Health Friday 6.6.2025 Open Thread: TLR4, S1, and mRNA-1283 (mNEXSPIKE): A Scientific Gourmanderie

The above image of TLR Signalling Pathways is courtesy of BioFinder and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s offering is related to the disaster of the COVID-19 virus itself, and of the COVID-19 “vaccines”, Yours Truly dedicates it to the memory of all persons, of whatever age or location, who have passed away from the negative effects of these lab-created Biological Toxin Weapons.

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.

And now, to the reader’s Edification Smorgasbord, a “feast of information” regarding just how dangerous and potentially deadly mRNA-1283 (mNEXSPIKE) is, Yours Truly offers the following Menu:

APPETIZER: WHAT IS TLR4?

TLR4 (aka Toll-like receptor 4) is a transmembrane protein that exists across a cell membrane. TLR4 functions as a kind of “sensing device” within the body. It detects foreign bacteria and viruses. When a foreign element is detected by TLR4, it begins to send messages to the natural immune system to activate the immune response. TLR4 is crucial to the correct functioning of the natural immune system. Please see the screenshots below for more information:

Citation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toll-like_receptor_4

Citation: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2007.05.016, “Toll-like receptors in inflammation, infection and cancer”, Keqiang Chen, et al., October 2007. Found via: https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/immunology-and-microbiology/tlr4.

FIRST COURSE: THE FDA APPROVES “mNEXSPIKE” IN MAY 2025:

The “newest version” COVID-19 “vaccine”, mRNA-1283 (aka mNEXSPIKE), was “fully approved” by the FDA on 30 May 2025. Yours Truly wrote about this situation here: https://www.theqtree.com/2025/06/01/stop-press-edition-hhs-secretary-robert-f-kennedy-needs-to-resign-now/. This “vaccine” claims to be “more effective” in “preventing” an infection of COVID-19. The claim is based on the fact that mRNA-1283 (aka mNEXSPIKE) uses “only” the S1 protein and the N sector of said S1 protein of the COVID-19 virus spike protein, as opposed to using the entire spike protein (as in mRNA-1273, the original “flagship” modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” by Moderna.) Please see: https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiaf022, “Safety and Immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Receptor-Binding Domain and N-Terminal Domain mRNA Vaccine”, Spyros Chalkias, et al., 15 April 2025 (most of the authors of this “informational paper” are either affiliated with Moderna, or are employees of Moderna.) A screenshot of the Background section of the Abstract of this paper is below:

At first glance, this “new development” by Moderna may appear to be a “positive” achievement. However, there are other issues that arise:

First, there is the fact that the S1 protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus contains both the RCB (Receptor-Binding Domain) AND the N-terminal domain of the virus. It is the RCB that allows the virus to “attach” itself , or to “dock” itself, to cells in the body — for example, to the ACE2 cell receptors; and, to TLR4 cells. The N-terminal domain is the “end part” of the S1 protein; it is a “free” group at the end of the protein, while, at the same time, it “initiates” a polypeptide chain.

Second, there is the fact that the S1 protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus interacts with TLR4 cells. Yours Truly begins with this: https://news-medical.net/news/20210510/Research-suggests-Pfizer-BioNTech-COVID-19-vaccine-reprograms-innate-innate-immune-responses.aspx, Sally Robertson, B.Sc., 10 May 2021. Please see the following screenshots from this article:

While the above article refers to the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” BNT162b2, the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” from Moderna, mRNA-1273, also targets the RBD, which interacts with TLR4 cells in the “vaccinated” person’s body. In addition, all of the modRNA “descendant clone” COVID-19 “vaccines” by both companies also use the RBD, there interacting with TLR4 cells in the “vaccinated / boosted” person’s body.

TLR4 cells are also present in multiple areas and organs of the body. The modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” will interact with these cells. This is due to the fact that the S1 protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus contains certain amino acids residues (numbers 1-1208) that interact with TLR4 cells. Please see: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.306187, “SARS-CoV-2 spike protein S1 subunit induces pro-inflammatory responses via toll-like receptor 4 signaling in murine and human macrophages”, Ken Shirato, Takako Kizaki, February 2021. A screenshot of the Abstract of this paper follows:

Regarding the S1 amino acids residues 1-1208 and TLR4, please see this paper, from 2020: https://europepmc.org/article/ppr/ppr170060, ” Structural characterization of a nanobody derived from a naive library that neutralizaes SARS-CoV-2″, M Dumoux, et al., 1 June 2020. Below are screenshots from the Methods section and from a portion of the Supplementary Table section of this paper (the Supplementary Table portion shows some of the gene code for the S1 1-1208 residues):

Further information regarding SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and its interaction with TLR4 is found here: https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1368946, “TLR2/4 are novel activating receptors for SARS-CoV-2 spike protein on NK cells”. Nadine Landolina, et al., 30 May 2024. “NK” stands for “Natural Killer” cells in the body. A screenshot from this paper is below:

Then, there is the issue of clinical trial used by the FDA to “justify” the “full approval” of mRNA-1283 (aka mNEXSPIKE), NCT05137236 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05137236.) There was NO Placebo Control Group in this study. The study participants (study subjects) were injected with the following Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”: mRNA-1273; OR, mRNA-1283; OR, mRNA-1283.211; OR, mRNA-1283.529. Why was there no Placebo Control Group? Assuming that the study subjects knew, in advance, they would be injected with any one of FOUR different variations of a modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, were they fine with that?

And, there is the “opinion piece” by Dr. Martin Makary (FDA Commissioner) and Dr. Vinay Prasad (new head of the FDA’s CBER division), regarding the “new approach” that the FDA will use for COVID-19 “vaccines.” Please see:

SECOND COURSE: WHAT DOES THE modRNA COVID-19 “VACCINE”, mNEXSPIKE, CONTAIN?

Please see the FDA-issued Fact Sheet for Healthcare Providers (aka the Package Insert) for mRNA-1283, mNEXSPIKE: https://www.fda.gov/media/186738/download. Below is a screenshot of section 11 Description, section 12 Clinical Pharmacology, and section 13 Nonclinical Toxicology of this document:

Which plainly states that mNEXSPIKE contains the same types of dangerous, deadly lipid nanoparticle and excipient that all the other modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” by Moderna contain: SM-102, and PEG2000-DMG. This means that mNEXSPIKE will be rapidly spread into every cell in the “vaccinated” person’s body. It is also clear that mNEXSPIKE has NOT been tested for mutation potential, cancer-inducement potential, or reproductive impairment potential.

Yours Truly then performed a search to ascertain whether or not mNEXSPIKE contains N1-methylpseudouridine. She has written extensively on this board about this lab-created “fake Uridine plus a form of methane”, which completely replaces the natural RNA in the Uridine in the body. Recall that natural Uridine is crucial to multiple body functions and mechanisms: regulation of mood, of learning and memory, and of “gut-brain connection” functions. Lo and behold, the US Patent for mRNA-1283 (aka mNEXSPIKE) does have language describing “various types” of pseudouridine, including N1-methylpseudouridine, are used in all of Moderna’s modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” — which would also include mNEXSPIKE. The US Patent for mRNA-1283 is found here (US 20240382581A1): https://patents.google.com/patent/US20240382581A1/en?q=(mRNA-1283)&oq=mRNA-1283, “Pan-human coronavirus vaccines”, ModernaTX, published 21 November 2024. Please see sections 0120, 0121, 0122, and 0123 of this document for descriptions of the “various types” of pseudouridine.

Lastly, there is the question as to whether mNEXSPIKE contains any saRNA (self-amplifying RNA) component. Yours Truly searched for information regarding this, since the IM dose (intramuscular injection dose) of this COVID-19 “vaccine” is a very small amount — 0.2mL. She found this, which appears to be a “dancing all around the truth” description of this “vaccine.” Please see: https://synapse.patsnap.com/article/what-is-mrna-1283-used-for?, 28 June 2024. A screenshot from this article is below:

Read the last sentence in the second paragraph above, especially “…a robust and durable immune response, potentially requiring fewer doses and offering longer-lasting immunity compares to other vaccines.” Sounds like a description of the saRNA H5N1 “vaccine”, KOSTAIVE, currently approved for use in the EU / Scandinavia, and in Japan; and, a version of which “vaccine” is to begin clinical trials in the United States (NCT06602531), under the name ARCT-2304.

DESSERT AND BEVERAGES: REACTIONS AND QUESTIONS:

First, this: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/maha-movement-flabbergasted-covid, “MAHA Movement Flabbergasted COVID-19 Vaccines Remain on Market”, Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH, 2 June 2025. There is an embedded interview with Dr. McCullough in this article, along with a linked copy of the “Kabuki Theater performance” regarding “stopping” the COVID-19 “vaccines” in the United States by Dr. Martin Makary (FDA), Dr. Jay Bhattacharya (NIH DIrector), and HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., on 27 May 2025. A screenshot from the McCullough article is below, giving his views on the current situation:

Second, this tweet, from Dr. William Makis: https://x.com/MakisMD/status/1930296443434348771, 4 June 2024. Two screenshots from his tweet are below: first, a statement from HHS Secretary Kennedy, Jr.; and, second, from Dr. Makis:

Questions, posed by Yours Truly: Why did the FDA “fully approve” a “new”, modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” that specifically targets person over age 65, and persons who “fit” a detailed list of “persons at risk of severe COVID-19 infection”, as complied by Dr. Martin Makary and Dr. Vinay Prasad? Why was there a “Kabuki Theater performance” on 27 May 2025 by Drs. Makary and Bhattacharya, along with HHS Secretary Kennedy, Jr., when it was obvious by that date that the FDA “full approval” of mNEXSPIKE was “a done deal”? Why did the FDA issue an Approval Letter to Moderna for mNEXSPIKE that has so many “caveats”, “requests for more information”, and an “order” for the company to perform a Phase 4 clinical study on the “vaccine” — a “vaccine” that the FDA had just “fully approved”? Please see: https://www.fda.gov/media/186740/download; and, the screenshot of Page 9 of this document, regarding the “order” for the Phase 4 study, below:

More questions, posed by Yours Truly: How many elderly persons are going to be pressured / cajoled / “mandated” (by the nursing home or care facility where they live), to take mNEXSPIKE? Will they be told that this injectable is “safer” than mRNA-1273, “because the dose is smaller”? What about persons who “fit” into the multiple categories of “persons at high risk for severe COVID-19 infection” according to Drs. Makary and Prasad? What pressure will these persons be subjected to in order to get them to agree to take mNEXSPIKE? Finally, will people be told the truth that mNEXSPIKE, just because it does not contain the S2 portion of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, is NOT “mRNA-1273 Lite” — but, rather, it is another version of a dangerous, potentially deadly modRNA COVID-19 ‘”vaccine”?

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

STOP PRESS EDITION: HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Needs to Get Control, or to Resign — Now.

The above image of a vintage vaccine vial and syringe is courtesy of Google Images.

This post is a STOP PRESS EDITION. It has to do with the FDA BLA (Biologics License Application) approval of the Moderna COVID-19 modRNA “vaccine” mRNA-1283. This “vaccine” was FDA-approved without any clinical trial in which there was a placebo control group. mRNA-1283 contains a “shorter portion” of the COVID-19 virus spike protein. This “vaccine” also contains elements of the H7N9 Avian Influenza strain that was used in Gain-of-Function experiments by Dr. Yoshihira Kawaoka, DVM, PhD, in 2013, along with other scientists, at the University of Wisconsin (Madison.)

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked this post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread of today’s offering, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Today’s offering is short and to the point. Special Thanks to our good duchess01, to https://www.thefocalpoints.com/, and to http://mole.substack.com/. Please refer to the following posts by Yours Truly for relevant background information regarding today’s offering: https://www.theqtree.com/2025/05/30/health-friday-5030-2025-open-thread-what-is-going-on-at-hhs-the-fda-and-the-cdc/; and, https://www.theqtree.com/2025/05/16/health-friday-open-thread-5-16-2025-about-that-universal-vaccine-theres-more-than-meets-the-eye-part-two/.

Please see the following breaking news outlets pieces regarding the FDA granting the BLA for the Moderna “newest COVID-19 “vaccine”, mRNA-1283: First, this one: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/cp/164898171, “BREAKING: FDA Goes Rogue — Approves Moderna’s Next-Gen COVID-19 mRNA Injection Without a Placebo-Controlled Trial”, Nicolas Hulscher, May 2025. Please see the screenshots from this article, below:

HOWEVER, there is another aspect to the mRNA-1283 modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” — this injectable appears to be a combination of BOTH the SARS-CoV-2 virus AND elements of the deadly H7N9 Avian Influenza virus. Please see: https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/cp/164803097, “FDA Approves Moderna COVID Jab Containing GOF Bird Flu Gene Segment That PCR Could Mistake for Infection”, 31 May 2025. The “bird flu gene segment” is from the Gain-of-Function experiments with the H7N9 Avian Influenza virus conducted by Dr. Yoshihiro Kawaoka, Ron Fouchier, and other scientists, under the aegis of the University of Wisconsin (Madison), where Dr. Kawaoka has his lab. These Gain-of-Function experiments were “outed” when serious lab accidents occurred; it appears that the experiments were then stopped. But not before Dr. Fouchier wrote this article: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1243325, “Gain-of-Function Experiments on H7N9”, 9 August 2013, in which Dr. Fouchier attempted to justify further Gain-of-Function experimentation.

Please see the following screenshot, below, from the Wikipedia entry on H7N9 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Influenza_A_virus_subtype_H7N9):

The archived article regarding the H7N9 experiments at the University of Wisconsin (Madison), is found here: https://archive.ph/LX7MP, “Study: Lab-derived H5N1 virus component binds to human receptors”, Robert Roos, 13 April 2013.

In Yours Truly’s opinion, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., the Secretary of Health and Human Services, is not doing his job. BOTH the FDA and the CDC have now “gone rogue” — first, with the “sleight-of-hand” regarding the CDC’s “new recommendations” about the COVID-19 “vaccines” (per Dr. Susan Monarez, PhD, the current Acting Director of the CDC, as of 30 May 2025); and, second, with the FDA (Dr. Martin Makary, Commissioner) granting approval of the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 + H7N9 gene pieces combination “vaccine”, mRNA-1283 (as of 31 May 2025.) It is time, in Yours Truly’s opinion, for Secretary Kennedy, Jr., to either get control of the FDA and CDC — after all, these agencies are part of HHS — or, to resign, and allow President Trump47 to find someone who will.

FLASH UPDATES! MORE ON THE “DIRTY BACKSTORY” RELATED TO THE FDA’s APPROVAL OF mRNA-1283 ON 30 MAY 2025:

ONE: The FDA’s Approval Letter to Moderna on 30 May 2025, regarding mRNA-1283: https://www.fda.gov/media/186740/download. Please see the screenshot of page nine of this document, below:

This is the PHASE 4 clinical study that Moderna is requested to perform for mRNA-1283, but which has NOT begun yet, nor has it ENROLLED any subjects yet.

TWO. This is the slide presentation for the CDC’s ACIP committee meeting for April 2025 related to the “2025-2026 COVID-19 Vaccines Formula” selections. Notice that there is NO vote that ACIP planned to take regarding mRNA-1283. Please see: https://www.cdc.gov/acip/downloads/slides-2025-04-15-16/05-Panagiotakopoulos-COVID-508.pdf. Below is a screenshot of the pertinent image from the slide presentation:

WHAT IS GOING ON HERE?

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday 5.30.2025 Open Thread: What is Going On at HHS, the FDA, and the CDC?

The above graphic is with thanks to https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/fda-recommends-more-mrna-shots-despite, “FDA Recommends More mRNA Booster Shots Despite New Study Showing Booster Failure — and Major Public Outcry”, by Nicolas Hulscher, 26 May 2025.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s offering has to do with the disaster of the COVID-19 “vaccines” (Bioweapon Toxin Injections), Yours Truly dedicates it to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have passed away due to the negative effects of the COVID-19 “vaccines” that they had injected into their bodies.

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to use any AI-generated material in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Yours Truly has been researching, reading about, and writing about, the COVID-19 disaster since March 2020. She had a sense, early in 2020 when the speculation about the development and use of a COVID-19 “vaccine”, that something was “off” in the hype regarding “how this will stop the spread” of the virus, “how this will prevent COVID-19 infection”, and so on. As it turns out, that “Suspicious Dog” feeling was the correct one — the COVID-19 “vaccines” have been, are now, and will be, a disaster. These injectables do not prevent COVID-19 infection. These injectables have injured, sickened, disabled, and even killed, millions of “vaccinated” persons all over the world. These “vaccines” will continue to injure, sicken, disable, and even kill, those who have them put into their body — not only because of the ingredients and mechanisms of these injectables, but now also because of the “new and improved” (not) faulty foundation of “lab-created antibody titer levels tests” that will be used in the development of the “latest mutation version” of the “vaccines”, instead of doing actual clinical trials with lab animals and/or with human subjects. I will make it clear at the start that today’s offering is not meant to “stir the pot.” There are, in my opinion, legitimate questions that need to be asked regarding certain recent news items.

There are several central elements of the current situation regarding the “2025-2026 COVID-19 Vaccine Formula”, and the actions of certain people and entities. One such entity is the FDA. The current Commissioner of the FDA is Dr. Martin Makary, MD, MPH, who is also a proponent of COVID-19 “vaccination” (including in pregnant women), and is himself “vaccinated.”

On 22 May 2025, the FDA’s VRBPAC (Vaccines and Related Biological Advisory Committee) members met to “consider” and then to “recommend” the “2025-2026 COVID-19 Vaccine Formula.” The committee voted unanimously, after “presentations” by Pfizer-BioNTech, by Moderna, and by Novavax, to “recommend” the “formulas” for the modRNA (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna) and the “inactivated protein” (Novavax) COVID-19 “vaccines.” Please see: https://www.contagionlive.com/view/fda-makes-recommendations-for-2025-2026-formula-for-covid-19-vaccines, 23 May 2025. A screenshot from this article is below:

These “vaccines” will be lab-developed, then lab-tested regarding the amount of “antibody titers” that “might” be “effective” in the “2025-2026 Formula COVID-19 Vaccines.” There will be no clinical trial testing of these “vaccines.” This protocol, outlined in the “Option 4” method, was adopted by the FDA on 28 June 2022. Please see the Briefing Document for this meeting: https://www.fda.gov/media/159452/download. “Option 4” is located on page 19. Please see the screenshot below:

Therefore, it appears that any person who takes an injection of the “2025-2026 Formula COVID-19 Vaccine” by Pfizer-BioNTech, by Moderna, or by Novavax, will be, in essence, a “human lab rat”, since these “vaccines” will only have been tested under “Petri-dish conditions” in a lab to confirm whether the “antibody titer amounts” expressed by the “vaccine” ingredients “might” be “effective” in humans.

There were over 95,000 public comments that were submitted to the FDA regarding the VRBPAC meeting of 22 May 2025, indicating a “major public outcry” against the “recommending” of more COVID-19 “vaccines.” Nonetheless, the VRBPAC members voted to endorse the “2025-2026 COVID-19 Vaccine” formulas, as described above, using the “Option 4” method. Please see: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/fda-recommends-more-mrna-shots-despite, “FDA Recommends More mRNA Booster Shots Despite New Study Showing Booster Failure — and Major Public Outcry”, Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 26 May 2025. Please see the screenshot from this article, below:

The phrase, “immunogenicity data” refers to the “Petri-dish lab experiments” as described above.

The image below is from the “opinion piece” written and published by Dr. Martin Makary and Dr. Vinay Prasad, MD, MPH. Dr. Prasad is another important person in the current situation regarding the HHS / FDA / CDC. As of 6 May 2025, Dr. Prasad is the new Director of the FDA’s CBER department (Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research.) The “opinion piece” was published on 20 May 2025, two days prior to the FDA’s VRBPAC meeting. Please see: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsb2506929. A screenshot of the combined Figure 2 and Figure 3 from the “opinion piece” are below:

Dr. Prasad made it clear, in a podcast, that the FDA will implement the elements outlined in the “opinion piece” as the “new framework” for COVID-19 “vaccination.” Please keep this in mind for later on in today’s offering.

The paper regarding the failure of COVID-19 “booster shots”, already online-published but will appear in a medical journal in June 2025, is found here: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127257, “Effect of the 2022 COVID-19 booster vaccination campaign in people aged 50 years in England: Regression discontinuity analysis in OpenSAFELY-TPP”, Andrea L. Schaffer, et al., journal Vaccine, Volume 59, 20 June 2025, 127257. The salient image from this paper is below:

Regarding the impact of COVID-19 “vaccination” on the lifetime supply of eggs in a female’s ovaries, it is now known that BOTH the modRNA AND the “inactivated” COVID-19 “vaccines” have a devastating impact on this egg supply. Please see: https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines/13040345, “Impact of mRNA and Inactivated COVID-19 Vaccines on Ovarian Reserve”, Enes Karaman, et al., 30 January 2025. This paper demonstrates that there is a 30% conception failure rate, and an overall loss of up to 60% of the lifetime egg supply in the female ovaries, both induced by COVID-19 “vaccination” in a female of child-bearing age.

Then, there is Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, MD, PhD, the new Director of the NIH (National Institutes of Health.) It appears that Dr. Bhattacharya may be “betting on both sides of the game” regarding COVID-19 and the COVID-19 “vaccines.” While it is true that Dr. Bhattacharya has stated that lockdowns, “mandated masking”, “social distancing”, and so on, are not real methods to deal with the virus, he also said this, in 2021, regarding the COVID-19 “vaccines”:

Link to the above: https://www.newsweek.com/stanford-doc-jay-bhattacharya-calls-vaccine-mandates-unethical-says-patients-can-choose-1611938. The above statement from Dr. Bhattacharya raises some questions: One, if COVID-19 is “basically a cold”, how can a “vaccine” protect against it? Two, if COVID-19 is “basically a cold”, why are there so many persons who have had a COVID-19 infection (either from the mechanisms of the COVID-19 “vaccines” themselves, or from the virus itself) and have since presented with symptoms of “Long COVID”? Three, if indeed a person who had a COVID-19 infection and recovered, is “protected against new disease”, why are people (COVID-19 “vaccinated” or not) still coming down with COVID-19 virus mutation infections?

Next is Susan Monarez PhD, the current Acting Director of the CDC. Previously, she had worked in the Department of Homeland Security with BARDA and with other HHS departments. Dr. Monarez is a “biosecurity expert” who has also endorsed the COVID-19 “vaccines.” Please see: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/24/health/cdc-director-monarez.html, “Trump Nominates Susan Monarez to Lead C.D.C.”, 24 March 2025. The pullquote from the article: “Monarez is a biosecurity expert who endorsed the Covid vaccines, and her selection may signal a growing impatience with anti-vaccine sentiment.”

And, finally, there is current HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., an attorney who founded the Children’s Health Defense organization (https://childrenshealthdefense.org/), and who has been an outspoken opponent of the COVID-19 “vaccines.”

And here begins Yours Truly’s presentation of the Kabuki theater going on at HHS / FDA / CDC:

On Tuesday 27 May 2025, HHS Secretary Kennedy, Jr., appeared in a video with Dr. Markary and Dr. Bhattacharya to announce that the COVID-19 “vaccines” that are “recommended” (in actual practice, they are called “routine”) by the CDC for healthy children under age 18, and for healthy pregnant women, would be removed from the CDC Immunization Schedules. Please see: https://x.com/bennyjohnson/status/1927374665745342535, a screenshot of which is below:

Where was Dr. Monarez, the Acting Director of the CDC? Why wasn’t she included in the video? An “announcement” of this importance would surely have required her to be included. To the best of Yours Truly’s knowledge and belief, neither Dr. Makary (FDA), nor Dr. Bhattacharya (FDA CBER), have the direct authority to remove vaccines from the CDC Immunization Schedules. The CDC is a separate departmental entity of HHS.

However: In reality, nothing has changed regarding the CDC Immunization Schedules. The CDC is still using the same 2025 Immunization Schedules that were issued on 21 November 2024. Please see: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/imz-schedules/index.html. The CDC is still “recommending” that pregnant women get COVID-19 “vaccinated”. Please see: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines-pregnancy/about/index.html. This “recommendation” was issued by the CDC on 17 June 2024.

The “elaborate costumes and dance of Kabuki theater” approach were on display during this video with Secretary Kennedy, Jr., Dr. Makary, and Dr. Bhattacharya. But it was a “performance.” And the audience suspended reality for the “performance.”

Yours Truly now turns to the blog article by Sasha Latypova, a former medical technology and pharmaceutical technology professional, about this “Kabuki theater performance” of 27 May: https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/eugenics-for-dummies-aka-hhss-evidence, “Eugenics for Dummies, aka HHS’s “Evidence-Based Approach” to covid shots.”, 29 May 2025. Please see the screenshots from her article, below:

It appears that, in reality, what has happened is that the current CDC Immunization Schedules have been neatly “absorbed into” the “new evidence-based approach to the COVID-19 vaccines” so-called “opinion piece” of Dr. Makary and Dr. Prasad (see the links to their “opinion piece”, above; and, also, the statement by Dr. Prasad that this “new approach” will be implemented at the FDA / CDC (so, it seems, they aren’t “opinions” at all.)

Further confirmation of the “Kabuki theater” element regarding the 27 May “announcement” by Secretary Kennedy, Jr., Dr. Makary, and Dr. Bhattacharya, comes from The Kingston Report: https://karenkingston.substack.com/cp/164733998, “Who’s Calling the Shots at HHS?”, 29 May 2025.

WHO IS IN CHARGE OF HHS? If Secretary Kennedy, Jr., can take the time to write letters to ask that ostriches in Canada are not “culled” due to a “possible” infection from Avian Influenza; if he can issue a directive to have titanium dioxide removed from candy (Skittles) — why did he participate in a “Kabuki theater performance” on 27 May regarding something incredibly important to the health of every American — the dangerous, deadly COVID-19 “vaccines”? Did he, or anyone else, at HHS, inform Dr. Monarez about the “change” in the CDC Immunization Schedules? If so, did she agree?

In Yours Truly’s opinion, there appears to be some sort of “issues” going on at HHS, the FDA, and the CDC. HHS Secretary Kennedy, Jr., needs to get to the bottom of all of them.

FLASH! AS OF TODAY, 30 MAY 2025: THE CDC HAS JUST ISSUED THE “NEW CHILDHOOD VACCINE IMMUNIZATION SCHEDULE” RELATED TO THE COVID-19 “VACCINES”:

It appears that Dr. Susan Monarez, PhD, has finally weighed in regarding the 27 May “announcement” (aka “Kabuki theater performance”) by HHS Secretary Kennedy, Jr., Dr. Makary, and Dr. Bhattacharya COVID-19 “vaccines” and the CDC Childhood Immunization Schedule. Please see Sasha Latypova’s presentation here: https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/cdc-issued-the-anticipated-updates, “CDC issued the anticipated updates to the children’s schedule for covid shots”, 30 May 2025.

HOWEVER, there’s some “catches” in the “updates.” Huge “catches.” These have to do with the CDC “definition” of what a “healthy child” means. In short summary: It will be the CDC who decides if a child meets their “criteria” for being a “healthy child” (meaning, the COVID-19 “vaccines” aren’t “necessary” or “recommended”); it will be the CDC’s “guidance” on this that will be in control of any discussion between a child’s parent(s)/guardians, and the clinician who can administer COVID-19 “vaccines”; there are no provisions that Yours Truly can see in the CDC “guidance” for exemptions on religious or other grounds; and, that ANY clinician who is cleared to administer COVID-19 “vaccines” will ultimately make the decision on whether or not to COVID-19 “vaccinate” a child who does not fit the CDC “criteria” for a “healthy child.” This includes clinicians who have never treated the child (in other words, a CVS pharmacist, for example.) Please see the screenshots below, from the Latypova article of today:

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday Open Thread 5.23.2025: The FDA’s EUA to Pfizer-BioNTech for BNT162b2 on 11 December 2020 Is Invalid

The above free vintage image of a vaccine vial and syringe is courtesy of iStock and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s offering is related to the COVID-19 biological toxin injections, aka the COVID-19 “vaccines”, Yours Truly dedicates it to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have been injured, made ill, become disabled, or have passed away, from the negative effects of these “vaccines” that they had in their body.

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They can be found here. NOTE: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Yours Truly began writing about the results of the huge C4591001 clinical trial of the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, BNT162b2, on the board here back in 2023. I was reading through document after document that the company generated related to this clinical trial, documents that were released to the general public only after Pfizer-BioNTech, in partnership with the FDA, lost their case in federal court to keep all of the data about C4591001 sealed for 75 years, and they were then sued by Attorney Aaron Siri’s group, Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency (PHMPT.) Please see: https://www.biospace.com/non-profit-group-wins-transparency-lawsuit-over-fda-records-of-pfizer-vaccine-authorization, 7 January 2022. Note: regarding the Pfizer-BioNTech and the Moderna COVID-19 “vaccines”, “mRNA” and “modRNA” are interchangeable descriptive words for these injectables.

The FDA press release of 11 December 2020, announcing the agency’s granting of the EUA for the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” BNT162b2 is here: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-annoucenments/fda-takes-key-action-fight-against-covid-19-issuing-emergency-use-authorization-first-covid-19, “FDA Takes Key Action in Fight Against COVID-19 By Issuing Emergency Use Authorization for First COVID-19 Vaccine.” A screenshot from this press release is below:

Note the phrase, “Follows Thorough Evaluation…”. It is now known that this manifestly was NOT performed before the EUA was granted.

Regarding the invalidity of the 11 December 2020 EUA that was granted to Pfizer-BioNTech for BNT162b2 to be used “to prevent COVID-19 infection” in the United States: Yours Truly begins here: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/fda-authorization-of-pfizer-covid. “FDA VRBPAC December 11, 2020 Decision on Pfizer mRNA Found Invalid”, Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 17 May 2025. There are several screenshots from this article, below:

Regarding the delaying by the FDA and the CDC of important information regarding the incidence of myocarditis following COVID-19 “vaccination”, and these agencies (and, also, Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna) failing to issue Black Box Warnings about this on the Package Inserts for their modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” (BNT162b2 [Pfizer-BioNTech] and mRNA-1273 [Moderna]), please see: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/us-fda-and-cdc-delayed-health-advisory, “US FDA and CDC Delayed Health Advisory on COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Myocarditis for Months, Failed to Issue Black Box Warning for Years”, Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH, 18 May 2025. A screenshot from this article is below:

The above slide image is from the FDA’s VRBPAC meeting of 22 October 2020. This meeting was held seven weeks prior to the 11 December 2020 granting of the EUA for BNT162b2. The FDA therefore KNEW before 11 December 2020 that BNT162b2 could cause myocarditis — but went ahead and issue the EUA anyway.

Yours Truly has written extensively on the manufacturing process for BNT162b2, and on associated topics. Please see: https://www.theqtree.com/2023/11/06/the-infamous-process-2-manufacturing-method-for-the-pfizer-biontech-modrna-covid-19-vaccines/

Also: https://www.theqtree.com/2024/02/01/an-open-letter-to-medical-professionals-who-took-the-covid-19-vaccines/

And: https://www.theqtree.com/2024/11/15/health-friday-11-15-2024-open-thread-hold-them-accountable-edition/

The FDA’s VRBPAC members will meet on Thursday 22 May 2025 to make “recommendations” regarding the “2025-2026 COVID-19 Vaccine Formulas.” Public comment is accepted until 11:59PM on Friday 23 May. To submit comments electronically, please see: https://www.federalregister.gov/2025/05/08/2025-080803/vaccines-and-related-biological-products-advisory-committee-notice-of-meeting-establishment-of-a; scroll down this page to the section “Electronic Submissions.”

But wait, there’s more! The “new” leadership of the FDA and the CDC, Dr. Vinay Prasad and Dr. Martin Makary wrote an article which was just published in the New England Journal of Medicine: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsb2506929, “An Evidence-Based Approach to COVID-19 Vaccination”, Vinay Prasad, MD, MPH, and Martin A. Makary, MD, MPH, 20 May 2025. This article is NOT an “opinion piece” — Drs. Prasad and Makary make it clear that they are going to implement this “new approach” to COVID-19 “vaccination” through the FDA and the CDC.

In Yours Truly’s opinion, this “new approach” has many items to question. For example: the granting of FDA authorization for “new formula” COVID-19 “vaccines”, authorization based on lab-performed experiments on the “new formula” ingredients that produce certain numbers of “antibody titers” that might “correspond” to “effectiveness.” There would be no clinical trials at all, performed either on lab rats or on humans. This “lab-experiments with Petri dishes results” authorization method is outlined in “Option 4” of the FDA vaccine authorization / full approval guidelines that the agency adopted in 2022. This “lab-experiments with Petri dishes results” method will now be used for “new formula” COVID-19 “vaccines” for persons age 65 and over; and for persons under age 65 with compromised immune systems or who are part of “vulnerable” or “at risk” populations — such as, for example, pregnant women. Please see, regarding the “Option 4”: https://www.fda.gov/media/159452/download, “VRBPAC Briefing Document”, 28 June 2022. A screenshot of “Option 4” is below:

For another example: COVID-19 “vaccination” will still be “recommended” for pregnant women and for women who have just given birth. This flies in the face of the mounting, and published, evidence that COVID-19 “vaccination” during pregnancy can, and does, result in miscarriages, stillbirths, live births but the infant has medical issues, and so on. In addition, COVID-19 “vaccine” antibodies show up in the breast milk that “vaccinated” new mothers nurse their infants with.

Why do the FDA / CDC continue to ignore the evidence-based facts that Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, Zinc, and Vitamin D both prevent and treat COVID-19 infections?

Three screenshots from the Prasad and Makary article are below:

NOTE THE LAST SENTENCE OF THE ABOVE IMAGE: “Ultimately, these studies alone can provide reassurance that the American repeat-boosters-in-perpetuity strategy is evidence-based.”

Let’s take a look at the combined Figure 2 and Figure 3 image:

Which makes it plain, in Figure 2, that the COVID-19 “vaccines” will be “recommended” for people who “fit” the diagnosis parameters of multiple types of medical conditions, including pregnant women and women who have just given birth — in other words, these groups of people may well be subjected to multiple types of “convincing” strategies to get them to agree to take these “vaccines.” Who made the decisions on the types of “risk factors” for the “increased at-risk” groups?

And, there’s this tweet, from Dr. Martin Makary, of August 2023:

There is published, irrefutable evidence that the COVID-19 “vaccines” can cause death among the “vaccinated.” Please see: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/the-causal-link-between-covid-19, “The Causal Link Between COVID-19 Vaccination and Death”, Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 21 May 2025. There is an embedded interview between Mr. Hulscher and Dr. Idriss J. Aberkane, PhD, on this subject. A screenshot from the Hulscher article is below:

It appears to be unclear, in Yours Truly’s opinion, about where this “new approach to COVID-19 vaccination” fits in as regards the “Generation Gold Standard” that was announced a few weeks ago. Does the federal government control “new” COVID-19 “vaccine” development processes? Where does Big Pharma (Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, Novavax) come in? Is that what “Sponsor-Driven” clinical trials means (see the above image)?

However, here’s the real situation: In Yours Truly’s opinion, given that the initial EUA granted by the FDA to the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 on 11 December 2020 was invalid — that means, by extension, that every other EUA (and “Full Approval”) of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” is also invalid: which would include any “formula” that is “recommended” for the “2025-2026 COVID-19 Vaccine”. Which would also, in Yours Truly’s opinion, invalidate any “Full Approval” of the Novavax COVID-19 “vaccine”, since the foundation of that injectable is the same Wuhan Hu1 SARS-CoV-2 virus that was used as the foundation for BNT162b2.

FLASH! — Meanwhile, the FDA just granted “Full Approval” to the Novavax company’s injectable on 19 May 2025, under the name “NUVAXOVID”: https://ir.novavax.com/press-releases/2025-05-19-U-S-FDA-Approves-BLA-for-Novavax-COVID-19-Vaccine.

FLASH! 2 — The VRBPAC members voted unanimously today to “recommend” that the “2025-2026 COVID-19 Vaccine Formula” injectables contain the JN.1 Omicron variant of the original SARS-CoV-2 virus. This is the same strain that was “recommended” for the “2024-2025 COVID-19 Vaccine Formula” injectables. The decision today by VRBPAC will be implemented according to the Dr. Prasad and Dr. Makary “new approach” method, as outlined above in today’s post. This means that persons age 65 and older, and that persons under age 65 who fall into one of the “increased risk” categories (Figure 2, above in the post) will be “encouraged” to get “vaccinated.” The exact formulation of the “2025-2026 COVID-19 Vaccine Formula” for the Pfizer-BioNTech and the Moderna injectables will be based, as was their other COVID-19 “vaccines” on the modRNA (aka mRNA)-based platform. The Novavax (now called NUVAXOVID) “2025-2026 vaccine” product will be based on the company’s previous “inactivated protein”-based platform. It is unclear whether the NUVAXOVID “2025-2026 vaccine” product will be authorized for persons under age 65 and/or who have underlying “increased risk” conditions. Please see: https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/covid-19/fda-vaccine-advisers-recommend-sticking-jn1-strain-next-covid-vaccines, 22 May 2025; and, https://cen.acs.org/pharmaceuticals/vaccines/FDA39s-new-COVID-19-vaccine/103/web/2025/05?sc=230901_cenrssfeed_eng_latestnewsrss_cen, 22 May 2025. A screenshot from the C&EN / ACS article is below, highlighting items related to the Dr. Prasad and Dr. Makary “new approach” article:

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday Open Thread 5.16.2025: About That “Universal Vaccine” — There’s More Than Meets the Eye, Part Two

Antique London’s photographs: Goldsmith Hall, The Assay Office

The above free vintage image of a laboratory is courtesy of iStock and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics.

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are found here. NOTE: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post anything in the discussion thread for today that is AI-generated, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Today’s offering is Part Two (of two) regarding the HHS / NIH announcement regarding the establishment of the “Generation Gold Standard” for future development and testing of vaccines in the United States. “Generation Gold Standard” includes the development and testing of a “Universal Vaccine Platform”, which will incorporate elements from various viruses, including coronaviruses (such as the SARS-CoV-2 virus, aka the COVID-19 virus.) Part One can be found here: https://www.theqtree.com/2025/05/09/health-friday-5-9-2025-about-that-universal-vaccine-theres-more-than-meets-the-eye-part-one/. The HHS / NIH announcement is found here: https://www.hhs.gov/press-room/hhs-nih-announces-generation-gold-standard.html, 1 May 2025. Please refer to the screenshot below:

Yours Truly discussed several items in the above announcement in Part One, referred to above. Part Two is a further discussion of items related to the BPL-1357 intranasal “universal virus vaccine”, a “cornerstone” of the “Generation Gold Standard” program. The primary focus of Part Two will be on the “adjuvant” for BPL-1357, a compound called ALFQ. However, before the presentation, there is this short paper, from January 2025: https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.188, “593. Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 1 Study of the Safety of BPL-1357, A BPL-Inactivated, Whole-Virus, Universal Influenza Vaccine”, Jeffery Taubenberger, Matthew J. Memoli, et al., 29 January 2025. A screenshot of the Background section of the Abstract of this paper is below:

Note the description of BPL-1357: It is to cover several types of Avian Influenza viruses. Nothing about covering coronaviruses. Why was there a ‘challenge” with Influenza A type viruses, and nothing about “challenges” with Influenza virus types B or C (https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/viruses-types.html.) How can BPL-1357 be considered a “Universal Vaccine” if it is only covers Avian Influenza viruses? How does this paper “stack up” vis-a-vis the HHS / NIH “Generation Gold Standard” announcement?

Then, there is the mysterious BPL-24910 (aka BPL-2491) vaccine, which is referred to in the HHS / NIH announcement, but of which there is no record at clinicaltrials.gov/, nor is much information available on the internet. Yours Truly was able to find a few items. The first one is here: https://www.ntd.com/health-officials-announce-new-effort-to-develop-universal-vaccines-targeting-multiple-virus-strains_1064264.html, by Zachary Stieber, 1 May 2025. Please see the screenshot from this article, below:

The NIAID awarded funds to a company called Lovelace Biomedical Research Institute for testing the toxicity of BPL-24910: https://www.usaspending.gov/award/CONT_AWD_75N93022F00001_7529_75N93021D00031_7529. Below are screenshots from this link:

Lovelace Biomedical Research Institute was founded in 1947 in Albuquerque, New Mexico. The institute joined Touro University in 2022. (https://www.lovelacebiomedical.org/, and Wikipedia.)

Now, on to the AFLQ “adjuvant” in BPL-1357:

ALFQ is a combination of two separate items: ALF plus QS21. ALF stands for monophosphoryl lipid A (aka 3D-PHAD.) It is also called “Army Liposome Formulation.” Please see the screenshot below, from https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-drug/def/monophosphoryl-lipid-a:

What is an endotoxin? Please see: https://www.britannica.com/science/endotoxin. A screenshot from the Britannica entry is below:

It is unclear which version of ALF is actually used in BPL-1357: the “LPS” version, or the “MPLA” version.

Then, there is 3D-PHAD. Please see below, from https://www.sigmaaldritch.com/:

And, more on ALF (aka Army Liposome Formulation) is here: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7412170/, “Army Liposome Formulation (ALF) Family of Vaccine Adjuvants”, Carl R Alving, et al, 7 August 2020. Please see the screenshot from this paper, below:

Note the reference to HIV-1. More on this later in today’s post.

ALFQ contains a TLR4 agonist. What is TLR4? Also known as CD284, it is a “key activator of the innate immune response”, per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toll-like_receptor_4. An agonist is an agent that interacts with a particular cellular receptor, and produces an observable positive response.

The other component of ALFQ is QS21. What is QS21? It is a vaccine adjuvant derived from the soapbark tree (Quillaja saponaria.) QS21 is used in the Novavax COVID-19 “vaccine” as an adjuvant, as part of the company’s “Matrix-M” ingredient.

QS21 has been studied for some time. Here is an article, from the John Innes Centre, that describes the history of QS21: https://www.jic.ac.uk/advances/the-quest-for-qs-21/, Winter 2020-2021. Please see a screenshot from this article, below:

Yours Truly now presents some “interesting information.” One is not making any judgements or opinions; the reader may make their own. This has to do with the HIV-1 reference above in the post. The first item is this: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-410X(00)00415-1, “QS21 promotes an adjuvant effect allowing for reduced antigen dose during HIV-1 envelope subunit immunization in humans”, Thomas G. Evans, et al., 28 February 2001. A screenshot of the Abstract of this paper is below:

The second item is here: https://worldcouncilforhealth.substack.com/cp/162703289, “BOMBSHELL: HIV Contamination Found In Moderna’s Covid Shot”, 2 May 2025. There are actually two bombshells here: two separate molecules related to HIV-1 were found in the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” — gp145 and gp120. Please see the screenshots from the World Council for Health article, below:

The graphic created by Dr. McKernan, from the above article, showing where the gp145 HIV-1 molecule is in the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” sequence:

Regarding the gp120 HIV-1 molecule in the Moderna mRNA-1273 modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, it was the famous (or, infamous) “Pradhan, et al., paper” from January 2020 which showed that there were gp120 HIV-1 molecules in the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) virus itself. The “Pradhan, et al., paper” was Withdrawn shortly after its publication, and is now difficult to find. Yours Truly was able to locate the paper here: https://academia.edu/79020098/Uncanny_similarity_of_unique_inserts_in_the_2019_nCoV_spike-protein_to_HIV_1_gp_120_and_Gag?f_ri-170, “Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike protein to HIV-1 gp120 and Gag”, Prashant Pradhan, et al., 31 January 2020. A screenshot from the paper is below:

Recall that in January 2020, there were no COVID-19 “vaccines” in use anywhere. Note also that the gp120 HIV-1 molecule is present in the COVID-19 virus itself spike protein. Did the Pfizer-BioNTech developers of BNT162b2 remove any or all of the four HIV-1 related inserts in the COVID-19 spike protein (found by Pradhan, et al.) in the process of working on their “vaccine”? Why did Moderna leave the gp120 HIV-1 molecule (and also, it turns out, the gp145 HIV-1 molecule) in that company’s modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, mRNA-1273?

And, there is the involvement of the United States Army in HIV research (this is in addition to the Army’s developing the “adjuvant”, ALFQ): https://hivresearch.org/hiv-research/alf-adjuvants. This is the Military HIV Research Program.

Yours Truly will reiterate that one is not making judgements or opinions here; readers will make their own. However, the following needs to be said: the gp120 molecule in HIV-1 attacks the body’s CD4 cells. Please see this paper, from 2010: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20088758/, “The GP120 molecule of HIV-1 and its interaction with T cells”, V Yoon, et al., 2010. A screenshot of the Abstract of this paper is below:

Also: the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself attacks the body’s CD4 cells: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84790, “SARS-CoV-2 uses CD4 to infect T helper lymphocytes”, Natalia S Brunetti, et al., 31 July 2023. A screenshot of the Abstract of this paper is below:

And, there is this paper: https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.596631, “Sharing CD4+ T cell Loss: When COVID-19 and HIV Collide on Immune System”, Jean-Pierre Routy, et al., 14 December 2020. Note that this paper was published just a few days after the initial EUAs were granted by the FDA for BNT162b2 and for mRNA-1273 in the United States (11 December 2020); therefore, the research into writing the Routy, et al., paper must have been accomplished at least a few months prior to December 2020. A screenshot of the opening statement of the paper is below:

Yours Truly will ask a question that perhaps is “inconvenient”, but needs to be asked: Is any potential connection between the presence of the gp120 HIV-1 molecule in the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself, AND its potential presence in the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, AND its potential presence in the Novavax COVID-19 “vaccine” (which uses the original SARS-CoV-2 virus itself spike protein as a foundation), AND the confirmed presence of BOTH the gp120 HIV-1 molecule and the gp145 HIV-1 molecule in the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” — with the multiple serious Adverse Events reports of autoimmune / immune-mediated, and related conditions, that are in the Appendix 1: List of Adverse Events of Special Interest section of this report: ttps://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf?

Another “inconvenient” question posed by Yours Truly: What, if anything, did Dr. Anthony Fauci, Dr. Francis Collins, Dr. Deborah Birx, Dr. Robert Redfield, and Dr. Janet Woodcock know about the presence of the gp120 HIV-1 molecule in the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself spike protein, AND in the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” mRNA-1273?

What will be done to make absolutely sure that there is NO molecule whatsoever related to HIV-1 present in the “Universal Vaccine” candidates BPL-1357 and BPL-24910, or in any other “Universal Vaccine” candidates? What will be done to hold accountable the people who allowed the gp120 HIV-1 molecule to be present in the original SARS-CoV-2 virus itself? What will be done to investigate the potential presence of the gp120 HIV-1 molecule in the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”? What will be done to hold accountable the people who allowed HIV-1 molecules gp120 AND gp145 to be present in the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”?

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday Open Thread 5.9.2025: About That “Universal Vaccine”–There’s More Than Meets the Eye, Part One

The above free vintage image of a laboratory is courtesy of iStock and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information regarding Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics.

There are Important Notifications by our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. NOTE: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post anything in the discussion thread for today’s post that is AI-generated, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Due to the nature of today’s topic, there will be two separate posts. Part One, today’s offering, starts here: https://www.hhs.gov/press-room/hhs-nih-announces-generation-gold-standard.html, “HHS, NIH Launch Next-Generation Universal Vaccine Platform for Pandemic-Prone Viruses”, 1 May 2025. Please see the following screenshots from the announcement:

To unpack the announcement, Yours Truly will begin with a 2016 document from the EPA regarding beta-propiolactone, aka BPL (as in BPL-1357): https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2016-09/documents/beta-propiolactone.pdf. Please see the following screenshots from this document:

Notice the risks associated with inhalation of beta-propiolactone (which is being used in the development and testing of the “new Gold Standard” intranasal version of the “new Universal Pandemic Vaccine”, BPL-1357.)

Note the language regarding irritations of various types; of damage to the corneas; convulsions; and “extreme acute toxicity.”

Note the language about cancer being induced in lab rats and mice by the use of beta-propiolactone, but no information being available regarding the inducement of cancer in humans by the use of beta-propiolactone.

The funds for Generation Gold Standard, in the amount of $500 million dollars, will come from reallocation of monies within BARDA (Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority: https://www.fiercebiotech.com/biotech/hhs-unveils-500m-universal-vaccine-initiative-calls-biden-era-covid-vax-accelerator, “HHS unveils $500M universal vaccine initiative, calls Biden-era COVID vax accelerator ‘wasteful'”, 1 May 2025. Please see the screenshots from this article, below:

Both Dr. Memoli and Dr. Taubenberger have been with the NIH / NIAID for years. Also, note the tiny subject pool of 45 adult subjects in the Phase 1 study of BPL-1357.

On a “tangential point”, there is this FDA announcement of 10 April 2025: https://www.fda.gov.media/186092/download, “Roadmap to Reducing Animal Testing in Preclinical Safety Studies”, by new FDA Director Dr. Marty Makary. Sasha Latypova analyzed the announcement here: https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/you-didnt-want-that-mrna-vax-tested, “You didn’t want that mRNA vax tested only on 8 mice? Marty Makary, FDA, has a solution — no more mice!”, 28 April 2025.

That’s right. Dr. Makary wants to reduce, then end, animal testing for vaccines in the preclinical stage, and to substitute testing them instead by using in silico models; then, to move to human subject testing; and, even to NOT have ANY human subject clinical trials at all in “certain circumstances.” Please see the screenshots below from the Latypova article:

Yours Truly understands that the use of animals in lab experiments must be done in the most humane manner possible — no more of the “Fauci tortured Beagles” situations. However, one is of the opinion that there is a place for using animals in lab experiments — to study physical reactions and/or reproductive issues related to the drug or injectable under investigation before human tests begin: something that an in silico model or an AI model cannot do. And, the part about no clinical trials at all in “certain circumstances”:

Note: the red text in the screenshots above link to other articles and information from the Latypova article. Also, recall that Ms. Latypova worked in medical and pharmaceutical techology for years before retiring from the field.

This is the same Dr. Marty Makary who recommended that pregnant women get COVID-19 “vaccinated”:

To finish today’s Part One offering, Yours Truly presents the involvement of United States Defense Department in the use of the “AFLQ adjuvant” that is going to be tested in clinical trials for BPL-1357: https://hivresearch.org/hiv-research/alf-adjuvants. This is the United States military research program into “Military HIV.” This article had a link that led to the following press release by the United States Army, from 2021: https://wrair.health.mil/News-Media/Press-Releases/Article/3166852/phase-1-clinical-trial-of-wrair-developed-covid-19-vaccine-begins/, 5 April 2021. The clinical trial is NCT04784767, that began with 29 subject enrollees on 5 April 2021, and had an “Estimated Study Completion Date” of 30 October 2023 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04784767.) The title of the clinical trial: “SARS-CoV-2 Spike Ferritin Nanoparticle Vaccine with ALFQ Adjuvant for Prevention of COVID-19 in Healthy Adults.” Below is a screenshot of the WRAIR article (WRAIR stands for Walter Reed Army Institute of Research):

Note the statement by Dr. Modjarrad that this “US Army COVID-19 Vaccine” would “pave the way for a universal vaccine to protect against not only the current virus, but also counter future variants…” — “universal vaccine” — sound familiar? “Who is driving this bus?” comes to mind.

To be continued in Part Two.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday 5.2.2025 Open Thread: The PREP Act Must be Repealed. Now.

The above vintage image of the United States Congress in session is courtesy of the Library of Congress and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s post speaks of the disaster of the lab-created bioweapons called COVID-19 — the COVID-19 virus itself; and, the COVID-19 “vaccines” — Yours Truly dedicates it to the memory of all persons, of whatever age or location, who have passed away from the negative effects of these bioweapons.

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. NOTE: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If anyone wishes to post AI-generated content to today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.

The PREP Act (also called PREPA) is a “License to Kill“, in the words of Sasha Latypova (https://sashalatypova.substack.com/.) The PREP Act removes accountability, liability, and transparency from the activities of the Health and Human Services Department of the United States Federal Government under the provisions of the Act. The PREP Act allows: unlimited research, development, and use of COVID-19 “countermeasures”, including, but not limited to, “vaccine” development and use; “respiratory devices” development and use (think ventilators); prescription drugs use (think Paxlovid and Remdesivir); “mandated” uses of masking, of “social distancing”, and even of “lockdowns”; the “mandated” administration of COVID-19 “vaccines”, including to newborn babies, to persons under the age of 18, to persons who wish to attend school or to work; and much more. The PREP Act allows the United States Federal government and its associated departments (including Health and Human Services and the United States Defense Department) to literally use American citizens as “human lab rats” in the administration and use of dangerous, deadly, COVID-19 “countermeasures” which are not “safe and effective”; but which, instead, damage and/or destroy the bodies and minds of the persons who take the COVID-19 “vaccines” and/or drugs such as Remdesivir. The PREP Act uses taxpayer monies, private research grants, collaboration with scientific labs all across the United States (think the Baric Lab at UNC, Chapel Hill), and with foreign labs (think the Wuhan Institute of Virology) to pursue the provisions of the PREP Act.

Yours Truly begins here: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/12/11/2024-29108/12th-amendment-to-declaration-under-the-public-readiness-and-emergency-preparedness-act-for-medical, “12th Amendment to Declaration Under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act for Medical Countermeasures Against COVID-19”, signed by then-Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, 11 December 2024. This 12th Amendment extends the PREP Act (also called PREPA) “emergency status” of COVID-19, along with all medical countermeasures used against COVID-19 (including development and use of “vaccines”, “respiratory devices”, and so on) — until 31 December 2029 (in other words, until after the 2028 General Election and into the Presidential administration that takes over on 20 January 2029.) It also means that, even though the “official” COVID-19 “state of emergency” ended in May 2023, the “virus emergency status” has not been ended. It also means that legal liability for any person, any medical professional, any drug manufacturer, any hospital / clinic / care facility, and supplier, and so on, that fall under the provisions of the 12th Amendment — are legally exempt from any and all liability. It also means that, while the current Health and Human Services Secretary can sign a document that rescinds and/or modifies the 12th Amendment, it must take an act of Congress to repeal the PREP Act.

Per Katherine Watt (paralegal and professional researcher), the two separate actions mentioned above are discussed here: https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/repealing-prep-act-and-terminating, “Repealing PREP Act and terminating HHS Secretary determinations and declarations issued under PREP Act are two different things.”, 4 April 2025. Please see the screenshots from her article, below:

For more information on the PREP Act (aka PREPA), please see: https://aspr.hhs.gov/legal/PREPact/pages/default.aspx. ASPR means the Administration for Strategic Preparedness & Response. The PREP Act was passed by Congress in 2005, under the administration of then-President George W. Bush. Please also see: https://aspr.hhs.gov/legal/PREPact/Pages/PREP-Act-Questions-and-Answers.aspx#COVID.

It appears that the various States of the United States have little room to challenge the provisions of the PREP Act. However, a recent case before the North Carolina Supreme Court, regarding a person under age 18 who was given a COVID-19 “vaccine” without consent, was decided in favor of the plaintiff: https://thefocalpoints.com/p/give-it-to-him-anyway-teen-given, “Give It to Him Anyway”: Teen Given COVID-19 mRNA Shot Without Consent — State Supreme Court Says Family Can Sue”, by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 24 March 2025. Please see the screenshot from the Hulscher article, below:

A lower court in North Carolina ruled that the family could not sue the school system, due to the “liability provisions” of the PREP Act. However, the North Carolina Supreme Court overruled the lower court, stating that the family can indeed sue:

Before turning to the final aspect of today’s offering, Yours Truly will expand the mention of Sasha Latypova above in the post. Ms. Latypova, a native of Ukraine, was trained in medical and pharmaceutical technology. She owned and ran several companies in this area. She worked with Pfizer-BioNTech and other drug manufacturers in medical technology. She is therefore a person with deep experience, in Yours Truly’s opinion, regarding the workings of these industries. After moving to the United States and subsequently retiring from these endeavors, Ms. Latypova began to research and write on how the medical technology and the pharmaceutical industries have now become entities that serve their shareholders and the government, not the patients they claim to serve. Regarding the PREP Act, here is one of her blog posts: https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/prep-act-license-to-kill-must, “PREP Act Brief: “License to Kill” must be repealed.”, 21 April 2025. This article is densely-written and detailed. Below are a couple of screenshots from her post. Note: There are numerous hyperlinked information sources embedded in the article:

Please also see this post, an interview between Ms. Latypova and Ms. Watt (Bailiwick News) regarding the PREP Act: https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/interview-with-the-former-feds-foundation, “Interview with the Former Feds Foundation: Katherine Watt and I discuss PREP Act as an act of treason.”, 25 April 2025.

Finally, there is this blog article from “Spartacus”: https://iceni.substack.com/cp/162062988, “Declaration of Sovereignty Pt. 1”, 24 April 2025 (this is a cross-post from the Mole substack website.) This post is long and intense; it traces the “Profane Myth of COVID-19.” A screenshot of part of this post is below:

It is the PREP Act which, in significant amounts, has placed the United States in the position where the country is today: just under 70% of the population has taken at least one injection of a dangerous, deadly COVID-19 “vaccine” (these injectables are NOT “safe and effective”, and mounting evidence proves this); the country is just beginning to emerge from the economic devastation and chaos of the “COVID lockdowns” period; and, the Medical Tsunami of COVID-19 “vaccine”-induced injuries, illnesses, disabilities, and deaths, which is starting to present among the “vaccinated.” There are many persons involved in the above who must now be held accountable; not the least of which are those who knew how dangerous and potentially deadly the COVID-19 “vaccines” are while working with “Operation Warp Speed”, and who withheld this information from then-President Donald Trump.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday 4.25.2026: The AMA is Still Pushing “Strategies” for Physicians to “Combat Vaccine Hesitancy”

The free vintage image above of children being vaccinated is courtesy of iStock and Getty Images, via Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information regarding Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s post speaks to the disaster of the COVID-19 “vaccines” (Bioweapon Toxin Injections), Yours Truly dedicates it to the memory of all persons, of whatever age or location, who have passed away from the negative effects of these lab-created bioweapons.

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. NOTE: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post anything in the discussion thread for today’s post that is AI-generated, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Yours Truly has written about the American Medical Association (the AMA) on previous occasions. The AMA is one of the most powerful professional organizations for physicians in the United States. The organization, which does not provide a list of its members to the general public, is also one of the most powerful lobbying agents in Congress. In addition, the AMA owns the rights to use the CPT codes, which are the codes for medical procedures, examinations, tests, for ordering medical equipment, and much more. The CPT codes are used to bill CMS (Medicare / Medicaid), and to bill private insurers. Please see below for screenshots from, first, https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/american-medical-association-summary; and, second, https://www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/american-medical-association/, regarding AMA spending on lobbying:

And, not surprisingly, the CPT code royalties paid to the AMA for use of these codes appear to generate the bulk of income for the organization — no wonder the AMA can spend over $21 million on lobbying efforts. Please see: https://paddockpost.com/2024/12/16/how-revenue-is-spent-at-the-ama-2022/.

The AMA has multiple “sub-units” within the organization. These “sub-units” range from DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion), to “health equity”, and to LGBTQ++ “health inclusion”, among others. The organization offers numerous CME (Continuing Medical Education) online courses and webinars for AMA members, to assist them in accumulating the yearly CME credits they must earn in order to maintain their License to Practice Medicine. It also publishes numerous medical papers, articles, and other media; among them, JAMA (the Journal of the American Medical Association.) Please see: https://www.theqtree.com/2024/04/24/the-ama-edhub-window-to-establishment-medicine/.

An example of an AMA-published article regarding “physician strategies to combat vaccine hesitancy among patients” is here: https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/public-health/covid-19-vaccine-hesitancy-10-tips-talking-patients#, “COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: 10 tips for talking with patients”, by Tanya Albert Henry, 15 December 2023. Here are the “10 tips”: “Know you are the most trusted information source”; “Tell patients they need to get the vaccine”; Understand your patients’ concerns”; “Ask why a patient is hesitant”; Counter any misinformation”; “Tailor your message”; “Address patients’ fear about side effects”; “Prepare our staff to answer questions”; “Show your vaccination pride”; “Tell stories to make impact”.

But, what are physicians supposed to say to the patient in order to “convince” them to take a COVID-19 “vaccine”? Again, the AMA has answers: for example, the “templates” in this published study: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24004377, “Patient concerns and physician strategies for addressing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy”, Joy Melnikow, et al., 22 May 2024. Below are three screenshots from this paper: section 2.1 Study sample; followed by Table 2, then Table 3:

All of above is to get a patient to agree to having a COVID-19 Bioweapon Toxin Injection (aka a COVID-19 “vaccine”) injected into their body. In Yours Truly’ opinion, if a physician follows the above “templates”, they are functioning not as physicians who swore to “Do No Harm”; in fact, they may be considered as “government representatives” under the current “extension” of the PREP Act for COVID-19 Countermeasures” that was signed by then-HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra in December 2024. Notice also the use of various aspects of direct psychological manipulation and of gaslighting in the “templates” for the physicians to follow. One wonders: What would these physicians say in response to a “vaccine-hesitant” patient who gives them a hard copy of a published study that clearly shows what the COVID-19 “vaccines” actually do to damage a “vaccinated” person’s body?

And now, to the most recent AMA “strategies for physicians to use on patients with vaccine hesitancy” effort, from the AMA EdHub series: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2025.4882, “Strategies for Communicating with Parents About Vaccines”, Sean T. O’Leary, MD, MPH, 9 April 2025. This article is full-access for AMA members; through an institution; or, via renting it through DeepDyve. Yours Truly went to DeepDyve and was able to get the following screenshot from the first page of Dr. O’Leary’s article, below:

Note the “strategies” that are to be used by the physician, listed in the Table above. Again, it appears to be yet another mixture of “your physician is the most trusted source of information”; plus, “It’s the responsible thing to do for your child”; plus, something new, “Prebunking“, which appears to be a type of psychological manipulation of / gaslighting of, the parent regarding any information they may find online from other physicians (say, Dr. Peter A. McCullough) regarding the dangers of taking the COVID-19 “vaccines”; or, other researchers (say, Steve Kirsch, about how childhood vaccination can induce autism [via the aluminum in the vaccines], and who cites medical statistics to support his contention.) Please see: https://kirschsubstack.com/p/two-pieces-of-evidence-that-together, “Two pieces of evidence that together show that vaccines cause autism”, 21 April 2025. Please also see: https://jessicar.substack.com/p/aluminum-exposure-and-autism-prevalence, 19 April 2025. Dr. Rose cites the following image, from data collected by the CDC:

The following article describes various adjuvants to vaccines, including Aluminum: https://www.chop.edu/vaccine-education-center/vaccine-safety/vaccine-ingredients/aluminum, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, 15 December 2022, reviewed by Dr. Paul A. Offit, MD.

Why is the AMA still pushing psychological manipulation / gaslighting “strategies” for physicians to use to “convince” patients to take a COVID-19 “vaccine”, or to allow their child (children) to be COVID-19 “vaccinated”, or to allow their child (children) to be “vaccinated” with injectables that contain substances such as Aluminum? Why does the CDC have dozens of “vaccines” listed on the agency’s Child and Adolescent Immunization Schedule (https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/imz-schedules/downloads/child/0-18yrs-child-combined-schedule.pdf)? With “vaccines” that are to be administered to newborns immediately after birth? Why do almost all public school systems “require” certain “vaccines” to be given to a child in order to attend public school? Why do state legislatures give the force of law to the CDC Child and Adolescent Immunization Schedule through legislative fiat for public school attendance — given that the CDC states on the schedule that the injectables are “Recommended”, not “Required”? Why do the AMA, the CDC, and the FDA refuse to acknowledge that the COVID-19 “vaccines” are dangerous and deadly, given the mountain of evidence currently in print which proves this to be the case?

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday 4.18.2025 Open Thread: Cellphone Radiation — Blood Cell Clustering and Damage to the Immune System

The above free image of a cellphone in use is courtesy of iStock and Google Images. There may some AI-generated aspects to this image: therefore, Yours Truly is citing the sources (iStock and Google Images.)

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. Today’s offering, part of a “mini-series”, speaks to the emerging dangers of 5G radiation effects as they relate to cellphone use.

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. NOTE: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is only the possible AI-generated “details” in the header image; and has cited this as such. If readers wish to post anything in today’s discussion thread that is AI-generated, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Today is Good Friday. It is also the sixth day of Passover.

(A side note: Today’s offering may sound, in some ways, like “another conspiracy theory” to some readers. However, given that many things that were called “conspiracy theories” about the COVID-19 “vaccines”, things which now are proving to be true, what is presented today may ultimately fit into the “down the road, toldjah” category.)

Just about everyone has a cellphone. Most of these cellphones are versions of a “smart phone” that have either Apple-based, or Andoid-based, technology built into them. Many people carry their smartphones in a pocket of their clothing. Other people carry their smartphones in a holder device connected to a lanyard that is worn around the neck. Many people hold their smartphones up to their ears when speaking or listening. Most smartphones are now connected to a 5G technology signal transfer system. These 5G signals are carried by cellphone “towers”; they are also carried by “mini-system stations” that are being added to existing telephone lines; they are also carried by other “mini-system devices” that are being attached to existing street lights, or are already built into new street lights. It is now possible to see 5G “mini-system stations” or “mini-system devices” on entire stretches of street lights.

5G technology is supposed to be the “new standard” for technology transfer (until it is likely eclipsed by higher transmission rates, such the “up and coming” 7G); for telecommunications; and for ease and speed of information transfer. However, there is another side to this situation: the radiation signals from 5G smartphones can interfere with red blood cell function in the person with the 5G smartphone, causing these cells to form clusters (also called aggregations) that resemble stacked coins.

Yours Truly begins here: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/study-direct-smartphone-exposure, “STUDY — Direct Smartphone Exposure Triggers Rapid Red Blood Cell Aggregation”, by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 1 April 2025. The paper referred to in the article is found here: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2025.1499499, “Hypothesis: ultrasonography can document dynamic in vivo rouleaux formation due to mobile phone exposure”, Robert R. Brown, Barbara Biebrich, 11 February 2025. A screenshot from this paper is below:

Rouleaux formation is the “coin stacking” appearance of red blood cells. Another screenshot from the paper is below, which includes an image of red blood cells in rouleaux formation:

The scientific community has apparently given 5G technology a “go-ahead”, despite numerous concerns that have been expressed regarding the safety and the possible negative effects from 5G radiation. Two articles that have discussed these concerns are: One: https://expose-news.com/2022/11/19/an-international-appeal-halt-rollout-of-5g/; and, Two: https://expose-news-com/2024/04/14/ten-new-studies-detail-health-risks-of-5g-analysis-by-dr-joseph-mercola/.

A third article, by Mr. Hulscher, on the same subject, is here: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/the-5g-safety-myth-assumed-safe-not, “The 5G Safety Myth: Assumed Safe, Not Proven Safe”, 15 March 2024. The paper cited in this article is here: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1058454, “The Assumption of safety is being used to justify the rollout of 5G technologies”, Victor Leach, et al., 26 January 2023. Two screenshots from this paper follow; first, the Figure 1:

And, from the Conclusions section of the paper:

As to the potential for 5G radiation negatively affecting the immune system of humans, please see: https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/emfs-wrecking-immune-system, “EMFs are Quietly Wrecking Your Immune System, Scientists Warn”, via the GMI Research Group, 2 April 2025.

There is now a collective name for the various types of illnesses that can be induced by 5G radiation: EMR Syndrome. Dr. Joseph Mercola writes about it here: https://www.theburningplatform.com/2025/04/10/wireless-radiation-sickness-gets-a-new-name-emr-syndrome/#more-364767. Dr. Mercola discusses EMR Syndrome and offers suggestions on how to avoid it and/or mitigate it. Please see the screenshots below:

Finally, Yours Truly again emphasizes the fact that COVID-19 “vaccination” weakens and/or destroys the natural immune system of the “vaccinated” person; in addition to potentially inducing and/or aggravating cancers, cardiovascular conditions, neurological conditions, and much more. This situation opens the door to what, in Yours Truly’s opinion, may be called “Interactive Conditions” potential, between the damage done by the COVID-19 “vaccines” that a person has in their body, and the possibility of 5G radiation-induced illnesses among the “vaccinated.”

Be aware — Please protect and keep good health.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

STOP PRESS Edition: The FDA Just Granted “Fast Track” Approval for the ARCT-2304 saRNA Avian Flu “Vaccine”

The image of a “Suspicious Dog” is from Yours Truly’s files. The source is unknown, but to the best of Yours Truly’s knowledge and belief, it is not AI-generated.

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. If readers wish to post anything that is AI-generated on the discussion thread for today’s special edition post, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Today’s STOP PRESS Edition post is devoted to one topic: the “Fast Track” approval that the FDA just granted to CSL / Arcturus Therapeutics for the company’s self-amplifying RNA (saRNA, aka sa-mRNA) Avian Influenza “vaccine”, ARCT-2304. Another version of this type of “vaccine” by the same company, called ARCT-154 or KOSTAIVE, for COVID-19 infection “prevention”, is already “fully approved” and in use in Japan and in the European Union / Scandinavia. Both of these “vaccines” are discussed in this article: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/arcturus-gets-fdas-fast-track-154900033.html, “Arcturus Gets FDA’s Fast Track Tag for Influenza Vaccine Candidate”, 11 April 2025. Two screenshots from this article are below:

Take note of the last sentence in the screenshot above: “A biologics license application for Kostaive in the United States is expected to be filed later in 2025.”

Now, the press release from Arcturus Therapeutics in January 2025, regarding ARCT-2304, found here: https://ir.arcturusrx.com/news-releases/news-release-details/acturus-therapeutics-announces-initiation-phase-1-h5n1-flu, “Arcturus Therapeutics Announces Initiation of Phase 1 H5N1 Flu Vaccine Trial”, 10 January 2025. The clinical trial for ARCT-2304 is registered here: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06602531. Note that this is a PHASE 1 human clinical trial. Some of the details are below:

NCT06602531: Study Start Date: 12-12-2024

Primary Completion Date: 7-21-2025 (This means ONLY SEVEN MONTHS of a PHASE 1 human clinical trial before the Primary Completion Date. This is also a RED FLAG indication that Arcturus Therapeutics may likely apply for either a EUA or for a BLA (Biologics License Application, otherwise known as “full FDA approval”) BY THE LATE SUMMER / EARLY FALL OF 2025. In Yours Truly’s opinion, it is SCIENTIFICALLY IMPOSSIBLE to know in FEWER THAN AT LEAST TWO YEARS OF TESTING, WHETHER OR NOT A “VACCINE” ACTUALLY WORKS, LET ALONE BE “SAFE AND EFFECTIVE.”) In Yours Truly’s opinion, any claim by a “vaccine” manufacturer that a DNA-viral vector-based /RNA-based / “protein subunit”-based / “cell-based” / mRNA-based / saRNA-based / sa-mRNA-based “vaccine” — can be SAFELY developed, “tested” and granted either an EUA or “full approval” by the FDA, in fewer than at least two years, must be considered to be not only suspect — but as outright fabrication or wishful thinking.

Estimated Study Completion Date: 12-19-2025 (This would mean that the Phase 1 human clinical trial would be “completed” IN ONE YEAR PLUS ONE WEEK.)

Recruitment Information: Not Yet Recruiting

Contacts and Locations: NO locations are listed; there is only an 888 area code number to call the “Clinical Trials Disclosure Manager” for further information (which, by the way, said information would only be released to “researchers.” One assumes this means “degree-holding scientific researchers”, not to non-scientific-degree-holding researchers, let alone to the general public.)

Clicking on the Researcher View tab on the main study registration page yields some ** interesting ** information. Some examples: There will be a total of 200 persons used in the clinical trial; the ages will range from 18 years old to 80 years old; there is a “control group” that will receive injections of what appears to be a “standard influenza vaccine” plus, and/or, a saline placebo; and, there will be THREE levels of injectable used on the study subjects, at a “low” dose, a “medium” dose, and a “high” dose — of which, NO amounts of “vaccine candidate” are delineated; among other information.

A short summary of how saRNA (aka sa-mRNA) “vaccines” work is here: https://www.promegaconnections.com/how-do-self-amplifying-rna-vaccines-work/, by Jordan Nutting, 6 February 2024. Please see the screenshots from this article, below:

Note the language above regarding what saRNA does in the body: “...it’s like having a built-in printing press that produces additional vaccine in cells.” (Yours Truly: This “printing press” is at work in the body of the person who takes an saRNA “vaccine” for an unknown time — perhaps indefinitely.)

Note the language about the very long length of the mRNA sequences that must be used in saRNA (aka sa-mRNA) “vaccines.”

WHY IS THERE THIS UNHOLY RUSH TO GET ARCT-2304 THROUGH THE CLINICAL TRIAL PROCESS AND INTO EITHER EUA OR BLA STATUS WITH THE FDA, AND THEREFORE GET INTO USE IN THE UNITED STATES? In Yours Truly’s opinion, the answer may involve: Peter Marks, MD, PhD.

When it relates to a new drug or biologic product (including vaccines and other injectables), BOTH the FDA’s CBER (Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research) AND CDER (Center for Drug Evaluation and Research) departments are involved. Peter Marks, MD, PhD, was the director of CBER from 1 January 2016 (this made him an Obama administration holdover at the FDA) until his resignation from CBER on 29 March 2025 (his resignation became effective on 5 April 2025.) It appears that unless Dr. Marks resigned, he was going to be fired by now-HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Please see the screenshots below from this article on the situation (https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-peter-marks-issues-veiled, “BREAKING – Peter Marks Issues Veiled Threat to America About Man-Made Biological Threats”, by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 5 April 2025.) The first is from Dr. Marks’ resignation letter; the other is from the article by Mr. Hulscher:

The screenshot below is from the interview transcript with Dr. Marks on CNN on 4 April 2025:

During this CNN interview, Dr. Marks made the “oblique threat” above.

On 2 April 2025, the FDA chose Scott Steele, PhD, as the Acting Director of CBER. Dr. Steele has been a full-time CBER advisor in late 2022 (this makes him a “Biden administration” holdover; and, Dr. Steele started with the FDA in June 2020 as an advisor in that agency’s Office of Medical Policy Initiatives.) Please see: https://www.fiercepharma.com/pharma/fda-taps-scott-steele-lead-cber-acting-basis-after-marks-departure, 2 April 2025. On 10 April 2025, the FDA granted “Fast Track” process approval for ARCT-2304. Who chose Dr. Steele to be the Acting Director of CBER on 2 April 2025?

In Yours Truly’s opinion, it is inconceivable that Dr. Steele and his colleagues at the related department of CDER, Dr. Jacqueline Corrigan-Curay, MD, and Peter P. Stein, MD — do not know what saRNA (aka sa-mRNA) does and how dangerous it can be to the human body; and, do not know that a “vaccine” product needs at least two to as long as five years to be properly developed, tested, results analyzed, and applications submitted to the FDA for EUA or for “full approval” of the injectable.

In Yours Truly’s opinion, what may be going on at the FDA regarding ARCT-2304 is a combination of an “end-run” around what Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., is trying to do to bring the agency into account for what is it supposed to do — to work in the best interests of the public health of the American people; plus, what appears to be personal bias against Mr. Kennedy, Jr., himself; plus, what appears to be a “H3ll-bent mindset” in the FDA to force the use of self-amplifying RNA products on the American people without going through the proper (lengthy) processes of testing, analysis, and proof of “safety and efficacy.”

Yours Truly presents the situation and her opinions. Readers can do their own due diligence and make their own conclusions.

FLASH! UPDATES, MONDAY 15 APRIL 2025:

First, this: https://twitter.com/RenzTom/status/1910780397899964560

Then, these: https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/fda-fast-tracks-vaccine-nightmare, 14 April 2025. Please scroll down the page to find the interview with Attorney Tom Renz; also: https://sayerji.substack.com/p/the-self-amplifying-rna-vaccine-threat, “The Self-Amplifying RNA Vaccine Threat and the Rise of BIo-Digital Warfare”, 11 April 2025. A screenshot from this article is below:

And, finally, from 2024: https://www.theqtree.com/2024/10/04/health-friday-open-thread-10-04-2024-self-amplifying-fda-sarna-a-primer-on-how-to-amplify-a-disaster/.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA