Our mission, as God-fearing and God-loving patriots, is to defend this Constitutional Republic and to increase its greatness, in all good things and ways, by using our voices in free but courteous speech, by discussing the happenings of the world and coming to a profound understanding of those things, and by sharing and promulgating these Truths on both this platform and others.
This Stormwatch Monday Open Thread remains open – VERY OPEN – a place for everybody to post whatever they feel they would like to tell the White Hats, and the rest of the MAGA/KAG/KMAG world (with KMAG being a bit of both).
Our various sister sites, listed in the Blogroll in the sidebar
Our beloved country is STILL under DIRECT THREATS by hostile forces – notably COMMUNISTS – and they’re HERE IN AMERICA.
Daily outrage and commie phuckery still abound.
We can give in to despair…or we can be defiant and fight back in any way that we can.
Commies won’t win!
And we will keep saying COMMIES OUT until we get their FRAUD and INSANITY out of our country!
THE STUFF
President Barack Obama listens to the remarks of John Brennan, Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism, his nominee for Director of the CIA, during the announcement in the East Room of the White House, Jan. 7, 2013. The President also announced former Senator Chuck Hagel, second from left, as his nominee for Secretary of Defense. Joining them are departing Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, left. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)
Did Obama and Brennan Abuse Early AI as an Illegal Hacking Tool?
Do you remember what the Obama administration did to Sharyl Attkisson’s husband, planting classified documents on his computer when they were going after her? This was fairly early in the Obama first term, if I am recalling correctly.
Just as an aside, they likely had extra motive against her, due to her persistence on vaccines, IYKWIM.
But as to the title question, the point is that there were MANY allegations – and many with pretty good proof – that the Obama administration and the Holder DOJ in particular were quite loose with what they considered “justice” – and what Trump has since called weaponization of the Department of Justice.
Obama, in my opinion, was particularly cunning, in using the failure of the original Obamacare website to induce all of Silicon Valley to “help” him – and thereby to draw the most powerful C-level names in America into weaponizing tech against Obama’s political opponents.
I have been increasingly wise to Obama since I actually voted for him in 2008. You see, there was a little event called Sandy Hook, remarkable in its level of exploitation in its aftermath. From that post-aw-shucks-reelection moment in 2012, as I watched hundreds of actions by government officials and political operatives, some directed at ME, PERSONALLY, that can only be described as PSY-OP, I began to grow up politically.
Something was NOT RIGHT in the Obama administration.
I began to understand what is REALLY going on.
So – back to the big question.
There is an obscure “conspiracy theory” that always struck me as a bit too realistic. It is supported by the admissions of one of the conspirators, and in my opinion is now made very clear by what is NOW publicly known about artificial intelligence, as well as a little tool called “Stuxnet” – the level of technology of which, while short of modern AI, fits into the timeline of both AI development and the conspiracy theory very, very well.
The fact that a lady named Tulsi Gabbard has released absolute proof of another conspiracy called “Russia, Russia, Russia”, including a smoking gun against the two key players in the title, only adds to its believability.
Tulsi-Gabbard-FNC-1200×630
You see, there were self-protecting stories from a hacker type named Dennis Montgomery, who claimed he had used some of the most cutting-edge hacking tools on the planet, in service of two guys named Barack Hussein Obama and John Brennan. This allegedly occurred during the time that Stuxnet was being developed – which was maybe 8 or 9 years before similar allegations of illegal hacking against Trump, BY government and allied forces, were made during the 2016 presidential election.
I remember when I first learned of the capabilities of Stuxnet, and how I marveled at the intelligence thereof.
Whether or not such highly advanced, highly automated tools can be legitimately called artificial intelligence really depends on WHEN the question is asked. Put another way, in the preface to Karen Hao’s book, Empire of AI…..
“It is said that to explain is to explain away. This maxim is nowhere so well-fulfilled as in the area of computer programming, especially in what is called heuristic programming and artificial intelligence. For in those realms, machines are made to behave in wondrous ways, often sufficient to dazzle even the most experienced observer. But once a particular program is unmasked, once its inner workings are explained in language sufficiently plain to induce understanding, its magic crumbles away; it is instead revealed as a mere collection of procedures, each quite comprehensible. The observer says to himself ‘I could have written that’. With that thought he moves the program in question from the shelf marked ‘intelligent,’ to that reserved for curios, fit to be discussed only with people less enlightened than he.”
-Joseph Weizenbaum, inventor of the first chatbot, 1966
The point I’m trying to make – which is in many ways a corollary of Weizenbaum’s quote, is that “future proves past” – in the words of the Q movement.
We now understand AI enough to know that old AI never seems that intelligent – but it does seem very REAL. And now that Stuxnet and the like seem like “old hat”, it’s much easier to believe that operations using such technology were quite real.
So, in many ways, I think Obama has a better understanding of AI than most people in tech give him credit for.
In my opinion, Obama is by now very familiar with Weizenbaum’s cited effect. Obama understands how understanding removes fear – but by the same token, how FEAR PREVENTS UNDERSTANDING.
Right now, Obama needs you to be afraid. My call to you is simple – FEAR NOT.
Fear is the mind-killer.
I have been aware of the same fears Obama is trying to instill in us, since not long after Dennis Montgomery says that he and his alleged associates were up to no good, using very smart software to break into banks, government institutions, credit card companies, and anywhere else with highly private information they desired. At that time, when I first understood the capabilities of Stuxnet, but had no experience with it, I sounded and felt a lot like everybody else right now, who is quite afraid of AI. I realized many potential dangers, and was afraid.
I now believe that others, who had access to that software, didn’t fear it. They mastered it, and used it, against people who didn’t even know it existed.
Think about what I’m saying. Research things – AI, Stuxnet, and Dennis Mongomery. Gain understanding. Use AI, and explain to yourself, or to others, but be careful not to explain away too much.
It took me a while to get over my fears of autonomous intelligent software, but I did.
AWARENESS and UNDERSTANDING were my tools to eliminate fear.
And one more. Above all, this tool.
God Bless you and yours!
Vaya con Dios!
W
References:
NONE. You have enough. In fact, you have more than you know.
There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.
Do not forget to LABEL AI articles, video and such.
Up front I want to say, if we are to be a free people it is up to us to take control of our lives. We have been deliberately trained to remain infantile and to look to an authority to tell us what to do. POTUS Trump wants us to be adults.
A word about POTUS Trump and Sec Kennedy.
Trump spent 5 years in a military school and then made his money building in one of the most corrupt cities in the USA. He KNOWS strategy. Kennedy is a trained, successful lawyer. He watched his father, his uncle and his cousin get assassinated by the Cabal. He also knows the enemy and strategy.
We focus on various battles – Vaccines, Epstein, illegals, crime, fuel prices, AI, Flock Cameras – POTUS and his Secretaries are focused on the WAR. The Globalist Cabal has various troops they deploy against We the People. The Fake News being a major weapon. Commie judges and the Senate being other major weapons. Then there are sanctuary cities and states, Antifa, drugs…. However I think the biggest battle is against the Mercantilists based in Europe & the City of London. Also remember POTUS is trying to bring back our industrial base. That includes Big Pharma that was exported to China and India thanks to the World Trade Organization ratification.
If you go back in history, depending on the author, you find similar systems. Whether it is Rome and slaves or Europe and serfs, you have an upper class (oligarchy) usually a priesthood and a thin layer of technical people. The rest of the people are serfs or slaves. Essentially feudalism.
Your government is a corporatocracy, a new authoritarian state in the process of consolidating your output into a more controllable, exploitable channel. The reason you are being misled by your government and told that all of this is good for you, is because there is no profit in managing a mass uprising. It is too disruptive. The markets want you to continue to consume—quietly and obediently. The technology that is being marketed to you is actually being used to condition you to expect to be spied on, and to spy on others. Every totalitarian state in history has relied on data collection. The Nazis were masters of data collection and analysis. Your government now has technological capabilities that far exceed anything ever seen on the planet to this date. You are in the midst of the biggest public relations scam in the history of the world. The pretty pastel vision of life in a SmartGrowth development is a manipulation, a mask. In fact these plans are designed to restrict your freedom of movement and choice.
According to ICLEI, if you only have one car or no car your disposable income will be at least 20% higher. Does this mean that you will have 20% more money to spend? No. It means that corporations can lower your wages by 20% and still sell you the same number of goods. A compression of the economy with a more efficient outcome for big business. Concentrating populations into urban areas where they can be easily monitored, where their usage of energy can be regulated, and where their consumption of goods can be restricted, is a goal of UN Agenda 21…
Normal use is the little green areas. Again, we got the future plans for our county. My farm is within a wildlife corridor and thus no human use will be allowed.
Getting rid of mRNA vaccines does not get rid of the real problem–the Oligarchy who actually rule us. If Kennedy & Trump manage to succeed in getting rid of mRNA vaccines, our rulers would just use a different method to cull the herd. Why do you think POTUS keeps saying Iran must never have a nuclear weapon?
In short POTUS is getting rid of the guy with the gun NOT THE GUN!
…
I want to use oil as an example of how complicated things actually are.
Brent Crude Oil – 60-Day Price Trend. Brent crude oil– the international benchmark that pricesapproximately 65% of the world’s traded crude… Brent crude trades at $114.89/bbl per barrel. The Strait of Hormuz crisis, OPEC+ production decisions, and sanctions on major producers are reshaping global energy markets. Oil prices directly affect gasoline costs, inflation, defense budgets, and geopolitical stability worldwide….
Five major crude oil benchmarks serve different regions and market segments. Understanding the spread between these benchmarks reveals supply constraints, sanctions effects, and regional demand patterns.
BENCHMARK .. PRICE USD/BBL .. EXCHANGE .. REGION .. DESCRIPTION
Brent Crude ……… $114.89 ……… ICE London …… Global ….. International
~65% of the world’s traded oil. [Price] sourced from North Sea production.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
WTI ……………. $108.20 ………….NYMEX…….Americas U.S. domestic benchmark.
(West Texas Intermediate) Delivered at Cushing, Oklahoma. Trades at a discount to Brent due to landlocked delivery. [And NOT because it is American oil.]
January 2026, the Norwegian Continental Shelf (NCS) — which accounts for the overwhelming majority of North Sea oil output — produced an average of 2.219 million barrels per day of oil, natural gas liquids (NGL), and condensate… the United Kingdom Continental Shelf (UKCS) ..with crude oil production falling from 0.56 million bpd in 2024 to 0.40 million bpd by 2029 [and 0.93 projected for 2026.]
So somewhere around 3.1 million barrels a dayof North Sea oil is used to price almost 65 million barrels a day.
The financiers in London are controlling the pricing, NOT the oil producers! As The Network of Global Corporate Controlshowed, “…737 top holders accumulate 80% of the control over the value of all TNCs[Trans National Corporations] …A relevant additional fact at this point is that ¾ of the core are financial intermediaries...”
These financiers, the City of London are POTUS Trump’s targets. That is why Mark Carney is acting nutz.
TradeBait goes into this too, only looking at the situation from the point of view of the US military.
This video is prompted to where you see the last ten minutes instead of two hours. Please watch to the end. Jim who speaks at the end is a Canadian. The other guy is Burning Bright from Badlands. He is from the Boston area.
…
THE ENEMY
Our enemy, once they had lost the overt fights against the USA, turned to psychological warfare.
“For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence–on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.”
“ Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.”
Bertrand Russell was a “scientific consultant” to evil psychopaths who wanted to run a world tyranny. In this book, he lays out a framework for a “scientific” global dictatorship, and ponders the intricacies of bringing it about, while blithely penning his sociopathic rationalizations for moving forward with it…
– p56 [1] On education “The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated. When the technique has been perfected, every government that has been in charge of education for a generation will be able to control its subjects securely without the need of armies or policemen.”
– p41 [2] “In like manner, the scientific rulers will provide one kind of education for ordinary men and women, and another for those who are to become holders of scientific power. Ordinary men and women will be expected to be docile, industrious, punctual, thoughtless, and contented. Of these qualities, probably contentment will be considered the most important. In order to produce it, all the researches of psycho-analysis, behaviourism, and biochemistry will be brought into play…. All the boys and girls will learn from an early age to be what is called ‘co-operative,’ i.e., to do exactly what everybody is doing. Initiative will be discouraged in these children, and insubordination, without being punished, will be scientifically trained out of them.” “It is to be expected that advances in physiology and psychology will give governments much more control over individual mentality than they now have even in totalitarian countries. Fichte laid it down that education should aim at destroying free will, so that, after pupils have left school, they shall be incapable, throughout the rest of their lives, of thinking or acting otherwise than as their schoolmasters would have wished.” – p61 [3] On control over opinion “The completeness of the resulting control over opinion depends in various ways upon scientific technique. Where all children go to school, and all schools are controlled by the government, the authorities can close the minds of the young to everything contrary to official orthodoxy.
(Jun. 19, 2018)—The kindest thing we can say about Queen’s Privy Council kingpin Lord Mark Malloch-Brown is that he is certainly one of a kind.
It has taken an entire group of researchers over a month just to gather the facts about him. These facts are scattered across the Internet in many dozens of biographies in an evident strategy to confuse people about his background. No two are alike. These convoluted biographies are telling for a man with literally trillions of dollars at his fingertips; meaning he can buy national elections anywhere on the planet, but he cannot seem to write his resume…
….the Queen’s Privy Council and the United Nations plan for us. Exploitation, abuse and euthanasia. They don’t even hide the fact that they want to exterminate 75-90% of the world’s population (see video-taped comments by eugenicists Prince Philip and Ted Turner).
Is the above article, bafflegab? Truth? Or a mix?
….
WOLF MOON onmRNAVACCINES
AND THIS IS KEY.
If what Wolf proposes is true, POTUS unleashed the brainstorming of Americans to find ways to mitigate the effects of the clot shots. Not only did Trump, spike the guns of the 10 years of lockdown crowd AND not require or promote the clot shot, but early on he promoted alternatives. Trump and Dr Navarro even got India to manufacture HCQ for the USA and the USA then had strategic reserves of the stuff. Of course the Cabal countered with a lying Fake Science trial showing HCQ kills people. With Ivermectin, they just killed the study.
Starting the comments HEREon September 22, 2026 11:26Bold is mine.
IMO, after numerous “behavioral training” hoaxes for allegedly possessing or releasing information, Trump is NEVER going to push to actually release information on deep military stuff like “why they’re developing bad but very quickly produced vaccines” that cost only 0.0001 out of 15, which apparently is a real DEAL as far as the military is concerned. Even among their own forces.
IMO Bobby Kennedy has been “read in”, too. But (IMO) they did NOT read in Prasad or Makary – too low-level and could not be trusted to keep the secrets. Those guys pushed where Kennedy could not protect them.
I strongly suspect now that JFK was killed because he was going to take stuff public in some way that was a predictable disaster.
If I go back and study the stuff that was kept secret during WWII, and assume that similar situations are ongoing today, then things starts making sense.
We are NEVER going to ban these vaccines. IMO they would rather disclose the truth and endure the resulting societal problems, than lose the military edge that genetic vaccines provide in hypothetical conflicts.
But whatever. We need to keep doing our thing to minimize the blowback, IMO. But not having the “gun/shield” is not an option.
You yourself have published the truth about the HHS/DoD connection. We all know that DoD and HHS have been joined at the hip on bioweapons for decades. I doubt that there was even military unanimity on the idea of Fauci and HHS moving experiments to Wuhan being a good idea or a bad idea. I suspect there are varying levels of realism on mRNA vaccines.
And yes, in these hypotheses, I assume Fauci was the guy who was “read in” on whatever is really going on.
Not everybody who supports mRNA vaccines has the same motivation for supporting them. Many people believe all the narrative BS that the media spits out. But then add people who discern varying levels of badness of the vaccines, and who then have varying levels of tolerance on that.
I don’t think anybody except embedded depoppers, ChiComs, and a few others are “fine” with the casualties of the clot shot. But I do think there are people in the system who know how bad it is, but who also know why that badness is being tolerated.
I’m not trying to discourage people. I’m trusting Trump, AND Bobby Kennedy, and simultaneously trying to explain why they’re allowing a marginal but potentially critical vaccine technology to be developed.
And if I’m right about this, it’s a lot more important than an election. I don’t LIKE that, but it’s true. A “humanity-clearing virus” with 80+% mortality being stopped in its tracks by a vaccine with a COVID-level death rate (or a COVID vaccine-level death rate – pretty similar) – that’s a win, if we’re ever in that position.
That’s cold, hard science. It’s not pretty, but it has to be considered.
Frontiers are not safe. At the same time we were developing the American frontier, we had “early” anesthesia. Ether, chloroform, and others. It was DANGEROUS as hell. We also had rapid amputations with saws. Same. But it was better than the alternative.
Right now – with all the flaws of the mRNA vaccines, if there is suddenly an “airborne Ebola”, then our having the ability to create a working and deliverable vaccine in under 24 hours is a huge, huge, huge military advantage in SAVING AMERICA. Maybe saving humanity.
Obviously, WE should not be making that virus. But WE don’t control other people on the planet (honestly, we can’t even control our own), and if there ARE “people” not on this planet who have more advanced technology, well, we don’t control them, either.
So, IMO, the bad (side effects) but good (fast) mRNA technology needs to move forward. I just think we need to be more honest about why we’re doing it. The REASONS of speed and simplicity have been mentioned. The reasons behind those have not.
I refuse to believe Trump is stupid about this, and that Bobby Kennedy has turned into a polar opposite on vaccines. Something is up. And these hypotheses explain it.
Thanks for thinking about it. It’s not easy, but it bears consideration by more minds to see if it makes sense.
I’ve done a lot of thinking to try to solve the riddle of Trump’s enigmatic vax position, but Bobby Kennedy gave me another equation to work with, and that allowed me to see some potential solutions. Mix in the military’s shadowy support for the entire thing, without knee-jerking that they’re Satan-worshiping DARPA baddies, and suddenly some rational possibilities come into view.
There are times that the entire COVID psy-op struck me as a bit of a live drill, and while I think that idea is far too simplistic, I do think that people advising Trump have surely been doing so from literal Q-clearance knowledge that can’t go public.
For instance (and this is also to share some mRNA knowledge) it is entirely possible that our military KNEW in 2018-2019 that there would eventually be another pathogen lab leak, likely significant, and in top military manner, we had prepared for it. The best tech for rapid response on a proven platform, though not using proven-safe protein targets, had to have been the mRNA technology, IMO, despite all its flaws, problems, and unknown risks. On paper, it’s the best. Yeah, it doesn’t guarantee a shut-off of production. Yeah, it makes errors because of N1-methylpseudouridine. Yeah, it has toxicity problems in the LNPs. Yeah, it goes to bad places it shouldn’t go. Everything we’ve discussed.
BUT we know that the baseline badness of side effects is probably only one or two orders of magnitude worse than our “best” vaccines. For some unknown future disease where the death rate exceeds that from the clot shot itself, AND the saving of lives due to fast action is exponential, mRNA shots will clearly have a desirable total life-saving yield. They won’t do it as safely as a traditional vaccine using a protein immunogen, but they will start saving lives sooner and faster. This can be easily modeled.
This would have been more obvious if Omicron had not saved us from Delta, with the latter being about as pathogenic as Original Wuhan, and it would have been completely clear if there had been no mutation of Wuhan, because in that case we might have seen permanent immunity from the vax.
All that said, we must (IMO) keep pointing out the deficiencies of the mRNA technology. I suspect there are limits to how much improvement is possible, so we cannot delude ourselves if these remain sub-par vaccines compared to protein technologies. We cannot let lies about mRNA technology, nor even its potential heroic use in a truly apocalyptic biological event, blind us to the reality that old-style vaccines are and likely will remain superior.
However, I think that it would be wonderful if somebody “on our side” were able to outline the highly theoretical risk-benefit curves, where mRNA vaccines might save lives sooner and bigger at high pathogenicity, but are demonstrably sub-optimal at low pathogenicity, thereby framing both the negatives and positives of the technology in a way that allows us to make peace with each other. In that case, RFKJ’s wisdom of allowing mRNA to go forward, but under increased scrutiny and deference to sound scientific results, will prove historically correct, IMO.
I’ll just say right off the bat that I don’t expect anybody here to believe any of these hypotheses – and I do call them hypotheses, because I’m not locked in on any of them. And just for further clarification, I’m not certain that anything you’re additionally speculating as being implied, is actually implied, or is intended by me to be implied, but you are welcome to digest what I say in any way that makes sense to you, no problem.
These are very loose hypotheses, designed around the idea that much of what we are seeing is the result of secrecy that is both constraining and manipulating President Trump and Bobby Kennedy.
I remain uncertain whether Trump was actually read in on anything potentially related to these hypotheses during his first term, but the suspicion that he (45) was NOT – and later (47) WAS – looms large to me as a handy explanation of otherwise inexplicable things. Indeed, I further suspect that Obama and Brennan’s plot to raise “Russia, Russia, Russia” suspicions about Trump was designed to make sure Trump could not be informed about certain things.
In the beginning of the “pandemic”, Trump had to act on uncertainty – uncertainty about many things, including the origin of the virus, the motivations of all the players behind it, the science itself, and even the actual lethality of the virus. I don’t know what he was told that was classified at the time, but I suspect he WAS informed of SOME classified things in SOME areas. That is a multi-dimensional continuum – not a binary.
I suspect his context for decisions included some, but not all, classified aspects. All I know is that I trust that Trump did the best he could with what he was given.
….
To me, this indicates the Malthusians aka British Empire has been in control. And to some extent still is. (See my Depop series especially Kissinger’s National Security Study Memorandum NSSM 200.) Remember Kissinger said point blank during a Chatham House speech, he kept the Brits better informed than our US State Dept. Also Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum was a protegee of Kissinger.
YOURS TRULY WARNED THIS BOARD ABOUT DR. ERICA SCHWARTZ, MD, Rear Adm (ret) WHEN SHE WAS CONFIRMED AS THE NEW CDC DIRECTOR — THE “QUEEN OF VACCINES.” THE “ENFORCER” OF THE PENTAGON’S COVID-19 BIOWEAPON “VACCINE” MANDATE ON THE U.S.MILITARY.
YOURS TRULY WARNED THIS BOARD ABOUT HOW HHS SEC. KENNEDY, JR., WAS BEING HOBBLED AND IS ESSENTIALLY USELESS.
Refusing to testify without a valid legal basis is itself the offense. Under 2 U.S.C. § 192, willfully failing to appear after a valid congressional subpoena, or refusing to answer pertinent questions once there, is a misdemeanor punishable by up to one year in prison and a fine.
The CRS puts it plainly: a subpoena recipient “has a legal obligation to comply, absent a valid and overriding privilege or other legal justification.” So the legal basis is the only shield. If an official can’t point to one — the Fifth Amendment, executive privilege, a recognized separation-of-powers conflict (e.g., the Secretary of State appearing at a major diplomatic event), attorney-client privilege, etc. — the refusal is contempt.
In practice, Congress has several enforcement levers when an official refuses without a valid basis:
She is also military so indictment would be via a military tribunal avoiding the Woke judges & juries of DC. It also allows RICO as she CONTINUES her pushing of the Clot Shots. (The five year window for the military is fast closing.)
