Health Friday 11.28.2025 Open Thread: Thanksgiving Season

The header image for today’s offering is courtesy of Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. There are Important Notifications by our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none, except perhaps for AI-generated content within linked URLs. If readers wish to post AI-generated content to today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Yours Truly is thankful that our gracious host, Wolf Moon, has established this blog to be a haven for truth; to be a place for honest discussion (and honest disagreement, too); to be a place for the sharing of life’s joys, and of life’s difficulties and sorrows; as a place for those who come to this Tree to encourage and support one another. One is grateful to be an author on this blog; grateful for all the other authors on this blog, including our gracious host; grateful for all who comment.

Yours Truly is grateful to those Pilgrims who came to Plymouth Rock, and to those earlier colonists who came to what is now the Commonwealth of Virginia (courtesy of our good Aubergine providing this latter knowledge), to establish a country based on freedom and on the Divine Providence of the Supreme Being: the country which became the United States of America. Yours Truly is grateful for her grandparents and great-grandparents who left their homes in England, Ireland, and Scotland, to come to the United States to make new lives for themselves, to marry, and to raise their children in this country.

———————————————————————-

And, on the concept of gratefulness: Yours Truly is also grateful for one particular thing: the successful completion of the difficult, time-consuming (seven months long), physician-supervised process of “tapering-down the dose, then weaning off, leading to discontinuation” of the SSRI prescription drug that she had been taking, on and off, for six years. (SSRI = Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor.)

Yours Truly was put on this SSRI in February 2019, after being diagnosed with PTSD (Post-Traumatic [or, Posttraumatic] Stress Disorder) following the death of my late husband. Please see the screenshot below, from Psychiatry.org/, “What is Posttraumatic Stress Disoder (PTSD)?”, reviewed by Donald Egan, M.D., March 2025 [1]:

In Yours Truly’s case, the PTSD was one of “delayed onset”, meaning that the symptoms began to appear months after my husband’s death.

Anti-depressant drugs are routinely prescribed by healthcare professionals for persons who are diagnosed with PTSD. Below is a screenshot from the Cleveland Clinic regarding SSRIs [2]:

Note the phrase above regarding SSRIs – that “they tend to cause fewer and milder side effects compared to other options.” Let’s look at the side effects lists for the SSRI that Yours Truly had been taking, paroxetine (Paxil), from Drugs.com/ [3]. Paroxetine is available in several different formulations — tablet; oral suspension; extended-release tablet; and, capsule. The Mayo Clinic list of paroxetine‘s brand names is: Brisdelle; Paxil; Paxil CR;, and, Pexeva [4].

How can any of the side effects listed above be called “fewer and milder”? Let’s take a look at only one of the side effects lists of paroxetine from Drugs.com/, from the For healthcare professionals section [5]:

The For healthcare professionals section lists of paroxetine side effects includes eighteen different areas, from General to Endocrine, that have adverse reactions and/or side effects from the use of this drug. Literally every organ or function of the human body is interfered with, and/or could be damaged by, paroxetine use. How can any of this be described as “fewer and milder” side effects?

Dr. Robert Malone, MD, penned a recent blog article, “Well Being: Selective Serotonin ReUptake Inhibitors (SSRI)”, regarding the routine prescribing of SSRIs by physicians [6]. Please see the screenshots, below, from his article:

A Midwestern Doctor, in their blog, has written extensively regarding the dangers of SSRIs; the multiple marketing and other ploys used to acclimate physicians to prescribing them, and patients to take them; and how difficult it is to follow the process of taper down the dose, wean off the drug, and have it finally discontinued. The following screenshots are from these articles: first, “The Dark Side of Antidepressants”, of 24 January 2025 [7]. Note: Some of the articles from A Midwestern Doctor are accessible in the entirety only if the reader subscribes (for free); and/or becomes a paying subscriber.

Then, from their article, “The Hidden Dangers of Antidepressants and Why They’re So Hard To Stop Taking”, [8] 9 February 2025:

And, from their article, “”Why Are Antidepressants So Harmful?”, [9] 26 November 2023:

Yours Truly was fortunate so have been able to get the taper down – wean off – discontinue process successfully completed (as regards stopping the taking of paroxetine) in about six months. However, the “wiring” of one’s brain to accept this SSRI and allow it to operate within the brain began in early 2019, when I was put on the drug by the PCP after diagnosis of PTSD. Thus, even with the discontinuation of the physical process of taking the drug, the “rewiring” of the brain back to pre-use of the drug is ongoing. One already feels much better since the “endemic physical effects” of the drug have ceased. One has also made a decision to never take another psychotropic drug.

What has helped Yours Truly to make real progress in “rewiring” the brain after the paroxetine discontinuation process was completed? A daily program that includes:

Probiotics (this includes yogurt)

Vitamin D, 2500IU

Vitamin C, 3000mg

Walking and free-weights exercise

Exposure to sunshine

Being well-hydrated

Cutting sugar, cutting simple carbohydrates, replacing them with complex carbohydrates, and using very little honey as a sweetener

Eating meat, eggs, and fish, rotating these during the week

Eating more green vegetables

Journaling — meditating — connecting with the Divine

Getting out and doing things — being with family; walking the dog; working in the yard

Reducing / eliminating stressors to the extent possible

Attitude — one is absolutely determined to “rewire” the brain back to pre-SSRI

———————————————————————-

Let’s take a look at serotonin, the crucially important element that the human gut makes — and which is the “target” of SSRIs. Below are screenshots from the 2022 Cleveland Clinic article, “What is serotonin?” [10]:

And, regarding the “gut-brain axis”, an article, “That gut feeling”, Dr. Siri Carpenter, [11] 1 September 2012, a screenshot from which is below:

Yours Truly does not fault the physician who started one on paroxetine in early 2019, nor the physician-therapist who continued the drug until I had had enough of the side effects by September 2024 and requested to go through the process to taper down — wean off — discontinue the drug. They were following conventional medical “recommendations.” However, Yours Truly, by the late summer of 2024, had also done enough research to understand that SSRIs are dangerous and addictive, that the decision to request going through the process was what had to be done. How many people taking SSRIs do the research necessary to understand what these drugs are doing to their bodies and their brains? Why don’t physicians who prescribe SSRIs (or, indeed, any psychotropic drug) caution the patient that there are multiple and potentially serious side effects and/or adverse reactions to these drugs? Why don’t physicians make it their business to ensure that, unless there is clear indication that the patient needs a higher dose, to start the patient on the lowest possible dose of an SSRI, and at the the first indication that the patient is having real trouble with side effects and/or adverse reactions, to begin the process of taper down — wean off — discontinue the drug; while, at the same time, ensuring that the patient starts or continues therapeutic counseling and healthy lifestyle changes? Similarly, why don’t physicians make it their business to ensure that, there is clear indication that the patient needs a higher dose of an SSRI drug, to start and keep the patient on the lowest possible dose?

The human gut is where over 90% of the body’s serotonin is produced. The human brain produces 10% or less of the body’s serotonin. Because of the “gut-brain axis” system in the body, serotonin produced in the gut “travels” to the brain via the bloodstream. Why aren’t physicians trained in the nutritional knowledge necessary to counsel patients with emotional/psychological issues to eat foods that would assist in proper and healthy serotonin production — foods such as, salmon, eggs, cheese, nuts, and turkey? Why don’t physicians realize that taking SSRI drugs actually block the normal “gut-brain axis travel” of serotonin to the brain — leaving the brain with only a small amount of serotonin; and which low level of serotonin is targeted by SSRI drugs? [12]

Yes, there are circumstances in which a physician makes the decision that the emotional/psychological issues of the patient warrant the need for that patient to take an SSRI. However, Yours Truly believes that, in addition to the SSRI, the patient needs to be counseled to eat foods that will help the gut produce healthy serotonin in proper amounts, to get out into the sunshine, to move their body, to get restful sleep, to have therapeutic psychological counseling if necessary; and, to understand that what they’re experiencing isn’t just “all in their head” — it’s also “that gut feeling.”

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

References:

[1]: “What is PTSD?”. https://www.psychiatry.org/patients-families/ptsd/what-is-ptsd. Reviewed by Donald Egan, M.D. March 2025.

[2]: “SSRIs (Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors.” https://.my.clevelandclinic.org/health-treatments/24795-ssri. Last reviewed on 09/26/2025 by Cleveland Clinic.

[3]: “Paroxetine side effects.” https://www.drugs.com/paroxetine.html#side-effects.

[4]: “Paroxetine – oral route.” https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supplements/paroxetine-oral-route/description/drg-20067632.

[5]: “Paroxetine – side effects. For healthcare professionals.” https://www.drugs.com/sfx/paroexetine-side-effects.html.

[6]: “Well Being: Selective Serotonin ReUptake Inhibitors (SSR).” https://www.malone.news/cp/179662213. 12 November 2025.

[7]: “The Dark Side of Antidepressants.” https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-dark-side-of-antidepressants. 24 January 2025.

[8[: “The Hidden Dangers of Antidepressants and Why They’re So Hard To Stop Taking.” https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-hidden-dangers-of-antidepressants. 9 February 2025.

[9]: “Why Antidepressants Are So Harmful?” https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-are-antidepressants-so-harmful. 26 November 2023.

[10]: “What is serotonin?” https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/articles/22572-serotonin. Last reviewed on 03/18/2022.

[11]: “That gut feeling.” https://www.apa-org/monitor/2012/09/gut-feeling. Dr. Siri Carpenter, PhD. 1 September 2012.

[12]: “Chronic SSRI Treatment Exacerbates Serotonin Deficiency in Humanized Tph2 Mutant Mice.” William B. Siessner, et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/cn300127h. 1 October 2012.

(Intellectual Property Disclaimer and Notice: With the exception of published scientific items cited above, the ideas and conclusions of today’s post are by PAVACA. Proper credit must be given to PAVACA if the ideas or conclusions from today’ post are used by other blog writers, by podcasters, in social media, or in print media.)

Health Friday 11.21.2025 Open Thread: The COVID-19 Information File, Part Three: Compendium

The above image (also the header image) of a vintage Rolodex in today’s offering is courtesy of Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s offering speaks to the disaster of COVID-19, Yours Truly dedicates it to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have passed away from either the negative effects of a COVID-19 virus infection; or, from the negative effects of the COVID-19 “vaccines” that they had in their body.

Please see the following for more background information: https://www.theqtree.com/2024/11/01/health-friday-open-thread-11-1-2024-the-covid-19-vaccines-information-file-part-one/; and, https://www.theqtree.com/2025/03/07/health-friday-3-7-2025-open-thread-the-covid-19-information-file-part-two-the-virus-itself-and-the-vaccines/. Note that the information and knowledge base regarding the COVID-19 virus itself, and the COVID-19 “vaccines” (Bioweapon Toxin Injections) is constantly evolving; and that more scientific papers, articles, and investigative reports that uncover the real truth behind the COVID-19 disaster are being published.

Books:

Vaccines, Amen, by Attorney Aaron Siri. Attorney Siri is involved with https://phmpt.org/ (Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency, one of the organizations that have forced the release of thousands of documents on the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” via FOIA lawsuits.)

The Courage to Face COVID-19: Preventing Hospitalization and Death While Battling the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex, by John Leake and Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH. Mr Leake and Dr. McCullough are involved with https://www.thefocalpoints.com/, a website that focuses on, among other topics, disseminating the real truth about the COVID-19 “vaccines”, the role of Bio Pharma in promoting the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, and more.

Information Compendium sites related to COVID-19:

From Children’s Health Defense: https://www.covidindex.science/, via Dr. Brian Hooker, PhD, Chief Scientific Officer of CHD. This is a searchable index of thousands of items.

From US Right to Know: https://usrtk.org/covid-19-origins/foi-documents-on-origins-of-sars-cov-2-risks-of-gain-of-function-research-and-biosafety-labs/. There are two separate sections in this huge compilation related to the activities of Dr. Ralph Baric, PhD, of the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, in the research and lab-creation of the COVID-19 virus itself, among other issues.

From this board: https://www.theqtree.com/author/pavaca. Over eighty articles, searchable.

Paper:

Preventing Cancer: The ROOT Protocols. https://doi.org/10.71189/JIM/2025/V01N04A02, by Paul Marik, MD, and Justus Hope, MD. Both of these medical doctors are involved with Independent Medical Alliance https://imahealth.org/ (formerly FLCCC.) Interested readers must register with the Journal of Independent Medicine (the journal of Independent Medical Alliance) in order to view the entire paper. A story on The ROOT Protocols is here: https://imahealth.substack.com/cp/178752784, 12 November 2025.

