Our mission, as God-fearing and God-loving patriots, is to defend this Constitutional Republic and to increase its greatness, in all good things and ways, by using our voices in free but courteous speech, by discussing the happenings of the world and coming to a profound understanding of those things, and by sharing and promulgating these Truths on both this platform and others.
There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.
Do not forget to LABEL AI articles, video and such.
Before I start I am going to leave these names right here. General Flynn, Ezra Cohen Watnick, & Rich Higgins LINK Also Jeff Session is retired military subject to recall. I wonder if they will surface again?
Wolf brought up:
Calley Means ran to Margaret Treason with the goods on Susie, and SD is covering it!
At this time I am not going to look at what SD has dug up and instead do the independent research that I started.
My takeaways from the following videos.
— Susie Wiles is a typical Uni-party cog. Good at what she does BUT not MAGA. She was put in place to protect the interests of the Republican Party — Think Chamber of Commerce.
— The Republican playbook (represented by Susie) is petrified and based on the Boomer Population Bulge. The problem is, Covid killed off many Boomers and they are no longer the deciding demographic.
— As Aubergine has said, the younger voters are ANGRY. It is not that they like the Democrats, they are just punishing the Republicans. Also there is a good chance the Democrats, with these impeachments, will shoot themselves in the foot. The promised affordability will be forgotten and with luck Trump can claim the credit.
— Charlie Kirk was targeted and killed BECAUSE he could reach younger voters. It is no coincidence that Nick Fuentes was waiting in the wings or Candice Owens and Tucker Carlson suddenly turned.
— We can win 2028 BUT only if we get off our rumps, get out into the field and TALK. The Democrats have a well coordinated ground game based on NGOs. Republicans rely on TV ads and stale messaging. We need to get Spencer Pratt and his like working for us on messaging and then knock on doors.
…
This is the latest info I have tripped over. I think Tom Luongo is spot on so I am putting this transcript Front & Center. Tom fleshes out Aubergine’s position and Tom, Barbara Boyd & Susan Kokinda flesh out what we can do going forward. (53 minutes)
ROUGH TRANSCRIPT
13:02 Rich: We can ask Tom about What Susie Wiles was really there for.
Tom: You’re guys are absolutely right. And to finish off the point about Stephen Miller, is that Susie Wiles was in the administration to ensure that that did not get done. What you guys just outlined all those those deficiencies, that was her job.
At the end of the day, there’s a number of things we can say about Susie Wiles. Very few of them good. She was brought in to ensure that she could bring the money and the old boomer network within the GOP. We were talking about this with my boys the other day, and one of the things that got brought up was it’s been that way for a while. We’ve been thinking in those terms. That she can speak boomer con, bring the donors, and bring the money, and bring those people in. Ensure that they stay on side, because they’re going to dominate the electorate, at least that was the argument made to Trump. They’re going to dominate the electorate in 2026, you have to keep them on side. You have to be able to minimize the damage within that group.
Here’s the problem. COVID killed off a lot of them. We’re farther along the boomer die-off curve than normal. The boomer die-off curve is far more accelerated than we thought.
Remember back in 2020, 2021, 2022, we started watching this. I’m like, “Oh, now we’re going to kill everybody with the shot and COVID.” What is this doing? This is trying to make sure that the old oligarchy, the British-Davos High Table, whatever you want to call it, they don’t want to pay out the extraordinary amount of money it’s going to cost in the health care of these old people. So, why don’t we just kill them off? That’s why we brought grandma to the nursing home. That’s why Chris, Not Chris, the other one. Governor Cuomo brought and pushed all the old people into the nursing homes so they could all get COVID together, so they all die. They did that on purpose. I used to call him grandma killer. I used to sing to Talking Heads, “Grandma killer.” Just to ensure that we got it through your head that’s what this guy was doing.
But the greater part of that was that when we get into the later election cycles and the demographic shift happens in the electorate — we had good boomer turnout — but it wasn’t enough, obviously. And there’s more. There’s more to it than that, but that’s what Susie Wiles was brought into the Trump administration to defend.
….
[This also explains POTUS Trump’s emphasis on Wall Street. If your voting block is Boomer, then their stock portfolio is important to them. Decent jobs and the cost of gas not so much. NOT being aware/informing POTUS of this demographic Time Bomb, can be laid directly at Susie Wiles’ feet. –GC]
…
And now she’s gone. And that’s the best thing you can say about her. At the same time, she was, of course, stabbing Trump in the back the entire time, just like she did during the primaries, you know, before that, with DeSantis, working with DeSantis. DeSantis is, by the way, I think completely on board with Trump at this point. She was absolutely the person trying to keep the two of them apart. Ron is implementing all of Trump’s stuff in Florida and making Florida into a grand success. Now, Ron still has to prove some things here, but there’s a lot of stuff going on. Sundance has been doing a lot of interesting posting for the last couple days about DeSantis, Wiles, Jared Kushner and others. And some other people have been doing some of this work as well. There’s a lot of conflicting ideas out there. But the whole thing is, clearly there was an axis here that would have been a really powerful set going forward involving DeSantis, Rubio, Trump, all of that. And Wiles was brought in to short-circuit all that. And to ensure that we lost the midterms.
And she’s gone. And she may wind up like John Roberts, who over the summer made sure that on every important major point the Supreme Court chose poorly. So, birthright citizenship, all of the voter ID stuff. It was clearat the end of the day, we’re going to lose the Republic because of an old cynical backstabbing second-tier political operative from Florida, Susie Wiles, and the worst Supreme Court Chief Justice in the country’s history. That’s the story as it exists right now.
Miller is going to come in and do exactly what you guys were suggesting. He is going to put everything back on message in a way that is going to set table for 2028. So, I can see the arc of this, which is that the Democrats are going to do what they always do, which is that they win an election and they think, “See, everybody loves our ideas.” Well, actually no. No one likes your ideas. As always the American electorate doesn’t trust either of these parties. They don’t like either of these groups of people. It gets worse as you go down the generation stack from Gen X to the Millennials to the Zoomers, to the new ones, whatever you’re calling the the next generation. All of them hate the system and with greater intensity hate the system. And if you’re not going to get it done, I’m voting against you. Right? So, that was Nick Fuentes’ operation.
[Barbara is listening intently BTW. – GC]
Barbara’s point about having lost our targeted megaphone towards that generation. Then of course does not validate the whole Susie Wiles boomer con versus zoomer strategy. We take away the guy who speaks to them and then immediately hijack him by turning it all into the Jews. Because, Charlie was still bleeding out on the ground and they were blaming Israel. It was pathetic. And so, they stole that from us. They stole Charlie from us. They stole Charlie’s death from us. They stole all this from us.
And now they probably stole parts of this election. We lost this election, but there’s still voter fraud. Let’s not kid ourselves. And so, we’re going to find out over the course of the next 45 – 60 days, what the shape of that is. What that’s going to do. But, the way I was describing it was that we’ve got a pendulum swinging in American politics. The truth of the matter is that there’s no loyalty in the middle 50% of the electorate to either party. They just want to get shit done and fix this shit right?
So, now if it’s swinging this way and there’s energy swinging that way, that means it’s got to swing the other when they fail, it’s going to swing back the other way just as hard. It’s the classic kind of bear market emotional puking that you see in the markets. The Dow’s down 5,000 and oh my god, it’s all going to die, right? Guess what? That’s when you buy. Because everybody is on the wrong side of the trade and everybody’s shorted the market, when people start to go flipping all the longs, the shorts are now trapped and then they have to cover the opposite direction so there is a natural pendulum swing. It works in politics the same damn way because it’s just human emotion, it’s just human nature.
So look at 2028 when the Democrats decide they want to go crazy and take our guns and do this and do that. What do you think is going to happen? Now what’s their counter move? It is do not go crazy. So that’s obvious what to do. Have you met these people? Do you think they’re capable of having that kind of self-control? [Barbara is laughing her head off –GC]
Susan Kokinda: Well some of them are going to try but they’re going to be shouted down by the crazies because they still have the momentum. But in terms of your pendulum swing you know I think part of the problem that we have is that because we gutted our middle class and our working class over the past 30 years all you have is the extremes. Right? You have the people who are comfortable or super comfortable. Or rich and I don’t fault them but that’s one thing. And then you have the vast majority of the population that, outside of just getting lucky on poly markets or something, they’re going to be struggling until they’re 55 or 60 years old and maybe they’ll still be struggling after that because you’ve lost the center of your society by gutting your real economic base, your industrial base. And so that’s why I think you’ve got this pendulum kind of situation. And that’s why I keep coming back — I don’t know how fast we’re going to see it, but as people begin to reintegrate into a productive society you’re going to see a much more profound shift in terms of the way people react to what is going on. It’s not going to be this emotional, “I feel screwed right now, so fuck the people in power”, which is what you’re getting at this point, but rather people who can actually see beyond the end of their nose and make decisions from that standpoint. You’ve all heard me say it. When we went to the picket lines in the UAW strike in 2023, we were shocked to find that over 60% of the auto workers were not listening to their leadership and were all ready to vote for Donald Trump.
Well, what’s different about them than their next-door neighbors who work in the gambling casinos? They know that the world has a certain kind of a reality principle and there are consequences to your actions. And if you vote for free trade because you want to buy cheap shit at the dollar store, you’re going to end up paying for it by losing your job and basically losing your town and losing your kids.
So I kept saying as we went into this, because she would say, “What do you think is going to happen in the midterms?” Yeah, I said, “It’s really going to be a question of what identity people carry with them into the polling place. Are they going to walk into the polling place as consumers and losers and victims?” I think that’s what happened. And that was definitely played.
I mean, everything they could do to increase the pain points, Carney’s tariff retaliations, deliberate. All targeting the swing states deliberately. Which is why Mike Rogers backed off on the tariff question and Trump gave him a pass because he knew how this was being played because it does hurt people here, right now, today. It won’t in the future when we get the supply chains back and the jobs are actually here, so the tariffs will be irrelevant, but they played that with the tariffs. They played it obviously with the price of gas. Everybody can see it. It’s a miracle. You vote for Democrats and 3 days later gas is below $4 a gallon. I drove out today. It’s 20 cents cheaper than it was yesterday. because it was deliberate. Now, some people might figure out that it was deliberate on the basis of that.
24:33 What Charlie Kirk’s assassination cost the movement
…
[I am going to add some additional thoughts. Given Charlie’s critical importance to MAGA, I think his murder was a CIA/MI6 hit. Nick Fuentes’ operation was waiting in the wings to take his place. Tucker suddenly flipped, Candice Owens went on the attack immediately AND all of a sudden it was OK to criticize Israel. That is just too neat and tidy. — GC]
…
Tom: All very important. Let me just interject for a second and I’ll hand it over to you. I just realized I missed part of the point about Charlie Kirk. Not only did they take the most powerful voice for Trump off the table to speak to them [the younger voters] What does that do? It sets the whole movement back and then we have to wait for the next wave of people. I.E. [For example] the four people in this conversation right here have to climb the same ladder again. We have to restart. So, here’s Charlie up here. If you knock him off, we’re down here. Now, with Charlie’s gone, All the fake MAGA turds, the Tucker Carlsons and the Megan Kellys and all of them, and Bannon, they all try to Pied Piper you off and tell you that Trump has betrayed you.
We have to fight that inertia while we’re trying to move up here. So, it’s just as always, the Tall poppy syndrome, that’s where we are now. Charlie’s at 10x above in terms of ability, reach, everything else. And that worked… So, that’s all their strategy was. That’s why he had to die. And we never grew the people around us and what not. That layer of the zeitgeist that was going to take that mantle up… We have to start at the beginning and they’re already at the midpoint. Right? We’ll never catch up. We saw that operation in real time… We can’t let them take the next voice.
I think the administration understood this. There was nothing they can do. And so, if that was the case, then you can almost make the argument, that they kill Charlie Kirk, you slow down the midterm. Well, might as well take 2026 and get all your geopolitical wins on the board. Take Venezuela out, deal with Iran, deal with this, deal with that, start the intervention, start breaking down theYen Carry Trade. Do all this stuff. Because what else you got for 2026? You’re going to lose the midterms anyway. Because you don’t have the voice necessary to get you through. And then Susie Wiles plays her games and then da da da, and it’ll play itself out. This is where my head is right now. We’ll further refine this as we go along.
27:59 — Charlie Kirk, Stephen Miller and the Wiles problem
Barbara: I think the point you’re making is the critical. Think about what Charlie Kirk did. He’s the reason why J.D. Vance is vice president. He’s the reason why J.D. Vance even got into politics at all and came to MAGA at all. He’s the reason why MAHA and RFK Jr. joined in 2020, and that whole movement came into the Trump movement and MAGA. He’s the reason, in terms of all of these various factions within MAGA. It’s kind of remarkable when he died and all of the tributes that people paid to him on all sides of this movement. Because he was the glue who worked 24 hours a day to hold this thing together.
You asked me about Stephen Miller and I go back to his memorial to Charlie Kirk. It was defiant. He really recognizes what happened here and what the mindset has to be in people in confronting the enemy we’re confronting here.
He [Charlie] wasn’t some dramatic speaker, but he had people’s affinity.
Stephen Miller, number one, wrote all of those soaring Trump speeches of the first term. All of the confrontations with Davos. All of the actual discussions of culture and history and what American culture is really all about. He wrote all those. I don’t think those are Trump’s words. Trump obviously corrected him and found his own voice within those speeches, but it’s a palette from which he’s working, which is a very different palette than any traditional politician would have.
And that indeed is the Susie Wiles problem. She is … it’s like saying what one of my friends said, “Well, what’s so different? She’s corrupt.” Well, she can always just work that way. If you go down K Street, where she works, and you look at how the Congress operates, and you look at all of these various things in terms of the corruption in the government. The fact that Alina Habba did something absolutely ridiculous in taking a $50 million bribe to actually get a pardon is kind of stratospheric, but it’s not any different than anything that K Street actually does day in and day out around the Congress. So, it’s that old school, which everybody out there really suspects screwed them, and it did.
She [Wiles] was representative of that. The frantic efforts at this point to say we didn’t do that, or we weren’t behind that, and James Blair’s incredible fights with Calley Means, after Calley Means said Susan was the person who killed MAHA. You actually see the fight which is emerging, which is around this younger voice, this younger generation actually advocating this program…
TOM: I look at this, I look at where we are, I have to wonder, what comes next. It is going to be total war. There’s no reason for Trump to hold anything back anymore. He’s got 2 years left. He’s not going to go for another term. He’s going to do what he has to do. You’ve got an exhausted electorate. He’s going to allow the Democrats to go crazy. He may or may not even challenge the the election results himself. As a matter of fact, it actually would be best if he didn’t. Just leave it all to the states. Right. It really would be the best thing for him to do. Leave it to the SOEs, leave it to the attorneys general of the various states. Let them do what they have to do. You can let the DOJ help them behind the scenes and all that stuff. He just stays out of it. Says, “No, okay, we lost.” Yep, you’re right, we lost. We did bad. Now what?
But by the time we’re done, notice, ain’t no rhinos left in the Republican Party. Ain’t no anything left in the Democratic Party. Like all the old operatives are going to be gone. When you watch James Carville, for example, lose his mind. the guy’s completely off his meds. One day he’s screaming at the Democrats. Next time he’s calling Trump a a Nazi. I think that the reality is that James Carville is reacting to the death of his industry… [Not just the consulting industry but the death of the Democrat Party. He is a savvy old goat and realizes Communism and Islam do NOT sell well to most Americans. That has him freaking out. –GC]
And that gets back to all the stuff that Susan says. You’re absolutely right. What’s happening is what we’re actually all describing here is a political zeitgeist that is beyond both of these parties. It’s bigger than Trump. It’s bigger than Miller. It’s bigger than Hakeem Jeff, I mean, T-Mobile Bama. It’s bigger than Chuck Schumer, it’s bigger than all of them. And they’re all reacting to what’s happening around them going, “But I thought we were going to be able to keep running our grift forever.” And it’s bigger, ultimately, than London or Davos or the High Table. This is coming at them fast, and it’s our job wrangle that zeitgeist into something constructive versus something destructive…
END TRANSCRIPT
Old GOP dies as Cult withers – President Trump’s MAGA can Now Rebuild the Country 12 minutes
Mike Steger examines the political upheaval reshaping America, the growing influence of social media on young voters… Mike also examines Spencer Pratt’s comments on political storytelling, the influencer economy, and why modern political movements must adapt to survive.
I am bringing that up because Susie Wiles has a lot of influence on how the republican elections are run and as Tom says “it’s our job wrangle that zeitgeist into something constructive versus something destructive” To do that we need new blood and new ideas. Susie Wiles represents the old corrupt system.
Susie Wiles helped dismantle Ron DeSantis and salvaged Donald Trump’s campaign. Is she a MAGA hero or an enemy of democracy?
Susie Wiles, the people who know her the best believe, is a force more sensed than seen. Her influence on political events, to many who know what they’re watching, is as obvious as it is invisible. The prints leave not so much as a smudge. It’s a shock when she shows up in pictures. Even then it is almost always in the background…
Wiles is not just one of Trump’s senior advisers. She’s his most important adviser. She’s his de facto campaign manager. She has been in essence his chief of staff for the last more than three years. She’s one of the reasons Trump is the GOP’s presumptive nominee and Ron DeSantis is not. She’s one of the reasons Trump’s current operation has been getting credit for being more professional than its fractious, seat-of-the-pants antecedents. And she’s a leading reason Trump has every chance to get elected again..
Wiles graduated from the University of Maryland, College Park, in 1978. While attending university, she began working for New York representative Jack Kemp…
In the 2010 Florida gubernatorial election, Wiles worked as Rick Scott’s campaign manager. After Scott’s victory, she served as Jon Huntsman Jr.’s campaign manager for his presidential campaign, though she resigned after less than a month amid a dispute with a strategist. In October 2015, Wiles was hired as a Florida campaign chairwoman for Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign. She became his campaign manager for Florida in September 2016. After Trump won that year’s presidential election, Wiles moved to Washington, D.C., to lead the lobbying firm Ballard Partners with Brian D. Ballard. In September 2018, she was hired to lead Ron DeSantis’ campaign for the 2018 Florida gubernatorial election. In 2020, Wiles was hired as a consultant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for the 2020 Israeli legislative election…
Brian D. Ballard and his father-in-law Jim Smith founded the lobbying firm Smith & Ballard in 1998.[7] Ballard previously worked as the chief of staff for Bob Martinez, Governor of Florida, and was later a lobbyist focused on the Florida Legislature.[8][9] Smith previously served as Secretary of State of Florida…
Prior to Donald Trump’s election win, Ballard Partners was based in Florida.[11] In 2017, they opened a Washington, D.C. office, following Trump’s first election victory.[6]
Ballard helped to raise $50 million for Trump’s 2024 campaign, including $250,000 that he donated personally.[11]
In 2025, OpenSecrets described it as the top lobbying firm in the country…
By February 2019, the firm had taken on more than 100 domestic and foreign clients and collected more than $28 million since the 2016 election.[15] Reported fees reached $19.1 million in 2019, excluding work for foreign governments, and $24.6 million in 2020, when it was the fifth highest-grossing firm in Washington.[16][17] It led the industry in new client registrations in 2018, 2019 and 2020, signing 145 in the last of those years against 104 for its closest competitor…
Following the 2020 election, Ballard said the firm did not expect to sustain its earlier growth, and that month it hired a Democratic fundraiser to expand its work with that party.
Ballard said that his intention was to build a bipartisan firm that would outlast the Trump administration…
Worth checking out the listed corporations and foreign countries as well as people such as Michael LaRosa
Michael LaRosa is an American lobbyist and political strategist who formerly served as the press secretary for the First Lady in the Biden administration from 2021 to 2022. LaRosa previously worked as a spokesman for Jill Biden and the Joe Biden 2020 presidential campaign. Since 2023 he has been a partner at Ballard Partners…
Looks like the only loyalty is to money… AND the Uniparty.
When Susie Wiles was made chief of staff, there wasn't a single media hit piece. No freak out from Democrats in Congress. No threats to make her life hell. Now you understand why.
In light of suggestions that Susie Wiles and James Blair may pursue legal action over my Joe Rogan interview, I am publicly requesting that she, Ballard Partners, Continental Straregy, and other relevant parties immediately preserve all potentially relevant records and…
The amount of senior administration officials who have called me with stories of Susie’s deranged betrayals of President Trump is revolting.
People who know Susie well have warned me that she has the capacity to inflict physical harm, and I do not appreciate unhinged threats… pic.twitter.com/DOL23GuSlV
The Joe Rogan podcast that he’s talking about. 1,278,778 views Nov 6, 2026 The Joe Rogan Experience
Calley Means is a health advocate, author, and former senior advisor to the United States Department of Health and Human Services. He is also a co-founder of Truemed and co-author of the book “Good Energy” with his sister Casey Means, MD
….
This is the video I was originally planning to examine (2 hours). And yes I know Josh is a bit of a flake but I wanted to see what that branch of MAGA was thinking.
ABBREVIATED TRANSCRIPT
Josh on Susie Wiles.
Alpha: …We’re going to analyze what’s happened over the course of the last year. We’re going to look at it from the Q perspective. We’ll talk a little bit about Q, what Q is, why Q is, how Q is. I always say is that the time for decodes is over.. because we are in the operational framework of what Q was actually meant for and as well as we’re going to get into Susie Wiles Because damn it, Josh was right again. Josh nailed this
Susie saying freaking lobbyist for me.
I said, “We’ll see what happens.” .. This is Josh back on December 15th, 2025. Why do Pam Bondi and Susie Wiles need to go? I was calling this back in 2025 because they’re the from the same lobbying firm, right? And guess what? Both of them are no longer with the Trump administration.
Why Susie Wiles got fired? And Yeah, technically she was fired.
A key former staffer and ally of Robert F Kennedy Jr accused outgoing Chief of Staff Susie Wiles of taking money from corporations and foreign interests to sabotage RFK’s Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) agenda.
Trump announced Friday that ‘ice queen’ Wiles would leavethe powerful position on Monday for a position in Trump’s political operation, to be replaced by Stephen Miller.
While many, including Trump, celebrated the work Wiles did, former Kennedy advisor Calley Means accused Wiles of pay to play involving her daughter in an interview with Joe Rogan.
Means, who departed the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) two weeks ago, alleged that companies willing to hire Katie Wiles for lobbyist work would get preferential treatment in the White House.
One of his most explosive allegations was that companies who hired the daughter of Susie Wiles, Trump’s longtime White House chief of staff, as a lobbyist received higher priority for funding from the administration.
‘If you’re a special interest and you want to get something done, the secret’s out. You pay Susie’s daughter, and it was openly discussed when they had a client,’ he told Rogan.
Means also blamed Wiles for shutting down MAHA reforms because of pressure from corporations and need for fundraising money.
‘Susie said to me many times: “We need money for the midterms, Calley. We need money for the midterms,”‘ he said, accusing her of shutting down a study into the effects of sugars on children…
Susie Wiles has 2 daughters. The following from Brave AI.
Katie Wiles works for Continental Strategy, a lobbying firm where she serves as a partner and director. Notable Healthcare & Insurance: Centene Corporation, CVS Health, Baptist Health, and Hims and Hers.
Caroline Wiles, the younger daughter, is currently the Vice President of Foreign Affairs at the lobbying firm Rubin Turnbull & Associates in Washington, D.C. Rubin, Turnbull & Associates represents a diverse portfolio of clients across healthcare, education, infrastructure, and technology. The firm’s largest and most consistent clients include HCA Healthcare, which paid $546,000 in 2023 for combined legislative and executive branch services. Also Major entities such as Sutter Health, Molina Healthcare, Nomi Health, Wellpath, Orchid Cove Health Group, Acadia Healthcare, MAXIMUS, and Hospital for Special Surgery.
So that is the background on Susie Wiles.
The following info is from Josh and Alpha, I cannot verify, but I thought it was interesting if true.
TRANSCRIPT: (It is 2 hours+ and I am not going to try and figure out who said what.)
…If you don’t know what happened last night in the White House, the information is coming out. Susie Wiles and her chief of staff were in the Oval Office with President Trump and President Trump was going off on her, screaming. She stormed out of the room, slammed the door, and Trump was still yelling at her and asked for her resignation. She resigned. the important part, the way that story is being shared and one of the particular gentlemen that’s sharing it — and he has pretty good reputation for being accurate — you know why Trump was pissed, right?
So there’s there’s a few different reasons why Trump was pissed. There is what was known as the Camp David plot and I don’t know if people knew about this. Well, let me share the one that I heard and like I said, this guy, he’s gone public with it, so it’s not like he’s keeping it back channel. As I said, he’s pretty good with his info.
Donald Trump‘s top advisor has fallen victim to a sinister scheme by hackers who infiltrated her phone and used artificial intelligence to impersonate her voice.
The nefarious plot involved stolen data from the personal cellphone of White Housechief of staff Susie Wiles that was then used to call some of American’s most powerful people.
Over the course of several weeks, high profile senators, governors and American business executives have received voicemails or messages from an unknown number claiming to be Wiles,Wall Street Journal reported.
The hackers came undone when they made the fatal mistake of asking questions that the president’s closest aide would already know the answer to…
Wiles was referred to as the ‘most feared and least known political operative’ prior to stepping into her now high-profile role.
She is now serving as the first female White House chief of staff in history after helping Trump to his historic victory in November as his campaign manager.
During the campaign, Iranians managed to hack into Wiles’ email account and reportedly accessed a research dossier she had on file about Trump’s running mate, now-vice president JD Vance.
Those who know Wiles best say she’s an expert at shaping political narratives and an expert at ‘managing personalities and managing information.’
And, according to associates, there’s something else to know about Wiles: Don’t cross her.
Several narratives, some contradictory, have filled the absence of any clear explanation behind Susie Wiles being replaced by Stephen Miller within three days of the Republican Party’s midterm loss — and all of them are dramatic. One such account said Trump was yelling at Susie Wiles and continued yelling until she left the room, while another says Trump would never do that to Susie. One account says Susie Wiles did not want to continue at the hectic job for long as she just recovered from breast cancer, while another says she had a Camp David plot up her sleeve to save her job…
Susie Wiles had allegedly planned a behind-the-scenes meeting at Camp David with her loyalists in a last-ditch attempt to retain her position, even as the president was preparing to replace her with Stephen Miller. According to reports, Wiles had booked an offsite meeting at the presidential retreat for Saturday, November 7, inviting White House officials and aides considered close to her…
The meeting was reportedly intended to work out how she could survive the leadership shake-up and remain in power. However, the meeting was delayed and then cancelled after Trump decided to replace her, Daily Mail reported. The president was scheduled to be in Florida on Saturday.The report also alleged that Wiles and her allies were attempting to shift responsibility for the Republicans’ disastrous midterm election performance onto Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, particularly over his role in the Iran war. The Daily Mail report said that Wiles’ allies had spent the days following the November 3 elections trying to make Hegseth’s involvement in the conflict the public explanation for the party’s losses. The war had contributed to rising living costs, including higher petrol prices, the report said. A senior Pentagon official alleged that Wiles was trying to push Hegseth out to deflect blame for the Republican defeat.”Susie was trying to push out Pete,” the official was quoted as saying…
This is from Josh:
…Susie Walls was setting up Hegseth to be the fall guy. That is 100% correct and accurate, but there’s more to it than that. Let’s just start here. The Camp David plot refers to the allegedly planned meeting between Wiles and allied officials while Trump was in Florida without Trump’s knowledge. Anonymous sources portrayed it as an effort to preserve her position. The meeting was eventually canceled. Her allies allegedly tried to shift blame [of election loss] to Pete Hegseth, pointing to the Iran war and rising living cost.
Hence, I want to point this out because this is really important. the SCOOP on Pete the last couple of days. The last couple of days there’s been massive attacks on Pete Hegseth. Guess where that’s coming from? That’s coming from the establishment party. That’s coming from Susie Wiles and her allies.
Now, it’s really important to understand that the chief of staff is is a critically important position in the White House. Probably the most important position within the White House besides the president, probably even more powerful than the vice president. So, I posted a post on April 2nd, 2026, and I said,
“This is concerning and not very conducive to how Trump operates.
” So, this was the important moment of this war. It happened in the Oval Office and nobody saw it. Susie Wiles, Trump’s chief of staff, gathered aides and told the president what nobody else would. The war is tanking his numbers. Gas prices are crushing Americans and the people around him were sugarcoating everything. She had been urging colleagues for weeks to be more forthright with the boss instead of telling him what he wanted to hear. Trump had been starting mornings watching military highlight reels.”
This was basically an anonymous source that came out and said that Susie was trying to tell Trump that the Iran war was basically going to destroy him and cut it all down.
What was really happening — we got this from other people like Paul Sperry. He talked about this. Other people in Washington DC talked about this — was that Susie Wiles was retaining intelligence from President Trump. She was keeping information from President Trump. She was being a gatekeeper. Not only that, she was the one controlling the narrative and the story, lots of Trump’s Truth Social posts and basically talking points that Trump was putting out there. So the idea here is this, If true, it shows that Susie Wiles is not aligned with Trump’s agenda that is unfolding from the war machine. So what you have to understand is that Trump and Susie had two different operations going on. Trump wanted to do one thing, Susie [a RINO] was doing another.
Now, why did Trump have Susie Wiles in his administration? Well, look at it as kind of what’s happening right now. We’re going to get into that discussion when we talk about the GOP and the end of the GOP or is it a restructuring of the GOP? And that’s the big difference here.
So, to give you an idea who’s friends with Susie Wiles.
Do you remember when Condoleezza Rice came into the White House ?
NOW – Trump, Condoleezza Rice and Susie Wiles shake hands and walk off together after White House event. pic.twitter.com/9WSfZZz2Zu
And what what did I say during that whole time? What was I saying on all the shows? Susie Wiles will be out after the midterms. Watch. And what happened with the Vanity Fair article? And this is really important to kind of put in context — because this has been building up and we’ve been covering this — is that Trump introduced Susie Wiles for the Vanity Fair article. The Vanity Fair article came out. It was a hit piece on Susie Wiles and it really destroyed a lot ofher reputation and she should have been fired over the article. She wasn’t. I think Trump set her up in hopes that she would resign then, but we knew at that point in time rumors started coming out of DC that she was going to be gone by the end of the midterms. And so that’s when I made that prediction and it just happened. Now, what’s also interesting is you had Katie Zakaria that became the new White House press secretary. Trump went around Susie Wiles to hire her. I’ll say that again. Trump did not go through Susie Wiles to hire her. Trump using probably Dan Scavino, brought her in, he liked her, he put her in front of there. And this is someone who’s been in Fox News and so forth. What happened? She went on Hannity. Who made the call to get her on Hannity? Susie Wiles. She was fired the next day by and I want to get specific on that part because he had a lot of sources out there debunking it saying it wasn’t Susie Wiles you know even Katie Zachariah said it was the people that handle communication. But when you backtrack those people answer to Susie Wiles. No those are the people that just make the phone calls and tell them the times. The actual decision was coming from Susie Wiles
… Now, in other words, there has been ruffling of feathers for power and control in the White House. And this meeting last week, this was before the midterms that was supposed to take place at Camp David while Trump was in Florida was the last straw. And basically it was a coupd‘état type of meeting. I think what they were going to try to do is find scapegoats. To remove Pete Hegseth. To remove other players. And Alpha laid this out earlier. To try to blame Trump and Hegseth and then move for impeachment on Trump and put JD Vance in power. Now why is this interesting? because Massie just filed articles of impeachment against Pete Hegseth and then Representative Comer comes out and says, “Yeah, we got a lot of questions for Hegseth and I can’t wait to get into that.” In other words, establishment GOP are turning on Trump’s people. Hence why we just had a bloodbath in the midterms and a lot of these people aren’t coming back to Congress.
… Patrick Burn, several weeks ago…said Susie Wiles was going to get fired….Like I said, the decision was made during the Vanity Fair article time frame. Trump was hoping she would resign then, but instead she said she will leave after the midterms. And so Trump made it finalized and fired her before she could resign.
What we’re trying to show people is that there’s a struggle for power and control. And with Trump’s moves he just made, Steven Miller becoming the new chief of staff, this is huge. Steven Miller has been with President Trump since 2015. In other words, he was there during the Q days. I mean, this is someone who understands the drops. Someone who goes out there and uses the verbiage all the time.
[Conversation goes to Q and Q proofs & such. Hopium Incoming]
… Alpha said that is the greatest military intelligence operation of our time. So, the key component goes back to the military, back to before October 28th, 2017. There was an active intelligence operation basically uncovering the criminality of the deep state and the globalists and the undermining of the US Constitution and the the treason and subversion of the Obama administration. And this was being done we believe through a special access program that was operating out of the National Security Agency at a time when the Obama administration came in. And it originally came about most likely due to the selling off of highly classified military technologies that fell under special access programs.[Think Hillary Sec of state January 21, 2009 – February 1, 2013]At least this is what my research has shown and what I’ve laid out. Now, within that, the NSA began spying on congressmen and senators and heads of state and foreign heads of state and government contractors and American citizens. And that operation got leaked to the media[May 2013]by a guy by the name of Edward Snowden. Kind of interesting right there. Immediately after that happened at the end of the year after Obama won re-election in 2012, Obama fired 198 what was known as constitutional generals, people within the military establishment that were adherent to the Constitution. I don’t think that that was a coincidence. The NSA program that was shut down was publicly known for spying on Democrats, Republicans, other people within the bureaucracy and so forth. Why is that important? Because if someone’s selling special access programs or highly advanced technologies to foreign adversaries or leaking classified information to NOS’s or whatnot or selling access to our government, you would kind of want to know. And as a military, it’s your job to protect and defend the Constitution, especially from those that are trying to usurp it. So that’s where we think that this operation started from.
One interesting point is that the Q group was anagency tucked inside the National Security Agencythat actually tried to hunt down and take down Edward Snowden. Now, one of the interesting parts about that, the Q group is formed off of a collaborative out of the National Security Council. Now, what’s interesting about that is that there was an impaneled group of people in the National Security Council, including the head of the Defense Intelligence Agency, who actually led the special task force. Do you want to know who the head of that special task force was that hunted down Edward Snowden? His name is General Michael Flynn.
So General Michael Flynn operated two different task force during that time as head of the the DIA. One was to actually take down Chelsea Manning and the otherwasthe take down Edward Snowden. It’s known as IRTF-2 on July 11th, 2013.
“Since 11 July2013, IRTF-2has led a coordinated DoD effort to discover, triage, and assess the impact of non-NSADefense material from NSAholdings of compromised data,” according to the DIA report. Read the full Defense Intelligence Agency report[except it has been deleted even from the Wayback archive.]
…
So, the task force was roughly between 200 to 250 people. It’s known as information review task force 2 IRTF2 established under Lieutenant General Michael Flynn while he was director of the Defense Intelligence Agency.
Now that’s interesting because Flynn becomes a core component in all of this Q world talk. Specifically PreQ he comes out and talks about digital warriors and he talks about the domain of information. Now, this is the author of 5GW, fifth generation warfare, and he’s talking to you about, hey, we need digital warriors because there’s a war on information. And the war on information is that we need to take it back because there’s a problem. There’s a constructed narrative. There’s a controlled narrative. The news, and information that is coming out right now is a psyop. It is an information influence op. People need to understand this and learn how all of this operates. And then soon after that, once the Trump administration came in, Q came out.
Now, what was Q? Q was the wake-up call from the information op that was being played through the mockingbird media for a very, very long time. …what I want to show people is this. Prior to 2017, pretty much about 2010, the world of information changed. And it changed quite drastically. See, the problem with big tech and social media companies up until 2010 is they didn’t have the infrastructure in place to actually do what they wanted to do with cell phones and tablets. You couldn’t stream videos really well. It was still hard to download content. They tried peer-to-peer content downloads, but the bandwidth size of the antennas just wasn’t large enough until around 2010. And that’s when Amazon and Google finalized a lot of their infrastructure build-outs and we had what was known as virtual machines which could spool up anywhere in the world and basically run content. And this gave birth to the information era to where people stopped consuming 60 minutes and 30 minute news broadcasts and started to go and consume 124 character tweets and two to three minute short videos on Vine or Facebook posts or memes that were just pictures depicting current events and you know Sunday comics.
So people started to consume information differently and people in the military began to understand that hey there’s an opportunity here to basically take back the domain of information by controlling this now evolving domain of information. This new emerging evolving domain of information because just like has happened in the past big large corporate media conglomerates were failing at adapting to this new technological trend. The military knew that this was going to be something. It was going to be really something. And so what do they do? They utilize movement warfare.
They utilize movement warfare and they constructed a psychological operation that was directed towards MAGA patriots, conspiracy theorists and people who question government. They started it on 4chan on October 28th, 2017. Actually, it it started well before October 28th because if anybody who’s on 4chan during that time, you know that since January of that year, there was people coming in and out of 4chan claiming to be White House insiders, claiming to be FBI insiders or people inside the Trump administration. So, either that was people out there just blowing smoke up people’s asses or those were dry test runs of what Q actually would become. But there was one posted specifically talking about Huma, John Podesta, Hillary Clinton. Hillary Clinton will be indicted or be arrested, passport flagged. These posts are the ones that captured people’s attentions. And primarily the main reason was because people created Reddit threads to start discussing all these threads. And this one was the one that got amplified the most on these Reddit threads and then on the Twitter boards. And once the amplification began, that is when it took off and it started to grow massively.
Soon after, a guy by the name of Joe M comes out and he puts some great movies out there, short little 9-minute movies called The Plan to Save the World. And then it went absolutely viral… I think it’s important because what the Q operation was in the social milieu serves multiple different purposes.
Number one, it was meant to wake up the American public, to have people start investigating, researching, and then take that information and begin broadcasting it. To take back the idea of information, take back the domain of information. That was key and paramount…
ALPHA: So, we get the news Susie Wiles is out and so everybody’s like, “Yes.” Like all these different groups that I’m in, people finally feel like our chin got a little bit above the water here. Who’s she getting replaced with? Stephen Miller. Every Democratic person out there losing their head.
Why is Hegseth so important, and why do they want him out so much? A Color Revolution is a kind of insurgency. An insurgency requires making people fear it more than the actual government. Beyond being a decorated combat soldier, Hegseth was also a counter-insurgency instructor in the army for many years. But it goes deeper. Hegseth is mediagenic and media savvy. He’s a charismatic communicator. And by all indications, a large number of troops love him.
In this way, he’s vastly more effective than an older SecDef who might have more political and policy sophistication. This is important because with that level of support amongst the troops it makes it unlikely that any Deep State officers will be able to move their troops towards insurrection against the current administration. Put another way, it’s not so much what he can get the military TO DO. It’s what he can prevent the military from doing.
And that’s why they are desperate to get rid of him.
On top of that Hegseth is 46, still buff, and very much a MAN. For the Gamergate Guys, he can, to some extent, take Charlie’s place as a leader. He is a good counter to Nick Fuentes and Tucker Carlson.
There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.
Do not forget to LABEL AI articles, video and such.
The video shows in the draft but not in the preview so I included the URL.
Short 2 year old clip from Glen Beck.
May thanks to eilert,Gudthots,TheseTruths, and others who brought this to the Q tree. I am puttingmuch of itin an article to preserve itin an easy to find place.
H/T barkerjim for last weeks C&C that sums up a lot of this mess. I have stolen a lot of the article because Jeff Childers does such a bang up job of summarizing what has been happening here and around the globe.
Here we go again. You would not be blamed for a sneaking suspicion that the left is up to something on a global scale. Deep staters conspiring in the US. Black bloc protestors without demands burning French town halls. Brazil stealing an election and its candidate fleeing across a bridge to Argentina on foot after midnight. Missile defense trucks deployed to chic Palm Beach around Mar-a-Lago. Now this. Headline from Fox, this morning: “Polish president turns plane around after ‘coup’ at nation’s top court.”…
🔥 It looks like Poland’s left is speed-running the Brazil experience…
In short, the communists found a way to capture a country by occupying its Supreme Court. This took years to accomplish in Brazil. It looks like the globalists just tried to do the same thing in one night in Poland while the President was out of town…
🔥 There’s a lot more kindling. Data professionals have dubbed this month “Black October” due to a global rash of cyberattacks. (It is also Cybersecurity Awareness Month, so.) Two days ago, the Military Times reported that the Pentagon is treating a string of freezer failures at US military commissaries, the on-base grocery stores, as a suspected Iranian hack. Fort Huachuca’s Facebook page said its freezer “went into defrost mode where it heated up all the food.” In a copycat attack on French grocery freezers at around the same time, some units got so hot they caught fire… [Good reason NOT to have smart appliances –GC]
🔥 The global unrest is due to everyone being more nervous than a long-tailed cat in a room full of rocking chairs…
But what everyone is really thinking is that the U.S. midterm elections are now just three days away. Even here, in my usually placid blue Alachua County, where progressives run everything and normally don’t bother, things are heating up…
What do we make of all this? Pessimists on X are predicting a coordinated global attack. Their theory is that globalist forces that lost their USAID grants see Tuesday as the last chance to stop the counter-revolution before the money never comes back. They have plenty of silliness to work with. Democrats are promising chaos
The No Kings brigades have been ominously quiet this summer and election season. But the No Kings website wants activists to be ready for “mass nonviolent action in rapid response” if officials “refuse to certify valid results.” In South Carolina this week, California’s oily governor slid into election denial even before the ballots, saying, “Trump is not screwing around. This guy’s trying to rig the election before a single vote is cast. The only way he can win is if he rigs the election.”
The LA Times reported that more than 20 Democratic attorneys general have already drafted “emergency lawsuits and temporary restraining orders” ready to file “at a moment’s notice.” Colorado’s Phil Weiser said, “We’re not going to be reacting in real time… We are going to be following through on plans we’ve made.”
Earlier this month, the Hill headlined, “Inside the Democratic effort to fight any Trump disruption of midterms.” According to the story, House Democrats have wargamed “roughly 150 different scenarios” and held more than 15 “shadow hearings,” which sounds totally democratic. Washington Governor Bob Ferguson offered county auditors plainclothes National Guard members to “inconspicuously monitor ballot drop boxes.” (Armed ICE agents near a polling place are intimidation, but undercover troops at the drop box are just neighborly.)…
None of this sounds like people confident of their blue wave. Democrats say they’re going to win in a landslide. They’ve also pre-drafted 150 lawsuits, just in case they do.
So what do we make of it all?…
In short, don’t count on knowing who won the House on election night. It might not be the kind of painful interlude that Polish folks are facing, but they aren’t going to keep all those lawsuits in a drawer. The courts should plan to cancel all their scheduled vacations, stock up on energy drinks, and maybe pre-order Costco Thanksgiving meals.
The French are packing board games. Americans should pack patience…
Here is the compilation in no particular order. And yes it is LONG. On a side note for future reference: DataRepublican’s Substack
These are two goods tweet on how to take back our country.
People keep asking what “10,000 Stephen Millers” actually means. Let me tell you, because it's simpler than the headline.
Stephen Miller started as a junior staffer in a Senate office. He wasn't famous. He wasn't connected. He stayed for years, learned the policy cold, worked… https://t.co/ixJuIGnDn8
Nick Solheim @NickSolheim People keep asking what “10,000 Stephen Millers” actually means. Let me tell you, because it’s simpler than the headline.
Stephen Miller started as a junior staffer in a Senate office. He wasn’t famous. He wasn’t connected. He stayed for years, learned the policy cold, worked harder than everyone around him, and was loyal to his boss and the mission. That’s how a junior staffer becomes an assistant to the president.
It’s not enough to just create right-wing staff. You have to make them humble, loyal, and willing to work harder and later than everyone else.
Since 2021, American Moment has trained several thousand young conservatives. Every semester, a small class of paid fellows learns how Washington actually works: how decisions get made, how paper moves, how to staff a principal, how to show up prepared. Our alumni now work across the administration and on Capitol Hill.
Elections change who sits in the big chairs. They don’t change who writes the memos, staffs the meetings, and implements their principal’s decisions — unless you build the people who do.
The other side understood this a long time ago. They built institutions to train and place their people, and they are now openly threatening ours for doing the same.
We’re going to keep building anyway. If you’re a young conservative who wants to serve — really serve, not just post — we will train you, we will help you get hired, and we will stand behind you when it gets hard.
Personnel is policy. Build the personnel, and the policy follows.
I really like this guy. He often appears on Rich Does Politics.
Five countries fell to the globalist playbook. 🇵🇱
A US senator went to Europe to learn how they did it.
Interesting videos. Please note, no human has an exclusive on Truth so I watch different view points and then form my own opinions. Tom Luongo mentions in another video that Alex Krainer does not like Trump and that he comes from a very different back ground than us, Communist Yugoslavia.
Matt Ehret (Canadian) and Alex Krainer: The Clash of the Two Systems from USA 1776 to China Today (1 hr 17 minutes)
Promethean Action Q&A (2 hrs)
43 minute – 51:30 promethean action about Data republican
59 minutes Sun Yat-Sen
1hr 5min Nevil Singham conntected to City of London
1:07:30 APAX Capitol Brits owns data base for Democrat party
1:22:30 1600 Ret Generals & Pentagon Insiders – Memo to POTUS NOT to use insurrection act to quell Political Violence.
2:01:00 Carroll Quigley
Tulsi Gabbard’s full speech from Turning Point USA: My warning to all Americans (23 minutes)
Now you know why they were collecting data on over 600,000 Trump supporters under Biden. If you put together what Slotkin, Susan Rice, Jake Sullivan, Jack Smith and company were doing, you can see the whole plan. Obama’s Goal is to DESTROY the whole MAGA movement so it NEVER rises again Through lawfare, intimidation, persecution. Buy a MAGA hat and you are on the list. Work for the Trump administration –>go to jail
Now you know why they were collecting data on over 600,000 Trump supporters
If you put together what Slotkin, Susan Rice, Jake Sullivan, Jack Smith and co were doing, you can see the whole plan.
America is currently in the midst of a color revolution designed to overthrow our Constitutional form of government. The only way to stop it is awareness.
(This is going to be a lengthy article, but please bear with me because I believe we all need to understand what is happening in the shadows.)
If you are not already aware of the treasure trove* of seditionist materials that @DataRepublican has uncovered, please stop now and review them, or at least listen to this audio describing the seditionist plot in the seditionists’ own words. Please come back to this article after you listen.
****************
Are you back?
Great, thanks.
THAT, friends, is what a color revolution sounds like.
However, if we are all going to fight this rebellion with our own words and deeds, we need the knowledge to be able to spot exactly what the fight looks like. To that end, I am writing this article to educate American patriots on what a color revolution actually is, what its key strategies consist of, and how those strategies relate to what we are seeing being unleashed in the USA today.
What is a Color Revolution?
Wikipedia defines a “color revolution” as follows:
“[Color revolutions] are a series of often non-violent protests and accompanying (attempted or successful) changes of government and society taking place in post-Soviet states (particularly Georgia, Ukraine, and Kyrgyzstan) and the former Yugoslavia during the 21st century. The aim of the color revolutions is to establish Western-style democracies. They were primarily triggered by election results widely viewed as falsified. The color revolutions are marked by the use of the internet as a method of communication, as well as a strong role of non-governmental organizations [(“NGOs”)] in the protests.”
While the main government players in all of this on the U.S. side were the CIA and USAID, “non-profit” NGOs like the National Endowment for Democracy (“NED,” directly congressionally funded), the National Democratic Institute (“NDI,” funded by grants from USAID, the Department of State and NED), the International Republican Institute (“IRI,” similarly funded by grants from USAID, the Department of State and NED), Freedom House (also similarly funded by grants from USAID, the Department of State and NED), and a plethora of other NGOs (many funded by George Soros’s infamous Open Society network) have done most of the dirty work.
Understanding the role of NGOs in all of this is crucial—NGOs provide a way for U.S. taxpayer dollars to fund foreign policy actions that are difficult to track and often run counter to the intent of a majority of American voters.
These NGOs all have one thing in common—they are all vocally dedicated to “protecting democracy.” However, when examining their track record of fomenting revolution, it’s arguable that many of the regimes they overthrew were, in fact, democratically elected (at least to standards no more corrupt than America’s 2020 Presidential election). This is particularly true with respect to the Revolution of Dignity and the overthrow of Ukraine’s democratically-elected President, Viktor Yanukovych. Far be it for me to uphold ex-Soviet oligarchs, but it appears that the devotion of these NGOs to “democracy” is actually to “democracies we approve of.”
We will come back to the NGOs.
How Do Color Revolutions Work?
There are numerous academic treatises on the features of color revolutions, but my personal research suggests that they rely upon six lines of attack:
1. Funding.
Those U.S. NGOs you see listed above operate by funding other NGOs and individuals inside the targeted nation. Dark U.S. money becomes even darker money inside the targeted nation. These organizations build parallel structures that can operate outside national control and coordinate/sustain protest capacity at a tightly-organized, high level.
2. Training.
The well-funded NGOs and individuals then engage in highly structured activist training programs. Often pyramidal in nature (i.e., “train the trainers”), these programs cover branding, the processing of parallel vote counts, actions that erode the legitimacy of existing governmental institutions and maintaining ostensibly nonviolent discipline to maximize activist legitimacy.
3. Narrative and Symbolism.
The narrative of government illegitimacy must be pushed and repeated over and over and over. Complicit media sources are essential to creating and sustaining this narrative (often with cash changing hands to publish a particular story). Very basic symbolism is also vital. The name “color revolution” itself refers to the use of an inspiring color to unify the activists and present a constant reminder of the surge of activism engulfing the country via clothing, signs and banners—the “Orange Revolution” is a perfect example. Logos, slogans, hashtags and similarly pithy symbolic expressions are essential in delegitimizing the targeted regime and present regime change as the only “democratic” outcome.
4. Electoral Trigger.
A big part of the dark money is used to deploy “independent” election monitors, create fake pre-election polling and fake exit polling, and rapidly publicize perceived “irregularities” to create a clear trigger for mass protests. NGO networks then convert the disputed vote into sustained mass street action. While the architects of color revolutions consistently highlight the “non-violent” nature of their protests, certain groups are designated to engage in covert (i.e., masked) violent action, and other groups are essentially sent to the slaughter in hopes that the government will violently crack down and create martyrs. (Although this name pre-dates color revolutions, such deliberate martyrdom is what I call the “Horst Wessel Strategy.”)
5. Elite pressure.
This is the process of relying on outside agents of high legitimacy to create public statements of support for the protestors and activists, create targeted sanctions or incentives for the current government to step down, and to quietly engage with military, bureaucratic, and business elites in the targeted government. The aim is to isolate the current government internationally and signal that cooperation with the old regime carries higher costs than accommodation with the protesters.
6. Defection of Security Forces and Military.
One of the main purposes of all of the above is to convince a nation’s military and security/police forces that they are a part of an illegitimate regime and that the only moral choice is to defect to the opposition. Ramping up violent protests such that these people must choose between firing on their own countrymen or defecting is a fundamental tenet of color revolutions, supposed “non-violent” practices notwithstanding. In high-trust societies where the military is well-respected, this is perhaps the most important tool in the color revolutionary’s tool box. When the military and police defect, the color revolution is over, and it wins.
These are the tools the U.S. government and its well-funded network of NGOs have been using for decades to foment the overthrow of disfavored national governments, all without approval or knowledge of the electorate. Then Donald Trump dismantled USAID, and it all stopped.
Or did it? All those ex-USAID employees had to go find something to do, and boy oh boy did they ever.
Our American Color Revolution
Hopefully by now you are already seeing the parallels between our overseas color revolutions and what we are seeing and experiencing in the USA in 2026.
USAID? Note how many of the videos and audios that @DataRepublican posted involve ex-USAID employees who know their color revolution toolbox cold.
NGOs? All of the actions @DataRepublican has uncovered involve NGOs with specific, compartmentalized, plausibly deniable roles: the United Democracy Alliance; 50501; Indivisible; National Security Leaders for America (this one is particularly troubling as it has ~1,600 former military, intelligence and State Department officials behind it); and many more. Some are still relying on funding they derived from U.S. taxpayers before President Trump shut it all down. George Soros funds many of them. Foreign power funding? Maybe—money laundering is a thing.
It’s the NGOs.
It’s always the NGOs.
Democracy? Sure, sure, sure. Those NGO plotters are all there to “protect our democracy.” In reality, they are there to overthrow any democratically-elected American they disapprove of, just like happened to some of the democratically-elected regimes we overthrew off our shores. To these people, “democracy” means the right of unelected bureaucrats and well-funded NGOs to control our national destiny. In reality, “democracy” is the very last thing they want.
As to the color revolution toolbox, the similarities to what we are seeing now are simply undeniable:
Funding? Do I even need to explain this one? The NGOs fomenting insurrection in the USA are incredibly well-funded, many by George Soros’ network.
Training? Since 2020 we have seen so many examples of training programs for Antifa and similar groups, all NGO funded. These training programs are designed to train protestors on how to effectively foment civil unrest and, at times, violence. For example, Indivisible’s “One Million Rising” project focuses on training to be able to analyze “pillars of support” for the Trump Administration (business, labor, faith, civil service, law enforcement, etc.) and tactics to weaken them. Specific examples include pressuring local sheriffs not to cooperate with ICE, “Signs of Solidarity” campaigns targeting businesses, and sustained local campaigns against lawful Trump Administration actions. Sign-up language for such training has included “Let’s get organized. Let’s stop Trump.” Indivisible materials state the goal of mobilizing people “to defeat MAGA” and disrupt policy through noncooperation and active protest. (This effort has received up to $7,600,000 in Soros funding, by the way.)
Narrative and Symbolism? Again, do I really need to elaborate? The legacy media cannot report on election integrity without stating that Donald Trump’s complaints about the 2020 election are “baseless.” We are awash in stories about how the Trump Administration’s efforts to ensure election integrity are instead a nefarious plot to steal the midterm elections. Today, the Washington Post—obviously in a hurried and desperate effort to get out in front of the revelations from @DataRepublican—published an anonymously-sourced article favorably describing the coup efforts she uncovered. If you read this article, it does not talk about a coup conspiracy. Instead it talks about a bunch of well-meaning, patriotic, anonymous ex-national security officials simply trying to protect America from the evil dictator Trump destroying “our democracy.” This article itself is straight out of the color revolution toolbox—it is propaganda designed to condition a populace to accept illegitimate actions. The Washington Post is part of the plot. As to symbolism, do “No Kings” and the “Resistance” mean anything to you? Again, these slogans/symbols are straight out of the color revolution toolbox.
Electoral Trigger? When you listen to the videos and audios released by @DataRepublican, the plotters consistently speak of the midterms as being the trigger for action. Again, these ex-USAID diplomats could not possibly speak more clearly in their intent to overthrow the Trump Presidency via the color revolution tactics they learned in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. (Oh yeah, as to the trigger creating useful idiot martyrs, do the names Renée Good and Alex Pretti ring a bell?)
Elite Pressure? While we see European Union nations constantly decrying Trump—which is actually part of the plot—the twist in a domestic color revolution is that the elite pressure will come directly from Democrat governors. The uncovered plot relies on the idea that rampant street protests will result in a crisis in legitimacy via Trump needing to invoke the Insurrection Act, such that Democrat and RINO governors declare themselves the only legitimate U.S. authority, up to and including reaching out to foreign powers for recognition. (Geez, that kind of feels like the Confederacy asking Queen Victoria to acknowledge their sovereignty, doesn’t it?) The final step here will be to overthrow the Constitution as we know it—they said so.
Defection of Security Forces and Military? This is another one I feel like I really do not need to explain. Seditious Six, anyone? This feature of the domestic color revolution has been in plain sight for quite some time. Our nation’s survival really depends on this not working. Given the institutional resistance to Department of War reforms from some of the senior military brass and the cabal of senior, unelected bureaucrats in the Senior Executive Service who have trashed their oaths via passive resistance to the electoral will of the American people, this is a real issue of concern. If the plotters can turn some of the generals and bureaucrats actively against their Commander-in-Chief, we are in real trouble. Fortunately, I think this is the weak point of the plot and why it will ultimately fail. Our military ranks are still filled almost totally with patriots who will honor their oath to the Constitution.
The plot is afoot. It’s real. It’s here. A color revolution is currently being attempted in the USA by the same people who so adroitly manipulated the fates of millions of Eastern Europeans and Central Asians some twenty years ago.
What Can We Do?
My X feed is awash with concerned patriots asking this same question. All of us—everyone of us—can do these three things:
1. Pray.
2. Call your Congressman/woman and Senators and demand an investigation. Light up the switchboards. MAKE THEM pay attention.
3. Tell everyone you know. Make them listen to this shocking audio, if nothing else. The time is past caring if midwit Cousin Susie or face tattoo Nephew Timmy will cut you off because you support our President. Make them listen. The time is late. Our nation and our freedoms are at risk.
One more thing—for some of us, the answer is to be prepared. Most of you know what I mean, I’ll leave it there.
This modern American Gunpowder Plot cannot and will not succeed.
*In case you doubt the veracity of @DataRepublican‘s materials, here is how she obtained them. Some doofus involved in the plot used an AI agent to record and archive everything that went on, all the way back to 2023, and them stupidly let the agent archive them in a publicly available Google Drive. DR got a tip as to the URL. Further, the man President Trump appointed to play a key role in USAID and shut it down (Pete Marocco) publicly vouched for their authenticity. Here is the link where he said so.
…
This is how you know my recordings are real and they’re scared. Washington Post already doing counter-messaging. “A small group of U.S. national security officials has been discreetly advising state governments and congressional lawmakers on how to prepare for the possibility that the Trump administration will attempt to interfere in November’s midterm elections, according to people involved in the effort. The group includes about 10 current and former officials with experience in the Defense Department, some of whom have previously focused on countering authoritarianism abroad.”
Part I of the Sedition files for the planned Midterm ‘Colour Revolution’ Coup
🚨🚨 THE ILLEGITIMACY PLAYBOOK / THE DEMOCRACY FILES: A PRIMER 🚨
I will be using this thread to track all drops, so bookmark it.
I spent most of yesterday backing everything (now 312 gigabytes) up in various sources and getting the materials out to others. I also produced an… pic.twitter.com/la5grkjLbK
THE ILLEGITIMACY PLAYBOOK / THE DEMOCRACY FILES: A PRIMER
I will be using this thread to track all drops, so bookmark it.
I spent most of yesterday backing everything (now 312 gigabytes) up in various sources and getting the materials out to others. I also produced an AI video (below) to explain the whole thing to others are not on 𝕏 – feel free to distribute.
Here’s the primer:
USAID, the foreign aid agency, had a democracy office. Inside the agency, it was called DRG.
Officially, DRG administered “democracy assistance.” They’d go inside countries they thought were sliding into authoritarianism and help the opposition there. That assistance included election monitoring, judicary support, independent media, and civil society building.
You may have heard the term “color revolution.” The model comes from Serbia in 2000, where trained student activists brought down Milosevic with the help of Western governments, after sustained protests. With the help of USAID’s democracy office, this model was implemented in many other countries to topple governments: Georgia’s “Rose Revolution” in 2003, Ukraine’s “Orange Revolution” in 2004, and many more.
Then last year, DOGE shut down USAID. But the USAID democracy office didn’t stop. They formed a group called the Democracy Renewal Group, the same initials as their office (USAID Democracy, Human Rights, Governance). Their goal: apply their own playbook to the United States itself.
This goal became a plan, called Renew American Democracy (RAD). It invoked the “4 B’s” framework. Block – use lawfare and protests to make life harder for the Trump administration. Bridge & Belong – control dialogue and win people over. The final and most important B is Build. Build means redesigning the American government itself, and the crisis is the opening.
In their own words:
“We can take that breakdown moment and leverage it for a big structural reform, you know, refounding moment.” – Danielle Reiff, DRG lead.
Calls show DRG working alongside DSA on ideas of creating a different government, one that does away with the Constitution itself.
DRG does not run the Block operations. They hand it to UDA, the United Democracy Alliance. One organizer calls it a “huge galaxy”: lawsuits, street protests, non-cooperation. They list No Kings, Indivisible, MoveOn, 50501, and many other mega-activist NGOs among their members.
Another organizer calls UDA Erica Chenoweth’s project. Chenoweth is the Harvard professor behind the three-and-half-percent rule of regime change: get that share of a country’s populace onto the streets, and historically, the movement wins.
The UDA is very “hush-hush.” They have no website, no roster, no filings.
Then come the red lines: things the Trump administration could do, such as calling the Insurrection Act on protesters, that would mean that the federal government, in their words, “crosses the threshold into illegitimacy.” Nobody voted on those lines. There was no public debate. These red lines were developed within secretive working groups, and in a paper addressed to governors and staff.
In the words of Reiff/DRG:
“So that if there is a red line crossed in terms of a Constitutional crisis, like everyone’s already pre-organized. And so Mike Smith actually said, he goes, oh, you guys have the day after tomorrow plan.”
Cross a line, and the paper’s options include states refusing to lend their resources to federal officials, and governors convening what it calls a “Third Continential Congress.”
Running the UDA’s Insurrection Act working group: Rear Admiral Mike Smith (RET) of National Security Leaders of America (NSL4A). NSL4A is also credited with operationalizing UDA, the blocking operations. NSL4A consists of about 1,600 ex-officers, spies, diplomats. They’re turning red lines into indicators and running a situation room to monitor them throughout the midterms and beyond.