…
In order to not clutter up this article, I removed a collection of VARIOUS COMMENTS ABOUT THE CLOT SHOT AND mRNA VACCINES. If Treepers wish I can put them in a separate article so they do not get lost. They would have doubled the length of this article.
There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.
Do not forget to LABEL AI articles, video and such.
In talking about scientific fraud, I want to start with a comment made by TheseTruthsLINK.
If you didn’t already have enough reasons to distrust Dr. Anthony Fauci, here’s a new one, and it’s a doozy.
Newly disclosed documents reveal that Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) had a formal institutional partnership with the CIA, one that provided cover for the agency’s biological-threat research. This goes well beyond the previously known off-the-books meetings tied to the Wuhan lab origins controversy. Fauci’s ties to American intelligence run far deeper than anyone outside a handful of investigators realized….
Anthony Stephen Fauci (born December 24, 1940) is an American physician-scientist and immunologist who served as the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) from 1984 to 2022 and as Chief Medical Advisor to the President from 2021 to 2022. He was one of the world’s most frequently cited scientists across all scientific journals from 1983 to 2002.
In 1984 Ronald Reagan was re-elected and his VP was George H. W. Bush of the CIA.
Since the FDA, USDA, EPA and other bureaucracies use ‘The Science ™‘ to validate their regulations I wanted to look at the history of the destruction of science over the last century.
1964 — The Problem-Solving Method They Removed From Every Textbook
In 1964, Richard Feynman was the only person on California’s textbook commission who actually read the textbooks. What he found should have ended careers — publishers sending blank books that still received ratings, first-grade science texts teaching children nothing but empty vocabulary, and an entire system designed to reward memorization over real understanding.This video breaks down Feynman’s forgotten problem-solving framework — the same approach he used to win the Nobel Prize, expose broken education systems from California to Brazil, and coin the term “Cargo Cult Science” in his legendary 1974 Caltech commencement speech.You’ll learn his 12 favorite problems technique (explained by mathematician Gian-Carlo Rota), why estimating before calculating is the single most underrated thinking skill, and how to tell the difference between someone who memorized the answer and someone who actually understands the problem — a distinction that matters more now than ever, because AI can memorize everything, but it can’t think from scratch.
If you’ve ever felt out of step with the system — at school, at work, in a meeting where nobody could answer the question that wasn’t on the slides — this video explains why. And it gives you a method to fix it tonight.🔹 Drop your own “label instead of an explanation” moment in the comments.——————————————————📖
Sources & Further Reading:
“Surely You’re Joking, Mr. Feynman!” — Chapters: “Judging Books by Their Covers” & “O Americano, Outra Vez!” (W.W. Norton, 1985) “What is Science?” — Feynman’s Address to the National Science Teachers Association, 1966 “Cargo Cult Science” — Caltech Commencement Address, 1974 “Genius: The Life and Science of Richard Feynman” — James Gleick (Pantheon, 1992) Gian-Carlo Rota — “Ten Lessons I Wish I Had Been Taught,” Lecture, 1996
I cut the most useful part of Feynman’s method out of this video — it needed pages, not minutes. It’s the test he used to check whether he actually understood something or had only learned its name. Three questions, about 90 seconds, and it fails almost everything most people think they know. That, plus the full 12 Favorite Problems system, is in The Feynman Field Guide to Clear Thinking: https://feynmanarchives.com/
Disclaimer: This video is for educational and informational purposes only. The views expressed are based on publicly available historical sources and the creator’s interpretation. This content does not constitute professional advice in education, career development, or any other field. Always conduct your own research and consult qualified professionals for specific decisions.
Part of the Transcript:
16:37
The reason you always felt out of step with the system is because the system was designed to produce the opposite of you.It produces people who follow the process perfectly right up until reality changes and then they freeze. You’ve seen it in hiring. The candidate with the perfect resume who can’t answer a simple what-if question in the interview. You’ve seen it in leadership. The director who can quote the strategy deck word for word but goes blank when a client throws a curveball.
The system trained them to memorize the runway, not to fly the plane.
Feynman left behind the method the system tried to bury.
— 12 problems always alive.
— Strip every claim down to what you can check.
— Estimate before you calculate.
— Test your understanding by rephrasing the question.
— If you can’t answer it in different words, you never understood it in the first place.
That’s it. That’s what they removed. And now you have it back.
But Feynman’s war on the textbooks exposed something bigger than bad education. He found the same pattern in science, in hiring, in way entire industries collapse when nobody inside them can think from scratch. And when he called it out by name, in front of the most powerful people in the room, they didn’t thank him. [Managed decline anyone? -GC]
The Deal That Reshaped the Market: Maxwell Buys Macmillan and Joins McGraw‑Hill
Robert Maxwell purchased Macmillan Inc. in the late 1980s, a transaction that positioned him as owner of one of the United States’ largest textbook publishers at the time; reporting from the period documents the acquisition and the creation of a joint venture combining Macmillan’s school publishing units with McGraw‑Hill’s to form Macmillan/McGraw‑Hill School Publishing Co. in 1989, a company that became the second‑largest U.S. textbook publisher [1][2]. The joint venture pooled Macmillan imprints like Glencoe and units such as Science Research Associates (SRA) into a single school publishing operation, reflecting Maxwell’s strategy of consolidating academic and educational assets under his Maxwell Communication Corporation umbrella, and contemporary sources note that McGraw‑Hill assumed sole ownership of the joint operation by 1993 after Maxwell’s death, indicating the Maxwell family no longer retained operational control
𝗥𝗼𝗯𝗲𝗿𝘁 𝗠𝗮𝘅𝘄𝗲𝗹𝗹, [𝗚𝗵𝗶𝘀𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗠𝗮𝘅𝘄𝗲𝗹𝗹’𝘀 𝗗𝗮𝗱] 𝘁𝗼𝗼𝗸 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗹 𝗼𝗳 𝗽𝗲𝗲𝗿 𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗶𝗲𝘄𝗲𝗱 𝘀𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲, 𝗺𝗼𝗻𝗲𝘁𝗶𝘇𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝘁 AND DESTROYED IT.
Eye of the Storm Ep. 138 (Badlands)
1:04:20: They show a clip from The Joe Rogan Experience (3 min clip)
ERIC: … Maxwell figured out how to DESTROY SCIENCE and MAKE A FORTUNE. So he diluted the quality of the editorship of the leading journals. This was a high quality informal enterprise. Now most of the destruction of science in terms of how high quality it used to be, has taken place relatively recently. POST ROBERT MAXWELL. Because we now have an enormous number of journals staffed by people who can’t spot publication cartels, where we agree to cite each others work and we agree to publish stuff, you know Pay for Play. ALL the nonsense you see with irreproducible research…
The peer review thing got woven in so that people think that the scientific method and peer review ARE THE SAME THING. Where ONE IS THE UNWANTED INFECTION FROM THE BIOLOGICAL BIOMEDICAL UNIVERSE, which had peer review much longer than anything else…”
From the article:
One of these ideas is what he calls👉the DISC (Distributed Idea Suppression Complex) which explains how disruptive and innovative ideas that challenge the status quo are suppressed.👈 Keeping institutions safe from individuals who create change….
Pergamon Press was an Oxford-based publishing house, founded by Paul Rosbaud and Robert Maxwell, that published scientific and medical books and journals. Originally called Butterworth-Springer, it is now an imprint of Elsevier.
History
The core company, Butterworth-Springer, started in 1948 to bring the “Springer know-how and techniques of aggressive publishing in science”[1] to Britain. Paul Rosbaud was the man with the knowledge. When Maxwell acquired the company in 1951, Rosbaud held a one-quarter share.[1] They changed the house name to Pergamon Press, using a logo that was a reproduction of a Greek coin from Pergamon. Maxwell and Rosbaud worked together growing the company until May 1956, when, according to Joe Haines, Rosbaud was sacked….
Proving that unpaid anonymous review is worth every cent, the 217 year old Wiley science publisher “peer reviewed” 11,300 papers that were fake, and didn’t even notice. It’s not just a scam, it’s an industry. Naked “gobbledygook sandwiches” got past peer review, and the expert reviewers didn’t so much as blink.
Big Government and Big Money has captured science and strangled it. The more money they pour in, the worse it gets. John Wiley and Sons is a US $2 billion dollar machine, but they got used by criminal gangs to launder fake “science” as something real.
Things are so bad, fake scientists pay professional cheating services who use AI to create papers and torture the words so they look “original”. Thus a paper on ‘breast cancer’ becomes a discovery about “bosom peril” and a ‘naïve Bayes’ classifier became a ‘gullible Bayes’. An ant colony was labeled an ‘underground creepy crawly state’.
And what do we make of the flag to clamor ratio? Well, old fashioned scientists might call it ‘signal to noise’. The nonsense never ends….
But this is not really about the recent virus; it goes back a very long time. Scientific fraud — not accident, not error, intentional misrepresentation — has been all over medicine and specifically pharmaceutical trials for decades.
Cuppa
November 2020 — External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results
[I get access denied due to rapid clicks…?? So here is the archived version LINK – GC]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Here are ‘Peer-Reviewed” studies and comments from medical journal editors. My list is so long I am going to cut it in half and put the rest in my next article. However since this type of information has a tendency to disappear, I want it documented.
US scientists are significantly more likely to publish fake research than scientists from elsewhere, finds a trawl of officially withdrawn (retracted) studies.Fraudsters are also more likely to be “repeat offenders,” the study shows.
Summary
There is increasing concern that most current published research findings are false.The probability that a research claim is true may depend on study power and bias, the number of other studies on the same question, and, importantly, the ratio of true to no relationships among the relationships probed in each scientific field. In this framework, a research finding is less likely to be true when the studies conducted in a field are smaller; when effect sizes are smaller; when there is a greater number and lesser preselection of tested relationships; where there is greater flexibility in designs, definitions, outcomes, and analytical modes; when there is greater financial and other interest and prejudice; and when more teams are involved in a scientific field in chase of statistical significance. Simulations show that for most study designs and settings, it is more likely for a research claim to be false than true. Moreover, for many current scientific fields, claimed research findings may often be simply accurate measures of the prevailing bias…..
….A pooled weightedaverage of 1.97%(N = 7, 95%CI: 0.86–4.45) ofscientists admitted to have fabricated, falsified or modified dataor results at least once –a serious form of misconduct by any standard– and up to33.7% admitted other questionable research practices. In surveysasking about the behaviour of colleagues, admission rates were14.12%< (N = 12, 95% CI: 9.91–19.72)for falsification, and up to 72% for other questionable research practices.Meta-regression showed that self reports surveys, surveys using the words “falsification” or “fabrication”, and mailed surveys yielded lower percentages of misconduct. When these factors were controlled for,misconduct was reported more frequently by medical/pharmacological researchers than others.
Considering that these surveys ask sensitive questions and have other limitations, it appears likely that this is a conservative estimate of the true prevalence of scientific misconduct.
As we said in December, an e-patient essential is sorting out what writings to trust, whether we find them online or in print. There’s an important update on this in the New York Timestoday, an interviewwith Marcia Angell MD, an author we’ve quoted before, and her husband Dr. Arnold Relman – both long-time editors of one of the world’s top journals, the New England Journal of Medicine. It contains some eye-poppers.
In 2009, as I was just starting to get educated about healthcare, I posted A Quote I Won’t Soon Forget, which began:
It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.
Dana Blankenhorn of the ZDNet health blog called it “a bombshell.” I couldn’t agree more. And I must say, with all the smart people in this community, why on earth haven’t we heard more about this??
And how on earth are we supposed to be empowered participatory patients if we can’t trust the world’s leading journal?
It echoed Richard Smith, 25 year editor of another top-tier journal (the British Medical Journal), in the first issue of our Journal of Participatory Medicine:
…most of what appears in peer-reviewed journals is scientifically weak.
This is no small issue in the life of an engaged patient. e-Patients who bring googled articles to their office visits are often lambasted or subjected to eye-rolls by clinicians who say that we should only trust academic medical journals. But can we trust them??
We got a rude update on why published science is shaky in our January 2011 post The Decline Effect: most published studies are never replicated by another lab! That’s absurd – heck, in high school I couldn’t get a science experiment passed if it wasn’t reproducible, but our journals do that??….
Every year, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) inspects several hundred clinical sites performing biomedical research on human participants and occasionally finds evidence of substantial departures from good clinical practice and research misconduct. However, the FDA has no systematic method of communicating these findings to the scientific community, leaving open the possibility that research misconduct detected by a government agency goes unremarked in the peer-reviewed literature….
Objectives
To identify published clinical trials in which an FDA inspection found significant evidence of objectionable conditions or practices, to describe violations, and to determine whether the violations are mentioned in the peer-reviewed literature.
Design and Setting
Cross-sectional analysis of publicly available documents, dated from January 1, 1998, to September 30, 2013, describing FDA inspections of clinical trial sites in which significant evidence of objectionable conditions or practices was found.
Results:Fifty-seven published clinical trials were identified for which an FDA inspection of a trial site had found significant evidence of 1 or more of the following problems:
falsification or submission of false information, 22 trials (39%);
problems with adverse events reporting, 14 trials (25%);
protocol violations, 42 trials (74%);
inadequate or inaccurate recordkeeping, 35 trials (61%);
failure to protect the safety of patients and/or issues with oversight or informed consent, 30 trials (53%);
and violations not otherwise categorized, 20 trials (35%).
Only 3 of the 78 publications (4%) that resulted from trials in which the FDA found significant violations mentioned the objectionable conditions or practices found during the inspection. No corrections, retractions, expressions of concern, or other comments acknowledging the key issues identified by the inspection were subsequently published.
Conclusions and Relevance
When the FDA finds significant departures from good clinical practice, those findings are seldom reflected in the peer-reviewed literature, even when there is evidence of data fabrication or other forms of research misconduct.
A decade ago, I wrote in another blog “Blogs are now performing the important tasks of scrutinizing papers and conclusions often finding gross mistakes.” That is probably one of the reasons we were shut up during Covid.
Much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness. As one participant put it, “poor methods get results”. The Academy of Medical Sciences, Medical Research Council, and Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council have now put their reputational weight behind an investigation into these questionable research practices. The apparent endemicity [i.e. pervasiveness within the scientific culture] of bad research behaviour is alarming. In their quest for telling a compelling story, scientists too often sculpt data to fit their preferred theory of the world. Or they retrofit hypotheses to fit their data. Journal editors deserve their fair share of criticism too. We aid and abet the worst behaviours. Our acquiescence to the impact factor fuels an unhealthy competition to win a place in a select few journals. Our love of “significance” pollutes the literature with many a statistical fairy-tale….
Similarly, the editor in chief of the New England Journal of Medicine, Dr. Marcia Angell, wrote in 2009:
(Original Article I quote below has vanished… imagine that!)
….It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine….
In fact, in October 2017, Angell went further – she published an article in the New York Review of books entitled,‘Drug Companies and Doctors: A Story of Corruption.’
This article in The New York Review of Books, by Marcia Angell, details the growing concern over the colonization of the medical profession by pharmaceutical companies
The NY Review article is paywalled. Archived Version can be read.
I am going to stop here and continue next week so you focus on reading the last 3 articles. They are DAMNING especially since Angell, spent two decades as the editor-in-chief of the New England Journal of Medicine.
Trump directs agencies to waive NDAs for former employees involved in UFO investigations: report
The nondisclosure agreements have proved an impediment to government investigations into UAPs, also known as UFOs, and the directive is intended to ease this source of reluctance.
Interesting. You will recall that I have long considered the possibility that relevant agencies were “less than honest” with PDJT(45) about certain highly classified information – ironically, we now know, because of that sketchy communist, Barack Hussein Obama, who poisoned the government against Trump with “The Frame Job”.
Well, it looks like Trump and the White Hats are trying to get access to ALL the information now.
President Donald Trump has directed federal agencies to waive the nondisclosure agreements that former government employees and contractors signed while they were working on investigations involving unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAPs), also known as UFOs.
The directives were given to the Department of War and the intelligence community, Fox News reported, citing unnamed sources.
The order asks that the agencies allow former government employees and contractors who have relevant information about UAPs to come forward to meet with representatives of Trump’s UAP taskforce, the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO). Any NDAs they signed would be waived under the order.
A senior administration official stressed that the directive is not a “declassification directive” and only allows employees and contractors to come forward through government channels.
The NDAs have proved an impediment to government investigations into UAPs, and the directive is intended to ease this source of reluctance.
“Silos” is right. And these silos have biometric ID elevators between floors, and pat-downs at all the exits.
What this tells me is that “there’s some there there”.
Interesting times.
W
For a grab of prior posts on this topic, check out this link.
There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.
Do not forget to LABEL AI articles video and such.
This is going to be very rough since I do not have time to do any editing and I had to transcribe by hand from the video.
I have mentioned a few times that I think the Trump administration is planning a major can of Whoop Ass. Every once in a while we see signs such as the indictment of Comey and Brennan’s freaking out.
Josh and Alpha had a recent conversation about just this subject, but before I get into that I want to point to a few shark fins surfacing.
Here we are 6 years later with the evidence of voter fraud by tens of thousands in just one blue city that have been held under lock snd key while the propagandist media declares the election steal to be fantasy. Multiply by literally thousands of locations to some undetermined extent. We know Fulton County, GA is going to be worse as an example..
Method explained in the article. One of many methods for cheating for the record.
We know the perpetrators are unlikely to see one day behind bars. We know even SCOTUS acted in defense of the perpetrators at the time. We now know with ample evidence that J6 was Fedsurrection. Yet, the perpetrators continue to walk free and pretend they did something great for America.
We also know that any person in America that opposes the provisions of the SAVE America Act self identifies as a criminal or complicit in seditious and perhaps treasonous behavior. All you have to do is ask any person where they stand on that issue and you know who they are.
There can be no peace and trust in government until justice is fully served.
After what was done to POTUS, there is no way he is going to let these monsters get off Scott free. They really blew it when they went raided his home in Florida. Makes you wonder if he moved there, to a friendlier legal environment on purpose.
The Badlands Brief: White House Task Force Gathers Intelligence Documents on 2020 Election for Declassification
A White House task force is gathering documents related to the 2020 presidential election for declassification from the CIA, the National Security Agency, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the FBI, and the Justice Department.
The task force, which operates in addition to ongoing Department of Justice probes into the 2020 election, consists of
Just The News’ John Solomonand former Trump administration officials including former national security aide Derek Harvey. Lawyers on the team have been reviewing gathered documents for months.
The documents focus on areas including ballot irregularities, potential voting machine issues, and possibly other topics. Members of the task force have been encouraged to limit redactions in declassified documents, even if that means retaining the names of government officials or other individuals, according to two people with knowledge of the effort.
The initiative involves gathering thousands of pages from US intelligence agencies, with plans to declassify some of them. The team has been quietly reviewing materials for months, sometimes late into the night.
President Trump told reporters Wednesday that acting DNI Bill Pulte will serve for only “a month or two” but is authorized to “declassify almost everything.”
Ashe in America: This is one of those anticipated disclosures that will serve as a check on whether we’re actually winning.
We can’t have a Golden Age without a Justice Phase and the core of any Justice Phase has to be elections. And we can’t have real elections without accountability and honesty for how fake they’ve been.
This ODNI thing could be a rug. Or, it could be the exact catalyst for change we desperately need.
I’m also awaiting disclosure (and indictments) on weaponization of government. They weaponized the government to prevent the truth about fake elections from coming out. A real investigative effort on the 2020 election would yield both of those change-making revelations.
I hope it drops before the 250th birthday. If it’s not a rug, that would be quite the victory to celebrate. And, if it is a rug, then we should probably declare independence again. Either way, July 4th is going to be epic!
Happy Independence Day, everyone!
And speaking of Election Fraud Badlands (Ghost) dropped this. For background see my article on Petro and Columbia LINK
….Petro is asserting that the recent Colombian presidential election was stolen using computer servers that are based in California.
My favorite excerpt is this part:
“From my phone conversation with Trump, I was able to confirm that he didn’t know I didn’t support de la Espriella because of his old ties to drug trafficking and the genocide in Colombia.
I hope that amid his concerns he has time to call his intelligence agencies so they can tell him who Abelardo de la Espriella is and why he is a US citizen and who his partners are, including alias “Boliche”.
Colombia’s current president is faced with evidence of an electoral fraud via algorithms and with prohibited foreign financing in our constitution.”
Wew, lad….
H/T Duchess
RNC unleashes ELECTION LAWSUIT to STOP Illegal Votes!
🚨 HOLY SMOKES. The FBI has just FLOODED Fulton County, Georgia with hundreds of agents to ramp up the 2020 election investigation, following a raid that seized ballots
Material that was seized is being reviewed, including DATA taken from ballot tabulation machines
HOLY SMOKES. The FBI has just FLOODED Fulton County, Georgia with hundreds of agents to ramp up the 2020 election investigation, following a raid that seized ballots
Material that was seized is being reviewed, including DATA taken from ballot tabulation machines
Over 200 AGENTS were just deployed to Georgia, and the investigation “appears to be accelerating” — Atlanta News First
Field offices NATIONWIDE are reportedly zeroing in on this probe
🚨 HOLY CRAP! President Trump is set to announce that Democratic Senators Jon Ossoff and Raphael Warnock of Georgia were ILLEGITIMATELY ELECTED due to massive fraud, following an FBI investigation into Fulton County 2020 — @DC_Reporter
28 minutes Elon posts Taylor Swift AI by an Anon on July 4th and then on July 5th. There is in the background 4559 Jul 1, a Q drop.
46:30 Josh: Now going back to that video for a second. Did you notice all the presidents were carrying Something? A RED FOLDER…
Does anyone know where the Red Folder Came from?
I have been talking about the Red Folder since Jan 2nd 2021 and you [Alpha] started talking about it in the beginning of the Trump administration. Well before that back in 2024 because this actually was when we referred to what was happening with the Mar-a-Logo raid. Hey, they are looking for the Red Folder.
What is in the Red Folder? Well it is the Crosfire Hurricane binder and other various secrets that Trump declassified and took with him before he left including information pertaining to Nancy Pelosi’s laptop. We started it and it spread to the whole anon community because, well we had talked to somebody and they said, they are after the red ‘bull’
48 minutes Josh Reads Trump Truth about Reconciliation 3.0, the $350 billion for defence plus Save America Act… Why is this interesting?
So if you understand that Trump doesn’t really want the Save America Act passed as Alpha and I have been saying. There are a multitude of reasons. Trump knows what we are about to say. If it is passed, Mark Elias and all the Lawfare lawyers will innediately put injunctions on it in court. You will have lawfare judges immediately stop it from being implemented. In other words you will not have implementation of the Save America Act prior to the midterms. There is a chance it could go th the Supreme Court but the scary part is the Supreme Court could vote either way.
So the idea is if we want the Save America Act to secure the midterm elections, it is just improbable. It is not going to happen. This means Trump most likely does not want the Save America Act to happen.
Now Reconciliation 3.0 is the National Defense Authorization Act. Now why is this crazy. Because Trump has come out and made a declaration. “I will sign ZERO bills until the Save America Act is passed.” I think he has 90 days before he has to send them back.
