Health Friday 10.16.2026 Open Thread: NUVAXOVID, the Novavax COVID-19 Bioweapon “Vaccine”: Part Two

The image of Spodoptera frugiperda (fall armyworm) for today’s offering header is courtesy of Wikipedia. Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: AI-generated items in today’s offering will be cited as such. If readers wish to post AI-generated items in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.

For previous information on NUVAXOVID, please see Part One of this series, here: https://www.theqtree.com/2026/10/02/health-friday-10-2-2026-open-thread-nuvaxovid-the-novavax-covid-19-bioweapon-vaccine-part-one/.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

NUVAXOVID, the Novavax COVID-19 Bioweapon “Vaccine”: Part Two

This article will discuss a sampling of more “details” from the Package Insert for Healthcare Providers for NUVAXOVID; followed by a presentation of the Patent for this injectable. The Package Insert for NUVAXOVID is here: https://www.fda.gov/media/186544/download. Let’s look at this statement on page 5, under the footnotes for section 6 ADVERSE REACTIONS:

**** In other words: it appears that there were TWO DIFFERENT manufacturing processes for the NUVAXOVID used in the clinical trials listed above the footnotes (seven clinical trials in all) — shades of the “Process 1” and “Process 2” manufacturing methods used by Pfizer-BioNTech for BNT162b2.

Study 1 (NCT04611802), which Yours Truly will call the first “NUVAXOVID Process 1 study” was conducted in the United States, Mexico, and Puerto Rico; Study 2 (NCT04583995), using the “NUVAXOVID Process 2 study”) was conducted in the United Kingdom; Study 3 (NCT04533300), another “NUVAXOVID Process 2 study”) was performed in South Africa; and, Study 4 (NCT 02368988), the final “NUVAXOVID Process 2 study”) was performed in the United States and Australia. Studies 1, 5, 6, and 7 used the “NUVAXOVID Process 1” manufacturing method. Information regarding the changes to the manufacturing processes for NUVAXOVID is found in this document, beginning on page 23 and continuing through page 31: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/assessment-report/nuvaxovid-epar-public-report_en.pdf, 4 January 2022. A screenshot of a portion of page 23 is below:

What follows, through page 31 of this document, is a “public-view description” of the multiple changes to the manufacturing process for NUVAXOVID: changes that occurred while clinical studies were ongoing; changes that occurred due to the “vaccine” (NVX-CoV2373, the “other name” for NUVAXOVID) being manufactured by at least two different entities in two different countries; changes that resulted in different types of formulations; and more. Were the human study subjects in the seven studies listed above informed that the NUVAXOVID (NVX-CoV2373) that was injected into them could have been manufactured in, for example, Japan or India? That the composition of the formulation that was injected into them could be different from one human study subject to another? Did the study subjects have to sign off on the above?

Looking “further afield” regarding the (at least two; perhaps, more?) manufacturing processes for NUVAXOVID, Yours Truly found this: https://www.mci.edu/en/news-filter-en/228-researchernews/4068-nuvaxovid-new-vaccine-explained, ” Nuvaxovid – the new subunit SARS-CoV-2 vaccine”, Carmen Nussbaumer, 28 February 2022 (Innsbruck, Austria.) A screenshot of the section, “What comprises the Nuvaxovid vaccine?” is below. This article confirms that the spike protein is the basis for NUVAXOVID. It also confirms that the spike protein is “inserted” into a virus created from the Spodoptera frugiperda Sf9 cell line, which is then introduced into the body — thus, two different viruses are used: the manipulated “baculovirus” that is inserted into the Sf9 insect cells + the spike protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.:

The Package Insert for Healthcare Providers for NUVAXOVID (link above) appears to focus on Study 1 (NCT04611802, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04611802), which was conducted in the United States, Mexico, and Puerto Rico. On page 8 of the Fact Sheet, for example, there is a breakdown of the types and percentages of study subjects affected by adverse reactions to NUVAXOVID. The figures on page 8 are, in Yours Truly’s opinion, revealing: one sees that the numbers of Study 1 subjects who had adverse reactions to this “vaccine” far outweigh the numbers of Study 1 subjects who were given the saline solution placebo injections. A screenshot of a portion of page is below:

Grade 3 adverse reactions include those which interfere with normal daily activities; which cause a high degree of pain; and so on. Grade 4 adverse reactions include those which require Emergency Room visits or hospitalization; which indicate tissue death (necrosis); and more. One more detail in the Package Insert for Healthcare Providers for NUVAXOVID: on page 42, the (“official”, per the Package Insert) manufacturer of this “vaccine” is Sanofi (also known as Sanofi-Pasteur.) A screenshot of page 42 is below:

Sanofi has a website devoted to NUVAXOVID: https://www.nuvaxovid.com/. This website states that the product does not contain SARS-CoV-2:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

The information regarding the differences in manufacturing processes among what Yours Truly will call the “NUVAXOVID Process 1” and the “NUVAXOVID Process 2” led one to look up the Patent for NUVAXOVID: https://patents.google.com/patent/US11253586B2/en, “Coronavirus vaccine formulations”. A screenshot of the Title and Date Summary of the Patent is below:

A screenshot of Claim 1 is below:

Which, by the way, appears to confirm that: the SARS-CoV-2 virus is NOT found in nature; that the spike protein of this virus is the foundation for NUVAXOVID; and, that elements of the spike protein were modified for use in the “vaccine” (modRNA.) Which also appears to contradict the statement on the Sanofi-sponsored NUVAXOVID website (link above, and image from the website) that there is no SARS-CoV-2 in the product.

Some other details from the Patent: One: Fig. 4 and Fig. 5, regarding two SARS-CoV-2 polypeptides (BV2365 and BV2373) which bind well to the ACE2 receptor enzymes in the body. These receptors are crucial for controlling blood pressure, wound healing, and inflammation (https://www.asbmb.org/asbmb-today/science/051620/what-is-the-ace-2-receptor, 16 May 2020.) Apparently, the inventors of NUVAXOVID spent time and effort in manipulating BV2365 and BV2373 to get the results they wanted: SARS-CoV-2 virus elements that would bind as completely as possible to the ACE2 receptors in the body. Two: there are several types of “detergents” that can be used (“in embodiments” is the language in the Patent) in NUVAXOVID to “scrub clean” the surface of body cells to assist the “vaccine’s” entry into these cells. Two such detergents are NP-9 and polysorbate 80 (PS80.) PS80 was one chosen for the U.S. version of this “vaccine” (see the Package Insert [link above], section 11 DESCRIPTION.)

**** The combination of the spike protein elements + PS80 make up the nanoparticle used in NUVAXOVID (Claim 6): it appears that the PS80 surfactant detergent “scrubs clean” the surface of the ACE2 receptors; so that the manipulated BV2365 and BV2373 enzymes from the spike protein can gain entry into these receptors: therefore interfering with their normal functions of controlling blood pressure, wound healing, inflammation, and other processes. In addition, the PS80 + spike protein which makes up the nanoparticle for NUVAXOVID allows the spike protein to be “mainlined” into every cell in the body.

But wait, there’s more! Reading through more of the Patent, it is apparent that: One: other forms of CoV (coronavirus) elements can be used (MERS, SARS-CoV), either alone OR IN COMBINATION with the spike protein from SARS-CoV-2, in NUVAXOVID; Two: it appears that the BV2373 enzyme from the SARS-CoV-2 virus is the “prime instigator” used in the “vaccine”; Three: that the “vaccine” is formulated to specifically attack the CD4 – CD8 cells of the body; Four: that ALUMINUM salts can also be used as an adjuvant in the “vaccine”; Five: that the use of the Matrix-M adjuvant (made from the soapbark tree) in the “vaccine” MAY LEAVE TRACE ELEMENTS of the manufacturing process for this adjuvant; and, Six: that the Matrix-M adjuvant can comprise AS MUCH AS 85% of the “vaccine” formulation. Note: adjuvants are used in “vaccines” to increase the response in body of the “vaccinated” person.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

**** What we have now is the following: A COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine”, called NUVAXOVID. This “vaccine”: may include not only the spike protein from the SARS-CoV-2 virus, but ALSO elements from other coronaviruses (MERS, or SARS-CoV, or others); which may include one OR more detergents (NP-9, PS80. or others); which may include UP TO 85% of a lab-created compound called Matrix-M, an adjuvant, lab-created from elements of the soapbark tree; which MAY also include aluminum salts as an adjuvant; which includes a “baculovirus” that is lab-created from the Sf9 cells of Spodoptera frugiperda (fall armyworm), a voracious crop destroyer insect; which is manufactured under “partnership” with Sanofi, or with FUJIFILM (Japan), or in India (the latter two locations were where the NUVAXOVID used in clinical trials were manufactured; it is unknown if these two locations are still being used to manufacture the “vaccine”); which is a “vaccine” that CROSSES THE BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER, in addition to entering into every cell of the “vaccinated” body; which allows the PS80 + spike protein nanoparticle in NUVAXOVID to be “mainlined” into every cell in the body; and, which contains at least one chemical compound — methyl-alpha-D-mannopyranoside) that is “Not for drug or household use” (https://www.tcichemicals.com/OP/en/p/M0368; click on “Safety & Regulations” tab; then click “Safety Data Sheet (SDS)” in English); and, finally, that the FDA-issued Package Insert for Healthcare Providers only contains the information that Novavax has given to the FDA. NUVAXOVID is a modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine.” It is NOT a “safer alternative” to COMIRNATY, to SPIKEVAX, to mNEXSPIKE, or to any other COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine.” In fact, NUVAXOVID, in Yours Truly’s opinion, could be slightly more dangerous than the other COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” — because the nanoparticle used in this “vaccine” is made up of a detergent + the elements of the SARS-CoV-2 virus spike protein itself (manipulated with Sf9 insect “baculovirus”.)

The FDA has granted full approval for this “vaccine.” Who, reading the information in today’s offering, along with that in Part One of the NUVAXOVID series, would allow this product to be injected into their body — or into the body of their child?

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA1

(Intellectual Property Disclaimer and Notice: Except for the linked URLs and other items that are available on the Internet, the ideas and/or opinions in today’s offering are by PAVACA1 (M.E. Forbes, aka M.E.C. Forbes.) Credit must be given to PAVACA1 if ideas and/or opinions in today’s offering are used by other blog writers; by podcasters; or in print or social media.)

Health Friday 10.2.2026 Open Thread: NUVAXOVID, the Novavax COVID-19 Bioweapon “Vaccine”: Part One

The image of Spodoptera frugiperda (fall armyworm) for today’s offering header is courtesy of Wikipedia.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: AI-generated items in today’s offering will be cited as such. If readers wish to post AI-generated item in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

NUVAXOVID, the Novavax COVID-19 Bioweapon “Vaccine”: Part One

Yours Truly has written many times regarding the modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines”, BNT162b2 (now COMIRNATY, by Pfizer-BioNTech); and, mRNA-1273 (SPIKEVAX) and mRNA-1283 (mNEXSPIKE), by Moderna. Today’s offering concerns NUVAXOVID, the mRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine” by Novavax. One will state at the outset that NUVAXOVID is not a “safer” COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine.” In Yours Truly’s opinion, there IS NO “SAFE” or “SAFER” COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine” — no matter what “delivery platform technology” is used. This includes modRNA-based, mRNA-based, saRNA-based, “protein subunit” based, “inactivated”, or any other platform technology. Any COVID-19 “vaccine” that is based on the SARS-CoV-2 virus (no matter if the entire spike protein is used, or part of the spike protein is used, in the product). Why? Because of the following, among other reasons: First, the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein itself, which was developed to invade the lungs and to attack the ACE2 receptors of the body (in the heart, intestines, and kidney, among other locations); and, Second, the other ingredients that these “vaccines” contain, among them: dangerous nanoparticles (ALC-0159; ALC-0315; SM-102); N1-methylpseudouridine; antibiotics; detergents; SV40; “loose” DNA fragments; — and, in the case of NUVAXOVID, insect matter from an invasive crop destroyer insect. By the way, NUVAXOVID utilizes the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 — and has deletions / alterations that were introduced into it — thus making this “vaccine” a modRNA-based injectable.

Spodoptera frugiperda (fall armyworm) is found all over the globe. This pest, swarming in large numbers and eating every part of the crop, can destroy entire fields of, for example, corn, in days. Please see: https://www.sygenta.com/agriculture/crop-production/pest-disease-management/billion-dollar-problem, “A billion dollar problem”, August 2024. A screenshot from this article is below:

The “culturing bath” for the modRNA mixture used in NUVAXOVID is lab-created from elements derived from Spodoptera frugiperda. This, in itself, in Yours Truly’s opinion, makes the final product suspect from the start. Such a “culturing bath” has its own potential risks and issues. Such a “culturing bath” is NOT “safer” or “better” than the E. coli-derived ones used by Pfizer-BioNTech and by Moderna for their COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine” products.

Yours Truly now turns to the FDA-issued Package Insert for Healthcare Providers for NUVAXOVID: https://www.fda.gov/files/vaccines,blood&biologics/published/Package-Insert-and-Patient-Package-Insert-NUVAXOVID.pdf. The healthcare providers Package Insert will be discussed first. Please see the following screenshots from this document. Note the admission, in section 5.2, that this “vaccine” can cause myocarditis / pericarditis; the dismissive language in section 6.2; the “potential benefits outweigh the potential risk”-type of argument in section 8.2; and the enormous amount of “adjuvant” used per injection of NUVAXOVID, compared to the amount of modRNA per injection:

Also: Pages 11 – 14 et seq. in the healthcare provider Package Insert — the Adverse Reactions sections — consistently has clearly dismissive language regarding adverse reactions reported as being “not causative.”

So far, what we see from the healthcare provider Package Insert is: that NUVAXOVID can cause heart issues; that postmarketing “vaccine”-induced issues can be dismissed under “not sufficient causal relationship” to having taken the “vaccine”; that, apparently, no animal (non-human) studies were performed to investigate whether or not NUVAXOVID elements are excreted in breast milk; that the “potential benefits outweigh potential risks” canard regarding taking COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” somehow applies to human lactation; and, that the ** published ** ingredients list of NUVAXOVID reads like a “laundry list” of chemicals plus a dose of crop-destroying insect residue plus a hefty dose of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.

Let’s look at some of the ingredients listed in section 11 DESCRIPTION of this “vaccine”: One: the “rS” spike protein used in NUVAXOVID is the full-length S protein; and, the “vaccine” attacks both the B-lymphocyte and the T-lymphocyte immune mechanisms. Please see: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8897963/, “Editorial: First Approval of the Protein-Based Adjuvanted Nuvaxovid (NVX-CoV2373) Novavax Vaccine for SARS-CoV-2 Could Increase Vaccine Uptake and Provide Immune Protection from Viral Variants”, Dinah V. Parums, MD, PhD, March 2022. Two: the lab-creation of the Sf9 Spodoptera frugiperda insect cell line used for the “culturing bath” for NUVAXOVID apparently only requires a BSL-1 laboratory level (thus making the process of culturing insect cell lines for use in “vaccines” faster and cheaper.) Please see: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392062088_The_Bioengineering_of_Insect_Cell_Lines_for_Biotherapeutics_and_Vaccine_Production_An_Updated_Review, Michal Sulek, Angieszka Szuster-Ciesielska, May 2025. (The title of the paper is the same as the URL.) Three: a few of the other ingredients in NUVAXOVID: potassium dihydrogen phosphate, a potassium salt that is used in fertilizer (https://pubchem.ncbi.nim.nih.gov/compound/Monobasic-potassium-phosphate); and, disodium hydrogen phosphate heptahydrate, a chemical compound that is not for food or drug use: https://www.biosynth.com/Files/MSDS/FS/32/MSDS_FS32721_7000_EN.pdf; see section 1; and, polysorbate 80, a surfactant (a type of detergent) used in soaps and cosmetics.

Adding these into the summary of what NUVAXOVID contains, we now have, citing only the items above: The full-length SARS-CoV-2 spike protein + residue from the “culturing bath” that is lab-created from the Sf9 elements of the Spodoptera frugiperda (fall armyworm) + a potassium salt that is used in fertilizer + a chemical compound that is not to be used in food or drugs + a detergent. Then, there is the “Matrix-M” adjuvant used in this “vaccine”, made of “Fraction A” and “Fraction C” from the soapbark tree (Quillaja saponaria Molina.) Matrix-M is the largest amount of any ingredient in NUVAXOVID — 50mcg in the injection. Please see: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/drug-delivery/articles/10.3389/fddev.2023.1279710/full, “Biodistribution of the saponin-based adjuvant Matrix-M (TM) following intramuscular injection in mice”, Cecilia Carnrot, et al., 5 November 2023. Note: every author of this paper is affiliated with Novavax AB (Sweden), or with Novavax Inc., Gaithersburg, MD. An image of Figure 3 (biodistribution) of this paper is below. Apologies for the length of the image:

Note the accumulations of the Matrix-M adjuvant COMBINED WITH THE SARS-CoV-2 SPIKE PROTEIN (the dark blue dots on the above image) in areas of the body. Note that NUVAXOVID crosses the Blood-Brain Barrier and enters the brain. Note that many of the accumulations INCREASE over the timeframe biodistribution period.

Let’s look at the Information for Patients and Caregivers section of the FDA Package Insert, which begins on Page 44 of the document. Yours Truly is including two images from this section of the Package Insert:

Note the FDA “bafflegab” regarding the presence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in NUVAXOVID. The “vaccine” is BASED ON THE SARS-CoV-2 VIRUS. The “XFG variant”, which is the “official” SARS-CoV-2 variant used in the “vaccine”, IS “DESCENDED” FROM THE ORIGINAL WUHAN HU1 SARS-CoV-2 VIRUS VIA THE OMICRON LINEAGE. The FDA “bafflegab” is like saying, for example, “Well, I don’t have any German blood in me, since my German ancestors came to the United States 150 years ago.” Of course the DNA of one’s ancestors is present in the bloodline, even if in smaller amounts. And, note the complete lack of information regarding the “other ingredients” listed for NUVAXOVID. Unless the patient / caregiver looks up information on the chemicals listed, they won’t know, for example, that disodium hydrogen phosphate heptahydrate is not for food or drug use (see above in today’s offering.) Yours Truly will again state: NUVAXOVID is NOT a “safer” modRNA-based COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine.”

To be continued with a deeper dive into the modRNA details, and more, of NUVAXOVID, in Part Two.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA1

(Intellectual Property Disclaimer and Notice: Except for the linked URLs and other items available on the Internet in today’s offering, the ideas and/or opinions above are by PAVACA1 (M.E. Forbes, aka M.E.C. Forbes.) Credit must be given to PAVACA1 if ideas and/or opinions from today’s offering are used by other blog writers; by podcasters; or in print or social media.)

Health Friday 9.18.2026 Open Thread: Dismantle Them. Salt The Ground. Start All Over Again. Do It Right Next Time: Part One

The free image of the trumpets of the Battle of Jericho is courtesy of Shutterstock and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats by Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: AI-generated items in today’s offering are cited as such. If readers wish to post AI-generated items in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Dismantle Them. Salt The Ground. Start All Over Again. Do It Right Next Time: Part One.

This is about completely dismantling the CDC, the FDA, NIH, and NIAID; and rebuilding them following a new format: that of actually serving the health of the American public. Up until 4 August 2026, this “edifice” named above had evolved into a funds-funneling vehicle for dangerous Gain-of-Function experiments in laboratories ranging from: Dr. Ralph Baric’s lab at UNC Chapel Hill (development of the SARS-CoV-2 “template” virus); to Dr. Zheng-li Shi’s laboratory at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (where the SARS-CoV-2 “template virus” was being “enhanced” prior to its being released in late fall 2019); to Dr. Peter Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance (Gain-of-Function experiments funding via “grants” from NIH / NIAID); to NIAID and Moderna entering into an agreement (in 2015) to co-develop, co-own the Patents for, and share in the royalty payments for the use of, mRNA-1273 (SPIKEVAX), and of mRNA-1345 (mRESVIA.)

What does dismantling this “edifice” involve? Among many other aspects, in Yours Truly’s opinion: firing all current employees; stopping the funding applications for new research projects; stopping all current funding in place for approved research projects; cutting all ties to, and involvement with, pharmaceutical companies regarding development and manufacture of drugs and injectables; and, RESCINDING the agreement signed between the United States Department of Defense and NIH / NIAID. This agreement was signed between the United States Department of War (signature by Dr. Robert Kadlec, MD, as representative, on 4 August 2026), and the NIH / NIAID (signature by Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, director of NIH, on 5 August 2026), that ceded future development of injectable medicines (including influenza and COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines”), in addition to other drugs, from NIH / NIAID to the Department of War; and, in addition, with NIH / NIAID providing “data and information”, along with to up to $2 Billion dollars in funding. (https://www.theqtree.com/2026/09/11/health-friday-9-11-2026-open-thread-25th-anniversary-of-9-11-nih-and-the-department-of-war-just-signed-a-new-agreement/.)

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

The focus of today’s offering is the now-proven fact that the modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” (gene therapy injections) can cause cancer in “vaccinated” persons via THREE OF THE INGREDIENTS IN THESE “VACCINES.” Note: the appelation “lipid nanoparticle(s)” and the acronym “LNP(s)” are used interchangeably.

The first and second ingredients in the modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” (gene therapy injections) that cause cancer: the spike protein; and, the SV40 cancer promoter gene code piece. Please see: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-study-pfizer-covid-19-vaccine, “BREAKING STUDY: Pfizer COVID-19 “Vaccine” Plasmid DNA Found Inside Lethal Turbo Cancer of the Heart”, Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 9 September 2026. The deceased was a 35-year-old male, with no personal or family history of cancer, who took the “primary series” of two injections of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine”, BNT162b2, in April and May 2021. 170 days after the second injection, the patient was diagnosed with a “large tumor” in the left atrium of his heart, and that had already metastasized to the brain. Despite numerous surgeries, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy, the patient ultimately passed away 675 days after the initial diagnosis. Please see the screenshots from the Hulscher article, below:

Look at the above again: The SV40 cancer promoter-enhancer was NOT found to be present. What WAS found to be present were “vaccine” spike protein fragments. This confirms that the spike protein in the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” can cause cancer. This is aside from the fact that the SV40 cancer promoter-enhancer gene code piece is ALSO in the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines.” Please see: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/17-ways-mrna-shots-may-cause-cancer, “17 Ways mRNA Shots May Cause Cancer, According to Over 100 Studies”, Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 24 June 2025.

**** This makes two ingredients (out of the three) which these modRNA-based injectables contain that can (and do) cause cancer. The paper that is referenced in the Hulscher article is here: https://zenodo.org/records/22677693, “Fatal Cardiac Intimal Sarcoma in a 35-Year-Old Male Following COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination: Plasmic DNA Fragments Encoding the S-Protein Detected in Tumor Tissue”, Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH, et al., 9 September 2026. Note: The paper is a preprint. Interested readers should consider archiving, printing out, or otherwise saving it, in the event the paper is later Withdrawn, Retracted, or Reissued with New Conclusions due to pressure brought on Zenodo by outside entities, or due to pressure brought onto the paper’s authors. In addition, it is now proven that the modRNA, the spike protein, and the SV40 cancer promoter-enhancer gene code piece can be found in “vaccinated” persons for at least 3.5 years after injection: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-peer-reviewed-study-finds-51c, “BREAKING: Peer-Reviewed Study Finds mRNA, SV40, and Spike Protein Can Persist in Humans for At Least 3.5 Years After COVID-19 “Vaccination””, Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 9 July 2026. The paper referred to in this article is found here: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.2026.0351, “Persistence of Vaccine mRNA, Plasmid DNA, Spike Protein, and Genomic Dysregulation Over 3.5 Years Post-COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination”, Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, et al., epublished 31 July 2026. Yours Truly discussed this paper in the following post: https://www.theqtree.com/2026/09/04/health-friday-9-4-2026-open-thread-countermeasures-and-precautions-an-opinion-piece/.

The third ingredient in the modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” that can cause cancer is now proven — cancer caused by the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) within these “vaccines.” Please see: https://jessicar.substack.com/p/causal-role-of-lnp-induced-inflammation, “Causal role of LNP-induced inflammation in cancer metastasis in mice”, Jessica Rose, PhD, 3 September 2026. Please the screenshots, below, from Dr. Rose’s article:

So, to examine a couple of things: First, what are neutrophils? The short answer is, they are a type of white blood cell. Please see: https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/body/22313-neutrophils; a screenshot from this article is below:

Second, the Pharmacokinetics Tabulated Summary report that Pfizer-BioNTech gave to the FDA early in 2021 (https://icandecide.org/wp-content/uploads/125742_S1_M2_26_pharmkin-tabulated-summary.pdf, regarding the biodistribution of BNT162b2 in the Wistar lab rats experiments and the related amounts of the lipid nanoparticles ALC-0159 and ALC-0315. Please see the screenshots from this report, below:

The paper referred to by Dr. Rose in her article is here: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2026.103039, “Lipid nanoparticle used in mRNA vaccine promotes metastasis in mouse model via mt-DNA-induced neutrophil activation and NETosis”, Binhan Wang, et al., 28 March 2026. Note: the full article is restricted-access via institutions or via article purchase. The following screenshot is from the ScienceDirect “public viewing sections” page of the paper:

So, it appears that multiple types of lipid nanoparticles were used in the Binhan Wang, et al., experiments. Note: some combination of the above LNPs (DSPC and DMG-PEG2000) are found in both the Pfizer-BioNTech and the Moderna 2026-2027 modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines.” SM-102, another LNP, is used in the Moderna “vaccines” (the ALC-0259 and ALC-0315 LNPs are used in the Pfizer-BioNTech “vaccines.”)

Please refer again to Page 7 of the Pharmacokinetics Tabulated Summary for BNT162b2 above, the huge accumulation of lipid nanoparticles AT THE INJECTION SITE of the Wistar lab rats. This argues that there is a similar accumulation of lipid nanoparticles AT THE INJECTION SITE for humans who take these “vaccines”: which would then also trigger the cascade of neutrophil activity for “vaccinated” persons, also STARTING AT THE INJECTION SITE WITH CELL DEATH. For another report on the Binhan Wang paper, and how important it is, please see: https://www.newstarget.com/2026-09-07-study-lipid-nanoparticle-mrna-vacines-promote-tumor-html, “Study finds Lipid Nanoparticle in mRNA Vaccines Could Promote Tumor Metatasis in Mice”, Morgan S. Verity, 7 September 2026.

**** And, there is another aspect of this situation: the fact that modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” SHED ONTO OTHER PEOPLE, including onto non-COVID-19 “vaccinated” people (https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/covid-19-vaccine-shedding-experiences, “What We’ve Learned from Over a Thousand Vaccine Shedding Reports”, 7 January 2024.) It is already known that, for example, mRNA-4157, the modRNA-based “individualized cancer vaccine” being developed by Moderna, requires female clinical study subjects to either be taking birth control starting BEFORE they begin participation in the study, AND to continue taking birth control for several months AFTER they complete participation; or, to be beyond childbearing age. This means that Moderna tacitly admits that mRNA-4157 CAN SHED. Please see: https://www.theqtree.com/2026/08/28/health-friday-8-28-2026-open-thread-mrna-4157-v940-also-known-as-intismeran-by-team-merck-and-moderna/.

It is past time, in Yours Truly’s opinion, for the American public to demand, first, that the entire “edifice” of the CDC / FDA / NIH / NIAID be completely dismantled and rebuilt as entities that will actually respond to, and safeguard the health of, the citizens of the United States; and, second, that the August 2026 agreement between NIH / NIAID and the United States Department of Defense be completely rescinded.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA1

(Intellectual Property Disclaimer and Notice: Except for linked URLs and other items available on the Internet, the ideas and/or opinions in today’s offering are by PAVACA1 (M.E. Forbes, aka M.E.C. Forbes.) Credit must be given to PAVACA1 if ideas and/or opinions in today’s offering are used by other blog writers; by podcasters; or in print or social media.)

Health Friday 9.4.2026 Open Thread: Countermeasures and Precautions: An Opinion Piece

The free vintage image of hand washing for today’s offering header is courtesy of Open Culture and Google Images. Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats by Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: AI-generated items in today’s offering will be cited as such. If readers wish to post AI-generated items in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Countermeasures and Precautions: An Opinion Piece

The following is not medical advice. The following is not “SHTF prepping.” The following is not intended to instill fear. The following are ideas and opinions for consideration regarding certain “ongoing and upcoming situations.” There are several areas to consider: First area: the FDA’s recent approval of mRNA-1010 (mFLUSIVA), the first modRNA-platform based influenza bioweapon “vaccine”; Second area: the FDA’s just approving the “latest version” of the COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” for 2026 – 2027, based only on testing performed on mice; and, Third area: the recent paper which proves that the spike protein and other ingredients of the COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine” injections remain active in the “vaccinated” person’s body for at least 3 1/2 years post-final “vaccine” injection.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

First area: the FDA’s recent approval of mRNA-1010 (mFLUSIVA): this situation has been covered extensively (and will continue to be covered) on this board; by our host, Wolf Moon, and by Yours Truly, among others who posted items related to the situation. The bottom lines of mFLUSIVA: One: this “vaccine” killed more than twice the number of clinical trial study subjects who took it, as compared to those study subjects who took the “comparator influenza” vaccine, Fluarix; Two: Moderna knows that mFLUSIVA can shed — study subjects were required sign an agreement to use birth control before, during, and after, their participation in the clinical trial; Three: mFLUSIVA was FDA-approved on “Accelerated Approval” for persons age 65 and over. Accelerated Approval means that Moderna must agree to perform a clinical trial of the “vaccine” using persons age 65 and older; Four: Moderna must also agree to track reports of deaths in persons who take mFLUSIVA. Our host, Wolf Moon, has written about mFLUSIVA; for example, here: https://www.theqtree.com/2026/08/07/a-grok-eyed-view-of-the-new-mrna-flu-shot/.

Second area: the FDA’s just granting approval for the “latest version” COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” for 2026 – 2027. The bottom lines: One: the FDA granted approval for the 2026 – 2027 “latest version vaccine” by Pfizer-BioNTech based on lab testing on 8 mice; no human trials. This follows the “Option 4” protocol for formulation of new COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” that was adopted by the FDA in 2022; Two: the FDA granted approval for the 2026 – 2027 “latest version vaccine” by Moderna based on lab testing on 10 mice, again following the “Option 4” described above; Three: based on the “ruling” against HHS by Federal Judge Brian E. Murphy earlier this year, these “latest version” COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” will be administered to persons from age 6 months and older. Please see: http://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-fda-approves-new-pfizer, “BREAKING: FDA Approves New Pfizer and Moderna XFG mRNA COVID-19 Shots Based on Data From Just 8 – 10 Mice”, Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 27 August 2026

Third area: the McCullough, et al., paper, which proves that serious adverse reactions and events can occur in COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccinated” persons at least 3.5 years after the last “vaccine” injection (https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-peer-reviewed-study-finds-51c, “BREAKING: Peer-Reviewed Study Finds mRNA, SV40, and Spike Protein Can Persist in Humans for At Least 3.5 Years After COVID-19 “Vaccination””, Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 9 July 2026; the paper cited is here: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.2026.0351, “Persistence of Vaccine mRNA, Plasmid DNA, Spike Protein, and Genomic Dysregulation Over 3.5 Years Post-COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination”, Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, et al.; published 31 July 2026. The bottom lines: One: these “vaccines” can, and do, have continuous negative consequences in persons who take them for years afterwards; Two: that repeated injections of these “vaccines” accumulate / aggravate / induce, continuous attack on the “vaccinated” person’s entire body and immune system; and, Three: repeated injections of these “vaccines” have the potential for accumulated damage to the entire body and the destruction of the “vaccinated” person’s immune system.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

It is estimated that about 77.1% of the population of the United States has taken at least one injection of a modRNA-based COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine” (https://dig.abclocal.go.com/ccg/interactives/us-vaccine-tracker/vax_us_cdc.html, “U.S. COVID-19 vaccine map by state”. It is estimated that 135.6 million persons in the United States took an influenza “vaccine” in the 2025 – 2026 season (https://www.cdc.gov/fluvaxview/dashboard/index.html.) It is unknown how many will be take mFLUSIVA; however, there are physicians actively promoting this injectable. In fact, mFLUSIVA is being promoted as the “replacement” influenza vaccine for persons age 50 and older (https://epicenter.nyc.com/what-to-know-about-the-new-mrna-flu-vaccine-for-those-over-50/, Ambar Castillo, 13 August 2026.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Where does all of the above leave the 20% – 25% of Americans who do not have COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” in their bodies? Where does that leave those who have had a COVID-19 infection, have recovered, but still may have lingering issues stemming from the infection (Long COVID; systemic inflammations of one kind or another; lung issues, and so on)? Where does that leave COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons who have decided to never take another injection of any of them? Where does this leave Americans with the 2026 – 2027 “latest version” COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” coming on the market within weeks, coupled with the campaigns from Establishment Medicine / government agencies / employers, and other entities, to “make sure one is up-do-date” with the “latest version vaccine”? Where does this leave people who decide to not take mFLUSIVA? In Yours Truly’s opinion, it comes down to making individual decisions regarding personal (and, perhaps, family) “countermeasures and precautions” — and following them faithfully.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

What would these “countermeasures and precautions” include? Perhaps, these areas to start the consideration and decision process: Countermeasures: Protocols using repurposed drugs (Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine); and, Vitamins, Supplements, and Foods. For Precautions: Lifestyle Protocols / Adjustments. Each of these have ramifications that impact finances; availability; and, interactions with people. Each of these require that people “do their own due diligence” in researching the “countermeasures and precautions” that they are considering implementing for themselves (and, perhaps, for their family.)

