Health Friday 1.16.2026 Open Thread: The Baric Files, Part Five: United States Department of Defense (now Department of War); 18 U.S.C. 2339; 18 U.S.C. 1001; and,15 U.S.C. 1-3

The header image for today’s offering of a vintage cover page of the United States Code (U.S.C.) is courtesy of Highline College Library and Google Images.

Health Friday is series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s offering speaks of the disaster of COVID-19 (the bioweapon virus itself, and the bioweapon “vaccines”), Yours Truly dedicates it to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have suffered (or still suffer) from injuries, illnesses, or disabilities induced from either an infection of the COVID-19 virus itself, or induced from “vaccination” by COVID-19 “vaccines”; or, who have passed away from the negative effects of an infection by the COVID-19 virus itself, or from the negative effects of the COVID-19 “vaccines” they had in their body.

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie;, and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linke here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none, except for AI-generated content within linked URLs. If readers wish to post AI-generated content to today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Special Note regarding today’s offering: In no way is the following, or The Baric Files series in general in Health Friday posts, to be construed as a “character assassination”, or as an “indictment”, or as any other type of attack or smear on Ralph S. Baric, PhD, of the UNC GIllings School of Global Public Health of the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, or of his lab at the university. The linked scientific papers, images therefrom, and other information about Dr. Baric (such as his Curriculum Vitae [1]) are all available on the internet. The ideas and conclusions of today’s offering are by Yours Truly. There is a plethora of items related to Dr. Baric; Yours Truly will focus on some of them in each part of The Baric Files.

Part One through Part Four of The Baric Files are linked here: https://www.theqtree.com/2025/12/05/health-friday-12-5-2025-open-thread-the-baric-files-part-one/; https://theqtree.com/2025/12/12/health-friday-12-12-2025-open-thread-the-baric-files-part-two-of-mice-rabbits-and-ai-23946/; https://www.theqtree.com/2026/01/02/health-friday-1-2-2026-open-thread-the-baric-files-part-three-patents-dr-anthony-fauci/; https://www.theqtree.com/2026/01/09/health-friday-1-9-2026-open-thread-the-baric-files-part-four-ecohealth-alliance-wuhan-institute-of-virology-dr-zheng-li-shi-the-template-patent/.

Thus far, in the research journey of Dr. Ralph Baric, PhD, of the UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, it has been seen that Dr. Baric progressed from the study of a certain virus (the Sindbid virus) carried by a certain mosquito — to the study of coronaviruses in other animals (mice, rabbits, pigs) — to the study of the SARS-CoV virus — to the inventions of, and applications of, methods to lab-create chimeric coronaviruses — to the invention of the “template virus” for the SARS-CoV-2 virus, for which Dr. Baric was granted the Patent in 2016.

However, there are other aspects in the research journey of Dr. Baric, one of which is: his involvement with the United States Defense Department.

Today’s offering is Part Five of six.

United States Department of Defense:

It appears that Dr. Baric has been involved with the United States Defense Department since at least 2018, if not before. The DEFUSE Proposal document that was presented to the Defense Department by Dr. Peter Daszak, then-CEO of EcoHealth Alliance, was written, in part, by Dr. Baric. Yours Truly covered this proposal in Part Four of The Baric Files (see above URL); and, is indebted to Jon Fleetwood for the linked article in today’s offering. Please see screenshots from his article [2], below:

From the DEFUSE Proposal document (top); and, from emails by Dr. Daszak regarding the proposal:

Again, from the DEFUSE Proposal document, below; this, about the furin cleavage sites in the potential SARS-CoV sequence that would be developed by Dr. Baric at his lab:

As Yours Truly wrote in Part Four of The Baric Files, the Defense Department did not pursue the DEFUSE Proposal. However, other entities did fund Gain-of-Function research that would result in the lab-creation of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. These other entities include NIH / NIAID. These other entities also include DTRA (Defense Threat Reduction Agency), a division within the Defense Department. Two examples are: first, grant HDTRA11710064, which helped to fund a September 2020 paper co-authored by Dr. Baric [3]. Please see the screenshots from this paper, below: first, the Funding statement; then, the Conclusion:

A second example is HDTRA1-1C-C-0072, the grant which funded the development (invention) of the antiviral drug, EIDD-2801 (now known as molnupiravir [LAGEVRIO], a treatment for SARS-CoV-2 [COVID-19] infection.) [4]. Emory University and Dr. Ralph Baric collaborated on this work. Molnupiravir is theoretically supposed to “mimic” natural Uridine, thus supposedly assisting in fighting a COVID-19 infection. The problem is that molnupiravir is a dangerous drug intervention; one that must be administered only under strict conditions and only for a limited number of days. Please see the screenshots from the Emory University press release regarding EIDD-2801, below:

The FDA Fact Sheet for Healthcare Providers for molnupiravir (LAGEVRIO) [5] lists the following required instructions for administration of the drug:

**** Yours Truly will not comment on, but simply mention, the irony that Dr. Ralph Baric, by September 2020, had already invented and Patented the SARS-CoV-2 virus (Patent Number US9884895B2, presented in Part Four of The Baric Files); that the Patent describes “methods for treatment” for an infection of this virus; and, that it appears that Emory University either did not know about said Patent, or ignored it.

**** Yours Truly will also comment on, but simply mention, the irony that molnupiravir (LAGEVRIO) attempts to “mimic” the Uridine in the body of a person “vaccinated” with a modRNA COVID-19 BIOWEAPON “vaccine” (such as, BNT162b2 / COMIRNATY by Pfizer-BioNTech, which contains the lab-created compound N1-Methylpseudouridine, a compound that DESTROYS the natural Uridine RNA in the “vaccinated” person’s body.)

Fort Detrick involvement with Dr. Baric (including USAMRIID):

Fort Detrick, located at Frederick, Maryland, is a United States Army military base and biological laboratory; it is also the location of the United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) [6].

An article in the People’s Daily (Communist China) in September 2021 drew attention to Dr. Baric’s involvement with Fort Detrick [7]. Granted, the CCP was doing / is likely still doing, all it can to deflect attention to the activities at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in the lab-creation of the COVID-19 virus; however, it confirms that Dr. Baric was involved, not only with the WIV, but also with the United States Defense Department, in the lab-creation of the virus. Please see the screenshot, below, from the People’s Daily article:

The People’s Daily article mentions two papers. The first, from 2006, [8], regards the Cynomolgus Macaque as a “model” for SARS infection. Please see the screenshot from this paper, below:

Yours Truly notes that, except for two co-authors associated with the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and for the co-author Dr. Ralph Baric, every other co-author of this 2006 paper is associated with the United States military — Fort Detrick; Walter Reed Army Hospital; and, other Defense Department facilities. In addition, it appears that Gain-of-Function techniques were used in the work.

The other paper mentioned in the People’s Daily article, from 2003 [9], regards the use of reverse genetics to create a full-length cDNA SARS code (in other words, Gain-of-Function research.) Please see the Abstract from this paper, below:

Yours Truly will note the following that are also listed in the October 2003 paper: first, the top of the Affliations list in the sidebar linked from the Authors Info & Affiliations hyperlink in the paper; and, second, the Affiliations entry regarding Dr. Ralph Baric from that list, which states that he is affiliated with USAMRIID:

Another item linking Dr. Baric to USAMRIID: the talk that he gave at the USAMRIID annual research conference in 2023 [10]. Please see the screenshot from the article on this event, below:

(By the way, another speaker at this event in 2023 was Dr. Deborah Birx, herself a 29-year Army veteran.)

18 U.S.C. 2339; 18 U.S.C. 1001; and, 15 U.S.C. 1-3:

Yours Truly now turns to the work of Dr. David E. Martin, PhD. Dr. Martin is founder and CEO of M-CAM, Inc., a company that specializes in intellectual property risk management. A screenshot of a portion of his biography, from a conference in 2006 [11], is below:

In 2021, Dr. Martin wrote and published The Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier [12]. The following screenshots are from this Dossier.

Page 2, Background, regarding Patents granted to Dr. Baric and to UNC:

Page 8, Dr. Baric and Dr. Shi: Related to 18 U.S.C. 2339 — Funding and Conspiring to Commit Acts of Terror:

Page 12, DARPA and NIH funding of biomedical research: related to 18 U.S.C. 1001 –Lying to Congress:

The following three portions of the Dossier are related to 15 U.S.C. 1-3 — Conspiring to Criminal Commercial Activity:

Page 16, NIH and biodefense Gain-of-Function funding for Dr. Baric:

Page 17, more on Dr. Baric:

Page 18: Dr. Baric: DARPA involvement; biodefense awards to Dr. Baric / UNC (funneled via NIAID):

The Biodefense Grants to Dr. Baric / UNC are “officially” from the “Southeast Regional Centers of Excellence for Biodefense and Emerging Infectious Diseases”, headquartered at UNC Chapel Hill. However, this entity (one of several such Regional Centers located in various areas of the United States) is funded by NIAID. NIAID, in turn, is in a “cooperative program” with USAMRIID (https://www.niaid.nih.gov/sites/default/files/category_a_progress_report.pdf, “NIAID Biodefense Research Agenda for CDC Category A Agents Progress Report”, August 2003, Page 6.)

Summary: In Part Five of The Baric Files, it can be seen that the research journey of Dr. Ralph Baric, PhD, has progressed from the study of a certain mosquito that carries a certain virus (the Sindbid virus) — to the study of coronaviruses in other animals (mice and rabbits) — to the study of a certain coronavirus that occurs in pigs (the TGEV coronavirus) — to the study and application of methods to lab-create coronaviruses and the injection of such chimeric viruses into lab animals to study the effects of said injections — to the granting of Patents to Dr. Baric for this work — to the study of the SARS-line of coronaviruses — to the invention of the “template virus” for SARS-CoV-2 by Dr. Baric and the granting of the Patent to him for this invention — to Dr. Baric’s involvement with various divisions of the United States Defense Department in the lab-creation of coronaviruses. Along the way in his research journey, Dr. Baric was involved with the Dr. Zheng-li Shi of the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Along the way in his research journey, some of the funding for Dr. Baric’s work was provided by the United States Defense Department (and some of which funding was “relayed” through NIAID.)

Questions that arise: Is Dr. Ralph Baric still affiliated with USAMRIID? Who exactly at NIAID accepted the funding from the United States Defense Department? Who exactly at NIAID signed the approval to send these funds to Dr. Baric? How much, if any, of the work performed by Dr. Baric with funding by the United States Defense Department was shared with Pfizer-BioNTech, or with Moderna, or with both companies?

To be continued in Part Six.

THE COVID-19 BIOWEAPON “VACCINES” — ALL OF THEM — MUST BE REMOVED FROM THE MARKET AND FROM ALL USE IN THE UNITED STATES. NOW. PERIOD.

THERE. MUST. BE. ACCOUNTABILITY.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

(Intellectual Property Disclaimer and Notice: With the exception of linked scientific papers and other items available on the Internet in today’s offering, the ideas and conclusions in today’s offering are by PAVACA. Proper credit must be given to PAVACA if the ideas and conclusions of today’s offering are used by other blog writers, by podcasters, in social media, or in print media.)

References:

[1]: “Curriculum Vitae Ralph Baric.” https://sph.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/112/2016/09/CV_Ralph_Baric.pdf. 2016.

[2]: “SARS-CoV-2 Furin Cleavage Site Sits at Exact Amino Acid Residue Location Designated By 2018 DEFUSE Document.” Jon Fleetwood. https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/sars-cov-2-furin-cleavage-site-sits?utm_source=publication-search. 8 December 2025.

[3]: “Possibility for reverse zoonotic transmission of SARS-CoV-2 to free-ranging wildlife: A case study of bats.” Ralph S.. Baric, et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008758. 3 September 2020.

[4]: “Emory, collaborators testing antiviral drug as potential treatment for coronaviruses.” https://news.emory.edu/stories/2020/02/coronavirus_eidd/index.html. February 2020.

[5]: “molnupiravir (LAGEVRIO) Package Insert.” https://www.fda.gov/media/155054/download.

[6]: “Fort Detrick.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fort_Detrick.

[7]: “What are behind Ralph Baric’s deep ties with Fort Detrick?” Zhou Fujing. https://en.people.cn/n3/2021/0907/9000-9892964.html. 7 September 2021.

[8]: “Cynomolgus Macaque as an Animal Model for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome.” Ralph Baric, et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030149. 18 April 2006.

[9]: “Reverse genetics in full-length infectious cDNA of severe acute respiratory coronavirus.” Ralph Baric, Mark R. Denison, Lisa E. Hensley, et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1735582100. 20 October 2003.

[10]: “Birx, Baric Headline Annual Research Festival.” Ramin A. Khalili, USAMRDC Public Affairs Office. https://mrdc.health.mil/index.cfm/media/articles/2021/birx_bari_headline_annual_research_festival. “Last Modified Date: 23 May 2023.”

[11]: “WIPO Open Forum on the Draft Substantive Patent Law Treaty Speakers: David E. Martin, PhD.” https://www.wipo.int/meetings/en/2006/csp_of_ge_06/speakers/martin.html. 2006.

[12]: “The Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier.” David E. Martin, PhD. https://www.gospanews.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/The_Fauci_COVID-19_Dossier.pdf. August 2021.

Health Friday 1.9.2026 Open Thread: The Baric Files, Part Four: EcoHealth Alliance; Wuhan Institute of Virology; Dr. Zheng-li Shi; the “Template Patent”

The vintage image of laundering for the featured image today is courtesy of Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s offering (as are all the posts of The Baric Files) is related to the lab-creation of the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) virus, Yours Truly dedicates it all persons, of whatever age or location, who have suffered an infection of this virus and recovered (with or without post-infection-induced complications); or, who have died from complications resulting from, or associated with, a COVID-19 virus infection.

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none, except perhaps for AI-generated images and/or text within linked URLs.

Special Note regarding today’s offering: In no way is the following, or The Baric Files series in general in Health Friday posts, to be construed as a “character assassination”, or as an “indictment”, or as any other type of attack or smear on Ralph S. Baric, PhD, of the UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health of the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, or of his lab at the university. The linked scientific papers, images therefrom, and other information about Dr. Baric (such as his Curriculum Vitae [1]) are all available on the internet. The ideas and conclusions of today’s offering are by Yours Truly. There is a plethora of items related to Dr. Baric; Yours Truly will focus on some of them in each part of The Baric Files.

Special Note regarding Part Four through Part Six of The Baric Files: Starting with Part Four, the research journey of Dr. Ralph Baric, PhD, becomes more complex. What began in Part One with research into the Sindbis virus becomes more like an “octopus with many tentacles” by Part Four. Yours Truly will present some of the more important aspects of the now-augmented research journey of Dr. Baric. Please bear with me. Thank you.

Today’s offering is Part Four of six.

The Baric Files, Part Four: EcoHealth Alliance; Wuhan Institute of Virology; Dr. Zheng-li Shi; the “Template Patent”

To “lay the groundwork” for The Baric Files, Part Four, it is necessary to first make a slight “detour” regarding two things: the ACE2 receptor cells of the human body; and, the increasing focus of Dr. Baric’s experiments with SARS-CoV coronaviruses after the year 2002. Both are important components in his research journey.

The ACE2 receptor cells of the human body: The following article by Sriram, et al., from May 2020 discusses these cells [2]. Please see the screenshots from this article, below:

In his research journey, Dr. Baric performed experiments with ACE2 cells, and also produced review / analysis papers regarding ACE2 cells. One example is a 2009 paper by Baric and Graham [3] which discusses recombination experiments (which may be otherwise known as Gain-of-Function experiments) of the spike protein of coronaviruses and “cross-species transmission.” Please see the screenshots from this paper, below:

An example of the increasing work with SARS-CoV viruses: In his research journey, Dr. Baric also performed Gain-of-Function experiments with lung cells (which also included mention of shedding of the SARS-CoV virus via infected lung ciliated cells). An example of this work is a 2004 paper from Baric, et al. [4]. This paper was funded by the NIH. Please see the screenshots from this paper, below:

Ciliated cells in the lungs are cells that have tiny “hair-like” protrusions (cilia) that, among other functions, help to remove mucus.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Now, on to EcoHealth Alliance and the Wuhan Institute of Virology:

These entities were funded, in part, by NIH / NIAID: either, to disperse funds to other research entities (via EcoHealth Alliance); or, direct funding to other research entities for Gain-of-Function work (Wuhan Institute of Virology; the Baric lab at the UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health.) These funds were to be used for performing Gain-of-Function experiments on coronaviruses. In 2018, the DEFUSE proposal by EcoHealth Alliance, which was presented to the United States Defense Department, specifically mentions the roles that Dr. Ralph Baric (at UNC) and that Dr. Zheng-li Shi (of the Wuhan Institute of Virology) would play [5]. Please see the screenshots below from the proposal; first, the Title page:

From Page one:

From Page two:

From Page four:

From Pages five and six:

One more item needs to be mentioned: SHC014. This “SARS-like coronavirus” infects horseshoe bats. It was discovered in Yunnan Province in Communist China. Please keep WIV1 and SHC014 in mind while reading on.

In Yours Truly’s opinion, the DEFUSE proposal reads like a “blueprint” for a kind of elaborate “grant funds-laundering plus experiment-laundering” scheme under the aegis of EcoHealth Alliance. The Defense Department did not pursue the proposal. Instead, it appears that NIH / NIAID stepped in and provided funding for both Dr. Baric and for Dr. Shi via EcoHealth Alliance. For example, the NIAID issued a statement in October 2021 regarding that agency’s awarding grant R01AI110964 for experiments leading to the lab-creation of SARS-CoV-2 to the Wuhan Institute of Virology [6]. Please see the screenshot from this statement, below:

Both the United States General Accounting Office (GAO) and USA Spending have documented the R01AI110964 award grant by NIAID to EcoHealth Alliance to be dispersed to the Wuhan Institute of Virology {7}, [8]. Notwithstanding the NIAID statement above, the agency used taxpayer money to help fund the lab-creation of SARS-CoV-2 via experiments performed at the Wuhan Institute of Virology — and used what appears to be a “grant funding-laundering” scheme to do this. Please see the screenshots below; the first, from the GAO report; the second, from the USA Spending report:

After the NIH / NIAID was caught funding Wuhan University and the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), the NIH grant R01AI110964 was terminated in 2022, with NIH citing “non-compliance” by the WIV in certain reporting areas [9].

However, it appears that Dr. Ralph Baric was one of the United States-based persons also using funds from R01AI110964. He, along with his co-authors (United States-based and overseas-based) collaborated on a paper, published on 3 September 2020, regarding the potential for SARS-CoV-2 “spillover” to wildlife [10].

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Dr. Zheng-li Shi

It appears that Dr. Ralph Baric had an exchange with Dr. Zheng-li Shi in 2013 at a conference [11]. It may be assumed that he had already known about her experiments with the SHC014 bat coronavirus. He asked her to send him some samples of this virus, which she did. Please the screenshots below from the above article:

It was after the 2013 exchange between Dr. Baric and Dr. Shi that the R01AI110964 grant was authorized in 2014 for SARS-CoV research at multiple facilities, including the Baric lab at UNC and at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (see above in today’s offering.)

It is interesting to note that EcoHealth Alliance (with, it appears, the consent and/or knowledge of Dr. Baric) was misleading the United States Defense Department regarding the DEFUSE Proposal that EcoHealth Alliance presented in 2018 [12]. It appears that EcoHealth was going to “emphasize” the United States portion of the SARS-CoV research that DEFUSE would fund, and “minimize” the involvement of Dr. Shi and the Wuhan institute of Virology. Please see the screenshots below from this article:

Dr. Zheng-li Shi denies ever actually working with Dr. Baric at his lab at UNC; instead, she sent the SHC014 samples and collaborated with Dr. Baric via other means (possibly, emails; written documents; and so on.) However, since Dr. Shi works at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (which itself is under the aegis of the Communist Chinese Peoples Liberation Army), it can perhaps be mentioned that “the truth is up for grabs” in this situation. These questions also arise: Were the students or others working at Dr. Baric’s lab who were from Communist China? If there were, is it possible that they were “information conduits” to persons working at the Wuhan Institute of Virology? Please see the screenshot from the True Story Award article by Jane Qiu [13] in February 2022, below:

Nonetheless, Dr. Shi and Dr. Baric were co-authors of the 2015 paper [14] which describes a “SARS-like cluster” of bat coronaviruses that could infect humans through zoonotic “leap “. This paper is sometimes cited as the “start of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.” Please see the screenshots from this paper, below; first, the Abstract; followed by two portions of the Main section; and, ending with the Acknowledgements:

The above 2015 Baric, Shi, et al., paper is Gain-of-Function on the SHC014 CoV bat coronavirus in order to render this virus possible to infect humans.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

The “Template Patent”

The 2015 Baric, Shi, et al., paper above was published on 9 November 2015. This would assume at least six months of work, data collection and analysis, writing the paper and submitting it for peer-review, and so on, prior to publication. The paper was submitted on 12 June 2015 and accepted on 8 October 2015.

However, Dr. Baric was also working on something else before the November 2015 paper: what appears to be the “Template Patent” for the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

The following are screenshots from US Patent 9884895B2 granted to Ralph Baric, et al., via the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill on 18 October 2016. This Patent was applied for by Dr. Baric, et al., on 20 March 2015.[15] Please see the screenshots from the Patent document, below: first, the Patent Title and US Patent Number listing; second, the Invention and timeline section; third, the general Description; fourth, from the Detailed Description of the Invention (examples: the continuous mention of the use of the 2b subdivision of SARS-CoV viruses in the lab-creation (chimeric creation) of the possible SARS-CoV-2 virus “template”, including SHC014 and WIV1; the use of the Venezuela Equine Encephalitis virus in the lab-creation of the possible SARS-CoV-2 virus “template”; the use of Virus-like Particles in the lab-creation of the possible SARS-CoV-2 virus “template”; fifth, descriptions of methods to treat, prevent, and/or protect against an infection by this lab-created chimeric virus; sixth, from the Examples section regarding the development of a “vaccine” against an infection of such a virus; and, several figures from the Patent document.

It is interesting to note in the above screenshot the language regarding the lab-creation of a potentially lethal virus under BSL2 laboratory conditions.

Fig. 2 from the Patent: the S1/S2 site:

Fig. 6 from the Patent: graphic of the chimeric spike:

Fig. 10 from the Patent: the chimeric spike with the Venezuela Equine Encephalitis added:

Yours Truly: the above last screenshot regarding “methods” for treatment / prevention / protection against, an infection by this possible SARS-CoV-2 “template virus”, reads like a possible “list of basic ingredients” for products such as the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” [by Pfizer-BioNTech and by Moderna]; and also the “inactivated protein subunit” COVID-19 “vaccine” [by Novavax].

Several questions arise: First, did Dr. Ralph Baric share with Dr. Zheng-li Shi any of the work involved leading up to the application for US Patent 9884895B2? Second, did NIH share any information from US Patent 9884895B2 with Pfizer-BioNTech, or Moderna, or the United States Defense Department, or all of these, after the Patent was assigned to NIH in May 2017? Third, exactly to whom at NIH was the Patent assigned in May 2017? Fourth, exactly who at NIH holds the Patent assignment currently,especially since the Patent is in force until the year 2035? Fifth, was any information that Dr. Baric may have shared with Dr. Shi involved in the “lab leak”/ intentional release, of the SARS-CoV-2 virus from the Wuhan Institute of Virology lab in late 2019?

Thus far, it appears that the research journey of Dr. Ralph Baric, PhD, has progressed from the study of a mosquito-borne virus, to experiments with swine coronaviruses, to experiments with SARS-coronaviruses of various types, to the lab-creation of the “template virus” for SARS-CoV-2, to the Patent for the “Template Virus” for SARS-CoV-2; a Patent which also describes “methods” to treat, prevent, or to protect against infection, of such virus. It is Yours Truly’s opinion that, while the SARS-CoV-2 virus that was released into the world in late 2019 emanated from the lab of Dr. Zheng-li Shi at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, the “template” for this virus was very likely constructed in the lab of Dr. Ralph Baric, PhD, at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, and a United States Patent for this “template virus” was issued to Dr. Baric in 2016..

To be continued in Part Five.

THE COVID-19 “VACCINES” — ALL OF THEM — MUST BE REMOVED FROM THE MARKET AND FROM USE IN THE UNITED STATES. NOW.

THERE. MUST. BE. ACCOUNTABILITY.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

(Intellectual Property Notice and Disclaimer: With the exception of items above in today’s offering that are available online, the ideas and conclusions of today’s offering are by PAVACA. Proper credit must be given to PAVACA if ideas and conclusions of today’s offering are used by other blog writers, by podcasters, on social media, or in print media.)

References:

[1]: “Curriculum Vitae Ralph Baric.” https://sph.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/112/2016/09/CV_Ralph_Baric.pdf. September 2016.

[2]: “What is the ACE2 receptor?” Krishna Sriram, Paul Insel, Rohit Loomba. https://www.asbmb.org/asbmb-today/science/051620/what-is-the-ace-2-receptor. 16 May 2020.

[3]: “Recombination, Reservoirs, and the Modular Spike: Mechanisms of Coronavirus Cross-Species Transmission.” Rachel L Graham, Ralph S Baric. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2838128/. 11 November 2009.

[4]: “Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Infection of Human Ciliated Airway Epithelia: Role of Ciliated Cells in Viral Spread in the Conducting Airways of the Lungs.” Amy C. Sims, Ralph S. Baric, Boyd Yount, Susan E. Burkett, Peter L. Collins, Raymond J. Pickles. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1316022/. December 2005.

[5]: “Project DEFUSE: Defusing the Thread of Bat-borne Coronaviruses.” Peter Daszak, Ralph Baric, et al. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21066966-defuse-proposal/. 2018.

[6]: SARS-CoV-2 and NIAID-supported Bat Coronavirus Research.” https://www.niaid.nih.gov/diseases-conditions/coronavirus-bat-research. “Content last reviewed on October 20, 2021.” “EXP. DATE: 07/31/2028.”

[7]: “FEDERAL RESEARCH: NIH Could Take Additional Actions to Manage Risks Involving Foreign Subrecipients.” https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-23-106119.pdf. 14 June 2023.

[8]: “R01AI110964.” https://www.usaspending.gov/award/ASST_NON_R01AI110964_7529.

[9]: Letter from Department of Health and Human Services to EcoHealth Alliance, Inc. https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/NIH-EHA-Production-8.19.22.pdf. 19 August 2022.

[10]: “Possibility for reverse zoonotic transmission of SARS-CoV-2 to free-ranging wildlife: A case study of bats.” Ralph S. Baric, Peter Daszak, Lin-Fa Wang, et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008758. 3 September 2020.

[11]: “Inside the risky bat-virus engineering that links America to Wuhan.” Rowan Jacobsen. https://www.congress.gov/117/meeting/house/114658/documents/HHRG-117-IF14-2022042. 29 June 2021.

[12]: “American scientists misled Pentagon on research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.” Emily Kopp. https://usrtk.org/covid-19-origins/american-scientists-misled-pentagon-on-wuhan-research/. 18 December 2023.

[13]: “Meet the Scientist at the Center of the COVID Lab Leak Controversy.” https://truestoryaward.org/story/313. Jane Qiu. 9 February 2022.

[14]: “A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence.” Ralph S. Baric, Zheng-li Shi, et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3985. Published 9 November 2015.

[15]: “Methods and compositions for chimeric coronavirus spike proteins.” Ralph Baric, Sudhakar Agnihothram, Boyd Yount. https://patents.google.com/patent/US9884895B2. Patent Application submitted, 3 March 2015. Patent Assigned to The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 18 October 2016.

Health Friday 12.12.2025 Open Thread: The Baric Files, Part Two: Of Mice, Rabbits, and AI 23946

The free vintage image of files for today’s header image is courtesy of iStock and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s offering speaks to the disaster of COVID-19, Yours Truly dedicates it to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have suffered injuries, illnesses, or disabilities; or, who have passed away from, the manifestations of the COVID-19 disaster: from an infection of the COVID-19 virus itself; or, from COVID-19 “vaccine”-induced or -aggravated injuries, illnesses, or disabilities due to the COVID-19 “vaccines” that they took; or, from complications induced by the shedding of either the COVID-19 virus itself, or by the COVID-19 “vaccines.”

There are Important Notifications by our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of out late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for AI-generated content; to the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none, except perhaps for AI-generated images within linked URLs. If readers wish to post AI-generated content to today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Special Note regarding today’s offering: In no way is the following, or The Baric Files series in general in Health Friday posts, to be construed as a “character assassination”, or as an “indictment”, or as any other type of attack or smear on Ralph S. Baric, PhD, of the UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health of the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, or of his lab at the university. The linked scientific papers, images therefrom, and other information about Dr. Baric (such as, his Curriculum Vitae) are all available on the internet. The ideas and conclusions of today’s offering are by Yours Truly. There is a plethora of items related to Dr. Baric; Yours Truly will focus on some of them in each part of The Baric Files.

Today’s offering is Part Two of six. Please refer to Part One for previous information: https://www.theqtree.com/2025/12/05/health-friday-12-5-2025-open-thread-the-baric-files-part-one/.

Now, to today’s offering:The Baric Files, Part Two: Of Mice, Rabbits, Templates, and AI 23946 (also known as AI023946 as per NIH Reporter.)

In reading through the section VIII. PUBLISHED MANUSCRIPTS: in the Curriculum Vitae for Ralph S. Baric, PhD, of the UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, it appears that Dr. Baric’s research efforts began to shift away from the Sindbis virus that he was investigating early on in his career, to murine (mice), rabbits, and coronaviruses in general: for example, published manuscripts starting with number 11. Please see the screenshot, below, of portions of Page 11 and Page 12 of his Curriculum Vitae [1]:

Yours Truly turns to published manuscript number 11, dated 1986. By now in the research journey of Dr. Baric, it appears that he was starting to experiment with combining pieces of viruses, a process called “recombination.” Published manuscript number 11 [2] is the result of such experiments with mouse coronaviruses. At the time that this paper was published, Dr. Baric was a Post-doctoral Fellow at the University of Southern California Los Angeles School of Medicine. This occurred before he was hired by the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill. Please see the screenshots from this paper, below; first, the general summary; and, second, a portion of the Discussion section:

Note the mentions of “mRNAs”, “coronavirus”, “transcription”, and “recombinant viruses.”

There are other published manuscripts (papers) by Dr. Baric that relate to experiments with mouse coronaviruses, such paper number 16, from 1988, which discusses the interaction between certain coronavirus sequences and “the nucleocapsid protein” [3].

By the year 1990, Dr. Baric’s research journey had led to studying heart issues in rabbits. The first result of this study was the 1990 paper, “Rabbit cardiomyopathy” [4]. Please see the screenshots of the Title page of this paper; the Introduction of this paper; and, a portion of the Discussion section, below:

There is one more screenshot from this 1990 paper, which Yours Truly considers to be a significant publication in the research journey of Dr. Baric: the Acknowledgements section:

Please take note of the mention of NIH grant AI 23946. This grant also funded, for example:

The 1992 paper by Dr. Baric and colleagues, “An experimental model for dilated cardiomyopathy after rabbit coronavirus infection” [5}. Please see the screenshots from this paper, below: the Title and general summary page; a portion of the Results section; the Figure 1.; and, the mention of funding by NIH grant AI 23946:

Yours Truly decided to investigate more regarding the NIH grant award AI 23946 to Dr. Baric. Two more (of the multiple papers) funded by this grant are: one, for example, from 2005: “Coronavirus Genome Structure and Replication” [6]. Please see the screenshots, below, from this paper: the Title and Authors page; the Future Directions section; and, the Acknowledgements:

And, NIH grant AI 23946 also funded this paper by Dr. Baric, from 2009 [7], “Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus nsp9 Dimerization Is Essential for Efficient Viral Growth.” Please see the screenshots from this paper, below: the Title page; the Summary; the Acknowledgements; and, the specific paragraph regarding the mouse hepatitis virus protein A59 (MHV-A59), which Dr. Baric was experimenting with back in 1986 (the Published Manuscript Number 11 [2], screenshots from which are above in today’s offering):

Below is the specific paragraph regarding MHV-59 and the nsp9 connection:

Dimerization is the process whereby two molecules of the same, or similar, chemical composition, join together to create a “dimer.”

————————————————————

Yours Truly is aware that all the above may appear as a “long tale to tell.” However, the point is to “trace” how Dr. Baric used one particular NIH grant, AI 23946 (among many other NIH grants, to be sure) to help fund his research journey. Part One and Part Two discuss his experimenting with a mosquito-borne virus — to experiments with mouse hepatitis and mouse coronavirus proteins — to experiments with rabbit coronavirus proteins — to experiments of the recombination of mouse hepatitis and mouse coronavirus proteins — to experiments with inducing myocarditis and Congestive Heart Failure in rabbits injected with rabbit coronaviruses: experiments that, with the exception of the ones on the Sindbis virus, were funded, at least in part, by AI 23946.

Along the way of what may be called “the NIH grant AI 23946 aspect” of Dr. Baric’s research journey, one observes that the focus of work becomes more concentrated; the research and laboratory methods become more complex and sophisticated; and, the work on combining coronaviruses and how to create “new versions” of them is emphasized (in other words, Gain-of-Function research.)

It appears, in Yours Truly’s opinion, that what began as Dr. Baric’s research into a certain virus (the Sindbis virus) carried by a certain mosquito (his published manuscripts 1980 – 1984 [1]), had, certainly by the year 2009, evolved into something very different: a detailed study of, and development of, lab-application processes for coronavirus gene code combination, genome manipulation, and inducement of disease conditions — including heart issues and severe respiratory infection — from these combinations and manipulations.

Part Three will discuss NIH grant AI 23946 further, in addition to presenting other aspects of Dr. Baric’s research journey.

ALL COVID-19 “VACCINES” MUST BE REMOVED FROM THE MARKET AND FROM USE IN THE UNITED STATES. NOW.

ALL GAIN-OF-FUNCTION RESEARCH IN THE UNITED STATES MUST STOP. NOW.

THERE. MUST. BE. ACCOUNTABILITY.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

References:

[1]: “Curriculum Vitae Ralph S. Baric.” https://sph.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/112/2016/09/CV_Ralph_Baric.pdf.

[2]: “Recombination between non-segmented RNA genomes of murine coronaviruses.” Lai, M.M.C., Baric, R.S., Makino, S., Keck, J.G., Egbert, G.E., Leibowitz, J., Stohlman, S.A. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC252599/pdf/jvirol00116-0117.pdf. 1986.

[3]: “Specific interaction between the coronavirus leader RNA sequences and the nucleocapsid protein.” Stohlman, S.A., Baric, R.S., Nelson, G., Soe, L., Deans, B. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/instance/253863/pdf/jvirol00090-0384.pdf. November 1988.

[4]: “Rabbit cardiomyopathy.” Baric, R.S., Edwards, S., Small, J.D. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4684-5823-7_71#chapter-info. 1990.

[5]: “An experimental model for dilated cardiomyopathy after rabbit coronavirus infection.” L K Alexander, J D Small, S Edwards, R S Baric. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/166.5.978. November 1992.

[6]: “Coronavirus Genome Structure and Replication.” D.A. Brian, R.S. Baric. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26765-4_1. 25 October 2005.

[7]: “Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus nsp9 Dimerization Is Essential for Efficient Viral Growth.” Zachary J. Miknis, Eric F. Donaldson, Timothy C. Umland, Ryan A. Rimmer, Ralph S. Baric, L. Wayne Schultz. https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.01505-08. 1 April 2009.

(Intellectual Property Disclaimer and Notice: With the exception of the linked published scientific papers and other linked items in the public domain listed above, the ideas, conclusions, and opinons in today’s offering are by PAVACA. Proper credit must be given to PAVACA if the ideas and conclusions of today’s offering are used by other blog writers, by podcasters, in social media, or in print media.)

Health Friday 12.5.2025 Open Thread: The Baric Files, Part One

The free vintage image of files for today’s offering header image is courtesy of iStock and Google Images.

Special Note regarding today’s offering: In no way is the following, or The Baric Files series in general in Health Friday posts, to be construed as a “character assassination”, or as an “indictment”, or as any other type of attack or smear on Ralph S. Baric, PhD., of the UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health of the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, or of his lab at the university. The linked scientific papers, images therefrom, and other information about Dr. Baric (such as his Curriculum Vitae) are all available on the internet. The ideas and conclusions of today’s offering are by Yours Truly. There is a plethora of items related to Dr. Baric; Yours Truly will focus on a few of them in each part of The Baric Files.

Today’s offering is Part One of six.

The Baric Files, Part One: The Beginnings

Ralph S. Baric, PhD, is a professor at the UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Please see screenshots from his UNC faculty profile, below [1}:

Dr. Baric has been affiliated with the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, since 1986. Please see the screenshots from his Curriculum Vitae, below regarding his education and employment [2]:

One was curious as to the beginnings of Dr. Baric’s scientific research journey, a journey which ultimately led him to the lab-creation of the SARS-CoV-2 virus (COVID-19 virus). Looking through the section VIII. PUBLISHED MANUSCRIPTS: of Dr. Baric’s Curriculum Vitae, it appears, in Yours Truly’s opinion, that the journey began with:

A mosquito. A certain mosquito that carries a certain virus. A certain virus called the Sindbis virus. A virus particle of which, in certain ways, looks like a “prototype” of a COVID-19 virus particle.

There are several listings of early papers co-authored by Dr. Baric regarding the Sindbis virus. It appears that after a paper on the Sindbis virus that he co-authored was published in 1984, his research attention began to shift to mouse viruses and rabbit viruses — coronaviruses. A screenshot from this portion of Dr. Baric’s Curriculum Vitae is below:

What is the Sindbis virus? Please see the screenshots below, from the Wikipedia entry on the subject [3]; first, of the text:

And, an image of the Sindbus virus particle, also per the WIkipedia entry:

The Sindbis virus does indeed have a nucleocapsid and spike structure (as does the COVID-19 virus.) Please see the screenshots below, from the Geng, et al., 2025 paper on structure and other “hallmarks” of the Sindbis virus [4]:

Note that the Sindbis virus has open reading frames (ORF), a structural hallmark that is also found in the COVID-19 virus. And, also from the Geng, et al., paper, the following:

In addition, the Sindbis virus has a C-terminal area, and an N-terminal area, also structurally similar in concept to the COVID-19 virus. In fact, the Sindbis virus is one of the “branch” members of coronaviruses from the family Togaviridae, genus Alphavirus (per the Wikipedia entry on Sindbis virus, above.)

The following screenshot is from the Fact Sheet on Sindbis Virus Fever from the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) [5]:

A 1983 Sindbis virus scientific research paper by Dr. Baric discusses the function of host transcription in the replication of the virus within the host body [6]: again, a similarity to the transcription function of the COVID-19 virus once the virus is introduced into the host body.

In fact, the Sindbis virus, since it can be “safely handled” in BSL-2 laboratories, can be used as a “mixing agent coronavirus” in experiments to lab-create “virus-like particles” (VLPs) [7]. Please see the screenshot from the Results section of the paper by Ma, et al., regarding using Sindbis virus particles to lab-create a “mixture” of this virus with the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) virus to further “investigate” its entry into the ACE2 cells.

Speaking of laboratory safety, the question Yours Truly raises regarding the above paper is that the Sindbis virus was “mixed with” elements of the SARS-CoV-2 virus (COVID-19 virus) in what appears to be less then BSL-4 laboratory conditions.

By the year 1984 (if not before), it is possible that Dr. Baric had appeared on the “radar” of Dr. Anthony Fauci, who in that year was named Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID; a division of the National Institutes of Health [NIH, itself a division of the Department of Health and Human Services [HHS]; Dr. Fauci had joined the NIAID in 1968, just after he had completed his medical Residency) [8].

To be continued in Part Two.

ALL COVID-19 “VACCINES” MUST BE REMOVED FROM THE MARKET AND FROM ALL USE IN THE UNITED STATES. NOW.

ALL COVID-19 “VACCINES” MUST BE REMOVED FROM ANY AND ALL “RECOMMENDED” IMMUNIZATION SCHEDULES: WHETHER THOSE SCHEDULES ARE PUBLISHED BY THE CDC, BY THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS, OR ANY OTHER ENTITY OR PERSON. NOW.

THERE. MUST. BE. ACCOUNTABILITY.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

(Intellectual Property and Disclaimer Notice: With the exception of published papers and other publicly-available internet links, the ideas and conclusions in today’s offering are by PAVACA. Proper credit must be given to PAVACA for use of the ideas and/or conclusions of today’s post are used by other blog writers, by podcasters, in social media, and in print media.)

References:

[1]: “Ralph S. Baric, PhD.” https://sph.unc.edu/adv_profile/ralph-s-baric-phd/. n.d.

[2]: “Curriculum Vitae Ralph S. Baric.” https://sph.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/112/2016/09/CV_Ralph_Baric.pdf. 2016.

[3]: “Sindbis Virus.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sindbis_virus.

[4]: “Structured and Functional Hallmarks of Sindbis Virus Proteins: From Virion Architecture to Pathogenesis.” Qiben Geng, et al. 27 August 2025. https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/26/17/8323.

[5]: “Facts about Sindbis fever.” https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/sindbis-fever/facts. Page last updated 15 December 2023.

[6]: “Requirement for host transcription in the replication of Sindbis virus.” Baric, R.S.; Carlin, L.J., Johnston, R.E. https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.45.1.200-205.1983. Published 1983.

[7]: “Engineering virus-like particles for safe and versatile modeling of SARS-CoV-2 host interaction and immune escape.” Liang Ma, et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-025-08768-4. 30 August 2025.

[8]: “Anthony Fauci.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/anthony_fauci.

Health Friday 3.14.2025 Open Thread: Heart Issues After COVID-19 “Vaccination”: And About the Virus Itself

The above free image of heart shapes is courtesy of iStock and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s post speaks about the disaster of COVID-19 (the COVID-19 virus itself, and the COVID-19 “vaccines”), Yours Truly dedicates it to the memory of all persons, of whatever age or location, who have passed away from the negative effects of these lab-created bioweapons.

There are Important Wolf Moon Notifications; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. NOTE: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for any AI-generated content. To the best of my knowledge and belief, there is none. Also: if readers wish to post anything in the discussion thread for today’s offering that is AI-generated, they must cite their source.

Today’s post may be regarded as a “narrow-focus” offering, one of a “mini-series.” This first “narrow-focus” offering regards the inducement of cardiac issues after COVID-19 “vaccination”; and, the potential for cardiac issues also induced from an infection of the COVID-19 virus itself. Yours Truly begins here: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/new-study-fatal-malignant-cardiac, “NEW STUDY — Fatal Malignant Cardiac Tumors Following COVID-19 mRNA Injection”, by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 6 March 2025. The paper that is cited in the article is here: https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcr/ytaf009, “Heart-breaking tumours: a case series of malignant pericardial effusion”, Abdur Rahman Mirza, et al., 18 January 2025. The paper is also found here: https://academic.oup.com/ehjcr/article/9/3/ytaf009/7960074. Below are screenshots of the Introduction of the paper; followed by a screenshot of the graphic of the paper that traces the “journey of pericarditis”:

And, the final portion of the Discussion section of the paper:

Note the mention of “diagnostic bias” regarding whether or not a cardiac issue presents after the patient has been COVID-19 “vaccinated.” In Yours Truly’s opinion, the young physician who is the lead author of the cited paper has likely not studied how the COVID-19 “vaccines” affect the heart (for example, this article: https://doctors4covidethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/causality-article.pdf, “Vascular and organ damage induced by mRNA vaccines: irrefutable proof of causality”, Michael Palmer, MD, and Sucharit Bhakdi, MD); has likely not read the BNT162b2 5.3.6 Postmarketing Experience report that Pfizer-BioNTech gave to the FDA in April 2021 (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf); and, has likely not read any of the posts that Dr. Peter A. McCullough, MD, has on his website (https://www.thefocalpoints.com/.) One suspects that many other physicians have not read these items, either.

Turning to the Hulscher article on The Focal Points blog, cited above: It is known that the COVID-19 “vaccines” can, and do, cause pericarditis, a type of inflammation involving the heart (please refer to the BNT162b2 Postmarketing Experience report cited above, page 36 of the report, in the Appendix 1. List of Adverse Events of Special Interest section of said report.) The Cleveland Clinic has an article on pericarditis, found here: https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/17353-pericarditis. Below is a screenshot from the Cleveland Clinic article:

It is also known that the COVID-19 “vaccines” can, and do, cause myocarditis (another type of cardiac inflammation.) Both pericarditis and myocarditis can, and do, cause permanent damage to the heart. Both pericarditis and myocarditis can ultimately result in the death of the patient. However, the COVID-19 “vaccines” contain BOTH the ingredients of the original Wuhan Hu1 virus (SARS-CoV-2 virus, aka COVID-19 virus), AND lab “enhancements” (dangerous lipid nanoparticles; N1-methylpseudouridine; “loose DNA” from the manufacturing process; a piece of the SV40 African Green Monkey cancer promoter gene code) — that make the COVID-19 “vaccines” much more dangerous and/or deadly to the cardiac system of the “vaccinated” person. There is more new information on this situation (thank you to Valerie Curren): https://slaynews.com/news/epidemiologist-new-data-linking-covid-vaccines-global-heart-death-surge/, by Frank Bergman, 1 March 2025. The paper linked in the article is found here: https://doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v17.12.1039909, “Risk stratification for future cardiac arrest after COVID-19 vaccination”, Peter A. McCullough, MD, and Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 26 February 2025. Below are two screenshots from the paper: the Abstract; and, the McCullough Protocol for spike protein detoxification:

Note the clear statement that cardiac issues can appear years after the person is COVID-19 “vaccinated.”

And, the McCullough Protocol:

Yours Truly finds it ** interesting ** that the above paper was given a “Grade C” for “scientific quality” by the paper’s reviewers, none of whom are identified except by their initials.

**** However, malignant pericardial effusion is a form of cardiac cancer. It is not an inflammation. Below is a screenshot from the National Cancer Institute definition of this condition (https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms/def/malignant-pericardial-effusion):

Malignant pericardial effusion is the subject of the Mirza, et al., paper cited above in today’s post.

**** On the other hand, the COVID-19 virus itself can cause cardiac issues in persons who contract an infection of said virus. The following paper is from July 2020, well before any COVID-19 “vaccines” was granted an Emergency Use Authorization in any country: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41569-020-0413-9, “COVID-19 and cardiovascular disease: from basic mechanisms to clinical perspectives”, Masataka Nishiga, et al., 20 July 2020. This paper is a good source of information regarding how the COVID-19 virus itself works; and, how this virus can affect the cardiovascular system. A screenshot of the Abstract of the paper is below:

Another paper, also from 2020, well before any COVID-19 “vaccine” was granted an EUA, regards how the COVID-19 virus itself can affect the cardiovascular system: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7095524/, “COVID-19 and the cardiovascular system”, Yi-Tong Ma, et al., 5 March 2020. Yours Truly finds it ** interesting ** that the authors of this paper are affiliated with either the Wuhan Institute of Virology, or to medical facilities linked to the People’s Liberation Army (all CCP.) Below is a screenshot from the Background section of the paper:

The following article has more information on the ACE2 receptors in the human body: https://www.cas.org/resources/cas-insights/ace2-covid-19-target, “ACE2: Targeting a potentially important receptor in disease pathogensis”, by Angela Zhou, 15 December 2022. Below is a screenshot from this article:

The point here is that BOTH the COVID-19 virus itself (aka SARS-CoV-2), AND the COVID-19 “vaccines” (since these injectables contain SARS-CoV-2), target and attack the ACE2 receptor cells in the human body.

Yours Truly will again emphasize that the COVID-19 virus itself, AND the COVID-19 “vaccines”, were BOTH designed to cause as much damage to the human body as possible. They are BOTH lab-created bioweapons. The COVID-19 virus is not “just another type of virus.” The COVID-19 “vaccines” were designed to be capable of “shedding” elements of these injectables onto other persons (whether those persons are “vaccinated”, or not.) What is of utmost importance is that all people, “vaccinated” or not, must be doing all that is possible to have, and to maintain, the highest degree of personal health. The COVID-19 “vaccines” must be removed from use worldwide — now.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday Open Thread 1.10.2025: p53, SV40, the COVID-19 “Vaccines”, and Cancer: With a Note on the Virus Itself

The above free vintage image of a medical doctor performing an exam on the larynx of a patient is courtesy of Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. Since today’s post speaks of the disaster of the COVID-19 virus itself, and of the COVID-19 BTI (aka the “vaccines”), it is dedicated to the memory of Yours Truly’s COVID-19 “fully vaccinated and boosted” late brother, Sam; to her late cousin, Bill; and, to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have passed away from the negative effects, direct or indirect, of the COVID-19 “vaccines” that they had in their bodies.

There are Important Wolf Moon Notifications, the Rules of our late, good Wheatie, and certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here.

This week’s Health Friday post concerns the ingredients and mechanisms of the COVID-19 BTI in the inducement of cancer in “vaccinated” persons. There is also a role to play here for the COVID-19 virus itself.

Yours Truly begins with examples of studies that prove the COVID-19 BTI (aka the “vaccines”) induce cancer: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2022.113008. “Innate immune suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes, and MicroRNAs”. Stephanie Seneff, Peter A. McCullough, et al., June 2022. Below are Table 6 and Table 7 from this paper:

And, from this paper: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9876036/, “Potential health risks of mRNA-based vaccine therapy: A hypothesis”, K Acevedo-Whitehouse and R Bruno, 25 January 2023. Below are two screenshots from the paper:

Another paper, which details damage in the “vaccinated” person’s body to the p53 tumor suppressor protein, plus damage to / interference with, the type I Interferon response (also called type I IFN response), is here: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.50703, “SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination and the Multi-Hit Hypothesis of Oncogenesis”, R.P. Angues and Y.P. Bustos, 17 December 2023. Below is the salient graphic from this paper:

**** Note that cancer can be fostered and/or metastasized by either COVID-19 “vaccination”, or by the COVID-19 virus itself. More on that later on in today’s post.

And, to “tie it all together” regarding the confirmation of the presence of “loose DNA” and the SV40 African Green Monkey cancer promoter gene piece in the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, this paper, by three high school students who worked in an FDA-supervised lab in Maryland: https://jhss.scholasticahq.com/article/127890-a-rapid-detection-method-of-replication-competent-plasmid-dna-from-covid-19-mrna-vaccines-for-quality-control, TJ Wang, A Kim, K Kim, 29 December 2024. The Wang, Kim, and Kim paper is further discussed here: https://blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/exclusive-fda-lab-uncovers-excess, “EXCLUSIVE: FDA lab uncovers excess DNA contamination in COVID-19 vaccines”, 2 January 2025. By the way, the Wang, Kim, and Kim paper was peer-reviewed prior to publication.

One important item that links all of the above is what the COVID-19 “vaccines” do to the p53 protein in the human body. P53 (also called TP53, or Tumor Protein 53) prevents the formation of cancer in the body. Please see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P53. The modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” manufactured by Pfizer-BioNTech damage the p53 in the “vaccinated” person’s body, (which then interferes with and/or “disables”, the ability of p53 to “detect” and prevent the formation of cancer tumors in the “vaccinated” person’s body) via the SV40 African Green Monkey cancer promoter gene code piece that is present in this company’s modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.“

Scientific researchers have been experimenting for years with the SV40 cancer promoter and its interaction to interfere with and/or to suppress, the p53 tumor suppressor protein. Here are examples of published papers on the topic:

One: https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.19.4.2746. “New Insights into the Mechanism of Inhibition of p53 by Simian Virus 40 Large T Antigen”, Hilary M. Sheppard, et al., April 1999. Below are two images from this paper:

Note that the “monkey – human” amino acid percentage of “identicalness” of p53 is much higher than that of the “mouse – human” percentage.

The “Hudson, Colvin” paper from 2016 details how SV40 suppresses p53, allowing tumors to form and grow: https://doi.org/10.1093/ilar/ilw001, “Transgenic Mouse Models of SV40-Induced Cancer”, Amanda L. Hudson, Emily K. Colvin, 31 March 2016. Below are images from this paper:

And, the Drayman, et al., 2016 paper: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5288138/, “p53 elevation in human cells halt SV40 infection by inhibiting T-ag expression”, Nir Drayman, et al., 21 July 2016. Below is Figure 7 from this paper:

The point here is that the p53 tumor suppressor does a good job of preventing SV40 cancer promoter cells from infecting the body and establishing oncogenic (cancer tumor) cells. And, that this knowledge has been around for some time.

Which brings one back to the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 BTI (aka the “vaccines”), and the discovery of “loose DNA” and of amounts of the SV40 cancer promoter gene code piece in these injectables. It is inconceivable that Pfizer-BioNTech did not know of the ability of the p53 protein in the human body to detect SV40 and then to prevent it from establishing oncogenic cells. It is also, in Yours Truly’s opinion, inconceivable that Pfizer-BioNTech can try to explain away this discovery by some kind of “Oops, we’re sorry, we didn’t mean to leave that stuff in the formulation of the product” hyperbole. The “loose DNA” (and, by extension, the SV40 cancer promoter gene code piece) are present in all the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” made by this company in the summer of 2020, when Pfizer-BioNTech “suddenly” switched the manufacturing process for BNT162b2 from the original “Process 1” method (not using an “extracts of E. coli bath” in the process), to the “Process 2” method (using an “extracts of E. coli bath” in the process) for use in the BNT162b2 (truncated and data-falsified) “clinical trials” going on at that time for this injectable; and which “Process 2” method has been used to manufacture the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” by this company since. Please also see here: www.theqtree.com/2023/11/06/the-infamous-process-2-manufacturing-method-for-the-pfizer-biontech-modrna-covid-19-vaccines/; the actual documentation that the company provided to the FDA regarding this change of manufacturing process is detailed.

Another piece to this situation is the fact that the modRNA COVID-19 BTI (aka the “vaccines”) contain dangerous lipid nanoparticles that quickly spread the contents (and, by extension, the mechanisms) of this injectables throughout the “vaccinated” person’s body. In addition, these lipid nanoparticles (ALC-0159 and ALC-0315 in the Pfizer-BioNTech BTI; and, SM-102 in the Moderna BTI) are specifically developed to evade the body’s natural “are you a friend or a foe” detection and elimination mechanisms. This is in addition to other excipients (adjuvants) in these injectables, such as PEG2000-DMG. Yours Truly has written extensively on these items and how they work to undermine / interfere with, the “vaccinated” body’s natural immune processes. Finally, there is the N1-Methylpseudouridine in BOTH the Pfizer-BioNTech AND the Moderna COVID-19 BTI. This lab-created compound was specifically developed to replace (remove) the natural Uridine RNA in the “vaccinated” body with “fake Uridine” plus a form of methane. In the specific case of N1-Methylpseudouridine, the consequences to the “vaccinated” body, BOTH in the physical AND in the psychological aspects, is profoundly negative. These are all aside from the addition of the SV40 cancer promoter in the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 “vaccines.”

Going back to the graphic from the “Angues and Bustos” paper regarding the fact that BOTH the COVID-19 itself, AND the COVID-19 BTI (aka the “vaccines”) can cause cancer. Below is a repeat of the graphic:

Notice the Impaired type I IFN response (type I Interferon) on the lower right of the graphic. This is another ingredient / mechanism of the COVID-19 virus itself (likely) AND of the COVID-19 BTI (definitely), the workings of which have also been studied and known for years. An example of a paper that speaks to this is here: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4666791/, “The Type I Interferons: Basic Concepts and Clinical Relevance in Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases”, Consuelo M Lopez-Padilla, Timothy B Niewold, PMC published 15 January 2017. Two images from this paper are below:

Please also see: https://wmcresearch.substack.com/p/a-unifying-theory-of-covid-19-pathogenesis, “A Unifying Theory of COVID-19 Pathogenesis, Combining Senescent, Cardiovascular, Oncogenic and Neurodegenerative Pathologies”, 4 April 2022.

Three points here, in Yours Truly’s opinion, regarding those who lab-created the COVID-19 virus itself, and those who lab-created the COVID-19 BTI (aka the “vaccines”): One: they knew exactly what things would: interfere with the body’s type I Interferon responses; interfere with and/or destroy elements of the body’s natural immune system (CD4 – CD8 cells, IgG3 cells, and so on); evade or interfere with, the body’s natural p53 tumor suppressor response to detect and eliminate the SV40 cancer promoter that would be present in the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 BTI; cross the Blood-Brain Barrier; and more. Two: they made sure that the COVID-19 virus itself is not “just another flu virus”, but, rather, a bioweapon that was lab-created from years of stunningly-detailed research and experimentation to wreak as much potential damage as possible on the person who contracts an infection of the virus itself. And, Three: they made sure that this created bioweapon virus would be the foundation of the COVID-19 “vaccines”; while, at the same time, limiting or denying access to simple and effective items that can successfully counteract the virus itself, such as Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, Zinc, Vitamin D, and Quercetin.

While it is true that the survival rate for non-COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons who contract a COVID-19 virus itself infection and recover is 99% for ages 0 to 65 years, and between 94% – 95% for ages 65 and above, an infection from the COVID-19 virus itself can still potentially damage the body. However, those who lab-created the COVID-19 virus itself did not reckon completely with the human body’s natural immune system’s ability to detect, fight off, and eliminate this bioweapon. In Yours Truly’s opinion, the COVID-19 “vaccines” were lab-created to “finish the job” in this regard: injections which were then “mandated” for people to take, to “keep themselves and others safe from the virus.” With the disastrous results that are now presenting worldwide.

There are several items that can support / supplement the p53 of the body. Here are some examples:

Green tea compound: www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/02/210212094113.htm, “Green tea compound aids p53, ‘guardian of the genome’ and tumor suppressor”, Chunyu Wang, et al., 12 February 2021.

Capsaicin: https://jeccr.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13046-016-0417-9, “Reactivation of mutant p53 by capsaicin, the major constituent of peppers”, Gabriella D’Orazi, et al., 6 September 2016.

Phenethyl isothiocyanate in the diet: www.nature.com/articles/cdd201648, “Reactivation of mutant p53 by a dietary-related compound phenethyl isothiocyanate inhibits tumor growth”, M Aggarwal, et al., 3 June 2016. This compound is also called “PEITC.” Natural sources of phenethyl include broccoli, watercress, cabbage, turnips, and radishes. More information can be found here: www.sciencedirect.com/topics/chemistry/phenethyl-isothiocyanate.

Finally, there is the phenomenon of shedding of the COVID-19 virus itself, and of the COVID-19 “vaccines.” It is not known at this time exactly what ingredients of these are shed. What IS known is that it is indeed happening, and that this shedding is negatively affecting the health of the people who are “shed upon.” A comprehensive article that explains this issue is here: https://pierrekorymedicalmusings.com/p/newly-published-study-shows-shedding, “Newly Published Study Shows Shedding of Covid mRNA Vaccine Products”. Pierre Kory, MD, 9 December 2024.

It is of the utmost importance that all people have, and maintain, the highest degree possible of general health; and, in particular, the health of their natural immune system.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

FLASH! Sunday 12 January 2025: ADDENDUM: Please see below, copied (and expanded here) from the main discussion thread today:

“WOLF MOON AND ALL — KEVIN McKERNAN FOUND THE MOAD REGARDING THE PFIZER-BIONTECH COVID-19 “VACCINES” AND TURBO-CANCERS:

The following is a “quick and dirty” summary. Yours Truly will append a “Flash! News” addendum to the body of the Health Friday post of two ago on the p53 cancer tumor suppressor gene and how SV40 interferes with it.

Summary:

One: Dr. Kevin McKernan ran the gene sequence from the cancer tumor biopsies and compared them to the gene sequence in the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 “vaccine.” There was a match. He also found traces of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 “vaccines” in the cancer tumors.

Two: At least one sequence match was made a year AFTER the patient had been COVID-19 vaxxed.

The article that talks about this: https://slaynews.com/news/top-scientist-sounds-alarm-traces-covid-vaccines-found-cancer-tumors/, “Top Scientist Sounds Alarm as Traces of Covid ‘vaccines’ Found in Cancer Tumors”, by Frank Bergman, 11 January 2025. There is a video in the article of an interview with COVID researcher John Beaudoin on this situation.

Screenshot from the above article:

There’s only one way that this can happen, IMO — it’s the SV40 African Green Monkey cancer promoter gene code piece that’s in the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 “vaccines.” The SV40 promoter interferes with the body’s p53 cancer suppressor protein.”

Yours Truly will amplify on the above.

First: IN ADDITION to SV40 interfering with the p53 cancer suppressor protein in the COVID-19 “vaccinated” person’s body, there is ALSO the damage / destruction of the crucial immune system IgG3 “fight it off” cells, instead fostering the increase of IgG4 “tolerate but never clear” cells. This “class switch” affects the entire body, “depressing” the natural immune “are you a friend or foe” mechanisms.

Second: The N1-Methylpseudouridine in the Pfizer-BioNTech AND in the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 BTI (aka the “vaccines”) replaces the RNA of the natural Uridine in the “vaccinated” person’s body. This ALSO interferes with / damages, the multiple body-brain interactions and mechanisms that natural Uridine regulates.

Third: There is ALSO the phenomenon of COVID-19 “vaccine” shedding by “vaccinated” persons to consider in this scenario. There are increasing reports of the negative effects that the ingredients (and, by extension, the mechanisms) of the COVID-19 “vaccines” do to non-“vaccinated” persons via this shedding. There is, in Yours Truly’s opinion, real potential for the SV40 cancer promoter that is in the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 “vaccines” to be shed from persons who have taken this “vaccine” onto other people, including onto non-“vaccinated” persons.

Below are two other screenshots from the Slay News article:

Links to two other articles from Slay News that are germane to the 11 January article: https://slaynews.com/news/top-surgeon-warns-aggressive-cancers-mutating-covid-vaxxed/, 27 October 2024 (with a video by British cancer surgeon, Dr. James Royle); and, https://slaynews.com/news/renowned-oncologist-evil-covid-vaccines-caused-turbo-cancer-explosion/, 17 December 2024 (an interview with British oncologist, Dr. Angus Dalgleish.)

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday Open Thread 12.6.2024: The Immune System after COVID-19 “Vaccination”; and a Note on the Virus Itself

The above image is courtesy of a Substack post by Jessica Rose, PhD: https://jessicar.substack.com/p/the-immunological-mechanism-of-action, “The immunological mechanism of action for lost immunity, a shift to tolerance (and autoimmunity?) from the shots”, 27 December 2022.

Health Friday is a series of posts related to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. Since today’s post is related to the COVID-19 virus itself, and to the COVID-19 “vaccines”, it is dedicated to the memory of Yours Truly’s COVID-19 “vaccinated” late brother, Sam, and to her late cousin, Bill; and to all people, of any age or location, who have passed away from the negative effects (direct or indirect) of the COVID-19 “vaccines” that they took. The discussion today is not limited to what is presented in the post: It is an Open Thread.

Today’s Health Friday post is about what the COVID-19 “vaccines” do to the “vaccinated” person’s natural immune system. It is also about what the COVID-19 virus itself does to a person’s natural immune system. The bottom lines are: One: the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” severely damage or even destroy the natural immune system of the person who takes these “vaccines”, with the damage or destruction increasing with each additional injection of them. Two: the COVID-19 virus itself can damage the natural immune system. Three: it is more possible to repair and support the immune system of a person who is non-COVID-19 “vaccinated.”

Yours Truly begins with these: first, https://x.com/tpvsean/status/1862616283738501504. Two screenshots of this tweet are below:

And, this: https://x.com/leejohnson/status/1862619457706770458. Two screenshots of this tweet are below:

Actually, Yours Truly respectfully disagrees with the title of the above book: in her opinion, it should read: Bill Gates I Want to Kill Three-Quarters of You, and Control the Survivors.

There. Must. Be. Justice.

There are several aspects that make up today’s post. *** Yours Truly is firmly convinced that the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself was designed and lab-created, AND the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” were / are designed and lab-created, as bioweapons. These lab-created bioweapons attack the immune system of the human body; damage and/or destroy important components of the immune system of the human body; and, in the case of the modRNA “vaccines”, keep this damage and/or destruction going for an indefinite period of time in the “vaccinated” person’s body. Also — Yours Truly will present evidence that — wait for it — the pangolin-CoV MP789 virus genome is an integral part of the situation.

To begin: The 5.3.6 Postmarketing Experience document that Pfizer-BioNTech submitted to the FDA on 30 April 2021: https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf, 5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports of PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Received Through 28-Feb-2021. Below are two screenshots from the Appendix 1: List of Adverse Events of Special Interest section of this document:

The above are autoimmune and immune-mediated medical conditions that were reported in the first two months after the rollout of the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” BNT162b2 among persons who took this “vaccine” during that period. Notes: BNT162b2 is the basis of all subsequent formulations of the COVID-19 “vaccine” injectables by this company (since 2022, marketed under the brand name COMIRNATY); and, there are other listings of autoimmune and immune-mediated conditions in the Appendix 1. of the above report.

Yours Truly now turns to a 2021 paper by Stephanie Seneff, PhD: https://doi.org/10.56098/ijvtpr.v2i1.23, “Worse Than the Disease? Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of the mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19”, 10 May 2021. Dr. Seneff points out that only the spike protein was used for the modRNA in the Pfizer-BioNTech and in the Moderna COVID-19 “vaccines” (BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273, respectively.) A screenshot from this paper is below, listing the “firsts” regarding the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”:

Dr. Seneff references a 2020 paper by Lu, et al., regarding an important discovery about the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7429369/, “A COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Encoding SARS-CoV-2 Like Particles Induces a Strong Antiviral-like Response in Mice.” The authors make it clear that there are three separate-but-important components in the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself: the membrane (M); the envelope (E); and, the spike protein (S). Another screenshot from the Seneff paper is below, regarding this issue:

Why is it important to know that Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna chose only the spike protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself as the basis for their respective modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”? Yours Truly hypothesizes that, in so doing, it was then possible for them to create a modRNA that would have the most potential to damage the persons taking these respective modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.” The Lu, et al., 2020 paper, cited above, also describes how the authors created various “prototype” COVID-19 “vaccines.” These “prototype vaccines” were lab-produced using various ingredients — one of which was — wait for it — N1-Methylpseudouridine; as well as one “prototype vaccine” that used Uridine. The authors concluded that N1-Methylpseudouridine was “superior” in creating “neutralizing antibodies.” Please refer to Figure 1. and its description underneath from this paper, where N1-Methylpseudouridine is used in the “Lane 5 proto-type vaccine” of the experiments. In Yours Truly’ opinion, it is within the realm of possibility that Pfizer-BioNTech, or Moderna, or both, knew of the Lu, et al., research.

Below are screenshots of section 11 Description of the Pfizer-BioNTech (COMIRNATY) “2024-2025 Formula COVID-19 vaccine”; and, of section 11 Description of the Moderna (SPIKEVAX) “2024-2025 Formula COVID-19 vaccine.” There is no mention in either one of the membrane or of the envelope of the original Wuhan Hu1 SARS-CoV-2 virus; there is only the mention of the spike protein:

The modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” damage and/or destroy crucial IgG3 immune system cells in the “vaccinated” person’s body (the “fight it off” element), and instead foster the increase of IgG4 immune system cells (the “tolerate but never clear” element). Please refer to the Jessica Rose, PhD, post at the top of today’s post. Below is another figure from her post, from the Supplementary Materials of this 2022 paper (cited in the post): www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciimmunol.ade2798, “Class switch toward noninflammatory, spike-specific IgG4 antibodies after repeated SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination”, Pascal Irrgang, et al., 22 December 2022. This image, from Figure 2: Figure S1 of the paper, clearly shows the decimation of IgG3 (“fight it off”) immune system cells, and the increase of IgG4 (“tolerate it”) immune system cells, after repeated modRNA COVID-19 “vaccinations”:

And, also from the Irrgang, et al., paper:

Those who are COVID-19 “vaccinated”, especially if they take repeated injections of these “vaccines”, are the slowest to “clear” a COVID-19 infection: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9258747/, “Duration of Shedding of Culturable Virus in SARS-CoV-2 Omicron (BA.1) Infection”, Julie Boucau, Ph.D., et al., published in the New England Journal of Medicine, 21 July 2022. The salient figure from this Letter to the Editor is below:

Please refer to the second and third column percentages. These “tell the tale.”

Yours Truly has written extensively regarding the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, some of their ingredients, and what damage these injectables do to the body and brain of the “vaccinated” person. Please refer to: www.theqtree.com/2024/11/08/health-friday-11-8-2024-open-thread-the-insidious-n1-methylpseudouridine-in-the-modrna-covid-19-vaccines/; www.theqtree.com/2024/11/01/health-friday-open-thread-11-1-2024-the-covid-19-information-file-part-one/; and, www.theqtree.com/2024/10/18/health-friday-10-18-2024-special-edition-neurological-effects-of-the-covid-19-vaccines-physical-and-psychological/, for examples. These “vaccines” contain, among other ingredients, the following that assist in the mechanisms of said injectables: the lab-created lipid nanoparticles ALC-0159, ALC-0315, SM-102, and PEG2000-DMG, which spread the “vaccines” to every cell of the “vaccinated” person’s body; and, N1-Methylpseudouridine (present in both the Pfizer-BioNTech and in the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”), which replaces the natural Uridine of the “vaccinated” person’s body with a lab-created combination of “fake Uridine” plus a form of methane. Recall that natural Uridine is an incredibly important RNA which assists or manages many bodily functions — including brain functions and emotions.

This leads to the next part of today’s post: the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself, which is the foundation of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.”

The lab-created SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) virus itself attacks the body (and brain) of a person infected with this virus in several ways. One way is that the virus “attaches” itself to the ACE2 receptor cells of the body. ACE2 stands for “angiotensin-converting enzyme 2” cells. What these cells do is discussed here: www.cas.org/recources/cas-insights/ace2-covid-19-target, by Angela Zhou, 15 December 2022. A screenshot of this article is below:

The spike protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself dysregulates (“downregulates”) the functions of the ACE2 receptor cells in the body of the infected person: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.04.409144, “SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Impairs Endothelial Function via Downregulation of ACE2”, Yuyang Lei, et al., 4 December 2020. “Endothelial function” is the range of functions of the vascular endothelium. Endothelial cells release elements that control the opening and closing of the arteries.

Also, the COVID-19 virus itself “mimics” the proteolytic activation of human ENaC cells: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58603. “SARS-CoV-2 strategically mimics proteolytic activation of human ENaC”, Praveen Anand, et al., 26 May 2020. ENaC stands for “Epithelial sodium channel” (an ion channel); this element has an important role in kidney function, the immune system, and vasculature. “Proteolysis” has to do with protein breakdown in the body.

The SARS-CoV-2 virus itself attacks, damages, and/or destroys, the CD4 cells of the human body. Please refer to: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.25.20200329, “SARS-CoV-2 uses CD4 to infect T helper lymphocytes”, Natalia S Brunetti, et al.; paper published in 2020, version of record 31 July 2023. A screenshot of the Abstract from this paper is below:

Note that damaged CD4 cells are a component in HIV infection; also, note again that, since the original SARS-CoV-2 virus itself is the foundation for the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” by Pfizer-BioNTech and by Moderna, the “attack and damage” elements and mechanisms described above are present in said “vaccines.”

For further information regarding how the spike protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself works in the human body, please refer to the ongoing research of Walter M Chesnut: https://wmcresearch.substack.com/.

And now, another visit with our shy, nocturnal scaly anteater, the Pangolin:

Yours Truly has written about this mammal, and of how the PRRARSV (or RRAR or RRARSV, depending on which scientific paper one reads) genome code in the original SARS-CoV-2 virus itself was lab-manipulated from the pangolin-CoV MP789 to include this code; for example: www.theqtree.com/2024/11/22/health-friday-11-22-2024-open-thread-lets-talk-about-prrarsv-the-backdoor-key/. It appears that the pangolin-CoV MP789 genome code was “mixed in” with the bat-CoV RaTG13 genome code in the lab experiments that created SARS-CoV-2. However, Yours Truly has discovered something else about pangolin-CoV MP789: It “binds” better to human ACE2 receptor cells, compared to the bat-CoV RaTG13!

The story behind this discovery begins here: www.crick.ac.uk/news/2021-02-05_pangolin-coronavirus-could-jump-to-humans. This article led to the following link: www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-21006-9, “Structure and binding properties of Pangolin-CoV spike glycoprotein inform the evolution of SARS-CoV-2”, Antoni G. Wrobel, et al., 5 February 2021. A screenshot from the Discussion section of this paper is below:

It would appear, then, that the pangolin-CoV MP789 genome has much more to do with the lab-creation of the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself (and, by extension, the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”) than at first meets the eye. This is not to discount the use of genome code elements from the bat-CoV RaTG13 in the lab-creation process of the virus itself; nor to discount the other coronavirus code elements that were “mixed in” from monkey, civet, and other animal coronaviruses. In Yours Truly’s opinion, those who lab-created the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself were searching for a genome code that could most effectively attack and compromise human ACE2 receptor cells and the mechanisms of these cells. They found what they were looking for in the pangolin-CoV MP789 genome code. However, it is crucial to understand that those who lab-created the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself did not also add N1-Methylpseudouridine to it — this compound was added to the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.” And therein, again in Yours Truly’s opinion, lies an important difference between the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) virus itself, and the presence of this virus in the modRNA-COVID-19 “vaccines.” It is the difference between a non-COVID-19 ” vaccinated” person being infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself and recovering (even if there are complications), because the natural Uridine in the non-COVID-19″vaccinated” person’s body is still operative to help regulate many body functions and mechanisms that can assist in recovery; whereas, in the COVID-19 “vaccinated” person’s body, the natural Uridine has been replaced with N1-Methylpseudouridine (thereby literally erasing the potential for natural Uridine to work.)

Is it, then, a foregone conclusion that the natural immune system of the COVID-19 “vaccinated” person is so severely damaged, or even destroyed, especially with that person taking more and more injections of these “vaccines”, that there is no hope for any possible repair or restoration of it? In the case of the RNA of Uridine being replaced by N1-Methylpseudouridine, some things can be done to supplement the body: consuming Uridine-containing foods, such as beets, goat cheese, walnuts, and broccoli. There is some promising research on the use of a compound, called 5-FU, to help repair Uridine RNA: https://doi.org/10.3389/frnar.2023.1248236, “RNA damage: the forgotten target of clinical compounds”, by Nicole Simms and John R.P. Knight. In the case of damaged CD4 cells, there are natural methods to increase the body’s healthy CD4 cell count. Please refer to: www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/how-to-boost-cd4-count-naturally, by Charlotte Lillis, 16 July 2024. Supplementation with Vitamin D, multivitamins, and probiotics are mentioned in this article.

Finally, Yours Truly firmly believes that the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself is not “just another virus” or “just another flu virus.” Au contraire: this virus itself was lab-created from a “palette” of animal coronaviruses (the pangolin-CoV MP789 in particular, with the bat-CoV RaTG13 close behind) to be as damaging as possible, even deadly, to the human body — in other words, a bioweapon. Yes, a non-COVID-19 “vaccinated” person may become infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself, and recover well; however, there may be “residual damage” from the virus itself remaining for some period of time in their body. There is also the phenomenon of “COVID-19 vaccine shedding” from COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons onto others, including onto non-COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons, to consider: as these “vaccines” contain elements in them that make this virus, as well as the “vaccines” themselves, more dangerous and/or deadly. Does this mean that non-COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons should avoid contact with other persons, especially COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons? No — what it does mean, however, is that it is imperative to have, and maintain, the highest possible degree of health of the body’s natural immune system.

There. Must. Be. Justice.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday Open Thread 10.25.2024: The Diblasi, et al., Paper: Undeclared Chemical Elements Found in the COVID-19 “Vaccines”

Detail of a partially blurred periodic table of the elements. Focus on Carbon.

The above image of part of the Periodic Table is courtesy of Google Images.

Today’s post is part of Health Friday, a series devoted to issues related to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. The discussion is not limited to what is presented here: It is an Open Thread.

There are Important Wolf Moon Notifications, the Rules of our late, good Wheatie, caveat items from Yours Truly, and other information that readers should know. They are all linked here. Since today’s post is related to the COVID-19 “vaccines” injectables (gene therapy injections), it is dedicated to the memory of Yours Truly’s cousin Bill, who “died suddenly and unexpectedly” in September 2023.

The post today is not an exhaustive interpretation of the “Diblasi, et al. paper.” In fact, the paper raises many other questions that demand answers: several sets of questions (from Yours Truly) are listed in the post. Yours Truly is also aware that a certain person is attempting online to “debunk” this paper, to the point of labeling it as a “hoax”; one finds it difficult to agree with such a conclusion. Stay with me, a certain amount of “preliminary” items are presented in the post to assist in the general framework. There is a General Summary at the end of the post.

The trail, for today’s purposes, begins with an X tweet by “toobaffled”: https://x.com/toobaffled/status/1847639454468755728. Below is a screenshot of the tweet:

The tweet leads to this link: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/undeclared-chamicals-heavy-metals-covid-vaccines/, 55 Undeclared Chemical Elements — Including Heavy Metals — Found in COVID Vaccines, by Brenda Baletti, Ph.D., 15 October 2024. This, in turn, led to the “Diblasi, et al. paper”: https://doi.org/10.56098/mt1njj52, At Least 55 Undeclared Chemical Elements Found in COVID-19 Vaccines from AstraZeneca, CanSino, Moderna, Pfizer, Sinopharm and Sputnik V, with Precise ICP-MS, Lorena Diblasi, Martin Monteverde, David Nonis, Marcela Sangorrin, 11 October 2024 (International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, Vol. 3 No.2 (2024): Injuries, Causes, and Treatments, Part 2.)

The Abstract of the paper:

Note that the there was a total of 62 undeclared chemical elements found, all told, in the COVID-19 “vaccines” injectables (gene therapy injections) that were tested by the authors. Note also that the COVID-19 “vaccines” (gene therapy injections, hereafter termed GTI) that were tested comprised various “platforms”: modRNA (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna; viral vector (AstraZeneca/Oxford, CanSino Biologics, and Sputnik V), and whole inactivated virus (Sinopharm.) (All “platform” descriptions, per Wikipedia.)

The Samples List of the “vaccines” tested, from the paper:

Below are the results for the Moderna “vaccine” samples, from the paper; note that, as of October 2022, 37.50% of COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons in the United States had taken at least one dose of this “vaccine” (mRNA-1273/SPIKEVAX.) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_vaccination_in_the_United_States

The results for the Pfizer-BioNTech “vaccine” samples, from the paper; note that, as of October 2022, 59.43% of COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons in the United States had taken at least one dose of this “vaccine” (BNT162b2/COMIRNATY.) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_vaccination_in_the_United_States

Given that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 “vaccine” (GTI) has the higher percentage of persons who were “vaccinated” with it, Yours Truly will restrict the discussion as it relates to this post to the results of the Pfizer-BioNTech tests. In addition, results of six isotope types (chemical element types) from the last two assay dates — 3/11/2023 and 3/1/2024, are underlined by Yours Truly. These six are: Lithium (Li); Aluminum (Al); Vanadium (V); Chromium (Cr); Arsenic (As); and, Barium (Ba.)

For reference, below is a definition of “Isotope” from the online Kids Britannica (https://kids.britannica.com/students/article/isotope/628327):

The higher the number of protons and neutrons in a chemical element, the more “mass” the chemical element has.

Yours Truly will remind readers that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 “vaccines” (GTI) cross the Blood-Brain Barrier, in addition to accumulating in organs and areas throughout the body of the person who takes this “vaccine.” Please see Page 7 and Page 8 of the company’s report on the biodistribution of their COVID-19 “vaccine” injectable BNT162b2 (now COMIRNATY), below:

Proceeding now to the underlined chemical elements items in the last two assays of BNT162b2 / COMIRNATY, from the Diblasi, et al., paper. Note: sections of information regarding this chemical element (Arsenic), and the other five underlined chemical elements in the last two assays of this “vaccine”, are from the Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) online entries; other sources of information for each one will be text-hyperlinked. First, Lithium (Li):

Lithium (Li) effects on the body: cognitive dulling, kidney dysfunction, and others: www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/326516.

Aluminum (Al):

Aluminum (Al) effects on the body: neurological toxicity, encephalopathy, among others: https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2017.0653, “The Health Effects of Aluminum Exposure”, Katrin Klotz, et al.

Vanadium (V):

Vanadium (V) effects on the body: nervous system issues, kidney damage: www.webmd.com/vitamins/ai/ingredientmono-749/vanadium.

Chromium (Cr):

Chromium (Cr) effects on the body: can negatively affect the liver, kidneys, skin, lungs; and, can cause cancer: www.atsdr.cdc.gov/csem/chromium_physiologic_effects_of_chromium_exposure.html.

Arsenic (As):

Arsenic (As) effects on the body: negatively affects multiple organs: brain, heart, liver, kidneys, and skin: www.atsdr.cdc.gov/csem/arsenic/physiologic_effects.html.

And, Barium (Ba):

Barium (Ba) effects on the body: this can damage the kidneys and lungs; it may also cause “reproductive harm”: https://nj.gov/health/eoh/rtkweb/documents/fs/0180.pdf.

Lithium, Aluminum, Vanadium, and Chromium are metals of various degrees of hardness (“heavy metals.”) Arsenic is a “semi-metal.” Barium is a “soft, alkaline earth metal.” (All, per Wikipedia.)

Questions that arise, first set: Why are there so many chemical elements in BNT162b2/COMIRNATY? Why did Pfizer-BioNTech not “declare” almost all of them? Were each of the chemical elements that the company added to BNT162b2/COMIRMATY separately tested for toxicity prior to inclusion in the product? Was there some sort of “collusion” among the developers of the various COVID-19 “vaccines” (GTIs) that were tested along the lines of, “You put ABC chemical elements into your product, we’ll put XYZ chemical elements into our product, and we’ll see how it goes”? Why does it appear that the amounts of these chemical elements reduce, increase, or “disappear” from the products from one test assay to another of the same “vaccine”? Does that have to do with the other technologies that seem to be in these “vaccines” — other technologies such as, “self-assembling” items? Or, such as, a kind of “incubation period” that is “built into” the product? If either, or both, of these are the case, what does that mean to the mechanisms of these “vaccines” once they are injected into the human body? What about COVID-19 “vaccine shedding” www.theatree.com/2024/03/25/the-elephant-in-the-room-shedding-of-both-the-covid-19-virus-itself-and-the-covid-19-vaccines/? For examples, Ruthenium and Lead are absorbed by the skin; and, Arsenic can be absorbed by the skin.

For an important comparison: One other item, the ICP-MS test results for the Russian COVID-19 “vaccine” (GTI), Sputnik V. Recall that this “vaccine” is made of the whole inactivated virus of SARS-CoV-2; it is the only “vaccine” that was tested that was based on this. Below are the test results:

Yours Truly included the Sputnik V test results because this COVID-19 “vaccine” is not modRNA-based. And yet, look at the test results for this product. The same six chemical elements that Yours Truly underlined in the BNT162b2/COMIRNATY test results are ALSO in Sputnik V: Lithium; Aluminum; Vanadium; Chromium; Arsenic; and Barium. Even if Aluminum is discounted (since various forms of Aluminum are used as “excipients / adjuvants” for COVID-19 “vaccines” injectables (GTIs), that leaves the other five chemical elements as being present in both products.

Questions that arise, second set: What does this mean? Could it possibly mean that the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) virus itself had chemical elements “lab-included” while it was being lab-created at the Wuhan Institute of Virology? If this is so, what about the other chemical elements on the test results list?

A paper published in 2023 (but using data from patients infected by the COVID-19 virus itself, and/or the SARS-CoV-2 virus, from before any COVID-19 “vaccine” was in use, or just after BNT162b2 was first authorized for use), gives, in Yours Truly’s opinion, a clue https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.115419, “Individual blood concentrations of persistent organic pollutants and chemical elements, and COVID-19: A prospective cohort study in Barcelona”, Miquel Porta, et al., 4 February 2023. The cohort patients in this study were infected with the COVID-19 virus itself, or the SARS-CoV-2 virus, between mid-February 2020 and 24 January 2021. Below are two screenshots from this paper:

The Porta, et al., paper lists in the Tables the pollutants and chemical elements that were found in the COVID-19 virus itself infected patients. Among them: Lead (Pb); Arsenic; Cadmium (Cd); Mercury (Hg); Thallium (Tl); Bismuth; (Bi) Molybdenum; (Mo) Iron (Fe); Zinc (Zn); Cobalt; (Co) Chromium; Tantalum (Ta); and, Ruthenium (Ru).

The Porta, et al., paper lists in the Tables the pollutants and chemical elements that were found in the SARS-CoV-2 infected patients. Among them: Ruthenium; Tantalum; Lead; DDT; and, Thallium.

“Lifestyle” factors, such as smoking (current, past, stopped) are accounted for in the Porta, et al., study. Even removing pollutants that would be found in cigarette smoke (naphthalene and Cadmium among them), that leaves chemical elements such as Ruthenium, Tantalum, and Thallium that were found in the blood of the patients in the Porta, et al., study. And, that the presence of these chemical elements was persistent — lingering after the infection was resolved. By the way, Ruthenium and Thallium are radioactive. Barium is a “radiographic contrast agent” (in, for example, the “barium milkshake” test.)

Questions that arise, third set: What about the other chemical elements found in the various COVID-19 “vaccines”, per the Diblasi, et al., study? Were these “lab-included” into the “excipients / adjuvants” used in these “vaccines”? Were these “lab-included” into the Wuhan Hu1 SARS-COV-2 samples that were used by the companies developing and/or manufacturing these “vaccines” (samples that presumably, at least the start of the pandemic, came from the WIV? Did these companies decide of themselves to include them?

The COVID-19 “vaccines” injectables (GTIs) contain: the modRNA (lab-enhanced from the Wuhan Hu1 SARS-CoV-2 virus) in the COVID-19 “vaccine” injectables that use this platform; the SV40 African Green Monkey cancer promoter gene piece in the Pfizer-BioNTech “vaccine” injectables (https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/mjc97, “DNA fragments detected in monovalent and bivalent Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA COVID-19 vaccines from Ontario, Canada: Exploratory dose response relationship with serious adverse events”, David J. Speicher, et al., 19 October 2023; DNA fragments in both the Pfizer-BioNTech and in the Moderna COVID-19 “vaccine” injectables (see paper cited above); dangerous lipid nanoparticles (ALC-0159, ALC-0315 in the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 “vaccine” injectables; SM-102 in the Moderna COVID-19 injectables); polyethylene glycol “excipients / adjuvants” (PEG2000-DMG); and, numerous chemical elements, including heavy metals (Vanadium; Chromium); radioactive elements (Thallium); Arsenic; Ruthenium; and, Lithium. These are the ingredients that COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons age 18 and older have in their bodies. These are the ingredients that adults allow their children to be COVID-19 “vaccinated” with. No one knows exactly how long the COVID-19 “vaccines” work inside the body of the “vaccinated” person.

What about the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself? Yours Truly opines that this may contain, among other items: mixed RNA/mRNA coronavirus elements and pieces from various animal sources (bats; monkeys; civets; pangolins); Chromium; Cobalt; Zinc; Arsenic; Molybdenum; Ruthenium; Cadmium; Gold (Au); Thallium; and, Lead. There are heavy metals among these.

“Chelation” is a method used to remove heavy metals from the body. The use of chelation is controversial. Physicians can prescribe certain medications to assist in removing heavy metals from the body. An article on a heavy metal “detox diet” is here: www.healthline.com/health/heavy-metal-detox, “Heavy Metal Detox Diet”, by Kiara Anthony, 13 September 2023.

(There is controversy about whether the SARS-CoV-2 virus has a spike protein: https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/does-spike-protein-exist-part-1, 15 October 2024. Yours Truly does not propose to delve into this aspect at the moment.)

Questions that arise, fourth set: What, if anything, did Dr. Anthony Fauci know about the inclusion of numerous chemical elements into the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 “vaccine” injectables? What did Dr. Francis Collins (Dr. Fauci’s superior at the NIH) know? What did Albert Bourla (CEO of PfizerUSA) know? What did Dr. Deborah Birx know? What did the FDA know? What did the CDC know?

Meanwhile, there is this: https://x.com/UngaTheGreat/status/1848791880395362460; a screenshot of the tweet is below:

En Fin: At what point will people, horrified at the deaths, disabilities, illnesses, and injuries, being inflicted on their COVID-19 “vaccinated” family members, friends, and colleagues, realize that “they’ve been had”? At what point will people realize that the “official narrative” of, “the COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective” means that these injectables are NOT safe; and, that “effective” means the amount of damage these injectables have done/continue to do, to the bodies of the “vaccinated”? At what point do people realize that the “official narrative” of, “the known and potential risks outweigh the known and potential risks” of the COVID-19 “vaccines” was, and is, a lie? — and that the COVID-19 “vaccines” are “all risk and no benefit”? (https://kirschsubstack.com/p/the-covid-vaccine-all-risk-no-benefit, by Steve Kirsch, 4 October 2024.)

General Summary: It is now known (per the Diblasi et al., paper) that the COVID-19 “vaccines” (GTIs) contain numerous chemical elements, some of which are radioactive, and others of which are metals and/or “rare Earth” elements. It is now known that the COVID-19 virus itself likely contains chemical elements, at least three of which (Chromium, Thallium, and Lead) are heavy metals; and that at least one of which (Thallium) is radioactive. It is now known that (per the Porta, et al. paper) that these chemical elements are persistent in the body of a person who was infected with the COVID-19 virus itself but who has recovered. It is now known that chemical elements are found in the modRNA-based and in the whole inactivated virus-based COVID-19 “vaccine” (GTI) injectables. There are many questions that arise from these discoveries that demand answers.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA