The Timelines Always Get Them

One of the greatest things I ever learned from Sundance over at The Last Refuge is this:

the timelines always get them

I will keep this simple, so the “aha” is easy to see.
This is my prior article on the conspiracy against Brett Kavanaugh:

Here is a link to said prior post on the conspiracy against Brett Kavanaugh. You can come back to it – it’s not needed to understand the following, although it helps fill in details.
Now, here is an article about the obscure (in my opinion) Mark Judge book that uses a very interestingly “barely camouflaged” version of Brett Kavanaugh’s name as somebody likely to be assumed to be Dr. Ford’s assailant. The name was changed to “Bart O’Cavanaugh”, if I remember the spelling correctly. C or K.
Note that this is not normally an expensive book – but it’s hard to get now, and hence the inflated price.
I will confess making a joke that this “rare book” was “worth something for a reason”.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2018/09/19/brett-kavanaugh-mark-judge-georgetown-prep-book/1357739002/
The book is listed here as being published in 2005.
2005, you say? Yes! 2005!
Question! Where does that fit on the Brett Kavanaugh career TIMELINE?
Glad you asked!
Here is a convenient Wall Street Journal article about – well – just look!

https://www.wsj.com/articles/timeline-brett-kavanaughs-rise-to-supreme-court-nominee-1531255425
Allow me to call attention to this part of it:

At this point, if you haven’t, you can go back to that link above to my prior post.
And now, to spell it all out, here is a comment I did on this on The Treehouse.
This was in response to Cari Kelemen (ParteaGirl) saying that she thought this claim was political from the very beginning.

The fact that Christine Ford made her claims- NOT to a law enforcement official- but to a POLITICIAN first tells me this was politically motivated from the get-go.

— Cari Kelemen (@KelemenCari) September 22, 2018

wolfmoon1776 says:

September 22, 2018 at 1:53 am

Absolutely. And I think the get-go goes WAY BACK.
Look at that Mark Judge book that conflates Kavanaugh’s name with (IMO) somebody else’s crime:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2018/09/19/brett-kavanaugh-mark-judge-georgetown-prep-book/1357739002/
The year is 2005. This book seems like a loser – the only thing it really seems good for is what it’s doing now. And remember – Hillary and her friends run the publishing industry. That part of the media is VERY Democrat. They use book deals as payoffs ALL THE TIME.
Look at the TIMELINE of Kavanaugh’s career here. Notice what’s going on around 2005?
https://www.wsj.com/articles/timeline-brett-kavanaughs-rise-to-supreme-court-nominee-1531255425
I think that the SEEDS of DISCREDITING HIM were sown in 2005.
THAT explains the NATURE of the LAWYERED UP statements of Judge and others.
The way CIA does a lot of this stuff is by suggestion. So I’m not saying that Judge KNEW at the time what was going on. But he may realize it now, and THAT is useful, just like the REAL PERP is unlikely to counter her story in any meaningful way that removes all doubt.
“Useful guilt keeps people quiet and lets things unfold according to a predictable script.”
An important lawfare principle.
I think this case is NASTY and may be a true conspiracy against Brett Kavanaugh.

I have been reminded by fellow Treepers that Dr. Ford is at legal risk if she either testifies OR if the letter is entered as evidence. Aren’t these things making sense now? Doesn’t CHI-FI / SPY-FI and her rather unorthodox way of “whoops” accidentally making this known, which was “kinds sorta not legally binding”, make sense now?
Indeed, isn’t everything making sense now?
W

JamesCoburncafescene — **“Bart O’Cavanaugh? This must be that ‘Fake News’ from the future they told me about.”**

The Lawfare Playbook Is Already Written

I just had a profound realization over at the Treehouse.
And that’s not counting the fact that the scenario I describe probably solves the Kavanaugh case via Ed Whelan’s findings. THAT is just one of many.
THE PLAYBOOK OF PERSONAL DESTRUCTION BY CRIMINAL LAWFARE HAS ALREADY BEEN WRITTEN FOR EVERY SINGLE TRUMP SCOTUS NOMINEE, JUST AS IT HAS BEEN FOR EVERY OTHER ENEMY OF THE DEEP STATE.
JUST AS IT WAS FOR TRUMP.
THESE ARE NOT “ONE-OFFS”. THEY WERE PREPARED LONG AGO.
I believe I understand what is going on with Kavanaugh’s accuser. This is based on the fact that a MORE LIKELY PERPETRATOR was found – a (still) lecherous drinker who grew up in a house that fits the accuser’s party description perfectly.
I have copied my posts of REALIZATION as follows. Watch how my thought progresses. Check my earlier Twitter for the lead-up. Even a few days ago, I was beginning to see how it comes together, piece by piece.

wolfmoon1776 says:

September 21, 2018 at 12:47 am

I believe that we are on the path to the truth, and that it passes through this man. In fact, if this was ever REALLY investigated, I think Garrett would be the top suspect. I think we have a perp who is being ingloriously defended by a liar. This is Democrat CIA playbook. I’ve been in a script like this. I know how it works. The guilty party is supposed to shut up and let the miscarriage work out the way the Dems want.
The Dems write these lawfare scripts based on the idea that people behave predictably in complex cases to protect themselves, and trust me – they do. I behaved predictably – but I never forgot what really happened.
I’m sorry – at this point it’s a MESS. This is why we need Rule of Law, etc. But when the Democrats decide to mud-wrestle, instead of rule of law, we cannot back down. We fight back, out in the open, until the truth is found.
They want to do it this way? Then their accuser GOES DOWN THIS WAY.
Democrats turned it into a kangaroo court. REMEMBER THAT IN NOVEMBER.
People want to end this kind of mud-slinging? Then VOTE THEM OUT. It is the ONLY WAY.

jetstream says:

September 21, 2018 at 1:25 am

Curious as to what you mean:
“I think we have a perp who is being ingloriously defended by a liar.”
Agree that the Democrat’s kangaroo court of manipulated public opinion obliterates Rule of Law. No one should be persecuted by accusation and innuendo without a proper investigation and evidence. Sorry to hear you went through such an experience.

Liked by you

wolfmoon1776 says:

September 21, 2018 at 2:15 am

Thank you. You just solved this. Digging into that solves this.
Here is how it works. Diagramming this out makes me even more certain this is what happened.
ABCD are four acquaintances.
A commits a petty semi-forgotten crime against B. A few people know about it, but it dies.
C and D know the others. C *may* know about the crime. D does NOT.
Years pass.
B obtains motive against D. If D had done to B what A did to her, D would be destroyed.
Now – something interesting happens.
C has written a book which may or may not share motive. It somewhat describes the crime, but not completely. It uses D’s name – almost – for A’s.
Note that this is very suspicious now, and resembles long-range discreditation operations I’m familiar with. This book has little reason to exist, IMO. Its greatest attribute is taking out Kavanaugh. Do the math. Seriously. Cause-effect reversal can crack cases.
The time arrives to discredit D. B lies about the crime and says D did it, not A.
A’s crime is protected by B’s lie that D is the perpetrator, and not A. As long as A stays quiet, no problem. As long as C stays quiet, no problem.
This is particularly true if C got money for the book and was compromised somehow in the process, such as being informed about things that make him an accessory before the fact.
I think it’s a conspiracy, with the word of 3 against 1. It’s beautiful. An almost perfect crime. But the crowd beat it.
Appendix:
I believe that the reason we see the same “playbook plays” over and over is that the plays are ALREADY CONSTRUCTED. They are already written. This fits with the discred ops that were prepared against me. They seemed to have been prepared YEARS in advance.
So what I am saying is that similar conspiracies have been prepared for EVERY one of the Republican SCOTUS nominees. I am not kidding.
Doesn’t that explain a lot?

This is all based upon a Twitter thread that starts with THIS tweet:
https://twitter.com/EdWhelanEPPC/status/1042893987747713024
and which is summarized by a link in this tweet:
https://twitter.com/Baba9773/status/1042930048062435330
https://twitter.com/Baba9773/status/1042930048062435330
Direct link here:
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1042893987747713024.html
I have a variety of tweets surrounding these tweets that explain more fully why I think Whelan has something here – OTHER evidence that falls in line with his thinking. Just check my timeline around the above tweets.

It is my opinion that:
1. Judge Kavanaugh should be confirmed.
2. The FBI should be ORDERED to investigate a case of CONSPIRACY against Judge Kavanaugh. (Note: The FBI’s prior rejection of the case was somewhat according to script (figure this out to follow me here – this is weaponized psychological relief – a pattern in this case and others that provides predictable behaviors), and thus there needs to be an internal investigation at FBI surrounding their part in this. Somebody is helping.)
3. A special counsel should be launched to investigate CIA/DNC political frauds, crimes, and conspiracies, based on results of this case, Spygate, Watergate (induced conspiracy), Halper/Reagan, and any other similar conspiracies, including leverage operations against private institutions and individuals. This will include murder of witnesses and attempted murder of witnesses.
Actually, we may need a few special counsels.