Protocols using repurposed drugs (Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine): These, in Yours Truly’s opinion, are the “core” of COVID-19 infection prevention or treatment. Independent Medical Alliance has both prevention and treatment protocols for COVID-19: https://imahealth.org/treatment-protocols/. Another protocol is found here: https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/bombshell-shocker-the-cia-and-pfizer, “BOMBSHELL SHOCKER: The CIA & Pfizer LIED To The Public About The Need For Their $afe & Effective PSYOP-19 “Vaccines””, 2 September 2026; scroll down to the end of the post for “The Ultimate Disease Cure & Prophylaxis Protocol” section.

Vitamins, Supplements, and Foods: First, Vitamins and Supplements: Vitamin C and Vitamin D, for example, can help to bolster the body’s immune system. Supplements such as Zinc, Magnesium, and Quercetin help to keep the lungs clear (Zinc); to regulate many enzyme systems in the body (Magnesium); and, to increase or maintain anti-inflammatory and antioxidant protection (Quercetin.) Please see: regarding Zinc: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC131177/, “What does zinc do?”, Abi Berger; 9 November 2002; regarding Magnesium: https://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/Magnesium-HealthProfessional/; regarding Quercetin: https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/quercetin, Ryan Raman; 7 May 2026. Many brands of multivitamins contain a more-or-less good range of vitamins and minerals; however, the amounts per vitamin or mineral may or may not satisfy the needs of the individual; in those instances, separate supplementation may be desired. Vitamin D uptake from sunshine can be done in many different and healthy ways.

Second, Foods: There is a saying, “Let food be thy medicine.” For some people, a diet that satisfies what is necessary regarding not only nutrition, but also for vitamins and minerals, may be one approach. An example for inclusion in such a diet is eggs (https://www.roswellpark.org/cancertalk/202504/are-eggs-good-you, “Are eggs good for you?”, 18 April 2025.) The “humble egg” is actually a “mini-powerhouse” of vitamins and minerals: Vitamins A — B2 — B12 — E; Lutein; Iodine; Selenium; and more; in addition to protein. Another example, this time of vegetables, is carrots (https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/foods/carrots, “Nutrition and Health Benefits of Carrots”, Adda Bjarnadottir, MS, RDN (Ice), 22 July 2026. Carrots provide beta-carotene (the body converts this into Vitamin A); fiber; antioxidants; and more. Carrots also may help support eye health, among other positive effects. Of course, there is red meat: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7015455/ , “What is the role of meat in a healthy diet?”, David M Klurfeld, July 2018. In addition to its being a complete protein, red meat also provides vitamins, amino acids, zinc, and iron.

Precautions: This area includes decisions regarding interacting with others who are COVID-19 “vaccinated”; whether or not to attend large-gathering places; and, if a non-COVID-19 “vaccinated” person is living with other who are “vaccinated”, among other situations. In no way is Yours Truly advocating that non-COVID-19 “vaccinated” people become “modern-day anchorites” with little or no contact with others. However, there are things that non-“vaccinated” people can do to reduce the potential for being exposed to “vaccine” shedding; and, to the potential for being infected by the COVID-19 virus itself. Examples: using disposable gloves at the gas pump; deciding whether or not to use “contactless” payment methods, as opposed to handing a credit card to someone; if possible, sitting at the back of a large-gathering event or facility; changing clothes after returning home from a family visit or going to a large-gathering event; taking an appropriately extra amount of, for example, Vitamin D before attending such an event; taking an appropriate extra dose of Ivermectin or Hydroxychloroquine after attending such an event; among others. Living with, or paying extended visits to, COVID-19 “vaccinated” people is another, and perhaps more difficult, area. Considerations here may be, for example, deciding to take Ivermectin on a weekly basis if a non-COVID-19 “vaccinated” person is part of a family (or, has roommates, etc.) that includes “vaccinated” people living in the same house. Please see: https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/covid-19-vaccine-shedding-experiences, “What We’ve Learned from Over a Thousand Vaccine Shedding Reports”, 7 January 2024.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

There is another, and important, area, to consider: interactions between drugs that are prescribed for particular needs, and repurposed drugs (such as, Ivermectin.) Please see: https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/articles/drug-interactions. The Cleveland Clinic defines a drug interaction as what happens when “foods, drinks, dietary supplements, other drugs, prevent medications from working as they should.” For example, Ivermectin interacts with warfarin (Coumadin), and with other drugs: https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/drugs-ivermectin-oral-tablet-interactions, Ashley Wong, PharmD, Last updated 17 January 2025. Ivermectin is also known to interact with: ketoconazole (an antifungal drug); and, with ritonavir (an HIV/AIDS treatment drug: please see https://synapse.patsnap.com/article/what-is-ivermectin-used-for); with benzodiazepines; and with alcohol (increased dizziness risk.) If using Ivermectin along with warfarin, it is important to keep a check on INR levels; it may also be germane to advise the healthcare professional who prescribed the warfarin, that Ivermectin is also being taken. Readers interested in investigating the potential for drug interactions regarding prescription drugs they take; and, for more information on prescription drugs, vitamins, and supplements (minerals) may wish to visit https://www.drugs.com/, or https://www.goodrx.com/. Note: be aware that these websites (and similar ones, such as the search engine at https://www.webmd.com/) appear to be biased against, for example, Ivermectin, except for the very narrow FDA-approved uses of this drug (to treat river blindness or lice.) The FDA still does not approve of Ivermectin for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

There is one final area to consider as a COVID-19 and/or mFLUSIVA countermeasure: regular mild to moderate exercise, at least five days a week for 20 – 30 minutes a day. If this exercise can be done in the open air, in the sunshine, there is even more benefit. And the exercise does not have to be strenuous: for example, Tai Chi sequences, practiced correctly and with using proper breathing techniques, can provide a “slow-motion” cardio workout. Just wearing a pedometer to count steps, or staying active inside the house, can help. The point is to avoid being sedentary. Please consult a health professional before starting, or increasing, an exercise program, especially if one is recovering from an illness, has certain health conditions, and so on.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA1

(Intellectual Property Disclaimer and Notice: Except for the linked URLs and other items available on the Internet, the ideas and/or opinions in today’s offering are by PAVACA1. Credit must be given to PAVACA1 if ideas and/or opinions in today’s offering are used by other blog writers; by podcasters; or in print or social media.)

Health Friday 8.14.2026 Open Thread: The Female Fertility and Pregnancy Killers in US9884895B2, the SARS-CoV-2 “Template Virus” Patented by Dr. Ralph Baric, PhD

The graphic above, which is also the header for today’s offering, is Fig. 1 from: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/cellular-and-infection-microbiology/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2021.735394/full, “COVID-19 Vaccination in Pregnancy and Lactation: Current Research and Gaps in Understanding”, Lydia L. Shook, et al.; 15 September 2021. With thanks to the authors of this paper.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: AI-generated items in today’s offering will be cited as such. If readers wish to post AI-generated items in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Please see: https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/bombshell-faucis-private-textx-admit, “BOMBSHELL: FAUCI’S PRIVATE TEXTS Admit “Theoretical Miscarriages for Pregnant Women From PSYOP-19 “Vaccine””, 11 August 2026. Please see the linked article, https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/confidential-pfizer-documents-confirm, “Confidential Pfizer Documents confirm 82 – 97% of COVID Vaccinated Pregnant Women sadly lost their Baby during Trial”, 15 August 2022. Please also see: https://www.theburningplatform.com/2026.08/12/fauci-knew-covid-jab-was-dangerous-for-pregnant-women/, Martin Armstrong, 12 August 2026. Another article is here: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/faucis-miscarriage-of-public-health. “Fauci’s Miscarriage of Public Health Led to Actual Fetal Loss in Thousands of Pregnant Women”, Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH (text summary and embedded video interview with Dr. McCullough.) There are links to other articles; to scientific papers; to charts and graphics, within each of the other cited URLs. An example of the items found in the links above is this one, a screenshot from the Martin Armstrong article. The paper by Dr. Tom Shimabukuro, the “federal study” of April 2021, is discussed further down in today’s offering:

In Yours Truly’s opinion: Dr. Anthony Fauci; Dr. Rochelle Walensky; and, Dr. Vivek Murthy — all knew what they were doing in privately recognizing to each other that the modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” were dangerous to pregnant women; to the child they were carrying; and, that these “vaccines” could cause the death of the fetus in a “vaccinated” pregnant woman: while, at the same time, each of them were stating that these same “vaccines” were “safe and effective”, and that they would not pose harm to a pregnant woman or to her unborn child. There is no excuse for, no “qualifying explanation” for, no running away from, the fact that the lies these three physicians spread resulted in the miscarriage — the stillbirth — the death inside the womb, of thousands of babies due to the their expectant mothers getting COVID-19 “vaccinated.” The miscarriages — stillbirths — deaths of these children are on their hands.

The Shimabukuro, et al., paper of April 2021, attempted to gloss over the dangers of the COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” to pregnant women (https://nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104983, “Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons”, Tom Shimabukuro, et al; April 2021. At the time this paper was published, Dr. Shimabukuro was the director of the Immunization Safety Office of the CDC. Please see the screenshot of the “Results” section of the Abstract from the original April 2021 paper; followed by the screenshot of the “Correction” version of the same “Results” that was published on 8 September 2021:

However, neither the original Shimabukuro, et al., paper, nor the “corrected” paper, apparently mention the fact that, of the 3958 reported pregnancies in COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccinated” women (“pregnant persons”), only 827 pregnancies were “completed.” Which leaves 3,131 reported pregnancies that were NOT “completed” in these “vaccinated” women; in other words, about a 79.2% non-completed pregnancy rate in these “vaccinated” women — not the 12.6% negative pregnancy outcomes rate stated in the paper.

Yours Truly now turns to US9884859B2, the Patent granted in October 2015 to Dr. Ralph Baric, PhD, of the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, for his “invention” of the “template virus” for SARS-CoV-2. The following screenshots, below, are from this Patent: the Title and Dates Summary; the Figure 1; the paragraph from the Detailed Description of the Invention regarding the use of subgroup 1a-type viruses in the “invention”; the citations from the Patent for viruses used in the subgroup 1a section on the Figure 1 “virus tree chart”

Look at the phrase from the paragraph regarding subgroup 1a viruses that can be used in Dr. Baric’s “invention”: “…, as well as any other subgroup 1a coronavirus now known (e.g., as can be found in the GenBank (R) Database or later identified, and any combination thereof.” This means that ANY subgroup 1a-type of coronavirus can be used in the SARS-CoV-2 “template virus” that Dr. Baric “invented.” How does this tie into the miscarriages, the stillbirths, the live births of infants who are weak / low weight, and so on, to expectant mothers who were “vaccinated” with a COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine”? First: Yours Truly believes that Dr. Ralph Baric shared information contained in US9884895B2 with Dr. Zheng-li Shi of the Wuhan Institute of Virology (as she was working on various coronaviruses, including SARS-CoV); and/or, he shared samples of certain subgroup 1a viruses with Dr. Shi. Second: Yours Truly believes that US9884895B2 was the “template virus” for SARS-CoV-2 “foundation” that ultimately became the “modRNA” (aka “mRNA”) used in the COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines.” Regarding the citation in the Patent above, about Porcine Respiratory and Reproductive Virus (also called Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome), please see the following screenshot from this website: https://www.merckvetmanual.com/generalized-conditions/porcine-reproductive-and-respiratory-sundrome/porcine-reproductive-and-respiratory-syndrome:

Regarding the Figure 1 of the Patent, please refer to the “1a” portion of the “virus tree.” There are three viruses listed: FCoV (Feline coronavirus); TGEV (Transmissible Gastroenteritis virus [swine]);, and, PRV (Pseudorabies virus [swine].) Please see the screenshot about PRV, below, from this website: https://merckvetmanual.com/nervous-system/pseudorabies/pseudorabies-in-pigs:

Why was Dr. Baric including at least two viruses that cause reproductive failure in swine in his Patented “template virus” for SARS-CoV-2 “invention” — Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Virus (PRRV, aka PRRS); and, Pseudorabies virus (PRV)? Why was Pseudorabies virus (PRV) the only one listed on Fig. 1 from the Patent US9884895B2, unless this entire “virus tree” graphic is only listing examples of the various subgroup viruses that could be utilized in Dr. Baric’s Patent “template virus” for SARS-CoV-2 “invention”?

Yours Truly turns to one final item: Page 8 of the Pharmacokinetics Tabulated Summary report on BNT162b2 (COMIRNATY) given to the FDA by Pfizer-BioNTech in 2021 (https://icandecide.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/125742_S1_M2_26_pharmkin-tabulated-summary.pdf. Look at the BNT162b2 accumulations (assisted by the ALC-0159 and ALC-0315 lipid nanoparticles in this “vaccine”) in the Ovaries (12.3) and in the Uterus (0.456) in the Wistar lab rats.) [Note: this is aside from the fact that the COVID-19 bioweapon virus itself, as “invented” by Dr. Baric, has these two female fertility and pregnancy killers included in it — meaning that a female of childbearing age could, in theory, become infected with the virus itself, recover, but potentially have problems in terms of conception, carrying the fetus through pregnancy, and delivering a healthy child. The difference here, in Yours Truly’s opinion, is that if the female is non-COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccinated”, that person still has a relatively intact natural immune system to help fight off the virus itself and its negative effects. A “vaccinated” female’s natural immune system is damaged or destroyed by the COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” that she took. The mechanism of these “vaccines” is to induce a constant state of “fake COVID-19 virus infection” in the “vaccinated” persons’ body. In addition, the lipid nanoparticles ALC-0159 and ALC-0315 (in the Pfizer-BioNTech “vaccines”); and, the SM-102 (in the Moderna “vaccines”) move the ingredients of these injectables into every cell in the “vaccinated” person’s body.)] Page 8 is below:

Now, tie these accumulations in with the information above regarding the inclusion of at least two types of swine virus that cause reproductive failure (PRRV, aka PRRS; and, PRV) into Dr. Baric’s “template virus” Patent for SARS-CoV-2, US9884895B2. To Yours Truly, the combination of these inclusions; plus, the documented accumulations in the ovaries and the uteruses of the Wistar lab rats injected with BNT162b2 (COMIRNATY); and which version, by the way, was the same version for which the FDA granted the initial EUA for use in the United States on 11 December 2020, and which version is still the “foundational version” still used in all “descendant versions” of COMIRNATY since then; plus, the documented reports of miscarriages — stillbirths — live births with weak and/or low weight infants, involving pregnant females who were injected with modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines”: all add to up something that is not a “coincidence.” It is, instead, a situation that cannot be ignored or minimized. It is, instead, a situation that must be fully investigated by the highest levels of government. In Yours Truly’s opinion: Pfizer-BioNTech; Moderna; and, Novavax, MUST be compelled to disclose the EXACT ingredients of the modRNA in their respective COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines”, the AMOUNTS of these ingredients, and the EXACT formulations of their respective COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines.” In addition, the above manufacturers MUST be compelled to disclose any and all communications with Dr. Baric regarding US9884895B2, and the use of any of the information in that Patent in their respective COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” formulations and manufacture.

THE USE OF ANY COVID-19 BIOWEAPON “VACCINE” ON PREGNANT FEMALES, AND ON FEMALES OF CHILDBEARING AGE, MUST STOP IMMEDIATELY.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

(Intellectual Property Disclaimer and Notice: Except for the linked URLs and other items available on the Internet, the ideas and/or opinions in today’s offering are by PAVACA (M.E. Forbes, aka M.E.C. Forbes.) Credit must be given to PAVACA if ideas and/or opinions in today’s offering are used by other blog writers; by podcasters; or in print or social media.)

mRNA Vaccines – A Movie to Refresh Your Memory

I will be hitting VERY HARD on the topic of mRNA vaccines in general, and the mRNA flu shot mFlusiva in particular, over the next few weeks.

I will be refreshing your memories to get you all back into FIGHTING SHAPE.

To begin with, I strongly suggest watching this 1 HOUR movie about mRNA vaccines. The main reason is that it will AWAKEN your dormant memories of the world under COVID. Automatic brain boost for our purposes.

I also think it is very important to see interviews with actual vaccine-injured people.

This movie will show you the reality of vaccine injury.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

W

THE MOVIE:

Chapters:

00:00 Intro
02:53 Surgeon Joel Wallskog’s health issues
06:21 Operation Warp Speed initiative
06:38 Former CDC Director on mRNA vaccines
07:35 Regulators’ safety assessment
08:09 Calls to pause mRNA vaccines
09:32 mRNA researcher Robert Malone
12:56 Pathologist Ryan Cole on COVID vaccination
14:14 Cardiologist Aseem Malhotra on heart health
14:37 Cardiologist Peter McCullough on side effects
17:28 Scientist Jessica Rose on vaccine concerns
18:41 Critical care specialist Paul Marik on patient community
21:17 Explaining mRNA
23:45 How mRNA vaccines work
27:06 Spike protein and possible effects
30:57 Pathologist Arne Burkhardt’s biopsy findings
32:49 Health agencies’ safety stance
33:38 Vaccination in pregnancy and children
34:22 Artist Jessica Sutta’s health issues
39:03 Future uses of mRNA technology
42:55 Tobie Vergara’s health issues
45:12 History of mRNA vaccines
46:44 Modified mRNA technology
48:40 mRNA research status in 2017
49:07 Toxicity concerns in 2017
49:33 Progress in mRNA technology
49:50 mRNA vaccines during the pandemic
55:41 Support for post-vaccination syndrome
57:06 Doctors offering assistance
Sources, studies, timecodes: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/…

Part of why I wanted you to see

Health Friday 8.7.2026 Open Thread: More on US9884895B2, Dr. Ralph Baric’s Patented “Template Virus” for SARS-CoV-2: Part One

The free image of the word Patent for today’s offering header is courtesy of Vecteezy and Google Images.

Special Note: the appellation viral biological weapon (VBW)© as a more accurate description of the SARS-CoV-2 “virus” (COVID-19 “virus”) is copyrighted by PAVACA1 (M.E. Forbes, aka M.E.C. Forbes.)

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Yours Truly has written regarding the “invention” by Dr. Ralph Baric, PhD, the now-retired head of the Baric Lab at the Gillings School of Global Public Health at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, of the “template virus” for SARS-CoV-2 (the COVID-19 “virus”), here: https://www.theqtree.com/2026/01/09/health-friday-1-9-2026-open-thread-the-baric-files-part-four-ecohealth-alliance-wuhan-institute-of-virology-dr-zheng-li-shi-the-template-virus/. This “invention” by Dr. Baric was almost totally funded through grants issued from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) via its National Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) division (Dr. Anthony Fauci, MD, NIAID Director from 1984 until his retirement in 2022.) This particular Health Friday series will focus on certain items in US9884895B2. Today’s offering is not intended to be a science lecture: it is to illustrate a certain aspect of the research journey of the “Master Designer” of SARS-CoV-2: Dr. Ralph Baric, PhD.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

The SARS-CoV-2 “virus” (COVID-19 “virus”) is actually a lab-created viral biological weapon (VLBW)©. It is nothing ever found in nature: it is a lab-created construct. This lab-created “virus” is a construct of gene code pieces from multiple animal coronaviruses, among them: RaTG13 bat coronavirus (which may also be a lab-created coronavirus; see the Bostickson and Ghannam paper link, below in today’s offering); SHC014 bat coronavirus; WIV1 bat coronavirus; VEEV (Venezuela Equine Encephalitis Virus); MP789 Pangolin coronavirus; and, TGEV (swine gastroenteritis virus.) The gene code pieces of the SHC014 bat coronavirus, the WIV1 bat coronavirus, the VEEV, and the TGEV — among dozens of other types of coronaviruses, including the MERS virus (Middle Eastern Respiratory Syndrome virus) — were spliced into Gain-of-Function viruses that Dr. Baric was experimenting with, to create his “invention” of the “template virus” for SARS-CoS-2, and for which Dr. Baric applied for a Patent in March 2015. It is this writer’s belief that Dr. Baric transmitted information related to the “invention” of US9884895B2, along with other items, to Dr. Zheng-li Shi of the Wuhan Institute of Virology (where she was already working on a SARS-type lab-created virus), in order for Dr. Shi to complete further “enhancement” of the “template virus” that Dr. Baric had lab-created. Yours Truly further believes that Dr. Baric and Dr. Shi had been in collaboration regarding this SARS-type virus “enhancement” since 2013, if not earlier. What is now known is that Dr. Shi did further “enhance” the SARS-type virus that she had been working on with more, and more lethal, coronaviruses: the MP789 Pangolin coronavirus; the 7896 bat coronavirus; and, perhaps others. In the case of the 7896 bat coronavirus, there was a concerted effort by the Communist Chinese version of the CDC to cover up the use of this particular coronavirus. Please see: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350515493_2_INVESTIGATION_OF_RaTG13_AND_THE_7896_CLADE, William Bostick and Yvette Ghannam, 2021; and, https://usrtk.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Latinne-et-al-3.pdf, the Accession Listing for MN312322, the 7896 bat coronavirus, at NCBI, as an inclusion into the SARs-CoV-2 “virus.” This Accession is on Page 77 (of 576) of File #3 of the section “Latinne at al. (2020) and the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI)”, found here: https://usrtk.org/covid-19-origins/foi-documents-on-origins-of-sars-cov-2-risks-of-gain-of-function-research-and-biosafety-labs/. Yours Truly believes that, since Dr. Shi was undoubtedly taught by Dr. Baric about how to use his other “invention”, the “No-see-um” invisible gene-splicing method for Gain-of-Function experiments (https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/jvi.76.21.11065-11078.2002, “Systematic Assembly of a Full-Length Infectious cDNA of Mouse Hepatitis Virus Strain 59”, B. Yount, M.R. Dennison, S.R.Weiss, R.S. Baric; November 2002), this method was used to insert the above-mentioned MP789 Pangolin coronavirus, the 7896 bat coronavirus, and likely other gene codes from other types of coronaviruses, into the SARS-type virus that Dr. Shi was already working on. Yours Truly believes that this (likely not-quite-“finished” enhanced SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) “virus” — this lab-created viral biological weapon (VBW)© was released into the world from the Wuhan Institute of Virology lab in late 2019. An aside: the 7896 bat coronavirus which is also included in the SARS-CoV-2 “virus” (listed as a clade of the HKU2 Rhinolophus bat coronavirus) as Accession Number MN312322 (see above links) — attacks the lungs and has a 50% death rate in humans (Bostickson and Ghannam, 2021, cited above.)

