In my last article, GREENHOUSE, ICEHOUSE OR CLIMATIC MADHOUSE? I made the case for ‘Global Cooling.’ This is substantiated by the change from ‘Global Warming’ to ‘Climate Change’ a few years ago. I also indicated that the Cabal did not actually believe their ‘CO2 causes Global Warming’ Dis-info Op and since the early seventies have been very concerned with ‘Over Population’ especially the ramifications of a large population in a cooling world. See: The 1974 CIA report: “A Study of Climatological Research as it Pertains to Intelligence Problems”
As I discussed in my last article. I think that the exiting of the Grand Solar Minimum and several scientists indicating a return to Little Ice Age conditions, has cause the Cabal to accelerate their plans for ‘culling’ the human herd. This is why POTUS Trump was such a threat to their plans.
The Malthusian Theory of Population is a theory of exponential population growth and arithmetic food supply growth. Thomas Robert Malthus, an English cleric, and scholar, published this theory in his 1798 writings, An Essay on the Principle of Population…
Malthusian Theory of Population Explained
1. Population and Food Supply
Thomas Malthus theorized that populations grew in geometric progression. A geometric progression is a sequence of numbers where each term after the first is found by multiplying the previous one by a fixed, non-zero number called the common ratio. For example, in the sequence 2, 10, 50, 250, 1250, the common ratio is 5.
Additionally, he stated that food production increases in arithmetic progression. An arithmetic progression is a sequence of numbers such that the difference between the consecutive terms is constant. For example, in series 2, 5, 8, 11, 14, 17, the common difference of 3. He derived this conclusion due to the Law of Diminishing Returns….
Eugenics, the selection of desired heritable characteristics in order to improve future generations, typically in reference to humans. The term eugenics was coined in 1883 by British explorer and natural scientist Francis Galton, [Darwin’s cousin] who, influenced by Charles Darwin’s theory of natural selection, advocated a system that would allow “the more suitable races or strains of blood a better chance of prevailing speedily over the less suitable.” Social Darwinism, the popular theory in the late 19th century that life for humans in society was ruled by “survival of the fittest,” helped advance eugenics into serious scientific study in the early 1900s. By World War I many scientific authorities and political leaders supported eugenics. However, it ultimately failed as a science in the 1930s and ’40s, when the assumptions of eugenicists became heavily criticized and the Nazis used eugenics to support the extermination of entire races.
However support never really died out. The British Royal Society actually hosted a Pro-Eugenics Conference in 2004 so it is not dead.
From the UK Guardian: Eugenics: the skeleton that rattles loudest in the left’s closet: Socialism’s one-time interest in eugenics is dismissed as an accident of history. But the truth is far more unpalatable
From The New Statesman: The eugenics movement Britain wants to forget
Disabled people and allies condemn pro-eugenics conference
PLACE Royal Society, Carlton House Terrace, London SW1
DATE/ TIME 9 am Sept 30th
Embargo: 8:30 AM Sept 30th 2004
People Against Eugenics (1) will be protesting today at a pro-eugenics conference at the Royal Society in London (2). Campaigners will be arguing that the Royal Society should not allow a platform to argue for the elimination of disabled people and for cloning and designer babies.
“The document The Real George Bernard Shaw – Fabian Socialist and Hitlerian Advocate of Mass Murder! has been deleted.” [SUPRISE! It gets scrubbed every time that information shows. Can’t have the kiddies realize Shaw was a eugenicist.]
Huxley’s position on eugenics is detailed below in an analysis of several of his most influential publications on eugenics, education, and race: his 1933 paper entitled “The Vital Importance of Eugenics,” his 1946 publication of the goals of UNESCO after becoming the organization’s first director-general, the UNESCO 1951 “Statement on Race,” and his 1962 Galton Memorial Lecture to the British Eugenics Society.
Contradictions abound between, and even within, several of these publications, but each address adds a specific dimension to Huxley’s overall position on eugenics, and together these sources detail the evolution of his stance on human biological inequality, education, and eugenic reform throughout the course of his career… [Well worth a read. It is not long]
UNESCO, acronym for United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, specialized agency of the United Nations (UN) that was outlined in a constitution signed November 16, 1945. The constitution, which entered into force in 1946, called for the promotion of international collaboration in education, science, and culture.
…Herbert George Wells who wrote a 1928 opus called The Open Conspiracy: Blueprint for a World Revolution calling for world government, and depopulation saying:
“The Open Conspiracy rests upon a disrespect for nationality, and there is no reason why it should tolerate noxious or obstructive governments because they hold their own in this or that patch of human territory.”
Wells was a member of an organization called The Fabian Society which itself was established in 1884 by a coterie of British eugenicists and Malthusians in order to promote a new social order designed to mold society into a new mechanized order run by a managerial elite of “social scientists” from above.
The choice of title “Fabian” was derived from the Roman general Fabius Maximus who was renowned for his strategy of defeating his enemies by superhuman patience and slow attrition. The Fabian philosophy was displayed in an infamous stained-glass piece of art featuring Fabian leaders George B. Shaw and Sidney Webb as blacksmiths hammering the world into their own secular image and featuring a shield of the Fabian logo of a wolf in sheep’s clothing….
“Margaret’s English exile gave her the opportunity to make some critical interpersonal connections as well. Her bed became a veritable meeting place for the Fabian upper crust: H. G. Wells, George Bernard Shaw, Arnold Bennett, Arbuthnot Lane, and Norman Haire. And of course, it was then that she began her unusual and tempestuous affair with Havelock Ellis. Ellis was the iconoclastic grandfather of the Bohemian sexual revolution…he had provided the free love movement with much of its intellectual apologia.”
George Grant, Grand Illusions: The Legacy of Planned Parenthood (Franklin, TN: Adroit Press, 1992), pg 57.
One of the conceptual grand strategists of this process was a man named Julian Sorrel Huxley (1887-1975). Celebrated as a biologist, and social reformer, Julian was a devout life-long member of the British Eugenics Society serving alongside John Maynard Keynes as secretary and later as its president.
Julian was a busy man, who along with his brother Aldous, worked hard to fill the very large shoes of their grandfather Thomas (aka: Darwin’s bulldog). While simultaneously managing the post-WW2 eugenics movement, Julian found himself setting into motion the modern environmental movement as founder of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature in 1948, co-founding the World Wildlife Fund in 1961, created the term “transhumanism” and also founding an immensely influential United Nations body called UNESCO (abbreviated for the United Nations Education, Science and Cultural Organization) in 1946 which he ran as Director General from 1946-1948.
The mandate for the new organization was set out clearly in Huxley’s 1946 UNESCO: Its Purpose and Its Philosophy:
“The moral for UNESCO is clear. The task laid upon it of promoting peace and security can never be wholly realised through the means assigned to it- education, science and culture. It must envisage some form of world political unity, whether through a single world government or otherwise, as the only certain means of avoiding war… in its educational programme it can stress the ultimate need for a world political unity and familiarize all peoples with the implications of the transfer of full sovereignty from separate nations to a world organization.”
To what end would this “world political unity” be aimed? Several pages later, Huxley’s vision is laid out in all of its twisted detail:
“At the moment, it is probable that the indirect effect of civilization is dysgenic instead of eugenic, and in any case it seems likely that the dead weight of genetic stupidity, physical weakness, mental instability and disease proneness, which already exist in the human species will prove too great a burden for real progress to be achieved. Thus even though it is quite true that any radical eugenic policy will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake
so that much that is now unthinkable may at least become thinkable.”
John Maynard Keynes, a founder of the Breton Woods agreement (World Bank and IMF.) was also a closet Fabian. LINK
The MSM may claim the Fabian concept of ‘Killing off the Useless Eaters’ is a thing of the past in the UK but the UK hospital records and the 65 deaths a day in 2012 due to fuel poverty shows the Cabal has just gotten more creative.
UK Telegraph NHS millions for controversial care pathway: The majority of NHS hospitals in England are being given financial rewards for placing terminally-ill patients on a controversial “pathway” to death, it can be disclosed.
Meanwhile across the Pond in the USA, we had, not only Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood but the Rockefellers
Ad clipping for ‘The Unborn‘ a eugenics play put on by John D. Rockefeller Jr. in 1915.
In 1916, the first birth control clinic, was started in Brownsville, Brooklyn by Sanger and then shut down by the cops.
1920 Rockefellers Goal to Mold You Hasn’t Changed – Corey Digs (H/T to the Treeper who pointed this out to me.)
“This is the transcript of the 1920 newspaper clipping. The actual clip is at the end.” – Corey
“We urge trade unionists and working people in general to be on the alert and extremely careful of the Rockefellers and other selfish money interests which seek to secure control of the education system and prevent their interference in the preparation of courses of study or the selection of members of educational bodies.
Frederick T. Gates, when president of the Rockefeller General Education Board, in their publication, known as ‘Occasional Papers, No. 1,’ on page 6 says:
‘In our dreams we have limitless resources and the people yield themselves with perfect docility to our moulding hand. The present education conventions made from our minds and unhampered by tradition we work our own good will upon a grateful and responsive rural folk.
We shall not try to make these people or any of their children into philosophers or men of learning or of science. We have not to raise up from among them authors, editors, poets or men of letters. We shall not search for embryo great artists, painters, musicians, nor shall we cherish even the humbler ambition to raise up from among them lawyers, doctors, preachers, politicians, statesmen, of whom we now have ample supply.
The task which we set before ourselves is a very simple as well as a very beautiful one, to train these people as we find them to a perfectly ideal life just where they are.‘”
“On page 10:
‘So we will organize our children into a little community and teach them to do in a perfect way the things their fathers and mothers are doing in an imperfect way, in the homes, in the shop and on the farm.’”
Corey goes on to say:
“…The committee also recommends that representatives of labor be appointed to the State Board of Regents; that the federation encourage teachers to organize and affiliate with it; that teachers be paid for time spent every three years in pursuing professional improvement work and that all business and trade schools be compelled to take out licenses from the State Board of Regents.
Elaborate graduation exercises and lavish overdressing of school children in classrooms are condemned by the report….” [Please read the rest if you have not already. It is short G.C.]
Notice ALL of the highlighted recommendations have now come to pass.
And another article about those clippings.
…The key words here are “undesirable,” which in this old context it means something a lot different, and “well-born” — the right of the child to be “well-born.”
Just a few months earlier, the Rockefellers also appear in multiple articles about a new eugenics enterprise printed in papers across the country like this one in The Washington Herald on September 3rd, 1915.
This one discusses the joint eugenics venture between Mrs. E.H. Harriman (mother of future statesman and Skull & Bones secret society member Averill Harriman); John D. Rockefeller; Andrew Carnegie; and scientist Alexander Graham Bell, the guy who invented the telephone and who was apparently a huge eugenicist….
Apparently John D. and Co. were giving “liberal financial assistance” (read: millions) to fund a “gigantic eugenic enterprise… to ascertain what is the matter with the human race” that had been going on for four years prior and which ended in the announcement in this article of a campaign being launched “for the sterilization of 15,000,000 Americans.”
Studies in eugenics had been “quietly conducted” for nearly half a decade not just at Cold Springs Harbor, but “by field workers all over the world.”
The article ends with,
”The organization, after his four years’ work in this country and Europe reached the conclusion that sterilization of defectives was the greatest work for them. Statistics gathered reveal the amazing fact that 10 per cent of the present population of the United States are defectives, who must be blotted out as reproducers of human life.”…
Even at a time when eugenics was en vogue, not everyone was on board with targeting the poorest and most vulnerable in society in a world run by Rockefeller wealth. In the October 8th, 1915 edition of The Day Book, R.F. Paine made just such a case…
by Anton Chaitkin
And while we are dealing with the moves the Rockefellers made…
1918 – Sam Bush patriarch of the Bush clan
Samuel Prescott Bush in 1901 was general manager of Buckeye Steel Castings Company, run by FDR’s brother Frank Rockefeller. In 1918, banker Bernard Baruch reorganized the War Industries Board as the U.S. prepared to enter World War I. He placed Sam Bush as chief of the Ordnance, Small Arms, and Ammunition Section, with national responsibility for government assistance to and relations with munitions companies – WIKI
1894 — Dumbing Down America by Dr. Samuel Blumenfeld — John Dewey the Father of Modern Progressive Education was funded by John D. Rockefeller.
1920 — The ‘New Progressive’ Child rearing practices taught mothers by doctors also came from the Rockefellers.
The Hand that Rocked the Cradle: A Critical Analysis of Rockefeller Philanthropic Funding, 1920-1960
Past research into the mental hygiene movement in Canada and the United States has tended to view it in isolation from co-temporary projects funded by Rockefeller philanthropy, such as mass communications research. The mental hygiene campaign aimed to modify adult-child relations by reducing the influence parents and teachers held over children’s personality development; the central aim of mass communications research was the development of conformity of opinion. One a project of social engineering, the other of social control, the two projects combined appear to have possessed considerable potential to work in concert to shift weight in the socializing matrix from families and schools to the media at the outset of the post-World War II baby boom.Brian J. Low
Full Paper: LINK
The Dark Roots of EUGENICS By Dennis L. Cuddy, Ph.D.
…It was during this time of the early 20th Century that Rockefeller introduced Margaret Sanger to the monied elite who would help her form the Birth Control League which would later become Planned Parenthood. The November 1921 issue of Sanger’s Birth Control Review carried the heading “Birth Control: To Create A Race of Thoroughbreds,” and Sanger would later advocate eugenically limiting “dysgenic stocks” such as blacks, Hispanics, American Indians and Catholics, as well as “slum dwellers” such as Jewish immigrants.
In 1926, Rockefeller money funded the founding of the American Eugenics Society, and the next year on May 2, 1927, the U.S. Supreme Court by an 8 to 1 majority ruled in Buck v. Bell that certain “unfit” people could be forcibly sterilized.
Regarding this ruling, British [Fabian Socialist] Professor Harold Laski wrote his friend Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes:
“Sterilize all the unfit, among whom I include all fundamentalists.”
HMMmmm Do you smell that attitude resurfacing with the FBI’s attack on conservative Catholics?
Penetrating a cloak of falsehood, deception and duplicity, Professor Antony C. Sutton reveals one of the most remarkable but unreported facts of the Second World War: that key Wall Street banks and American businesses supported Hitler’s rise to power by financing and trading with Nazi Germany.
He presents a thoroughly documented account of the role played by J.P. Morgan, T.W. Lamont, the Rockefeller interests, General Electric Company, Standard Oil, National City Bank, Chase and Manhattan banks, Kuhn, Loeb and Company, General Motors, the Ford Motor Company, and scores of others in helping to prepare the bloodiest, most destructive war in history.
I went into this a little bit in my article Spies, Spooks, Snakes and The Sea Eye Aye It is really amazing how the same key players keep showing up over and over.
There is more here: Why The Nuremberg Code Exists. Above Top Secret forum
Rockefeller & feminism: Feminism was a creation of the Rockefellers:
Lyndon Johnson’s “Great Society” speech – May 22, 1964
It is a very pretty speech but….
However it was NOT about just voting Democrat. The CIA didn’t kill off JFK and put this demon in the White House just for yucks. It was ALWAYS part of Cabal’s Eugenics plans.
Jan 26 2021 – Black Families Were Doing Better Than White Families Before Welfare – Evie Magazine
Black Families Thrived without Government Assistance
We’re not allowed to talk about the fact that the highest cause of death by a long shot in black urban communities is the wildly high rate of black-on-black crime. But if you just open your eyes to the truth instead of the propaganda, you’ll see that the percentage of black men who were killed by police officers in 2019 was 0.1%. Only 0.1%. That means only 9 black men were killed by police officers in 2019. That’s the definition of a statistical rarity. Now compare that to the 7,407 black men who were killed by homicide. BLM is based on the lie that racist white police officers are targeting black men, when the truth is a police officer is 18.5 times more likely to be killed by a black man than the other way around.