So now we have the National Defense Authorization Act coming up. Sp what else is in the the National Defense Authorization Act?
You remember last week all the talk about the various different sections? One section where there is a convergence of Israel and the US military complex. Where there is information sharing, technology sharing of inovation thru the 2 military industrial complexes on the commecial viability side. And there is a merging of US and Israeli intelligence in the middle east. Those 2 things are in the National Defense Authorization Act.
Did Donald Trump just squash the National Defense Authorization Act by attaching the Save America Act to it by saying I’m not going to sign it unless this bill actually gets passed?
Here is my theory, I think John Thune is intentionally not bringing it up because Trump ordered him not to. We are going to act like we really want to get this passed by we really do not want to. Why?
You have DNI Poulti who is working with John Solomon. John just joined ODNI as a special contractor to go in there and help locate classified records pertaining to Crossfire Hurricane,Russia Russia Russia, 2020 election fraud
DNI Poulti inherited DNI Gabbard’s task force on election integrity & infrastructure. We are waiting for a report to come out on that. I think John Solomon [an excellent journalist] is actually coming in to help finalize that report with other types of declassified information. And where did they get these declassified files from? A lot of these are coming from the quote unquote burn bags that were found in the SCIFs of the FBI building that were set to be destroyed but never were. In other words it was the military that had it all along and somehow injected it.
How do you enter evidence legally? [Q quote] You put someone in the military in DNI who can find and retrieve these records where ever the military put them and then bring them out thru points of declassification.
[Could have been hidden during Trump 1.0 or perhaps in 2.0 –GC]
And I think Poulti is going to be the one who is going to release this information pertaining to the 2020 election fraud. And that is going to show that a foreign adversary was definitely involved. Probably a few different ones. I think you’re going to see Great Britain, Ukraine, China, Cuba [Karen Bass?] Venezuala Iran, all involved in stealing the 2020 election, as well as the mail-in ballot scheme.
And this is where it gets really really interesting, Alpha with the conversations that Donald Trump is bringing about. The last week he has been seeding the narrative against Communists. Commie, Comie, he is talking about Communists all the time. I get that communists may have just won. In Washington DC you have a gun bomb. Mandummi in NY, but what I also want to point people to. Go with the constructed narrative.Both sides construct the narrative and they seed that narrative along the way.
This is one of the ways that I have become incredibly accurate with what I do.
Donald Trump started talking about the Communists on the same day it was announced that there is a Grand Jury in NY that has subpoenaed Neville Roy Singham, the founder philanthropist of an NGO who lives in Bejing China.That collaborates directly with the Chinese Communist Party, is a self-proclained
Maoist, funded the ICE riots and protests, funded the No Kings riots and protests, funded BLM and ANTIFA. The guy is a billionaire. The same day the subpoena comes out Trump starts talking about Communists.
Why is it important?
Now go back to the whole infrastructure of what the US Attorney, Joe DeGeneva, is doing in the Southern District of Florida. Joe is obviously running the investigation into, basically, you’ve go to think 20216 and the 2020 Fisagate, Russiagate, Crossfire Hurricane & all that.
Well his team came out last week and they said that they are taking a different approach.
54:40 Alpha: there is something in that article that is very specific.
54:45 Josh: I have it right here. It is Paul Sperry BTW… [Can not find it]
Well basically Joe is investigating the Grand Conspiracy, the RICO investigation. One of the things his team has done is they have broken it down into smaller component parts… what they are likely talking about here is instead of one grand conspiracy with 50 people, and one trial with 10 to 15 years of court. Because of that they are looking at segregating this down into various different parts. Now one of the things that we got an indication of is PRE 2016. This is very interesting because if you ever listen to Patrick Byne, he says how he was recruited by the Obama administration, by the FBI, his FBI handler at the CIA, Cia/FBI handler, to actually infiltrate the early Republican candidates prior to the primaries including Trump. That began in 2015. He talked about this and said it began actually in Las Vegas. So we know they are looking into that part.
#2 is FISAgate, right? This is where you start to enter into the NGO infrastructure.
DNI Tulsi Gabbard released the classified email between Lenny Bonardo of the Open Society Foundations and another executive director at the Open Society Foundations, talking about Julianne Smith who is Hilary Clinton’s foreign campaign manager or foreign affairs campaign manager and how Julianne Smith had gotten back to him and confirmed that HRC was going to move forward with the Russian compromised story on Donald Trump but they did not have the evidence. But they said do not worry we will get it thru our verious different partners of ThreatConnect and Crowd Strike, which I found kinda interesting. So that was Open Society foundation. They enter on stage left right there early on 2016. This is pre-primaries, pre-election.
57:13 Then obviously you have FISA Gate. That email was the day before Bill Clinton met with Loretta Lynch. Clinton offered a seat on the Supreme Court if she dropped the case against hillary.
Then Hillary spent the July 4th weekend with James Comey while she was under investigation by the FBI. On July 7th she gets on Airforce One with Obama and flies to NC for a rally.
Late in July the Lead FBI Investigator drops the case against Hillary and 3 days later opens a case on Donald. Peter Strozk was the guy investigating the hilary Clinton email scandal
Starting 58:30 to 1:05:30 go over highlghted sections
1:05″30 to is discussion:
John Durham was about preserving evidence and not prosecuting. Admiral Rogers got position on recommendation of General Flynn. Bill Clinton & lynch met in the wee hours of the morning in what was supposed to be a private meeting. Reporter Christopher Sein was tipped off by old friend high in Intel community. He played football for Univ of Alabama. Trump was given a jersey #17 from the Univ of Alabama. And Jeff Sessions who also went to UofA was in the same farternity. Chistopher ‘commited suicide’ via hung by dog leash from door knob. A favorite of the CIA.
1:08:30 — 1:12:00 Josh explains why a video crew was needed so NSA could listen in to the conversation. Admiral Rogers according to Q misfiled that conversation…. The conversation was used to threaten Comey into re-opening Hillary server case…. Many more dots connected.
Josh brings up article Real Clear Investigations by Paul Sperry June 25, 2026. It is well worth the read.
1:12:00 – Backing up a bit. Joe DeGenova has not only broken up the RICO case but has TWO grand juries. The second one, operated by Jasson Reddy-Kionas, is in Miami and targeting Obama’s re-written 2016 IC assessment and John Brennan. Josh goes into what he knows of that case. (Do not miss the Mark Warner & Adam Schiff connections)
1:13:15 there is a whistle blower Thomas Speciali the Third. [Google & brave never heard of him — SURPRISE!]
1:13:30 — 1:15:00 Thomas Speciali, a cooperating witness, was hired by the Intel community to go out there and discover Russian interference in the 2016 election so he had full access to every state’s election system. The Dominion voting machines and everything. One of the things he said is that there was no Russian intrusion. There was no evidence but there were some foreign IPs that had touched our servers, basically pinged them. Some APPEARED to be Russian
Then Josh goes into Victoria Nuland, Ukraine, the Perfect Phone call, the 2nd impeachment and Eric Ciaramella who has been indicted in the Eastern District of Virginia. Eric Ciaramella ran the money aspect of the Maidan Massacre and hired the Wagner Group out of Russia.. Josh covers the firing of Shokin, who was investigating money laundering and trafficking by Burisma… Josh goes into how money laundering works in Ukraine
…
1:15:00 to 1: The Perfect Phone Call. Most important part when POTUS asked “DO YOU HAVE THE SERVER? YOU KNOW CROWDSTRIKE, BURISMA, I want to have my Dept of Justice take a look at it.” [This is why they went after Rudy so hard BTW – GC]
That was PANIC IN DC.
Why did Crowdstrike a DNC IT company have a server in Burisma?
Burisma from circa 2014 was one of the heads for Human trafficking, arms trafficking, Money laundering for that region. [I wonder if this is where Justice Roberts adopted kids came from? They were supposedly Russia. -GC]
The server was a proxy server doing all the messing with the Alpha Bank server to compromise Trump. Second it was running Hammer and Scorecard which was meant to steal the 2016 election for Hilary.
Why was the server in Burisma? Because it was very close to the Russian border so you could spoof Russian addresses. Remember Thomas Speciali, saying the pings APPEARED to be from Russia? However someone shut them down. Josh thinks it was Russia and really pissed off the Deep State.
1:19:30 This is where it gets really interesting because in 2018 the elections were stolen at the STATE LEVEL. Red States all of a sudden flipped blue. It was almost like Trump let it happen because of what is going to happen now with all this information comming out. George Soros & the Open Society Foundation and other NGOs [Like Arrabella – GC] funded Act Blue from various private shell companies, spoofing credit card numbers and funding all of these candidates. They funded 3 of the primary state candidates thru all the states, These were, the governor, Sec of State and the State Attorney General. Back in 2018 we really did not know why. When you look back at it it makes complete sense. At the same time Soros, father & son and Bill Gates were investing in different types of companies.
Hunter Biden’s company Rosemont Senaca invested in Metabiota a Disaster and pandemic preparedness company in 2014. (In eastern Ukraine) In 2018 & 19 & 20, Soros & Gates join collaborative efforts and start investing in zoological virus research companies investigating how to detect them if they spread to humans. Such viruses were not around in 2018 & 2019. They were also investing in Crisper-Cas9 companies, genetic modification companies, mRNA companies, AND companies dealing with pandemic response and pandemic testing.
1:22:50 in 2020 we learn the reason for stuffing the top state offices. In Sept of 2019, a level 4 biocontainment plant burns down in Russia on the eastern [obviously Western -GC] border of Russia which I find kinda sketchy… Then 3 days later POTUS standing with Fauci & Brixs signed an EO authorizing the creation of mRNA vaccines.
Josh discuses Event 201 (Oct 2019)
POTUS does a state of emergency.
Secs of State change rules on how mail-in ballots are handled… This is where the NGO infastructure comes in. The whole point was to get as many people on the voter rolls as humanly possible because the number of ballots PRINTED are based on that number.
That is why the Trump admin wants those rolls and the states are refusing to turn them over.
Basically you have a conspiracy forming in 2014 to 2016. The NGO infrastructure. Remember it is the NGOs, it was Neville Roy Singham, Soros, Weiss, Gates, Zuckerburg. They funded NGOs that went out and got people to sign up to vote. And then these same NGOs were running ballots to the Drop boxes.
in 2021, Citizens sued their states and the Supreme Courts of the states ruled in their favor, saying the Sec of state DID NOT HAVE THE AUTHORITY to change mail-in ballot laws but since the elections had already happened there was nothing that could be done…. So that right there is the prerequisite for everything that we are going to see with Joe DeGeneva.
1:27:00 we haven’t even gotten into 2021 when they start to flood the border..
There is another 1/2 hour but I think that gives a good look at the information and actions.
A couple of references. With this first reference ONLY Yandex had the article. Google/Brave buried it and come up with nothing on Thomas Speciali the Third.
Miranda Devine zooms in on a pivotal and controversial event in recent U.S. political history: the October 2020 “Dirty 51” letter, signed by former intelligence officials, including ex-CIA Director John Brennan. The letter—claiming that the Hunter Biden laptop story had “all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation”—is dissected for its role in influencing the 2020 election and shaping public perception. The episode centers on a dramatic confrontation between Brennan and whistleblower Thomas Speciali, unpacking the latest developments in calls for accountability, including current DOJ investigations.
It starts at Yale and a professor of Arabic who romanticizes terrorism.
Eric Ciaramella was radicalized at Yale by professors like Bassam Frangieh. He was quickly recognized as a fellow traveler and became an insider in the Obama administration.
There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.
Do not forget to LABEL AI articles video and such.
Just for fun: (Looks like the wild horses are a better solution.)
The following information validates some of the information I learned from Colonel Towner.
Rough Transcript from an Economic Times video. 15 minutes
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna: What did you learn about MK Naomi, and do you believe its activities were even more serious than what we know about MK Ultra?
Dr Kinzer: The MK Ultra project was aimed at seizing control of the minds of individuals. The Army was interested in something different, which was trying to use biological agents in warfare against entire populations. So, MK Naomi is the place where these two goals overlap.
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna: Did you find direct documentation between Paperclip scientists and the development of MK Ultra’s experimental protocols, specifically the use of mescaline, hypnosis, and sensory deprivation?
Dr Kinzer: I found what I think might be the first secret CIA prison or black site. It’s a nice chalet in Germany. These were the cells where the MK Ultra officers, working side by side with Nazis, uh carried out those gruesome experiments.
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna: These experiments were happening after the Nuremberg trials, correct? So, the CIA would have known that these were crimes against humanity. Um my first question is for Mr. O’Neill. MK Naomi, the joint CIA Army program that ran parallel with MK Ultra at Fort Detrick, appears to have been run with deliberate minimal documentation. Um Army records on Special Operations Division have apparently been destroyed. In your investigation, what did you learn about MK Naomi, and do you believe its activities were even more serious than what we know about MK Ultra?
Mr. O’Neill: I’m sorry. I didn’t learn anything about those operations. I kept my focus mostly on Dr. West and his work. I do know that the only reason I found the documents I found was cuz Dr. West accidentally left them in his papers, and he probably did that because he corresponded with Gottlieb under Gottlieb’s assigned alias, which was Sherman Grifford, and he addressed all his mail to a post office box here under Foss Cut Corporation.
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna: Thank you, Mr. I’m just going to real quick go to Dr. Kinzer. Are you aware of anything that exists with MK Naomi in your research? And if you could please press the button.
Dr Kinzer: My understanding My understanding of MK Naomi is that it was a joint project between the military and the CIA. And there’s a big difference because the MK Ultra project was aimed [music] at seizing control of the minds of individuals. The army was interested in something different, which was trying to use biological agents in warfare against entire populations. So, MK Naomi is the place where these two goals overlapped.
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna: And that was the 1953 Frank Olson death. Was that in a way tied to that? from some chatter that we had seen in
Dr Kinzer: Exactly what the motivation was behind the decision about Frank Olson, if there was such a decision, is unknown.
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna: My next question is also for you, sir. Operation Paperclip brought over 1,600 German scientists into the United States government after World War II, including individuals who had conducted human experimentation in concentration camps. The CIA and military were aware of their backgrounds and recruited them anyways. In your research, did you find direct documentation between Paperclip scientists and the development of MK Ultra’s experimental protocols, specifically the use of mescaline, hypnosis, and sensory deprivation, which were techniques also documented at Dachau?
Dr Kinzer: Absolutely. Um Kurt Blome, who was the chief of biological weapons development for the Nazi government, came to work for the CIA. So did Walter Schreiber, who was the surgeon general of the Nazi army. Um I can just tell a a brief story. When I was researching my book, I found what I think might be the first secret CIA prison or black site. It’s a nice chalet in Germany. And the guy who now owns it took me into the basement. He said these were the cells where the MK Ultra officers, working side by side with Nazis, uh carried out those gruesome experiments, which were actually just continuations of the experiments that those Nazis had been conducting just a few years earlier right down the road.
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna: Just for timeline and clarification, these experiments were happening after the Nuremberg trials, correct? So, the CIA would have known that these were crimes against humanity.
Dr Kinzer: [4:20] I looked for an episode in which the Nuremberg doctrines were posted on the wall in some MK Ultra or CIA office, and I was never able to find any indication that those Nuremberg principles ever were even consulted, much less obeyed.
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna: Thank you. My next question would be for either witness to comment, Dr. Kinzer or Mr. O’Neill. Both witnesses have written about the site psychiatrist Louis Jolly West. Sydney Gottlieb ran MK Ultra program for the CIA, hired West as a contractor to conduct research for sub-project 43, combining hypnotism, drugs, and sensory deprivation to create dis-associative states in which, to quote Mr. Kinzer in his book Poisoner in Chief, the human mind could be pulled away from its moorings. Following the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, West psychiatrically examined Jack Ruby, then in prison for murdering… Lee Harvey Oswald, the assassin accused um of murdering President Kennedy. A report emerged from West’s examination said that Ruby had suffered an acute psychotic break. Can you explain why Dr. West in particular was chosen to conduct an examination of Jack Ruby alone in his jail cell with no other psychologist present?
Mr O’Neill: Be happy to. West inserted himself into the case of Ruby.. the day after the shooting, West approached the judge in the preliminary hearings and asked to be assigned to the case. He was refused by the judge. After Ruby was convicted at his first trial, an associate of West, Dr. Hubert Winston Smith, who was a psychiatrist and an attorney, took over Ruby’s defense for his appeal, and he had already discussed appointing.. West to the case. And as you said, West examined Ruby alone at the jail cell and emerged to announce that in the preceding 48 hours he had had a acute psychotic break from which he would never recover. He had been declared incompetent to stand trial in his the first time by a panel of I think eight psychiatrists. This psychotic break lasted until his death in 1967. Two months after West examined him, Ruby testified for the first time, and only time to the Warren Commission, and it was the first time he ever publicly was supposed to say what his reasons were for his shooting Oswald. The testimony had to be halted cuz he was babbling incoherently. As Allen Inspector, who was a counsel to the commission, wrote in his memoirs, he pulled him aside and said that they were cutting off the arms and legs of children in Albuquerque and El Paso, and he said he was making no sense whatsoever. West in his letters to Gottlieb from 1953 discussed experiments where he would induce specific mental disorders in people without their awareness. A year before the Kennedy assassination, he publicly spoke in Oklahoma City and talked about his LSD experiments inducing psychiatric breaks and psychosis in people with the use of LSD, which he of course later contradicted, when he told the New York Times he never used LSD in animal experimentation.
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna: What an interesting connection. I might have time but I’ll be now recognizing Mr. Burlison from Missouri for 5 minutes.
[7:54]
Mr. Burlison: Thank you Madam Chair. Thank you for your diligent work on this and hopefully we will hear back from the CIA on those boxes of documents that have so many questions about. Dr. Kinzer and Mr. O’Neill the CIA created MK Ultra in 1953 supposedly out of fear that the Soviet Union and China had developed mind control capabilities. Let me go back a little bit further. So one of my questions has to do with the event that happened in 1951 in August in France. There was a bakery that I guess the people that lived in that community over 250 some say 300 people were poisoned from the bread. It was determined that that was LSD that was causing all of these people to hallucinate. Some people died. Is there any connection Dr. Kinzer to that event and was that something that either inspired the MK Ultra program or the MK Naomi program or is that something that we were involved in even that early on?
Dr Kinzer: I would turn that question back to you. I don’t think anybody really knows the full story of what happened at that time in that town in France. That the United States could have been involved, that this could have been part of what was then called Operation Artichoke, the predecessor for MK Ultra seems to me not beyond the realm of possibility. There’s a lot of overlap between the ergot enzyme that is the basis of LSD and certain rye and wheat fungus that can be used in breads. Was that something intentional? Was it something the Americans were involved in? I have my suspicions, but just based on my background as a journalist, I don’t operate on suspicions. So, I would love to see more investigation of that episode.
…..
Comment on Ergot Poisoning. It is worth a quick look because it describes the symptoms.
In her excellent lecture “The SalemWitchTrials and Ergot, the ‘Moldy Bread’ Hypothesis,” historian Margot Burns describes a conversation with Linnda Caporael about the publication of this article.
…..
Mr. Burlison: My next question has to do with once the program began. I think one of the most shocking things that we determined is that Operation Midnight Climax that occurred in the early 1950s, ’60s, where the CIA had safe houses. And there was Dr. Kinzer, I mean this obviously extremely disturbing behavior that was happening where you had American citizens who were being lured into these brothels and then dosed with a hallucinogenic and then filmed during their sex acts. Was there anyone prosecuted for this for these crimes?
Dr Kinzer: No, there have been no prosecutions for any crime related to MKUltra as far as I know. To me, the remarkable aspect of Operation Midnight Climax was that there wasn’t even the pretense of scientific experimentation. The person watching behind the one-way mirror was a grossly overweight drug officer sitting on a portable toilet and drinking cocktails out of a pitcher. There was nobody there that was a scientist or somebody who had understood sexual behavior or human psychology. So, there was no science involved in it at all. I can add a little footnote. When I was researching Poisoner in Chief, I came across a document in which one of the officers involved in setting up that program, Operation Midnight Climax, said that Sidney Gottlieb himself used to fly from Washington out to inspect the project regularly and always asked that women be provided for him. So…. [Interrupts]
Mr. Burlison: That was my next question. Do you think that the agents were involved in the sexual encounters?
Dr Kinzer: Well, could that have actually been the reason why the bordello was opened? There was no prospect of any serious scientific result out of that project given the personnel who were overseeing it. So, those CIA officers, particularly Gottlieb, involved in overseeing Operation Midnight Climax, certainly were able to take advantage of what it offered.
Mr. Burlison: Thank you. And my my last question, first I want to say thank you to Mr. O’Neill. The book Chaos, I checked it out from the Library of Congress. and [I] greatly appreciate your work there. I was intrigued by one of the statements that you made based on your research that the MKUltra program, they were actually successfully able to replace memories. And because of that, I’m wondering if And Dr. Kinzer, you can chime in if you have any knowledge of this. Did the program continue? And do you think that the program in some aspect is still continuing today?
Mr O’Neill: You’re asking if the program continued after 1973 when it was halted supposedly. That’s a question I’m asked at almost every appearance I do. Is it happening today? Did it continue? I don’t know. I can’t imagine that it didn’t though because the technology that they worked to establish over 20, 25 years and spent more money on than any operation the CIA ever conducted was successful. I imagine it’s being used. I have no evidence of it being used, so it’s a complete assumption.
Dr Kinzer: I would just add that one of the letters to which Mr. O’Neill referred contains a quote from Mr. Gottlieb saying that these experiments were necessary quote in these times. I think it’s important to put yourself back in that mindset where the United States felt that it was under such overwhelming threat that the loss of a few lives or a few hundred lives was a small price to pay. Commitment to a great cause is one of the most fundamental justifications for committing immoral acts, and patriotism is among the most noble of causes. It can be twisted, and it can be used as an excuse to carry out research under the guise that this is simply research we’re doing to protect ourselves against others, and I think that is a mindset that may still be active in some parts of our government.
Mr. Burlison: Thank you, gentlemen. Thank you, Madam Chair. My time has expired. I yield back.
The House Oversight Committee’s Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets held a hearing entitled, “Mind Control and Accountability: Uncovering the Truth of the CIA’s MKULTRA Project.”
INTRODUCTION:
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna: Task force on declassification of federal secrets will come to order. Welcome everyone. Without objection, the chair may declare a recess at any time.
I recognize myself for the purpose of making an opening statement. This hearing is about the crimes committed by the Central Intelligence Agency against the American citizens and the decades of secrecy used to conceal them. The American people deserve a complete and truthful record. The victims and their families deserve acknowledgment, and this Congress has a constitutional obligation to ensure that full declassification is not delayed any longer. Project MK Ultra was not a policy failure or an overzealous program that got out of hand. It was a deliberate systematic governmental operation that subjected American citizens, prisoners, hospital patients, veterans, ordinary people to LSD, electroshock, hypnosis, sensory deprivation, psychological torture without their knowledge or consent. This went on for 20 years on American soil, funded by American taxpayer dollars, and authorized by the very top of US intelligence apparatus. And this program, when it did end, the men who ran it did not cooperate with investigators. They did not come forward. They committed another crime. They destroyed evidence.
The documents this task force has reviewed are unambiguous. In January 1973, the director of the CIA, Richard Helms, prepared to leave office. He personally ordered the destruction of MK Ultra records. The CIA official document in writing states, “Over my stated objectives, the MK Ultra files were destroyed by the order of DCI Mr. Helms shortly before his departure from office. A separate internal account confirms that Helms telephoned Dr. Gottlieb directly and instructed him to destroy quote all files pertaining to drug research and associated activities. Gottlieb compiled. Four people spent an entire day tearing burning down 152 files. Then Gottlieb had his personal papers destroyed by his secretary before he retired. The head of the CIA own records center protested the destruction in writing, but he was overruled. That is obstruction of justice. That is criminal destruction of federal records.
And neither individuals were ever charged with a crime for it. Helms received a $2,000 fine for lying to Congress about an unrelated manner and collected his government pension until he died. Gottlieb retired in rural Virginia and wrote poetry. No one went to prison.
No victim was ever formally compensated by the government for the harm that they caused. By 1975, the Church Committee and the Rockefeller Commission had already established through sworn testimony and the surviving 1963 Inspector General report that MK Ultra existed and that the CIA had run a program of human experimentation on unwitting Americans. The scope and detail of what we know today is largely because of an accident. In 1977, an archivist diligently complying with a foyer request discovered seven boxes of MK Ultra financial records that had been misfiled and escaped the bonfire. Those seven boxes included the names of institutions, the name of sub projects, the researchers who participated, the specific operation that the CIA had funded, and without them, the vast majority ofMK Ultra would only be a rumor, just as Helms and Gottlieb intended. Those seven boxes revealed the MK Ultra comprised at least 149 sub projects, operated across more than 80 institutions, and involved 185 non-government researchers.
They revealed that the CIA covertly contributed $375,000 to a hospital research wing, which was approved directly by DCI Allen Dulles, with Richard Helms concurrence, so the agency could use unwitting patients as experimental subjects in what their own documents called a hospital safe house. The CIA’s own inspector general said in 1963, his classified report concluded that the program had exceeded the agency’s legal chapter and covert testing on unwitting subjects placed the rights and interests of US citizens in jeopardy. The program ran for a decade that we know of and they ignored their own watchdog.
Let me be clear [about] what I believe that we are dealing with here. Administering drugs to people without their knowledge or consent, subjecting humans to psychological torture and using prisoners and hospital patients as nonconsenting research subjects. These are crimes against humanity. The Central Intelligence Agency committed them and then the director of the CIA ordered the destruction of evidence. Today we will hear from two witnesses who have spent years unraveling the cover up that our government ordered. Steven Kzer documented the life and crimes of Sydney Gottlieb in his uh book prisoner of chief and Tom O’Neill spent over 20 years investigating what the CIA buried and what they obscured that in my mind constitutes some of the worst notorious crimes against humanity in the 20th century. Their persistence in the research in this hearing is possible simply because they are patriots. The American people deserve the complete record. The victims and their families deserve acknowledgment, accountability, and justice. And this Congress has a constitutional obligation to make sure that the CIA never does this again.
With that, I’m going to be opening up first questions, and I’ll hold my question to the end, to Representative Berles. Before I do pass it, I did want to just note a few weeks ago, we did receive reports. There was some back and forth regarding the CIA and ODI pertaining to new MK Ultra boxes that were discovered. Myself and Representative Berles did go down to Langley. We did meet with the CIA and the CIA is currently in the process of declassifying newly found documentation. although the documents, and I feel comfortable enough to share it here, pertain specifically to a forgery program that was being housed under MK Ultra. So as soon as those files are released, we will be putting out notification with your help to also comb through some of the newly released documents, but I did want to give you a quick update.
There were three witnesses:
Dr Elizabet Ginexi,
independent Consultant and former Senior Program officer at the National Institute of Health
Dr Kinzer author of: Poisoner in Chief, Sydney Gottlieb and the CIA’s Search for Mind Control
Mr. O’Neill author of: Chaos, Charles Manson, the CIA and the Secret history of the 60s
At 8 minutes Dr Stephen Kinszer’s opening statement.
Thank you very much, Madam Chairman. Let me begin by expressing my gratitude to this task force for confronting the enormous issue of over classification of government documents and the culture of secrecy that enables it. I’m especially gratified by your interest in MK Ultra, the project the CIA carried out through the 1950s in an attempt to find the secret of mind control. MK Ultra was one of the most secret government programs in American history. The chemist who directed it, Sydney Gottlieb, lived in total anonymity. My book, Poisoner and Chief, may be the most complete account of MK Ultra that exists in public, but I’m painfully aware that I have discovered only a small portion of what MK Ultra was and what Sydney Gottlieb did. In 1951, the CIA hired Gottlieb and directed him to launch what became MK Ultra. Gottlieb believed that in order to find a way to implant a new mind into someone’s brain, you first had to find a way to destroy the mind that was in there already.
In its search for ways to destroy a human mind and body, MK Ultra conducted the most extreme experiments on human beings that have ever been carried out by a US government agency. By any standard, they qualify as medical torture. These experiments took place in prisons, clinics, and safe houses in the United States, in Europe, in Asia, and even in Latin America. Officers of MK Ultra were authorized to travel to foreign countries, preferably those under formal or informal US occupation, and ask the local CIA station to provide them with expendables, human beings who would not be missed if they disappeared. Gottlieb had what amounted to a license to kill issued by the US government. Neither the number of MK Ultra victims nor the number of those who were experimented to death is known.
Gottlieb as a result of this license to kill might have been the most powerful unknown American of the 20th century. Some information about MK Ultra spilled out during the 1970s, but senior CIA officers had intentionally let Gottlieb operate without supervision. So they were able to claim that they knew nothing about his excesses. This was a way for the CIA to deny its institutional role in MK Ultra and to portray it misleadingly as the product of one man’s sadism or excessive zeal. Investigating MK Ultra is challenging because when Gottlieb and his mentor Richard Helms left the CIA in 1973, they illegally ordered that its records be destroyed. Soon afterwards, under DCI Stansfield Turner, a CIA analyst, as you pointed out, Madame Chairman, discovered a cache of MK Ultra documents hidden among financial records. Turner credited that analyst with doing a very diligent job of Sherlock Holmesing. That same diligence I believe could bring results today.
One of the great mysteries of MK Ultra has to do with the death in 1953 of an MK Ultra scientist Frank Olsen who had announced his intention to quit the project. His plunge from a New York hotel room was described in the press as the suicide of an army scientist. He was not an army scientist. He worked for the CIA and evidence suggests that his death may have not have been a suicide. So there could be hidden documents that could illuminate this case.
I would also point out that in addition to searching for unknown documents, this committee could do a tremendous service by simply asking for the end of redactions on the documents that we now have. There are reams of documents about MK Ultra that have heavy sections redacted. In the 1970s, this was justified by the argument that it had only been 20 years since these terrible things had happened and revealing details might affect national security. Now, 70 years have passed. That argument can no longer be valid. So, I would urge this committee to try to fill out all the blank spaces in the documents that we have because we know that is there. This task force could also consider trying to determine whether some new incarnation of MK Ultra exists today. When the main phase of MK Ultra drew to a close in the early 1960s, Sydney Gottlieb concluded that it had failed. That in fact there is no such thing as mind control. Even if he was right, however, he may have been right only at that time. In the many decades since then, there have been enormous advances in cyber technology, in artificial intelligence, in neuroscience. Covert agencies may have access now to tools for mind control that Sydney Gottlieb could not even have imagined. It may well have been true in 1963 that mind control is a myth, but whether it’s still true is uncertain. And that question of whether mind control might now be possible under our new circumstances is something that has presumably occurred to scientists who work for secret services, including our own.
This task force has a chance to connect the past to the future. A renewed effort to find MK Ultra documents from the 1950s and to fill out the redactions of those that have been released might shed new light on how the CIA operated during that period. It could also inform a new inquiry into whether any mind control projects are now underway inside the US security apparatus that might help prevent the emergence of a 21st century MK Ultra that could be even more destructive than the original. Thank you.
Tom O’Neill’s opening statement.
Thank you, Chairwoman Luna and members of the committee. It’s a privilege to be here today. Almost 50 years ago, the last congressional hearings into MK Ultra took place just a short walk from here in the Dirks Senate Office Building. At those hearings convened in August and September of 1977, representatives of the CIA told Congress and the American people that its 25-year effort to control human behavior had been a colossal failure. I believe Congress was never told the truth about what this program actually achieved. In fact, I believe the agency misled Congress in 1977 when it characterized MK Ultra as a failure. My name is Tom O’Neill and in 1999 I accepted a magazine assignment to write a story about murders committed by a group of hippies called the Manson family. For those unfamiliar with this horrific episode of American history, in the summer of 1969, four young people acting on the orders of a cult leader named Charles Manson, went to the home of movie director Roman Polanski and murdered everyone they found there, including his eight and a half month pregnant wife, the actress Sharon Tate. The victims were complete strangers to their killers. The following night, Manson’s followers murdered another couple in the same grizzly fashion. At the time I accepted the assignment, I’d never heard of MK Ultra, and I wouldn’t for another two years. After I’d missed countless deadlines, lost the assignment, and fall fallen down a nightmarish rabbit hole trying to answer the question I couldn’t quite shake. How had Manson, a barely literate ex-con, acquired the ability to persuade ordinary young people to murder complete strangers simply because he had told them to?
The pursuit of the answer to that question led me to Dr. Lewis Jolian West, known to his friends as Jolly. West was one of the most influential psychiatrists in America. During his career, he crossed paths with some of the most controversial events of the 20th century, including the Patty Hurst kidnapping case and the aftermath of the John F. Kennedy assassination investigation. In 1977, West was one of seven academic researchers named in a front page New York Times story alleging that the CIA had used American universities, hospitals, and prisons as secret laboratories for experiments involving LSD and other drugs on unwitting human subjects. West vigorously denied the allegations. He acknowledged that the agency had approached him but insisted he had refused because he said LSD was too dangerous and unpredictable to be used on humans. He added that he limited all of his research with LSD to animals. The revelations in the Times led directly to the congressional hearings held later that year. West denials, however, were effective. He was never investigated and his name never came up at the hearings.
I’ll spare you the long and tedious story of how my Manson reporting led me to West except to say that I eventually learned that in 1967 when Manson transformed into the cult leader we are familiar with today, he and his followers were receiving free medical care at a clinic in San Francisco where West had established a base of operations for a research project he was conducting nearby. After becoming intrigued by the allegations against West, I learned that UCLA, his last academic home, had inherited his paper following his death in 1999.
Nearly two months and more than 200 boxes later, I found the proverbial needle in a hay stack, correspondence between West and Dr. Sydney Gottlieb, the architect of MK Ultra. The letters begin in 1953, just two months after CIA director Alan Dulles authorized the program and while West was stationed at the Lackland Air Force Base in San Antonio, Texas, where he was chief chief psychiatrist at the base hospital. In his first letter to Gottlieb, West proposed conducting experiments on unwitting human subjects, including military personnel, prisoners, and psychiatric patients at the base hospital. He then outlined the experiments themselves in six more pages that could have been written by Josef Mengele Using LSD in combination with hypnosis, West purposed inducing confusion, amnesia, and specific mental disorders in people who would remember nothing of their interaction with him afterward. He sought to develop techniques to extract true information and implant false information in unwilling subjects and to alter the attitudes and beliefs of quote previously loyal individuals. In other words, to completely switch their allegiance from one group or leader to another.
But it was another sentence at the end of that letter that stopped me cold. These experiments, he wrote, must eventually be put to test in practical trials in the field. Gottlieb’s response could hardly have been more enthusiastic. My good friend, he wrote, I had been wondering whether your apparent rapid and comprehensive grasp of our problems could possibly be real. You have indeed developed an admirably accurate picture of exactly what we are after. West replied that there was no more vital undertaking conceivable in these times. There was another document in West papers that had even more significant implications. It was a 14-page report that West wrote in 1956, just three years after he contracted with the CIA. In the report, West described administering LSD and other drugs in conjunction with hypnosis on unwitting human subjects. And then he made a remarkable claim. He announced that he had learned how to replace true memories with false memories on people without their knowledge. In other words, he clarified, it has been found to be feasible to take the memory of a definite event in the life of an individual and through hypnotic suggestion bring about the subsequent conscious recall to the effect that this event never actually took place, but that a different fictional event actually did occur. If West report was accurate, this was not the failure agency officials described in 1977. Quite the opposite. It was in fact the central ambition of the MK Ultra operation, the means of gaining the ability to seize the control of a person’sperceptions, memories, and ultimately their behavior.
But there was still one more discovery, and this time I found it in the National Security Archives at George Washington University. the official repository of the CIA’s MK Ultra records, which were released to Congress after the 1977 hearings. In those holdings was a different versions of West 1956 report. The original paper had been replaced by a four-page summary that did not exist in West files and appears to have been written by someone else. Here his claims about replacing memories were gone. in their place was a theoretical discussion of LSD and disassociative states. The versions supplied to Congress concluded that the effects of LSD and similar drugs on disassociative states had, and I’m quoting, never been studied. Never been studied. In the original report, West discusses observations from his own experiments, including detailed descriptions of using LSD to, as he wrote, speed the induction of the hypnotic state and deepen the trance in subjects. Those passages have been removed in the report turned over to Congress. The discrepancy could not have been more stark. Nearly 50 years ago, another congressional committee believed it had been given the truth about MK Ultra. It had not. In conclusion, I respectfully submit that these records, some newly available, and others that remained outside the government’s disclosure for decades, weren’t a thorough re-examination of what the program accomplished, what Congress was told, and what may still remain hidden. I’m happy to provide the documents I’ve referenced today and I’ve provided many additional details in my written testimony.
Dr Elizabeth Ginexi opening statement. [BOY is she angry her cushy job got smacked!] I debated on whether or not to add her opening statement since I do not see how it has anything to do with MK Ultra … What is glorious is at 47:20 she gets called out on just that AND Covid.
Chairman Luna, and distinguished members of the committee, thank you for the opportunity to testify today. I’m a health research scientist with a master’s and doctoral degrees in psychology from the George Washington University. I spent 22 years from 2003 to 2025 as a scientific program official at the National Institutes of Health, managing more than $132 million in health research grants and co-authoring 18 federal funding programs. I left the NIH in April of 2025. I’m here today because what is happening to NIH right now is not reform. It is the replacement of scientific judgment with political control. [She is talking about Robert Kennedy]
For 80 years, US federal investment in biomedical research produced outcomes that no private market would have funded. Heart disease is the leading cause of death in the United States. NIH funded research on blood pressure, cholesterol, and smoking drove a 56% decline in heart disease between 1950 and 1996. Cancer has been transformed. treatments for breast, lung, prostate, and childhood cancers along with immunotherapies that converted previously fatal diagnoses into manageable conditions traced directly to NIH funded research. HIV AIDS were a death sentence in 1981. No pharmaceutical company saw a profitable market for treatment. NIH ran the trials that no one else would run. The result was antiretroviral therapy and preexposure prophylaxis. Global AIDS deaths have fallen 54% since 2010.
Rare diseases that affect 30 million Americans get studied at the NIH because no market will fund that research. Every dollar that’s appropriated to the National Institutes of Health generates $246 in economic output. NIH supported work contributed to 354 of the 356 new drugs that the FDA approved between 2010 and 2019. Cutting the funding source of that pipeline does not slow it. It ends it. The proposed OM federal financial assistance rule would give political appointees authority to terminate funded grants at any time without cause, including ongoing clinical trials with enrolled patients. This is not a hypothetical. NIH has already terminated or frozen thousands of grants, including hundreds of ongoing clinical trials since January 2025, concentrated in infectious disease, vaccine, and health disparities research. This proposed rule will make that authority permanent. The NIH director has eliminated the merit score thresholds that once protected peer review and political appointees are right now overriding peer review outcomes to screen grants for alignment with administrative pri priorities.
The proposed OM rule will also severely restrict international research. We’re managing an H5N1 blue bird flu outbreak that has more than 70 documented human cases. We recently concluded a hivirus response that required CDC scientists working alongside Argentine counterparts. The current Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo is now the third largest on record and is outpacing containment efforts. This rule will curtail exactly that kind of cooperation that we need. NIH lost 1,112 PhD trained workers from 2025 to early 26. More than half of the NIH institutes right now are operating without permanent scientific leadership. The majority of its advisory councils required by statute to provide independent oversight have lost more than half of their members. The fundamental choice before this Congress is between a system where scientists make scientific judgments through accountable processes and one where political appointees make those calls instead. That choice will determine whether the next breakthroughs in cancer, Alzheimer’s, antibiotic resistance, and pandemic defense will happen here, somewhere else, or perhaps not at all. I urge this committee to support a joint resolution of disapproval to block the proposed OM financial assistance rule. that authority to replace peer review with political approval has not been granted by Congress…
This is a congressional hearing that is worth checking out.
There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.
Do not forget to LABEL AI articles video and such.
Just for fun.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hl8vErrqjKY
BTW Hubby was corresponding with a Russian scientist doing similar studies in Siberia using domesticated Russian horses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
In my opinion Iran was never just about the Middle East, it was about world peace and breaking the grip of the Cabal. That is why there is such a stark contrast between how the press and the rest of the world views the Ukrainian war vs the military op against Iran.
LIVE Q&A: Iran, Lawfare, and Why the Establishment Is Going All-In Against Trump
PARTIAL ROUGH TRANSCRIPT
32:00 Barbara Boyd: On a bill in Congress about merging Israeli & US technological intelligence: “ Well Hey. It’s already pretty effectively merged in terms of the Mossad and the COA and has been ever since James J Angleton created in essence the Mossad from the CIA. To me none of this has any magnitude equivalent to the complete merger of our intelligence community with MI6 and Five Eyes and NATO. Which is far, far, far more dangerous, more disgusting and more off the mark in terms of a native US-Based intelligence compared to anything Israel could think about…
36:20 Iran having a nuclear weapon is a threat to the world. Iran started off negotiations with Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff by saying, we have enough nuclear material for nine bombs right now. That is a genuine threat to the world. You are seeing how the IRGC operates before your eyes. It has been that way for a very, very long time. There is no terrorist operation in the world which doesn’t benefit in some fundamental way. They are not independent. And most of what the IRGC is and everything else comes from the City of London’s long time control of every single terrorist operation in the Middle East. Be they Shiite or Be they Sunni.
Trump stopped that at the beginning of his very first term with his visit to Saudi Arabia. Trump said, the USA is out of this game PERIOD. And that in part is the long history of what this is really all about.
37:50 Mike Steger: The Middle East is the cockpit for escalated war on a Global scale. Iran was set up as part of that agenda. We have documented this. Bernard Lewis, Brzeziński, this was radical Islam used as a basic weapon to threaten the world. [And push it] into a kind of chaos which then Lloyds and others would control and profit and monetize.
Trump realizes that [and] he has dedicated more time in his presidency to stabilizing the Middle East. And there is no doubt that the situation in the Middle East on October 7th which escalated into this horrific war in Gaza came out of Iran and Iran’s interests – Largely British – but through Iran to destabilize the Middle East AND PREVENT THE ABRAHAM ACCORDS, TO PREVENT LONG-TERM PEACE AND STABILITY IN THE MIDDLE EAST. [Ghost in the last video on this page goes into the actual play-by-play of how the Abraham Accords were de-railed. -GC]
38:40 The reality is you have a military cult in the IRGC which controls upward of 50% of the entire Iranian economy. I do not think the clerics or the so-called democratically elected political representatives have had any real control in that country for quite some time if ever… I think the situation is far more dangerous than Iran. And I will point to just one clear evidence of that.
[Ghost goes even further and thinks Iran was all about starting a nuclear war. As I wrote in THECASEFORNUCLEARWAR I think the Cabal is crazy enough to want to start one. –GC]
Kim Jong-un and Trump could have one-on-one direct dialogue. They are having ongoing letter and other correspondence as we speak. He has had that since he came back in. There was NEVER a chance to have dialogue with the clerics or the Ayatollah because the reality is the Ayatollah has not really been holding real power. I think that is the fundamental difference. You can’t trust Iran because you actually don’t have a sense of who is really in power. That is why the negotiations have been hung up. Because there is not a real center of power in Iran to give it a coherent nation state status. [So WHO and WHERE is that center of power? In the UK where the Ayatollah and top IRGC commanders have property?? GC]
43:00 Mike Steger: I think there’s been a kind of a fight in China and it’s not been maybe a balanced one per se. What the communism of Mao was set up, largely by kind of British and globalist interests, to play, is the exact role China was beginning to play in this kind of globalist globalized economy. They became the kind of sweat shop of the world. Cheap labor supply, cheap manufacturing, and what you saw was a rise of billionaires dominating China. And that’s been a kind of corruption that China now is trying to confront and clean out.
What Trump’s challenging China is to say, look, that doesn’t function. That doesn’t work. And there are some people in China at various political levels who recognize that that is not the pathway to go. That it’s led to intrinsic corruption in China, that it leads to political instability. But China’s got a difficult problem. They’ve got to try to hold the nation together. And it’s been a 2,000-year-old problem in China. The Chinese like to break off into their own separate provinces, their own separate princedoms and kingdoms. It’s hard to hold the nation together. So that’s kind of an underlying threat that China constantly faces. And they’ve tried to nationalize with the Mandarin language. There’s all kinds of things they’ve had to do that most people wouldn’t have any idea of, to try to rectify this lack of real national unity inside China… [This agrees with the little I have learned of China. Ghost & Alpha Warrior distinguish between the CCP and Xi. The CCP being the Chinese Deep State. Also given the amount of trouble Xi has handling China, I doubt he wants to actually control anymore land except as tribute states (Belt & Road). –GC]
45:00 Trump has shown in Iran that we are killing the old system. The vestiges of this kind of divided world, this kind of a new cold war era of China, Iran, Russia, North Korea as a block. He’s saying, “We’re killing that system. You’re not going to benefit off of cheap Iranian oil, but we’re going to have a much longer term stable system led by the United States, founded on the US dollar-based system, but based on nations having the right to industrialize, build up, and to thrive. A system of nation states.” And I think there are some in China. I think probably this is the dialogue President Trump is having with Chairman Xi that this is where he’s taking the world and that chairman Xi is well aware that that would be best long-term for China because it really doesn’t have the ability to play the role of a global economic hegemon. That’s just British imperial thinking that’s made its way into China through various aspects including Maoism. So, I think that’s the presentation Trump is making. And I think he’s got to be forceful because if you don’t kill the old system, it’s very difficult for people holding on to the status quo to ever leave it and jump into the new one. I would just add that, China was essentially manipulated based on the WTO — this whole idea of globalization — to become the sweat shop of the world. That’s not really what any nation wants to be….
Steve Bannon and others who continue to insist that we have to go to war with China are not understanding what the president is actually doing and that’s why Mike is quite right…
51:00 Adam: And then here’s one from Cool Cool Roy which I think is actually a much more important question than people realize. “Would you agree that playing the hate and blame game is one of the greatest forms of self- oppression and government oppression on earth?” Before I open it up, let me just say yes. And the way that people describe it sometimes is the victim mentality. Become victimized by some other group or some other ideology, some other identity. Barbara and Mike, your thoughts on this super chat here.
51:30 Barbara Boyd: I think this is a good one. Mike’s pointing to me, so I’ll start.
Okay. Aristotle and Carl Schmidt, the German legal theorist and Nazi, basically had this idea that you don’t know who you are unless you have an enemy. In other words, you define yourself by your enemy. By something terribly negative. You don’t define who you really are, what your mission is here on this earth, and what reality actually is in terms of of how you deal with it. That is human. What Carl Schmidt and Aristotle believed is best deal because you end up in a cycle of endless wars out of all of that and kind of tribal policing of yourselves based on tribal ideas and identities rather than superseding them to actually fulfill our mission here on earth. Genesis tells us what it is. Go forth, multiply and subdue the earth. I really think that’s completely different than either Aristotle or Carl Schmidt.
Carl Schmidt, — I just went and reminded myself, his entire thesis was based on the friend – enemy distinction. That was kind of like the central thesis to it. This kind of issue of building these gangs and encounter gangs of different varieties and then having that kind of gang counter gang warfare play out in the public sphere. That in my mind is basically what’s been controlling essentially all of modern politics. It is using that control mechanism in one way or another for sure. Mike, any thoughts?
53:42 Mike Steger: Yeah, Let’s just take it into the British question, because this is how they tried to control their empire. They did it n East Africa. 👉But probably the most famous case is in India. Where Hindus were the majority, the British power would back the Muslim minority and to aggravate the sense that the Hindus had a right if they had the majority to direct where they wanted to go. But in the Muslim controlled areas near the Indus in West India which is now Pakistan they would back the Hindu minority and aggravate the Muslim majority to the point where you would get this kind of potential for a major backlash👈… It’s not parody in terms of the kind of conditions, but you get this emotional backlash that creates civil war. And that’s exactly what happened in India when the British left in 1947. A civil war broke out on religious lines, killing up to two million people. And that’s the kind of thing you see them attempting to provoke, whether it’s in Belfast or the Henry Nowak: case or the George Floyd dynamic in the United States. They’re trying to create and instigate this kind of reaction. [Crypto Rich, a Muslim, informed Mike of this in a lot greater detail in his recent podcast. -GC]
You can see this if you go to X because it’s so visceral so guttural that it dominates a lot of the social media discussion. That’s why, on Promethean Action, we focus on unifying the country. Our strength is unity and orienting towards the redevelopment of the nation. To rebuilding it just like you want to unify the church as an ecumenical mission, as a good Christian, you want to unify the nation towards a mission of industrial and scientific advancement…
AI DATA CENTERS
1:02:07 Mike Steger: I think there’s a number of things. It’s clear that this data center AI comes out of Silicon Valley. There’s very little to trust about a lot of these institutions. The way they’ve run the social media process, what they’ve run with social control, what they did with censorship, how they were back doors to the intelligence community. All of that’s true. All of that’s worth not trusting. But at the same time, there is a real viability to AI applications, but not necessarily the way that a lot of these AI firms are talking about it.
So, there’s a lot of this idea that we can deliver it to personal consumers and it’s going to be some big financial gain based like social media was broad-based consumption on every phone, every young person. The reality is that AI is probably going to be far more profitable and useful as it’s integrated into the re-industrialization of the United States because there’s real applications connecting it to an industrial robotic and high-tech process of manufacturing of logistics. So there’s real benefit to these kinds of advancements. It’s always a double-edged sword. How do you apply it? Do you apply it towards social control which has been the IC Silicon Valley modus operandi for 25, 30 40 years or is it going to be applied towards a new re-industrialized United States? There are certainly very clear aspects of Trump, of the JD Vance, of this new Republican party, who see that they’re building up the industrial firms, they’re broadening out the defense contractor base with new firms who are looking to apply these things, to integrate it into real manufacturing and production, to increase the kind of broad-based wealth of the country.
Now that said, how we deal with data centers is something that we’ve got to think through as a country. Doing it in big farmland areas doesn’t make a lot of sense. There was a proposal to do it in Buick City up in Flint, which was prior to River Rouge where Ford did the largest factory at the time. It was Buick City up in Flint. That was a massive start to finish raw material to finish automotive product in one plant.
Now that’s been laid waste for a long time and there was proposal to put data centers there. Now Flynn has knocked it out. Like to me it makes a lot more sense to put them into brown fields where you have connected water and power supply than to do it into open farmlands. Much like power centers should be integrated into city centers and industry, not just, solar panels all over our corn fields. So, I think we’ve got to think this thing through. I think that there’s plays on both sides as Barbara’s pointed out. Maybe she wants to go into more depth today.
There’s clearly other aspects. There was a lot of propaganda push from Russian news networks to target our fracking industry. You know, 15, 20 years ago, they really tried to undercut the idea of fracking. They got the whole left in America to be anti-fracking even though that’s what’s created all of this natural gas that these green environmentalists have been obsessed with. The same thing is true today with China because there is a real race for AI that’s real and largely because China sees it. China knows even maybe better than a lot of Americans that this AI is going to be a boon towards their manufacturing and productive sector and they sought to have global control of that. So I think the question is re-industrializing thinking about how we use these AI data centers. Even as Trump said making sure that these AI companies are treated like pharmaceutical companies. You can’t just release these new models. We have to know what they’re actually going to be doing. What kind of effect they have….
so we’ve got to regulate it. We might have to integrate it, but we have to be smart about it. It’s a double-edged sword. We can’t become anti-technology, but we can’t allow the model of Silicon Valley and social control to continue to dominate the way we let these companies become big major firms in the United States. And I think that’s a political question. It’s a question of political power. And it’s the kind of challenge that self-government creates because we can just either hand it to the experts and be ruled by oligarchy or if we’re going to deal with it, we’ve got to deal with it in a smart way and not just react because there are certain forces that want to control our reaction. They want us to react and shut this thing down and we’ve got to be smart about it. So that’s kind of how I think about it.
1:06:40 Barbara Boyd: I had pointed out I think last week that Kevin O’Leary who you know is famous from TV, is actually building a data center in Utah and started getting all sorts of strange stuff that he wasn’t doing in terms of zoning and everything else. Big attacks on him. He hired a firm to actually track down where all this was coming from. Unsurprisingly he proved that it was coming from China. Which makes a whole lot of sense. Okay, We’re in a race as to who is going to actually develop the useful aspects of this first and foremost. Data centers are a requirement of that. That said, you’ve got to take into account environment. You shouldn’t be building it on, farmland, which should be in agriculture at this point. And is a really big deal out there because we have problems with our farmers, which have nothing to do with AI. [Goes into food Cartels]
POLITICAL ISLAM
1:50:00 Adam: Sha says “I think you are missing the plan of Islam.” Barbara and Mike your thoughts on this one? Are are we missing the plan of Islam?
Barbara Boyd: No, we’re not missing it. You got to understand a little bit about Islam as a religion. All right? There’s two sides to it. There is so-called political Islam, which was largely an invention. And you know, some of my Muslim friends will actually get mad at me at this point, but that was actually an invention of the Arab Bureau of British Secret Intelligence for purposes of using Islam as a weapon in this whole dynamic in the Middle East to have gangs and counter gangs. Basically, revisionist Zionism versus political Islam. The Muslim Brotherhood being the biggest example of that. Obviously the Muslim Brotherhood and those who are looking to have a re-founding of the caliphate, even Turkey wants that, are looking towards proselytizing other people in the world to become part of Islam or they’re considered to be enemies of the religion that is essentially what you’re talking about when you talk about the Plan of Islam. Most Muslims do not subscribe to this at all. So, you got to be very careful here and make the distinction and figure out whether you’re being pushed into something that really is not all that big a deal. I think the last time I looked demographically, the Muslims constitute about 1% of the United States total in various areas of the country. [Google says 1.3% to 1.5% – GC] They obviously have settled, because of immigration patterns and family patterns and the religion and everything else. People get freaked out about it because they think oh my god this group of people is here and they’re not adhering to anything in the community and they haven’t been absorbed into the community. That’s a problem. It’s a problem we face across the board in terms of immigration in our country.
👉But, in order for people to actually integrate into a culture, you got to be able to define the culture they’re integrating themselves into.👈
And if you look at our culture in the United States at this point, and you asked yourself, if I was coming here and I actually am being told you need to integrate into American culture, what would I see? What would I see? Would I see Graham Platner and think that I got to integrate with that? That’s kind of a problem. It’s not as simple as the plan, which everybody’s kind of attached to at this point of, oh my god. they’re going to come here and essentially take us all over. It is a source of tension in various communities in the United States around this question of, you know, becoming an American and identifying being an American as your essential identity. But in order for people to do that, we got to do a much better job of actually defining what a citizen and citizenship in the United States actually means. So that’s how to answer your question.…
118:16 Mark Steger: And let me just go back to the last question because I think what people are missing, I mean Islam has been radically altered by a lot of the foreign funding [and] British operations over the last 50 years. What Trump’s message to a lot of these Gulf Kingdoms, the Saudis, the entire Islamic world is in 2017, knock it off. We’re not going to be funding ISIS and al-Qaeda any longer as we did under Obama. We’re not going to be funding Hamas in this operation. You guys have got to change the orientation away from this caliphate.
But the bigger question is for too long people in the United States and in Europe have taken Christian civilization for granted. There’s not a clarity of what it is, what its principles are, how it manifests as a worldview, what we’re committed to developing, what our role in the universe is. We don’t have a people [who] might go to church. They might want to oppose the kind of cultural decadence and destruction of Hollywood and the elites, the liberal elites in this country. We have not fortified in a theological and deeper cultural way, a worldview that expresses the kind of strength and beauty and the kind of power of scientific discovery that Christian civilization really means. And I think people have to have a sense that that’s what’s needed. That’s what we’re doing with Promethean Action. That’s what we’ve recognized for a long time. And we’re developing it from the standpoint of how this kind of cultural outlook has got to be strengthened and made more conscious in the minds and hearts of the American people. And if we have that, as Barbara said, we’re going to recruit a lot more of the people that are here towards a real sense of what our civilization is based on. And we’re going to counter probably the most insidious effects which has been things like the rap culture. This rap music culture, this anti-American materialist kind of culture which has recruited a lot of the immigrant communities.
Parents come in hoping to maybe integrate and be part of it, but they’ve got their traditions and cultures. It’s their children. You’ll see this in France. the second & third generations have become less and less assimilated and integrated because the culture that’s been promoted has largely been anti the very principles of our civilization. So the question is are we making clear the real principles of what a western Christian civilization represent. And I think that’s what we’ve got. That’s what Trump’s looking to revive….
Speaking of Iran, and Obama’s ‘Agreement’ There is Obama’s Handler, Valerie Jarrett.
….According to FBI files obtained by Judicial Watch, Jarrett’s father, Dr. James E. Bowman, a pathologist and geneticist, “had extensive ties to Communist associations and individuals.”
The files also show that “in 1950, Bowman was in communication with a paid Soviet agent Alfred Stern, who fled to Prague after getting charged with espionage.”
Alfred Stern and his wife, Martha Dodd Stern, “were indicted in absentia on espionage charges on Sept. 9, 1957, The New York Times reported. The indictment charged them with conspiring to act as Soviet agents, receiving American military, commercial and industrial information and transmitting it to the Soviet Union. The indictment charged that they used their house in Ridgefield, Conn., for meetings with Soviet agents.”
Dr. James Bowman “was also a member of a Communist-sympathizing group called the Association of Internes and Medical Students,” reported Judicial Watch. “After his discharge from the Army Medical Corps in 1955, Bowman moved to Iran to work.” Valerie Jarret was born in Iran on Nov. 14, 1956.
The Association of Internes and Medical Students, according to the FBI files, is a group that “has long been a faithful follower of the Communist Party line.” Bowman had “deep ties to Chicago,” reported Judicial Watch, “where he often collaborated with fellow Communists.”
Judicial Watch further stated that the Jarrett family Communist ties “also include a business partnership between Jarrett’s maternal grandpa, Robert Rochon Taylor (1899-1957) and [Alfred] Stern, the Soviet agent associated with her dad.”
Valerie Jarrett’s father-in-law, Vernon Jarrett (1917-2004), “was also another big-time Chicago Communist,” according to the FBI files. “For a period of time Vernon Jarrett appeared on the FBI’s Security Index and was considered a potential Communist saboteur who was to be arrested in the event of a conflict with the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR),” Judicial Watch said.
According to the FBI documents, Vernon Jarrett’s job was to “write propaganda for a Communist Party front group in Chicago that would ‘disseminate the Communist Party line among … the middle class.”
“Faithful to her roots, [Valerie Jarrett] still has connections to many Communist and extremist groups, including the Muslim Brotherhood,” said Judicial Watch. “Jarrett and her family also had strong ties to Frank Marshall Davis, a big Obama mentor and Communist Party member with an extensive FBI file.”
…The federal government placed Bowman [ValJar’s Dad — GC] under special surveillance because of his involvement with the European Recovery Program (ERP)—i.e., the Marshall Plan. Historian Paul Kengor explains: “This ERP/Marshall Plan association is very intriguing, and troubling. One of the most insidious forms of Communist Party agitation in the 1940s and 1950s was to frame the Marshall Plan as a form of vile American imperialism. It was the Kremlin line, pushed by Stalin and Molotov and mimicked by [the] Communist Party USA. One of the worst peddlers of this line was Frank Marshall Davis, who characterized the Marshall Plan in his columns as a ‘device’ to maintain ‘white imperialism.’ The plan, by Davis’s rendering, was a disgusting ‘oppression of non-white peoples everywhere,’ a slavery purchased by Secretary of State Marshall’s ‘billions of U.S. dollars … to bolster the tottering empires of England, France, Belgium, Holland and the other western exploiters of teeming millions of humans.’ … Was James Bowman [promoting the same notions about the Marshall Plan]? I cannot tell from … his FBI file, but I can say that Bowman’s work for, or position on, the Marshall Plan was the item of special concern to the FBI.”
Bowman was also a member of the Association of Internes and Medical Students, a group that, according to Bowman’s FBI file, engaged in un-American activities and “has long been a faithful follower of the Communist Party line.” …
Bowman was also very active with the communist student group American Youth for Democracy as well as the International Labor Defense and the American Committee for Protection of Foreign Born (ACPFB), three of Frank Marshall Davis’s favorite organizations. Paul Kengor writes the following about ACPFB:
“This group had been so extreme that the Democratic Congress’s huge ‘Investigation of Un-American Propaganda Activities in the United States’ (published in 1944) devoted a lengthy 15-page section just to ACPFB, atop innumerable added references elsewhere in the report. Key members included prominent African-American communists Langston Hughes and Paul Robeson, the gushing admirer of Joe Stalin, plus the usual assemblage of duped liberals/progressives, ranging from theologian Reinhold Niebuhr, to the great Orson Welles, to famed movie actor Edward G. Robinson.
“As the Congressional report noted, ACPFB ‘was founded by the Communist Party in order to exploit racial divisions in the United States for its own revolutionary purposes.’ Its modus operandi was to polarize Americans along racial lines in order to advance the Soviet agenda. Closely linked to International Labor Defense, the primary (concealed) intention of ACPFB was to protect foreign communists who came to America and agitated for the Soviet Comintern. The core objective was to prevent deportation of these foreign-born communists living in America. One such figure was German communist Gerhart Eisler, who became a major CPUSA cause, and whose name was omnipresent throughout Frank Marshall Davis’s Chicago Star….
1961-1983
When Valerie Jarrett was five, her family relocated to London for one year before settling in Chicago’s elite Hyde Park neighborhood in 1963.
For additional Information on Valerie Jarrett, click here.
The Republican War mongers and Israel are NOT happy about the possibility of peace in the Middle East. Is Israel going to get Greece to fight Turkey? Israel cannot fight directly because Turkey is in NATO. Also the Israeli Draft of people into the IDF is having repercussions. It is very disruptive of business and commerce. Dual citizens are leaving Israel to escape the Draft and the Ultra-Orthodox Jews are now praying for the fall of Israel.
WARNING: Ghost does not like the expansionist plans of Israel or the Zionists. However he has facts and background not normally available. Much of it complements the information from the Promethean Action video above. The video is 1 ½ hours.
There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.
Do not forget to LABEL AI articles video and such.
Just for fun: Otxi the Iceman
I decided to go into an Alpha Warrior – Colonel Towner discussion on the Southern Poverty Law Center. In chasing down a reference the ‘rabbit trail’ led to this info.
A recent landmark Jamestown Foundation report maps Chinese United Front operations, the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP’s) effort to co-opt and weaponize civil society against the CCP’s enemies.
The report, titled “Harnessing the People” and authored by researcher Cheryl Yu, identifies more than 2,000 such organizations operating in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Germany. More than 1,000 are operating in the United States.
They span a wide range, including student, business, professional, cultural, and “friendship” groups as well as media outlets.
In this episode, I sit down with Peter Mattis, president of The Jamestown Foundation. Few understand this complex web of Chinese influence and espionage operations as well as he does…
The 116th U.S. Congress held meetings in 2019 that included discussions about the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), with Laird Wilcox, an expert on fringe political movements, providing testimony or commentary. Wilcox critiqued the SPLC’s approach to labeling groups as “hate groups,” suggesting it was incautious and politically motivated.
His remarks were part of a broader congressional examination of extremism and the role of organizations like the SPLC in monitoring far-right activity.
Key points from the context:
On April 9, 2019, a House Judiciary Subcommittee meeting included documents referencing Wilcox’s analysis of the SPLC’s practices.
Wilcox argued that the SPLC used broad and potentially misleading labels, such as “hate group,” without rigorous standards.
The SPLC responded through spokesperson Mark Potok, who dismissed Wilcox as having “an ax to grind” against anti-racist organizations.
These discussions occurred amid growing scrutiny of both extremist movements and the institutions tracking them.
One of the papers linked to the Subcommittee meeting, that was not mentioned is this:
ALPHA: We are on chapter 93 and going to be talking about the Southern Poverty Law Center. It’s been in the headlines and of course we will have a Gladio perspective on that.
Colonel, I reached out to you this morning and you said we should probably talk about this.
06:15
COLONEL: I had looked into the Southern Poverty Law Center probably about a year and a half ago um somewhere in a thread somewhere. And what um what immediately stood out to me is if you go back in writings about the Southern Poverty Law Center, almost every article that someone would write about and um specifically a guy by the name of Laird Wilcox, what I found fascinating is on a regular search engine, number one, you almost cannot find any of his material. And archive.org has almost all of his references dead on archive.org, which was kind of like a red flag to me. But you can go through Yandex and do some digging to find some of his old articles about the Southern Poverty Law Center I posted a bunch of them today and all through the day. Of course everybody ignored him like usual, but he was on to this decades ago.
…During college, Wilcox joined the radical left, a political tradition he inherited from his father. He founded the Student Peace Union and the Kansas Free Press at the University of Kansas. He was active in Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) and the civil-rights movement. Then something happened.
What started out as a noble cause turned ugly. “When it came to the left,” he now says of that time, “I’d never seen such hate in my life.” He quit the movement as he saw it sliding into “mindless nihilism, self-destructiveness, and craziness.”
In 1965, before leaving the university and joining forces with the right to complete his intellectual journey, he sold his collection of political literature to the university for $1,000, thus beginning the Wilcox Collection.
For a time he waltzed as an observer through such organizations as the Ku Klux Klan, the John Birch Society, and some fundamentalist Christian groups. He participated to the fullest and built his collection of literature of the right.
Then Wilcox began to straddle the line. One week he could be seen at a Socialist Workers Party meeting and the next marching with the Nazis. He became plugged in at the highest levels…
“….Recently, [2010] The Social Contract’s contributing editor Peter Gemma [TSC] went to Kansas City to tour the Wilcox Collection and interview Laird Wilcox….”
page 183
TSC: In the course of your research and cataloging work, when did you first become aware of the Southern Poverty Law Center?
Wilcox: About the time they emerged on the scene. Initially, the ideas implied by the name “Southern
Poverty Law Center” sounded kind of appealing, like an organization that would help poor people deal
with their legal problems. After a few years it became apparent that it was nothing like that.
TSC: How did you realize that it’s all a facade, that the SPLC has its own political agenda?
Wilcox: In looking over their fundraising stuff, I could see that they were sensationalizing racial conflict issues, and when their reports on “extremist” groups began appearing it was obviously a bogus fundraising scheme that was into demonizing and blacklisting. It reminded me so much of similar operations that were aimed at leftists during the fifties and sixties, that I concluded it was basically modeled after them…
Laird Wilcox lectures widely on the psychology of ideological belief systems and these topics. — LINK
The above articles are all from Yandex.
….
COLONEL: But what struck me when I was looking at it before, and today, was how often the Southern Poverty Law Center is attached to the ADL, the Anti Defamation League. In almost every article, there’s some tie between the two as far as them tag teaming issues, which again to me is a red flag. So, let’s start off by introducing a couple of the characters we’re going to talk about.
The first one is Morris, and you don’t ever see his middle name used. It’s Seligman, which is a very notorious German Jewish surname. [“Seligman is a surname of German and Ashkenazi Jewish origin, primarily derived from the root word selig (or Yiddish zeleg), meaning “blessed,” “happy,” or “prosperous” — Brave AI– GC] His last name is Dees. So, he’s from an area that’s just east of Montgomery, Alabama. All of the descriptions of him say that he’s the son of a farmer.
09:25
And what’s interesting is that area has been known for a school there just outside of that little town, Mount Meigs. Mount Meigs, had at the beginning of the 1900s, a school there that was a reformatory for black children. Unreformed: the Story of the Alabama Industrial School for Negro Children – GC] And they had young children there. They had middle-aged children there. And basically it was a prison camp and they were starved. I mean there was horrific stories, They were sexually abused there. I found it rather ironic that he grew up in that area while that school was in operation. I just want to explain to people how Orwellian the name is, Southern Poverty Law Center. And that’s going to come back multiple times when I talk about some of the lawsuits that this guy was involved in because he’s a multi, multi, multi-millionaire.
He goes to law school at the University of Alabama and the first thing he does is open a direct mail sales company. He also publishes books and he creates an organization called Fuller and D’s Marketing Group. That’s what he was known for. It grew to be one of the largest publishing companies in the south. And you can’t find any evidence that this guy was concerned about poverty at all, even in his own backyard. No reaching out to any of those people that went through that torture of growing up in that [school.] As a matter of fact, many of the people later on in life resorted to violence and ended up, with life sentences in prison because they were psychologically tortured in that place. There was no legal representation for any of those people. He never went back and revisited any of their sentences, nothing. So to me that’s very noteworthy.
11:59
He gets approached by the Los Angeles Times to buy his publishing company. Now, those of you who followed me long enough understand that the media basically is all part of this [CIA] operation, right? So they offer him something like a million dollars for his publishing and direct sales company. I think that’s the point in which this guy is compromised. Of course he is given all of the normal awards from the establishment. The National Education Association, heaps awards on him. He gets all kinds of accolades like they’re building a portfolio for him. The USJC’s [U.S. Justice Coalition -GC] gives him awards, blah blah blah. In 1967 is the first time he started taking on controversial cases. He filed a suit to stop construction of a white university in an Alabama city that had a black state college there. He also sued to integrate Montgomery’s YMCA, which of course we all think is a great idea.