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Yours Truly turns to the NCBI PubChem entry for the breakdown of what appears to be the “main elements” that Dr. Ralph Baric included in his “invention” of the SARS-CoV-2 “virus” (COVID-19 “virus”) “template virus”, which Patent application was filed in March 2015. The PubChem entry is here: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/patent/US-9884895-B2, “Methods and compositions for chimeric coronavirus spike proteins”, Ralph Baric, Boyd Yount, Sudhakar Agnihothram. The hyperlinked list of elements, chemical compositions, and so forth, is on the right side of this page. Yours Truly clicked on the section “Linked Genes”, and found a gene numbered 5970, called “RELA — RELA proto-oncogene, NF-kB subuit (human).” Below is a screenshot from section 9 “Linked Genes”:

Yours Truly clicked on the 5970 hyperlink. This led to another page, https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/5970. Please see the screenshot, below, of the Title and Summary of this gene:

**** Notice the multiple types cancers this gene, 5970, is involved in the establishment of: ductal carcinoma in situ; lung cancer; lymphoma; renal cell carcinoma; multiple other types of carcinoma; cervical carcinoma in situ. This gene is also involved in the establishment of other types of diseases, including diseases of the prostate. Why was Dr. Ralph Baric splicing gene 5970 into his “invention” of the SARS-CoV-2 “Template virus”?

Yours Truly then clicked on the section 9 “Cell Lines” hyperlink on the 5970 gene page. This took one to: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/5970#section=Cell-Lines, and then clicked on the “COV18” hyperlink. From there, one then clicked on subsection 4, “Diseases.” Please see the screenshot, below, of subsection 4:

That’s correct — High grade ovarian serous adenocarcinoma. Which, again, raises the question: Why was Dr. Ralph Baric inserting gene code pieces from gene 5970, which has multiple connections to potentially causing cancer in the human body, into his SARS-CoV-2 “template virus invention”, US9884895B2? And gene 5970 is only one of dozens of genes that had code pieces inserted into various “permutations” of this “invention”, US9884895B2. Which also means, in Yours Truly’s opinion, that the SARS-CoV-2 “virus” (actually, a viral biological weapon (VBL), see above) can also have the potential to cause cancers of various types in persons who become infected with this viral biological weapon (VBL.)

Yours Truly then went to Page 8 of the BNT162b2 Pharmacokinetics Tabulated Summary report that Pfizer-BioNTech gave to the FDA on 21 January 2021 (https://icandecide.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/125742_S1_M2_26_pharmkin-tabulated-summary.pdf.) Please see the screenshot of Page 8, below:

Look at the BNT162b2 accumulation (assisted by the lipid nanoparticles ALC-0159 and ALC-0315 in BNT162b2) in the OVARIES of the Wistar lab rats 48 hours post-injection: 12.3.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

What is a “proto-oncogene?” Please see the screenshots, below, from this article: https://www.nature.com/scritable/topicpage/proto-oncogenes-to-oncogenes-to-cancer-883/, Heidi Chial, PhD, 2008:

Yours Truly then went back to gene 5970, RELA — RELA proto-oncogene, NF-kB, subunit (human), and did some more digging. I found this: https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/A0A087x0W8/variant-viewer. There are 448 variants of this gene. Many are listed as “Variant of uncertain significance.” However, for example, Variant 372 causes “Mucocutaneous ulceration, chronic”, and is also listed as “Pathogenic.” Another example: Variant 264 causes “RELA-related disorder” and is also listed as a “Variant of uncertain significance.”

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

All of the foregoing in today’s offering is not to incite a “frisson” of “this is too much information and it’s too detailed.”

All of the foregoing in today’s offering is, instead, to illustrate the “layered permutations” of just ONE of the elements contained in Dr. Ralph Baric’s “template virus” for SARs-CoV-2, which he Patented as US9884895B2 in October 2015 — about a month before he and Dr. Zheng-li Shi (which whom Dr. Baric was working since at least 2013, if not earlier) published their “Bait Circulating Coronavirus” paper of November 2015.

All of foregoing in today’s offering is, instead, to illustrate the fact that the SARS-CoV-2 “virus” itself (which is actually a viral biological weapon (VBW)©) has the potential (either from gene 5970, or from other proto-oncogenes that may be included in the “invention” by Dr. Baric) to cause cancer. This is entirely aside from the fact that the modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” can, and do, cause cancer de novo; and/or the aggravation of previous cancer that was under treatment prior to COVID-19; and/or the re-establishment of cancer that was in remission prior to COVID-19 — in “vaccinated” persons.

Dr. Ralph Baric, PhD, does not have a “pre-emptive pardon” from the “President Biden auto-pen.” Dr. Ralph Baric’s Gain-of-Function experiments, which ultimately resulted in the Patent US9884895B2, Dr. Baric’s “invention” of the SARS-CoV-2 “template virus”, in 2015, were funded by Dr. Anthony Fauci of the NIAID as far back as the mid-1980s. Dr. Baric has close ties with the Wuhan Institute of Virology and with the United States Defense Department. It is time for Dr. Baric to be brought to account for his activities. Dr. Baric needs to answer questions, under oath, such as: What information, if any, was shared with Pfizer-BioNTech (PfizerUSA), and/or with Moderna, from Patent US9884895B2? What information, if any, was shared with Pfizer-BioNTech (PfizerUSA), and/or with Moderna, regarding the possible inclusion of proto-oncogenes listed in Patent US9884895B2 into these companies’ modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines”? What information, if any, was shared with DARPA, BARDA, NIAID, or any other United States government entity, from Patent US9884895B2?

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA1

(Intellectual Property Disclaimer and Notice: Except for the linked URLs and other items available on the Internet in today’s offering, the ideas and/or opinions above are by PAVACA1 (M.E. Forbes, aka M.E.C. Forbes.) Credit must be given to PAVACA1 if ideas and/or opinions in today’s offering are used by other blog writers; by podcasters; or in print or social media.)

Health Friday 7.3.2026 Open Thread: Health Freedom: An Opinion Piece

The word cloud image of Good Health for today’s offering header is courtesy of Dreamstime and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: AI-generated items in today’s offering will be cited. If readers wish to post AI-generated items in today’s discussion thread, the must cite their source. Thank you.

Health Freedom

Guard Your Health Freedom: The federal government will not do this for you, or for your family. Nor will the American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, or the Federal Judiciary. In fact, the federal government (via the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the United States military’s biological weapons development and procurement divisions (DARPA and military research labs), and both the House of Representatives and the Senate (funding these activities) are doing all they can to continue the imposition of the COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” (gene-therapy injections) on the citizens of the United States of America.

Example: https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/hhs-awards-moderna-314-million-for, “HHS Awards Moderna $314 Million for Adult and Pediatric COVID-19 Vaccines: SAM.gov”, 28 June 2026. These awards were granted to Moderna through the CDC Office of Acquisition Services. The awards contracts were granted on 3 June 2026. The awards numbers and amounts are:

Pediatric: Award Number 75D30126D21000 for $285,044,250.

Adult: Award Number 75D30126D21003 for $29,183,000.

Example: https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/cdc-awards-pfizer-12-billion-for, “CDC Awards Pfizer $1.2 Billion for More COVID Vaccines: SAM.gov”, 11 June 2026. These awards were granted to Pfizer (PfizerUSA / Pfizer-BioNTech) through the CDC Office of Acquisition Services. The awards contracts were granted on 3 June 2026. The awards numbers and amounts are:

Pediatric: Award Number 75D3012621001 for $735,720,598.

Adult: Award Number 75D30126D21004 for $505, 272, 000.

The CDC Office of Acquisition Services is located at 1600 Clifton Rd., Atlanta, GA, 30333. The most current (as of 20 June 2024) organization chart for the CDC’s Office of Financial Resources (of which the Office of Acquisition Services is part) is listed here: https://www.cdc.gov/about/media/pdfs/ofr-org-chart.pdf. There are NO EMPLOYEE NAMES associated with ANY of the offices listed on this chart. None of the awards contracts listed above have any contract details, other than the date of the awards, the company name that is the awardee, and the contract number. These awards are examples of how the current HHS is operating. So much for “oversight” and “transparency” in the current HHS. Who exactly signed the awards documents for HHS? Who signed the acceptance documents at Pfizer (PfizerUSA / Pfizer-BioNTech) and at Moderna? Did HHS Sec. Kennedy, Jr., know about these awards in advance and signed off on them? Was he told after the fact and then signed off on them? A screenshot of one of the “information pages” for one of these awards is below. My apologies for the length of the screenshot — one has to see this to believe it:

Who is Jariya Taylor, the “Primary Point of Contact” for this award? Apparently, via Internet search, this person is a “Procurement Officer” with the CDC Office of Acquisition Services. Who is Chad Turner, the “Alternative Point of Contact” for this award? Apparently, via Internet search, this person is also a “Procurement Officer” with the CDC Office of Acquisition Services. How long have they worked for the CDC? What are their qualifications to be “Procurement Officers”? Are these employees the exact ones who signed the awards documents for HHS / CDC for the Pfizer (PfizerUSA / Pfizer-BioNTech) and the Moderna awards? Why does the award state, “Inactive” at the top of the document? What happened to the money? Who at Pfizer (PfizerUSA / Pfizer-BioNTech) “solicited” this award? Or, did the CDC, via Jariya Taylor and Chad Turner, reach out to the company to “be aware of an opportunity (award)”? Does the reader see how the game is played between Big Pharma, the CDC — and all using taxpayer monies?

Another point: How do the CDC awards to Moderna for their 2026-2027 modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” (gene-therapy injections) square with THIS story?: https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/misc-emerging-topics/moderna-chief-company-won-t-invest-new-late-stage-vaccine-trials, “Moderna chief: Company won’t invest in new late-stage vaccine trials”, Stephanie Soucheray, MA, 26 January 2026. Moderna CEO, Stephane Bancel, made these remarks at the WEF summit in Davos in January. Direct quotation from the article, from Mr. Bancel: “You cannot make a return on investment if you don’t have access to the U.S. market.” Direct quotation from the article: “He [Mr. Bancel] said the vaccine market in the United States is much smaller as more anti-vaccine guidelines have become the norm.” If that is so, then WHY did the CDC “create the opportunity” to award Moderna $314 Million to develop and market the company’s 2026 – 2027 modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” (gene-therapy injections)?

Example: HHS Sec. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., wrote and issued a “new” charter for the CDC’s ACIP panel (Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices) in April 2026. This was after Federal Brian E. Murphy disbanded the former ACIP panel, every recommendation made by this panel from June 2025 to March 2026, and re-instituted the old CDC Childhood and Adolescent Immunization Schedule that has a total of 72 “vaccine” injections to be administered to children age 0 up to age 18. HHS Sec. Kennedy, Jr., is an attorney. However, it appears that he was not either informed of, or paying attention to, the minutiae of drawing up federal regulations. The result is that the “new” ACIP charter was quietly withdrawn in May 2026 (https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/vaccines/121349, “HHS Withdraws New Rules for CDC Vaccine Panel”, Terrence Rudd, 19 May 2026); and, replaced it with yet another “new” ACIP panel charter (https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/childhood-vaccines/new-acip-charter-could-allow-rfk-jr-further-restrict-vaccine-access-critics-say, Liz Szabo, MA, 26 June 2026.)

Meanwhile, the re-instituted old CDC Childhood and Adolescent “vaccination” schedule — the one that “recommends” 72 total “vaccine” injections in children age 0 to age 18 — is here: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/imz-schedules/child-adolescent-age.html. There is a mealy-mouthed “we’re sorry, but we have to do this because a Federal Judge ordered us to” CDC “excuse” on this webpage, above the immunization schedule hyperlink. And, recalling that it was the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) which sued HHS and won, via the “ruling” of Federal Judge Brian E. Murphy in March 2026 — take a look at the current CDC VFC Vaccine Price List: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines-for-children/pdfs/2026/06/Pediatric-VFC-Vaccine-Price-List-06-16-2026.pdf. Pediatricians who inject children with the “vaccines” on the VFC List will get compensated according to the Price List (via the billing codes they send to the patients’ insurance company, and/or to CMS.) The ruling by Judge Murphy is discussed here: https://www.risehealth.org/insights-articles/federal-judge-stops-hhs-cdc-vaccine-policy-overhaul/, Ilene MacDonald, 17 March 2026. The “Recommended Immunization Schedule” for children and adolescents that was issued by the American Academy of Pediatrics (which closely “mirrors” the old CDC immunization schedule) is here: https://downloads.aap.org/AAP/PDF/AAP-Immunization-Schedule.pdf.

The American Medical Association (AMA) has championed the development and use of the COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” since early 2021. The AMA is the most powerful medical organization lobby in both houses of Congress. The AMA devotes entire sections of its “guidance” to physicians to “combating misinformation” about these “vaccines” (in other words, fighting the spread of the real truth of the dangers and deadliness of these “vaccines”; training physicians on how to “convince” the “vaccine-hesitant” patient to agreeing to have these “vaccines” injected into them; and so on.) Two examples of AMA publications on these topics: https://www.ama-assn.org/public-health/infectious-diseases/covid-19-vaccines-guide-physicians (scroll down to the “Read now” link and click); and, https://www.ama-assn.org/topics/vaccines-vaccinations-immunizations.

And, more corroboration that Big Pharma and the federal government are intent on poisoning Americans with “vaccines” (especially American children): https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/democide-update-if-all-vaccines-are, “DEMOCIDE UPDATE: If ALL Vaccines are Unsafe and Ineffective, Then Why Are They Being Foisted on Humanity?”, 28 June 2026.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

The following is not intended to blame persons who were gaslighted, coerced, or “mandated” into taking the COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” (gene-therapy injections.) A multi-level, planned, extremely sophisticated, orchestrated program was implemented by governments and official entities all over the world, to ensure that the maximum number of persons on Earth would be injected with these “vaccines.” Please see: https://www.theqtree.com/2025/01/31/health-friday-1-31-2025-open-thread-hhs-gaslighting-and-propaganda-to-increase-vaccines-uptake/. However, the evidence is now a Tsunami of information proving that these “vaccines” (gene-therapy injections) are dangerous and deadly. Only one example: the rising incidence of “turbo cancer” among COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons:

🚨 SHOCKING VIDEO BOMBSHELL from Prof. Angus Dalgleish (World-Renowned Oncologist):

“People cleared of Cancer FOR YEARS start relapsing — they ALL had been given the COVID Boosters.” “It’s simple — Boosters repress T-Cells and CANCERS go up with each VACCINE.”

T-cell exhaustion… pic.twitter.com/90vGgcfVO6
— Dr. Dawn Michael (@DawnsMission) June 28, 2026

Yours Truly thanks Brave and Free for this link.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

If a reader of today’s offering is a COVID-19 “vaccinated” medical professional / licensed healthcare provider: Stop “recommending”, let alone administering, these gene-therapy injections. Stop taking these “vaccines” yourself. Stop your family from taking them. Recognize that all COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons (including “vaccinated” medical professionals / healthcare providers) have had their natural immune system damaged or even destroyed by the ingredients and mechanisms of these “vaccines” (https://www.thefocalpoints.com/, by Dr. Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH; search “immune system”; https://jessicar.substack.com/, by Dr. Jessica Rose, PhD; search “class switch.”) Read the post-authorization report from Pfizer-BioNTech that the company gave to the FDA in early 2021 regarding the reports of over 1,200 medical conditions, diseases, and serious negative side effects (including death) in persons who were injected with BNT162b2 (FDA approved under the name COMIRNATY): https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf, date-stamped by the FDA on 30 April 2021. Have the courage to put yourself, COVID-19 “vaccinated” family, and COVID-19 “vaccinated” patients, on a protocol to try and mitigate / reduce the damage that the spike protein in these injections have already done to the body. One example of protocols to search: https://www.twc.health; The Wellness Company, Dr. Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH. Another example: https://imahealth.org/treatment-protocols/ (the Independent Medical Alliance website.) Other entities also provide COVID-19 spike protein detox items: search “COVID-19 spike protein detox protocol” on the Internet. There are certain foods that can assist in spike protein detoxification: for examples of these foods, and also for natural spike protein detox advice, please see: https://drwillcole.com/spike-protein-detox-functional-medicine/; and, https://www.417integrativemedicine.com/articles/the-role-of-nutrition-and-detoxification-in-spike-protein-removal. Note: Yours Truly is not endorsing any particular COVID-19 spike protein detox / removal protocol; I am merely listing some ideas for interested readers to search for themselves. The point is to find ways to safely detox/or remove the spike protein from the body; or, at the least, to minimize the spike protein’s negative effects.

If a reader of today’s offering who is not a medical professional, or a healthcare provider, but who is COVID-19 “vaccinated”: Stop taking the injections. Do not allow your family to be COVID-19 “vaccinated.” Recognize that the spike protein in these injections already in the body have damaged or destroyed the natural immune system; have damaged the heart muscle / cardiovascular system, and the lungs; have altered the DNA in the LINE1 liver cells; have crossed the Blood-Brain Barrier and damaged both the physical (Central Nervous System) and the psychological (learning, memory, and emotional control) mechanisms of the brain. Please see above for information regarding getting on a spike protein detox protocol. The same applies to COVID-19 “vaccinated” family members. For more information about the damage that these injections have done, please visit the links above; and, also, https://doctors4covidethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/causality-article.pdf, “Vascular and organ damage induced by mRNA vaccines: irrefutable proof of causality”, Michael Palmer, MD, and Sucharit Bhakdi, MD; https://www.theqtree.com/author/pavaca/ (search “LINE1”; “Blood-Brain Barrier”; and, “neurological.”)

For those who are not COVID-19 “vaccinated” (and also in those who are “vaccinated”), there is the potential for “shedding” from these “vaccines” from those who are “vaccinated”, onto other persons. Yours Truly has not advocated, nor is advocating, that the non-“vaccinated” live like “anchorites in the desert”: this is simply not possible. However, there is justifiable room for being cautious. It is up to the individual to determine what “being cautious” means. Having a healthy natural immune system is important. Taking care of health issues when they arise is important. Following a healthy diet and exercise program is important. Having Ivermectin and/or Hydroxycholorquine — Vitamin D — Quercetin — Zinc — among other items — on hand, and using them, is important. Please see: https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/covid-19-vaccine-shedding-experiences, 7 June 2024.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Good health is Health Freedom. The ability to decide what constitutes good health, and what to do to support and maintain good health, is Health Freedom. There are times when choosing this freedom comes with a price. The individual gets to decide if that price is worth paying. But how is this freedom affected when health is compromised? What if a person has a condition that negatively affects movement, or the heart, or the lungs, or the eyesight, or the emotional/psychological region — then what? In Yours Truly’s opinion, based on personal experience, the “then what?” becomes finding a balance between doing all one can to ameliorate / support the compromised area(s) — perhaps even finding ways to cure these, if that is a possibility; and strengthening the areas which are not compromised. One believes that a healthy natural immune system is an important key to the whole: along with inner determination, and a positive connection with a Higher Power / Supreme Being.

As the United States of America begins celebrations for the 250th anniversary of her founding, please, consider Health Freedom becoming a part of one’s life.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA1

(Intellectual Property Disclaimer and Notice: Except for linked URLs and other items in today’s offering that are available on the Internet, the ideas and/or opinions of today’s offering are by PAVACA (M.E. Forbes, aka M.E.C. Forbes.) Credit must be given to PAVACA1 if ideas and/or opinions of today’s offering are used by other blog writers; by podcasters; or in print or social media.)

Health Friday 6.12.2026 Open Thread: “Noel des Enfants: COVID-19”

The image of Truth and Lies for the header of today’s offering is courtesy of Shutterstock and Google Images.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

The COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” (in reality, dangerous and deadly gene-altering therapy injections) — which have now been proven to cause, to aggravate, or to re-establish a myriad of different types of medical conditions (physical and/or psychological conditions; including those which were under control or were in remission before the patient took any of these “vaccines”) — which have now been proven to cause or to aggravate these conditions as long as three and a half years post-injection — which render the “vaccinated” person to be a “ticking time bomb” of negative cardiac and lung issues — which interfere with and/or damage the p53 protein of the human body, the protein that detects cancer cells — which severely damage or even destroy the innate immune system of the human body, rendering it catastrophically vulnerable to all sorts of infections (including to COVID-19 infection) — which destroy up to 60% of the lifetime supply of eggs in the “vaccinated” female’s body — which induce myocarditis / pericarditis in children (and in adults) — are still being administered to millions of persons all over the world. These “vaccines” are still being pushed by the CDC and the FDA in the United States. These “vaccines” are still on the CDC’s Childhood and Adolescent Immunization Schedule. These “vaccines” are still on the CDC’s Adult Immunization Schedule. Those who are the main figures in the lab-creation of the COVID-19 bioweapon virus itself, and of the COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” (either in research, or in funding, or in suppression of the truth about these bioweapons) — Dr. Anthony Fauci; Dr. Francis Collins; Dr. Deborah Birx; Dr. Ralph Baric; Dr. Peter Daszak; Dr. Robert Redfield; Dr. Stephen Hahn; among others — have not been brought to justice. Please search the following sources for more information: https://jessicar.substack.com/; https://www.thefocalpoints.com/; https://www.theqtree.com/author/pavaca/; https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/imz-schedules/child-adolescent-age.html; https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/imz-schedules/adult-age.html.

Meanwhile, the COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” in the body of every person who ever took an injection of these products are quietly (and, sometimes, not quietly) doing their built-in work to render the body badly compromised to fight off infections; to be in a constant state of fighting off the “fake COVID-19 infection” that the “vaccines” induce in the body; to longer have a healthy cardiovascular system; to no longer have strong, clear lungs; to no longer be able to count on conceiving a child, let alone carrying the fetus to term and giving birth to a healthy infant; and much more. Please see: https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf; https://doctors4covidethics.org/wp-conent/uploads/2022/08/causality-article.pdf; https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/about-my-deathvax-injured-relative-5b9.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

“Noel des Enfants qui N’ont Plus de Maisons” (“Christmas of the Children who No Longer Have a Home”) is an art song written in December 1915 (during World War I) by the French composer, Claude Debussy. The French lyrics are below, followed by the English translation:

Yours Truly is deeply appreciative of, and thanks, https://www.melodietreasury.com/ for the above image of the original French lyrics and of the English translation of this song.

In order to put into context how this song applies to today’s offering, please listen to baritone John Brancy perform it with pianist Peter Dugan. Yours Truly is deeply appreciative of the musical talents of the performers, and thanks https://www.youtube.com/ for the opportunity to share their efforts. The song is under three minutes long:

Years ago, Yours Truly had the honor to accompany her voice teacher, baritone Edmund Najera, when he performed this song as part of a voice recital. Even decades later, when I hear this song, it brings chills down the spine. The raw emotions of anger, sorrow, loss, and fear in the original lyrics leap out of the vocal line and of the piano accompaniment music.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

What the world has suffered since late 2019 — and what still continues today — is not a war of bombs and of bullets: It is a war waged with fear and gaslighting; with a lab-created “virus” cobbled together from pieces of various animal coronaviruses, and named SARS-CoV-2; with needles and syringes. It is waged in healthcare clinics, hospitals, and pharmacies. It is the war of COVID-19: the bioweapon virus itself, and the bioweapon “vaccines.” It is a war waged using unquestioning acceptance of government statements that the COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” are “safe and effective” — when it has been conclusively proven that they are not. It is a war waged using unquestioning compliance with “mandates” or “requirements” or “recommendations” by employers, by school systems, by healthcare providers, that people who wish to access these entities be COVID-19 “vaccinated.” It is waged in the laboratories of Pfizer-BioNTech, of Moderna, of Novovax, and of other entities, which lab-create and manufacture these “vaccines.” It is a war waged through the marginalizing, the silencing, the loss of jobs, the loss of Licenses to Practice Medicine, and the “de-platforming” of those who dare to question the official narratives; of those who dare to present solid evidence that these “vaccines” are dangerous and deadly to those who take them; of those who dare to treat COVID-19 infected persons — or to offer alternative (and safe) prophylactic COVID-19 protocols — using “off-label” drugs, and/or alternative therapeutic vitamins and supplements. It is waged through the enormous financial grants by government funders (NIH, NIAID), and by private funders (Gates Foundation, CEPI, GAVI) to those who lab-create these “vaccines.” A stunning, recent example of the “silencing” of those who dare to present evidence that the “vaccines” are NOT “safe and effective” is written about here: https://worldcouncilforhealth.substack.com/p/one-of-the-greatest-manipulations (the death by suicide of COVID-19 “vaccine” dangers statistician, Christine Cotton.) Meanwhile, the induced, aggravated, or re-established illnesses, injuries, and disabilities in “vaccinated” people, continues. The deaths that result from these “vaccines” being injected into human beings continues.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Yours Truly presents a “modern-day” version that she wrote of the lyrics for “Noel des Enfants.” The English language version and the French language version are below:

As in the original lyrics by M. Debussy, the story is told through the experiences of children. However, in Yours Truly’s opinion, the lyrics can also be a story as told by adults — illness; death; loss of loved ones; a sense of helplessness. A sense — a realization — that, despite the assurances from government (World War I was supposed to be “the war to end all wars”; the COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” were supposed to “stop the spread” and be “safe and effective”) — these “assurances” were lies: and that people are paying the price for believing the lies.

(Notes: One: Apologies for the layout — one is not a professional editor; and, Two: while the original Claude Debussy lyrics and piano accompaniment are considered to be “In the public domain” in the United States (per Wikipedia search regarding Public Domain items in the United States), Yours Truly personally would not attempt to use the French translation of the new lyrics that I wrote to replace, or substitute for, the original lyrics of the song.)

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

THERE IS NO PLACE IN THE HUMAN BODY FOR AN mRNA, A modRNA, AN saRNA, OR A taRNA PRODUCT OF ANY KIND. THIS INCLUDES THE COVID-19 BIOWEAPON “VACCINES.”

THERE MUST BE MUCH MORE RESEARCH INTO THESE PLATFORMS. THERE MUST BE COMPLETE AND DETAILED ANALYSES OF RESEARCH RESULTS DATA ON THESE PLATFORMS. THERE MUST BE COMPLETE AND RIGOROUS TESTING OF THESE PLATFORMS. THE RESULTS MUST CLEARLY INDICATE THAT THESE PLATFORMS ARE “SAFE AND EFFECTIVE” FOR USE IN HUMAN BEINGS. THE RESULTS MUST BE MADE PUBLIC. ONLY THEN, CAN PRODUCTS THAT USE THESE PLATFORMS BE ALLOWED TO APPLY FOR FDA AUTHORIZATION OR APPROVAL.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

(Intellectual Property Disclaimer and Notice: Except for URL’s and other items available on the Internet, the ideas and/or opinions in today’s offering are by PAVACA (M.E. Forbes / M.E.C. Forbes.) Proper credit must be given to PAVACA if ideas and/or opinions in today’s offering are used by other blog writers; by podcasters; or in print or social media.)

Health Friday 5.8.2026 Open Thread: Two Establishment Medicine Nominees: An Opinion Piece

The header image of a physician consultation for today’s offering is courtesy of Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here: https://www.theqtree.com/2024/09/27/health-friday-open-thread-9-27-2024-another-scientific-paper-under-attack-for-telling-the-truth-about-the-covid-19-vaccines/. Note: AI-generated items in today’s offering will be cited as such. If readers wish to post AI-generated items in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Two Establishment Medicine Nominees:

This Establishment Medicine practitioner was recently nominated by President Donald Trump 47 to be the next Director of the CDC: Dr. Erica Schwartz. https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/116416018325047452:

This nomination occurred after Dr. David Weldon withdrew from his nomination for the post; and, after Dr. Susan Monarez, PhD, was let go from her position as CDC director (fewer than six months after being confirmed by the Senate for the job) when it was discovered that she could have been working behind-the-scenes to obstruct the agenda for the agency that HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., was attempting to implement.

Dr. Schwartz’s accomplishments are impressive: earning a doctor of medicine degree, a Master of Public Health degree, and a law degree; and, as serving as a Coast Guard physician (https://time.com/article/2016/04/17/turmp-nominates-erica-schwartz-new-cdc-director/.) What is troubling, however, is the fact that Dr. Schwartz was instrumental in enforcing the “mandate” that all United States military personnel be injected with COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines”: https://aaronsiri.substack.com/p/the-queen-of-mandating-vaccines, Aaron Siri, Esq., 18 April 2026. According to Attorney Siri:

Another take on the nomination of Dr. Schwartz is here: https://tdefender.substack.com/cp/194572403, ” ‘Cause for Real Concern: MAHA Activists Criticize Trump’s Pick to Lead CDC’ “, Michael Devradakis, PhD, 17 April 2026. It appears that there may be a combination of several factors involved in the nomination of Dr. Schwartz: among them, a further “reining in” of Sec. Kennedy, Jr.’s HHS agenda: also, a potential attempt to weaken and/or divide the groundswell of dissatisfaction with the COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines”, along with the growing recognition of the documented dangers and deaths that these “vaccines” induce.

Yet other aspects regarding the nomination are presented by Dr. Peter A. McCullough, here: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/the-deep-states-medical-playbook, 27 April 2026. This post is a combination of video interview with Dr. McCullough by Emerald Robinson, and an AI-generated text summary. Dr. McCullough argues that if confirmed, Dr. Erica Schwartz could either be “the insider” who can lead the CDC into meaningful and positive change; or, she could be a “Trojan horse” of betrayal of Make American Healthy Again.

HHS Sec. Kennedy, Jr., supports the nomination: https://x.com/SecKennedy/status/2044867883012850027. A partial screenshot of this tweet is below:

The questions arise: Why would HHS Sec. Kennedy, Jr., support “the queen of mandating vaccines” (Dr. Erica Schwartz, MD, MPH, JD) as the next Director of the CDC? Is this the same HHS Sec. Kennedy, Jr., who was sworn into the job last year?

The second Establishment Medicine nominee of President Trump 47 is that of Dr. Nicole Saphier as the next Surgeon General of the United States: https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/116494658794846023:

Dr. Saphier is another experienced physician, with credits at the Mayo Clinic and at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Which sounds fine, except for the fact that Dr. Saphier is also a fierce proponent of the COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” — and of childhood “vaccination” in general: https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/mixed-bag-maha-president-trump-nominates, 2 May 2026:

The above is from this tweet: https://x.com/Liz_Wheeler/status/2050182644453818623, 1 May 2026.

Jon Fleetwood weighs in on the nomination of Dr. Saphier: https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/trump-surgeon-general-pick-dr-saphier, “Trump Surgeon General Pick Repeatedly Instructed Americans to Take COVID-19 Shot”, 1 May 2026. In his article, Mr. Fleetwood traces Dr. Saphier’s advocacy of the COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines.” A portion of his concluding remarks is below:

Yours Truly would point out the following required reading for Dr. Schwartz and Dr. Saphier: https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf, “BNT162b2 5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization Adverse Event Reports“, given by Pfizer-BioNTech to the FDA on 30 April 2021. The section Appendix 1. List of Adverse Events of Special Interest, which being on Page 30 of the report, lists the 1,291 types of conditions (including Death) that were induced by persons receiving BNT162b2 (now called COMIRNATY) between 11 December 2020 (the date that the FDA granted the initial EUA for use of BNT162b2 in the United States), and 28 February 2021 — a time frame of fewer than three months of market use of the “vaccine.”

Another set of data points that needs to be required reading for Dr. Schwartz and Dr. Saphier: https://x.com/NicHulscher/status/2047483961354432956, 23 April 2026. Mr. Hulscher points out that cancers for persons under age 50 in the United States have risen, in the aggregate, 6.4% from 2021 (the year of the COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” rollout) and 2023. He discusses the situation in depth, here: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-us-government-cancer-data, 23 April 2026.

What is going on here regarding the nominations of two Establishment Medicine stalwarts, both of whom are strong proponents of “vaccination”, including COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccination”? Why is HHS Sec. Kennedy, Jr., supporting the nomination of Dr. Nicole Saphier? What “signals” are being given? Are these nominations another “outcome” of the “ruling” by Federal Judge Brian E. Murphy earlier this year, which reversed the new CDC childhood / adolescent immunization schedule (a new schedule that reduced the number and types of “vaccines” that would be “recommended”) — and re-instated the former CDC immunization schedule of 72 “vaccines” injections to be given to children from the day of birth, up to 18 years of age? Are these nominations to bring back “business as usual” / “the good old days” at the CDC and at the Surgeon General’s office?

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA