Genomic DNA Incorporation of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Explained by Unique Hidden Key to Nucleus and Spike’s Surprising Ability to Transport mRNA

This is SO HUGE. I must explain this to you.

TL;DR – The spike protein not only contains a special sequence that allows it into the cell nucleus – it also has an ability to bring its own spike mRNA sequence with it. Both features appear to be unique among coronaviruses. The features explain genomic incorporation found for both the virus and the vaccines. The special key and the mRNA shepherding can be considered to be defects in any spike vaccine that has them.

¡Muy explosivo!

Due to comments by WSB and Valerie Curren, I realized that I had to do this post.

Also, NONE of the “bigs” are talking about this, but it is HUGE, if only people will read the paper.

By sheer luck, I was alerted to this new development ASAP on Twitter.

A follower of mine, who I had followed back, posted on Twitter the link to a paper with this title:

Nuclear translocation of spike mRNA and protein is a novel feature of SARS-CoV-2

I immediately realized what this was about.

It’s about how the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID) virus spike protein and its mRNA get into the cell nucleus – an extremely important point which WSB has been hitting on over and over. It’s very important, because THAT is how “genomic incorporation” happens. And genomic incorporation is what HIV does – what retroviruses do. They “get into” the DNA and leave cookies, so to speak.

Sometimes, they leave enough cookies, that the whole virus comes back out, fully functional, and ready to infect. Sometimes, they only leave enough junk in the DNA to cause some damage. Sometimes, they leave enough to change us – and that is why human DNA is filled with “viral leftovers”.

In principle, mRNA technology should NOT do this. We were TOLD that mRNA technology could not do this. But somebody LIED TO US. And not only that – NOBODY – from Bill Gates on down – ever apologized to us about lying, or even about just “being mistaken”.

We’ll get to that later.

You will recall that there are two papers I love to mention.

One is the “Jaenisch paper”, which describes how the SARS-CoV-2 virus manages to get some of its genetic instructions for the spike protein into the DNA of cells.



The other is the “De Marinis paper”, which describes how the Pfizer vaccine did the same thing to human liver cells in vitro – meaning that in an experiment using cells in culture, the Pfizer vaccine got its mRNA sequences into the DNA genetic material of human liver cells, and it did so in a matter of minutes.

McCullough got in a lot of trouble with Twitter for posting this, even though it was utterly true. Now we know that the government was trying to shut it down. They likely used the technicality of McCullough’s very VALID speculation (stated as speculation and concern), which turned out to be correct, IMSO.



These papers explain ALMOST everything. When I saw the Jaenisch paper, I predicted that we would see the De Marinis paper. MEANING – when I saw that the virus could get mRNA into the DNA, I predicted that the vaccine might get its mRNA into the DNA, too. And yes, I was right. Clearly others thought the same thing, and decided to investigate.

Now, after the De Marinis paper, it seemed very obvious to me that one did not need any kind of special conditions or reverse transcription promoters to get the vaccine mRNA to incorporate.

That bothered me, and I suspected, at the time, that MAYBE – just maybe – the spike protein ITSELF was somehow causing genomic incorporation – that it functioned as a kind of reverse transcription promoter.

Well, it sure looks like that is the case.

According to the discoveries revealed in the new paper, which I have taken to calling the “Mehedi paper”, there is a special sequence in the spike protein that acts like a “key to the nucleus” – and this sequence is found in NO other coronavirus spike protein.



Here is the abstract of the new paper.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) causes severe pathophysiology in vulnerable older populations and appears to be highly pathogenic and more transmissible than other coronaviruses. The spike (S) protein appears to be a major pathogenic factor that contributes to the unique pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2. Although the S protein is a surface transmembrane type 1 glycoprotein, it has been predicted to be translocated into the nucleus due to the novel nuclear localization signal (NLS) “PRRARSV,” which is absent from the S protein of other coronaviruses. Indeed, S proteins translocate into the nucleus in SARS-CoV-2-infected cells. S mRNAs also translocate into the nucleus. S mRNA colocalizes with S protein, aiding the nuclear translocation of S mRNA. While nuclear translocation of nucleoprotein (N) has been shown in many coronaviruses, the nuclear translocation of both S mRNA and S protein reveals a novel feature of SARS-CoV-2.

Let me put that in plainer English.

COVID-19 really hurts old people and seems to be both deadlier and easier to catch than other coronaviruses. The spike protein seems to be why. Although the spike protein is a surface protein that normally would not do this, it might be predicted to get into the cell nucleus because it has a special sequence “PRRARSV,” a known key to the nucleus which appears in no other coronavirus. Sure enough, the COVID spike protein gets into the nucleus of infected cells. What’s more, the mRNA for COVID spike protein also gets into the nucleus. What happens is that the spike mRNA collects near the spike protein, which helps it get in. While a different protein called the “nucleoprotein” of many coronaviruses is known to get into the nucleus of cells, the penetration of the cell nucleus by BOTH the spike protein AND the mRNA for it, seems to be a unique new feature of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Once you read it in plain English, it’s much more mind-blowing.

Now – I really recommend that you read the rest of the paper, but it’s really just technical details about what was mentioned in the abstract. Those details can help you gauge the expectedness or unexpectedness of things, but I have tried to do that as best as I could in the translation.

At this point, you should have all kinds of questions.

  • could this defect of the vaccines have been predicted?
  • should it have been predicted?
  • did the Chinese know this when they sent us the sequence?
  • did we know it when we got the sequence?
  • would NOT using the full spike protein have prevented this?
  • if so, why did we use the full spike protein anyway?
  • would the “forbidden” Winfried Stöcker RBD vaccine have avoided this?
  • if so, why was his vaccine suppressed by the German government?
  • does this affect the Peter Hotez vaccine, Corbevax?
  • if not, why didn’t his vaccine get promoted through the process quicker?
  • is nuclear penetration a common problem with mRNA technology?
  • how did this “key” get into the sequence? Naturally or not?
  • could “directed evolution” of the spike have yielded this?
  • why wasn’t this clear from the moment we got the sequence?
  • did people know this and hide the information?
  • were key people like Bill Gates (their side) and Robert Malone (our side) aware of this possibility?

The last question is a gift to WSB and her virologist friend. I am by default a defender of Dr. Malone, but WSB and her friend are long-time skeptics of the technology, and thus of Dr. Malone. In all fairness, I think we have to ask EVERYBODY the same questions.

  • Did people KNOW that mRNA technology had this vulnerability?
  • Does this look any more like an engineered bioweapon, designed to get into the nucleus?
  • Was this thing made by nature, by people, or by somebody with more advanced technology?
  • What is the purpose of getting into the nucleus, if it is designed to do that?

That should be enough. I will leave some links to prior comments I have made, in an appendix, hopefully added later.

Thank you.


John Fink and James Coburn discuss case in a scene from the film ‘The Carey Treatment’, 1972. (Photo by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer/Getty Images)

PS – A great interview of our site mascot!

5 1 vote
Article Rating
Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments


Wow! Thanks.

Valerie Curren

Looking forward to your appendix, whenever you get to it. Hopefully you’ll give that day’s daily a heads up when you’ve done that update. Such Great & Very Important work here–Thank You!!!


From slowest of the slower slowest: So in the broadest most simple laymen’s terms, these mRNA vaccines get into the humane genome, becoming part of it, thus changing the DNA, to produce these potentially lethal spike proteins and this explains how that is done?

Assuming the above is correct, what other doors does this open up besides creating spike proteins? Could their be a more benign purpose at least for a chosen subset of the population? In other words, if they can change the DNA to produce spike proteins, what else could they change? Cause this sounds like there might be no limitations and all the world is there laboratory play ground

Might give new meaning to “Learn to Code”.


Made the world’s population into lab rats, which also implies they are not part of it. They are the observers and creators of their Frankensteins.


“I almost cannot imagine that Harari would not take the shot – that he would “miss out” on his own transhumanist experiment. His FOMO levels would be excruciating not to take the Frankenvax.”


Except what fear could there have been of missing out?

Why not sit the first year or six out, to see if it was dangerous (which it is and which everybody had to assume as a default position)?

If it turned out to be something great (fat chance), he could always ‘catch-up’ by dosing himself with the vaxx after the effects were known (proven).

Not that there was any chance he’d want to, because even Dr. Moreau knows it never turns out well when you monkey around with human genetics.

And his paper was written in the late 1800s.


“One possible interpretation (which I believe I may have stated before) is that they were creating a “backdoor” into humanity’s DNA.”

Post 4966

That’s why I asked you the question about transhumanism awhile back. It’s all adding up that it is underway.


Good explanation! Thanks.

When I was reading about this stuff yesterday, I had one thought that I believe this information proves;

This virus was CREATED.

Whether it was released on purpose, or not, it is not natural. And somehow that has to be dealt with.


Which is exactly what I have posted on here since it started – a bioweapon designed to achieve an end result. Wolf is building the scientific case along with contributions from a handful of terrific Qtreepers of a long planned AND implemented event. The questions he posed lead to only one conclusion IMO.

World control through depopulation and breakdown of natural (God designed) immunities.

My view had little to do with science. I am so thankful for our friends on here for expressing their knowledge as it broadens mine. My view had to do with human nature, economics, history, Biblical, etc. related observations. Everybody with a curious bone in their body should have been questioning Fauxi, Gates and crew from the beginning. All one had to do was look at their personal attitudes, history and statements going back decades. Then – follow the money. Chi-coms are godless totalitarians. That has also been known for decades. Add the two camps together and what do we get?

We are at war. Our role is to shine a light on the evil and influence all we can so that some may be saved. Paul – I Corinthians 9:22. That chapter lays out what some do here in all areas of their expertise and knowledge. You would be one of those people.


Thank you, TB! I am happy to contribute whatever understanding I can, however small.

I am not science-minded by nature. This has been a struggle for me from the beginning, to wrap my head around it all.

I am, like you appear to be, curious, and a student of history, human nature, and the wily and evil ways of some parts of humanity. Of course, that ties to the eternal fight between Good and Evil.

And you are correct, we are in that war. All I can do is my best to stay on the side of the Good. Glad to be here with others doing the same.

Gail Combs

You have been very helpful by sharing your knowledge of nutraceuticals, and I thankQ very very much.


I’m glad. Thank you for your incredible research and ability to find, organize, and keep records! It is truly outstanding.

Gail Combs

Just a good memory and the tendencies of a pack-rat.  🤓 


Downplaying your genius IMO.

