KMAG DAILY THREAD 20260916 & Trump vs The Oligarchs part I

Site rules stolen from our good friend PAVACA

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Do not forget to LABEL AI articles, video and such.

As we come into the mid-terms and the economy becomes more and more important, let’s start with Tom Luongo’s

Market Report 9-13-2026: All About the Benjamins

With the ECB hiking rates this week we’ve seen a big move by capital markets, especially on Friday, the 25th Anniversary of 9/11, where bond markets globally sold off more than 10 bps.

To my conspiratorial mind this was a warning shot to the Fed, the US, the Trump Administration and the gods themselves, that Davos and their London sycophants are not going down without the fight of our lives.

The reality is that Lagarde raised to protect euro-bond/JGB carry spreads and to punish Germans for voting populist. Meanwhile, the UK is looking at a breakup, to ensure that there is no country left, freeing the Scots, Welsh and Northern Irish to rejoin the EU and finally betray BREXIT completely.

Christine Lagarde hiked into an energy supply shock because of Keynesian dogma, or so the story goes. It was a policy mistake of epic proportions. And in response, the bond market sell off globally was intended to force Kevin Warsh at the Fed to make the same policy mistake.

CPI, employment, labor, and producer price data clearly do not warrant a rate hike from the Fed. Lagarde sparked a dollar liquidity spasm into the weekend with this and the Financial press tried to sell it as a statement by bond vigilantes that the Fed must hike.

Nonsense. The MOVE index sits at 82.2 after that. Break-even rates are still below 2%

Oil prices are elevated on future supply refilling but that is clearly transitory.

The real story continues to be in the those aforementioned carry spreads, which Trump pushes Canada into a war which will not end well for them…


When Reading the tweets from the Debriefing (Below) the word FinCEN caught my eye because of this passage from one of my older articles, KMAG DAILY THREAD 20260225 & COLUMBIA

GhostofBasedPatrickHenry

This program that Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent is rolling out with FINcen seems to streamline the bounty system while focusing on the critical evidence: the money.

“Follow the money” is a notorious refrain not only in the Q Research community, but in the entire cultural ethos of “criminology” as well. Whether you are talking about a crime drama presented as a work of fiction on Netflix, or academic detective work, forensic accounting is the ideal method of mapping out criminal networks because the money flow is objective and traceable.

If you’ve listened to the past few episodes of Breaking History, we have been discussing FINcen and the Egmont Group. While FINcen is the financial crimes intelligence unit in the US government, the

Egmonth Group is an international network of over 170 of this type of intelligence unit from nearly every government on earth. The purpose being to share in this intelligence.

Colombian President Gustavo Petro was sanctioned by the Treasury Department last year, [October 24, 2025] and in the sanctioning document Petro is accused of getting Colombia’s financial crimes intelligence unit suspended from Egmont for allegedly sharing information he collected from the Egmont servers.

It is fascinating that both Petro and Maduro have accused all of the most powerful banks in the US and Europe of literally being the cartels. Petro says that it is institutions like Egmont Group that allow the criminality to continue and prosper, because it covers for them.

Bessent’s strategy is brilliant because it creates a practical incentive structure and has a reliable source of reward money. It also inherently targets the core culprit in all organized crime syndicates: the financial institutions.

We are going to pay criminals to rat out their friends. We are going to pay bureaucrats and accountants to blow the whistle on shady stuff they see around the office. And we are going to pay them with the money collected from fines imposed on the guilty parties. The idea being that the investigations will lead to criminal referrals and indictments.

Scott Bessent is weaponizing the financial system against itself by tapping into base human instincts.

Home – Egmont Group

As a global organization, the Egmont Group facilitates and prompts the exchange of information, knowledge, and cooperation amongst member FIUs. Access the Egmont Group core documents including the Charter and Principles for Information Exchange Between Financial Intelligence Units.

The Egmont Group provides FIUs with a platform to securely exchange expertise and financial intelligence to combat money laundering, terrorist financing, and associated predicate crimes. The Egmont Group does not conduct financial investigations. Instead, domestic law enforcement and investigative authorities manage such inquiries.

Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units – Wikipedia

Formation1995; 31 years ago
Founded atEgmont PalaceBrusselsBelgium
Headquarters Ottawa, Ontario, Canada[1][2]
MembersSee below
Chair Elżbieta Franków- Jaśkiewicz[3]
Websiteegmontgroup


HMMMmmm, Founded in Brussels, headquartered in Ontario.

….

TEXT:

This is long but I wanted to archive the information.

TheDebriefing17 @TheDebriefing17

🤔TIMELINES, PATTERNS & THE DEBRIEF

I’m not a lawyer. I’m not an intelligence officer. I’m not a government official. I’m a guy who works in construction who has spent six years reading primary sources, tracking enforcement actions, and building a workbook that now contains more than six hundred and thirty documented events across five countries and more than forty jurisdictions.

I’m not going to ask you to believe me. I’m going to ask you to look at what the government itself has said, in its own documents, on its own letterhead, and decide for yourself whether what you’re watching on the news makes more sense once you’ve seen the blueprint underneath it.

And at the end, I’m going to show you the evidence that cuts against me. Because if I only show you the parts that fit, I’m not an analyst. I’m a salesman.

Here is the case.

EXHIBIT A They built the machine.

After September 11, 2001, the United States government constructed a financial surveillance and enforcement architecture unlike anything in human history. This is not disputed. The agencies exist. The laws were passed. The executive orders are published.

They created the legal authority to trace every dollar moving through the global banking system. Section 314 of the PATRIOT Act gave them the ability to query every financial institution in America about any person, simultaneously. They created the

ability to map networks. Treasury’s Office of Intelligence and Analysis established December 2003 describes its own analysts as using all-source intelligence to, and I’m quoting their own press releases, “map illicit financial networks.” They created the

ability to cut anyone off. Section 311 gives them the power to designate any foreign financial institution as a money laundering concern and sever its access to the U.S. dollar.

They tested it on small banks in Myanmar in 2003.

They tested it on Banco Delta Asia in 2005.

By 2007, the weapon was battle-tested.

They created the ability to freeze assets without warning. The PATRIOT Act amendment to IEEPA allows blocking pending investigation. Freeze first, notify later. Every OFAC action since 2001 traces to this authority. And they connected all of it together.

In September 2004, FinCEN signed a formal memorandum of understanding with every major federal banking regulator the Federal Reserve, FDIC, OCC, OTS, NCUA. The MOU established a standing, bidirectional information pipeline. Law enforcement intelligence could flow to banking supervisors. Examination data could flow back.

The MOU specifically contemplated financial crime issues with and these are the document’s exact words “national systemic impact on the banking industry.”

By 2006, FinCEN was connected to the SEC.

By 2007, OFAC compliance was embedded inside Federal Reserve safety-and-soundness examinations.

By July 2008, the Fed and SEC signed a direct information-sharing agreement covering mortgage markets, credit derivatives, securitization, and counterparty relationships. Eighteen agencies.

Created or reorganized between 2001 and 2008. Covering terrorism, finance, borders, intelligence, military command, WMD, cyber, and cargo.

All built around the same operational concept: find the network, map the network, track the network, isolate the network, dismantle the network.

I didn’t write those documents. They did. And they published them. The machine exists. That is not a theory.

EXHIBIT B The authorities that matter never get turned off.

Let me be precise here, because precision is the whole point. Emergency authorities under IEEPA do get terminated. Zimbabwe’s was ended in March 2024. Côte d’Ivoire’s in September 2016. Liberia’s in November 2015.

Of seventy-seven national emergencies declared under IEEPA since 1977, forty-six are still running as of last year. Thirty-one were shut down. So the authorities are not permanent. Somebody decides.

Now look at which ones nobody ever decides to end.

Narcotics trafficking declared 1995. Still active.

Terrorism declared 2001. Still active. Transnational criminal organizations declared 2011. Still active.

Malicious cyber activity declared 2015. Still active.

Serious human rights abuse and corruption declared December 20, 2017. Renewed every single year since, by two administrations that agreed on nothing else.

Election interference declared 2018. Still active.

Cartels renewed July 16, 2026, eight weeks ago.

Zimbabwe gets released. The network authorities never do. That’s not a coincidence of paperwork. That’s a choice, made annually, in writing, published in the Federal Register, by presidents of both parties who were actively trying to erase each other’s legacies on everything else.

The government currently holds simultaneous emergency authority over every category of threat this workbook tracks. All at once. Right now.

And the machine that uses those authorities FinCEN, OFAC, the entire post-9/11 financial warfare stack has been running continuously for twenty-five years.

EXHIBIT C They let the network operate.

This is the part people struggle with.

Why didn’t they stop it sooner? Because that’s not how intelligence operations work. And we know this because the government has publicly admitted to doing exactly this repeatedly.

ANOM. The FBI secretly built and ran an encrypted phone platform. They let criminals adopt it. For three years, drug traffickers, arms dealers, and money launderers used it thinking it was secure, while every message went straight to law enforcement. When they rolled it up: eight hundred arrests. Sixteen countries. One morning.

Hansa Market. Dutch police secretly seized a darknet marketplace. They didn’t announce it. They ran it for a month. When AlphaBay was publicly taken down, users flooded to Hansa straight into the trap. Thousands of identities harvested.

EncroChat. French and Dutch intelligence penetrated the encrypted phone network used by organized crime across Europe. Monitored it for months. Then rolled it up. Six thousand five hundred arrests.

The crypto enforcement record we track shows an average of eight point seven years between the crime and the prosecution. Not because prosecutors are slow. Because they were watching. Building the map. Letting the blockchain record every transaction. And then prosecuting when the map was complete.

This is the “let it ride” doctrine. You find the network. You don’t kick down the door. You let it operate. Every transaction is a receipt. Every connection reveals another name. Every day the network runs is another day of evidence building itself.

The criminals do the work for you. They think nobody is watching. So they get comfortable. They get sloppy. They bring in their cousins, their bankers, their lawyers. And every single connection goes into the map.

EXHIBIT D Then they activated. Everywhere.

In December 2017, Executive Order 13818 pointed the machine at a new target. Not just terrorists. Not just rogue states. The transnational criminal network class operating through legitimate institutions. Across borders. Across continents. Everywhere the network touches. What we have documented is not five countries acting alone.

It is five sovereign powers the United States, China, Russia, Saudi Arabia, and India who are geopolitical adversaries on nearly every other issue, conducting parallel enforcement operations against the same network class, on overlapping timelines, without opposing each other’s enforcement actions. That is the spine.

But the spine is connected to a body.

Forty-plus jurisdictions are participating in the same enforcement wave. Not because one country told them to. Because the network class operates in all of them, and the enforcement architecture reaches all of them.

INTERPOL’s Operation First Light, this year five thousand eight hundred and eleven arrests, two hundred and ninety-three million dollars intercepted, ninety-seven nations, in one operation running January through April.

And here is the detail nobody reports. INTERPOL has run First Light since 2014. It is funded by China’s Ministry of Public Security. With support from ASEANAPOL, the Gulf Cooperation Council police organization, and Europol.

Read that again. A Chinese-funded, INTERPOL-coordinated operation producing arrests in ninety-seven countries including the United States. Beijing pays for it. Brussels supports it. Riyadh participates. Washington participates.

You are told these countries are on the brink of war with each other. They are co-funding the same police operation.

The extended cooperation arc documented in our workbook three hundred and forty agencies, sixty-five countries, four point four billion dollars in lifetime frozen assets.

And here’s the cleanest single sequence in the entire workbook. One organization Cartel Jalisco Nueva Generación. Eleven separate enforcement actions. Nine different sovereign governments. Seven agencies. Six distinct legal instruments. Eighteen months. Nobody announced a joint task force. Nine sovereigns hit the same organization anyway.

The European Union and United Kingdom issuing joint sanctions against thirty-three Russian FSB cyber targets in a single coordinated action. The United States and United Kingdom publishing joint enforcement guidance for the first time. The United States and Saudi Arabia jointly sanctioning Hezbollah financial networks. Canada and the United States dismantling Punjab-based transnational crime syndicates together. Australia sentencing Sam Gor network leaders to fifteen years.

Twenty-plus bilateral deals signed since April 2025 not trade deals. Enrollment deals. Each one contains enforcement cooperation provisions, anti-money-laundering requirements, intelligence-sharing architecture. Jordan. Vietnam. South Korea. Japan. The UAE. Each country that signs isn’t just making a trade agreement. It’s joining the enforcement infrastructure.

This is not five countries having a coincidence.

The phrase I use is coordinated capacity, not central command. Nobody is running a war room telling forty countries what to do on Tuesday. What is happening is that forty-plus countries independently possess the same enforcement tools, face the same network class embedded in their own institutions, and are activating against that network on timelines that converge because the network itself is global, and the cleanup has to be global to work.

You cannot clean a house by sweeping one room if the dirt tracks through every hallway. You sweep every room. At the same time. Or the dirt just moves.

In the last eighteen months alone:

Six Latin American criminal organizations designated as Foreign Terrorist Organizations with the first financial network sanctions hitting within thirty-five days of designation. A Mexican cartel co-founder sentenced to life with a fifteen billion dollar forfeiture the largest in American history. A trade statute from 1930 used for the first time in ninety-six years with the required commission re-stacked three days before the weapon was fired. Spain’s largest hotel chain pulling thirty-four properties out of Cuba in a single week because sanctions made it impossible to operate. Crypto exchanges having their cloud servers seized.

China running purges through six separate institutional domains the energy sector, the securities regulator, the defense establishment, the Politburo itself, a transnational laundering conglomerate, and finally the national banking regulator. Saudi Arabia arresting two hundred and ninety government officials in two months. India raiding money laundering operations across multiple states. Russia purging its own oligarchs.

And in the spring of 2023 five financial institutions failed in eight weeks. Silvergate. Silicon Valley Bank. Signature. Credit Suisse. First Republic. Every one of them a bridge between the old rails and the new ones. Some paid fines and rebuilt their compliance function and survived. Some didn’t survive. That is not a banking crisis. That is a sorting mechanism.

Every action follows the same construction schedule. Build the legal tool. Staff the institution. Fire the weapon. In that order. Every time.

EXHIBIT E The system was designed to survive its own disruption.

The United States maintains an active, continuously funded, heavily classified continuity of government architecture. Raven Rock Mountain Complex is a strategic battle-command platform their words, not mine undergoing forty-two million dollars in classified modernization right now. The FY2027 budget request for Raven Rock continuity equipment is explicitly classified.

The Emergency Federal Register maintained at a continuity facility in West Virginia ensures the government can continue publishing legally effective orders even if Washington is destroyed. Presidential Emergency Action Documents pre-drafted classified executive orders sitting ready to sign have existed since the Cold War. As of 2017, there were reportedly fifty-six in effect. None has ever been declassified.

And on June 23, 2026 eleven weeks ago the White House published the America-First Resilience Strategy. It calls for distributed command and control across regions of the United States, secure networked communications, and continuity of the economy during disruption by preserving payments, liquidity, and trusted information flows.

Distributed command. Financial continuity. Payments. Liquidity. On the same page. From the White House.

EXHIBIT F The receipts arrive on a schedule.

Every OFAC sanctions notice in the Federal Register contains two dates. The date the action was issued and the date it was published. They are never the same. The action always comes first.

The publication comes days or weeks later. This is printed on every notice. In plain English. The government is telling you on its own letterhead that the enforcement happened before you read about it.

The banks were already notified. The assets were already frozen. The target was already cut off. By the time the Federal Register publishes the notice, the operation is complete. The publication is the government telling the public what it already did.

Everything you read in the news is the last chapter of a story that started years ago.

EXHIBIT G Now here’s what cuts against me.

I told you I’d show you this part.

In the last several weeks, four things happened that my framework did not predict and cannot easily absorb.

One. The beneficial ownership reporting requirement the rule that was going to force every American shell company to disclose who actually owns it was permanently eliminated for domestic companies. That was the single most important transparency rail in the entire architecture. It’s gone. Foreign-owned entities still have to report. American ones don’t.

Two. Enforcement of Russian sanctions evasion went quiet for seventeen months, then resumed. Seventeen months.

Three. Ahead of a summit in Alaska, sanctions were suspended by emergency authority. Not lapsed. Suspended. Deliberately.

Four. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s protective injunction was vacated. The agency that supervises the consumer end of the financial system is being dismantled. [Elizabeth Warren Built the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau — GC]


All four of those happened while the same Treasury Department levied a record anti-money-laundering penalty against UBS, designated Iranian exchanges, and the Justice Department stood up a five-hundred-prosecutor fraud division.

Same government. Same Treasury. Same Secretary. Same week.

There are two honest ways to read that, and I cannot falsify either one. The first reading is that this is a sorting mechanism operating by design. Enforcement expands against the network while supervision of ordinary business contracts. Front door opens, back door closes. Deliberate.

The second reading is simpler. It’s one administration with contradictory policies, doing two incompatible things at once because different people are running different pieces.

I don’t know which is true. Neither does anybody else who’s honest about it. Both survive the evidence.

And Russia is the hardest case in the whole workbook. Russia purges its own oligarchs and receives sanctions accommodation in the same quarter. It is not cleanly activated. It is not cleanly accommodated. It is both, simultaneously, and I have watched the same waiver lapse and reissue twice now on a pattern I can document but cannot explain.

Nine years of tracking. Zero predictions falsified. And I want to be very direct with you about that number.

Zero falsifications is not a victory. It’s a warning. A framework that never gets anything wrong is usually a framework that isn’t specific enough to be wrong. That’s why I write down, in advance, with hard dates, exactly what would prove me wrong. And that’s why I’m reading you the four counter-signals instead of the four confirmations I could have picked instead.

THE QUESTION I’M ASKING YOU TO ANSWER

I’m not asking you to believe that a secret government is running the world from a bunker. I’m not asking you to believe in any conspiracy. I’m asking you to look at what the government itself has documented, published, and funded and ask yourself one question:

Does what you’re watching on the news make more sense now?

Does the timing make more sense? Does the sequencing make more sense? Does a Chinese-funded INTERPOL operation arresting people in ninety-seven countries make more sense? Does nine sovereigns hitting the same cartel in eighteen months make more sense? Does the pattern build the tool, staff the institution, fire the weapon, every single time make more sense?

The machine was built after 9/11. The authorities that matter were stacked and never released. The intelligence was gathered for years while the networks operated. The map was drawn. The deals were made. The cooperators were turned. And then, starting in December 2017 and running every year since, the enforcement wave began.

Not in one country. In all of them.

Not against one target. Against the entire network class.

Not with one tool. With every legal authority accumulated over twenty-five years, stacked on top of each other, all active simultaneously, deployed through a system designed to survive anything.

Here’s what I will not tell you.

I will not tell you it’s finished. I will not tell you the good guys won. I will not tell you there’s a date on the calendar when the curtain comes down and everything is made right in a single morning.

That’s not the shape of this thing. This isn’t a flood. It’s an actuarial table. Slow. Distributed. Only legible in aggregate, and only in hindsight. Six hundred and thirty events don’t feel like anything on any given Tuesday. Stacked on one timeline across nine years and forty jurisdictions, they look like something being built.

And it is still being built. Some floors are going up. One of them just came down.

What you are watching right now, today, on your phone, in your newsfeed is not the investigation.

It’s the receipts.

They spent twenty-five years building a machine that can follow every dollar on earth, freeze any account, cut off any bank, designate any target, seize any asset, survive any disruption, and coordinate across more than forty nations.

And now they’re using it.

Whether they use all of it, on everyone, is the part I’m still watching. So should you.

I am the guy on the couch, and you have been debriefed.

TEXT:

Too many different systems keep moving in the same direction at the same time. The simple version is:

👉Cartel bosses get arrested while major financial/crypto cases hit in the same windows.

👉Authorities often watch networks for years before acting.

👉Old crimes are producing seizures 8–10+ years later.

👉The government stopped routinely selling seized Bitcoin, then later created a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve.

👉Now some seized Bitcoin can become a government asset instead of just being sold off.

👉Money escape routes keep getting closed: mixers, exchanges, shadow banks, payment channels.

👉The financial system itself is becoming more transparent through new rails and reporting rules.

👉Different laws hit different parts of a network: the people, the money, the banks, the property, the facilitators.

👉They are not just arresting people; they are taking down infrastructure that lets networks rebuild.

👉DOJ, Treasury, FinCEN, OFAC, Europol, INTERPOL and foreign governments keep producing overlapping enforcement waves.

The easiest way to explain our whole argument on a show is:

“I’m not saying every event has one hidden commander. I’m saying the same pattern keeps repeating: get the data, map the network, close the money routes, arrest the people, seize the assets, then harden the system so they can’t rebuild.”

And our strongest question to a skeptic is: “If this is all random and unrelated, why do the arrests, seizures, financial restrictions and infrastructure changes keep landing in the same periods and pushing toward the same result?”

I am The Guy on The Couch and you have been Debriefed


TEXT:

Tom Luongo on X:
“Market Report 9-9-2026: Putting the Kids to Bed…
It’s after Labor Day, yes oil is $100/bbl, bond markets continue to fall, and equity markets are confused.
The Old World is changing right before our eyes and the guardians of that Old World are angry because well, it’s their world. The New World is coming.


In order to do that the status quo of global funding of the financial system has to change to reflect the needs and desires of this New World. That means more than just a complete remodeling of the kitchen, it means rewiring and replumbing the house itself.


The bond and currency markets are telling you who is winning this battle. But to see it you have to see the world the way they do, through the carry trades, the sovereign bond spreads, and the cost of maintaining them.
Central banks have the ability to create unlimited money, until someone takes away their credit card.


That is what is happening in Europe and the UK as I type this. The problem is they have subsidiaries all over the world and they have to be knocked out, flipped, or neutered before you can go for the source.


The key to this week is in the EUR/JPY cross and how it relates to the bond market yields you see on your screens.


The old financial system is a powder keg and Scott Bessent just lit the fuse.
As Tom Cruise would say, “Cue the music…” https://t.co/QiQzpbSYYq“

To understand what is going on, you have to know what the Carry Trade is.

What Is Carry Trade? Definition, Example & Risks Explained

A carry trade is any strategy where an investor borrows capital at a lower interest rate to invest in assets with potentially higher returns. It’s best known for its use in foreign exchange (forex or FX) markets, where traders borrow in a low-interest rate currency and invest in higher-yielding assets denominated in another currency.1 Traders can profit from the spread during stable markets, but a market shift can quickly erode their profits.


TEXT:

🚨 BREAKING: In a MASSIVE move, Treasury Sec. Scott Bessent has just GROUNDED Iranian airlines with devastating new sanctions 36 targets were just SEVRED.

Bessent is also launching a pressure campaign for banks to report procurement networks supporting Iran’s aviation industry 🔥

This man is on a CRUSADE against Iran…he’s not letting up! WE LOVE BESSENT 🇺🇸

“Sanctions on companies that continue to support Mahan Air. Let this be a warning to anyone doing business with Iran’s remaining airlines, all of which we sanctioned today: You are at risk of being cut off from the global financial system.”

27 airlines were specifically designated. It’s getting worse for them every single day.

Do not underestimate Scott Bessent, Iran!

They Can’t Win the United Kingdom; So, They’re Dismantling It (12 minutes)

Barbara Boyd: Today, the first ministers of Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland are meeting to plan the breakup of the United Kingdom. They claim they are seeking independence. If you know the crimes committed by the UK in recent history, you might be tempted to think this is a very good thing, but it’s not. It’s part of a secret plan for defeating the United States and Donald Trump in the November midterm elections by creating massive instability and turmoil worldwide through psy-war propaganda, economic manipulation, and proxy wars.

The plan also involves Canada joining the EU. Donald Trump is very aware of this goal and he is shooting back. So, the first question we’ll address is who is being dismantled here? Then we’ll show you more of their secret plan. We’ll end by showing you the Trump card President Trump holds.

Now, last week, the nationalist AFD shocked the EU by an overwhelming victory in provincial elections in Germany. And recent coverage says that the nationalist Maria La Pen is leading the race to replace Francis Emanuel Mcronone. In the UK, recent polls say the nationalist and pro-Brexit reform UK would win if Labor Prime Minister Andy Burnham calls a new election. This is mostly because of the UK’s open borders policy and its horrendous economy. But it’s also because Burnham and the Labor Party are openly betraying Brexit and seeking to rejoin the EU.

Here’s President Trump yesterday in Ireland criticizing the absurd EU arrangement where Scotland gets its oil from Norway at very high prices while leaving one of the world’s richest oil deposits in the North Sea completely untouched.

TRUMP: The capital of European oil was in Aberdine. Aberdine was an unbelievable capital and it could be again. But they said if they open up the North Sea, the UK is going to be rich. If they don’t open up the North Sea, the UK is bankrupt. Thank you everybody.

Barbara Boyd: It’s untouched because Scotland and the EU remain committed to the insane policy of net zero and to the City of London, which makes his money on speculating on oil and other commodities, not by producing them. Now, President Trump is only stating the stark reality. He was also stating what most people in England think, not what their overlords tell them about reality.

The reform poverty has long campaigned against the EU and Labor Party net zero energy policies. The Conservative Party agrees that these policies are bankrupting Britain, which has been in an economic crisis ever since 2008. Knowing that England is lost and its votes outweigh the other three countries of the UK, the EU and Labor Party are trying to change who will determine Europe’s future by moving the center of the empire to Brussels. England and Wales were solidly for leave in the 2016 Brexit referendum. Wales has now joined Scotland and North Ireland in wanting EU membership. Otherwise, the populations of Europe and England are anti-EU, anti-NET zero, and anti- Ukraine war. But England won’t matter if you move the votes that govern Europe’s northern flank into three separate capitals that will only answer to Brussels.

You don’t need to win England if England stops being the unit that decides.

Now, President Trump threw a political bomb at this process in Ireland over the weekend when he suggested that the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland unite again, producing joy in Irish nationalists.

https://static.dw.com/image/79221353_1004.webp

Canada, Ukraine pledge 100-year partnership

But putting the three countries in the EU isn’t even the whole story here. What this is about only becomes clearer if you look at Mark Carney’s lunatic actions over the last week about Ukraine, the EU, and the United States…My friend Tom Lango put this image at the front of his newsletter this week. He’s talking about the 100-year partnership between Canada and Ukraine announced by Mark Carney and Vladimir Zuinski in Alberta on September 10th. It was an in your-face rejection of President Trump’s efforts to bring the Ukraine war to a peaceful end. The partnership agreement states that Ukraine’s path to membership in NATO is irreversible. It pledges to immediately turn Canada into a drone factory for war with Russia.

The Trump administration knows that the Biden administration’s support for Ukraine’s NATO membership is what started the Ukraine war. It is the redest of red lines for the Russians. President Trump rejects it because he knows this. Does Canada have the physical capacity to do what Carney says? In his joint press conference with Zillinski, here’s how Carney described Canada’s present production capabilities. He knows the whole thing is a very bad joke.

And now, as Canada undertakes our largest defense rearmament in 70 years, drones will be at the forefront of our mission to build Canada strong, Canada safe, Canada secure. Mr. President, I have to confess that our armed forces currently have but 2,000 drones in our infantry.

Thinking that Canada can somehow immediately become a massive drone factory from the start and without any United States support left me asking whether Silinski shared his stash with Carney during the visit.

That’s not all Carney is doing. On Thursday, he goes to Europe to explore an associate membership for Canada in the EU, according to the Wall Street Journal. Creating an enemy on the northern border is the clear intent. [ An OBVIOUS enemy, unlike the hidden enemy during the last 250 years -GC] The journal piece talks about Canada laying underwater cables to link Europe and Canada and jointly constructing data centers, cloud storage, and new satellite networks beyond the reach of American tech giants. Carney wants to lay the pipelines Canada needs to redirect gas normally pumped across the US border to his new European allies. As soon as the article was published, Canadians and others push back so hard that Carney now says he’s not fully giving up Canada sovereignty for EU membership, just parts of it.

Obviously, the EU in its present dilapidated and failing state is never going to replace the massive and growing US economy as a viable trade partner. But reality is not what we’re talking about here. All of these moves are moves directed at Donald Trump and the midterms. They might be called militarized fantasies and delusions. Carney’s industry minister, Mélanie Joly, admits it openly. Just listen to her.


[Mélanie Joly has a degree in law from Université de Montréal (2001) & a masters in Public Law from Oxford (UK) NO BUSINESS TRAINING OR EXPERIENCE! — GC ]

Interviewer: I guess what I’m driving at is it’s not a coincidence that you’ve picked some products that are major exports from some US states that will be critical in deciding the balance of power in Washington. Is that fair to say?

Mélanie Joly: We are putting pressure clearly on different states and different people. We don’t want to do that. We don’t want this trade war. We didn’t start it. Um we’ve been at the negotiation table until the very last minute. The prime minister had to make a call at 10:00 on Friday night to leave the negotiating table because of new demands at a time where he thought he had a deal. So this is serious. And so that is why of course we don’t want to do this but we have to do this because it’s a question of protecting jobs and our economy.

Barbara Boyd: The other part of this crazy joint EU Canada anti-US campaign is financial. The European Central Banks raised interest rates last week despite the fact that it’ll hurt their own failing economies. They did it to pressure the Fed to raise rates this week and stall the Trump economy’s momentum. These guys are also behind the run on the bond market despite the fact that there are no weaknesses in US treasuries. Treasury Secretary Bessent laid out the strength of our treasuries and the total lack of substance behind the propaganda about them in an interview with Steve Bannon’s War Room last week. He said it was a bunch of noise. Let’s hear him.

Treasury Secretary Bessent: It’s a bunch of noise and in my career I’ve made money ignoring the noise.

Barbara Boyd: But that noise is designed to create an artificial financial panic to be blamed on Trump.

Now, there’s every reason to believe that this destructive plot was cooked up back in May when Barack Obama, Senator Elise Slotkin, and a host of other prominent Democrats met with Carney to discuss how to stop Trump. And Trump is very aware that the campaign against him is being heavily run by the Democratic Party’s foreign masters. Take for example diesel which is at the center of the energy inflation right now. Twice this weekend Trump said he told Zelenskyy  to stop hitting Russia diesel refineries which are having a massive impact on world supply. Russia is second to the United States in supplying diesel to the world. Here is President Trump last night.

POTUS Trump: The problem I have with Ukraine and Russia is that you know a lot of the diesel comes, the diesel oil comes, and that’s the one where there’s a a big up, [it] comes from Russia and the Russia plants are being hit by Ukraine and I’ve asked President Zelenskyy  not to hit the diesel plants refineries.

Reporter: Is it potentially that Ukraine war could end

POTUS Trump: The diesel is being driven up by the fact that It’s [Diesel is] having a hard time coming out of Russia and that’s a case that hurts the world. We got to stop it [The war].

Barbara Boyd: So Ukraine’s bombs are being used to feed the Democrats quote affordability crisis claims against the president here. In the past few weeks, NATO has also become increasingly provocative in staging false flag security incidents throughout Europe and blaming them on Russia. The false claims include claims that Russia tried to drone attack President Zelenskyy ‘s plane and Boris Johnson’s train traveling through Poland. The reality is that precision proximity strikes near the plane and the train were warning shots from Russia. On the battlefield, Ukraine is losing the war. But President Putin said over the weekend that now the Europeans are contemplating sending European troops to Ukraine. If that happens, it will mean war with Europe. Putin underlined that. But as usual, President Trump has an ace up his sleeve that these idiots can’t even believe would be there.

That’s his relationship with President Xi and Modi, who together with the US and Japan constitute the most productive economies in the world. They are collaborating to prevent war, stabilize the financial system, and build the overwhelmingly productive physical economy, which will vanquish the weak and failing globalists. So when people say this election will determine the fate of the republic, and we’re in a war, they’re not exaggerating. The target in this war is the minds of the US population since the enemy lacks the physical means to really fight. It’s a war in which Tucker Carlson, the doom scrollers, and the financial speculators are the soldiers on the other side. And it’s a war we’re determined to win decisively.


A couple more interesting videos on similar subjects.


Trump’s Treasury Just CUT OFF London’s Offshore Banks – No Sanctions Needed (41 minutes)


Canada Is Now The Cartel’s Front Door Into America (43 minutes)


IRGC IN CANADA: Sam Cooper Reveals a National Security Threat Hiding in Plain Sight (27 minutes)

I wanted to document the hidden war that is now being fought. It is literally a second American Revolution and most American’s are completely oblivious to the fact their future and that of their descendants is now being decided. Our would be future owners are not about to give up without a fight. To those paying attention, it is obvious that Canada has been ‘Activated.’ That is why a City of London Bankster, Mark Carney, was installed in Canada.

KMAG DAILY THREAD 20260909 & Scientific Fraud part 2

Site rules stolen from our good friend PAVACA

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Do not forget to LABEL AI articles video and such.

In talking about scientific fraud, I wanted to provide as much information as possible in the hope that the overwhelming amount might encourage people to stop and think before blindly following the recommendations of a drug salesman aka doctor.

And then more information showed up so I am going to include that.

What I found significant is:


US scientists are significantly more likely to publish fake research than scientists from elsewhere, finds a trawl of officially withdrawn (retracted) studies.


British Medical Journal


Why the USA?

Because we were intentionally targeted. The Brits never gave up their desire to retake the USA.

Despite all the hype about slavery, if you look you can see the fine Italian hand of the Brits and French who were hoping to grab the USA after the ‘colonials’ had exhausted themselves fighting each other. When they were about to make their move the Czar of Russia warned he would attack on behalf of the Americans, thwarting their plans. My reference for that bit of info is long gone but there is this.

Abraham Lincoln and Russia’s Czar Alexander II formed an unusual, but crucial, wartime alliance.

…Russian and American interests quickly coalesced around the prevention of French and British interference in the Civil War. The British decision to recognize the belligerency of the Confederacy by declaring neutrality in May 1861 opened the possibility of recognition of the Confederate States of America as an independent nation. “England will take advantage of the first opportunity to recognize seceded states,” Stoeckl warned, “and France will follow her.”…

Czar Alexander-II

After the American Civil War you had the assassinations of Lincoln (April 14, 1865) and the Czar of Russia ( March 13, 1881) Both can be traced to British influence. In 1913 we had a covert overthrow of our government (Federal Reserve Act) and in 1917 the Russian Revolution facilitated by the same bankers. Meanwhile in the middle of all of this the Fabian Society was founded on 4 January 1884 in London. A decade later in 1895 the Fabian Society founded the London School of Economics which has been training world leaders ever since. John Dewey – “father” of progressive education was a member of the American Fabian Society. And helped establish it in 1895.

At that point the switch was made to a gradual destruction of the USA instead of a frontal assault.

Dumbing Down America by Dr. Samuel Blumenfeld

I am often asked to name those educators responsible for the change in primary reading instruction which has led to the decline of literacy in America. People ask this because by the time they understand the history of the reading problem and of the dumbing down process that has been going on in our public schools for the past forty years, they recognize that all of this is not the result of a series of accidents but of conscious, deliberate decisions made by our educational leaders.

After twenty-five years of research, I can state with complete confidence that the prime mover in all of this was none other than John Dewey who is usually characterized as the father of progressive education. Yet the change of the teaching of reading is probably Dewey’s greatest contribution to the tranformation of American education from an academically oriented process to a social one.

The progressives were a new breed of educator that came on the scene around the turn of the century. These rejected the religion of the Bible and placed their new faith in science, evolution and psychology. Indeed, men like G. Stanley Hall, James McKeen Cattell, Charles Judd, James Earl Russell traveled to Germany to study the new psychology under Prof. Wilhelm Wundt at the University of Leipzig. It was these men who later imposed the new psychology on American education and transformed it permanently from its academic function to one dedicated to behavioral change.

John Dewey got his education in the new psychology under G. Stanley Hall at John Hopkins University. In 1887, at the tender age of 28, Dewey felt that he knew enough about psychology to be able to write a textbook on the subject, entitled fittingly Psychology. In 1894, Dewey was appointed head of the department of philosophy, psychology and education at the University of Chicago which had been established two years earlier by a gift from John D. Rockefeller. In 1896, Dewey created his famous experimental Laboratory School where he could test the effects of the new psychology on real live children.

Dewey’s philosophy had evolved from Hegelian idealism to socialist materialism, and the purpose of the school was to show how education could be changed to produce little socialists and collectivists instead of little capitalists and individualists. It was expected that these little socialists, when they became voting adults, would dutifully change the American economic system into a socialist one.

In order to do so he analyzed the traditional curriculum that sustained the capitalist, individualistic system and found what he believed was the sustaining linchpin — that is, the key element that held the entire system together: high literacy. To Dewey, the greatest obstacle to socialism was the private mind that seeks knowledge in order to exercise its own private judgment and intellectual authority. High literacy gave the individual the means to seek knowledge independently. It gave individuals the means to stand on their own two feet and think for themselves. This was detrimental to the “social spirit” needed to bring about a collectivist society


The rest of that article is even more damning. Our education system was deliberately poisoned by the Fabians.


Antonio Gramsci took over where John Dewey left off. (H/T to the Q-treeper that brought this to the tree.)

The Frankfurt School

In 1924, it was created as part of Frankfort University, the Institute for Social Research. One of its founders was Max Horkheimer and its director since 1930. They will also be part of this group thinkers such as Adorno, Marcuse and Erich Fromm (who will then distance himself from the school).

The Nazi persecution in 1934 resulted in the transfer of the Institute to Columbia University in New York (HorkheimerMarcuse and Fromm were of Jewish origin) and although some of its members would return to Frankfort at the end of the war, others, such as Marcuse, will choose to stay in the USA. In this second stage, it will be its directors Adorno and Habermas, who will be the main representative of the school from 1956.

The Institute for Social Research emerges in a clear Marxist line…

The Frankfurt School adopted an interdisciplinary persepective, adding approaches not only from philosophy but also from sociology, psychology, psychoanalysis, Protestant theology and criticism of culture and art. These are, therefore, studies of “social theory”. The works produced by the Frankfort school are known as “Critical Theory”: it is not a system of doctrines but a particular methodological conception.

Related topics

Critical Theory of the Media

Critical Theory and Education


Antonio Gramsci – The Most Dangerous Intellectual of the Twentieth Century.

Antonio Gramsci – The Most Dangerous Intellectual of the Twentieth Century. Not the most famous. Not the most read. The most dangerous and the most consequential – because he was the one who figured out why the revolution kept failing, and what to do instead. The man who invented the long march through the institutions. Everything that followed — the Frankfurt School, the Fabian Society’s operational model, the WEF formation pipeline, the captured university, the HR department enforcing approved speech — is downstream of what he wrote in a prison cell in Mussolini’s Italy, in code, between 1929 and 1935.

1. His central question: why hasn’t it happened? The working class was supposed to rise. The contradictions of capitalism were supposed to produce the revolution. They hadn’t – not in the West. Gramsci’s answer was precise and devastating: because the ruling class does not maintain power through force alone. It maintains power through cultural hegemony – the control of the ideas, values, and frameworks through which people understand the world. The worker who accepts that the existing order is simply how things are will not revolt, regardless of his material conditions. The revolution requires cultural change first.

2. The instrument was the long march through the institutions. Not the barricade. The school, the university, the media, the judiciary, the civil service, the cultural establishment – every institution through which a civilization transmits its values to the next generation. Capture these, fill them with people who share the counter-hegemonic project, and the cultural assumptions that maintain the existing order gradually dissolve. No barricades. No visible moment of rupture. Just the slow replacement of one cultural hegemony with another.

3. The educational capture was the masterpiece. Control the curriculum and you control the categories of thought available to the next generation. Not by telling them what to conclude – by shaping what questions they think to ask, what they consider obvious and what they consider unthinkable. The generation educated after the long march does not need to be told what to think. It thinks what it was formed to think – and experiences that thinking as its own…

And so we have the destruction of the independent thinking mind. Followed by utter crap science such as Global Warming and 72 genders. I kid you not

MedicineNet — How Many Genders Are There? All 72 Genders List “How many genders are there? Besides male and female, here is a list of all 72 other gender identities that a person may belong to. How can I help my child understand gender?” This is actually written by MDs!

From my point of view, I see this as when the government got into using OUR tax dollars to fund THEIR pet projects.

Manhattan Project Background Information 

Background Information: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) traces its origins to World War II and the Manhattan Project effort to build the first atomic bomb. As the direct descendent of the Manhattan Engineer District, the organization set up by the Army Corps of Engineers to develop and build the bomb, the Department continues to own and manage the Federal properties at most of the major Manhattan Project sites, including Oak Ridge, Tennessee; Hanford, Washington; and Los Alamos, New Mexico.

In a national survey at the turn of the millennium, both journalists and the public ranked the dropping of the atomic bomb and the end of the Second World War as the top news stories of the twentieth century. The Manhattan Project is the story of some of the most renowned scientists of the century combining with industry, the military, and tens of thousands of ordinary Americans working at sites across the country to translate original scientific discoveries into an entirely new kind of weapon. When the existence of this nationwide, secret project was revealed to the American people following the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, most were astounded to learn that such a far-flung, government-run, top-secret operation existed, with physical properties, payroll, and a labor force comparable to the automotive industry. At its peak, the project employed 130,000 workers and, by the end of the war, had spent $2.2 billion.

The legacy of the Manhattan Project is immense. The advent of nuclear weapons not only helped bring an end to the Second World War but ushered in the atomic age and determined how the next war, the Cold War, would be fought. In addition, the Manhattan Project became the organizational model behind the remarkable achievements of American “big science” during the second half of the twentieth century. Without the Manhattan Project, DOE, with its national laboratories — the jewels in the crown of the nation’s science establishment, would not exist as it does in its present form…

Did you catch that?

In addition, the Manhattan Project became the organizational model behind the remarkable achievements of American “big science” during the second half of the twentieth century. Without the Manhattan Project, DOE, with its national laboratories — the jewels in the crown of the nation’s science establishment, would not exist as it does in its present form.

U.S. Department of Energy

A Brief History of Science Funding | Columbia [Univ.] Magazine

(Remember the Frankfurt School moved to Columbia University.)

Universities have come to rely on federal funding to support scientific and medical research. How did we get here?…

Columbia history professor Alma Steingart ’06GS recently provided some answers. From her office in Fayerweather Hall, Steingart, who studies how mathematical thought and computer technology have influenced US electoral politics, explained that government science funding as we know it began in the mid-twentieth century. Before World War II, she said, research money at universities came primarily from donors and private foundations; but during the war, the US Office of Scientific Research and Development (OSRD) began funding research aimed at gaining military advantage. The development of the atomic bomb, known as the Manhattan Project, in which Columbia physicists played a key role, was one major investment.

After the war, Vannevar Bush ’47HON, the former dean of MIT’s engineering school and the head of OSRD, called on the US to fund basic research in the physical and medical sciences in order to ensure American strength and progress. “There was a realization that there was no going back to the previous model,” said Steingart. “The debate was whether federal funds should be used for basic science or applied science. Many scientists felt that developing science around particular goals was limiting, and Bush successfully made the case that it was basic research that led to discoveries and applications that would help the country.” Bush’s advocacy led to the creation of the National Science Foundation (NSF) in 1950.

Then, in 1957, the Soviet Union launched Sputnik, the first artificial satellite. “That was a critical moment,” said Steingart. Within a year, the NSF budget more than tripled, from $40 million to $134 million. Meanwhile, other government agencies, such as the Atomic Energy Commission and the Air Force Scientific Advisory Board, noting that basic science was already being funded, began to direct money toward applied research.

“With the Cold War came the idea that you needed an army of engineers, mathematicians, physicists, and chemists in order to keep pace with the Soviet Union,” Steingart said. “Remember, the NSF doesn’t just fund research. It also funds postdoctoral fellowships and PhD fellowships. And so in the 1960s, the number of PhDs greatly expanded — which meant that universities expanded, and so did their expenditures.”

History of Federal Science Funding – AHA (American Historical Association)

About the Briefing

This handout was created for the AHA’s December 11, 2025, Congressional Briefing on the history of federal science funding. Panelists Melinda Baldwin (Univ. of Maryland), Arthur Daemmrich (Arizona State Univ.), and Bhaven Sampat (Johns Hopkins Univ.) discussed the history of the federal government’s approach toward science in public policy, and how the government has supported and funded scientific research and innovation over time.

1790–1900: Building Practical Science and National Capacity

1790 – Congress passes the first US patent act, encouraging invention and creating a new system of intellectual property.

1803 – Congress funds the Lewis & Clark expedition, which maps the West, identifies plant and animal species, and describes unique geologic formations.

1807 – The US Coast Survey becomes the first civilian scientific agency, supporting navigation and defense.

1843 – Congress funds Samuel Morse’s telegraph demonstration line through a $30,000 appropriation, helping launch US telecommunications.

1846 – Congress establishes the Smithsonian Institution as a public-private partnership. It quickly becomes a center for research and public science and later evolves into a museum complex.

1840s–90s – Scientific associations including the American Association for Advancement of Science (AAAS), the American Chemical Society (ACS), and the Geological Society of American (GSA) are founded, strengthening the nation’s scientific community… [Continues with a long list –GC]

Note during the early years it is CONGRESS funding specific projects. Now that duty is handed off to bureaucrats along with buckets of cash.

American Historical Association Congressional Briefing: History of Federal Science Funding (1 hour)

Sep 24, 2019

“Evidence-based medicine is actually so corrupt as to be useless or harmful,” Marcia Angell wrote in 2009. The statement was less a revelation than something many already knew, but it made waves because of its source. Angell, a medical insider, had spent two decades as the editor-in-chief of the New England Journal of Medicine.

Dr. Jason Fung is also a medical insider who has become wary of scientific research that purports to be “evidence based.” A well-known nephrologist and author, Fung often speaks about Type-2 diabetes reversal and the metabolic effects of intermittent fasting, but in this presentation from Dec. 15, 2018, he turns his focus toward the many ways the foundations of evidence-based medicine have become corrupted by financial conflicts of interest. The first conflicts of interest he highlights pertain to the corruption of doctors. Practicing physicians who accept gifts from Big Pharma are 225-335% more likely to prescribe drugs from the gift-giving company than those who do not, Fung explains.

The corruption of doctors in prestigious universities is even worse, he claims. “There’s a clear correlation: The more prestigious a doctor, the more money they’re getting from the pharmaceutical.” Anecdotally, he says, this means you may be better off seeking medical advice from a family physician than from a Harvard professor; the former probably just accepted a $10 pen from Big Pharma while the latter is on the take for $500,000. “It just is a terrible system,” he says. “Yet, these people are the people that are in the newspaper. They’re the ones that are teaching medical students, are the ones who are teaching the — the dietitians, the pharmacist — everybody.” The most insidious corruption affects the published research on particular drugs. Fung highlights the influence industry can have when it finds a medical journal editor willing to take its money. Another problem arises in the form of industry-funded medical research.

This conflict of interest leads to the selective publication of positive trials, which can skew the science on particular drugs and lead to unnecessary or even dangerous overprescription. Fung notes how statin prescriptions illustrate the scope of this particular problem. “We accept this of drug companies … but the problem is that people die,” Fung says. He later adds: “You can make arguments that sugar is a health food, that opioids are good for you … but it harms patients, and we always have to remember that at the end of the day, this is not why we became doctors. The reason we became doctors was to help people, but we’re not until we kind of set those same rules as everybody else.” (49 minute video)

America’s Main Problem: Corruption

Posted on May 6, 2015 by WashingtonsBlog

Preface: Sadly, in the month since we last posted on this topic, many new examples of corruption have arisen.

The Cop Is On the Take

Government corruption has become rampant:

And it goes on and on. This is the cesspool President Trump waded into in 2017. With that type of bureaucrat in charge of handing out grants, is it any wonder US science is riddled with fraud?

KMAG DAILY THREAD 20260903 & Scientific Fraud part 1

Site rules stolen from our good friend PAVACA

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Do not forget to LABEL AI articles, video and such.

In talking about scientific fraud, I want to start with a comment made by TheseTruths LINK.

Dr. Fauci’s Disturbing CIA Connection Revealed

If you didn’t already have enough reasons to distrust Dr. Anthony Fauci, here’s a new one, and it’s a doozy.

Newly disclosed documents reveal that Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) had a formal institutional partnership with the CIA, one that provided cover for the agency’s biological-threat research. This goes well beyond the previously known off-the-books meetings tied to the Wuhan lab origins controversy. Fauci’s ties to American intelligence run far deeper than anyone outside a handful of investigators realized….


Anthony Fauci – Wikipedia


Anthony Stephen Fauci (born December 24, 1940) is an American physician-scientist and immunologist who served as the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) from 1984 to 2022 and as Chief Medical Advisor to the President from 2021 to 2022. He was one of the world’s most frequently cited scientists across all scientific journals from 1983 to 2002.

In 1984 Ronald Reagan was re-elected and his VP was George H. W. Bush of the CIA.

Since the FDA, USDA, EPA and other bureaucracies use ‘The Science ™‘ to validate their regulations I wanted to look at the history of the destruction of science over the last century.

1964The Problem-Solving Method They Removed From Every Textbook


In 1964, Richard Feynman was the only person on California’s textbook commission who actually read the textbooks. What he found should have ended careers — publishers sending blank books that still received ratings, first-grade science texts teaching children nothing but empty vocabulary, and an entire system designed to reward memorization over real understanding.This video breaks down Feynman’s forgotten problem-solving framework — the same approach he used to win the Nobel Prize, expose broken education systems from California to Brazil, and coin the term “Cargo Cult Science” in his legendary 1974 Caltech commencement speech.You’ll learn his 12 favorite problems technique (explained by mathematician Gian-Carlo Rota), why estimating before calculating is the single most underrated thinking skill, and how to tell the difference between someone who memorized the answer and someone who actually understands the problem — a distinction that matters more now than ever, because AI can memorize everything, but it can’t think from scratch.

If you’ve ever felt out of step with the system — at school, at work, in a meeting where nobody could answer the question that wasn’t on the slides — this video explains why. And it gives you a method to fix it tonight.🔹 Drop your own “label instead of an explanation” moment in the comments.——————————————————📖

Sources & Further Reading:

“Surely You’re Joking, Mr. Feynman!” — Chapters: “Judging Books by Their Covers” & “O Americano, Outra Vez!” (W.W. Norton, 1985) “What is Science?” — Feynman’s Address to the National Science Teachers Association, 1966 “Cargo Cult Science” — Caltech Commencement Address, 1974 “Genius: The Life and Science of Richard Feynman” — James Gleick (Pantheon, 1992) Gian-Carlo Rota — “Ten Lessons I Wish I Had Been Taught,” Lecture, 1996

I cut the most useful part of Feynman’s method out of this video — it needed pages, not minutes. It’s the test he used to check whether he actually understood something or had only learned its name. Three questions, about 90 seconds, and it fails almost everything most people think they know. That, plus the full 12 Favorite Problems system, is in The Feynman Field Guide to Clear Thinking: https://feynmanarchives.com/

Disclaimer: This video is for educational and informational purposes only. The views expressed are based on publicly available historical sources and the creator’s interpretation. This content does not constitute professional advice in education, career development, or any other field. Always conduct your own research and consult qualified professionals for specific decisions.


Part of the Transcript:

16:37

The reason you always felt out of step with the system is because the system was designed to produce the opposite of you. It produces people who follow the process perfectly right up until reality changes and then they freeze. You’ve seen it in hiring. The candidate with the perfect resume who can’t answer a simple what-if question in the interview. You’ve seen it in leadership. The director who can quote the strategy deck word for word but goes blank when a client throws a curveball.

The system trained them to memorize the runway, not to fly the plane.

Feynman left behind the method the system tried to bury.

— 12 problems always alive.

— Strip every claim down to what you can check.

— Estimate before you calculate.

— Test your understanding by rephrasing the question.

— If you can’t answer it in different words, you never understood it in the first place.

That’s it. That’s what they removed. And now you have it back.

But Feynman’s war on the textbooks exposed something bigger than bad education. He found the same pattern in science, in hiring, in way entire industries collapse when nobody inside them can think from scratch. And when he called it out by name, in front of the most powerful people in the room, they didn’t thank him. [Managed decline anyone? -GC]

….

ROBERT MAXWELL

Which specific U.S. school textbook companies were owned by Robert Maxwell or his companies?

The Deal That Reshaped the Market: Maxwell Buys Macmillan and Joins McGraw‑Hill

Robert Maxwell purchased Macmillan Inc. in the late 1980s, a transaction that positioned him as owner of one of the United States’ largest textbook publishers at the time; reporting from the period documents the acquisition and the creation of a joint venture combining Macmillan’s school publishing units with McGraw‑Hill’s to form Macmillan/McGraw‑Hill School Publishing Co. in 1989, a company that became the second‑largest U.S. textbook publisher [1] [2]. The joint venture pooled Macmillan imprints like Glencoe and units such as Science Research Associates (SRA) into a single school publishing operation, reflecting Maxwell’s strategy of consolidating academic and educational assets under his Maxwell Communication Corporation umbrella, and contemporary sources note that McGraw‑Hill assumed sole ownership of the joint operation by 1993 after Maxwell’s death, indicating the Maxwell family no longer retained operational control

𝗥𝗼𝗯𝗲𝗿𝘁 𝗠𝗮𝘅𝘄𝗲𝗹𝗹, [𝗚𝗵𝗶𝘀𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗠𝗮𝘅𝘄𝗲𝗹𝗹’𝘀 𝗗𝗮𝗱] 𝘁𝗼𝗼𝗸 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗹 𝗼𝗳 𝗽𝗲𝗲𝗿 𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗶𝗲𝘄𝗲𝗱 𝘀𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲, 𝗺𝗼𝗻𝗲𝘁𝗶𝘇𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝘁 AND DESTROYED IT.

Eye of the Storm Ep. 138 (Badlands)

1:04:20: They show a clip from The Joe Rogan Experience (3 min clip)

The guy talking is Eric Weinstein: The Mathematician turned Physicist & Economist (It is an interesting article about Dr Weinstein.)

PARTIAL TRANSCRIPT

ERIC: … Maxwell figured out how to DESTROY SCIENCE and MAKE A FORTUNE. So he diluted the quality of the editorship of the leading journals. This was a high quality informal enterprise. Now most of the destruction of science in terms of how high quality it used to be, has taken place relatively recently. POST ROBERT MAXWELL. Because we now have an enormous number of journals staffed by people who can’t spot publication cartels, where we agree to cite each others work and we agree to publish stuff, you know Pay for Play. ALL the nonsense you see with irreproducible research…

The peer review thing got woven in so that people think that the scientific method and peer review ARE THE SAME THING. Where ONE IS THE UNWANTED INFECTION FROM THE BIOLOGICAL BIOMEDICAL UNIVERSE, which had peer review much longer than anything else…”

From the article:

One of these ideas is what he calls👉the DISC (Distributed Idea Suppression Complex) which explains how disruptive and innovative ideas that challenge the status quo are suppressed.👈 Keeping institutions safe from individuals who create change….

Pergamon Press – Wikipedia

Pergamon Press was an Oxford-based publishing house, founded by Paul Rosbaud and Robert Maxwell, that published scientific and medical books and journals. Originally called Butterworth-Springer, it is now an imprint of Elsevier.

History

The core company, Butterworth-Springer, started in 1948 to bring the “Springer know-how and techniques of aggressive publishing in science”[1] to Britain. Paul Rosbaud was the man with the knowledge. When Maxwell acquired the company in 1951, Rosbaud held a one-quarter share.[1] They changed the house name to Pergamon Press, using a logo that was a reproduction of a Greek coin from Pergamon. Maxwell and Rosbaud worked together growing the company until May 1956, when, according to Joe Haines, Rosbaud was sacked….


This illustrates the larg problem we now have.


Barkerjim  May 25, 2024 07:38

So much for “peer review” — Wiley shuts down 19 science journals and retracts 11,000 gobbledygook papers

By Jo Nova

Proving that unpaid anonymous review is worth every cent, the 217 year old Wiley science publisher “peer reviewed” 11,300 papers that were fake, and didn’t even notice. It’s not just a scam, it’s an industry. Naked “gobbledygook sandwiches” got past peer review, and the expert reviewers didn’t so much as blink.

Big Government and Big Money has captured science and strangled it. The more money they pour in, the worse it gets. John Wiley and Sons is a US $2 billion dollar machine, but they got used by criminal gangs to launder fake “science” as something real.

Things are so bad, fake scientists pay professional cheating services who use AI to create papers and torture the words so they look “original”. Thus a paper on ‘breast cancer’ becomes a discovery about “bosom peril” and a ‘naïve Bayes’ classifier became a ‘gullible Bayes’. An ant colony was labeled an ‘underground creepy crawly state’.

And what do we make of the flag to clamor ratio? Well, old fashioned scientists might call it ‘signal to noise’. The nonsense never ends….


Bring Them All To Justice – Market Ticker

Yes, that’s a strong headline.

But this is not really about the recent virus; it goes back a very long time.  Scientific fraud — not accident, not error,  intentional misrepresentation — has been all over medicine and specifically pharmaceutical trials for decades.

Cuppa

November 2020 — External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results

URL = Researchgate Pub

[I get access denied due to rapid clicks…?? So here is the archived version LINK – GC]

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Here are ‘Peer-Reviewed” studies and comments from medical journal editors. My list is so long I am going to cut it in half and put the rest in my next article. However since this type of information has a tendency to disappear, I want it documented.

August 30, 2005 — Why Most Published Research Findings Are False

Source: BMJ-British Medical Journal

US scientists are significantly more likely to publish fake research than scientists from elsewhere, finds a trawl of officially withdrawn (retracted) studies. Fraudsters are also more likely to be “repeat offenders,” the study shows.

Summary

There is increasing concern that most current published research findings are false.The probability that a research claim is true may depend on study power and bias, the number of other studies on the same question, and, importantly, the ratio of true to no relationships among the relationships probed in each scientific field. In this framework, a research finding is less likely to be true when the studies conducted in a field are smaller; when effect sizes are smaller; when there is a greater number and lesser preselection of tested relationships; where there is greater flexibility in designs, definitions, outcomes, and analytical modes; when there is greater financial and other interest and prejudice; and when more teams are involved in a scientific field in chase of statistical significance. Simulations show that for most study designs and settings, it is more likely for a research claim to be false than true. Moreover, for many current scientific fields, claimed research findings may often be simply accurate measures of the prevailing bias…..


May 29, 2009How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data

ABSTRACT

….A pooled weighted average of 1.97% (N = 7, 95%CI: 0.86–4.45) of scientists admitted to have fabricated, falsified or modified dataor results at least once –a serious form of misconduct by any standard– and up to 33.7% admitted other questionable research practices. In surveys asking about the behaviour of colleagues, admission rates were 14.12%< (N = 12, 95% CI: 9.91–19.72) for falsification, and up to 72% for other questionable research practices. Meta-regression showed that self reports surveys, surveys using the words “falsification” or “fabrication”, and mailed surveys yielded lower percentages of misconduct. When these factors were controlled for, misconduct was reported more frequently by medical/pharmacological researchers than others.

Considering that these surveys ask sensitive questions and have other limitations, it appears likely that this is a conservative estimate of the true prevalence of scientific misconduct.


March 20, 2012 — Former NEJM editors on the corruption of American medicine (NY Times) from https://participatorymedicine.org/

As we said in December, an e-patient essential is sorting out what writings to trust, whether we find them online or in print. There’s an important update on this in the New York Times today, an interview with Marcia Angell MD, an author we’ve quoted before, and her husband Dr. Arnold Relman – both long-time editors of one of the world’s top journals, the New England Journal of Medicine. It contains some eye-poppers.

In 2009, as I was just starting to get educated about healthcare, I posted A Quote I Won’t Soon Forget, which began:

Marcia Angell MD is a well-known, respected physician, long-time editor of NEJM. So it was a bit of a shock today when Amy Romano, blogger for Lamaze International, sent me this quote:

It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.

It was from Dr. Angell’s review Drug Companies & Doctors: A Story of Corruption. It continued:

Dana Blankenhorn of the ZDNet health blog called it “a bombshell.” I couldn’t agree more. And I must say, with all the smart people in this community, why on earth haven’t we heard more about this??

And how on earth are we supposed to be empowered participatory patients if we can’t trust the world’s leading journal?

It echoed Richard Smith, 25 year editor of another top-tier journal (the British Medical Journal), in the first issue of our Journal of Participatory Medicine:

most of what appears in peer-reviewed journals is scientifically weak.

This is no small issue in the life of an engaged patient. e-Patients who bring googled articles to their office visits are often lambasted or subjected to eye-rolls by clinicians who say that we should only trust academic medical journals. But can we trust them??

We got a rude update on why published science is shaky in our January 2011 post The Decline Effectmost published studies are never replicated by another lab! That’s absurd – heck, in high school I couldn’t get a science experiment passed if it wasn’t reproducible, but our journals do that??….

April 2015 — JAMA Intern Med Research Misconduct Identified by the US Food and Drug Administration: Out of Sight, Out of Mind

Every year, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) inspects several hundred clinical sites performing biomedical research on human participants and occasionally finds evidence of substantial departures from good clinical practice and research misconduct. However, the FDA has no systematic method of communicating these findings to the scientific community, leaving open the possibility that research misconduct detected by a government agency goes unremarked in the peer-reviewed literature….

Objectives

To identify published clinical trials in which an FDA inspection found significant evidence of objectionable conditions or practices, to describe violations, and to determine whether the violations are mentioned in the peer-reviewed literature.

Design and Setting

Cross-sectional analysis of publicly available documents, dated from January 1, 1998, to September 30, 2013, describing FDA inspections of clinical trial sites in which significant evidence of objectionable conditions or practices was found.

Results: Fifty-seven published clinical trials were identified for which an FDA inspection of a trial site had found significant evidence of 1 or more of the following problems:

falsification or submission of false information, 22 trials (39%);

problems with adverse events reporting, 14 trials (25%);

protocol violations, 42 trials (74%);

inadequate or inaccurate recordkeeping, 35 trials (61%);

failure to protect the safety of patients and/or issues with oversight or informed consent, 30 trials (53%);

and violations not otherwise categorized, 20 trials (35%).

Only 3 of the 78 publications (4%) that resulted from trials in which the FDA found significant violations mentioned the objectionable conditions or practices found during the inspection. No corrections, retractions, expressions of concern, or other comments acknowledging the key issues identified by the inspection were subsequently published.

Conclusions and Relevance

When the FDA finds significant departures from good clinical practice, those findings are seldom reflected in the peer-reviewed literature, even when there is evidence of data fabrication or other forms of research misconduct.

A decade ago, I wrote in another blog “Blogs are now performing the important tasks of scrutinizing papers and conclusions often finding gross mistakes.” That is probably one of the reasons we were shut up during Covid.


June 1, 2015 Editors In Chief of World’s Most Prestigious Medical Journals: “Much of the Scientific Literature, Perhaps HALF, May Simply Be Untrue”

… “It Is Simply No Longer Possible To Believe Much of the Clinical Research That Is Published”

Posted on June 1, 2015 by WashingtonsBlog

Corruption Is Destroying Basic Science

“Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine are the two most prestigious medical journals in the world.

It is therefore striking that their chief editors have both publicly written that corruption is undermining science.

The editor in chief of Lancet, Richard Horton, wrote:

*http://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lancet/PIIS0140-6736(15)60696-1.pdf

Much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness. As one participant put it, “poor methods get results”. The Academy of Medical Sciences, Medical Research Council, and Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council have now put their reputational weight behind an investigation into these questionable research practices. The apparent endemicity [i.e. pervasiveness within the scientific culture] of bad research behaviour is alarming. In their quest for telling a compelling story, scientists too often sculpt data to fit their preferred theory of the world. Or they retrofit hypotheses to fit their data. Journal editors deserve their fair share of criticism too. We aid and abet the worst behaviours. Our acquiescence to the impact factor fuels an unhealthy competition to win a place in a select few journals. Our love of “significance” pollutes the literature with many a statistical fairy-tale….

Similarly, the editor in chief of the New England Journal of Medicine, Dr. Marcia Angell, wrote in 2009:

“We can no longer trust Drug company clinical trials”

(Original Article I quote below has vanished… imagine that!)

….It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine….

In fact, in October 2017, Angell went further – she published an article in the New York Review of books entitled, Drug Companies and Doctors: A Story of Corruption.’ 

“Drug Companies & Doctors: A Story of Corruption”

Date Published:

Jan 14, 2009 07:00 PM

Author: Marcia Angell

Source: New York Review of Books

This article in The New York Review of Books, by Marcia  Angell, details the growing concern over the colonization of the medical profession by pharmaceutical companies

The NY Review article is paywalled. Archived Version can be read.

That article points to this:

Our Daily Meds: How the Pharmaceutical Companies Transformed Themselves into Slick Marketing Machines and Hooked the Nation on Prescription Drugs

Another article similar to the NY Review article

Marcia AngellDrug Co & DoctorsA Story of Corruption

I am going to stop here and continue next week so you focus on reading the last 3 articles. They are DAMNING especially since Angell, spent two decades as the editor-in-chief of the New England Journal of Medicine.

KMAG DAILY THREAD 20260902 & The Attack on Red Meat

Site rules stolen from our good friend PAVACA

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.


Do not forget to LABEL AI articles video and such.


Of interest: Israel Planted a 2,000-Year-Old Seed From an Extinct Date Palm Variety


.

Why isn’t our grant money going into cloning these very valuable trees instead of money going to idiotic stuff like, Shrimp on a treadmill [$1.3 million], Robotic squirrel vs. rattlesnakes [$390,000] and a Smart toilet / “analprint” camera system [$7 million] LINK Cancel those three and I would think there is plenty of money for cloning.

How to Grow Medjool Dates From Seed “..date palms are typically propagated by cuttings. aka cloning.

I found these interesting articles but nothing about cloning these trees.

Methuselah Is Doing Very Well: This Extinct Tree from Time of Jesus was Revived from a 2,000-Year-Old Seed

Scientists Grow Trees From 2,000-Year-Old Seeds Found In Dead Sea Scroll Caves

A children’s book about these trees is available. The Miracle Seed by Martin Lemelman; Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdman’s Books for Young Readers (c) 2023; ISBN 9780802-855909; 71 pages; $18.99 on Amazon

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>


Since I think this is an important point, I want to continue the discussion about Sama Hoole’s tweet. It is a tweet about colon cancer and establishment lies. After I finished uploading this article I realized these has other major ramifications aside from weakening the serf class. Does Vegan/Vegetarian brain shrinkage and malnutrition contribute to left wing hysteria and lack of critical thinking skills especially in the women?


I made a one liner explanation to each part in this comment for Scott. Scott responded but I did not see the responses until the next day. Hence this article since my response is a bit long.

……

Scott, I though he was clear.

Sama Hoole @SamaHoole

RFK Jr. pointed at the colon cancer figures in young adults this week, and within about four hours the response had arranged itself into the same two instructions we have been issued since 1982. Eat less red meat. Eat more fibre.

Translation: we are getting the same crappy advice as always.

Red meat has a scheduling problem. American beef consumption peaked in 1976 and has fallen by roughly a third since. The generation now being diagnosed at thirty-five ate less of it than any generation of the last century, while early-onset colorectal cancer doubled in two decades. A suspect who has been leaving town for fifty years, still in the dock, still not asked to explain himself.

Translation: It can not be beef because beef consumption has dropped since 1976.

Fibre did worse. They ran it properly, twice, in two countries, thousands of people, years of wheat bran and extra fruit and veg, watching for polyps. The polyps came back at exactly the same rate as in the people eating none of it. Nobody withdrew the advice. Nobody ever does.

Translation: Fibre makes ZERO difference and they have the studies to prove it.

Then last year a team sequenced 981 tumours from eleven countries. Certain E. coli strains make 

a toxin called colibactin, which snaps both strands of DNA and leaves a signature so distinctive you can read it off a tumour decades later. In patients diagnosed under forty it turns up 3.3 times more often than in patients over seventy.

Translation: They found the culprit, a toxin called colibactin that snaps strands of DNA.

And they could date it. The mutations were laid down in the first ten years of life. So the damage that produces a tumour at thirty-five was done before that person was old enough to buy anything, choose anything or cook anything. Whatever they had for lunch last Tuesday is not in the frame and never was. Colibactin is also pathetically short lived. It only works on contact. The bacterium has to be physically pressed against the colon lining, and it cannot get there, because the inner mucus layer is a sterile exclusion zone that holds the entire microbiome at arm’s length. Something has to take that barrier down.

Translation: The toxin did it’s dirty work in the 1st ten years of life. However there is a mucus lining that SHOULD prevent the toxin from getting next to the colon lining.

Carboxymethylcellulose. Polysorbate 80. Industrial detergents, filed under emulsifiers, because emulsifier sounds like something a chef does. They are in the ice cream, the bread, the sauces, the protein bars and most of what gets handed to a child. Feed carboxymethylcellulose to healthy adults under supervision and you can watch their bacteria move in and take up residence against the wall. 

The toxin is thousands of years old. The barrier it has to get through is the thing that changed, it is on the label, and everybody in this argument is busy discussing a steak.

Translation: It is Polysorbate 80, a detergent/emulsifier, a common ingredient in processed food that lets the toxin get pass the mucus barrier and cause cancer.

AND it is NOT being banned from food.

…..


In one reply to my comment Scott said:

I had no idea what that meant. If the suspected cause of colorectal cancer is beef, and beef consumption has been dropping for 50 years (leaving town), the rest of it I’m not sure about.

If beef is ‘in the dock’, that seems like a court/trial reference, so beef is on trial, but not asked to explain himself?

What is there for beef (the suspect) to explain, if beef isn’t the cause of colorectal cancer?

It’s just confusing (to me!).

I did not realize that Scott was unaware of the constant targeting of beef by the Cabal.

A couple decades ago the Fake News was screaming Red Meat causes cancer!! Then they said Cow Farts (belches) cause Global Warming!!!

June 28, 2019 Red Meat & Cancer—Again! Will It Ever Stop?

The media and blogosphere are abuzz with the latest report from the WHO, which classified cured and processed meats as carcinogens and put them in the same category as asbestos, alcohol, arsenic, and tobacco. But what does the research really tell us about the link between red meat and cancer?

Well, here we go again. Each year, like clockwork, the conventional medical establishment mounts an attack against red meat.

For decades, we were told not to eat it because of the cholesterol and saturated fat it contains. When that argument became less convincing, a new one was offered: we shouldn’t eat red meat because it increases production of a compound called TMAO, which causes heart attacks.

Now we’re being told not to eat red meat—and especially cured and processed meat—because it will give us cancer. In a recent report, the World Health Organization (WHO) ranked bacon, sausage, and other cured and processed meats as “group 1 carcinogens,” which puts them in the same category as tobacco, asbestos, alcohol, and arsenic. It also placed fresh red meat in the “group 2A” category, which suggests that it is “probably carcinogenic” to humans.

Of course, this isn’t a new argument; it’s been around for at least 40 years. As far back as 1975, scientists speculated that the consumption of animal products was linked to cancer. (1)


Note that it is again the magic 1970s decade.


So WHY the targeting? Because a large, Strong, SMART serf class is NOT what the Globalists want for their New World Order.


Vegetarians have smaller brains

There is overwhelming evidence that we can not be a vegetarian species. In 1972 the publication of two independent investigations confirmed this.[1] [2] They concerned fats. About half our brain and nervous system is composed of complicated, long-chain, fatty acids. These are also used in the walls of our blood vessels. Without them we cannot develop normally. These fatty acids do not occur in plants, although fatty acids in a simpler form do. This is where plant-eating herbivores come in. Over the year, the herbivores convert the simple fatty acids found in grasses and seeds into intermediate, more complicated forms. By eating the herbivores we can convert their stores of these fatty acids into the ones we need…

[long discussion]

Using tests and brain scans on community-dwelling volunteers aged 61 to 87 years without cognitive impairment at enrolment, they measured the size of the participants’ brains. When the volunteers were retested five years later the scientists found those with the lowest levels of vitamin B12 intake were the most likely to have brain shrinkage. Not surprisingly, vegans who eschew all foods of animal origin, suffered the most brain shrinkage. This confirms earlier research showing a link between brain atrophy and low levels of B12.

Vegans are the most likely to be deficient because the best sources of the vitamin are meat, particularly liver, milk and fish.

Confirmation of this was provided the following year by another study by the Oxford Project to Investigate Memory and Ageing, the Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, UK.[19] Noting that vitamin B-12 deficiency is often associated with cognitive deficits, they reviewed evidence that cognition in the elderly may also be adversely affected at concentrations of vitamin B-12 above the traditional cutoffs for deficiency. Their suggestion is that the elderly in particular should be encouraged to maintain a good, rather than just an adequate, vitamin B-12 status by dietary means.

Conclusion

It is obvious that we need to be eating more, not less, meat and animal-sourced foods.

If vegetarians — and vegans in particular — berate you for ‘murdering’ and eating animals, please be kind to them. They are almost certainly suffering from self-inflicted brain atrophy, and have little recognition of both the damage they are doing to themselves and the harm that are doing to others who follow their advice.

References

[1]. Crawford M, Crawford S. The Food We Eat Today. Spearman, London, 1972.

[2]. Leopold AC, Ardrey R. Toxic Substances in Plants and Food Habits of Early Man. Science 1972; 176(34): 512-4.

[3]. McHenry HM. How big were early hominids? Evol Anthropol 1992; 1: 15-20.

[4]. Stefansson V. The fat of the land. MacMillan, New York, 1960. 15-39.

[5]. Sinclair AJ. Long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids in mammalian brain. Proc Nutr Soc 1975; 34: 287-91.

[6]. Crawford MA, Cunnane SC, Harbige LS. A new theory of evolution: quantum theory. In: Sinclair A, Gibson R, eds. Essential fatty acids and eicosanoids. American Oil Chemists Society, Champlaign, Ill, 1992. 87-95.

[7]. Leonard WR, Robertson ML. Evolutionary perspectives on human nutrition: the influence of brain and body size on diet and metabolism. Am J Human Biol 1994; 6: 77-88.

[8]. Aiello LC, Wheeler P. The expensive tissue hypothesis: the brain and the digestive system in human and primate evolution. Current Anthropology, 1995; 36: 199-221.

[9]. Milton K. Primate diets and gut morphology: implications for hominid evolution. In: Food and Evolution: Toward a Theory of Food Habits, eds. Harris M, Ross EB; Temple University Press, Philadelphia, 1987, 93-115.

[10]. Martin RD, et al. Gastrointestinal allometry in primates and other mammals. In: Size and Scaling in Primate Biology. Jungers WL ed., Plenum Press, New York, 1985, 61-89.

[11]. Ruff CB, Trinkaus E, Holliday TW. Body mass and encephalization in Pleistocene Homo. Nature 1997; 387: 173-176.

[12]. Eaton, S Boyd, Eaton, Stanley B III. Evolution, diet and health. Presented in association with the scientific session, Origins and Evolution of Human Diet. 14th International Congress of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences, Williamsburg, Virginia, 1998.

[13]. Callender ST, Spray GH. Latent pernicious anaemia. Br J Haematol 1962; 8: 230.

[14]. Halstead JA, et al. Serum and tissue concentration of vitamin B 12 in certain pathologic states. N Eng J Med 1959; 260: 575.

[15]. Herbert V. Vitamin B-12: plant sources, requirements and assay. Am J Clin Nutr 1988; 48: 852.

[16]. Miller DR, et al. Vitamin B-12 status in a macrobiotic community. Am J Clin Nutr 1991; 53: 524-9.

[17]. Chanarin I, O’Shea AM, Malkowska V, Rinsler MG. Megaloblastic anaemia in a vegetarian Indian community. Lancet 1985; ii: 1168.

[18] Vogiatzoglou A, et al. Vitamin B12 status and rate of brain volume loss in community-dwelling elderly. Neurology 2008; 71(11): 826-32

[19] Smith AD, Refsum H. Vitamin B-12 and cognition in the elderly. Am J Clin Nutr 2009; 89: 707S-11S.

Veganism May Shrink the Brain

[They are talking about adults who gave up eating meat, not babies or children. — GC]

Well, this explains a lot. (Just kidding.) There is a theory that eating meat is one reason why human beings developed our bigger brains. Now, credence might be added to that hypothesis with a study that shows non meat eating might actually shrink the brain. 

 From the story: [Now removed of course -GC]

Scientists have discovered that going veggie could be bad for your brain-with those on a meat-free diet six times more likely to suffer brain shrinkage.

Vegans and vegetarians are the most likely to be deficient because the best sources of the vitamin are meat, particularly liver, milk and fish. Vitamin B12 deficiency can also cause anaemia and inflammation of the nervous system. Yeast extracts are one of the few vegetarian foods which provide good levels of the vitamin.

The link was discovered by Oxford University scientists who used memory tests, physical checks and brain scans to examine 107 people between the ages of 61 and 87.

When the volunteers were retested five years later the medics found those with the lowest levels of vitamin B12 were also the most likely to have brain shrinkage. It confirms earlier research showing a link between brain atrophy and low levels of B12.

Although, as the story states, supplements are available, according to The Vegetarian Society, they have not been proved to be effective...

US babies mysteriously shrinking

Birthweights in the US are falling but no one knows why, according to a study of 36.8 million infants born between 1990 and 2005.

A 52-gram drop in the weight of full-term singletons – from an average of 3.441 to 3.389 kilograms – has left Emily Oken’s team at Harvard Medical School scratching their heads. It can’t be accounted for by an increase in caesarean sections or induced labours, which shorten gestation. What’s more, women in the US now smoke less and gain more weight during pregnancy, which should make babies heavier. Oken suggests that unmeasured factors, such as diet or exercise, could explain why babies are being born lighter.

“For your average baby, 50 grams probably makes no difference at all,” she stresses. But those born substantially lighter could be at increased risk of heart disease and diabetes later in life.

Journal reference: Obstetrics & Gynecology, DOI: 10.1097/aog.0b013e3181cbd5f5


8/29/2009 Red meat consumption: An overview of the risks and benefits

Abstract

Red meat is long established as an important dietary source of protein and essential nutrients including iron, zinc and vitamin B12, yet recent reports that its consumption may increase the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and colon cancer have led to a negative perception of the role of red meat in health. The aim of this paper is to review existing literature for both the risks and benefits of red meat consumption, focusing on case–control and prospective studies. Despite many studies reporting an association between red meat and the risk of CVD and colon cancer, several methodological limitations and inconsistencies were identified which may impact on the validity of their findings.

Overall, there is no strong evidence to support the recent conclusion from the World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) report that red meat has a convincing role to play in colon cancer. [Well Surprise, Surprise! –GC]

A substantial amount of evidence supports the role of lean red meat as a positive moderator of lipid profiles with recent studies identifying it as a dietary source of the anti-inflammatory long chain (LC) n−3 PUFAs and conjugated linoleic acid (CLA). In conclusion, moderate consumption of lean red meat as part of a balanced diet is unlikely to increase risk for CVD or colon cancer, but may positively influence nutrient intakes and fatty acid profiles, thereby impacting positively on long-term health.


Role of red meat in the diet for children and adolescents.

In 1968, Dobbing (1) suggested that there were vulnerable periods of neurological development that coincided with times of maximal brain growth. These periods begin during foetal development at around the 25th week of gestation and continue for the first two years of postnatal life. Nutrient deficiencies occurring during these vulnerable periods may well have an impact upon brain growth and, hence, neurological and psychomotor development. (1)

These nutrient deficits have subsequently been shown to result in more functional deficiencies rather than physical abnormalities. Not only is optimal nutrition essential for achieving optimal physical and psychosocial development, but it also appears to have significant disease implications for later in adult life. Barker and his epidemiology group in the UK proposed that not only intrauterine malnutrition, but also poor weight gain in the first year of life, was associated with an increased incidence of cardiovascular disease (particularly in adults aged >50 years), hypertension and glucose intolerance during adulthood. (2) Their retrospective, epidemiological report has been supported by several studies on the Netherlands famine during World War II…

The Incredible Shrinking Human

What ten thousand years of bones have been trying to tell us

Consider, for a moment, the humble skeleton.

It cannot be lobbied. It does not receive research grants from the soy industry. It has never appeared on a podcast to promote its new book about plant-based longevity. It just sits there, in its glass case in its museum, holding the shape of a life, and telling you exactly what that life was made of.

Bone is a biological ledger. Every year of growth leaves a record: how much protein was available, how well the body processed it, whether the raw materials were there in sufficient quantity and quality to build a full human being. You cannot retrospectively alter the record. You cannot claim the skeleton would have been taller if only the methodology had been different. The numbers are in the ground. They have been in the ground for thousands of years. And they do not care about your dietary politics.

What follows is their evidence….

Given the continual targeting of red meat over the last five decades the following is important. THE ELITE KNOW THE IMPORTANCE OF MEAT!

Medieval English males averaged around 5’5″ to 5’7″. Subsisting primarily on pottage, bread, and whatever could be scavenged from the margins of a feudal food system that had no particular interest in their wellbeing, the peasant population of England sat well below its biological potential for generation after generation.
It would be remiss not to note what was happening above their heads while they were shrinking. The ruling class ate differently. They ate beef, venison, pork, game birds, aged cheese, salted fish. The medieval aristocracy was, predictably, taller than the peasantry it governed. The relationship between protein access and physical stature was not invisible to contemporaries; it was simply regarded as the natural order of things.
And then someone formalised it.
The Forest Laws of Norman England, codified under William I in the 1080s, designated a third of the country’s land as the king’s personal hunting ground. Killing a deer carried the death penalty.
Maiming one was punishable by blinding and castration. A peasant could live on the edge of a forest teeming with protein and starve legally while the gamekeeper rode past.
You can read the full forensic accounting of that history in Forbidden Flesh. What matters here is the relationship between law and skeleton. The centuries of codified meat restriction left a biological signature in the remains of the people it was applied to. You can measure it. It fits in a museum case. The case has a label.

SAMA HOOLE

……………. Cro-Magnon ……. Neolithic Farmer ……… Medieval Serf, …………… Immigrant, ……….Modern American

(My guesses)

Japan, 1945 to 1980

In 1945, the average Japanese male stood approximately 5’3″. The diet was predominantly plant-based: rice, vegetables, some fish, very little meat, almost no dairy.

Under American occupation, and subsequently through a deliberate government nutritional programme in the 1950s, Japan introduced school milk, increased meat consumption, and began actively encouraging animal protein intake at a population level. The results were not subtle. Between 1950 and 1980, average male height in Japan increased by approximately three inches. The same genetic population, on the same island, in the same climate, eating differently, producing a different skeleton within a single generation.

This is as close to a controlled experiment as human nutritional science ever gets. One variable changed. The height followed.

Contemporary Japan has maintained those gains. The Japanese government did not respond to its population’s growth by suggesting they return to the pre-war dietary pattern on environmental grounds. They noticed what worked, and they kept doing it. There is a lesson here for anyone paying attention, and apparently several governments that are not…

Oh I think the Cabel is paying attention. Sama Koole is assuming they have our best interests at heart. I do not. -GC

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Carboxymethylcellulose and Polysorbate 80.


From Brave AI

Carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) and Polysorbate 80 (P80) are widely used synthetic emulsifiers in processed foods, eye drops, and cosmetics, primarily to improve texture and prevent separation. 

While regulatory bodies like the FDA classify them as “generally recognized as safe” (GRAS), animal and in vitro studies suggest they may negatively impact gut health by altering the intestinal microbiota and promoting low-grade inflammation.  Specifically, P80 has been shown to decrease anti-inflammatory bacterial taxa like Bacteroides dorei, while CMC increases pro-inflammatory species such as Ruminococcus torques

  • Mechanism: Both additives can disrupt the protective mucus layer of the gut and increase intestinal permeability, potentially allowing bacteria to cross the epithelial barrier. 
  • Health Risks: These changes are linked to metabolic syndromeobesity, and the promotion of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in predisposed models. 
  • Human Evidence: While direct human trials are limited, research on human gut microbiota maintained ex vivo confirms that these emulsifiers increase pro-inflammatory potential within days of exposure. 


Polysorbate 80 and carboxymethylcellulose: A different impact on epithelial integrity when interacting with the microbiome

Abstract

The consumption of dietary emulsifiers, including polysorbate 80 (P80) and sodium carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), has raised safety concerns due to its interaction with the intestinal microbiome. This study demonstrated that increasing concentrations of P80 and CMC added to a dynamic four-stage gut microbiota model (BFBL gut simulator) altered the microbiome composition and impacted epithelial integrity in a dose-dependent manner. 16S rDNA amplicon-based metagenomics analysis revealed that these emulsifiers increased microbial groups with proinflammatory capacities while decreasing microbial taxa known to enhance barrier function.

Increasing doses of P80 significantly decreased Bacteroides dorei and Akkermansia, taxa associated with anti-inflammatory potential, while increasing doses of CMC were linked to a higher abundance of Ruminococcus torques and Hungatella, which negatively impact barrier function. Both emulsifiers displayed a different impact on epithelial integrity when interacting with the microbiome. On one hand, supernatants from the BFBL simulator fed with P80 disrupted epithelial integrity to a lesser extent than the additive alone. On the other hand, both the microbiota and the supernatants from the BFBL simulator fed with CMC diminished the epithelial integrity, though the additive itself did not. These findings highlight the need to incorporate the gut microbiome in the risk assessment of these additives.

Brave AI had the clearest definition.

Epithelial integrity refers to the structural and functional coherence of epithelial tissues, ensuring they remain organized, sealed, and mechanically stable to function as effective barriers.  This integrity is primarily maintained by tight junctions, adherens junctions, and desmosomes that seal adjacent cells, preventing the unregulated leakage of substances and pathogens while allowing selective permeability for essential nutrients and ions. 


Integrity of the Intestinal Barrier: The Involvement of Epithelial Cells and Microbiota—A Mutual Relationship

Simple Summary

The gastrointestinal tract is a complex organization of various types of epithelial cells forming a single layer of the mucosal barrier, the host mucosal immune system, and microorganisms termed as gut microbiota inhabiting this area. The mucosal barrier, including physical and chemical factors, spatially segregates gut microbiota and the host immune system preventing the development of immune response directed towards non-pathogenic commensals and dietary antigens. However, for the maintenance of the integrity of the mucosal surfaces, cross-talk between epithelial cells and microbiota is required. The microbiome and the intestinal epithelium developed a complex dependence necessary for sustaining intestinal homeostasis. In this review, we highlight the role of specific epithelial cell subtypes and their role in barrier arrangement, the mechanisms employed by them to control intestinal microbiota as well as the mechanisms utilized by the microbiome to regulate intestinal epithelial function. This review will provide information regarding the development of inflammatory disorders dependent on the loss of intestinal barrier function and composition of the intestinal microbiota.

KMAG DAILY THREAD 20260715 RICO CASE(S)?

Site rules stolen from our good friend PAVACA

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Do not forget to LABEL AI articles video and such.

This is going to be very rough since I do not have time to do any editing and I had to transcribe by hand from the video.

I have mentioned a few times that I think the Trump administration is planning a major can of Whoop Ass. Every once in a while we see signs such as the indictment of Comey and Brennan’s freaking out.

Josh and Alpha had a recent conversation about just this subject, but before I get into that I want to point to a few shark fins surfacing.

TradeBait explains our continuing frustration.

TradeBait2  July 11, 2026 09:04 1628706

Here we are 6 years later with the evidence of voter fraud by tens of thousands in just one blue city that have been held under lock snd key while the propagandist media declares the election steal to be fantasy. Multiply by literally thousands of locations to some undetermined extent. We know Fulton County, GA is going to be worse as an example..

Method explained in the article. One of many methods for cheating for the record.

We know the perpetrators are unlikely to see one day behind bars. We know even SCOTUS acted in defense of the perpetrators at the time. We now know with ample evidence that J6 was Fedsurrection. Yet, the perpetrators continue to walk free and pretend they did something great for America.

We also know that any person in America that opposes the provisions of the SAVE America Act self identifies as a criminal or complicit in seditious and perhaps treasonous behavior. All you have to do is ask any person where they stand on that issue and you know who they are.

There can be no peace and trust in government until justice is fully served.


After what was done to POTUS, there is no way he is going to let these monsters get off Scott free. They really blew it when they went raided his home in Florida. Makes you wonder if he moved there, to a friendlier legal environment on purpose.

The Badlands Brief: White House Task Force Gathers Intelligence Documents on 2020 Election for Declassification

A White House task force is gathering documents related to the 2020 presidential election for declassification from the CIA, the National Security Agency, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the FBI, and the Justice Department.

The task force, which operates in addition to ongoing Department of Justice probes into the 2020 election, consists of 

Just The News’ John Solomon and former Trump administration officials including former national security aide Derek Harvey. Lawyers on the team have been reviewing gathered documents for months.

The documents focus on areas including ballot irregularities, potential voting machine issues, and possibly other topics. Members of the task force have been encouraged to limit redactions in declassified documents, even if that means retaining the names of government officials or other individuals, according to two people with knowledge of the effort.

The initiative involves gathering thousands of pages from US intelligence agencies, with plans to declassify some of them. The team has been quietly reviewing materials for months, sometimes late into the night.

President Trump told reporters Wednesday that acting DNI Bill Pulte will serve for only “a month or two” but is authorized to “declassify almost everything.”

Ashe in America: This is one of those anticipated disclosures that will serve as a check on whether we’re actually winning.

We can’t have a Golden Age without a Justice Phase and the core of any Justice Phase has to be elections. And we can’t have real elections without accountability and honesty for how fake they’ve been.

This ODNI thing could be a rug. Or, it could be the exact catalyst for change we desperately need.

I’m also awaiting disclosure (and indictments) on weaponization of government. They weaponized the government to prevent the truth about fake elections from coming out. A real investigative effort on the 2020 election would yield both of those change-making revelations.

I hope it drops before the 250th birthday. If it’s not a rug, that would be quite the victory to celebrate. And, if it is a rug, then we should probably declare independence again. Either way, July 4th is going to be epic!

Happy Independence Day, everyone!


And speaking of Election Fraud Badlands (Ghost) dropped this. For background see my article on Petro and Columbia LINK

….Petro is asserting that the recent Colombian presidential election was stolen using computer servers that are based in California.

My favorite excerpt is this part:

“From my phone conversation with Trump, I was able to confirm that he didn’t know I didn’t support de la Espriella because of his old ties to drug trafficking and the genocide in Colombia.

I hope that amid his concerns h
e has time to call his intelligence agencies so they can tell him who Abelardo de la Espriella is and why he is a US citizen and who his partners are, including alias “Boliche”.

Colombia’s current president is faced with evidence of an electoral fraud via algorithms and with prohibited foreign financing in our constitution.”

Wew, lad….

H/T Duchess

RNC unleashes ELECTION LAWSUIT to STOP Illegal Votes!

eilert(@guest_1629079)  July 12, 2026 12:28

TEXT:

HOLY SMOKES. The FBI has just FLOODED Fulton County, Georgia with hundreds of agents to ramp up the 2020 election investigation, following a raid that seized ballots

Material that was seized is being reviewed, including DATA taken from ballot tabulation machines

Over 200 AGENTS were just deployed to Georgia, and the investigation “appears to be accelerating” — Atlanta News First

Field offices NATIONWIDE are reportedly zeroing in on this probe

HERE WE GO! KEEP PUSHING, 

@FBIDirectorKash

From TradeBait2

FBI Fires Husband and Wife Analysts Who Refused to Assist Georgia 2020 Election Investigation

H/T Marica

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Streamed on: Jul 7, 10:32 pm EDT

Very Rough TRANSCRIPT:

28 minutes Elon posts Taylor Swift AI by an Anon on July 4th and then on July 5th. There is in the background 4559 Jul 1, a Q drop.

46:30 Josh: Now going back to that video for a second. Did you notice all the presidents were carrying Something? A RED FOLDER…

Does anyone know where the Red Folder Came from?

I have been talking about the Red Folder since Jan 2nd 2021 and you [Alpha] started talking about it in the beginning of the Trump administration. Well before that back in 2024 because this actually was when we referred to what was happening with the Mar-a-Logo raid. Hey, they are looking for the Red Folder.

What is in the Red Folder? Well it is the Crosfire Hurricane binder and other various secrets that Trump declassified and took with him before he left including information pertaining to Nancy Pelosi’s laptop. We started it and it spread to the whole anon community because, well we had talked to somebody and they said, they are after the red ‘bull’

48 minutes Josh Reads Trump Truth about Reconciliation 3.0, the $350 billion for defence plus Save America Act… Why is this interesting?

So if you understand that Trump doesn’t really want the Save America Act passed as Alpha and I have been saying. There are a multitude of reasons. Trump knows what we are about to say. If it is passed, Mark Elias and all the Lawfare lawyers will innediately put injunctions on it in court. You will have lawfare judges immediately stop it from being implemented. In other words you will not have implementation of the Save America Act prior to the midterms. There is a chance it could go th the Supreme Court but the scary part is the Supreme Court could vote either way.

So the idea is if we want the Save America Act to secure the midterm elections, it is just improbable. It is not going to happen. This means Trump most likely does not want the Save America Act to happen.

Now Reconciliation 3.0 is the National Defense Authorization Act. Now why is this crazy. Because Trump has come out and made a declaration. “I will sign ZERO bills until the Save America Act is passed.” I think he has 90 days before he has to send them back.

So now we have the National Defense Authorization Act coming up. Sp what else is in the the National Defense Authorization Act?

You remember last week all the talk about the various different sections? One section where there is a convergence of Israel and the US military complex. Where there is information sharing, technology sharing of inovation thru the 2 military industrial complexes on the commecial viability side. And there is a merging of US and Israeli intelligence in the middle east. Those 2 things are in the National Defense Authorization Act.

Did Donald Trump just squash the National Defense Authorization Act by attaching the Save America Act to it by saying I’m not going to sign it unless this bill actually gets passed?

Here is my theory, I think John Thune is intentionally not bringing it up because Trump ordered him not to. We are going to act like we really want to get this passed by we really do not want to. Why?

You have DNI Poulti who is working with John Solomon. John just joined ODNI as a special contractor to go in there and help locate classified records pertaining to Crossfire Hurricane,Russia Russia Russia, 2020 election fraud

DNI Poulti inherited DNI Gabbard’s task force on election integrity & infrastructure. We are waiting for a report to come out on that. I think John Solomon [an excellent journalist] is actually coming in to help finalize that report with other types of declassified information. And where did they get these declassified files from? A lot of these are coming from the quote unquote burn bags that were found in the SCIFs of the FBI building that were set to be destroyed but never were. In other words it was the military that had it all along and somehow injected it.

How do you enter evidence legally? [Q quote] You put someone in the military in DNI who can find and retrieve these records where ever the military put them and then bring them out thru points of declassification.

[Could have been hidden during Trump 1.0 or perhaps in 2.0 –GC]

And I think Poulti is going to be the one who is going to release this information pertaining to the 2020 election fraud. And that is going to show that a foreign adversary was definitely involved. Probably a few different ones. I think you’re going to see Great Britain, Ukraine, China, Cuba [Karen Bass?] Venezuala Iran, all involved in stealing the 2020 election, as well as the mail-in ballot scheme.

And this is where it gets really really interesting, Alpha with the conversations that Donald Trump is bringing about. The last week he has been seeding the narrative against Communists. Commie, Comie, he is talking about Communists all the time. I get that communists may have just won. In Washington DC you have a gun bomb. Mandummi in NY, but what I also want to point people to. Go with the constructed narrative.Both sides construct the narrative and they seed that narrative along the way.

This is one of the ways that I have become incredibly accurate with what I do.

Donald Trump started talking about the Communists on the same day it was announced that there is a Grand Jury in NY that has subpoenaed Neville Roy Singham, the founder philanthropist of an NGO who lives in Bejing China.That collaborates directly with the Chinese Communist Party, is a self-proclained

Maoist, funded the ICE riots and protests, funded the No Kings riots and protests, funded BLM and ANTIFA. The guy is a billionaire. The same day the subpoena comes out Trump starts talking about Communists.

Why is it important?

Now go back to the whole infrastructure of what the US Attorney, Joe DeGeneva, is doing in the Southern District of Florida. Joe is obviously running the investigation into, basically, you’ve go to think 20216 and the 2020 Fisagate, Russiagate, Crossfire Hurricane & all that.

Well his team came out last week and they said that they are taking a different approach.

54:40 Alpha: there is something in that article that is very specific.

54:45 Josh: I have it right here. It is Paul Sperry BTW… [Can not find it]

Well basically Joe is investigating the Grand Conspiracy, the RICO investigation. One of the things his team has done is they have broken it down into smaller component parts… what they are likely talking about here is instead of one grand conspiracy with 50 people, and one trial with 10 to 15 years of court. Because of that they are looking at segregating this down into various different parts. Now one of the things that we got an indication of is PRE 2016. This is very interesting because if you ever listen to Patrick Byne, he says how he was recruited by the Obama administration, by the FBI, his FBI handler at the CIA, Cia/FBI handler, to actually infiltrate the early Republican candidates prior to the primaries including Trump. That began in 2015. He talked about this and said it began actually in Las Vegas. So we know they are looking into that part.

#2 is FISAgate, right? This is where you start to enter into the NGO infrastructure.

DNI Tulsi Gabbard released the classified email between Lenny Bonardo of the Open Society Foundations and another executive director at the Open Society Foundations, talking about Julianne Smith who is Hilary Clinton’s foreign campaign manager or foreign affairs campaign manager and how Julianne Smith had gotten back to him and confirmed that HRC was going to move forward with the Russian compromised story on Donald Trump but they did not have the evidence. But they said do not worry we will get it thru our verious different partners of ThreatConnect and Crowd Strike, which I found kinda interesting. So that was Open Society foundation. They enter on stage left right there early on 2016. This is pre-primaries, pre-election.

57:13 Then obviously you have FISA Gate. That email was the day before Bill Clinton met with Loretta Lynch. Clinton offered a seat on the Supreme Court if she dropped the case against hillary.

Then Hillary spent the July 4th weekend with James Comey while she was under investigation by the FBI. On July 7th she gets on Airforce One with Obama and flies to NC for a rally.

Late in July the Lead FBI Investigator drops the case against Hillary and 3 days later opens a case on Donald. Peter Strozk was the guy investigating the hilary Clinton email scandal

Starting 58:30 to 1:05:30 go over highlghted sections

1:05″30 to is discussion:

John Durham was about preserving evidence and not prosecuting. Admiral Rogers got position on recommendation of General Flynn. Bill Clinton & lynch met in the wee hours of the morning in what was supposed to be a private meeting. Reporter Christopher Sein was tipped off by old friend high in Intel community. He played football for Univ of Alabama. Trump was given a jersey #17 from the Univ of Alabama. And Jeff Sessions who also went to UofA was in the same farternity. Chistopher ‘commited suicide’ via hung by dog leash from door knob. A favorite of the CIA.

1:08:30 — 1:12:00 Josh explains why a video crew was needed so NSA could listen in to the conversation. Admiral Rogers according to Q misfiled that conversation…. The conversation was used to threaten Comey into re-opening Hillary server case…. Many more dots connected.

Josh brings up article Real Clear Investigations by Paul Sperry June 25, 2026. It is well worth the read.

Russiagate Prosecutor Calls Audible on ‘Grand Conspiracy

1:12:00 – Backing up a bit. Joe DeGenova has not only broken up the RICO case but has TWO grand juries. The second one, operated by Jasson Reddy-Kionas, is in Miami and targeting Obama’s re-written 2016 IC assessment and John Brennan. Josh goes into what he knows of that case. (Do not miss the Mark Warner & Adam Schiff connections)

1:13:15 there is a whistle blower Thomas Speciali the Third. [Google & brave never heard of him — SURPRISE!]

1:13:30 — 1:15:00 Thomas Speciali, a cooperating witness, was hired by the Intel community to go out there and discover Russian interference in the 2016 election so he had full access to every state’s election system. The Dominion voting machines and everything. One of the things he said is that there was no Russian intrusion. There was no evidence but there were some foreign IPs that had touched our servers, basically pinged them. Some APPEARED to be Russian

Then Josh goes into Victoria Nuland, Ukraine, the Perfect Phone call, the 2nd impeachment and Eric Ciaramella who has been indicted in the Eastern District of Virginia. Eric Ciaramella ran the money aspect of the Maidan Massacre  and hired the Wagner Group out of Russia.. Josh covers the firing of Shokin, who was investigating money laundering and trafficking by Burisma… Josh goes into how money laundering works in Ukraine

1:15:00 to 1: The Perfect Phone Call. Most important part when POTUS asked “DO YOU HAVE THE SERVER? YOU KNOW CROWDSTRIKE, BURISMA, I want to have my Dept of Justice take a look at it.” [This is why they went after Rudy so hard BTW – GC]

That was PANIC IN DC.

Why did Crowdstrike a DNC IT company have a server in Burisma?

Burisma from circa 2014 was one of the heads for Human trafficking, arms trafficking, Money laundering for that region. [I wonder if this is where Justice Roberts adopted kids came from? They were supposedly Russia. -GC]

The server was a proxy server doing all the messing with the Alpha Bank server to compromise Trump. Second it was running Hammer and Scorecard which was meant to steal the 2016 election for Hilary.

Why was the server in Burisma? Because it was very close to the Russian border so you could spoof Russian addresses. Remember Thomas Speciali, saying the pings APPEARED to be from Russia? However someone shut them down. Josh thinks it was Russia and really pissed off the Deep State.

1:19:30 This is where it gets really interesting because in 2018 the elections were stolen at the STATE LEVEL. Red States all of a sudden flipped blue. It was almost like Trump let it happen because of what is going to happen now with all this information comming out. George Soros & the Open Society Foundation and other NGOs [Like Arrabella – GC] funded Act Blue from various private shell companies, spoofing credit card numbers and funding all of these candidates. They funded 3 of the primary state candidates thru all the states, These were, the governor, Sec of State and the State Attorney General. Back in 2018 we really did not know why. When you look back at it it makes complete sense. At the same time Soros, father & son and Bill Gates were investing in different types of companies.

Hunter Biden’s company Rosemont Senaca invested in Metabiota a Disaster and pandemic preparedness company in 2014. (In eastern Ukraine) In 2018 & 19 & 20, Soros & Gates join collaborative efforts and start investing in zoological virus research companies investigating how to detect them if they spread to humans. Such viruses were not around in 2018 & 2019. They were also investing in Crisper-Cas9 companies, genetic modification companies, mRNA companies, AND companies dealing with pandemic response and pandemic testing.

1:22:50 in 2020 we learn the reason for stuffing the top state offices. In Sept of 2019, a level 4 biocontainment plant burns down in Russia on the eastern [obviously Western -GC] border of Russia which I find kinda sketchy… Then 3 days later POTUS standing with Fauci & Brixs signed an EO authorizing the creation of mRNA vaccines.

Josh discuses Event 201 (Oct 2019)

POTUS does a state of emergency.

Secs of State change rules on how mail-in ballots are handled… This is where the NGO infastructure comes in. The whole point was to get as many people on the voter rolls as humanly possible because the number of ballots PRINTED are based on that number.

That is why the Trump admin wants those rolls and the states are refusing to turn them over.

Basically you have a conspiracy forming in 2014 to 2016. The NGO infrastructure. Remember it is the NGOs, it was Neville Roy Singham, Soros, Weiss, Gates, Zuckerburg. They funded NGOs that went out and got people to sign up to vote. And then these same NGOs were running ballots to the Drop boxes.

in 2021, Citizens sued their states and the Supreme Courts of the states ruled in their favor, saying the Sec of state DID NOT HAVE THE AUTHORITY to change mail-in ballot laws but since the elections had already happened there was nothing that could be done…. So that right there is the prerequisite for everything that we are going to see with Joe DeGeneva.

1:27:00 we haven’t even gotten into 2021 when they start to flood the border..

There is another 1/2 hour but I think that gives a good look at the information and actions.

A couple of references. With this first reference ONLY Yandex had the article. Google/Brave buried it and come up with nothing on Thomas Speciali the Third.

PF1 Minisode: John Brennan and The Dirty 51.

November 3, 2025

Miranda Devine zooms in on a pivotal and controversial event in recent U.S. political history: the October 2020 “Dirty 51” letter, signed by former intelligence officials, including ex-CIA Director John Brennan. The letter—claiming that the Hunter Biden laptop story had “all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation”—is dissected for its role in influencing the 2020 election and shaping public perception. The episode centers on a dramatic confrontation between Brennan and whistleblower Thomas Speciali, unpacking the latest developments in calls for accountability, including current DOJ investigations.

This one is really interesting.

The Radicalizing of Eric Ciaramella | The American Spectator

November 9, 2019,

It starts at Yale and a professor of Arabic who romanticizes terrorism.

Eric Ciaramella was radicalized at Yale by professors like Bassam Frangieh. He was quickly recognized as a fellow traveler and became an insider in the Obama  administration.

KMAG DAILY THREAD 20260708 MK Ultra & the CIA

Site rules stolen from our good friend PAVACA

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Do not forget to LABEL AI articles video and such.


Just for fun: (Looks like the wild horses are a better solution.)

The following information validates some of the information I learned from Colonel Towner.

Rough Transcript from an Economic Times video. 15 minutes

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna: What did you learn about MK Naomi, and do you believe its activities were even more serious than what we know about MK Ultra?

Dr Kinzer: The MK Ultra project was aimed at seizing control of the minds of individuals. The Army was interested in something different, which was trying to use biological agents in warfare against entire populations. So, MK Naomi is the place where these two goals overlap.

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna: Did you find direct documentation between Paperclip scientists and the development of MK Ultra’s experimental protocols, specifically the use of mescaline, hypnosis, and sensory deprivation?

Dr Kinzer: I found what I think might be the first secret CIA prison or black site. It’s a nice chalet in Germany. These were the cells where the MK Ultra officers, working side by side with Nazis, uh carried out those gruesome experiments.

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna: These experiments were happening after the Nuremberg trials, correct? So, the CIA would have known that these were crimes against humanity. Um my first question is for Mr. O’Neill. MK Naomi, the joint CIA Army program that ran parallel with MK Ultra at Fort Detrick, appears to have been run with deliberate minimal documentation. Um Army records on Special Operations Division have apparently been destroyed. In your investigation, what did you learn about MK Naomi, and do you believe its activities were even more serious than what we know about MK Ultra?

Mr. O’Neill: I’m sorry. I didn’t learn anything about those operations. I kept my focus mostly on Dr. West and his work. I do know that the only reason I found the documents I found was cuz Dr. West accidentally left them in his papers, and he probably did that because he corresponded with Gottlieb under Gottlieb’s assigned alias, which was Sherman Grifford, and he addressed all his mail to a post office box here under Foss Cut Corporation.

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna: Thank you, Mr. I’m just going to real quick go to Dr. Kinzer. Are you aware of anything that exists with MK Naomi in your research? And if you could please press the button.

Dr Kinzer: My understanding My understanding of MK Naomi is that it was a joint project between the military and the CIA. And there’s a big difference because the MK Ultra project was aimed [music] at seizing control of the minds of individuals. The army was interested in something different, which was trying to use biological agents in warfare against entire populations. So, MK Naomi is the place where these two goals overlapped.

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna: And that was the 1953 Frank Olson death. Was that in a way tied to that? from some chatter that we had seen in

Dr Kinzer: Exactly what the motivation was behind the decision about Frank Olson, if there was such a decision, is unknown.

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna: My next question is also for you, sir. Operation Paperclip brought over 1,600 German scientists into the United States government after World War II, including individuals who had conducted human experimentation in concentration camps. The CIA and military were aware of their backgrounds and recruited them anyways. In your research, did you find direct documentation between Paperclip scientists and the development of MK Ultra’s experimental protocols, specifically the use of mescaline, hypnosis, and sensory deprivation, which were techniques also documented at Dachau?

Dr Kinzer: Absolutely. Um Kurt Blome, who was the chief of biological weapons development for the Nazi government, came to work for the CIA. So did Walter Schreiber, who was the surgeon general of the Nazi army. Um I can just tell a a brief story. When I was researching my book, I found what I think might be the first secret CIA prison or black site. It’s a nice chalet in Germany. And the guy who now owns it took me into the basement. He said these were the cells where the MK Ultra officers, working side by side with Nazis, uh carried out those gruesome experiments, which were actually just continuations of the experiments that those Nazis had been conducting just a few years earlier right down the road.

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna: Just for timeline and clarification, these experiments were happening after the Nuremberg trials, correct? So, the CIA would have known that these were crimes against humanity.

Dr Kinzer: [4:20] I looked for an episode in which the Nuremberg doctrines were posted on the wall in some MK Ultra or CIA office, and I was never able to find any indication that those Nuremberg principles ever were even consulted, much less obeyed.

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna: Thank you. My next question would be for either witness to comment, Dr. Kinzer or Mr. O’Neill. Both witnesses have written about the site psychiatrist Louis Jolly West. Sydney Gottlieb ran MK Ultra program for the CIA, hired West as a contractor to conduct research for sub-project 43, combining hypnotism, drugs, and sensory deprivation to create dis-associative states in which, to quote Mr. Kinzer in his book Poisoner in Chief, the human mind could be pulled away from its moorings. Following the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, West psychiatrically examined Jack Ruby, then in prison for murdering… Lee Harvey Oswald, the assassin accused um of murdering President Kennedy. A report emerged from West’s examination said that Ruby had suffered an acute psychotic break. Can you explain why Dr. West in particular was chosen to conduct an examination of Jack Ruby alone in his jail cell with no other psychologist present?

Mr O’Neill: Be happy to. West inserted himself into the case of Ruby.. the day after the shooting, West approached the judge in the preliminary hearings and asked to be assigned to the case. He was refused by the judge. After Ruby was convicted at his first trial, an associate of West, Dr. Hubert Winston Smith, who was a psychiatrist and an attorney, took over Ruby’s defense for his appeal, and he had already discussed appointing.. West to the case. And as you said, West examined Ruby alone at the jail cell and emerged to announce that in the preceding 48 hours he had had a acute psychotic break from which he would never recover. He had been declared incompetent to stand trial in his the first time by a panel of I think eight psychiatrists. This psychotic break lasted until his death in 1967. Two months after West examined him, Ruby testified for the first time, and only time to the Warren Commission, and it was the first time he ever publicly was supposed to say what his reasons were for his shooting Oswald. The testimony had to be halted cuz he was babbling incoherently. As Allen Inspector, who was a counsel to the commission, wrote in his memoirs, he pulled him aside and said that they were cutting off the arms and legs of children in Albuquerque and El Paso, and he said he was making no sense whatsoever. West in his letters to Gottlieb from 1953 discussed experiments where he would induce specific mental disorders in people without their awareness. A year before the Kennedy assassination, he publicly spoke in Oklahoma City and talked about his LSD experiments inducing psychiatric breaks and psychosis in people with the use of LSD, which he of course later contradicted, when he told the New York Times he never used LSD in animal experimentation.

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna: What an interesting connection. I might have time but I’ll be now recognizing Mr. Burlison from Missouri for 5 minutes.

[7:54]

Mr. Burlison: Thank you Madam Chair. Thank you for your diligent work on this and hopefully we will hear back from the CIA on those boxes of documents that have so many questions about. Dr. Kinzer and Mr. O’Neill the CIA created MK Ultra in 1953 supposedly out of fear that the Soviet Union and China had developed mind control capabilities. Let me go back a little bit further. So one of my questions has to do with the event that happened in 1951 in August in France. There was a bakery that I guess the people that lived in that community over 250 some say 300 people were poisoned from the bread. It was determined that that was LSD that was causing all of these people to hallucinate. Some people died. Is there any connection Dr. Kinzer to that event and was that something that either inspired the MK Ultra program or the MK Naomi program or is that something that we were involved in even that early on?

Dr Kinzer: I would turn that question back to you. I don’t think anybody really knows the full story of what happened at that time in that town in France. That the United States could have been involved, that this could have been part of what was then called Operation Artichoke, the predecessor for MK Ultra seems to me not beyond the realm of possibility. There’s a lot of overlap between the ergot enzyme that is the basis of LSD and certain rye and wheat fungus that can be used in breads. Was that something intentional? Was it something the Americans were involved in? I have my suspicions, but just based on my background as a journalist, I don’t operate on suspicions. So, I would love to see more investigation of that episode.

…..

Comment on Ergot Poisoning. It is worth a quick look because it describes the symptoms.

Debunking the “Moldy Bread” Theory – Salem Witch Museum

In her excellent lecture “The Salem Witch Trials and Ergot, the ‘Moldy Bread’ Hypothesis,” historian Margot Burns describes a conversation with Linnda Caporael about the publication of this article.

…..

Mr. Burlison: My next question has to do with once the program began. I think one of the most shocking things that we determined is that Operation Midnight Climax that occurred in the early 1950s, ’60s, where the CIA had safe houses. And there was Dr. Kinzer, I mean this obviously extremely disturbing behavior that was happening where you had American citizens who were being lured into these brothels and then dosed with a hallucinogenic and then filmed during their sex acts. Was there anyone prosecuted for this for these crimes?

Dr Kinzer: No, there have been no prosecutions for any crime related to MKUltra as far as I know. To me, the remarkable aspect of Operation Midnight Climax was that there wasn’t even the pretense of scientific experimentation. The person watching behind the one-way mirror was a grossly overweight drug officer sitting on a portable toilet and drinking cocktails out of a pitcher. There was nobody there that was a scientist or somebody who had understood sexual behavior or human psychology. So, there was no science involved in it at all. I can add a little footnote. When I was researching Poisoner in Chief, I came across a document in which one of the officers involved in setting up that program, Operation Midnight Climax, said that Sidney Gottlieb himself used to fly from Washington out to inspect the project regularly and always asked that women be provided for him. So…. [Interrupts]

Mr. Burlison: That was my next question. Do you think that the agents were involved in the sexual encounters?

Dr Kinzer: Well, could that have actually been the reason why the bordello was opened? There was no prospect of any serious scientific result out of that project given the personnel who were overseeing it. So, those CIA officers, particularly Gottlieb, involved in overseeing Operation Midnight Climax, certainly were able to take advantage of what it offered.

Mr. Burlison: Thank you. And my my last question, first I want to say thank you to Mr. O’Neill. The book Chaos, I checked it out from the Library of Congress. and [I] greatly appreciate your work there. I was intrigued by one of the statements that you made based on your research that the MKUltra program, they were actually successfully able to replace memories. And because of that, I’m wondering if And Dr. Kinzer, you can chime in if you have any knowledge of this. Did the program continue? And do you think that the program in some aspect is still continuing today?

Mr O’Neill: You’re asking if the program continued after 1973 when it was halted supposedly. That’s a question I’m asked at almost every appearance I do. Is it happening today? Did it continue? I don’t know. I can’t imagine that it didn’t though because the technology that they worked to establish over 20, 25 years and spent more money on than any operation the CIA ever conducted was successful. I imagine it’s being used. I have no evidence of it being used, so it’s a complete assumption.

Dr Kinzer: I would just add that one of the letters to which Mr. O’Neill referred contains a quote from Mr. Gottlieb saying that these experiments were necessary quote in these times. I think it’s important to put yourself back in that mindset where the United States felt that it was under such overwhelming threat that the loss of a few lives or a few hundred lives was a small price to pay. Commitment to a great cause is one of the most fundamental justifications for committing immoral acts, and patriotism is among the most noble of causes. It can be twisted, and it can be used as an excuse to carry out research under the guise that this is simply research we’re doing to protect ourselves against others, and I think that is a mindset that may still be active in some parts of our government.

Mr. Burlison: Thank you, gentlemen. Thank you, Madam Chair. My time has expired. I yield back.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

FULL MKULTRA HEARING: 1 hour 27 minutes

The House Oversight Committee’s Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets held a hearing entitled, “Mind Control and Accountability: Uncovering the Truth of the CIA’s MKULTRA Project.”

INTRODUCTION:

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna: Task force on declassification of federal secrets will come to order. Welcome everyone. Without objection, the chair may declare a recess at any time.

I recognize myself for the purpose of making an opening statement. This hearing is about the crimes committed by the Central Intelligence Agency against the American citizens and the decades of secrecy used to conceal them. The American people deserve a complete and truthful record. The victims and their families deserve acknowledgment, and this Congress has a constitutional obligation to ensure that full declassification is not delayed any longer. Project MK Ultra was not a policy failure or an overzealous program that got out of hand. It was a deliberate systematic governmental operation that subjected American citizens, prisoners, hospital patients, veterans, ordinary people to LSD, electroshock, hypnosis, sensory deprivation, psychological torture without their knowledge or consent. This went on for 20 years on American soil, funded by American taxpayer dollars, and authorized by the very top of US intelligence apparatus. And this program, when it did end, the men who ran it did not cooperate with investigators. They did not come forward. They committed another crime. They destroyed evidence.

The documents this task force has reviewed are unambiguous. In January 1973, the director of the CIA, Richard Helms, prepared to leave office. He personally ordered the destruction of MK Ultra records. The CIA official document in writing states, “Over my stated objectives, the MK Ultra files were destroyed by the order of DCI Mr. Helms shortly before his departure from office. A separate internal account confirms that Helms telephoned Dr. Gottlieb directly and instructed him to destroy quote all files pertaining to drug research and associated activities. Gottlieb compiled. Four people spent an entire day tearing burning down 152 files. Then Gottlieb had his personal papers destroyed by his secretary before he retired. The head of the CIA own records center protested the destruction in writing, but he was overruled. That is obstruction of justice. That is criminal destruction of federal records.

And neither individuals were ever charged with a crime for it. Helms received a $2,000 fine for lying to Congress about an unrelated manner and collected his government pension until he died. Gottlieb retired in rural Virginia and wrote poetry. No one went to prison.

No victim was ever formally compensated by the government for the harm that they caused. By 1975, the Church Committee and the Rockefeller Commission had already established through sworn testimony and the surviving 1963 Inspector General report that MK Ultra existed and that the CIA had run a program of human experimentation on unwitting Americans. The scope and detail of what we know today is largely because of an accident. In 1977, an archivist diligently complying with a foyer request discovered seven boxes of MK Ultra financial records that had been misfiled and escaped the bonfire. Those seven boxes included the names of institutions, the name of sub projects, the researchers who participated, the specific operation that the CIA had funded, and without them, the vast majority of MK Ultra would only be a rumor, just as Helms and Gottlieb intended. Those seven boxes revealed the MK Ultra comprised at least 149 sub projects, operated across more than 80 institutions, and involved 185 non-government researchers.

They revealed that the CIA covertly contributed $375,000 to a hospital research wing, which was approved directly by DCI Allen Dulles, with Richard Helms concurrence, so the agency could use unwitting patients as experimental subjects in what their own documents called a hospital safe house. The CIA’s own inspector general said in 1963, his classified report concluded that the program had exceeded the agency’s legal chapter and covert testing on unwitting subjects placed the rights and interests of US citizens in jeopardy. The program ran for a decade that we know of and they ignored their own watchdog.

Let me be clear [about] what I believe that we are dealing with here. Administering drugs to people without their knowledge or consent, subjecting humans to psychological torture and using prisoners and hospital patients as nonconsenting research subjects. These are crimes against humanity. The Central Intelligence Agency committed them and then the director of the CIA ordered the destruction of evidence. Today we will hear from two witnesses who have spent years unraveling the cover up that our government ordered. Steven Kzer documented the life and crimes of Sydney Gottlieb in his uh book prisoner of chief and Tom O’Neill spent over 20 years investigating what the CIA buried and what they obscured that in my mind constitutes some of the worst notorious crimes against humanity in the 20th century. Their persistence in the research in this hearing is possible simply because they are patriots. The American people deserve the complete record. The victims and their families deserve acknowledgment, accountability, and justice. And this Congress has a constitutional obligation to make sure that the CIA never does this again.

With that, I’m going to be opening up first questions, and I’ll hold my question to the end, to Representative Berles. Before I do pass it, I did want to just note a few weeks ago, we did receive reports. There was some back and forth regarding the CIA and ODI pertaining to new MK Ultra boxes that were discovered. Myself and Representative Berles did go down to Langley. We did meet with the CIA and the CIA is currently in the process of declassifying newly found documentation. although the documents, and I feel comfortable enough to share it here, pertain specifically to a forgery program that was being housed under MK Ultra. So as soon as those files are released, we will be putting out notification with your help to also comb through some of the newly released documents, but I did want to give you a quick update.

There were three witnesses:

Dr Elizabet Ginexi,

independent Consultant and former Senior Program officer at the National Institute of Health

Dr Kinzer author of: Poisoner in Chief, Sydney Gottlieb and the CIA’s Search for Mind Control

Mr. O’Neill author of: Chaos, Charles Manson, the CIA and the Secret history of the 60s

At 8 minutes Dr Stephen Kinszer’s opening statement.

Thank you very much, Madam Chairman. Let me begin by expressing my gratitude to this task force for confronting the enormous issue of over classification of government documents and the culture of secrecy that enables it. I’m especially gratified by your interest in MK Ultra, the project the CIA carried out through the 1950s in an attempt to find the secret of mind control. MK Ultra was one of the most secret government programs in American history. The chemist who directed it, Sydney Gottlieb, lived in total anonymity. My book, Poisoner and Chief, may be the most complete account of MK Ultra that exists in public, but I’m painfully aware that I have discovered only a small portion of what MK Ultra was and what Sydney Gottlieb did. In 1951, the CIA hired Gottlieb and directed him to launch what became MK Ultra. Gottlieb believed that in order to find a way to implant a new mind into someone’s brain, you first had to find a way to destroy the mind that was in there already.

In its search for ways to destroy a human mind and body, MK Ultra conducted the most extreme experiments on human beings that have ever been carried out by a US government agency. By any standard, they qualify as medical torture. These experiments took place in prisons, clinics, and safe houses in the United States, in Europe, in Asia, and even in Latin America. Officers of MK Ultra were authorized to travel to foreign countries, preferably those under formal or informal US occupation, and ask the local CIA station to provide them with expendables, human beings who would not be missed if they disappeared. Gottlieb had what amounted to a license to kill issued by the US government. Neither the number of MK Ultra victims nor the number of those who were experimented to death is known.

Gottlieb as a result of this license to kill might have been the most powerful unknown American of the 20th century. Some information about MK Ultra spilled out during the 1970s, but senior CIA officers had intentionally let Gottlieb operate without supervision. So they were able to claim that they knew nothing about his excesses. This was a way for the CIA to deny its institutional role in MK Ultra and to portray it misleadingly as the product of one man’s sadism or excessive zeal. Investigating MK Ultra is challenging because when Gottlieb and his mentor Richard Helms left the CIA in 1973, they illegally ordered that its records be destroyed. Soon afterwards, under DCI Stansfield Turner, a CIA analyst, as you pointed out, Madame Chairman, discovered a cache of MK Ultra documents hidden among financial records. Turner credited that analyst with doing a very diligent job of Sherlock Holmesing. That same diligence I believe could bring results today.

One of the great mysteries of MK Ultra has to do with the death in 1953 of an MK Ultra scientist Frank Olsen who had announced his intention to quit the project. His plunge from a New York hotel room was described in the press as the suicide of an army scientist. He was not an army scientist. He worked for the CIA and evidence suggests that his death may have not have been a suicide. So there could be hidden documents that could illuminate this case.

I would also point out that in addition to searching for unknown documents, this committee could do a tremendous service by simply asking for the end of redactions on the documents that we now have. There are reams of documents about MK Ultra that have heavy sections redacted. In the 1970s, this was justified by the argument that it had only been 20 years since these terrible things had happened and revealing details might affect national security. Now, 70 years have passed. That argument can no longer be valid. So, I would urge this committee to try to fill out all the blank spaces in the documents that we have because we know that is there. This task force could also consider trying to determine whether some new incarnation of MK Ultra exists today. When the main phase of MK Ultra drew to a close in the early 1960s, Sydney Gottlieb concluded that it had failed. That in fact there is no such thing as mind control. Even if he was right, however, he may have been right only at that time. In the many decades since then, there have been enormous advances in cyber technology, in artificial intelligence, in neuroscience. Covert agencies may have access now to tools for mind control that Sydney Gottlieb could not even have imagined. It may well have been true in 1963 that mind control is a myth, but whether it’s still true is uncertain. And that question of whether mind control might now be possible under our new circumstances is something that has presumably occurred to scientists who work for secret services, including our own.

This task force has a chance to connect the past to the future. A renewed effort to find MK Ultra documents from the 1950s and to fill out the redactions of those that have been released might shed new light on how the CIA operated during that period. It could also inform a new inquiry into whether any mind control projects are now underway inside the US security apparatus that might help prevent the emergence of a 21st century MK Ultra that could be even more destructive than the original. Thank you.

Tom O’Neill’s opening statement.

Thank you, Chairwoman Luna and members of the committee. It’s a privilege to be here today. Almost 50 years ago, the last congressional hearings into MK Ultra took place just a short walk from here in the Dirks Senate Office Building. At those hearings convened in August and September of 1977, representatives of the CIA told Congress and the American people that its 25-year effort to control human behavior had been a colossal failure. I believe Congress was never told the truth about what this program actually achieved. In fact, I believe the agency misled Congress in 1977 when it characterized MK Ultra as a failure. My name is Tom O’Neill and in 1999 I accepted a magazine assignment to write a story about murders committed by a group of hippies called the Manson family. For those unfamiliar with this horrific episode of American history, in the summer of 1969, four young people acting on the orders of a cult leader named Charles Manson, went to the home of movie director Roman Polanski and murdered everyone they found there, including his eight and a half month pregnant wife, the actress Sharon Tate. The victims were complete strangers to their killers. The following night, Manson’s followers murdered another couple in the same grizzly fashion. At the time I accepted the assignment, I’d never heard of MK Ultra, and I wouldn’t for another two years. After I’d missed countless deadlines, lost the assignment, and fall fallen down a nightmarish rabbit hole trying to answer the question I couldn’t quite shake. How had Manson, a barely literate ex-con, acquired the ability to persuade ordinary young people to murder complete strangers simply because he had told them to?

The pursuit of the answer to that question led me to Dr. Lewis Jolian West, known to his friends as Jolly. West was one of the most influential psychiatrists in America. During his career, he crossed paths with some of the most controversial events of the 20th century, including the Patty Hurst kidnapping case and the aftermath of the John F. Kennedy assassination investigation. In 1977, West was one of seven academic researchers named in a front page New York Times story alleging that the CIA had used American universities, hospitals, and prisons as secret laboratories for experiments involving LSD and other drugs on unwitting human subjects. West vigorously denied the allegations. He acknowledged that the agency had approached him but insisted he had refused because he said LSD was too dangerous and unpredictable to be used on humans. He added that he limited all of his research with LSD to animals. The revelations in the Times led directly to the congressional hearings held later that year. West denials, however, were effective. He was never investigated and his name never came up at the hearings.

I’ll spare you the long and tedious story of how my Manson reporting led me to West except to say that I eventually learned that in 1967 when Manson transformed into the cult leader we are familiar with today, he and his followers were receiving free medical care at a clinic in San Francisco where West had established a base of operations for a research project he was conducting nearby. After becoming intrigued by the allegations against West, I learned that UCLA, his last academic home, had inherited his paper following his death in 1999.

Nearly two months and more than 200 boxes later, I found the proverbial needle in a hay stack, correspondence between West and Dr. Sydney Gottlieb, the architect of MK Ultra. The letters begin in 1953, just two months after CIA director Alan Dulles authorized the program and while West was stationed at the Lackland Air Force Base in San Antonio, Texas, where he was chief chief psychiatrist at the base hospital. In his first letter to Gottlieb, West proposed conducting experiments on unwitting human subjects, including military personnel, prisoners, and psychiatric patients at the base hospital. He then outlined the experiments themselves in six more pages that could have been written by Josef Mengele Using LSD in combination with hypnosis, West purposed inducing confusion, amnesia, and specific mental disorders in people who would remember nothing of their interaction with him afterward. He sought to develop techniques to extract true information and implant false information in unwilling subjects and to alter the attitudes and beliefs of quote previously loyal individuals. In other words, to completely switch their allegiance from one group or leader to another.

But it was another sentence at the end of that letter that stopped me cold. These experiments, he wrote, must eventually be put to test in practical trials in the field. Gottlieb’s response could hardly have been more enthusiastic. My good friend, he wrote, I had been wondering whether your apparent rapid and comprehensive grasp of our problems could possibly be real. You have indeed developed an admirably accurate picture of exactly what we are after. West replied that there was no more vital undertaking conceivable in these times. There was another document in West papers that had even more significant implications. It was a 14-page report that West wrote in 1956, just three years after he contracted with the CIA. In the report, West described administering LSD and other drugs in conjunction with hypnosis on unwitting human subjects. And then he made a remarkable claim. He announced that he had learned how to replace true memories with false memories on people without their knowledge. In other words, he clarified, it has been found to be feasible to take the memory of a definite event in the life of an individual and through hypnotic suggestion bring about the subsequent conscious recall to the effect that this event never actually took place, but that a different fictional event actually did occur. If West report was accurate, this was not the failure agency officials described in 1977. Quite the opposite. It was in fact the central ambition of the MK Ultra operation, the means of gaining the ability to seize the control of a person’s perceptions, memories, and ultimately their behavior.

But there was still one more discovery, and this time I found it in the National Security Archives at George Washington University. the official repository of the CIA’s MK Ultra records, which were released to Congress after the 1977 hearings. In those holdings was a different versions of West 1956 report. The original paper had been replaced by a four-page summary that did not exist in West files and appears to have been written by someone else. Here his claims about replacing memories were gone. in their place was a theoretical discussion of LSD and disassociative states. The versions supplied to Congress concluded that the effects of LSD and similar drugs on disassociative states had, and I’m quoting, never been studied. Never been studied. In the original report, West discusses observations from his own experiments, including detailed descriptions of using LSD to, as he wrote, speed the induction of the hypnotic state and deepen the trance in subjects. Those passages have been removed in the report turned over to Congress. The discrepancy could not have been more stark. Nearly 50 years ago, another congressional committee believed it had been given the truth about MK Ultra. It had not. In conclusion, I respectfully submit that these records, some newly available, and others that remained outside the government’s disclosure for decades, weren’t a thorough re-examination of what the program accomplished, what Congress was told, and what may still remain hidden. I’m happy to provide the documents I’ve referenced today and I’ve provided many additional details in my written testimony.

Dr Elizabeth Ginexi opening statement. [BOY is she angry her cushy job got smacked!] I debated on whether or not to add her opening statement since I do not see how it has anything to do with MK Ultra … What is glorious is at 47:20 she gets called out on just that AND Covid.

Chairman Luna, and distinguished members of the committee, thank you for the opportunity to testify today. I’m a health research scientist with a master’s and doctoral degrees in psychology from the George Washington University. I spent 22 years from 2003 to 2025 as a scientific program official at the National Institutes of Health, managing more than $132 million in health research grants and co-authoring 18 federal funding programs. I left the NIH in April of 2025. I’m here today because what is happening to NIH right now is not reform. It is the replacement of scientific judgment with political control. [She is talking about Robert Kennedy]

For 80 years, US federal investment in biomedical research produced outcomes that no private market would have funded. Heart disease is the leading cause of death in the United States. NIH funded research on blood pressure, cholesterol, and smoking drove a 56% decline in heart disease between 1950 and 1996. Cancer has been transformed. treatments for breast, lung, prostate, and childhood cancers along with immunotherapies that converted previously fatal diagnoses into manageable conditions traced directly to NIH funded research. HIV AIDS were a death sentence in 1981. No pharmaceutical company saw a profitable market for treatment. NIH ran the trials that no one else would run. The result was antiretroviral therapy and preexposure prophylaxis. Global AIDS deaths have fallen 54% since 2010.

Rare diseases that affect 30 million Americans get studied at the NIH because no market will fund that research. Every dollar that’s appropriated to the National Institutes of Health generates $246 in economic output. NIH supported work contributed to 354 of the 356 new drugs that the FDA approved between 2010 and 2019. Cutting the funding source of that pipeline does not slow it. It ends it. The proposed OM federal financial assistance rule would give political appointees authority to terminate funded grants at any time without cause, including ongoing clinical trials with enrolled patients. This is not a hypothetical. NIH has already terminated or frozen thousands of grants, including hundreds of ongoing clinical trials since January 2025, concentrated in infectious disease, vaccine, and health disparities research. This proposed rule will make that authority permanent. The NIH director has eliminated the merit score thresholds that once protected peer review and political appointees are right now overriding peer review outcomes to screen grants for alignment with administrative pri priorities.

The proposed OM rule will also severely restrict international research. We’re managing an H5N1 blue bird flu outbreak that has more than 70 documented human cases. We recently concluded a hivirus response that required CDC scientists working alongside Argentine counterparts. The current Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo is now the third largest on record and is outpacing containment efforts. This rule will curtail exactly that kind of cooperation that we need. NIH lost 1,112 PhD trained workers from 2025 to early 26. More than half of the NIH institutes right now are operating without permanent scientific leadership. The majority of its advisory councils required by statute to provide independent oversight have lost more than half of their members. The fundamental choice before this Congress is between a system where scientists make scientific judgments through accountable processes and one where political appointees make those calls instead. That choice will determine whether the next breakthroughs in cancer, Alzheimer’s, antibiotic resistance, and pandemic defense will happen here, somewhere else, or perhaps not at all. I urge this committee to support a joint resolution of disapproval to block the proposed OM financial assistance rule. that authority to replace peer review with political approval has not been granted by Congress…

This is a congressional hearing that is worth checking out.

KMAG DAILY THREAD 20260617 IRAN DOT CONNECTING

bolton-war-stache-toon

Site rules stolen from our good friend PAVACA

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.


Do not forget to LABEL AI articles video and such.


Just for fun.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hl8vErrqjKY


BTW Hubby was corresponding with a Russian scientist doing similar studies in Siberia using domesticated Russian horses.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

In my opinion Iran was never just about the Middle East, it was about world peace and breaking the grip of the Cabal. That is why there is such a stark contrast between how the press and the rest of the world views the Ukrainian war vs the military op against Iran.

LIVE Q&A: Iran, Lawfare, and Why the Establishment Is Going All-In Against Trump

PARTIAL ROUGH TRANSCRIPT

32:00 Barbara Boyd: On a bill in Congress about merging Israeli & US technological intelligence: “ Well Hey. It’s already pretty effectively merged in terms of the Mossad and the COA and has been ever since James J Angleton created in essence the Mossad from the CIA. To me none of this has any magnitude equivalent to the complete merger of our intelligence community with MI6 and Five Eyes and NATO. Which is far, far, far more dangerous, more disgusting and more off the mark in terms of a native US-Based intelligence compared to anything Israel could think about…

36:20 Iran having a nuclear weapon is a threat to the world. Iran started off negotiations with Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff by saying, we have enough nuclear material for nine bombs right now. That is a genuine threat to the world. You are seeing how the IRGC operates before your eyes. It has been that way for a very, very long time. There is no terrorist operation in the world which doesn’t benefit in some fundamental way. They are not independent. And most of what the IRGC is and everything else comes from the City of London’s long time control of every single terrorist operation in the Middle East. Be they Shiite or Be they Sunni.

Trump stopped that at the beginning of his very first term with his visit to Saudi Arabia. Trump said, the USA is out of this game PERIOD. And that in part is the long history of what this is really all about.

37:50 Mike Steger: The Middle East is the cockpit for escalated war on a Global scale. Iran was set up as part of that agenda. We have documented this. Bernard Lewis, Brzeziński, this was radical Islam used as a basic weapon to threaten the world. [And push it] into a kind of chaos which then Lloyds and others would control and profit and monetize.

Trump realizes that [and] he has dedicated more time in his presidency to stabilizing the Middle East. And there is no doubt that the situation in the Middle East on October 7th which escalated into this horrific war in Gaza came out of Iran and Iran’s interests – Largely British – but through Iran to destabilize the Middle East AND PREVENT THE ABRAHAM ACCORDS, TO PREVENT LONG-TERM PEACE AND STABILITY IN THE MIDDLE EAST. [Ghost in the last video on this page goes into the actual play-by-play of how the Abraham Accords were de-railed. -GC]

38:40 The reality is you have a military cult in the IRGC which controls upward of 50% of the entire Iranian economy. I do not think the clerics or the so-called democratically elected political representatives have had any real control in that country for quite some time if ever… I think the situation is far more dangerous than Iran. And I will point to just one clear evidence of that.

[Ghost goes even further and thinks Iran was all about starting a nuclear war. As I wrote in THE CASE FOR NUCLEAR WAR I think the Cabal is crazy enough to want to start one. –GC]

Kim Jong-un and Trump could have one-on-one direct dialogue. They are having ongoing letter and other correspondence as we speak. He has had that since he came back in. There was NEVER a chance to have dialogue with the clerics or the Ayatollah because the reality is the Ayatollah has not really been holding real power. I think that is the fundamental difference. You can’t trust Iran because you actually don’t have a sense of who is really in power. That is why the negotiations have been hung up. Because there is not a real center of power in Iran to give it a coherent nation state status. [So WHO and WHERE is that center of power? In the UK where the Ayatollah and top IRGC commanders have property?? GC]

43:00 Mike Steger: I think there’s been a kind of a fight in China and it’s not been maybe a balanced one per se. What the communism of Mao was set up, largely by kind of British and globalist interests, to play, is the exact role China was beginning to play in this kind of globalist globalized economy. They became the kind of sweat shop of the world. Cheap labor supply, cheap manufacturing, and what you saw was a rise of billionaires dominating China. And that’s been a kind of corruption that China now is trying to confront and clean out.

What Trump’s challenging China is to say, look, that doesn’t function. That doesn’t work. And there are some people in China at various political levels who recognize that that is not the pathway to go. That it’s led to intrinsic corruption in China, that it leads to political instability. But China’s got a difficult problem. They’ve got to try to hold the nation together. And it’s been a 2,000-year-old problem in China. The Chinese like to break off into their own separate provinces, their own separate princedoms and kingdoms. It’s hard to hold the nation together. So that’s kind of an underlying threat that China constantly faces. And they’ve tried to nationalize with the Mandarin language. There’s all kinds of things they’ve had to do that most people wouldn’t have any idea of, to try to rectify this lack of real national unity inside China… [This agrees with the little I have learned of China. Ghost & Alpha Warrior distinguish between the CCP and Xi. The CCP being the Chinese Deep State. Also given the amount of trouble Xi has handling China, I doubt he wants to actually control anymore land except as tribute states (Belt & Road). –GC]

45:00 Trump has shown in Iran that we are killing the old system. The vestiges of this kind of divided world, this kind of a new cold war era of China, Iran, Russia, North Korea as a block. He’s saying, “We’re killing that system. You’re not going to benefit off of cheap Iranian oil, but we’re going to have a much longer term stable system led by the United States, founded on the US dollar-based system, but based on nations having the right to industrialize, build up, and to thrive. A system of nation states.” And I think there are some in China. I think probably this is the dialogue President Trump is having with Chairman Xi that this is where he’s taking the world and that chairman Xi is well aware that that would be best long-term for China because it really doesn’t have the ability to play the role of a global economic hegemon. That’s just British imperial thinking that’s made its way into China through various aspects including Maoism. So, I think that’s the presentation Trump is making. And I think he’s got to be forceful because if you don’t kill the old system, it’s very difficult for people holding on to the status quo to ever leave it and jump into the new one. I would just add that, China was essentially manipulated based on the WTO — this whole idea of globalization — to become the sweat shop of the world. That’s not really what any nation wants to be….

Steve Bannon and others who continue to insist that we have to go to war with China are not understanding what the president is actually doing and that’s why Mike is quite right…

51:00 Adam: And then here’s one from Cool Cool Roy which I think is actually a much more important question than people realize. “Would you agree that playing the hate and blame game is one of the greatest forms of self- oppression and government oppression on earth?” Before I open it up, let me just say yes. And the way that people describe it sometimes is the victim mentality. Become victimized by some other group or some other ideology, some other identity. Barbara and Mike, your thoughts on this super chat here.

51:30 Barbara Boyd: I think this is a good one. Mike’s pointing to me, so I’ll start.

Okay. Aristotle and Carl Schmidt, the German legal theorist and Nazi, basically had this idea that you don’t know who you are unless you have an enemy. In other words, you define yourself by your enemy. By something terribly negative. You don’t define who you really are, what your mission is here on this earth, and what reality actually is in terms of of how you deal with it. That is human. What Carl Schmidt and Aristotle believed is best deal because you end up in a cycle of endless wars out of all of that and kind of tribal policing of yourselves based on tribal ideas and identities rather than superseding them to actually fulfill our mission here on earth. Genesis tells us what it is. Go forth, multiply and subdue the earth. I really think that’s completely different than either Aristotle or Carl Schmidt.

Carl Schmidt, — I just went and reminded myself, his entire thesis was based on the friend – enemy distinction. That was kind of like the central thesis to it. This kind of issue of building these gangs and encounter gangs of different varieties and then having that kind of gang counter gang warfare play out in the public sphere. That in my mind is basically what’s been controlling essentially all of modern politics. It is using that control mechanism in one way or another for sure. Mike, any thoughts?

53:42 Mike Steger: Yeah, Let’s just take it into the British question, because this is how they tried to control their empire. They did it n East Africa. 👉But probably the most famous case is in India. Where Hindus were the majority, the British power would back the Muslim minority and to aggravate the sense that the Hindus had a right if they had the majority to direct where they wanted to go. But in the Muslim controlled areas near the Indus in West India which is now Pakistan they would back the Hindu minority and aggravate the Muslim majority to the point where you would get this kind of potential for a major backlash👈… It’s not parody in terms of the kind of conditions, but you get this emotional backlash that creates civil war. And that’s exactly what happened in India when the British left in 1947. A civil war broke out on religious lines, killing up to two million people. And that’s the kind of thing you see them attempting to provoke, whether it’s in Belfast or the Henry Nowak: case or the George Floyd dynamic in the United States. They’re trying to create and instigate this kind of reaction. [Crypto Rich, a Muslim, informed Mike of this in a lot greater detail in his recent podcast. -GC]

You can see this if you go to X because it’s so visceral so guttural that it dominates a lot of the social media discussion. That’s why, on Promethean Action, we focus on unifying the country. Our strength is unity and orienting towards the redevelopment of the nation. To rebuilding it just like you want to unify the church as an ecumenical mission, as a good Christian, you want to unify the nation towards a mission of industrial and scientific advancement…


AI DATA CENTERS

1:02:07 Mike Steger: I think there’s a number of things. It’s clear that this data center AI comes out of Silicon Valley. There’s very little to trust about a lot of these institutions. The way they’ve run the social media process, what they’ve run with social control, what they did with censorship, how they were back doors to the intelligence community. All of that’s true. All of that’s worth not trusting. But at the same time, there is a real viability to AI applications, but not necessarily the way that a lot of these AI firms are talking about it.

So, there’s a lot of this idea that we can deliver it to personal consumers and it’s going to be some big financial gain based like social media was broad-based consumption on every phone, every young person. The reality is that AI is probably going to be far more profitable and useful as it’s integrated into the re-industrialization of the United States because there’s real applications connecting it to an industrial robotic and high-tech process of manufacturing of logistics. So there’s real benefit to these kinds of advancements. It’s always a double-edged sword. How do you apply it? Do you apply it towards social control which has been the IC Silicon Valley modus operandi for 25, 30 40 years or is it going to be applied towards a new re-industrialized United States? There are certainly very clear aspects of Trump, of the JD Vance, of this new Republican party, who see that they’re building up the industrial firms, they’re broadening out the defense contractor base with new firms who are looking to apply these things, to integrate it into real manufacturing and production, to increase the kind of broad-based wealth of the country.

Now that said, how we deal with data centers is something that we’ve got to think through as a country. Doing it in big farmland areas doesn’t make a lot of sense. There was a proposal to do it in Buick City up in Flint, which was prior to River Rouge where Ford did the largest factory at the time. It was Buick City up in Flint. That was a massive start to finish raw material to finish automotive product in one plant.

Now that’s been laid waste for a long time and there was proposal to put data centers there. Now Flynn has knocked it out. Like to me it makes a lot more sense to put them into brown fields where you have connected water and power supply than to do it into open farmlands. Much like power centers should be integrated into city centers and industry, not just, solar panels all over our corn fields. So, I think we’ve got to think this thing through. I think that there’s plays on both sides as Barbara’s pointed out. Maybe she wants to go into more depth today.

There’s clearly other aspects. There was a lot of propaganda push from Russian news networks to target our fracking industry. You know, 15, 20 years ago, they really tried to undercut the idea of fracking. They got the whole left in America to be anti-fracking even though that’s what’s created all of this natural gas that these green environmentalists have been obsessed with. The same thing is true today with China because there is a real race for AI that’s real and largely because China sees it. China knows even maybe better than a lot of Americans that this AI is going to be a boon towards their manufacturing and productive sector and they sought to have global control of that. So I think the question is re-industrializing thinking about how we use these AI data centers. Even as Trump said making sure that these AI companies are treated like pharmaceutical companies. You can’t just release these new models. We have to know what they’re actually going to be doing. What kind of effect they have….

so we’ve got to regulate it. We might have to integrate it, but we have to be smart about it. It’s a double-edged sword. We can’t become anti-technology, but we can’t allow the model of Silicon Valley and social control to continue to dominate the way we let these companies become big major firms in the United States. And I think that’s a political question. It’s a question of political power. And it’s the kind of challenge that self-government creates because we can just either hand it to the experts and be ruled by oligarchy or if we’re going to deal with it, we’ve got to deal with it in a smart way and not just react because there are certain forces that want to control our reaction. They want us to react and shut this thing down and we’ve got to be smart about it. So that’s kind of how I think about it.

1:06:40 Barbara Boyd: I had pointed out I think last week that Kevin O’Leary who you know is famous from TV, is actually building a data center in Utah and started getting all sorts of strange stuff that he wasn’t doing in terms of zoning and everything else. Big attacks on him. He hired a firm to actually track down where all this was coming from. Unsurprisingly he proved that it was coming from China. Which makes a whole lot of sense. Okay, We’re in a race as to who is going to actually develop the useful aspects of this first and foremost. Data centers are a requirement of that. That said, you’ve got to take into account environment. You shouldn’t be building it on, farmland, which should be in agriculture at this point. And is a really big deal out there because we have problems with our farmers, which have nothing to do with AI. [Goes into food Cartels]

POLITICAL ISLAM

1:50:00 Adam: Sha says “I think you are missing the plan of Islam.” Barbara and Mike your thoughts on this one? Are are we missing the plan of Islam?

Barbara Boyd: No, we’re not missing it. You got to understand a little bit about Islam as a religion. All right? There’s two sides to it. There is so-called political Islam, which was largely an invention. And you know, some of my Muslim friends will actually get mad at me at this point, but that was actually an invention of the Arab Bureau of British Secret Intelligence for purposes of using Islam as a weapon in this whole dynamic in the Middle East to have gangs and counter gangs. Basically, revisionist Zionism versus political Islam. The Muslim Brotherhood being the biggest example of that. Obviously the Muslim Brotherhood and those who are looking to have a re-founding of the caliphate, even Turkey wants that, are looking towards proselytizing other people in the world to become part of Islam or they’re considered to be enemies of the religion that is essentially what you’re talking about when you talk about the Plan of Islam. Most Muslims do not subscribe to this at all. So, you got to be very careful here and make the distinction and figure out whether you’re being pushed into something that really is not all that big a deal. I think the last time I looked demographically, the Muslims constitute about 1% of the United States total in various areas of the country. [Google says 1.3% to 1.5%GC] They obviously have settled, because of immigration patterns and family patterns and the religion and everything else. People get freaked out about it because they think oh my god this group of people is here and they’re not adhering to anything in the community and they haven’t been absorbed into the community. That’s a problem. It’s a problem we face across the board in terms of immigration in our country.

👉But, in order for people to actually integrate into a culture, you got to be able to define the culture they’re integrating themselves into.👈

And if you look at our culture in the United States at this point, and you asked yourself, if I was coming here and I actually am being told you need to integrate into American culture, what would I see? What would I see? Would I see Graham Platner and think that I got to integrate with that? That’s kind of a problem. It’s not as simple as the plan, which everybody’s kind of attached to at this point of, oh my god. they’re going to come here and essentially take us all over. It is a source of tension in various communities in the United States around this question of, you know, becoming an American and identifying being an American as your essential identity. But in order for people to do that, we got to do a much better job of actually defining what a citizen and citizenship in the United States actually means. So that’s how to answer your question.…

118:16 Mark Steger: And let me just go back to the last question because I think what people are missing, I mean Islam has been radically altered by a lot of the foreign funding [and] British operations over the last 50 years. What Trump’s message to a lot of these Gulf Kingdoms, the Saudis, the entire Islamic world is in 2017, knock it off. We’re not going to be funding ISIS and al-Qaeda any longer as we did under Obama. We’re not going to be funding Hamas in this operation. You guys have got to change the orientation away from this caliphate.

But the bigger question is for too long people in the United States and in Europe have taken Christian civilization for granted. There’s not a clarity of what it is, what its principles are, how it manifests as a worldview, what we’re committed to developing, what our role in the universe is. We don’t have a people [who] might go to church. They might want to oppose the kind of cultural decadence and destruction of Hollywood and the elites, the liberal elites in this country. We have not fortified in a theological and deeper cultural way, a worldview that expresses the kind of strength and beauty and the kind of power of scientific discovery that Christian civilization really means. And I think people have to have a sense that that’s what’s needed. That’s what we’re doing with Promethean Action. That’s what we’ve recognized for a long time. And we’re developing it from the standpoint of how this kind of cultural outlook has got to be strengthened and made more conscious in the minds and hearts of the American people. And if we have that, as Barbara said, we’re going to recruit a lot more of the people that are here towards a real sense of what our civilization is based on. And we’re going to counter probably the most insidious effects which has been things like the rap culture. This rap music culture, this anti-American materialist kind of culture which has recruited a lot of the immigrant communities.

Parents come in hoping to maybe integrate and be part of it, but they’ve got their traditions and cultures. It’s their children. You’ll see this in France. the second & third generations have become less and less assimilated and integrated because the culture that’s been promoted has largely been anti the very principles of our civilization. So the question is are we making clear the real principles of what a western Christian civilization represent. And I think that’s what we’ve got. That’s what Trump’s looking to revive….

Speaking of Iran, and Obama’s ‘Agreement’ There is Obama’s Handler, Valerie
Jarrett.


Flashback: Who is Valerie Jarrett?

….According to FBI files obtained by Judicial Watch, Jarrett’s father, Dr. James E. Bowman, a pathologist and geneticist, “had extensive ties to Communist associations and individuals.”

The files also show that “in 1950, Bowman was in communication with a paid Soviet agent Alfred Stern, who fled to Prague after getting charged with espionage.”

Alfred Stern and his wife, Martha Dodd Stern, “were indicted in absentia on espionage charges on Sept. 9, 1957, The New York Times reported. The indictment charged them with conspiring to act as Soviet agents, receiving American military, commercial and industrial information and transmitting it to the Soviet Union. The indictment charged that they used their house in Ridgefield, Conn., for meetings with Soviet agents.”

Dr. James Bowman “was also a member of a Communist-sympathizing group called the Association of Internes and Medical Students,” reported Judicial Watch. “After his discharge from the Army Medical Corps in 1955, Bowman moved to Iran to work.” Valerie Jarret was born in Iran on Nov. 14, 1956.

The Association of Internes and Medical Students, according to the FBI files, is a group that “has long been a faithful follower of the Communist Party line.” Bowman had “deep ties to Chicago,” reported Judicial Watch, “where he often collaborated with fellow Communists.”

Judicial Watch further stated that the Jarrett family Communist ties “also include a business partnership between Jarrett’s maternal grandpa, Robert Rochon Taylor (1899-1957) and [Alfred] Stern, the Soviet agent associated with her dad.”

Valerie Jarrett’s father-in-law, Vernon Jarrett (1917-2004), “was also another big-time Chicago Communist,” according to the FBI files. “For a period of time Vernon Jarrett appeared on the FBI’s Security Index and was considered a potential Communist saboteur who was to be arrested in the event of a conflict with the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR),” Judicial Watch said.

According to the FBI documents, Vernon Jarrett’s job was to “write propaganda for a Communist Party front group in Chicago that would ‘disseminate the Communist Party line among … the middle class.”

“Faithful to her roots, [Valerie Jarrett] still has connections to many Communist and extremist groups, including the Muslim Brotherhood,” said Judicial Watch. “Jarrett and her family also had strong ties to Frank Marshall Davis, a big Obama mentor and Communist Party member with an extensive FBI file.”


Discover the NetworksValerie Jarrett

…The federal government placed Bowman [ValJar’s Dad — GC] under special surveillance because of his involvement with the European Recovery Program (ERP)—i.e., the Marshall Plan. Historian Paul Kengor explains: “This ERP/Marshall Plan association is very intriguing, and troubling. One of the most insidious forms of Communist Party agitation in the 1940s and 1950s was to frame the Marshall Plan as a form of vile American imperialism. It was the Kremlin line, pushed by Stalin and Molotov and mimicked by [the] Communist Party USA. One of the worst peddlers of this line was Frank Marshall Davis, who characterized the Marshall Plan in his columns as a ‘device’ to maintain ‘white imperialism.’ The plan, by Davis’s rendering, was a disgusting ‘oppression of non-white peoples everywhere,’ a slavery purchased by Secretary of State Marshall’s ‘billions of U.S. dollars … to bolster the tottering empires of England, France, Belgium, Holland and the other western exploiters of teeming millions of humans.’ … Was James Bowman [promoting the same notions about the Marshall Plan]? I cannot tell from … his FBI file, but I can say that Bowman’s work for, or position on, the Marshall Plan was the item of special concern to the FBI.”

Bowman was also a member of the Association of Internes and Medical Students, a group that, according to Bowman’s FBI file, engaged in un-American activities and “has long been a faithful follower of the Communist Party line.” …

Bowman was also very active with the communist student group American Youth for Democracy as well as the International Labor Defense and the American Committee for Protection of Foreign Born (ACPFB), three of Frank Marshall Davis’s favorite organizations. Paul Kengor writes the following about ACPFB:

“This group had been so extreme that the Democratic Congress’s huge ‘Investigation of Un-American Propaganda Activities in the United States’ (published in 1944) devoted a lengthy 15-page section just to ACPFB, atop innumerable added references elsewhere in the report. Key members included prominent African-American communists Langston Hughes and Paul Robeson, the gushing admirer of Joe Stalin, plus the usual assemblage of duped liberals/progressives, ranging from theologian Reinhold Niebuhr, to the great Orson Welles, to famed movie actor Edward G. Robinson.

“As the Congressional report noted, ACPFB ‘was founded by the Communist Party in order to exploit racial divisions in the United States for its own revolutionary purposes.Its modus operandi was to polarize Americans along racial lines in order to advance the Soviet agenda. Closely linked to International Labor Defense, the primary (concealed) intention of ACPFB was to protect foreign communists who came to America and agitated for the Soviet Comintern. The core objective was to prevent deportation of these foreign-born communists living in America. One such figure was German communist Gerhart Eisler, who became a major CPUSA cause, and whose name was omnipresent throughout Frank Marshall Davis’s Chicago Star….

1961-1983

When Valerie Jarrett was five, her family relocated to London for one year before settling in Chicago’s elite Hyde Park neighborhood in 1963.

For additional Information on Valerie Jarrett, click here.

Why did Jarrett’s family go to London for a year?

How the British Invented Communism (And Blamed It on the Jews) — The Untold Story of Karl Marx, Leon Trotsky, MI6, and the Russian Revolution

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

A different take on the Middle East situation.

The Republican War mongers and Israel are NOT happy about the possibility of peace in the Middle East. Is Israel going to get Greece to fight Turkey? Israel cannot fight directly because Turkey is in NATO. Also the Israeli Draft of people into the IDF is having repercussions. It is very disruptive of business and commerce. Dual citizens are leaving Israel to escape the Draft and the Ultra-Orthodox Jews are now praying for the fall of Israel.


WARNING: Ghost does not like the expansionist plans of Israel or the Zionists. However he has facts and background not normally available. Much of it complements the information from the Promethean Action video above. The video is 1 ½ hours.

KMAG DAILY THREAD 20260506 – Is SPLC a CIA OP?

Site rules stolen from our good friend PAVACA

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Do not forget to LABEL AI articles video and such.

Just for fun: Otxi the Iceman

I decided to go into an Alpha Warrior – Colonel Towner discussion on the Southern Poverty Law Center. In chasing down a reference the ‘rabbit trail’ led to this info.

First:

The CCP’s Secret Weapon to “Storm and Shatter the Enemy’s Position”  (1 hour)

If you do not want to view a video here is the report:

Over 1,000 CCP-Linked Groups in America: Exposing United Front Operations | Peter Mattis

April 25, 2026 • 70 mins (I ❤ Radio)

A recent landmark Jamestown Foundation report maps Chinese United Front operations, the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP’s) effort to co-opt and weaponize civil society against the CCP’s enemies.

The report, titled “Harnessing the People” and authored by researcher Cheryl Yu, identifies more than 2,000 such organizations operating in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Germany. More than 1,000 are operating in the United States.

They span a wide range, including student, business, professional, cultural, and “friendship” groups as well as media outlets.

In this episode, I sit down with Peter Mattis, president of The Jamestown Foundation. Few understand this complex web of Chinese influence and espionage operations as well as he does…

BRAVE AI

The 116th U.S. Congress held meetings in 2019 that included discussions about the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), with Laird Wilcox, an expert on fringe political movements, providing testimony or commentary. Wilcox critiqued the SPLC’s approach to labeling groups as “hate groups,” suggesting it was incautious and politically motivated. 

 His remarks were part of a broader congressional examination of extremism and the role of organizations like the SPLC in monitoring far-right activity. 

Key points from the context:

  • On April 9, 2019, a House Judiciary Subcommittee meeting included documents referencing Wilcox’s analysis of the SPLC’s practices.
  • Wilcox argued that the SPLC used broad and potentially misleading labels, such as “hate group,” without rigorous standards.
  • The SPLC responded through spokesperson Mark Potok, who dismissed Wilcox as having “an ax to grind” against anti-racist organizations.
  • These discussions occurred amid growing scrutiny of both extremist movements and the institutions tracking them. 

One of the papers linked to the Subcommittee meeting, that was not mentioned is this:

MARCH 26, 2019 — THE SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER IS EVERYTHING THAT’S WRONG WITH LIBERALISM (18 pages)

Makes you wonder if this meeting was the beginning of the investigation into SPLC…

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

OPERATION GLADIO – CHAPTER 93 – “SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER” – EP.541

ROUGH TRANSCRIPTION

03:17

ALPHA: We are on chapter 93 and going to be talking about the Southern Poverty Law Center. It’s been in the headlines and of course we will have a Gladio perspective on that.

Colonel, I reached out to you this morning and you said we should probably talk about this.

06:15

COLONEL: I had looked into the Southern Poverty Law Center probably about a year and a half ago um somewhere in a thread somewhere. And what um what immediately stood out to me is if you go back in writings about the Southern Poverty Law Center, almost every article that someone would write about and um specifically a guy by the name of Laird Wilcox, what I found fascinating is on a regular search engine, number one, you almost cannot find any of his material. And archive.org has almost all of his references dead on archive.org, which was kind of like a red flag to me. But you can go through Yandex and do some digging to find some of his old articles about the Southern Poverty Law Center I posted a bunch of them today and all through the day. Of course everybody ignored him like usual, but he was on to this decades ago.

……

SEE: The Laird M. Wilcox Papers via Yandex. One section is Left-wing extremists — United States not much info. On line This is better Meet Laird Wilcox 1986 — REASON Mag – GC]

Meet Laird Wilcox

…During college, Wilcox joined the radical left, a political tradition he inherited from his father. He founded the Student Peace Union and the Kansas Free Press at the University of Kansas. He was active in Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) and the civil-rights movement. Then something happened.

What started out as a noble cause turned ugly. “When it came to the left,” he now says of that time, “I’d never seen such hate in my life.” He quit the movement as he saw it sliding into “mindless nihilism, self-destructiveness, and craziness.”

In 1965, before leaving the university and joining forces with the right to complete his intellectual journey, he sold his collection of political literature to the university for $1,000, thus beginning the Wilcox Collection.

For a time he waltzed as an observer through such organizations as the Ku Klux Klan, the John Birch Society, and some fundamentalist Christian groups. He participated to the fullest and built his collection of literature of the right.

Then Wilcox began to straddle the line. One week he could be seen at a Socialist Workers Party meeting and the next marching with the Nazis. He became plugged in at the highest levels…

An Expert on Fringe Political Movements Reflects on the SPLC’s Political Agenda Congress.gov >meeting>house>documents from 116th U.S. Congress (2019)

“….Recently, [2010] The Social Contract’s contributing editor Peter Gemma [TSC] went to Kansas City to tour the Wilcox Collection and interview Laird Wilcox….”

page 183

TSC: In the course of your research and cataloging work, when did you first become aware of the Southern Poverty Law Center?

Wilcox: About the time they emerged on the scene. Initially, the ideas implied by the name “Southern

Poverty Law Center” sounded kind of appealing, like an organization that would help poor people deal

with their legal problems. After a few years it became apparent that it was nothing like that.

TSC: How did you realize that it’s all a facade, that the SPLC has its own political agenda?

Wilcox: In looking over their fundraising stuff, I could see that they were sensationalizing racial conflict issues, and when their reports on “extremist” groups began appearing it was obviously a bogus fundraising scheme that was into demonizing and blacklisting. It reminded me so much of similar operations that were aimed at leftists during the fifties and sixties, that I concluded it was basically modeled after them…

Mr. Wilcox [left] is also co-author (with John George [right]), of American Extremists: Militias, Supremacists, Klansmen, Communists, & Others(Prometheus: 1996), and Be Reasonable: Selected Quotations for Inquiring Minds(Prometheus: 1994).

Laird Wilcox lectures widely on the psychology of ideological belief systems and these topics. — LINK

The above articles are all from Yandex.

….

COLONEL: But what struck me when I was looking at it before, and today, was how often the Southern Poverty Law Center is attached to the ADL, the Anti Defamation League. In almost every article, there’s some tie between the two as far as them tag teaming issues, which again to me is a red flag. So, let’s start off by introducing a couple of the characters we’re going to talk about.

The first one is Morris, and you don’t ever see his middle name used. It’s Seligman, which is a very notorious German Jewish surname. [“Seligman is a surname of German and Ashkenazi Jewish origin, primarily derived from the root word selig (or Yiddish zeleg), meaning “blessed,” “happy,” or “prosperous”Brave AI GC] His last name is Dees. So, he’s from an area that’s just east of Montgomery, Alabama. All of the descriptions of him say that he’s the son of a farmer.

09:25

And what’s interesting is that area has been known for a school there just outside of that little town,  Mount Meigs.  Mount Meigs, had at the beginning of the 1900s, a school there that was a reformatory for black children. Unreformed: the Story of the Alabama Industrial School for Negro Children – GC] And they had young children there. They had middle-aged children there. And basically it was a prison camp and they were starved. I mean there was horrific stories, They were sexually abused there. I found it rather ironic that he grew up in that area while that school was in operation. I just want to explain to people how Orwellian the name is, Southern Poverty Law Center. And that’s going to come back multiple times when I talk about some of the lawsuits that this guy was involved in because he’s a multi, multi, multi-millionaire.

He goes to law school at the University of Alabama and the first thing he does is open a direct mail sales company. He also publishes books and he creates an organization called Fuller and D’s Marketing Group. That’s what he was known for. It grew to be one of the largest publishing companies in the south. And you can’t find any evidence that this guy was concerned about poverty at all, even in his own backyard. No reaching out to any of those people that went through that torture of growing up in that [school.] As a matter of fact, many of the people later on in life resorted to violence and ended up, with life sentences in prison because they were psychologically tortured in that place. There was no legal representation for any of those people. He never went back and revisited any of their sentences, nothing. So to me that’s very noteworthy.

11:59

He gets approached by the Los Angeles Times to buy his publishing company. Now, those of you who followed me long enough understand that the media basically is all part of this [CIA] operation, right? So they offer him something like a million dollars for his publishing and direct sales company. I think that’s the point in which this guy is compromised. Of course he is given all of the normal awards from the establishment. The National Education Association, heaps awards on him. He gets all kinds of accolades like they’re building a portfolio for him. The USJC’s [U.S. Justice Coalition -GC] gives him awards, blah blah blah. In 1967 is the first time he started taking on controversial cases. He filed a suit to stop construction of a white university in an Alabama city that had a black state college there. He also sued to integrate Montgomery’s YMCA, which of course we all think is a great idea.

His partner’s last name is Joseph J. Levin, Jr. They both go to the same school. They graduate from the same law school and go in a business called the Southern Poverty Law Center with a civil rights activist by the name of Julian Bond. So now we’ve got the Southern Law Poverty Law Center. And again, he is heaped with rewards by the likes of the American Bar Association, which is corrupt as hell. [Boy don’t we know it! – GC] It gives him an award. The American Civil Liberties Union, ACLU, gives him an award. I already mentioned the National Education One. So in 1972, he becomes the finance director for George McGovern’s presidential campaign because he’s a whiz at direct mailing, he raises over $24 million for George McGovern using his technique. He also served as President Carter’s national finance director in 1976. He served as the national finance chairman for Senator Kennedy’s 1980 presidential campaign. Now, you won’t be surprised at all if I tell you that if you go to the Southern Poverty Law C Center’s website and want to donate, do you know who runs their donations? Act Blue.

So Dees becomes the chief trial council at the Southern Poverty Law Center and he participates in creating that hate map. He’s infamous for suing quote unquote hate groups that he also funds. Kind of like the self-licking ice cream cone. And every case that he takes he uses as a marketing tool. So he says that he’s representing John Doe and then he advertises and uses direct mailing to get millions of dollars, donations from everybody. BUT while he’s representing these people, he doesn’t share any of that money with the victims of the lawsuits. And I’ll come back to that in a minute.

17:00

So he writes books. And one of the first books he writes is A Season for Justice. He also writes a book called Hate on Trial: The Case Against America’s Most Dangerous Neo-Nazis that was published in early 1990s. And it basically talks about a trial and a $12.5 million judgment against a quote unquote white supremacist Tom Mezer and his white Aryan resistance group for beating up a young black student in Portland, Oregon. His third book was called Gathering Storm: America’sMilitia Threat. Of course then he goes out and creates his own militia. So he has now combined all of those aspects.

I need to also say this guy was married four times that I could track. In his last divorce, the woman accused him of being a pedophile for trying to go to bed with her daughter from another marriage and being gay and having sex with somebody that he tried to get into a threesome with his wife. He also was accused multiple times of sexually harassing females at Southern Poverty Law Center. Now, you can discount the divorce stuff cuz that came out in the divorce, the stuff about him being a pedophile and gay. You can take that for whatever it’s worth. There are charges made in divorces that are not necessarily true, but that’s part of this whole guy’s persona. So, just putting that out there.

So let me go back and talk about Joseph Levin, his law partner. As I said before, he graduated from University of Alabama with a law degree as well. He spent two years in the US Army and he goes into business at the Southern Poverty. They had a law firm and then that law firm basically becomes Southern Poverty Law Center.

20:10

I want to get to this other guy because he’s very interesting. He had a couple of things to say. He was one of the original guys that Dees was in business with. His name was Millard Fuller. He’ was Dees marketing guy. He allows Dees to buy him out from that marketing firm and donates all of that money to charity and he then goes on to establish Habitat for Humanity. So apparently he’s a good guy. But one of the articles that quoted Fuller that I saw basically said that his complaint and why he wanted out of that business was that Dees had said to him that he was only in it for the money. He was going to do whatever it took to get rich. And Fuller being more of a humanitarian was in it for the right reasons. So at that point I’ve made my assessment of what type of a person Dees is. I think that’s critical background for understanding the Southern Poverty Law Center.

So, one of the first things that struck me is that the Southern Poverty Law Center, their big famous thing that they produce is called an intelligence report, which of course for me is like what? Who does that? Who writes an intelligence report at a nonprofit NGO? Like nobody, unless you’re in it for other reasons. So the intelligence report is the crux of the whole thing. The people that are in this intelligence group inside the Southern Poverty Law Center monitors hate groups and racial extremists throughout the United States and exposes their activities to law enforcement agencies, the media, and the public. They are quoted as saying, “We publish our investigative findings online in the intelligence report. our award winning quarterly journal.” Of course, this intelligence report is used by law enforcement all over the country.

If you were the CIA, hypothetically, and you wanted to operate inside the United States and target groups, would you not use an organization like the Southern Poverty Law Center who has their own intelligence body inside of it?

ALPHA: Absolutely, I would.

COLONEL: And when you look at the production of the identification of hate groups, do you think 764 or Transtifa or any of those are on there as a hate group or the Muslim extremists? No. No, they’re not. They’re not on there anywhere. The only ones that are really on there are basically the more patriot focused organizations. You’ll find one or two, but it’s primarily focused at exactly the same people, the nationalists, that the CIA targets overseas. So if you go into any of the 90 plus countries that we’ve talked about, the focus is always on the people that don’t play ball, right? So you go to the Tupamaros en Chile, they are the ones that are the nationalist that don’t want the CIA operating and wants their government as a representative democracy. So, I have a sneaking suspicion that we’re going to find out that there are direct ties domestically. And these are one of the exact same organizations that we’ve looked at overseas multiple times in our Gladio series because they fit the exact footprint. So, let me transition here.

25:50

ALPHA: I like what you said there and I hope people caught it. You know, that it mimics the exact same footprint because that’s what matters. For those of you that saw last week’s show, you know, one of the organizations that Colonel was talking about and I was like, “Hey, this really sounds like Red Seat Ventures” Well, this is that situation what we’ve been talking about, you know, on all these different countries. Now you look at the behavior of the Southern Poverty Law Center and it mimics the same behavior. So I hope people caught what you said right there.

26:16

COLONEL: Let’s go over a little bit. We all know that there was an indictment that was released. It indicates that there was fraud and money laundering going on inside. Again this is another part of the whole footprint because that’s exactly what was going on in overseas vehicles that were used by the CIA to destabilize countries. So, when you look at them through your Gladio glasses, SPLC does not appear to be a civil rights watchdog. I’m going to go through a couple of cases in just a second, but it’s an institutionalized center for strategy of tension. So, if I can fund raise off of hate, I have to have hate. So if I don’t have enough hate, I just create the hate and I fund raise off of exposing the hate that I actually funded. And so I’m I’m going to get to a couple of examples of that, too.

I was trying to put all of this into words. What I came up with was it is the foundational logic of Gladio operations throughout Europe and around the world. Intelligence services and their proxies infiltrate extremist factions on both the far right and far left. The objective was never to eliminate dissent, but to facilitate and control chaos by funding, guiding, and radicalizing groups that were already pre-disposed to violence. These actors created a perpetual state of fear, justifying the expansion of state powers, the suppression of political enemies, and the validation of existing elite narratives. The indictment confirms that this model has been imported and institutionalized in American nonprofit sectors which is again exactly how USAID does it overseas using NOS’s. They do that by funneling millions of dollars to highly placed figures in the Ku Klux Klan and neo-Nazi movements. The SPLC ensured that these groups stayed active, visible, and violent when they might have otherwise withered into irrelevance. This provided a steady state of quote unquote racism, even if it’s manufactured, that served as raw material for their fundraising apparatus. It’s the perfect system, generate the problem, weaponize the problem, and secure tax-exempt funding and use the money to fuel the problem further. And of course, we know the Southern Poverty Law Center material is used by the FBI. It’s used by police departments. And they use it as part of congressional testimony.

29:40

ALPHA:I told you before the show that I referenced them in a search warrant that I did many years ago. You think the data, because it’s used by these other entities and it’s referenced and you’re like, “Oh, this is legitimate.” And then you get over here and you’re just like, “Well, yeah, the numbers might have been real, but only because they created them.”

COLONEL: Right? So, the indictment also says that they created entities and potentially shell accounts that mirror all of the organizational structure used in Gladio overseas. They paid informants to stoke racial hatred or coordinated logistical support for rallies such as the 2017 Charlottesville event. Did you know that they were intimately involved in Charlottesville?

30:49

ALPHA: I do now and have been over the last 24 hours. i don’t know what you’ve researched, but a lot of the information that’s circulating, I have not vetted it, but a lot of the information circulating is that Charlottesville event is one of the events that helped launch Nick Fuentes’s notoriety.

COLONEL: Correct.

ALPHA: Interesting.

COLONEL: Yes. Isn’t it? and they provided logistical support. You know, if you read through it, it looks almost like they were controlling it. They talked about it and they even had several days before scenarios about using vehicles to run over people. So this is the textbook example of agent provocateur tactics used by the CIA and their European counterparts to ensure geopolitical and social outcomes are steered exactly where they want them to head. They didn’t act in a vacuum. They were deeply integrated in the FBI and political establishments, which allowed its quote unquote hate group list to act as a de-facto policy manual for domestic security. It created a feedback loop where the government and the quote unquote watchdog acted as a unified unaccountable superstructure that defined who the domestic enemy was in order for them to take action against them. SPLC’s role in this destabilization project goes beyond just money. It centers on the American heartland by demonizing the identity of historic white Christian population and labeling their legitimate political concerns as extremism.

The SPLC has been the primary engine for managed decline, and racial tension. By equating American nationalism with violent fringe groups they essentially subsidized, they effectively de-legitimized any serious attempt at organizing any type of national interest or conservative preservation in the United States. They criminalized being a patriot. That’s the bottom line. They criminalized being an American first patriot.

Now, this goes back to when we were talking about the three events with the Ruby Ridge, Waco, and Oklahoma, right?

33:45

ALPHA: Correct.

COLONEL: Also, there were SPLC infiltrators in the Aryan Nation all, over, to include the Oklahoma location where Timothy McVeigh hung out. Where we also found Strassmeir who I track back to Germany whose dad [the Chief of Staff to Chancellor Helmut Kohl per WIKI –GC] was intimately involved as Germany’s what they call the Department of interior guy during the Gladio operations where there were bombings all over Germany. So his dad was the government entity in Germany responsible for preventing those but they happened everywhere and included killing several US service members in those bombings. That guy’s son was at the Aryan Nation location in Oklahoma where Timothy McVeigh was hanging out. He’s the guy that was, after the bombing, escorted out of the country. Kind of like the JFK, OAS agent was escorted out of the country by the Dallas Police Department. So, the Southern Poverty Law Center, like I said, had infiltrators inside, if not paying for some of the rabble rousing that was going on in the Aryan Nation location in Oklahoma. It’s all connected.

So, they basically provided The Hegelian Dialect. They provided the thesis i.e. extreme manufactured racism and the anti-thesis of globalist multi-cultural establishment, which they fully endorse. Keeping the public locked into this dialectical conflict that prevents any serious discussion of the collapse of the nuclear family or the erosion of national sovereignty or anything else. Because as soon as you broach those subjects, you’re called a racist, right? So, obviously this indictment exposes the administrative state here in the United States and their reliance on a controlled opposition. If you’ve got to create hate groups, you really don’t have hate unless you manufacture it.

A couple of key points on the indictment. The Southern Poverty Law Center and its affiliated financial entities constituted a massive indictment that is far worse than racketeering or state sponsored disruption. They talk in the indictment about racketeering and fraudulent conduit schemes. They alleged that they functioned as an expansive racketeering enterprise. It’s accused of utilizing pass through entities and domestic NGOs to move millions of dollars to fringe extremist organizations. It’s documented through a series of quote unquote consulting fees and research grants that were in practice salaries and operational subsidies for leadership figures in self-styled white supremacist and separatist groups. This goes back to your comment about Nick Fuentes, right? How many of these people that are spewing this garbage are on the SPLC’s pay list?

ALPHA: It’s absolutely important because you made me spawn a thought and that thought led to another one and I’m trying to find it right now to verify some information. I’m going to look a little deeper before I mentioned the second one. But one of the things that came to mind was, you remember the Sedition Hunters?

38:50

COLONEL: Oh yes.

ALPHA: Because they were targeting a bunch of us.

COLONEL: I know they targeted my neighbors.

ALPHA:Exactly. And a lot of people might remember ‘Maga Granny’ , the one that ended up flipping on Trump? She tried to out me but didn’t realize that I keep everything recorded and long story short, she started working with the Sedition Hunters. People that are, very loyal to this show and cared about me took it upon themselves to go do investigations and were like, “Hey, look at this brand new car she’s driving after she’s talking about doing all these fundraisers, and It was just very interesting. So I’m very curious to what kind of connections the Southern Poverty Law Center had to the Sedition Hunters. But another organization I’m curious to if there’s any connections and I found one I’m trying to verify it right now as well, it is The Lincoln Project. And so you got my mind going because like you just said, it’s this this big circle of organizations. it’s the intelligence apparatus saying let’s just create these other organizations that don’t have to submit to FOIA. they don’t have to submit to different things that are out there.

COLONEL: They’re fronts.

ALPHA: They’re fronts, but here’s the other part. It is knowing that the FBI starting with them is something that would mimic a very large RICO case because you’re building your way up to the way this works. So, anyway, my mind’s going wild and I hope people are paying attention, because for all the people out there that have been screaming nothing’s happening. I think this is going to be freaking huge. I think this is Pandora’s. Colonel Please continue.

41:47

COLONEL: Okay. Also in the indictment, they were accused of sending direct payments from SPLC linked accounts to bank accounts of identified extremists by the SPLC. So they identify them, then they pay them. These funds were used for tactical gear, travel, and logistics for rallies intended to draw mass media attention and public outrage. The indictment alleges a revolving door between radical group leadership, [and] the SPLC consulting roles. By paying these figures to maintain their visibility, the SPLC ensured a constant supply of inflammatory imagery and audio to sustain high levels of fear, to encourage donations and to add legitimacy to a increasingly bigger surveillance state. The indictment challenges the SPLC’s tax-exempt status by demonstrating that its core activity was not educational or legal advocacy but political warfare. Which is huge. It also says that they had tracked hundreds of millions of dollars to offshore accounts. And again, how ‘Gladio’ is that? They argue that they were not legitimate endowments, but a war chest intended to influence internal political outcomes, probably used for overseas as well. Allegations include a systemic filing of false financial disclosures with the IRS, failing to disclose the true nature of the expenditures and misidentifying political activities as civil rights legal defense.

44:06

ALPHA: So, let me plug in a little information here because it ties into legal defenses. I told you I was looking at Southern Poverty Law Center and the Lincoln Project to see if there’s any connections. Now, this is cursory level just so folks understand. I haven’t gone deep into it. And here’s one of the ones that we have. First, the breakdown January 5th, 2021. This is from the Lincoln Project, the their program listed Nancy Abudu as a guest. Separate sources identify Abudu at the time as an SPLC voting rights

leader and later a strategic litigation leader. That is a documented personnel crossover in a media appearance. So there’s one. The second one, and this comes in 2024, the Georgia election case. The court filing hosted on SPLC’s site shows SPLC lawyers representing one group of Amichi while the same filing certificate of service separately lists councils for Georgia First Incorporated and the Lincoln Project Incorporated. That shows that SPLC and the Lincoln Project were at least in line on the same side of that litigation.

45:46

COLONEL: It fits the pattern.

ALPHA: This is gonna be big.

COLONEL: That’s a great find. So obviously they have a monopoly on the watch list or terrorist list. The prosecution for the indictment argues that the information used by the SPLC to lobby federal law enforcement both at DHS and FBI was often derived from individuals that the SPLC was funding. Talk about a self-licking ice cream cone! It alleges that SPLC provided evidence of domestic threats to federal agencies that they themselves had manufactured via their network of informants and subsidized radicals. This is framed as a breach of federal law regarding the manipulation of intelligence and the subversion of internal security processes. Because they’re basically passing off fake information. Oh, who else does that? Oh, I don’t know. the CIA who actually creates intelligence as opposed to gathering intelligence? That’s exactly what SPLC is doing. They’re acting as a mini CIA domestically. That’s exactly what the indictment says. They are part of Operation Gladio in the United States.

ALPHA:100%. Because it’s my opinion that’s what Sedition Hunters were. They were doxing all of us and they were doing that at the behest of the corrupt side of the intelligence agencies.

COLONEL: Well, there’s there’s I wouldn’t even say they were doxing. They were literally tracking people down.

So, just so you guys know, I’ve told this story a couple of times. I had a friend of mine that was running for political office in the local area here and she knew a lot of people and she talked to all the cops and the fire department blah blah blah cuz she was running for mayor. She called me one day and said I needed to meet her immediately. I had made it well known that my neighbors were the three people in my hometown here that were implicated in January 6th and they were tracking one of them down. They couldn’t find him. The other two had on electronic monitors so they could try to find the third one since they all are related. So I drove over and met her and she just handed me a piece of paper. In the note that she handed me, because she didn’t want to even say it out loud, was that the sedition hunters had been to all of the local businesses here asking about that guy. The one that got away. That they couldn’t find. And so I went to my friend who is the aunt of the one that they couldn’t find and walked out in the woods and had a conversation with her husband about that. I just handed him the note. We had a conversation talking about just how ridiculous the whole thing was. But they were actively combing the area, talking to every business owner, trying to find him. They were conducting a manhunt. It was crazy.

…..

I want to stop here and point out the government’s vastly different response to these Sedition Hunters and to Nick Shirley with the  “Stop Nick Shirley Act” to Criminalize Investigative Journalism

or the people canvassing voters in the aftermath of the 2020 election.  This article documents the court case against Ashe in America and her co-defendants. In all three cases private citizens are investigating possible criminal behavior but only the Sedition Hunters were praised and paid. No mention is made of the physical harassment by these people mentioned by Alpha and Shawn Taylor in the following article: Biden’s FBI paid anti-Trump ‘Sedition Hunters’ as informants in J6, Arctic Frost probes, memos show

GC

……

49:23

So the prosecution claims that SPLC’s actions were intended to spark civil unrest by intentionally facilitating high-profile confrontations. The SPLC created an environment where the state could justify their surveillance of political dissident, which is exactly what they’ve [CIA] done in every country. This is the Phoenix Program, people. The censorship of alternative media and the expansion of de domestic counter-terror authorities. SEE: The CIA’s ‘Phoenix Program’ in Vietnam: Practice run for the “war on terror”

The filing also argues that SPLC utilized these manufactured tensions to prevent any broad based consensus among American citizenry, specifically by weaponizing the quote unquote hate group label to shut down any legitimate debate regarding immigration, demographic shifts, or the erosion of the traditional American values.

50:37

Now let’s talk about Patriot Front. Do you remember them?

ALPHA: Oh, I do.

COLONEL: And everybody kept saying that they were basically FBI agents, right? >>

Well, the indictment of the Southern Poverty Law Center addresses Patriot Front, characterizing the organization not as an independent grassroots entity, but as a critical node in an SPLC managed controlled opposition network. It provided a detailed breakdown of the institutional and financial intersections which aligned with operational patterns observed in many of the overseas operations. It says that the operational capacity of Patriot Front was significantly enabled by funds originating from SPLC linked entities like direct wire transfers. Supposedly they conducted forensic accounting and it presented consistent masked wire transfers from NGOS’s under the SPLC umbrella to private accounts owned by key Patriot Front leadership. The indictment links SPLC funds to specific logistical expenditures. Remember all those vans? Those U-Haul vans? Those expenditures included the leasing of those vans, the procurement of uniforms, and the purchasing of communication equipment used during high profile demonstrations. No wonder they all got away all the time and nobody tried to unmask them except for a few times. They also said that documents indicated that the timing, locations, and specific messaging of Patriot Front marches was coordinated to coincide with political moments where white supremacist threat narrative needed to surge. The indictment says that SPLC pushed for the use of mask face coverings for Patriot Front members. This was not a security measure for the members, but a deliberate tactical decision to prevent personal identification and ensure they remained viewed by the public as a monolithic threat to individuals.

ALPHA:Now, can you see the screen Colonel?

COLONEL: Yep.

53:19

ALPHA: So, this flag here to the left, one of the first things that caught my attention, there were so many obvious signs here, but I want you guys to pay attention what our star where our stars would normally be. And any of you that have followed any of the coverage that I’ve been doing, you know, over the last couple years on the Azov battalion and the Nazis and Ukraine and all that stuff going on, you will recognize that symbol [Used by the Patriot Front – Wiki –GC] because it is also known as the black sun. And so I’ll just read just the first two sentences. “The black sun is a type of sun wheel symbol originating in Nazi Germany and later employed by neo-Nazis and other far-right individuals and groups. “ WIKI

THE BLACK SUN


Former badge of the Azov Brigade,

which uses a Black Sun and the

 National Idea symbol in the forefront”

COLONEL: No, they’re trying to create them. They’re trying to create a narrative. It was a Psyops. It was a psychological operation conducted on the American people.

54:14

ALPHA: So this way you remember. You make it look organic but it’s synthetic. That way once you do get ordinary people sucked into it emotionally and make the mistake then those people are going to get hammered. It’s the whole thing in Michigan with Gretchen Whitmer. And the brothers and all that stuff that went out there. It’s 90% FBI agents, 10% people. That was the operation. That’s ridiculous. And and and there’s no tactical leader in the world that would have ever allowed a legitimate operation like that to go through. If they were legitimate. If I would have went to my police chief and said, “Hey, chief, you know, there’s these two guys and I think we can bust them being part of an organization.” How big’s the organization? Well, 12 members. Well, ain’t 10 of you guys in there, though. That’s besides the point. He would have looked at me like, “You’re crazy. What’s wrong with you guys?” But yet, that’s what they did.

55:21

COLONIAL: It also suggests that SPLC researchers were the ones providing the guidance for Patriot Front rhetoric. When Patriot Front would subsequently release a manifesto or make a provocative statement, the SPLC would then discover. in air quotes and highlight this rhetoric to the FBI or DOJ and media, thereby validating their own manufactured feedback loop. So, I’m going to give you the script, you read it, and then I’m going to act outraged. The indictment claims that SPLC personnel served as a clearing house for information provided to federal agencies regarding Patriot Front activities, effectively curating which extreme groups the government would focus on and which ones they would allow to operate unhindered, which again is exactly what the CIA does overseas. The indictment further contends that the Patriot Front was maintained purposely to erode the legitimacy of the broader American nationalist movement by keeping the group active, well funded, and highly visible. They created a psychological lightning rod. Every action taken by the Patriot Front was used to broaden the definition of hate to cover mainstream patriotic and pro-Western sentiment. The indictment says that SPLC used these stunts to pressure corporations, social media platforms, and political representatives to de-platform and suppress nonviolent legitimate desenters by associating them with the manufactured optic of the Patriot Front, which they themselves created. So it basically functioned as a part of the strategy of tension serving as a foil that SPLC could manipulate to justify suppression of the historic American population. The indictment represents the group as a modern-day iteration of a false front organization utilizing intelligence operations to ensure legitimate political opposition remains trapped by characterized by radical optic and damaging. That’s crazy.

58:12

Now, let me go back to the comparison of the SPLC and the anti-defamation league, the ADL…

I started doing a side-by-side comparison of the tactics used by the ADL for their agenda and the SPLC for their agenda. And it’s weird just how closely they mirror each other. They basically are operating like a two-headed monster within the administrative state. They actually share intelligence data between the intelligence project of the SPLC and the ADL’s center on extremism. They function as a private sector CIA for domestic social management. They share files on political dissident, coordinate de-platforming campaigns against journalists and activists and trade information with the federal law enforcement to ensure that their version of hate becomes codified in state sanctioned policy. By having two massive tax-exempt organizations reporting on the same threat, they create an echo – system. If the SPLC identifies an individual as dangerous, the ADL echoes it and vice versa. This creates a feedback loop for media outlets themselves often staffed by people with similar ideological commitments and they can then treat it as objective truth with independent verification of the other. It provides a cover of legitimacy that destroys people’s livelihood and reputations.

Both the SPLC and the ADL have been the tip of the spear for advocating for mass migration, the eraser of heritage-based identities for the majority population and the active promotion of multiculturalism. The globalist agenda. It’s a deliberate strategy, a form of social engineering that effectively functions as a survival mechanism against perceived threats. The ADL pioneered this industry obviously with the historical trauma of the Holocaust as a political cudgel to shield its own political agenda from criticism. And what does the SPLC use? Slavery. It’s the same thing. Their tactics are identical to each other. Almost like they share it.

62:54

ALPHA: Well, what you’re looking the timing of this exposure is good. really really good because and I mentioned this on on my show earlier this week, Colonel, the Carmela Anthony case is coming into play. And I’ve had been warning people since last year, keep your eyes on this case. They’re going to use it. If the religious tribalism is not getting the results they want, they’re going to default to back to the one that they know always works. Black versus white in these crimes. I go, “So, keep an eye on the  Karmelo Anthony case.” and that, you know, the judge came out and and had some choice words about not letting people exploit it. But seeing that these institutions are getting exposed now, that’s a good thing because it can probably rug-pull any event that they probably had planned for that trial. >>

63:48

COLONEL: Yep. I couldn’t agree with you more. So both groups are currently acting as enforcers of post-Christian globalist regime and in our case regime change. they basically are trying to set the agenda of what’s acceptable politically to talk about. They also thrive on the existence of domestic conflict, which of course destabilization, which is what the CIA is known for. Without an extremist boogeyman, their funding evaporates, their influence declines, and their reason for existence vanishes. They have successfully embedded themselves as recognized experts into the FBI, the DOJ, the Department of Homeland Security, and many other organizations to include the military when the government produces domestic terrorism briefings. They are often essentially citing reports generated by the SPLC or the ADL. This is basically a private public outsourcing of state power.

…The other thing. The SPLC was intimately involved in a lawsuit with the Women’s League of Voters, .. they joined up with the Women’s League of Voters to thwart the lawsuits that happened about the 2020 census. They challenged whether or not you could count illegal immigrants. They both got together and if you look over the list of people that donate large large sums of money to the SPLC, it’s a very interesting list that looks exactly like the oligarchs that we’ve talked about in the past.

66:41

ALPHA:Here’s some names right here.

COLONEL: Oh, look, JP Morgan and George Soros. What? That’s crazy. You mean the same JP Morgan that funds all of this Gladio shit and George Soros that funds all of this Gladio shit more recently? They would be funding the SPLC. Yes. Yes, they would.

ALPHA: I’m very shocked.

67:04

COLONEL: Yeah. Isn’t that interesting? There’s a ton more, but I think we’ve pretty much made the case that this is definitely Operation Gladio inside the United States.

ALPHA: It is. I want to just highlight my brother Shawn Taylor. He sent me this. “Share this I got to help make it go viral. So I will be posting it It comes from the pamphleteer out in Nashville. I haven’t had a chance to verify this story, so I want to be very clear about that. The SPLC is a recurring character in the Phil investigation. If you guys remember, this is Phil Williams. We’re talking NC5 News out there in Tennessee. This is the one that came after brother Shawn Taylor, the Millersville PD when they were looking into the cases that involved some of the corruption there, the human trafficking there, the child trafficking there. But they had also stumbled upon a gentleman, I don’t remember his name, so I don’t want to get inaccurate, but they had a drone contract with our department defense to train the guys out in Ukraine over this. And it was a large contract. And when the TBI raided them because they said this investigation that they’re doing into human and child trafficking went beyond the scope of their duty. One of the things in their search warrant that they asked the judge for was files related to that guy, which had nothing to do with those other cases. But on the heels of yesterday’s indictment, Williams Confronting Hate Series, which builds its authority off the SPLC’s work, is worthy of further scrutiny. So, looks like there might even be some connections coming out of there, folks. And I think you’re going to see this on a lot of things. I think this is the rugpull of that. call me excited cuz I am, Colonel. And for those that have been tracking my other shows, I told everybody, and this lines up in that window, that we were going to see some people that were just going to start disappearing off of social media. Not violent stuff, just their accounts were going to start vanishing. I think related to that because once the funding is removed from all these inorganic accounts that are out there that are pushing this propaganda they’re going to disappear. The only reason they’re doing it is money or something that might be leveraged on them and I think we are going to see social media heads that are going to find themselves if not charged at least named in the indictments, Things like what they did with Patriot Front. I think we are going to see that broaden into some of these other third party applications. They try to use shell companies to conceal everything. And so when these influencers.. then you find out who was paying them and before you know it, you’re just like, “Oh, so it was money that just got washed a few times in in laundry before it made its way to these influencers.” I really do believe that we’re going to see stuff like that, Colonel.

70:34

COLONEL: Oh, 100%. You definitely need to be looking at that exact thing because they apparently have been doing this for a very long time. I did want to mention when I was talking about some of the lawsuits they were involved in. So, this black woman had her son killed by what was alleged to be a Klu Klux Klan hit .They the SPLC sue and she got a single digit million dollar settlement, but the people that were involved involved had $52,000 to their name. So that was what the grieving mother was going to receive from the lawsuit. Meanwhile, thanks to Mr. Dees’ direct mailing, he got double digit millions of dollars frpm being involved in that lawsuit. And that woman saw not a penny of it. Not a penny. And she got like a $6 million award during the trial, but of course the people didn’t have the money, so she didn’t get that. She got like $50,000. This is repeated throughout their very selective taking of cases. [example of another case.]

And that so that brings in a completely different line. These are the same people, the ADL and the SPLC that were the backing of hate crimes. Just like they tried to do with the terrorism charge on January 6ers, right? So, you can you convict them of something and then you up-charge them with a terrorism enhancement. That’s what hate crime is. There’s no such thing as a hate crime. That’s BULLSHIT. And you know who created that? The SPLC and the ADL. And so if you kill somebody and that somebody happens to be a minority, they can upcharge you for that. It’s still murder. If it even is murder and not self-defense, it’s murder. It has nothing to do with the race of the victim, but thanks to these people and all of their nefarious bullshit and they will encourage hate crimes because they profit off of them. They turn everything into a hate crime to profit off of them.

75:25

ALPHA: I know what it’s like being on the law enforcement side of this. In the area where I was working, we had a a a larger than average demographic of people from the LGBT community. You would get the news trying to influence investigations, trying to say that this was against somebody’s sexuality. We know the facts of the case had nothing to do with that. This was just a robbery. There needs to be people held accountable… But again, it’s one of those things where on the law enforcement side, if you are the good guys and you’re honest investigators, you can see the media manipulation. Now, granted, if you got some good administration, good chiefs like we did, they’ll pull back the radios. “Hey, these encrypted radios we gave you guys, we’re going to take those back.” And it’s the the politics, right? That tug-of-war went back and forth. If you’re going to go out there and try to influence our investigations, well, these, , extra things that we’ve given you that we don’t have to give you, well, we’re going to pull that back. But imagine areas where you got corrupt law enforcement administration, you got corrupt media, and then you have entities like this. You’re screwed.

77:02

COLONEL: I also think it’s very very important to look at everything that has happened since the 2015 time frame of this massive ramping up. So today when I was looking into this was looking at the numbers of alleged KKK. So back in the day, in the 60s or 50s time frame, you saw like tens of thousands of estimated KKK members. The number had dwindled down to like under 5,000 and that’s lumping a whole bunch of people in that may or may not have been KKK members but you see the significant drop off. It was reported as 50 or 60,000 and you’re down to 4,000. But they can’t let it die. You know that whole thing of David Duke and his association and they’re talking to Trump about oh my god he endorsed you well let’s go back and look how much David Duke got paid from the SPLC wouldn’t that be an interesting number to know because you have to have somebody like that to create that narrative right? And that was their go to thing to denounce him… I’ll give you this money so I can use you as a statistic in my Hate Map.

And I also came across something where somebody said that the SPLC put Charlie Kirk and Turning Point [on their Hate Map] l right before he was assassinated.

ALPHA: Wow. Well, this is how it works. If you go back to The ‘Seditious Six? They did that. Five of them excluding the the military dude, five of them all had training from the same activist organization. All of this all of this is is them.

80:23

COLONEL: But again so we were just doing the Lebanon thing. How MI6 had created that training to deploy in Lebanon to create those activists. [mi6-plots-with-islamists closest I can come –GC]

It’s the exact same thing. This has been done all over. They did it in Chile. In all of these different coups that we’ve looked at. They basically just train people in those stay-behind units to create havoc. It wasn’t a more sophisticated destabilization. But that started changing in the early 1970s. The first one that I noticed significantly with the training aspect of actually teaching people how to be the agitators was in the Chile in 73-74 time frame. So from then on it gets progressively more sophisticated and you get to 2004 when they did the first coup in Ukraine and then up to the 2014 one for the Maidan coup and it’s much more sophisticated as far as training the people. The whole Serbian and Croatia destabilization with the Albert Einstein Institute. So now they have actual entities that are making their livelihood on setting up these regime change destabilization efforts.

And the SPLC is doing in the United States is the same thing the Albert Einstein Institute did overseas. They’re doing the exact same thing. I hope that came across today. They have very nefarious beginnings as far as I’m concerned when he sells his direct mail order business to a media company called the LA Times. And he then uses that money to launch the SPLC. This just stinks of CIA all over.

82:45

ALPHA: 100% agree with you on on that, Colonel. And you know, we knew the timing window. I don’t know if you’ve heard me say in some other shows, but we’re approaching that choke point. Trump and them are. I always knew they’re going to weaponize. I kept telling everybody, you’re going to see all kinds of stuff happen in a very small window. How do I know? Because it’s what they were trying to do to Trump and the good guys. Overwhelm them with everything. Impeachments, you know, this is going on. That investigation, did he declassify?

You overwhelm everybody with this. So, nobody knows where to even begin to fight. And that’s exactly what’s happening to the deep state right now. That’s exactly what’s happening to the globalists and all their funding apparatuses. Trump is brilliant.

COLONEL: I meant to say this earlier. The first black lawyer that worked for the SPLC quit. He was disgusted with the SPLC. And that to me says everything. He was absolutely disgusted with what he saw on the inside of the SPLC. There were numerous people that were alleged to have sexual relationships with Dees during his tenure there. That’s probably why he was married four times. It certainly was an allegation in the last divorce proceedings. but there were lots of accusations and workplace shenanigans going on in the SPLC.

84:50

ALPHA: There was. And then I don’t know if you saw this when I brought this guy up from one of the founders from the SPLC. You brought him up. Joseph Levin. Talk about limited info. It is Like they scrape this guy’s digital footprint very, very well. That what you see on the screen for a cursory search. Obviously, if you start using some of these other sites like Yandex and all that, you’ll probably get more, but

COLONEL: No, no, there’s almost nothing out there on him.

ALPHA: Wow. So, that in and of itself tells you a lot. Colonel.

………….


I certainly hope Jeff Childers is correct!

KMAG DAILY THREAD 20260429 & JUSTICE COMING???

Site rules stolen from our good friend PAVACA

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.


Do not forget to LABEL AI articles video and such.

Remember Ristvan over at CTH and also at WUWT?

ristvan says:

March 19, 2018 at 6:31 pm

Lurking Lawyer here. Follow up to a late subcomment on a previous thread, with more clarity. If the supposed presser is timed to IG report release, then based on Sessions comments, McCabe firing, and Nunes memo, here is what is going on.
Sessions explicitly said had brought in an experienced non-DC DoJ prosecutor. That means somewhere in flyover country. Inference is to work alongside IG, who can only refer crimes for prosecution. We know there were crimes, because McCabes firing was for ‘lacking candor—including under oath’. That is codespeak for criminal federal perjury 18USC1621. McCabes Saturday statement shows Comey also committed perjury—same statute. Trumped tweeted this weekend, just left out the legal part (but he surely knows). We know from the Nunes memo on FISA court abuse plus Comey’s sworn testimony about the dossier being unverified plus McCabes sworn testimony that without it there would have been no FISA warrant or renewals that Loretta Lynch, Sally Yates, Comey, and probably McCabe made false attestations about the Steele dossier to FISA. Those are all felonies under 18USC1018 (and diGenova says there are a total of six felonies—one suffices for this comment). We know from Comey’s mid 2016 announcement about Hillary and her email server that Hillary is guilty under 18USC798, which does not require intent and is the same statute used to send the navy submariner to prison for year (who Trump just pardons, which means he and Sessions know a lot more about what I am saying than they are letting on… And just to round up, it is highly likely that Strzok, Page, both Ohrs, and others gave false statements to the IG early in his investigations, in violation of 18USC1001 — the same felony to which Mueller forced Flynn to plead guilty.
Now, where does this lead? The flyover country prosecutor has impaneled a secret grand jury. He is presenting them with this evidence. There is no need for the grand jury to hear witnesses on any of this. They are returning sealed indictments on all of the above named. Remember, Trump rally chants of ‘lock her up’ were more of a campaign promise to be kept. The DNC and Hillary’s campaign paid Fusion GPS to pay Steele for the dossier, when OHR met Steele in London and reported back to FBI in writing that Steele was rabidly antiTrump (per Nunes memo). More than enough reason formTrump to direct his white hat team to proceed on HRC. Only thing I don’t know is whether they can also get Obama. The Susan Rice CYA email about the Jan 5 WH meeting (especially if there were priors) written as Trump was being inaugurated suggests maybe yes.

So my quite educated guess is that the rumored presser will be Trump and Sessions unsealing all these prebaked indictments (the Big Ugly unveiled), with diGenova then to unpack it all to stunned Dems and MSM. And that will nicely set the midterms table for Crumbs Pelosi, Shutdown Shumer, the Dem stiffed DACA deal (a brilliant Trump gambit), and a lot more.

Looks like Ristvan was off by about a decade.

4773

Sep 26, 2020 7:32:51 PM EDT

What did we learn this week?

1. Durham ‘true’ start?

2. Durham ‘take-over’ Huber [select parts re: CF-i]? What if there’s another prosecutor (outside of DC) assigned by SESSIONS w/ the same mandate/authority?

Q

3385 Jul 09, 2019 12:37:54 PM EDT

You didn’t think the Epstein investigation began a few months ago did you?

It was all under the direction and oversight of AG Jeff SESSIONS.

Expect a lot more to become public (unsealing).

Q

3371 Jul 08, 2019 9:07:51 PM EDT

Sometimes you need to ‘take one for the team publicly’ before you are vindicated as a hero.

Q

Hopefully we will soon see if Q is correct about Huber, Durham and Sessions.

The Debriefing 17

In 2017, Trump began laying the legal minefield. In 2019, he pulled the trigger — reissuing Executive Order 13224 under EO 13886 and quietly upgrading it into a global financial kill switch.

theDebriefing17

🤔 Imagine the U.S. government has four big legal “kill switches” sitting on a shelf. Each one was built at a different time, by a different president, for a different reason. But they all work the same way: the president flips the switch by declaring a national emergency, and once it’s flipped, the Treasury Department gets superpowers.

What the superpowers actually are:

👉 Freeze anyone’s money. Any foreign person, anywhere in the world, who fits the category. No trial. No warning. No Congress vote needed for each one.

👉 Block their property. Houses, bank accounts, crypto wallets, yachts, businesses frozen.

👉 The “you helped them, you’re next” rule. If you did business with someone on the list your bank, your lawyer, your shipping company, your crypto exchange you can get added to the list too. This is the cascade. One name becomes ten. Ten becomes a hundred.

👉 The secret list. There’s a public list everyone sees, and a classified list nobody sees. We don’t know how many names are on the secret one.

The four switches:

Switch #1 Terrorists (built 2001 after 9/11, upgraded 2019). Originally for al-Qaeda. The 2019 upgrade made it cover way more people anyone who “trains,” “leads,” or “supports” a terror group, defined broadly.

Switch #2 Corrupt people and human rights abusers (built 2017). Cartels, kleptocrats, traffickers, dirty officials anywhere on Earth.

Switch #3 Hackers and election meddlers (built 2015, upgraded 2016 and 2018). Russian troll farms, ransomware gangs, foreign election interference.

Switch #4 Sketchy foreign tech (built 2019). The one used to ban Huawei.

Here’s the part that matters:

Every single one of these switches was flipped on and never flipped off. Not by the president who came after. Not by the next one. Every year, each president has to sign a piece of paper saying “yep, still an emergency, keep it running.” Every president has signed. Every year. For up to 25 years on the oldest one.

That means the legal machinery to freeze assets, blacklist networks, and unravel criminal organizations worldwide has been quietly running in the background the entire time through Bush, Obama, Trump, Biden, Trump again. It doesn’t matter who’s in the White House. The machine keeps running.

Why this matters for the framework:

When you see a giant crypto seizure ($15 billion from Chen Zhi), or a cartel boss arrested, or a Russian oligarch’s yacht impounded, or a crypto mixer shut down that’s not random. That’s one of these four switches being used. The switches were built years before the enforcement wave started. The enforcement wave is just the switches being used the way they were designed to be used.

The simple bottom line:

The legal weapons were loaded over 20 years, by presidents from both parties. Now they’re being fired. The fact that they keep getting renewed no matter who’s president is the strongest evidence that this isn’t one administration’s project. It’s an institutional one that survives elections. That’s what the four-pillar table will show on one page: the weapons, who built them, when they were built, and the fact that nobody has put them back on the shelf.

I think, like the Patriot Act, they were NOT intended for good but as weapons to be used against Patriots. Now they are being used in the service of the USA.

Wow. This new release from Chuck Grassley on the Clinton Foundation is a staggering 91 page treasure trove. I just skimmed it, and it is all there, Uranium One, Russia, Boeing, Haiti, Hillary’s brother, and all the other stuff. And the FBI did not even open a full investigation, whereas with Trump they had one false tip about barroom gossip from three months earlier and they immediately launched a full enterprise investigation. Absolute travesty that Comey, Strzok, Atkinson (who shows up here as well), and others have not been held to account.

Grassley Memorandum to DOJ, FBI on Uranium One

VIA ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION
Mr. Todd Blanche
Acting Attorney General
Department of Justice
The Honorable Kash Patel
Director
Federal Bureau of Investigation

Dear Acting Attorney General Blanche and Director Patel:
For over a decade, I’ve raised concerns regarding alleged actions taken by former Secretary of State
Hillary Clinton, including her use of non-government email for official business, mishandling of highly classified information, potential campaign finance violations, and dubious Clinton Foundation financial dealings.1 For instance, on May 17, 2016, I wrote a letter to then-Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director James Comey raising concerns that many of the emails found on her non-government server blurred lines between the actions taken on behalf of the State Department, Clinton Foundation, and Teneo, a private firm founded by a former counselor to President Clinton.2 Then, on July 6, 2016, I requested information from then-Director Comey regarding public corruption issues and the Clinton Foundation and questioned the Director on whether the FBI investigated the Clinton Foundation regarding former President Clinton’s speaking fees from foreign governments while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State.3 Further, on August 8, 2016, I wrote to the Department of Justice (DOJ) asking the Department to explain its reported decision to drop reported inquiries into Clinton Foundation and State Department interactions; specifically, allegations that the State Department, during Secretary Clinton’s tenure, took favorable actions for Clinton Foundation donors….

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Joe Lange had more information to add. These are the most recent of a long series.

Iran Peace Deal

PART 9

Pakistan is playing a KEY role.

Iran will give up the uranium “dust” that will be tested, to PROVE the uranium that Iran was using to develop nuclear weapons, was provided by the “Uranium One Deal.”

The U1 deal is one of the biggest coverups in American history.

It was a KEY part of Alwaleed’s 16 year plan to destroy the U.S.

The U1 deal connects a lot of dots.

….

Pakistan is playing a KEY role.

Iran will give up the uranium “dust” that will be tested, to PROVE the uranium that Iran was using to develop nuclear weapons, was provided by the “Uranium One Deal.”

The U1 deal is one of the biggest coverups in American history.

It was a KEY part of Alwaleed’s 16 year plan to destroy the U.S.

The U1 deal connects a lot of dots. [Worth a read]

Iran Peace Deal

Part 10

…Bill and Hillary Clinton were the ones, who “organized and planned” the U1 deal.

This goes back much further than most people realize.

How is it connected to Pakistan?

The CIA?

The Clintons have been working hand in hand, with the CIA, to not only fund our enemies, but to help arm them with weapons.

Including nuclear weapons.

U1 was planned years in advance.

Peace doesn’t sell.

War sells.

Taxpayers dollars are easily stolen based on perceived “threats.”

Anybody remember OPERATION MERLIN?

“Deep in the bowels of the CIA, someone must be nervously, but very privately, wondering: “Whatever happened to those nuclear blueprints we gave to the Iranians?”

“The story dates back to the Clinton administration and February 2000, when one frightened Russian scientist walked Vienna’s winter streets. The Russian had good reason to be afraid. He was walking around Vienna with blueprints for a nuclear bomb...

“The Russian, who had defected to the US years earlier, still couldn’t believe the orders he had received from CIA headquarters. The CIA had given him the nuclear blueprints and then sent him to Vienna to sell them – or simply give them – to the Iranian representatives to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). With the Russian doing its bidding, the CIA appeared to be about to help Iran “leapfrog” one of the last remaining engineering hurdles blocking its path to a nuclear weapon.”

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

UFOs or is that the cover story for STOLEN NUCLEAR SECRETS….

Well this explains The Atlantic hit piece on Kash

And just to add a bit of humor.

I guess Shifty Schiff forgot about Senator Robert Byrd, the “exalted cyclops” of the KKK.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

So Trump’s Team is taking out the NGOs

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

The Rico case against the Democrat (& City of London?) Criminal Enterprise is heating up.

From Sundance:

AAG Todd Blanche Moves diGenova and DeLorenz to South Florida Group Assisting USAO Jason Reding Quiñones 

I bet there are some Russia Hoax pushers shaking in their shoes after that move.

Pay Back is gonna be a BITCH!

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

The Gateway Pundit articles on ActBlue

Developing: Democrat Fundraising Juggernaut ActBlue Likely Lied to Congress About Foreign Donations

Apr. 3, 2026 

In early 2025, the law firm, Covington & Burling out of Washington DC, raised legal concerns that ActBlue’s CEO lied to GOP investigators in a 2023 letter explaining how the organization vetted donations to ensure that they were not illegally coming from foreign citizens.

This shocking development was published in The New York Times this week….

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton Files Lawsuit Against ActBlue For “Deceiving Americans” by Accepting Foreign and Fraudulent Donations

Apr. 20, 2026

The ActBlue fundraising scandal is heating up in the Lone Star State.

In October 2024, the Gateway Pundit reported that Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton called for the Department of Justice to investigate the Democrat fundraising powerhouse for “circumstances surrounding highly suspicious campaign contributions made through political committee online contribution platforms.”

The state’s own investigation confirmed evidence showing that donations were being made in people’s names without their knowledge or consent.  This was in line with discoveries made by Peter Bernegger and reported by James O’Keefe regarding smurfing activities involving ActBlue.

Today, AG Paxton announced on X that he has filed a lawsuit against ActBlue “for deceiving Americans by lying about its donation processes that allow fraudulent and foreign donations.”…

Five ActBlue Employees Plead the Fifth on 146 Questions During House Judiciary Depositions – EVERY Member of Legal & Compliance Was Fired, Quit, or on Extended Leave From Platform in 2025

Apr. 20, 2026

On Monday, The Gateway Pundit reported that Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sued ActBlue, the Democrat fundraising platform, for “deceiving Americans by lying about its donation processes that allow fraudulent and foreign donations.”  This was following an internal investigation that “prove[d] that ActBlue continues to process gift card donations” without proving identification of the donor.

The same day, the House Judiciary Committee deposed five employees after subpoenas were issued to two employees in June 2025 by Reps. Jim Jordan, Bryan Steil, and James Comer.  The recent depositions included “top staff responsible for fraud prevention” and sought to “learn more about the platform’s acceptance of illegal donations – and the subsequent cover-up,” according to a post on X by the House Judiciary GOP….

From Badlands:

Justice Department Announces Resumption of Firing Squad as Execution Method

The U.S. Justice Department said Friday it is expanding federal execution procedures to include firing squads as part of a broader effort to strengthen and accelerate use of the federal death penalty. The department said it acted to restore its duty to carry out lawful capital sentences once condemned inmates have exhausted appeals.

The department said it directed the Federal Bureau of Prisons to broaden execution protocols to allow additional methods, including the firing squad, and to readopt the lethal injection protocol used during President Donald Trump’s first administration.

It also said internal processes would be streamlined to expedite capital cases.

Reuters reported the administration also intends to add electrocution and gas asphyxiation as alternative federal execution methods.

No wonder they are trying to kill POTUS TRUMP!

KMAG DAILY THREAD 20260422- THE STORM?

Site rules stolen from our good friend PAVACA

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Do not forget to LABEL AI articles video and such.


Various groups are suggesting “the Storm is upon us.” I certainly think I see it approaching. I am going to try and put things into some semblance of order. It least that was my original intent until I went looking for a piece of information and got yanked sideway. Oh well.

It has been my thesis that the Brits never really conceded defeat after the US Revolution and have been trying to get control of the USA ever since. I think for all intents they actually got some control in 1913 and have been working slowly, Fabian Society style, to consolidate their grip and impose a world government. The UK has been the home of the Globalists since William and Mary brought the Dutch banking system to England and the City of London was set up.

8:00 Brady: But the cool thing is William… [He] brings all these great ideas with him. Things like a stock exchange. A central Bank. In fact the Bank of England would be founded 6 years later. And we know where that lead us to.

Col Towner: So he is just transferring the Dutch Empire to the English Empire.

Brady: Yeah, We talked about how the Dutch securitized their entire industry. They stopped producing goods and services, and they just basically speculated all over the world. It is exactly what Wall Street became. They [the Dutch] have already been investing in the British pounds because it pays bigger interest… So they are subsidizing their own enemies.

THAT IS WHY THE DUTCH FELL. THEY HAD STRETCHED TOO THIN AND THEY WERE FINANCIALLY SPECULATING ALL OVER THE WORLD.

Col Towner: Which is what you see happening today.

Brady: Well that is why we are telling the story so we do not repeat it too.

From the video The Shadow State 67: The City of London

Susan Kokinda:

Iran wasn’t the target. The British imperial system was. And on April 16th, Scott Bessent walked into a room with the British Chancellor of the Exchequer and said it out loud. Here’s the Treasury readout… During their discussion, Secretary Besson underscored the US Treasury’s commitment to Economic Fury, leveraging all tools and authorities against those who continue to support Iran’s terrorist activities. He’s underscoring the mission of Economic Fury to Britain’s top financial officer. In essence warning of a new reality… The Trump administration has the empire’s number and is systematically dismantling its power. Which is why the Hudson Institute is now pinning its hopes on a royal visit. They want King Charles to save ‘the special relationship’… Here’s what they’re all missing. Iran wasn’t the target. The British imperial system was and is the target.

The strait was never just Iran’s weapon.

It was London’s leverage. And Trump’s target was never the strait itself. It was the system that monetized it. That system is what is being dismantled. And that holds regardless of what happens in the next 48 hours. In fact, if you look at Trump’s post about no longer being used as a weapon against the world, you can read it in two ways. The Strait won’t be used as a weapon by Iran and Iran won’t be used as a weapon by the British. And because the president understood that, he is bringing an end to the 47 year-old extortion racket.

06:31

The president himself named it back on April 11th in a truth social in all caps, WORLD EXTORTION. That’s not rhetoric. That’s a precise description of how the City of London has run the global financial system for over a century and Bessent is now systematically dismantling it. Here’s how the architecture works.

Think about what London actually prices:

* The global gold fix and other metals through the London Metal Exchange and the IC, the Intercontinental Exchange.

* The price of oil through the Brent crude benchmark since 1988.

* Shipping rates on every barrel of oil that moved through the strait determined by Lloyd’s war risk premiums.

And every regional crisis sent traders to London and allowed them to manipulate prices.

Managed conflict wasn’t just a geopolitical tool. It was a revenue stream. Trump called it world extortion. He’s right….

07:41

But before that, even bigger moves were going on that most people didn’t notice. Vivify Mariposa pulls the curtain back in an important post entitled The System That Owns You, How It Was Built, and Why It’s Breaking. She describes how Trump’s tariff offensive has caused a dramatic shift in the economic balance of power. Because of Trump’s moves, physical gold has been moving from London vaults to New York. Copper pricing is migrating from the London Metal Exchange to American markets and London’s own exchange has publicly conceded that the shift is permanent. Now, Mariposa concludes by saying the pricing authority is moving gold to American vaults, copper to comics, LNG contracts referencing American benchmarks. London is not being replaced by Qatar. London is being bypassed by New York…

[Makes you wonder if the election of Mandani as NYC mayor was because the Cabal saw this coming. -GC]

However Susan and the rest of the crew at Promethean Action are ‘Keeping it Simple Stupid’ Oil is indeed a factor, just not the only one. They are:

TRADE ROUTES
OIL
and
DRUGS

At this point I went looking for the info (on the Chinese) that I wanted to document. I remembered it was in Conspirators’ Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of Three Hundred — CIA library by Dr John Coleman who is still alive BTW. The CIA document is 169 pages so I am going to quote it as well as asking readers to read PAGE 103 – 107 where Dr Coleman quotes H. G. Wells, co-founder of the British Fabian Society.

What I find interesting is the fact Colonel Towner’s Gladio Series information dovetails with this information about the CIA, NATO,‘The Criminal Syndicate’ and drugs.

I am going to start with Dr Coleman’s H. G. Wells quotes and then go back and look at the Iran & China information.

[BEGIN QUOTE]

PAGE 103

What then are we looking at? A loosely-knit gathering of people with weird ideas?

Certainly not. In the Committee of 300, which has a 150-year history, we have some of the most brilliant intellects assembled to form a completely totalitarian, absolutely controlled “new” society only it isn’t new, having drawn most of its ideas from the Clubs of Cultus Diabolicus. [or formal religion of the devil, the existence of which, in the middle ages, is registered by the known facts of the Black Sabbath – GC] It strives toward a One World Government rather well described by one of its late members, H. G. Wells, in his work commissioned by the Committee which Wells boldly called: “THE OPEN CONSPIRACY– PLANS FOR A WORLD REVOLUTION.” [written in 1928 — GC]

…There will be no middle class, only rulers and servants. All laws will be uniform under a legal system of world courts practicing the same unified code of laws, backed up by a One World Government police force and a One World unified military…

Only one religion will be allowed and that will be in the form of a One World Government Church, which has been in existence since 1920 as we shall see. Satanism, Luciferianism and Witchcraft shall he recognized as legitimate One World Government curricula with no private or church schools. All Christian churches have already been subverted and Christianity will be a thing of the past in the One World Government…

Each person shall be fully indoctrinated that he or she is a creature of the One World Government with an identification number clearly marked on their person so as to be readily accessible, which identifying number shall be in the master file of the NATO computer in Brussels, Belgium, subject to instant retrieval by any agency of the One World Government at any time. The master Files of the CIA, FBI, state and local police agencies, IRS, FEMA, Social Security shall be vastly expanded and form the basis of personal records of all individuals in the United States.

Marriage shall be outlawed and there shall be no family life as we know it. Children will be removed from their parents at an early-age and brought up by wards as state property…

At least 4 billion “useless eaters” shall be eliminated by the year 2050 by means of limited wars, organized epidemics of fatal rapid-acting diseases and starvation. Energy, food and water shall be kept at subsistence levels for the non-elite, starting with the White populations of Western Europe and North America and then spreading to other races. The population of Canada, Western Europe and the United States will be decimated more rapidly than on other continents, until the world’s population reaches a manageable level of 1 billion, of which 500 million will consist of Chinese and Japanese races, selected because they are people who have been regimented for centuries and who are accustomed to obeying authority without question…

[I want to insert here, that I think the original plan was Orientals would be the high functioning intelligent workers and the black/brown would be the lower intelligent grunt workers, that is if they are not replaced by robots. The only whites will be the rulers, thus color coding people so they are easily IDed by sight. –GC]

The United States will be flooded by peoples of alien cultures who will eventually overwhelm White America, people with no concept of what the United States Constitution stands for and who will, in consequence, do nothing to defend it, and in whose minds the concept of liberty and justice is so weak as to matter little. FOOD and shelter shall be the main concern.

Rival factions and groups such as Arabs and Jews and African tribes shall have differences magnified and allowed to wage wars of extermination against each other under the eyes of NATO and U.N. observers. The same tactics will be used in Central and South America. These wars of attrition shall take place BEFORE the take-over by the One World Government…

It is obvious from the foregoing that much work remains to be done before the dawning of the New World Order can occur. The Committee of 300 has long ago perfected plans to destabilize civilization as we know it, some of which plans were made known by Zbignew Brzezinski in his classic work “THE TECHNOTRONIC ERA” and the works of Aurellio Peccei who founded the Club of Rome, especially in his book, “THE CHASM AHEAD.” [pg 107]

[END QUOTE]


I am going to stop here and take a quick look at a couple of Russian articles on Brzezinski.

Brzezinski Ideas

…Brzezinski in an article published in Foreign Affaire (1970), explains his vision of the “New World Order” stating that “it is necessary a new and bolder vision (the creation of a community of developed countries can deal effectively with the broad problems of humanity”, outlines a theory fleshed out in his book “Between Two Ages: America’s role in the era technetronic” 1971), explaining that the era has come to rebalance world power, power that must be passed on to a new global political order based on a trilateral economic linkage between Japan, Europe and the United States.

In the book “Between Two Ages,” (1971), he also calls for control of population by an elite through “cyber manipulation”, by stating: “The technotronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled and dominated society by an elite without the restrictions of traditional values, so it will soon be possible to ensure the monitoring almost continuous over every citizen and maintain complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen, files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities, “what would herald the subsequent implementation of the PRISM program. Also, in a recent speech at a meeting of Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the former Carter adviser warned that “U.S. domination was no longer possible due to an acceleration of social change driven by instant communication that caused the awakening of a universal political consciousness of the masses (Global Political Awakening) and which is proving detrimental to foreign domination as prevailed in the era of colonialism and imperialism”, so after the failed attempt to control the cloud (PRISM Program), in the coming years will see the end of the democratization of information, with the impossibility of direct access to the network using the steps of restrictive policies implemented by countries like China, Russia or Iran.

According to the Financial Times, Brzezinski in a hearing before the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate in 2007, said:

 “One possible scenario for a military confrontation with Iran means a terrorist act in American soil of which would Iran be responsible. This could culminate in a U.S. military action “defense” against Iran in which would be included Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan,”

What follows is the possibility of a new attack in the U.S. that would be falsely attributed to Iran to bring its invasion and a subsequent totalitarian derived USA, similar to that recorded with George W. Bush after 11- S, 2001. So, a month after the attack of 11-S, George W. Bush secretly decided to cancel a major constitutional protection in this country (habeas corpus) by-law known as the USA Patriot Act under the justification of its “fight against” terrorism “according to official documents revealed in late 2005 in a series of reports in the New York Times…

A second interesting Russian article is:

Prisoners of Friedman and Brzezinski: Neoliberal America vs. Multipolarity

Especially given the date is just before Trump’s first election: 28.10.2016

Recently, the US has begun to lose its strategic positions in the Middle East. When some say that the US Empire is collapsing, this no longer sounds like an exaggeration. It definitely looks like this is what is going to happen in front of our very eyes. Failed regime-change attempts in Syria revealed to the whole world the true nature of the so called Arab Spring, and only those who still want to remain stooped in illusions take the Western MSM as a source of reliable information. The Arab Spring served a much bigger purpose of maintaining and expanding US world domination by imposing the Western way of life and, in fact, Western ideology on the Arab World. Western values and way of life have been exposed as the devil in disguise when the US imposes soft power on smaller countries.

Western values are far from being good. They are essentially nothing but Milton Friedman’s utopian neoliberal economic ideas (Naomi Klein’s The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism is one of the best written documentations of this topic). Free-market or liberal, capitalism is a doctrine that demands that everything must be sacrificed on the unholy altar of commerce, including traditional and religious values. This is why nation-states and religious values are seen as a threat in Western corridors of power – a threat that must be destroyed by supranational and secular powers. The US has been the front man and a driving force in this “progress.” So, if US will lose its positions, will this progress stop? Or, if Trump will be elected, can he change this course and stop its progress? Will the world find a new way of life? Together? Or will the world go back to nation-states and religious values? I have no answers to these questions, but what is sure is that there must be a new value system or ideology to fill this vacuum if the Western system is going to collapse. Ideally, this would be a loose context for different religions and political ideologies to integrate – a spiritual multipolarity that combines nations rather than dividing them

Back to Dr Coleman’s book.

CHINA and IRAN
[QUOTE]

…it is hardly likely that the U.S. would make any real effort to stop the production of opium in the Golden Triangle which is under the control of the Chinese military, a serious war would erupt if any country tried to interdict the trade. A serious attack on the opium trade would bring Chinese military intervention.

The British know this; they have no quarrel with China, except for an occasional squabble over who gets the larger share of the pie. Britain has been involved in the China opium trade for over two centuries. No one is going to be so foolish as to rock the boat when millions upon millions of dollars flow into the bank accounts of the British oligarchists and more gold is traded on the Hong Kong gold market than the combined total traded in London and New York… Every British monarch since 1729 has benefited immensely from the drug trade and this holds good for the present occupant of the throne…

In later years the Chinese appealed to Britain for help with their immense problem and received it. Thereafter respective Chinese governments realized the value in cooperating instead of fighting with Britain–and this held good during the bloody rule of Mao Tse Tung–so that today, as I have already mentioned, any quarrels that come about are only over the share of the opium trade each is entitled to.

To advance to more modern history, the Chinese-British partnership was solidified by the Hong Kong agreement which established an equal partnership in the opium trade…

Rowntree’s book, “The Imperial Drug Trade”[1903] gives a fascinating account of how Prime Minister Gladstone and his fellow plutocrats lied, cheated, twisted and turned to keep the astonishing truth of the involvement of the British monarchy in the opium trade from being exposed…

The Eastern Liberal Establishment families of the United States were just as deeply involved in the China opium trade as were the British, indeed they still are. Witness recent history when [President] James Earl Carter toppled the Shah of Iran. Why was the Shah deposed and then murdered by the United States government? fn a word, because of DRUGS. The Shah had clamped down and virtually put an end to the immensely lucrative opium trade being conducted out of Iran by the British. At the time that the Shah took over in Iran, there were already one million opium/heroin addicts.

This the British would not tolerate, so they sent the United States to do their dirty work for them in terms of the “special relationship” between the two countries. When Khomeini took over the U.S. Embassy in Tehran, arms sales by the United States, which had begun with the Shah, were not discontinued. Why not? Had the United States done so, Khomeini would have canceled the British monopoly of the opium trade in his country. To prove the point, after 1984, Khomeini’s liberal attitude toward opium had increased the number of addicts to 2 million, according to United Nations and World Health Organization statistics. [That certainly puts a different light on the Khomeini – Carter communications. GC]


Both President Carter and his successor, Ronald Reagan, willingly and with full knowledge of what was at stake, went on supplying arms to Iran even while American hostages languished in captivity. In 1980 I wrote a monograph under the title, “What Really Happened in Iran,” which set out the facts. The arms trade with Iran was sealed at a meeting between Cyrus Vance, a servant of the Committee of 300, and Dr. Hashemi, which resulted in the U.S. Air Force beginning an immediate airlift of arms to Iran, carried on even at the height of the hostage crisis the arms came from U.S. Army stockpiles in Germany ….

The demise of the Shah of Iran was run to a plan devised by Bernard Levin and Richard Falk, and supervised by Robert Anderson’s Aspen Institute. Levin was the author of a work entitled “Time Perspective and Morale” which is a Club of Rome publication concerning how to break down the morale of nations and individual leaders. Here is an extract of the document:

“One of the main techniques for breaking morale through a strategy of terror consists in exactly this tactic: keep the person hazy as to where he stands and just what he may expect. In addition, if frequent vacillations between severe disciplinary measures and promise of good treatment together with the spreading of contradictory news make the structure of the situation unclear, then the individual may cease to know whether a particular plan would lead toward or away from his goal. Under these conditions, even those individuals who have definite goals and are ready to take risks are paralyzed by the severe inner conflict in regard to what to do.”

This Club of Rome blueprint applies to COUNTRIES as well as to individuals, particularly the government leaders of those countries. We in the U.S. need not think that “Oh well, this is America, and those kinds of things just do not happen here.” Let me assure you that they ARE happening in the U.S., and perhaps more so than in any other country. Remember that Khomeini was groomed for years by British intelligence, especially during his time in Paris, before he suddenly appeared as the savior of Iran. Boris Yeltsin is from the same M16-SIS stable...

The route taken by the raw opium carriers of the Golden Crescent goes through Iran, Turkey and Lebanon. When the Shah of Iran was in control of the country, he refused to allow the heroin trade to continue and it was forcibly discontinued-up until the time that he was “dealt with” by the Committee of 300. Raw opium from Turkey and Lebanon finds it way to Corsica, from where it is shipped to Monte Carlo with the connivance of the Grimaldi family. Pakistani laboratories, under the guise of “military defense laboratories” are doing a bigger share of refining than they were two years ago, but the best refining is still done along the French Mediterranean coastline and in Turkey. Here again, banks play a vital role in financing these operations.

Let us stop here for a moment. Are we to believe that with all the modern and vastly improved surveillance techniques, including satellite reconnaissance, available to law enforcement agencies in these countries, that this vile trade cannot be pin-pointed and stopped? How is it that law enforcement agencies cannot go in and destroy these laboratories once they are discovered? If this IS the case, and we still cannot interdict the heroin trade, then our anti-narcotics services ought to be known as “The Geriatrics” and not drug enforcement agencies.

Even a child could tell our alleged “drug watchers” what to do. Simply keep a check on all factories making acetic anhydride, THE most essential chemical component needed by laboratories to refine heroin from raw opium. THEN FOLLOW THE TRAIL!…

For some strange reason the Cali cartel, which is equal in size to the Medellin cartel, has been–at least up until now–largely ignored by the DEA. Cali differs from the Medellin cartel in that it is run by BUSINESSMEN, who eschew all forms of violence and never break agreements. Even more significant is that Cali does virtually no business in Florida. My source told me that the Cali cartel is run by shrewd businessmen unlike any seen in the cocaine business. He believes that they were “specially appointed,” but does not know by whom. “They never call attention to themselves,” he said. “They do not go around importing red Ferraris like Jorge Ochoa did, attracting immediate attention, because it is forbidden to import such cars into Colombia.”

Cali cartel markets are in Los Angeles, New York and Houston, which closely parallel the heroin markets. Cali has not shown any signs of moving into Florida. A former DEA operative who is a colleague of mine said recently, “These Cali people are sure smart. They are a different breed to the Ochoa brothers. They act like professional businessmen. They are now larger than the Medellin cartel and I think we are going to see a lot more cocaine get into the United States than ever before. The kidnapping of Manuel Noriega will facilitate an easier flow through Panama of cocaine and money, what with so many banks there. So much for President George Bush’s Operation Just Cause. All it did was make life a great deal easier for Nicolas Ardito Barletta who used to be run by the Ochoa brothers and who is fixing to front for the Cali cartel.”

Based on my experience with the heroin trade I believe that the Committee of 300 has stepped in and taken over full control of the South American cocaine trade. There is no other explanation For the rise of the Cali cartel which is coupled with the kidnapping of Noriega. Did Bush take his orders from London regarding Noriega? There is every indication that he was literally PUSHED into invading Panama and kidnapping Noriega, who had become a serious impediment to “trade” in Panama, especially in the banking business.

Several former intelligence agents have given me their opinions which coincide with my own. Like the Gulf War that followed in the wake of Panama, it was only after several calls from the British Ambassador in Washington that Bush finally plucked up enough courage to make his totally illegal move on General Noriega. That he was supported by the British press and the New York Times, a British intelligence run newspaper, speaks volumes…

[END QUOTE]

So President Trump is attacking trade routes, drug running AND oil. I certainly do not envy Trump’s job in unraveling this mess! It makes you wonder just how many ‘American Politicians’ are actually agents of the City of London.

Paul White Gold Eagle @PaulGoldEagle
I DIDN’T WRITE THIS BUT A VERY SMART PERSON DID!!! This should be read by every news station and every single person that is against what president Trump has done, not just for America, but for the world!!!

WRITTEN BY MICHAEL HUNTSMAN

I keep hearing “Trump doesn’t have a plan”.

First off, it doesn’t seem like the greatest idea to tell everyone what your plan is. (Especially when so many from within want you destroyed.)

However, for those of you who are unable to see it. Let me remind you.
One of Trump‘s biggest campaign promises was not only to make America energy Independent, but also to be the energy leader worldwide.

Take a look at the moves he’s already made. If you can’t see his plan, it’s because you refused to.

He told us from the start exactly what he would do when he said “America Will Lead the World in Energy”

He started almost immediately.
On February 9, 2025, he began his energy dominance plan by changing the name of the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America.
He did this to circumvent policies designed to stop American oil drilling, refining, and shipping in the Gulf.
(The crazy half of the country lost their mind and called it racism)

Then with no delay at all, he went after the Panama Canal and regained its passage rights. (Again, the lunatics lost their mind and claimed it was about stopping innocent refugees, and therefore, ‘Racist’.)

Next came Venezuela. In a matter of minutes he captured a dictator, freed millions of people, and secured the absolute largest oil reserves in the world. (Suddenly the crazies poured into the streets, waving Venezuelan flags and demanding the dictator be returned)

Greenland came and went before their tears over the Venezuelan dictator even hit the floor.

With Greenland, he secured not only northern shipping lanes but strategic defensive positioning and mineral rights to one of the largest deposits of rare earth minerals in the world. (Think batteries, electrical components, semiconductors, etc..)

After gaining control of North and South American shipping lanes, oil, and rare earth minerals. He sets his sites on the Middle East.

Which brings us to Iran. So far he has decimated their highest leaders and military, while protecting their infrastructure of oil distribution (And the people of Iran are ecstatic).

At this very moment the U.S. is blockading the Gulf of Oman.(Arguably, more strategic than the Strait of Hormuz itself.)

In the meantime (while waiting out Iran in the Gulf of Oman) He has secured the strait of Malacca, and guaranteed control of shipping rights to the Eastern Seaborg. (Who knows how the Looney Tunes will spin that one when they find out.)

If you haven’t figured it out yet, this was the plan all along. Just like he said,
“America Will Lead the World in Energy”

Keep your eyes open, because it ain’t over yet. Next on his list will be to secure the shipping lanes around Cuba then the straits of Bosporus and Gallipoli. Completing his plan and making America the world‘s leader in energy.
Just like he said he would.

If you still fail to see the plan? Forget I mentioned any of this. Wait for the newest outrage, or stick with your most recent “Orange man bad, he has no plan”.

Whether you march in the streets waving some other countries flag, or protest a King that doesn’t exist.
His plan is being executed and is working beautifully.

America will be the Leader in World Energy.

The truth is: You, Me, and the rest of the free world will benefit greatly from his plan for generations to come.

God bless the President and God bless the United States of America. 🇺🇸

…………

The above quotations are reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.