“We do not believe any group of men adequate enough or wise enough to operate without scrutiny or without criticism. We know that the only way to avoid error is to detect it, that the only way to detect it is to be free to inquire. We know that in secrecy error undetected will flourish and subvert.” –J. Robert Oppenheimer
Health Friday is a series devoted to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics.
There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are found here.
Today’s offering follows a different path from the posts on the COVID-19 disaster. Yours Truly will make it clear that she is not a climatologist, nor a meteorologist. However, the topic warrants discussion.
Assume, for argument’s sake, that one wakes up in the morning and sees a nice, clear sky from the window looking out to the southeast. Assume, for argument’s sake, that a couple of hours later, one sees a few (or, perhaps, more) “streaks” in the sky, that resemble thin lines; these “thin lines” do not look like real clouds forming. Assume, for argument’s sake, that one hears what sounds like a small plane (or, perhaps, a couple of small planes) in the sky. Assume for argument’s sake, that one sees more of these “thin lines” that have “spread out” into what may appear to be “low-level clouds” — except, that these “clouds” follow a strange pattern of horizontal, vertical, diagonal, and/or oblique directions. Assume, for argument’s sake, that these “clouds” are seen in the southeast sky, which then “spread out” towards the northwest, and appear not to “generate” on the opposite direction on the compass (in other words, in the northwest direction.) Assume, for argument’s sake, that on days when there are multiples of these “not-real-clouds” in the air, there is also “something” that makes the sinuses hurt, that make one feel as if a bad allergy day is occurring, that makes the eyes sting, and that the usual remedies for allergy symptoms (antihistamine, saline nasal spray) have minor or no effect.
Yours Truly has seen and felt all of these things, both in the Spring of last year and also this Spring. Photos of examples of what was seen are below:
View of the sky to the SE, early morning, April 2025.
View of the sky to the SE, around Noon, April 2025.
View of the sky to the NW, morning, April 2025.
Then, there is ** something ** that was different about the Central North Carolina pollen that was in the air, on the car, covering the front porch floor, on the window sills, and just about everywhere else — including getting into one’s lungs. In the Spring, starting in about mid-March, the Central North Carolina pollen starts to show up. It is a slightly “greasy”-feeling and looks like a yellow and green mixture. Not so this year. What one observed this Spring was a dry, yellow-colored powder that coated everything. It had a slightly acrid smell. Photos of what Yours Truly observed of this yellow-colored powder are below, taken in April. The first photo is from what I scraped onto a clean index card; the second photo is this stuff on the front porch floor:
Yours Truly began to research about “chemtrails”, one of those “conspiracy theories” that has been around for some years. What she found out is quite interesting. And, Yes, they are real.
One understands that “seeding” of the sky has been going on for years. However, the old-style “cloud seeding to induce rain” approach has changed — into “seeding” the sky with other types of chemicals. Please see: https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-09-10-chemtrails-no-longer-conspiracy-globalists-battle-climate-change.html, “Chemtrails no longer a conspiracy theory as globalists call it an essential part of their battle against “Climate Change””, S.D. Wells, 9 October 2024.
And, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., has weighed in on the issue. Please see: https://uk.news.yahoo.com/trump-administration-claims-us-behind-143951527.html, “Trump administration claims US is behind sinister ‘chemtrails’ programme once thought to be conspiracy theory”, by Joshua Nair, 2 May 2025. Please a screenshot from this article, below:
DARPA = Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, a unit of the United States Defense Department.
In Yours Truly’s opinion, if “there’s something in the air” that is being sprayed without the knowledge and consent of the American public, that is wrong and must be stopped.
The above image of TLR Signalling Pathways is courtesy of BioFinder and Google Images.
Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s offering is related to the disaster of the COVID-19 virus itself, and of the COVID-19 “vaccines”, Yours Truly dedicates it to the memory of all persons, of whatever age or location, who have passed away from the negative effects of these lab-created Biological ToxinWeapons.
There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.
And now, to the reader’s Edification Smorgasbord, a “feast of information” regarding just how dangerous and potentially deadly mRNA-1283 (mNEXSPIKE) is, Yours Truly offers the following Menu:
APPETIZER: WHAT IS TLR4?
TLR4 (aka Toll-like receptor 4) is a transmembrane protein that exists across a cell membrane. TLR4 functions as a kind of “sensing device” within the body. It detects foreign bacteria and viruses. When a foreign element is detected by TLR4, it begins to send messages to the natural immune system to activate the immune response. TLR4 is crucial to the correct functioning of the natural immune system. Please see the screenshots below for more information:
FIRST COURSE: THE FDA APPROVES “mNEXSPIKE” IN MAY 2025:
The “newest version” COVID-19 “vaccine”, mRNA-1283 (aka mNEXSPIKE), was “fully approved” by the FDA on 30 May 2025. Yours Truly wrote about this situation here: https://www.theqtree.com/2025/06/01/stop-press-edition-hhs-secretary-robert-f-kennedy-needs-to-resign-now/. This “vaccine” claims to be “more effective” in “preventing” an infection of COVID-19. The claim is based on the fact that mRNA-1283 (aka mNEXSPIKE) uses “only” the S1 protein and the N sector of said S1 protein of the COVID-19 virus spike protein, as opposed to using the entire spike protein (as in mRNA-1273, the original “flagship” modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” by Moderna.) Please see: https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiaf022, “Safety and Immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Receptor-Binding Domain and N-Terminal Domain mRNA Vaccine”, Spyros Chalkias, et al., 15 April 2025 (most of the authors of this “informational paper” are either affiliated with Moderna, or are employees of Moderna.) A screenshot of the Background section of the Abstract of this paper is below:
At first glance, this “new development” by Moderna may appear to be a “positive” achievement. However, there are other issues that arise:
First, there is the fact that the S1 protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus contains both the RCB (Receptor-Binding Domain) AND the N-terminal domain of the virus. It is the RCB that allows the virus to “attach” itself , or to “dock” itself, to cells in the body — for example, to the ACE2 cell receptors; and, to TLR4 cells. The N-terminal domain is the “end part” of the S1 protein; it is a “free” group at the end of the protein, while, at the same time, it “initiates” a polypeptide chain.
While the above article refers to the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” BNT162b2, the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” from Moderna, mRNA-1273, also targets the RBD, which interacts with TLR4 cells in the “vaccinated” person’s body. In addition, all of the modRNA “descendant clone” COVID-19 “vaccines” by both companies also use the RBD, there interacting with TLR4 cells in the “vaccinated / boosted” person’s body.
TLR4 cells are also present in multiple areas and organs of the body. The modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” will interact with these cells. This is due to the fact that the S1 protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus contains certain amino acids residues (numbers 1-1208) that interact with TLR4 cells. Please see: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.306187, “SARS-CoV-2 spike protein S1 subunit induces pro-inflammatory responses via toll-like receptor 4 signaling in murine and human macrophages”, Ken Shirato, Takako Kizaki, February 2021. A screenshot of the Abstract of this paper follows:
Regarding the S1 amino acids residues 1-1208 and TLR4, please see this paper, from 2020: https://europepmc.org/article/ppr/ppr170060, ” Structural characterization of a nanobody derived from a naive library that neutralizaes SARS-CoV-2″, M Dumoux, et al., 1 June 2020. Below are screenshots from the Methods section and from a portion of the Supplementary Table section of this paper (the Supplementary Table portion shows some of the gene code for the S1 1-1208 residues):
Further information regarding SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and its interaction with TLR4 is found here: https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1368946, “TLR2/4 are novel activating receptors for SARS-CoV-2 spike protein on NK cells”. Nadine Landolina, et al., 30 May 2024. “NK” stands for “Natural Killer” cells in the body. A screenshot from this paper is below:
Then, there is the issue of clinical trial used by the FDA to “justify” the “full approval” of mRNA-1283 (aka mNEXSPIKE), NCT05137236 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05137236.) There was NO Placebo Control Group in this study. The study participants (study subjects) were injected with the following Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”: mRNA-1273; OR, mRNA-1283; OR, mRNA-1283.211; OR, mRNA-1283.529. Why was there no Placebo Control Group? Assuming that the study subjects knew, in advance, they would be injected with any one of FOUR different variations of a modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, were they fine with that?
And, there is the “opinion piece” by Dr. Martin Makary (FDA Commissioner) and Dr. Vinay Prasad (new head of the FDA’s CBER division), regarding the “new approach” that the FDA will use for COVID-19 “vaccines.” Please see:
SECOND COURSE: WHAT DOES THE modRNA COVID-19 “VACCINE”, mNEXSPIKE, CONTAIN?
Please see the FDA-issued Fact Sheet for Healthcare Providers (aka the Package Insert) for mRNA-1283, mNEXSPIKE: https://www.fda.gov/media/186738/download. Below is a screenshot of section 11 Description, section 12 Clinical Pharmacology, and section 13 Nonclinical Toxicology of this document:
Which plainly states that mNEXSPIKE contains the same types of dangerous, deadly lipid nanoparticle and excipient that all the other modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” by Moderna contain: SM-102, and PEG2000-DMG. This means that mNEXSPIKE will be rapidly spread into every cell in the “vaccinated” person’s body. It is also clear that mNEXSPIKE has NOT been tested for mutation potential, cancer-inducement potential, or reproductive impairment potential.
Yours Truly then performed a search to ascertain whether or not mNEXSPIKE contains N1-methylpseudouridine. She has written extensively on this board about this lab-created “fake Uridine plus a form of methane”, which completely replaces the natural RNA in the Uridine in the body. Recall that natural Uridine is crucial to multiple body functions and mechanisms: regulation of mood, of learning and memory, and of “gut-brain connection” functions. Lo and behold, the US Patent for mRNA-1283 (aka mNEXSPIKE) does have language describing “various types” of pseudouridine, including N1-methylpseudouridine, are used in all of Moderna’s modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” — which would also include mNEXSPIKE. The US Patent for mRNA-1283 is found here (US 20240382581A1): https://patents.google.com/patent/US20240382581A1/en?q=(mRNA-1283)&oq=mRNA-1283, “Pan-human coronavirus vaccines”, ModernaTX, published 21 November 2024. Please see sections 0120, 0121, 0122, and 0123 of this document for descriptions of the “various types” of pseudouridine.
Lastly, there is the question as to whether mNEXSPIKE contains any saRNA (self-amplifying RNA) component. Yours Truly searched for information regarding this, since the IM dose (intramuscular injection dose) of this COVID-19 “vaccine” is a very small amount — 0.2mL. She found this, which appears to be a “dancing all around the truth” description of this “vaccine.” Please see: https://synapse.patsnap.com/article/what-is-mrna-1283-used-for?, 28 June 2024. A screenshot from this article is below:
Read the last sentence in the second paragraph above, especially “…a robust and durable immune response, potentially requiring fewer doses and offering longer-lasting immunity compares to other vaccines.” Sounds like a description of the saRNA H5N1 “vaccine”, KOSTAIVE, currently approved for use in the EU / Scandinavia, and in Japan; and, a version of which “vaccine” is to begin clinical trials in the United States (NCT06602531), under the name ARCT-2304.
DESSERT AND BEVERAGES: REACTIONS AND QUESTIONS:
First, this: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/maha-movement-flabbergasted-covid, “MAHA Movement Flabbergasted COVID-19 Vaccines Remain on Market”, Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH, 2 June 2025. There is an embedded interview with Dr. McCullough in this article, along with a linked copy of the “Kabuki Theater performance” regarding “stopping” the COVID-19 “vaccines” in the United States by Dr. Martin Makary (FDA), Dr. Jay Bhattacharya (NIH DIrector), and HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., on 27 May 2025. A screenshot from the McCullough article is below, giving his views on the current situation:
Second, this tweet, from Dr. William Makis: https://x.com/MakisMD/status/1930296443434348771, 4 June 2024. Two screenshots from his tweet are below: first, a statement from HHS Secretary Kennedy, Jr.; and, second, from Dr. Makis:
Questions, posed by Yours Truly: Why did the FDA “fully approve” a “new”, modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” that specifically targets person over age 65, and persons who “fit” a detailed list of “persons at risk of severe COVID-19 infection”, as complied by Dr. Martin Makary and Dr. Vinay Prasad? Why was there a “Kabuki Theater performance” on 27 May 2025 by Drs. Makary and Bhattacharya, along with HHS Secretary Kennedy, Jr., when it was obvious by that date that the FDA “full approval” of mNEXSPIKE was “a done deal”? Why did the FDA issue an Approval Letter to Moderna for mNEXSPIKE that has so many “caveats”, “requests for more information”, and an “order” for the company to perform a Phase 4 clinical study on the “vaccine” — a “vaccine” that the FDA had just “fully approved”? Please see: https://www.fda.gov/media/186740/download; and, the screenshot of Page 9 of this document, regarding the “order” for the Phase 4 study, below:
More questions, posed by Yours Truly: How many elderly persons are going to be pressured / cajoled / “mandated” (by the nursing home or care facility where they live), to take mNEXSPIKE? Will they be told that this injectable is “safer” than mRNA-1273, “because the dose is smaller”? What about persons who “fit” into the multiple categories of “persons at high risk for severe COVID-19 infection” according to Drs. Makary and Prasad? What pressure will these persons be subjected to in order to get them to agree to take mNEXSPIKE? Finally, will people be told the truth that mNEXSPIKE, just because it does not contain the S2 portion of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, is NOT “mRNA-1273 Lite” — but, rather, it is another version of a dangerous, potentially deadly modRNA COVID-19 ‘”vaccine”?
The above free vintage image of a vaccine vial and syringe is courtesy of iStock and Google Images.
Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s offering is related to the COVID-19biological toxin injections, aka the COVID-19 “vaccines”, Yours Truly dedicates it to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have been injured, made ill, become disabled, or have passed away, from the negative effects of these “vaccines” that they had in their body.
There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They can be found here. NOTE: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.
Yours Truly began writing about the results of the huge C4591001 clinical trial of the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, BNT162b2, on the board here back in 2023. I was reading through document after document that the company generated related to this clinical trial, documents that were released to the general public only after Pfizer-BioNTech, in partnership with the FDA, lost their case in federal court to keep all of the data about C4591001 sealed for 75 years, and they were then sued by Attorney Aaron Siri’s group, Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency (PHMPT.) Please see: https://www.biospace.com/non-profit-group-wins-transparency-lawsuit-over-fda-records-of-pfizer-vaccine-authorization, 7 January 2022. Note: regarding the Pfizer-BioNTech and the Moderna COVID-19 “vaccines”, “mRNA” and “modRNA” are interchangeable descriptive words for these injectables.
Note the phrase, “Follows Thorough Evaluation…”. It is now known that this manifestly was NOT performed before the EUA was granted.
Regarding the invalidity of the 11 December 2020 EUA that was granted to Pfizer-BioNTech for BNT162b2 to be used “to prevent COVID-19 infection” in the United States: Yours Truly begins here: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/fda-authorization-of-pfizer-covid. “FDA VRBPAC December 11, 2020 Decision on Pfizer mRNA Found Invalid”, Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 17 May 2025. There are several screenshots from this article, below:
Regarding the delaying by the FDA and the CDC of important information regarding the incidence of myocarditis following COVID-19 “vaccination”, and these agencies (and, also, Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna) failing to issue Black Box Warnings about this on the Package Inserts for their modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” (BNT162b2 [Pfizer-BioNTech] and mRNA-1273 [Moderna]), please see: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/us-fda-and-cdc-delayed-health-advisory, “US FDA and CDC Delayed Health Advisory on COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Myocarditis for Months, Failed to Issue Black Box Warning for Years”, Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH, 18 May 2025. A screenshot from this article is below:
The above slide image is from the FDA’s VRBPAC meeting of 22 October 2020. This meeting was held seven weeks prior to the 11 December 2020 granting of the EUA for BNT162b2. The FDA therefore KNEW before 11 December 2020 that BNT162b2 could cause myocarditis — but went ahead and issue the EUA anyway.
But wait, there’s more! The “new” leadership of the FDA and the CDC, Dr. Vinay Prasad and Dr. Martin Makary wrote an article which was just published in the New England Journal of Medicine:https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsb2506929, “An Evidence-Based Approach to COVID-19 Vaccination”, Vinay Prasad, MD, MPH, and Martin A. Makary, MD, MPH, 20 May 2025. This article is NOT an “opinion piece” — Drs. Prasad and Makary make it clear that they are going to implement this “new approach” to COVID-19 “vaccination” through the FDA and the CDC.
In Yours Truly’s opinion, this “new approach” has many items to question. For example: the granting of FDA authorization for “new formula” COVID-19 “vaccines”, authorization based on lab-performed experiments on the “new formula” ingredients that produce certain numbers of “antibody titers” that might “correspond” to “effectiveness.” There would be no clinical trials at all, performed either on lab rats or on humans. This “lab-experiments with Petri dishes results” authorization method is outlined in “Option 4” of the FDA vaccine authorization / full approval guidelines that the agency adopted in 2022. This “lab-experiments with Petri dishes results” method will now be used for “new formula” COVID-19 “vaccines” for persons age 65 and over; and for persons under age 65 with compromised immune systems or who are part of “vulnerable” or “at risk” populations — such as, for example, pregnant women. Please see, regarding the “Option 4”: https://www.fda.gov/media/159452/download, “VRBPAC Briefing Document”, 28 June 2022. A screenshot of “Option 4” is below:
For another example: COVID-19 “vaccination” will still be “recommended” for pregnant women and for women who have just given birth. This flies in the face of the mounting, and published, evidence that COVID-19 “vaccination” during pregnancy can, and does, result in miscarriages, stillbirths, live births but the infant has medical issues, and so on. In addition, COVID-19 “vaccine” antibodies show up in the breast milk that “vaccinated” new mothers nurse their infants with.
Why do the FDA / CDC continue to ignore the evidence-based facts that Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, Zinc, and Vitamin D both prevent and treat COVID-19 infections?
Three screenshots from the Prasad and Makary article are below:
NOTE THE LAST SENTENCE OF THE ABOVE IMAGE: “Ultimately, these studies alone can provide reassurance that the American repeat-boosters-in-perpetuity strategy is evidence-based.”
Let’s take a look at the combined Figure 2 and Figure 3 image:
Which makes it plain, in Figure 2, that the COVID-19 “vaccines” will be “recommended” for people who “fit” the diagnosis parameters of multiple types of medical conditions, including pregnant women and women who have just given birth — in other words, these groups of people may well be subjected to multiple types of “convincing” strategies to get them to agree to take these “vaccines.” Who made the decisions on the types of “risk factors” for the “increased at-risk” groups?
And, there’s this tweet, from Dr. Martin Makary, of August 2023:
There is published, irrefutable evidence that the COVID-19 “vaccines” can cause death among the “vaccinated.” Please see: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/the-causal-link-between-covid-19, “The Causal Link Between COVID-19 Vaccination and Death”, Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 21 May 2025. There is an embedded interview between Mr. Hulscher and Dr. Idriss J. Aberkane, PhD, on this subject. A screenshot from the Hulscher article is below:
It appears to be unclear, in Yours Truly’s opinion, about where this “new approach to COVID-19 vaccination” fits in as regards the “Generation Gold Standard” that was announced a few weeks ago. Does the federal government control “new” COVID-19 “vaccine” development processes? Where does Big Pharma (Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, Novavax) come in? Is that what “Sponsor-Driven” clinical trials means (see the above image)?
However, here’s the real situation: In Yours Truly’s opinion, given that the initial EUA granted by the FDA to the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 on 11 December 2020 was invalid — that means, by extension, that every other EUA (and “Full Approval”) of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” is also invalid: which would include any “formula” that is “recommended” for the “2025-2026 COVID-19 Vaccine”. Which would also, in Yours Truly’s opinion, invalidate any “Full Approval” of the Novavax COVID-19 “vaccine”, since the foundation of that injectable is the same Wuhan Hu1 SARS-CoV-2 virus that was used as the foundation for BNT162b2.
FLASH! 2 — The VRBPAC members voted unanimously today to “recommend” that the “2025-2026 COVID-19 Vaccine Formula” injectables contain the JN.1 Omicron variant of the original SARS-CoV-2 virus. This is the same strain that was “recommended” for the “2024-2025 COVID-19 Vaccine Formula” injectables. The decision today by VRBPAC will be implemented according to the Dr. Prasad and Dr. Makary “new approach” method, as outlined above in today’s post. This means that persons age 65 and older, and that persons under age 65 who fall into one of the “increased risk” categories (Figure 2, above in the post) will be “encouraged” to get “vaccinated.” The exact formulation of the “2025-2026 COVID-19 Vaccine Formula” for the Pfizer-BioNTech and the Moderna injectables will be based, as was their other COVID-19 “vaccines” on the modRNA (aka mRNA)-based platform. The Novavax (now called NUVAXOVID) “2025-2026 vaccine” product will be based on the company’s previous “inactivated protein”-based platform. It is unclear whether the NUVAXOVID “2025-2026 vaccine” product will be authorized for persons under age 65 and/or who have underlying “increased risk” conditions. Please see: https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/covid-19/fda-vaccine-advisers-recommend-sticking-jn1-strain-next-covid-vaccines, 22 May 2025; and, https://cen.acs.org/pharmaceuticals/vaccines/FDA39s-new-COVID-19-vaccine/103/web/2025/05?sc=230901_cenrssfeed_eng_latestnewsrss_cen, 22 May 2025. A screenshot from the C&EN / ACS article is below, highlighting items related to the Dr. Prasad and Dr. Makary “new approach” article:
Antique London’s photographs: Goldsmith Hall, The Assay Office
The above free vintage image of a laboratory is courtesy of iStock and Google Images.
Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics.
There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are found here. NOTE: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post anything in the discussion thread for today that is AI-generated, they must cite their source. Thank you.
Yours Truly discussed several items in the above announcement in Part One, referred to above. Part Two is a further discussion of items related to the BPL-1357 intranasal “universal virus vaccine”, a “cornerstone” of the “Generation Gold Standard” program. The primary focus of PartTwo will be on the “adjuvant” for BPL-1357, a compound called ALFQ. However, before the presentation, there is this short paper, from January 2025: https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.188, “593. Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 1 Study of the Safety of BPL-1357, A BPL-Inactivated, Whole-Virus, Universal Influenza Vaccine”, Jeffery Taubenberger, Matthew J. Memoli, et al., 29 January 2025. A screenshot of the Background section of the Abstract of this paper is below:
Note the description of BPL-1357: It is to cover several types of Avian Influenza viruses. Nothing about covering coronaviruses. Why was there a ‘challenge” with Influenza A type viruses, and nothing about “challenges” with Influenza virus types B or C (https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/viruses-types.html.) How can BPL-1357 be considered a “Universal Vaccine” if it is only covers Avian Influenza viruses? How does this paper “stack up” vis-a-vis the HHS / NIH “Generation Gold Standard” announcement?
Lovelace Biomedical Research Institute was founded in 1947 in Albuquerque, New Mexico. The institute joined Touro University in 2022. (https://www.lovelacebiomedical.org/, and Wikipedia.)
And, more on ALF (aka Army Liposome Formulation) is here: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7412170/, “Army Liposome Formulation (ALF) Family of Vaccine Adjuvants”, Carl R Alving, et al, 7 August 2020. Please see the screenshot from this paper, below:
Note the reference to HIV-1. More on this later in today’s post.
ALFQ contains a TLR4 agonist. What is TLR4? Also known as CD284, it is a “key activator of the innate immune response”, per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toll-like_receptor_4. An agonist is an agent that interacts with a particular cellular receptor, and produces an observable positive response.
The other component of ALFQ is QS21. What is QS21? It is a vaccine adjuvant derived from the soapbark tree (Quillaja saponaria.) QS21 is used in the Novavax COVID-19 “vaccine” as an adjuvant, as part of the company’s “Matrix-M” ingredient.
QS21 has been studied for some time. Here is an article, from the John Innes Centre, that describes the history of QS21: https://www.jic.ac.uk/advances/the-quest-for-qs-21/, Winter 2020-2021. Please see a screenshot from this article, below:
Yours Truly now presents some “interesting information.” One is not making any judgements or opinions; the reader may make their own. This has to do with the HIV-1 reference above in the post. The first item is this: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-410X(00)00415-1, “QS21 promotes an adjuvant effect allowing for reduced antigen dose during HIV-1 envelope subunit immunization in humans”, Thomas G. Evans, et al., 28 February 2001. A screenshot of the Abstract of this paper is below:
The second item is here: https://worldcouncilforhealth.substack.com/cp/162703289, “BOMBSHELL: HIV Contamination Found In Moderna’s Covid Shot”, 2 May 2025. There are actually two bombshells here: two separate molecules related to HIV-1 were found in the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” — gp145 and gp120.Please see the screenshots from the World Council for Health article, below:
The graphic created by Dr. McKernan, from the above article, showing where the gp145 HIV-1 molecule is in the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” sequence:
Regarding the gp120 HIV-1 molecule in the Moderna mRNA-1273 modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, it was the famous (or, infamous) “Pradhan, et al., paper” from January 2020 which showed that there were gp120 HIV-1 molecules in the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) virus itself.The “Pradhan, et al., paper” was Withdrawn shortly after its publication, and is now difficult to find. Yours Truly was able to locate the paper here: https://academia.edu/79020098/Uncanny_similarity_of_unique_inserts_in_the_2019_nCoV_spike-protein_to_HIV_1_gp_120_and_Gag?f_ri-170, “Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike protein to HIV-1 gp120 and Gag”, Prashant Pradhan, et al., 31 January 2020. A screenshot from the paper is below:
Recall that in January 2020, there were no COVID-19 “vaccines” in use anywhere. Note also that the gp120 HIV-1 molecule is present in the COVID-19 virus itself spike protein. Did the Pfizer-BioNTech developers of BNT162b2 remove any or all of the four HIV-1 related inserts in the COVID-19 spike protein (found by Pradhan, et al.) in the process of working on their “vaccine”? Why did Moderna leave the gp120 HIV-1 molecule (and also, it turns out, the gp145 HIV-1 molecule) in that company’s modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, mRNA-1273?
And, there is the involvement of the United States Army in HIV research (this is in addition to the Army’s developing the “adjuvant”, ALFQ): https://hivresearch.org/hiv-research/alf-adjuvants. This is the Military HIV Research Program.
Yours Truly will reiterate that one is not making judgements or opinions here; readers will make their own. However, the following needs to be said: the gp120 molecule in HIV-1 attacks the body’s CD4 cells. Please see this paper, from 2010: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20088758/, “The GP120 molecule of HIV-1 and its interaction with T cells”, V Yoon, et al., 2010. A screenshot of the Abstract of this paper is below:
Also: the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself attacks the body’s CD4 cells: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84790, “SARS-CoV-2 uses CD4 to infect T helper lymphocytes”, Natalia S Brunetti, et al., 31 July 2023. A screenshot of the Abstract of this paper is below:
And, there is this paper: https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.596631, “Sharing CD4+ T cell Loss: When COVID-19 and HIV Collide on Immune System”, Jean-Pierre Routy, et al., 14 December 2020. Note that this paper was published just a few days after the initial EUAs were granted by the FDA for BNT162b2 and for mRNA-1273 in the United States (11 December 2020); therefore, the research into writing the Routy, et al., paper must have been accomplished at least a few months prior to December 2020. A screenshot of the opening statement of the paper is below:
Yours Truly will ask a question that perhaps is “inconvenient”, but needs to be asked: Is any potential connection between the presence of the gp120 HIV-1 molecule in the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself, AND its potential presence in the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, AND its potential presence in the Novavax COVID-19 “vaccine” (which uses the original SARS-CoV-2 virus itself spike protein as a foundation), AND the confirmed presence of BOTH the gp120 HIV-1 molecule and the gp145 HIV-1 molecule in the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” — with the multiple serious Adverse Events reports of autoimmune / immune-mediated, and related conditions, that are in the Appendix 1: List of Adverse Events of Special Interest section of this report: ttps://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf?
Another “inconvenient” question posed by Yours Truly: What, if anything, did Dr. Anthony Fauci, Dr. Francis Collins, Dr. Deborah Birx, Dr. Robert Redfield, and Dr. Janet Woodcock know about the presence of the gp120 HIV-1 molecule in the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself spike protein, AND in the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” mRNA-1273?
What will be done to make absolutely sure that there is NO molecule whatsoever related to HIV-1 present in the “Universal Vaccine” candidates BPL-1357 and BPL-24910, or in any other “Universal Vaccine” candidates? What will be done to hold accountable the people who allowed the gp120 HIV-1 molecule to be present in the original SARS-CoV-2 virus itself? What will be done to investigate the potential presence of the gp120 HIV-1 molecule in the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”? What will be done to hold accountable the people who allowed HIV-1 molecules gp120 AND gp145 to be present in the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”?
Joe Biden never won. This is our Real President – 45, 46, 47.
AND our beautiful REALFLOTUS.
This Stormwatch Monday Open Thread remains open – VERY OPEN – a place for everybody to post whatever they feel they would like to tell the White Hats, and the rest of the MAGA/KAG/KMAG world (with KMAG being a bit of both).
Our various sister sites, listed in the Blogroll in the sidebar
Our beloved country is under Occupation by hostile forces.
Daily outrage and epic phuckery abound.
We can give in to despair…or we can be defiant and fight back in any way that we can.
Joe Biden didn’t win.
And we will keep saying Joe Biden didn’t win until we get His Fraudulency out of our White House.
Wolfie’s Wheatie’s Word of the Week:
placeholder
noun
a dummy post on The Q Tree
other definitions we don’t care about
still more definitions we don’t care about
Used in a sentence
A placeholder is not the same as the command to place Holder under arrest.
Shown in a picture
Shown in a video
MUSIC!
Placeholder!
THE STUFF
Well, it looks like we have a placeholder for a nuclear clock!
Thorium. Useful stuff.
Just sayin’!
And remember…….
Until victory, have faith!
And trust the big plan, too!
And as always….
ENJOY THE SHOW
W
NOTE:
What you see above is essentially the “Monday Placeholder”. If you see nothing more, and no different, then you are seeing the placeholder.
If I have time and the inclination, I may swap in a new Word of the Week, some new videos, and possibly even an added topic.
Today, I will leave the placeholder alone, for reference, but I will add a topic. Thanks!
W
The Strategy I See Behind the New “Universal Vaccine Platform”
Some of you have to be asking yourselves why Robert F. Kennedy Jr. seems to have gone from being an opponent of vaccines, to being a proponent of them. I will try to explain.
To begin with, it helps to read the following document (H/T to PAVACA for producing these images). You can use this link, or the images below it.
HHS, NIH Launch Next-Generation Universal Vaccine Platform for Pandemic-Prone Viruses
It is hard for me to put into words, how much of a change this really is. But let me give you a quick “TL;DR” list of the big-ticket items.
Big Pharma is completely cut out of this platform – it’s US government owned and driven.
The vaccines are designed to be resistant to evolution of the pathogens they protect against. The vaxxes themselves are immune to “scariants”.
The vaccines completely abandon mRNA, cDNA, recombinant antigen, spike protein, lipid nanoparticle, and all genetic and related technologies.
The vaccines abandon Fauci’s always-failing strategy of targeting current variants, and instead seek to handle both current and future variants.
The result is fewer and less frequent shots. The better the shot, the more this is true.
The vaccines must pass rigorous safety standards, or otherwise fail to be approved.
The vaccines change direction and focus, from smaller subunits to whole-virus immunity.
The vaccines are potentially capable of inhibiting transmission.
IMO this is not just about changing the vaccines – it’s about changing minds in government science.
Most scientists, sadly, are sheep. They have neither the courage nor the inclination to challenge anything in the current scientific narrative – particularly as reported by our toxic media. If the media says “most scientists believe X”, then most scientists think this is true, and won’t bother to check, much less actively disagree.
The evil media has trained us all to believe certain myths.
There will be more and more exotic diseases coming at us from nature
There will need to be more and more vaccines, and more and more injections of them
Vaccines get better by using newer technology, not by working better for people
Vaccine hesitancy is a bad thing, and must be prevented at all costs
Vaccines are all safe, and rumors that any are bad, are dangerous
Apparently, despite the iron fist of Faucism, somebody in NIAID was thinking in ways that lead in the opposite direction from where Pfizer was taking us. I suspect that these forces sat tight, waited for “reinforcements to arrive” (Trump, RFKJ, and Dr. Jay), and had their proposal working up the chain of command as soon as Trump won.
Will this vaccine approach work? IMO it will work better than mRNA. Whether it works well enough to pass Kennedy’s new standard, based on comparison to placebos and true controls, is another question.
For the sake of those who still want vaccines, I hope so.
I suspect that these vaccines will be safer than mRNA, but not completely safe – particularly with a pathogen like COVID. As long as these vaccines are not mandated, I’m OK with their existence. In any case, the vaccines will have to prove themselves safe and effective.
Antique London’s photographs: Goldsmith Hall, The Assay Office
The above free vintage image of a laboratory is courtesy of iStock and Google Images.
Health Friday is a series devoted to information regarding Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics.
There are Important Notifications by our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. NOTE: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post anything in the discussion thread for today’s post that is AI-generated, they must cite their source. Thank you.
Due to the nature of today’s topic, there will be two separate posts. Part One, today’s offering, starts here: https://www.hhs.gov/press-room/hhs-nih-announces-generation-gold-standard.html, “HHS, NIH Launch Next-Generation Universal Vaccine Platform for Pandemic-Prone Viruses”, 1 May 2025. Please see the following screenshots from the announcement:
Notice the risks associated with inhalation of beta-propiolactone (which is being used in the development and testing of the “new Gold Standard” intranasal version of the “new Universal Pandemic Vaccine”, BPL-1357.)
Note the language regarding irritations of various types; of damage to the corneas; convulsions; and “extreme acute toxicity.”
Note the language about cancer being induced in lab rats and mice by the use of beta-propiolactone, but no information being available regarding the inducement of cancer in humans by the use of beta-propiolactone.
Both Dr. Memoli and Dr. Taubenberger have been with the NIH / NIAID for years. Also, note the tiny subject pool of 45 adult subjects in the Phase 1 study of BPL-1357.
On a “tangential point”, there is this FDA announcement of 10 April 2025: https://www.fda.gov.media/186092/download, “Roadmap to Reducing Animal Testing in Preclinical Safety Studies”, by new FDA Director Dr. Marty Makary. Sasha Latypova analyzed the announcement here: https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/you-didnt-want-that-mrna-vax-tested, “You didn’t want that mRNA vax tested only on 8 mice? Marty Makary, FDA, has a solution — no more mice!”, 28 April 2025.
That’s right. Dr. Makary wants to reduce, then end, animal testing for vaccines in the preclinical stage, and to substitute testing them instead by using in silico models; then, to move to human subject testing; and, even to NOT have ANY human subject clinical trials at all in “certain circumstances.” Please see the screenshots below from the Latypova article:
Yours Truly understands that the use of animals in lab experiments must be done in the most humane manner possible — no more of the “Fauci tortured Beagles” situations. However, one is of the opinion that there is a place for using animals in lab experiments — to study physical reactions and/or reproductive issues related to the drug or injectable under investigation before human tests begin: something that an in silico model or an AI model cannot do. And, the part about no clinical trials at all in “certain circumstances”:
Note: the red text in the screenshots above link to other articles and information from the Latypova article. Also, recall that Ms. Latypova worked in medical and pharmaceutical techology for years before retiring from the field.
This is the same Dr. Marty Makary who recommended that pregnant women get COVID-19 “vaccinated”:
To finish today’s Part One offering, Yours Truly presents the involvement of United States Defense Department in the use of the “AFLQ adjuvant” that is going to be tested in clinical trials for BPL-1357: https://hivresearch.org/hiv-research/alf-adjuvants. This is the United States military research program into “Military HIV.” This article had a link that led to the following press release by the United States Army, from 2021: https://wrair.health.mil/News-Media/Press-Releases/Article/3166852/phase-1-clinical-trial-of-wrair-developed-covid-19-vaccine-begins/, 5 April 2021. The clinical trial is NCT04784767, that began with 29 subject enrollees on 5 April 2021, and had an “Estimated Study Completion Date” of 30 October 2023 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04784767.) The title of the clinical trial: “SARS-CoV-2 Spike Ferritin Nanoparticle Vaccine with ALFQ Adjuvant for Prevention of COVID-19 in Healthy Adults.” Below is a screenshot of the WRAIR article (WRAIR stands for Walter Reed Army Institute of Research):
Note the statement by Dr. Modjarrad that this “US Army COVID-19 Vaccine” would “pave the way for a universal vaccine to protect against not only the current virus, but also counter future variants…” — “universal vaccine” — sound familiar? “Who is driving this bus?” comes to mind.
The image of a “Suspicious Dog” is from Yours Truly’s files. The source is unknown, but to the best of Yours Truly’s knowledge and belief, it is not AI-generated.
There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. If readers wish to post anything that is AI-generated on the discussion thread for today’s special edition post, they must cite their source. Thank you.
Today’s STOP PRESS Edition post is devoted to one topic: the “Fast Track” approval that the FDA just granted to CSL / Arcturus Therapeutics for the company’s self-amplifying RNA (saRNA, aka sa-mRNA) Avian Influenza “vaccine”, ARCT-2304. Another version of this type of “vaccine” by the same company, called ARCT-154 or KOSTAIVE, for COVID-19 infection “prevention”, is already “fully approved” and in use in Japan and in the European Union / Scandinavia. Both of these “vaccines” are discussed in this article: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/arcturus-gets-fdas-fast-track-154900033.html, “Arcturus Gets FDA’s Fast Track Tag for Influenza Vaccine Candidate”, 11 April 2025. Two screenshots from this article are below:
Take note of the last sentence in the screenshot above: “A biologics license application for Kostaive in the United States is expected to be filed later in 2025.”
Primary Completion Date: 7-21-2025 (This means ONLY SEVEN MONTHS of a PHASE 1 human clinical trial before the Primary Completion Date. This is also a RED FLAG indication that Arcturus Therapeutics may likely apply for either a EUA or for a BLA (Biologics License Application, otherwise known as “full FDA approval”) BY THE LATE SUMMER / EARLY FALL OF 2025. In Yours Truly’s opinion, it is SCIENTIFICALLY IMPOSSIBLE to know in FEWER THAN AT LEAST TWO YEARS OF TESTING, WHETHER OR NOT A “VACCINE” ACTUALLY WORKS, LET ALONE BE “SAFE AND EFFECTIVE.”) In Yours Truly’s opinion, any claim by a “vaccine” manufacturer that a DNA-viral vector-based /RNA-based / “protein subunit”-based / “cell-based” / mRNA-based / saRNA-based / sa-mRNA-based “vaccine” — can be SAFELY developed, “tested” and granted either an EUA or “full approval” by the FDA, in fewer than at least two years, must be considered to be not only suspect — but as outright fabrication or wishful thinking.
Estimated Study Completion Date: 12-19-2025 (This would mean that the Phase 1 human clinical trial would be “completed” IN ONE YEAR PLUS ONE WEEK.)
Recruitment Information: Not Yet Recruiting
Contacts and Locations: NO locations are listed; there is only an 888 area code number to call the “Clinical Trials Disclosure Manager” for further information (which, by the way, said information would only be released to “researchers.” One assumes this means “degree-holding scientific researchers”, not to non-scientific-degree-holding researchers, let alone to the general public.)
Clicking on the Researcher View tab on the main study registration page yields some ** interesting ** information. Some examples: There will be a total of 200 persons used in the clinical trial; the ages will range from 18 years old to 80 years old; there is a “control group” that will receive injections of what appears to be a “standard influenza vaccine” plus, and/or, a saline placebo; and, there will be THREE levels of injectable used on the study subjects, at a “low” dose, a “medium” dose, and a “high” dose — of which, NO amounts of “vaccine candidate” are delineated; among other information.
Note the language above regarding what saRNA does in the body: “...it’s like having a built-in printing press that produces additional vaccine in cells.” (Yours Truly: This “printing press” is at work in the body of the person who takes an saRNA “vaccine” for an unknown time — perhaps indefinitely.)
Note the language about the very long length of the mRNA sequences that must be used in saRNA (aka sa-mRNA) “vaccines.”
WHY IS THERE THIS UNHOLY RUSH TO GET ARCT-2304 THROUGH THE CLINICAL TRIAL PROCESS AND INTO EITHER EUA OR BLA STATUS WITH THE FDA, AND THEREFORE GET INTO USE IN THE UNITED STATES? In Yours Truly’s opinion, the answer may involve: Peter Marks, MD, PhD.
When it relates to a new drug or biologic product (including vaccines and other injectables), BOTH the FDA’s CBER (Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research) AND CDER (Center for Drug Evaluation and Research) departments are involved. Peter Marks, MD, PhD, was the director of CBER from 1 January 2016 (this made him an Obama administration holdover at the FDA) until his resignation from CBER on 29 March 2025 (his resignation became effective on 5 April 2025.) It appears that unless Dr. Marks resigned, he was going to be fired by now-HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Please see the screenshots below from this article on the situation (https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-peter-marks-issues-veiled, “BREAKING – Peter Marks Issues Veiled Threat to America About Man-Made Biological Threats”, by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 5 April 2025.) The first is from Dr. Marks’ resignation letter; the other is from the article by Mr. Hulscher:
The screenshot below is from the interview transcript with Dr. Marks on CNN on 4 April 2025:
During this CNN interview, Dr. Marks made the “oblique threat” above.
On 2 April 2025, the FDA chose Scott Steele, PhD, as the Acting Director of CBER.Dr. Steele has been a full-time CBER advisor in late 2022 (this makes him a “Biden administration” holdover; and, Dr. Steele started with the FDA in June 2020 as an advisor in that agency’s Office of Medical Policy Initiatives.) Please see: https://www.fiercepharma.com/pharma/fda-taps-scott-steele-lead-cber-acting-basis-after-marks-departure, 2 April 2025. On 10 April 2025, the FDA granted “Fast Track” process approval for ARCT-2304. Who chose Dr. Steele to be the Acting Director of CBER on 2 April 2025?
In Yours Truly’s opinion, it is inconceivable that Dr. Steele and his colleagues at the related department of CDER, Dr. Jacqueline Corrigan-Curay, MD, and Peter P. Stein, MD — do not know what saRNA (aka sa-mRNA) does and how dangerous it can be to the human body; and, do not know that a “vaccine” product needs at least two to as long as five years to be properly developed, tested, results analyzed, and applications submitted to the FDA for EUA or for “full approval” of the injectable.
In Yours Truly’s opinion, what may be going on at the FDA regarding ARCT-2304 is a combination of an “end-run” around what Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., is trying to do to bring the agency into account for what is it supposed to do — to work in the best interests of the public health of the American people; plus, what appears to be personal bias against Mr. Kennedy, Jr., himself; plus, what appears to be a “H3ll-bent mindset” in the FDA to force the use of self-amplifying RNA products on the American people without going through the proper (lengthy) processes of testing, analysis, and proof of “safety and efficacy.”
Yours Truly presents the situation and her opinions. Readers can do their own due diligence and make their own conclusions.
The above free vintage image of a hand-drawn heart is courtesy of VectorStock and Google Images.
Health Friday is a series devoted to information regarding Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s post speaks to the disaster of the COVID-19 “vaccines”, Yours Truly dedicates it to the memory of all persons, of whatever age or location, who have passed away from the negative effects of these lab-created bioweapons.
There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. NOTE: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for any AI-generated content. To the best of my knowledge and belief, there is none. Also: Readers who wish to post anything in the discussion thread of today’s post that is AI-generated, must cite their source. Thank you.
Today’s offering is part of a “mini-series” devoted to a single topic and/or scientific paper. Yours Truly presents a new paper confirming the increased risk for stroke, heart attack, and other cardiovascular serious events, after COVID-19 “vaccination.”
One begins here: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-85-million-person-study, “BREAKING: 85-Million-Person Study Finds Increased Risks of Stroke, Heart Attack, Coronary Artery Disease, and Arrhythmia Following COVID-19 Vaccination”, by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 7 April 2025. The new paper cited in his article is found here: https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpvm.ijpvm_260_24, “COVID-19 Vaccination and Cardiovascular Events: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Multivariate Meta-Analysis of Preventive Benefits and Risks”, Raheleh Karimi, et al., 14 March 2025. (A discussion on how Bayesian Multivariate Meta-Analysis models work is here: https://bookdown.org/MathiasHarrer/Doing_Meta_Analysis_in_R/bayesian-ma.html.) Two screenshots from the Hulscher article follow: One is from the paper; the other is his statistical analysis:
The Karimi, et al., paper, in Yours Truly’s opinion, if one is reading it correctly, while being detailed and using sophisticated models for its conclusions, appears to endorse COVID-19 “vaccination” as a way to reduce the incidence of stroke: and, also, the authors appear to state that multiple injections of a COVID-19 “vaccine” reduce the potential for cardiovascular damage. Yours Truly believes that the paper’s authors have ignored a couple of important items: First, the fact that cardiovascular damage induced from COVID-19 “vaccination” can be incremental and cumulative over time. Please see: https://doctors4covidethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/causality-article.pdf, “Vascular and organ damage induced by mRNA vaccines: irrefutable proof of causality”, Michael Palmer, MD, and Sucharit Bhakdi, MD; refer to Slide 8 through Slide 11 of this article. And, Second, there is the paper published this year, based on the Yale LISTEN Study. Please see: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.18.25322379, “Immunological and Antigenic Signature Associated with Chronic Illnesses after COVID-19 Vaccination”, Akiko Iwasaki, et al. This paper clearly demonstrates that the spike protein in the COVID-19 modRNA “vaccines” (and, therefore, the potential for “vaccine”-induced damage) is present in the “vaccinated” person’s body for as long as, if not longer than, 709 days post-injection.
The following is the Conclusions section of the Karimi, et al., paper. It is astonishing to read that the authors appear to believe that the COVID-19 “vaccines” are “safe and effective” — just that persons with known (or suspected) cardiovascular issues should be tested before they are offered the opportunity to take one of these “vaccines”:
Why on Earth would a person (with cardiovascular issues or not) agree to have a COVID-19 “vaccine” that can cause (or aggravate) cardiovascular issues injected into their body? Why are cardiologists recommending that patients with heart conditions take COVID-19 “vaccines”? Please see: https://www.rush.edu/news/cardiologists-recommend-covid-19-vaccine-heart-patients, “Cardiologists Recommend COVID-19 Vaccine for Heart Patients Doctors say the vaccine can help prevent further heart and health complications”, copyright 2025 Rush University Medical Center (Chicago, Illinois.) Are these cardiologists not aware of the Palmer and Sucharit article cited above? Are they not aware that the FDA knew back in April 2021, that the COVID-19 “vaccines” can, and do, cause numerous types of heart and cardiovascular serious adverse effects in COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons? Please see the Appendix 1. List of Adverse Events of Special Interest section of this report, which Pfizer-BioNTech gave to the FDA in April 2021 regarding the company’s “flagship” modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, BNT162b2: https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf. Scroll through the pages of the Appendix 1. to see the various types of heart and cardiovascular serious adverse events that were reported in persons who took this “vaccine.” For example, here is Page 2 of the Appendix 1. Note the multiple serious adverse events that were reported regarding cardiovascular conditions.
And there are many more types of cardiovascular serious adverse events reported in the Appendix 1. There are listings under “Coronary”; under “Thrombo”- (for example, Thrombocytopenia; and, under “Vascular” — among others.
The information regarding how dangerous and deadly the COVID-19 “vaccines” are is increasing from a “trickle” to a “torrent.” Why are physicians still recommending these injections? Why are these injections still listed on the CDC Child and Adolescent Immunization Schedule?
The above free image of an 1867 vaccination certificate is courtesy of iStock and Google Images.
Health Friday is a series devoted to information regarding Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s post speaks to the disaster of the COVID-19 “vaccines”, Yours Truly dedicates it to the memory of all persons, of whatever age or location, who have passed away from the negative effects of these lab-created bioweapon toxin injections.
There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.
Today’s Health Friday offering is one of a “mini-series” devoted to one topic and to one important news item related to that topic (although there may be other items related to the topic presented as supporting and/or clarifying information. The topic for today is what the COVID-19 “vaccines” do to damage and/or destroy the crucial IgG3 immune system cells in the “vaccinated” person’s body.
This 80% higher risk was found in persons who had had multiple injections of COVID-19 “vaccines.”
The COVID-19 “vaccines”, especially via repeated injections, damage and destroy the crucial IgG3 (“fight it off”) immune system cells in the “vaccinated” person’s body; while, at the same time, fostering the increase of the IgG4 (the “tolerate but never clear”) immune system cells.Another screenshot from the Berenson article is below:
The paper referred to in the Berenson article is here: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2025.106473, “Post-Vaccination IgG4 and IgG2 class switch associates with increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infections”, Gemma Monocunill, et al., 18 March 2025. Below is a screenshot from this paper:
An important paper regarding descriptions and functions of the IgG immune system cell class in the human body is here: https://journals.aai.org/jimmunol/aticle/205/12/3400/107683/IgG-Subclasses-Shape-Cytokine-Responses-by-Human, “IgG Subclasses Shape Cytokine Responses by Human Myeloid Immune Cells through Differential Metabolic Reprogramming”, Willianne Hoepel, et al., 15 December 2020. A screenshot of the Abstract of this paper is below:
Note that this paper was published after the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” by Pfizer-BioNTech and by Moderna were granted their initial EUAs in the United States by the FDA (this occurred on 11 December 2020), but before these bioweapon toxin injections entered widespread use.
Back to the Monocunill, et al., paper. There is mention in the paper regarding the involvement of the T17 cells in the “vaccinated” person’s body in the IgG subclass switching. Yours Truly wrote about the importance of the T17 cells (also called Th17 cells or T17 Helper Cells), and the role of the N1-Methylpseudouridine in the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” in “turning off” these cells in the “vaccinated” person’s body (thus paving the way for continuous inflammation of many types) here: https://www.theqtree.com/2025/03/21/health-friday-3-21-2025-open-thread-more-on-the-n1-methylpseudouridine-in-the-modrna-covid-19-vaccines/.
However, there is another aspect of the situation discussed in the Monocunill, et al., paper that is of huge importance: The similarities between malaria, COVID-19 infection, and the class switch to IgG4 that the COVID-19 “vaccines” induce. Below is a screenshot from the Discussion section of the paper regarding this:
Yours Truly will now blow something out of the water regarding the FDA’s and the CDC’s official opposition to, and prohibition of, using Ivermectin or Hydroxychloroquine to prevent or to treat COVID-19 infection.
And, Hydroxycholoquine (and also Chloroquine) can be used to treat malariaAND COVID-19. Please see this paper from September 2020: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7476892/, “Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of malaria and repurposing in treating COVID-19”, Zi-Ning Lei, et al. (USA and CCP), 8 September 2020.
In Yours Truly’s opinion, it is inconceivable that the NIH / NIAID / FDA / CDC did not know about the existence of these papers. Instead, by September 2020, these entities were hell-bent in pushing through the unproven modRNA “technology” for the Pfizer-BioNTech and the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” then in development. This meant that the FDA / CDC accepted the manipulated / incorrect “data” that were given to them from the truncated “clinical trials” for these “vaccines” by Pfizer-BioNTech and by Moderna. This meant that the FDA / CDC did not question the sudden “vaccine”-manufacturing switch from the original “Process 1” method to the “Process 2 method” that occurred in August 2020, that is still in use by both companies in the production of their respective “new formula” COVID-19 “vaccine booster shots”, and is based on “culturing” the modRNA of the said “vaccines” in a “bath” of E. coli.
Further confirmation that malaria and COVID-19 infect the lungs in similar ways is here:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9445119/, “The striking mimics between COVID-19 and malaria: A review”, Emadeldin Hassan E Konozy, et al. A screenshot from this paper is below:
Note the mention of the ACE2 receptorsas regards malaria infection. These cells are also attacked by the COVID-19 virus itself (and, therefore, since they are based on the virus, so do the COVID-19 “vaccines” attack the ACE2 receptors of the “vaccinated” person’s body.)
In short: the FDA / CDC pushed, and continue to push, COVID-19 “vaccines” to “prevent” COVID-19 infections, while knowing that Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine also prevent — and treat — COVID-19 infections. Why is this still going on? How about ASKING BILL GATES. UNDER OATH.
This is aside from the fact that those who lab-created the bioweapon of the COVID-19 virus itself, and those who lab-created-and-enhanced the bioweapons of the COVID-19 “vaccines” — knew that malaria and COVID-19 would attack the lungs in similar ways. They knew what would “turn off” the T17 cells that are so important for the immune system and for Uridine in the human body. They knew what would damage or destroy the crucial IgG3 cells of the natural immune system of the human body, while fostering the increase of the IgG4 cells that allow illness and medical conditions to take hold and thrive. These things they incorporated into the creation of the COVID-19 virus itself, and into the creation of the COVID-19 “vaccines.”
The above free image of memoir writing is courtesy of iStock and Google Images.
Health Friday is a series devoted to information regarding Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s post speaks about the disaster of COVID-19 (the COVID-1 p9 virus itself, and the COVID-19 “vaccines”), Yours Truly dedicates it to the memory of all persons, of whatever age or location, who have passed away from the negative effects of these lab-created bioweapons.
There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are found here. NOTE: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for any AI-generated content. To the best of my knowledge and belief, there is none. Also: If readers wish to post anything in the discussion thread for today’s offering that is AI-generated, they must cite their source.
Today’s post is a COVID-19 Memoir, with this post as the inspiration: https://www.theburningplatform.com/2025/03/17/a-covid-contrarian-speaks-out-about-all-she-has-lost/, a guest post by Alex Berenson. This post describes the memoir statement of Jennifer Sey, who lost her job, her friends, family ties, and more, because she refused to bow to the demands of the organized psy-op that was the “command and control method” used over literally billions of human beings during the COVID-19 pandemic — and which organized psy-op is still being used today. Readers are welcome to post their own COVID-19 memoirs on today’s discussion thread, leaving out or referring to in an “oblique” manner, those details they wish to keep private.
Others on the board here have shared their COVID-19 Memoirs. Some of these postings have detailed dealing with an infection of the COVID-19 virus itself. Other postings have described the experiences of watching “vaccinated” family or friends becoming ill from the negative effects of the “vaccines” that they had taken. Still others have described their own issues after being “shed upon” by COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons. Sadly, our own Deplorable Patriot (Susie Sampson) passed away from the combined effects of the COVID-19 infection she very likely caught in November 2024 from a recently COVID-19-“boosted” choir member.
Yours Truly now adds her own COVID-19 Memoir. It began in December 2019, with the first media reports of a “mystery illness” that was infecting and killing people in Communist China, which “mystery illness” then making its way to the United States. This “illness” was variously called “Wuhan coronavirus”, “coronavirus”, or “novel coronavirus” (among other names), finally settling on the name “COVID-19” or “SARS-CoV-2” in early 2020. The issue became more “personal” in mid-February 2020, when Yours Truly contracted an illness that had all the hallmarks of an infection by the COVID-19 virus itself, most likely via exposure either at a restaurant in Chapel Hill, or at a local discount store in Durham. One was very sick for almost a month, subsisting on hot tea with honey and lemon, vitamins, scrambled eggs and toast, Tylenol(R), DayQuil(R), and guaifenesin cough syrup; after that, it was another month before the fatigue began to lift, the coughing to lessen and stop, and taste and smell to fully return. I was literally sequestered to my house for over six weeks. At the same time that I was sick, I was also taking care of my little Yorkie, Sona, who was entering the end stage of the kidney disease that resulted in his being put to sleep in my arms in mid-August of 2020.
It was during this period that I began to research about, read about, think about, and to eventually write about, this virus. My first decision was that I would never permit the deep-nasal probe PCR “test” to be administered to me. I began to order in groceries; to wear disposable gloves whenever I had to leave the house to do absolutely necessary things like getting gasoline for the car; to change clothes and bathe after I returned from being out of the house; and so on. Amazon became my source for many items. The United States went into “lockdown” on almost all aspects of the economy, and of life in general, by mid-March of 2020. The fear was palpable.
By the summer of 2020, there was speculation regarding the development and use of COVID-19 “vaccines.” There was speculation regarding the development and use of monoclonal antibody therapy for COVID-19 virus infected persons. Persons hospitalized for COVID-19 infection were being put on Remdesivir and ventilators, killing many. Antigen tests to determine whether or not a person had been infected with the COVID-19 virus were being used by September 2020. Then, the Pfizer-BioNTech and the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” were granted their initial Emergency Use Authorizations for use in the United States on 11 December 2020. Starting in January 2021, all of the members of my family, with the exception of Yours Truly, were getting COVID-19 “vaccinated”; in many cases, this was “mandated” or “required” in order for them to keep their jobs, for travel, and so on. In the spring of 2021, I began to shift much of my focus to researching about the COVID-19 “vaccines” — and came to the conclusion that a “vaccine” that had been developed and put on the market as quickly as these products were, was likely not a good thing. I made a decision to never allow myself to be COVID-19 “vaccinated.” This was the beginning of strained relationships with “vaccinated” family and friends, once Yours Truly informed them that these “vaccines” were not for her. I contacted a physician through AFLDS (America’s Frontline Doctors), and started taking prescribed Hydroxychloroquine and Zinc. Afterwards, I contacted the then-FLCCC Alliance (now the Independent Medical Alliance) and began taking prescribed Ivermectin. Yours Truly is still not COVID-19 “vaccinated.”
It is now, in March 2025, five years from the first COVID-19 “lockdowns.” Yours Truly lost a cousin in September 2023 due to the negative effects of the COVID-19 “vaccines” he had taken. Yours Truly lost her brother in October 2024 due to the negative effects of the COVID-19 “vaccines” he had taken. Yours Truly is now concerned about the other “vaccinated” members of her family. She had tried to warn some of them, based on my research, of the dangers and uncertainties of these bioweapon toxin injections, but was met with “We follow the science” or “I trust my doctor.” I hope the ongoing strained relationships between certain “vaccinated” family members and Yours Truly will heal. I have made certain decisions regarding how I interact with people and situations outside the family circle when encountering them in public places.
Life as it was before November 2019 will never be the same. COVID-19 is the perfect example of an “equal-opportunity” bioweapon. The COVID-19 virus itself, if a person is infected with it, can have lingering, or even permanent, issues that remain after the person recovers. The COVID-19 “vaccines”, since they contain the virus, plus “enhancements” such as N1-Methylpseudouridine, permanently and negatively affect “vaccinated” persons throughout the body, including the brain. “Long COVID”, resulting either from an infection of the COVID-19 virus itself, or from being COVID-19 “vaccinated”, is now recognized medical condition. There is also the emerging issue of COVID-19 “vaccine shedding” from “vaccinated” persons onto other persons, including onto the non-“vaccinated.”
Those adults who are not COVID-19 “vaccinated” (the percentage of people in this category is anywhere between 15% – 25% of the entire population of the Earth) have, in a sense, “defeated COVID-19” — even if they contracted an infection of the virus and recovered. This has nothing to do with the “Joe X is not COVID-19 “vaccinated”, so he is a pureblood” depiction; or with the “Joe X is not COVID-19 “vaccinated”, so he is somehow morally superior to those who are “vaccinated”” allegation — this has everything to do with personal decision making. Those adults who are not COVID-19 “vaccinated” have resisted the gaslighting, the “mandates” and the “recommendations” to get COVID-19 “vaccinated”; the urging from “vaccinated” family and friends; the loss of employment, of schooling, of opportunities, of relationships. They have grieved and mourned for “vaccinated” family members and/or friends who have passed away from the negative effects of the COVID-19 “vaccines” that they had taken. They have, in many instances, done their own research into the “vaccines” and vowed never to take them. They have, in many instances, decided to never allow their children to be COVID-19 “vaccinated.” They have learned that “safe and effective”, as applied to these bioweapon toxin injections, was — and is — a lie. They are stronger than they knew. They are stronger than they know. They will need this strength in the future.
Yours Truly believes that, in order for society to heal from the COVID-19 disaster, to have trust in the medical profession, to have trust in the government, the perpetrators of the COVID-19 disaster must be brought to justice; and that the unsafe, ineffective, dangerous and deadly COVID-19 “vaccines” must be withdrawn from the market worldwide. The “establishment medicine” entities (the American Medical Association; the American Academy of Pediatrics; the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; and many more); the government agencies (the CDC; the FDA; the Department of Health and Human Services; and many more) — who are still “recommending” these injectables, who still have them on the Immunization Schedules — must stop these activities. All mRNA-based “vaccine” funding and development must be stopped until the entire issue of the safety and efficiency of these injectables is thoroughly investigated and analyzed. Medical freedom of choice must be returned to the general public — for example, Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine must be made readily available at a low cost. Physicians must be permitted to prescribe these safe and effective prophylactic / treatment drugs for COVID-19 infection without fear of being “disciplined” or “restricted” by the their state medical licensing board; let along having their License to Practice Medicine revoked. Hospitalized COVID-19 patients mustbe allowed freedom of choice to be treated inpatient with Ivermectin or Hydroxychloroquine, Vitamin D, and other effective treatments that are, even now, being denied because the FDA does not “authorize” or “approve” them.
There are many persons who must be held accountable for their actions during the entire COVID-19 disaster. Among them:The first person, in Yours Truly’s opinion, who must be held accountable for his actions during the entire COVID-19 disaster is Dr. Anthony Fauci. Now in “retirement”, he commands $100,000 per “motivational talk”, like the one he is scheduled to give on 14 April in Sarasota, Florida. Please see: https://rescue.substack.com/p/serious-questions-for-fauci, by Matt Walsh, 23 March 2025.
The next two persons, in Yours Truly’s opinion, who must be held accountable for their actions during the entire COVID-19 disaster are: Dr. Francis Collins (Dr. Fauci’s superior at the NIH; now retired); and, Peter Daszak, PhD, of EcoHealth Alliance (funneling Gain-of-Function funds to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, among other research facilities, for the lab-creation of the COVID-19 virus, and coordinating the “official” government communications to the media; Dr. Daszak has recently been fired from EcoHealth Alliance. )
