Health Friday 9.26.2025 Open Thread: More on Gain-of-Function Research is Still Going On — In the United States

The header image of a vintage laboratory for today’s offering is courtesy of Adobe Stock and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics.

Today’s offering contains more proof that, even though the United States government has “officially” paused Gain-of-Function experiments, these experiments are still continuing. Please see: https://www.theqtree.com/2025/08/29/health-friday-8-29-2025-open-thread-gain-of-function-research-is-still-going-on/. This time, there are two separate facilities in the United States that are performing the Gain-of-Function (GoF) work. The first is the new “bat experiments lab” at Colorado State University at Fort Collins, CO. The second is the laboratory at Georgia State University at Atlanta, GA. Bear with Yours Truly: the end of the post is the “punch line.” Yours Truly makes it clear at the start that there is no intent to “cast aspersions” on the research of any of the persons mentioned in today’s offering, or on the current Acting Director of the NIAID.

To begin, the Colorado State University facility. Please see: https://www.theburningplatform.com/2025/09/15/gain-of-function-is-alive-and-thriving-in-the-united-states/, by Patti Johnson, 9 September 2025. This regards a 14,000 square foot “bat research facility” that was added to an already-exiting research lab building at Colorado State University (CSU.) The majority of the funding for this “bat research lab”, $6.7 million dollars, came from NIH grant C06OD032019 (https://source.colostate.edu/csu-awarded-6-7-million-nih-award-for-research-facility-focused-on-bat-health-disease-transmission/, 7 October 2021. CSU already had a 38,000 square foot research facility in which the university had invested $22 million dollars, and which had opened in 2020: https://cvmbs.source.colostate.edu/more-than-a-building-the-center-for-vector-borne-infectious-diseases-marks-a-new-era-in-research/, 11 December 2020 (which, by the way, is the same date that the FDA granted the initial Emergency Use Authorization for the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” BNT162b2 to be used in the United States.) In “The Center for Vector Borne Infectious Diseases” at CSU, the professors “mix in” with students in the labs. This facility has 10 labs and employs more than 90 personnel. The labs are all BSL-2 labs. This situation, in and of itself, raises two questions: One, why are students allowed to “mix in” with the professors in these labs? And, Two, if these labs are handling / experimenting with, infectious diseases pathogens, why are the labs only BSL-2 safety level? Please see: https://ghphipps.com/colorado-state-university-center-for-vector-borne-infectious-disease/. A screenshot from this article is below:

GH Phipps was the construction company for the facility.

However, the “new bat research facility” is the separate 14,000 square foot building: https://yellowscene.com/2024/09/19/csu-to-build-taxpayer-funded-facility-for-bat-breeding-and-research/, 19 September 2024. This was the facility built with the NIH grant of $6.7 million dollars. This building is located here: 3105 Rampart Rd., Ft. Collins, CO, 5 minutes from downtown Fort Collins.

And, guess what? The “new bat research facility” in Fort Collins also has BSL-2 level labs: A screenshot from the Yellow Scene article is below:

The entire situation at CSU raises other questions: One, will professors ALSO “mix in” with students at this “bat breeding and research” facility? And, Two, why is CSU attempting to be the “United States version” of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which is what the “new bat research facility” at CSU appears to be?

And, now, turning to the second issue, the continuing Gain-of-Function experiments with Avian Influenza viruses going on in the United States —- this time, at Georgia State University in Atlanta. Please see: https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/us-and-south-korean-scientists-lab, “U.S. and South Korean Scientists Lab-Engineer Frankenstein Bird Flu Viruses in Georgia: Journal ‘Virology'”. 14 September 2025. The GoF experiments at GSU, supported by an NIH grant, were performed by South Korean scientists who are ALSO be professors at Georgia State University, with a couple of said professors ALSO having ties to South Korean institutions. Yours Truly will also present **interesting information** regarding the scope of this research at GSU by one particular author of the paper just cited. Please see the screenshot below, from the Fleetwood article:

The paper cited in the Fleetwood article is here: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2025.110674, “Interferon-y receptor signaling is critical for balanced immune activation and protection against influenza after vaccination”, Sang-Moo Kang, et al., 6 September 2025. A screenshot of the list of the paper’s authors and their affiliations is below, from the paper itself:

Note that the TITLE of the paper does NOT mention what type of influenza was the study subject (in this case, it was Avian Influenza.) More on this aspect later on in today’s offering.

Following are screenshots from sections of the paper that are available online. Note: the entire paper is available only through institutional access, or through paid access.

From the Introduction of the paper:

And, the from the funding section of the paper:

The NIH grant went to Sang-Moo Kang, the principal investigator. Please see: https://www.gsu.edu/2021/06/04/biomedical-sciences-researcher-gets-2-7-million-federal-grant-to-study-seasonal-and-universal-vaccination-in-aged-populations/. This was the NIH grant AI154656 cited above. A screenshot of this article is below — in its entirety, as there are several “clues” in it:

Note the “clues”: “universal vaccination”; aged populations”; “multiple influenza proteins”; “translational science”; “cross protective efficacy.” However, the “multiple influenza proteins” that were experimented with in the paper cited above were not regular “seasonal flu viruses” — they were strains of H5N1, the Avian Influenza virus.

It appears that Dr. Kang has also used some of the AI154656 NIH grant on other research and papers, such as for this paper: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127206, “Intranasal vaccination with multi-neuraminidase and M2e virus-like particle vaccine results in greater mucosal immunity and protection against influenza than intramuscular injection”, Sang-Moo Kang, et al., Version of Record 7 May 2025. Again, this is “Dr. Kang and his gang” at work; the exception here is that the researchers for this paper are all affiliated only with Georgia State University. And, again, the entire paper is available only through institutional access or through paid access. Keep in mind the emphasis of the paper on “intranasal vaccine delivery.”

This particular paper is the result of Dr. Kang’s, et al., research using another “mixture” of influenza viruses — H1N1 (“swine flu”, a subtype of Influenza A), plus H3N2 (a non-human influenza virus in pigs that can infect humans, https://oklahoma.gov/health/health-education/acute-disease-service/disease-information/influenza-a-h3n2-variant-.html), plus H5N1 Avian Influenza. Screenshots from the “snippets” of this paper that are available online are below: the Abstract; a portion of the Viruses section; and, a portion of the Acknowledgements section:

It appears that the paper purports to prove that the intranasal method of “vaccine delivery” is superior to the current intramuscular (injection) method. It is also clear that experiments that were performed were Gain-of-Function work — this time, combining various Influenza A subtypes (“swine flu” that infects humans; “swine flu” that can infect humans; and, Avian Influenza); plus, Influenza B. It is also clear that these experiments were designed to have maximum effect on the CD4 – CD8 cells and the IgG system. By the way, neuraminidase is an important component in the spread of influenza virus in human lungs. Interferon-y (IFN-y) is an element that is important in the regulation of immune and inflammatory responses, among other functions.

**** There is one more paper by “Dr. Kang and Gang” at GSU that bears scrutiny; this one, published in July 2024: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-50087-5, “Enhancing cross-protection against influenza by heterologous sequential immunization with mRNA LNP and protein nanoparticle vaccines”, Sang-Moo Kang, et al., 10 July 2024. This paper describes Gain-of-Function experiments not only with various influenza viruses (H3N2 and H7N9 [H7N9 is an Avian Influenza virus that is particularly lethal to humans who get infected with it]); it also describes what can only be Gain-of-Function experiments with “delivery methods” for the TWO different kinds of influenza “vaccines” that use EITHER lipid nanoparticles, OR use PHC (a protein-based nanoparticle.) Several screenshots from this paper are below, starting with the Abstract; then, Figure 1.; followed by a portion of the Discussion section:

The LNPs (lipid nanoparticles) used in the “mRNA initial series vaccine” in the experiments in the above paper are: DOTMA (cationic lipid, used in gene therapies, enhances gene transfection); DOPE (enhances intracellular “delivery” of the “vaccine” ingredients); and, DMG-PEG2000 (nanoparticle version of polyethylene glycol; one of the two LNPs in the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, the other being SM-102.)

It appears that this paper describes how a “multi-delivery method” of a 2-injection series of a modRNA influenza “vaccine”, followed by a 1-dose “booster” of an intranasal modRNA influenza “vaccine”, is the “optimal” method for “cross-protection” against infection.

The “PUNCH LINE” section of today’s offering follows:

**** In fact, it appears that the above paper claims that modRNA influenza “vaccine” intramuscular injection (IM injection) is now to be considered as “priming the pump” for the subsequent use of modRNA intranasal delivery of the influenza “vaccine” in order to have “sufficient protection” against infection. In other words — TWO types of “delivery methods” need to used.

The above paper was funded by NIH grants R01AI101047 and R01AI143844 to “Dr. Kang and Gang” researcher Bao-Zhong Wang. Dr. Wang, by the way, seems to be from Communist China, having earned his PhD from the Chinese Academy of Sciences in 2003.

Which brings Yours Truly back to the “Broadly Protective Influenza Vaccine” Patent that is owned by Dr. Jeffery Taubenberger, a “career employee” of the NIH who is now the Acting Director of the NIAID. Yours Truly has written about this scientist in the Health Friday offering of 29 August 2025, cited above in today’s offering. This is the “Universal Influenza Vaccine” that Dr. Taubenberger developed at the NIH: https://www.techtransfer.nih.gov/tech/tab-3388, “Broadly Protective Influenza Vaccine Comprising a Cocktail of Inactivated Avian Influenza Viruses”, published 6 July 2020. A screenshot from this page is below:

Note the “intranasally or intramuscularly” in the above statement.

The Patent declaration document for the above “Universal Influenza Vaccine” is here: https://image-ppubs.uspto.gov/dirsearch-public/print/downloadPdf/11369675, filed 21 July 2020. The title of the Patent is the same as that of the NIH TechTransfer information cited above.

All of the foregoing appears to point in the direction of a “universal influenza vaccine” that includes various types of influenza viruses (“swine flu”; Avian influenza; Influenza B); that would require at least three doses of a “vaccine” to have “sufficient protection”; and, that the “delivery methods” of the three doses appears to be 2 intramuscular injections of a modRNA plus cationic lipid nanoparicles “vaccine” to “prime the pump”, plus 1 “booster dose” of an intranasal modRNA plus PHC-nanoparticle “vaccine” to “provide sufficient protection” from infection. And, that this situation is being “influenced”, so to speak, by the “new direction” of the NIAID, led by Acting Director Dr. Jeffery Taubenberger.

One must ask: Why is there so much emphasis on a “universal influenza vaccine” that combines elements of “swine flu” viruses, of various Avian Influenza viruses, and, of the Influenza B virus? Why is there an emphasis on “aged populations” in the Gain-of-Function experiments described above in today’s offering?

THERE. MUST. BE. ACCOUNTABILITY.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday 9.19.2025 Open Thread: Remove the COVID-19 “Vaccines” from the Market and from Use. Now.

The free header image for today’s offering is courtesy of Dreamstime.com/ and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s offering speaks of the disaster of the COVID-19 “vaccines” (Bioweapon Toxin Injections), Yours Truly dedicates it to all those persons who have taken these “vaccines” and have since suffered injuries, illnesses, or disabilities, resulting from them; and, to the memory of all those persons who have taken these “vaccines” but who then passed away due to their deleterious effects. The foregoing is not a kind of “boilerplate” — it is to help ensure that those who have suffered from taking these “vaccines” are not forgotten.

Yours Truly begins here: https://www.theburningplatform.com/2025/09/07/the-massive-covid-vaccine-deception/, “THE MASSIVE COVID VACCINE DECEPTION”, by Camus. Please see the screenshots below of portions of the statements by HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.:

“For the first six weeks, the vaccine is ineffective.” Not so fast. The following is proof that the COVID-19 “vaccines” are “effective” — not in the “official government statements” ways (“prevention of COVID-19”; “reducing risk of severe infection and death from COVID-19”, etc.), but instead in the multiple negative ways in which these injectables were designed to be, and are still designed to be, from the moment they are injected into a person’s body. Please note: the list below is not exhaustive. The following are examples of what may be termed the “Actual Efficacy” of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”:

They kill: https://kirschsubstack.com/p/new-analysis-of-the-czech-covid-vaccines, “New analysis of the Czech COVID vaccine data reveals that the mRNA shots were deadly for all ages. They should be pulled from the market.”, 28 August 2025. Please see the screenshot from this article, below, which shows that death occurred in COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons in the Czech Republic within a month after said “vaccination“:

The death rates from COVID-19 “vaccination” began to rise on 1 June 2021, the start date of the statistical analysis timefrane on the chart above.

They cause myocarditis and/or pericarditis among the COVID-19 “vaccinated“: The “primary source material” proof on this situation is furnished by Pfizer-BioNTech itself — the BNT162b2 Post-authorization report that the company gave to the FDA on 30 April 2021. The report is found here: https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf, “5.3.6 CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-AUTHORIZATION ADVERSE EVENTS REPORTS OF PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) RECEIVED THROUGH 28-FEB-2021”, by Worldwide Safety, Pfizer-BioNTech. The APPENDIX 1. LIST OF ADVERSE EVENTS OF SPECIAL INTEREST section begins on Page 30 of this report. This section lists the 1,291 types of serious adverse events reported among persons who took BNT162b2 between 11 December 2020 (the date that the FDA granted the initial Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for this modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”), and the end of February 2021 — a span of only 79 days (11.2 weeks.) Please see Page 6 of the APPENDIX 1 section (Page 35 of the report), where “Myocarditis” listed; and, Page 7 of the same section (Page 36 of the report), where “Pericarditis” is listed. Screenshots of the salient portions of each page are below; first, of Page 6:

And, of Page 7:

They cause permanent alteration of the DNA of the LINE-1 cells of the COVID-19 “vaccinated” person’s body (this permanent alteration is accomplished within 48 hours after “vaccination”): Please see: https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44030073, “Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line”, Markus Alden, Yang De Marinis, et al., 22 February 2022. Figure 2 from this paper is below. BNT162b2 is reverse transcribed into LINE-1 human liver cells within 48 hours post-“vaccination”, resulting in permanent alteration of the DNA of these cells:

They cross the Blood-Brain Barrier and facilitate entry of the spike protein into the cerebral arteries: Please see https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111223, “Expression of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in cerebral Arteries: Implications for hemhorragic stroke Post-mRNA vaccination.”, Nakao Ota, et al., June 2025. A screenshot of the Highlights section of this paper is below:

They replace all of the RNA of the natural Uridine in the “vaccinated” person’s body with the lab-created compound, N1-Methylpseudouridine. This replacement “turns off” the functions of the natural Uridine. The N1-Methylpseudouridine then acts as a “facilitator” for the spread of the ingredients of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” throughout the body; and, via the vagus nerve (which natural Uridine helps to regulate the functions and mechanisms thereof), into the brain. Please see https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-51301-0, “N1-Methylpseudouridine and pseudouridine modifications modulate mRNA decoding during translation”, Kristin S Koutmou, et al., 16 September 2024. A screenshot of a portion of the Introduction of this paper is below:

“Substitute” the RNA of the Uridine is a fancy way of saying, “Destroys the RNA, then replaces it with N1-Methylpseudouridine.”

By the way, the “primary source document” regarding the fact that N1-Methylpseudouridine destroys all of the natural RNA of the Uridine in the “vaccinated” person’s body (along with details and descriptions of the other ingredients in BNT162b2, such as the inclusion of lipid nanoparticles) is found in the Worldwide Patent declaration for BNT162b2 by Pfizer-BioNTech. This document was published on 28 October 2021. It is found here: https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2021213945A1/en, “CORONAVIRUS VACCINE”, by Pfizer-BioNTech. Click on “Download PDF” for the entire document.

They cause serious Central Nervous System (CNS) issues, since they cross the Blood-Brain Barrier: Multiple CNS issues result from modRNA COVID-19 “vaccination”; among them, new-onset Multiple Sclerosis. Again, the “primary source document” for this is the 5.3.6 Post-Authorization report cited above. Please see the salient portion of Page 6 of the APPENDIX 1. section of this report (Page 35 of the report), below:

Please also see: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroim.2021.577785, “New diagnosis of multiple sclerosis in the setting of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine exposure”, Karlo Toljan, et al., 9 December 2021. A screenshot of section 3.2 Case 2 from this paper is below:

They accumulate COVID-19 “vaccine” ingredients (modRNA, spike protein, lipid nanoparticles, and all the other elements of this injectable) in every organ and area of the “vaccinated” body: Please see another “primary source document” from Pfizer-BioNTech regarding this situation. The document is found here: https://icandecide.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/125742_S1_M2_26_pharmkin-tabulated-summary.pdf, “BNT162b2 2.6.5 Pharmacokinetics Tabulated Summary”, by Pfizer-BioBNTech. The company gave this document to the FDA on 21 January 2021. Page 7 and Page 8 of the document are below; first, Page 7:

And, Page 8:

Please note that these accumulations begin to occur within 30 minutes after injection with BNT162b2. Please also note that the formulation used in the Wistar lab rats experiments above is the same formulation that was granted the initial FDA Emergency Use Authorization for use in the United States on 11 December 2020; and was subsequently FDA-approved under the name COMIRNATY.

In terms of the “waning efficacy” of the COVID-19 “vaccines”: It was shown in the large Penn State University study of 2022 that COVID-19 “vaccine efficacy” wanes badly by the fifth month after “vaccination”; in fact, the “efficacy” begins to wane well before that. Please see https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07418-y, “SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness against infection, symptomatic and severe COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis”, Paddy Ssentengo, et al., 7 May 2022. A screenshot of the Results section of this paper is below:

VE = Vaccine Effectiveness

It is also known that the COVID-19 “vaccines” do not prevent COVID-19 infection; they do not prevent death from COVID-19 infection in “vaccinated” persons; they do not prevent the spread of the virus; and, that any “efficacy” from these injectables wanes almost completely well before seven months post-“vaccination.” In short, the COVID-19 “vaccines” are ineffective in what they were / are “officially” designed to do. On the other hand, these injectables are “effective” in causing “vaccine”-induced injuries, illnesses, disabilities, and death.

HHS Secretary Kennedy, Jr.: All COVID-19 “vaccines” must be pulled off the market and removed from use. Now. There is no rational reason why these injectables are still being authorized, approved, or administered. The Amendment 12 to the PREP Act regarding COVID-19 Medical Countermeasures, signed by former HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra in December 2024, must be rescinded. Bring those who lab-created the COVID-19 “vaccines” brought to account. Get Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, Vitamin C, Vitamin D, Azithromycin / Doxycycline, Zinc, NAC, and Quercetin all FDA-approved for prevention and treatment of COVID-19 infection. Get these items made readily available to the general public and also to medical professionals.

THERE. MUST. BE. ACCOUNTABILITY.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday 9.12.2025 Open Thread: Evil In Our Time

The free header image of a “swirl clock” for today’s offering is courtesy of 123RF and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics.

Charlie Kirk, conservative activist, commentator, husband and father, was assassinated on Wednesday of this week (10 September 2025) as he was speaking at a “Prove Me Wrong” debate and rally at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah. He was shot on the left side of his neck by a sniper who fired from approximately 200 yards away. It appears that the sniper’s single shot fired hit Mr. Kirk’s carotid artery. Mr. Kirk was pronounced dead at the hospital to which he was rushed after the hit. He leaves behind his wife, their two very young children, his parents, other relatives, and many friends. He leaves behind his work with Turning Point USA (TPUSA, of which he was the founder and chairman), and his other endeavors (his Salem Media Group talk show, his social media activities, and so on.) May Charlie Kirk rest in eternal Peace; and may the Almighty God sustain his widow and young children. May the assassin be found, along with those who recruited him. May Justice be meted out to them.

The cold-blooded, planned assassination of Charlie Kirk was Evil In Our Time. Make no mistake about this.

Today’s offering is not about the COVID-19 disaster: it is about the potential for a “new pandemic on the horizon”: H5N1 (Avian Influenza), another Evil In Our Time. Yours Truly has written about this situation in other Health Friday posts. Today’s post regards the latest Evil In Our Time news related to this issue: the lab-creation of TWO new chimeric types of H5N1 virus by the Chinese Communist government-owned company, Sinopharm. The first of these new, lab-created chimeric H5N1 viruses “attaches” to host cells at a rate 64 times higher than other strains of H5N1 viruses; the second of these new, lab-created chimeric H5N1 viruses has a “kill rate” of 100% in lab animals.

The story is here: https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/china-lab-engineers-two-new-bird, “China Lab Engineers Two New Bird Flu Constructs: One Binds to Host Cells 64x Stronger, the Other is 100% Lethal in Mammals”, Jon Fleetwood, 8 September 2025. Please see the screenshots from this article, below:

The paper published by the Sinopharm scientists who performed the work is here: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2025.110672, “H5N1 influenza virus-like particles based on BEVS induce robust functional antibodies and immune responses”, Yongbo Qiao, et al., 29 August 2025.

The Sinopharm scientists actually did two things: First, they lab-created two new, chimeric types of H5N1 virus that would guarantee either “attachment” to host cells at a rate 64 times higher than current H5N1 strains; or, would be lethal 100% of the time. Then, Second, they lab-created a “VLP-based vaccine” that would “induce robust functional antibodies and immune responses” to the said two new, chimeric H5N1 viruses. Please see the screenshots of the Abstract from this paper, and the Graphical Image from this paper, below:

Note that “Antigen presentation in lymph node” is the attack by these lab-created new, chimeric H5N1 viruses on the CD4 – CD8 T cells in the lymph nodes— the same things that the SARS-Cov-2 (COVID-19) virus itself, and the COVID-19 ‘vaccines”, do. Proper function of the CD4 – CD8 T cells is crucial to proper function of the human immune system in general.

This type of state-sponsored and state-funded Gain-of-Function work is Evil In Our Time. It’s not so much “the advancement of science.”

By the way, the Sinopharm lab where the work was performed is a BSL-3 lab — like the ones in many other bioweapons labs, and in university labs (like the Baric Lab at UNC, Chapel Hill.) http://en.sinopharm.com/2023-02/c_18829.html, 24 February 2023 (Sinopharm R&D webpage — be aware, it’s not secure.)

ALL GAIN-OF-FUNCTION WORK, NO MATTER WHERE IT IS PERFORMED, AND NO MATTER ON WHAT, MUST BE STOPPED. NOW. ALL EFFORTS TO MOUNT A “NEW PANDEMIC” OF H5N1, NO MATTER OF WHAT STRAIN, MUST BE STOPPED. NOW.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday 9.5.2025 Open Thread: Human LINE-1, Chromosomes, and the modRNA COVID-19 “Vaccines”: Part One

The header image for today’s offering is courtesy of https://genesdev.cshlp.org/content/37/21-24/948.full, “LINE-1 retrotransposition and its regulation in cancers: implications for therapeutic opportunities”, Carlos Mendez-Dorantes, and Kathleen H. Burns, 13 December 2023.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s offering speaks of the disaster of COVID-19 (the COVID-19 virus itself, and the COVID-19 “vaccines”), Yours Truly dedicates it to all persons, of whatever age or location: who have contracted a COVID-19 infection and recovered from it, but who also have residual complications from the infection; who have suffered COVID-19 “vaccine”-induced injury, illness, disability, or “Long COVID”; or, who have passed away, either from complications from an infection of the COVID-19 virus itself, or from COVID-19 “vaccine”-induced issues caused by these “vaccines” they had in their body.

Today’s offering is Part One of two. It is not a lesson on human anatomy or on human genetics: it is a presentation of some of the most-recent information regarding the dangers and deadliness of the COVID-19 “vaccines” (Bioweapon Toxin Injections.) Yours Truly will emphasize at the start that more and more information that exposes these dangers and deadliness is coming out by the week — the “information trickle” of previous years regarding this situation is becoming a torrent. There is also information that potentially links some of the deleterious effects of the COVID- 19 “vaccines” back to the original Wuhan Hu1 SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) virus itself. Please bear with me: what may look like “diffuse parts” are all important pieces of the whole.

There is some “background information” that is necessary to “lay the groundwork” for the rest of today’s offering. Yours Truly begins here, with a paper by Ralph Baric, PhD, of the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, from 2006. The paper is found here: https://www.jcvi.org/sites/default/assets/projects/synthetic-genomics-options-for-governance/Baric-Synthetic-Viral-Genomics.pdf, “Synthetic Viral Genomics: Risks and Benefits for Science and Society”, Ralph S. Baric, PhD. In Yours Truly’s opinion, this paper can be viewed as a “blueprint” for the future Gain-of-Function (GoF) lab-experimentation with, and the lab-creation of, viruses such as the Wuhan Hu1 SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) virus; and the more-recent GoF experiments with strains of the H5N1 (Avian Influenza) virus. Please see the screenshots from Dr. Baric’s 2006 paper, below:

YT: Note the mentions, right at the start in the paper, about “biological warfare” and “biodefense.”

YT: The above images are from the Baric 2206 paper. Figure 4b appears to “outline” how to lab-create (Gain-of-Function work) of “synthetic coronavirus” genome codes.

Yours Truly will specially point out the passage above, “…data will provide detailed predictions regarding easy approaches to humanize zoonotic strains by retargeting the attachment proteins to recognize human, not the animal receptors (43-45).” This, in my opinion, is a direct “tie-in” to the gene code pieces from the Pangolin MP789 coronavirus that were used in the lab-creation of the original Wuhan Hu1 SARS-CoV-2 virus (COVID-19 virus) itself — the same virus that is the foundation of all the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, including the “booster shots” and the “latest formula vaccines.” The MP789 coronavirus gene code has multiple “areas” that the human body can be receptive to — including the PRRAR / PRRARSV “backdoor key” to nucleus of every cell. Please see the following for more information about MP789 and its connection to the PRRARSV “backdoor key” that both the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” by Pfizer-BioNTech and by Moderna contain: https://www.theqtree.com/2023/05/01/pfizer-and-moderna-vaccines-both-contain-the-prrarsv-key-to-the-cell-nucleus/; https://www.theqtree.com/2024/11/22/health-friday-11-22-2024-open-thread-lets-talk-about-prrarsv-the-backdoor-key/; and, https://www.theqtree.com/2024/11/27/placeholder-open-thread-11-27-2024-prrarsv-part-2-pangolin-edition/.

There is also something else of interest to point out regarding one of the References in the 2006 Baric paper: Reference 45. The referenced paper is found here: https://www.embopress.org/doi/full/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600640, “Receptor and viral determinants of SARS- coronavirus adaptation to human ACE2.”, Li, W., et al., 24 March 2005. This paper discusses the GoF experiments performed to determine and then lab-create elements of various rat and palm civet coronaviruses to the ACE2 receptor cells of humans. Recall that rat and civet coronaviruses experiments were performed at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in the process of lab-creating the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) virus itself. Please see the screenshots from the paper, below. The first is from the authors’ “summary” a the top of the paper; the second is the end of the Discussion section of the paper:

Ralph Baric, PhD, was also working on the “cross-species adaptation and transmission” aspects of SARS- coronaviruses. For example, this paper: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2838128/, “Recombination, Reservoirs, and the Modular Spike: Mechanisms of Coronavirus Cross-Species Transmission”, Rachel L Graham, Ralph S Baric, 11 November 2009. The paper specifically discusses Spike 1 residues and ACE2 receptor cells in coronaviruses found in Himalayan palm civets; bats; and raccoon dogs — and the possibility that these coronaviruses can “leap” to humans.

And now, with the above as part of the context, Yours Truly presents LINE-1. First, via Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LINE1):

And, Second, from ActiveMotif (https://www.activemotif.com/blog-line-1, “LINE-1 Elements: Walk the LINE-1”, Michelle Tetrault Carlson, PhD, 13 September 2022):

LINE-1 cells are found throughout the human body. LINE-1 aberrations are involved in the following conditions: Genetic disease; cancers (lung; ovarian; bladder; colon; breast; brain [glioma]; and, liver.) LINE-1 aberrations / changes are also involved in aging and “aging related diseases” (per the article above, in the “LINE-1 and Aging” section.)

LINE-1 (also called L1) cells have been studied for some time; in particular, the association between L1 “retrotransposition” and disease. This is important in the context of what will be discussed next.

L1 cells can be “retrotransposed.” This will create “genetic instability.” Such retrotransposition can occur as an aberration resulting from genetic predisposition in the body. Please see: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00839-5, “Human L1 Retrotransposition Is Associated with Genetic Instability”, David E. Symer, et al., 9 August 2002. The Abstract from this paper is below:

This paper also discusses the role of SV40 in L1 retrotransposition. In addition, there is a section entitled, “L1 Is an Engine for Genetic Change.”

“Transposed” L1 cells can be involved in the establishment of cancers: https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.351051.123, “LINE-1 retrotransposition and its deregulation in cancers: implications for therapeutic opportunities”, Carlos Mendez-Dorantes, Kathleen H. Burns, 13 December 2023. Please see the screenshot from this paper (a graphical “process image” of L1 being “retrotransposed”), below:

The alarm bells have been ringing regarding the dangers of LINE-1 (L1) retrotranposition (“reverse transcription”) effect of the modCOVID-19 “vaccines” for some time. Examples: the “Maurol, et al.” paper of March 2022: https://www.hilarispublisher.com/articles/intracellular-reverse-transcription-of-covid19-mrna-vaccine-eminvitroem-in-human-cell-87770.html, “Intracellular Reverse Transcription of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine In-Vitro in Human Cell.”, Maurol, Luisette Mauro, Naseer Almukthar, Tarro Giulio, and Gamal abdul Hamid, et al., J Genet DNA Res6(2022):116. Please see the screenshot from this article, below:

YT: Note the mention of a timeframe of 5-10 years that is needed to study the effects of the “transcription activity.” Keep this in mind when reading the end of today’s offering.

Then, there is the “Alden, et al.” paper from April 2022: https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73, “Intracellular Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line”, Markus Alden, Yang De Marinis, et al., 11 April 2022. Please see the screenshots from this paper, below. The first is from the paper itself; the second, an image of the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 reverse transcription of DNA, is Slide 14 from the Doctors for COVID Ethics article (https://doctors4covidethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/causality-article.pdf, “Vascular and organ damage induced by mRNA vaccines: irrefutable proof of causality”, Michael Palmer, MD, and Sucharit Bhakdi, MD, August 2022):

And, the “Acevedo-Whitehouse and Bruno” paper from February 2023: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2023.111015, “Potential health risks of mRNA-based vaccine therapy: A hypothesis”, K. Acevedo-Whitehouse, R. Bruno, 6 February 2023. Please see the screenshots from this paper, below; the first is part of the Abstract; the second is the end of the Consequences and discussion section:

Which all lead to this, from Dr. Peter McCullough in May 2025: https://www.americaoutloud.news/genetic-bombshell-covid-19-vaccines-change-the-human-genome/, 24 May 2025. Please see the screenshots from this article, below. First, this one:

This harks back to the information that there are natural reasons for DNA alteration in a person’s body (for example, inherited genetic aberrations.) **** However, the issue here is the fact that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” by Pfizer-BioNTech and by Moderna contain ingredients and mechanisms that deliberately and permanently alter the DNA of the human LINE-1 cell lines of any person who takes these “vaccines” — even one injection of them. This includes DNA alteration in the body of a fetus of an expectant mother who takes modCOVID-19 “vaccines”, due to the fact that these “vaccines” cross the placenta and into the body of the fetus. (And, by the way, those same ingredients and mechanisms are present in all “descendant clone” modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” made by these companies, including the “booster shots” and the “latest version formula” injectables. This is because these are based on, and contain elements of, the original modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” by these companies.)

Then, the second screenshot, below:

YT: **** Please read this phrase again, from Dr. McCullough, regarding the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” by Pfizer-BioNTech and by Moderna: “…sadly, both Pfizer and Moderna do permanently alter DNA via reverse transcription.” It is the “permanently alter DNA via reverse transcription” effects from these injectables that the COVID-19 “vaccinated” in the United States and all over the world are starting to present. It is impossible that the FDA did not know about the potential DNA-altering effects of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” — especially after scientific papers were published which demonstrated that this indeed is the case.

Another piece of the situation has just been published: According to the CDC, 76.4% of all American adults have at least one chronic disease (2023 figures), compared to baseline 2013 figures. The CDC paper is here: https://cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2025/04_0539.htm#ContribAff, “Trends in Multiple Chronic Conditions Among US Adults, By Life Stage, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2013 – 2023”, Kathleen B. Watson, MD, et al., 17 April 2025. All of the authors of this paper are either employees of the CDC; or, of the United States Uniformed Health Services. While it is true that chronic diseases, such as arthritis, can develop for many reasons during adult years, there is NOT ONE WORD in this paper regarding COVID-19 “vaccination” in this age group (18 years – 65+ years) being involved in the increase of any of the chronic diseases that are listed. In other words — the CDC still has its “head firmly in the sand” regarding the dangers and deadliness of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, and the role of these “vaccines” in inducing and/or aggravating multiple types of chronic conditions.

**** What are “COVID-19 “vaccinated” Joe or Jane Average American” going to do when they find out and understand (which they will, eventually) that the most fundamental “building block” of their body — their DNA — was deliberately and permanently altered without their knowledge or consent, if they took any injection of a Pfizer-BioNTech or a Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”? That it doesn’t matter when the “vaccine” injection was put into their body, or how many injections? That their modRNA COVID-19 “vaccinated” children ALSO had their DNA deliberately and permanently altered without their parents’ or guardian’s knowledge or consent? That the state and local governments who “mandated” or legislated that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” be taken by their children in order for them to attend school were complicit in the DNA alteration in their children?

**** What will “COVID-19 “vaccinated” Joe or Jane Average American” do when they find out and understand (which they will, eventually) that the altered DNA in their “vaccinated” body will “lurk” in the body and brain, creating permanent dysfunction of multiple organs of said body, until a modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”-induced injury, illness, or disability presents later on? That is very likely no “cure” or “turning the clock back” for this altered DNA in the “vaccinated” body?

**** What will “COVID-19 “vaccinated” Joe or Jane Average American” do when they find out and understand (which they will, eventually) that the medical professionals they trusted when they took the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” have betrayed them at the most basic level —“Do No Harm”— by not doing the investigation which would have alerted them to this danger — but, which medical professionals, instead, followed the CDC / FDA / AMA mantras of, “The COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective”, and “The known and potential benefits of the COVID-19 vaccines outweigh the known and potential risks”?

The people who included the elements and mechanisms in the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” that guarantee the deliberate and permanent reverse-transcription of the LINE-1 DNA of every COVID-19 “vaccinated” person; the people who knew about these reverse-transcription elements and mechanisms, but still allowed EUAs and “FDA full approval” of these “vaccines” to proceed; the people who intentionally withheld vital information regarding the real dangers and deadliness of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” from President Trump45 during “Operation Warp Speed”; the people who, even today, are still “recommending” COVID-19 “vaccination” for anyone of any age (paging Dr. Martin Makary, current FDA Commissioner) — all must answer for their actions. All modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” must be removed from use and pulled off the market — now.

THERE. MUST. BE. ACCOUNTABILITY.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday 8.29.2025 Open Thread: Gain-of-Function Research Is Still Going On

The featured vintage image of a laboratory for today’s offering is courtesy of iStock and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics.

Today’s offering is about the “under-the-table” work, the “being performed but under another name” work, the “grandfathered-in” work, of Gain-of-Function (GoF) experiments that are onoing. These GoF experiments involve experiments with mRNA-based platforms; with “inactivated virus” platforms; and, with “novel delivery” platforms. These GoF experiments are being funded by “private Big Money”; and, by the United States government (in other words, with taxpayer money.) This post is long; please bear with me.

It is now well-known that the COVID-19 disaster was a product of GoF experiments, of two types: One, the GoF work that was performed in various labs (the Baric Lab at UNC, Chapel Hill; the Wuhan Institute of Virology, Wuhan, Communist China; the United States Army biological weapons labs at Ft. Detrick, Maryland, among others.) And, Two, the GoF work that was performed using the lab-created Wuhan Hu1 SARS-CoV-2 virus itself as the foundation for the modRNA (aka mRNA) COVID-19 “vaccines” that were developed by numerous companies, among them: PfizerUSA (at the company’s Pearl River, New York, facility; and, at other facilities); and, BioNTech (Mainz, Germany); Moderna (with the NIAID in Bethesda, Maryland, and at other facilities) — for use in the United States and also world-wide. (Note: PfizerUSA and BioNTech are separate companies that operate as a “joint venture” called Pfizer-BioNTech. PfizerUSA and BioNTech each have a separate CEO [Chief Executive Officer].)

Three articles by Jon Fleetwood start today’s offering. The first is here: https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/260-children-infected-with-tubersulosis, “260 Children Infected With Tuberculosis in Gates-Funded Study Injecting Children with Live Mycobacterium bovis Bacteria: “New England Journal of Medicine'”, 8 May 2025. The second is here: https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/new-bill-gates-funded-chimeric-polio, “New Bill Gates-Funded Chimeric Polio Vaccine Sheds 100% in Recipients, Spread Documented: ‘The Lancet’ Journal”, 18 August 2025. The third is here: https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/bill-gates-funds-slim-microneedle, “Bill Gates Funds ‘SLIM’ Microneedle Tech That Self-Assembles Inside the Body”, 24 April 2025.

Regarding the first Jon Fleetwood article: The 260 study subject children were living in South Africa, and were between the ages of 10 and 18 years. They were confirmed by to be HIV-negative at the time they were added to the study subject pool. They were injected with the Danish tuberculosis vaccine BCG1331 strain (Bacille Calmette-Guerin). The Package Insert for this vaccine is here: https://nibsc.org/documents/ifu/07-270.pdf. The BCG1331 strain is the Mycobacterium bovis strain, which causes tuberculosis in cattle and can also cause the disease in humans, especially in HIV-compromised persons. Please see the screenshot from the Fleetwood article, below:

The paper that resulted from the study is here: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2412381, “BCG Revaccination for the Prevention of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection”, Alexander C Schmidt, et al., 8 May 2025. Please see the screenshot from this paper, below:

In other words, 260 children now have tuberculosis because of the BCG1331 strain vaccine that they were injected with. And that Bill Gates funded this “human guinea-pig experiment.” But there’s more — the Fleetwood article also describes the Bill Gates-funded Mycobacterium bovis experiments at the University of Texas, performed in 2012, that resulted in a what may be called a “turbo-charged Gain-of-Function” version of this tuberculosis bacterium. The paper that was published from the 2012 study is here: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-9792(13)70007-6, “Mycobacterium tuberculosis MtrAY102C is a gain-of-function mutant that potentially acts as a constitutively active protein”, Akash T Satsangi, et al., published December 2013.

Regarding the second Fleetwood article: Another Bill Gates-funded effort, this time about a lab-created chimeric polio oral “vaccine” that was tested on human subjects in the United States. The study results are nothing short of terrifying. Please the screenshot from the Fleetwood article, below:

There was a 100% incidence of “shedding” of this lab-created chimeric oral polio “vaccine.” Six human subjects were released from the study when it was found that testing of their stool showed they had possibly contracted the oral vaccine virus from other study subjects. Several human subjects had severe adverse reactions to this lab-created chimeric oral polio “vaccine.” This lab-created chimeric oral polio “vaccine” caused “unexpected” interactions with the type 2 poliovirus.

The team that lab-created this chimeric oral polio “vaccine” were from medical centers across the United States, including: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; University of Vermont; and, Dartmouth. The paper that was published from the study is here: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(25)00285-3/fulltext, “Safety and immunogenicity of novel live attenuated type 1 and type 3 oral poliomyelitis vaccines in healthy adults in the USA: a first-in-human, observer-masked, multicentre, phase 1 randomized controlled trial”, Laina D Mercer, PhD, et al., 13 August 2025. The clinical trial for this lab-created chimeric polio virus “vaccine” is listed here: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04529538. Again, from the Fleetwood article:

Regarding the third Fleetwood article: Bill Gates has funded the creation of a new technology, called “SLIM microneedle”, which injects “microcrystals” of a contraceptive drug (levonorgestrel) into the body of a female; and, which microcrystals then”self-assemble” into an “implant” inside her body. Please see the screenshot from the Fleetwood article on this situation, below:

This type of “self-injected, self-assembly inside the body” approach has profound implications. Please see below, again from the Fleetwood article:

The paper that was published on this issue is here: https://www.nature.com/articles/s44286-025-00194-x, “Self-aggregating long-lasting injectable microcrystals”, Vivian K. Feig, et al., 24 March 2025. Note how “self-assembling” has magically become “self-aggregating” — in some attempt to hide the fact that the microcrystals really do “self-assemble?”

The SLIM “delivery system” for the contraceptive levonorgestrel (called “LNG” in the paper above) uses a solvent called Benzyl Benzoate (called “BB” in the paper above.) The paper describes the experiments performed to find the “right combination” of levonorgestrel + Benzyl Benzoate to create the SLIM delivery system — the “winning delivery system candidate” was named “LNG-BB.” Benzyl Benzoate is clearly dangerous. Part of Section 4 FIRST AID MEASURES from the MSDS Safety Sheet on Benzyl Benzoate from Spectrum Chemical (https://www.spectrumchemical.com/) is below:

And this is the “long-lasting solvent” that is used in the SLIM microneedle “self-aggregating” delivery system for levonorgestrel. Which means that this solvent will be acting in the body of the female who uses this delivery system for this drug for an (undetermined) amount of time.

Now, on to a recent GoF experiment, this one funded by NIH / NIAID, at the University of Pittsburgh. This GoF experiment resulted in the lab-creation of a chimeric H5N1 Avian Influenza virus strain that could infect dairy cattle. Jon Fleetwood wrote about this situation, here: https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/nih-funded-pennsylvania-researchers, “NIH-Funded Pennsylvania Researchers Build New Frankenstein Bird Flu Virus: ‘Journal of Virology'”, 26 August 2025. Vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) is a virus that infects horses and cattle. In humans, Stomatitis infection can result in HSV-1 (the “cold sore” virus: per https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/stomatitis-oral-mucositis.) However, the researchers at the University of Pittsburgh concentrated on “splicing” an element of VSV with H5N1. The paper that was published from this experiment is here: https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.00621-25, “Dairy cattle herds mount a characteristic antibody response to highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza viruses”, Kevin R. McCarthy, et al., 25 August 2025. Please see the screenshots from the Fleetwood article on this issue, below:

Isn’t it “convenient timing” that this “new, chimeric VSV + H5N1 virus” comes on the heels of the announcement by the White House on 5 May 2025, that Gain-of-Function research would be stopped — but it appears that “certain contracts” would be permitted to “finish out”? And, that one of those “certain contracts” is with Arcturus Therapeutics for its self-amplifying RNA (saRNA) Avian Influenza “vaccine”, ARCT-2304? The White House announcement is here: https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/05/improving-the-safety-and-security-of-biological-research/. The news release related to the second quarter 2025 financial update and “pipeline progress” for Arcturus Therapeutics in which ARCT-2304 is mentioned, is here: https://www.biospace.com/press-releases/arcturus-therapeutics-announces-second-quarter-2025-financial-update-and-pipeline-progress, 12 August 2025. The clinical trial for ARCT-2304 is registered here: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06602531; which, by the way, has NO saline-only Placebo control group; the only “control groups” in the study will be injected with a “control vaccine” or a “placebo vaccine” (which last, in and of itself, is not a true Placebo.)

And now, regarding something else: the GoF experiments that resulted in the lab-creation of an Avian Influenza “vaccine” which is a “Cocktail of Inactivated Avian Influenza Viruses”, a patent owned by Dr. Jeffery Taubenberger, a “career medical employee” of HHS and the federal government, and who is also the current Acting Director of the NIAID (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, previously headed by Dr. Anthony Fauci), and who now is in control of the $500 Million dollars that was pulled from mRNA research activities in May 2025. This “bird flu vaccine cocktail” contains BPL (Beta-propiolactone), a known carcinogen.

The NIH TechTransfer information on this “cocktail” invention by Dr. Taubenberger is here: https://www.techtransfer.nih.gov/tech/tab-3388, “Broadly Protective Influenza Vaccine Compromising a Cocktail of Inactivated Avian Influenza Viruses”. Sounds “benign,” yes? Until one starts reading the actual Patent document itself, found here: https://image-ppubs.uspto.gov/dirsearch-public/print/downloadPdf/11369675, filed 21 July 2020. The following are screenshots from the Patent document:

Note it appears that Dr. Taubenberger was experimenting with as many as sixteen different strains of Avian Influenza to lab-create his “cocktail vaccine.”

Note it appears that Dr. Taubenberger is perfectly all right with “vaginal” and “rectal” administration of his “cocktail vaccine.”

Note that the Patent was registered in July 2020 — which can only mean that work on the experiments to lab-create this “Avian Influenza cocktail vaccine” must have begun at least nine months earlier. This would place the commencement of the experiments around October 2019 — just before the COVID-19 original virus was unleashed on on the world.

Here are two screenshots from the MSDS Safety Sheet for Beta-propiolactone from Sigma Aldritch (https://www.sigmaaldritch.com/US/en/sds/sigma/p5648):

And THIS ingredient is part of the “Avian Influenza Cocktail Vaccine” of Dr. Jeffery Taubenberger, two possible methods of administration of which are INTRANASAL or INHALED, per the Patent document images above?

It is not enough that HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., terminated 22 contracts for mRNA research in May of this year, but allowed “certain contracts” for mRNA (and saRNA) research to “finish out.” It is not enough that the White House announced a ban on Gain-of-Function research, since this type of research is still going on — funded by “private Big Money”, and/or by the NIH / NIAID (in other words, the United States government). The entire Gain-of-Function situation must be stopped, from all funding sources and on all levels of research and experimentation — until there are clear, firm, and enforceable regulations and restrictions on who can perform this type of research; that such research can only be permitted under strict circumstances; that such research must be under tight supervision; and, that such research can only be performed where there is a clear need in the area of public health — not what amounts to a “chimeric fishing expedition” to lab-create viruses. It is time for any and all “go-along-to-get-along” activities to stop — such as, bowing to the “demand” by Sen. Dr. Bill Cassidy for his “cooperation” in “working with” HHS as regards hiring, or anything else. By the way — Sen. Dr. Cassidy has received donations from multiple pharmaceutical entities (United Health, AstraZeneca, Pediatrix Medical Group, and so on: per Open Secrets (https://opensecrets.org/.) And — that the further development of the above-discussed “Avian Influenza Cocktail Vaccine” must be stopped.

HHS Secretary Kennedy, Jr.: Please understand that the “career medical bureaucrats” in the CDC, the FDA, and the other divisions of the HHS, are not inclined to your views. They want “the good old days” of these divisions brought back. They are working “behind the scenes” in some instances, and in other instances, out in the open, to obstruct, delay, and thwart your efforts to clean up HHS and “re-tool” the department to reflect Make American Healthy Again. There is even what may be called “soft interference” by persons not employed by HHS such as, Sen. Dr. Cassidy.

THERE. MUST. BE. ACCOUNTABILITY.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday 8.22.2025 Open Thread: “Clean Sweep” Edition: An Opinion Piece

The header image of smallpox vaccination in Paris in 1905 used in today’s offering is courtesy of Alamy and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s offering speaks of the disaster of COVID-19, Yours Truly dedicates it to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have suffered injuries, illnesses, or disabilities, either COVID-19 “vaccine”-induced, or as the result of a COVID-19 infection; and, to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have passed away either from the negative effects of the COVID-19 “vaccines” they had in their bodies, or as the result of a COVID-19 infection.

“Clean Sweep.” This means completely dismantling the FDA (the Food and Drug Administration); the NIH (the National Institutes of Health); and, the NIAID (the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases), all of which are divisions of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) — and completely rebuilding them from the top down. Why “Clean Sweep” for these divisions? Because it is becoming more apparent by the week that they are more devoted to using “career” medical bureaucrats/officials, many of whom are “holdovers” from the “Collins / Fauci era” in the NIH and NIAID; they are more devoted to injecting American citizens with the proven-dangerous, proven-deadly COVID-19 “vaccines” than they are to approving readily-available, cheap drugs (such as, Ivermectin) and other therapeutics (such as, Zinc) to prevent or to treat COVID-19 infection; and, they are more devoted to pushing through injectables via “Fast Track” or “accelerated approval” methods, rather than taking the time to fully test and analyze test data. “Completely rebuilding them from the top down” means establishing entirely redesigned divisions that are fully devoted to the betterment of the public health.

Yours Truly presents a transcript of the op-ed published in the Washington Post on 12 August 2025 by Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, the current Director of the NIH (National Institutes of Health); the op-ed appears here: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinons/2025/08/12/nih-mrna-vaccines-jay-bhattacharya/, “Jay Bhattacharya: Why the NIH is pivoting away from mRNA vaccines”, 12 August 2025. Yours Truly provides her personal commentary, which will appear in Bold and surrounded in brackets. (The Washington Post op-ed is behind a paywall; Yours Truly is indebted to Shannon Joy, whose X tweet has the entire article: https://xcancel.com/ShannonJoy/status/1956140133474034025.) Note: Yours Truly will make it clear that the commentary is done with all due respect to Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, MD.

The transcript:
“The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ decision to wind down its mRNA vaccine development activities marks a necessary pivot in how we steward public health innovation in vaccines. The right path requires us to consider the inherent strengths and weaknesses of a technology as well as any alternatives, along with public attitudes and experience with the technology. The mRNA platform is promising technology. I do not dispute its potential. In the future, it may yet deliver breakthroughs in treating diseases such as cancer, and HHS is continuing to invest in ongoing research in oncology and other complex diseases.”

[YT: First of all, if HHS is truly going to “wind down” mRNA vaccine development, why is Moderna being allowed to progress to Phase 3 clinical trials of its modRNA “vaccine” against CMV (Cytomegalovirus), mRNA-1647? This “vaccine” contains six different mRNA sequences, two different antigens, the dangerous lipid nanoparticle SM-102 (the same LNP that is in the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, SPIKEVAX), and apparently targets both the IgG immune system cells and the CD4-CD8 cells of the body. Please see: https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.01603-23, “Characterization of humoral and cellular immunologic responses to an mRNA-based human cytomegalovirus vaccine from a phase 1 trial of healthy adults”, Kai Wu, et al.; J Virol. 2024 Mar 25;18(4):e01603-23. Please refer to Fig. 2 and Fig.4. Secondly, the current modRNA (aka mRNA) COVID-19 “vaccines” have demonstrated that they do not have “inherent strengths”: in fact, they only have what may be called “inherent dangers.” These “inherent dangers” include: altering of the LINE1 Human Liver cell line; replacement of natural Uridine RNA with the lab-created N1-Methylpseudouridine; crossing the Blood-Brain Barrier to attack areas of the brain that are not protected by this barrier (for example, the Pituitary Gland); causing autoimmune attack on heart tissue via aggregation of lymphocytes induced by the COVID-19 “vaccines” in that organ; and, causing infiltration of lymphocytes in lung tissue. Regarding the DNA alteration, and heart and lung damage, caused by the COVID-19 “vaccines”, please see: https://doctors4covidethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/causality-article.pdf, “Vascular and organ damage induced by mRNA vaccines: irrefutable proof of causality”, Michael Palmer, MD, and Sucharit Bhakdi, MD, Slide 9 through Slide 14. Thirdly, why on Earth is oncology (cancer study, diagnosis, and treatment) included in the phrase “and other complex diseases?” Yours Truly calls this a writing mistake; however, one believes someone should have proofread the op-ed for “context or syntax” issues before publication.]

“But as a vaccine intended for broad public use, especially during a public health emergency, the platform has failed a crucial test: earning public trust. No matter how elegant the science, a platform that lacks credibility among the people it seeks to protect cannot fulfill its public health mission.”

[YT: The “public trust” for the COVID-19 “vaccines” was destroyed when it was proven that hundreds of persons who took these injectables passed away from immediate heart attacks induced by them just after being injected; when “vaccinated” persons began to present with myocarditis or pericarditis after being injected; when stillbirths and miscarriages began to be reported among pregnant women who had been injected; and much, much more. And, by the way, the initial modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” rollout in December 2020 was intended for the elderly and for healthcare workers; it was when the “COVID-19 health emergency” was declared in March 2021 that the “vaccines” began to be “mandated” for all persons. “Elegant science?” Does “elegant science” include the kind of “science” that was rushed through the initial EUAs for the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” without proper testing and data analyses?]

“It is critical to understand the development of the mRNA coronavirus vaccines in the context of the very successful Operation Warp Speed launched during the first Trump administration.”

[YT: Does “the development of the mRNA coronavirus vaccines” include the fact that neither Pfizer-BioNTech, nor Moderna, had never previously brought a successful mRNA injectable to market prior to “Operation Warp Speed?” And that Dr. Albert Bourla, DVM, the CEO of PfizerUSA, admitted on video that he had been “convinced” by Pfizer scientists to use the then-new and unproven mRNA technology in a COVID-19 “vaccine?” (10 March 2022, “Albert Bourla on why mRNA technology was “counterintuitive” to producing an effective vaccine”, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9_YRw7jBF4.)]

“Operation Warp Speed represented a paradigm shift in how the government should invest in new technologies and solutions and embrace strategic investments in public-private partnerships, innovation in trial design and removal of bureaucratic red tape to allow parallel rather than sequential vaccine development. It produced a new vaccine in record time and also helped develop a successful monoclonal antibody.”

[YT: Really? “Embrace strategic partnerships in public-private partnerships?” What about that “public-private partnership” document between the NIAID and Moderna, which includes development of RNA-based vaccines, and that was filed with the SEC in 2015, several years BEFORE the COVID-19 disaster? That “partnership” is still going on, with patent-ownership sharing, royalty payments sharing, “partnering” in developing new COVID-19 “vaccines”, and so on, until at least 2041. “Innovation in trial design?” — Meaning the “Next Gold Generation Standard”, announced in May 2025, in which lab testing with animals using humane, safe protocols, then progressing to better and safer human-subject testing, may well be replaced with “Petri-dish testing” only” for new “vaccines”? “Parallel vaccine development?” — Meaning that “Universal Vaccine” that’s touted in the “Next Gold Generation Standard?”]

“Unfortunately, the Biden administration did not manage public trust in the coronavirus vaccines, largely because it chose a strategy of mandates rather than a risk-based approach and did not properly acknowledge Americans’ growing concerns regarding safety and effectiveness.”

[YT: So, “risk-based approach?” Like the “risk populations chart” in the “opinion piece” that Dr.Martin Makary and Dr. Vinay Prasad published in the New England Journal of Medicine in May 2025 (https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsb2506929, “An Evidence-Based Approach to Covid-19 Vaccination”— a chart in which, for example, even healthy pregnant women are considered to be at “risk” for “severe complications from COVID-19” and should get COVID-19 “vaccinated?” And what about the statements about how the “known and potential benefits of the for COVID-19 vaccines outweigh the known and potential risks?” — like the one here: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/planning/children/6-things-to-know.html, “6 Things to Know about COVID-19 Vaccination for Children.“]

“Consider the data: In a late 2024 Pew Research Center survey, 60 percent of American adults reported no intention of getting an updated coronavirus mRNA vaccine despite the Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s advice that nearly all adults receive yet another dose. As of late April 2025 (the latest data published reported by the CDC), only 13 percent of children between the ages of 6 months and 17 years had received an updated coronavirus vaccine, even though the Biden-era CDC had placed the vaccine on the childhood immunization schedule.”

[YT: It appears that the real reason behind why “only 13 percent of children between the ages of 6 months and 17 years had received an updated coronavirus vaccine” is that their parents or guardians have concluded that these “vaccines” are more dangerous than helpful. And how did these adults come to this conclusion? Because of the news spreading that these “vaccines” cause myocarditis / pericarditis in children; because of the news spreading that these “vaccines” do not prevent COVID-19 infection, but instead actually damage the “vaccinated” person’s immune system, making it vulnerable to COVID-19 infection; and so on. In Yours Truly’s opinion, the COVID-19 “vaccines” have no place in the CDC Childhood Immunization Schedule whatever — due to the foregoing and other reasons.]

“In 2021, the Biden administration’s HHS spent nearly a billion dollars on a campaign supporting the coronavirus vaccine, the most expensive pharmaceutical campaign in history. The government spent the money on a vast number of TV, radio and internet spots, which misinformed the American public that the vaccine would protect them from contracting and spreading covid. Nevertheless, just a few years later, less than half the U.S. adult population will heed the CDC’s guidance. Some outlets have blamed the poor coronavirus mRNA vaccine uptake on poor messaging or “anti-vax” counter-messaging. But the Biden administration made suppression of speech — and a mandate for all on the vaccines — into a priority.”

[YT: Perhaps Dr. Bhattacharya should look at the FDA Package Insert for the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, COMIRNATY (Pfizer-BioNTech), section 1 INDICATIONS AND USAGE. The Package Insert is here: https://www.fda.gov/media/151707/download. Notice that the FDA officially states that COMIRNATY is “to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19.)” Is the FDA “spreading misinformation?”

“The failure was thus not a communications problem. It is a trust problem due to the Biden administration’s scientific overreach, public pressure and, frankly, arrogance.”

[YT: Does this mean that “the new FDA”, and the “Next Generation Gold Standard”, and the “accelerated approval” of “vaccines” that may be lab-created in Petri-dishes will somehow magically restore public trust?]

“In addition to the trust problem, the mRNA technology has special biological features that make it different from other vaccines in that it (ideally) instructs our cells to produce proteins that subsequently invoke an immune response. To do so with complete confidence about vaccine safety and efficacy requires an exact understanding of dosage, biodistribution and off-target effects. Unfortunately, we fall short in all three. We lack clarity on how much antigen each mRNA molecule produces, where in the body the mRNA product winds up, how long it stays in the body, and whether unintended proteins are created.”

[YT: Unfortunately, this paragraph, in Yours Truly’s opinion, “has more holes than a Swiss cheese.” First: the mRNA “vaccines” do instruct the cells of the “vaccinated” person to “invoke an immune response”: that “response”, among other things, causes multiple types of autoimmune attack within the COVID-19 “vaccinated” person’s body — for example, in the heart (please refer above to the article by Doctors For COVID Ethics.) Second: Perhaps Dr. Bhattacharya would like to read this report, which Pfizer-BioNTech gave to the FDA in January 2021, regarding the biodistribution of BNT162b2 (FDA-approved in 2022 as COMIRNATY.) The report is here: https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/125742_S1_M2_pharmkin-tabulated-summary.pdf, “MODULE 2.6.5. PHARMACOKINETICS TABULATED SUMMARY.” Yours Truly has included images of Page 7 and Page 8 of this report, which are the Biodistribution Tables for BNT162b2. (The BNT162b2 used in this experiment is the same one that was granted the initial FDA for use in the United States in December 2020.) Third: Stephanie Seneff, PhD, and Greg Nigh, wrote back in 2021 about the unintended consequences of the mRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” creating “unintended proteins.” Their paper is here: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Worse-Than-the-Disease-Reviewing-Some-Possible-of-Seneff-Nigh/, “Worse Than the Disease? Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of the mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19”, 16 June 2021, International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research 2(1), May 10,2021 Page 389 – 430. The point is: there is an “exact understanding” of multiple aspects regarding the mRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” already.]

“From a regulatory perspective, getting approval for a vaccine with such inherent uncertainties should be difficult.”

[YT: Agreed— except that the “new FDA” is doing exactly that already (such as the recent FDA “approval” without any human trials testing of the “2025-2026 Formula COVID-19 Vaccines” by Pfizer-BioNTech, by Moderna, and by Novavax.)]

“Still, I do not believe the mRNA vaccines caused either mass harm on the one hand or saved 14 million lives on the other. Those estimates swing wildly based on speculative modeling, not concrete evidence. A recent modeling study conluded that the global coronavirus vaccination campaign saved 2.5 million lives from 2020 to 2024, mainly among the elderly.”

[YT: “Still I do not believe the mRNA vaccines caused either mass harm…” Really, Dr. Bhattacharya? Did you read through the OpenVAERS website? (https://openvaers.com/) Have you read through the thousands of actual reports of persons who took a COVID-19 “vaccine” and then either died from the injection, or had serious medical issues afterwards from the injection? Are you saying that these reports are “wildly based on speculative modeling?” Are you saying that these reports are not “concrete evidence?” Are you dismissing the extensive work of Ed Dowd, who analyzes statistical reports of claims from insurance companies, claims that have skyrocketed since the COVID-19 “vaccine” rollout in 2021? https://phinancetechnologies.com/, then click on the “Our Projects” PDF brochure on the webpage to find the “Current Projects” section, then click on any of the green arrows.]

“The scientific controversy over the vaccine’s effect on mortality rages on. Science isn’t propaganda agenda. It’s humility.”

[YT: Real science is truth. There isn’t a “controversy” about the “vaccine’s effect on mortality” — the COVID-19 “vaccines” have increased mortality across the board and across the world. Have you read Steve Kirsch’s Substack, Dr. Bhattacharya? (https://kirschsubstack.com/). Mr. Kirsch’s Substack has many articles that quote studies which show that the COVID-19 “vaccines” increase mortality across the board. However, since Mr. Kirsch is not a medical professional, that removes him from “credibility” in the medical professional world, as far as the NIH is concerned? It doesn’t matter that Mr. Kirsch makes his living from collecting and analyzing data (financial and medical)?]

“And when public health officials stopped communicating with humility, we lost much of the public, an absolute necessity for any vaccine platform.”

[YT: Actually: It’s when public health officials withheld the truth about the dangers and the deadliness of the COVID-19 “vaccines” (which the FDA knew about back in early 2021 — please see here: https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf, “5.3.6 CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-AUTHORIZATION ADVERSE EVENT REPORTS OF PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) RECEIVED THROUGH 28-FEB-2021.” Please go to the APPENDIX 1. LIST OF ADVERSE EVENTS OF SPECIAL INTEREST section.) — and the public had to find out the truth themselves — that public health officials “lost much of the public.”]

“I am not here to litigate the past. I am here to chart a better path forward. That is why the NIH, under the leadership of HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., is investing in new vaccine technologies based on whole-virus inactivated vaccines, which offer a broader immune response and have a longer track record of safety and public acceptance.”

[YT: So, here, apparently, is the “kernel” of the op-ed. Dr. Bhattacharya is not interested in anything related to how dangerous and deadly the current types of COVID-19 “vaccines” have been, and still are. “Let bygones be bygones and just move on” seems to the situation. Not so fast, Doctor. And that “whole-virus inactivated vaccine” scheme that is central to the “Next Generation Gold Standard?” The “Universal Vaccine?” Which, according to the “Next Generation Gold Standard” ethos, may be developed in Petri-dishes in federal government-based facilities only? And the PATENT for which “Universal Vaccine” is owned by the current Acting Director of NIAID, Dr. Jeffery Taubenberger? (https://www.techtransfer.nih.gov/tech/tab-3388)]

“We are continuing the Operation Warp Speed model of investing in technology with the most potential to help Americans.”

[YT: And, will this “continued” Operation Warp Speed model again be done in such a way that important information is deliberately withheld from President Trump47, as was the case with the original Operation Warp Speed in President Trump’s first term?]

“We will move forward with scientific rigor, transparency, and humility. At the NIH, we will fund promising research based not on hype, but on evidence. And I will continue to use my platform to communicate candidly in public conversations where debate and disagreement are welcomed.”

[YT: “Humility” is always a good thing. So is TRUTH.]

“We are entering a new era of public health, grounded not in wishful thinking or performative consensus, but in open inquiry and respect for the American people’s intelligence. The only to rebuild trust is to earn it — one honest conversation at a time.”

[YT: The “one honest conversation at a time” must include the honest admission by the NIH / NIAID / FDA / CDC, that the entire COVID-19 “vaccine” disaster could have been prevented through FDA approval of using re-purposed items to prevent or to treat COVID-19 infection: Ivermectin, Hydroxycholorquine, Doxycycline, Zinc and Vitamin D supplementation. There are plenty of peer-reviewed, published scientific papers which prove that these work. Instead, the FDA, TO THIS DAY, still refuses to approve the use of these items to prevent or to treat COVID-19. Can you explain why this is still the case, Dr. Bhattacharya?]

THERE. MUST. BE. ACCOUNTABILITY.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday 8.15.2025 Open Thread: Special Report Edition

The free header image for today’s offering is courtesy of Shutterstock and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s offering is related, in part, to the disaster of the COVID-19 “vaccines”, Yours Truly dedicates it to all persons who have contracted injures, illnesses, or disabilities, induced or aggravated by the COVID-19 “vaccines” that were injected into their bodies; and, to the memory of all persons who have passed away from the negative effects of the COVID-19 “vaccines” that were injected into their bodies.

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none, except for perhaps AI-generated images in any of the linked URLs below. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.

There are two sections to today’s Special Report offering: the first section, regarding the now-proven linkage of COVID-19 “vaccine boosters” to increases in cancer and in general mortality; the second section, regarding what appears to be the potential emergence of the “next plandemic” in Communist China. Please bear with Yours Truly: one does not want to “weary by recitals”, as the Duc de Saint-Simon once wrote — but there is a lot of information, multiple screenshots, and so on. The evolving knowledge regarding the disaster called COVID-19 (the virus itself, and the “vaccines”) is gaining speed with each passing day. This evolving knowledge base is important to understand in light of the developments regarding the new information about the “Chikungunya outbreak” currently in China, and which is apparently spreading to other countries (shades of the original COVID-19 virus itself outbreak in China.)

First section, the linkage between COVID-19 “booster vaccines” with increases in cancer and in general mortality. COVID-19 “vaccine boosters” means any injection of a “latest version” of a COVID-19 “vaccine.” This includes the FDA- approved 2025-2026 “new formula COVID-19 vaccine versions” of the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, COMIRNATY; of the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, SPIKEVAX; and, of the Novavax COVID-19 “vaccine”, NUVAXOVID.

Yours Truly begins here: https://slaynews.com/news/renowned-oncologist-sounds-alarm-cancer-deaths-now-surging-among-covid-boosted/, “Renowned Oncologist Sounds Alarm: Cancer Deaths Are Now Surging Among Covid-Boosted”, by Frank Bergman, 6 August 2025. There is an embedded video statement by Prof. Dr. Angus Dalgleish (St. George’s, University of London.) Dr. Dalgleish warns, in no uncertain terms, that it is the suppression of T-cell immune cells in the body of the COVID-19 “vaccine boosted” that is causing the surge of cancer among these persons. Please see the screenshot from the Slay News article, below:

There is another study from Japan, which also confirms that repeated COVID-19 “vaccine boosters” cause increases in mortality. Please see: https://slaynews.com/news/official-japanese-data-confirms-covid-vaccines-caused-worsening-excess-death-surge/, by Frank Bergman, 1 August 2025 (the article title is the same as the URL.) Please see the screenshots from this article, below:

The paper referenced above is here: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-6899448/v2, “Factors contributing to the sharp rise in excess mortality in Japan since 2021”, Atsushi Takahashi, 17 July 2025. This paper is a pre-print. Please see the screenshots from this paper, below. They are: portions of the Results section; Figure 4; and, Figure 9:

The identifier names are those of the Prefectures in Japan that were studied. Even with taking other factors into consideration (examples: the size and population of the various Prefectures; the number of adults in age brackets in the Prefectures; whether or not a Prefecture was “rural” in character and location, as compared to “urban”), it is clear that the increase in mortality is tied to an increased amount of COVID-19 “vaccine boosters” that were administered.

There is a Commentary to this paper, to be seen here: https://jxiv.jst.go.jp/index.php/jxiv/preprint/view/1398/, “Commentary: Immune imprinting and spike protein toxicity — rethinking COVID-19 vaccinesty: rethinking COVID-19 vaccines”, Yasuhiko Kamikubo; Takahashi, Atsushi, 2025. This Commentary is in a mixture of English and Japanese. The English translation (no figures included) is here: https://jxiv.jst.go.jp/index.php/jxiv/preprint/view/1398/3679.

The above items confirm this article, written in July 2025: https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/coronavirus/covid-boosters-correlate-worse-survival-rates-cancer-third-most-deaths, “COVID boosters correlate with worse survival rates for cancer with third-most deaths: study”, by Greg Piper, 9 July 2025. Please see the screenshots from this article, which relates to a study in Japan regarding survival rates among COVID-19 “vaccine boosted” pancreatic cancer patients, below:

The peer-reviewed paper on the Japan study is here: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17122006, “Repeated COVID-19 Vaccination as a Poor Prognostic Factor in Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective, Single-Center Cohort Study”, Makoto Abue, et al., 16 June 2025.

Yours Truly has written extensively for the board here regarding the damage / destruction of the natural immune system of the person who takes COVID-19 “vaccines.” These injectables were designed to attack, damage / destroy the CD4 – CD8 immune system cells. These injectables were designed to attack, damage / destroy the IgG3 immune system “fighter” cells, while at the same time, fostering the increase of IgG4 immune system “tolerate and never clear” cells. This damage / destruction increases with each injection of a modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, including injections of the “latest formula version” of said “vaccines”, which includes the “2025-2026 Formula versions” of said “vaccines” (COMIRNATY [Pfizer-BioNTech]; SPIKEVAX [Moderna]; and, NUVAXOVID [Novavax.])

The “Seneff and Nigh” paper of 10 May 2021 discusses how “immune system imprinting” in the the body of persons who take the COVID-19 “vaccines” have the potential to result in what the authors call “unintended consequences.” The paper is available here: https://dpbh.nv.gov/uploadedFiles/dpbhnvgov/content/Boards/BOH/Meetings/2021/SENEFF-1.PDF, “Worse Than the Disease? Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of the mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19”, Stephanie Seneff and Greg Nigh; International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research 2(1), May 10, 2021, Page 38-79. Please see the screenshots from this article, below. They are: the Abstract; the “Unprecedented” box; and, Figure 2.

Further information regarding the “class switch” between IgG3 cells and IgG4 cells resulting from COVID-19 “vaccination” is here: https://jessicar.substack.com/p/the-immunological-mechanism-of-action, “The immunological mechanism of action for lost immunity, a shift to tolerance (and autoimmunity?) from the shots”, by Jessica Rose, PhD, 22 December 2022. Please also see: https://www.theqtree.com/2025/04/04/health-friday-4-4-2025-open-thread-the-covid-19-vaccines-decimate-the-igg-immune-system-cells/; and, https://www.theqtree.com/2024/12/06/health-friday-open-thread-12-6-2024-the-immune-system-after-covid-19-vaccination-and-a-note-on-the-virus-itself/.

Second section, regarding the potential for the “next plandemic” to come from Communist China. This has to do with the current emergence of mosquito-borne Chikungunya infections in several areas of China, which has resulted in various government-enforced measures. There is also an ** interesting connection ** to the United States involved in this situation.

What is Chikungunya? It is a virus transmitted by the bite of an infected female mosquito of (usually) the Aedes aegypti or the Aedes albopictus species. (As an aside: female mosquitos of these species can also transmit Dengue fever via bites.) The virus that is transmitted causes joint pain and fever; these can progress to severe. Most people infected with Chikungunya, however, make a full recovery. The virus is an RNA alphavirus. Please see: https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/25083-chikungunya; there is a screenshot from this article, below:

Another source of information regarding Chikungunya is here: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/chikungunya; please see the screenshot from this article, below:

Two recent articles regarding the Chikungunya outbreak in China: the first, here: https://jessicar.substack.com/p/the-new-pending-plandemic-is-it-scheduled, “The new pending “plandemic” — is it scheduled for November?”, by Jessica Rose, PhD, 12 August 2025. Dr. Rose makes it clear that the “alphavirus + saRNA-LNP platform” (self-amplifying RNA + lipid nanoparticles “vaccine” platform) is based on the VEEV alphavirus (Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis Virus.) Please see the screenshots from her article, below:

**** Note the mention of immune system issues that are induced in persons who are COVID-19 “vaccinated”, and how this can potentially severely complicate any infection by Chikungunya.

The second article is here: https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/psyop-25-scamdemic-update-chinese, “PSYOP-25 SCAMDEMIC UPDATE: Chinese Authorities Mandating Blood Tests, Releasing Lab Mosquitoes to Fight Chikungunya Outbreak”, 13 August 2025. Please see the screenshots from this article, below:

The founder of the “mosquito lab” in Guangzhou is Dr. Zhiyong Xi. Please see the screenshot below from the above link:

Let’s look at Dr. Zhiyong Xi. https://archive.md/b5xWD:

He is still a professor at Michigan State University in the United States: https://directory.natsci.msu.edu/Directory/Profiles/Person/101715, “Zhiyong Xi”:

And here is a portion of the work that Dr. Zhiyong Xi is doing at Michigan State University, via https://scholars.msu.edu/scholar/8639/ZHIYONG_XI:

Which work, at least in part, is being funded by NIAID (division of NIH — both divisions part of HHS.)

Which begs the following questions: WHY is Dr. Zhiyong XI still doing mosquito research in the United States if he founded a mosquito study lab in Communist China? WHY is Dr. Zhiyong Xi’s research at Michigan State University being funded, at least in part, by the NIH / NIAID?

There are two “FDA-approved vaccines” against Chikungunya: IXCHIQ, and VIMKUNYA. BOTH of these “vaccines” were FDA-approved under “accelerated approval” methods. Please see the screenshots, below, from the Package Inserts for these injectables. First, from the Package Insert for IXCHIQ (https://ixchiqhcp.com/PI-new.pdf):

And, from the Package Insert for VIMKUNYA (https://bavariannordic.io/uploads/Vimkunya-pi.pdf):

Note the presence of Aluminum Hydroxide as an adjuvant in VIMKUNYA.

NOTE THAT THE “EXACT MECHANISM OF PROTECTION’ HAS NOT BEEN DETERMINED FOR EITHER IXCHIQ OR FOR VIMKUNYA. In other words, the United States government (via the FDA) is fine with injecting people with these “vaccines” WITHOUT THE FDA KNOWING THE EXACT MECHANISMS OF PROTECTION FOR EITHER OF THEM. What are the “CHIKV-specific immune responses” that these injectables supposedly elicit?

And, by the way, both IXCHIQ and VIMKUNYA can be “shed” onto newborn children if the expectant mother is sick with a virus (this is called viremia) at the time of delivery. A pregnant female who takes either one of the above “vaccines” runs the risk of contracting “viral viremia.” Neither IXCHIQ, nor VIMKUNYA have had proper testing for potential effects on pregnant females, their fetuses, or their newborns (section 8.1 Pregnancy in either Package Insert.)

All of the above begs the following questions: Does HHS Sec. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., know about these Chikujgunya “vaccines”? Does he know that the FDA approved them under “accelerated approval” methods? Does he understand that the FDA does NOT know the “exact mechanism of protection” for either IXCHIQ or VIMKUNYA? Does Dr. Martin Makary (FDA Commissioner) know about this situation? Do either Sec. Kennedy, Jr., or Dr. Makary know that “career FDA types” in the CBER division signed the FDA Approval Letters for IXCHIQ (signed by R. Douglas Pratt, MD, 6 August 2025) and for VIMKUNYA (signed by David C. Kaslow, MD, 14 February 2025)?

Yours Truly will again emphasize that it is critically important for all persons, whether COVID-19 “vaccinated” or not, to follow some type of COVID-19 spike protein mitigation / prophylaxis protocol. It is also critically important that all persons, whether COVID-19 “vaccinated” or not, to do all they can to build and maintain their general health, and the health of their immune system, so as to be in the best shape possible.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday 8.8.2025 Open Thread: Dr. Martin Makary Edition

The header image of a vintage doctor’s office sign for today’s offering is courtesy of iStock and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics.

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note One: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none, except for some possible AI-generated images embedded in certain of the links below in the post. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Note Two: Today’s offering is not intended to be, nor is it to be construed as, defamation or “character assassination” of the person who is the subject of the post. Thank you.

Today’s offering is about Dr. Martin Makary, MD, MPH, the current Commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS.) Dr. Makary serves under HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. There is some “interesting information”, along with multiple screenshots, in today’s post. All information is searchable on the internet. Yours Truly will highlight opinions of her own in Italics.

The official FDA biography of Dr. Martin Makary, MD, MPH, is here: https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/fda-organization/martin-makary. Yours Truly cannot find a biographical entry on Dr. Makary that states when he was born. What is known is that Dr. Makary was born in Liverpool, England, and came with his birth family to the United States when he was a child. What is known is that Dr. Makary graduated with a B.S. degree from Bucknell University (likely about 1994), and graduated with his MD degree from the medical school of Thomas Jefferson University in 1998. This would, likely, place his year of birth in about 1970. Dr. Makary held a position at The Johns Hopkins University Hospital System as a Surgical Oncologist. He has also served as a professor in the Business School of The Johns Hopkins University. He also served as a consultant for the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2009 in that organization’s “Patient Safety Initiative”, in which Dr Makary assisted in creating the “Surgery Checklist” for surgeons (https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/44185/9789241598552_eng.pdf, page 121.) Dr. Makary was confirmed as the current Commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) division of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in March 2025.

It is also known that Dr. Makary has apparently refused to take COVID-19 “vaccines” himself. Please see the screenshot, below, from this article: https://www.arabnews.com/node/2580559/amp. “Trumps names two Arab Americans for his Cabinet”, 25 November 2024:

Which, if the above is true, begs the question: If Dr. Makary did not take COVID-19 “vaccines” himself, why is he “recommending” these injectables for anyone else — for example, for people now deemed “at risk of severe complications from COVID-19 infection”, which includes pregnant women and women who have just given birth?

Now, on to recent developments in the FDA under Dr. Makary: https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/fda-opens-drug-fast-track-with-approvals, “FDA Opens Drug Fast Track With Approvals in as Little as 30 Days – Safety Oversight Under Fire, 26 July 2025. Please see the screenshots from this article, below:

Below is a screenshot from the FDA’ announcement of the new CNPV scheme as it relates to the drug industry (Big Pharma). The FDA press release is found here: https://www.fda.gov/industry/commissioners-priority-voucher-cnpv-pilot-program, 22 July 2025:

There are sections of the FDA website (URL above) regarding “Background and Program Priorities”, “Eligibility Criteria” for drug companies, “Solicitation of Statements of Interest”, and “Submission and Selection” for the program, underneath the FDA announcement.

This FDA announcement comes on the heels of another “opinion piece” by Dr. Martin Makary and Dr. Vinay Prasad, “Priorities for a New FDA”, published on JAMA Network on 10 June 2025. Their article is found here: http://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2835314. Please see the screenshots from this “opinion piece”, below:

On 30 July 2025, Dr. Makary went on CNBC for an interview, in which he stated that the FDA “could hit a record number of approvals this year.” Please see: https://www.cnbc.com/video/2025/07/30/fda-commissioner-dr-marty-makary-the-agency-could-hit-a-record-number-of-approvals-this-year.html. This begs the question: is this FDA “record number of approvals this year” somehow tied into the new CNPV scheme?

While, at the same time, Dr. Makary is”making no plans” to remove mifepristone, the “abortion pill”. from the market. Please see: https://www.semafor.com/article/04/24/2025/fdas-marty-makary-no-plans-to-pull-abortion-pill-mifepristone, 24 April 2025. A screenshot from this article is below:

Yours Truly has written extensively on the board here regarding an organization called BIO (https://www.bio.org/.) Please see: https://www.theqtree.com/2025/07/04/health-friday-open-thread-7-4-2025-independence-day-edition-the-250th-birthday-of-the-united-states-of-america/. BIO is the organization that is actively working behind the scenes to have HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., removed. This is the organization that “partners closely” with the United States Defense Department in the development of vaccines and other technologies. This organization held a conference for its “partners” and investors in March 2025. Dr. Martin Makary was a headliner speaker at this conference. Please see: https://convention.bio.org/program-1/fireside-chat-martin-makary-md-mph-commissioner-food-drugs-us-food-drug-administration. (Yours Truly was unable to find a copy of the video of this “fireside chat”, nor to find a transcript. It appears that this presentation was available only to attendees of the BIO convention.) Also see: https://convention.bio.org/speaker/martin-makary. Jon Fleetwood discusses this situation on his Substack, here: https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/trump-fda-chief-headlines-gates-tied, “Trump FDA Chief Headlines Gates-Tied ‘BIO 2025″ Biotech Convention as Pandemic Infrastructure Expands”, 17 June 2025. Please see the screenshot from the Fleetwood article, below:

In addition, there is another part of this “tapestry”: the statements by Dr. Makary himself as recorded in https://bgrdc.com/, a “Premier Bipartisan Public Affairs Firm” (per their website) based in Washington, DC. The following screenshots are from https://bgrdc.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Dr-Makary-Policy-Positions.pdf:

Dr. Makary is involved with drug and/or other companies:

Which begs the question: Does this indicate that Dr. Makary may have conflicts of interest in certain areas?

Dr. Makary: Herd immunity from COVID-19 is via infection AND COVID-19 “vaccination”:

Dr. Makary: The non-COVID-19 “vaccinated” should avoid “vaccination” until new COVID-19 “vaccines” are authorized:

Dr. Makary: The need for “universal masking” against COVID-19:

Dr. Makary: On the other hand, “universal masking” harms children:

Dr.Makary: COVID-19 “lockdowns” are acceptable:

PRIOR to his being confirmed as Commissioner of the FDA, Dr. Makary questioned the concept of FDA authorization of COVID-19 “vaccines” without proper testing:

And, last but not least, Dr. Makary urges people to not “dissect” what now-HHS Secretary Kennedy, Jr., said years ago:

Which last screenshot begs the question: Has Dr. Makary apparently applied the “don’t dissect what someone said years ago” standard to himself as regards “the new FDA” that he and Dr. Prasad have created and that Dr. Makary is now implementing at the FDA?

There is a final piece to the “tapestry”, regarding the announcement by HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., on 5 August 2025, that HHS was cancelling 22 contracts for “vaccine development under BARDA.” Please see: https://www.hhs.gov/press-room/hhs-winds-down-mrna-development-under-barda.html. However, BARDA is going to be “allowed” (how did this happen?) to complete contracts already begun for the ARCT-2304 self-amplifying RNA (saRNA) Avian Influenza “vaccine”, AND for the development of the “latest RNA technology platform”, called trans-amplifying RNA (taRNA.) And it was the FDA, under Dr. Martin Makary, who granted Arcturus Therapeutics (the developer of ARCT-2304) “Fast Track” status on 10 April 2025 — just after he was confirmed as the new Commissioner of the FDA. Fierce Biotech has an article on the BARDA continuation of these two contracts. Please see: https://www.fiercebiotech.com/biotech/hhs-cancels-all-mrna-vaccine-development-funded-barda, “HHS winds down mRNA vaccine development funded by BARDA”, by Darren Incorvaia, 5 August 2025. A screenshot from this article is below:

Jon Fleetwood discusses this situation on this Substack, here: https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/hhs-terminated-22-mrna-projectsbut, “HHS Just Terminated 22 mRNA Projects — But Quietly Preserved the Bill Gates-Funded Bird Flu Shot”, 6 August 2025. Please see a screenshot from this article, below:

There is also an embedded video of an interview with Mr. Fleetwood in his article above.

Yours Truly also wrote about the self-amplifying RNA “vaccine”, ARCT-2304, on this board. Please see: https://www.theqtree.com/2025/06/20/health-friday-6-20-2025-the-new-fda-did-hhs-secretary-robert-f-kennedy-jr-approve-of-all-this/.

So, it would appear that, at the very least, FDA Commissioner Dr. Martin Makary “went along”, for whatever reason(s), with the cancelling of mRNA “vaccine” contracts, while at the same time, allowing BARDA to continue with the development of two very dangerous and unproven “vaccine platform technologies”: self-amplifying RNA and trans-amplifying RNA.

Refer above in today’s offering regarding the presence of Dr. Makary as a “headliner” at the BIO.org/ convention in March of this year. Representatives of both CSL Behring and Seqirus were at this convention. Arcturus Therapeutics IS A PARTNER WITH CSL / SEQIRUS in the development of ARCT-2304. Please see: https://arcturusrx.com/mrna-medicines-business-development/, under “Partnered RNA Medicines.”

Trans-amplifying RNA (taRNA), by the way, is a COMBINATION of two, “shorter” RNA fragments: one fragment encodes the antigen; the other fragment encodes the “replicase” (a replicase is an enzyme that facilitates the synthesis of another RNA molecule.)

Summary: In Yours Truly’s opinion, Dr. Martin Makary, the current Commissioner of the FDA, is a person of many convictions and viewpoints, some of which may be conflict with each other. It is up to individual readers to do their own research and form their own opinions.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday 8.1.2025 Open Thread: The FDA and the CDC — Rebuild Them From Top To Bottom

The free vintage public health poster from World War II about washing the hands is courtesy of Open Culture and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series of information regarding Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics.

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats by Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note One: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for any AI-generated content. Other than AI-generated images that may be embedded in URL links, to the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Note Two: Nothing in today’s offering is intended to be, nor shall it be construed as, what might be termed “character assassination” regarding HHS Sec. Kennedy, Jr., or any employee (current or former) of the FDA or of the CDC. Thank you.

Today’s offering is about one topic: It is past time to: first, to shut down the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) divisions of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS); then, second, to rebuild these agencies from top to bottom so that they truly serve the public health of Americans.

Yours Truly begins here: https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/another-day-another-episode-of-the, “Another day, another episode of the new FDA lying just like the old FDA…plus self dealing by MAHA Action”, by Sasha Latypova, 28 July 2025. This article regards certain statements by Dr. Martin Makary, the current Commissioner of the FDA. Ms. Latypova worked in Big Pharma for her professional career, designing and helping to implement clinical studies for drugs. She retired from her career when she realized that, in Yours Truly’s opinion, she concluded that it was all part of a “shell game” that was played by Big Pharma. Since retiring, Ms. Latypova has begun a new endeavor: to expose this “shell game.” There are those who may differ with certain of Ms. Latypova’s opinions; however, Yours Truly believes that she is right on the mark on multiple issues. Please see the screenshot from her article, below:

The Latypova 28 July article discusses several aspects of what appears to Yours Truly to be two things: first, an internecine war going on within the FDA; and, second, deep and potentially catastrophic conflicts of interest within certain key employees of the FDA regarding their personal prejudices versus the line of their duties within the FDA. The transcript portion above is from an interview with Dr. Martin Makary (current FDA Commissioner) by Jan Jekielek of American Thought Leaders (ATL) of 16 July 2025; the second screenshot is Ms. Latypova’s considered opinion as to what is going on “behind the scenes.” The Jekielek tweet about this interview, with an embed of the interview itself, is here: https://x.com/JanJekielek/status/1945560472909906288.

Yours Truly now turns to the case of Dr. Vinay Prasad, the now-former head of the CBER division of the FDA (Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research.) The CBER division of the FDA is responsible, among other duties, to make sure that “biological products” (drugs, vaccines, and so on) are “safe and effective” and are available “to those who need them” (https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/fda-organization/center-biologics-evaluation-and-research-cber). Dr. Prasad joined CBER as the new Director in May 2025, and he resigned abruptly on 29 July 2025. Sasha Latypova wrote the following article about the situation: https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/breaking-vinay-prasad-is-out-from, “Breaking: Vinay Prasad is out from the FDA!”, 29 July 2025. Please see the screenshot from this article, below:

About the Sarepta decision: please see https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/sarepta-plot-thickens, 25 July 2025, and the screenshot from this article, below:

Dr. Prasad was an opponent of the FDA re-instating the use of Elevidys for young people with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy who can still walk (as opposed to the 18 July 2025 FDA request that the drug be stopped for all Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy patients.) He was overruled by Dr. Martin Makary.

The Latypova article above presents an argument that the FDA re-instatement of Elevidys is profound on several levels — among them, funding for the drug’s manufacturing company, Sarepta. And there are other “ripple effects” from this re-instatement: please see the screenshot of the stock value of Sarepta related to the FDA withdrawal of the drug; then, to the FDA re-instatement:

Yahoo Finance has this article regarding Sarepa, funding, and the Elevidys situation: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fda-ask-sarepta-halt-elevidys-193245811.html. Please see the screenshot from this article, below:

Elevidys, by the way, has a list of adverse effects and other complications; among them is acute liver injury (this is what killed the patients who passed away after being treated with Elevidys.) Please see the Package Insert for this drug, available here: https://www.drugs.com/pro/elevidys.html, “Sarepta Refused FDA’s Request to Halt Elevidys Shipments”, 18 July 2025.

Regarding the departure of Dr. Prasad from the FDA’s CBER division, there are several “pieces to the puzzle” (and some of these “pieces” are still unknown.) However, Yours Truly has been able to trace the following:

ONE: Please see the items above in today’s offering related to the Sarepta / Elevidys situation and the involvement of Dr. Prasad.

TWO: It was Dr. Vinay Prasad who signed off on the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” SPIKEVAX being used on babies and young children ages 6 months to 11 years old. This “FDA full approval” was signed on 9 July 2025. Dr. Prasad did this signing off on his own authority as Director of the FDA’s CBER division, and without informing HHS Sec. Kennedy, Jr., who was on vacation. However, there is another aspect of the issue: Did Dr. Prasad confer with, and/or communicate with, Dr. Martin Makary, either in advance of, or after, this signing off? Please see: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/07/now-we-know-who-approved-spikevax-vaccine-children/, “Now We Know the Official Who Approved the Spikevax Vaccine for Children While Robert Kennedy Jr. Was Allegedly on Vacation”, by Jim Hoft, 31 July 2025. Please see a screenshot from this article, below:

THREE: The investigative reporter, Laura Loomer, posted multiple items regarding Dr. Prasad that, in his own words, paint him as a believer in left-wing political positions; as a person who actually despises President Donald Trump 47; and more. The 2nd Smartest Guy in the World Substack article on the Laura Loomer investigation is here: https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/breaking-vinay-prasad-is-out-at-the, “BREAKING: Vinay Prasad is Out at the FDA”, 30 July 2025. Please see the screenshots from this article, portions of Ms. Loomer’s X posts of her investigation, below:

Laura Loomer’s X post is here: https://x.com/LauraLoomer/status/1947103566239289523.

Last, but not least, is the situation now at the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.) The United States Senate, on a strictly “party-line vote”, just confirmed Susan Monarez, PhD, who had been serving as Acting Director of the agency, to be Director of the CDC. Dr. Monarez is a well-known proponent of “vaccines save lives.” Please see: https://apnews.com/article/susan-monarez-cdc-director-senate-hearing-rfk-c7c883f604711238643a9ffd1681bcc0, “CDC nominee Susan Monarez sidesteps questions about disagreements with RFK in Senate hearing”, by Jonel Aleccia, 25 June 2025. Please see the screenshots from this article, below:

Note Dr. Monarez’s emphasis on the role of “public health interventions, including immunizations…”.

Yours Truly’s opinion on all the above in today’s offering is that there are real and divisive issues with the FDA and the CDC, who both appear to be in opposition to HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. In her opinion, it is time to shut down both agencies and to rebuild them from top to bottom, so that the new entities truly reflect their duty to serve the public health of Americans.

FLASH! JUST ON THE WIRES NOW: https://www.politico.com/newsletters/politico-pulse/2025/07/31/why-trump-ordered-ouster-of-fda-official-00485966, 31 July 2025. It appears that it was President Trump 47 himself who ordered the firing of Dr. Vinay Prasad, overruling both HHS Sec. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., and Dr. Martin Makary, who opposed Dr. Prasad’s ouster. (Since it’s POLITICO, perhaps a “measure of salt” should be in order… it’s that “people with knowledge of the decision” stuff in the POLITICO article.)

THERE. MUST. BE. ACCOUNTABILITY.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday 7.25.2025 Open Thread: More on the COVID-19 “Vaccines” and What They Do to the Human Brain

The header image of the pituitary gland and the influence it has on the human body is courtesy of https://www.123rf.com/ and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s offering speaks to the disaster of the COVID-19 “vaccines” (Bioweapon Toxin Injections), Yours Truly dedicates it to the memory of all persons, of whatever age or location, who have passed away from the negative, toxic effects of the the COVID-19 “vaccines” that they had injected into their body.

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note One: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, the only AI-generated content are images that may be embedded in certain of the linked items in today’s post. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Note Two: the format of today’s offering will be a combination of “in-text” links, with other items having numerical identifiers such as would be used in a scientific research article or paper. Citations related to the numerical identifiers will be listed at the end of the post. Thank you.

Today’s offering regards more information on the negative effects that the COVID-19 “vaccines” have on the human brain. The trail begins here:

Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi: Because Of mRNA Vaccines, The Brains Of Billions Of People Are Not Working Anymore.

"The mRNA vaccines cause the destruction of brain cells. Obviously. And that is what we are now experiencing. We're seeing — I'm afraid to say BILLIONS OF PEOPLE — whose… pic.twitter.com/pvgpBRjsj7
— Camus (@newstart_2024) July 11, 2025

Recall that Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, MD, a medical microbiologist who is involved with the Doctors for COVID Ethics organization (https://doctors4covidethics.org/), and who is a dual citizen of Thailand and of Germany, was put on trial in Germany for his anti-COVID-19 “vaccine” stance. The court returned a verdict of Not Guilty in May 2023. The prosecutor’s appeal of Dr. Bhakdi’s Not Guilty verdict, an appeal that was to go to court in February 2025, was postponed [1]. More on the story related to the tweet by Dr. Bhakdi is here: https://slaynews.com/news/renowned-microbiologist-mrna-vaccines-destroyed-brains-billions-people/, “Renowned Microbiologist: mRNA ‘Vaccines’ ‘Destroyed the Brains’ of ‘Billions of People'”, by Frank Bergman, 14 July 2025.

Yours Truly has written extensively on this board about some of the negative effects of the COVID-19 “vaccines” on the brain of the “vaccinated” person. These articles are found here: https://www.theqtree.com/2024/10/18/health-friday-10-18-2024-special-edition-effects-of-the-covid-19-vaccines-physical-and-neurological/; https://www.theqtree.com/2024/11/08/health-friday-11-0-2024-open-thread-the-insidious-n1-methylpseudouridine-in-the-modrna-covid-19-vaccines/; and, https://www.theqtree.com/2025/03/21/health-friday-3-21-2025-open-thread-more-on-the-n1-methylpseudouridine-in-the-modrna-covid-19-vaccines/.

Today’s offering speaks to the negative effects of the COVID-19 “vaccines” on the human brain having to do with two small, but very important, glands located in the brain: the pituitary gland and the pineal gland.

The pituitary gland, a small, pea-shaped gland,is found in the human brain near the hypothalamus. The pituitary gland secretes several hormones that are important to various body functions. The pineal gland, another small gland, is found in the center area of the human brain. The pineal gland, among other functions, secretes melatonin, a hormone that is important for the body’s circadian rhythm and for proper sleep. The pituitary gland, the pineal gland, and the hypothalamus are components of the endocrine system of the human body. Please see the screenshots below: the first is about the pituitary gland [2]; the second is about the pineal gland [3]; and the third is from an article on the pineal gland that includes a discussion about the endocrine system [4]:

The ingredients (and, therefore, the mechanisms) of the COVID-19 “vaccines”, once injected into the body, quickly spread, via the dangerous lipid nanoparticles “rapid delivery system” compounds that are contained in these injectables, to every area of the human body, including to the brain. Yours Truly has written and posted about these lab-created compounds. They are: ALC-0159 and ALC-0315 in the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” (all of them); and, SM-102 in the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” (all of them.) It is now known that the COVID-19 “vaccines” cross the Blood-Brain Barrier of the human body and do damage to the brain. Once inside the brain, these “vaccines” can, and do, induce multiple problems ranging from Central Nervous System damage, to stroke, to cognitive impairment, to Alzheimer’s disease, and more. The Ota, et al., 2025 paper demonstrates that the COVID-19 spike protein (the foundation ingredient of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”) enters the cerebral arteries [5]. Please see a screenshot from this paper, below:

The Roh, et al. paper, from 2024, demonstrates that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” can induce Alzheimer’s disease [6]. Please see a screenshot from the Abstract of this paper, below:

A compilation of articles regarding how the COVID-19 “vaccines” enter the human brain and induce damage is here: https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/vaids-bombshell-the-covid-vaccine, “VAIDS BOMBSHELL: “The ‘Covid Vaccine’ is a CHEMICAL LOBOTOMY. A recent study of 558,017 Koreans found that the mRNA shots Increase the Risk of Cognitive Impairment +137.7% & Alzheimer’s disease +22.5”, 23 July 2025. There are numerous links in this article to previous posts in this Substack which discuss brain issues after COVID-19 “vaccination.” The Ota, et al., paper is also mentioned.

There is another aspect of the issue regarding how the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” enter into every area (and, therefore, into the cells of these areas) of the “vaccinated” human body. This is the fact that the PRRARSV gene code piece from the Pangolin MP789 coronavirus is present in BOTH the Pfizer-BioNTech and the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” (all of them.) This particular gene code piece has a 90%+ compatibility to the human genome code. In the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, PRRARSV functions as a “backdoor key” to facilitate entry into every cell in the “vaccinated” person’s body. Both our host, Wolf Moon, and Yours Truly has written about this situation here, for examples: https://www.theqtree.com/2023/05/01/pfizer-and-moderna-vaccines-both-contain-prrarsv-key-to-the-cell-nucleus/; and, https://www.theqtree.com/2024/11/27/placeholder-open-thread-11-27-2024-prrarsv-part-2-pangolin-edition/.

Back to the pituitary gland and the pineal gland of the human brain. Dr. Michele Ross, PhD, discusses the four areas of the brain that are not specifically protected by the Blood-Brain Barrier. Please see a screenshot from her article [7], below:

The modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” enter and damage the pituitary gland, one of the glands that is not specifically protected by the human Blood-Brain Barrier. The Taieb and Mounira paper from 2024 discusses this issue [8]. Two screenshots from their paper are below; the first is from the Abstract; the second is the Figure 2:

Another paper, by Verrienti, et al., from 2024, is a review of effects on the pituitary gland after COVID-19 “vaccination”[9]. Please see the screenshots from this paper, below. The first is the Conclusions section; the second is the Figure 1.

************ And now, to what may appear to be a minor point, but actually is, in Yours Truly’s opinion, an important aspect of the types of damage that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” do to the pineal gland of the human brain: these injectables interfere with the ADAMTS3 enzyme (a protein), part of the adamalysin family of enzymes. The influences of the ADAMTS enzymes in the human body range from functions in the brain, to correct growth of the lymphatic vessels, and more. Please see the screenshot from the Wikipedia entry on ADAMTS [10], below:

One member of the ADAMTS family is ADAMTS3. This enzyme (protein) is involved with, among other functions, the proper regulating of the brain’s cortex (the cerebral cortex, the outer “covering” of the brain.) Please see the screenshot from the Wikipedia entry on ADAMTS3 [11], below:

Pay special attention to the mention of Reelin. This protein is essential to the lamination of the cerebral cortex (lamination of the cerebral cortex appears like “multiple folds.”) When Reelin is decreased during the human aging process, brain function is negatively affected. When Reelin is decreased at other times in the human lifespan, the result can be Schizophrenia and other neurological conditions. Please see the screenshot from the Sighild Lemarchant article of 2017 [12], below:

The Cleveland Clinic article on the cerebral cortex starts with the following [13]:

************ And here is the “tie-in” to the COVID-19 spike protein and the brain: the spike protein of this virus interferes with the functioning of ADAMTS3. The Seabra Rodrigues Dias, et al., 2022 paper discusses what COVID-19 does to disrupt the work of the ADAMTS enzymes in the body [14]. Please see the screenshots from this paper, below. The first is a portion of section 2.5 Adamalysin expression in COVID-19 patients; the second is the Table 2. of body areas and functions that ADAMTS3 influences:

************ It is Yours Truly’s considered opinion that, since the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” (and the COVID-19 virus itself) contain elements that accelerate the aging of the entire body, down to the mitochondrial level, they also accelerate aging of the Reelin function in the brain related to ADAMTS3. This accelerated aging of the Reelin function can “leave the door open” for the development of cognitive impairment, of dementia, of Alzheimer’s disease, and other neurological / psychological conditions. Please see: https://www.theqtree.com/2023/10/28/the-covid-19-virus-and-the-modrna-covid-19-vaccines-induce-accelerated-aging/.

Yours Truly will point out that, while the COVID-19 virus itself does not contain the lab-created compound N1-Methylpseudouridine, nor the dangerous lipid nanoparticles ALC-0159, ALC-0315, or SM-102 — the COVID-19 virus itself does contain the PRRARSV “backdoor key”, and it also appears to contain elements that interfere with ADAMTS enzymes (proteins) in the body, including ADAMTS3 and the function of the Reelin protein in the brain. In my opinion, these facts may contribute to the incidence of “Long COVID” in non-COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons who contract an infection of the COVID-19 virus itself, recover from it, but then can present with symptoms of “Long COVID.” This is aside from COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons who can also present with symptoms of “Long COVID.” These “Long COVID” symptoms may present as neurological and/or psychological issues (either new-onset, or aggravation of previously-diagnosed conditions.)

TO CONCLUDE: It is Yours Truly’s considered opinion that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” were designed to damage, to injure, and/or to destroy, the human body. This damage, injury, and/or destruction includes every organ and area of the body of a person who has taken any injection of modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.” This damage, injury, and/or destruction begins the moment that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” is injected into the body. The modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” contain a lab-created compound, N1-Methylpseudouridine, that replaces the natural Uridine in the “vaccinated” person’s body with a “fake” Uridine combined with a type of methane. Natural Uridine plays crucial roles in multiple types of brain function, in mood regulation, and in the regulation of the “gut-brain axis” functions of the body. N1-Methylpseudouridine has no role in the body beyond replacing natural Uridine, thus weakening the “vaccinated” person’s body natural immune system against the other ingredients and mechanisms of the “vaccines.” The modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” contain dangerous lab-created lipid nanoparticles, which quickly spread the ingredients (and, therefore, the mechanisms) of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” throughout the body of the “vaccinated” person, including crossing the Blood-Brain Barrier and entering the brain. The modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” induce multiple types of damage and injury to the brain, including to the areas of the brain that are not specifically protected by the Blood-Brain Barrier, such as the pituitary gland and the pineal gland. The modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” contain elements that interfere with the important ADAMTS3 enzyme (protein) of the body; a protein that plays critical roles in multiple areas, including the proper regulation of the cerebral cortex covering of the brain. The spike protein in the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” interfere with the proper function of the Reelin protein in the brain as it relates to ADAMTS3. The modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” also contain the PRRARSV gene code piece from the Pangolin MP789 coronavirus; PRRARSV acts as a “backdoor key” that facilities the entry of the COVID-19 spike protein in the modRNA “vaccines” to enter the nucleus of every cell in the “vaccinated” person’s body. [The above are aside from the fact that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” also contain a SV40 cancer promoter gene code piece from the African Green Monkey.] The COVID-19 virus itself contains the PRRARSV gene code piece; and, it also appears to contain elements that interfere with the important ADAMTS3 enzyme of the body. In addition, there is the now-known phenomenon of COVID-19 “vaccine” spike protein “shedding” from “vaccinated” persons onto other persons, including onto non-COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons. It is Yours Truly’s considered opinion that this “shedding” can also potentially result in negative neurological effects, among other negative effects, in non-COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons. Yours Truly is NOT advocating that non-COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons avoid all contact with persons who may be COVID-19 “vaccinated”: but, instead, to be following a prophylatic COVID-19 spike protein protocol. In addition, ALL persons who have ever taken a COVID-19 “vaccine”, and ALL non-COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons who have been infected with COVID-19 and recovered, ALSO need to be following a COVID-19 spike protein mitigation / reduction protocol.

************ Yours Truly will state the following: It is past time for all COVID-19 “vaccines” to be taken off the market, and to be completely removed from use; to have all COVID-19 “vaccines” completely removed from any and all “recommendation lists” issued by any government agency, any private or non-governmental agency or organization, any hospital, clinic, pharmacy, nursing home or care facility, and any school board or educational facility; to have all COVID-19 “vaccine” inventories that are used on human beings reduced to zero; to retain only those COVID-19 “vaccine” vials that will be used for complete analysis and data compilation regarding the exact ingredients in these injectables and the sources of these ingredients, with the resulting information and data analyses made public; and, to hold to full account those who created the COVID-19 virus itself and the COVID-19 “vaccines.”

THERE. MUST. BE. ACCOUNTABILITY.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.

Citations:

[1] “Timeline: Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi Case”. https://doctors4covidethics.org/timeline-of-the-events/

[2] “Pituitary Gland: What It Is, Function & Anatomy”. Last reviewed on 04/04/2022/ https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/body/21459-pituitary-gland.

[3] “5 Functions of the Pineal Gland”. Neel Duggal, medically reviewed by Avi Varna, MD, MPH, AAHIVS, FAAFP. Updated December 20, 2022. https://www.healthline.com/health/pineal-gland-function.

[4] “Pineal gland”. Last reviewed on 06/22/2022. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/body/23334-pineal-gland.

[5] Ota N., Itani M., Aoki T., Sakurai A., Fujisawa T., Okada Y., Noda K., Arakawa Y., Tokuda S., Tanikawa R. Expression of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in cerebral Arteries: Implications for hemhorrhagic stroke Post-mRNA vaccination. J Clinical Neuroscience. Volume 136, June 2025 111223.

[6] Jae Hoon Roh, Inha Jung, Yunsun Suh, Min-Ho Kim, A potential asssociation between COVID-19 vaccination and development of Alzheimer’s disease, QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, Volume 117, Issue 10, October 2024, Pages 709-716, https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcae103.

[7] “4 Parts of the Brain Not Protected by the Blood-Brain Barrier”, Michele Ross, Phd. n.d. https://drmicheleross.com/brain-not-protected-blood-barrier/.

[8] Taieb A, Mounira EE. Pilot Findings on SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine-Induced Pituitary Diseases: A Mini Review from Diagnosis to Pathophysiology. Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Nov 24; 10(12):2004. doi.10.3390/vaccines10122004. PMID: 36560413; PMCID: PMC9786744.

[9] Verrienti, M., Picciola, V., Ambrosio, M.R. et al. Pituitary and COVID-19 vaccination: a systematic review. Pituitary 27, 970-985 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/S11102-024-01402-2.

[10] “ADAMTS”. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ADAMTS.

[11] “ADAMTS3”. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ADAMTS3.

[12] Relevance of the Proteolytic Processing of Reelin by ADAMTS-3 in Brain Functions. Sighild Lemarchant. Journal of Neuroscience 19 July 2017, 37 (29) 6814-6815; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1077-17.2017.

[13] “Cerebral Cortex”. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/articles/23073-cerebral-cortex. Last reviewed on 05/23/2022.

[14] “Adamalysins in COVID-19 — Potential mechanisms behind exacerbating the disease” Ivo Ricardo de Seabra Rodrigues Dias, Zhijian Cao, Hang Fai Kwok. J Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy. Vol. 150, June 2022, 112970.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA