Super-Flake

I woke up today and there was a disturbance in the force.

Just look at his mug. That sick Romney crap just DRIPPIN’ OFF.

Gonna have to do somethin’ about it. 😉

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/jan/1/mitt-romney-washington-post-op-ed-assails-donald-t/?utm_campaign=shareaholic&utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=socialnetwork

Posobiec had a great comment.

https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1080297049898262529

Sundance digs in for the fight.

Thank goodness somebody had the guts to call it like it is.

I have only one comment.

W

Let’s send Super-Flake where the original went.  Early retirement.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
274 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Harry Lime

Romney carries about as much weight in President Trump’s America First Republican Party as Bill Krystol. It is unfortunate to see him back in the public eye…but I don’t think anyone will listen to him…well, except for Wapo, CNN, MSNBC…right where he feels comfortable and where he belongs.

Harry Lime

In other words…what a LOSER!

singularZoe

He’s a plant or a shill, take your pick. He’s going to obstruct, and probably gather forces for impeachment.

singularZoe

Plant for China, think we know who he works for. It’s the great flake-off.

singularZoe

Definitely globalist, and if you know about George Romney and that family, it’s the Re Rockefeller wing of the G.O.P. Not to be trusted in any way.

rayzorbak

Dip Schitt Mitt

michaelh

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
Tonight, Current Narrative News features special guest Mitt Romney.
Hello Mitt, it’s good to have you on the show tonight.
Yes Andy great to be with you!
Hold on a sec, I need to take another shot. *Gulp* WHEEWWWWW *Hissssss* *head shake* man that stuff will burn your lungs! ARRGH!!!!!!
OK, so you were just telling us the reasons why the Senate should seriously consider convicting Donald Trump.
Sure Anderson, I think my fellow Republicans should give this matter due and serious consideration–
–Hold on, hold on right there. You think they should “consider” it? I mean, isn’t it obvious enough right now that conviction is a necessity?
Yeah well you know we really shouldn’t jump the gun, these are serious charges we’re talking about–
So what is the hesitancy then with the Republican party? The charges are very serious–
–yes they are but–
And with serious charges, we should recognize that conviction should be a foregone conclusion at this point, correct?
–well YES, but–
So really Mitt, what we want to know is what is stopping the Republicans from taking that next logical step? Why is there hesitancy for Republicans to do their Constitutional duty and convict?
–well yeah, those are all good points, uh, Anderson, and I know that we do believe that the Republicans will do the right thing in the end. But right now the important thing is that we follow, you know, the process, which is that the Senate actually has an opportunity to hear the charges, and we can consider how serious they are–
OK Mitt I hate to cut you off, but this is a problem. We already all know the charges are very serious, correct?
–Right, yeah but–
And we know that we need to understand the gravity of those charges, correct? I mean we know that when people come forward with their story, they’re putting themselves at great personal and emotional risk–
–sure, sure–
–and we have to know that these courageous people – and I mean, there’s really no other way to describe them, right? They are courageous to step forward and put their story out there and put themselves in the public eye–
–well wait Andy, these are all anonymous, you know, people who need their identity protected, because of the uh threat of uh, political retaliation–
–Yes yes, exactly but that doesn’t mean that they aren’t exposing their story and making a courageous stand does it?
–No no of course it takes courage to put yourself out there like that–
–So you agree then that we need to take their stories seriously, because the gravity of the accusations should really inform the Senate of the need to reach a conviction?
Well yes Andy but it’s more complicated than just that–
–How so?
–well, uh, because, well the Senate has to hear these stories out first, I mean–
–But they are serious? Doesn’t the Senate know they are serious?
–Well yes and well that’s why we need to hear them! Because they are so serious! The Senate needs to hear them!
–OK so why doesn’t the Senate just hear them? Why should this be so difficult? Are the Republicans afraid of what they’re going to hear?
–Oh No Andy, The Republicans aren’t afraid. But we do have to follow proper Senate protocols–
–So what’s it going to take for the Republicans to act on the serious accusations that we’ve been hearing about? Because so far all I’m hearing is a bunch of stalling and slow walking and waiting, I mean, the American people have been waiting over two years, OVER TWO YEARS Mitt, for this moment. What is it going to take for them to finally act and get the conviction that the American people have been clamoring for all this time?
–Yes yes you’re exactly right. We can do it soon and we can do it quickly. The problem is that we need the accusations declassified–
–Oh wait, stop right there. You mean these serious accusations are classified? They are a matter of national security?
–Well Andy I really can’t speak to that, but uh, I do know that the Special Counsel–
–You mean Robert Mueller, correct? Investigating the Russian Collusion that we have been reporting on for two years?
–Yeah exactly, Robert Muller has all these very serious allegations to bring to the Senate, but we have to be very careful because they are all highly sensitive, classified information–
–OK we’re running short on time so before the break I need to ask you one final question. Even if the Senate doesn’t get the accusations, for as you said, national security reasons, and because we know the accusations are extremely serious and should be taken seriously, do you think the Republicans will be able to put party politics aside and do what’s right for the United States of America?
–Well Andy, that’s what I sure hope to find out.
–Thanks so much Mitt for being on tonight.
END TRANSCRIPT

Spab

Maybe if we pray hard enough Romney might have a Lindsay Event. The question is whether Romney has ever been anything but a Globalist. RomneyCare was the prototype of national healthcare wasn’t it?

prairie123

Headline reads: “Failed Presidential Candidate Says Orange Man Bad!” *Fake headline I read from J. Posobiec’s twitter feed; I don’t know how to copy to word press, sorry.
And I agree Harry, Mitt is a loser… sad!

churchmouse

Here’s the tweet (just copy the link and paste):
https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1080336808783818752

prairie123

Yes! Thank you, that’s the one. 🙂

churchmouse

You’re welcome! 🙂

sunnydaysall

Just what we need… another Flake in Congress. (sarcasm) And I thought Jeff Flake was the biggest flake on the planet… Well, I stand corrected. I can’t wait till POTUS45 gives “mittens” his new nickname! Any takers as to what it will be?

Spab

Senator Vapors comes to mind.

GA/FL

NO doubt whatsoever McMullin is hiding under Romney’s stinking coattails.

GA/FL

McMullin probably heads a (Mormon) troll farm running nasty comments about Trump on every Trump account and on every blog that doesn’t ban them.

Cuppa Covfefe

Yep. First we had Frick and Frack, now we have Flake and Fake…
Fake, the Moron… He’s even a fake at his “faith”… And since when was he from Utah???

PeteC

No, but reminds me of a little humor we had in seminary— More Mone, More Fun!!! I said “ a little”!😳

Gil
rayzorbak

Looks like 3 Demon Monkeys to me.

Anonymoushorse

Romney- McCain the lesser.

TheseTruths

Brad Parscale’s tweet (kindly, in my opinion) says Romney didn’t have the ability to save the country. But I don’t think Romney wants to save the country. I see him as a NeverTrumper, progressive, RINO, chamber of commerce Democrat masquerading as a Republican. A snake of the lowest order.
No offense to any Latter-day Saints adherents, but every now and then I see something that indicates some Mormons have opposing views to traditional conservatism. I’ve seen reports of Mormons advocating for Islamic migration here, and then there is Glenn Beck at the border with the teddy bears. I think the way some Mormons interpret their faith bears watching regarding the actions of people like Romney, especially because Mormons have the reputation of being family-oriented conservatives — which helps them fly under the radar of scrutiny.
Glenn Beck, though he admitted to being Mormon, was able to fool people for years by talking in Christian terms about such things as redemption. Again, no offense, but Mormonism and Christianity are very different and not interchangeable relative to church doctrine, including that of salvation. I did not appreciate Beck’s lack of transparency about his motivation for some of the things he did.

churchmouse

Brad’s tweet:

Brad nailed it by mentioning jealousy.

NUTHA-VYOO

Dum Dum Dum Dum Dum.
ref Southpark. No Fan, but if the shoe fits….

michaelh

Was an epic episode. I have a recording of it that I used to pull out watch with students in the college ministry every so often.

GA/FL

Got a link for us old fogeys?

NUTHA-VYOO

apologize for the only “findable” reference but thanks to “The Real Ryan Westfall” for this and begin at about 1:01

NUTHA-VYOO

No offense intended to members of the actual faith.

GA/FL

Very interrrresssstink!
This was 2003, Episode 12. Certainly not PC – could they air that show today?

NUTHA-VYOO

Always about ANTI-PC.

singularZoe

These Truths, you are right on all counts.

NebraskaFilly

Don’t forget Bundy’s betrayal of his supporters as well over illegal aliens! IMO, Mormonism is a cult, pure and simple. Now, I say that even tho my sister, whom I admire tremendously, attends a Mormon church. However, she takes from it what she needs and ignores the insanity of the other Mormon precepts.

PeteC

So true! They added a Book of Fairy Tales—not good!!!

Anonymoushorse

Beck is not a ‘cradle’ Mormon. He and his wife became Mormons after ‘church shopping’. He mentioned this once on his radio show. IIRC, he started out as a Catholic, but I might be mistaken.

GA/FL

You said it all and very well, TheseTruths!!!
I’m saving that comment!

TheseTruths

Thanks. NebraskaFilly made a good point about Bundy, too. No doubt there are other examples.

churchmouse

Someone posted this on SD’s Romney thread:comment image

Sadie Slays

I’m no Mitt Romney fan, but I’m not that concerned. The Q team would have made Romney retire like Flake, Corker, and the rest if Romney was a threat.

churchmouse

He only got elected in November.

Sadie Slays

They could have derailed his campaign if they needed to.

Anonymoushorse

This is my thought also.

Anonymoushorse

p.s I made a crack about Flake’s nose on Twatter recently and was suspended for 12 hours and made to take it down.

churchmouse

What role will Ronna, his niece, play in all this?

GA/FL

Good question!

churchmouse

Someone kindly posted her tweet here — critical of her Nunks. Incredible.
I’ll repost it:

churchmouse

Good one:comment image

holley100

Hey Wolf have I not had enough coffee yet or is that that Flake’s nose on the picture you tweeted?

Tonawanda

Yes! Very, very funny!

PeteC

Yes, I saw that crooked nose too, Holley!!!

Anonymoushorse

I tweeted that maybe Flake’s nose would snap back into place when he was hung for treason. Twatter did’nt appreciate it.

Anonymoushorse

Just the suspension and forced deletion. I don’t have enough followers to be more than a ‘mosquito’.

redlegleader68

Reblogged this on RedLegLeader Blog and commented:
#SuperFlake

realsauce

Maybe Romney and Son of Mailman can jello wrestle for the right to lead the lap dogs of the left, AKA the Rinocrats

Greg Cox

He could wrestle that recent transgendered wrestling champ.

michaelh

Would Romney be entering as the transgendered wrestler or would we need to find a transgender to wrestle him?

Anonymoushorse

Wouldn’t work; Son of Mailman would eat all the Jello.

churchmouse

In record time, too.

redlegleader68

Ok, I just took one for the Team and checked out the WaPost article directly, checking out the comments. No need for any of us to go there since this is the header of the comment section:
“This conversation is moderated according to The Post’s community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion.
“Send feedback about the comments section here.” …followed by…
“Featured comments are hand-selected by our Post moderators. Criteria include, but are not limited to: likes by users, replies by users, and previous history of valuable commenting.”
Bwahahahaha …

Sylvia Avery

Mitt Romney launches a classic pincher action. The Commie House on the left flank, Mitt Romney in the Senate will try to rally any remaining Never Trumpers to his side and make mischief in the Senate to hurt PDJT and they think they will crack him like a nut between them.
Mitt will take his millions and his national media profile and his professional handlers and will set up permanent shop on the Sunday morning shows for the next two years attacking PDJT. It is infuriating. Who knows, he may even have delusions about primarying PDJT.
I’m not worried about Mitt. I am sure he will be swatted away like a blue bottle fly with a tweet or two. But I am really, really p.o.’d.

GA/FL

I’ve still got all my links from 2012 on nasty Romney.
Will never forget Ann Barnhardt unloading on him!

Sylvia Avery

AND another thing, if Mitch could only locate his manhood he would grab Mittens by the tie and tell him if he ever wants a committee assignment, ever ever ever ever, he had better put on his best Colgate smile and sing the praises of PDJT regularly.

Sylvia Avery

AND it took me clear until now to notice Mitt has Jeff Flake’s crooked nose.
My fingers just itch to realign it with my little entrenching tool portable shovel.

realsauce

You go girl!

GA/FL

🎶 Bam-Bam-Sylvia’s Silver Shovel came down upon his head….🎶

GA/FL

*

(Remember this?)

Aubergine

Thoughts on Mitt Romney:
I live in Montana, so I am surrounded by Mormon communities. I have a handful of friends who are Mormon, including one I have known well for years.
In a word, sorry to offend any if they are here, but Mormonism is cray-cray.
I have no problem with anyone practicing any religion they want, but I do have issues with cult behavior. People in cults don’t think for themselves and are very easily manipulated by large forces. Mitt Romney grew up in a cult, within which real dissent (if you want to be a Mormon “in good standing”) is not tolerated. The word comes down from on high (that’s anybody from a ward Bishop to the prophet himself) what you are “called” to do, and you do it. Whether it is teaching Sunday School, or trashing a duly elected President of the United States, you “follow your calling.”
As an example of how this training works, I once attended church with my good Mormon friend. I am strong minded enough that I would walk into a room full of Moonies or Scientologists without fear of being overcome. 🙂
At this church wervice, people were called upon to give their “testimony.” That in itself was pretty disturbing, as they all say pretty much the same thing:
“I know this church is true. Joseph Smith was given the word of God on golden plates. The prophet talks directly to God…” On and on it goes, all the same.
But the WORST part was when a mother got up with her three-year-old son. She spoke her “testimony,” and then HE DID. But of course, he’s three, so she would whisper the words into his ear, and he would parrot them out of his mouth, like a Charlie McCarthy doll. I was so shocked and appalled I left the room right after that, and never returned. I had seen enough.
Mitt Romney does not have his own mind. He has the one that was programmed into him.

singularZoe

Agree, Aubergine. And the Christ of Mormonism is a false one, and the so-called communion is water.

NebraskaFilly

Ha – posted pretty much the same thing before reading your post. Yep – a cult, through-and-through. I went through AIT with a gal who was a Mormon and wanting out of it desperately. She requested an overseas assignment in order to get as far from them as possible.

Gil

Im old town san diego there is a mormon battlement trubute for their effort in the civil war and how they came to the area. Very nice supposedly for kids ir families to learn history. I took my kiddo in for the room to room interactive show. We lasted through 1 and a .5 rooms bc it was PURE PROPAGANDA. Minimal history but lots of conversion and they kept you in the room like a time share. My kiddo realized it quick and wanted out. The kids there were already mormon and acted a bit off. I dont think they are used to people walking out!

michaelh

I have extended family who are Mormon. It isn’t my intention to offend anyone – at the same time I’m not going to avoid telling the truth just because someone might not like it.
I don’t have any Mormon friends. Not for lack of trying, but because they are a very insular tribe. It is a closed system and outsiders, particularly ones perceived to be a threat to their system, are not welcome.
Mormons are very much reality-challenged. The reason is fairly straightforward:
* They have a book of scripture that presents itself as EXOTERIC – ostensibly, the Book of Mormon presents itself as a historical book, recording the history of ancient people.
* However, there is not one shred of external evidence for the book. So there is NO EXOTERIC criteria that can verify the claims.
* Wholly lacking external evidence, the remaining solution is to seek confirmation from inside oneself. So in practice, they ask potential converts to look for a witness within. This is the definition of ESOTERIC knowledge.
* Once someone accepts the ESOTERIC justification for the Book of Mormon, the question becomes how to understand the EXOTERIC claims coupled with lack of evidence. The solution is to reject the EXOTERIC evidence and trust only the ESOTERIC.
* The rejection of the EXOTERIC in favor of the ESOTERIC is the rejection of the outside reality in favor of the inward experience/knowledge. The inward feelings/knowledge (testimony, burning, spirit, whatever) always take precedence over any external reality.
* Thus they are REALITY CHALLENGED: The internal feelings (ESOTERISM) always supercede the external reality (EXOTERISM). No reality can challenge their internal feelings, or the narrative explanation they have created around them.
* This is also the reason why they are difficult to reason with. The EXOTERIC reasons do not matter, all that matters is the ESOTERIC reasons. Trying to argue on EXOTERIC objective grounds will always be like nailing jello to the wall – their reasons are not based in reality. The ESOTERIC reasons from within are experiential, subjective, and are therefore immune to external (EXOTERIC) testing.
* It is possible, of course, for a Mormon true believer to come to a point where they question the validity of their ESOTERIC experience, and to realize that their own heart and feelings are deceptive. When they start to question whether their own religious experiences were valid, a crack of EXOTERIC light can enter the formerly airtight system.
None of the above is unique to Mormonism. This is extremely common among occultists for example.
When we talk about mind control systems, this is why I go out of my way to remind people that no single institution has a monopoly on mind control. All mind control can be summed up in a single principle: Getting a person to convince him or herself that the reality they see is not correct, but that another person’s reality narrative is true. If possible, the target will accept the false narrative enthusiastically. Hence, a “True Believer,” to use Eric Hoffer’s terminology.

Cuppa Covfefe

Very good points and analysis.
The interesting this is, you could just as well be describing liberals…

michaelh

LOL – Exactly!
“When we talk about mind control systems, this is why I go out of my way to remind people that no single institution has a monopoly on mind control.”
The major difference between liberals and Mormons in this analysis is the Mormons rely on esoteric experience and mystical sensations; liberals just rely on their own feelings and emotion while ignoring reality. Otherwise it’s the same dynamic at play.

singularZoe

I don’t know about the “mystical” part, but iI got involved with Mormonism for a few months when I was a lot younger, and you have to be willing to swallow an awful lot of fake documents which were a fraud to begin with. There is a surface appeal to it–all the family home evenings, and if you suspend scepticism and don’t look closely, there is a surface seeming wholesomeness that appeals to people, but there is a lot of smoke and mirrors and deception.

holley100

Fake documents…Yup. And then there are the “Gold Plates” Joseph Smith used to write the Book of Mormon that have since disappeared.

SteveInCO · Thermonuclear MAGA

I’m told that’s where the phrase “talking out of [one’s] hat” comes from.

singularZoe

There was a book published in 1945 by an historian, Dr. Fawn Brodie, that exposed the whole thing–I’d call it a hoax. For me, the thing that really shocked me was the fact they claimed to believe the Bible, yet the so-called Mormon d scriptures or documents contradict the Bible in too many ways to count. Besides, the story of the founding doesn’t hold up

andrew1979

what about the 11 witnesses that saw the golden plates and the seer stones!?!?!?!?!?!?!

Plain Jane

All I know about Mormons I learned from 2 people.
In my youth I fought off potential date rape several times. The only time I was scared was because the Mormon insinuated I give or die. Yes a real threat. I called on ,y angels and was released.
The other Mormon was a neighbor who was about 15 years older than DH and me. He was they neighborhood jerk. Always burning stuff way beyond dry leaves. Once he put an old stuffed arm chair in his burning pile. Anyway, he was always wanting our beautiful young daughter to come inside his house. Thank God she knew better.
He finally apologized to me, begging forgiveness for being such a blank, one early morning after a storm downed a large oak, to hang on a limb of a smaller oak,he came running over in a panic. If the smaller oak branch gave way, it would have smashed through the bedroom where he was sleeping.
Yes I forgave him. He moved shortly afterward. The neighbors all did the happy dance.
So now Willard is telling me what Mormons are all about. Rotten track record here, but they do have a good chior. 🙂

michaelh

Good Chior indeed. Public Relations. Propaganda techniques applied to marketing.
Not coincidentally the LDS are masters at SEO techniques. The PR outreach game is real.

Plain Jane

Interesting.

Tonawanda

The Study in Scarlet never ended!

GA/FL

McCain, Flake, Romney, Kristol – 4 of a Kind!
Traitors, Cheaters, Liars, Scoundrels, Scum – Anti-American bad actors all the way!

MysticRose80

As if I couldn’t feel more disgust for this POS than I already do. How I wish I could time-travel back to 2012 and prevent myself from casting my vote for him.
I don’t know if he’s become bitter over his 2012 loss (which, IMO, was his own damn fault) or if he has always always been a POS.

GA/FL

BOTH/AND!

michaelh

It would be difficult to think of a Republican nominee for President that was more disappointing than Romney.
Then I remember Bob Dole.
Yeah…

GA/FL

…and McCain who also choked and caved.

rayzorbak

Warmongering Traitor McStain was far worse than McRomneyCare in my opinion. Though BOTH were probably Demonrats in Republitard clothing

GA/FL

Romney governed Massachusetts left of Teddy Kennedy – his whole governorship from school curriculum to Romneycare was the lab model for Obama’s presidency. To the letter. Romney is Obama/leftist in RINO sheep clothing.

rayzorbak

How else could such a SEVERE CONservative be elected in Mass without actually being “One of THEM”? (Dumb Mass Demoncrat)

Tonawanda

Dole was actually a genuine, nice guy.

Marica

https://twitter.com/LisaMei62/status/1080468293906038784
Potus Just flicked him off his shoulder like a gnat! LOL!!!
I really believe there is more to this than just a “hit piece”….Something is going down…

GA/FL

56,808,901 @realDonaldTrump followers – 9:38 am – 1/2/19
Edging quickly toward 57 Million – Look for Twitter to do a purge to try to delay it as long as possible! Always happens.

TheseTruths

“I really believe there is more to this than just a “hit piece”….Something is going down…”
I wonder if there are any skeletons in Romney’s closet. I doubt it. I think he’s just a wolf in sheep’s clothing who will take McCain and Flake’s place as a media darling and thorn in Pres. Trump’s side. But one can hope…

churchmouse

‘I wonder if there are any skeletons in Romney’s closet.’
There’s always the incident with his dog on top of his car on the way from Massachusetts to Ontario. Yes, I realise I already posted it earlier, but it bears repeating:comment image

Marica

https://twitter.com/thebradfordfile/status/1080468973567782913
This is part of the Plan….I am trying to figure it out… Why would Mittens even Go here?

GA/FL

Mitt has fallen for his own reflection – he is the possessor of overweening pride. Romney believes he is more righteous and worthy and more cunning and intelligent than DJT.

Anonymoushorse

At the time PT was “considering” Mittens for Sec State, I felt that PT was just playing him and humiliating him. I wonder if this is Mitten’s payback, and I wonder if PT anticipated and planned this to happen for some reason? Part of THE PLAN?

GA/FL

Oh what subterfuge and double-dealing in DC!

Tonawanda

It looks like Mitt was pre-humiliated!

Marica

GA– I believe Geraldo agrees! 😉

rayzorbak

Thanks for posting this as I have GR on AutoMUTE!

gingersmom2009

The elegant new senator. 😂 I generally cannot stand Geraldo, but he has completely nailed this.

michaelh

Geraldo is so annoying, that when he does nail it, you know that whoever got nailed is going to be VERY irritated by it.

rayzorbak

Broken clock………
Blind squirrel………

Cuppa Covfefe

Rich Corinthian Leather…
(as he drives off in his Cordoba [named after an Islamic city in Spain]…).

GA/FL

On THE WALL – President Trump will not fail! As a builder, he’s itching to complete it, to make it work/function as the best it can be!

Marica
churchmouse

Whoa — that is YUGE!

Marica

Right CM? Something is definitely UP!

churchmouse

Wow, wow and wow.
I can hardly wait for the next ‘instalment’.
The Trump presidency is miles better than any political television series. You never know what will happen next!!

Marica

next instalment…

churchmouse

Excellent!
Thanks very much!
I hope a load of his fellow GOP senators take issue with him. They will have him calling Uncle as they put the dog behind the wheel and Mitt on top of the car for a 12-hour ride. 😉

MysticRose80

Get him, Rand 😄! #IstandwithRand

singularZoe

Thanks, Marica. Agree that is

Gil

Im so glad she is independent. Good for her.

Linda

I think she got shamed into this. Her Twitter feed last night was filled with people asking for her comment.

Pat Frederick

Willard…nuf said

rf121

And of course guess where he is going for a TV interview.

Gil

Honestly what the hell? Are they trying for coup no. 2?

Anonymoushorse

Savant in business, idiot in all else.

rayzorbak

Sounds more like a “Useful IDIOT” to me.

Gil

Tunnel vision mitt!

singularZoe

Someone needs to look into Romney’s family background. He may have been programmed from when he was very young, MK kind of thing.

Nor'easter

“The Big Dig”!

churchmouse

Only religiously (JMHO).

michaelh

Talk about FAKE NEWS.
You write an op ed.
Next thing you know, you’re a guest on CNN.
For what?
To talk about what you wrote on the op ed!
Right.
Luckily, I got an advance copy of the transcript.

Marica

THis whole thing is NUTS! More POPCORN Please! Like a very long Crazy Movie–Who said that? Q? 😉

Anonymoushorse

I hope there’s an intermission- I really have to p**.

Marica

IKR!! LOL!

rf121
michaelh

Funny that reminds me of John McCain.
Why is that we keep finding ourselves comparing Mitt Romney to John McCain??
Hmm…
…walks like a duck…
…talks like a duck…

Anonymoushorse

Exits like a duck.

Anonymoushorse

Help! I set up a Word Press account so I can click ‘Like’, and now all my comments are ‘awaiting moderation’- yikes!

phoenixRising

PLEASE y’all… don’t watch the interview today…
Huge distraction !!!!
Remember… POTUS has called for a meeting today on the CR and inclusion of funds for the wall…

Pat Frederick

I agree…they needed something new for the news cycle–McCain’s gone, so is Flake, no one cares about Stormy anymore–they just got a “fresh face” for distraction/impeachment

Cuppa Covfefe

From Stormy to Mormy (who’s only interested in “more me”…).
Presstitutes supporting perps prostituting their non-existent values…

Marica

Phoenix–Mittens is the shiny object to distract–you are exactly right…

itswoot

“Schitt and Schmitt were walking down the street…” The combo does have the makings of a good joke!
For Mitt Romney, I think a big part of what he is doing in slamming POTUS is noose-avoidance posturing. If he is brought up on criminal charges, it would give him an excuse for saying he is being unfairly targeted for daring to take a stand against President Trump and his policies.
Same thing/excuse for Dem 2020 candidates for President who announce they are running for the office.

Cuppa Covfefe

He’s putting up a show, “not necessarily the noose”. Though it really should be “noose at 11” for that traitor…

phoenixRising

singularZoe

I think so. I once read a book by a former spy, and he said many in the CIA and FBI are either mornons or masons.

michaelh

Wow! Romney as a primary challenge in 2020? What a brilliant plan!
Let’s start by pissing off the ENTIRE Republican base.
That’ll work!

Marica

IS it that Mittens is really THAT out of touch? Maybe the 48 hour fudge rule will apply here…
I am NOW hopelessly and utterly LOST!

michaelh

Reverse the question.
Does Mitt have any mental connection left to reality?

thetinfoilhatsociety

He’s obviously suffering from a terminal case of TDS. He’s got the characteristic “crazy eyes” just like Adam Schiff!

phoenixRising

phoenixRising

Wolf…
YOU are so cool !!! Love it !

Plain Jane

LOL.

singularZoe

You’re on to them, Wolfie.

churchmouse

Like the phraseology: ‘a normal person’. Hmm.

TheseTruths

I just read Romney’s entire statement. Without his saying so, it is his declaration that he will run for president in 2024 and even 2020 if he sees so much as a tiny opening.
It is globalist claptrap of “working together,” “elevate the national discourse,” “anti-tribalism,” etc. Romney might as well have said, “I hereby declare my candidacy for the presidency as a Democrat.”
I’m so tired of the veiled rhetoric like “the rights of all people to freedom and equal justice.” Hillary, Pocahontas, Pelosi, and Dems are masters at it. As if we don’t believe in that as well! It’s rhetoric wrapped up and tied with a bow so you don’t see what’s inside.
I was puzzled that Romney would come out now with such a strong statement. But now I know: His intent was never to be a Senator, and especially not as a Republican helping to MAGA; he wants the presidency.

singularZoe

TheseTruths, exactly.

MysticRose80

Mittens had his chance at the presidency and choked. He’s a fool to think that he has a chance in 2024…and downright insane to challenge Trump in 2020.
He can take his globalistic talking points and shove them. While he’s focused on nursing his battered ego, the landscape around him is slowly shifting from globalism to true freedom.

scott467

Romney is a psychopath with a god-complex — which probably describes at least 85% of the national political-class.
But Romney won’t get close to the nomination again, he’s already a two-time loser.
He might have been ‘selected’ again by the PTB to take another dive for whomever the PTB select as his opponent in the quadrennial Uni-Party Farce, but We the People are onto their ‘splitter’ strategy scheme.
And more importantly, the Uni-Party better be in Gitmo already, before November 2020 even gets close.

realsauce

Let me put on my Vizzini robe and propose a In-Con-Ceivable theory…..
Perhaps Mitch is doing a triple reverse lindy, solidifying his mantel of supreme NeverTrumper, only to become the voice of reason when the indictments break, lending credence to the credibility and depth of the charges we are all expecting….heh, I know, I know,,,and the Mule and Rosie are pretzels too 😉

Anonymoushorse

Yipes!, after following these convolutions a need a triple dose of Tiger Balm!

rayzorbak

But, But….. Mittens McRomneycare is a SEVERE “CONservative”…..
HaHaHaHahaHaHaHa!

scott467

Except Romney is certainly guilty of all kinds of crimes which will land him in Gitmo with the rest of the Uni-Party Globalist Treason Cabal.

Cuppa Covfefe

The Battle of Mitts?

phoenixRising

this must be the day to pile on POTUS…
here comes crooked Reid

Spab

At some point in this guy’s past it is almost a certainty that someone said to Harry, “I’ll see you hang cowboy.”

phoenixRising

Ohhh, his name is very much “on the List” ….

phoenixRising
phoenixRising
scott467

For Romney to claim that Trump’s character falls short — two years AFTER he has already been president and accomplished so much — is not just the Pot calling the Kettle black.
It’s the pit of the abyss calling light darkness.

scott467

Why not make him the poster-child for the U.S. segment of the Cabal, focus all fire on his coordinates, until he cracks?
It’s their own playbook, and they wouoldn’t use it if it wasn’t effective. Let’s take a look, and see if this wouldn’t work.
Alinksy Rules:
1. “Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.” Power is derived from 2 main sources – money and people. “Have-Nots” must build power from flesh and blood.
Alinsky wrote this in 1970-1971. We have the Internet today, so we have the “people” part of the equation.
.
2. “Never go outside the expertise of your people.” It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone.
No need to go outside the expertise of our people. Between the Anons, Twitter, CTH, and places like here, we have a digital army with multiple special forces divisions.
.
3. “Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.” Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty.
This part is not only easy, but running psy-ops against Traitor Romney will be the FUN part.
.
4. “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules.
This is PART of the fun part. It should be no problem for Anons to uncover an endless stream of contradictions and hypocrisies and lies which Romney has told and continues to tell and do. Confront him with these hypocrisies daily, via Twitter, FB and every other avenue available. Expose him for the liar and hypocrite and traitor that he is, every day, all day long. There are MILLIONS of us, and only one of him. If even a tiny fraction of a percentage participates, it will result in a 24/7/365 stream of posts and resulting pressure on that psychopath.
.
5. “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions.
Pretty sure we’ve got THAT part covered in spades 😁
.
6. “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.” They’ll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They’re doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones.
Who enjoys going after these corrupt traitors with Truth and ridicule and memes more than We the People and our merry band of Anons?
.
7. “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.” Don’t become old news.
Unless it’s FUN, in which case there is nothing to ‘drag’…
.
8. “Keep the pressure on. Never let up.” Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new.
Roger that.
.
9. “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.” Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist.
No threat to worry about in this case, it’s just Mittens of Queensbury we’re talking about here, so fire at will.
.
10. “The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.” It is this unceasing pressure that results in the reactions from the opposition that are essential for the success of the campaign.
It would be civic achievement to break this dirtbag.
.
11. “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.” Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog.
This one never applied; it’s evidence that Alinksy hadn’t thought his ‘Rules’ through all the way at the point they were written and published. The violence always came from the radical Left, not from the Right.
.
12. “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.” Never let the enemy score points because you’re caught without a solution to the problem.
The Left has no solution to ANY problem, because they ARE the problem. They CREATE the problems, daily.
.
13. “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions.
The target is Romney, the Traitor. Freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.

Nor'easter

Excellent post! The “Good-for-the-Gander” strategy.
Especially like this line:
“Between the Anons, Twitter, CTH, and places like here, we have a digital army with multiple special forces divisions.”

pgroup

I hope I’m not posting something someone else did. Found this on that other site:
////////////////////////////////
Marica says:
January 2, 2019 at 1:40 am
Shout out to Minnie! and Gunny and G Combs and Flep and Cozette and Black Knight! Menagerie!!! and even the resident Eeyore–are you Koot now? Miss you guys! but found a new home.. another tree.. it’s the 17th letter..LOL Support SD! Be strong! Don’t Fight! WE are in this together!! Happy New Year!! Love Ya’ll!! And by the way– We got Sylvia’s shovel!! We win!! 😉
Liked by 1 person
Reply
MaineCoon says:
January 2, 2019 at 8:49 am
I stumbled upon your Q Tree blog as the link was posted here at it’s inception when many of you (according to you’ll) were supposedly banned and departed from this blog. I was shocked to see a full blown Q Tree discussion to determine which Treepers your poster voted to pre-emptively ban from your Q board. Who does this kind of stuff, I ask?
Each of you shredded SD, shredded many individual posters on this board and the collective mindset of the board in general.
I believe I can say with great truth that SD et al has never pre-emptively banned anyone from posting here. So what does that say about your Q-Tree blog?
It speaks to the very character of it.
Before anyone here considers “joining” that blog, I suggest you review the comments to see if you have been pre-emptively banned, discussed in anyway, blackballed.
What kind of group collectively does that?
A group I would never want to be a part of. I do not agree with that clickish, closed-“sorority/fraternity”-style mentality, “everyone-must-be-of-the-same-exact mindset group think. No growth there.
Shame of all of you for disparaging many of us on this board and in particluar Sundance. Who made all of you God to critique his work as if you are better than he?
Shame on all of you. Take your false greetings elsewhere.
Liked by 2 people
Reply
Marica says:
January 2, 2019 at 9:01 am
Funny! Ya”ll Dont get get it… I feel NO SHAME!– We are ALL Patriots and ALL LOVE our POTUS! Just Warriors from different perspectives…Had to work it out — But If you want to have “Growth” Open your mind and look at ALL perspectives…
Looks even better from 40K feet…
Still care about all you peeps here– But love my new place on the WWW!
Like
Reply
MaineCoon says:
January 2, 2019 at 9:57 am
P.S.
The Roller-Coaster Man started that Q-blog, posted the link here and tried to take SD’s committed (the above Brutus quote is applicable) followers with him after SD posted the Q article in Nov (?). The Q believers migrated to it and, imo, banned themselves from posting here thinking this entire blog would crash ‘n burn without them (your posting gives supporting evidence to my theory, in part. Some probably have been banned for reasons unknown.)
Sundance didn’t crash ‘n burn with you’lls departure. Highly overrated yourselves to think this blog would not survive without all of you. Sad.
Shame on you and all on your board for your open discussions of many posters here when you collectively, openly in the blog and at the request of Roller Coaster Man were asked who should be banned from posting on that Q board.
What kind of people do that?
Like all liberals faced with truth, you avoided the issue I exposed.
No problem. We can figure it out.
Nothing wrong with starting a Q-blog. Everything wrong with the open voting process to negatively discuss many posting here in order to openly vote to ban them from your Q-blog, and Shovel Lady participated in the banning process. I didn’t call that a winner or a winning process. Only losers operate in this manner. Sad and very disappointing.
Liked by 2 people
Reply
Marica says:
January 2, 2019 at 10:02 am
You sound like Mittens… Stop. We are all on the same team–Virtue shaming does nothing for anyone.. Won’t be back–so get off your soap box.. You are much of the reason good people leave… Adios

Pat Frederick

“A group I would never want to be a part of. I do not agree with that clickish, closed-“sorority/fraternity”-style mentality, “everyone-must-be-of-the-same-exact mindset group think. No growth there.”
hmmm sounds a little hypocritical if you ask me…weren’t we banned because we believed something different than the group think over there?
and I never shredded anyone about believing or disbelieving in Q…and if y’all (that’s the correct way to spell that btw) did, I must’ve missed it.
I still read the threads, skim the comments, but the blinders are off…

TheseTruths

“Cliquish” is the very definition of CTH.

Sauce

Cultish….but I guess we’re splitting hairs

holley100

Wow…unhinged and vindictive Maine Coon. Kudos to Marica for moving past it all and staying positive.

holley100

Agree. “Work in parallel, not together”. I really like that.

singularZoe

Wolf, hard as it is to accept, I think you are probably wise to ask this blog not be mentioned over there. Attempts to reach out were made, but there is just too much of possibly misunderstanding and there might be unintended consequences of going over there and stirring things up.

Sylvia Avery

“I really don’t think it’s a good idea for people to go over there and mention this place any more. In fact, I’m ready to ASK people not no mention ME or this blog AT ALL on CTH.
What do people think? Would that be a good idea? I personally would prefer not to be even MENTIONED or defended there.”
I agree, Wolf. Let us go our own way.
I considered MaineCoon a board friend, too, and WSB who liked MC’s comment so presumably she agrees. I’m a little sad about all of this. But I am choosing to accept it and move on.
It’s a new year, a fresh beginning, and we have a war to win.

holley100

Right Sylvia! We have more important things to do. Onward!

rayzorbak

I didn’t leave the CTH……
The CTH left me (out in the cold) with their BANHAMMER!
Thank you Wolf for taking me in.
The weather is so much nicer in this neck of the woods.

Harry Lime

I left of my own accord when I saw how others (many who came here) were being treated (only to be banned later trying to inform others how CTH bans people. At that point I knew I would be). Many of my favorite posters disappeared from over there. Prior to the ‘Abolish Q’ thread that started it all I was not a huge Q follower…I was watching Q but wasn’t quite sure what to make of it and I still feel that way today to some degree (I hope Q is real and would prefer not to be ridiculed for having that hope)…I don’t believe I had ever mentioned Q on that site before that thread. I was ridiculed by several people just for defending others ability to think for themselves without being censored/banned or made fun of. Again, I won’t mention names.
I agree with Pat F above…the hypocrisy is hilarious…where on Earth has this person been? Did he miss that entire episode? He uses the words clickish and groupthink while defending that site for banning fellow longstanding members? Wow.
“Q people are stupid! Go somewhere else and post that garbage!”
“What the…I can’t believe they went somewhere else to post their garbage…the traitors!”
And as far as SD asking politely to not mention Q anymore on his site in that thread, there is truth in that statement (it was repeated ad nauseam during that conversation by some I won’t mention), he did ask somewhat politely if not condescendingly, but as they also kept repeating it was his house that we were in. We should show some respect! So I ask, what kind of host drops a bomb in his living room and then disappears to let his guests duke it out in a nasty verbal bloodbath? SD or Admin never had a problem intervening in nasty affairs in the past. They chose not to. That’s when I lost a great deal of respect for that site. SD’s a very smart man but he has also turned out to be a very bitter and angry one. I hope he finds some peace.
I agree Wolf. It’s not gonna do a lick of good stirring up bad feelings between MAGA folks no matter what their differing opinions. It’s an unfortunate set of circumstances better left alone. I do wish CTH well in promoting the Trump agenda to maximum benefit. They used to do that so very well. I hope they can get back to a more positive outlook. Hillary is still not our President after all.

Sylvia Avery

Highly doubtful.

Sauce

I agree, but it was nice of her to throw out one last lifeline to those she mentioned that we would like to see here.

scott467

And it was plain for all to see — especially those continue in denial at CTH — how her effort was rewarded.
And not a single man or woman defended her, because even if any disagreed with Maine Coon, they are too afraid to speak up, for fear of being ‘banned’.
And that says it all.

TheseTruths

Exactly.

andrew1979

i was not “banned” that i know of – i just left straight away after reading that infamous post. i didn’t have to “figure it out” or “interpret” what so and so was saying. i read the post and i was done. yeah, i have been accused in the past of having “no emotion”, etc, etc, but i am not a cold hearted jerk. i have the same emotions as everyone else, but i will not be told what to think and when group think takes over it’s time to move on. there is absolutely no place for “yes men” or whatever you want to call it. NOTHING can be accomplished for good that way.

Anonymoushorse

Amen.

GA/FL

I’m ready to not to ever mention CTH or having been banned there again either.
It’s enough to have a new place to speak about the issues in our country that are important to us – a place that is a true refuge.
Thanks from the bottom of my heart, Wolfmoon1776. You are a gracious and kindly light in this world.

TheseTruths

“In fact, I’m ready to ASK people not to mention ME or this blog AT ALL on CTH.”
This goes along with what I said recently about not posting “the 17th letter” on CTH to try to sneak in posts about Q, when SD doesn’t want that on his site. He has stated and demonstrated (by banning) where he stands. So I agree that it’s best not to go over there and go against the stated rules and desires of the site owner. I say this not in his defense, but because it’s best to listen to what people say and watch what they do, to take them at their word, and to accept reality. We aren’t going to change SD or heal this strange rift; better to accept it and move on, in my opinion.

Marica

sorry Wolfie! learned my lesson.. Dang–IT takes a baseball bat for me sometimes..

scott467

Maine Coon: “I stumbled upon your Q Tree blog as the link was posted here at it’s inception when many of you (according to you’ll) were supposedly banned and departed from this blog.”
___________________
Nothing ‘supposed’ about it, MC.
But don’t take any of our word for it… why don’t you ask Sundance?
See if he will answer you honestly, if you even have the courage to ask — need to be careful though, so as not to be banned. So tread lightly on that sea of eggshells laid out in the shape of a Tree House.
Because if SD bans you too… by your own words, you certainly wouldn’t want to come here. So be fearful of what you say over there. Know for certain that any post you make over there could be your last — and post accordingly.
If you think I’m wrong, then what do you have to lose?
Go ahead, ask him.
Either he will answer honestly, in which case you will know the truth.
Or he won’t answer honestly, in which case he exposes himself. But that possibility is the part you won’t be able to handle, isn’t it?
I wouldn’t worry about it — I think SD would answer truthfully, if any of the Q-haters have the guts to ask him.
I have more confidence in SD than you do.
You know why that is?
Because I didn’t make him into an idol.
I can respect him AND disagree with him.
But you can’t.
Not really.
You don’t have that kind of freedom.
You have made yourself into a ‘yes man’ in SD’s Praetorian Guard.
.
MC: “I was shocked to see a full blown Q Tree discussion to determine which Treepers your poster voted to pre-emptively ban from your Q board.”
___________________
The truth hurts sometimes, Maine.
But were you really ‘shocked’? Like Capt. Renault in Casablanca shocked?
.
MC: “Who does this kind of stuff, I ask?”
___________
Why not go take a look in the CTH mirror and find out, MC?
.
MC: “Each of you shredded SD, shredded many individual posters on this board and the collective mindset of the board in general.”
________________
Each of us? Well, when you don’t have any individual names or actual quotes, just paint with a broad brush and accuse everyone, right MC?
You sound just like a Liberal, lol!
And for the record, and as you know full well, I didn’t say anything here — or anywhere else — that I wouldn’t say to SD on his own website, if he wouldn’t ban me for saying it.
On several occasions I pointed out that the fawning and outright worship toward SD does not serve SD well, and that I didn’t believe he wanted or needed that kind of adulation. And I was always disappointed when he allowed it to go uncorrected. It is far more valuable to have some who are not afraid to speak plainly when they disagree, than to surround oneself with ‘yes men’, leaving yourself blind to any view but your own.
Yes, I know, you will say things like ‘It’s his site, he can do as he pleases, we’re just guests’ as you pass the purple Kool-Aid around.
All true.
But if your host can’t handle even a LITTLE heat — if he’s so fragile that sincere and honest disagreement simply WILL NOT BE TOLERATED, such that people have to censor themselves if they want to avoid being banned — well then, I guess that’s the kind of place where you belong, MC. It speaks volumes, about you AND him, doesn’t it?
I could be wrong.
If I am, will you not show me?
.
MC: “I believe I can say with great truth that SD et al has never pre-emptively banned anyone from posting here.”
________________
What’s the difference between ‘great truth’ and regular ‘truth’?
Why do you care about not being able to post somewhere that you clearly despise anyway?
.
MC: “So what does that say about your Q-Tree blog?”
_______________
Why don’t you ask that question here — or have someone who can post here ask, instead of just disguising another attack in the form of wondering aloud on the same board that banned anyone who had the gall to speak his or her own mind?
.
MC: “It speaks to the very character of it.”
________________
After attacking Marica for simply wishing you a happy New Year, how is it that you’re in any position to talk about ‘character’, MC?
When she came with an olive branch, you hit her with a shovel.
What kind of person does that?
For that matter, what kind of person allows that type of personal attack on his website, in clear violation of his own website rules?
.
MC: “Before anyone here considers “joining” that blog, I suggest you review the comments to see if you have been pre-emptively banned, discussed in anyway, blackballed.”
_______________
You mean like you’re doing right now, talking about us over on the CTH website?
Hypocrite much?
Who blackballed who first?
If you were repeatedly attacked and then banned from a website where you had been posting for years, and those who were banned found a new place to get together where they wouldn’t be persecuted or banned for speaking outside the doctrinally permitted group-think parameters, would you want the haters to follow you?
The animosity and vitriol against fellow CTH members was so thick you could cut it with a knife, thanks in large part to SD, who — for reasons unknown — gave the haters the green light.
They know who they are — and those who were not the haters and attackers, know who they are, too.
If you are one of the haters MC, you have to ask yourself a simple question.
Why would you want to follow us here?
Not enough people for you to hate on at CTH anymore?
Who’s fault is that?
Those who acted as you are now created the division, helped foster that hate and grew it to fruition.
So be happy… didn’t you got what you wanted? Weren’t those whom you hate all banned, and now you have the Borg-like conformity and unquestioning idol worship that you clearly prefer?
Why not just own it, and be glad? Isn’t this exactly what you wanted?
When people are ‘banned’, the person doing the ‘banning’ relinquishes whatever ‘control’ he might have had. Unlike you, we can speak freely now. We don’t have to walk on eggshells, or toe a ‘company line’ or narrative. We have the freedom to QUESTION, something which you do not enjoy.
And as one of the new ‘enforcers’, you know exactly what happens to those who step out of line, right MC?
The threat of banishment is the Sword of Damocles hanging over every one of your heads over there. Always has been, the only difference is that now, after the Purge and the unspoken permission to violate CTH website rules so long as the ‘right’ people are attacked, it’s visible for all to see.
They are always watching, looking for an opportunity to make an example of someone, whenever the warnings from sycophants and self-appointed Digital Brown-shirts go unheeded.
I would gladly take you on, along with anyone else who wants a shot, but like so many others here, I was ‘banned’ for not rendering fealty to the new Creed at the group-think plantation.
As were so many others here, in the space of just a few days, in what amounted to a ‘purge’, a digital ‘pogrom’, an ‘Inquisition’ against anyone who dared think or speak or believe outside of the officially designated dogma of one man.
I don’t want you to think I’m engaging in hyperbole, so let’s take a look at those words and see what they mean:
purge
1. to rid of whatever is impure or undesirable; cleanse; purify.
2. to rid, clear, or free (usually followed by of or from): to purge a political party of disloyal members.
pogrom
1. an organized massacre, especially of Jews.
inquisition
1. an official investigation, especially one of a political or religious nature, characterized by lack of regard for individual rights, prejudice on the part of the examiners, and recklessly cruel punishments.
.
Welcome to it.

rayzorbak

Great Replies Scott…… too bad MC will never see them.
Or was this posted over there?

scott467

“too bad MC will never see them. Or was this posted over there?”
_________________
No, it was not posted over there, I was ‘banned’ on or around the 11th of November, if I remember correctly.
But I’m confident he will see it, either because he is lurking here or because someone will alert him to it.
Many others will see it, too.
And they should.
What was done was not right. It violated everything SD and CTH claims to stand for.
He knows it, the people who did it know it, and so does everyone else.
So when anyone over there seeks to point the finger of blame at others, it rightly points directly back at themselves.
So let them see it.
And let those — especially over there — who disagreed with what was done, be certain that their judgment is right and true.
The injustice of it cannot help but continue to hang over that website, until what was done is acknowledged and an account is given.

Sylvia Avery

I suspect MCs post to Marica will bring a bunch of people over here to check it out.

scott467

MC: “What kind of group collectively does that?”
________________
I don’t know, you’d have to ask a group collective, a place where one person does all the thinking and sets the official narrative, and the followers do all the admiring and praising and parroting and defending.
Is that ringing any bells, MC?
.
MC: “A group I would never want to be a part of.”
________________
The lady doth protest too much, methinks…
If you don’t want to be a part of such a group, then why are you part of exactly such a group — right now?
Is your lack of self-awareness so complete that you really can’t see it?
.
MC: “I do not agree with that clickish, closed-“sorority/fraternity”-style mentality, “everyone-must-be-of-the-same-exact mindset group think. No growth there.”
________________
It would be funny, if it wasn’t so sad.
Take a look around your own confines, MC. You are a MEMBER of a website so clickish, so closed-minded, so ‘everyone-must-be-of-the-same-exact mindset group think’ that they literally KICKED EVERYBODY OUT who did NOT toe the ‘party line’, lol!
How is it that you don’t have eyes to see?
.
MC: “Shame of all of you for disparaging many of us on this board and in particluar Sundance.”
______________
Is the shame not yours?
How many of ‘you’ disparaged, mocked, demeaned, belittled and ridiculed fellow Treepers — good people who were members there for many years — with your hate? Were you not acting EXACTLY like NeverTrump Traitor Cruzealots and Cruzlims during the 2015-2016 election campaign?
It was amazing to see how NASTY many of you were. Certainly not all, not by a long shot — but MANY. And were you not encouraged, given the green light, by Sundance?
Is that not TRUE?
Did ANY of it happen without his implicit approval, when the haters were violating all kinds of CTH rules against personal attack, without consequence?
And who did Sundance ban?
Did he ban the haters and attackers who completely ignored CTH rules against personal attacks?
Or did he ban those who were attacked and hated?
.
MC: “Who made all of you God to critique his work as if you are better than he?”
______________
Slap your mouth.
When did you start worshipping SD as if he was God, MC?
When did you ‘elevate’ SD to the point where his narrative were above question?
And here’s a bigger question: what kind of person allows and accepts (and in so doing, encourages) that kind of adulation and worship?
Has that question never even crossed your mind, over there at the Group-Think Corral?
If we hadn’t all been kicked out, we could discuss these things and hammer them out amongst ourselves. But by enforcing strict adherence to SD’s own version of ideological purity and unquestioning obedience, how do you suppose that plays out?
What was the great ‘sin’ that was committed, MC?
Did you ever even stop to think about it?
We were open-minded enough to consider the POSSIBILITY that Q might be exactly who he/they claim to be. A possibility which neither you nor anyone else can logically or conclusively rule out.
That’s it.
That was the unforgivable sin, the ‘heresy’, the horrific ‘deed’ which could not be overlooked.
We allowed for the possibility that another information source could be valid, and we were willing to remain open-minded until conclusive evidence was discovered, one way or the other.
And for this, SD threw his own CTH rules out the window, fostered an environment of animosity among his own membership, gave haters the green light to personally attack anyone with whom they disagreed, and then banished everyone who was being attacked.
That’s the group you’re a part of now, MC.
Unquestioningly.
Welcome to it.
Maybe he had a good reason, maybe he didn’t. Maybe we’ll find out one day, and maybe we won’t.
I’m open-minded enough to allow for the possibility.
Which is more than anyone can say about SD — at least at this point.
If I’m wrong, show me.
I’m not afraid of being wrong, and I’m not afraid of the truth.
And I’m not afraid of being banned, either.
So go ahead.
Show me.
.
MC: “Shame on all of you.”
___________________
No.
The shame is yours, for how you treated fellow members so despicably. That’s on you. But the log in your own eye is so large, you can’t even see it, and you’re too arrogant to even consider the possibility that you might be in the wrong. Which is even more of a shame.
.
MC: “Take your false greetings elsewhere.”
___________________
Haters gotta hate, right MC?
Are you the official Spokesperson of the CTH now?
Do you speak on behalf of the entire CTH, or just for the two who clicked the ‘Like’ button for your mean-spirited post?

Harry Lime

I think I would definitely want you on my debate team, Scott….just sayin’.

Sylvia Avery

NO KIDDING! He does the best take downs. And he isn’t mean, he’s just thorough. Very, very thorough.

Harry Lime

A scalpel comes to mind.

Sylvia Avery

Oh yeah! Total precision!

singularZoe

Scott’s argumentation is the best. Reading him kind of reminds me of having my teeth cleaned at the dentist when they get into every little nook and cranny and nothing escapes, and it’s sort of pleasant and uncomfortable at the same time, and you know it’s a good thing. I would never want to go into a debate without Scott. He’s the best.

scott467

That is very kind of you to say. I never know what to say when someone says nice things like that, except to simply say, thank you 🙂

singularZoe

Scott, so relieved my weird comment didn’t offend you–I hoped you’d understand my dental reference, but I wrote it in the middle of the night, and even as I wrote it and hit send, I thought it might not be wise. Glad you understood and were not offended.

singularZoe

Glad you understood me, Scott.

Marica

Scott!! Thank you for taking up for me!! I did not mean to start firestorm! But you are so super sweet to take up for me.. Hugs my dear!!! Q Tree is truly THE LAST LAST refuge!!! Happy New YEAR! Misty eyes right now..

Marica

ALL Ya’ll!! Hugs!

scott467

You are very welcome, and Happy New Year to you too, I hope this is a good one, for all of us 🙂

phoenixRising

Anonymoushorse

Help, help, I’m in the Word Press desert- rescue me!

GA/FL

President Trump handled Romney’s ridiculous rude self-righteous smugness with such grace – like a master – a BOSS!

andrew1979

i am BEGGING for one of these traitorous f*cks to be publicly shamed and i want to see tears and absolute pain in their soul. i mean, it’s getting freaking ridiculous. we have now entered the “the greatest plan of all time” territory at this point – and i am not being negative. but this is getting way way way over the top. now another NEW group of asshats gets “elected” and they can spout more and more drivel.
gosh darn it… i promised myself i wouldn’t get frustrated today – my internal dday. but this is just absolute insanity.

Sylvia Avery

Hang on, Andrew. I know how you feel, I’m right there, too. It is so hard to grit my teeth and face yet another insult like this one. Justice come soon!

andrew1979

it hurts so good sometimes 🙂

Anonymoushorse

O.k., I’m freaking out here. I started a Word Press account so that I could ‘like’ comments. Now all my comments are going into moderation. I’m really a tech dunce, how do I undo my Word Press account so that I can comment again?

wheatietoo

Rmoney always does this…always.
He always fights against Republicans instead of Dems!
Remember how nasty he was towards his fellow R’s in the 2012 primaries?
And he got great press for it, as I recall.
Did he ever fight against HusseinO with the same level of ruthlessness that he deployed against the R’s?
No.
He never did.
Rmoney couldn’t even wait till he was sworn in, to start spewing his venom towards our President.
This means he Lied to the people of Utah.
He doesn’t care about them.
He doesn’t care about us, either.
Pres Trump is us…and we are him.
He speaks for us, the forgotten ones, and he fights for us!
Who does Rmoney fight for?
He fights for the globalists who want to enslave us.
Thank you, Wolfie, for putting Flake’s crooked nose on Rmoney.
Hah. That’s brilliant!
I love it.

Harry Lime

Great post. It’s good to see you, Wheatie, for a while there I thought maybe you were banned from this site, too. Then where would we all be? Thank you Wolf, for not banning Wheatie!

wheatietoo

Haaaa. No, not banned.
Thanks, Harry.
I’ve just been getting caught up on chores, which sadly, is an endless process.
😀

rayzorbak

I vote for “putting Flake’s crooked nose on Romney” for ANY and ALL AWARDS this could be nominated for.
#SuperFlake

Linda

” Pres Trump is us…and we are him.
He speaks for us, the forgotten ones, and he fights for us!
Who does Rmoney fight for?
He fights for the globalists who want to enslave us.”
Exactly right.

GA/FL

Truth:

GA/FL

It’s a pattern with Romney:

singularZoe

Wolf, rommunist is so brilliant.

PeteC

A post today by SD on “Mitt Romney Explains Why His Group Must Oppose PDT”, relates to observations I made in a post here on New Years Eve. It referenced the globalists Wall St. versus the Trumpian Main St. economics among other things.
SD writes — “However, that said, before the battle of greatest consequence can be waged … we all need to ride hard and fast to wake everyone up about the specifics of who the enemy really is.”
Who is calling the shots? It is not the Reagans, the Bushes, the Clintons, the Obamas, the Merkels, the Mays!! I think most of you here know that. The ruling globalist organization is made up of circles (much like Cecil Rhodes’ Round Table group, which is in fact the precursor of today’s organization) — where the outer circles insulate the inner most circle of actors, the core of the group. So, the aforementioned leaders operate in the outer rings of the circles (puppets if you will) — whereas a Kissinger or Soros, etc. belong to a more inner ring of participants. They are all enemies, but the real enemy lies within the inner core, who seeks to remain unknown and behind the scenes. Different names has been assigned to this inner circle, which I will not get into. Personally, there is no doubt in my belief system that they all worship “the prince of the power of the air of this world” (cf. Eph. 2:2), Lucifer (or Satan, if you prefer). This is the force of evil and corruption in this world (the darkness).
At this time, I do not think PDJT is one of their number, and he is fighting against all hope to right the world ship to the right (or the light). Even as the Lord rose up the worldly King Cyrus to be favorable to the children of Israel during the Babylonian Captivity in the Old Testament, so we pray the Lord has done the same with President Trump! The evidence of Trump being an outsider is the globalists outright disdain and hatred of everything Trump including his followers. They are literally gnashing their teeth at us!!!
“Thus says the Lord to Cyrus, His anointed, whom I have taken by the right hand, to subdue the nations before him, and to loose the loins of kings; to open doors before him so that gates will not be shut: ‘I will go before you and make the rough places smooth; I will shatter the doors of bronze, and cut through their iron bars. And I will give you the treasures of darkness, and hidden wealth of secret places, in order that you may know that it is I, the Lord, the God of Israel, who calls you by your name.'” (Isaiah 45: 1–3; NASB)
Our gallant President is in the midst of the swamp — who can he trust? He is bombarded by the arrows of the enemy daily for our account, surrounded by the evil and corruptness that is DC!!! Although we are powerless, our prayers are all-powerful. Pray for our President and his family to the Lord … “Rejoice always; pray without ceasing; in everything give thanks; for this is God’s will for you in Christ Jesus.” (1Thes. 5:16–18)

scott467

“At this time, I do not think PDJT is one of their number, and he is fighting against all hope to right the world ship to the right (or the light).”
“Our gallant President is in the midst of the swamp — who can he trust? He is bombarded by the arrows of the enemy daily for our account, surrounded by the evil and corruptness that is DC!!!”
“Although we are powerless, our prayers are all-powerful.”
____________________
This is what is so exasperating.
He doesn’t NEED to be fighting against all hope, if he would just… put is in the game, coach!
We are NOT powerless.
We’re like the 13th man at a home game for a college or pro football team.
WE could be a tremendous asset, if he would just LET us be that asset!
How?
STOP fighting all these secret battles of the shadow war by himself!
Rip the LID off this sucker, expose ALL the bad actors by face and name.
Q: “At some point the streets (for them) will not be safe.”
DJT can make that so, at any time.
Once the Public knows exactly WHO the bad guys are, and exactly WHAT hideous deeds they have committed, there is NO PLACE in the WORLD that these people can hide.
They won’t be attacking the president or tweeting or standing in the halls of Congress making threats.
They will be running for their LIVES.
They will turn themselves in to authorities to ESCAPE justice being served directly by We the People.
So while it’s great that DJT is WHOOPIN’ their BUTTS, he doesn’t have to do it alone, or behind the scenes.
We’re the 13th Man.
Put us IN the game, coach!

PeteC

Great thoughts, Scott!!! Do not disagree at all — Count me in!!!

scott467

Meant to say the 12th man… 11 players on the field, and the HOME CROWD is the 12th Man…
It was late, I was tired, but that’s still no excuse 😣
I was looking for the ‘hiding under my chair’ icon that is available on some forums, but I couldn’t find it 😁

ozzytrumpsterOzzytrumpster

PDT is not alone though he is the face the enemy can see. He and Q and the Q team are light years ahead of the inbreds they are up against. His biggest handicap is that he doesn’t want any harm to the ordinary people, for whom he has great compassion, unlike microns treatment of the yellow vests. When he want the people to step up he’ll let everyone know, whether at the ballot box or taking to the streets.

scott467

DJT could brand Rmoney (thanks, Wheatie!) as a hater, and it would be hilarious.
……………………………….
“What a hateful thing for Mitt Romney to say. Not only toward me, after I endorsed him and gave him my full support — but more importantly, to the American People who supported me and our successful efforts to MAGA.
Imagine how much more success we could have, if RINO haters like Mitt Romney were for the American People, instead of against them?”
………………………………
This would put Rmoney in a box from which he could never escape. He has ‘binders’ on women, he took a dive in the presidential election rather than confront Hussein, and now that he has bought a Senate seat from Utah as a consolation prize, he’s out there hating on the People’s Choice, the leader of his own (supposedly) party.
If Rmoney denies that he’s a hater, then he’s on defense, and every time he says something negative toward Trump, it reinforces the ‘hater’ brand.
And if Rmoney embraces the ‘hater’ brand, he becomes the living face of the Treasonous Cabal, drawing so much animosity toward himself that he will never withstand it.
Remember, this is the cream puff who collapsed rather than confront the islamic she-male, Hussein.
Now either he collapsed against Hussein because he’s a pathetic, weak, nasty little Rmoney man — or he collapsed because he was paid off to take a dive, in which case he’s a traitor and a criminal.
DJT can have so much fun with this scumbag, the sky’s the limit.

rayzorbak

Brilliant!

rf121

Yep. The first debate he crushed Obozo. Then the next two he rolled over. I have made bad votes before “for the team” but I need a hot shower with a wire brush to clean up from that one.

PeteC

So true rf121 !! Lol

scott467

“Super-Flake”
_________________
Reminds me of an old Rick James song… and I don’t even HAVE any Rick James music 😁

wheatietoo

Haaa…I remember that song.
It was ‘Super Freak’.
Which applies to Rmoney too — he’s a globalist super freak!

scott467

“It was ‘Super Freak’.”
________________
Yep, I remember!
Just substitute ‘Flake’ for ‘Freak’ 😁

NYGuy54

This guy Shanahan is a brass knuckle fighter. He does it in a quiet way however. Cleaning house already. Albeit his own staff but still…