Shut Off Your Electricity for 21 Minutes at 10 AM Washington Time on 10/12 (BFF – Blackout For Freedom)

“Yup. But the Constitution says they have to be led by Obama’s White Slave.”

_____________

Okay, let’s think this through.

Let’s give the current military the benefit of the doubt, they they are not insane or oblivious.

Retired military sees the tyranny happening. ‘They’ (enemies) are coming for the essential workers first, and for the rest of America next.

Who is ‘they’, the ‘enemies’ who are ‘coming’ for ‘essential workers’, and ‘for the rest of America’ next?

Who is causing all the chaos, and enforcing it?

At the risk of stating the obvious, who is ‘government’?!?

So ‘government’ is the ‘enemy’.

The ‘government’ is ‘coming’ for ‘essential workers’ and ‘the rest of America’ next.

Obviously if the government had not been taken over by foreign enemies, none of this would be happening, there would be no motivation for the government to attack its own population and country, unless the government itself was under the treasonous control of a hostile foreign enemy.

The ‘government’ has defined the American People as the ‘enemy’, and in so doing, declared themselves the ‘enemy’ of the American People.

Retired military see all of this.

Ergo, current military must see it too.

Retired military is apparently fixin’ to do something about it, because they swore an oath to defend the Constitution.

Current military swore an oath to defend the Constitution also.

So retired military and current military both see what’s happening, both recognize that the government has been taken over by a hostile foreign adversary, and both swore an oath to protect and defend the Constitution.

But only retired military have expressed any intention to keep and honor their oath.

Why would this be?

Your comment suggests that current military must follow whatever Hussein’s white puppet says.

But Hussein Sonofadumpsterfire is not the CIC, and neither is [JB].

In order to become the lawful president, one must win the presidential election, and [JB] did not, because election theft doesn’t count.

This is where the ‘process’ people jump in and want to take everyone to court, which of course is pointless, because the enemy could not have taken over the Executive Branch and the Legislative Branch without taking over the Judicial Branch too.

All of which is obvious and to the best of my knowledge, not credibly contested by anyone here.

If the enemy controls the courts, then petitioning the court for redress of grievances is quite literally pointless. Even worse, it’s a waste of time and resources which can only ever result in the demoralization of your own side.

Retired military sees all of this.

Current military must therefore see it too.

Retired and current military know that the enemy government is effectively a bunch of unarmed septa and octogenarians who wouldn’t know how to fire a gun even if they had one, which most of them don’t.

There are maybe a few hundred armed criminal FIBs and criminals in other agencies who are so out of their minds that they would go down fighting.

With sidearms and shotguns and AR15s, vs. the United States military.

So it’s a joke. If the military wants to put a stop to this, all they have to do is FLINCH and the criminal political-class Nazi regime folds like a tent.

So what would the military do, if Hitler had usurped Roosevelt and installed one of his flunkies as president?

Would the military have joined the German military and helped Hitler defeat the rest of the world, because the Constitution says they have to be led by Hitler’s puppet?

Suppose King George had stolen our first election and installed his wife as POTUS, and began turning American into a slave client state. No British troops were even present, just American troops.

Would the military just follow Queen George’s Wife (whoever she was, it’s not relevant), aiding and abetting a hostile foreign adversary to destroy and enslave America?

In every case, the ‘answer’ can only be ‘yes’ if the Constitution is a suicide pact.

And it isn’t.

And to my knowledge there is not a single credible legal scholar on the planet who would argue otherwise.

So all that leaves us with is excuses.

Retired military sees what is happening, because they don’t have a bag over their head, which is the only way anyone with a functioning brain couldn’t see what’s happening.

They’re going to honor and uphold their oath to defend the Constitution.

Current military also sees what is happening, because they don’t have bags over their heads either.

They swore an oath to defend the exact same Constitution, but they’re not doing it.

Same Constitution, same oath, one is apparently preparing to honor that oath, and the other is making excuses.

One document (the Constitution).

One oath.

Two groups of people (retired and current military) who took the same oath to the same Constitution.

One group is preparing to honor their oath and defend the Constitution, the other isn’t.

They cannot both be right, they cannot both be honoring their oath to the same Constitution, and be in diametric opposition.

So which group is right?