News Items:

One:

The CDC has finally admitted that the agency’s blanket statement that “vaccines do not cause autism” is not backed up by science: https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/bombshell-cdc-now-admits-science, “Bombshell: CDC Now Admits Science Lacking Behind Claim ‘Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism'”, 20 November 2025. The CDC revised statement is here: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines-safety/about/autism.html#cdc_generic_section_1-vaccines-do-not-cause-autism, “Autism and Vaccines”, 19 November 2025. Please see the screenshot from the CDC statement, below:

Two:

Dr. Jessica Rose and Dr. Kevin McKernan have just finished a new project which reveals the truth behind the inclusion of N1-Methylpseudouridine, in both the Pfizer-BioNTech and the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”; and, of the inclusion of a gene code piece from the African Green Monkey cancer promoter, SV40, in the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”: https://jessicar.substack.com/p/we-know-exactly-how-and-why-the-dna. “We now exactly how and why the DNA is in the Moderna and Pfizer vials”, 15 November 2025. Please see the screenshots from this article, below;

Three:

A new study, by Alain R. Thierry, et al., reveals that 100% of COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons have microclots in their blood; and, that COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons who present with symptoms of “Long COVID” also have microclots: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-study-anomalous-amyloid, “Breaking Study: Anomalous Amyloid Microclots Found in 100% of the COVID-19 Vaccinated”, Nicolas Hulscher, 17 November 2025. Please see the screenshots from this article, below:

The scientific paper referred to in the Hulscher article is here: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.70613, “Circulating Microclots Are Structurally Associated With Neutraphil Extracurricular Traps and Their Amounts Are Elevated in Long COVID Patients”, Alain R. Thierry, et al., 2 October 2025. Note the use of the word, “circulating.” This means that the microclots in the blood of the COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons are moving around inside the body. The Abstract from this paper is below:

The COVID-19 “vaccines” — all of them — if, for no other reason, must be immediately removed from use, from the market, and removed from any immunization schedule (especially the Immunization Schedules of the CDC), because of the evidence presented in the Thierry, et al., paper regarding circulating microclots in the blood of COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons, and in the blood of COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons who present with symptoms of “Long COVID.” There is no other acceptable option at this point.

THERE. MUST. BE. ACCOUNTABILITY.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

(Intellectual Property Notice: With the exception of cited published scientific papers and publicly-available blogs and other websites, the ideas and conclusions in today’s post are by PAVACA. Proper credit must be given to PAVACA if other blog writers, podcasters, social media posts, or print media, use the ideas or conclusions in today’s post.)

Health Friday 11.14.2025 Open Thread: What’s Going on at Pfizer-BioNTech?: Part Two

The header image of vintage Pfizer vaccine vials for today’s offering is courtesy of Dreamstime and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s offering speaks to the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, Yours Truly dedicates it to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have passed away from the negative effects of these “vaccines” that they had in the body. May they rest in eternal Peace.

Please refer to Part One of this two-part set, found here: https://www.theqtree.com/2025/11/07/health-friday-11-7-2025-open-thread-whats-going-on-at-pfizer-biontech-part-one/, regarding recent activities of PfizerUSA (also known as Pfizer), the United States-based co-partner of Pfizer-BioNTech. Today’s presentation will discuss some of the activities of the other co-partner, Germany-based BioNTech. Of necessity, some of today’s presentation will include items related to Pfizer (PfizerUSA.)

The current “pipeline” for the BioNTech product line is found here: https://www.biontech.com/int/en/home/pipeline-and-products/pipeline.html. The full PDF of the “pipeline” is found here: https://www.biontech.com/content/dam/biontech-corporate/global/pdf/home/pipeline-and-products/pipeline/assets/BioNTech-Clinical-Pipeline-EN-Q3.pdf, “Status: November 3, 2025.” A screenshot of the Infectious Diseases section of this pipeline is below:

Note the Collaborator / Partner listings on the far right of the image. There are two entities involving Bill Gates: the Gates Foundation; and, CEPI. There are two mentions of Pfizer (also known as PfizerUSA.) There is one mention of the University of Pennsylvania. Note also the BioNTech rights listings: the company fully owns the mRNA (modRNA) “vaccines” under development for Tuberculosis, for Malaria, and for Monkeypox (Mpox.) More on the Fosun Pharma collaboration / partnership will be presented further below in today’s post.

It appears that the modRNA-based “combo vaccine” for COVID-19 + influenza, also known as either BNT162b2 + BNT161, or as tozinameran + famtozinameran, is actually being developed and tested by BioNTech, with PfizerUSA (Pfizer) as a kind of “stand-by” or “silent” co-partner. Please see the screenshots below, from registered clinical trials information, per https://clinicaltrials.gov/:

**** NONE of these clinical trials have a true Control Group (study subjects injected with a plain saline solution “placebo vaccine.”)

BioNTech is ALSO working on a “new” version of of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, BNT162b2. However, the only BioNTech listing is this: https://clinicaltrials.biontech.com/trials/C4591076, which “translates” to the NCT07069309 clinical trial referenced above. “C459” is the prefix for Pfizer-BioNTech clinical trials for their modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” — for example, the huge C4591001 original clinical trial for BNT162b1 / BNT162b2 / BNT162b3, from which BNT162b2 was the “vaccine candidate” chosen by the company in the late summer/early fall of 2020 to proceed through the Emergency Use Authorization applications in the United States and in the EU / Scandinavia.

The question Yours Truly has regarding the “new COVID-19 “vaccine candidate” being used in NCT07069309: Is this “new COVID-19 vaccine candidate” ALSO being used in the clinical trial NCT06821061, also listed above? The modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” called Investigational COVID-19 Vaccine per the Researcher View of NCT06821061?

Gentle reader, does one see how this aspect of the modRNA “vaccine” game works? BioNTech (the co-partner of PfizerUSA/Pfizer) comes up with a “new vaccine candidate” for COVID-19 — a “new vaccine candidate” which, in reality, is for the current circulating virus variant, LP.8.1. — and appears to use it it as an Investigational COVID-19 Vaccine in one clinical trial (NCT068210161): while, at the same, time, also using this same injectable in another clinical trial (NCT07069309)? How many study subjects in either clinical trial were told of this?

—————————————————————————-

And now, a dive into the “collaborators”, and what may be termed “the other partners”, the “investments partners”, and other entities that are involved with Pfizer-BioNTech, either with PfizerUSA(Pfizer), or with BioNTech. Yours Truly begins with the “active partners” list of PfizerUSA (Pfizer): https://www.pfizer.com/partners/venture-investments/our-portfolio. Below is a screenshot from this article regarding one of these “venture investments partners” — Saama:

What the above article does not mention is the fact that PfizerUSA (Pfizer), along with a group of other healthcare entities, acquired a majority stake in Saama back in October, 2021: https://carlyle.com/media-room/news-release-archive/carlyle-and-leading-healthcare-focused-venture-funds-announce-investment-saama, 20 October 2021. A screenshot from this article is below:

On the other hand, PfizerUSA (Pfizer), wanting to enter more fully into the weight-loss drug marketplace, began acquisition talks with a company called Metsera in August 2025. Metsera is developing a GLP-1 based weight-loss drug, MET-097i, a GLP-1 drug. GLP-1 drugs (Glucagon-like Peptide 1) drugs are designed to lower blood sugar in people taking them, thus (theoretically) leading to weight loss. However, another company, Novo Nordisk, also wanted to acquire Metsera, and, at one point, was working on an “agreement in principle” with the company. This led to a “battle of offers” for Metsera between Pfizer and Novo Nordisk, leading to a lawsuit filed by Pfizer on 1 November 2025 against Metsera and against Novo Nordisk’s offers to Metsera (https://sbj.net/stories/pfizer-sues-metsera-novo-nordisk,101765, Springfield Business Journal, 3 November 2025.) It also appears that Pfizer possibly contacted the United States Federal Trade Commission about the situation — with the result that Novo Nordisk backed away due to a letter sent to the company by the FEC; and, Pfizer, then having the “green light”, could move forward with the acquisition deal for Metsera (https://www.fiercebiotech.com/biotech/pfizer-beats-out-novo-10b-agreement-buy-metsera, Eric Sagonowsky, 8 November 2025.)

Gentle reader, does one see how this aspect of the game is played? It appears that PfizerUSA (Pfizer) gets the United States Federal Trade Commission involved in blocking a deal that a rival company (Novo Nordisk) is working on, in order for Pfizer to acquire the target company?

—————————————————————————

Meanwhile, what of the “collaborators” and “partners” with BioNTech, other than their co-partner, PfizerUSA (Pfizer)? Following is a “snapshot” of this situation:

BioNTech and CEPI (Gates Foundation) are “partnered” in expanding mRNA “vaccine” research, development, and manufacturing, in Kigali, Rwanda: https://cepi.net/biontech-and-cepi-expand-partnership-strengthen-africas-mrna-vaccine-ecosystem, 28 May 2024. A screenshot of the summary from this article is below:

This article emanated from Mainz, Germany, and Oslo, Norway.

**** Note also the use of a new term: “mRNA vaccine ecosystem.” Gentle reader, does one see how this aspect of the game is played? First, create the “problem” (the COVID-19 virus); Second, create the “solution” (modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”); Third, convince / coerce / frighten / gaslight, billions of people into taking this unproven gene-therapy technology; Fourth, create an “mRNA vaccine ecosystem” in which endless types of mRNA-based / modRNA-based “vaccines” are created and administered to the convinced / coerced / frightened / gaslighted, billions of people as part of the “mRNA vaccine ecosystem”, with the underlying “passive-aggressive threat” of “people must take these “vaccines”, otherwise they would likely get very sick and/or die”.

Yours Truly now turns to the “partnership” between BioNTech and the Communist China-based pharmaceutical company, Fosun Pharma.

Fosun Pharma, also known as Shanghai Fosun Pharmaceutical (Group) Co., Ltd., was founded in 1994. The company has since “spun off” into other related entities, such as Fosun International, and https://fosunpharmausa.com/. Lest there is any doubt that the Chinese Communist Party holds a significant stake in Fosun Pharma, please see this: https://en.fosun.com/Upload/File/202104021739947_5055.pdf, “Corporate Social Responsibility Report – Fosun”, for the year 2012. A graphic from Page 11 of this report is below:

The Wikipedia entry on Fosun Pharma is here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fosun_Pharma.

However, it also appears that Guo Guangchang, founder and chairman of Fosun International, has run afoul of the Chinese government at least twice. He “disappeared” in 2015 and in 2017, only to “resurface” after what appears to have been detention and interrogation (for the 2015 “disappearance”, at least) by Chinese authorities: https://variety.com/2015/biz/asia/missing-chinese-executive-released-1201660214/, Patrick Frater, 13 December 2015.

Fosun Pharma and BioNTech went into partnership regarding the development and distribution of BNT162b2 in Communist China. Please the screenshot from the Wikipedia entry regarding this, below:

Please refer also to the BioNTech “pipeline” graphics further above in today’s offering. Fosun Pharma is listed in the Infectious Diseases section as Collaborator / Partner with BioNTech regarding the development and distribution of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” BNT162b2 (now known as COMIRNATY.)

The Fierce Pharma story regarding the Fosun Pharma – BioNTech “partnership” and BNT162b2 is here: https://www.fiercepharma.com/manufacturing/biontech-fosun-pharma-eye-1b-doses-covid-19-vaccine-capacity-new-china-jv, Angus Liu, 10 May 2021. A screenshot from this article is below:

In addition, Fosun Pharma is also “partnering” with PfizerUSA (Pfizer) in the manufacture of a generic form of Paxlovid (owned by Pfizer) for international use: https://medicinepatientpool.org/story-post/fosun-pharmas-global-impact-expanding-access-to-covid-19-treatments-and-beyond-through-voluntary-licensing-with-mpp, 22 November 2024. This sublicense agreement with Medicine Patient Pool (MPP) was signed in March 2022. MPP is, in turn, a division of Unitaid (https://unitaid.org/.) More information regarding MPP is here: https://medicinepatientpool.org/who-we-are/about-us.

Gentle reader, does one see how this aspect of the game is played? The Big Pharma company “creates partnerships” or “sublicensing agreements” with other companies around the world to push the drugs and / or “vaccines” that the Big Pharma company creates and manufactures. Smaller pharmaceutical companies; alternative treatment entities and their products; other avenues of treatment opportunities — are left out / choked off / minimized.

The 2024 salary of Dr. Ugur Sahin, MD, CEO of BioNTech: $287 million dollars.

The 2024 salary of Dr. Albert Bourla, DVM, CEO of PfizerUSA (Pfizer): $24.6 million dollars.

Per: https://www.fiercepharma.com/special-reports/big-pharmas-10-highest-paid-ceos-2024, 16 June 2025.

Meanwhile, the Medical Tsunami of documented modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”-induced or aggravated illnesses, injuries, or disabilities, among those who took / take these “vaccines”, rolls on. Meanwhile, the Medical Tsunami of documented modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”-induced or related deaths among those who took these “vaccines” rolls on.

All persons — COVID-19 “vaccinated” or not — need to be following some type of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein detox / mitigation protocol. All persons — COVID-19 “vaccinated” or not — need to keep their immune system in the best shape possible.

All modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” MUST be removed from the market and from use. Now.

THERE. MUST. BE. ACCOUNTABILITY.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

(Intellectual Property Notice: With the exception of linked articles and/or scientific papers that are available online, the ideas and conclusions in today’s offering are by PAVACA. Proper credit must be given to PAVACA for any other blog writer, podcaster, or social media outlet, in using the ideas or conclusions in today’s offering.)

Health Friday 11.7.2025 Open Thread: What’s Going on at Pfizer-BioNTech?: Part One

The free image of vintage Pfizer vaccine vials for the header in today’s offering is courtesy of Dreamstime and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s offering speaks to the COVID-19 “vaccines”, Yours Truly dedicates it to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have passed away from the negative effects of the COVID-19 “vaccines” that they had in their body. May they rest in eternal Peace.

This Part One trail begins here, with two news reports regarding the September 2025 agreement reached between the United States government and Pfizer (PfizerUSA, the United States co-partner of Pfizer-BioNTech; BioNTech, the other co-partner, is headquartered in Mainz, Germany.). First, from Virginia Business (https://virginiabusiness.com/pfizer-agrees-to-lower-drug-costs-70b-us-investment/), “Pfizer agrees to lower drug costs, $70B US investment”, 30 September 2025. A screenshot from this article is below:

And, second, the announcement from PfizerUSA (https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/pfizer-reaches-landmark-agreement-us-government-lower-drug, “Pfizer Reaches Landmark Agreement with U.S. Government to Lower Drug Costs for American Patients”, 30 September 2025. A screenshot from this article is below:

Note that the specific details of this agreement, which will affect millions of Americans, “remain confidential.”

The company called Pfizer-BioNTech is a formal co-partnership between Pfizer, also known as PfizerUSA (CEO, Dr. Albert Bourla, DVM); and, BIoNTech of Mainz, Germany (CEO, Dr. Ugur Sahin, MD.) Both PfizerUSA and BioNTech were involved / still are involved, in the development and manufacture of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” line, COMIRNATY (this “vaccine” was previously known as BNT162b2, or “Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine.“) Both PfizerUSA and BioNTech have agreements regarding their sharing royalty payments for COMIRNATY “vaccines” purchased and used throughout the world. PfizerUSA and BioNTech are also involved in the development and manufacture of other drugs and vaccines, either separately or in coordination with each other.

The most recent (as of 5 August 2025) PfizerUSA (and Pfizer-BioNTech) product “pipeline” website is here: https://www.pfizer.com/science/drug-product-pipeline. Click on “Downloadable PDF” to view the entire pipeline. Screenshots of two pipeline areas, Internal Medicine and Vaccines, follow. The first screenshot, Internal Medicine, with discussion by Yours Truly, is below:

**** WHY is Paxlovid, a combo drug of nirmatrelvir (an antiviral) + ritonavir (an HIV/AIDS treatment drug that targets the immune system) going to be used on CHILDREN who become infected with COVID-19?

**** Ibuzatrelvir (PF-07817883), now in Phase 3 clinical trials, is an oral / enhanced “nirmatrelvir on steroids” treatment for COVID-19 infection that was granted “Fast Track” approval by the FDA The intended use of this drug appears to be as a “replacement” for Paxlovid.. Please see: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacsau.4c00508, 30 July 2024. Pfizer has already patented this drug. Let’s take a look at the Overview of this Phase 3 clinical trial, as described here: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06679140:

Does “Fast Track” approval by the FDA mean that the “Study Completion (Estimated)” of 6 May 2027 will be “bypassed”, and only the data from the “Primary Completion (Estimated)” of 12 December 2026 will be used to push this drug onto the market faster? In addition, WHY is the study subject pool so small (2330 persons) for a drug that would potentially be used on hundreds of thousands of persons?

And, from the Researcher View of this clinical trial, part of the Secondary Outcomes descriptions:

Note that the “viral load” measurement will be performed via EITHER a nasal sample, OR via a nasopharyngeal sample. If a nasopharyngeal sample swab is used, this is the extremely long swab that reaches all the way to the VERY BACK of the nasal cavity and can touch the COVERING OF THE BRAIN. By the way, the correct administration of the nasopharyngeal swab is also to ROTATE the swab a couple of times after insertion.

In addition, in the information about NCT06679140, the “placebo tablet” that will be used is NOT described at all. Is the “placebo tablet” going to be Paxlovid? Is the “placebo tablet” going to be a completely drug-free “empty” tablet?

And now, the second screenshot from the “pipeline” PDF, Vaccines, is below. Yours Truly will discuss an interesting new “vaccine” from this list, under development by PfizerUSA (in conjunction with BioNTech) — PF-07926307, a combination modRNA-based COVID-19 plus influenza “vaccine“:

The available-to-the-public information regarding PF-07926307 is both confusing and concerning. Pfizer-BioNTech insists that this “combo vaccine” is only for “prophylactic” use against COVID-19 plus influenza: https://investors.biontech.de/news-releases/news-release-details/pfizer-and-biontech-provide-update-mrna-based-combination, “Pfizer and BioNTech Provide Update on mRNA-based Combination Vaccine Program Against Influenza and COVID-19 in Individuals 18-64 Years of Age”, 16 August 2024. Only ONE of of the two outcomes measurements of the Phase 3 clinical trial for this “vaccine” were met (NCT06178991.) A screenshot from the company’s press release is below:

Note that this press release emanates from Germany, not the United States;, and that the “combination candidate” is not identified as PF-07926307.

**** In addition, it appears that PF-07926307 is actually a combination of TWO separate Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA “vaccines” formulations: BNT162b2 and BNT 161: https://investors.biontech.de/news-releases/news-release-details/biontech-outlines-2024-strategic-priorities-42nd-annual-jp, “BioNTech Outlines 2024 Strategic Priorities at the 42nd Annual J.P. Morgan Healthcare Conference”, 9 January 2024. Please see the screenshot from this article, below:

**** Note the clinical trial mentioned in the above screenshot: NCT05596734. The modRNA “combo vaccine” used in this clinical trial is none other than BNT162b2 (tozinameran, now marketed as COMIRNATY, but which was the ORIGINAL Pfizer-BioBNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” against the ORIGINAL Wuhan Hu1 SARS-CoV-2 [COVID-19] virus), plus BNT161 (famtozinameran, the ORIGINAL modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” against the OMICRON variant BA.4/BA.5) Please see: https://covid-vaccine.canada.ca/comirnaty-original-omicron-ba4ba5/product-details, which also states, “Cancelled by sponsor May 3rd, 2024.”

**** However, at the same time, it appears that this Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “combo vaccine” of BNT162b2 plus BNT161 — also known as PF-07926307 — IS being used — in Singapore: https://labeling.pfizer.com/ShowLabeling.aspx?id=20959, “Date of last revision: July 2024.” Please see the screenshot from the package information for this product administered in Singapore, below:

And, screenshots from Page 65 (of 65), from the package information for the above injectable:

BNT161, one of the component modRNA “vaccines” in PF-07926307, is an influenza “vaccine”, meaning that it can be used against EITHER influenza OR COVID-19 (Omicron BA.4/BA.5.) The German partner of PfizerUSA — BioNTech — has been working on this injectable since at least 2022: https://biontechse.gcs-web.com/news-releases/press-release-details/biontech-announces-third-quarter-2022-financial-results-and, “BioNTech Announces Third Quarter 2022 Financial Results and Corporate Update”, 7 November 2022. A screenshot from this article is below:

Note that the press release is from BioNTech Sweden.

A screenshot from the Adisinsight Drug Profile for BNT161 is below. Note that this modRNA “vaccine” is a quadrivalent influenza injectable (https://adisinsight.springer.com/drugs/800052769):

**** On the other hand, here is the article on PF-07926307 (BNT162b2 + BNT161) by the tech / AI / data collection and analysis platform, Patsnap: https://synapse.patsnap.com/article/what-is-pf-07926307-used-for?, 28 June 2024. A screenshot of the entire article is below; Yours Truly includes the entire article because it has a wealth of information and clues as to the possible real “agenda” behind this injectable:

**** Note that, per the article above, the “primary indication” for the use of PF-07926307 is for the treatment of cancers caused by overactive kinases responses, such as are found in lymphomas; with what may be called a “secondary indication” for treatment of chronic inflammatory diseases. Lymphomas or chronic inflammatory diseases induced by, say, modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” injections, such as BNT162b2 (COMIRNATY?) Is it remotely possible that PF-07926307 (BNT162b2 + BNT161) is being redesigned as a “backdoor oncology and/or chronic inflammatory diseases treatment” injectable? How does this square with what Pfizer-BioNTech claims that this “vaccine” is to be used for — against COVID-19 + influenza infection? What is the truth here?

**** In any case, WHY is Pfizer-BioNTech apparently using BNT162b2, the company’s original modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, as a foundational component in the development of a “New Molecular Entity” called PF-07926307, which is to used as a “prophylactic” against COVID-19 plus influenza? What happened regarding all those other modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” made by this company, to be used against the LATEST MUTATIONS of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, such as the “2025-2026 version” of COMIRNATY? Why is Pfizer-BioNTech going all the way back to the ORIGINAL Wuhan Hu1 SARS-CoV-2 virus contained in BNT162b2 (COMIRNATY) to formulate PF-07926307?

What is going on at Pfizer-BioNTech? Does the United States government know about PF-07926307 (BNT162b2 + BNT161)? Did the “Specific terms of the agreement remain confidential” regarding the deal between the United States government and PfizerUSA reached in September 2025 include provisions that our government “looks the other way” about the activities of PfizerUSA’s co-partner, BioNTech? Does the HHS / FDA / CDC / BARDA have the complete details of the “Specific terms of the agreement remain confidential” provisions? Are the “specific details” being shared with only the “top brass” of the FDA / CDC / BARDA — and that HHS Sec. Kennedy, Jr., is being kept in the dark?

———————————————————————————

All current COVID-19 “vaccines” — ALL of them — MUST be pulled off the market and from use. Now.

All research and development of “new” COVID-19 “vaccines” that are in ANY form — injectable; oral; nasal; micro-needle — MUST be stopped. Now.

There MUST be complete analysis of the ingredients and mechanisms of the current COVID-19 “vaccines”, performed by impartial testing entities, and with complete results made public. Now.

THERE. MUST. BE. ACCOUNTABILITY.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

(Intellectual Property Notice: With the exception of links to published media reports and links to published scientific papers, the ideas and conclusions of today’s post are by PAVACA. Proper credit must be given to PAVACA if other blog writers, or persons on podcasts, social media, or print media, use the ideas and/or conclusions of today’s post. Thank you.)

Health Friday 10.31.2025 Open Thread: Echoes

My older brother, Sam, circa 1960 – 1961, dressed to perform in a school band concert:

My older brother, Sam, December 2021:

My older brother, Sam, early summer 2024, after his having taken at least five injections of a COVID-19 “vaccine”, beginning in early 2021:

Requiescat in Pace aeterna, frater mi. Lux perpetua tibi luceat.

My older brother, Sam: 24 November 1948 – 29 October 2024.

Health Friday is a series devoted to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. Today’s offering is dedicated to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have passed away from the negative effects of the COVID-19 “vaccines” that they had injected into their body. May they rest in eternal Peace.

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie;, and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none, except perhaps for AI-generated images within URL links. If readers wish to add AI-generated content to today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.

————————————————————

My older brother, Sam, passed away on 29 October 2024. He was only 75 years old. He had taken at least five (possibly, six) injections of COVID-19 “vaccines”, starting in early 2021. His last “vaccine” injection was taken around Thanksgiving of 2023, although he may have been given yet another shot while he was residing in a nursing home in the early fall of 2024. Yours Truly has written for this board regarding the health decline of Sam after he took the COVID-19 “vaccine” shot in November 2023: please see https://www.theqtree.com/2024/10/18/health-friday-10-18-2024-special-edition-neurological-effects-of-the-covid-19-vaccines-physical-and-psychological/; and, https://www.theqtree.com/2025/07/25/health-friday-7-25-2025-open-thread-more-on-the-covid-19-vaccines-and-what-they-do-to-the-brain/. Within the period of fewer than six months after his taking that COVID-19 “vaccine” shot in November 2023, my brother had lost interest in things he had once enjoyed, such as helping out with his grandchildren; had stopped going to church; had a “freak accident” in which he wrecked his car and then decided not to drive again; had lost interest in taking care of himself and eating properly; and so on. Then, there was the catastrophic fall he sustained in his home in early July 2023; then, to two weeks in the ICU; then, to be being discharged to a nursing home; then, to the diagnosis of “sudden-onset dementia” at that facility; then, to his losing the ability to walk and becoming bed-bound; then, to his contracting pneumonia in late October 2023 at this facility; then, to his death.

My brother had co-morbidities that complicated his health profile: among them, COPD from decades of smoking (he quit in 2010 after that diagnosis and was treated); and, prostate cancer (diagnosed and treated in 2019.) He had lost his wife in the October 2018, just shy of their 47th wedding anniversary; she passed away from an undiagnosed aneurysm that ruptured. He had spent several years after her death taking counseling and medications, which assisted in his processing of this tragedy.

What ultimately happened with my brother was despite the fact that he had “good longevity genes” in his makeup — there were multiple older members on both sides of our birth family who had lived well beyond their 80th, and even their 90th, birthdays. What happened with my brother was also despite the fact that he had made it a point of taking better care of his health since the diagnosis of COPD in 2010. While it is not possible for Yours Truly to state this definitively, I will say I firmly believe that it was the ingredients and mechanisms of the COVID-19 “vaccines” that Sam took which, over time and incrementally, compromised his brain — cognitively and emotionally — with terrible consequences. I firmly believe that it was the COVID-19 “vaccine” injection that my brother took at Thanksgiving 2023 which was the “straw that broke the camel’s back” for him.

However, even before my brother passed away, Yours Truly’s cousin Bill died in September 2023, a “died suddenly and unexpectedly” situation. Cousin Bill had also had taken COVID-19 “vaccines”, starting in 2021. By early 2022, this previously-healthy, active man had been diagnosed with cardiac problems and was undergoing treatment. According to what I understand of the issue, he was “doing well” in treatment. I am also more than fairly certain that my cousin Bill continued to take COVID-19 “booster vaccine” injections, likely based on the recommendations of his doctors. And then, September 2023 happened. Cousin Bill’s death was the first close-family death of the COVID-19 era for Yours Truly. To say that his death was hard for me is an understatement. I have good memories of cousin Bill. His father had passed away in 1993; his mother had passed away in 2017. They did not have to deal with the death of their son.

To say that the passing away of my own brother was devastating to Yours Truly is an understatement of Malthusian proportions. His death has shaken me down to my core. The last time I spoke to him (by phone) was twelve days before his death. It was heartbreaking and gut-wrenching to hear him fighting the “sudden-onset dementia” that had closed in on his brain. To know that he would never leave the nursing home, go back to his house and his nice old dog, go and be with his adult children and his grandchildren. To hear him tell me to send him books on the Civil War or World War II so he could “brush up” on his reading (the truth was, that by this time, he couldn’t read more than one or two sentences from anything.) To know that what had happened to him was so senseless, so incredibly senseless. It was (and still is) heartbreaking to go through the “what-if?” scenarios in my head — What if he had listened to me when I tried to warn him about the dangers of the COVID-19 “vaccines”, and refused to take any more of those injections? What if he had taken Ivermectin to try and clear out at least some of the COVID-19 “vaccine”-induced damage to his body and mind? What if the ingredients and mechanisms of the COVID-19 “vaccines” Sam took aggravated the lung damage from his COPD? What if the ingredients and mechanisms of the COVID-19 “vaccines” he took aggravated or re-established any emotional / psychological issues still lingering after the death of his beloved wife? What if? What if? Our mother had passed away in 1992; our father, in 2006. They did not have to deal with the death of Sam.

Yours Truly is not writing the above in order to solicit sympathy. I am writing the above to illustrate the kinds of things that went on — that are going on now — and, that will go on — in millions of families when the damage induced by the COVID-19 “vaccines” that were taken by family members starts to present (and the damaging effects that have started to present already.) It is all well and good to have a general “working knowledge” of the negative effects these “vaccines” (Bioweapon Toxin Injections) can, and do, induce in those who take them. It is quite another thing to lose close family members due to the negative effects of these “vaccines” that they took. It is quite another thing to have to deal with the knowledge that loved ones in the “here and now” who are COVID-19 “vaccinated” have had their bodies and brains damaged from these “vaccines.” It is quite another thing to listen to them tell those who try to warn them that they aren’t interested — that they “follow the science”; that they “trust their doctor”; among other responses.

Yours Truly will therefore say to those reading today’s offering who have taken COVID-19 “vaccines”:

**** The COVID-19 “vaccines” in your body have already damaged your natural immune system, perhaps even destroyed it: https://jessicar.substack.com/p/the-bnt162b2-mrna-vaccine-against, “‘The BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 reprograms both adaptive and innate immune responses”, 16 December 2021. Please see the screenshot from her article, below, the Figure 3 from the cited paper in the article:

Figure 3 shows how the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” systematically damage and destroy the natural immune system cells of the “vaccinated” person’s body.

**** The COVID-19 “vaccines” in your body are damaging your heart and lungs: https://doctors4covidethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/causality-article.pdf, “Vascular and organ damage induced by mRNA vaccines: irrefutable proof of causality”, Michael Palmer, MD, and Sucharit Bhakdi, MD, 18 August 2022. Please see the screenshots of Slide 7 and its description from the above paper, which clearly shows myocarditis induced by modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”:

Please see the screenshot of Slide 12 from the above paper, which clearly shows lung damage induced by modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”:

Note: the slides in the above paper are from autopsies of persons who passed away after COVID-19 “vaccination.”

**** The COVID-19 “vaccines” in your body crossed the Blood-Brain Barrier and damaged the cells and functions of your brain: https://eurmedres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40001-023-00992-0, “A review of neurological side effects of COVID-19 vaccination”, Roya Hosseini and Nayere Askari, 25 February 2023. Please see the screenshot of Figure 1 from this paper, below:

**** The COVID-19 “vaccines” in your body can induce psychosis: https://nature.com/articles/s41380-024-02627-0, “Psychiatric adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination: A population-based cohort study in Seoul, South Korea”, Eun Mi Chun, et al., 4 June 2024. Please see the screenshot of Figure 2 from this paper, below:

It is a mistake to dismiss the above paper and its conclusions “because it’s from South Korea.” The modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” used in South Korea that are examined for the above paper are the same as those used in the United States (COMIRNATY, by Pfizer-BioNTech; and, SPIKEVAX, by Moderna.)

**** The COVID-19 “vaccines” in your body will alter your DNA and change your body’s genomic codes. These effects are permanent, and are involved in cancers that present after COVID-19 “vaccination”: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-first-peer-reviewed-study-715, “BREAKING: First Peer-Reviewed Study Finds Direct Molecular Evidence of mRNA “Vaccine” Genomic Integration”, Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 14 October 2025. Please see the screenshot from this article, below (the image was AI-generated):

**** The COVID-19 “vaccines” in your body, if you are a female, have destroyed up to 60% of the lifetime supply of eggs in your ovaries: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/mrna-shots-are-crippling-humanitys, “mRNA Shots Are Crippling Humanity’s Ability to Reproduce—And No Government is Ending COVID-19 Vaccination”, Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 15 May 2025. Please see the screenshot from this article, below (Yours Truly believes that the graphic image of how COVID-19 “vaccines” destroy primordial follicles is AI-generated):

**** Every injection of a COVID-19 “vaccine” WILL SHORTEN THE LIFE OF THE “VACCINE” RECIPIENT: Please see: https://slaynews.com/news/major-study-confirms-covid-vaccine-dose-shortens-lives-recipients/, “Major Study Confirms Every Covid ‘Vaccine’ Dose ‘Shortens the Lives of Recipients'”, by Frank Bergman, 14 October 2025. The published paper is here: https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/123/423, “Were the COVID-19 Shots Good, Bad, or Just Ugly? Dispensing with the Only Reasonable Objection to the Empirical Fact that Each Dose of the COVID-19 Shots, on the Average, Shortened the Lives of the Recipients”, John W. Oller, Jr., PhD, and Daniel Santiago, PharmD, 7 October 2025. Screenshots from this paper are below; first, of the Figure 2 from the paper, the all-age mortality figures reported to Public Health England:

Followed by Table 3 from the paper, the Connecticut Medicare Records:

Next, of Figure 5 from the paper, also derived from the Connecticut Medicare Records:

Then, from the Conclusions section of the paper:

These are the COVID-19 “vaccines” that you allowed to be injected into your body.

These are the COVID-19 “vaccines” that you allowed to be injected into the bodies of your children.

And why did you allow these unproven-technology, not-completely tested, “vaccines” to be put into your body, and into the bodies of your children? Because you “trusted the science“; because you “trusted your doctor“; because you were told that “it was the right thing to do“; because you were told that the COVID-19 “vaccines” were “safe and effective“; because you were told that the “the known and potential benefits of the COVID-19 vaccines outweigh the known and potential risks”; because you were told to “get COVID-19 vaccinated in order to keep yourself, your children, and your parents, safe“; because were you told “get COVID-19 vaccinated in order to keep your job, in order to travel, in order to go to school.” You were lied to. Every step of the way. Lied to by the government — by the CDC and the FDA — by your doctors — by your employer — by your school. They are continuing to lie to you.

The above is courtesy of https://www.theburningplatform,com/2025/10/27/why-are-these-criminals-free/. The Five Times August tweet is here: https://x.com/FiveTimesAugust/status/1982469251098153444.

Yours Truly has questions for those reading today’s offering who are COVID-19 “vaccinated”:

**** What are you going to do to try and mitigate the damage that these injections have done to your body and brain? To the bodies and brains of your children?

**** What are you going to do to educate yourself regarding how dangerous and deadly these injections are?

**** Do you plan to challenge and question any “recommendation” or “mandate” to have yourself and/or your children injected with more COVID-19 “vaccine” shots?

**** Do you plan to at least think about refusing to take any more COVID-19 “vaccines”, and to think about refusing COVID-19 “vaccines” being injected into your children?

Interested persons may wish to investigate these websites:

The Wellness Company (Dr. Peter A. McCullough, MD): https://www.twc.health

Leading Edge Clinic (Dr. Pierre Kory, MD): https://drpierrekory.com/

Independent Medical Alliance (Dr. Joseph Varon, MD): https://imahealth.org/

For those medical professionals who are COVID-19 “vaccinated”, Yours Truly has extra questions, below. These are based on my 5 1/2+ years of being an independent COVID-19 researcher and writer:

**** With all due respect: Have you recognized that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” induce multiple types of serious adverse events, medical conditions, and can also kill? Have you read this report?: https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf, 5.3.6 CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-AUTHORIZATION ADVERSE EVENT REPORTS OF PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) RECEIVED THROUGH 28-FEB-2021, FDA time-stamped on 30 April 2021 09:26 (GMT).

**** With all due respect: Do you understand, that since you are COVID-19 “vaccinated”, there is a strong likelihood that you have also had negative effects induced from these “vaccines”?

**** With all due respect: Why are you still recommending and/or administering these “vaccines”, given the above evidence of damage and death induced by these injectables? Did you perform your own research into the COVID-19 “vaccines” to satisfy yourself that the CDC / FDA claims of “safe and effective” regarding these injectables were / are, true? And, with all due respect, before there are objections to what Yours Truly is writing, please see these websites, by medical doctors, who have actually investigated the COVID-19 “vaccines” and know how dangerous and deadly they are : https://www.thefocalpoints.com/ (Dr. Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH); https://pierrekorymedicalmusings.com/ (Dr. Pierre Kory, MD, MPA, Certified Tribal Practitioner); https://doctors4covidethics.org/ (Dr. Michael Palmer, MD, Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, MD); https://imahealth.org/ (Dr. Joseph Varon, MD, FCCM, FCCP).

**** With all due respect: Why are you not demanding that your employer; your State Medical Licensing Board; your medical professional organization; your Medical Specialty Credentialing organization; the CDC, FDA, AMA — impartially investigate the mounting evidence that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” are dangerous and deadly? Do you, perhaps, have concerns about “retribution” from these entities by doing so?

————————————————–

Yours Truly will remember the echoes of my older brother, Sam, before he started taking COVID-19 “vaccines.” I will remember the echoes of my Cousin Bill before he “died suddenly and unexpectedly.” The pain and the sense of loss from their deaths will never completely go away, since the human mind stores everything in the subconscious and the memory. One can only integrate the pain and the sense of loss into their own being in the healthiest way possible while moving onward.

And, in memory of those who have passed away from the negative effects of the COVID-19 “vaccines” that they took, “The Lark Ascending”, by Ralph Vaughan Williams: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZR2JIDnT218&list=RDZRJIDnT218&start_radio=1

The COVID-19 “vaccines” — ALL OF THEM — MUST be removed from the market and from use. NOW.

THERE. MUST. BE. ACCOUNTABILITY.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

(Intellectual Property Disclaimer: With the exception of URL links to scientific papers and online articles listed above, the ideas and conclusions of today’s offering are by PAVACA. Proper credit must be given to PAVACA if other blog writers, social media, podcasters, or print media, use or refer to the ideas and conclusions of today’s offering.)

Health Friday 10.24.2025 Open Thread: A Cautionary Tale

The free header stock image of a nursing home is courtesy of Vecteezy and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics.

Please take a moment and remember our good GA/FL (Georgia Sibyl Swink Smith), who passed away on 8 October 2025. The time, energy, and ingenunity that GA/FL invested into decades of taking care of her late daughter, “Sally Q” Smith, after the latter’s diagnosis of Friedreich’s Ataxia at the age of 14, was amazing and inspiring. Sally Q passed away from the effects of this condition on 10 May 2025. Georgia was a devout Christian. May she and her daughter rest in eternal Peace. GA/FL will be sorely missed.

Today’s offering begins here: https://www.theburningplatform.com/2025/10/04/keeping-the-elderly-sheep-in-line/, by Donald Jefferies. The article is about nursing homes. Two screenshots from his article are below:

Yours Truly comes from a birth family that, on both sides, had a horror of having to go into “a home” (“a home” was “code” for a nursing home or care facility.) Grandparents, aunts, uncles — even one’s own father — vigorously preferred to remain at home, no matter what, and stay away from congregate living of any kind. Only as a last resort, did my maternal grandmother have to go to live at a nursing home. I think she had a premonition that she would not “come out alive” from the facility. She was correct. My own brother was discharged from the hospital to a nursing home, but that, too, was under “last resort” circumstances; he, also, did not “come out alive” from the facility. In both the cases of my maternal grandmother and of my brother, there were extremely serious medical conditions which excluded their ever living at their own homes again.

Nursing homes and care / rehabilitation facilities in the United States are inspected by the state health agencies where these are located. CMS (Medicare / Medicaid) will step in if a nursing home or care facility fails to meet state inspection standards, or if complaints are filed with either the state health department or CMS regarding a nursing home or care / rehabilitation facility. Please see: https://www.cms.gov/medicare/health-safety-standards/enforcement/nursing-home-enforcement, last updated 21 April 2025.

Nursing homes and care / rehabilitation facilities in the United States were especially negatively affected by the COVID-19 disaster. During the “lockdown” period, these places became off-limits to family and friends of the residents / patients. Untold numbers of these residents / patients died alone. Untold numbers of residents / patients were injected with the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, whether they consented to this or not. According to data complied by the CDC, residents / patients of these facilities had increased risk of death if they were “vaccinated” against COVID-19: https://kirschsubstack.com/p/cdc-nursing-home-data-the-vaccine, “CDC Nursing Home Data: The vaccine increased the risk of the elderly dying from COVID”, Steve Kirsch, 5 September 2023. Please see the screenshots from this article, below:

The AMA (American Medical Association), on the other hand, made it clear, also in 2023, that deaths among the COVID-19 “vaccinated” simply underscored the “need” for persons to get a COVID-19 “vaccine booster shot”: https://www.ama-assn.org/public-health/infectious-diseases/why-covid-19-deaths-among-vaccinated-show-boosters-matter, Cynthia Cos, et al., 7 March 2023. Please see the screenshots from this article, below, in which Dr. Elaine Choi (a member of the AMA) is “explaining” why COVID-19 “vaccine booster shots” are a good thing, even though “vaccinated” persons were then dying from COVID:

Currently, the AMA, among other professional medical organizations, is speaking out regarding what they term the “new restrictions against COVID-19 vaccination” that were put into place by HHS Sec. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., earlier this year. One example of such “speaking out” is here: https://www.chiefhealthexecutive.com/view/defending-vaccines-ama-nursing-leaders-speak-out, Ron Southwick, 22 September 2025. There is a video embedded in the article; two screenshots from the article’s text are below:

Note the old (and misinformation) canard about “if you’re young and healthy, get a COVID-19 vaccine so your grandparents won’t get COVID” from Mensik Kennedy.

Steve Kirsch posted an article this week on his Substack blog regarding the Japan CMRR data, which proves that the more COVID-19 “vaccine” injections a person takes, the more risk that person has of dying: https://kirschsubstack.com/p/japan-cmrr-data-website-shows-clear, “Japan CMRR data website shows clear mortality increase caused by COVID shot”, 20 October 2025. Please see the screenshot from his article, below. (Note: CMRR = Cumulative Mortality Risk Ratio.) The first screenshot is of the general summary chart:

The second screenshot is from the Kirsch KCOR analysis of the Japan data, along with text summary;

To access the KCOR analysis, please see: https://medicalfacts.info/kcor.rb.

Applying all of the above to persons who, for whatever reason, are residents / patients in nursing homes or care / rehabilitation facilities: How do these people, if they do NOT want to take a COVID-19 “vaccine” injection, make their decision clear to the staff, including to the medical staff? How are these people assured, that if they do NOT want to take a COVID-19 “vaccine” injection, and there is an outbreak of COVID at the facility, that they will have access to Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, Vitamin D, Zinc, and other alternative treatments for prevention or treatment of a COVID infection? How are these people assured, if they do NOT want to take a COVID-19 “vaccine” injection, that they will NOT be moved into a “segregated area” of the facility; or, worse yet, be told (or, their family / guardian be told) that the resident / patient “has to find another facility?” The issue is compounded by the fact that almost all nursing homes and care / rehabilitation facilities receive CMS funding or payments of some kind. Also, there is the “Next Generation Gold Standard” of “evidence-based COVID-19 vaccination” guidelines that were announced and implemented by HHS / NIH / CDC / FDA earlier this year. These guidelines “recommend” that persons age 65 and older get a COVID-19 “booster shot” TWICE a year. What does this mean for the person living in a nursing home in, for example, Alabama, (a facility that receives CMS funding or payments) — a person who is competent to make their own decisions, and who decides to refuse to take a COVID-19 “vaccine” injection? What if that person refuses because of religious belief? What if the person refuses because the “vaccine” contains elements lab-recreated from aborted fetal blood cell lines (the HEK293 lines?) Does the facility then “have the right”, because of the “new guidelines” in the “Evidence-Based Approach to COVID-19 Vaccination” that have been implemented, to override the person’s decision and give the injection anyway? Does the facility now “have the right” to tell the person’s children / guardian that they need to “find another facility” to take the person? Please see: https://www.hhs.gov/press-room/hhs-nih-announce-generation-gold-standard.html; also, https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsb2506929, “An Evidence-Based Approach to COVID-19 Vaccination”, Martin Makary, MD, MPH, and Vinay Prasad, MD, MPH. Dr. Makary is the Commissioner of the FDA; Dr. Prasad is the Director of the CBER Division of the FDA. Please see the screenshot of Figure 3 from this NEJM paper, below:

Please see the latest CDC immunization schedule recommendations for persons age 19 years and older as of 1 October 2025, here: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/imz-schedules/adult-age.html#table-age. A screenshot of the schedule is below:

In addition, please see the age 65 and older immunization schedule recommendations for other injectables on the chart above — Influenza; RSV; pneumonia; Monkeypox; Herpes Zoster (“Shingles”); Hepatitis A and Hepatitis B; and more.

There is now supposed to be “Shared Clinical Decision-Making” between patient and healthcare provider regarding the COVID-19 “vaccines” for persons age 19 and above. Does that also apply across the board to persons living in nursing homes or care / rehabilitation facilities who are competent, but the facility they reside or stay in is also receiving CMS and/or Medicare-Medicaid payments?

There are multiple “Notes” sections regarding the administration of the other “vaccines” listed above in persons age 65 and older (and, in some cases, age 60 and older.) These “Notes” are found here: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/imz-schedules/adult-notes.html#note-covid-19; please scroll down this webpage and click on the topic to read about, such as, “Influenza vaccination.” There are multiple “vaccines” that are considered to be “routine”, such as the influenza “vaccine”, the RSV “vaccine”, and so on. What if a person living in a nursing home or care / rehabilitation facility decides to refuse all of these “routine” injectables, or decides to take only one or two? What happened to “Shared Clinical Decision-Making” in regards to this? Especially in light of new research that proves, for example, that the pneumonia “vaccines” actually increase the risk of contracting pneumonia and dying from said infection? Please see: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-223-million-person-study, “BREAKING: 2.23 Million Person Study Finds Pneumococcal Vaccines Increase Risk of Pneumonia and Death”, Nicolas Hulscher, 22 October 2025.

And, what about the COVID-19 “vaccinated” personnel (administration staff; doctors; nurses; CNAs / PCAs; facility maintenance staff; kitchen staff, etc.) who work at these nursing homes or care / rehab facilities? What about the “downstream Medical Tsunami” of negative effects on them of the “vaccines” that they took, which will present at some point, if not already? What about potential staff loss / turnover?

And, what about the vast majority of the adult children of these residents / patients, who are themselves also COVID-19 “vaccinated” — including the adult children who have already taken multiple injections of these “vaccines?” What about the “downstream Medical Tsunami” of negative effects on them of the COVID-19 “vaccines” that they took, which will present at some point, if not already?

And, what about the potential for another “pandemic emergency” being declared (including from some type of Avian Influenza outbreak) that “mandates” another round of “lockdowns”, which would effect nursing homes or care / rehab facilities?

In Yours Truly’s opinion, these are all things that need to be brought into the daylight and discussed. They represent another “ripple effect” aspect of the ongoing disaster of COVID-19.

THERE. MUST. BE. ACCOUNTABILITY.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

(Intellectual Property Disclaimer: With the exception of links to published scientific papers, website articles, and other items in the public domain, the ideas and conclusions in this post are by PAVACA. Proper credit must be given if ideas or conclusions of this post are used by other blog writers, or on social media, or in print media. Thank you.)

Health Friday 10.17.2025 Open Thread: LINE-1, Chromosomes, and the modRNA COVID-19 “Vaccines”: Part Two

The free vintage header image for today’s offering of human chromosomes as drawn by hand is courtesy of iStock and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. Today’s offering is dedicated to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have suffered injuries, illnesses, or disabilities resulting from an infection of the COVID-19 virus itself, or from having been injected with the COVID-19 “vaccines”; and, to those who have died from either an infection of the COVID-19 virus itself, or from the negative effects of the COVID-19 “vaccines” that they had taken.

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. These are linked here. Note 1: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none, except possibly for some items embedded in linked URLS. If readers wish to add AI-generated content to today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Note 2: Starting with today’s offering, there will be an “Intellectual Property” notice at the end of the post. This is because Yours Truly has noticed that another blog has apparently modified and used certain information in a Health Friday post on their own blog without giving credit to Yours Truly. Thank you.

Yours Truly posted Part One of the LINE-1 and Chromosome 19 situation regarding the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” here: https://www.theqtree.com/2025/09/25/health-friday-9-5-2025-open-thread-human-line-1-chromosomes-and-the-modrna-covid-19-vaccines-part-one/. Part One discussed the (permanent) alteration to the LINE-1 human cell line that was designed into the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.” Part Two will discuss the alteration to the human Chromosome 19 (along with alteration to other human chromosomes) that were ALSO designed into the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.” To begin Part Two, here is a “refresher” on the paper that was published by Ralph Baric, PhD, of the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, on “Synthetic Genomics.” This paper has multiple graphics that display his “templates” for lab-creating synthetic viruses that are “programmed” to alter the DNA, the cells, and the chromosomes of humans: https://www.jcvi.org/stes/default/files/assets/projects/synthetic-genomics-options-for-governance/Baric-Synthetic-Viral-Genomics.pdf, “Synthetic Viral Genomics: Risks and Benefits for Science and Society”, Ralph S. Baric, PhD, 2006. Screenshots of a few of the graphics in this paper are below:

Note the phrase, “…reverse genetics and directed evolution.” Keep this phrase in mind for later in today’s offering.

And now, Yours Truly presents Part Two, beginning with human Chromosome 19, one of the 23 pairs of chromosomes that make up the human chromosome “map.” Below is an image of human Chromosome 19, per Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chromosome_19.) One of the two parts of the chromosome pair is from the father; the other is from the mother:

What does human Chromosome 19 do? The following if from https://medlineplus.gov/genetics/chromosome/19: first, a general Description of human Chromosome 19:

Then, a description of a set of conditions called 19p13.13 Deletion Syndrome:

A short discussion of other types of conditions related to human Chromosome 19 issues:

And, human Chromosome 19 in relation to Cancers:

Below is a screenshot of the Chromosome 19 Disease Map that was published in 1997 (https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/gte.1997.1.145, “Disease genes and chromosomes: disease maps of the human genome. Chromosome 19”, by F Gilbert):

There has been more research since 1997 into human Chromosome 19 and its relationship to diseases and health conditions. An example is here: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91924-7, “Mutant p53 and chromosome 19 microRNA cluster overexpression regulate cancer testis antigen expression and cellular transformation in hepatocellular carcinoma”, Goodwin G. Jinesh, et al., 16 June 2021. Two screenshots from the Introduction of this paper are below:

Take a look again at the 1997 graphic above, and note the areas of human Chromosome 19q.13, q.13.2, q13.32, and q13.34 on the Disease Map that influence the body. An interesting paper from 2018 regarding human Chromosome 19 and what occurs when there is dysregulation is here: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6112826/, “Cancer and the junkyard chromosome: how repeat DNA sequence on chromosome 19 influences risk of malignant disease”, Anne M. Rose, 10 August 2018. Two screenshots from this paper are below. The point here is that human Chromosome 19 is a “rich and fertile ground” for those who wish to experiment with how to alter certain areas of the chromosome, such as the p area or the q area; both of these chromosome 19 areas influence multiple organs and functions of the human body:

Yours Truly has written about the deleterious effects that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” have on the immensely important p53 protein of the human body: https://www.theqtree.com/2025/01/10/health-friday-open-thread-1-10-2025/p53-sv40-the-covid-19-vaccines-and-cancer-with-a-note-on-the-virus-itself/; and, https://www.thetree.com/2025/02/28/health-friday-2-28-2025-open-thread-more-on-p53-the-guardian-of-the-genome-and-tumor-suppressor/. Lab-created aberrations and/or inclusions and/or alterations to the p53 protein, the “Guardian of the Genome”, impacts the influence of human Chromosome 19; and are particularly injurious to the entire body.

**** It appears, then, that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” interact with both the p53 protein AND human chromosome 19 to induce cancers in “vaccinated” persons; and, that the SV40 African Green Monkey cancer promoter gene code piece that is ALSO in the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” is also involved regarding the inducement of cancer in “vaccinated” persons.

Which brings Yours Truly to this, a paper proving the first DIRECT evidence of human Chromosome 19 being altered by the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, which then induce Stage IV bladder cancer: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-study-first-direct-evidence, “BREAKING STUDY: First Direct Evidence of mRNA “Vaccine” Genomic Integration Identified in Stage IV Cancer Patient”, Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 15 September 2025. Please see the screenshot from this article, below:

Note regarding the above: the sequences identified which induced the Stage IV bladder cancer in the patient were contained within the Spike protein (S protein) of the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” that she took, not from within the Nucleocapsid protein (N protein.)

The young woman in question took THREE injections of the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” (mRNA-1273) during 2021 (the “primary series” plus one “booster shot.”) She was diagnosed with Stage IV bladder cancer within twelve months.

The paper is on the preprint server, Zenodo: https://zenodo.org/records/17122912, “Genomic Integration and Molecular Dysregulation in Aggressive Stage IV Bladder Cancer Following COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination”, John A. Catanzano, Nicolas Hulscher, Peter A. McCullough, 15 September 2025. Please see the following screenshots from this paper; first, Table 1. from the Case Presentation. Table 1. outlines the exact “drivers” and “pathways” that established the bladder cancer in the previously-healthy 31-year-old patient after she took the three Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” injections:

Second, from the Case Presentation in the paper. Please note the mention that numerous human Chromosome 19 alterations induced by the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” EXACTLY MATCH the same Open Reading Frame (ORF) sequences in the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” (BNT162b2):

Which means that the alterations to human Chromosome 19 in BOTH the Moderna AND the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” occur within the Open Reading Frame of the spike protein (S protein.) This chromosome altering capability is thus then present in all “descendant modRNA COVID-19 vaccines” from these companies, including the “2025-2026 version” of Pfizer-BioNTech (COMIRNATY) and of Moderna (SPIKEVAX), since said “descendant COVID-19 vaccines” all employ the S protein from the original COMIRNATY or SPIKEVAX injectables.

From the Discussion section of the paper. Please read the screenshot below carefully. This is a description of how the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” induce TURBO-CANCER:

**** What we have here is proof that the oncogenic driver known as human Chromosome 3q26.32, Gene PIK3CA — was included in the modRNA of the Moderna COVID-19 “vaccine” mRNA-1273. Please see the Catanzano, et al., paper cited above: the Table 1., and the Discussion screenshots; and, also, the OMIM Phenotype – Gene Relationships table cited further down in today’s offering (though the OMIM table refers to colorectal cancer, PIK3CA is a driver for other cancers, also.

**** However, there is another element in play here: the Wuhan Hu1 virus itself (aka the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself / the COVID-19 virus itself) ALSO targets and attacks human Chromosomes: in particular, Chromosomes 3, 6, 12, 19, and 21. Please see this paper from December 2020, regarding a study performed on patients in the UK who were sick from the COVID-19 virus itself: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-03065-y, “Genetic mechanisms of critical illness in COVID-19”, Erola Pairo-Castineira, et al., 11 December 2020. Two screenshots from this paper are below; first, from the general introduction:

Compare the references to human Chromosome 19p13.2 and human Chromosome 19p13.3 in the Liebert Chromosome 19 Disease Map graphic above in today’s offering. This is proof that those who lab-created the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) virus itself , and those who lab-created the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, did experiment with human Chromosome 19 in order to include aberrations to areas of this chromosome that could result in negative health outcomes BOTH for persons infected with the virus itself, and for persons who took the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.”

And, Table 1 from the above paper:

Note: 11 December 2020 was the date of the initial Emergency Use Authorization for the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” BNT162b2 to be used in the United States. Given that it takes months for a scientific paper to be researched, written, and published, one can assume that the Pairo-Castineira, et al., paper, was begun several months before the 11 December 2020 publish date. Note: There are FOUR identified areas on human Chromosome 6 that are attacked by the COVID-19 virus itself.

This paper, from 2014, describes the multiple health conditions and diseases that are associated with alterations to / deletions involving, human Chromosome 6: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2013.08.001, “The Human Proteome Organization Chromosome 6 Consortium: Integrating Chromosome-centric and biology/disease driven strategies”, P.A. Keown, et al., 4 April 2014. Please see the screenshot, below, from the Introduction of this paper:

From https://www.storymd.com/, the “Ideogram of human chromosome 6“, which lists the multiple health conditions and diseases associated with aberrations of / alterations to / deletions of, parts of human Chromosome 6. The ideogram is courtesy of the Office of Biological and Environmental Research of the U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge National Laboratory:

Yours Truly firmly believes that, since human Chromosome 6 is also attacked by the SARS-CoV2 (COVID-19) virus itself; and, since the COVID-19 virus itself is the foundational element within all of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” — that these “vaccines”, once injected into the body, can and will attack the human Chromosome 6 of the “vaccinated” person’s body, along with attacking human Chromosomes 3, 12, 19, and 21.

Yours Truly firmly believes that those who lab-created the COVID-19 virus itself, and the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, experimented with human Chromosomes 3, 6, 12, 19, and 21, in order to introduce aberrations / mechanisms into them that could induce or aggravate health conditions and/or diseases that would not otherwise appear in healthy persons, then included the results of these experiments in both the virus itself, and in the modRNA “vaccines.

Yours Truly firmly believes that those who lab-created the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” then added the dangerous lipid nanoparticles (ALC-0159, ALC-0315, SM-102), and N1-Methylpseudouridine, to these “vaccines” to evade the human body’s immune system, to damage / destroy the human body’s immune system, and to damage / destroy the human body’s ability to detect and eliminate “enemy elements”, in order to force the “vaccinated” body to be defenseless to the negative effects of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.” Thus, there are reports of, for example, Diabetes Mellitus resulting from modRNA COVID-19 “vaccination” by the Pfizer-BioNTech “vaccine”, BNT162b2, in this document: https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf, APPENDIX 1. LIST OF ADVERSE EVENTS OF SPECIAL INTEREST section.

FLASH! Yours Truly has just found more proof, in her opinion, regarding the experiments on human Chromosomes by those who lab-created the COVID-19 virus itself, and by those who lab-created the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”. Please see, first: https://www.theburningplatform.com/2025/10/16/8300-spike-in-colon-cancer-that-just-means-the-jabs-are-working/, “8300% SPIKE IN COLON CANCER — THAT JUST MEANS THE JABS ARE WORKING”, by Camus. A screenshot from this article is below:

The Burning Platform article is based on the recent research by Dr. Jessica Rose, PhD, of VAERS reports of colon cancer since 2021 (rollout of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.”) She posted a blog article regarding her analysis, here: https://jessicar.substack.com/p/colon-cancer-on-the-rise-since-2021, 7 September 2025. The huge increase in colon cancer since 2021, per the VAERS reports, appears to be in children under age 18.

Please refer to the human Chromosome Disease Maps, and the screenshots from the 2020 paper of COVID-19 infected persons in the UK, above in today’s offering, regarding human Chromosome 3 and human Chromosome 19.

BOTH human Chromosome 3 AND human Chromosome 19 (among other chromosomes) show up on the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man listing for #114500 COLORECTAL CANCER: CRC Phenotype – Gene Relationships: https://www.omim.org/entry/114500. The human Chromosomes that correlate to the COVID-19 virus itself, and therefore to the COVID-19 modRNA “vaccines”, are:

human Chromosome 3p22.1 Gene: CTNNB1 Colorectal cancer, somatic

human Chromosome 3q26.32 Gene: PIK3CA Colorectal cancer, somatic

human Chromosome 19q13.33 Gene: BAX Colorectal cancer, somatic

NONE of the above are inherited “predispositions.”

The OMIM table is below:

In Yours Truly’s opinion, there is no possible way that the detailed, precise experiments that had to have been performed with human Chromosomes 3, 6, 12, 19, and 21, in the lab-creation of the COVID-19 virus itself, and in the lab-creation of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, could have been accomplished just during the years 2019 – 2020. This is a process that would need several years of work, at the least.

Questions: What kind of POMC (Pieces of Human Excrement) would lab-create a virus, let alone a modRNA “vaccine”, that would induce colon cancer in anyone, let alone in children? What kind of medical professional would inject this type of “vaccine” into children? What kind of government agency would “recommend” that this type of “vaccine” be injected into anyone, let alone into children? What kind of “professional medical organization” (such as, the American Academy of Pediatrics) would “recommend” that this type of “vaccine” be injected into children?

IT IS OF UTMOST IMPORTANCE THAT ALL PERSONS BUILD AND MAINTAIN THEIR NATURAL IMMUNE SYSTEM TO BE IN THE BEST HEALTH POSSIBLE.

THE COVID-19 “VACCINES” — ALL OF THEM — MUST BE REMOVED FROM THE MARKET AND FROM USE. NOW.

THE ARRESTS OF THOSE WHO WERE / ARE INVOLVED IN THE ABOVE ACTIVITIES REGARDING THE LAB-CREATION OF THE COVID-19 VIRUS ITSELF, AND OF THE modRNA COVID-19 “VACCINES”, MUST START. NOW.

THERE. MUST. BE. ACCOUNTABILITY.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Intellectual Property Disclaimer: With the exception of links to scientific papers, public-domain scientific research or information websites, and news / media / Substack outlets that are on the internet, the contents of the above article are the ideas and/or conclusions of the writer, PAVACA. Proper credit must be given to the writer (PAVACA) if the ideas and/or conclusions in the above article are used by any other blog author or writer, or by persons on social media and/or on podcasts, or by persons using print media. Thank you.

Health Friday 10.10.2025 Open Thread: A Letter to Dr. Martin Makary, FDA Commissioner

The free vintage header image of writing a letter for today’s offering is courtesy of Shutterstock and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post AI-generated content in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Today’s offering is dedicated to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have suffered negative consequences from an infection of the COVID-19 virus itself after recovering from the infection; to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have COVID-19 “vaccine”-induced injuries, illnesses, and/or disabilities; and, to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have passed away from either an infection of the COVID-19 virus itself, or from the negative effects of the COVID-19 “vaccines” they had in their body.

“Dr. Martin Makary, MD, MPH, Commissioner, United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

10903 New Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD, 20993

Dear Dr. Martin Makary:

Greetings. This letter is in reference to certain questions that the writer poses regarding the FDA, under your leadership, still promoting the use of the COVID-19 “vaccines” (actually, mRNA gene therapies) in the United States. This includes the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” COMIRNATY, by Pfizer-BioNTech; the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” SPIKEVAX and NEXSPIKE, by Moderna; and, the “inactivated virus” COVID-19 “vaccine” NUVAXOVID, by Novavax. Thank you in advance for your attention. The questions follow:

Question One: Have you read through the report on BNT162b2 that Pfizer-BioNTech submitted to the FDA on 21 January 2021, regarding the Pharmacokinetics tests results for this modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” (which was subsequently approved by the FDA in 2022 under the name COMIRNATY)?

Would you please answer, in detail, your reasoning behind the continued FDA approval of COMIRNATY based on the results of this report? The report is found here: https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/125742_S1_M2_26_phramkin-tabulated-summary.pdf, “BNT162b2 2.6.5 Pharmacokinetics Tabulated Summary”, time-stamped by the FDA on 21 January 2021 at 23:22 (GMT), and starting with FDA CBER document identification number FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0013907. For your convenience, images of Page 7 and Page 8 of this report are below; first, Page 7:

And, Page 8:

The writer of this letter assumes that you understand that the BNT162b2 formulation used in the Wistar lab rats experiments above is the same formulation that the FDA granted the initial EUA to for use in the United States on 11 December 2020.

Question Two: Have you read through the Post-marketing Experience report on BNT162b2 that Pfizer-BioNTech submitted to the FDA on 30 April 2021? In particular, have you read through the APPENDIX 1. LIST OF ADVERSE EVENTS OF SPECIAL INTEREST section of this report, which begins on Page 30? The report is found here: https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf, “BNT162b2 5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization Adverse Event Reports”, time-stamped by the FDA on 30 April 2021 at 09:26 (GMT), starting with FDA CBER document identification number FDA-CBER-2021-0000054. The APPENDIX 1. section covers only those serious adverse events reports to Pfizer-BioNTech that were submitted between 11 December 2020 (the date that the FDA granted the initial EUA for BNT162b2 to be used in the United States), and 28 February 2021 — a period of fewer than 12 weeks. There are over 1,200 different listings of serious adverse events reports in the APPENDIX 1. section of the document.

Would you please answer, in detail, your reasoning behind the continuing FDA approval of COMIRNATY, given this document? Would you please answer, in detail, your reasoning why the FDA would simply accept this document without demanding an investigation of why there are so many different serious adverse events reports for BNT162b2? For you convenience, an image of Page one of the APPENDIX 1. section (Page 30 of the report document) is below:

The APPENDIX 1. section of the report runs from Page 30 to Page 38.

Question Three: Have you read the paper, published in the journal Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology on 15 September 2021, in which the authors prove that both the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” of Pfizer-BioNTech and of Moderna, and the viral vector COVID-19 “vaccines” (for example, of Janssen), cross the placenta of a COVID-19 “vaccinated” pregnant woman and enter into the body and brain of the fetus she is carrying? And, that, similarly, these “vaccines” also cross into the breast milk of the nursing mother who was “vaccinated”, therefore also entering into her nursling’s body and brain? The paper is found here: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.735394, “COVID-19 Vaccination in Pregnancy and Lactation: Current Research and Gaps in Understanding”, Lydia L. Shook, Parisa N. Fallah, Jason N. Silberman, Andrea G. Edlow, 15 September 2021. For your convenience, a screenshot of Figure 1 from the paper is below:

Which means, according to the graphic above from the paper, that the fetus and the nursling will get COVID-19 “vaccinated” along with the mother, due to the ingredients and mechanisms that cross into the placenta and/or the breast milk from the “vaccinated” mother. The natural immune systems of a fetus or of a nursling child are not mature enough, or strong enough, to handle the antibody-manufacturing demands of the COVID-19 “vaccines” that involuntarily enter their body and brain via the “vaccinated” mother.

Would you please describe, in detail, your reasoning for the FDA continuing to recommend COVID-19 “vaccination” of pregnant women, and/or breastfeeding mothers, based on the Frontiers In paper report?

Question Four: Are you aware that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” by Pfizer-BioNTech and by Moderna, contain N1-Methylpseudouridine, a lab-created compound, that replaces the natural RNA in the Uridine of the “vaccinated” person’s body with this compound? Are you aware that N1-Methylpseudouridine was specifically created and included in the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” because this lab-created compound facilitates the entry of the ingredients of these “vaccine” into every cell of the “vaccinated” person’s body? Are you aware that, by replacing the RNA of the natural Uridine in the “vaccinated” person’s body, the multiple beneficial functions of Uridine RNA are damaged or lost? Are you aware that, among the multiple beneficial functions of Uridine RNA include cognitive elements (learning, memory), and emotional/psychological elements (mood regulation?) Are you aware that N1-Methylpseudouridine is present in all COVID-19 “vaccines” by Pfizer-BioNTech? For your convenience, please see: https://www.theqtree.com/2024/11/08/health-friday-11-8-2024-open-thread-the-insidious-n1-methylpseudouridine-in-the-covid-19-vaccines/; and, https://www.theqtree.com/2025/03/21/health-friday-3-21-2025-open-thread-more-on-the-n1-methylpseudouridine-in-the-modrna-covid-19-vaccines/. The Patent Declaration by Pfizer-BioNTech for BNT162b2, which describes the inclusion of N1-Methylpseudouridine in this “vaccine”, and what it does, is found here: https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2021213945A1/en. For reference, the following screenshot is from this Patent Declaration:

Would you please explain, in detail, your reasoning behind why the FDA should continue to approve for use in the United States, an injectable (the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”) that specifically includes a lab-created compound (N1-Methylpseudouridine) which replaces natural Uridine RNA — and that this replacement is performed without the advance knowledge and consent of the person receiving this “vaccine?”

Question Five: The writer of this letter assumes that you, Dr. Makary, are aware that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” induce cardiovascular issues and conditions, such as, myocarditis and pericarditis. This would mean induction of these conditions by the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” (COMIRMATY); or, by the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” (SPIKEVAX.) The writer of this letter will focus on the Moderna product. The Package Insert for the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, SPIKEVAX, is found here: https://www.fda.gov/media/155675/download. For your convenience, screenshots of the the following portions of this document are below; first, the Warnings and Precautions section:

The writer of this letter notes that the Warnings and Precautions are not enclosed in a “Black Box Warning.” Why is this the case?

Then, from section 5.2 Myocarditis and Pericarditis:

And, from section 6.2 Postmarketing Experience:

There actually is information available regarding the potential for long-term sequelae of myocarditis or pericarditis after taking COVID-19 “vaccines.” It is here: https://doi.org/10.61577/ijcri.2025.100001, “Myocarditis after SARS-CoV-2 Infection and COVID-19 Vaccination: Epidemiology, outcomes, and new perspectives”, M. Nathaniel Mead, Jessica Rose, William Makis, Kirk Milhoan, Nicolas Hulscher, and Peter A. McCullough, 20 March 2025. For your convenience, a screenshot of the Abstract of this paper is below:

And, Figure 6 from the paper, VAERS reports of myocarditis after COVID-19 “vaccination”:

Would you please describe, in detail, your reasoning why the FDA needs to continue to promote the use of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” in the United States, for any age group, based on the paper above?

Finally, Question Six: Would you please describe, in detail, what medical school and/or Residency classes you took in which you learned that it was acceptable for patients to be given injections of an mRNA gene therapy treatment platform (in this case, the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”) without that injectable first having gone through a rigorous testing and analysis protocol beforehand?

Sincerely,

An independent COVID-19 researcher for the past five and a half years.”

The COVID-19 “vaccines” — ALL of them — must be removed from the market and from use. Now.

THERE. MUST. BE. ACCOUNTABILITY.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday 10.3.2025 Open Thread: The Continuing Disaster of COVID-19: “Set Pieces”

The free image of an example of a theatrical set piece is courtesy of Study.com/ and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s offering speaks to the disaster of COVID-19, it is dedicated to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have suffered illness, injury, disability, or death from either an infection of the COVID-19 virus itself; or, from illness, injury, disability, or death, induced by the COVID-19 “vaccines” that were injected into their body.

Today’s offering follows a different path.

In the performing arts world, a “set piece” is a detailed design for a production. Set pieces are designed for plays, for musical theater productions, for movies, for dance or ballet productions, for opera and other large Classical music productions, and so on. Set pieces can be elaborate, or they can be “bare-bones” simple. Sometimes, there are multiple set pieces created for the production; sometimes, there are only one or two set pieces; sometimes, set pieces are built on revolving stage areas and are “rotated” according to the scene or act in the production; sometimes, extra items, such as water (in pools, as waterfalls, etc.) are incorporated into a set piece (think Esther Williams swimming movies); and so on. However, the set piece (or, set pieces) all serve to help the framework of the production and the intention behind the plot, script, or and/or music of the work. And, set pieces are designed — in almost all cases, they are not “thrown together” at the last minute; one exception is the performance of pure “improv” (improvisation; many improv performances use props only, not set pieces.)

Examples of performing arts “set pieces” of various types are below:

From Giacomo Puccini’s opera, Tosca, the final scene, in which Tosca leaps to her death from the parapets of the Castel Sant’Angelo to escape capture after she killed her tormentor, Baron Scarpia. Courtesy of the Metropolitan Opera, 2024-2025 season:

Yours Truly will note that the “other side” of the Castel Sant’Angelo set piece has multiple layers of foam pads, trained stage technicians, and first-aid personnel on hand to make quite sure that the singer playing Tosca lands safely. The “leap scene” rehearsal related to the Metropolitan Opera 2024 – 2025 season production is on video, here: https://www.facebook.com/MetOpera/videos/puccini-tosca-jump-rehearsal/568495235373588/.

An example of a water “set piece” from the Esther Williams 1952 movie, Million Dollar Mermaid. Courtesy loveletterstooldhollywood.blogspot.com/:

A set piece from a performance of Samuel Becket’s stage play, Waiting for Godot. Courtesy of Wikipedia:

“Set Pieces” in the COVID-19 disaster:

In the COVID-19 disaster, there have been well-designed, elaborate “set pieces” employed, such as: the “mandating” of lockdowns; the “universal masking”; the deliberate withholding of important information from then-President Donald Trump 45 regarding the ingredients and mechanisms of the COVID-19 “vaccines” in development during “Operation Warp Speed; the subsequent rollout of the COVID-19 “vaccines”; the marginalizing and ostracizing of those who had any reservations about the “safety and efficacy” of these “vaccines”; the persecution / prosecution / loss of medical licenses, of those who began to investigate and to write about the dangers and deadliness of these “vaccines” — for only a few examples. These “set pieces” affected millions of people, who were coerced and/or gaslighted-frightened into being “actors” (such as, standing six feet away from other persons; “following the science” and taking multiple injections of COVID-19 “vaccines”.) Others were labelled as “anti-vaxxers” because they refused to take the “vaccines.” All were, at the same time, also forced to be “spectators” (watching their children suffer from not being able to attend school during the “lockdowns”; losing jobs, family relationships, friends, and colleagues; watching COVID-19 “vaccinated” loved ones, friends, and colleagues begin to succumb to COVID-19 “vaccine”-induced injuries, illnesses, disabilities, or death.)

It appears that new “set pieces” regarding the COVID-19 “vaccines” in the United States are being created and put into place. One such new “set piece” involves, among other items, the 19 September 2025 ACIP “recommendation” that COVID-19 “vaccine” administration be restricted to persons age 65 and over; and, to persons who are deemed to be at “high risk of severe complications from a COVID-19 infection”, as per the FDA’s “new approach”, outlined here: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsb2506929, “An Evidence-Based Approach to Covid-19 Vaccination”, Martin Makary, MD MPH, and Vinay Prasad, MD, MPH, published 20 May 2025. Figure 2 from this “opinion piece”, which lists the populations of Americans at “high risk”, and should therefore take a COVID-19 “vaccine”, is below. Note: the age 65 and older category is already “assumed” to be a high risk:

The CDC’s ACIP group “recommendations” from the September 2025 meeting are summarized here: https://www.hhw.gov/press-room/acip-recommends-covid-19-vaccination-individual-decision-making.html. A screenshot from this article is below:

However, “individual decision-making” runs counter to what “Establishment Medicine” organizations, such as the AMA, advises physicians to do. For example, in the AMA podcast interview with Sean O’Leary, MD, published 30 April 2025, found here: https://edhub.ama-assn-org/jn-learning/audio-player/18969411, “Strategies for Talking With Parents About Vaccines.” This audio interview is a must-listen. Dr. O’Leary describes the AMA “talking points” regarding pushing “vaccination” for young children (including newborns) along the lines of “presumptive” (“your child is due now to have X vaccines”) discussion with parents, as opposed to “participatory” (“what do you think about vaccination?”) discussion with parents. Dr. O’Leary makes it clear that “presumptive” discussion results in more agreement from the parents to have their young children “vaccinated.” Dr. O’Leary also speaks about “pre-bunking”, the process of minimizing / dismissing “vaccine misinformation” or “vaccine disinformation” from “anti-vaxxers”; instead, the physician is urged to “steer” the “vaccine”-hesitant or “vaccine”-questioning parent to “trusted websites” like the ones from the AAP (American Academy of Pediatrics, which endorses “vaccination” of all kinds for children, including from birth, and including the COVID-19 “vaccines.”) In fact, the American Academy of Pediatrics https://www.aap.org/ has issued its own “recommended childhood vaccine schedule”, in contravention to the revised Childhood Immunization Schedule of the CDC. Below are screenshots of the “AAP recommended vaccines”, the “AAP recommended vaccination schedule”, and, the “AAP recommended vaccination schedule by medical condition”, below:

Note that the COVID-19 “vaccines” are “recommended” by the AAP for all children ages 6 months and older — for healthy children; for immunocompromised children; and, for children with heart disease, and other medical conditions.

Another “set piece” was added this week: the email from Jack Leeming, an “editor” at the journal Nature, that he sent to selected blog authors at Substack. These blog authors work every day to investigate and write about the dangers and deadliness of the COVID-19 “vaccines.” Among the blog authors contacted by Jack Leeming are: Sasha Latypova; Alex Berenson; and, Dr. Peter A. McCulloug, MD. In this email, Leeming is requesting their “input” before Nature publishes a “hit piece” on them. Apparently, this “hit piece” will try to do the following:

Defame Substack blog authors who are doing all they can to spread the actual truth about the dangers and deadliness of the COVID-19 “vaccines”;

Pressure Substack into imposing “content moderation” (translation: censorship) of these blogs;

Pressure Substack into “de-monetizing” these blogs.

Pressure Substack into showcasing “COVID-19 vaccine friendly” blogs.

Sasha Latypova wrote about the email she received from Leeming. Please see: https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/journal-nature-is-planning-a-hit, “Journal Nature is planning a hit piece about me. This is my response to their “request for comment.””, 1 October 2025. A screenshot of Leeming’s email to her, via her blog article, is below:

Ms. Latypova’s reply, which is also in her article, takes Leeming and his email apart. A portion of her reply is in the screenshot below:

All of the above begs the questions: Who (and/or What) are in the “Control Booth” regarding the “set pieces” of the COVID-19 disaster? Who (and/or What) are telling those in the “Control Booth” what to do?

THE COVID-19 “VACCINES” — ALL OF THEM — MUST BE REMOVED FROM THE MARKET AND FROM USE. NOW.

THERE. MUST. BE. ACCOUNTABILITY.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday 9.26.2025 Open Thread: More on Gain-of-Function Research is Still Going On — In the United States

The header image of a vintage laboratory for today’s offering is courtesy of Adobe Stock and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics.

Today’s offering contains more proof that, even though the United States government has “officially” paused Gain-of-Function experiments, these experiments are still continuing. Please see: https://www.theqtree.com/2025/08/29/health-friday-8-29-2025-open-thread-gain-of-function-research-is-still-going-on/. This time, there are two separate facilities in the United States that are performing the Gain-of-Function (GoF) work. The first is the new “bat experiments lab” at Colorado State University at Fort Collins, CO. The second is the laboratory at Georgia State University at Atlanta, GA. Bear with Yours Truly: the end of the post is the “punch line.” Yours Truly makes it clear at the start that there is no intent to “cast aspersions” on the research of any of the persons mentioned in today’s offering, or on the current Acting Director of the NIAID.

To begin, the Colorado State University facility. Please see: https://www.theburningplatform.com/2025/09/15/gain-of-function-is-alive-and-thriving-in-the-united-states/, by Patti Johnson, 9 September 2025. This regards a 14,000 square foot “bat research facility” that was added to an already-exiting research lab building at Colorado State University (CSU.) The majority of the funding for this “bat research lab”, $6.7 million dollars, came from NIH grant C06OD032019 (https://source.colostate.edu/csu-awarded-6-7-million-nih-award-for-research-facility-focused-on-bat-health-disease-transmission/, 7 October 2021. CSU already had a 38,000 square foot research facility in which the university had invested $22 million dollars, and which had opened in 2020: https://cvmbs.source.colostate.edu/more-than-a-building-the-center-for-vector-borne-infectious-diseases-marks-a-new-era-in-research/, 11 December 2020 (which, by the way, is the same date that the FDA granted the initial Emergency Use Authorization for the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” BNT162b2 to be used in the United States.) In “The Center for Vector Borne Infectious Diseases” at CSU, the professors “mix in” with students in the labs. This facility has 10 labs and employs more than 90 personnel. The labs are all BSL-2 labs. This situation, in and of itself, raises two questions: One, why are students allowed to “mix in” with the professors in these labs? And, Two, if these labs are handling / experimenting with, infectious diseases pathogens, why are the labs only BSL-2 safety level? Please see: https://ghphipps.com/colorado-state-university-center-for-vector-borne-infectious-disease/. A screenshot from this article is below:

GH Phipps was the construction company for the facility.

However, the “new bat research facility” is the separate 14,000 square foot building: https://yellowscene.com/2024/09/19/csu-to-build-taxpayer-funded-facility-for-bat-breeding-and-research/, 19 September 2024. This was the facility built with the NIH grant of $6.7 million dollars. This building is located here: 3105 Rampart Rd., Ft. Collins, CO, 5 minutes from downtown Fort Collins.

And, guess what? The “new bat research facility” in Fort Collins also has BSL-2 level labs: A screenshot from the Yellow Scene article is below:

The entire situation at CSU raises other questions: One, will professors ALSO “mix in” with students at this “bat breeding and research” facility? And, Two, why is CSU attempting to be the “United States version” of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which is what the “new bat research facility” at CSU appears to be?

And, now, turning to the second issue, the continuing Gain-of-Function experiments with Avian Influenza viruses going on in the United States —- this time, at Georgia State University in Atlanta. Please see: https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/us-and-south-korean-scientists-lab, “U.S. and South Korean Scientists Lab-Engineer Frankenstein Bird Flu Viruses in Georgia: Journal ‘Virology'”. 14 September 2025. The GoF experiments at GSU, supported by an NIH grant, were performed by South Korean scientists who are ALSO be professors at Georgia State University, with a couple of said professors ALSO having ties to South Korean institutions. Yours Truly will also present **interesting information** regarding the scope of this research at GSU by one particular author of the paper just cited. Please see the screenshot below, from the Fleetwood article:

The paper cited in the Fleetwood article is here: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2025.110674, “Interferon-y receptor signaling is critical for balanced immune activation and protection against influenza after vaccination”, Sang-Moo Kang, et al., 6 September 2025. A screenshot of the list of the paper’s authors and their affiliations is below, from the paper itself:

Note that the TITLE of the paper does NOT mention what type of influenza was the study subject (in this case, it was Avian Influenza.) More on this aspect later on in today’s offering.

Following are screenshots from sections of the paper that are available online. Note: the entire paper is available only through institutional access, or through paid access.

From the Introduction of the paper:

And, the from the funding section of the paper:

The NIH grant went to Sang-Moo Kang, the principal investigator. Please see: https://www.gsu.edu/2021/06/04/biomedical-sciences-researcher-gets-2-7-million-federal-grant-to-study-seasonal-and-universal-vaccination-in-aged-populations/. This was the NIH grant AI154656 cited above. A screenshot of this article is below — in its entirety, as there are several “clues” in it:

Note the “clues”: “universal vaccination”; aged populations”; “multiple influenza proteins”; “translational science”; “cross protective efficacy.” However, the “multiple influenza proteins” that were experimented with in the paper cited above were not regular “seasonal flu viruses” — they were strains of H5N1, the Avian Influenza virus.

It appears that Dr. Kang has also used some of the AI154656 NIH grant on other research and papers, such as for this paper: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127206, “Intranasal vaccination with multi-neuraminidase and M2e virus-like particle vaccine results in greater mucosal immunity and protection against influenza than intramuscular injection”, Sang-Moo Kang, et al., Version of Record 7 May 2025. Again, this is “Dr. Kang and his gang” at work; the exception here is that the researchers for this paper are all affiliated only with Georgia State University. And, again, the entire paper is available only through institutional access or through paid access. Keep in mind the emphasis of the paper on “intranasal vaccine delivery.”

This particular paper is the result of Dr. Kang’s, et al., research using another “mixture” of influenza viruses — H1N1 (“swine flu”, a subtype of Influenza A), plus H3N2 (a non-human influenza virus in pigs that can infect humans, https://oklahoma.gov/health/health-education/acute-disease-service/disease-information/influenza-a-h3n2-variant-.html), plus H5N1 Avian Influenza. Screenshots from the “snippets” of this paper that are available online are below: the Abstract; a portion of the Viruses section; and, a portion of the Acknowledgements section:

It appears that the paper purports to prove that the intranasal method of “vaccine delivery” is superior to the current intramuscular (injection) method. It is also clear that experiments that were performed were Gain-of-Function work — this time, combining various Influenza A subtypes (“swine flu” that infects humans; “swine flu” that can infect humans; and, Avian Influenza); plus, Influenza B. It is also clear that these experiments were designed to have maximum effect on the CD4 – CD8 cells and the IgG system. By the way, neuraminidase is an important component in the spread of influenza virus in human lungs. Interferon-y (IFN-y) is an element that is important in the regulation of immune and inflammatory responses, among other functions.

**** There is one more paper by “Dr. Kang and Gang” at GSU that bears scrutiny; this one, published in July 2024: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-50087-5, “Enhancing cross-protection against influenza by heterologous sequential immunization with mRNA LNP and protein nanoparticle vaccines”, Sang-Moo Kang, et al., 10 July 2024. This paper describes Gain-of-Function experiments not only with various influenza viruses (H3N2 and H7N9 [H7N9 is an Avian Influenza virus that is particularly lethal to humans who get infected with it]); it also describes what can only be Gain-of-Function experiments with “delivery methods” for the TWO different kinds of influenza “vaccines” that use EITHER lipid nanoparticles, OR use PHC (a protein-based nanoparticle.) Several screenshots from this paper are below, starting with the Abstract; then, Figure 1.; followed by a portion of the Discussion section:

The LNPs (lipid nanoparticles) used in the “mRNA initial series vaccine” in the experiments in the above paper are: DOTMA (cationic lipid, used in gene therapies, enhances gene transfection); DOPE (enhances intracellular “delivery” of the “vaccine” ingredients); and, DMG-PEG2000 (nanoparticle version of polyethylene glycol; one of the two LNPs in the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, the other being SM-102.)

It appears that this paper describes how a “multi-delivery method” of a 2-injection series of a modRNA influenza “vaccine”, followed by a 1-dose “booster” of an intranasal modRNA influenza “vaccine”, is the “optimal” method for “cross-protection” against infection.

The “PUNCH LINE” section of today’s offering follows:

**** In fact, it appears that the above paper claims that modRNA influenza “vaccine” intramuscular injection (IM injection) is now to be considered as “priming the pump” for the subsequent use of modRNA intranasal delivery of the influenza “vaccine” in order to have “sufficient protection” against infection. In other words — TWO types of “delivery methods” need to used.

The above paper was funded by NIH grants R01AI101047 and R01AI143844 to “Dr. Kang and Gang” researcher Bao-Zhong Wang. Dr. Wang, by the way, seems to be from Communist China, having earned his PhD from the Chinese Academy of Sciences in 2003.

Which brings Yours Truly back to the “Broadly Protective Influenza Vaccine” Patent that is owned by Dr. Jeffery Taubenberger, a “career employee” of the NIH who is now the Acting Director of the NIAID. Yours Truly has written about this scientist in the Health Friday offering of 29 August 2025, cited above in today’s offering. This is the “Universal Influenza Vaccine” that Dr. Taubenberger developed at the NIH: https://www.techtransfer.nih.gov/tech/tab-3388, “Broadly Protective Influenza Vaccine Comprising a Cocktail of Inactivated Avian Influenza Viruses”, published 6 July 2020. A screenshot from this page is below:

Note the “intranasally or intramuscularly” in the above statement.

The Patent declaration document for the above “Universal Influenza Vaccine” is here: https://image-ppubs.uspto.gov/dirsearch-public/print/downloadPdf/11369675, filed 21 July 2020. The title of the Patent is the same as that of the NIH TechTransfer information cited above.

All of the foregoing appears to point in the direction of a “universal influenza vaccine” that includes various types of influenza viruses (“swine flu”; Avian influenza; Influenza B); that would require at least three doses of a “vaccine” to have “sufficient protection”; and, that the “delivery methods” of the three doses appears to be 2 intramuscular injections of a modRNA plus cationic lipid nanoparicles “vaccine” to “prime the pump”, plus 1 “booster dose” of an intranasal modRNA plus PHC-nanoparticle “vaccine” to “provide sufficient protection” from infection. And, that this situation is being “influenced”, so to speak, by the “new direction” of the NIAID, led by Acting Director Dr. Jeffery Taubenberger.

One must ask: Why is there so much emphasis on a “universal influenza vaccine” that combines elements of “swine flu” viruses, of various Avian Influenza viruses, and, of the Influenza B virus? Why is there an emphasis on “aged populations” in the Gain-of-Function experiments described above in today’s offering?

THERE. MUST. BE. ACCOUNTABILITY.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA