Dear KMAG: 20191231 Open Topic

The rejection of any kind of modesty (amplified by a denial of any individual responsibility in one’s choices) is joined by the need to complain about the “male gaze” (and no doubt an “imperialist r@p3 culture”) where they are free to complain about others (presumably! this is 100% presumption…) and their lack of responsibility. I’m convinced that 99% of feminism is intentional gaslighting and crazy-making inflicted upon culture write large – all to achieve the neo-marxist colonial aims, of course. The other 1%, which is really 99%+1%=100%, is to subvert human equality by creating a subhuman class of demonized men from which the alleged victimized women can rule by force and Orwellian cultural politically correct constructs.
Contrast with:
First wave feminists who were overwhelmingly Christian in their religious and spiritual orientation. Today’s feminists worship a false god of political and cultural hegemony (“my precious”).
Modesty as a feminine virtue in all healthy flourishing societies and civilizations in ALL history
The Biblical view that a man and woman are a divinely ordained whole from which fruitful procreation freely flows. Modern feminism widely regards reproduction to be a curse (unless of course they decide they want to reproduce, consistency is not a hallmark of their ideology, which is part of why the gaslighting/crazymaking is strong with this one…)
Rather than man and woman falling in love, the tale as old as time of humanity, of the man pursuing and winning the heart of the woman, feminism loudly proclaims “Make WAR not LOVE!”
But the radical feminist can feel free to pursue s3x on her own terms. Heck, if she feels remorseful after the fact, she can also declare abuse or r@p3. Having your cake and eating too, dang it must be good to be a gangsta.
Children? What? Are you joking? (But if she wants them, she can choose to raise them any way she likes, even if they grow up resenting her for destroying their childhood.)
Of course, children imply responsibility. With the radical feminist, nothing is ever her fault – she never accepts personal responsibility for her life or her choices. And of course, her health care should provide free birth control and abortion and feminine hygiene products, you know, because. Government should be there to solve all her problems.
The radical feminist “knows” that any woman who doesn’t share her enlightened views is abused, brainwashed by the patriarchy, and naturally is suffering from Stockholm syndrome. The fact that such women are consistently surveyed to be happier and more fulfilled in their lives is taken as evidence of how much more work remains to be done to unseat the patriarchy’s stronghold over culture, which is presumed to be cultural conditioning rather than an innate part of human nature. Science that says otherwise is imperialist white male stuff. Must be good to know better than everybody.
She wonders why no man wants anything to do with her. Rather than reflecting in the mirror, she just blames it on men and their provincial obsession with patriarchy.
The radical feminist never needs to come to terms with the insane logical contradictions that are created by her incoherent worldview. She never suffers cognitive dissonance. How does she achieve this? Simple, she is not trying to achieve a logically consistent worldview. She is just pursuing her passions and desires with whatever path is expedient. It isn’t about logic, because her worldview is the infantile perceptions of emotional narcissism. No matter what, in her mind, she’s ALWAYS right, facts and reality be damned. However she feels at any moment in time, now THAT’S reality! It’s the world that’s the problem, because it stubbornly refuses to give a rat’s behind about her feelings.
Meanwhile there are self-respecting women, who believe that modesty and integrity is important, who learn that taking personal responsibility for their lives is the only way to prevent themselves from being perpetual victims, who believe that men are not only not the enemy but the God-given creature with whom they are called to team up with and mate with in order to maximize their happiness flourishing fruitfulness and economic productivity with, who either believe or learn that a monogamous marriage is the best path to love happiness and a lifetime of fulfillment, and that giving yourself in love for another (a husband and for children) is far better than rotting in narcissistic self-love.

Logically speaking whether something is “credible” has no bearing on the truth or falsehood of the premises.
Same can be said for the “source”, people put more stock in the source of the message than the content of the message.
“The Economy is GREAT!” + Rush Limbaugh => NPC: “NO IS NOT!!!”
“The Economy is GREAT!” + NYT => NPC: “YES IS FACT!!!”
“But there was found in it a poor, wise man, and he by his wisdom delivered the city. Yet no one remembered that poor man.” ~ Ecclesiastes 9:15 ESV