Excellent dig.

Now add the Ag census where they not only wanted to know the number and type of live stock and equipment you had but ALSO THE NUMBER OF TOILETS!

This is when they were trying to shove NAIS down farmers throats. BOY did the poor ladies working the phones get an earful!

I called and had a long conversation with one of the ladies. She said they were bewildered by the vicious attacks they were getting so I explained the situation to her and she was horrified. (A farm given a PREMISE ID is no longer YOURS you are only a ‘Stakeholder.’)

From Derry Brownfield may he rest in peaceful fields.

https://www.opednews.com/articles/The-SCAM-behind-NAIS–Ou-by-Derry-Brownfield-081130-795.html

I consider Wayne Hage one of the most intelligent men I ever met. On our very first visit he was explaining the World Bank, the International Monetary fund and how the world bankers planned on collateralizing the world debt with land. Not just the U.S. national debt, but also the “WORLD” debt. A listener sent me a copy of a report of the FOURTH WORLD WILDERNESS CONGRESS, which was held in Denver in 1987. Over 1500 people from sixty countries were told that wilderness lands were to protect the reindeer, the spotted owl and other endangered species. Ninety percent of the group consisted of conservationists, ecologists, government and United Nations bureaucrats. The other ten percent were world banking heavyweights, such as David Rockefeller of Chase Manhattan Bank, London banker Edmund de Rothschild and the Secretary of the U.S. Treasury, James Baker, who gave the keynote address. George W. Hunt, an investment councilor, served as official host and sat in on all the meetings. It was George Hunt that wrote the report from which I have gleaned much of my information.

During the first three days, the group was told that the WILDERNESS CONGRESS was about beating the ozone deterioration and bringing the rain forests back. The following days were closed to the public. With only the bankers in attendance, the topics discussed centered on the creation of a “WORLD CONSERVATION BANK” with collateral being derived from receipt of wilderness properties throughout the world. This bank would have central bank powers similar to the Federal Reserve. It would create currency and loans and engage in international discounting, counter-trade, barter and swap actions. Rothschild personally conducted the monetary matters and the creation of this WORLD CONSERVATION BANK. This bank would refinance by swapping debt for assets. A country with a huge national debt would receive money to pay off the debt by swapping the debt for wilderness lands. The plan was to swap one trillion dollars of Third World Debt into this new bank. In the long term, when the countries won’t be able to pay off the loans, governments from around the world will give title to their wilderness lands to the bankers.

George Hunt wrote: “Title to the lands will go to the World Wilderness Land Inventory Trust. This Trust will float into the World Conservation Bank by the unanimous decree of the world’s people, saying, God bless you for saving our reindeer. Those people at the congress were ignorant. They don’t suspect anything. They’re very naive. Not stupid, ignorant. I’m talking about the 90% that were not the world banking heavyweights.”… Throughout the entire Draft National Animal Identification System Users Guide, land is referred to as a premises and not property. A “Premises” has no protection under the Constitution of the United States, while property always has the exclusive rights of the owner tied to it. The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution protect property rights.

The word “Premise” is a synonym for the word tenement. A definition of the word tenement in law is: Property, such as land, held by one person “leasing” it to another. Webster’s New World Dictionary 1960 College Edition defines “Premises” as the part of a deed or “lease” that states its reason, the parties involved and the property in “conveyance.” Webster then defines “conveyance” as the transfer of ownership of real property from one person to another. It is quite obvious that the bureaucrats in Washington had a very good reason to use the term “premises” and never mention “PROPERTY.”

Let’s take another look at the wilderness areas and the World Bank’s plans to collateralize its loans. While the wilderness areas cover about one third of the earth’s surface, they are wilderness areas for a good reason – they were useless or difficult to homestead, farm or use in a constructive manner. Worldwide, the best and more valuable land is occupied by farmers, ranchers and people with the ambition to produce. Wouldn’t the World Bankers rather have some productive property besides mountains, deserts and swamps?

I am convinced that the word “premise” will put an encumbrance on your deed. The bankers say they want to monetize land. It’s your land and my land they want to monetize….

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

The USDA is about to make the attachment of a “Premise ID” to American farmland mandatory. “Premises ID” once attached to the deed completely and forever removes the property rights recognized by the US Constitution. Furthermore the USDA has absolutely refused to consider changing “Premise ID” to “Property ID”

Alfred Adask answers the question of WHY the USDA refuses to use the word “property” He contends there are two different kinds of money. FRNs – Federal Reserve notes (bank IOU’s) and while granted “legal tender” status in 1913, they do not have “FULL legal tender” status. Therefore FRNs only purchase equitable title (possession and use) and NOT legal title (ownership). FRNs are different than Constitutionally “lawful” money such as gold coins which are granted “full legal tender” status. Purchasing property with “full legal tender” conveys both legal and equitable titles to property but “legal tender” (Federal Reserve Notes) only conveys equitable title. One kind of money conveys mere possession and use of the property; the other real ownership.

“Federal Reserve Notes (FRNs). Because they are debt-instruments (promises to pay, not payment) they were loaned into circulation and remain the property of the bank that made the initial loan until the loan is repaid in lawful money (gold or silver coin). As debt-instruments, FRNs can be used to transfer use (equitable title) of property from one person to another, but they can’t convey/ exchange that property’s legal title. ” this is because “the promise to pay (IOU) can not and does not complete the transfer of title because the contract has not been fulfilled until lawful payment is made. Mr. Adask explains this in great detail in Greater Fools and FRNs http://www.ripit4me.org/PublishedAuthors/Media/Antishyster/V08N2-GrtrFools&FRNs.pdf

“Without legal title, it appears that we have no legal rights, no access to courts of law, and at best enjoy the perpetual status of “beneficiary” (which is a politically correct way of saying “nigger”). Ohh, you may be blonde, blue-eyed, well-dressed, live in a mansion drive a Rolls Royce, and be the local Klan’s Imperial Dragon – but without legal title to property, the banks and government regard you as just another “house nigger” who owns nothing, has no legal rights and no standing in law.” http://www.ripit4me.org/PublishedAuthors/Media/Antishyster/V08N2-TitleWars.pdf

If Mr Adask is correct it would go a long way in explaining why the USDA refuses to use the term property. Affixing a “Property ID” grants property status to farmland and would undermine the Bankers’ ownership of our farmland. Even if Mr. Adask is incorrect, farmers have another disaster looming on the horizon. The Banking Crisis.

In 1933 the bankers manufactured a banking crisis. Thanks to the fractional banking part of the Federal Reserve Act the banks managed to make enough bad loans overseas that they did not have the gold reserves to cover the federal reserve notes. When the Bank of England bought up all the notes and presented them to “ be redeemed in gold on demand at the Treasury Department of the United States” The US treasury was in a world of hurt. President Roosevelt got a new law passed and then used an executive order to confiscate ALL personal gold from every citizen in the USA and gave it to the banks in exchange for bank IOUs (Federal reserve notes). This is also the year dollars were taken off the “gold standard” and backed by US treasury notes. That set a legal precedence of personal property being used to cover the private bankers (Federal Reserve) International debts!

Executive Order 6102: “Section 2. All persons are hereby required to deliver on or before May 1, 1933, to a Federal Reserve Bank or a branch or agency thereof or to any member bank of the Federal Reserve System all gold coin, gold bullion and gold certificates now owned by them or coming into their ownership on or before April 28, 1933”