Are Climate and Animal Rights Extremists Infiltrating Food Processing and Production Facilities on Behalf of WEF?

Sometimes, the answer is right under their nose rings.

extinction rebellion banner reads:


The master stroke of the globalists is to create what they want in the name of stopping the same thing. The ultimate satanic deceit.

People have been getting scared by the seemingly coordinated yet mysterious disasters in food production facilities. It seems like some kind of scary “phenomenon”. We suspect a human hand, but there seems to be none. It’s as if some mysterious organization like “SPECTRE” or “KAOS” is behind it. Some people have even postulated “DEWs” (directed energy weapons). That’s when I start smelling “disinformation” – likely being planted by allies of actual arsonists and saboteurs. Or is the entire thing just a media effect? Is the Fake News media just playing up “normal” industrial accidents, as a means of “information terrorism” that the media is so skilled at performing for their corporate masters?

Or maybe some of BOTH?

The first time I heard about an egg-laying facility in super-progressive New Zealand catching fire, I realized things were getting very REAL, and potentially UNREAL at the same time. Because of the years of extreme fakery and lies coming from the Ardern regime, I figured something might be up – real or not.

The second time I heard about that egg-laying facility catching fire, a thought fully formed.

You remember those climate activists.

I know from certain sources that the FBI was, at one time, very heavy in following the “animal rights” groups and protesters. Ironically, because FBI is extremely woke now, and because agents at a certain level pick their own cases, this enforcement has languished.

Just ask Gail Combs about the tolerance of climate and animal activists by the regime (see comments below, and references to prior posts). They are used in a one-sided war against independent operations and small farmers, on behalf of government and large corporate interests.

Part of the reason governments are not responding well to these arsons of food processors, IMO, is because they are ideologically aligned with the arsonists.

Take Canada, for instance, ruled by “Baby Castro” Trudeau – who is WEF incarnate.

These government agencies are not looking out for us. They’re looking out for the hoaxy, insane, climate narrative, and those who benefit from it.

Anyway, I am creating this post, in part to create a nice tweetable LINK to advance the theory of INFILTRATION AND SABOTAGE/ARSON OF FOOD PROCESSING FACILITIES – likely by climate commies and animal rights activists, in coordination with WEF’s climate and “EAT ZEE BUGS” agendas.

Please feel free to add anything you’d like in the comments. I want to make sure that there is a strong PUSHBACK on these dangerous climate ninnies and their fellow animal rights crazies. Not to mention the evil, insane, and dangerous World Economic Forum, and the evil forces behind it.

If they win, we won’t just be eating bugs. We’ll be eating grass – like my mother did in World War II.


See Also:

The Population Control Shot – Understanding the Peoples Climate Temple

In cases of religious mass suicide/homicide, such as Jonestown, Heaven’s Gate, and Aum Shinrikyo, it is very difficult to regain a humanitarian understanding of the key participants after the infamy of defining events sears the conscience and redefines reality. Even more difficult, however, is the opposite – to BEGIN to think the unthinkable and speak …

5 2 votes
Article Rating
Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments


If they win, we won’t just be eating bugs. We’ll be eating grass – like my mother did in World War II.

They can’t win. I wish someone could catch them and find out who is behind it. Maybe have extra security at such facilities.

And what a terrible experience for your mother! Something one never forgets.


Generational impressions. It’s happening now too, though not in a kinetic war, at least in the U.S.


If its really those who know are so traumatized and locked in by their experiences, it would be 1000s of people over the years who contributed to making this happen. These latest people must be disposable besides unhinged.


Like the students in communist revolutions that think theyll be the leaders or the reparations crew that think theyll be “kangs yo”. Uh uh. Or auntyfa…. similar!

Gail Combs

The idiots should learn from history.
Attacks on Intelligentsia

Attacks on Intelligentsia: Early Attacks

In the years immediately following their accession to power in 1917, the Bolsheviks took measures to prevent challenges to their new regime, beginning with eliminating political opposition. When the freely-elected Constituent Assembly did not acknowledge the primacy of the Bolshevik government, Vladimir Lenin dissolved it in January 1918. The Left Socialist Revolutionary Party, which protested the action, withdrew from the Bolshevik coalition in March, and its members were automatically branded enemies of the people. Numerous opposition groups posed military threats from various parts of the country, placing the survival of the revolution in jeopardy. Between 1918 and 1921, a state of civil war existed.

Bolshevik policy toward its detractors, and particularly toward articulate, intellectual criticism, hardened considerably. Suppression of newspapers, initially described as a temporary measure, became a permanent policy. Lenin considered the Constitutional Democrats (Kadets) the center of a conspiracy against Bolshevik rule. In 1919, he began mass arrests of professors and scientists who had been Kadets, and deported Kadets, Socialist Revolutionaries, Mensheviks, and Nationalists.

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗕𝗼𝗹𝘀𝗵𝗲𝘃𝗶𝗸 𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽 𝘀𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗿𝗮𝗽𝗶𝗱𝗹𝘆 𝘁𝗼 𝗽𝘂𝗿𝗴𝗲 𝗥𝘂𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗮 𝗼𝗳 𝗽𝗮𝘀𝘁 𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝗼𝗿𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗼 𝗯𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝘂𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝗼𝗻 𝗮 𝗰𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗻 𝘀𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗲.

These harsh measures alienated a large number of the intellectuals who had supported the overthrow of the tsarist order. The suppression of democratic institutions evoked strong protests from academics and artists,who felt betrayed in their idealistic belief that revolution would bring a free society. Writers who had emigrated shortly after the revolution published stinging attacks on the new government from abroad. As a result, further exit permits for artists were generally denied.

The disenchantment of the majority of intellectuals did not surprise Lenin, who saw the old Russian intelligentsia as a kind of rival to his “party of a new type,” which alone could bring revolutionary consciousness to the working class. In his view, artists generally served bourgeois interests, a notion that fueled the persecution of intellectuals throughout the Soviet period.

Attacks on Intelligentsia: Renewed Attacks

The pattern of suppressing intellectual activity, with intermittent periods of relaxation, helped the party leadership reinforce its authority. After 1923, when threats to the revolution’s survival had disappeared, intellectuals enjoyed relative creative freedom while the regime concentrated on improving the country’s economic plight by allowing limited free enterprise under the Lenin’s New Economic Policy.

But in 1928, the Central Committee established the right of the party to exercise guidance over literature; and in 1932 literary and artistic organizations were restructured to promote a specified style called socialist realism. Works that did not contribute to the building of socialism were banned. Lenin had seen the need for increasing revolutionary consciousness in workers. Stalin now asserted that art should not merely serve society, but do so in a way determined by the party and its megalomaniacal plans for transforming society. As a result, artists and intellectuals as well as political figures became victims of the Great Terror of the 1930s.

During the war against Nazi Germany, artists were permitted to infuse their works with patriotism and to direct them against the enemy. The victory in 1945, however, brought a return to repression against deviation from party policy…. 


Fools those people were.


Attacks on food and farms continue – world-wide.

“Last week the largest egg processing plant in Connecticut burned to the ground kill hundreds of thousands of chickens. This week fire in New Zealand. It’s not an accident the government’s are doing this on purpose.”

Gail Combs

When the Criminals in DC wanted the ‘Food safety Modernization Act’ passed so they could REGULATE FARMS. they used ACTIVISTS.

Here is Anthony Watts falling for the False Flag:

Disease out breaks significantly increased since 1995 When the World Trade Organizations’s Agreement on Agriculture when into effect. Look at the graph of Produce caused disease. I did the chart on page 4 showing the CDC food borne illness for the 5 years before and after the World Trade Organization Agreement on Ag. The numbers DOUBLED.

From my old notes:

 National Animal ID HISTORY

1995 Cargill VP Amstrutz writes WTO Agreement on Ag
2001 China’s WTO entry. 1.2 billion people, rising incomes, enormous market potential, the reason Big AG wants NAIS.
2002 NAII, representing Big Ag and tag makers push for NAIS
2005 USDA issues Draft Strategic Plan
2006 NAIS implemented in Texas, Wisconsin, Texas backs down.
2007 USDA final rules of mandatory NAIS canceled.
2008 Big Ag, posts record breaking profit

NAIS compromises Food Safety
NAIS starts with WTO in 1995. USDA and FDA substitute WTO approved methods of risk assessment and open borders for “low risk” areas. Food borne disease rises rapidly from less than 20/year prior to 1995 to 60 to 80 per year. Disease testing is Decreased in response to OIE “disease free status” Example testing for bovine TB in Ca decreased from over 10,000/year in 1995 to less than 1200. Cattle ports of entry are manned by a Mexican Cattleman’s Assoc, the US has a sudden increase in bovine TB found mainly in Mexican Cattle.


Based on risk-assessment, HACCP plans allow both industry and government to allocate their resources efficiently in establishing and auditing safe food production practices. In 1994, the organization of International HACCP Alliance was established initially for the US meat and poultry industries to assist them with implementing HACCP HACCP differs from traditional “produce and test” quality assurance methods.

Principle 1: Conduct a hazard analysis.
Principle 2: Identify critical control points.
Principle 3: Establish critical limits for each critical control point.
Principle 4: Establish critical control point monitoring requirements.
Principle 5: Establish corrective actions. T
Principle 6: Establish record keeping procedures.
Principle 7: Establish procedures for ensuring the HACCP system is working as intended. (Validation)
Government reduces audits to checking paper work and eliminates costly pathogen testing.

“It is important to note that no animal identification program by itself will prevent an introduction of animal disease, ensure safe food or prevent a recall.” – SCOTT CHARBO, Chief Information Officer at USDA Quoted in Nelson Antosh, “Tracking of Cattle Becomes Key Goal,” Houston Chronicle, March 6, 2004

Animal Agriculture 2008 Farm Bill. 1/9/2009

With a few exceptions (such as milk), the products of animal agriculture are not eligible for the price and income supports that Congress historically has written into farm bills for major row crops such as grains, cotton, and oilseeds. However, the meat and poultry industries do look to the federal government for leadership and support in promoting their exports, resolving trade disputes, and reassuring markets that their products are safe, of high quality, and disease-free. Farm bills can contain policy guidance and resources to help achieve these objectives.    

“….At the same time, a growing number of producers seems to agree that some type of universal animal identification (ID) program would be a beneficial tool in addressing animal disease problems. ..”

“…For example, smaller (i.e., fewer than 100-head) cow-calf operations (where beef cows are bred and born) represent a majority of such operations and hold nearly half of all U.S. Cattle. …”

There were 1,142,357 Livestock farms in 2002 – see chart on pg 2
“….the farm value of animal production was more than $105 billion in 2002, more than half the total value of all U.S. agricultural production…..”

𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗖𝗵𝗲𝗰𝗸: 𝗙𝗮𝗿𝗺𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗲𝗻 𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗿 𝗵𝗲𝗮𝗱𝘀 𝗼𝗳𝗳 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝗛𝗔𝗧𝗘 𝗜𝗗. 𝗦𝘁𝗼𝗽 𝗡𝗔𝗜𝗦 𝗿𝗮𝗻𝗸𝗲𝗱 #𝟭𝟳 𝗼𝗻 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲.𝗴𝗼𝘃, 𝗥-𝗖𝗔𝗟𝗙 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗙𝗮𝗿𝗺 𝘁𝗼 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘂𝗺𝗲𝗿 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗼𝗿𝗴𝗮𝗻𝗶𝘇𝗲𝗱 𝗽𝗲𝘁𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀. 𝘄𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗻 𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗳𝗶𝗹𝗲𝗱 𝗹𝗮𝘄𝘀𝘂𝗶𝘁𝘀. 𝗜𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝗮 𝗴𝗿𝗼𝘄𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗻𝘂𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿 𝗼𝗳 “𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗰𝗲𝗿𝘀” 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗿 𝗮𝗴𝗿𝗲𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁????

“…Despite several years of effort on the part of USDA, as well as industry groups, and states—and public funding totaling an anticipated $128 million through FY2008—a universal U.S. system is not expected to be in place for some time, as policymakers attempt to resolve numerous questions about its design and purpose….USDA currently envisions a voluntary universal system for all of the major farm and ranch species of live animals…”

Yeah they spend a lot of time and effort trying to convince farmers we WANTED to turn our PROPERTY into a GOVERNMENT CONTROLLED PREMISE complete with IDs.

It didn’t work. So they went to plan #2 get the PUBLIC SCARED.

Gail Combs

The FDA has plainly stated its position. ”Failure to reach a consistent, harmonized set of laws, regulations and standards within the freetrade agreements and the World Trade Organization Agreements [WTO] can result in considerable economic repercussions.” Alternate reference

So our future can be seen in Australia as Congress tries to pass one of the recent “food Safety bills”

Huff and Puff tries to “set the record straight” but misses the boat because they ignore the clause “in any action to enforce the requirements of the food safety law, the connection with interstate commerce required for jurisdiction SHALL BE PRESUMED TO EXIST.” Huffy forgot to read up on the Commerce Clause.

Here is an accurate dissection of HR875. I am using HR875 because the first bill is what is actually wanted. A “compromise bill” is then passed and later phrases, such as the Commerce Clause are add to other bills as one line amendments to bring the compromise bill back to the original form.

Remember “….Vice President and presidential candidate Al Gore let slip what many have long believed was his real intention as regards to U.S. agriculture.” Upon hearing that the FFA member wanted to continue on in production agriculture, Gore reportedly replied that the young person should develop other plans because our production agriculture is being shifted out of the U.S. to the Third World.”

Under Ag Sec. Veneman, in September, 1995, the USDA’s Food Safety & Inspection Service presented a 600-page document, Farm-To-Table, intended to control every step in the food chain from production to home preparation. This was written right after the ratification of the WTO and the Agreement on Agriculture.

During the same time period, under President Clinton, we also got the 25×25 resolution:
” By 2025, America’s farms, forests and ranches will provide 25 percent of the total energy consumed in the United States, while continuing to produce safe, abundant, and affordable food, feed and fiber.”

The Resolution was passed both in the House and in the Senate

Obama of course is fully supportive

It doesn’t help that all that grain diverted to biofuel uses MORE fossil fuel, not less

Al Gore has been very consistent in his push for the destruction of the USA. Here is another Al Gore goody.

Al Gore was the head of the Regional Commissions, where activists replaced elected officials. Stakeholder councils consist of representatives of special-interest, non-government organizations, and employees of local, state, and federal government agencies. Ordinary taxpayers are systematically discouraged from participating in these groups. The groups dictate public policy. Local elected officials can either accept the projects, or be ridiculed for rejecting federal money.
Regional Governance

Gail Combs

My first two comments were to set the stage. BIG AG WANTED TO TRANSFER LIABILITY TO FARMERS! That was what NAIS was all about. If you can TRACK a cow back to a farm you can then make that farmer LIBEL for your crappy slaughter house practices. e-coli contamination is all about contaminating the meat with feces from a puncture intestine.

SHIELDING THE GIANT: USDA’s “Don’t Look, Don’t Know” Policy for Beef Inspection


….The Government Accountability Project (GAP) has just completed the first phase of an investigation since March to find the answer. The catalyst for the investigation was John Munsell, owner of the family business Montana Quality Foods, Inc. Mr. Munsell charged that USDA tried to harass him out of business for blowing the whistle on USDA’s failure to act on evidence that ConAgra was shipping E. coli contaminated ground beef. He knew from experience. In January 2002, some six months before the recall of ConAgra product produced in April-July, ConAgra shipped him E. coli contaminated coarse ground beef produced the previous August. When he pressed the government to learn the full extent of and stop ConAgra’s commerce in E. coli beef, the bureaucracy blamed him for receiving the ground beef already vouched for as wholesome through USDA’s Seal of Approval. FSIS proceeded to make him rewrite his HACCP plan fourteen times, and for four months suspended his privileges to grind his own beef products. As a result, he only could grind coarse ground beef supplied by large packers like ConAgra that had shipped the contaminated product to him in January. USDA aggressively enforced a “do not look, do not tell” noninterference policy with the giant firm….

This is KEY to what happened to me and a friend.

The USDA was DETERMINED to get the Food Safety Modernization Act passed but they had ZERO SUPPORT and also had active push back. There was also an Animal Protection law they wanted updated so it applied to animals that never crossed state lines.

Enter the Activists.

The year before Big Ag got those wishes fufilled, I had the cinches on my ponies loosened several times so kids would fall off. I caught one pair untying my largest pony. I had them try to open my petting farm panels to let my sheep and goats out and when they couldn’t get them apart one of the SOB kicked my sheep in the eye. We had to rush her to the vet And yes she lost the eye.

The last attack on me was the week before the NC state fair.

My friend had his petting farm at my county fair the week before the state fair. THERE WERE NOT PROBLEMS AT ALL I CHECKED.

Thanks to the updated Animal welfare act, my friend had to have the ANIMAL RIGHTS ACTIVIST Bitch of a USDA inspector check his animals before he was allowed to be at the state fair.


Up until this time E.coli O157:H7 the strain that causes illness in humans, was only found in cattle.

My friend’s sheep and goats were the FIRST to have that strain but only AFTER having been handled by that bitch. She tried to shut down the NC zoo and was very proud of it. Her own writing about that condemned her as an Animal Rights Activist.

Well my friend took his animals to the state fair. He covers the ground with shavings. Any feces will end up UNDER THE SHAVING.  👈  Personal experience.

A bunch of kids got sick with E.coli O157:H7. By the time the state looked into it, the FOOD VENDORS WERE LONG GONE and their equipment sanitized. However the petting farm area would still harbor the bacteria.

So the State pointed the finger at my friend. All his animals were confiscated and tested. OVER FOUR HUNDRED TESTS WERE PERFORMED!!! No E Coli was found on the fur or in the mouth of the animals IT WAS ONLY FOUND IN THE FECES. And as I said, those feces would be UNDER the shavings. the kids would have to dig under the shavings, pick-up and eat the poo.

Anthony Watts had the alternate possibility.
2006 — Escherichia coli

The latest food poisoning of E.Coli makes one wonder: Just how safe is our food supply? Are the increased frequency of incidents an indicator of sloppy food handling, processing, and transport, 𝗼𝗿 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘄𝗲 𝘀𝗲𝗲𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸 𝗼𝗳 𝘀𝗼𝗺𝗲 𝗴𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗽 𝗼𝗿 𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗮𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝘁𝗼 𝗱𝗲𝘁𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗽𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗳𝗼𝗼𝗱 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗹𝘆?

Contaminating foods with E. Coli is extraordinarily easy. Just culture it in an easily made bilogical medium known as Agar. Agar is typically sold as packaged strips of washed and dried seaweed, or in powdered form. Combine the E Coli culture with liquid, and spray a field with a hand pump, or toss a jar of it onto a bin of it during harvesting or processing.

The culprit here is a speciifc strain of Escherichia coli (usually abbreviated to E. coli, coli is Latin for “of the colon”) discovered by Theodor Escherich, a German pediatrician and bacteriologist, is one of the main species of bacteria that live in the lower intestines of mammals, known as gut flora…..

Escherichia coli O157:H7 is a leading cause of foodborne illness. Based on a 1999 estimate, 73,000 cases of infection and 61 deaths occur in the United States each year. In the ten CDC Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet) sites (which represent 15% of the US population), there was a 29% decline in E. coli O157:H7 infection since 1996-98.

Infection with E. coli often leads to bloody diarrhea, and occasionally to kidney failure. People can become infected with E.coli O157:H7 in a variety of ways. Though 𝗺𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗵𝗮𝘀 𝗯𝗲𝗲𝗻 𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗼𝗰𝗶𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝗰𝗼𝗼𝗸𝗲𝗱, 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗴𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱 𝗯𝗲𝗲𝗳,people have also become ill from eating contaminated bean sprouts or fresh leafy vegetables such as lettuce and spinach….

Any bets the beef served by all the food vendors at that state fair was from a Refrigerated trailer packed with ConAgra’s E. coli contaminated ground beef. OR that Animal Right Activists, hired as casual labor were deliberately contaminating the food?

OH, and AFTER the NC State fair my friend did two other big fairs with NO TROUBLE.

Also that attack just before the state fair was THE LAST I HAD since they now had the ‘SCARE EVENT’ to justify the passage of the The FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) 


Interesting the resurgence of human mad cow disease post-vaccine.

Gail Combs

Mad cow disease is another fiasco where the US Gov’t moved to PROTECT THE GUILTY.

I can not find my notes on this part, but from memory, the UK was EXPORTING FEED that contained cow brain containing mad cow disease

Thousands of tons of the incriminated UK MBM feed was exported for cattle feed during the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s to areas that have remained BSE -free to date, such as South Africa, Sweden, Eastern Europe, Middle East, India and other Third World countries. [AND THE USA]

The UK BANNED the use of the feed in the UK BUT continued to export it. The USDA/FDA KNEW and did NOTHING to stop the importation of this contaminated feed.

U.S. rejects private tests for mad cow

The U.S. Department of Agriculture rejected late Thursday one meatpacker’s plan to test all its cattle for mad cow disease, a signal the government won’t allow private tests for the deadly affliction.

I remember this fight and it made ZERO SENSE. The meat packer wanted to do the testing so he could ship to Japan. He would be using the same exact test as the USDA. Also the test is done on the cow’s brain so samples could easily be kept in freezer for additional testing BY THE USDA if they came up positive.

The only reason for BANNING the testing is because the USDA KNEW we had a disease problem and did not want it uncovered.

Creekstone Farms Premium Beef created a raging debate in the cattle industry by seeking government certification for its plan to test 100 percent of the animals slaughtered at its Arkansas City, Kan., plant….

Major meat packers vocally opposed Creekstone’s plan, saying universal tests are not justified by science. The government also has opposed testing every cow on similar grounds, but had said it would evaluate Creekstone’s proposal.

However, Bill Hawks, the USDA’s undersecretary for marketing and regulatory programs, said in a statement Friday that the government’s public testing program is intended only to check for other cases and that “use of the test as proposed by Creekstone would have implied a consumer safety aspect that is not scientifically warranted.”

Now does the above make ANY SENSE??? Why would additional testing be a problem IF THERE WAS NO ILLNESS???

USDA to cut back BSE testing program

Jul 20, 2006 (CIDRAP News) – The US government’s expanded testing program for bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) will be cut back soon, having shown that the nation has “no significant BSE problem,” Agriculture Secretary Mike Johanns said today. 

About 759,000 cattle, or more than 1,000 cattle per day, have been tested since the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) expanded BSE surveillance in June 2004, Johanns said at a news conference. Two cases were found during that time, in addition to the first US case discovered in 2003. 

Starting as early as late August, testing will be reduced to about 40,000 cattle a year, or about 110 a week, Johanns announced. The reduced testing program—similar to what was done before the expansion—will cost about $8 million a year, versus about $52 million a year currently, he said. 

To the suggestion that the current level of testing should continue indefinitely, Johanns said, “There simply is no scientific justification for doing so. . . . The reality is this: there is no significant BSE problem in the United States. And after all this surveillance I am able to say there never was. We’ve proved that with our enhanced surveillance.” 

Johanns said that testing 40,000 cattle a year is 10 times as many as recommended in the science-based guidelines of the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE). The USDA will continue to test cattle from high-risk populations and from a variety of places around the country, he said. 

“To put it simply, we’ve accomplished our enhanced surveillance goals, and it’s time to move forward with a level of surveillance that corresponds to the very low level of BSE in this country,” he added. In a news release, he stated that the reduced testing program “will maintain our ability to detect BSE, [and] provide assurance that our interlocking safeguards are successfully preventing BSE.” 

The testing program was expanded in response to the first BSE case in 2003, with the aim of determining the disease’s prevalence. The government originally proposed to test about 275,000 cattle over 12 to 18 months, but the program now has lasted more than 25 months. 

The plan to reduce testing comes as Japan prepares to resume importing US beef, long banned because of BSE worries, and as the USDA tries to reopen South Korea and China to American beef. Japan has been inspecting US beef processing plants this month and, if the results are satisfactory, is expected to resume imports of beef from cattle younger than 20 months. 

In response to questions, Johanns said the USDA told the nation’s trading partners about the testing cutback in advance. He also said it would have been “enormously disingenuous, if not downright dishonest” if the USDA had waited until the foreign markets reopened and then reduced the testing program….

Mad Cow: Is America Next?
Tuesday April 10, 10:45 am ET
Source of Article:
WHEAT RIDGE, CO–(MARKET WIRE)–Apr 10, 2007 — GeneThera, Inc. (OTC BB:GTHA.OB – News).

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) announced in March it was reducing its national Mad Cow testing and tracking programs by 90 percent. The USDA will reduce its cattle-testing level to 40,000 cattle per year down from an average of about 360,000 cattle. The reduced testing level will cost $8 million a year. USDA said it will focus on the “most at-risk animals” that show demonstrated signs of the disease.  

Brave and Free
Last edited 1 year ago by Brave and Free
Brave and Free

Sorry can’t seem to get them here. 🤔


What’s interesting to me about all this is, they are just going to starve their own.

At my house, we will be eating eggs and chicken. And the occasional elk burger, with a side of homegrown veggies.

In the cities, they will eat ze bugs, because they can’t have chickens, or grow a vegetable. The only thing you could hunt would be the neighbors. And the cities are where the crazy liberals live.

I don’t get it.

Gail Combs

Those Feral humans in the cities, once they are out of food, will come HUNTING for food in rural areas. All you have to do is make sure they have access to gasoline.

When they start invading farmers there WILL BE A SHOOTING WAR and that is what the Commies need to BAN ALL GUNS. So it is a win-win from their point of view.

Deplorable Patriot

Don’t sell the cities short. Most, other than the ones in California, are less than an hour from farm country. There’s farmers’ markets every weekend in most places. Those of us who don’t farm or have chickens can get eggs. They are expensive, and two local chains of grocery store carry eggs from local operations, so they will be available. It’s the people who depend on Walmart for staples who are going to go without, which in and of itself is a problem.


Yes. The resourceful will be ok, IF they can avoid being overrun by the others.

I’ll never forget watching New Orleans after Katrina, and all the people sitting on a bridge with no food, no water, no supplies day after day, while the reporters came and went. It never seemed to occur to the people on the bridge to ask where the reporters were coming from, and to try to get there.

I would have hitched a ride or walked out, because I am resourceful. But the people who sat and waited for rescue are the ones who will starve in the cities.


Yes, they are. It’s sad.


WEF, Antifa, BLM, LBGTXYZ, Epstein, ISIS, Covid Pandemic/Vaccines, Abortion, Euthanasia, Eugenics – all are ops of the corrupt depraved globalist cabal.

Gail Combs

At least they did not harm the goats.