Gail Combs


Valerie Curren

Hearty Amen!!!


Slow guy had an audible sigh of relief, with this, “Let me put that in plainer English”.

  • Although the spike protein is a surface protein that normally would not do this,
  • it might be predicted to get into the cell nucleus because it has a special sequence “PRRARSV,”
  • a known key to the nucleus which appears in no other coronavirus.

Targeted. Gain Of Function research, resulted in Covid-19.

  • Covid-19 Man-Made. NOT natural. (Yea, redundant.)
  • Covidiot mRNA Injections amplify, damage created by Covid-19.

Certainly explains why folks, that have had Covid, should never get the Covidiot Injection.

Not that anyone should ever get the Covidiot Injection. No one should get jabbed.


The passcode can be blocked.


Wolf Moon
Thank you, thank you! Please do get some rest.

Yours Truly believes that the virus and its spike protein known as SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) is a construct made from experiments on Chinese horseshoe bats + Malayan pangolins + rabbits + Wistar rats. These experiments were conducted over a period of years in various locations, notably at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and at Ralph Baric’s lab at UNC, Chapel Hill. The COVID-19 virus is nothing that is found in nature. The COVID-19 virus was released into the world either via a lab leak accident, or by design.
Yours Truly believes that this virus and its spike protein were created to have “maximum effect” on certain populations of humans — the elderly; the immunocompromised of whatever age; and the unborn fetus / newborn / nursling.
Yours Truly believes that the lipid nanoparticles in the COVID-19 “vaccines” were added to increase and facilitate the entry of the spike protein (and its mRNA) from the COVID-19 “vaccine” into the cells of the “vaccine” recipient.
However, IMO, the poorly-designed, rushed to production COVID-19 “vaccines” in use have dangerous, even deadly, short-term and long-term effects on persons who have these “vaccines” in their bodies.
It appears clear, IMO, that a goal in the development and release of the COVID-19 virus, and the development and use of the COVID-19 “vaccines” is to reduce the human population of the Earth.
It appears that both Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna developed at least one new lipid nanoparticle construct for use their respective company’s “primary use” COVID-19 “vaccine”, BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273. It is unclear to Yours Truly whether these new lipid nanoparticle constructs were tested separately by each company before being added to their COVID-19 “vaccine” formulations.
“A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence”
(This is the famous 2015 paper by Ralph Baric)
“An Experimental Model for Myocarditis and Congestive Heart Failure after Rabbit Coronavirus Infection”
(This Ralph Baric paper is from January, 1992. Partially funded by the NIH.
The images presented in paper look eerily to Yours Truly like one in the article by Michael Palmer, MD and Sucharit Bhakdi, MD regarding the progress of myocarditis after mRNA-based COVID-19 “vaccination.”
Look at Slide 11.)
“Nanoparticles in the clinic: An update post-COVID-19 vaccines”
“Lipid nanoparticles for mRNA delivery”
“Without these lipid shells, there were would be no mRNA vaccines for COVID-19”

Last edited 1 year ago by PAVACA

A couple thoughts, not argumentative.

However, IMO, the poorly-designed, rushed to production COVID-19 “vaccines” in use have dangerous, even deadly, short-term and long-term effects on persons who have these “vaccines” in their bodies.

^^^ My take. Poor-design, IS an unintended feature, supporting their goal. Covid Injections were never intended to improve health. DePop.

It appears clear, IMO, that a goal in the development and release of the COVID-19 virus, and the development and use of the COVID-19 “vaccines” is to reduce the human population of the Earth.

^^^ Spot On. If we could only wake the normies.


Thank you. As to the first point — this is the most likely scenario.
As to the second point — agreed.
Yours Truly believes that “normies” will start to awaken soon to the evil that is this entire situation — but only if the truth is spread far and wide with the information and numbers to back it up.

Gail Combs

All it takes is 10% of DEDICATED truth tellers and with Ron Johnson hopefully heading a covid commission in the House the information WILL GET OUT.

Ron Johnson is Ranking Member:
Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations 

The Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations is the Committee’s chief investigative subcommittee and has the responsibility of studying and investigating the efficiency and economy of operations relating to all branches of the government. The Subcommittee is also tasked with studying and investigating the compliance or noncompliance with rules, regulations and laws, investigating all aspects of crime and lawlessness within the United States which have an impact upon or affect the national health, welfare and safety, including syndicated crime, investment fraud schemes, commodity and security fraud, computer fraud, and the use of offshore banking and corporate facilities to carry out criminal objectives.


Thanks. Gotta believe we are making headway.


^^^ This. Thanks for the receipts, RDS. You do great work.

We are in agreement. It’s all been out there hiding in plain sight.

Gail Combs

I think that ‘Operation Warp Speed’ “…the poorly-designed, rushed to production COVID-19 “vaccines” in use…” MAY ACTUALLY BE LESS DEADLY than ORIGINALLY PLANNED.

BTW this is a Wolf Moon article 6 months into the Vax Mandate:

Signs of COVID Plot Downfall
If you step back and look, you can see we are by no means defeated. There are a LOT more people who did not take the vax than is reported and as each day passes, it becomes less and less likely they will. More important THEY DO NOT TRUST and once blind trust is broken, you aren’t going to ever get it back again.

yes, we are seeing a major increase in death rate as the chart shows:
comment image

This is from

However you can also find
Female deaths 58,334
Female Population 168,445,179
Female Death Rate 9.2088

Male deaths 68,391
Male population 163,437,676
Male Death Rate 11.1169

I do not think, a 100,000 out of over 3 million is they type of die-off they hoped for. AND I think they are NOT going to be able to get many more people to take the Clot Shot.


Gail Combs
IMO, you might have something there regarding the “type of die-ff they hoped for” not happening — at least, not yet.
The next 3 – 5 years, IMO, may tell a different tale, likely mostly in terms of persons dying from aggravated / new “co-morbidities” that were either induced or made worse by the “vaccines” these persons now have in their bodies.
On the other hand, and not trying to sound too “apocalyptic”, both Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna are racing each other to develop “new” and “effective” mRNA-based “vaccines” for many conditions.


Wolf Moon
At the risk of going over items that were earlier discussed on the main site:
FTA: “But the fact is that Moderna and Pfizer both made vaccines based on the computer generated MN908947.3.”
MN908947.3 is also 2 Genbank 908947.3.
This construct appears to be a synthesis of computer-generated genome pieces gleaned from coronavirus experiments on various lab animals, plus DNA technology. This construct does not appear to have come from, or to be found in, anything in nature.
Proof that Pfizer-BioNTech used this construct in the development of Pfizer-BioNTech’s BNT162b2 COVID-19 “vaccine”:
“BNT162b2-Elicited Neutralization against New SARS-CoV-2 Spike Variants”

Proof that Ralph Baric, in conjunction with Moderna, used the same construct in the development of Moderna’s mRNA-1273 COVID-19 “vaccine”:
“SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine design enabled by prototype preparedness”

Since both the Pfizer-BioNTech and the Moderna “COVID-19 + Omicron BA.4 + Omicron BA.5 new bivalent booster vaccines”, authorized by the FDA last summer, contain spike protein from BNT162b2 and from mRNA-1273 in the (separate) formulations, that would mean that MN908947.3 is present also in both products.
And now that the FDA has approved (on 26 January, two days ago) the “single formula” option for all COVID-19 “vaccines” going forward, which is based on Pfizer-BioNTech’s “COVID-19 + Omicron BA.4 + Omicron BA.5 bivalent booster vaccine”, it would appear that MN908947.3 would be present in all future COVID-19 “vaccines.” [Perhaps including the “vaccines” that Pfizer-BioNTech is developing from the “mutated COVID-19 viruses” the company is experimenting with — information courtesy of their (Dr.) Jordan Walker and on video tape by Project Veritas.]

IMO, there’s another possible piece to this matter: the paper of December, 2020:
If one is reading this correctly, it appears that Pfizer-BioNTech added a new code sequence at the very end of the Wuhan Hu1 spike protein sequence chain in the company’s development of BNT162b2.

Gail Combs

Thanks for putting it here.


Thanks for all the work you do here, Wolf. It matters.

Gail Combs

Yes it does.

I remember I used to comment on Steve Heller’s site and thought we were not speaking to hardly anyone. I was flooded when Steve the YUGE number of views his site got.

I also found my comments transferred to sites I never heard of. SO yes, IT MATTERS!


Good Lord, yes, it matters.

Gail Combs

DARPA was working with Moderna on mRNA vaccines. Moderna never brought a vaccine to market before.


Project Veritas Pfizer Video | Dr. Peter McCullough & Steve Kirsch

I mentioned this in the other thread.

@ 12 minutes Steve Kirsch talks of combining vaccine data base with death data base. NO ONE will release those data bases. He did get a hold of 1500 death records. your dying is way shorter if you got the shot. (I think he means your life span is way shorter.) “…It is not even CLOSE. THEY WON”T RELEASE THE DATA!…” CMinTN minutes he talked to the FAA. Steve gave the director the number of the pilot who had a heart attack directly after landing. He called the pilot. THE FAA NEVER FOLLOWED UP (I had the same result when I tried to whistleblow to the FAA)

Here is more:

@ 42:30 Tommy (the moderator) mentions he is reading Dr Huff’s book. “…Moderna had a 2016 patent ON THE EXACT GENETIC SEQUENCE and when he started to blow the whistle, DARPA cae to him and said they wanted to hire him but bypassed all the normal TSI [top secret investigations?], polygraph things and were like hey, we just WANT YOU IN, WE WANT TO GIVE YOU THE CLEARANCE…..”..

Tommy then points out that IF Dr Huff had taken the offer he would have gone from ‘Whistleblower’ to TRAITOR and disappeared directly into GITMO — if lucky, if he said a word.

Steve then goes on to say he thinks the majority of the people at the FDA and CDC are SHEEP, they are hire BECAUSE they do what they are told and believe what they are told to believe. [ASIDE: NEVER EVER put on a resume that you had a small business, you WILL NOT GET HIRED — this I was told by the plant manager at a company I worked for.]

@ 44:30 Steve then says, Pfizer must have a morality test for hiring…. Having interview with Pfizer, I CAN CONFIRM that they DO! If you are honest they do not want you!

@ 46:00 Steve says VAERS had over 700 ‘safety signals’ and the CDC says nothing. And we do not find out about it until there is a freedom of info act. AND THE DEATH SAFETY SIGNAL TRIGGERED A MONTH, LESS THAN A MONTH, AFTER THEY ROLLED OUT THESE VACCINES! And they still will not admit it two years later!
And even after the Safety Signal Trigger came out in the FOIA and they even admitted it in the FOIA. BUT to the public they have the audacity to claim the stroke safety signal is triggered ONLY in VSD.

@ 49:.. Dr McCullough goes back to the Damar Hamlin collapse. He has a very interesting observation. Prior to that he and Steve discuss papers looking at kids that show around 50% of the heart damage (scarring) to kids is SILENT. going from that, the Good Dr surmise Hamlin got an initial, the second and a booster before the players said to the NFL NO MORE! Also mentioned was a contract with NFL to ADVERTISE THE CLOT SHOT…
Anyway, Dr McCullough said, “…what I have seen is in 2022 THEY GET COVID, so they get superimposed Covid and that is their third exposure to the Spike Protein and then a few weeks later BOOM Pulmonary emboli or myocarditis…” He then gives examples including two doctors in his practice.

51:00 Steve says the Veritas video is NOT the whole video, Tommy complains he is teasing and Steve smiles and say if I told you you could figure out the source…

Dr McCullough chimes in. “𝗜 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗸 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗜𝗳 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗴 𝗱𝗼𝗰𝘁𝗼𝗿 𝘀𝗮𝘆𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗲, 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝗣𝗙𝗜𝗭𝗘𝗥 𝗜𝗦 𝗔𝗖𝗧𝗨𝗔𝗟𝗟𝗬 𝗗𝗘𝗩𝗘𝗟𝗢𝗣𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗔𝗚𝗔𝗜𝗡𝗦𝗧 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗨𝗡𝗜𝗧𝗘𝗗 𝗦𝗧𝗔𝗧𝗘𝗦 𝗢𝗥 𝗔𝗚𝗔𝗜𝗡𝗦𝗧 𝗖𝗢𝗨𝗡𝗧𝗥𝗜𝗘𝗦 𝗢𝗙 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗪𝗢𝗥𝗟𝗗 𝗔𝗡𝗗 𝗧𝗛𝗜𝗦 𝗜𝗦 𝗔𝗖𝗧𝗨𝗔𝗟𝗟𝗬 𝗕𝗜𝗢-𝗧𝗘𝗥𝗥𝗢𝗥𝗜𝗦𝗠
Dr McCullough goes on to say JUST PLANNING is ILLEGAL. Tommy talks about interviewing a Soviet Union Bioweapon guy. (They were putting Ebola on the nose cones of ICBMs) the interview only got 100 views. When asked about Wuhan and Covid, he shrugged and said there was a bio-weapon lab their what else do you want to know. (Think about Putin’s Ukraine paranoia…)

54:00 they get back into the Death records.
Dr McCullough talks of a German Health Insurance company records. They have seen a giant increase in death since the roll out. Because they are a health insurance company they KNOW what the actual causes of death are. 𝗗𝗨𝗘 𝗧𝗢 𝗨𝗡𝗞𝗡𝗢𝗪𝗡 𝗖𝗔𝗨𝗦𝗘𝗦….
Talk about a baby getting the array of shots and dropping dead a few days later “shot to death’ an acquantance casually mentioning a 25 year old goes into cardiac arrest on the plane and Doctors shock him back alive. Dr McCullough thinks that will become common place. the ?Lecasick? study shows the risk amplifies with each successive shot.

Steve: Cleveland clinic 51,000 employees. Working age Some have 4 shots, some have 3, shots, 2 shots, 1 shot, none. IT IS A PERFECT DISTRIBUTION. With every shot you get, you are more likely to become infected with covid. The ?Shraffa? paper is a pre-print not peer reviewed AND THEY ARE TRYING TO GET IT TAKEN DOWN.

@ 59:40 Dr McCullough explains what a paper goes through and that once a paper is peer-reviewed and accepted it is part of medical history. IT CAN NOT BE RETRACTED UNLESS SHOWN FRAUDULENT LIKE THE HCQ PAPERS (No actual data) He has had a journal try to retract his paper and the journal editor refused and QUIT over the matter! They are still fighting over the retraction. He has had two retracted.
“…𝗧𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗽𝗼𝗶𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗘𝗡𝗢𝗥𝗠𝗢𝗨𝗦 𝗣𝗥𝗘𝗦𝗦𝗨𝗥𝗘 𝘁𝗼 𝗸𝗲𝗲𝗽 𝗮𝗻𝘆 𝗽𝗮𝗽𝗲𝗿 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘄𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘀𝗮𝗳𝗲𝘁𝘆 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗰𝗲𝗿𝗻𝘀 𝗢𝗨𝗧 𝗢𝗙 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗟𝗜𝗧𝗘𝗥𝗔𝗧𝗨𝗥𝗘….”

@ 1:01:00 Steve: Doctor working in retirement community. When the vaccines rolled out the first year, 𝗵𝗲 𝗵𝗮𝗱 𝟭𝟬𝟬 𝗰𝗮𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱 𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝟱𝟬% 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺 𝗗𝗜𝗘𝗗 𝗪𝗜𝗧𝗛𝗜𝗡 𝟭𝟱 𝗗𝗔𝗬𝗦 𝗢𝗙 𝗚𝗘𝗧𝗧𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗩𝗔𝗖𝗖𝗜𝗡𝗘.

[Remember the charts where you were considered NOT VAXXED for the first 14 days after injection? — THEY KNEW!]

Steve asks Dr McCullough, does that surprise you?

ANSWER: No it matches. There is actually a nursing home study in Norway and also the ?McClackland? analysis from VAERS from Queens Univ in London. Remember ?McClackland? analysis is very very important. It was April of 2021 and he only had three months of data with the vaccine. The doctors reviewed the  vignettes and coded the  vignettes. 𝗔𝗻𝗱 ?𝗠𝗰𝗖𝗹𝗮𝗰𝗸𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗱? 𝗳𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝘄𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗱𝘆𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝗳𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝘃𝗮𝘅 𝗪𝗘𝗥𝗘 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗦𝗘𝗡𝗜𝗢𝗥𝗦 The older they were, some of them died within a few hours of taking the Vax…. About 45% of papers get into the literature. the others do not because of censorship. That is well known. But Steve I think the important point is, we think the young people are notable but there maybe LARGE LARGE numbers of seniors now towards the end of their life, and the progression to death maybe accelerated by vaccination. I am very worried about this.

Steve:There is no question.
I can cut my death data and look at the 80 to 90 cohort and the 70 to 80 cohort, AND WE ARE SEEING THAT ACCELERATION IN THE ELDERLY. I know of a geriatric practice, very large, 1000 patients. 11 [deaths] is the mean and the std dev. is exactly what you get for a poisson distribution. All of a sudden in 2022, they recorded 39 deaths. So I asked them, what do yu attribute these excess deaths to? Every single one of them said THE VACCINE.”

Dr McCullough: Well it fits with the autopsy data. You know Schwab from Heidelberg Germany and now Chavez from Columbia, 2 separate studies, autopsy after vaccination, top line, 70% to 80% have clear cut accepted vaccine injury syndromes, blood clots, hear damage, neurological damage.
Steve, you know it is interesting, the FDA, some of the workers are trying to signal us. Some FDA workers put out a paper by WU and colleagues they are publishing on the Jansen vaccine… So when these embalmers are reporting these large blood clots, we have been trying to figure out are they premortem or postmortem artifact…. They are premortem.

Steve: Yeah, it is like two feet. I have heard of 2 feet long clots being taken out of a live person. AND IT IS INTACT! Normally you take out a blood clot, you can not take it out intact….

Dr McCullough: Several papers show this. The spike protein which is produced by the vaccine in large quantities is PHYSICALLY IN THE BLOOD CLOT, THE PROTEIN IS PHYSICALLY IN THE BLOOD CLOT. The spike protein damages the lining of the blood vessels, so it starts the blood clotting process and then it dramatically stimulates blood clotting and worse than that,

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗽𝗶𝗰𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗲𝗶𝗻 𝗶𝘀 𝗮𝗺𝗼𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗿𝗲𝗲 𝗱𝗼𝘇𝗲𝗻 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗲𝗶𝗻𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗼𝗱𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗮𝗺𝘆𝗹𝗼𝗶𝗱𝗼𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗶𝗰 𝗠𝗘𝗔𝗡𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗜𝗧 𝗙𝗢𝗟𝗗𝗦, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗽𝗶𝗸𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗲𝗶𝗻 𝗳𝗼𝗹𝗱𝘀 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻 𝗮 𝗯𝗹𝗼𝗼𝗱 𝗰𝗹𝗼𝘁 𝗶𝘁 𝗯𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘀 𝗿𝘂𝗯𝗯𝗲𝗿𝘆. 𝗔𝗠𝗬𝗟𝗢𝗜𝗗 𝗠𝗘𝗔𝗡𝗦 𝗥𝗨𝗕𝗕𝗘𝗥𝗬…. 𝗔𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗹𝗼𝗼𝗱 𝗰𝗹𝗼𝘁𝘀 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝘀𝗼𝗹𝘃𝗲.  𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗲𝗺𝗯𝗮𝗹𝗺𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗺𝘆𝗹𝗼𝗶𝗱𝗼𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗶𝗰 𝗯𝗹𝗼𝗼𝗱 𝗰𝗹𝗼𝘁𝘀…..

There are ten more minutes of good info. Dr McCullough talks about types of deaths and in what age groups you are most likely to see the. Steve brings up there is NO CODE (ICD-10) FOR COVID VACCINE DEATH!

International Classification of Diseases,Tenth Revision (ICD-10)The ICD-10 consists of: tabular lists containing cause-of-death titles and codes (Volume 1); inclusion and exclusion terms for cause-of-death titles (Volume 1); an alphabetical index to diseases and nature of injury, external causes of injury, table of drugs and chemicals (Volume 3), and description, guidelines, and coding rules (Volume 2)


Gail Combs
Thank you.
The Shrestha et al is the Cleveland Clinic employee study. One isn’t surprised that ** someone ** is trying to get it removed.

Gail Combs

ThankQ for clarifying. I can not spell worth crap so my rough transcripts can contain really horrible spellings of names.


They are called clot shots for good reasons.

[Remember the charts where you were considered NOT VAXXED for the first 14 days after injection? — THEY KNEW!]


Gail Combs

If you are going to look at only one video on the subject, this is the one I would suggest. Unlike Died Suddenly it is NOT sensational. It is just two knowledgeable people having a conversation and bringing in the ‘sauce’


From my Taller Half in the securities business, Moderna was a well-known shell company, never ever had a drug. Fauci kept piling in money.

Maybe Fauci kept it alive for a reason.


Years, Wolf! If a stock broker who dabbled in bio-tech could see this…hiding in plain sight.


Was Moderna a DARPA entity?


Thank you for this, the article by Walter Chesnut. IMO, his use of “nonsense” in the title may be to get it past any “COVID-19 information censors” that are scanning around. Yours Truly believes that the mRNA “translations” in the original Wuhan Hu1 spike protein AND its “enhanced” version in the COVID-19 “vaccines” were **deliberately** developed. The work on this goes all the way back to that January, 1992, paper by Ralph Baric (cited above in the discussion thread) about induced myocarditis in rabbits from “rabbit coronavirus infection” experiments performed at his lab. Myocarditis was rarely seen in adolescents and almost never in young children — until these age groups began to take COVID-19 “vaccines.”

Gail Combs

Oh thanks for posing that here too!

I am beginning to think we need a list of all the important papers! (However it would probably be a book)

Valerie Curren

A list AND a Gail-style summation of the good stuff!




Excellent! Retweeted!


If you ain’t bein’ suppressed on Twitter, you ain’t nobody, nohow….


The way the shadow ban normally works is unless you follow the tweeter you don’t see the tweet. Then there seems to be even exceptions to that basic rule to hide the tweets further.


Wow. Maybe Mr. Musk can be clued in?


Yeah it is!


h/t Marica’s blog:

The documents that both Pfizer-BioNTech AND the FDA were trying to have sealed for 75 years regarding the REAL DATA from the company’s development of the COVID-19 “vaccine”, BNT162b2 — and BOTH entities lost in court when sued under FOIA — are now available in an e-book. The title: “War Room / Daily Clout Pfizer Documents Analysis Volunteers’ Reports eBook: Find Out What Pfizer, FDA Tried to Conceal”.

Last edited 1 year ago by PAVACA
Gail Combs

IIRC Naomi Wolf and a posse from Steve Bannon’s war room have been combing thru those records.



I am so thankful for you being such a warrior of truth.

Many of us here are laymen with this type of expertise. God oddly led me to two people in 2020 of whom I never even really knew what they did!

On March 15, 2020, we had a cocktail conference call that Sunday after the NY lockdown. Instead of our Sunday Dinner Club, we spoke on the phone where all of this background started to come out.

All I could remember was, “Wait for about a year or more to figure out just what the heck is going on.” Then in later months after Warp-Speed and the ‘vaccine’ was announced…”All of this hysteria over the ‘virus’ sounds fake. Spike proteins penetrating human cells was never a good idea…in the experiments, all the animals died.” Then persistent growling about Fauci, Birx, Redfield, HIV and AZT in the weeks to come.

I am no scientist but as a commercial interior architect, my end product is quite complex, especially if I am on a 1M SF project. So when this overwhelmingly complex mystery was revealed yet simple advice was given, I heeded.

I will forward your most excellent article today to my cohorts, family and friends. In the interim, I found a very unique article which seems to very swiftly spell out one account of this whole history.

Too many paragraphs to copy here. A quick and easy read, the author has a point of view as to what happened when.

Will continue to hunt for nuggets.

Thank you again, Wolf, Valerie, and all who contribute here. Precious group to humbly follow!

“The tangled history of mRNA vaccines

Hundreds of scientists had worked on mRNA vaccines for decades before the coronavirus pandemic brought a breakthrough.”


🙏 for you and yours!

Valerie Curren

It’s truly amazing how God works in & through each of us. Your connections with these virologists might bear surprising & expansive fruit! God Bless YOU!!!


“In other words, if they can change the DNA to produce spike proteins, what else could they change? Cause this sounds like there might be no limitations and all the world is there laboratory play ground.”

“This is a great question, and I’m not sure. I think that Malone and some others may have some great opinions here. One possible interpretation (which I believe I may have stated before) is that they were creating a “backdoor” into humanity’s DNA.”

Wolf, this is where I and others ‘get off the highway’.

When is it ethical to backdoor Humanity’s DNA? Or blow the door down?


And this is where my two virologist friends have an issue with the original experiments.

Piercing every human cell with foreign fatty or other matter is just not ethical in their views. It violates the essence of natural life.


PS, my one friendly virologist is going back to natural healing, prior to Henry Ford manipulating the natural practice of medicine.

Go figure. Full circle.


PPS Wolf, Virologist No. 1 has an active law suit against the mother ship for being fired for refusing this bioweapon.

Can you believe it? A place that was built to ‘help’ people had the mandate.

WE all know better.

What a wonder of God’s leadership. Please say a prayer for my virologists! Both are so caring. Both are witnesses to what has devolved into meda-killers.


So true!




Wolf Moon
Thank you.
Proves that Pfizer-BioNTech is going full non-stop about developing more mRNA-based “vaccines.”
Is this their R&D facility in New York state where that truck of 100 monkeys was going when the truck crashed and the monkeys got loose back last January?


And there may be more to this situation.

Recall that on 28 June 2022, the FDA’s VRBPAC members approved use of the at-that-time, brand-new “COVID-19 + Omicron BA.4 + Omicron BA.5 booster shot vaccine” that Pfizer-BioNTech HAD ONLY TESTED ON 8 MICE (and ALL the mice got COVID-19 after exposure to it thereafter).
The FDA then authorized BOTH the Pfizer-BioNTech AND the Moderna versions of this “new booster shot vaccine” on 31 August, 2022.
In April, 2022, the FDA’s VRBPAC members began to discuss various “new approaches” to the development and implementation of “new” COVID-19 “vaccines.”
One of the “new approaches” options that was discussed was “Option 4.”
Here is the language for “Option 4”, per the FDA’s VRBPAC meeting of 28 June 2022 Briefing Document, Page 19:
“Recommend that the composition of all vaccines used for booster shots be updated to contain a more recent Omicron component (e.g., BA.2, BA.2.12.1, BA.4/BA.5) without clinical evidence, based upon clinical data from other candidate vaccines” (bolding mine)
This is EXACTLY what the FDA followed upon — the agency authorized the production and use of the Pfizer-BioNTech “new bivalent vaccine” AND the Moderna “new bivalent vaccine” based on OPTION 4.
IMO, the Pfizer-BioNTech R&D facility at Pearl River, New York, is even now engaging in experiments for “new” mRNA-based “vaccines”, not only for COVID-19, BUT FOR OTHER CONDITIONS ALSO, that can be rushed through for authorization and use WITHOUT HUMAN TRIALS, since the FDA set the precedent in August, 2022. And that Moderna is doing the same.

VRBPAC Meeting Briefing Document for the 28 June 2022 session:
Look at Page 19, the description of “Option 4.”

AND, there’s more:
At the 26 January 2023 VRBPAC meeting, it was UNANIMOUSLY approved that all future formulations of COVID-19 “vaccines” contain the Wuhan Hu1 spike protein + the Omicron BA. spike protein + the Omicron BA.5 spike protein. THIS IS “OPTION 5” ON PAGE 19 OF THE VRBPAC BRIEFING DOCUMENT JUST REFERENCED ABOVE.

The FDA is is member of a group called ICMRA — International Coalition of Medicines Regulatory Authorities. This group had a meeting in June, 2022, with Dr. Peter Marks as a keynote speaker. The meeting was convened to discuss various “new options” to the development of “new vaccines” for SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19.) If one is reading the “Conclusions and Next Steps” section of the meeting (see below), the recommendation was to use a “combo-vaccine” of the Wuhan Hu1 spike protein + Omicron BA.4 spike protein + Omicron BA.5 spike protein for future COVID-19 “vaccines” — EXACTLY the “single vaccine formulation option” that the VRBPAC members voted to approve this month at their meeting. IMO, the groundwork for this approval was laid at the ICMRA meeting last June. Translation: IMO, it appears that the FDA has surrendered its authority to conduct its own due diligence to an “international medicines regulatory” group.
“International Coalition of Medicines Regulatory Authorities SARS-CoV-2 Variant Workshop”


I don’t know whether to be excited to connect the dots or to want to vomit.

Great work…


It has the potential to make one literally ill in body and spirit to start going down “certain rabbit holes.” At some point soon, IMO, many people will have to start going down “certain rabbit holes” of reality regarding COVID-19 and the “vaccines.” Especially when the “sudden deaths” numbers start to explode, when the “new aggressive cancer” diagnoses start showing up in waves, when “vaccinated” friends and family members begin to present with “vaccine”-engendered illnesses or disabilities (previously being healthy and with no serious problems before “vaccination”.)


So, if one has it straight up:

The man-made virus called SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19), a construct created from coronavirus experiments on lab animals conducted for years at several locations, notably the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the Ralph Baric lab at UNC, Chapel Hill, has a unique “backdoor key”, called PRRARSV, known ONLY to this virus, that allows entry of its spike protein and its RNA into the cells of the body of a person infected with the virus. Once inside the cells, virus’ spike protein and its RNA proceed to literally alter the “genomic recipe” of said cells.
The “vaccines” that were rushed into development and use “against” this virus incorporate the spike protein and its RNA (now called mRNA) of COVID-19 into their formulations, “enhanced” with lipid nanoparticles designed to help facilitate and speed the entry of the spike protein and its mRNA into the cells of “vaccinated” persons. The “vaccines” migrate to, and lodge in, organs and areas throughout the bodies of “vaccinated” persons, from the brain to the blood to the bones to the reproductive organs to the heart and lungs, and more.
These “vaccines” have embedded “instructions” that force the body to produce large amounts of human immune response processes to “fight off” the “pseudo-infection” of COVID-19 that the “vaccines” produce in the body. Nobody knows how long, or at what intensity, these “instructions” last. What IS now known is that the bodies of “vaccinated” persons gradually lose the IgG3 “fight the infection off” cells, with the body replacing these with more IgG4 “tolerate but never clear” cells. The result is GRADUAL LOSS OF IMMUNE SYSTEM FUNCTION — AS IS SEEN IN HIV/AIDS INFECTION PROGRESSION.
At the same time, the actions of these “vaccines” in the human body apparently also produce a variation of what can be called “premature or accelerated” aging.
The UN-“vaccinated” who come down with COVID-19 and recover, IMO, at least have the potential to mitigate / reduce, the consequences of the virus’ spike protein and its mRNA within their bodies. The “vaccinated”, however, IMO, have much less of a chance.

Last edited 1 year ago by PAVACA