The above free vintage image of a hand-drawn heart is courtesy of VectorStock and Google Images.
Health Friday is a series devoted to information regarding Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s post speaks to the disaster of the COVID-19 “vaccines”, Yours Truly dedicates it to the memory of all persons, of whatever age or location, who have passed away from the negative effects of these lab-created bioweapons.
There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. NOTE: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for any AI-generated content. To the best of my knowledge and belief, there is none. Also: Readers who wish to post anything in the discussion thread of today’s post that is AI-generated, must cite their source. Thank you.
Today’s offering is part of a “mini-series” devoted to a single topic and/or scientific paper. Yours Truly presents a new paper confirming the increased risk for stroke, heart attack, and other cardiovascular serious events, after COVID-19 “vaccination.”
One begins here: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-85-million-person-study, “BREAKING: 85-Million-Person Study Finds Increased Risks of Stroke, Heart Attack, Coronary Artery Disease, and Arrhythmia Following COVID-19 Vaccination”, by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 7 April 2025. The new paper cited in his article is found here: https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpvm.ijpvm_260_24, “COVID-19 Vaccination and Cardiovascular Events: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Multivariate Meta-Analysis of Preventive Benefits and Risks”, Raheleh Karimi, et al., 14 March 2025. (A discussion on how Bayesian Multivariate Meta-Analysis models work is here: https://bookdown.org/MathiasHarrer/Doing_Meta_Analysis_in_R/bayesian-ma.html.) Two screenshots from the Hulscher article follow: One is from the paper; the other is his statistical analysis:
Note: The AstraZeneca viral vector DNA COVID-19 “vaccine” uses a “delivery platform” similar to that of the Johnson & Johnson (Janssen) viral vector DNA COVID-19 “vaccine” that was used in the United States from 2021 until it was discontinued in 2023 (https://www.yalemedicine.org/news/coronavirus-vaccine-blood-clots, 17 May 2023.) However, the this “vaccine” (under the brand name, Janssen) is still in use in many other countries around the world (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_COVID-19_vaccines_authorizations#Janssen; scroll down the page to “Janssen.”)
The Karimi, et al., paper, in Yours Truly’s opinion, if one is reading it correctly, while being detailed and using sophisticated models for its conclusions, appears to endorse COVID-19 “vaccination” as a way to reduce the incidence of stroke: and, also, the authors appear to state that multiple injections of a COVID-19 “vaccine” reduce the potential for cardiovascular damage. Yours Truly believes that the paper’s authors have ignored a couple of important items: First, the fact that cardiovascular damage induced from COVID-19 “vaccination” can be incremental and cumulative over time. Please see: https://doctors4covidethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/causality-article.pdf, “Vascular and organ damage induced by mRNA vaccines: irrefutable proof of causality”, Michael Palmer, MD, and Sucharit Bhakdi, MD; refer to Slide 8 through Slide 11 of this article. And, Second, there is the paper published this year, based on the Yale LISTEN Study. Please see: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.18.25322379, “Immunological and Antigenic Signature Associated with Chronic Illnesses after COVID-19 Vaccination”, Akiko Iwasaki, et al. This paper clearly demonstrates that the spike protein in the COVID-19 modRNA “vaccines” (and, therefore, the potential for “vaccine”-induced damage) is present in the “vaccinated” person’s body for as long as, if not longer than, 709 days post-injection.
The following is the Conclusions section of the Karimi, et al., paper. It is astonishing to read that the authors appear to believe that the COVID-19 “vaccines” are “safe and effective” — just that persons with known (or suspected) cardiovascular issues should be tested before they are offered the opportunity to take one of these “vaccines”:
Why on Earth would a person (with cardiovascular issues or not) agree to have a COVID-19 “vaccine” that can cause (or aggravate) cardiovascular issues injected into their body? Why are cardiologists recommending that patients with heart conditions take COVID-19 “vaccines”? Please see: https://www.rush.edu/news/cardiologists-recommend-covid-19-vaccine-heart-patients, “Cardiologists Recommend COVID-19 Vaccine for Heart Patients Doctors say the vaccine can help prevent further heart and health complications”, copyright 2025 Rush University Medical Center (Chicago, Illinois.) Are these cardiologists not aware of the Palmer and Sucharit article cited above? Are they not aware that the FDA knew back in April 2021, that the COVID-19 “vaccines” can, and do, cause numerous types of heart and cardiovascular serious adverse effects in COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons? Please see the Appendix 1. List of Adverse Events of Special Interest section of this report, which Pfizer-BioNTech gave to the FDA in April 2021 regarding the company’s “flagship” modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, BNT162b2: https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf. Scroll through the pages of the Appendix 1. to see the various types of heart and cardiovascular serious adverse events that were reported in persons who took this “vaccine.” For example, here is Page 2 of the Appendix 1. Note the multiple serious adverse events that were reported regarding cardiovascular conditions.
And there are many more types of cardiovascular serious adverse events reported in the Appendix 1. There are listings under “Coronary”; under “Thrombo”- (for example, Thrombocytopenia; and, under “Vascular” — among others.
The information regarding how dangerous and deadly the COVID-19 “vaccines” are is increasing from a “trickle” to a “torrent.” Why are physicians still recommending these injections? Why are these injections still listed on the CDC Child and Adolescent Immunization Schedule?
THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.
Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA