KMAG DAILY THREAD 20260107 & VENEZUELA

Let’s remember where Venezuela is. It borders the Caribbean. What else is in the Caribbean? The origin point for the infamous system of offshore banking established directly by the British. Back in 1960, the largest banking houses in London, working in partnership with the government and the ex-checker, established 14 completely separate secret jurisdictions. These are the offshore banking centers that now hold between 50 and 75 trillion dollars with all 50 of the world’s largest banks operating within them. These offshore centers exist outside the control of sovereign governments. They’re secret, they’re unregulated, and they facilitate illegal activity. What we once had, a legitimate regulated banking system, has been transformed into a criminal enterprise.

Interestingly, the Russians have known this for years and have been more vociferous about it than any Western government. In a 2014 speech, Viktor Ivanov, then Russia’s top drug enforcement official, laid it out clearly in a Moscow conference. He said,

“This allows us to confidently assert that narco money is the foundation of the modern financial system. It is not surprising that during the first peak of the financial crisis of 2008 2009, Antonio Costa from the UN announced that the top banks in the world dumped in around $352 billion of narco dollars to use for interbank borrowing to address the critical shortage of liquidity. And he goes on to make clear that the global financial system needs drug money to survive. The very existence of the global financial bubble, he said, is based on precisely this opportunity for banks to attract liquid narco money. In fact,this garbage fertilizes the present economic system…

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessant recently commented that 50% of his job involves issues of national security.

ROUGH PARTIAL TRANSCRIPT

48 minutes Josh: ..Now you were talking about Scavino? Every journey has an end? … Hold on because this is important. So Scavino, by the way Trump shows the three phases and the last phase is the last one the completion right? So now you have Dan Scavino. “Every journey has an end.” Well this is really, really interesting .. [Discus relevant Q posts]. That’s contextual reference frame that it correlates directly to what you’re just talking about. And then what do you have? You have the White House posting on the same day that the DOW [Dept of War] CTO posted “Trust in Trump. Sit back and relax. It’ll all work out in the end. It always does. President Donald J. Trump.” So, another trust in Trump. Now, I didn’t look at the time stamp of this one. I can check it out [on the Q board] real quick. .. [ __ ] “Now, here comes the pain….

Cuz you said that the quote that Scavino put up was from Endgame, right? Or Enders Game. The one that I put, “part of the journey is the end”, which is the back half of that quote…

Post 3227

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 968323 No.5929534

https://twitter.com/Savedangel61/status/1111049557620768769
He thought that was part of the plan (end game)?
Hence why [] drafted the recommendation letter to fire?
https://twitter.com/Comey/status/1109930531389472768
“So many questions.”
HAS FULL CONTROL?
These people are stupid.
Indictment(s) coming?
Q

.. And it’s from Endgame. “He thought that was part of the plan. (Endgame)? So many questions. who has full control? These people are stupid. Indictment(s) coming.”

52 minutes Josh: ….I want to get into something else that happened today. So, we got the Q. So, something big is about to happen. Now, isn’t it interesting that today Trump nominated his new director of national intelligence?

Alpha: And you know, he did it on the same day that BB formally declared the new director for Mossad….

53 minutes Josh: Now why Bill Pulte? Why? Why did Donald Trump put the trust fund Bill Pulte as director of national intelligence? It’s actually very simple.

Number one, Bill Pulte is a Trump loyalist through and through. The guy won’t cross Trump.

Number two is he tells Trump everything that’s going on. He’s very good at delivering Trump’s orders. In other words, Trump basically has someone in the DNI that he knows is 100% absolute loyal to him.

Why is that important? Because you have Devin Nunes who is in a senior consulting position directly at ODNI who’s basically going to be guiding Pulte through everything that comes about from DNI Tulsi Gabbard’s declassification and investigations that she’s leading. Pulte is simply pointing a finger. Do this, do this, do this. Devin Nunes is controlling it and Trump is controlling it. This is actually highly strategic of Donald Trump to do this.

It scares the living shit out of the DC freaking panicans.

[Think refusal to renew their beloved FISA all of a sudden and threatening to pass a law preventing Bill Pulte taking the position. So yes some are freaking out. — GC]

Now, I want people to understand that there are people in the Senate, so when DNI Tulsi Gabbard resigned and said that she’s coming out on the 30th, what happens then is John Thune and various different Senate leaders, they go and meet with Donald Trump and they say, Hey, this is who we we would want to go in as director of national intelligence. This is who we’re suggesting.” This is how it works in DC.” And typically 85% of the time, the president would go with those recommendations because you’re going to guarantee Senate approval.

Tom Cotton was one of the lead people that was being proposed by the Senate, by the way, so APEC right there.

….

Double check of Info:


SEE: https://www.opensecrets.org/profiles/tom-cotton/us_congress/organizations?mpid=1140206

American Israel Public Affairs Cmte — $838,347
Goldman Sachs ————————— $103,500
Blackstone Group ————————- $41,200
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher ————— $37,400
Stephens Inc ——————————- $37,308
Walmart Inc ——————————- $22,241
Brownstein, Hyatt et al —————— $21,250
Andreessen Horowitz ——————– $21,000
Pfizer Inc ——————————— $19,500

But I want to add something that I think is MUCH MORE TO THE POINT. You will see why later.

See: https://www.opensecrets.org/profiles/tom-cotton/us_congress/summary?cycle=2020&mpid=1140206

Real Estate developers & subdividers — $180,085


Tom Cotton Got Big Campaign Cash From a Donor profiting off Russia’s War on Ukraine – Business Insider

Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas — one of the Republican Party’s more hawkish members — received tens of thousands of dollars in campaign cash from a hedge fund investor who’s reportedly made millions of dollars from commodity speculations that have paid off since Russia invaded Ukraine, according to federal campaign finance records.

Federal Election Committee records show that Soroban Capital Partners LP founder Eric Mandelblatt and his wife, Danielle Mandelblatt, last year spread $43,000 in political contributions between political action committees that support Cotton…

………..

53 minutes Josh: Well, guess what? Trump rug pulled them with Pulte. Now, why Pulte?

Pulte is already in a Senate confirmed position. So, he can get Senate confirmation. [Maybe -GC] DNI is a little bit different. He’s got to go through the Senate Intelligence Committee, but I’m pretty sure Pulte is going to get it. He’s already been Senate confirmed. So they know they can get the votes for him. But also, I think that this might be an interim rug pull. I don’t think that this is going to be Donald Trump’s final selection. He’s just going to be the interim.

You got to remember because you had the acting DNI after Tulsi Gabbard, was supposed to be the assistant DNI, Lucas, who by the way is a deep stater. He’s a holdover. And I think that a lot of people got to Trump’s ear and said, “You need to get rid of this And that’s why Bill Pulte is going in there as acting, but we will see if that comes about. I think that there’s going to be a rug pull down the road. I would say after July 4th and Trump will move Pulte out. I think that that was just to get Tom Cotton and the other Senate guys out of the running and Trump has a plan. I think it’s going to be Devin Nunez at the end of the day.

[I disagree, Pulte has a major job to do connecting Mortgage Fraud to the Drug Cartels. –GC]

56 minutes Alpha: I do think you’re right. I think Trump is going to run with a lot of acting positions until he gets his new House and Senate in January. And when that new House and Senate in January swears in, then it’s break glass time. He’s going to have a super majority and he’s going to appoint everyone that is going to make jaws drop in all these different positions and that’s going to be the A team. I think what he’s doing right now is he’s going to roll with some of these acting positions for a while.

57 minutes Josh: So, there’s also something else here and I think that this is very interesting… So I’m going to pull this up. I want to take people through my thinking here.

Josh pulls up a Trump Truth Post at 57:28:

I am appointing the Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency and Chairman of Fanny Mae/ Freddie Mac, William J Pulte, to serve as Acting Director of National intelligence. William has deep experience managing sensitive matters in America, the safety and soundness of the Markets, and over 10 Trillion Dollars at Fanny Mae/ Freddie Mac, a substantial increase from where it was just 12 months ago. During this period, he will remain Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency and Chairman of Fanny Mae/ Freddie Mac. Congratulations to Director Pulte.
President DONALD J. TRUMP

… during this period he will remain director of the federal housing finance agency. That’s interesting.

Now here’s something interesting. The federal housing finance agencies already went after Adam Schiff. They went after Leticia James. Why? Because they’re the ones that investigate all the mortgage fraud claims, right?

Did you see what else Donald Trump did today? He signed an executive order. [Executive Order 14406 The critical phrase “…it has long been the policy of the United States to adopt tailored measures to safeguard our financial system from illicit use and promote safe and sound lending and other practices by financial institutions. My Administration will not tolerate national security and public safety risks caused by illicit cross-border financial activity” GC] Let me pull this up. [A truth post]

May 19, 2026 Restoring Integrity to America’s Financial System

SECURING AMERICA’S FINANCIAL SYSTEM: Today, President Donald J. Trump signed an Executive Order to protect America’s financial system from illicit activity, strengthen customer identification requirements for financial institutions, and address the credit risks posed by extending financial services to non-work authorized illegal aliens.


[Josh reads part of the Truth]


Illegal Immigrants and Foreign Fraudster steal BILLIONS every year from the American taxpayer. As part of my administration’s historic effort to end FRAUD and reverse MASS ILLEGAL IMIGRATION, I recently signed a powerful new Executive Order which will be led by the Treasury Department to stop Banks, Credit Cards, and Financial Institutions from being used to facilitate Human Trafficking or Human Smuggling, Drug Trafficking, Illegal Immigration, and the Criminal Cartels who orchestrate the activities. Access to our nation’s financial systems must be limited to those who have a legal right to be here and who are engaged in lawful and legitimate commerce. Bank accounts being used to enable illegal immigration or to store the welfare received by illegal aliens will be shut down….

Josh: Then he says, “My executive order will also allow us to stop billions in leaving our country in a matter of criminal activity.” But there’s a part here I want to point out.

Those engaged in lawful or legitimate commerce are the only ones who can use it. Then he says bank accounts being used to enable illegal immigration or to store the welfare received by illegal aliens will be shut down. You remember we talked about citizens on paper only. How the Democrats were basically creating employee agencies through Congress funded at $5 million. They had 20 employees but there’s actually two people that work there. They were actually collecting paychecks that were going through bank accounts. Well, what else are we finding out? A lot of this stuff with illegal immigrants. Think about how it works on the illegal immigrant side. All you have to do is have an illegal immigrant come in and open up a bank account or someone say that they’re an illegal immigrant and guess what happens now? They are put into the system and they can have benefits deposited, SNAP, welfare, so forth. Well, this is what he’s talking about because that is nothing more than an operation by the left, by the socialists to basically collect taxpayer dollars without ever actually being somebody meeting the benefit criterias. So, SNAP, Medicaid, and welfare fraud is massive. So, keep this in mind because he [Trump] just signed an executive order. Basically, if a bank goes out there and does business with one of these fictitious, fake people or an illegal immigrant, they are now going to come under federal scrutiny and they’re going to be investigated.

Now, remember the senior Act Blue executive in Texas was just tried for mortgage fraud. 65 million dollar worth of loans on one mortgage [ home worth] $300,000. Now, here’s the thing. How are they able to do that? They were able to do that because this is the kickback mechanism that they do. This is why Leticia James has multiple primary residences. Adam Schiff has multiple primary residences.

This is why all of the Arizona Senate and Congress are real estate brokers buying up and fixing and flipping houses out there because what they’ll do is they’ll buy a house for $250,000. They’ll put $50,000 into it and then the cartels will come out there through ancillary business organizations and give them $4 million cash for the house and they clear that money outright. This is how they have been basically getting paid off for all these transactions. Well, now you have the one man who’s going to be the acting director of national intelligence as well as the head of the housing finance office who can investigate all the mortgage fraud and everything like that. But now he’s the director of national intelligence as well. So now he has a back-end view of the classified aspects of all this operation, how it works with the cartels, with the NGOS. Do you understand what I’m saying?

1 hour 2 minutes Alpha: I think I’m picking up on something. You at least made me think of a strategy that Trump’s pulling out. Yeah, with Tulsi Gabbard as DNI working the RICO aspect of the Russia, Russia, Russia hoax and all that other stuff. With that position, you now have access to certain clearances. She’s got everything that she needs. So now she moves into an advisory role. She gets put on the sidelines.

Now the next RICO case that’s being worked on is all the mortgage fraud and everything that’s going on. So now you bring him [Pulte] in, make him the acting head of DNI. Now he gets those security clearances. He gets the access of it. And then down the line, til we see the next person that gets put into the DNI who’s working the next [RICO case] is Trump strategically putting these people in as these heads of positions to give them clearance and access to things to complete the respective investigations that they’re doing. That’s F..King GENIUS!

1 hour 3 minutes Josh: Well, not only that, but think about Bill Pulte. He could only deal with the American side of it. He doesn’t have all the information. He doesn’t know why these people are committing mortgage fraud or how that mortgage fraud is operating on a grander scale. But now as a Director of National Intelligence, he’s going to see the movement of cartels and foreign intelligence agencies and foreign militaries and how they’re moving the money around from various different banks. And how those are funding ancillary and shell corporations that then flow in to these mortgage companies and buy these houses up. And he’s going to be like, OH!” This is to take down their [the globalist’s] massive funding mechanism.”

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

There are plenty of other financial tracks showing illegal activity, but I think this is the specific money laundering method that scares the crap out of the politicians who are on the take.

KMAG DAILY THREAD 20260603 INTRINSIC, SUBJECTIVE, and OBJECTIVE VALUE

Site rules stolen from our good friend PAVACA

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.


Do not forget to LABEL AI articles video and such.


Just FOR FUN:

….

☕️ MIND WARS ☙ Monday, June 1, 2026 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠

Jeff points out the major failure feature of the Fake News.

…Editors should have: separated real evidence from allegations, resisted parroting the framing of biased sources, brought in neutral independent forensic and archaeological voices, and updated headlines as the picture changed. In other words, basic journalism vanished like the alleged mass graves.

It was a complete failure of what is supposedly the media’s most important function: to separate interested gossip from facts. Maybe I should say, that used to be media’s most important function. Now, corporate media’s most important function appears to be distributing clever propaganda that destabilizes countries, spurs stochastic terrorism, and permits politicians to effect massive wealth transfers…


Earlier, on May 29, Jeff Childers wrote:

…Government researchers enrolled extremely vulnerable infants in an experimental RSV trial, did not obtain informed consent, continued dosing even as severe cases emerged, and two children died. Nobody was prosecuted or even fired. This is serious iatrogenic harm (injury caused by medical treatment) and a research‑ethics failure on its face, full stop.

The Times did its absolute best to cloak that very disturbing and all-too-familiar story in race. The two boys were black. “Most, if not all,” of the 31 kids in the trial group were black. Thus, the Times concluded: racism. What the Times didn’t say was that by the late 1950s and into the 1960s, Washington, D.C. had become a majority‑black city; black residents were the single largest racial group, and by 1970 had peaked at about 71% of the entire population.

That’s one problem for the Times’ unfounded racial hypothesis. Second, the NIH’s RSV trial was deployed through government-run or funded clinics. Both because blacks were in the majority in DC, and because of basic economics, most patients at these public clinics were also black. So we needn’t dream up some conspiratorial racial animus to explain the trial’s demographics.

Black folks were just unlucky enough to be living in DC in large numbers at the time. That’s it.

So, once again, the NYT’s dumb, woke narrative collapses with the most trivial inspection. But more interesting is why the Times leaned so hard into the race angle, despite having not a scrap of evidence. It’s because the last thing the big health agencies need right now is more scandals.

This is exactly the institutional reform RFK Jr. and Jay Bhattacharya were hired to deliver.

🔥 At some point during the Cold War, our big health agencies contracted a deadly disease. They are infected with a mind-virus called utilitarianism. The scandal here is not that the NIH gave experimental RSV shots to black infants without informing their black parents. The real scandal is that the NIH believes you can’t make a public health omelet without breaking a few babies.

In other words, the NIH’s secret trials of experimental vaccines would not have been more acceptable if the babies had been white, orange, or green.

Classic ethical philosophy based on Judeo-Christian principles says: “You may not use people purely as a means, not even for a huge benefit to others.” Utilitarianism rudely inverts that: if the benefit is big enough, and the expected risk is small enough, almost any use of human bodies as means can be rationalized.

At some point in the recent past, our public health agencies quietly slid from “we are here to protect people” to “we are managing a herd, sorry, a population,” and those are not the same posture. In other words, instead of thinking of themselves as healers, they think they are ranchers.

The Lot 100 episode illustrates this problem perfectly. Severe harms and even deaths of infants were tolerated by elite managers because the perceived collective value of “staying the course” was so high. Even fudging the numbers to hide the harms was considered virtuous.

Stalin’s stats were great too, until they weren’t.

In classic public‑health utilitarian fashion, the stated good was enormous —preventing a leading cause of infant mortality worldwide— so the “cost” of experimenting on a few dozen vulnerable infants in D.C. could be rationalized as small in comparison.

The reason progressives and public health types (but I repeat myself) stick like limpets to utilitarianism is that it is technocratic. The philosophy —which is a necessary foundation for communism— presumes it is possible to quantify, in hard numbers, the numeric value of human lives and flourishing. That makes it possible to compare political policies: which ones produce on balance the most human flourishing?

It is both sensationally attractive and completely perverted…

In the Lot 100 case, we find scientists who explicitly or implicitly calculated that infants were less valuable than adults, and that poor folks were less valuable than more economically privileged ones. After all, the NIH investigators recruited from public children’s clinics, not from the private practices their own children or colleagues might have used.

Put even more simply and uglier: the NIH bureaucrats didn’t experiment on their own kids.

🔥 I will say it: utilitarianism is an evil, reprehensible ideology that all good people should root out and shun.

Utilitarianism isn’t a neutral “science of compassion.” It’s a license for elites to convert other people’s lives into numbers and then quietly decide which ones are expendable. Once you agree that it’s acceptable to harm a few innocents to buy hypothetical benefits for the many, you haven’t elevated morality— you’ve simply replaced “thou shalt not” with “let’s run the model and see who dies.”

Lot 100 was not a tragic mistake; it was utilitarianism doing exactly what it promises: sacrificing powerless babies in a D.C. clinic for the supposed good of a population they never got to join. [It continues]


Jeremy Bentham (1748–1832), the “Father” of Modern Utilitarianism and progressive saint. His preserved head, anyway.


What is interesting is I had already put the following together about the philosophies of ‘value’ because I like Mises and Gary North. Gary passed away in February of 2022, at the age of 80 due to complications from prostate cancer.

Gary North RIP, 1942–2022

…He was by training an economic historian and had a strong commitment to Austrian economics. He greatly admired Mises and Rothbard. He once asked Mises how he had been able to publish his famous article of 1920 on socialist calculation in a journal edited by Max Weber. Mises answered, “Well, I knew him, and I sent it in.” Gary wrote a notable study of Marx, Marx’s Religion of Revolution, and a long and learned commentary on biblical economics. He was also a founder of the Christian Reconstruction movement, along with his father-in-law, R.J. Rushdoony.

He was on Ron Paul’s staff in 1976, and he and Dr. Paul were close friends. For many years, he spoke at Mises Institute conferences, and he was the best debater I have ever heard. In his speaking style, he was highly organized and relentless; but he was in conversation kind and friendly. When I saw him at conferences, we would exchange stories of the old days. Now, alas, I cannot do that anymore.


Gary’s Mises on Money is well worth the read. I featured it in an article called A PRIMER ON MONEY. The following article by Gary is another excellent read as he identifies the problems that are metastasizing in American thought.

But first the cancer we are fighting.

The Philosophy Of Karl Marx

The philosophical bases of Marx’s thought were laid early and remained unchanged throughout his life. As a student, Marx accepted the philosophy of Hegel as the only sound and adequate explanation of the universe. According to this philosophy, “the only immutable thing is the abstraction of movement.” The one universal phenomenon is change, and the only universal form of this phenomenon is its complete abstraction. Thus, Hegel accepted as real only that which existed in the mind. Objective phenomena and events were of no consequence; only the conceptions of them possessed by human minds were real. Ideas, not objects, were the stuff of which the universe was made.


If Objective Reality does not exist, than a little girl can become a boy or a cat or a dog. The people pushing this insanity are not going to tell you that it is based on Marxism but that is where it comes from.


The Purfuit of Happineff by Gary North

Old timers will recall this title as a memorable line in a memorable comedy album, Stan Freberg Presents the United States of America, Volume 1….

WHAT EVER HAPPENED TO “PROPERTY”?

The phrase, “life, liberty, and property,” does not appear in the Declaration. The phrase is incorrectly attributed to John Locke. It was implied in Locke’s Second Treatise on Government (1690), but it does not appear. Locke used the word estate rather than property. He subsumed all three words under property.

Man being born, as has been proved, with a title to perfect freedom and an uncontrolled enjoyment of all the rights and privileges of the law of Nature, equally with any other man, or number of men in the world, hath by nature a power not only to preserve his property, that is, his life, liberty, and estate, against the injuries and attempts of other men, but to judge of and punish the breaches of that law in others, as he is persuaded the offence deserves, even with death itself, in crimes where the heinousness of the fact, in his opinion, requires it ( Sect. 87).

Protection of all three — life, liberty, property — is guaranteed in writing by the United States Constitution. This guarantee appears in Article 5 of the Bill of Rights, which was ratified in 1791. It has proven as reliable as other government guarantees of its own performance.

A similar phrase appears in Edmund Burke’s Reflections on the Revolution in France (1790). Burke wrote this of the revolutionaries:

To those who have observed the spirit of their conduct it has long been clear that nothing was wanted but the power of carrying the intolerance of the tongue and of the pen into a persecution which would strike at property, liberty, and life.

But there is no question that Jefferson substituted “the pursuit of happiness” for the more common term, “property.” Was there something ideological in this substitution? Was Jefferson a proto-socialist, as numerous contemporary historians argue?

Had he inserted “property,” this would have saved defenders of private property a lot of time and trouble when dealing with statist scholars, who are always searching for support for their position in the writings of famous defenders of democracy.

The pursuit of happiness is for modern academic man what the pursuit of truth is: a way to avoid the responsibility for discovering anything final. There is no objective truth for modern academic man, other than the truth against objective truth. Similarly, there is no objective happiness. There is only the subjective pursuit of such lofty goals by individuals. In this, as in virtually everything else, academics substitute process for objectivity. Defending the process is holy communion for modern academics. There is officially no holy grail, which would be much too objective.

Why this commitment to pursuit, trivial or otherwise? I suggest two reasons. First, academics do not officially believe in objective truth, which implies objective responsibility, which is decidedly old fashioned and even vaguely suggestive of the Christian doctrine of final judgment. The concept of objective responsibility implies objective standards and objective performance. Academics prefer to avoid both.

Second, modern academics control access to salaried participation in the process of the great search, especially in higher education. They control the implementation of the officially objective standards of tenure, institutional accreditation, and the flow of departmental funds. What Daniel Klein has described so well in the closed, self-certified world of Ph.D. economists operates in every academic discipline.

In contrast, “property” implies enforceable titles to identifiable units of ownership. This is altogether too objective for modern defenders of the political defense of the pursuit of happiness. They defend the democratic process, which affirms, “Thou shalt not steal, except by majority vote.” They want to believe in Jefferson the democrat, not Jefferson the defender of free market capitalism. They want to eradicate political restrictions on the confiscation of property by the State. The suggestion that politics exists so as to defend private property is only marginally less welcome than the suggestion that the Second Amendment to the Constitution actually means that civilians possess the right to keep and bear arms.

JEFFERSON WAS NOT ALONE

It was not only Jefferson who neglected to spell out in official detail his personal adherence to the private property social order. It was also Adam Smith, whose Wealth of Nations (1776), four months earlier, had placed the division of labor at the forefront of its economic attack on mercantilism, an attack that Jefferson made political in the Declaration. Smith’s pedagogical strategy backfired for the next 150 years. By failing to specify in Wealth of Nations the moral and philosophical foundations for private ownership, Smith handed the seemingly high moral ground over to Godwin and the socialists. The consequences of this decision have been chronicled in considerable detail by Tom Bethell in Chapter 7 of his book, The Noblest Triumph: Property and Prosperity Through the Ages (1998).

Jefferson was the supreme follower of Adam Smith among the American Revolutionaries. But by failing to specify property as the third pillar of the justification for civil government — a mistake Locke had not made — he made more difficult his ideological heirs’ defense of the private property order.

The pursuit of happiness is open-ended and non-specific. Liberty is just too vague to be defended systematically. What was needed in 1776 in both of those legendary documents was the insight made by Frederic Bastiat in 1850, in the midst of a European revolution that had begun in early 1848, a few weeks before Marx and Engels’ anonymous tract appeared, Manifesto of the Communist Party. Bastiat wrote in The Law, “Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” Or, in the words of a previous defender of objective private property, “Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat: But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die” (Genesis 2:16b-17)

Gary North Mentions Bastiat. Here is part of an article about Bastiat and his philosophy.

Bastiat, Spoliation by Law

Frédéric Bastiat (1801-1850) was one of the leading advocates of free markets and free trade in the mid-19 century. He was inspired by the activities of Richard Cobden and the organization of the Anti-Corn Law League in Britain in the 1840s and tried to mimic their success in France. Bastiat was an elected member of various French political bodies and opposed both protection and the rise of socialist ideas in these forums. His writings for a broader audience were very popular and were quickly translated and republished in the U.S. and throughout Europe. His incomplete magnum opus, Economic Harmonies, is full of insights into the operation of the market and is still of great interest to economists. He died at a young age from cancer of the throat.

LAW, Spoliation by

LAW, Spoliation by. What is law? It is the collective organization of the individual right of legitimate defense. Every man certainly has received from nature, from God, the right to defend his person, his liberty and his property, since these are the three constitutive or conservative elements of life, elements which complement one another, and which can not be understood, one without the other. For what are our faculties but an extension of our personality? And what is property but an extension of our faculties? If every man has the right to defend, even by force, his person, his liberty and his property, a number of men have the right to concert together, to agree and to organize a common force in order to provide regularly for this defense. The collective right has its principle, and its reason of being, and bases its legitimacy upon the individual right, and the common force can not legitimately have any other end or any other mission than the isolated forces for which it is substituted. Thus, as an individual can not legitimately make any forcible attempt against the person, liberty or property of another individual, so, for the same reason, a community can not legitimately make use of force to destroy the person, liberty or property of individuals or of classes. For this perversion of force would be, in the latter case, as well as in the former, in contradiction to our premises.

Which brings us to capitalism which TradeBait2 discussed yesterday. This is looking at Capitalism from the point of view of an Atheist. For those who may not know Ayn Rand grew up in the Soviet Union.

Capitalism: the Unknown Ideal

Laissez-faire capitalism, according to Ayn Rand, is not just an ideal but an unknown ideal. Few grasp its meaning, history, economics, or moral justification. In Capitalism, Rand sets out to remedy that.

Rand argues that capitalism is “a social system based on the recognition of individual rights, including property rights, in which all property is privately owned.” In practice, this means that a capitalist society is one in which the government performs a single function: it protects individual rights by banning “physical force from human relationships.”

Pure capitalism, she concludes, has never existed: but in the countries that approached it, with America in the second half of the nineteenth century leading the way, the individual was able to flourish. This is because capitalism is the only system that fully recognizes that man is the rational being who “has the right to exist for his own sake,” free from coercion by others.

Intrinsic Theory of Values

There are, in essence, three schools of thought on the nature of the good: the intrinsic, the subjective, and the objective. The intrinsic theory holds that the good is inherent in certain things or actions as such, regardless of their context and consequences, regardless of any benefit or injury they may cause to the actors and subjects involved. It is a theory that divorces the concept of “good” from beneficiaries, and the concept of “value” from valuer and purpose — claiming that the good is good in, by, and of itself.

The subjectivist theory holds that the good bears no relation to the facts of reality, that it is the product of a man’s consciousness, created by his feelings, desires, “intuitions,” or whims, and that it is merely an “arbitrary postulate” or an “emotional commitment.”

The Good

There are, in essence, three schools of thought on the nature of the good: the intrinsic, the subjective, and the objective. The intrinsic theory holds that the good is inherent in certain things or actions as such, regardless of their context and consequences, regardless of any benefit or injury they may cause to the actors and subjects involved. It is a theory that divorces the concept of “good” from beneficiaries, and the concept of “value” from valuer and purpose — claiming that the good is good in, by, and of itself.

The subjectivist theory holds that the good bears no relation to the facts of reality, that it is the product of a man’s consciousness, created by his feelings, desires, “intuitions,” or whims, and that it is merely an “arbitrary postulate” or an “emotional commitment.”

The intrinsic theory holds that the good resides in some sort of reality, independent of man’s consciousness; the subjectivist theory holds that the good resides in man’s consciousness, independent of reality.

The objective theory holds that the good is neither an attribute of “things in themselves” nor of man’s emotional states, but an evaluation of the facts of reality by man’s consciousness according to a rational standard of value. (Rational, in this context, means: derived from the facts of reality and validated by a process of reason.) The objective theory holds that the good is an aspect of reality in relation to man — and that it must be discovered, not invented, by man. Fundamental to an objective theory of values is the question: Of value to whom and for what? An objective theory does not permit context-dropping or “concept-stealing”; it does not permit the separation of “value” from “purpose,” of the good from beneficiaries, and of man’s actions from reason.


GOOGLE AI: Ayn Rand intrinsic value

Value Requires a Valuer and a Purpose

Rand asked the fundamental question: Of value to whom and for what? [1]

  • Because she rejected intrinsic value, she maintained that an object cannot have value without someone to value it.
  • For a thing to have value, it must play a specific causal role in achieving a goal for an individual. [1, 2, 3]

The Ultimate Standard of Value

Rand argued that the concept of “value” only makes sense because living organisms face the alternative of life or death. Therefore, the ultimate standard of value is an individual’s own life. An object or action is considered “good” or “valuable” if it serves to sustain and further that specific individual’s life. [1, 2, 3]

Explore the Intrinsic Theory of Values in the Ayn Rand Lexicon to read her exact definitions and arguments. [1]


Commentary: Remember Khrushchev’s Prediction in 1959?

Khrushchev was right.

With the support of the Democratic Socialists, his prediction is coming true.

Also, I remember him beating his shoe on the desk in the UN saying,”We will bury you”….

A reminder of Khrushchev comments September 29, 1959: THIS WAS Russian Prime Minister Nikita Khrushchev’s ENTIRE QUOTE from that day:

“Your children’s children will live under communism, You Americans are so gullible. No, you won’t accept communism outright; but we will keep feeding you small doses of socialism until you will finally wake up and find you already have Communism. We will not have to fight you; We will so weaken your economy, until you will fall like overripe fruit into our hands.” “The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not.”

Do you remember or know all of what Russia’s Khrushchev said in 1959?

How do you create a Socialist State?

There are 8 levels of control; read the following recipe:

1) Healthcare – Control healthcare and you control the people.

2) Poverty – Increase the poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them.

3) Debt – Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty.

4) Gun Control – Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state.

5) Welfare – Take control of every aspect (food, housing, income) of their lives because that will make them fully dependent on the government.

6) Education – Take control of what people read and listen to and take control of what children learn in school.

7) Religion – Remove the belief in God from the Government and schools because the people need to believe in ONLY the government knowing what is best for the people.

8) Class Warfare – Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. Eliminate the middle class This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to tax the wealthy with the support of the poor.

Fast forward to 2021.

Is this parallel to the Democrat Socialist Agenda???? 

With an open mind, you can draw your own conclusions.

One last historical fact that needs to be remembered: In 1964, on the floor of the U.S. Senate, Democrats held the longest filibuster in our nation’s history, 75 days. All trying to prevent the passage of one piece of legislation. You guessed it: THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT.

Amazing how the CIA reading room hides all of this:

Approved for release 1/22/2002 Khrushchev We will bury you

LYRICS

None shall sleep,

None shall sleep!

Even you, oh Princess,

In your cold room,

Watch the stars,

That tremble with love

And with hope.

But my secret is hidden within me,

My name no one shall know,

No… no…

On your mouth,

I will tell it,

When the light shines.

And my kiss will dissolve

the silence that makes you mine!

(No one will know his name

and we must, alas, die.)

Vanish, o night!

Set, stars! Set, stars!

At dawn,

I will win!

I will win!

I will win!

KMAG DAILY THREAD 20260527Kash Patel & the FBI cont.

Site rules stolen from our good friend PAVACA

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Do not forget to LABEL AI articles, video and such.

The second and last part of the Kash Patel transcript.

45:0058:30: The FISA Fraud: How the Spying Began — CONTINUED

58:3001:10:00: Modernizing the Bureau: AI vs. Terrorist Threats

01:10:0001:25:30: Stopping Foreign Scam Centers & Fentanyl

01:25:3001:49:00: Investigating Arctic Frost & Plasma Echo

First I want to draw attention to this new disclosure. I had not heard of this operation before and Google says it does not exist.

@jsolomonReports predicts that the SPLC case is only the beginning of what’s to come from this DOJ:

“I think we’re about to enter into a period of MAAA. Make America Accountable Again. I think with Pam Bondi moved aside, the speed at which the Justice Department will move on things that have been working in the system for months is picking up.

I think in the summer and fall, we are going to talk a lot more about a case called “Operation Round River. Its goal was to neutralize anyone who would dare suggest there was a corrupt relationship between Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, and the Ukrainian Government or the Ukrainian company Burisma.

All the people I’ve talked to in government think that Round River may be the most JAW-DROPPING of the four codename investigations that targeted Donald Trump and his followers.”


The four investigations Kash IDed are, Arctic Frost, Plasmic Echo, Round River and of course Crossfire Hurricane.

….

ROUGH TRANSCRIPT:

51:30 — Kash Patel: They lost the election. And so what they wanted to do was kneecap the presidency of Donald Trump and set him up to fail. And so they breathlessly put out that false narrative about Russia and collusion over and over and over again. Remember these same people in Trump one, the Rosensteins and Comeys and McCabes of the world were the ones that proposed wearing a wire under the 25th amendment to record Donald Trump. That’s not me saying it. That’s the documents we found. Again, their arrogance. They wrote it down. We put it out. Can you imagine if Obama or Biden’s FBI or DOJ proposed to wear a wire in the Oval Office to record the president of the United States? Would we not still be talking about that?

Sean Hannity: Well, think back again. Donald Trump is running and Hillary is paying for this dirty dossier. Unverified, unverifiable. And James Comey looks at it. Didn’t know anything about the authenticity of it. Then he makes this famous trip to Trump Tower.

First of all, I’ve known Donald Trump for 30 years. It made me laugh when I heard it because I knew it was complete utter BS. Well, there was a report, sir, that you might have been in the Ritz Carlton in Moscow and you might have had hookers in your room urinating on you. Okay, if anyone knows Donald Trump, he is the biggest germaphobe. Him and Howard Stern, the biggest germaphobes in the world. And so it wasn’t true. But Comey knew it wasn’t true.

Kash Patel: There’s something more basic to it than that. The dossier, which now everyone has seen, when I first saw it, I said, “Let’s just do some investigative 101.

” Does that hotel with that room even exist in Moscow? It doesn’t. It literally doesn’t exist.

Sean Hannity: Whoa, whoa, whoa. This is the first I’m hearing it. What? Come on.

Kash Patel: Serious. So, we looked it up. Doesn’t exist. A hotel exists. Not with that room. Not in that location. It’s available on the internet. Anybody at the FBI could have verified that. They didn’t do it on purpose because the narrative, the salacious and fake narrative against Donald Trump was what they wanted out there to kneecap his presidency because they knew we were uncovering their FISA fraud. So once we caught them doing that, what’s the next best thing? Continue the narrative anyway. Continue the narrative to make sure President Trump doesn’t succeed. And thankfully to your reporting and just a select few others, and we were vilified for it then, we got the truth out. And now the American people, when you fast forward across the four years that President Trump was out of office and now that he’s back in office for the first year, it’s right to be focused on this. It’s right to be pissed off about it because what law enforcement should be doing is what we talked about at the top of the show, doing cop work.

Sean Hannity: I want to read Dan Bongino’s famous tweet and I first I want to know what you thought. Did he talk to you before he sent it out?

Kash Patel: The..

Sean Hannity: The infamous Bongino Holy Shit… All right, let me read it to you.

Kash Patel: Yeah, read it to me.

Sean Hannity: It says, “During my tenure here as the deputy director of the FBI, I’ve repeatedly relayed to you that things are happening that may not be immediately visible, but they are happening.” He said, “The director and I are committed to stamping out public corruption and the political weaponization of both law enforcement and intelligence operations. It is a priority for us. But what I have learned in the course of our properly predicated and necessary investigations into these aforementioned matters has shocked me down to my core. I’ll continue in a minute. I’ve known Dan like I’ve known you for years. This is not written lightly.

Kash Patel: No, we talked about it.

Sean Hannity continuing to read: We cannot run a republic like this. I’ll never be the same after learning what I’ve learned. We’re going to conduct these righteous and proper investigations by the book and in accordance with the law. We are going to get the answers we all deserve. And as with any investigation, I cannot predict where it will land. But I can promise you an honest and dignified effort at truth. Not my truth or your truth, but the truth. God bless America

Sean Hannity: I’ve known this guy forever. He did not write that lightly.

Kash Patel: No, we talked about it.

Sean Hannity: Look, he talked to you about it before he sent it out. And you said send.

Kash Patel: We were the best partners. Dan was easily the best hire I’ve made or I’ll ever make. He told me he only wanted to go a year. That was the agreement. I said, “Hey, man. We need you.” When we were first talking about he said, “I can give you a year.” I said, “Give me a year. We’ll take it.”

Here’s the difference. We are doing it by the book. That’s why it takes time. That’s why it takes time to build a prosecution team in different jurisdictions to look at this, to get the grand jury subpoenas out, to put witnesses in the grand jury. We’ve put a ton of witnesses in the grand jury. That’s what they don’t do. They don’t play by the rules. They don’t play by the book, but we do because, as Dan said, we got to do this right. We got one shot at it. We’re not going to do it fast just to get the headline. We’re going to take our time and get it done right and get everybody that was involved under the microscope.

Sean Hannity: When you say, the amount of corruption, this is a priority and that we cannot run a republic like this. I interpret that to mean and I want your impression. Tell me about Comey. as Trump always refers to him as a bad dirty cop. Is he right?

Kash Patel: Yeah. Look at Russia Gate. You can’t do that if you’re stupid. He’s not dumb. You can’t go out and give that Hillary Clinton press conference if you’re stupid or dumb. It’s intentional to seed the narrative and to cover up their dirty work. And so he built a team around him, which we obviously got rid of, that would advance that narrative that crippled the credibility of the FBI. And that’s the one thing we’ve been fixing. It’s not me saying it. The FBI’s credibility before Donald Trump got back into office was cratering. Cratering because of THIS, because they didn’t tackle violent crime and didn’t tackle national security issues. I mean, just look at how fast it changed.

Sean Hannity: Well, how could they be if they’re involved in all this political intrigue and sabotage?

[From the Sundance]

Kash Patel: And that’s what hurt the mission the most. The heroes of this mission under President Trump and this FBI are in the field. That’s why we’re giving them the resources. That’s why we’re bringing in things like AI. AI was never used at the FBI till we got there. Literally, I’m using it everywhere. I’m using it in places like our criminal justice information system database so we can pop fingerprints immediately and get fugitives and arrest warrants out. I’m using it in places like our national threat operations center.

I’ll give you an example. They wanted to do it human by human. Can you imagine how many tips the FBI gets a week? Thousands. If we had just humans look at it, we would never sift through them all. I put AI in there. We stopped a school massacre in North Carolina because we got a tip and we were able to triage it with artificial intelligence. We stopped a school shooting in New York because we got a tip from our private sector partners who are building our AI infrastructure. I mean just think about the old school movies. Remember they get the fingerprint screens up and they’ll say we’ll see you in a couple days when we get a hit. Now those hits are instantaneous because we are welcoming in artificial intelligence.

The former FBI rejected that notion because they knew that wasn’t their focus. Their focus was on weaponization, not modernization. My predecessors didn’t spend one second modernizing the FBI. They kept calling it the premier law enforcement agency in the world, but they failed to give the people in the field the resources that they need. They failed to give our SWAT operators, our tactical operators, our hostage rescue teams the tools they needed.

Sean, our guys, just to give you an example, are doing dynamic hostage rescue operations on a weekly basis with night vision goggles that don’t work. That’s not that’s not hyperbole. That’s a fact. So, I called my partners at DOW and I said, “I need an assist.” They were like, “Roger that. We got you covered.” Why? The question the American people should be asking is, “Why didn’t this so-called premier law enforcement agency of the world, why didn’t they resource it? Why didn’t they build a backbone infrastructure? Why didn’t they go out to the private sector and say, “Hey, we need your help.” Donald Trump kicked that door open. I’ve got every major tech company in the world embedded in the FBI rebuilding our internet capabilities, our classified systems, and the ability for artificial intelligence to be in our counterterrorism program so we can get instantaneous results. What’s the point of collecting terabytes of data if you can’t sift through it?

They never answer that question. And the mainstream media doesn’t ask the question as to why our predecessors kept putting a band-aid on a gunshot to attempt to triage the broken system of the FBI. We spent the last year, this is one of the things I’m most proud of, rebuilding our entire backbone infrastructure because an agent in the field in Omaha should have the exact same toolkit as a guy in New York City. No different. Our SWAT operators should be using machines. They didn’t have Bearcats in the field. We got them Bearcats in the field. You guys want these guys kicking down doors and dropping fast roping off helicopters and things like that and rescuing kids like we just did in Alabama the other week in the middle of a night from a guy who’s holding a young woman at gunpoint. We got to give them the tools that they need. And none of them bothered to do it. They just kept repeating the past hyperbole and resting on the history of the FBI saying we’re great and we’re going to get there.

How come Chris Wray didn’t fight for a budget for this FBI in his five years and saw decline in funds year-over-year for his entire directorship?

Sean Hannity: If Comey is a dirty cop, I know this issue in the indictment 8647. Okay, I think he’s completely full of shit when he says that. Oh, I just thought it was an interesting shell formation. Okay, every American knows what 8647 means. What an interesting shell formation. My wife suggested that I put it on Instagram. I’m like, okay, good luck with that. But to me, that’s the low-hanging fruit for him. Which is why I want to get into what the grand conspiracy will be.

But first, if Comey was a dirty cop, Director Wray used to always warn about some type of apocalyptic meltdown in the country, but then he never did a thing to secure the borders and he kept letting these millions of people come from 200 plus countries and that frustrated me. I felt that that those were all CYA appearances before Congress or the Senate. So my question is, how do you describe Director Wray?

Kash Patel: Look, I don’t spend my days thinking about Director Wray. He paid lip service to the American people to say we have all these investigations but didn’t reduce crime. That’s the result. The results speak for themselves. In one year, in 14 months with President Trump, this FBI has done more than the prior two guys combined. That’s that shows that the mandate of the FBI has been restored by President Trump.

Sean Hannity: That shows you’re not playing politics. You’re not out to screw the next Democrat. You there to stop crime.

Kash Patel: That shows the breadth of cooperation we’re getting from people like the government of Mexico, the government of India, China, Russia even. We’re getting these fugitives from all over the world and we’re sending our people to go get them. I was there on the ground in Mexico when we got the Ryan Weddings of the world. When they said you couldn’t get them, you couldn’t find them. We created operations to go and flush these guys out and we’re getting them all in record speed. We went to the government of India and said, “Hey, there’s a gal over there on our top 10 most wanted list who murdered her handicapped 5-year-old son. They found her in a week for us and we went and brought her back.” They could have done that in the Biden administration. They could have gotten Ryan Wedding. They could have gotten the rapist in North Carolina who was our most wanted fugitive. They could have done all that work. They didn’t because they were focused on keeping the status quo. That’s what the American people hated the most. That’s why I believe they voted Donald Trump back into office again because they wanted to change the status quo in Washington DC on Capitol Hill and the way this FBI represents itself across the country.

Sean Hannity: Walk through the next level. We got all the way through 2016. They set him up like a bowling pin because they took a career senior intelligence officials assessments about there was no Russian interference. They used the dirty dossier to backdoor spy on candidate Trump, transition team Trump, and then later the Trump administration. Carter Page is a nice guy. My understanding is he was a hero. He used to work with three-letter agencies. Is that your assessment of him, too?

Kash Patel: That’s the public information that’s out there. That’s correct.

Sean Hannity: I mean, that’s public and he’s told me directly that he would always help out our government. He was a patriot. Trump has to deal with that for three years. But there’s more to the story. It’s a bigger broader case. The reason that the grand conspiracy, if which you have said you’re looking into is so critical, is because the small the low-hanging fruit on Comey 8647 while important for sure is not the worst of what this guy did. And unfortunately the statute of limitations ran out because you had the intervening Biden years. They were never going to investigate the guy that did all this work for them. However, if there is a grand conspiracy, there are no statutes of limitations.

Kash Patel: Well, and also if they did it again, right? The win here is not just holding these people accountable. The win here is making sure that the FBI, DOJ, and the entire government are never able to do this again to anyone else. That’s what President Trump has said repeatedly. He was the ultimate target, but he wants to make sure that this can never happen to anyone ever again. That is the ultimate win for our republic. And it’s not just this statute of limitations thing. These people, as I said earlier, are so arrogant that they ran back the same playbook. That’s what we uncovered.

Sean Hannity: Isn’t it then important then that those that were involved in it be held accountable?

Kash Patel: All of them. Every single one of them.

Sean Hannity: Okay. So, how do we get from it began here in 2016, July, the press conference, all the way through the setup for 2017, and Trump’s coming in and explain how it continues from there.

Kash Patel: That’s the part that I’ve got to be a little careful about. What I was saying earlier is they ran it back again. I don’t mean in 2016 and 17. I don’t mean in 2021. I mean they ran it back just now.

Sean Hannity: Explain.

Kash Patel: In the last election. In the one that just put Trump back in office. They ran the same playbook of getting regurgitated bogus information funded by political operatives seeded into the intelligence community. And that’s what we figured out and unlocked. And that is where I spend most of my time when it comes to the deweaponization of government. Focused on, collecting those bad actors, getting grand juries, getting prosecutors, and building teams around the country, not just in one location to look at that because these people haven’t stopped. The same actors were involved yet again.

And so that, when you say grand conspiracy, I think the American public thinks one thing. When I hear it, I’m talking about the breath of the entirety of it. And we are putting it all in one place and that’s the crux of what we’re doing right now.

Sean Hannity: Explain how it goes out further. My understanding is you brought Joe diGenova in?

Kash Patel: DOJ did.

Sean Hannity: He’s one tough kick-ass prosecutor.

Kash Patel: He’s been around a long time.

Sean Hannity: I would not want to go up against him. One of the few people I’m like, UH No. But I think he’s also truth oriented and he’ll want to get to the the bottom line. So there really is an effort to just… what do you think it stems from? Is it they hate him? They hate his politics. They hate what he stands for. They hate his style. What is it?

Kash Patel: They hate that he [Trump] did everything they said they were going to do and didn’t get done. Everything from ending the forever wars to securing the border to reducing crime to historic low proportions. He’s accomplished all that and so much more. And if an Obama or Harris or Biden had done it, they would be building monuments for them. But he did it. They talked about it. They ran on it. They weaponized government. He exposed it. Trump then got back into power and said, “We’re going to fix it forever. So do it the right way. Don’t go fast. Get it done and get everybody. And that’s what we’re doing. We’re only 14 months in. I know people think it should have happened yesterday. But look at the public corruption cases we’ve already brought. The work that we’re already doing, the fraud. We haven’t even talked about the fraud in Minnesota or the scam centers overseas that are plaguing the United States of America. We’re doing all of this work. At the same time, we’re doing what you and I are talking about.

Sean Hannity: So, and this is what I guess frustrated me knowing you for a long time. You walk in the door and like people are immediately like slamming you with, “Oh, wait a minute. Where are the JFK files? RFK files with MLK files and are there UFOs?” Which, by the way, I’m going to ask you all of that. I’m fascinated with the UFO part. But you’re slammed with that. But then you’re also slam with getting to the bottom of this, keeping Americans safe and secure, dealing with narco terrorists, dealing with child trafficking operations. All this has taken place in our country. It’s kind of hard to absorb that.

Kash Patel: Well, President Trump not only promised to restore law enforcement and make it better than it’s ever been, he’s also the most transparent president in the history of the United States. All the things you talked about are things other presidents could have put out but didn’t. He did. And let me give you another example of what this FBI is doing. Our constitutional oversight comes from the United States Congress. I’m a big proponent of that. The prior two directors released a total of 14,000 pages of documents to Congress in a total of 10 years. 14,000 pages of documents to oversight committees in Congress.

Sean Hannity: How many [have you released] And if if you listen to your critics, they would think that you’re hiding everything.

Kash Patel: 41,000 pages in 14 months, I don’t do math, but I think it’s like a 350% increase. And that’s just in 14 months because President Trump is driving the transparency initiative. And the documents are the best work. And whether it’s JFK or RFK or UFOs or what have you, it’s also the underlying [stuff] and that’s the balance we got to strike. People are like, “Where are the rest of the Russia gate?” You know, conspiracy documents. My balance is to release what we can while maintaining the integrity of the investigation. If we put everything out, then we jeopardize the integrity of the prosecutions that we will bring. That’s the balance that I have to strike. And I get it. We take a lot of incoming for it. Why don’t you just put it out? Why don’t you just put it out? Well, we want accountability, too, right?

Sean Hannity: But you can’t. But people don’t understand either. You take in voluminous amounts of information. A lot of it is not verified and a lot of it’s not vetted. It’s raw intel that could hurt innocent people. You have redactions that would go along with it. I would urge anyone to go through 500 pages and try to redact what you have to redact and the amount of the intensity of that work alone would be insane and you’re talking about hundreds of thousands of documents. That’s a lot. [Just editing these transcripts is a (euphemism) and I can only handle about 5 to 10 pages a day! –GC]

A random question and then we’ll get back more focused but what keeps Kash Patel awake at night

Kash Patel: Missing something. Did we miss a national security threat? Did we miss the chance at protecting another kid or another community? And I can tell the American public that just look at the month of December alone last year. We stopped four terrorist attacks in four weeks during the holidays. Four.

Sean Hannity: Slow down a second. Most Americans don’t know that.

Kash Patel: Yeah. Everything from the pumpkin tape plot all the way through the attacks that were going to happen in Texas, Florida, and New York. And we stopped them all. We, this FBI.

Sean Hannity: When you say terror attack, do you mean a real attack, a terrorist organization, [and you] stopped it? That’s got to give you a lot of personal job satisfaction and then scare the hell out of you about what else may be out there.

Kash Patel: It’s a two-edged sword, right? Like, thank God that this FBI is on mission doing it. We put it out as much as we can because the work of this FBI should be known to the American public and it should be advertised. Their wins, the sleepless nights that the agents, the intel analysts and professional staff put in. The time away from their families. We are the folks that are responsible for safeguarding America. What keeps me up at night is we’re trying to do everything we can not miss anything.

Sean Hannity: So, you have to be perfect every time.

Kash Patel: Yeah. Well, they only have to get through once.

Sean Hannity: Do you fear a 911 style attack could happen again?

Kash Patel: We’re always on the watch for that given the current circumstances we’re in. And as I said earlier, the thing about terrorists is they’re exceedingly patient. After the disastrous withdrawal in Afghanistan, which led directly to the deaths of 13 of our brave soldiers at Abbey Gate. And by the way, in the first two weeks on the job, Johnny Ratcliffe and I went to the Pakistanis and got the Abbey Gate bomber who just got convicted last week. The question the American public should be asking is what was the Biden administration doing for four years not finding this guy that killed 13 American soldiers. That’s how fast we moved. And that’s how fast you can move.

The problem is, the way that Afghanistan was left by the Biden administration, allows al-Qaeda and ISIS K [ISIS-Khorasan – Terrorist Groups – GC] specifically to rejuvenate. ISIS K, which is the worst of the worst pretty much outside of the Iranian terror regime. And so they are rebuilding slowly. That’s what we’re watching. And we’re watching to see if they are moving people across continents into Africa into South America. And we’re working with our intelligence community partners, CIA, NSA overseas, and of course the DOW running targeted operations overseas, going after the drug traffickers. And the big shift that we had here was we finally equated terrorists to being terrorists. What do I mean by that? Muslim Brotherhood, they’re terrorists. Donald Trump did that. Drug trafficking organizations in Mexico, they’re terrorists. Donald Trump made them FTOs. [Foreign Terrorist Organizations] So that unlocks authorities that we have to traditionally manhunt al-Qaeda and ISIS and ISIS K on these organizations. That is a critical win that is never talked about. Moving the machine to designate these organizations as foreign terrorist organizations so the FBI the CIA the NSA and DOW can do what you’re seeing.

Sean Hannity: Are there sleeper cells… do you believe? And what degree of certainty do you have that there are sleeper cells in this country?

Kash Patel: So we can only work off the intelligence that we have and currently we are looking at that with our partners across the IC. I’m not saying there aren’t. I’m saying the intelligence that’s been produced so far doesn’t show credible information to support that. That’s the assessment of the IC.

Sean Hannity: I don’t know if I’d want to read the presidential daily briefing every day. I think that would be a pretty long when I look at all of this. I want to go back to your interpretation when you had the burn bags ‘cuz that was a big story. When I heard they left burn bags behind. I’m like, either they’re dumb — And then Dan was the one that opened my eyes by saying, I think somebody probably left them there hidden on purpose, hoping we’d find it and maybe even tipped you off that it was there. ‘Cuz you said this is in a room that nobody knew existed. Was it like a safe room?

Kash Patel: Literally, it was in a safe room.

Sean Hannity: And so you told WHO[???] go look in this room.

Kash Patel: First, we had to find it. Remember, it goes back to the arrogance. The people that authored Russia Gate and the ultimate weaponization of government and law enforcement, we caught them because we used their documents. We found their documents. I knew they had done that again. What we found was just a chunk of it. So, I knew it was elsewhere. So, I said, “We’ve got to go comb through the entire building and find a combination of two things. Their arrogance coupled with good people in the FBI who were smart enough to make sure that the material that the arrogant people assumed would be destroyed was not and that was the key for us.

Sean Hannity: We got Dan’s reaction. What was your reaction when you read it?

Kash Patel: It was something I anticipated. I wasn’t surprised by it.

Sean Hannity: Well, you were more deeply involved because you were working with Devon. So, it was just confirmation of what you already knew with more information.

Kash Patel: Yeah. That we hadn’t seen yet. with more information.

Sean Hannity: How do you explain that they put it down on paper? Because that seems pretty dumb to me.

Kash Patel: The arrogance. Why would you put down on paper that you had information that exonerated Carter Page and President Trump’s campaign? ‘Cuz they thought, “No one’s ever going to see this. Hillary’s going to win. We’re never going to see this.”

Sean Hannity: Are you convinced that there’s enough evidence that the DOJ in the future will be able to bring real strong cases against the people that are involved here?

Kash Patel: Yes. I can’t start saying names.

Sean Hannity: … [story about cops in his family] …restoring the FBI to its former greatness and restoring our intelligence community to its former greatness. Are you confident in this 4-year period, assuming we just have four years? I’m hoping longer. That’s possible?

Kash Patel: Yes. That’s what we’re doing. That’s what President Trump’s leading out on. people should really take a hard look at the last 14 months and some of the things we’ve talked about.

They said that none of that was possible. There’s no way you could reduce robberies in this country by 20%. There’s no way you could drop the murder rate in this country by 20%. We did all that. There’s no way you could tackle fraud in Minnesota. What did you see last week? FBI agents along with the inter agency executing 21 search warrants and raiding locations across Minnesota. Not just the fraud here, but the fraud that’s being manufactured and stood up by the CCP overseas in places like Cambodia, Thailand, and Burma. They’re standing up those scam center compounds that are defrauding senior citizens in America by the billions. Just last week, because of President Trump’s ability to have countries in the Middle East, Dubai specifically, the FBI, the Dubai police, and the MPS were on the ground. We shut down nine scam centers, freed 2,000 trafficked enslaved laborers, sent them back home, and shut down a $5 billion scam center fraud that was being perpetrated in the United States of America.

Sean Hannity: It’s crazy this level of crime, especially coming from abroad, is here.

Kash Patel: And [where] they headquartered it. So you have to root out the fraud like we’re doing on the ground in Minnesota. This is our operational plan that we’ve been executing the last year and go to places like Cambodia, Thailand, and Burma where the CCP is standing up villages of scam center compounds and work with our private sectors to annihilate them.

Sean Hannity: Is China the worst of all our geopolitical foes?

Kash Patel: Yeah, by far.

Sean Hannity: Let me ask you about this. So you know I work closely with John Solomon. We know about Arctic Frost. The summary I would give and maybe you can give yours. They actually spied without a warrant, without any basis. You talk about unreasonable search and seizure on congressmen and senators and others.

Kash Patel: Yeah. And others.

Sean Hannity: How’s that investigation going?

Kash Patel: It’s far down the track.

Sean Hannity: You feel you’re getting where you need to be?

Kash Patel: Yeah

Sean Hannity: Here’s the reporting of John Solomon. It’s not just Arctic Frost . What about Round River [Google denies it even exists! – GC], which deals with Ukraine. What about Plasmic Echo, which has to do with classified documents? And then of course, Crossfire Hurricane.

Kash Patel: All of it. All of it collectively is run on the same MO that was stood up by a weaponized law enforcement. And all of it is being uncovered and exposed by the same MO that President Trump came into office again with to root out corruption and weaponization of law enforcement. But how?

Get the documents, then get the witnesses, then get the grand jury subpoenas out, then put people in the grand jury, then build a case with our prosecutors at the same time to collectively hold these people responsible and find jurisdictions where we can prosecute them based on the law. That’s what we’re doing across the board.

Sean Hannity: Relatively speaking, things that have happened to me, like I had Jim Jordan come on my TV show once and say, “Oh, by the way, the government suppressed your social media account for the 2020 election. Or my own my private personal text messages are released publicly with people like Paul Maniffort, Mark Meadows, Jim Jordan, Kayleigh McEnany, I mean, I would think I have a right to privacy. I’ve never committed a crime in my life except speeding and I don’t speed anymore. Nobody ever gets held accountable for that stuff. And nobody in the media ever cared ‘cuz it was me.

Kash Patel: Yeah, I know the feeling. Mine too.

Sean Hannity: And by the way, your FBI contacted me at least a couple of times through my lawyer, and said, “Oh, by the way, we think your client got hacked by Russia, China, and Iran.” My phone. First of all, why do Russia, China, and Iran want to hack my phone?

Kash Patel: Well, you got a pretty big audience, Sean. I don’t know if you noticed that. And our adversaries, look, but in all seriousness, our adversaries aren’t stupid. Why wouldn’t they target you? You’re one of the most powerful messengers of truth that there is.

Sean Hannity: They want him.

Kash Patel: So, they want you and me. I’m a sitting FBI director and I just figured out that the prior FBI illegally surveilled and collected my information.

Sean Hannity: Is there any way to keep your phone safe? ‘cuz I learned through the Nancy Guthrie case that you could think everything is deleted and you have equipment that can actually retrieve it, which I don’t think you guys want it out there . For example, if you delete your cloud, you delete your text, you delete your email, you wipe it clean and it’s still out there like hanging out in the air and it can be retrieved.

Kash Patel: Well, that’s that’s a whole separate conversation when it comes to how do we use technology and how do we use these tech companies, phone companies, social media companies, cloud services. Everybody wants the best of both worlds. They want to be able to use that and rightfully so. But they also want everything protected and that’s why it takes an act of Congress to come in with laws that we can utilize to safeguard these American citizens. I mean, China, Russia, Iran, and DPRK are never going to stop their espionage activities.

Sean Hannity: Ever.

Kash Patel: Ever. We shouldn’t expect them to.

Sean Hannity: We spy on them.

Kash Patel: But what we can do. What this FBI has done is turbocharge how we go after them. I mean, Sean, you cannot have a 43% increase in espionage arrests in 13 months unless you actually turbocharge and do what the president wants you to do, which is safeguard American citizens. So, we’re on that mission set. We’re also working with the private sector to say, “Hey, you guys and us have to work on a couple of things. Ultimately, safeguarding, you know, free speech and everybody’s right to it. But at the same time, our job in law enforcement is to safeguard your privacy.” That’s a tough balance because people want it both ways and it’s really hard to strike that balance.

Sean Hannity: So, a friend of mine who is pretty high ranking in the FBI, he’s now retired. I’ll never forget this conversation I had with him and I brought this up with with Dan. We were talking about the FBI and he volunteered to me, said if the FBI ever comes to your house, don’t talk to them. That goes against every instinct in my being, my natural reaction would be this is the FBI. I want to help the FBI. You know, if they need my assistance, how can I help you? He said, nuh-uh.

Kash Patel: That’s the ultimate goal we’re working towards, to go back to that. But that’s what we want our FBI and our law enforcement to get back to. That’s the degradation of trust that has happened.

Sean Hannity: This is a guy who loves his country. This guy was an agent’s agent. This guy risked his life all the time, was undercover for years in his life. And for him to say, “Whatever you do, don’t talk to them.” It’s probably a perjury trap. That’s what he told me. Well, look at what they did. I mean, he’s saying that because of the examples you and I have talked about. He left because of it.

Kash Patel: And here’s the other thing. I’ve got so many FBI agents. We created a new program for them to come back in. They were so fed up that they left. They’re all coming back in and helping us. And so the ultimate goal of not just holding everyone accountable for the past that we’ve talked about is, the law enforcement community you and I grew up in, me in New York too, that if a cop shows up or an agent shows up, you invite them in and say, “How can we help? We’re getting there. When I go across this country, when I visit the field offices, when I’m in the community, every single agent, analyst, and civilian tells me the same exact thing. We are feeling more safe under President Trump’s leadership than we ever have before. And we’re finally starting to trust the FBI again when they show up because look at what we’re doing. We’re responding in record speed. You see things like political violence. We’re taking that on. You see things like a political system that was used to target individuals. We took on the SPLC. Why do you think they started coming after me so hard just around the time we indicted the SPLC?

Sean Hannity: Weren’t you on their list? I know I’ve been mentioned by them a million times.

Kash Patel: The hate list. Yeah, I’m sure. These are things that Americans have wanted for a long time and we’re doing it with facts, and every time, and this you know this better than anyone, when they’re coming after you, they’ve come after President Trump and the louder the cauldron of baseless reporting is in Washington DC, the more you’re over the target. The only thing left to do is keep pummeling the target. And that’s what we’re doing with everything from the fraud investigations in Minnesota to SPLC to supporting and defending people’s right like those individuals that we just arrested for throwing a girl to the floor for expressing her freedom of speech right and basically attacking her. We got them too. We’re doing that across the country. That’s just one example. And so that’s what the American public wants. And that’s why we stood up our national mission center in the FBI. We literally, made another transformational change. What we did was we have 10 agencies in the FBI headquarters that have stood up just to ingest all of the information on social media and everywhere

else about people being attacked. We are responding to that in record time and go talk to the folks on social media and see, if when they’re being threatened, how fast this FBI responds. We’re running that and quarterbacking that operation out of this FBI.

Sean Hannity: So, we mentioned immigration, unfettered immigration. The president closed the borders. Those 12 million plus un-vetted illegals from over 200 countries, many with terror ties. I’ll tell you my other big fear is we now lived through the third assassination attempt of President Trump. [more like 5 or more with 25 incidents — GC] I know it’s outside of the FBI’s purview, but I’m concerned because I see three common traits in each example. And I’m not being critical. I mean, we saw the best in Secret Service that night at the White House correspondence dinner. You were there.

As a matter of fact, I was in touch with you. You were with the guy, I think, within probably less than 3 minutes, 5 minutes, but here’s what bothers me. I think we have a perimeter problem. In other words, I thought the perimeter in this case was too close to the venue. I think you need multiple perimeters. And if I’m wrong, tell me. I know it’s separate from the FBI. I am concerned that the whole entire hotel was not swept. I was concerned that Trump International, If you know that golf course where the treed areas are known for paparazzi, they would congregate there. They never swept that area. You have to sweep, secure, and then hold it. Make sure nobody goes in after you sweep it. And then Butler, how does somebody get within 130 yards of a president with a rifle and use a ladder to get on a roof? I’m concerned that while the agents themselves, the rank and file are doing a great job, and I’m not being critical of management. I’m just critical of, do we need a an examination or re-examining how we’re protecting our president?

Kash Patel: Well, look, Mark Wayne and I work closely, you know, every day together.

Sean Hannity: He just started, too.

Kash Patel: We’re getting better and better. But just going back to the White House correspondents dinner. You know what the American public should also be proud of is the inter agency showing up. We were all there, the media was all there, and in record time, we had the suspect subdued. I had a mobile command center stood up at the Hilton Hotel. I launched our NC3, our national crisis coordinate center at Hoover and I stood up our command center at the Washington field office. And you’re right, I was on scene. We stayed on scene. We made sure all the civilian population was safely exited from the building after the individual was secured, processed that individual immediately. The FBI agents are the ones that took him to the hospital and interrogated him on the way. And that’s why again with transparency while protecting the integrity of the investigation, we put out more information than any FBI would have on this individual in our investigation.

That night, we stayed up through the night. I stayed up with my leadership team, and got back early the next morning to make sure that we had adjudicated and, safeguarded the integrity of the investigation to make sure there’s accountability, but also to learn what we could. We’re always looking for what we can be doing better, especially when it comes to safeguarding the president of the United States.

Sean Hannity: I just think we need more perimeters further away from venues. And if you can’t sweep an entire hotel, then we can’t have our president there. Especially with the assassination culture. Three attempts against him. Charlie Kirk is dead. Charlie Kirk, you knew him. I knew him. Can’t have it.

All right. Now, let me ask you the fun questions. You know, one thing I want to ask you is about the Nancy Guthrie case. I got frustrated because I knew from my sources they were trying to keep you guys out.

Kash Patel: They did.

Sean Hannity: And look, time matters in an investigation.

Kash Patel: Look, the first 48 hours of anyone’s disappearance are the most critical. And here’s how these cases works. It is a state matter. It’s a state and local law enforcement matter. What we, the FBI, do is say, “Hey, we’re here to help. What do you need? What can we do?” And for four days, we were kept out of the investigation. And when we were finally let in, Sean, look what we did. We went in and got the Ring doorbell and we said, “Hey, is anyone talking to Google?” I called the leadership at Google and I said, “Look, we know that there was not a subscription service to capture all of the data that would have been captured had there been a subscription service. But can we go into the cache? Can we go into the data before it’s deleted and see what we can find?” That’s why you have that image because the FBI worked with Google to put that image out. Another thing we asked to do..

Sean Hannity: You guys got that tape which was the biggest breakthrough during that case.

Kash Patel: We could have gotten it days before. We could have also maybe gotten more data had we..

Sean Hannity: Why wouldn’t they want your help? Why did they send the DNA to a lab in Florida, not Quantico?

Kash Patel: That’s the other thing that you hit on, right? Again, we were saying we’ll process it. I launched hundreds of agents and intel staff to Phoenix and to Tucson just for this case, just to be on stand-by, just to do the canvasing. And we said we’ll take the DNA. And again, it’s a state and local matter, so it’s their call on where to send the DNA. We have Quantico, best lab in the world. I had a fixed wing aircraft on the ground ready to move it immediately through the night.

Sean Hannity: Did they just say no?

Kash Patel: And they said we’re sending it to Florida and and then I don’t know.

Sean Hannity: They have jurisdiction, so it’s their call. Bad call.

Kash Patel: Well, that’s for the American public to decide. And what we can do is continue to offer support. We would have analyzed it within days and maybe gotten better information or more information. Our lab’s just better than any other private lab out there and we didn’t get a chance to do that. So, I understand everybody’s frustrations on that.

Sean Hannity: No, I’m not frustrated with you. If I was the sheriff and you the FBI was willing to help me and time is of the essence, I would want all the help I can get. Okay. Let me ask you about this. And I think this is really important. You’re going to hate me, but I’m obsessed with it. The JFK files, some have been released. But not all of them. If you go back and watch any documentary of the doctors that took care of JFK at Parkland Hospital, They all said the entrance wound was here, the exit wound was here. All of them. That never changed. Then you came up with the Warren Commission. This whole idea of a magic bullet that goes from here to here, hits him, hits him, hits the, you know, okay, never made sense to me. Every time there’s been an attempt to release those files, there’s opposition. There’s got to be a reason.

Kash Patel: Yeah. And that opposition isn’t with the FBI. We don’t control.

Sean Hannity: Have you ever looked at them?

Kash Patel: We’ve examined and fully un-redacted everything that’s within our purview, but there are other agencies that have equities in that, that I can’t speak to. And so the opposition doesn’t come from this FBI or us. As I said, most transparent administration ever under President Trump, put out more documents on JFK, RFK than ever before. I can’t address the reasons why other agencies said we can’t release X for Y.

Sean Hannity: It’s seems crazy to me. I it just doesn’t seem possible. You know, when the Warren Commission comes up with this magic bullet theory and the doctors at the hospital that are.. that was the leading trauma hospital in Dallas and they all said the same thing. They think the entrance wound was here came out the back which exploded. Makes sense based on my knowledge of ballistics. Did the ballistic side of it tell you a story?

Kash Patel: So here’s the thing. It’s a tragic example of what the FBI does and can do. And then when individuals want to be allowed to target someone, they’ll target the FBI. And that’s okay. That’s their right to do that. But we work with the inter agency. We don’t have a unilateral decision point on that. We don’t. We have to respect their equities. we have to respect whatever they have that is ongoing sources or otherwise that have nothing to do with what actually happened but they’re doing something else later. And so that’s the decision making process that goes into it. As you said, and as I’ve said earlier, I’ve been more transparent than any FBI director literally ever and so has President Trump.

Sean Hannity: So the previous 10 years 13,000 documents they released and in less than a year or a little over a year you’ve been in office 41,000 in a year. Do you have a personal interest in like JFK, RFK, MLK that you would just say let me just take a look at it? Not that you have a lot of spare time on your hands.

Kash Patel: I got a lot of personal interests, but I’ll get to those on the other side of this. On another Saturday.

Sean Hannity: Okay. Then I got to get to the question of either it’s true, these people that I’ve interviewed, these documentaries that I’ve watched. I’m more and more convinced. Have you watched Agent Disclosure?

Kash Patel: I haven’t seen it.

Sean Hannity: Okay. You’re busy. You have a full-time job. I’m more and more convinced that probably and my faith tells me you know we have universes within universes. There’s no limit to God’s imagination. So the idea that there would be life on other planets that may have visited here would not at all shock or surprise me. Have you ever looked into it?

Kash Patel: We’re looking at it. Here’s the thing again.

Sean Hannity: Okay. I want all the details.

Kash Patel: Here’s the thing. Every other president before President Trump could have said, “Hey, let’s look at that and get the American people the information.” What did he do? He stood up an inter agency process with Department of War leading that effort to get out the documentation related to everything that you’re talking about, not just from the FBI, from the IC and everywhere else. And so what do we do? We already delivered our first tranche of information to that committee and they’re going to be publicly releasing this information very soon. We are all for it. There’s nothing in this subject that we’re talking about that we don’t want released. Our job at the FBI is to work with the White House and DOW, give them the information, and then they’re going to put that out in a methodical process and you’re going to start seeing those releases literally happening in the very near future. We just met on it.

Sean Hannity: Do you think we’ve ever recovered alien forms?

Kash Patel: I don’t have any information on that specific.

Sean Hannity: So, you know, Donald Trump is kind of verbose. He talks a lot.

Kash Patel: I’m going to let you tell him that.

Sean Hannity: Oh, I tell him anything I want. I have no hesitation. But he clams up on this issue and I don’t know why. I’ve never been interested in it. I’m like, I want you to get interested in it.

Kash Patel: Well, it’s just another example of President Trump listens to what the American public has an interest in. He’s got a a job that’s a billion times more busy than mine. I’m just focused on law enforcement, national security, and crushing violent crime. He’s got to do a million different things at once, and he still has the time to say, “Stand up an organization. The American public wants the documents. We’ve already delivered the documents. They’re coming out. That’s it.”

Sean Hannity: All right. My last thing I want to reiterate for people is in the what 14 months you’ve been the FBI director, what a dramatic shift. And the statistics speak for themselves. And you never get credit. Do you care about not getting credit?

Kash Patel: I don’t want me to get the credit. I don’t care about that. I care about restoring the FBI’s credibility, which is what President Trump is driving for. And I think at some point in the future, people are going to look back and say, “Look at what President Trump and the FBI did. Restored safety to communities across America.” We’re going to start hearing from all these families just generally speaking, not in the media. I mean, saying, “My kid didn’t have access to these illicit drugs in their school, and there was not an overdose. Our communities and playgrounds are safe. They’re back out there doing what they need to be doing. These kids are getting to go to college. There’s not senseless murders and robberies. Gang violence is at an all-time or getting to an all-time low.

These are things that take time to message from the American populace. And I think there’ll be a point in time where that starts meeting the statistics that we’ve laid out here. And that’s the ultimate win. That’s the job. It’s not about me. It’s about these guys and gals doing the work out there. And again, putting the mission first and giving the credit to the heroes in the field and not the monstrosity that was created in Washington DC by my predecessors, which we’ve taken a wrecking ball to. We didn’t come up with some super creative way on how to retool law enforcement. We just took what President Trump said, back the blue, and let good cops be cops. And you’re seeing the results. And we’re doing things like the FBI field manual. I’ll leave you with this. The FBI field manual, our operations guide book used to be like this. [hands one foot apart]

Approvals, requirements, authorities. I slashed that by 40%. I let all the state and local officers that came up to me over the last year and change said, “Hey, I want to be a task force officer with the FBI.” I’m like, “Great. Let’s do it.” I’ve been waiting 14 months. Why is that? Because the FBI had an internal policy that didn’t allow it. Gone. Now you can be a task force officer in 60 days. We cleared a 700 task force officer backlog. Gone. So now if you want the job, which we want you in on, now they’re coming. State and locals, they’re thrilled with that. Little things like the cross deputization, we no longer have to wait for the inter agency to deputize our task force guys. the FBI field offices where the power is in the field and the special agents in charge are now on their own for the first time ever allowed to deputize their own task force officers. Why didn’t the FBI do that before? The institution prevented it because the bureaucracy was so bloated.

Sean Hannity: You know what one of the saddest things Dan said to me in in his interview is that he thinks if they get back in power again, they’re going to want to arrest people like him and you, me probably, and anybody else they disagree with politically. That’s pretty scary. I mean, this is the US.

Kash Patel: It is scary.

Sean Hannity: That shouldn’t happen in our country.

Kash Patel: It shouldn’t. And that’s why we’re making sure we build this place into something that lasts forever. And that’s the job. That’s the behind the-scenes job. All the things we talked about, I probably haven’t ever talked about 80% of it before today. What we’re doing behind the scenes. Because it’s not the sexy changes that people, advertise, but it’s us listening to the guys and gals in the field that said, “I want this. We want intelligence to drive ops in the field. We don’t want intelligence driven Catholic memos from Washington DC.” And so we listen, Dan and I, and their current leadership. So we listen. We want task force officers. We listen. We want cross deputizations. We listen. We want more intel folks in the field. We listen. We want more agents in the field. We listen. We want to be able to get promoted in the field and not have to come back to Washington DC. We listened. We shrunk the dialogue. The operational guide book by 40%. We listened. And that is why we are moving at the speed with which we are moving because that is what President Trump promised the American people.

Sean Hannity: You know what? If we restore the FBI, our intel community, and we embrace law and order and safety and security, how can we not be a greater, safer country? And that prerequisite that I discussed earlier of law and order, safety, security to pursue happiness, then Americans will be better off.

Amazing story untold sadly. It needs to be told more. I know you don’t have a lot of time to do a lot of media. We really appreciate your time coming out and hanging out with us.

Kash Patel: Thanks for letting me hang out, Sean. I appreciate it.

Hopefully the wait will soon be over!