Another fact we’re not allowed to talk about: black families were doing better than white families in the U.S. before the welfare state was set up in the 1960s. Yes, they were actually outpacing white families in economic growth, and they had very similar rates of marriage and unemployment. Before the “Great Society” program was established in 1964 by former President Lyndon B. Johnson, a black child had a very good likelihood of being born into a home with both of their biological parents. Black men were doing excellently in the workforce and maintaining a steady upward trajectory in the career force….
GOP presidential candidate Ben Carson late Wednesday tied Planned Parenthood to eugenics and then eugenics to Hillary Clinton, saying the organization puts clinics in black neighborhoods to “control that population.”
And if you want the statistics:
The abortion rate for black women is four times the rate for white women. Every day, over 900 black babies are aborted. In New York City, where Planned Parenthood is headquartered, there are 1180 abortions of black children for every 1000 live births. — Rick Johnson
In 2021, the white (non-Hispanic) group made up 59.3% of the population….Blacks made up 12.6% … Between 2010 and 2021, the share of the population that is Hispanic/Latino grew the most, increasing 2.5 percentage points to 18.9%….
So why, if whites are 60% of the population and blacks are only 12 %, do Blacks have four times the abortion rate of white women?
THE PIVOTAL 1970’S
Even the Nazis WWII atrocities did not stop the Eugenics Movement nor did the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Number of Victims
Over 8,000 sterilizations were approved by the Eugenics Board of North Carolina. The total number of victims actually sterilized is estimated to have been over 7,600 (Winston-Salem, “Lifting the Curtain on a Shameful Era”). Of this number, females represented approx. 85% of those sterilized (State Library, “Statistics,” p. 1). By the late 1960s, the sterilization of men was virtually halted, as women made up 99% of those sterilized (Sinderbrand, p. 1). African Americans represent 39% of those sterilized overall; by the later 1960s, they made up 60% of those sterilized, even though they made up only a quarter of the population (Sinderbrand, p. 1). Of those sterilized up to 1963, 25% were considered mentally ill and 70% were considered mentally deficient. In each of these categories, females account for over 75% of the sterilizations. North Carolina ranked third in the United States for the total number of people sterilized.
Period During Which Sterilization Occurred
Sterilizations started in 1929 with the passage of the sterilization law and continued through 1973, when the last recorded sterilization is known to have been reported…..
Passage of Laws
The very first sterilization law was passed in 1919 but it was probably never put to use. Many feared that the law was unconstitutional and therefore the state feared putting it into practice (Paul, p. 420). In 1929, The North Carolina General Assembly passed a new sterilization law. It stated that “the governing body or responsible head of any penal or charitable institution supported wholly or in part by the State of North Carolina, or any sub-division thereof, is hereby authorized and directed to have the necessary operation for asexualization or sterilization performed upon any mentally defective or feeble-minded inmate of patient thereof” (State Library, “History”, p. 1). After this law was declared unconstitutional by the state’s Supreme Court in 1933 due to a deficient appeals process, North Carolina in the same year enacted a new sterilization law that “provided for notice, hearing, and the right to appeal” (Paul, p. 421). The passage of this law also created the North Carolina Eugenics Board (see below). The passage of the 1929 sterilization law made North Carolina the 17th state out of 33 to pass one. North Carolina’s 1933 law remained effective until 1973, when the last recorded sterilizations were performed (State Library, “History,” p. 1). Finally, on April 4, 2003, the North Carolina Senate voted unanimously to overturn it (“Bill to Overturn Eugenics Law Passes State Senate,” p. 1)…
From 1929 until 1974, an estimated 7,600 North Carolinians, women and men, many of whom were poor, undereducated, institutionalized, sick or disabled, were sterilized by choice, force or coercion under the authorization of the North Carolina Eugenics Board program.
It is interesting that sterilization was shut down in 1973…. I wondered if legalizing birth control pills for unmarried women in 1972 had anything to do with it. Not to mention Title X government funding for Planned Parenthood…
And THEN I READ Kissinger’s 1974 National Security memo (NSSM 200)
And I realized it was ALL ABOUT OPTICS. The USA did not want third world countries to realize the USA supported Eugenics!!!!
That NSSSM – 200 RABBIT HOLE IS SO DEEP I AM GOING TO DO A SEPARATE ARTICLE.