His partner’s last name is Joseph J. Levin, Jr. They both go to the same school. They graduate from the same law school and go in a business called the Southern Poverty Law Center with a civil rights activist by the name of Julian Bond. So now we’ve got the Southern Law Poverty Law Center. And again, he is heaped with rewards by the likes of the American Bar Association, which is corrupt as hell. [Boy don’t we know it! – GC] It gives him an award. The American Civil Liberties Union, ACLU, gives him an award. I already mentioned the National Education One. So in 1972, he becomes the finance director for George McGovern’s presidential campaign because he’s a whiz at direct mailing, he raises over $24 million for George McGovern using his technique. He also served as President Carter’s national finance director in 1976. He served as the national finance chairman for Senator Kennedy’s 1980 presidential campaign. Now, you won’t be surprised at all if I tell you that if you go to the Southern Poverty Law C Center’s website and want to donate, do you know who runs their donations? Act Blue.
So Dees becomes the chief trial council at the Southern Poverty Law Center and he participates in creating that hate map. He’s infamous for suing quote unquote hate groups that he also funds. Kind of like the self-licking ice cream cone. And every case that he takes he uses as a marketing tool. So he says that he’s representing John Doe and then he advertises and uses direct mailing to get millions of dollars, donations from everybody. BUT while he’s representing these people, he doesn’t share any of that money with the victims of the lawsuits. And I’ll come back to that in a minute.
17:00
So he writes books. And one of the first books he writes is A Season for Justice. He also writes a book called Hate on Trial: The Case Against America’s Most Dangerous Neo-Nazis that was published in early 1990s. And it basically talks about a trial and a $12.5 million judgment against a quote unquote white supremacist Tom Mezer and his white Aryan resistance group for beating up a young black student in Portland, Oregon. His third book was called Gathering Storm: America’sMilitia Threat. Of course then he goes out and creates his own militia. So he has now combined all of those aspects.
I need to also say this guy was married four times that I could track. In his last divorce, the woman accused him of being a pedophile for trying to go to bed with her daughter from another marriage and being gay and having sex with somebody that he tried to get into a threesome with his wife. He also was accused multiple times of sexually harassing females at Southern Poverty Law Center. Now, you can discount the divorce stuff cuz that came out in the divorce, the stuff about him being a pedophile and gay. You can take that for whatever it’s worth. There are charges made in divorces that are not necessarily true, but that’s part of this whole guy’s persona. So, just putting that out there.
So let me go back and talk about Joseph Levin, his law partner. As I said before, he graduated from University of Alabama with a law degree as well. He spent two years in the US Army and he goes into business at the Southern Poverty. They had a law firm and then that law firm basically becomes Southern Poverty Law Center.
20:10
I want to get to this other guy because he’s very interesting. He had a couple of things to say. He was one of the original guys that Dees was in business with. His name was Millard Fuller. He’ was Dees marketing guy. He allows Dees to buy him out from that marketing firm and donates all of that money to charity and he then goes on to establish Habitat for Humanity. So apparently he’s a good guy. But one of the articles that quoted Fuller that I saw basically said that his complaint and why he wanted out of that business was that Dees had said to him that he was only in it for the money. He was going to do whatever it took to get rich. And Fuller being more of a humanitarian was in it for the right reasons. So at that point I’ve made my assessment of what type of a person Dees is. I think that’s critical background for understanding the Southern Poverty Law Center.
So, one of the first things that struck me is that the Southern Poverty Law Center, their big famous thing that they produce is called an intelligence report, which of course for me is like what? Who does that? Who writes an intelligence report at a nonprofit NGO? Like nobody, unless you’re in it for other reasons. So the intelligence report is the crux of the whole thing. The people that are in this intelligence group inside the Southern Poverty Law Center monitors hate groups and racial extremists throughout the United States and exposes their activities to law enforcement agencies, the media, and the public. They are quoted as saying, “We publish our investigative findings online in the intelligence report. our award winning quarterly journal.” Of course, this intelligence report is used by law enforcement all over the country.
If you were the CIA, hypothetically, and you wanted to operate inside the United States and target groups, would you not use an organization like the Southern Poverty Law Center who has their own intelligence body inside of it?
ALPHA: Absolutely, I would.
COLONEL: And when you look at the production of the identification of hate groups, do you think 764or Transtifa or any of those are on there as a hate group or the Muslim extremists? No. No, they’re not. They’re not on there anywhere. The only ones that are really on there are basically the more patriot focused organizations. You’ll find one or two, but it’s primarily focused at exactly the same people, the nationalists, that the CIA targets overseas. So if you go into any of the 90 plus countries that we’ve talked about, the focus is always on the people that don’t play ball, right? So you go to the Tupamaros en Chile, they are the ones that are the nationalist that don’t want the CIA operating and wants their government as a representative democracy. So, I have a sneaking suspicion that we’re going to find out that there are direct ties domestically. And these are one of the exact same organizations that we’ve looked at overseas multiple times in our Gladio series because they fit the exact footprint. So, let me transition here.
25:50
ALPHA: I like what you said there and I hope people caught it. You know, that it mimics the exact same footprint because that’s what matters. For those of you that saw last week’s show, you know, one of the organizations that Colonel was talking about and I was like, “Hey, this really sounds like Red Seat Ventures” Well, this is that situation what we’ve been talking about, you know, on all these different countries. Now you look at the behavior of the Southern Poverty Law Center and it mimics the same behavior. So I hope people caught what you said right there.
26:16
COLONEL: Let’s go over a little bit. We all know that there was an indictment that was released. It indicates that there was fraud and money laundering going on inside. Again this is another part of the whole footprint because that’s exactly what was going on in overseas vehicles that were used by the CIA to destabilize countries. So, when you look at them through your Gladio glasses, SPLC does not appear to be a civil rights watchdog. I’m going to go through a couple of cases in just a second, but it’s an institutionalized center for strategy of tension. So, if I can fund raise off of hate, I have to have hate. So if I don’t have enough hate, I just create the hate and I fund raise off of exposing the hate that I actually funded. And so I’m I’m going to get to a couple of examples of that, too.
I was trying to put all of this into words. What I came up with was it is the foundational logic of Gladio operations throughout Europe and around the world. Intelligence services and their proxies infiltrate extremist factions on both the far right and far left. The objective was never to eliminate dissent, but to facilitate and control chaos by funding, guiding, and radicalizing groups that were already pre-disposed to violence. These actors created a perpetual state of fear, justifying the expansion of state powers, the suppression of political enemies, and the validation of existing elite narratives. The indictment confirms that this model has been imported and institutionalized in American nonprofit sectors which is again exactly how USAID does it overseas using NOS’s. They do that by funneling millions of dollars to highly placed figures in the Ku Klux Klan and neo-Nazi movements. The SPLC ensured that these groups stayed active, visible, and violent when they might have otherwise withered into irrelevance. This provided a steady state of quote unquote racism, even if it’s manufactured, that served as raw material for their fundraising apparatus. It’s the perfect system, generate the problem, weaponize the problem, and secure tax-exempt funding and use the money to fuel the problem further. And of course, we know the Southern Poverty Law Center material is used by the FBI. It’s used by police departments. And they use it as part of congressional testimony.
29:40
ALPHA:I told you before the show that I referenced them in a search warrant that I did many years ago. You think the data, because it’s used by these other entities and it’s referenced and you’re like, “Oh, this is legitimate.” And then you get over here and you’re just like, “Well, yeah, the numbers might have been real, but only because they created them.”
COLONEL: Right? So, the indictment also says that they created entities and potentially shell accounts that mirror all of the organizational structure used in Gladio overseas. They paid informants to stoke racial hatred or coordinated logistical support for rallies such as the 2017 Charlottesville event. Did you know that they were intimately involved in Charlottesville?
30:49
ALPHA: I do now and have been over the last 24 hours. i don’t know what you’ve researched, but a lot of the information that’s circulating, I have not vetted it, but a lot of the information circulating is that Charlottesville event is one of the events that helped launch Nick Fuentes’s notoriety.
COLONEL: Correct.
ALPHA: Interesting.
COLONEL: Yes. Isn’t it? and they provided logistical support. You know, if you read through it, it looks almost like they were controlling it. They talked about it and they even had several days before scenarios about using vehicles to run over people. So this is the textbook example of agent provocateur tactics used by the CIA and their European counterparts to ensure geopolitical and social outcomes are steered exactly where they want them to head. They didn’t act in a vacuum. They were deeply integrated in the FBI and political establishments, which allowed its quote unquote hate group list to act as a de-facto policy manual for domestic security. It created a feedback loop where the government and the quote unquote watchdog acted as a unified unaccountable superstructure that defined who the domestic enemy was in order for them to take action against them. SPLC’s role in this destabilization project goes beyond just money. It centers on the American heartland by demonizing the identity of historic white Christian population and labeling their legitimate political concerns as extremism.
The SPLC has been the primary engine for managed decline, and racial tension. By equating American nationalism with violent fringe groups they essentially subsidized, they effectively de-legitimized any serious attempt at organizing any type of national interest or conservative preservation in the United States. They criminalized being a patriot. That’s the bottom line. They criminalized being an American first patriot.
Now, this goes back to when we were talking about the three events with the Ruby Ridge, Waco, and Oklahoma, right?
33:45
ALPHA: Correct.
COLONEL: Also, there were SPLC infiltrators in the Aryan Nation all, over, to include the Oklahoma location where Timothy McVeigh hung out. Where we also found Strassmeir who I track back to Germany whose dad [the Chief of Staff to Chancellor Helmut Kohl per WIKI –GC] was intimately involved as Germany’s what they call the Department of interior guy during the Gladio operations where there were bombings all over Germany. So his dad was the government entity in Germany responsible for preventing those but they happened everywhere and included killing several US service members in those bombings. That guy’s son was at the Aryan Nation location in Oklahoma where Timothy McVeigh was hanging out. He’s the guy that was, after the bombing, escorted out of the country. Kind of like the JFK, OAS agent was escorted out of the country by the Dallas Police Department. So, the Southern Poverty Law Center, like I said, had infiltrators inside, if not paying for some of the rabble rousing that was going on in the Aryan Nation location in Oklahoma. It’s all connected.
So, they basically provided The Hegelian Dialect. They provided the thesis i.e. extreme manufactured racism and the anti-thesis of globalist multi-cultural establishment, which they fully endorse. Keeping the public locked into this dialectical conflict that prevents any serious discussion of the collapse of the nuclear family or the erosion of national sovereignty or anything else. Because as soon as you broach those subjects, you’re called a racist, right? So, obviously this indictment exposes the administrative state here in the United States and their reliance on a controlled opposition. If you’ve got to create hate groups, you really don’t have hate unless you manufacture it.
A couple of key points on the indictment. The Southern Poverty Law Center and its affiliated financial entities constituted a massive indictment that is far worse than racketeering or state sponsored disruption. They talk in the indictment about racketeering and fraudulent conduit schemes. They alleged that they functioned as an expansive racketeering enterprise. It’s accused of utilizing pass through entities and domestic NGOs to move millions of dollars to fringe extremist organizations. It’s documented through a series of quote unquote consulting fees and research grants that were in practice salaries and operational subsidies for leadership figures in self-styled white supremacist and separatist groups. This goes back to your comment about Nick Fuentes, right? How many of these people that are spewing this garbage are on the SPLC’s pay list?
ALPHA: It’s absolutely important because you made me spawn a thought and that thought led to another one and I’m trying to find it right now to verify some information. I’m going to look a little deeper before I mentioned the second one. But one of the things that came to mind was, you remember the Sedition Hunters?
38:50
COLONEL: Oh yes.
ALPHA: Because they were targeting a bunch of us.
COLONEL: I know they targeted my neighbors.
ALPHA:Exactly. And a lot of people might remember ‘Maga Granny’ , the one that ended up flipping on Trump? She tried to out me but didn’t realize that I keep everything recorded and long story short, she started working with the Sedition Hunters. People that are, very loyal to this show and cared about me took it upon themselves to go do investigations and were like, “Hey, look at this brand new car she’s driving after she’s talking about doing all these fundraisers, and It was just very interesting. So I’m very curious to what kind of connections the Southern Poverty Law Center had to the Sedition Hunters. But another organization I’m curious to if there’s any connections and I found one I’m trying to verify it right now as well, it is The Lincoln Project. And so you got my mind going because like you just said, it’s this this big circle of organizations. it’s the intelligence apparatus saying let’s just create these other organizations that don’t have to submit to FOIA. they don’t have to submit to different things that are out there.
COLONEL: They’re fronts.
ALPHA: They’re fronts, but here’s the other part. It is knowing that the FBI starting with them is something that would mimic a very large RICO case because you’re building your way up to the way this works. So, anyway, my mind’s going wild and I hope people are paying attention, because for all the people out there that have been screaming nothing’s happening. I think this is going to be freaking huge. I think this is Pandora’s. Colonel Please continue.
41:47
COLONEL: Okay. Also in the indictment, they were accused of sending direct payments from SPLC linked accounts to bank accounts of identified extremists by the SPLC. So they identify them, then they pay them. These funds were used for tactical gear, travel, and logistics for rallies intended to draw mass media attention and public outrage. The indictment alleges a revolving door between radical group leadership, [and] the SPLC consulting roles. By paying these figures to maintain their visibility, the SPLC ensured a constant supply of inflammatory imagery and audio to sustain high levels of fear, to encourage donations and to add legitimacy to a increasingly bigger surveillance state. The indictment challenges the SPLC’s tax-exempt status by demonstrating that its core activity was not educational or legal advocacy but political warfare. Which is huge. It also says that they had tracked hundreds of millions of dollars to offshore accounts. And again, how ‘Gladio’ is that? They argue that they were not legitimate endowments, but a war chest intended to influence internal political outcomes, probably used for overseas as well. Allegations include a systemic filing of false financial disclosures with the IRS, failing to disclose the true nature of the expenditures and misidentifying political activities as civil rights legal defense.
44:06
ALPHA: So, let me plug in a little information here because it ties into legal defenses. I told you I was looking at Southern Poverty Law Center and the Lincoln Project to see if there’s any connections. Now, this is cursory level just so folks understand. I haven’t gone deep into it. And here’s one of the ones that we have. First, the breakdown January 5th, 2021. This is from the Lincoln Project, the their program listed Nancy Abudu as a guest. Separate sources identify Abudu at the time as an SPLC voting rights
leader and later a strategic litigation leader. That is a documented personnel crossover in a media appearance. So there’s one. The second one, and this comes in 2024, the Georgia election case. The court filing hosted on SPLC’s site shows SPLC lawyers representing one group of Amichi while the same filing certificate of service separately lists councils for Georgia First Incorporated and the Lincoln Project Incorporated. That shows that SPLC and the Lincoln Project were at least in line on the same side of that litigation.
45:46
COLONEL: It fits the pattern.
ALPHA: This is gonna be big.
COLONEL: That’s a great find. So obviously they have a monopoly on the watch list or terrorist list. The prosecution for the indictment argues that the information used by the SPLC to lobby federal law enforcement both at DHS and FBI was often derived from individuals that the SPLC was funding. Talk about a self-licking ice cream cone! It alleges that SPLC provided evidence of domestic threats to federal agencies that they themselves had manufactured via their network of informants and subsidized radicals. This is framed as a breach of federal law regarding the manipulation of intelligence and the subversion of internal security processes. Because they’re basically passing off fake information. Oh, who else does that? Oh, I don’t know. the CIA who actually creates intelligence as opposed to gathering intelligence? That’s exactly what SPLC is doing. They’re acting as a mini CIA domestically. That’s exactly what the indictment says. They are part of Operation Gladio in the United States.
ALPHA:100%. Because it’s my opinion that’s what Sedition Hunters were. They were doxing all of us and they were doing that at the behest of the corrupt side of the intelligence agencies.
COLONEL: Well, there’s there’s I wouldn’t even say they were doxing. They were literally tracking people down.
So, just so you guys know, I’ve told this story a couple of times. I had a friend of mine that was running for political office in the local area here and she knew a lot of people and she talked to all the cops and the fire department blah blah blah cuz she was running for mayor. She called me one day and said I needed to meet her immediately. I had made it well known that my neighbors were the three people in my hometown here that were implicated in January 6th and they were tracking one of them down. They couldn’t find him. The other two had on electronic monitors so they could try to find the third one since they all are related. So I drove over and met her and she just handed me a piece of paper. In the note that she handed me, because she didn’t want to even say it out loud, was that the sedition hunters had been to all of the local businesses here asking about that guy. The one that got away. That they couldn’t find. And so I went to my friend who is the aunt of the one that they couldn’t find and walked out in the woods and had a conversation with her husband about that. I just handed him the note. We had a conversation talking about just how ridiculous the whole thing was. But they were actively combing the area, talking to every business owner, trying to find him. They were conducting a manhunt. It was crazy.
So the prosecution claims that SPLC’s actions were intended to spark civil unrest by intentionally facilitating high-profile confrontations. The SPLC created an environment where the state could justify their surveillance of political dissident, which is exactly what they’ve [CIA] done in every country. This is the Phoenix Program, people. The censorship of alternative media and the expansion of de domestic counter-terror authorities. SEE: The CIA’s ‘Phoenix Program’ in Vietnam: Practice run for the “war on terror”
The filing also argues that SPLC utilized these manufactured tensions to prevent any broad based consensus among American citizenry, specifically by weaponizing the quote unquote hate group label to shut down any legitimate debate regarding immigration, demographic shifts, or the erosion of the traditional American values.
50:37
Now let’s talk about Patriot Front. Do you remember them?
ALPHA: Oh, I do.
COLONEL: And everybody kept saying that they were basically FBI agents, right? >>
Well, the indictment of the Southern Poverty Law Center addresses Patriot Front, characterizing the organization not as an independent grassroots entity, but as a critical node in an SPLC managed controlled opposition network. It provided a detailed breakdown of the institutional and financial intersections which aligned with operational patterns observed in many of the overseas operations. It says that the operational capacity of Patriot Front was significantly enabled by funds originating from SPLC linked entities like direct wire transfers. Supposedly they conducted forensic accounting and it presented consistent masked wire transfers from NGOS’s under the SPLC umbrella to private accounts owned by key Patriot Front leadership. The indictment links SPLC funds to specific logistical expenditures. Remember all those vans? Those U-Haul vans? Those expenditures included the leasing of those vans, the procurement of uniforms, and the purchasing of communication equipment used during high profile demonstrations. No wonder they all got away all the time and nobody tried to unmask them except for a few times. They also said that documents indicated that the timing, locations, and specific messaging of Patriot Front marches was coordinated to coincide with political moments where white supremacist threat narrative needed to surge. The indictment says that SPLC pushed for the use of mask face coverings for Patriot Front members. This was not a security measure for the members, but a deliberate tactical decision to prevent personal identification and ensure they remained viewed by the public as a monolithic threat to individuals.
ALPHA:Now, can you see the screen Colonel?
COLONEL: Yep.
53:19
ALPHA: So, this flag here to the left, one of the first things that caught my attention, there were so many obvious signs here, but I want you guys to pay attention what our star where our stars would normally be. And any of you that have followed any of the coverage that I’ve been doing, you know, over the last couple years on the Azov battalion and the Nazis and Ukraine and all that stuff going on, you will recognize that symbol [Used by the Patriot Front – Wiki –GC] because it is also known as the black sun. And so I’ll just read just the first two sentences. “The black sun is a type of sun wheel symbol originating in Nazi Germany and later employed by neo-Nazis and other far-right individuals and groups. “WIKI
THE BLACK SUN
“Former badge of the Azov Brigade,
which uses a Black Sun and the
National Idea symbol in the forefront”
COLONEL: No, they’re trying to create them. They’re trying to create a narrative. It was a Psyops. It was a psychological operation conducted on the American people.
54:14
ALPHA: So this way you remember. You make it look organic but it’s synthetic. That way once you do get ordinary people sucked into it emotionally and make the mistake then those people are going to get hammered. It’s the whole thing in Michigan with Gretchen Whitmer. And the brothers and all that stuff that went out there. It’s 90% FBI agents, 10% people. That was the operation. That’s ridiculous. And and and there’s no tactical leader in the world that would have ever allowed a legitimate operation like that to go through. If they were legitimate. If I would have went to my police chief and said, “Hey, chief, you know, there’s these two guys and I think we can bust them being part of an organization.” How big’s the organization? Well, 12 members. Well, ain’t 10 of you guys in there, though. That’s besides the point. He would have looked at me like, “You’re crazy. What’s wrong with you guys?” But yet, that’s what they did.
55:21
COLONIAL: It also suggests that SPLC researchers were the ones providing the guidance for Patriot Front rhetoric. When Patriot Front would subsequently release a manifesto or make a provocative statement, the SPLC would then discover. in air quotes and highlight this rhetoric to the FBI or DOJ and media, thereby validating their own manufactured feedback loop. So, I’m going to give you the script, you read it, and then I’m going to act outraged. The indictment claims that SPLC personnel served as a clearing house for information provided to federal agencies regarding Patriot Front activities, effectively curating which extreme groups the government would focus on and which ones they would allow to operate unhindered, which again is exactly what the CIA does overseas. The indictment further contends that the Patriot Front was maintained purposely to erode the legitimacy of the broader American nationalist movement by keeping the group active, well funded, and highly visible. They created a psychological lightning rod. Every action taken by the Patriot Front was used to broaden the definition of hate to cover mainstream patriotic and pro-Western sentiment. The indictment says that SPLC used these stunts to pressure corporations, social media platforms, and political representatives to de-platform and suppress nonviolent legitimate desenters by associating them with the manufactured optic of the Patriot Front, which they themselves created. So it basically functioned as a part of the strategy of tension serving as a foil that SPLC could manipulate to justify suppression of the historic American population. The indictment represents the group as a modern-day iteration of a false front organization utilizing intelligence operations to ensure legitimate political opposition remains trapped by characterized by radical optic and damaging. That’s crazy.
58:12
Now, let me go back to the comparison of the SPLC and the anti-defamation league, the ADL…
I started doing a side-by-side comparison of the tactics used by the ADL for their agenda and the SPLC for their agenda. And it’s weird just how closely they mirror each other. They basically are operating like a two-headed monster within the administrative state. They actually share intelligence data between the intelligence project of the SPLC and the ADL’s center on extremism. They function as a private sector CIA for domestic social management. They share files on political dissident, coordinate de-platforming campaigns against journalists and activists and trade information with the federal law enforcement to ensure that their version of hate becomes codified in state sanctioned policy. By having two massive tax-exempt organizations reporting on the same threat, they create an echo – system. If the SPLC identifies an individual as dangerous, the ADL echoes it and vice versa. This creates a feedback loop for media outlets themselves often staffed by people with similar ideological commitments and they can then treat it as objective truth with independent verification of the other. It provides a cover of legitimacy that destroys people’s livelihood and reputations.
Both the SPLC and the ADL have been the tip of the spear for advocating for mass migration, the eraser of heritage-based identities for the majority population and the active promotion of multiculturalism. The globalist agenda. It’s a deliberate strategy, a form of social engineering that effectively functions as a survival mechanism against perceived threats. The ADL pioneered this industry obviously with the historical trauma of the Holocaust as a political cudgel to shield its own political agenda from criticism. And what does the SPLC use? Slavery. It’s the same thing. Their tactics are identical to each other. Almost like they share it.
62:54
ALPHA: Well, what you’re looking the timing of this exposure is good. really really good because and I mentioned this on on my show earlier this week, Colonel, the Carmela Anthony case is coming into play. And I’ve had been warning people since last year, keep your eyes on this case. They’re going to use it. If the religious tribalism is not getting the results they want, they’re going to default to back to the one that they know always works. Black versus white in these crimes. I go, “So, keep an eye on the Karmelo Anthony case.” and that, you know, the judge came out and and had some choice words about not letting people exploit it. But seeing that these institutions are getting exposed now, that’s a good thing because it can probably rug-pull any event that they probably had planned for that trial. >>
63:48
COLONEL: Yep. I couldn’t agree with you more. So both groups are currently acting as enforcers of post-Christian globalist regime and in our case regime change. they basically are trying to set the agenda of what’s acceptable politically to talk about. They also thrive on the existence of domestic conflict, which of course destabilization, which is what the CIA is known for. Without an extremist boogeyman, their funding evaporates, their influence declines, and their reason for existence vanishes. They have successfully embedded themselves as recognized experts into the FBI, the DOJ, the Department of Homeland Security, and many other organizations to include the military when the government produces domestic terrorism briefings. They are often essentially citing reports generated by the SPLC or the ADL. This is basically a private public outsourcing of state power.
…The other thing. The SPLC was intimately involved in a lawsuit with the Women’s League of Voters, .. they joined up with the Women’s League of Voters to thwart the lawsuits that happened about the 2020 census. They challenged whether or not you could count illegal immigrants. They both got together and if you look over the list of people that donate large large sums of money to the SPLC, it’s a very interesting list that looks exactly like the oligarchs that we’ve talked about in the past.
66:41
ALPHA:Here’s some names right here.
COLONEL:Oh, look, JP Morgan and George Soros. What? That’s crazy. You mean the same JP Morgan that funds all of this Gladio shit and George Soros that funds all of this Gladio shit more recently? They would be funding the SPLC. Yes. Yes, they would.
ALPHA: I’m very shocked.
67:04
COLONEL: Yeah. Isn’t that interesting? There’s a ton more, but I think we’ve pretty much made the case that this is definitely Operation Gladio inside the United States.
ALPHA: It is. I want to just highlight my brother Shawn Taylor. He sent me this. “Share this I got to help make it go viral. So I will be posting it It comes from the pamphleteer out in Nashville. I haven’t had a chance to verify this story, so I want to be very clear about that. The SPLC is a recurring character in the Phil investigation. If you guys remember, this is Phil Williams. We’re talking NC5 News out there in Tennessee. This is the one that came after brother Shawn Taylor, the Millersville PD when they were looking into the cases that involved some of the corruption there, the human trafficking there, the child trafficking there. But they had also stumbled upon a gentleman, I don’t remember his name, so I don’t want to get inaccurate, but they had a drone contract with our department defense to train the guys out in Ukraine over this. And it was a large contract. And when the TBI raided them because they said this investigation that they’re doing into human and child trafficking went beyond the scope of their duty. One of the things in their search warrant that they asked the judge for was files related to that guy, which had nothing to do with those other cases. But on the heels of yesterday’s indictment, Williams Confronting Hate Series, which builds its authority off the SPLC’s work, is worthy of further scrutiny. So, looks like there might even be some connections coming out of there, folks. And I think you’re going to see this on a lot of things. I think this is the rugpull of that. call me excited cuz I am, Colonel. And for those that have been tracking my other shows, I told everybody, and this lines up in that window, that we were going to see some people that were just going to start disappearing off of social media. Not violent stuff, just their accounts were going to start vanishing. I think related to that because once the funding is removed from all these inorganic accounts that are out there that are pushing this propaganda they’re going to disappear. The only reason they’re doing it is money or something that might be leveraged on them and I think we are going to see social media heads that are going to find themselves if not charged at least named in the indictments, Things like what they did with Patriot Front. I think we are going to see that broaden into some of these other third party applications. They try to use shell companies to conceal everything. And so when these influencers.. then you find out who was paying them and before you know it, you’re just like, “Oh, so it was money that just got washed a few times in in laundry before it made its way to these influencers.” I really do believe that we’re going to see stuff like that, Colonel.
70:34
COLONEL: Oh, 100%. You definitely need to be looking at that exact thing because they apparently have been doing this for a very long time. I did want to mention when I was talking about some of the lawsuits they were involved in. So, this black woman had her son killed by what was alleged to be a Klu Klux Klan hit .They the SPLC sue and she got a single digit million dollar settlement, but the people that were involved involved had $52,000 to their name. So that was what the grieving mother was going to receive from the lawsuit. Meanwhile, thanks to Mr. Dees’ direct mailing, he got double digit millions of dollars frpm being involved in that lawsuit. And that woman saw not a penny of it. Not a penny. And she got like a $6 million award during the trial, but of course the people didn’t have the money, so she didn’t get that. She got like $50,000. This is repeated throughout their very selective taking of cases. [example of another case.]
And that so that brings in a completely different line. These are the same people, the ADL and the SPLC that were the backing of hate crimes. Just like they tried to do with the terrorism charge on January 6ers, right? So, you can you convict them of something and then you up-charge them with a terrorism enhancement. That’s what hate crime is. There’s no such thing as a hate crime. That’s BULLSHIT. And you know who created that? The SPLC and the ADL. And so if you kill somebody and that somebody happens to be a minority, they can upcharge you for that. It’s still murder. If it even is murder and not self-defense, it’s murder. It has nothing to do with the race of the victim, but thanks to these people and all of their nefarious bullshit and they will encourage hate crimes because they profit off of them. They turn everything into a hate crime to profit off of them.
75:25
ALPHA: I know what it’s like being on the law enforcement side of this. In the area where I was working, we had a a a larger than average demographic of people from the LGBT community. You would get the news trying to influence investigations, trying to say that this was against somebody’s sexuality. We know the facts of the case had nothing to do with that. This was just a robbery. There needs to be people held accountable… But again, it’s one of those things where on the law enforcement side, if you are the good guys and you’re honest investigators, you can see the media manipulation. Now, granted, if you got some good administration, good chiefs like we did, they’ll pull back the radios. “Hey, these encrypted radios we gave you guys, we’re going to take those back.” And it’s the the politics, right? That tug-of-war went back and forth. If you’re going to go out there and try to influence our investigations, well, these, , extra things that we’ve given you that we don’t have to give you, well, we’re going to pull that back. But imagine areas where you got corrupt law enforcement administration, you got corrupt media, and then you have entities like this. You’re screwed.
77:02
COLONEL: I also think it’s very very important to look at everything that has happened since the 2015 time frame of this massive ramping up. So today when I was looking into this was looking at the numbers of alleged KKK. So back in the day, in the 60s or 50s time frame, you saw like tens of thousands of estimated KKK members. The number had dwindled down to like under 5,000 and that’s lumping a whole bunch of people in that may or may not have been KKK members but you see the significant drop off. It was reported as 50 or 60,000 and you’re down to 4,000. But they can’t let it die. You know that whole thing of David Duke and his association and they’re talking to Trump about oh my god he endorsed you well let’s go back and look how much David Duke got paid from the SPLC wouldn’t that be an interesting number to know because you have to have somebody like that to create that narrative right? And that was their go to thing to denounce him… I’ll give you this money so I can use you as a statistic in my Hate Map.
And I also came across something where somebody said that the SPLC put Charlie Kirk and Turning Point [on their Hate Map] l right before he was assassinated.
ALPHA: Wow. Well, this is how it works. If you go back to The ‘Seditious Six? They did that. Five of them excluding the the military dude, five of them all had training from the same activist organization. All of this all of this is is them.
80:23
COLONEL: But again so we were just doing the Lebanon thing. How MI6 had created that training to deploy in Lebanon to create those activists. [mi6-plots-with-islamistsclosest I can come –GC]
It’s the exact same thing. This has been done all over. They did it in Chile. In all of these different coups that we’ve looked at. They basically just train people in those stay-behind units to create havoc. It wasn’t a more sophisticated destabilization. But that started changing in the early 1970s. The first one that I noticed significantly with the training aspect of actually teaching people how to be the agitators was in the Chile in 73-74 time frame. So from then on it gets progressively more sophisticated and you get to 2004 when they did the first coup in Ukraine and then up to the 2014 one for the Maidan coup and it’s much more sophisticated as far as training the people. The whole Serbian and Croatia destabilization with the Albert Einstein Institute. So now they have actual entities that are making their livelihood on setting up these regime change destabilization efforts.
And the SPLC is doing in the United States is the same thing the Albert Einstein Institute did overseas. They’re doing the exact same thing. I hope that came across today. They have very nefarious beginnings as far as I’m concerned when he sells his direct mail order business to a media company called the LA Times. And he then uses that money to launch the SPLC. This just stinks of CIA all over.
82:45
ALPHA: 100% agree with you on on that, Colonel. And you know, we knew the timing window. I don’t know if you’ve heard me say in some other shows, but we’re approaching that choke point. Trump and them are. I always knew they’re going to weaponize. I kept telling everybody, you’re going to see all kinds of stuff happen in a very small window. How do I know? Because it’s what they were trying to do to Trump and the good guys. Overwhelm them with everything. Impeachments, you know, this is going on. That investigation, did he declassify?
You overwhelm everybody with this. So, nobody knows where to even begin to fight. And that’s exactly what’s happening to the deep state right now. That’s exactly what’s happening to the globalists and all their funding apparatuses. Trump is brilliant.
COLONEL: I meant to say this earlier. The first black lawyer that worked for the SPLC quit. He was disgusted with the SPLC. And that to me says everything. He was absolutely disgusted with what he saw on the inside of the SPLC. There were numerous people that were alleged to have sexual relationships with Dees during his tenure there. That’s probably why he was married four times. It certainly was an allegation in the last divorce proceedings. but there were lots of accusations and workplace shenanigans going on in the SPLC.
84:50
ALPHA: There was. And then I don’t know if you saw this when I brought this guy up from one of the founders from the SPLC. You brought him up. Joseph Levin. Talk about limited info. It is Like they scrape this guy’s digital footprint very, very well. That what you see on the screen for a cursory search. Obviously, if you start using some of these other sites like Yandex and all that, you’ll probably get more, but
COLONEL: No, no, there’s almost nothing out there on him.
ALPHA: Wow. So, that in and of itself tells you a lot. Colonel.
There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.
Do not forget to LABEL AI articles video and such.
Lurking Lawyer here. Follow up to a late subcomment on a previous thread, with more clarity. If the supposed presser is timed to IG report release, then based on Sessions comments, McCabe firing, and Nunes memo, here is what is going on. Sessions explicitly said had brought in an experienced non-DC DoJ prosecutor. That means somewhere in flyover country. Inference is to work alongside IG, who can only refer crimes for prosecution. We know there were crimes, because McCabes firing was for ‘lacking candor—including under oath’. That is codespeak for criminal federal perjury 18USC1621. McCabes Saturday statement shows Comey also committed perjury—same statute. Trumped tweeted this weekend, just left out the legal part (but he surely knows). We know from the Nunes memo on FISA court abuse plus Comey’s sworn testimony about the dossier being unverified plus McCabes sworn testimony that without it there would have been no FISA warrant or renewals that Loretta Lynch, Sally Yates, Comey, and probably McCabe made false attestations about the Steele dossier to FISA. Those are all felonies under 18USC1018 (and diGenova says there are a total of six felonies—one suffices for this comment). We know from Comey’s mid 2016 announcement about Hillary and her email server that Hillary is guilty under 18USC798, which does not require intent and is the same statute used to send the navy submariner to prison for year (who Trump just pardons, which means he and Sessions know a lot more about what I am saying than they are letting on… And just to round up, it is highly likely that Strzok, Page, both Ohrs, and others gave false statements to the IG early in his investigations, in violation of 18USC1001 — the same felony to which Mueller forced Flynn to plead guilty. Now, where does this lead? The flyover country prosecutor has impaneled a secret grand jury. He is presenting them with this evidence. There is no need for the grand jury to hear witnesses on any of this. They are returning sealed indictments on all of the above named. Remember, Trump rally chants of ‘lock her up’ were more of a campaign promise to be kept. The DNC and Hillary’s campaign paid Fusion GPS to pay Steele for the dossier, when OHR met Steele in London and reported back to FBI in writing that Steele was rabidly antiTrump (per Nunes memo). More than enough reason formTrump to direct his white hat team to proceed on HRC. Only thing I don’t know is whether they can also get Obama. The Susan Rice CYA email about the Jan 5 WH meeting (especially if there were priors) written as Trump was being inaugurated suggests maybe yes.
So my quite educated guess is that the rumored presser will be Trump and Sessions unsealing all these prebaked indictments (the Big Ugly unveiled), with diGenova then to unpack it all to stunned Dems and MSM. And that will nicely set the midterms table for Crumbs Pelosi, Shutdown Shumer, the Dem stiffed DACA deal (a brilliant Trump gambit), and a lot more.
2. Durham ‘take-over’ Huber [select parts re: CF-i]? What if there’s another prosecutor (outside of DC) assigned by SESSIONS w/ the same mandate/authority?
Sometimes you need to ‘take one for the team publicly’ before you are vindicated as a hero.
Q
Hopefully we will soon see if Q is correct about Huber, Durham and Sessions.
The Debriefing 17
In 2017, Trump began laying the legal minefield. In 2019, he pulled the trigger — reissuing Executive Order 13224 under EO 13886 and quietly upgrading it into a global financial kill switch.
🤔Imagine the U.S. government has four big legal "kill switches" sitting on a shelf. Each one was built at a different time, by a different president, for a different reason. But they all work the same way: the president flips the switch by declaring a national emergency, and… https://t.co/tTKA8AZyHs
🤔 Imagine the U.S. government has four big legal “kill switches” sitting on a shelf. Each one was built at a different time, by a different president, for a different reason. But they all work the same way: the president flips the switch by declaring a national emergency, and once it’s flipped, the Treasury Department gets superpowers.
What the superpowers actually are:
👉 Freeze anyone’s money. Any foreign person, anywhere in the world, who fits the category. No trial. No warning. No Congress vote needed for each one.
👉 Block their property. Houses, bank accounts, crypto wallets, yachts, businesses frozen.
👉 The “you helped them, you’re next” rule. If you did business with someone on the list your bank, your lawyer, your shipping company, your crypto exchange you can get added to the list too. This is the cascade. One name becomes ten. Ten becomes a hundred.
👉 The secret list. There’s a public list everyone sees, and a classified list nobody sees. We don’t know how many names are on the secret one.
The four switches:
Switch #1 Terrorists (built 2001 after 9/11, upgraded 2019). Originally for al-Qaeda. The 2019 upgrade made it cover way more people anyone who “trains,” “leads,” or “supports” a terror group, defined broadly.
Switch #2 Corrupt people and human rights abusers (built 2017). Cartels, kleptocrats, traffickers, dirty officials anywhere on Earth.
Switch #3 Hackers and election meddlers (built 2015, upgraded 2016 and 2018). Russian troll farms, ransomware gangs, foreign election interference.
Switch #4 Sketchy foreign tech (built 2019). The one used to ban Huawei.
Here’s the part that matters:
Every single one of these switches was flipped on and never flipped off. Not by the president who came after. Not by the next one. Every year, each president has to sign a piece of paper saying “yep, still an emergency, keep it running.” Every president has signed. Every year. For up to 25 years on the oldest one.
That means the legal machinery to freeze assets, blacklist networks, and unravel criminal organizations worldwide has been quietly running in the background the entire time through Bush, Obama, Trump, Biden, Trump again. It doesn’t matter who’s in the White House. The machine keeps running.
Why this matters for the framework:
When you see a giant crypto seizure ($15 billion from Chen Zhi), or a cartel boss arrested, or a Russian oligarch’s yacht impounded, or a crypto mixer shut down that’s not random. That’s one of these four switches being used. The switches were built years before the enforcement wave started. The enforcement wave is just the switches being used the way they were designed to be used.
The simple bottom line:
The legal weapons were loaded over 20 years, by presidents from both parties. Now they’re being fired. The fact that they keep getting renewed no matter who’s president is the strongest evidence that this isn’t one administration’s project. It’s an institutional one that survives elections. That’s what the four-pillar table will show on one page: the weapons, who built them, when they were built, and the fact that nobody has put them back on the shelf.
I think, like the Patriot Act, they were NOT intended for good but as weapons to be used against Patriots. Now they are being used in the service of the USA.
2/2 And for everyone complaining, "oh, another letter," @GrassleyPress is spoon feeding the DOJ & FBI evidence of obstruction. https://t.co/fxpBIZTuCt
Wow. This new release from Chuck Grassley on the Clinton Foundation is a staggering 91 page treasure trove. I just skimmed it, and it is all there, Uranium One, Russia, Boeing, Haiti, Hillary’s brother, and all the other stuff. And the FBI did not even open a full investigation,… https://t.co/S6q3YEoTn5pic.twitter.com/mSR3HsIuBg
Wow. This new release from Chuck Grassley on the Clinton Foundation is a staggering 91 page treasure trove. I just skimmed it, and it is all there, Uranium One, Russia, Boeing, Haiti, Hillary’s brother, and all the other stuff. And the FBI did not even open a full investigation, whereas with Trump they had one false tip about barroom gossip from three months earlier and they immediately launched a full enterprise investigation. Absolute travesty that Comey, Strzok, Atkinson (who shows up here as well), and others have not been held to account.
VIA ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION Mr. Todd Blanche Acting Attorney General Department of Justice The Honorable Kash Patel Director Federal Bureau of Investigation
Dear Acting Attorney General Blanche and Director Patel: For over a decade, I’ve raised concerns regarding alleged actions taken by former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, including her use of non-government email for official business, mishandling of highly classified information, potential campaign finance violations, and dubious Clinton Foundation financial dealings.1 For instance, on May 17, 2016, I wrote a letter to then-Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director James Comey raising concerns that many of the emails found on her non-government server blurred lines between the actions taken on behalf of the State Department, Clinton Foundation, and Teneo, a private firm founded by a former counselor to President Clinton.2 Then, on July 6, 2016, I requested information from then-Director Comey regarding public corruption issues and the Clinton Foundation and questioned the Director on whether the FBI investigated the Clinton Foundation regarding former President Clinton’s speaking fees from foreign governments while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State.3 Further, on August 8, 2016, I wrote to the Department of Justice (DOJ) asking the Department to explain its reported decision to drop reported inquiries into Clinton Foundation and State Department interactions; specifically, allegations that the State Department, during Secretary Clinton’s tenure, took favorable actions for Clinton Foundation donors….
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Joe Lange had more information to add. These are the most recent of a long series.
Iran will give up the uranium “dust” that will be tested, to PROVE the uranium that Iran was using to develop nuclear weapons, was provided by the “Uranium One Deal.”
The U1 deal is one of the biggest coverups in American history.
It was a KEY part of Alwaleed’s 16 year plan to destroy the U.S.
The U1 deal connects a lot of dots.
….
Pakistan is playing a KEY role.
Iran will give up the uranium “dust” that will be tested, to PROVE the uranium that Iran was using to develop nuclear weapons, was provided by the “Uranium One Deal.”
The U1 deal is one of the biggest coverups in American history.
It was a KEY part of Alwaleed’s 16 year plan to destroy the U.S.
The U1 deal connects a lot of dots. [Worth a read]
…Bill and Hillary Clinton were the ones, who “organized and planned” the U1 deal.
This goes back much further than most people realize.
How is it connected to Pakistan?
The CIA?
The Clintons have been working hand in hand, with the CIA, to not only fund our enemies, but to help arm them with weapons.
Including nuclear weapons.
U1 was planned years in advance.
Peace doesn’t sell.
War sells.
Taxpayers dollars are easily stolen based on perceived “threats.”
Anybody remember OPERATION MERLIN?
“Deep in the bowels of the CIA, someone must be nervously, but very privately, wondering: “Whatever happened to those nuclear blueprints we gave to the Iranians?”
“The story dates back to the Clinton administration and February 2000, when one frightened Russian scientist walked Vienna’s winter streets. The Russian had good reason to be afraid. He was walking around Vienna with blueprints for a nuclear bomb...
“The Russian, who had defected to the US years earlier, still couldn’t believe the orders he had received from CIA headquarters. The CIA had given him the nuclear blueprints and then sent him to Vienna to sell them – or simply give them – to the Iranian representatives to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). With the Russian doing its bidding, the CIA appeared to be about to help Iran “leapfrog” one of the last remaining engineering hurdles blocking its path to a nuclear weapon.”
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
MORE – Department of Energy and Department of War will coordinate with the FBI. National Nuclear Security Administration officials called the pattern at high-security labs "eyebrow raising," adding that staff do risk becoming targets of foreign espionage.https://t.co/yIaKWZZ0rb
SPLC is a domestic terrorist organization that issued a fatwa against Charlie Kirk and Turning Point USA earlier this year. They put a target on Charlie’s back and all but called for his assassination.
Who remembers this? SPLC lawyer charged over Antifa terrorist attack in 2023.
Guess what happened, by the way? He faced no consequences.
I contacted SPLC spokesman @MichaelEHayden at the time to inquire if the nonprofit denounces political violence. They refused to. Now it… pic.twitter.com/jyg4YSq9T3
In early 2025, the law firm, Covington & Burling out of Washington DC, raised legal concerns that ActBlue’s CEO lied to GOP investigators in a 2023 letter explaining how the organization vetted donations to ensure that they were not illegally coming from foreign citizens.
This shocking development was published in The New York Times this week….
The ActBlue fundraising scandal is heating up in the Lone Star State.
In October 2024, the Gateway Pundit reported that Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton called for the Department of Justice to investigate the Democrat fundraising powerhouse for “circumstances surrounding highly suspicious campaign contributions made through political committee online contribution platforms.”
The state’s own investigation confirmed evidence showing that donations were being made in people’s names without their knowledge or consent. This was in line with discoveries made by Peter Bernegger and reported by James O’Keefe regarding smurfing activities involving ActBlue.
Today, AG Paxton announced on X that he has filed a lawsuit against ActBlue “for deceiving Americans by lying about its donation processes that allow fraudulent and foreign donations.”…
On Monday, The Gateway Pundit reported that Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sued ActBlue, the Democrat fundraising platform, for “deceiving Americans by lying about its donation processes that allow fraudulent and foreign donations.” This was following an internal investigation that “prove[d] that ActBlue continues to process gift card donations” without proving identification of the donor.
The same day, the House Judiciary Committee deposed five employees after subpoenas were issued to two employees in June 2025 by Reps. Jim Jordan, Bryan Steil, and James Comer. The recent depositions included “top staff responsible for fraud prevention” and sought to “learn more about the platform’s acceptance of illegal donations – and the subsequent cover-up,” according to a post on X by the House Judiciary GOP….
The Committees deposed five ActBlue employees, including top staff responsible for fraud prevention, to learn more about the platform’s acceptance of illegal donations—and the subsequent cover-up.
The U.S. Justice Department said Friday it is expanding federal execution procedures to include firing squads as part of a broader effort to strengthen and accelerate use of the federal death penalty. The department said it acted to restore its duty to carry out lawful capital sentences once condemned inmates have exhausted appeals.
The department said it directed the Federal Bureau of Prisons to broaden execution protocols to allow additional methods, including the firing squad, and to readopt the lethal injection protocol used during President Donald Trump’s first administration.
It also said internal processes would be streamlined to expedite capital cases.
Reuters reported the administration also intends to add electrocution and gas asphyxiation as alternative federal execution methods.
There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.
Do not forget to LABEL AI articles video and such.
Various groups are suggesting “the Storm is upon us.” I certainly think I see it approaching. I am going to try and put things into some semblance of order. It least that was my original intent until I went looking for a piece of information and got yanked sideway. Oh well.
It has been my thesis that the Brits never really conceded defeat after the US Revolution and have been trying to get control of the USA ever since. I think for all intents they actually got some control in 1913 and have been working slowly, Fabian Society style, to consolidate their grip and impose a world government. The UK has been the home of the Globalists since William and Mary brought the Dutch banking system to England and the City of London was set up.
8:00 Brady: But the cool thing is William… [He] brings all these great ideas with him. Things like a stock exchange. A central Bank. In fact the Bank of England would be founded 6 years later. And we know where that lead us to.
Col Towner: So he is just transferring the Dutch Empire to the English Empire.
Brady: Yeah, We talked about how the Dutch securitized their entire industry. They stopped producing goods and services, and they just basically speculated all over the world. It is exactly what Wall Street became. They [the Dutch] have already been investing in the British pounds because it pays bigger interest… So they are subsidizing their own enemies.
THAT IS WHY THE DUTCH FELL. THEY HAD STRETCHED TOO THIN AND THEY WERE FINANCIALLY SPECULATING ALL OVER THE WORLD.
Col Towner: Which is what you see happening today.
Brady: Well that is why we are telling the story so we do not repeat it too.
Iran wasn’t the target. The British imperial system was. And on April 16th, Scott Bessent walked into a room with the British Chancellor of the Exchequer and said it out loud. Here’s the Treasury readout… During their discussion, Secretary Besson underscored the US Treasury’s commitment to Economic Fury, leveraging all tools and authorities against those who continue to support Iran’s terrorist activities. He’s underscoring the mission of Economic Fury to Britain’s top financial officer. In essence warning of a new reality… The Trump administration has the empire’s number and is systematically dismantling its power. Which is why the Hudson Institute is now pinning its hopes on a royal visit. They want King Charles to save ‘the special relationship’… Here’s what they’re all missing. Iran wasn’t the target. The British imperial system was and is the target.
The strait was never just Iran’s weapon.
It was London’s leverage. And Trump’s target was never the strait itself. It was the system that monetized it. That system is what is being dismantled. And that holds regardless of what happens in the next 48 hours. In fact, if you look at Trump’s post about no longer being used as a weapon against the world, you can read it in two ways. The Strait won’t be used as a weapon by Iran and Iran won’t be used as a weapon by the British. And because the president understood that, he is bringing an end to the 47 year-old extortion racket.
06:31
The president himself named it back on April 11th in a truth social in all caps, WORLD EXTORTION. That’s not rhetoric. That’s a precise description of how the City of London has run the global financial system for over a century and Bessent is now systematically dismantling it. Here’s how the architecture works.
Think about what London actually prices:
* The global gold fix and other metals through the London Metal Exchange and the IC, the Intercontinental Exchange.
* The price of oil through the Brent crude benchmark since 1988.
* Shipping rates on every barrel of oil that moved through the strait determined by Lloyd’s war risk premiums.
And every regional crisis sent traders to London and allowed them to manipulate prices.
Managed conflict wasn’t just a geopolitical tool. It was a revenue stream. Trump called it world extortion. He’s right….
07:41
But before that, even bigger moves were going on that most people didn’t notice. Vivify Mariposa pulls the curtain back in an important post entitled The System That Owns You, How It Was Built, and Why It’s Breaking. She describes how Trump’s tariff offensive has caused a dramatic shift in the economic balance of power. Because of Trump’s moves, physical gold has been moving from London vaults to New York. Copper pricing is migrating from the London Metal Exchange to American markets and London’s own exchange has publicly conceded that the shift is permanent. Now, Mariposa concludes by saying the pricing authority is moving gold to American vaults, copper to comics, LNG contracts referencing American benchmarks. London is not being replaced by Qatar. London is being bypassed by New York…
[Makes you wonder if the election of Mandani as NYC mayor was because the Cabal saw this coming. -GC]
However Susan and the rest of the crew at Promethean Action are ‘Keeping it Simple Stupid’ Oil is indeed a factor, just not the only one. They are:
TRADE ROUTES OIL and DRUGS
At this point I went looking for the info (on the Chinese) that I wanted to document. I remembered it was in Conspirators’ Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of Three Hundred — CIA library by Dr John Coleman who is still alive BTW. The CIA document is 169 pages so I am going to quote it as well as asking readers to read PAGE 103 – 107 where Dr Coleman quotes H. G. Wells, co-founder of the British Fabian Society.
What I find interesting is the fact Colonel Towner’s Gladio Series information dovetails with this information about the CIA, NATO,‘The Criminal Syndicate’ and drugs.
I am going to start with Dr Coleman’s H. G. Wells quotes and then go back and look at the Iran & China information.
[BEGIN QUOTE]
PAGE 103
What then are we looking at? A loosely-knit gathering of people with weird ideas?
Certainly not. In the Committee of 300, which has a 150-year history, we have some of the most brilliant intellects assembled to form a completely totalitarian, absolutely controlled “new” society only it isn’t new, having drawn most of its ideas from the Clubs of Cultus Diabolicus. [or formal religion of the devil, the existence of which, in the middle ages, is registered by the known facts of the Black Sabbath – GC] It strives toward a One World Government rather well described by one of its late members, H. G. Wells, in his work commissioned by the Committee which Wells boldly called: “THE OPEN CONSPIRACY– PLANS FOR A WORLD REVOLUTION.” [written in 1928 — GC]
…There will be no middle class, only rulers and servants. All laws will be uniform under a legal system of world courts practicing the same unified code of laws, backed up by a One World Government police force and a One World unified military…
Only one religion will be allowed and that will be in the form of a One World Government Church, which has been in existence since 1920 as we shall see. Satanism, Luciferianism and Witchcraft shall he recognized as legitimate One World Government curricula with no private or church schools. All Christian churches have already been subverted and Christianity will be a thing of the past in the One World Government…
Each person shall be fully indoctrinated that he or she is a creature of the One World Government with an identification number clearly marked on their person so as to be readily accessible, which identifying number shall be in the master file of the NATO computer in Brussels, Belgium, subject to instant retrieval by any agency of the One World Government at any time. The master Files of the CIA, FBI, state and local police agencies, IRS, FEMA, Social Security shall be vastly expanded and form the basis of personal records of all individuals in the United States.
Marriage shall be outlawed and there shall be no family life as we know it. Children will be removed from their parents at an early-age and brought up by wards as state property…
At least 4 billion “useless eaters” shall be eliminated by the year 2050 by means of limited wars, organized epidemics of fatal rapid-acting diseases and starvation. Energy, food and water shall be kept at subsistence levels for the non-elite, starting with the White populations of Western Europe and North America and then spreading to other races. The population of Canada, Western Europe and the United States will be decimated more rapidly than on other continents, until the world’s population reaches a manageable level of 1 billion, of which 500 million will consist of Chinese and Japanese races, selected because they are people who have been regimented for centuries and who are accustomed to obeying authority without question…
[I want to insert here, that I think the original plan was Orientals would be the high functioning intelligent workers and the black/brown would be the lower intelligent grunt workers, that is if they are not replaced by robots. The only whites will be the rulers, thus color coding people so they are easily IDed by sight. –GC]
The United States will be flooded by peoples of alien cultures who will eventually overwhelm White America, people with no concept of what the United States Constitution stands for and who will, in consequence, do nothing to defend it, and in whose minds the concept of liberty and justice is so weak as to matter little. FOOD and shelter shall be the main concern.
Rival factions and groups such as Arabs and Jews and African tribes shall have differences magnified and allowed to wage wars of extermination against each other under the eyes of NATO and U.N. observers. The same tactics will be used in Central and South America. These wars of attrition shall take place BEFORE the take-over by the One World Government…
It is obvious from the foregoing that much work remains to be done before the dawning of the New World Order can occur. The Committee of 300 has long ago perfected plans to destabilize civilization as we know it, some of which plans were made known by Zbignew Brzezinski in his classic work “THE TECHNOTRONIC ERA” and the works of Aurellio Peccei who founded the Club of Rome, especially in his book, “THE CHASM AHEAD.” [pg 107]
[END QUOTE]
I am going to stop here and take a quick look at a couple of Russian articles on Brzezinski.
…Brzezinski in an article published in Foreign Affaire (1970), explains his vision of the “New World Order” stating that “it is necessary a new and bolder vision (the creation of a community of developed countries can deal effectively with the broad problems of humanity”, outlines a theory fleshed out in his book “BetweenTwo Ages: America’s role in the era technetronic” 1971), explaining that the era has come to rebalance world power, power that must be passed on to a new global political order based on a trilateral economic linkage between Japan, Europe and the United States.
In the book “Between Two Ages,” (1971), he also calls for control of population by an elite through “cyber manipulation”, by stating: “The technotronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled and dominated society by an elite without the restrictions of traditional values, so it will soon be possible to ensure the monitoring almost continuous over every citizen and maintain complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen, files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities, “what would herald the subsequent implementation of the PRISM program. Also, in a recent speech at a meeting of Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the former Carter adviser warned that “U.S. domination was no longer possible due to an acceleration of social change driven by instant communication that caused the awakening of a universal political consciousness of the masses (Global Political Awakening) and which is proving detrimental to foreign domination as prevailed in the era of colonialism and imperialism”, so after the failed attempt to control the cloud (PRISM Program), in the coming years will see the end of the democratization of information, with the impossibility of direct access to the network using the steps of restrictive policies implemented by countries like China, Russia or Iran.
According to the Financial Times, Brzezinski in a hearing before the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate in 2007, said:
“One possible scenario for a military confrontation with Iran means a terrorist act in American soil of which would Iran be responsible. This could culminate in a U.S. military action “defense” against Iran in which would be included Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan,”
What follows is the possibility of a new attack in the U.S. that would be falsely attributed to Iran to bring its invasion and a subsequent totalitarian derived USA, similar to that recorded with George W. Bush after 11- S, 2001. So, a month after the attack of 11-S, George W. Bush secretly decided to cancel a major constitutional protection in this country (habeas corpus) by-law known as the USA Patriot Act under the justification of its “fight against” terrorism “according to official documents revealed in late 2005 in a series of reports in the New York Times…
Especially given the date is just before Trump’s first election: 28.10.2016
Recently, the US has begun to lose its strategic positions in the Middle East. When some say that the US Empire is collapsing, this no longer sounds like an exaggeration. It definitely looks like this is what is going to happen in front of our very eyes. Failed regime-change attempts in Syria revealed to the whole world the true nature of the so called Arab Spring, and only those who still want to remain stooped in illusions take the Western MSM as a source of reliable information. The Arab Spring served a much bigger purpose of maintaining and expanding US world domination by imposing the Western way of life and, in fact, Western ideology on the Arab World. Western values and way of life have been exposed as the devil in disguise when the US imposes soft power on smaller countries.
Western values are far from being good. They are essentially nothing but Milton Friedman’s utopian neoliberal economic ideas (Naomi Klein’s The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism is one of the best written documentations of this topic). Free-market or liberal, capitalism is a doctrine that demands that everything must be sacrificed on the unholy altar of commerce, including traditional and religious values. This is why nation-states and religious values are seen as a threat in Western corridors of power – a threat that must be destroyed by supranational and secular powers. The US has been the front man and a driving force in this “progress.” So, if US will lose its positions, will this progress stop? Or,if Trump will be elected, can he change this course and stop its progress? Will the world find a new way of life? Together? Or will the world go back to nation-states and religious values? I have no answers to these questions, but what is sure is that there must be a new value system or ideology to fill this vacuum if the Western system is going to collapse. Ideally, this would be a loose context for different religions and political ideologies to integrate – a spiritual multipolarity that combines nations rather than dividing them…
Back to Dr Coleman’s book.
CHINA and IRAN [QUOTE]
…it is hardly likely that the U.S. would make any real effort to stop the production of opium in the Golden Triangle which is under the control of the Chinese military, a serious war would erupt if any country tried to interdict the trade. A serious attack on the opium trade would bring Chinese military intervention.
The British know this; they have no quarrel with China, except for an occasional squabble over who gets the larger share of the pie. Britain has been involved in the China opium trade for over two centuries. No one is going to be so foolish as to rock the boat when millions upon millions of dollars flow into the bank accounts of the British oligarchists and more gold is traded on the Hong Kong gold market than the combined total traded in London and New York… Every British monarch since 1729 has benefited immensely from the drug trade and this holds good for the present occupant of the throne…
In later years the Chinese appealed to Britain for help with their immense problem and received it. Thereafter respective Chinese governments realized the value in cooperating instead of fighting with Britain–and this held good during the bloody rule of Mao Tse Tung–so that today, as I have already mentioned, any quarrels that come about are only over the share of the opium trade each is entitled to.
To advance to more modern history, the Chinese-British partnership was solidified by the Hong Kong agreement which established an equal partnership in the opium trade…
Rowntree’s book, “The Imperial Drug Trade”[1903] gives a fascinating account of how Prime Minister Gladstone and his fellow plutocrats lied, cheated, twisted and turned to keep the astonishing truth of the involvement of the British monarchy in the opium trade from being exposed…
The Eastern Liberal Establishment families of the United States were just as deeply involved in the China opium trade as were the British, indeed they still are. Witness recent history when [President] James Earl Carter toppled the Shah of Iran. Why was the Shah deposed and then murdered by the United States government? fn a word, because of DRUGS. The Shah had clamped down and virtually put an end to the immensely lucrative opium trade being conducted out of Iran by the British. At the time that the Shah took over in Iran, there were already one million opium/heroin addicts.
This the British would not tolerate, so they sent the United States to do their dirty work for them in terms of the “special relationship” between the two countries. When Khomeini took over the U.S. Embassy in Tehran, arms sales by the United States, which had begun with the Shah, were not discontinued. Why not? Had the United States done so, Khomeini would have canceled the British monopoly of the opium trade in his country. To prove the point, after 1984, Khomeini’s liberal attitude toward opium had increased the number of addicts to 2 million, according to United Nations and World Health Organization statistics. [That certainly puts a different light on the Khomeini – Carter communications. GC]
Both President Carter and his successor, Ronald Reagan, willingly and with full knowledge of what was at stake, went on supplying arms to Iran even while American hostages languished in captivity. In 1980 I wrote a monograph under the title, “What Really Happened in Iran,” which set out the facts. The arms trade with Iran was sealed at a meeting between Cyrus Vance, a servant of the Committee of 300, and Dr. Hashemi, which resulted in the U.S. Air Force beginning an immediate airlift of arms to Iran, carried on even at the height of the hostage crisis the arms came from U.S. Army stockpiles in Germany ….
The demise of the Shah of Iran was run to a plan devised by Bernard Levin and Richard Falk, and supervised by Robert Anderson’s Aspen Institute. Levin was the author of a work entitled “Time Perspective and Morale” which is a Club of Rome publication concerning how to break down the morale of nations and individual leaders. Here is an extract of the document:
“One of the main techniques for breaking morale through a strategy of terror consists in exactly this tactic: keep the person hazy as to where he stands and just what he may expect. In addition, if frequent vacillations between severe disciplinary measures and promise of good treatment together with the spreading of contradictory news make the structure of the situation unclear, then the individual may cease to know whether a particular plan would lead toward or away from his goal. Under these conditions, even those individuals who have definite goals and are ready to take risks are paralyzed by the severe inner conflict in regard to what to do.”
This Club of Rome blueprint applies to COUNTRIES as well as to individuals, particularly the government leaders of those countries. We in the U.S. need not think that “Oh well, this is America, and those kinds of things just do not happen here.” Let me assure you that they ARE happening in the U.S., and perhaps more so than in any other country. Remember that Khomeini was groomed for years by British intelligence, especially during his time in Paris, before he suddenly appeared as the savior of Iran. Boris Yeltsin is from the same M16-SIS stable...
The route taken by the raw opium carriers of the Golden Crescent goes through Iran, Turkey and Lebanon. When the Shah of Iran was in control of the country, he refused to allow the heroin trade to continue and it was forcibly discontinued-up until the time that he was “dealt with” by the Committee of 300. Raw opium from Turkey and Lebanon finds it way to Corsica, from where it is shipped to Monte Carlo with the connivance of the Grimaldi family. Pakistani laboratories, under the guise of “military defense laboratories” are doing a bigger share of refining than they were two years ago, but the best refining is still done along the French Mediterranean coastline and in Turkey. Here again, banks play a vital role in financing these operations.
Let us stop here for a moment. Are we to believe that with all the modern and vastly improved surveillance techniques, including satellite reconnaissance, available to law enforcement agencies in these countries, that this vile trade cannot be pin-pointed and stopped? How is it that law enforcement agencies cannot go in and destroy these laboratories once they are discovered? If this IS the case, and we still cannot interdict the heroin trade, then our anti-narcotics services ought to be known as “The Geriatrics” and not drug enforcement agencies.
Even a child could tell our alleged “drug watchers” what to do. Simply keep a check on all factories making acetic anhydride, THE most essential chemical component needed by laboratories to refine heroin from raw opium. THEN FOLLOW THE TRAIL!…
For some strange reason the Cali cartel, which is equal in size to the Medellin cartel, has been–at least up until now–largely ignored by the DEA. Cali differs from the Medellin cartel in that it is run by BUSINESSMEN, who eschew all forms of violence and never break agreements. Even more significant is that Cali does virtually no business in Florida. My source told me that the Cali cartel is run by shrewd businessmen unlike any seen in the cocaine business. He believes that they were “specially appointed,” but does not know by whom. “They never call attention to themselves,” he said. “They do not go around importing red Ferraris like Jorge Ochoa did, attracting immediate attention, because it is forbidden to import such cars into Colombia.”
Cali cartel markets are in Los Angeles, New York and Houston, which closely parallel the heroin markets. Cali has not shown any signs of moving into Florida. A former DEA operative who is a colleague of mine said recently, “These Cali people are sure smart. They are a different breed to the Ochoa brothers. They act like professional businessmen. They are now larger than the Medellin cartel and I think we are going to see a lot more cocaine get into the United States than ever before. The kidnapping of Manuel Noriega will facilitate an easier flow through Panama of cocaine and money, what with so many banks there. So much for President George Bush’s Operation Just Cause. All it did was make life a great deal easier for Nicolas Ardito Barletta who used to be run by the Ochoa brothers and who is fixing to front for the Cali cartel.”
Based on my experience with the heroin trade I believe that the Committee of 300 has stepped in and taken over full control of the South American cocaine trade. There is no other explanation For the rise of the Cali cartel which is coupled with the kidnapping of Noriega. Did Bush take his orders from London regarding Noriega? There is every indication that he was literally PUSHED into invading Panama and kidnapping Noriega, who had become a serious impediment to “trade” in Panama, especially in the banking business.
Several former intelligence agents have given me their opinions which coincide with my own. Like the Gulf War that followed in the wake of Panama, it was only after several calls from the British Ambassador in Washington that Bush finally plucked up enough courage to make his totally illegal move on General Noriega. That he was supported by the British press and the New York Times, a British intelligence run newspaper, speaks volumes…
[END QUOTE]
So President Trump is attacking trade routes, drug running AND oil. I certainly do not envy Trump’s job in unraveling this mess! It makes you wonder just how many ‘American Politicians’ are actually agents of the City of London.
I DIDN’T WRITE THIS BUT A VERY SMART PERSON DID!!! This should be read by every news station and every single person that is against what president Trump has done, not just for America, but for the world!!!
Paul White Gold Eagle @PaulGoldEagle I DIDN’T WRITE THIS BUT A VERY SMART PERSON DID!!! This should be read by every news station and every single person that is against what president Trump has done, not just for America, but for the world!!!
WRITTEN BY MICHAEL HUNTSMAN
I keep hearing “Trump doesn’t have a plan”.
First off, it doesn’t seem like the greatest idea to tell everyone what your plan is. (Especially when so many from within want you destroyed.)
However, for those of you who are unable to see it. Let me remind you. One of Trump‘s biggest campaign promises was not only to make America energy Independent, but also to be the energy leader worldwide.
Take a look at the moves he’s already made. If you can’t see his plan, it’s because you refused to.
He told us from the start exactly what he would do when he said “America Will Lead the World in Energy”
He started almost immediately. On February 9, 2025, he began his energy dominance plan by changing the name of the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America. He did this to circumvent policies designed to stop American oil drilling, refining, and shipping in the Gulf. (The crazy half of the country lost their mind and called it racism)
Then with no delay at all, he went after the Panama Canal and regained its passage rights. (Again, the lunatics lost their mind and claimed it was about stopping innocent refugees, and therefore, ‘Racist’.)
Next came Venezuela. In a matter of minutes he captured a dictator, freed millions of people, and secured the absolute largest oil reserves in the world. (Suddenly the crazies poured into the streets, waving Venezuelan flags and demanding the dictator be returned)
Greenland came and went before their tears over the Venezuelan dictator even hit the floor.
With Greenland, he secured not only northern shipping lanes but strategic defensive positioning and mineral rights to one of the largest deposits of rare earth minerals in the world. (Think batteries, electrical components, semiconductors, etc..)
After gaining control of North and South American shipping lanes, oil, and rare earth minerals. He sets his sites on the Middle East.
Which brings us to Iran. So far he has decimated their highest leaders and military, while protecting their infrastructure of oil distribution (And the people of Iran are ecstatic).
At this very moment the U.S. is blockading the Gulf of Oman.(Arguably, more strategic than the Strait of Hormuz itself.)
In the meantime (while waiting out Iran in the Gulf of Oman) He has secured the strait of Malacca, and guaranteed control of shipping rights to the Eastern Seaborg. (Who knows how the Looney Tunes will spin that one when they find out.)
If you haven’t figured it out yet, this was the plan all along. Just like he said, “America Will Lead the World in Energy”
Keep your eyes open, because it ain’t over yet. Next on his list will be to secure the shipping lanes around Cuba then the straits of Bosporus and Gallipoli. Completing his plan and making America the world‘s leader in energy. Just like he said he would.
If you still fail to see the plan? Forget I mentioned any of this. Wait for the newest outrage, or stick with your most recent “Orange man bad, he has no plan”.
Whether you march in the streets waving some other countries flag, or protest a King that doesn’t exist. His plan is being executed and is working beautifully.
America will be the Leader in World Energy.
The truth is: You, Me, and the rest of the free world will benefit greatly from his plan for generations to come.
God bless the President and God bless the United States of America. 🇺🇸
…………
The above quotations are reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
