Twitter: Stepping Up The Message Against QAnon

pgroup
April 14, 2019 at 04:53
“What if he/she/it is right about Christianity? What if Christianity is a tool to control the masses, as Marx (or was it Trotsky) said?
Before you throw things at me, let me explain…..”
Mz Molly Anna says OT on December 14, 2018 at 10:01 am
“They, the world’s elite, bound by bloodlines, never wanted the average man to rise the their status and challenge them. Marx was asked to devise a plan, and social construct as to where the masses remained the masses and never challenge their “club”. This was the beginning of communism and communism lite (socialism/progressives)
Soaked in feelings and heart wrenching vocabulary, the progressives easily spread their ideology. More common sense folk could see the follies of it, yet many sucombed to its appeal. America was one country that did not accept it so easily and has forever been a thorn in the ruling classes quiver….”
>>>>>>>>>>>
Let’s explore history for a bit. (THIS IS NOT AN ATTACK ON CHRISTIANITY but on those who would use it for evil.)
As I said earlier religion has often been a tool used by rulers to control those they rule. The Pharaohs were GOD-KINGS. In Japanese mythology, according to Kojiki and Nihon Shoki, the Emperor and his family are said to be direct descendants of the sun-goddess Amaterasu. “His Royal Highness Crown Prince Al Hussein bin Abdullah II is the 42nd-generation direct descendant of Prophet Mohammad…”. The ruling families of Morocco and Jordan descend from the Prophet Muhammad’s family through his daughter Fatimah…
What about Christianity? It is over 2000 years old. Have you ever played Telephone as a child? Remember how garbled the message was after it passed through serveral people and that was almost INSTANTANEOUS, not over 2000 years. We use writing to make sure messages do not get garbled.
2000 years ago, could a shepard or farmer write? OR was it the nobility and their DIRECT HIRES?
Could it be the SCRIBES of the nobility who inserted this???

Divine Right of Kings
Romans 13 1 through 7 says:
Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God. Therefore whoever resists the authorities resists what God has appointed, and those who resist will incur judgment. For rulers are not a terror to good conduct, but to bad. Would you have no fear of the one who is in authority? Then do what is good, and you will receive his approval, for he is God’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword in vain. For he is the servant of God, an avenger who carries out God’s wrath on the wrongdoer. Therefore one must be in subjection, not only to avoid God’s wrath but also for the sake of conscience.

When they were trying to TRICK Jesus he took a coin and looked at it and said:
“Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s; and to God the things that are God’s.”

Tell us therefore, What thinkest thou? Is it lawful to give tribute unto Caesar, or not?
But Jesus perceived their wickedness, and said, Why tempt ye me, ye hypocrites?
Shew me the tribute money. And they brought unto him a penny.
And he saith unto them, Whose is this image and superscription?
They say unto him, Caesar’s. Then saith he unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s; and unto God the things that are God’s.

I do not read that as Jesus saying bow down to worldly authority but as a bit of snark. So Romans 13 1-7 seems off.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
A quick look at the history of the time shows:

The Protestant Reformation was a major 16th century European movement aimed initially at reforming the beliefs and practices of the Roman Catholic Church. Its religious aspects were supplemented by ambitious political rulers who wanted to extend their power and control at the expense of the Church. The Reformation ended the unity imposed by medieval Christianity and, in the eyes of many historians, signaled the beginning of the modern era.
https://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h1136.html

1776 – American Revolution
1789 until 1799. French Revolution
1803 – 1815 Napoleonic Wars (involving most of Europe)
The Holy Roman Emire with it’s First emperor, Charlemagne from 800, lasted until it was dissolved: August 6, 1806 during the middle of the Napoleonic Wars.
War of 1812
1838 — 1858. Chartism was a working-class movement for political reform in Britain which existed from 1838 to 1858. ( Classical Liberal or Socialist? I would think Classical Liberal.)
All of this was the third estate (peasants/bourgeoisie) shaking off the yoke of the Aristocracy and the Roman Catholic clergy and putting a major scare into the elite.
…..
It is my thesis that contrary to popular belief, Karl Marx was not writing in the interest of the worker/peasant but in the interests of the Aristocracy/Banking Elite. The idea was to establish a replacement for the Roman Catholic Church, with its iron grip on medieval peasants, and as a method to legitimize the confiscation of private property and return it to the control of the State/Elite.
The Connection to the Aristocracy:
From WIKI on Karl Marx:

…Spending summer and autumn 1836 in Trier, Marx became more serious about his studies and his life. He became engaged to Jenny von Westphalen, an educated baroness of the Prussian ruling class who had known Marx since childhood. Having broken off her engagement with a young aristocrat to be with Marx, their relationship was socially controversial due to the differences between their ethnic and class origins, but Marx befriended her father, a liberal aristocrat, Ludwig von Westphalen, and later dedicated his doctoral thesis to him….

From WIKI on Ludwig von Westphalen:

Westphalen, was the youngest son of Christian Philip Heinrich von Westphalen (1724–92), who had been de facto “chief of staff” to Duke Ferdinand of Brunswick during the Seven Years’ War, and from whom he inherited the aristocratic title of baron.[1][2] Through his mother he was the descendant of many Scottish and European noble families….
in 1816 Ludwig von Westphalen was transferred to Trier.[1]
It was in Trier that he met and befriended Heinrich Marx, the father of Karl Marx….
….In fact, Ludwig was seen as the mentor and role model of Karl Marx, who referred to him as a “dear fatherly friend”.[1] It was Ludwig who first introduced Marx to the socialist teachings of Saint-Simon.[2] Marx’s dissertation was dedicated to Ludwig…

So Marx was not exactly unfriendly with the aristocracy.
The Connection to the central banking cartel:
A wealth banker, his mother’s brother Benjamin Philips, financed Marx.

Marx was born into the Jewish business class. His father was a lawyer, for businesses, and he owned vinyards. His maternal grandfather was a textile merchant and banker. His grandmother’s first cousin married Nathan Rothschild, founder of the British branch of the Rothschild banking dynasty. Lion Philips’ brother Benjamin was a “banker and industrialist”. Lion’s son Frederick was a banker.
http://www.discussionist.com/?com=view_post&forum=1015&pid=61017

SxyxS comment — Marx secretary Pieper was at the same time employed the Rothschild. When the Rothschild left Frankfurt they went to Paris (the first place Marx lived in Exile) and London(the second exile home of Marx).
Also Nathan Rothschild was executor of Cecil Rhodes will around fifty years later.
…….
With that as background this passage from The Communist Manifesto makes a bit more sense:

The bourgeoisie, wherever it has got the upper hand, has put an end to all feudal, patriarchal, idyllic relations. It has pitilessly torn asunder the motley feudal ties that bound man to his ‘natural superiors,’ and has left remaining no other nexus between man and man than naked self-interest, callous ‘cash payment.’ It has drowned the most heavenly ecstasies of religious fervor, of chivalrous enthusiasm, of philistine sentimentalism, in the icy water of egotistical calculation. It has resolved personal worth into exchange value, and in place of the numberless indefeasible chartered freedoms, has set up that single, unconscionable freedom—Free Trade. In one word, for exploitation, veiled by religious and political illusions, it has substituted naked, shameless, direct, brutal exploitation.
The bourgeoisie has stripped of its halo every occupation hitherto honored and looked up to with reverent awe. It has converted the physician, the lawyer, the priest, the poet, the man of science, into its paid wage laborers.
The bourgeoisie has torn away from the family its sentimental veil, and has reduced the family relation to a mere money relation.”
― Karl Marx, The Communist Manifesto