The NSL4A’s lawyers told them to stop recording meetings in case of subpoenas. But the rest of the network continued to record. DRG works in conjunction with Renew to Thrive (R2T), which ended up accidentally publishing 400+ calls and thousands of documents. These calls and documents were never meant for our eyes, but it’s them, on tape.
Thousands of NGOs and billions of dollars are involved in this endeavor. Most of them believe they’re saving democracy. The problem is that people who spent their careers deciding when other countries’ governments had lost their legitimacy wrote that test for ours, in private, and planned for what comes after.
Who decides when your government is legitimate?
🚨🚨THE DEMOCRACY FILES, PART 2: WHEN AND HOW TO DECLARE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ILLEGITIMATE 🚨
Some questioned whether a group of 200 ex-USAID officials could actually pull off their ambitions to rewrite the Constitution.
Part II of the Sedition files for the planned Midterm ‘Colour Revolution’ Coup
THE DEMOCRACY FILES, PART 2: WHEN AND HOW TO DECLARE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ILLEGITIMATE 🚨 Some questioned whether a group of 200 ex-USAID officials could actually pull off their ambitions to rewrite the Constitution.
Here, they describe exactly how it works. They aren’t working alone. The videos all come from Renew to Thrive (R2T) group and associates.
Danielle Reiff and Paul Zeitz play key roles within R2T.
R2T sits inside a much, much larger umbrella called United Democracy Alliance (UDA), which is an extremely hush-hush control plane of leaders from major “blocking” NGOs such as 50501 and Indivisible fulfilling various functions. UDA decides when protests get deployed, timelines, how to respond, all that.
R2T’s role within UDA is concerned with “the day after tomorrow” – in other words, their function is to conceive what a rewritten American government will look like after the rest of UDA fulfills its purpose. As will be shown, Erica Chenoworth is credited with conceiving UDA in the first place under the Horizons “Big Tent” initiative.
Note here that National Security Leaders for America (NSL4A) is credited for operationalizing UDA. NSL4A is a group of 1,600 ex-military, intelligence, and diplomatic officials. They are led by Rear Admiral Michael E. Smith (Ret). NSL4A also played a key role in the “illegal orders” messaging which targeted Pete Hegseth. Zeitz is also a member of NSL4A.
It must be emphasized that the choice of a military-oriented organization to coordinate NGOs across domestic protests is an interesting one all in itself – especially in an umbrella conceived by a regime change expert like Chenoworth.
You will have a hard time finding any mentions of UDA in the public. They are extremely hush-hush and selective who they talk to.
Mike Smith himself makes a personal appearance in other calls, coordinating Insurrection Act exercises and roleplaying with R2G as one of the participants.
As the audio transcript shows, they have outlined a sequence of “redlines” in which case the federal government should be declared illegitimate. Invoking the Insurrection Act against “peaceful” protesters is one of the most discussed redlines. I will post the illegitimate criteria below, but basically, almost any effective pushback against NGOs is a measure of illegitimacy according to them.
Important to understand:
The audio shows they shopped this idea around governors, but the reality is that governors do not have to explicitly sign on to the pact to play their role in the coup. All they have to do is refuse troops in their state and let UDA / R2G do the work of dissolving the federal government.
….
Part III of the Sedition files for the planned Midterm ‘Colour Revolution’ Coup
At what point does this become foreign interference of our elections?
To back up: the main group that Danielle Reiff and the other ex-USAID workers belongs to, Renew To Thrive (R2T) / Renew American Democracy (RAD) have an explicit strategy document. That strategy outlines “preparing for the worst” which includes the Insurrection Act or “election meltdown,” and their goal is to get “structural reform” in place by that – a polite way of saying our Constitutional Republic has to be overhauled.
In July 2026, R2T/RAD invited foreign state actors to share experience with the American community, for the express purpose of operationalizing their expertise right here in the United States. All actors had experience in international community assisted transitions (I’ll let you figure out what that is a code word for).
The disturbing part, though, is that all of the foreign actors’ recommendations were implemented right here in America.
You may have seen news headlines like:
– Restore trust in processes
– Increased election security, increased legal presence at polls
– Democratic officials hold tabletop exercises
– Judges prepare for post-election challenges
To be clear, this video doesn’t prove that this meeting specifically caused this cascade of escalations. But what it shows is that the democracy-promotion playbook the U.S. spent decades exporting, with situation rooms, observers at every polling place, prebunking and litigation paired with street mobilization, is now being run on America’s own election. The same people are running it, and they’re taking advice from the foreign actors the U.S. once backed.
Now when you look at officials talking about independent watchdogs or tabletop exercises… know that it’s because they are now treating the United States midterms exactly the same as they’d treat elections in a third world country.
And I think more than a small part of them are hoping that it does become a self-fulfilling prophecy as it has in so many of those countries. (For context, my book Unelected documents that so-called “election meltdowns” are precursors to transitions of power via color revolution.)
“We are collectively ready to enforce our election results if and as needed.” That was Free DC executive director Keya Chatterjee’s pledge after Washington’s June primary. Now the anti-Trump organizing group is recruiting activists to rehearse election protests ahead of the midterms. Its September 26 training promises to revisit “election enforcement” and includes: “interactive role play of protest scenarios.” The announcement follows preparations in which DC organizers developed a contingency for intersection blockades, a march to the Capitol and a coordinated withdrawal from work, school and shopping if primary results were seriously contested or tampered with. Free DC has institutional backing for its organizing. Its fiscal hosts are Community Change and Community Change Action. Community Change’s disclosed supporters include Open Society Policy Center, Pivotal Ventures and Pritzker Family Foundation. On Free DC’s advisory council sits the head of an organization that has run political scenario exercises involving hundreds of groups. Funders: Blockades were already on the table The earlier election contingency laid out a sequence for taking the dispute into the streets. Movement trainer Daniel Hunter, writing about DC’s June election preparations, described: “morning intersection blockades, a midday march to the Capitol, evening gatherings” The accompanying call: “no work, no school, no shopping” Organizers planned to revive tactics from their May Day demonstrations if the election went seriously wrong. Hunter described the contingency as nonviolent non-cooperation and reported that it was never activated. Organizers also prepared to explain why a slow ranked-choice count did not mean an election had been stolen…
More donors are listed in the rest of the article. They need to be investigated.
🚨🚨 THE DEMOCRACY FILES / ILLEGITIMACY PLAYBOOK, PART 7: THE SECRET MEGA-ALLIANCE WAITING FOR A RED LINE TO BE CROSSED 🚨
What do you call a mega-alliance that:
• Covers hundreds, if not thousands, of protest organizations • Covers all the lawfare-related organizations •… pic.twitter.com/T3JMuPcKdc
• Covers hundreds, if not thousands, of protest organizations
• Covers all the lawfare-related organizations
• Liasions with governors when a Constitutional crisis is crossed
• Consults federal workers on how to block emergency efforts
• Runs a situation room for the midterms and beyond
• Is credited to regime change expert and professor Erica Chenoweth
• Is operationalized by National Security Leaders for America, an organization of 1,600 retired officers, spies, and diplomats
• … and determines the “red lines” for mobilization of the above?
Meet the United Democracy Alliance (UDA).
UDA is the secret alliance behind the messaging we saw this week:
• JB Pritzker’s warning that states will “strongly resist”
• Governor Newsom’s office declaring a “CODE RED”
• Norm Eisen talking about “war rooms”
• Slotkin predicting a “national security incident”
You will not find any mentions of the United Democracy Alliance (UDA) on the web. It is a mega-alliance of resistance NGOs ready to deploy on a moment’s notice, monitoring every action President Trump takes and monitoring every polling place.
We only can put together the pieces by recordings. Some key quotes:
• “if there’s a moment where there’s a constitutional crisis, like one of the UDA four red lines, if they get crossed… governors then become the kind of lead anchor for political power.” (Zeitz, Aug 6)
• “the big, big, big, big, big tent that’s being organized in the blocking community so that if there is a red line crossed in terms of a constitutional crisis, like, everybody’s already pre-organized.” (Reiff, Aug 5)
• “We are also starting to consult federal workers on how to do some blocking inside the govt agencies during emergency situations” (Eric Manton, Zoom chat, Aug 6)
According to
@JeffClarkUS
, the last point above about federal workers conspiring to block emergency responses may violate serious statutes. More on federal workers involvement in Drop 8.
UNDERCOVER: GAVIN NEWSOM SAYS THE DSA IS "GOING TO BE DOMINANT" AND "MAINSTREAM" IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY!
"The DSA, the energy and the desire and demand for bold change, not incremental change, is very much going to be dominant. I mean, that's going to be a mainstream Democratic… pic.twitter.com/y83qCrYiwO
UNDERCOVER: GAVIN NEWSOM SAYS THE DSA IS “GOING TO BE DOMINANT” AND “MAINSTREAM” IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY!
“The DSA, the energy and the desire and demand for bold change, not incremental change, is very much going to be dominant. I mean, that’s going to be a mainstream Democratic movement. Absolutely. No question about that.” That’s California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a likely 2028 presidential candidate, speaking to an undercover journalist while campaigning in New Hampshire. Asked by a “younger voter” who said “we don’t want Kamala Harris, we want more democratic socialist policies”: “No one is arguing to manage the status quo and fail more efficiently.” “You can’t play in the margins anymore. The system’s broken. It’s completely unbalanced, and we can’t manage the decline. We have to completely reimagine.”
The Gateway Pundit: So the people who want to abolish the Senate and the Presidency, open jails, and defund the police are going to be the dominant wing of the Democrat Party? Good to know, good to know.
Looks like McCarthy was correct!
…
DataRepublican analysis of this:
Governor Newsom on 17 October: "The whole – the system's broken. It's completely unbalanced. And you can't – we can't manage the decline. We have to completely reimagine."
Then within the files, I see very similar language: "The system is broken — and it cannot fix itself."… pic.twitter.com/zQGh2KT3LL
Governor Newsom on 17 October: “The whole – the system’s broken. It’s completely unbalanced. And you can’t – we can’t manage the decline. We have to completely reimagine.”
Then within the files, I see very similar language: “The system is broken — and it cannot fix itself.”
Does that mean the specific ex-USAID workers we’ve been tracking are controlling Newsom? No. But as you’ve seen throughout these files, every individual in the ecosystem belongs to multiple NGOs and alliances. They network constantly. They attend each other’s conferences. They form coalitions on similar projects. They give each other feedback. That’s how they develop a hive mind.
The proposed methods may differ from group to group, but they are all converging on one goal: America governance must be rewritten from top down, and soon.
Trump used DC and the Home Rule Act, as the blueprint for every crime-ridden city in the nation. This is psychological normalization for the Insurrection Act. DC was essentially a soft-launch of the Insurrection Act, so the public could see that the concept works, and have trust in the US MIL.
At some point, the Insurrection Act will be invoked, so the US MIL can assist law enforcement and carry out arrests on US soil, secure and safeguard the nation, and restore law and order in blue cities/states that refuse to enforce federal law and harbor illegals/criminals from the federal government (sanctuary cities). [I agree – GC]
And for those claiming that the Dems “want” Trump to invoke the Insurrection Act… you are mistaken. The Insurrection Act is quite literally the thing they fear most, because the Dems know that means the US MIL can conduct arrests on US soil, and they REALLY don’t want that.
I think that some Dems are crazy enough to think Canada and the UN will step in. Also Remember the 16 year plan. The US military was SUPPOSED to be de-fanged by now and controlled by the Cabal. That is why Slutkin et al were calling on the US Military to revolt.
Michigan Democrat Sen. Elissa Slotkin was recorded in an undercover video laying out a concrete plan for what Democrats intend to do if they regain a congressional majority in the midterms, describing preselected “signature cases” of alleged corruption that they would pursue in every committee starting in January. The clip, obtained by Townhall and posted Friday on the outlet’s X account, was filmed Thursday at a Michigan campaign event where Slotkin was appearing in support of congressional candidate Sean McCann. During the exchange, an undercover reporter expressed concern that Democrats might be “too nice” and pressed Slotkin on prosecutions against the Trump administration and its allies. Slotkin responded that she was “with you” and outlined the plan. “We have a list of, like, the ‘signature cases.’ So the things where it’s, like, so egregious, such a violation of law, such a corruption case… and we will have, in every committee, there will be the ‘signature cases’ where we hold people accountable.” Slotkin added that these would be the matters “that people identify with.” ➡️ The senator specifically named the White House ballroom project in the East Wing, the reflecting pool renovation on the National Mall, and “$200 million in, you know, from the Defense Department” as examples. “So that’s what you’ll see basically in January.”
Eilert
…Normen Eisen and Marc Elias already have their Color Revolution ducks lined up.
OTH POTUS is already on to them
🚨🚨 THE DEMOCRACY FILES / THE INSURRECTION PLAYBOOK, PART 12: IS NORM EISEN CALLING THE SHOTS? 🚨
First, sorry for the absence of drops; I had to go on a last minute trip to DC and back. @nataliegwinters has been releasing many drops adjacent to the Democracy Files, including… pic.twitter.com/JWP9bJ0BpL
🚨🚨 THE DEMOCRACY FILES / THE INSURRECTION PLAYBOOK, PART 12: IS NORM EISEN CALLING THE SHOTS? 🚨
First, sorry for the absence of drops; I had to go on a last minute trip to DC and back.
@nataliegwinters has been releasing many drops adjacent to the Democracy Files, including materials on ESRN and Norm Eisen.
The Democracy Files, while significant, are told through the lenses of a mid-to-high level operatives group of ex-USAID workers, a group called DRG (Democracy Renewal Group). DRG, in these videos, collaborate with other groups, receive briefings from others such as Rear Admiral Mike Smith (RET), participate in and host working groups, and so forth.
But DRG are not the shot-callers. They explicitly do not decide when a mass protest has to happen. They do not have a final say in what has to occur before mass mobilization occurs. Erica Chenoweth isn’t personally secretly running things. Mike Smith is a high level operational leader, not a shot-caller.
So who calls the shots?
Put together the Democracy Files and Winters’ drops, and a larger hierarchical picture emerges: ESRN, Election Safeguards Response Network, which is mentioned in @nataliegwinters reporting. The Democracy Files heavily suggests that ESRN is who ultimately calls the shots when it is time to mobilize United Democracy Alliance (UDA).
And that particular trail leads directly to none other than Norm Eisen.
Now, this does not mean Eisen is the unilateral mastermind. Most likely, that belongs to yet another mysterious small coalition of elites – we can only speculate on who else is in that club; ESRN is financed under State Democracy Defenders Action, EIN 93-1524544.
But Eisen’s hands are on a great many levers, and we can reasonably infer he is one of the key decision-making figures.
5:51 PM · Oct 31, 2026
Norm Eisen is the executive chair of State Democracy Defenders Fund, a coalition which includes people such as @BillKristol . Their tax form lists Sayer Lagalle as “ESRN Director.”
There’s no such thing as an organic nationwide protest. That has been debunked for once and for all.
….
@pepesgrandma Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻@pepesgrandma
Oct 31
Have you ever considered they meant just Democracy Alliance. The same folks that ran the first coup attempt?
…
eilert
BTW This is her latetest post (Part 13) documenting the Color Revolution:
🚨🚨 DEMOCRACY FILES / THE ILLEGITIMACY PLAYBOOK, PART 13: THE NEW FOUNDING 🚨
The "democracy" ecosystem is mostly decentralized. There's competition sometimes (as this drop will show). But when a direction has been set by funders, actors converge towards a common goal.
🚨🚨 DEMOCRACY FILES / THE ILLEGITIMACY PLAYBOOK, PART 13: THE NEW FOUNDING 🚨
The “democracy” ecosystem is mostly decentralized. There’s competition sometimes (as this drop will show). But when a direction has been set by funders, actors converge towards a common goal.
And that goal is: American government must be rewritten from scratch, and soon.
RAD, the project of ex-USAID workers we’ve been tracing in the Democracy Files, represents one plan. PolicyLink represents another plan.
What is PolicyLink?
Towards the end of UNELECTED, I write about PolicyLink – a highly connected NGO which receives more than $50 million annually in funding. There, I describe its “soul work” – engineering the human soul to create a renewed democracy. That’s not an exaggeration; that’s how they describe it, in their own words.
PolicyLink appears again in the Democracy Files. Here, you can see PolicyLink personnel use the same language we’ve seen in prior drops: founders, a new founding, redesigning the federal government.
PolicyLink has over $100 million in assets and receives its funding from all the usual suspects – Rockefeller, Open Society, Ford, Gates, etc. It has worked closely with Democratic administrations in setting policy.
RAD and PolicyLink compete for the same funders and the same space. But they say the same thing: a “new founding,” drafted by people no one elected, ready “before the window opens.”
RAD is perhaps simply more honest about how that window will open.
More about PolicyLink’s “soul work,” which is covered in UNELECTED – thanks to @SKDoubleDub33 and @iamlisalogan for finding this:
The big picture and its history is all covered in UNELECTED. Buy it here:
How the NGO-Administrative Complex Seized Power—And How to Get It Back
$200 billion for Ukraine. $50 billion a year for USAID. $9 billion for resettling refugees. Meanwhile, Americans struggle to earn a living, buy a home, and start a family. The welfare state works for everyone but employed citizens trying their best to make ends meet and pay their taxes on time. Why are the world’s most generous people financially abused by their own government?
As one scandal after another breaks, there is one question that becomes harder and harder to ignore: How did the American government and a vast network of NGOs become the vehicle for funneling American middle-class wealth to the rest of the world? The surprising answer is not financial, but philosophical, the little-known yet centuries-old ideology called supranationalism. From George Soros through George W. Bush, from the 17th century Treaty of Westphalia through the rise of President Donald Trump, a clear timeline emerges for how everyday Americans became the number-one mark for a global ruling class intent on redistributing their resources. Barricading its backroom dealmaking behind federal departments, nonprofits and NGOs, and charitable foundations whose names we all know yet whose operations will still shock and horrify, this NGO-Administrative Complex has perfected the art of converting U.S. taxpayer money into instant-access welfare for the rest of the world. This is the story of how this machine was built, how it runs, and how it can finally be dismantled.
Drawing on Jennica Pounds’ receipt-backed analysis trusted by millions on X at @DataRepublican, together with page-turning narratives of New York Times best-selling author Joshua Lisec, Unelected maps the money, names the gatekeepers, and rug-pulls the unelected networks running the show from behind dated logos and sappy slogans to impoverish us all and usher in a new world order in which every American city is destined to become another Minneapolis.
TRANSCRIPT
On Saturday, Benny Johnson asked Donald Trump to give a final message to Republicans before the Tuesday midterms.
And the final message for Republicans.
“Just be smart, be strong, love your country, and just keep going on the same path that we’re on, and we’re going to make this country greater than ever before. “
Now, compare what the president said to what Senator Alyssa Slatkin said last month at the Carnegie Endowment.
“President Trump thinks America is unremarkable. mediocre and in decline. He thinks America is the Titanic and he’s charging the passengers for a seat on the lifeboat.”
Slatkin’s remarks are not delusional. Her full Carnegie speech is a confession about what she has planned for 2027 and how she and her cohorts have test run a color revolution playbook in Hungary and are now running it in Poland. And she wasn’t alone on that Carnegie stage. Sitting next to her was a woman who has played a central role in trying to bring down Donald Trump on behalf of London.
I’m Susan Kokinda and today I’m going to look at Slatkin’s post-midterm plans, how it ties to the playbook being run in Poland, and how the political earthquake that hit Slutkin’s home state of Michigan tears it all up. So listen to Slutkin’s full quotes on September 30th where she seems to be completely unbothered by reality.
“President Trump thinks America is unremarkable, mediocre, and in decline. He believes we are not exceptional in our role in the world and we never were. And now with AI, we are headed for inevitable destruction. His vision for our country in this term is quite literally the opposite of make America great again. Instead, he believes America never again is going to be great. Only someone with these beliefs can so fundamentally destroy our laws, our known, our norms, and our spirit. And because he believes we’re broken beyond repair, he’s just going to get his. He’s going to cash out and get his cut for himself, his family, and his loyalists.”
Now, unless you live in the world of CNN news feeds or Bluesky posts, that is just bizarre. It’s not Donald Trump who believes we are broken beyond repair. It’s the newly emergent socialist wing of Slutkin’s own party, which thinks that America is in decline and that it was never exceptional, so we should trash our entire form of government and become like Cuba. The rest of her speech described how to stop the authoritarian Trump in 2027 with hearings run by a hoped for Democratic Congress.
And her partner on stage, Anne Applebaum, who we will return to in a minute, was positively nostalgic for a rerun of the January 6th show trial.
“The use and purpose of congressional investigations, explorations. We had one after January the 6, which I thought was excellent actually. It was very well run. There were excellent witnesses. It was even timed and organized in a way that was constructed for television. They really thought it through. “
So, that’s the form. What will be the content of these hearings? Slutkin let that all out in a very unguarded response when caught on an undercover video on October 29th.
“I’m worried that we’re going to be too nice.What are we going to do to hold the Trump regime and its collaborators . responsible? I’m talking prosecutions Nuremberg level. What what are we going to do?So basically assuming we win both houses, even if we just win one, we’ll have a list of signature cases. So the things where it’s so egregious, such a violation of law, such a corruption case, like and we will have in every committee, there will be the signature cases that we where we hold people accountable. I just went to Hungary. I went over to Budapest in Hungary cuz they just got rid of their authoritarian leader after 16 years. And I’m like, how did you handle 16 years of corruption? We don’t have that much, but we have so much. and they did these signature cases and they’re ones that people identify with like the east wing of the ball[room]of the white house, you know, the ballroom or the reflecting pool or $200 million from the defense department. So that’s what you’ll see basically[in]January. “
The signature cases she named a privately funded ballroom and the reflecting pool. So, while Donald Trump rebuilds the American economy, the Democrats will be running hearings about a paint job. But that is exactly how the color revolution playbooks work. And that playbook is only deployed against leaders like Donald Trump who challenge the globalist system.
Now, Slutkin and Applebaum are pros at using that playbook. And last week, it was unleashed in Poland where they both have connections. Before giving that Carnegie speech, Alyssa Slutkin had taken a little field trip.
“At the beginning of this month, I got to visit Poland and Hungary, our NATO allies. In the past six months, Hungary has quite literally taken the playbook to fight an authoritarian, the people’s playbook, if you will, and dusted it off to make it more relevant for the 21st century. In Poland, they called this plan the iron broom, cleaning the place up. “
And this past weekend, the next chapter in the Polish playbook was activated. On Friday, the pro-EU prime minister of Poland, Donald Tusk, moved against the constitutional tribunal, the country’s highest court. Its president was suspended and police surrounded the building. Now, Poland’s president, Carol Naraki, a Trump ally, turned his plane around and returned to Poland to defend the court. The EU has sided with Tusk. Tusk’s opponents have called it a coup, and President Trump’s ambassador in Warsaw saw it for what it was. He said, “We appear to be witnessing an unprecedented confrontation over the government’s use of state power and the independence and authority of a constitutional institution.” Now, who stepped up to defend Tusk’s actions to the world? Poland’s foreign minister, Rodisloff Sakorski. Now, Sakorski isn’t just Poland’s foreign minister. He is also Anne Applebaum’s husband. The woman sitting across from Slatkin at Carnegie is married to the man defending the power grab and she even mentioned it from the stage.
“So, some of you know I live part of the time in Poland. I’ve spent a lot of time in Hungary. “
So, let’s look at this couple. Starting with him. Sakorski fled Poland to Britain in 1982, went to Oxford where he hung out with the likes of future British prime ministers David Cameron and Boris Johnson. He became a British citizen in 1987, but he gave it up in 2006 when he became Poland’s defense minister. Now for his wife. Applebaum is American born, but her career was made in London. She was a Marshall scholar at the London School of Economics. She wrote for a string of British newspapers and ran a disinformation program at the LSE. Her US outlets are the Washington Post and the Atlantic. And then there’s her role in the Integrity Initiative. An operation which was exposed in the British [House of] Commons, in 2018 for receiving nearly 2 million pounds this financial year from the British Foreign Office.
My co-host Barbara Boyd has tracked this British operation for years. It runs what it calls clusters. Journalists, academics, foreign office people who get activated directly through British embassies whenever London needs a narrative pushed.
Applebaum, then working for the Washington Post, was in one of those clusters along with Sir Andrew Wood of Orbus Business Intelligence. The firm founded by Christopher Steel, the British intelligence agent who launched Russiagate. So, let that sink in. The person helping write Slutkin’s midterm playbook is an identified British agent of influence with ties to Russiagate and her husband is the face of that playbook as it unfolds in Warsaw. So, the script is written when Congress launch signature case hearings timed for television and swing the iron broom. But in Slutkin’s home state of Michigan, someone is rewriting the script.
Let’s go back to Carnegie where Slutkin promised a brand new movement.
“What we know here in the US is that a new coalition is needed that crosses party lines to win in 2028. Insiders in Washington need to accept that it’s no longer Democrat versus Republicans or moderates versus progressives. “
Well, Senator, your coalition arrived on Sunday morning. It just didn’t show up where you expected. Two days before the midterms at Perfecting Church in Detroit, Democratic Congresswoman Haley Stevens stood next to Republican Senate candidate Mike Rogers. Then she endorsed him.
“My vote for Senate, I am just one vote, as is every Michigander. My vote for Senate is going to be with Mike Rogers. And I will tell you why. Because we have to stand with country. We can’t stand with hate.”
Stevens had been narrowly defeated by Abdul El Sayed in the August primary. Then she dutifully fell on her sword and endorsed the Democratic Socialists chosen candidate. So what changed? She had asked El Sayed to disavow an outside ad blaming your high grocery bill on foreign aid to Israel. An ad so blatantly anti-Semitic that even CNN commentators were shocked by it. El Sayed refused and then dis-invited Stevens from weekend campaign events. That’s when she endorsed Rogers.
But Steven’s bombshell endorsement of Rogers isn’t going to deter Slutkin’s attempt to build her new coalition based on the narrative that corruption is the cause of high prices. Or in the case of El Sayed, it’s the Jews. Here’s how Slutkin explained it.
“We need to make clear to the public that corruption at the top is taking money directly out of their pockets. When Trump gains, you lose. Take as an example how your electricity bills keep climbing. That’s because AI companies are building data centers that guzzle power and President Trump is giving them tax breaks to do it.”
Notice what’s missing. Not one word about Trump’s initiatives to compel the SI companies to produce their own electricity and add it to the grid. Not one word about decades of shutdown plants, choked off pipelines, and green mandates that left the grid unable to deal with either foreign energy shocks or with new industry. She does the same thing with healthcare, ignoring how Obamacare wrecked what was left of our health care system and how the president is taking on big pharma and big health to try and fix it. But reality doesn’t fit into the anti-authoritarian playbook.
“But connecting that to corruption, political corruption, financial corruption is the way that we make it relevant to them. “
Make it relevant to them. Them is you. Find what people feel, attach a villain to it, and run it on television. That’s not economics. It’s the Color Revolution Playbook being run by a CIA trained senator and a card carrying British agent of influence. Meanwhile, the Trump administration is reversing decades of free trade industrial collapse. This past month alone, the president and his team announced billions in new and expanded factories that will rebuild the middle class. And even before many of those jobs come online, the initial revival of our economy has dropped child poverty and Hispanic poverty to the lowest levels on record. Those aren’t signature cases. Those are the actual receipts of a reviving American economy.
So on Tuesday, you have a choice between two playbooks. One was written in London and is being run again in Warsaw. It runs on hearings timed for television and an iron broom for anyone in the way. The other is the one Donald Trump gave Benny Johnson on Saturday night. Be smart, be strong, love your country, and make America greater than before.
There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.
Do not forget to LABEL AI articles, video and such.
As a young woman, living in upstate NY, thanks to a near by nuclear plant, my electric bill was $10.00/month despite electric heat. I then moved to the Boston MA area and suffered sticker shock with an electric bill of $300.00 a month! I have been a fan of nuclear power ever since.
”Giving society cheap, abundant energy would be the equivalent of giving an idiot child a machine gun.”
Paul Ehrlich, Professor of Population Studies, Author: “Population Bomb” and “Ecoscience”
Obama’s Science Czar John Holdren co-authored the 1971 Science paper “Impact of Population Growth” and the 1977 textbook Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment with Paul and Anne Ehrlich.
”The prospect of cheap fusion energy is the worst thing that could happen to the planet.”
This is also what makes Alaska the natural home for something I have waited decades to see. I care immensely about the health of the earth, and after looking at every alternative energy option, I long ago concluded “green nuclear power” was the most viable one we had, then watched the promising designs go nowhere. The most promising is thorium: there is 3–4 times as much of it in the earth as uranium¹ (and since it occurs alongside the rare earths America is now scrambling to secure, we already extract it and then throw it away as radioactive waste), all of it can be used as fuel (rather than the 0.72% of uranium that can, which leaves behind mountains of depleted waste), the molten-salt designs it is paired with have no solid core to melt (if they overheat, the salt expands, the reaction slows, and the fuel drains into a tank without pumps), they produce far less long-lived waste, and they greatly reduce the risk of weapons proliferation, since no enrichment plants are needed.
This raises the obvious question of why it was never adopted. Simply put, the entire American nuclear complex was built as a weapons program with a civilian branch attached, and uranium was the fuel that made weapons. Oak Ridge demonstrated a working molten salt reactor in the 1960s, but in the early 1970s the Atomic Energy Commission committed the country to a plutonium breeder instead, its director Alvin Weinberg was pushed out after eighteen years for continuing to argue his reactor was the safer path, and the program was cancelled in 1973.¹,² Thorium’s low proliferation risk, now its great selling point, at the time simply meant it did not offer what the nuclear establishment wanted. After that, the industry became large enough to keep competitors from getting off the ground (mirroring what I have watched happen with countless forgotten medical technologies).
The result is that the technology now requires a supply chain that does not exist, so two things are needed: a relaxing of regulatory restrictions (which began in May 2025, when Trump signed executive orders setting a goal of quadrupling nuclear capacity by 2050 and ordering the NRC to decide new reactor applications within 18 months)¹ and a very large investment, which is now possible for the first time, as an industry has emerged that needs enormous amounts of power and is willing to pay almost anything for it. The published models place thorium power among the cheapest sources of electricity ($20–55 per megawatt hour),¹,² a fraction of what new conventional nuclear plants cost ($175–255).¹
Note: the money is already moving. The major technology companies have contracted for roughly ten gigawatts of nuclear capacity in two years,¹ and Microsoft signed a twenty-year deal to restart the Three Mile Island reactor that sat beside the one which partially melted down in 1979 (Unit 1, which closed in 2019 for economic reasons), at a price analysts estimate at roughly $110–115 per megawatt hour,¹well above the projected cost of thorium power.
The timing matters because of how long every step takes. A serious American program could have a molten salt test reactor running by the end of this decade and first commercial power in the mid-2030s, so a decision now decides the second and third waves of data centers. China already has a molten salt reactor running and a public ladder toward commercial units by 2040,¹ so if America waits until those are built to begin, it will be buying the technology rather than fielding it. A campus in Alaska that starts on stranded gas can then switch to a microreactor, then a small modular reactor, then a thorium plant, without ever raising anyone’s utility bill, and the fiber and rail built to support it will remain useful regardless of whether the AI boom lives up to its hype.
Promethian Action prompted at 13 minutes.
ROUGH TRANSCRIPT:
Bessent Takes On the IMF
13:16 — Susan Kokinda:
I think that it’s really critical for people to put this in the context of the battle between two systems. I want to focus people a little bit on something which I’m sure flew under most people’s radar screen, except for the ones who watched my show the other day, [It] is what Scott Bessent said to the International Monetary Fund… Because when you look at what Bessent did at the International Monetary Fund meeting, every leftist in the world should honestly be cheering this. But they’re not. What he did is completely challenge the fundamental premises that have run the world financial structure going back to 1971 and which has allowed the global financier elite to loot nations, destroy nations, [and] prevent third-world countries from developing. [To] gut advanced sector nations like ours by eliminating the middle class and the working class, creating what the Democrats hope is a perpetual class of poor people. [People] that they can throw some crumbs to and so on while Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren have hundreds of millions of dollars…
So, what are the three things that Bessent challenged? First of all, he challenged the core principle of the IMF, which is the way you get out of debt is you cut the budget. And Bessent stood his ground in direct opposition to the head of the IMF… Bessent said, “No, it is growth that is going to solve our problems, and everything we are doing is unleashing that kind of growth.” Second, he had a very subtle reference, but it was definitely there, to the problem of deregulated currencies, floating exchange rates. and said, “This has be addressed in terms of creating perpetual imbalances.
That has been one of the key weapons that the global bankers have used, especially to keep the third world backward. They control currency prices through speculation because we took the dollar off the gold reserve standard. They control commodity prices through the City of London. And the net result of that has been the perpetual unneeded backwardness of many developing sector nations.
Another tool in the bankers’ toolkit, in the globalists’ toolkit, has been the green agenda and being anti-nuclear. And Bessent took that on directly. He said, “Cut it out. Stop making your decisions from hostility to oil and gas.” But even more important, he pledged the the United States to start putting money into a nuclear development fund for the third world. You know how many nuclear loans the World Bank has made since 1959? One, and that was to Italy.
That’s it. But plenty of solar panels, plenty of windmills, plenty of pails so that people can carry water 5 miles from where they are, and so on. So, this was a direct challenge to the underlying premises of this globalist financier elite at that level.
Obviously this administration is doing the same thing domestically because it’s been a lot easier to liberate ourselves than it is to liberate the rest of the world where we’re not the only sheriff in town, although we’re an important one. What the president has done is thrown out the green mandates, challenged the traditional orthodox Republican position that the only way you can get out of the deficit and debt crisis is by cutting. And making very clear, “No, we are going to grow your way out.” And third, by actually unleashing the productive power and base of the United States.
So, on both fronts, what you have is this administration internationally and domestically… is the biggest challenge to the control of the British Imperial financial elite system — it’s generic name is globalization. You know, we see the World Economic Forum, we have the modern names like George Soros and Klaus Schwab and all the rest of them, but this is simply the British Imperial system that we’ve been in a fight [with]. The Ukraine conflict, which Barbara described, has been one of the key strategic cornerstones of that. Because… to challenge this globalist financier system, you need the other major superpowers on your side. You need Russia, you need China, you need India, you need Japan. Those are pretty much the big ones. And what the president is doing with his team is creating the conditions where these nations, as sovereign nations, can join United States in preliminarily solving some of these immediate problems, like the wars, preliminarily begin uncorking a certain level of development, but I think ultimately what this administration intends is an entirely new international financial system. So, you know, I think it’s important to keep that in mind as we go into the final 10-day countdown for the midterms.
END TRANSCRIPT
….
Rich Does Politics prompted at 36 minutes.
ROUGH TRANSCRIPT:
Scott Bessent, the Big Gay Patton [giggle]
36:32 — Rich:
it’s the first time in history where a secretary treasury secretary hasn’t attended an IMF meeting. So what’s that about? And the IMF is a proxy of the city of London…
37:27 — Susan Kokinda:
They first applied their playbook to the developing sector, then they applied it to post Soviet Russia, and then they applied it to the advanced sector. And ironically, it was Russia that said no first. And now we have Donald Trump saying no, we’re not going to play British liberal economics…
Then Bessant sent a written speech to the IMF
… when I read his speech yesterday, what he said about the developing sector and that what the United States is doing is it’s increasing its contribution to a nuclear development fund for the third [world] for the developing sector. [Those are] the real fighting words. Right?
Because the City of London, the imperial system, the most cardinal rule in their playbook is you do not let the developing sector actually develop. You keep it backward. You know the famous Barack Obama statement, “oh well, if people in Africa all had air conditioning in cars, the climate would boil over.” No, you stay backwards. you keep burning wood for fuel.
This is something that Chris Wright, the energy secretary, is very passionate about. He talks about a million preventable deaths every year because so many people are still using wood and dung, to cook on. Whereas if they had modern energy, you would see, an increase in the standard of living. Well, nuclear power isn’t just modern energy because when you go over the past 30, 40 years, every time you see a developing sector leader wanting to push nuclear power, they usually end up dead or out of power or in exile. Starting with the Shah of Iran, who at a certain point said, “All right, I don’t just want to be a gas station for British petroleum.” You know, I want to develop my country. Boom… You just go on and on and on. Every time a third world leader actually wanted to develop his country using advanced nuclear power boom that was it.
For Bessant to make this explicit, the question of nuclear power for the developing sector this is like the gunfight at the OK Corral….
41:34 — Tom Luongo:
…Why do you think they’re blowing up oil refineries?
They’re doing it now in the first world. This is the thing that bothers me…
I read an article about the Exxon Mobile refinery in Illinois that was shut down for quote “an unknown electrical failure,” unquote. Now, I read that coming out of Reuters .. and I’m like, “Oh, yeah.” Like they would not report that attack, that shutdown, that way if they weren’t covering up the fact that it was external action against one of our oil refineries.. but clearly whoever did do it was politically untenable at that moment in time. So this is the classic MI6 thing. We know that you know that we know that you know we did it and we also know that you can’t tell anybody that we did it because that would make you look crazy. So therefore, we get to do it.
[After all what is Trump going to do? Declare overt war on the UK? Makes you wonder about all those food plant fires too. — GC]
…We’re watching this more and more. And we’re going to continue to watch them do this. And that’s going to be our biggest tail risk to deal with this low-level constant drag. [The] monkey wrenching on the physical economy… They’re moving away from physical choke points and the maritime world the straits of Malaka the straits of whatever and now they’re moving to the other choke points. They’re moving from upstream choke points which is the drilling of oil and the early stages of moving the oil to refining. Now they’re moving to mid-stream and downstream and they’re attacking that aspect of the market.
So as we deregulate the energy markets around the world in order to bring everybody out of poverty, that’s the fight right now.
46:27 — Rich:
…And then the nuclear power deal, I just recorded a video with Ghost from Badlands Media. So, we’re talking about Saudi Arabia, the history of Saudi Arabia, and getting on to Mohammed bin Salman who’s doing deals with Russia to build nuclear power stations in Saudi Arabia, and it looks like he’s going to get away with it because London is a waning power.
Susan Kokinda:
You can even go back to the to the 1970s. Richard Nixon’s first Secretary of State, William P. Rogers, had come out of the Eisenhower administration. Of course, Eisenhower was Atoms for Peace. But, Rogers’ approach to the Middle East was nuclear power development as the basis for economic cooperation in the entire region. And of course, he got canned, and Henry Kissinger took on the dual portfolio of National Security Advisor and Secretary of State. Of course, we have the wonderful symmetry today that Marco Rubio wears the same two hats. [laughter] But, from the completely opposite side of what they’re trying to do.
But, yeah, this question of nuclear power is something where you see the hand of the empire in its most brutal and Saudi Arabia working with Russia, just gives you the picture. This is an entirely new world which is flying beneath most people’s radar screens. But it is the much more fundamental change that’s going on in the world. You know, not the little laundry list. Donald Trump isn’t doing anything because he didn’t do… I had the feeling of someone watching somebody, on the Gong Show. He didn’t do this gong. He didn’t do that gong. I mean he’s bringing down the globalist system, you idiots.
49:02 — Tom Luongo:
I was thinking about this the other day. Every time we bring up this thing about nuclear power… I just think back to the story of Oak Ridge and thorium molten salt and how that was destroyed. I don’t know how that got done under the Kennedy. It was I think done under Kennedy… but they were beginning the process, right? Thorium molten salt ends all of this nonsense because then we don’t have the uranium 233 cycle, doesn’t produce any plutonium. It just produces a surfeit of neutrons and a lot of power and no nuclear waste.
And there’s enough thorium in the seawater that you can ream it up off the Florida coastline and then ship it over to Crystal River… I’ve watched a lot of and talked to a lot of people who were involved in this. That research was not only buried, it was meant to be destroyed completely and it got saved at the last moment. It’s like a spice. It’s like one of these stories that if you were to listen.. There’s a great documentary out there about this. A three and a half or four hour documentary about it and you listen to the story that’s been told about how this information got saved, right? You’re like, nah, that can’t possibly happen that way, but it did because it was the perfect intersection of government perfidy and government incompetence.
So, they just shut the program down and they mothballed it all and then no one was allowed to deal with it and and they were getting around to destroying all the research, all the notebooks and all of this and all of it, but they never got around to it because someone got fired and it wound up in a room somewhere. Then somebody found it all and now the Russians have a pilot plant, the Chinese have a pilot plant, other people [India –GC] are working on it and it’s 20 still 20 years out. We still have a lot of work to do, but imagine if we hadn’t lost those 60 years of metallurgy and and all the chemistry that was necessary to develop the right fluids and the metallurgy in order to create the containment vessels and everything.
As a chemist I know it’s a very aggressive environment. So, that’s another way of saying highly corrosive and highly unstable. And so, if you want to build a 50 year duty cycle reactor system that can, run steady state for 50 years, there’s still a lot of basic materials work that has to be done in order to get us to that point and to scale it up to a reasonable level. But there’s so many angles on this. And they know that once energy is free at that level, and in fact free, they don’t have a choke point anymore.
52:00 — Susan Kokinda:
The sabotage, when I first went to DC for their predecessor organization, one of the first fights we waged was to try and save the Clinch River breeder reactor. If you can reprocess the fuel, you don’t have the waste problem. The waste problem was one of the key things the environmentalists used to have everybody’s hair on fire and everybody’s clear and blah blah blah blah. And we lost because what you had was an alliance between the environmentalist movement and the right-wing budget cutters. That’s what killed the Clinch River breeder reactor. It is sort of like your uni-party. Then you had the sabotage of fusion, which went on for years and years and years. Finally, enough private sector kept it going, and now this administration is encouraging it. We should have had it 30 years ago talking about virtually free energy. This is this has been the the critical component of the imperial playbook. You have to prevent economic development, which means you prevent the energy. So, the choke points, the money, and so on. But the new technologies, which make your choke points completely irrelevant, make blowing up refineries irrelevant. If you’ve got these new kinds of technologies, and that’s what’s being unleashed.
END TRANSCRIPT
….
15 years ago, when I first hear of them, the Lightbridge Corporation was very interested in thorium as a fuel source. Lightbridge was originally founded in 1992 as Thorium Power, Ltd., showing it’s original focus on thorium-based nuclear fuels. Since then it has shifted focus to producing metallic nuclear fuel alloy designed for use in existing and future light water reactors. This includes the Special HALEU fuel now purchased from Russia.
“High-Assay Low-Enriched Uranium (HALEU) is nuclear fuel enriched to contain between 5% and 20% uranium-235, serving as the critical fuel source for mostnext-generation small modular reactors(SMRs) and advanced nuclear designs.” — Brave AI
15 year old 4 minute video note reference to Obama.
Va., Nov. 03, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Lightbridge Corporation (“Lightbridge” or the “Company”) (Nasdaq: LTBR), an advanced nuclear fuel technology company, today announced that it has received a Notice of Allowance from the Eurasian Patent Office for its innovative multi-zone nuclear fuel rod design. Specifically, this patent covers methods and apparatus for fabricating fuel rods using additive manufacturing techniques, enabling the creation of distinct radial and axial zones with varying compositions of refractory metals and alloys, as well as fuel materials, such as zirconium alloys combined with uranium, plutonium, or thorium.
Centrus and Lightbridge will work towards creating high-assay low-enriched uranium (HALEU) based fuels. HALEU fuel contains uranium enriched to 5-20% uranium-235 (higher than the 3-5% typically used in light water reactors). It is required by most of the advanced reactor designs being developed under DOE’s Advanced Reactor Demonstration Program (ARDP).
Centrus President & CEO Daniel B Poneman said: “Our plant in Ohio is the only HALEU production plant in the world outside of Russia and would be an ideal site for Lightbridge’s proposed facility. Since Lightbridge Fuel has the potential to bring HALEU and its benefits to the existing fleet of reactors, this partnership holds the potential to significantly expand the market for HALEU.” …
Lightbridge is developing Lightbridge Fuel, a proprietary next-generation nuclear fuel technology for existing light water reactors and pressurised heavy water reactors, which it says will significantly enhance reactor safety, economics, and proliferation resistance. The Company is also developing Lightbridge Fuel for new small modular reactors (SMRs).
May 27, 2025 interview with Lightbridge (LTBR) CEO, Seth Grae. (14 minutes)
Lightbridge (LTBR) CEO, Seth Grae, says nuclear power will be a leading energy source to power electricity in the coming year. He sees the U.S. moving from 19% nuclear power usage now to 50% in years to come. Seth talks about how Lightbridge plays a role in nuclear’s rising popularity and how it’s tied to powering the A.I. trade. He later talks about the company’s partnership with Oklo Inc. (OKLO).
I am happy to see that Lightbridge has survived and is doing well.
There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.
Do not forget to LABEL AI articles, video and such.
Up front I want to say, if we are to be a free people it is up to us to take control of our lives. We have been deliberately trained to remain infantile and to look to an authority to tell us what to do. POTUS Trump wants us to be adults.
A word about POTUS Trump and Sec Kennedy.
Trump spent 5 years in a military school and then made his money building in one of the most corrupt cities in the USA. He KNOWS strategy. Kennedy is a trained, successful lawyer. He watched his father, his uncle and his cousin get assassinated by the Cabal. He also knows the enemy and strategy.
We focus on various battles – Vaccines, Epstein, illegals, crime, fuel prices, AI, Flock Cameras – POTUS and his Secretaries are focused on the WAR. The Globalist Cabal has various troops they deploy against We the People. The Fake News being a major weapon. Commie judges and the Senate being other major weapons. Then there are sanctuary cities and states, Antifa, drugs…. However I think the biggest battle is against the Mercantilists based in Europe & the City of London. Also remember POTUS is trying to bring back our industrial base. That includes Big Pharma that was exported to China and India thanks to the World Trade Organization ratification.
If you go back in history, depending on the author, you find similar systems. Whether it is Rome and slaves or Europe and serfs, you have an upper class (oligarchy) usually a priesthood and a thin layer of technical people. The rest of the people are serfs or slaves. Essentially feudalism.
Your government is a corporatocracy, a new authoritarian state in the process of consolidating your output into a more controllable, exploitable channel. The reason you are being misled by your government and told that all of this is good for you, is because there is no profit in managing a mass uprising. It is too disruptive. The markets want you to continue to consume—quietly and obediently. The technology that is being marketed to you is actually being used to condition you to expect to be spied on, and to spy on others. Every totalitarian state in history has relied on data collection. The Nazis were masters of data collection and analysis. Your government now has technological capabilities that far exceed anything ever seen on the planet to this date. You are in the midst of the biggest public relations scam in the history of the world. The pretty pastel vision of life in a SmartGrowth development is a manipulation, a mask. In fact these plans are designed to restrict your freedom of movement and choice.
According to ICLEI, if you only have one car or no car your disposable income will be at least 20% higher. Does this mean that you will have 20% more money to spend? No. It means that corporations can lower your wages by 20% and still sell you the same number of goods. A compression of the economy with a more efficient outcome for big business. Concentrating populations into urban areas where they can be easily monitored, where their usage of energy can be regulated, and where their consumption of goods can be restricted, is a goal of UN Agenda 21…
Normal use is the little green areas. Again, we got the future plans for our county. My farm is within a wildlife corridor and thus no human use will be allowed.
Getting rid of mRNA vaccines does not get rid of the real problem–the Oligarchy who actually rule us. If Kennedy & Trump manage to succeed in getting rid of mRNA vaccines, our rulers would just use a different method to cull the herd. Why do you think POTUS keeps saying Iran must never have a nuclear weapon?
In short POTUS is getting rid of the guy with the gun NOT THE GUN!
…
I want to use oil as an example of how complicated things actually are.
Brent Crude Oil – 60-Day Price Trend. Brent crude oil– the international benchmark that pricesapproximately 65% of the world’s traded crude… Brent crude trades at $114.89/bbl per barrel. The Strait of Hormuz crisis, OPEC+ production decisions, and sanctions on major producers are reshaping global energy markets. Oil prices directly affect gasoline costs, inflation, defense budgets, and geopolitical stability worldwide….
Five major crude oil benchmarks serve different regions and market segments. Understanding the spread between these benchmarks reveals supply constraints, sanctions effects, and regional demand patterns.
BENCHMARK .. PRICE USD/BBL .. EXCHANGE .. REGION .. DESCRIPTION
Brent Crude ……… $114.89 ……… ICE London …… Global ….. International
~65% of the world’s traded oil. [Price] sourced from North Sea production.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
WTI ……………. $108.20 ………….NYMEX…….Americas U.S. domestic benchmark.
(West Texas Intermediate) Delivered at Cushing, Oklahoma. Trades at a discount to Brent due to landlocked delivery. [And NOT because it is American oil.]
January 2026, the Norwegian Continental Shelf (NCS) — which accounts for the overwhelming majority of North Sea oil output — produced an average of 2.219 million barrels per day of oil, natural gas liquids (NGL), and condensate… the United Kingdom Continental Shelf (UKCS) ..with crude oil production falling from 0.56 million bpd in 2024 to 0.40 million bpd by 2029 [and 0.93 projected for 2026.]
So somewhere around 3.1 million barrels a dayof North Sea oil is used to price almost 65 million barrels a day.
The financiers in London are controlling the pricing, NOT the oil producers! As The Network of Global Corporate Controlshowed, “…737 top holders accumulate 80% of the control over the value of all TNCs[Trans National Corporations] …A relevant additional fact at this point is that ¾ of the core are financial intermediaries...”
These financiers, the City of London are POTUS Trump’s targets. That is why Mark Carney is acting nutz.
TradeBait goes into this too, only looking at the situation from the point of view of the US military.
This video is prompted to where you see the last ten minutes instead of two hours. Please watch to the end. Jim who speaks at the end is a Canadian. The other guy is Burning Bright from Badlands. He is from the Boston area.
…
THE ENEMY
Our enemy, once they had lost the overt fights against the USA, turned to psychological warfare.
“For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence–on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.”
“ Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.”
Bertrand Russell was a “scientific consultant” to evil psychopaths who wanted to run a world tyranny. In this book, he lays out a framework for a “scientific” global dictatorship, and ponders the intricacies of bringing it about, while blithely penning his sociopathic rationalizations for moving forward with it…
– p56 [1] On education “The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated. When the technique has been perfected, every government that has been in charge of education for a generation will be able to control its subjects securely without the need of armies or policemen.”
– p41 [2] “In like manner, the scientific rulers will provide one kind of education for ordinary men and women, and another for those who are to become holders of scientific power. Ordinary men and women will be expected to be docile, industrious, punctual, thoughtless, and contented. Of these qualities, probably contentment will be considered the most important. In order to produce it, all the researches of psycho-analysis, behaviourism, and biochemistry will be brought into play…. All the boys and girls will learn from an early age to be what is called ‘co-operative,’ i.e., to do exactly what everybody is doing. Initiative will be discouraged in these children, and insubordination, without being punished, will be scientifically trained out of them.” “It is to be expected that advances in physiology and psychology will give governments much more control over individual mentality than they now have even in totalitarian countries. Fichte laid it down that education should aim at destroying free will, so that, after pupils have left school, they shall be incapable, throughout the rest of their lives, of thinking or acting otherwise than as their schoolmasters would have wished.” – p61 [3] On control over opinion “The completeness of the resulting control over opinion depends in various ways upon scientific technique. Where all children go to school, and all schools are controlled by the government, the authorities can close the minds of the young to everything contrary to official orthodoxy.
(Jun. 19, 2018)—The kindest thing we can say about Queen’s Privy Council kingpin Lord Mark Malloch-Brown is that he is certainly one of a kind.
It has taken an entire group of researchers over a month just to gather the facts about him. These facts are scattered across the Internet in many dozens of biographies in an evident strategy to confuse people about his background. No two are alike. These convoluted biographies are telling for a man with literally trillions of dollars at his fingertips; meaning he can buy national elections anywhere on the planet, but he cannot seem to write his resume…
….the Queen’s Privy Council and the United Nations plan for us. Exploitation, abuse and euthanasia. They don’t even hide the fact that they want to exterminate 75-90% of the world’s population (see video-taped comments by eugenicists Prince Philip and Ted Turner).
Is the above article, bafflegab? Truth? Or a mix?
….
WOLF MOON onmRNAVACCINES
AND THIS IS KEY.
If what Wolf proposes is true, POTUS unleashed the brainstorming of Americans to find ways to mitigate the effects of the clot shots. Not only did Trump, spike the guns of the 10 years of lockdown crowd AND not require or promote the clot shot, but early on he promoted alternatives. Trump and Dr Navarro even got India to manufacture HCQ for the USA and the USA then had strategic reserves of the stuff. Of course the Cabal countered with a lying Fake Science trial showing HCQ kills people. With Ivermectin, they just killed the study.
Starting the comments HEREon September 22, 2026 11:26Bold is mine.
IMO, after numerous “behavioral training” hoaxes for allegedly possessing or releasing information, Trump is NEVER going to push to actually release information on deep military stuff like “why they’re developing bad but very quickly produced vaccines” that cost only 0.0001 out of 15, which apparently is a real DEAL as far as the military is concerned. Even among their own forces.
IMO Bobby Kennedy has been “read in”, too. But (IMO) they did NOT read in Prasad or Makary – too low-level and could not be trusted to keep the secrets. Those guys pushed where Kennedy could not protect them.
I strongly suspect now that JFK was killed because he was going to take stuff public in some way that was a predictable disaster.
If I go back and study the stuff that was kept secret during WWII, and assume that similar situations are ongoing today, then things starts making sense.
We are NEVER going to ban these vaccines. IMO they would rather disclose the truth and endure the resulting societal problems, than lose the military edge that genetic vaccines provide in hypothetical conflicts.
But whatever. We need to keep doing our thing to minimize the blowback, IMO. But not having the “gun/shield” is not an option.
You yourself have published the truth about the HHS/DoD connection. We all know that DoD and HHS have been joined at the hip on bioweapons for decades. I doubt that there was even military unanimity on the idea of Fauci and HHS moving experiments to Wuhan being a good idea or a bad idea. I suspect there are varying levels of realism on mRNA vaccines.
And yes, in these hypotheses, I assume Fauci was the guy who was “read in” on whatever is really going on.
Not everybody who supports mRNA vaccines has the same motivation for supporting them. Many people believe all the narrative BS that the media spits out. But then add people who discern varying levels of badness of the vaccines, and who then have varying levels of tolerance on that.
I don’t think anybody except embedded depoppers, ChiComs, and a few others are “fine” with the casualties of the clot shot. But I do think there are people in the system who know how bad it is, but who also know why that badness is being tolerated.
I’m not trying to discourage people. I’m trusting Trump, AND Bobby Kennedy, and simultaneously trying to explain why they’re allowing a marginal but potentially critical vaccine technology to be developed.
And if I’m right about this, it’s a lot more important than an election. I don’t LIKE that, but it’s true. A “humanity-clearing virus” with 80+% mortality being stopped in its tracks by a vaccine with a COVID-level death rate (or a COVID vaccine-level death rate – pretty similar) – that’s a win, if we’re ever in that position.
That’s cold, hard science. It’s not pretty, but it has to be considered.
Frontiers are not safe. At the same time we were developing the American frontier, we had “early” anesthesia. Ether, chloroform, and others. It was DANGEROUS as hell. We also had rapid amputations with saws. Same. But it was better than the alternative.
Right now – with all the flaws of the mRNA vaccines, if there is suddenly an “airborne Ebola”, then our having the ability to create a working and deliverable vaccine in under 24 hours is a huge, huge, huge military advantage in SAVING AMERICA. Maybe saving humanity.
Obviously, WE should not be making that virus. But WE don’t control other people on the planet (honestly, we can’t even control our own), and if there ARE “people” not on this planet who have more advanced technology, well, we don’t control them, either.
So, IMO, the bad (side effects) but good (fast) mRNA technology needs to move forward. I just think we need to be more honest about why we’re doing it. The REASONS of speed and simplicity have been mentioned. The reasons behind those have not.
I refuse to believe Trump is stupid about this, and that Bobby Kennedy has turned into a polar opposite on vaccines. Something is up. And these hypotheses explain it.
Thanks for thinking about it. It’s not easy, but it bears consideration by more minds to see if it makes sense.
I’ve done a lot of thinking to try to solve the riddle of Trump’s enigmatic vax position, but Bobby Kennedy gave me another equation to work with, and that allowed me to see some potential solutions. Mix in the military’s shadowy support for the entire thing, without knee-jerking that they’re Satan-worshiping DARPA baddies, and suddenly some rational possibilities come into view.
There are times that the entire COVID psy-op struck me as a bit of a live drill, and while I think that idea is far too simplistic, I do think that people advising Trump have surely been doing so from literal Q-clearance knowledge that can’t go public.
For instance (and this is also to share some mRNA knowledge) it is entirely possible that our military KNEW in 2018-2019 that there would eventually be another pathogen lab leak, likely significant, and in top military manner, we had prepared for it. The best tech for rapid response on a proven platform, though not using proven-safe protein targets, had to have been the mRNA technology, IMO, despite all its flaws, problems, and unknown risks. On paper, it’s the best. Yeah, it doesn’t guarantee a shut-off of production. Yeah, it makes errors because of N1-methylpseudouridine. Yeah, it has toxicity problems in the LNPs. Yeah, it goes to bad places it shouldn’t go. Everything we’ve discussed.
BUT we know that the baseline badness of side effects is probably only one or two orders of magnitude worse than our “best” vaccines. For some unknown future disease where the death rate exceeds that from the clot shot itself, AND the saving of lives due to fast action is exponential, mRNA shots will clearly have a desirable total life-saving yield. They won’t do it as safely as a traditional vaccine using a protein immunogen, but they will start saving lives sooner and faster. This can be easily modeled.
This would have been more obvious if Omicron had not saved us from Delta, with the latter being about as pathogenic as Original Wuhan, and it would have been completely clear if there had been no mutation of Wuhan, because in that case we might have seen permanent immunity from the vax.
All that said, we must (IMO) keep pointing out the deficiencies of the mRNA technology. I suspect there are limits to how much improvement is possible, so we cannot delude ourselves if these remain sub-par vaccines compared to protein technologies. We cannot let lies about mRNA technology, nor even its potential heroic use in a truly apocalyptic biological event, blind us to the reality that old-style vaccines are and likely will remain superior.
However, I think that it would be wonderful if somebody “on our side” were able to outline the highly theoretical risk-benefit curves, where mRNA vaccines might save lives sooner and bigger at high pathogenicity, but are demonstrably sub-optimal at low pathogenicity, thereby framing both the negatives and positives of the technology in a way that allows us to make peace with each other. In that case, RFKJ’s wisdom of allowing mRNA to go forward, but under increased scrutiny and deference to sound scientific results, will prove historically correct, IMO.
I’ll just say right off the bat that I don’t expect anybody here to believe any of these hypotheses – and I do call them hypotheses, because I’m not locked in on any of them. And just for further clarification, I’m not certain that anything you’re additionally speculating as being implied, is actually implied, or is intended by me to be implied, but you are welcome to digest what I say in any way that makes sense to you, no problem.
These are very loose hypotheses, designed around the idea that much of what we are seeing is the result of secrecy that is both constraining and manipulating President Trump and Bobby Kennedy.
I remain uncertain whether Trump was actually read in on anything potentially related to these hypotheses during his first term, but the suspicion that he (45) was NOT – and later (47) WAS – looms large to me as a handy explanation of otherwise inexplicable things. Indeed, I further suspect that Obama and Brennan’s plot to raise “Russia, Russia, Russia” suspicions about Trump was designed to make sure Trump could not be informed about certain things.
In the beginning of the “pandemic”, Trump had to act on uncertainty – uncertainty about many things, including the origin of the virus, the motivations of all the players behind it, the science itself, and even the actual lethality of the virus. I don’t know what he was told that was classified at the time, but I suspect he WAS informed of SOME classified things in SOME areas. That is a multi-dimensional continuum – not a binary.
I suspect his context for decisions included some, but not all, classified aspects. All I know is that I trust that Trump did the best he could with what he was given.
….
To me, this indicates the Malthusians aka British Empire has been in control. And to some extent still is. (See my Depop series especially Kissinger’s National Security Study Memorandum NSSM 200.) Remember Kissinger said point blank during a Chatham House speech, he kept the Brits better informed than our US State Dept. Also Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum was a protegee of Kissinger.
YOURS TRULY WARNED THIS BOARD ABOUT DR. ERICA SCHWARTZ, MD, Rear Adm (ret) WHEN SHE WAS CONFIRMED AS THE NEW CDC DIRECTOR — THE “QUEEN OF VACCINES.” THE “ENFORCER” OF THE PENTAGON’S COVID-19 BIOWEAPON “VACCINE” MANDATE ON THE U.S.MILITARY.
YOURS TRULY WARNED THIS BOARD ABOUT HOW HHS SEC. KENNEDY, JR., WAS BEING HOBBLED AND IS ESSENTIALLY USELESS.
Refusing to testify without a valid legal basis is itself the offense. Under 2 U.S.C. § 192, willfully failing to appear after a valid congressional subpoena, or refusing to answer pertinent questions once there, is a misdemeanor punishable by up to one year in prison and a fine.
The CRS puts it plainly: a subpoena recipient “has a legal obligation to comply, absent a valid and overriding privilege or other legal justification.” So the legal basis is the only shield. If an official can’t point to one — the Fifth Amendment, executive privilege, a recognized separation-of-powers conflict (e.g., the Secretary of State appearing at a major diplomatic event), attorney-client privilege, etc. — the refusal is contempt.
In practice, Congress has several enforcement levers when an official refuses without a valid basis:
She is also military so indictment would be via a military tribunal avoiding the Woke judges & juries of DC. It also allows RICO as she CONTINUES her pushing of the Clot Shots. (The five year window for the military is fast closing.)
…
In order to not clutter up this article, I removed a collection of VARIOUS COMMENTS ABOUT THE CLOT SHOT AND mRNA VACCINES. If Treepers wish I can put them in a separate article so they do not get lost. They would have doubled the length of this article.
There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.
Do not forget to LABEL AI articles, video and such.
For fun, from one half of the Prussiagate team known as Will Zol.
Trump’s “Oranges” Slip Was A Clue – Nobody Caught It For 7 Years (43 minutes)
I am going to start with how things stand today. In reading X-22 on Wednesday I realized there was a tweet that fits very well with this article so I am adding it here at the top of the page.
Tell people they’re going to die.
Then tell them only you can save them.
That’s the oldest trick in the book, and the AI doom machine is running it at full throttle.
First comes the extinction warning: greater than a 10% chance AI kills humanity within a decade.
…we find that only 737 top holders accumulate 80% of the control over the value of all TNCs [Trans National Corporations] …This means that network control is much more unequally distributed than wealth. In particular, the top ranked actors hold a control ten times bigger than what could be expected based on their wealth…
…In detail, nearly 4/10 of the control over the economic value of TNCs in the world is held, via a complicated web of ownership relations, by a group of 147 TNCs in the core, which has almost full control over itself. The top holders within the core can thus be thought of as an economic “super-entity” in the global network of corporations. A relevant additional fact at this point is that 3/4 of the core are financial intermediaries….
There may be 147 companies in the world that own everything, as colleague Bruce Upbin points out and they are dominated by investment companies as Eric Savitz rightly points out. But it’s not you and I who really control those companies, even though much of our money is in them. Given the nature of how money is invested, there are four companies in the shadows that 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 control those companies that own everything.
Before I reveal them, some light math:
According to the 2011 annual factbook from the Investment Company Institute, there is $24.7 trillion in all the mutual funds in the world (a little less than half from the US). Based on data from the ICI, $1.24 trillion of this is directly invested in index funds, plus another $992 billion in assets beyond that $24.7 trillion in Exchange Traded Funds, which aren’t mutual funds but are index funds. That means the bulk of that money is in “active” managed funds or fund of funds.
.the chief of hedge funds at a very large asset manager told me last week (alas, I cannot identify either) that an internal study his firm recently performed found that the vast majority of mutual funds defined as actively managed see 95% of the assets they hold determined by an index. That means just 5% of actively managed funds really are driven by the active manager’s judgment….
So of the $25.69 trillion in worldwide assets we’ve identified, $2.23 trillion are directly in indexes (ETFs and index mutual funds) with another $22.3 trillion indirectly beholden to indexes (that 95% of actively managed fund holdings said to be determined by an index).
You can see where I’m headed here. That means the real power to control the world lies with four companies: McGraw-Hill, which owns Standard & Poor’s, Northwestern Mutual, which owns Russell Investments, the index arm of which runs the benchmark Russell 1,000 and Russell 3,000, CME Group which owns 90% of Dow Jones Indexes, and Barclay’s, which took over Lehman Brothers and its Lehman Aggregate Bond Index, the dominant world bond fund index. Together, these four firms dominate the world of indexing. And in turn, that means they hold real sway over the world’s money…
And FYI from Brave AI:
Robert Maxwell, the late British media tycoon and father of Ghislaine Maxwell, did not own McGraw-Hill but formed a major joint venture with the company in 1989. Through his U.S. subsidiary Macmillan Inc., Maxwell merged his educational publishing assets with McGraw-Hill’s to create Macmillan/McGraw-Hill School Publishing Co., which became the nation’s largest or second-largest textbook publisher depending on the source.
Small world…Does all the Corporate Woke Schiff now make sense?
The financiers then made the next move. Using corporate money to influence the US elections. I very much disagree with this SCOTUS decision. Corporations ARE NOT PEOPLE!
By a 5-to-4 vote along ideological lines, the majority held that under the First Amendment corporate funding of independent political broadcasts in candidate elections cannot be limited. Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote for the majority joined by Chief Justice John G. Roberts and Justices Antonin G. Scalia, Samuel A. Alito, and Clarence Thomas. Justice John Paul Stevens dissented, joined by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen G. Breyer, and Sonia Sotomayor. The majority maintained that political speech is indispensable to a democracy, which is no less true because the speech comes from a corporation. The majority also held that the BCRA’s disclosure requirements as applied to The Movie were constitutional, reasoning that disclosure is justified by a “governmental interest” in providing the “electorate with information” about election-related spending resources. The Court also upheld the disclosure requirements for political advertising sponsors and it upheld the ban on direct contributions to candidates from corporations and unions. In a separate concurring opinion, Chief Justice Roberts, joined by Justice Alito, emphasized the care with which the Court handles constitutional issues and its attempts to avoid constitutional issues when at all possible. Here, the Court had no narrower grounds upon which to rule, except to handle the First Amendment issues embodied within the case. Justice Scalia also wrote a separate concurring opinion, joined by Justices Alito and Thomas in part, criticizing Justice Stevens’ understanding of the Framer’s view towards corporations. Justice Stevens argued that corporations are not members of society and that there are compelling governmental interests to curb corporations’ ability to spend money during local and national elections.
In 2010, the Supreme Court ruled that corporations and others have a First Amendment right to raise and spend unlimited money on elections. Few modern Supreme Court decisions have received as much public attention, or backlash, as Citizens United v. FEC. The U.S. has since seen a surge in megadonors and a rise in dark money, or undisclosed campaign donations. A tiny sliver of Americans now wield more power than at any time since Watergate, too often at the expense of ordinary citizens whose needs are not prioritized.
On top of influencing elections, corporations (and NGOs) use their large amounts of cash to lobby Congress.
CHAPTER 6 Uncertain Victory: BIG BUSINESS AND THE POLITICS OF REGULATORY REFORM (pp. 174-200)
The Business Roundtable [a nonprofit association of 200+ CEOs of major U.S. companies, founded in 1972 in Washington, D.C.-GC] helped define corporate lobbying in Washington, D.C., in the 1970s, but for twenty years the group also maintained an office in New York City, where it kept its administrative and strategic planning functions geographically separate from its lobbying. From its prehistory at the Links Club on 62nd Street, the Roundtable bounced around Manhattan’s hot real estate locations, including stints on Wall Street, Broad Street, and Lexington Avenue. From 1978 until its final move south in 1993, member CEOs and professional staff members, particularly those who worked on nonlobbying issues like construction industry negotiations..
….
The author of the following article is Stephen D. Foster, Jr., a flaming liberal who holds a Bachelor’s Degree in History and Political Science from Missouri University of Science and Technology. However I do think he has a point. Given the East India Company, I do not think corporations were looked on with favor by the Founding Fathers.
…To say that the founding fathers supported corporations is very absurd. Its quite the opposite in fact. Corporations like the East India Trading Company were despised by the founding fathers and they were just one reason why they chose to revolt against England. Corporations represented the moneyed interests much like they do today and they often wielded political power, sometimes to the point of governing a colony all by themselves like the Massachusetts Bay Company did.
… At the time, in Britain, large corporations funded elections generously and its stock was owned by nearly everyone in parliament. The founding fathers did not think much of these corporations that had great wealth and great influence in government. And that is precisely why they put restrictions upon them after the government was organized under the Constitution…
After the nation’s founding, corporations were granted charters by the state as they are today. Unlike today, however, corporations were only permitted to exist 20 or 30 years and could only deal in one commodity, could not hold stock in other companies, and their property holdings were limited to what they needed to accomplish their business goals. And perhaps the most important facet of all this is that most states in the early days of the nation had laws on the books that made any political contribution by corporations a criminal offense. When you think about it, the regulations imposed on corporations in the early days of America were far harsher than they are now. That is hardly proof that the founding fathers supported corporations. In fact its quite the opposite…
Was Foster making this up out of whole cloth? Or was there truth in what he wrote?
Jane Anne Morris is a corporate anthropologist and writer…
In researching nineteenth-century laws regulating corporations, Morris found that in Wisconsin, as in most other states at that time:
Corporations were required to have a clear purpose, to be fulfilled but not exceeded.2
Corporations’ licenses to do business were revocable by the state legislature if they exceeded or did not fulfill their chartered purpose(s).3
The state legislature could revoke a corporation’s charter if it misbehaved.4
The act of incorporation did not relieve corporate management or stockholders/owners of responsibility or liability for corporate acts.5
As a matter of course, corporation officers, directors, or agents couldn’t break the law and avoid punishment by claiming they were “just doing their job” when committing crimes but instead could be held criminally liable for violating the law.6
State (not federal) courts heard cases where corporations or their agents were accused of breaking the law or harming the public.7
Directors of the corporation were required to come from among stockholders.8
Corporations had to have their headquarters and meetings in the state where their principal place of business was located.9
Corporation charters were granted for a specific period of time, such as twenty or thirty years (instead of being granted “in perpetuity,” as is now the practice).10
Corporations were prohibited from owning stock in other corporations, to prevent them from extending their power inappropriately.11
Corporations’ real estate holdings were limited to what was necessary to carry out their specific purpose(s).12
Corporations were prohibited from making any political contributions, direct or indirect.13
Corporations were prohibited from making charitable or civic donations outside of their specific purposes.14
State legislatures could set the rates that some monopoly corporations could charge for their products or services.15
All corporation records and documents were open to the legislature or the state attorney general.16
Similar laws existed in most other states. It is important to understand that tens of thousands of entrepreneurs did business in the early colonies and continue to do so today without being incorporated—the proverbial butcher, baker, and candlestick maker. To do business in America or most of the world does not require a corporate structure—people can run partnerships, individual proprietorships, or simply manufacture and sell products or offer services without any business structure whatsoever other than keeping track of the money for the Internal Revenue Service….
It’s only when a group of people get together and put capital (cash) at risk and want to seek from the government legal limits on their liability, and to legally limit their possible losses, that a corporate form becomes necessary. In exchange for these limitations on liability, governments demand certain responsibilities from corporations.
The oldest historic one was that corporations “operate in the public interest” or “to the public benefit.” After all, if the people, through their elected representatives, are going to authorize a legal limitation of liability for a group of people engaged in the game of business, it’s quite reasonable to ask that the game be played in a way that throws off some benefit to the government’s citizens or at least doesn’t operate counter to the public welfare...
E. M. Smith aka ChiefIO is a trained economist. This is what he had to say back in 2011.
Realize that the corporate urge is not toward a competitive market. It’s the very LAST thing any corporate wants. What a corporate wants is a monopoly where they can achieve the profit maximizing price point. Not competition. No “market” with many sellers.
So watch what GE does, as an example. It is always on the hunt for a market it can “dominate”. It uses political leverage to get its products mandated and the competition banned. It doesn’t want a market, it wants a ‘company store’.
Internalize that, and a lot of things “fit” better…
Monsanto pushing legislation to ban private traditional seeds[saving] and seed sharing, and promoting GMO products. (Why would a seed company want to ‘destroy’ a seed market? So you must come to the company store…)
EPA is used to forbid all sorts of things that can be done easily and cheaply, and where the alternative is very expensive ….
Once corporations figure out that it is cheaper and easier to get the competition banned and them mandated, than to create new products; and that they can make lots of money as the sole provider of a crappy product but not that much making good products in a competitive market; well, lets just say that the campaign contributions flow…
Oddly, you can look at Communism as the “limit case” where there is ONE corporation and it IS the government. At the other extreme is “laissez faire” with huge numbers of competitors. As you move toward Communism you pass through stages of ever more “concentration” of control. Just shy of communism is Classical Socialism with it’s state planning boards and commissions. A bit more toward L.F. you get “Market Socialism” (with some sub-types in between).
The USA until about 1990 was a “Mixed Economy” with some “natural monopolies” under government “control” via “regulation”; and with many competitive markets. We’ve moved to more central planning and more central “regulation” (in some cases as a cover for the “planning” word that has gotten tied to Socialism… so is political to some extent). With the nationalization of GM and the bank “bailout” / “rescue” that was really more of a ‘take-under’ in some ways; we moved to a Lange Type Socialism.
The result of the last 50 years has been more companies in markets with Oligopolies that are essentially guaranteed by the government. Who dominates the Home Mortgage Market? Fanny & Freddy – Gov’t Corporations. Who dominates the Student Loan Market? Sally Mae – a Gov’t Corporation. Who dominates US Autos? GM – a Gov’t Corporation via Nationalization, but now being sold off. (Though Ford is doing well too.) And who “Calls the Tune” for the Banks in America? ALL of them? The Federal Reserve Bank – a Gov’t sponsored corporation. And there are a whole lot more of them. Try taking a train from coast to coast for example…
At the next tier down, we have Gov’t dependent Oligopolies. Say you wanted to make airplanes. First off, you need that dozen lawyers to work the FAA for you. Next up, you need some friends in the Military to feed you contracts. Don’t think so? When Boeing gets a $B contract to ‘study’ or ‘develop’ and you need to design your new tech from scratch on your own money: Who do you think will win? So the government basically decides how many companies it wants, and who they will be, then funds them “to plan” with contracts. (This is NOT a hypothetical… I’ve watched them flat out announce “We’d like Lockheed and Martin to merge” or “we don’t want…” usually when one of them is ‘having issues’ and the topic is raised. Then the gov’t casts the one vote that matters…)
And so it goes…
This is, dare I say it…. basically the same way the Fascist “Third Way” worked. (And it DOES work). FDR and Wilson both had high praise for The Third Way and you can see how they shifted America from a ‘free market’ toward “Third Way” government – corporation “cooperation” … It was this same process / tendency that Ike warned about in the “Military Industrial Complex” speech.
So we’ve moved away from straight up competition (and with good reasons… it is less profitable and more destructive in some ways and it is prone to monopoly practices) and toward that Classical Socialist end of things; with exact placement varying over time. And we called it a “Mixed Economy” at the ‘tepid’ end; as the name “fascist Third Way” got a bit tainted during W.W.II …. that tendency for Mussolini and Hitler to stir in a load of Nationalism and for the Nazi’s a double helping of Racism spoiled the soup for the Third Way “Socialist Lite” folks like FDR.
And the propaganda worked.
We’ve now got a “Progressive” and a “Third Way” government that IS a form of Socialism. (Now being rebranded as “Market Socialism” in the Eastern Block and Euro zones; called “Regulation” in the USA and sometimes poking it’s head up under “Rescue” as well with the most recent bits called “Social Justice”… all the pieces as slices of salami, but no overall Big Picture of it… we like to keep our socialism hidden in tiny bites with different names.) But just don’t ever point out that it’s basically the same “Third Way” process, using what’s properly called “Corporatism”, to achieve the Socialist agenda; that was first innovated by the Fascists… After all, it doesn’t fit the propaganda paradigm “Fascists bad, WORLD Socialists good” put out by Stalin…
And that is the root cause of your pondering. Corporations are very happy under a Socialist Third Way / Progressive / Market Socialism / Fascist / “Government regulated Coopertition” (whatever you name you like to apply to the same beast) system. They are not very happy with wide open competitive markets. See all of Europe for an example of “Managed Markets” (yet another name…) The French are masters of this technique, and the Germans not far behind. The Japanese innovated the Keiretsu as a way to limit competition to manageable chunks with government supervision.
Like I said, it DOES work. What galls me is just that we run around putting 20 different names on the same process and that just hides what’s really going on. All for political reasons. Very “un-tidy”… You’d think these folks had something to hide…
At any rate, I’d like our economy to move back more toward a “Mixed Economy” with less of it “regulated and rescued” and be a bit further from a Lange Type Socialism and more like the Socialism Lite we used to be. Somehow some folks think that means I want laissez faire (which is prone to other evil failures); even more folks think Corporations must be laissez faire machines and tools of the Evil Right Wing; when the reality is that they are much more useful to the Third Way Socialists of the world… and make much more stable profits under them.
Hope that helps you see why “corporations would want to destroy their own markets”… Just need to change it around a little and it makes a lot of sense:
“Why would corporations want to destroy the competitive nature of their own markets?”…
THE COST OF REGULATIONS, CORPORATIONS FAVORITE WEAPON
“This is a good time to recall the lesson George McGovern learned when he started a boutique hotel after his political career ended, only to learn the bitter lessons of the heavy foot of government regulation. This led McGovern to express a heresy:
I also wish that during the years I was in public office, I had had this firsthand experience about the difficulties business people face every day. That knowledge would have made me a better U.S. senator and a more understanding presidential contender…
[M]y business associates and I also lived with federal, state and local rules that were all passed with the objective of helping employees, protecting the environment, raising tax dollars for schools, protecting our customers from fire hazards, etc. While I never have doubted the worthiness of any of these goals,👉the concept that most often eludes legislators is: “Can we make consumers pay the higher prices for the increased operating costs that accompany public regulation and government reporting requirements with reams of red tape.” It is a simple concern that is nonetheless often ignored by legislators.👈
U.S. GDP is just $16 trillion instead of $54 trillion
The growth of federal regulations over the past six decades has cut U.S. economic growth by an average of 2 percentage points per year, according to a new study in the Journal of Economic Growth. As a result, the average American household receives about $277,000 less annually than it would have gotten in the absence of six decades of accumulated regulations—a median household income of $330,000 instead of the $53,000 we get now.
The researchers, economists John Dawson of Appalachian State University and John Seater of North Carolina State, constructed an index of federal regulations by tracking the growth in the number of pages in the Code of Federal Regulations since 1949. The number of pages, they note, has increased six-fold from 19,335 in 1949 to 134,261 in 2005. (As of 2011, the number of pages had risen to 169,301.) They devise a pretty standard endogenous growth theory model and then insert their regulatory burden index to calculate how federal regulations have affected economic growth. (Sometimes deregulation extends rather than shortens the number of pages in the register; they adjust their figures to take this into account.)…
People esp ‘economists’ forget small business. There are a LOT of one to ten person shops out there. They hire a person or two even if it is just casual labor for a day or two or a week.
…. most of these new participants in the underground economy are ordinary hard-working Americans who are increasingly taking jobs that pay “under the table” either because nothing else is available or they need a second source of income to make ends meet.
America’s underground economy is nothing new, but since the Great Recession hit,[The Obummer years] experts estimate it has doubled in size, driven by unemployed or underemployed people desperate for income….
Small firms accounted for 65 percent (or 9.8 million) of the 15 million net new jobs created between 1993 and 2009…. An estimated 552,600 new employer firms opened for business in 2009, and 660,900 firms closed….
How important are small businesses to the U.S. economy?
Small firms: • Represent 99.7 percent of all employer firms. • Employ half of all private sector employees. • Pay 44 percent of total U.S. private payroll. • Generated 65 percent of net new jobs over the past 17 years. • Create more than half of the nonfarm private GDP. • Hire 43 percent of high tech workers ( scientists, engineers, computer programmers, and others). • Are 52 percent home-based and 2 percent franchises. • Made up 97.5 percent of all identified exporters and produced 31 percent of export value in FY 2008. • Produce 13 times more patents per employee than large patenting firms.
….cities and states stifle new small businesses at every turn, burying them in mounds of paperwork; lengthy, expensive and arbitrary permitting processes; pointless educational requirements for occupations; or even just outright bans. Today, the Institute for Justice released a series of studies documenting government-imposed barriers to entrepreneurship in eight cities. In every city studied, overwhelming regulations destroyed or crippled would-be businesses at a time when they are most needed.
Time and again, these reports document how local bureaucrats believe they should dictate every aspect of a person’s small business. They want to choose who can go into which business, where, what the business should look like, and what signs will be put in the windows. And if that means that businesses fail, or never open, or can operate only illegally, or waste all their money trying to get permits so they have nothing left for actual operations, that’s just too bad. This attitude would be bad enough in prosperous times, but in a period of financial strain and high unemployment, it’s almost suicidally foolish…..
It’s well-known the regulatory burden falls disproportionately on small business. American Action Forum (AAF) research has discovered they are shedding jobs and wages are falling because of the Affordable Care Act. In addition, as regulation increases, the number of small business establishments decreases, while the largest businesses grow more numerous. Based on AAF’s latest research, the paperwork and compliance burdens alone total more than 3.3 billion hours and $64.6 billion. Given that compliance affects small businesses more acutely, each new hour of paperwork means less productivity, fewer profits, and diminished competitiveness, relative to larger competitors….
Now if we can get the states, towns and cities to give small businesses relief from idiotic regulations some of those underground businesses can come back into the regular economy. [This is what POTUS Trump is trying to do to unleash the US Economy.]
The 2013 Federal Register contains over 80,000 pages of new rules. As the Dollarhites showed only a large corporation that hires a full time legal staff has any hope of steering clear of traps in those new rules and in the new laws with completely off topic amendments attached. The Dollarhites, whose kids raised pet rabbits and sold them, fell foul of a one liner in an unrelated bill that amended the Animal Welfare Act years after the original law was passed.
That one liner is why I sold off my petting farm animals.
…the Dollarhite family of Nixa, Mo., first started raising and selling bunnies as part of a lesson to teach their teenage son about responsibility and hard work, they had no idea they would eventually meet the heavy hand of the US Department of Agriculture (USDA). According to a recent article covered in Breitbart’s
Big Government, the USDA recently ordered the Dollarhite family to pay more than $90,000 in fines because they sold more than $500 worth of rabbits in a year — and if they fail to pay the fine by Monday, May 23, the fine will multiply to nearly $4 million….
On top of that you need a compliance staff. I worked for a company with a small thirty man staff. After a new law was passed we had to add 3 more people, 10% of the employees, to do nothing except deal with the additional paperwork required. That cost YOU money.
Following a record year of rulemaking, the Obama Administration is continuing to unleash more costly red tape. In the first six months of the 2011 fiscal year, 15 major regulations were issued, with annual costs exceeding $5.8 billion and one-time implementation costs approaching $6.5 billion. No major rulemaking actions were taken to reduce regulatory burdens during this period. Overall, the Obama Administration imposed 75 new major regulations from January 2009 to mid-FY 2011, with annual costs of $38 billion. There were only six major deregulatory actions during that time, with reported savings of just $1.5 billion. This flood of red tape will undoubtedly persist, as hundreds of new regulations stemming from the vast Dodd–Frank financial regulation law, Obamacare, and the EPA’s global warming crusade advance through the regulatory pipeline—all of which further weakens an anemic economy and job creation, while undermining Americans’ fundamental freedoms. Action by Congress as well as the President to stem this regulatory surge is essential.
It’s clear the Barack Obama White House ranks as one of the most activist regulatory administrations in history. Consequently, it’s not surprising the administration argues that regulatory costs and uncertainty aren’t hurting the economy.
Jan Eberly, assistant treasury secretary on economic policy, recently tried to make the case for an-all-is-well position on regulation in a Treasury Department blog. The piece opened by quoting Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner in his recent Senate testimony: “I’m very sympathetic to the argument you want to be careful to get the rules better and smarter, but I don’t think there’s good evidence in support of the proposition that it’s regulatory burden or uncertainty that’s causing the economy to grow more slowly than any of us would like.”
Eberly goes on to make various points that supposedly undercut the argument regulation hurts business, the economy and jobs.
She cites a recovery in corporate profits.But that ignores where profits should or could be. In fact, corporate profits only climbed above their 2006 levels last year. For good measure, Eberly ignores that as of the second quarter of this year, proprietors’ income had still failed to climb back to its 2006 level.[Proprietorsare small business owners.]
Eberly asserts that a flat workweek for private workers and low capacity utilization point to poor demand, not fear of regulation…
As a private citizen do YOU have the time to read 80,000 pages of new regs a year, not to mention court cases? (Courts can make laws. It is called case law.) These regulations make it almost impossible for people to start and grow a small business.
And that brings us back to the attack on AI. Regulations are the best way to pick winners and losers AND to manage the decline of the USA while making people nothing but wage slaves.
There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.
Do not forget to LABEL AI articles, video and such.
As we come into the mid-terms and the economy becomes more and more important, let’s start with Tom Luongo’s
With the ECB hiking rates this week we’ve seen a big move by capital markets, especially on Friday, the 25th Anniversary of 9/11, where bond markets globally sold off more than 10 bps.
To my conspiratorial mind this was a warning shot to the Fed, the US, the Trump Administration and the gods themselves, thatDavosand their London sycophants are not going down without the fight of our lives.
The reality is that Lagarde raised to protect euro-bond/JGB carry spreads and to punish Germans for voting populist. Meanwhile, the UK is looking at a breakup, to ensure that there is no country left, freeing the Scots, Welsh and Northern Irish to rejoin the EU and finally betray BREXIT completely.
Christine Lagarde hiked into an energy supply shock because of Keynesian dogma, or so the story goes. It was a policy mistake of epic proportions. And in response, the bond market sell off globally was intended to force Kevin Warsh at the Fed to make the same policy mistake.
CPI, employment, labor, and producer price data clearly do not warrant a rate hike from the Fed. Lagarde sparked a dollar liquidity spasm into the weekend with this and the Financial press tried to sell it as a statement by bond vigilantes that the Fed must hike.
Nonsense. The MOVE index sits at 82.2 after that. Break-even rates are still below 2%
Oil prices are elevated on future supply refilling but that is clearly transitory.
The real story continues to be in the those aforementioned carry spreads, which Trump pushes Canada into a war which will not end well for them…
When Reading the tweets from the Debriefing (Below) the word FinCEN caught my eye because of this passage from one of my older articles, KMAG DAILY THREAD 20260225 & COLUMBIA
This program that Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent is rolling out with FINcen seems to streamline the bounty system while focusing on the critical evidence: the money.
“Follow the money” is a notorious refrain not only in the Q Research community, but in the entire cultural ethos of “criminology” as well. Whether you are talking about a crime drama presented as a work of fiction on Netflix, or academic detective work, forensic accounting is the ideal method of mapping out criminal networks because the money flow is objective and traceable.
If you’ve listened to the past few episodes of Breaking History, we have been discussing FINcen and the Egmont Group. While FINcen is the financial crimes intelligence unit in the US government, the
Egmonth Group is an international network of over 170 of this type of intelligence unit from nearly every government on earth. The purpose being to share in this intelligence.
Colombian President Gustavo Petro was sanctioned by the Treasury Department last year, [October 24, 2025] and in the sanctioning document Petro is accused of getting Colombia’s financial crimes intelligence unit suspended from Egmont for allegedly sharing information he collected from the Egmont servers.
It is fascinating that both Petro and Maduro have accused all of the most powerful banks in the US and Europe of literally being the cartels. Petro says that it is institutions like Egmont Group that allow the criminality to continue and prosper, because it covers for them.
Bessent’s strategy is brilliant because it creates a practical incentive structure and has a reliable source of reward money. It also inherently targets the core culprit in all organized crime syndicates: the financial institutions.
We are going to pay criminals to rat out their friends. We are going to pay bureaucrats and accountants to blow the whistle on shady stuff they see around the office. And we are going to pay them with the money collected from fines imposed on the guilty parties. The idea being that the investigations will lead to criminal referrals and indictments.
Scott Bessent is weaponizing the financial system against itself by tapping into base human instincts.
The Egmont Group provides FIUs with a platform to securely exchange expertise and financial intelligence to combat money laundering, terrorist financing, and associated predicate crimes. The Egmont Group does not conduct financial investigations. Instead, domestic law enforcement and investigative authorities manage such inquiries.
HMMMmmm, Founded in Brussels, headquartered in Ontario.
….
🤔TIMELINES, PATTERNS & THE DEBRIEF
I'm not a lawyer. I'm not an intelligence officer. I'm not a government official. I'm a guy who works in construction who has spent six years reading primary sources, tracking enforcement actions, and building a workbook that now contains more… https://t.co/mHqBxjJu67pic.twitter.com/soLBDasMAq
I’m not a lawyer. I’m not an intelligence officer. I’m not a government official. I’m a guy who works in construction who has spent six years reading primary sources, tracking enforcement actions, and building a workbook that now contains more than six hundred and thirty documented events across five countries and more than forty jurisdictions.
I’m not going to ask you to believe me. I’m going to ask you to look at what the government itself has said, in its own documents, on its own letterhead, and decide for yourself whether what you’re watching on the news makes more sense once you’ve seen the blueprint underneath it.
And at the end, I’m going to show you the evidence that cuts against me. Because if I only show you the parts that fit, I’m not an analyst. I’m a salesman.
Here is the case.
EXHIBIT A They built the machine.
After September 11, 2001, the United States government constructed a financial surveillance and enforcement architecture unlike anything in human history. This is not disputed. The agencies exist. The laws were passed. The executive orders are published.
They created the legal authority to trace every dollar moving through the global banking system. Section 314 of the PATRIOT Act gave them the ability to query every financial institution in America about any person, simultaneously. They created the
ability to map networks. Treasury’s Office of Intelligence and Analysis established December 2003 describes its own analysts as using all-source intelligence to, and I’m quoting their own press releases, “map illicit financial networks.” They created the
ability to cut anyone off. Section 311 gives them the power to designate any foreign financial institution as a money laundering concern and sever its access to the U.S. dollar.
They tested it on small banks in Myanmar in 2003.
They tested it on Banco Delta Asia in 2005.
By 2007, the weapon was battle-tested.
They created the ability to freeze assets without warning. The PATRIOT Act amendment to IEEPA allows blocking pending investigation. Freeze first, notify later. Every OFAC action since 2001 traces to this authority. And they connected all of it together.
In September 2004, FinCEN signed a formal memorandum of understanding with every major federal banking regulator the Federal Reserve, FDIC, OCC, OTS, NCUA. The MOU established a standing, bidirectional information pipeline. Law enforcement intelligence could flow to banking supervisors. Examination data could flow back.
The MOU specifically contemplated financial crime issues with and these are the document’s exact words “national systemic impact on the banking industry.”
By 2006, FinCEN was connected to the SEC.
By 2007, OFAC compliance was embedded inside Federal Reserve safety-and-soundness examinations.
By July 2008, the Fed and SEC signed a direct information-sharing agreement covering mortgage markets, credit derivatives, securitization, and counterparty relationships. Eighteen agencies.
Created or reorganized between 2001 and 2008. Covering terrorism, finance, borders, intelligence, military command, WMD, cyber, and cargo.
All built around the same operational concept: find the network, map the network, track the network, isolate the network, dismantle the network.
I didn’t write those documents. They did. And they published them. The machine exists. That is not a theory.
EXHIBIT B The authorities that matter never get turned off.
Let me be precise here, because precision is the whole point. Emergency authorities under IEEPA do get terminated. Zimbabwe’s was ended in March 2024. Côte d’Ivoire’s in September 2016. Liberia’s in November 2015.
Of seventy-seven national emergencies declared under IEEPA since 1977, forty-six are still running as of last year. Thirty-one were shut down. So the authorities are not permanent. Somebody decides.
Now look at which ones nobody ever decides to end.
Narcotics trafficking declared 1995. Still active.
Terrorism declared 2001. Still active. Transnational criminal organizations declared 2011. Still active.
Malicious cyber activity declared 2015. Still active.
Serious human rights abuse and corruption declared December 20, 2017. Renewed every single year since, by two administrations that agreed on nothing else.
Election interference declared 2018. Still active.
Cartels renewed July 16, 2026, eight weeks ago.
Zimbabwe gets released. The network authorities never do. That’s not a coincidence of paperwork. That’s a choice, made annually, in writing, published in the Federal Register, by presidents of both parties who were actively trying to erase each other’s legacies on everything else.
The government currently holds simultaneous emergency authority over every category of threat this workbook tracks. All at once. Right now.
And the machine that uses those authorities FinCEN, OFAC, the entire post-9/11 financial warfare stack has been running continuously for twenty-five years.
EXHIBIT C They let the network operate.
This is the part people struggle with.
Why didn’t they stop it sooner? Because that’s not how intelligence operations work. And we know this because the government has publicly admitted to doing exactly this repeatedly.
ANOM. The FBI secretly built and ran an encrypted phone platform. They let criminals adopt it. For three years, drug traffickers, arms dealers, and money launderers used it thinking it was secure, while every message went straight to law enforcement. When they rolled it up: eight hundred arrests. Sixteen countries. One morning.
Hansa Market. Dutch police secretly seized a darknet marketplace. They didn’t announce it. They ran it for a month. When AlphaBay was publicly taken down, users flooded to Hansa straight into the trap. Thousands of identities harvested.
EncroChat. French and Dutch intelligence penetrated the encrypted phone network used by organized crime across Europe. Monitored it for months. Then rolled it up. Six thousand five hundred arrests.
The crypto enforcement record we track shows an average of eight point seven years between the crime and the prosecution. Not because prosecutors are slow. Because they were watching. Building the map. Letting the blockchain record every transaction. And then prosecuting when the map was complete.
This is the “let it ride” doctrine. You find the network. You don’t kick down the door. You let it operate. Every transaction is a receipt. Every connection reveals another name. Every day the network runs is another day of evidence building itself.
The criminals do the work for you. They think nobody is watching. So they get comfortable. They get sloppy. They bring in their cousins, their bankers, their lawyers. And every single connection goes into the map.
EXHIBIT D Then they activated. Everywhere.
In December 2017, Executive Order 13818 pointed the machine at a new target. Not just terrorists. Not just rogue states. The transnational criminal network class operating through legitimate institutions. Across borders. Across continents. Everywhere the network touches. What we have documented is not five countries acting alone.
It is five sovereign powers the United States, China, Russia, Saudi Arabia, and India who are geopolitical adversaries on nearly every other issue, conducting parallel enforcement operations against the same network class, on overlapping timelines, without opposing each other’s enforcement actions. That is the spine.
But the spine is connected to a body.
Forty-plus jurisdictions are participating in the same enforcement wave. Not because one country told them to. Because the network class operates in all of them, and the enforcement architecture reaches all of them.
INTERPOL’s Operation First Light, this year five thousand eight hundred and eleven arrests, two hundred and ninety-three million dollars intercepted, ninety-seven nations, in one operation running January through April.
And here is the detail nobody reports. INTERPOL has run First Light since 2014. It is funded by China’s Ministry of Public Security. With support from ASEANAPOL, the Gulf Cooperation Council police organization, and Europol.
Read that again. A Chinese-funded, INTERPOL-coordinated operation producing arrests in ninety-seven countries including the United States. Beijing pays for it. Brussels supports it. Riyadh participates. Washington participates.
You are told these countries are on the brink of war with each other. They are co-funding the same police operation.
The extended cooperation arc documented in our workbook three hundred and forty agencies, sixty-five countries, four point four billion dollars in lifetime frozen assets.
And here’s the cleanest single sequence in the entire workbook. One organization Cartel Jalisco Nueva Generación. Eleven separate enforcement actions. Nine different sovereign governments. Seven agencies. Six distinct legal instruments. Eighteen months. Nobody announced a joint task force. Nine sovereigns hit the same organization anyway.
The European Union and United Kingdom issuing joint sanctions against thirty-three Russian FSB cyber targets in a single coordinated action. The United States and United Kingdom publishing joint enforcement guidance for the first time. The United States and Saudi Arabia jointly sanctioning Hezbollah financial networks. Canada and the United States dismantling Punjab-based transnational crime syndicates together. Australia sentencing Sam Gor network leaders to fifteen years.
Twenty-plus bilateral deals signed since April 2025 not trade deals. Enrollment deals. Each one contains enforcement cooperation provisions, anti-money-laundering requirements, intelligence-sharing architecture. Jordan. Vietnam. South Korea. Japan. The UAE. Each country that signs isn’t just making a trade agreement. It’s joining the enforcement infrastructure.
This is not five countries having a coincidence.
The phrase I use is coordinated capacity, not central command. Nobody is running a war room telling forty countries what to do on Tuesday. What is happening is that forty-plus countries independently possess the same enforcement tools, face the same network class embedded in their own institutions, and are activating against that network on timelines that converge because the network itself is global, and the cleanup has to be global to work.
You cannot clean a house by sweeping one room if the dirt tracks through every hallway. You sweep every room. At the same time. Or the dirt just moves.
In the last eighteen months alone:
Six Latin American criminal organizations designated as Foreign Terrorist Organizations with the first financial network sanctions hitting within thirty-five days of designation. A Mexican cartel co-founder sentenced to life with a fifteen billion dollar forfeiture the largest in American history. A trade statute from 1930 used for the first time in ninety-six years with the required commission re-stacked three days before the weapon was fired. Spain’s largest hotel chain pulling thirty-four properties out of Cuba in a single week because sanctions made it impossible to operate. Crypto exchanges having their cloud servers seized.
China running purges through six separate institutional domains the energy sector, the securities regulator, the defense establishment, the Politburo itself, a transnational laundering conglomerate, and finally the national banking regulator. Saudi Arabia arresting two hundred and ninety government officials in two months. India raiding money laundering operations across multiple states. Russia purging its own oligarchs.
And in the spring of 2023 five financial institutions failed in eight weeks. Silvergate. Silicon Valley Bank. Signature. Credit Suisse. First Republic. Every one of them a bridge between the old rails and the new ones. Some paid fines and rebuilt their compliance function and survived. Some didn’t survive. That is not a banking crisis. That is a sorting mechanism.
Every action follows the same construction schedule. Build the legal tool. Staff the institution. Fire the weapon. In that order. Every time.
EXHIBIT E The system was designed to survive its own disruption.
The United States maintains an active, continuously funded, heavily classified continuity of government architecture. Raven Rock Mountain Complex is a strategic battle-command platform their words, not mine undergoing forty-two million dollars in classified modernization right now. The FY2027 budget request for Raven Rock continuity equipment is explicitly classified.
The Emergency Federal Register maintained at a continuity facility in West Virginia ensures the government can continue publishing legally effective orders even if Washington is destroyed. Presidential Emergency Action Documents pre-drafted classified executive orders sitting ready to sign have existed since the Cold War. As of 2017, there were reportedly fifty-six in effect. None has ever been declassified.
And on June 23, 2026 eleven weeks ago the White House published the America-First Resilience Strategy. It calls for distributed command and control across regions of the United States, secure networked communications, and continuity of the economy during disruption by preserving payments, liquidity, and trusted information flows.
Distributed command. Financial continuity. Payments. Liquidity. On the same page. From the White House.
EXHIBIT F The receipts arrive on a schedule.
Every OFAC sanctions notice in the Federal Register contains two dates. The date the action was issued and the date it was published. They are never the same. The action always comes first.
The publication comes days or weeks later. This is printed on every notice. In plain English. The government is telling you on its own letterhead that the enforcement happened before you read about it.
The banks were already notified. The assets were already frozen. The target was already cut off. By the time the Federal Register publishes the notice, the operation is complete. The publication is the government telling the public what it already did.
Everything you read in the news is the last chapter of a story that started years ago.
EXHIBIT G Now here’s what cuts against me.
I told you I’d show you this part.
In the last several weeks, four things happened that my framework did not predict and cannot easily absorb.
One. The beneficial ownership reporting requirement the rule that was going to force every American shell company to disclose who actually owns it was permanently eliminated for domestic companies. That was the single most important transparency rail in the entire architecture. It’s gone. Foreign-owned entities still have to report. American ones don’t.
Two. Enforcement of Russian sanctions evasion went quiet for seventeen months, then resumed. Seventeen months.
Three. Ahead of a summit in Alaska, sanctions were suspended by emergency authority. Not lapsed. Suspended. Deliberately.
All four of those happened while the same Treasury Department levied a record anti-money-laundering penalty against UBS, designated Iranian exchanges, and the Justice Department stood up a five-hundred-prosecutor fraud division.
Same government. Same Treasury. Same Secretary. Same week.
There are two honest ways to read that, and I cannot falsify either one. The first reading is that this is a sorting mechanism operating by design. Enforcement expands against the network while supervision of ordinary business contracts. Front door opens, back door closes. Deliberate.
The second reading is simpler. It’s one administration with contradictory policies, doing two incompatible things at once because different people are running different pieces.
I don’t know which is true. Neither does anybody else who’s honest about it. Both survive the evidence.
And Russia is the hardest case in the whole workbook. Russia purges its own oligarchs and receives sanctions accommodation in the same quarter. It is not cleanly activated. It is not cleanly accommodated. It is both, simultaneously, and I have watched the same waiver lapse and reissue twice now on a pattern I can document but cannot explain.
Nine years of tracking. Zero predictions falsified. And I want to be very direct with you about that number.
Zero falsifications is not a victory. It’s a warning. A framework that never gets anything wrong is usually a framework that isn’t specific enough to be wrong. That’s why I write down, in advance, with hard dates, exactly what would prove me wrong. And that’s why I’m reading you the four counter-signals instead of the four confirmations I could have picked instead.
THE QUESTION I’M ASKING YOU TO ANSWER
I’m not asking you to believe that a secret government is running the world from a bunker. I’m not asking you to believe in any conspiracy. I’m asking you to look at what the government itself has documented, published, and funded and ask yourself one question:
Does what you’re watching on the news make more sense now?
Does the timing make more sense? Does the sequencing make more sense? Does a Chinese-funded INTERPOL operation arresting people in ninety-seven countries make more sense? Does nine sovereigns hitting the same cartel in eighteen months make more sense? Does the pattern build the tool, staff the institution, fire the weapon, every single time make more sense?
The machine was built after 9/11. The authorities that matter were stacked and never released. The intelligence was gathered for years while the networks operated. The map was drawn. The deals were made. The cooperators were turned. And then, starting in December 2017 and running every year since, the enforcement wave began.
Not in one country. In all of them.
Not against one target. Against the entire network class.
Not with one tool. With every legal authority accumulated over twenty-five years, stacked on top of each other, all active simultaneously, deployed through a system designed to survive anything.
Here’s what I will not tell you.
I will not tell you it’s finished. I will not tell you the good guys won. I will not tell you there’s a date on the calendar when the curtain comes down and everything is made right in a single morning.
That’s not the shape of this thing. This isn’t a flood. It’s an actuarial table. Slow. Distributed. Only legible in aggregate, and only in hindsight. Six hundred and thirty events don’t feel like anything on any given Tuesday. Stacked on one timeline across nine years and forty jurisdictions, they look like something being built.
And it is still being built. Some floors are going up. One of them just came down.
What you are watching right now, today, on your phone, in your newsfeed is not the investigation.
It’s the receipts.
They spent twenty-five years building a machine that can follow every dollar on earth, freeze any account, cut off any bank, designate any target, seize any asset, survive any disruption, and coordinate across more than forty nations.
And now they’re using it.
Whether they use all of it, on everyone, is the part I’m still watching. So should you.
I am the guy on the couch, and you have been debriefed.
🤔Too many different systems keep moving in the same direction at the same time.
The simple version is: 👉Cartel bosses get arrested while major financial/crypto cases hit in the same windows. 👉Authorities often watch networks for years before acting. 👉Old crimes are producing… pic.twitter.com/USCoKl6NwI
The easiest way to explain our whole argument on a show is:
“I’m not saying every event has one hidden commander. I’m saying the same pattern keeps repeating: get the data, map the network, close the money routes, arrest the people, seize the assets, then harden the system so they can’t rebuild.”
And our strongest question to a skeptic is: “If this is all random and unrelated, why do the arrests, seizures, financial restrictions and infrastructure changes keep landing in the same periods and pushing toward the same result?”
I am The Guy on The Couch and you have been Debriefed
Market Report 9-9-2026: Putting the Kids to Bed…
It's after Labor Day, yes oil is $100/bbl, bond markets continue to fall, and equity markets are confused. The Old World is changing right before our eyes and the guardians of that Old World are angry because well, it's their…
Tom Luongo on X: “Market Report 9-9-2026: Putting the Kids to Bed… It’s after Labor Day, yes oil is $100/bbl, bond markets continue to fall, and equity markets are confused. The Old World is changing right before our eyes and the guardians of that Old World are angry because well, it’s their world. The New World is coming.
In order to do that the status quo of global funding of the financial system has to change to reflect the needs and desires of this New World. That means more than just a complete remodeling of the kitchen, it means rewiring and replumbing the house itself.
The bond and currency markets are telling you who is winning this battle. But to see it you have to see the world the way they do, through the carry trades, the sovereign bond spreads, and the cost of maintaining them. Central banks have the ability to create unlimited money, until someone takes away their credit card.
That is what is happening in Europe and the UK as I type this. The problem is they have subsidiaries all over the world and they have to be knocked out, flipped, or neutered before you can go for the source.
The key to this week is in the EUR/JPY cross and how it relates to the bond market yields you see on your screens.
The old financial system is a powder keg and Scott Bessent just lit the fuse. As Tom Cruise would say, “Cue the music…” https://t.co/QiQzpbSYYq“
To understand what is going on, you have to know what the Carry Trade is.
A carry trade is any strategy where an investor borrows capital at a lower interest rate to invest in assets with potentially higher returns. It’s best known for its use in foreign exchange (forex or FX) markets, where traders borrow in a low-interest rate currency and invest in higher-yielding assets denominated in another currency.1 Traders can profit from the spread during stable markets, but a market shift can quickly erode their profits.
🚨 BREAKING: In a MASSIVE move, Treasury Sec. Scott Bessent has just GROUNDED Iranian airlines with devastating new sanctions
36 targets were just SEVERED.
Bessent is also launching a pressure campaign for banks to report procurement networks supporting Iran’s aviation industry… pic.twitter.com/z5S03dg8u6
🚨 BREAKING: In a MASSIVE move, Treasury Sec. Scott Bessent has just GROUNDED Iranian airlines with devastating new sanctions 36 targets were just SEVRED.
Bessent is also launching a pressure campaign for banks to report procurement networks supporting Iran’s aviation industry 🔥
This man is on a CRUSADE against Iran…he’s not letting up! WE LOVE BESSENT 🇺🇸
“Sanctions on companies that continue to support Mahan Air. Let this be a warning to anyone doing business with Iran’s remaining airlines, all of which we sanctioned today: You are at risk of being cut off from the global financial system.”
27 airlines were specifically designated. It’s getting worse for them every single day.
Do not underestimate Scott Bessent, Iran!
They Can’t Win the United Kingdom; So, They’re Dismantling It (12 minutes)
Barbara Boyd: Today, the first ministers of Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland are meeting to plan the breakup of the United Kingdom. They claim they are seeking independence. If you know the crimes committed by the UK in recent history, you might be tempted to think this is a very good thing, but it’s not. It’s part of a secret plan for defeating the United States and Donald Trump in the November midterm elections by creating massive instability and turmoil worldwide through psy-war propaganda, economic manipulation, and proxy wars.
The plan also involves Canada joining the EU. Donald Trump is very aware of this goal and he is shooting back. So, the first question we’ll address is who is being dismantled here? Then we’ll show you more of their secret plan. We’ll end by showing you the Trump card President Trump holds.
Now, last week, the nationalist AFD shocked the EU by an overwhelming victory in provincial elections in Germany. And recent coverage says that the nationalist Maria La Pen is leading the race to replace Francis Emanuel Mcronone. In the UK, recent polls say the nationalist and pro-Brexit reform UK would win if Labor Prime Minister Andy Burnham calls a new election. This is mostly because of the UK’s open borders policy and its horrendous economy. But it’s also because Burnham and the Labor Party are openly betraying Brexit and seeking to rejoin the EU.
Here’s President Trump yesterday in Ireland criticizing the absurd EU arrangement where Scotland gets its oil from Norway at very high prices while leaving one of the world’s richest oil deposits in the North Sea completely untouched.
TRUMP: The capital of European oil was in Aberdine. Aberdine was an unbelievable capital and it could be again. But they said if they open up the North Sea, the UK is going to be rich. If they don’t open up the North Sea, the UK is bankrupt. Thank you everybody.
Barbara Boyd: It’s untouched because Scotland and the EU remain committed to the insane policy of net zero and to the City of London, which makes his money on speculating on oil and other commodities, not by producing them. Now, President Trump is only stating the stark reality. He was also stating what most people in England think, not what their overlords tell them about reality.
The reform poverty has long campaigned against the EU and Labor Party net zero energy policies. The Conservative Party agrees that these policies are bankrupting Britain, which has been in an economic crisis ever since 2008. Knowing that England is lost and its votes outweigh the other three countries of the UK, the EU and Labor Party are trying to change who will determine Europe’s future by moving the center of the empire to Brussels. England and Wales were solidly for leave in the 2016 Brexit referendum. Wales has now joined Scotland and North Ireland in wanting EU membership. Otherwise, the populations of Europe and England are anti-EU, anti-NET zero, and anti- Ukraine war. But England won’t matter if you move the votes that govern Europe’s northern flank into three separate capitals that will only answer to Brussels.
You don’t need to win England if England stops being the unit that decides.
Now, President Trump threw a political bomb at this process in Ireland over the weekend when he suggested that the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland unite again, producing joy in Irish nationalists.
But putting the three countries in the EU isn’t even the whole story here. What this is about only becomes clearer if you look at Mark Carney’s lunatic actions over the last week about Ukraine, the EU, and the United States…My friend Tom Lango put this image at the front of his newsletter this week. He’s talking about the 100-year partnership between Canada and Ukraine announced by Mark Carney and Vladimir Zuinski in Alberta on September 10th. It was an in your-face rejection of President Trump’s efforts to bring the Ukraine war to a peaceful end. The partnership agreement states that Ukraine’s path to membership in NATO is irreversible. It pledges to immediately turn Canada into a drone factory for war with Russia.
The Trump administration knows that the Biden administration’s support for Ukraine’s NATO membership is what started the Ukraine war. It is the redest of red lines for the Russians. President Trump rejects it because he knows this. Does Canada have the physical capacity to do what Carney says? In his joint press conference with Zillinski, here’s how Carney described Canada’s present production capabilities. He knows the whole thing is a very bad joke.
And now, as Canada undertakes our largest defense rearmament in 70 years, drones will be at the forefront of our mission to build Canada strong, Canada safe, Canada secure. Mr. President, I have to confess that our armed forces currently have but 2,000 drones in our infantry.
Thinking that Canada can somehow immediately become a massive drone factory from the start and without any United States support left me asking whether Silinski shared his stash with Carney during the visit.
That’s not all Carney is doing. On Thursday, he goes to Europe to explore an associate membership for Canada in the EU, according to the Wall Street Journal. Creating an enemy on the northern border is the clear intent. [ An OBVIOUS enemy, unlike the hidden enemy during the last 250 years -GC] The journal piece talks about Canada laying underwater cables to link Europe and Canada and jointly constructing data centers, cloud storage, and new satellite networks beyond the reach of American tech giants. Carney wants to lay the pipelines Canada needs to redirect gas normally pumped across the US border to his new European allies. As soon as the article was published, Canadians and others push back so hard that Carney now says he’s not fully giving up Canada sovereignty for EU membership, just parts of it.
Obviously, the EU in its present dilapidated and failing state is never going to replace the massive and growing US economy as a viable trade partner. But reality is not what we’re talking about here. All of these moves are moves directed at Donald Trump and the midterms. They might be called militarized fantasies and delusions. Carney’s industry minister, Mélanie Joly, admits it openly. Just listen to her.
[Mélanie Jolyhas a degree in law from Université de Montréal (2001) & a masters in Public Law from Oxford (UK) NO BUSINESS TRAINING OR EXPERIENCE! — GC ]
Interviewer: I guess what I’m driving at is it’s not a coincidence that you’ve picked some products that are major exports from some US states that will be critical in deciding the balance of power in Washington. Is that fair to say?
Mélanie Joly: We are putting pressure clearly on different states and different people. We don’t want to do that. We don’t want this trade war. We didn’t start it. Um we’ve been at the negotiation table until the very last minute. The prime minister had to make a call at 10:00 on Friday night to leave the negotiating table because of new demands at a time where he thought he had a deal. So this is serious. And so that is why of course we don’t want to do this but we have to do this because it’s a question of protecting jobs and our economy.
Barbara Boyd: The other part of this crazy joint EU Canada anti-US campaign is financial. The European Central Banks raised interest rates last week despite the fact that it’ll hurt their own failing economies. They did it to pressure the Fed to raise rates this week and stall the Trump economy’s momentum. These guys are also behind the run on the bond market despite the fact that there are no weaknesses in US treasuries. Treasury Secretary Bessent laid out the strength of our treasuries and the total lack of substance behind the propaganda about them in an interview with Steve Bannon’s War Room last week. He said it was a bunch of noise. Let’s hear him.
Treasury Secretary Bessent: It’s a bunch of noise and in my career I’ve made money ignoring the noise.
Barbara Boyd: But that noise is designed to create an artificial financial panic to be blamed on Trump.
Now, there’s every reason to believe that this destructive plot was cooked up back in May when Barack Obama, Senator Elise Slotkin, and a host of other prominent Democrats met with Carney to discuss how to stop Trump. And Trump is very aware that the campaign against him is being heavily run by the Democratic Party’s foreign masters. Take for example diesel which is at the center of the energy inflation right now. Twice this weekend Trump said he told Zelenskyy to stop hitting Russia diesel refineries which are having a massive impact on world supply. Russia is second to the United States in supplying diesel to the world. Here is President Trump last night.
POTUS Trump: The problem I have with Ukraine and Russia is that you know a lot of the diesel comes, the diesel oil comes, and that’s the one where there’s a a big up, [it] comes from Russia and the Russia plants are being hit by Ukraine and I’ve asked President Zelenskyy not to hit the diesel plants refineries.
Reporter: Is it potentially that Ukraine war could end
POTUS Trump: The diesel is being driven up by the fact that It’s [Diesel is] having a hard time coming out of Russia and that’s a case that hurts the world. We got to stop it [The war].
Barbara Boyd: So Ukraine’s bombs are being used to feed the Democrats quote affordability crisis claims against the president here. In the past few weeks, NATO has also become increasingly provocative in staging false flag security incidents throughout Europe and blaming them on Russia. The false claims include claims that Russia tried to drone attack President Zelenskyy ‘s plane and Boris Johnson’s train traveling through Poland. The reality is that precision proximity strikes near the plane and the train were warning shots from Russia. On the battlefield, Ukraine is losing the war. But President Putin said over the weekend that now the Europeans are contemplating sending European troops to Ukraine. If that happens, it will mean war with Europe. Putin underlined that. But as usual, President Trump has an ace up his sleeve that these idiots can’t even believe would be there.
That’s his relationship with President Xi and Modi, who together with the US and Japan constitute the most productive economies in the world. They are collaborating to prevent war, stabilize the financial system, and build the overwhelmingly productive physical economy, which will vanquish the weak and failing globalists. So when people say this election will determine the fate of the republic, and we’re in a war, they’re not exaggerating. The target in this war is the minds of the US population since the enemy lacks the physical means to really fight. It’s a war in which Tucker Carlson, the doom scrollers, and the financial speculators are the soldiers on the other side. And it’s a war we’re determined to win decisively.
A couple more interesting videos on similar subjects.
Trump’s Treasury Just CUT OFF London’s Offshore Banks – No Sanctions Needed (41 minutes)
Canada Is Now The Cartel’s Front Door Into America (43 minutes)
IRGC IN CANADA: Sam Cooper Reveals a National Security Threat Hiding in Plain Sight (27 minutes)
I wanted to document the hidden war that is now being fought. It is literally a second American Revolution and most American’s are completely oblivious to the fact their future and that of their descendants is now being decided. Our would be future owners are not about to give up without a fight. To those paying attention, it is obvious that Canada has been ‘Activated.’ That is why a City of London Bankster, Mark Carney, was installed in Canada.
There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.
Do not forget to LABEL AI articles video and such.
In talking about scientific fraud, I wanted to provide as much information as possible in the hope that the overwhelming amount might encourage people to stop and think before blindly following the recommendations of a drug salesman aka doctor.
And then more information showed up so I am going to include that.
What I found significant is:
US scientists are significantly more likely to publish fake research than scientists from elsewhere, finds a trawl of officially withdrawn (retracted) studies.
Because we were intentionally targeted. The Brits never gave up their desire to retake the USA.
Despite all the hype about slavery, if you look you can see the fine Italian hand of the Brits and French who were hoping to grab the USA after the ‘colonials’ had exhausted themselves fighting each other. When they were about to make their move the Czar of Russia warned he would attack on behalf of the Americans, thwarting their plans. My reference for that bit of info is long gone but there is this.
…Russian and American interests quickly coalesced around the prevention of French and British interference in the Civil War. The British decision to recognize the belligerency of the Confederacy by declaring neutrality in May 1861 opened the possibility of recognition of the Confederate States of America as an independent nation. “England will take advantage of the first opportunity to recognize seceded states,” Stoeckl warned, “and France will follow her.”…
Czar Alexander-II
After the American Civil War you had the assassinations of Lincoln (April 14, 1865) and the Czar of Russia ( March 13, 1881) Both can be traced to British influence. In 1913 we had a covert overthrow of our government (Federal Reserve Act) and in 1917 the Russian Revolution facilitated by the same bankers. Meanwhile in the middle of all of this the Fabian Society was founded on 4 January 1884 in London. A decade later in 1895 the Fabian Society founded the London School of Economics which has been training world leaders ever since. John Dewey – “father” of progressive education was a member of the American Fabian Society. And helped establish it in 1895.
At that point the switch was made to a gradual destruction of the USA instead of a frontal assault.
I am often asked to name those educators responsible for the change in primary reading instruction which has led to the decline of literacy in America. People ask this because by the time they understand the history of the reading problem and of the dumbing down process that has been going on in our public schools for the past forty years, they recognize that all of this is not the result of a series of accidents but of conscious, deliberate decisions made by our educational leaders.
After twenty-five years of research, I can state with complete confidence that the prime mover in all of this was none other than John Dewey who is usually characterized as the father of progressive education. Yet the change of the teaching of reading is probably Dewey’s greatest contribution to the tranformation of American education from an academically oriented process to a social one.
The progressives were a new breed of educator that came on the scene around the turn of the century. These rejected the religion of the Bible and placed their new faith in science, evolution and psychology. Indeed, men like G. Stanley Hall, James McKeen Cattell, Charles Judd, James Earl Russell traveled to Germany to study the new psychology under Prof. Wilhelm Wundt at the University of Leipzig. It was these men who later imposed the new psychology on American education and transformed it permanently from its academic function to one dedicated to behavioral change.
John Dewey got his education in the new psychology under G. Stanley Hall at John Hopkins University. In 1887, at the tender age of 28, Dewey felt that he knew enough about psychology to be able to write a textbook on the subject, entitled fittingly Psychology. In 1894, Dewey was appointed head of the department of philosophy, psychology and education at the University of Chicago which had been established two years earlier by a gift from John D. Rockefeller. In 1896, Dewey created his famous experimental Laboratory School where he could test the effects of the new psychology on real live children.
Dewey’s philosophy had evolved from Hegelian idealism to socialist materialism, and the purpose of the school was to show how education could be changed to produce little socialists and collectivists instead of little capitalists and individualists. It was expected that these little socialists, when they became voting adults, would dutifully change the American economic system into a socialist one.
In order to do so he analyzed the traditional curriculum that sustained the capitalist, individualistic system and found what he believed was the sustaining linchpin — that is, the key element that held the entire system together: high literacy. To Dewey, the greatest obstacle to socialism was the private mind that seeks knowledge in order to exercise its own private judgment and intellectual authority. High literacy gave the individual the means to seek knowledge independently. It gave individuals the means to stand on their own two feet and think for themselves. This was detrimental to the “social spirit” needed to bring about a collectivist society…
The rest of that article is even more damning. Our education system was deliberately poisoned by the Fabians.
Antonio Gramscitook over where John Dewey left off. (H/T to the Q-treeper that brought this to the tree.)
In 1924, it was created as part of Frankfort University, the Institute for Social Research. One of its founders was Max Horkheimer and its director since 1930. They will also be part of this group thinkers such as Adorno, Marcuse and Erich Fromm (who will then distance himself from the school).
The Nazi persecution in 1934 resulted in the transfer of the Institute to Columbia University in New York (Horkheimer, Marcuse and Fromm were of Jewish origin) and although some of its members would return to Frankfort at the end of the war, others, such as Marcuse, will choose to stay in the USA. In this second stage, it will be its directors Adorno and Habermas, who will be the main representative of the school from 1956.
The Institute for Social Research emerges in a clear Marxist line…
The Frankfurt School adopted an interdisciplinary persepective, adding approaches not only from philosophy but also from sociology, psychology, psychoanalysis, Protestant theology and criticism of culture and art. These are, therefore, studies of “social theory”. The works produced by the Frankfort school are known as “Critical Theory”: it is not a system of doctrines but a particular methodological conception.
Antonio Gramsci – The Most Dangerous Intellectual of the Twentieth Century. Not the most famous. Not the most read. The most dangerous and the most consequential – because he was the one who figured out why the revolution kept failing, and what to do instead. The man who invented the long march through the institutions. Everything that followed — the Frankfurt School, the Fabian Society’s operational model, the WEF formation pipeline, the captured university, the HR department enforcing approved speech — is downstream of what he wrote in a prison cell in Mussolini’s Italy, in code, between 1929 and 1935.
1. His central question: why hasn’t it happened? The working class was supposed to rise. The contradictions of capitalism were supposed to produce the revolution. They hadn’t – not in the West. Gramsci’s answer was precise and devastating: because the ruling class does not maintain power through force alone. It maintains power through cultural hegemony – the control of the ideas, values, and frameworks through which people understand the world. The worker who accepts that the existing order is simply how things are will not revolt, regardless of his material conditions. The revolution requires cultural change first.
2. The instrument was the long march through the institutions. Not the barricade. The school, the university, the media, the judiciary, the civil service, the cultural establishment – every institution through which a civilization transmits its values to the next generation. Capture these, fill them with people who share the counter-hegemonic project, and the cultural assumptions that maintain the existing order gradually dissolve. No barricades. No visible moment of rupture. Just the slow replacement of one cultural hegemony with another.
3. The educational capture was the masterpiece. Control the curriculum and you control the categories of thought available to the next generation. Not by telling them what to conclude – by shaping what questions they think to ask, what they consider obvious and what they consider unthinkable. The generation educated after the long march does not need to be told what to think. It thinks what it was formed to think – and experiences that thinking as its own…
And so we have the destruction of the independent thinking mind. Followed by utter crap science such as Global Warming and 72 genders. I kid you not
MedicineNet — How Many Genders Are There? All 72 Genders List“How many genders are there? Besides male and female, here is a list of all 72 other gender identities that a person may belong to. How can I help my child understand gender?” This is actually written by MDs!
From my point of view, I see this as when the government got into using OUR tax dollars to fund THEIR pet projects.
Background Information: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) traces its origins to World War II and the Manhattan Project effort to build the first atomic bomb. As the direct descendent of the Manhattan Engineer District, the organization set up by the Army Corps of Engineers to develop and build the bomb, the Department continues to own and manage the Federal properties at most of the major Manhattan Project sites, including Oak Ridge, Tennessee; Hanford, Washington; and Los Alamos, New Mexico.
In a national survey at the turn of the millennium, both journalists and the public ranked the dropping of the atomic bomb and the end of the Second World War as the top news stories of the twentieth century. The Manhattan Project is the story of some of the most renowned scientists of the century combining with industry, the military, and tens of thousands of ordinary Americans working at sites across the country to translate original scientific discoveries into an entirely new kind of weapon. When the existence of this nationwide, secret project was revealed to the American people following the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, most were astounded to learn that such a far-flung, government-run, top-secret operation existed, with physical properties, payroll, and a labor force comparable to the automotive industry. At its peak, the project employed 130,000 workers and, by the end of the war, had spent $2.2 billion.
The legacy of the Manhattan Project is immense. The advent of nuclear weapons not only helped bring an end to the Second World War but ushered in the atomic age and determined how the next war, the Cold War, would be fought. In addition, the Manhattan Project became the organizational model behind the remarkable achievements of American “big science” during the second half of the twentieth century. Without the Manhattan Project, DOE, with its national laboratories — the jewels in the crown of the nation’s science establishment, would not exist as it does in its present form…
Did you catch that?
In addition, the Manhattan Project became the organizational model behind the remarkable achievements of American “big science” during the second half of the twentieth century. Without the Manhattan Project, DOE, with its national laboratories — the jewels in the crown of the nation’s science establishment, would not exist as it does in its present form.
(Remember the Frankfurt School moved to Columbia University.)
Universities have come to rely on federal funding to support scientific and medical research. How did we get here?…
Columbia history professor Alma Steingart ’06GS recently provided some answers. From her office in Fayerweather Hall, Steingart, who studies how mathematical thought and computer technology have influenced US electoral politics, explained that government science funding as we know it began in the mid-twentieth century. Before World War II, she said, research money at universities came primarily from donors and private foundations; but during the war, the US Office of Scientific Research and Development (OSRD) began funding research aimed at gaining military advantage. The development of the atomic bomb, known as the Manhattan Project, in which Columbia physicists played a key role, was one major investment.
After the war, Vannevar Bush ’47HON, the former dean of MIT’s engineering school and the head of OSRD, called on the US to fund basic research in the physical and medical sciences in order to ensure American strength and progress. “There was a realization that there was no going back to the previous model,” said Steingart. “The debate was whether federal funds should be used for basic science or applied science. Many scientists felt that developing science around particular goals was limiting, and Bush successfully made the case that it was basic research that led to discoveries and applications that would help the country.”Bush’s advocacy led to the creation of the National Science Foundation (NSF) in 1950.
Then, in 1957, the Soviet Union launched Sputnik, the first artificial satellite. “That was a critical moment,” said Steingart. Within a year, the NSF budget more than tripled, from $40 million to $134 million. Meanwhile, other government agencies, such as the Atomic Energy Commission and the Air Force Scientific Advisory Board, noting that basic science was already being funded, began to direct money toward applied research.
“With the Cold War came the idea that you needed an army of engineers, mathematicians, physicists, and chemists in order to keep pace with the Soviet Union,” Steingart said. “Remember, the NSF doesn’t just fund research. It also funds postdoctoral fellowships and PhD fellowships. And so in the 1960s, the number of PhDs greatly expanded — which meant that universities expanded, and so did their expenditures.”…
This handout was created for the AHA’s December 11, 2025, Congressional Briefing on the history of federal science funding. Panelists Melinda Baldwin (Univ. of Maryland), Arthur Daemmrich (Arizona State Univ.), and Bhaven Sampat (Johns Hopkins Univ.) discussed the history of the federal government’s approach toward science in public policy, and how the government has supported and funded scientific research and innovation over time.
1790–1900: Building Practical Science and National Capacity
1790 – Congress passes the first US patent act, encouraging invention and creating a new system of intellectual property.
1803 – Congress funds the Lewis & Clark expedition, which maps the West, identifies plant and animal species, and describes unique geologic formations.
1807 – The US Coast Survey becomes the first civilian scientific agency, supporting navigation and defense.
1843 – Congress funds Samuel Morse’s telegraph demonstration line through a $30,000 appropriation, helping launch US telecommunications.
1846 – Congress establishes the Smithsonian Institution as a public-private partnership. It quickly becomes a center for research and public science and later evolves into a museum complex.
1840s–90s – Scientific associations including the American Association for Advancement of Science (AAAS), the American Chemical Society (ACS), and the Geological Society of American (GSA) are founded, strengthening the nation’s scientific community… [Continues with a long list –GC]
Note during the early years it is CONGRESS funding specific projects. Now that duty is handed off to bureaucrats along with buckets of cash.
American Historical Association Congressional Briefing: History of Federal Science Funding (1 hour)
…
Sep 24, 2019
“Evidence-based medicine is actually so corrupt as to be useless or harmful,” Marcia Angell wrote in 2009. The statement was less a revelation than something many already knew, but it made waves because of its source. Angell, a medical insider, had spent two decades as the editor-in-chief of the New England Journal of Medicine.
Dr. Jason Fung is also a medical insider who has become wary of scientific research that purports to be “evidence based.” A well-known nephrologist and author, Fung often speaks about Type-2 diabetes reversal and the metabolic effects of intermittent fasting, but in this presentation from Dec. 15, 2018, he turns his focus toward the many ways the foundations of evidence-based medicine have become corrupted by financial conflicts of interest. The first conflicts of interest he highlights pertain to the corruption of doctors. Practicing physicians who accept gifts from Big Pharma are 225-335% more likely to prescribe drugs from the gift-giving company than those who do not, Fung explains.
The corruption of doctors in prestigious universities is even worse, he claims. “There’s a clear correlation: The more prestigious a doctor, the more money they’re getting from the pharmaceutical.” Anecdotally, he says, this means you may be better off seeking medical advice from a family physician than from a Harvard professor; the former probably just accepted a $10 pen from Big Pharma while the latter is on the take for $500,000. “It just is a terrible system,” he says. “Yet, these people are the people that are in the newspaper. They’re the ones that are teaching medical students, are the ones who are teaching the — the dietitians, the pharmacist — everybody.” The most insidious corruption affects the published research on particular drugs. Fung highlights the influence industry can have when it finds a medical journal editor willing to take its money. Another problem arises in the form of industry-funded medical research.
This conflict of interest leads to the selective publication of positive trials, which can skew the science on particular drugs and lead to unnecessary or even dangerous overprescription. Fung notes how statin prescriptions illustrate the scope of this particular problem. “We accept this of drug companies … but the problem is that people die,” Fung says. He later adds: “You can make arguments that sugar is a health food, that opioids are good for you … but it harms patients, and we always have to remember that at the end of the day, this is not why we became doctors. The reason we became doctors was to help people, but we’re not until we kind of set those same rules as everybody else.” (49 minute video)
Investigators from the Treasury’s Office of the Inspector Generalfound that some of the regulator’s employeessurfed erotic websites, hired prostitutes and accepted gifts from bank executives … instead of actually working to help the economy
The Minerals Management Service – the regulator charged with overseeing BP and other oil companies to ensure that oil spills don’t occur – was riddled with “a culture of substance abuse and promiscuity”, which included “sex with industry contacts”
Agents for the Drug Enforcement Agencyhad dozens of sex parties with prostitutes hired by the drug cartels they were supposed to stop (they also received money, giftsand weapons from drug cartel members)
The former chief accountant for the SEC says thatBernanke and Paulson broke the law and should be prosecuted
The governmentknew about mortgage fraud a long time ago. For example, the FBI warned of an “epidemic” of mortgage fraud in 2004. However, the FBI, DOJ and other government agencies then stood down and did nothing. See this and this. For example, the Federal Reserve turned its cheek and allowed massive fraud, and the SEC has repeatedly ignored accounting fraud. Indeed, Alan Greenspan took the position that fraud could never happen…
And it goes on and on. This is the cesspool President Trump waded into in 2017. With that type of bureaucrat in charge of handing out grants, is it any wonder US science is riddled with fraud?
There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.
Do not forget to LABEL AI articles, video and such.
In talking about scientific fraud, I want to start with a comment made by TheseTruthsLINK.
If you didn’t already have enough reasons to distrust Dr. Anthony Fauci, here’s a new one, and it’s a doozy.
Newly disclosed documents reveal that Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) had a formal institutional partnership with the CIA, one that provided cover for the agency’s biological-threat research. This goes well beyond the previously known off-the-books meetings tied to the Wuhan lab origins controversy. Fauci’s ties to American intelligence run far deeper than anyone outside a handful of investigators realized….
Anthony Stephen Fauci (born December 24, 1940) is an American physician-scientist and immunologist who served as the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) from 1984 to 2022 and as Chief Medical Advisor to the President from 2021 to 2022. He was one of the world’s most frequently cited scientists across all scientific journals from 1983 to 2002.
In 1984 Ronald Reagan was re-elected and his VP was George H. W. Bush of the CIA.
Since the FDA, USDA, EPA and other bureaucracies use ‘The Science ™‘ to validate their regulations I wanted to look at the history of the destruction of science over the last century.
1964 — The Problem-Solving Method They Removed From Every Textbook
In 1964, Richard Feynman was the only person on California’s textbook commission who actually read the textbooks. What he found should have ended careers — publishers sending blank books that still received ratings, first-grade science texts teaching children nothing but empty vocabulary, and an entire system designed to reward memorization over real understanding.This video breaks down Feynman’s forgotten problem-solving framework — the same approach he used to win the Nobel Prize, expose broken education systems from California to Brazil, and coin the term “Cargo Cult Science” in his legendary 1974 Caltech commencement speech.You’ll learn his 12 favorite problems technique (explained by mathematician Gian-Carlo Rota), why estimating before calculating is the single most underrated thinking skill, and how to tell the difference between someone who memorized the answer and someone who actually understands the problem — a distinction that matters more now than ever, because AI can memorize everything, but it can’t think from scratch.
If you’ve ever felt out of step with the system — at school, at work, in a meeting where nobody could answer the question that wasn’t on the slides — this video explains why. And it gives you a method to fix it tonight.🔹 Drop your own “label instead of an explanation” moment in the comments.——————————————————📖
Sources & Further Reading:
“Surely You’re Joking, Mr. Feynman!” — Chapters: “Judging Books by Their Covers” & “O Americano, Outra Vez!” (W.W. Norton, 1985) “What is Science?” — Feynman’s Address to the National Science Teachers Association, 1966 “Cargo Cult Science” — Caltech Commencement Address, 1974 “Genius: The Life and Science of Richard Feynman” — James Gleick (Pantheon, 1992) Gian-Carlo Rota — “Ten Lessons I Wish I Had Been Taught,” Lecture, 1996
I cut the most useful part of Feynman’s method out of this video — it needed pages, not minutes. It’s the test he used to check whether he actually understood something or had only learned its name. Three questions, about 90 seconds, and it fails almost everything most people think they know. That, plus the full 12 Favorite Problems system, is in The Feynman Field Guide to Clear Thinking: https://feynmanarchives.com/
Disclaimer: This video is for educational and informational purposes only. The views expressed are based on publicly available historical sources and the creator’s interpretation. This content does not constitute professional advice in education, career development, or any other field. Always conduct your own research and consult qualified professionals for specific decisions.
Part of the Transcript:
16:37
The reason you always felt out of step with the system is because the system was designed to produce the opposite of you.It produces people who follow the process perfectly right up until reality changes and then they freeze. You’ve seen it in hiring. The candidate with the perfect resume who can’t answer a simple what-if question in the interview. You’ve seen it in leadership. The director who can quote the strategy deck word for word but goes blank when a client throws a curveball.
The system trained them to memorize the runway, not to fly the plane.
Feynman left behind the method the system tried to bury.
— 12 problems always alive.
— Strip every claim down to what you can check.
— Estimate before you calculate.
— Test your understanding by rephrasing the question.
— If you can’t answer it in different words, you never understood it in the first place.
That’s it. That’s what they removed. And now you have it back.
But Feynman’s war on the textbooks exposed something bigger than bad education. He found the same pattern in science, in hiring, in way entire industries collapse when nobody inside them can think from scratch. And when he called it out by name, in front of the most powerful people in the room, they didn’t thank him. [Managed decline anyone? -GC]
The Deal That Reshaped the Market: Maxwell Buys Macmillan and Joins McGraw‑Hill
Robert Maxwell purchased Macmillan Inc. in the late 1980s, a transaction that positioned him as owner of one of the United States’ largest textbook publishers at the time; reporting from the period documents the acquisition and the creation of a joint venture combining Macmillan’s school publishing units with McGraw‑Hill’s to form Macmillan/McGraw‑Hill School Publishing Co. in 1989, a company that became the second‑largest U.S. textbook publisher [1][2]. The joint venture pooled Macmillan imprints like Glencoe and units such as Science Research Associates (SRA) into a single school publishing operation, reflecting Maxwell’s strategy of consolidating academic and educational assets under his Maxwell Communication Corporation umbrella, and contemporary sources note that McGraw‑Hill assumed sole ownership of the joint operation by 1993 after Maxwell’s death, indicating the Maxwell family no longer retained operational control
𝗥𝗼𝗯𝗲𝗿𝘁 𝗠𝗮𝘅𝘄𝗲𝗹𝗹, [𝗚𝗵𝗶𝘀𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗠𝗮𝘅𝘄𝗲𝗹𝗹’𝘀 𝗗𝗮𝗱] 𝘁𝗼𝗼𝗸 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗹 𝗼𝗳 𝗽𝗲𝗲𝗿 𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗶𝗲𝘄𝗲𝗱 𝘀𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲, 𝗺𝗼𝗻𝗲𝘁𝗶𝘇𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝘁 AND DESTROYED IT.
Eye of the Storm Ep. 138 (Badlands)
1:04:20: They show a clip from The Joe Rogan Experience (3 min clip)
ERIC: … Maxwell figured out how to DESTROY SCIENCE and MAKE A FORTUNE. So he diluted the quality of the editorship of the leading journals. This was a high quality informal enterprise. Now most of the destruction of science in terms of how high quality it used to be, has taken place relatively recently. POST ROBERT MAXWELL. Because we now have an enormous number of journals staffed by people who can’t spot publication cartels, where we agree to cite each others work and we agree to publish stuff, you know Pay for Play. ALL the nonsense you see with irreproducible research…
The peer review thing got woven in so that people think that the scientific method and peer review ARE THE SAME THING. Where ONE IS THE UNWANTED INFECTION FROM THE BIOLOGICAL BIOMEDICAL UNIVERSE, which had peer review much longer than anything else…”
From the article:
One of these ideas is what he calls👉the DISC (Distributed Idea Suppression Complex) which explains how disruptive and innovative ideas that challenge the status quo are suppressed.👈 Keeping institutions safe from individuals who create change….
Pergamon Press was an Oxford-based publishing house, founded by Paul Rosbaud and Robert Maxwell, that published scientific and medical books and journals. Originally called Butterworth-Springer, it is now an imprint of Elsevier.
History
The core company, Butterworth-Springer, started in 1948 to bring the “Springer know-how and techniques of aggressive publishing in science”[1] to Britain. Paul Rosbaud was the man with the knowledge. When Maxwell acquired the company in 1951, Rosbaud held a one-quarter share.[1] They changed the house name to Pergamon Press, using a logo that was a reproduction of a Greek coin from Pergamon. Maxwell and Rosbaud worked together growing the company until May 1956, when, according to Joe Haines, Rosbaud was sacked….
Proving that unpaid anonymous review is worth every cent, the 217 year old Wiley science publisher “peer reviewed” 11,300 papers that were fake, and didn’t even notice. It’s not just a scam, it’s an industry. Naked “gobbledygook sandwiches” got past peer review, and the expert reviewers didn’t so much as blink.
Big Government and Big Money has captured science and strangled it. The more money they pour in, the worse it gets. John Wiley and Sons is a US $2 billion dollar machine, but they got used by criminal gangs to launder fake “science” as something real.
Things are so bad, fake scientists pay professional cheating services who use AI to create papers and torture the words so they look “original”. Thus a paper on ‘breast cancer’ becomes a discovery about “bosom peril” and a ‘naïve Bayes’ classifier became a ‘gullible Bayes’. An ant colony was labeled an ‘underground creepy crawly state’.
And what do we make of the flag to clamor ratio? Well, old fashioned scientists might call it ‘signal to noise’. The nonsense never ends….
But this is not really about the recent virus; it goes back a very long time. Scientific fraud — not accident, not error, intentional misrepresentation — has been all over medicine and specifically pharmaceutical trials for decades.
Cuppa
November 2020 — External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results
[I get access denied due to rapid clicks…?? So here is the archived version LINK – GC]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Here are ‘Peer-Reviewed” studies and comments from medical journal editors. My list is so long I am going to cut it in half and put the rest in my next article. However since this type of information has a tendency to disappear, I want it documented.
US scientists are significantly more likely to publish fake research than scientists from elsewhere, finds a trawl of officially withdrawn (retracted) studies.Fraudsters are also more likely to be “repeat offenders,” the study shows.
Summary
There is increasing concern that most current published research findings are false.The probability that a research claim is true may depend on study power and bias, the number of other studies on the same question, and, importantly, the ratio of true to no relationships among the relationships probed in each scientific field. In this framework, a research finding is less likely to be true when the studies conducted in a field are smaller; when effect sizes are smaller; when there is a greater number and lesser preselection of tested relationships; where there is greater flexibility in designs, definitions, outcomes, and analytical modes; when there is greater financial and other interest and prejudice; and when more teams are involved in a scientific field in chase of statistical significance. Simulations show that for most study designs and settings, it is more likely for a research claim to be false than true. Moreover, for many current scientific fields, claimed research findings may often be simply accurate measures of the prevailing bias…..
….A pooled weightedaverage of 1.97%(N = 7, 95%CI: 0.86–4.45) ofscientists admitted to have fabricated, falsified or modified dataor results at least once –a serious form of misconduct by any standard– and up to33.7% admitted other questionable research practices. In surveysasking about the behaviour of colleagues, admission rates were14.12%< (N = 12, 95% CI: 9.91–19.72)for falsification, and up to 72% for other questionable research practices.Meta-regression showed that self reports surveys, surveys using the words “falsification” or “fabrication”, and mailed surveys yielded lower percentages of misconduct. When these factors were controlled for,misconduct was reported more frequently by medical/pharmacological researchers than others.
Considering that these surveys ask sensitive questions and have other limitations, it appears likely that this is a conservative estimate of the true prevalence of scientific misconduct.
As we said in December, an e-patient essential is sorting out what writings to trust, whether we find them online or in print. There’s an important update on this in the New York Timestoday, an interviewwith Marcia Angell MD, an author we’ve quoted before, and her husband Dr. Arnold Relman – both long-time editors of one of the world’s top journals, the New England Journal of Medicine. It contains some eye-poppers.
In 2009, as I was just starting to get educated about healthcare, I posted A Quote I Won’t Soon Forget, which began:
It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.
Dana Blankenhorn of the ZDNet health blog called it “a bombshell.” I couldn’t agree more. And I must say, with all the smart people in this community, why on earth haven’t we heard more about this??
And how on earth are we supposed to be empowered participatory patients if we can’t trust the world’s leading journal?
It echoed Richard Smith, 25 year editor of another top-tier journal (the British Medical Journal), in the first issue of our Journal of Participatory Medicine:
…most of what appears in peer-reviewed journals is scientifically weak.
This is no small issue in the life of an engaged patient. e-Patients who bring googled articles to their office visits are often lambasted or subjected to eye-rolls by clinicians who say that we should only trust academic medical journals. But can we trust them??
We got a rude update on why published science is shaky in our January 2011 post The Decline Effect: most published studies are never replicated by another lab! That’s absurd – heck, in high school I couldn’t get a science experiment passed if it wasn’t reproducible, but our journals do that??….
Every year, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) inspects several hundred clinical sites performing biomedical research on human participants and occasionally finds evidence of substantial departures from good clinical practice and research misconduct. However, the FDA has no systematic method of communicating these findings to the scientific community, leaving open the possibility that research misconduct detected by a government agency goes unremarked in the peer-reviewed literature….
Objectives
To identify published clinical trials in which an FDA inspection found significant evidence of objectionable conditions or practices, to describe violations, and to determine whether the violations are mentioned in the peer-reviewed literature.
Design and Setting
Cross-sectional analysis of publicly available documents, dated from January 1, 1998, to September 30, 2013, describing FDA inspections of clinical trial sites in which significant evidence of objectionable conditions or practices was found.
Results:Fifty-seven published clinical trials were identified for which an FDA inspection of a trial site had found significant evidence of 1 or more of the following problems:
falsification or submission of false information, 22 trials (39%);
problems with adverse events reporting, 14 trials (25%);
protocol violations, 42 trials (74%);
inadequate or inaccurate recordkeeping, 35 trials (61%);
failure to protect the safety of patients and/or issues with oversight or informed consent, 30 trials (53%);
and violations not otherwise categorized, 20 trials (35%).
Only 3 of the 78 publications (4%) that resulted from trials in which the FDA found significant violations mentioned the objectionable conditions or practices found during the inspection. No corrections, retractions, expressions of concern, or other comments acknowledging the key issues identified by the inspection were subsequently published.
Conclusions and Relevance
When the FDA finds significant departures from good clinical practice, those findings are seldom reflected in the peer-reviewed literature, even when there is evidence of data fabrication or other forms of research misconduct.
A decade ago, I wrote in another blog “Blogs are now performing the important tasks of scrutinizing papers and conclusions often finding gross mistakes.” That is probably one of the reasons we were shut up during Covid.
Much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness. As one participant put it, “poor methods get results”. The Academy of Medical Sciences, Medical Research Council, and Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council have now put their reputational weight behind an investigation into these questionable research practices. The apparent endemicity [i.e. pervasiveness within the scientific culture] of bad research behaviour is alarming. In their quest for telling a compelling story, scientists too often sculpt data to fit their preferred theory of the world. Or they retrofit hypotheses to fit their data. Journal editors deserve their fair share of criticism too. We aid and abet the worst behaviours. Our acquiescence to the impact factor fuels an unhealthy competition to win a place in a select few journals. Our love of “significance” pollutes the literature with many a statistical fairy-tale….
Similarly, the editor in chief of the New England Journal of Medicine, Dr. Marcia Angell, wrote in 2009:
(Original Article I quote below has vanished… imagine that!)
….It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine….
In fact, in October 2017, Angell went further – she published an article in the New York Review of books entitled,‘Drug Companies and Doctors: A Story of Corruption.’
This article in The New York Review of Books, by Marcia Angell, details the growing concern over the colonization of the medical profession by pharmaceutical companies
The NY Review article is paywalled. Archived Version can be read.
I am going to stop here and continue next week so you focus on reading the last 3 articles. They are DAMNING especially since Angell, spent two decades as the editor-in-chief of the New England Journal of Medicine.
There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.
Do not forget to LABEL AI articles video and such.
Of interest: Israel Planted a 2,000-Year-Old Seed From an Extinct DatePalmVariety
.
Why isn’t our grant money going into cloning these very valuable trees instead of money going to idiotic stuff like, Shrimp on a treadmill[$1.3 million], Robotic squirrel vs. rattlesnakes[$390,000] and aSmart toilet / “analprint” camera system [$7 million]LINKCancel those three and I would think there is plenty of money for cloning.
A children’s book about these trees is available. The Miracle Seed by Martin Lemelman; Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdman’s Books for Young Readers (c) 2023; ISBN 9780802-855909; 71 pages; $18.99 on Amazon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Since I think this is an important point, I want to continue the discussion about Sama Hoole’s tweet. It is a tweet about colon cancer and establishment lies. After I finished uploading this article I realized these has other major ramifications aside from weakening the serf class. Does Vegan/Vegetarian brain shrinkage and malnutrition contribute to left wing hysteria and lack of critical thinking skills especially in the women?
RFK Jr. pointed at the colon cancer figures in young adults this week, and within about four hours the response had arranged itself into the same two instructions we have been issued since 1982. Eat less red meat. Eat more fibre.
I made a one liner explanation to each part in this comment for Scott. Scott responded but I did not see the responses until the next day. Hence this article since my response is a bit long.
RFK Jr. pointed at the colon cancer figures in young adults this week, and within about four hours the response had arranged itself into the same two instructions we have been issued since 1982. Eat less red meat. Eat more fibre.
Translation: we are getting the same crappy advice as always.
Red meat has a scheduling problem. American beef consumption peaked in 1976 and has fallen by roughly a third since. The generation now being diagnosed at thirty-five ate less of it than any generation of the last century, while early-onset colorectal cancer doubled in two decades. A suspect who has been leaving town for fifty years, still in the dock, still not asked to explain himself.
Translation: It can not be beef because beef consumption has dropped since 1976.
Fibre did worse. They ran it properly, twice, in two countries, thousands of people, years of wheat bran and extra fruit and veg, watching for polyps. The polyps came back at exactly the same rate as in the people eating none of it. Nobody withdrew the advice. Nobody ever does.
Translation: Fibre makes ZERO difference and they have the studies to prove it.
Then last year a team sequenced 981 tumours from eleven countries. Certain E. coli strains make
a toxin called colibactin, which snaps both strands of DNA and leaves a signature so distinctive you can read it off a tumour decades later. In patients diagnosed under forty it turns up 3.3 times more often than in patients over seventy.
Translation: They found the culprit, a toxin called colibactin that snaps strands of DNA.
And they could date it. The mutations were laid down in the first ten years of life. So the damage that produces a tumour at thirty-five was done before that person was old enough to buy anything, choose anything or cook anything. Whatever they had for lunch last Tuesday is not in the frame and never was. Colibactin is also pathetically short lived. It only works on contact. The bacterium has to be physically pressed against the colon lining, and it cannot get there, because the inner mucus layer is a sterile exclusion zone that holds the entire microbiome at arm’s length. Something has to take that barrier down.
Translation: The toxin did it’s dirty work in the 1st ten years of life. However there is a mucus lining that SHOULD prevent the toxin from getting next to the colon lining.
Carboxymethylcellulose. Polysorbate 80. Industrial detergents, filed under emulsifiers, because emulsifier sounds like something a chef does. They are in the ice cream, the bread, the sauces, the protein bars and most of what gets handed to a child. Feed carboxymethylcellulose to healthy adults under supervision and you can watch their bacteria move in and take up residence against the wall.
The toxin is thousands of years old. The barrier it has to get through is the thing that changed, it is on the label, and everybody in this argument is busy discussing a steak.
Translation: It is Polysorbate 80, a detergent/emulsifier, a common ingredient in processed food that lets the toxin get pass the mucus barrier and cause cancer.
AND it is NOT being banned from food.
…..
In one reply to my comment Scott said:
I had no idea what that meant. If the suspected cause of colorectal cancer is beef, and beef consumption has been dropping for 50 years (leaving town), the rest of it I’m not sure about.
If beef is ‘in the dock’, that seems like a court/trial reference, so beef is on trial, but not asked to explain himself?
What is there for beef (the suspect) to explain, if beef isn’t the cause of colorectal cancer?
It’s just confusing (to me!).
I did not realize that Scott was unaware of the constant targeting of beef by the Cabal.
A couple decades ago the Fake News was screaming Red Meat causes cancer!! Then they said Cow Farts (belches) cause Global Warming!!!
The media and blogosphere are abuzz with the latest report from the WHO, which classified cured and processed meats as carcinogens and put them in the same category as asbestos, alcohol, arsenic, and tobacco. But what does the research really tell us about the link between red meat and cancer?
Well, here we go again. Each year, like clockwork, the conventional medical establishment mounts an attack against red meat.
For decades, we were told not to eat it because of the cholesterol and saturated fat it contains. When that argument became less convincing, a new one was offered: we shouldn’t eat red meat because it increases production of a compound called TMAO, which causes heart attacks.
Now we’re being told not to eat red meat—and especially cured and processed meat—because it will give us cancer. In a recent report, the World Health Organization (WHO) ranked bacon, sausage, and other cured and processed meats as “group 1 carcinogens,” which puts them in the same category as tobacco, asbestos, alcohol, and arsenic. It also placed fresh red meat in the “group 2A” category, which suggests that it is “probably carcinogenic” to humans.
Of course, this isn’t a new argument; it’s been around for at least 40 years. As far back as 1975, scientists speculated that the consumption of animal products was linked to cancer. (1)
Note that it is again the magic 1970s decade.
So WHY the targeting? Because a large, Strong, SMART serf class is NOT what the Globalists wantfor their New World Order.
There is overwhelming evidence that we can not be a vegetarian species. In 1972 the publication of two independent investigations confirmed this.[1] [2] They concerned fats. About half our brain and nervous system is composed of complicated, long-chain, fatty acids. These are also used in the walls of our blood vessels. Without them we cannot develop normally. These fatty acids do not occur in plants, although fatty acids in a simpler form do. This is where plant-eating herbivores come in. Over the year, the herbivores convert the simple fatty acids found in grasses and seeds into intermediate, more complicated forms. By eating the herbivores we can convert their stores of these fatty acids into the ones we need…
[long discussion]
Using tests and brain scans on community-dwelling volunteers aged 61 to 87 years without cognitive impairment at enrolment, they measured the size of the participants’ brains. When the volunteers were retested five years later the scientists found those with the lowest levels of vitamin B12 intake were the most likely to have brain shrinkage. Not surprisingly, vegans who eschew all foods of animal origin, suffered the most brain shrinkage. This confirms earlier research showing a link between brain atrophy and low levels of B12.
Vegans are the most likely to be deficient because the best sources of the vitamin are meat, particularly liver, milk and fish.
Confirmation of this was provided the following year by another study by the Oxford Project to Investigate Memory and Ageing, the Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, UK.[19] Noting that vitamin B-12 deficiency is often associated with cognitive deficits, they reviewed evidence that cognition in the elderly may also be adversely affected at concentrations of vitamin B-12 above the traditional cutoffs for deficiency. Their suggestion is that the elderly in particular should be encouraged to maintain a good, rather than just an adequate, vitamin B-12 status by dietary means.
Conclusion
It is obvious that we need to be eating more, not less, meat and animal-sourced foods.
If vegetarians — and vegans in particular — berate you for ‘murdering’ and eating animals, please be kind to them. They are almost certainly suffering from self-inflicted brain atrophy, and have little recognition of both the damage they are doing to themselves and the harm that are doing to others who follow their advice.
References
[1]. Crawford M, Crawford S. The Food We Eat Today. Spearman, London, 1972.
[2]. Leopold AC, Ardrey R. Toxic Substances in Plants and Food Habits of Early Man. Science 1972; 176(34): 512-4.
[3]. McHenry HM. How big were early hominids? Evol Anthropol 1992; 1: 15-20.
[4]. Stefansson V. The fat of the land. MacMillan, New York, 1960. 15-39.
[5]. Sinclair AJ. Long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids in mammalian brain. Proc Nutr Soc 1975; 34: 287-91.
[6]. Crawford MA, Cunnane SC, Harbige LS. A new theory of evolution: quantum theory. In: Sinclair A, Gibson R, eds. Essential fatty acids and eicosanoids. American Oil Chemists Society, Champlaign, Ill, 1992. 87-95.
[7]. Leonard WR, Robertson ML. Evolutionary perspectives on human nutrition: the influence of brain and body size on diet and metabolism. Am J Human Biol 1994; 6: 77-88.
[8]. Aiello LC, Wheeler P. The expensive tissue hypothesis: the brain and the digestive system in human and primate evolution. Current Anthropology, 1995; 36: 199-221.
[9]. Milton K. Primate diets and gut morphology: implications for hominid evolution. In: Food and Evolution: Toward a Theory of Food Habits, eds. Harris M, Ross EB; Temple University Press, Philadelphia, 1987, 93-115.
[10]. Martin RD, et al. Gastrointestinal allometry in primates and other mammals. In: Size and Scaling in Primate Biology. Jungers WL ed., Plenum Press, New York, 1985, 61-89.
[11]. Ruff CB, Trinkaus E, Holliday TW. Body mass and encephalization in Pleistocene Homo. Nature 1997; 387: 173-176.
[12]. Eaton, S Boyd, Eaton, Stanley B III. Evolution, diet and health. Presented in association with the scientific session, Origins and Evolution of Human Diet. 14th International Congress of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences, Williamsburg, Virginia, 1998.
[They are talking about adults who gave up eating meat, not babies or children. — GC]
Well, this explains a lot. (Just kidding.) There is a theory that eating meat is one reason why human beings developed our bigger brains. Now, credence might be added to that hypothesis with a study that shows non meat eating might actually shrink the brain.
Scientists have discovered that going veggie could be bad for your brain-with those on a meat-free diet six times more likely to suffer brain shrinkage.
Vegans and vegetarians are the most likely to be deficient because the best sources of the vitamin are meat, particularly liver, milk and fish. Vitamin B12 deficiency can also cause anaemia and inflammation of the nervous system. Yeast extracts are one of the few vegetarian foods which provide good levels of the vitamin.
The link was discovered by Oxford University scientists who used memory tests, physical checks and brain scans to examine 107 people between the ages of 61 and 87.
When the volunteers were retested five years later the medics found those with the lowest levels of vitamin B12 were also the most likely to have brain shrinkage. It confirms earlier research showing a link between brain atrophy and low levels of B12.
Although, as the story states, supplements are available, according to The Vegetarian Society, they have not been proved to be effective...
Birthweights in the US are falling but no one knows why, according to a study of 36.8 million infants born between 1990 and 2005.
A 52-gram drop in the weight of full-term singletons – from an average of 3.441 to 3.389 kilograms – has left Emily Oken’s team at Harvard Medical School scratching their heads. It can’t be accounted for by an increase in caesarean sections or induced labours, which shorten gestation. What’s more, women in the US now smoke less and gain more weight during pregnancy, which should make babies heavier. Oken suggests that unmeasured factors, such as diet or exercise, could explain why babies are being born lighter.
“For your average baby, 50 grams probably makes no difference at all,” she stresses. But those born substantially lighter could be at increased risk of heart disease and diabetes later in life.
Red meat is long established as an important dietary source of protein and essential nutrients including iron, zinc and vitamin B12, yet recent reports that its consumption may increase the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and colon cancer have led to a negative perception of the role of red meat in health. The aim of this paper is to review existing literature for both the risks and benefits of red meat consumption, focusing on case–control and prospective studies. Despite many studies reporting an association between red meat and the risk of CVD and colon cancer, several methodological limitations and inconsistencies were identified which may impact on the validity of their findings.
Overall, there is no strong evidence to support the recent conclusion from the World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) report that red meat has a convincing role to play in colon cancer. [Well Surprise, Surprise! –GC]
A substantial amount of evidence supports the role of lean red meat as a positive moderator of lipid profiles with recent studies identifying it as a dietary source of the anti-inflammatory long chain (LC) n−3 PUFAs and conjugated linoleic acid (CLA). In conclusion, moderate consumption of lean red meat as part of a balanced diet is unlikely to increase risk for CVD or colon cancer, but may positively influence nutrient intakes and fatty acid profiles, thereby impacting positively on long-term health.
In 1968, Dobbing (1) suggested that there were vulnerable periods of neurological development that coincided with times of maximal brain growth. These periods begin during foetal development at around the 25th week of gestation and continue for the first two years of postnatal life. Nutrient deficiencies occurring during these vulnerable periods may well have an impact upon brain growth and, hence, neurological and psychomotor development. (1)
These nutrient deficits have subsequently been shown to result in more functional deficiencies rather than physical abnormalities. Not only is optimal nutrition essential for achieving optimal physical and psychosocial development, but it also appears to have significant disease implications for later in adult life. Barker and his epidemiology group in the UK proposed that not only intrauterine malnutrition, but also poor weight gain in the first year of life, was associated with an increased incidence of cardiovascular disease (particularly in adults aged >50 years), hypertension and glucose intolerance during adulthood. (2) Their retrospective, epidemiological report has been supported by several studies on the Netherlands famine during World War II…
What ten thousand years of bones have been trying to tell us
Consider, for a moment, the humble skeleton.
It cannot be lobbied. It does not receive research grants from the soy industry. It has never appeared on a podcast to promote its new book about plant-based longevity. It just sits there, in its glass case in its museum, holding the shape of a life, and telling you exactly what that life was made of.
Bone is a biological ledger. Every year of growth leaves a record: how much protein was available, how well the body processed it, whether the raw materials were there in sufficient quantity and quality to build a full human being. You cannot retrospectively alter the record. You cannot claim the skeleton would have been taller if only the methodology had been different. The numbers are in the ground. They have been in the ground for thousands of years. And they do not care about your dietary politics.
What follows is their evidence….
Given the continual targeting of red meat over the last five decades the following is important. THE ELITE KNOW THE IMPORTANCE OF MEAT!
Medieval English males averaged around 5’5″ to 5’7″. Subsisting primarily on pottage, bread, and whatever could be scavenged from the margins of a feudal food system that had no particular interest in their wellbeing, the peasant population of England sat well below its biological potential for generation after generation. It would be remiss not to note what was happening above their heads while they were shrinking. The ruling class ate differently. They ate beef, venison, pork, game birds, aged cheese, salted fish. The medieval aristocracy was, predictably, taller than the peasantry it governed. The relationship between protein access and physical stature was not invisible to contemporaries; it was simply regarded as the natural order of things. And then someone formalised it. The Forest Laws of Norman England, codified under William I in the 1080s, designated a third of the country’s land as the king’s personal hunting ground. Killing a deer carried the death penalty. Maiming one was punishable by blinding and castration. A peasant could live on the edge of a forest teeming with protein and starve legally while the gamekeeper rode past. You can read the full forensic accounting of that history in Forbidden Flesh. What matters here is the relationship between law and skeleton. The centuries of codified meat restriction left a biological signature in the remains of the people it was applied to. You can measure it. It fits in a museum case. The case has a label.
In 1945, the average Japanese male stood approximately 5’3″. The diet was predominantly plant-based: rice, vegetables, some fish, very little meat, almost no dairy.
Under American occupation, and subsequently through a deliberate government nutritional programme in the 1950s, Japan introduced school milk, increased meat consumption, and began actively encouraging animal protein intake at a population level. The results were not subtle. Between 1950 and 1980, average male height in Japan increased by approximately three inches. The same genetic population, on the same island, in the same climate, eating differently, producing a different skeleton within a single generation.
This is as close to a controlled experiment as human nutritional science ever gets. One variable changed. The height followed.
Contemporary Japan has maintained those gains. The Japanese government did not respond to its population’s growth by suggesting they return to the pre-war dietary pattern on environmental grounds. They noticed what worked, and they kept doing it. There is a lesson here for anyone paying attention, and apparently several governments that are not…
Oh I think the Cabel is paying attention. Sama Koole is assuming they have our best interests at heart. I do not. -GC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Carboxymethylcellulose and Polysorbate 80.
From Brave AI
Carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) and Polysorbate 80 (P80) are widely used synthetic emulsifiers in processed foods, eye drops, and cosmetics, primarily to improve texture and prevent separation.
While regulatory bodies like the FDA classify them as “generally recognized as safe” (GRAS), animal and in vitro studies suggest they may negatively impact gut health by altering the intestinal microbiota and promoting low-grade inflammation. Specifically, P80 has been shown to decrease anti-inflammatory bacterial taxa like Bacteroides dorei, while CMC increases pro-inflammatory species such as Ruminococcus torques.
Mechanism: Both additives can disrupt the protective mucus layer of the gut and increase intestinal permeability, potentially allowing bacteria to cross the epithelial barrier.
Health Risks: These changes are linked to metabolic syndrome, obesity, and the promotion of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in predisposed models.
Human Evidence: While direct human trials are limited, research on human gut microbiota maintained ex vivo confirms that these emulsifiers increase pro-inflammatory potential within days of exposure.
The consumption of dietary emulsifiers, including polysorbate 80 (P80) and sodium carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), has raised safety concerns due to its interaction with the intestinalmicrobiome. This study demonstrated that increasing concentrations of P80 and CMC added to a dynamic four-stagegut microbiotamodel (BFBL gut simulator) altered themicrobiomecomposition and impacted epithelial integrity in a dose-dependent manner.16S rDNA amplicon-based metagenomics analysis revealed that these emulsifiers increased microbial groups with proinflammatory capacities while decreasing microbial taxa known to enhance barrier function.
Increasing doses of P80 significantly decreased Bacteroidesdorei and Akkermansia, taxa associated with anti-inflammatory potential, while increasing doses of CMC were linked to a higher abundance of Ruminococcustorques and Hungatella, which negatively impact barrier function. Both emulsifiers displayed a different impact on epithelial integrity when interacting with the microbiome. On one hand, supernatants from the BFBL simulator fed with P80 disrupted epithelial integrity to a lesser extent than the additive alone. On the other hand, both the microbiota and the supernatants from the BFBL simulator fed with CMC diminished the epithelial integrity, though the additive itself did not. These findings highlight the need to incorporate the gut microbiome in the risk assessment of these additives.
Brave AI had the clearest definition.
Epithelial integrity refers to the structural and functional coherence of epithelial tissues, ensuring they remain organized, sealed, and mechanically stable to function as effective barriers. This integrity is primarily maintained by tight junctions, adherens junctions, and desmosomes that seal adjacent cells, preventing the unregulated leakage of substances and pathogens while allowing selective permeability for essential nutrients and ions.
The gastrointestinal tract is a complex organization of various types of epithelial cells forming a single layer of the mucosal barrier, the host mucosal immune system, and microorganisms termed as gut microbiota inhabiting this area. The mucosal barrier, including physical and chemical factors, spatially segregates gut microbiota and the host immune system preventing the development of immune response directed towards non-pathogenic commensals and dietary antigens. However, for the maintenance of the integrity of the mucosal surfaces, cross-talk between epithelial cells and microbiota is required. The microbiome and the intestinal epithelium developed a complex dependence necessary for sustaining intestinal homeostasis. In this review, we highlight the role of specific epithelial cell subtypes and their role in barrier arrangement, the mechanisms employed by them to control intestinal microbiota as well as the mechanisms utilized by the microbiome to regulate intestinal epithelial function. This review will provide information regarding the development of inflammatory disorders dependent on the loss of intestinal barrier function and composition of the intestinal microbiota.
There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.
Do not forget to LABEL AI articles video and such.
This is going to be very rough since I do not have time to do any editing and I had to transcribe by hand from the video.
I have mentioned a few times that I think the Trump administration is planning a major can of Whoop Ass. Every once in a while we see signs such as the indictment of Comey and Brennan’s freaking out.
Josh and Alpha had a recent conversation about just this subject, but before I get into that I want to point to a few shark fins surfacing.
Here we are 6 years later with the evidence of voter fraud by tens of thousands in just one blue city that have been held under lock snd key while the propagandist media declares the election steal to be fantasy. Multiply by literally thousands of locations to some undetermined extent. We know Fulton County, GA is going to be worse as an example..
Method explained in the article. One of many methods for cheating for the record.
We know the perpetrators are unlikely to see one day behind bars. We know even SCOTUS acted in defense of the perpetrators at the time. We now know with ample evidence that J6 was Fedsurrection. Yet, the perpetrators continue to walk free and pretend they did something great for America.
We also know that any person in America that opposes the provisions of the SAVE America Act self identifies as a criminal or complicit in seditious and perhaps treasonous behavior. All you have to do is ask any person where they stand on that issue and you know who they are.
There can be no peace and trust in government until justice is fully served.
After what was done to POTUS, there is no way he is going to let these monsters get off Scott free. They really blew it when they went raided his home in Florida. Makes you wonder if he moved there, to a friendlier legal environment on purpose.
The Badlands Brief: White House Task Force Gathers Intelligence Documents on 2020 Election for Declassification
A White House task force is gathering documents related to the 2020 presidential election for declassification from the CIA, the National Security Agency, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the FBI, and the Justice Department.
The task force, which operates in addition to ongoing Department of Justice probes into the 2020 election, consists of
Just The News’ John Solomonand former Trump administration officials including former national security aide Derek Harvey. Lawyers on the team have been reviewing gathered documents for months.
The documents focus on areas including ballot irregularities, potential voting machine issues, and possibly other topics. Members of the task force have been encouraged to limit redactions in declassified documents, even if that means retaining the names of government officials or other individuals, according to two people with knowledge of the effort.
The initiative involves gathering thousands of pages from US intelligence agencies, with plans to declassify some of them. The team has been quietly reviewing materials for months, sometimes late into the night.
President Trump told reporters Wednesday that acting DNI Bill Pulte will serve for only “a month or two” but is authorized to “declassify almost everything.”
Ashe in America: This is one of those anticipated disclosures that will serve as a check on whether we’re actually winning.
We can’t have a Golden Age without a Justice Phase and the core of any Justice Phase has to be elections. And we can’t have real elections without accountability and honesty for how fake they’ve been.
This ODNI thing could be a rug. Or, it could be the exact catalyst for change we desperately need.
I’m also awaiting disclosure (and indictments) on weaponization of government. They weaponized the government to prevent the truth about fake elections from coming out. A real investigative effort on the 2020 election would yield both of those change-making revelations.
I hope it drops before the 250th birthday. If it’s not a rug, that would be quite the victory to celebrate. And, if it is a rug, then we should probably declare independence again. Either way, July 4th is going to be epic!
Happy Independence Day, everyone!
And speaking of Election Fraud Badlands (Ghost) dropped this. For background see my article on Petro and Columbia LINK
….Petro is asserting that the recent Colombian presidential election was stolen using computer servers that are based in California.
My favorite excerpt is this part:
“From my phone conversation with Trump, I was able to confirm that he didn’t know I didn’t support de la Espriella because of his old ties to drug trafficking and the genocide in Colombia.
I hope that amid his concerns he has time to call his intelligence agencies so they can tell him who Abelardo de la Espriella is and why he is a US citizen and who his partners are, including alias “Boliche”.
Colombia’s current president is faced with evidence of an electoral fraud via algorithms and with prohibited foreign financing in our constitution.”
Wew, lad….
H/T Duchess
RNC unleashes ELECTION LAWSUIT to STOP Illegal Votes!
🚨 HOLY SMOKES. The FBI has just FLOODED Fulton County, Georgia with hundreds of agents to ramp up the 2020 election investigation, following a raid that seized ballots
Material that was seized is being reviewed, including DATA taken from ballot tabulation machines
HOLY SMOKES. The FBI has just FLOODED Fulton County, Georgia with hundreds of agents to ramp up the 2020 election investigation, following a raid that seized ballots
Material that was seized is being reviewed, including DATA taken from ballot tabulation machines
Over 200 AGENTS were just deployed to Georgia, and the investigation “appears to be accelerating” — Atlanta News First
Field offices NATIONWIDE are reportedly zeroing in on this probe
🚨 HOLY CRAP! President Trump is set to announce that Democratic Senators Jon Ossoff and Raphael Warnock of Georgia were ILLEGITIMATELY ELECTED due to massive fraud, following an FBI investigation into Fulton County 2020 — @DC_Reporter
28 minutes Elon posts Taylor Swift AI by an Anon on July 4th and then on July 5th. There is in the background 4559 Jul 1, a Q drop.
46:30 Josh: Now going back to that video for a second. Did you notice all the presidents were carrying Something? A RED FOLDER…
Does anyone know where the Red Folder Came from?
I have been talking about the Red Folder since Jan 2nd 2021 and you [Alpha] started talking about it in the beginning of the Trump administration. Well before that back in 2024 because this actually was when we referred to what was happening with the Mar-a-Logo raid. Hey, they are looking for the Red Folder.
What is in the Red Folder? Well it is the Crosfire Hurricane binder and other various secrets that Trump declassified and took with him before he left including information pertaining to Nancy Pelosi’s laptop. We started it and it spread to the whole anon community because, well we had talked to somebody and they said, they are after the red ‘bull’
48 minutes Josh Reads Trump Truth about Reconciliation 3.0, the $350 billion for defence plus Save America Act… Why is this interesting?
So if you understand that Trump doesn’t really want the Save America Act passed as Alpha and I have been saying. There are a multitude of reasons. Trump knows what we are about to say. If it is passed, Mark Elias and all the Lawfare lawyers will innediately put injunctions on it in court. You will have lawfare judges immediately stop it from being implemented. In other words you will not have implementation of the Save America Act prior to the midterms. There is a chance it could go th the Supreme Court but the scary part is the Supreme Court could vote either way.
So the idea is if we want the Save America Act to secure the midterm elections, it is just improbable. It is not going to happen. This means Trump most likely does not want the Save America Act to happen.
Now Reconciliation 3.0 is the National Defense Authorization Act. Now why is this crazy. Because Trump has come out and made a declaration. “I will sign ZERO bills until the Save America Act is passed.” I think he has 90 days before he has to send them back.
So now we have the National Defense Authorization Act coming up. Sp what else is in the the National Defense Authorization Act?
You remember last week all the talk about the various different sections? One section where there is a convergence of Israel and the US military complex. Where there is information sharing, technology sharing of inovation thru the 2 military industrial complexes on the commecial viability side. And there is a merging of US and Israeli intelligence in the middle east. Those 2 things are in the National Defense Authorization Act.
Did Donald Trump just squash the National Defense Authorization Act by attaching the Save America Act to it by saying I’m not going to sign it unless this bill actually gets passed?
Here is my theory, I think John Thune is intentionally not bringing it up because Trump ordered him not to. We are going to act like we really want to get this passed by we really do not want to. Why?
You have DNI Poulti who is working with John Solomon. John just joined ODNI as a special contractor to go in there and help locate classified records pertaining to Crossfire Hurricane,Russia Russia Russia, 2020 election fraud
DNI Poulti inherited DNI Gabbard’s task force on election integrity & infrastructure. We are waiting for a report to come out on that. I think John Solomon [an excellent journalist] is actually coming in to help finalize that report with other types of declassified information. And where did they get these declassified files from? A lot of these are coming from the quote unquote burn bags that were found in the SCIFs of the FBI building that were set to be destroyed but never were. In other words it was the military that had it all along and somehow injected it.
How do you enter evidence legally? [Q quote] You put someone in the military in DNI who can find and retrieve these records where ever the military put them and then bring them out thru points of declassification.
[Could have been hidden during Trump 1.0 or perhaps in 2.0 –GC]
And I think Poulti is going to be the one who is going to release this information pertaining to the 2020 election fraud. And that is going to show that a foreign adversary was definitely involved. Probably a few different ones. I think you’re going to see Great Britain, Ukraine, China, Cuba [Karen Bass?] Venezuala Iran, all involved in stealing the 2020 election, as well as the mail-in ballot scheme.
And this is where it gets really really interesting, Alpha with the conversations that Donald Trump is bringing about. The last week he has been seeding the narrative against Communists. Commie, Comie, he is talking about Communists all the time. I get that communists may have just won. In Washington DC you have a gun bomb. Mandummi in NY, but what I also want to point people to. Go with the constructed narrative.Both sides construct the narrative and they seed that narrative along the way.
This is one of the ways that I have become incredibly accurate with what I do.
Donald Trump started talking about the Communists on the same day it was announced that there is a Grand Jury in NY that has subpoenaed Neville Roy Singham, the founder philanthropist of an NGO who lives in Bejing China.That collaborates directly with the Chinese Communist Party, is a self-proclained
Maoist, funded the ICE riots and protests, funded the No Kings riots and protests, funded BLM and ANTIFA. The guy is a billionaire. The same day the subpoena comes out Trump starts talking about Communists.
Why is it important?
Now go back to the whole infrastructure of what the US Attorney, Joe DeGeneva, is doing in the Southern District of Florida. Joe is obviously running the investigation into, basically, you’ve go to think 20216 and the 2020 Fisagate, Russiagate, Crossfire Hurricane & all that.
Well his team came out last week and they said that they are taking a different approach.
54:40 Alpha: there is something in that article that is very specific.
54:45 Josh: I have it right here. It is Paul Sperry BTW… [Can not find it]
Well basically Joe is investigating the Grand Conspiracy, the RICO investigation. One of the things his team has done is they have broken it down into smaller component parts… what they are likely talking about here is instead of one grand conspiracy with 50 people, and one trial with 10 to 15 years of court. Because of that they are looking at segregating this down into various different parts. Now one of the things that we got an indication of is PRE 2016. This is very interesting because if you ever listen to Patrick Byne, he says how he was recruited by the Obama administration, by the FBI, his FBI handler at the CIA, Cia/FBI handler, to actually infiltrate the early Republican candidates prior to the primaries including Trump. That began in 2015. He talked about this and said it began actually in Las Vegas. So we know they are looking into that part.
#2 is FISAgate, right? This is where you start to enter into the NGO infrastructure.
DNI Tulsi Gabbard released the classified email between Lenny Bonardo of the Open Society Foundations and another executive director at the Open Society Foundations, talking about Julianne Smith who is Hilary Clinton’s foreign campaign manager or foreign affairs campaign manager and how Julianne Smith had gotten back to him and confirmed that HRC was going to move forward with the Russian compromised story on Donald Trump but they did not have the evidence. But they said do not worry we will get it thru our verious different partners of ThreatConnect and Crowd Strike, which I found kinda interesting. So that was Open Society foundation. They enter on stage left right there early on 2016. This is pre-primaries, pre-election.
57:13 Then obviously you have FISA Gate. That email was the day before Bill Clinton met with Loretta Lynch. Clinton offered a seat on the Supreme Court if she dropped the case against hillary.
Then Hillary spent the July 4th weekend with James Comey while she was under investigation by the FBI. On July 7th she gets on Airforce One with Obama and flies to NC for a rally.
Late in July the Lead FBI Investigator drops the case against Hillary and 3 days later opens a case on Donald. Peter Strozk was the guy investigating the hilary Clinton email scandal
Starting 58:30 to 1:05:30 go over highlghted sections
1:05″30 to is discussion:
John Durham was about preserving evidence and not prosecuting. Admiral Rogers got position on recommendation of General Flynn. Bill Clinton & lynch met in the wee hours of the morning in what was supposed to be a private meeting. Reporter Christopher Sein was tipped off by old friend high in Intel community. He played football for Univ of Alabama. Trump was given a jersey #17 from the Univ of Alabama. And Jeff Sessions who also went to UofA was in the same farternity. Chistopher ‘commited suicide’ via hung by dog leash from door knob. A favorite of the CIA.
1:08:30 — 1:12:00 Josh explains why a video crew was needed so NSA could listen in to the conversation. Admiral Rogers according to Q misfiled that conversation…. The conversation was used to threaten Comey into re-opening Hillary server case…. Many more dots connected.
Josh brings up article Real Clear Investigations by Paul Sperry June 25, 2026. It is well worth the read.
1:12:00 – Backing up a bit. Joe DeGenova has not only broken up the RICO case but has TWO grand juries. The second one, operated by Jasson Reddy-Kionas, is in Miami and targeting Obama’s re-written 2016 IC assessment and John Brennan. Josh goes into what he knows of that case. (Do not miss the Mark Warner & Adam Schiff connections)
1:13:15 there is a whistle blower Thomas Speciali the Third. [Google & brave never heard of him — SURPRISE!]
1:13:30 — 1:15:00 Thomas Speciali, a cooperating witness, was hired by the Intel community to go out there and discover Russian interference in the 2016 election so he had full access to every state’s election system. The Dominion voting machines and everything. One of the things he said is that there was no Russian intrusion. There was no evidence but there were some foreign IPs that had touched our servers, basically pinged them. Some APPEARED to be Russian
Then Josh goes into Victoria Nuland, Ukraine, the Perfect Phone call, the 2nd impeachment and Eric Ciaramella who has been indicted in the Eastern District of Virginia. Eric Ciaramella ran the money aspect of the Maidan Massacre and hired the Wagner Group out of Russia.. Josh covers the firing of Shokin, who was investigating money laundering and trafficking by Burisma… Josh goes into how money laundering works in Ukraine
…
1:15:00 to 1: The Perfect Phone Call. Most important part when POTUS asked “DO YOU HAVE THE SERVER? YOU KNOW CROWDSTRIKE, BURISMA, I want to have my Dept of Justice take a look at it.” [This is why they went after Rudy so hard BTW – GC]
That was PANIC IN DC.
Why did Crowdstrike a DNC IT company have a server in Burisma?
Burisma from circa 2014 was one of the heads for Human trafficking, arms trafficking, Money laundering for that region. [I wonder if this is where Justice Roberts adopted kids came from? They were supposedly Russia. -GC]
The server was a proxy server doing all the messing with the Alpha Bank server to compromise Trump. Second it was running Hammer and Scorecard which was meant to steal the 2016 election for Hilary.
Why was the server in Burisma? Because it was very close to the Russian border so you could spoof Russian addresses. Remember Thomas Speciali, saying the pings APPEARED to be from Russia? However someone shut them down. Josh thinks it was Russia and really pissed off the Deep State.
1:19:30 This is where it gets really interesting because in 2018 the elections were stolen at the STATE LEVEL. Red States all of a sudden flipped blue. It was almost like Trump let it happen because of what is going to happen now with all this information comming out. George Soros & the Open Society Foundation and other NGOs [Like Arrabella – GC] funded Act Blue from various private shell companies, spoofing credit card numbers and funding all of these candidates. They funded 3 of the primary state candidates thru all the states, These were, the governor, Sec of State and the State Attorney General. Back in 2018 we really did not know why. When you look back at it it makes complete sense. At the same time Soros, father & son and Bill Gates were investing in different types of companies.
Hunter Biden’s company Rosemont Senaca invested in Metabiota a Disaster and pandemic preparedness company in 2014. (In eastern Ukraine) In 2018 & 19 & 20, Soros & Gates join collaborative efforts and start investing in zoological virus research companies investigating how to detect them if they spread to humans. Such viruses were not around in 2018 & 2019. They were also investing in Crisper-Cas9 companies, genetic modification companies, mRNA companies, AND companies dealing with pandemic response and pandemic testing.
1:22:50 in 2020 we learn the reason for stuffing the top state offices. In Sept of 2019, a level 4 biocontainment plant burns down in Russia on the eastern [obviously Western -GC] border of Russia which I find kinda sketchy… Then 3 days later POTUS standing with Fauci & Brixs signed an EO authorizing the creation of mRNA vaccines.
Josh discuses Event 201 (Oct 2019)
POTUS does a state of emergency.
Secs of State change rules on how mail-in ballots are handled… This is where the NGO infastructure comes in. The whole point was to get as many people on the voter rolls as humanly possible because the number of ballots PRINTED are based on that number.
That is why the Trump admin wants those rolls and the states are refusing to turn them over.
Basically you have a conspiracy forming in 2014 to 2016. The NGO infrastructure. Remember it is the NGOs, it was Neville Roy Singham, Soros, Weiss, Gates, Zuckerburg. They funded NGOs that went out and got people to sign up to vote. And then these same NGOs were running ballots to the Drop boxes.
in 2021, Citizens sued their states and the Supreme Courts of the states ruled in their favor, saying the Sec of state DID NOT HAVE THE AUTHORITY to change mail-in ballot laws but since the elections had already happened there was nothing that could be done…. So that right there is the prerequisite for everything that we are going to see with Joe DeGeneva.
1:27:00 we haven’t even gotten into 2021 when they start to flood the border..
There is another 1/2 hour but I think that gives a good look at the information and actions.
A couple of references. With this first reference ONLY Yandex had the article. Google/Brave buried it and come up with nothing on Thomas Speciali the Third.
Miranda Devine zooms in on a pivotal and controversial event in recent U.S. political history: the October 2020 “Dirty 51” letter, signed by former intelligence officials, including ex-CIA Director John Brennan. The letter—claiming that the Hunter Biden laptop story had “all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation”—is dissected for its role in influencing the 2020 election and shaping public perception. The episode centers on a dramatic confrontation between Brennan and whistleblower Thomas Speciali, unpacking the latest developments in calls for accountability, including current DOJ investigations.
It starts at Yale and a professor of Arabic who romanticizes terrorism.
Eric Ciaramella was radicalized at Yale by professors like Bassam Frangieh. He was quickly recognized as a fellow traveler and became an insider in the Obama administration.
11/03/25 5:06 PM 
