Over The Target: Our First Site Hack

It’s great to know that we’re already bothering the other side. Tonight – the first attack on this site, via the WordPress sidebar widgets. These are people who know who I am, too – very interesting. My guess is KGB-CIA, although Brits and ChiComs are likely, too.
Sadly, I may have to disable the sidebar, but we’ll see. WordPress will need to be notified that they are vulnerable to some new hack, possibly via those sidebar widgets.
This is not the first time WordPress has been hacked.

https://thehackernews.com/2017/06/wordpress-hacking-sql-injection.html
So far, what I have seen is only modification of the “followed blogs” list. Somehow they are able to manipulate that list. It’s very likely they can do more, but we’ll see.
Remember – SCREENSHOTS are your friend in dealing with these perps. Sadly, I MISSED the very first one, so you’ll have to do with a description of that first image.

Here is what my sidebar blog and link lists should look like now. This is close to what they looked like at the beginning of this story, after I added them.

Intitially, the “Blogroll” list looked a lot bigger – it was filled with what looked like “suggested” WordPress internal blogs from WordPress itself, explaining different options, services, etc. I pared that down to what you see above.
The “Blogs I Follow” list looked just like above, but it was partially unfamiliar – I had forgotten about “BrotherWatch” and “The Daily Post”, which I believe I followed while tending my other blog, wolfmoon1776.wordpress.com. but otherwise, THAT seemed normal.
A bit later, while working on the site, I noticed that the “Follow” list was now MUCH longer, and filled with MANY unfamiliar blogs. I thought that maybe these were SUGGESTED blogs – or perhaps blogs I had at one time visited. I thought that I MIGHT have visited one or two, but on looking at them more closely, they didn’t seem familiar at all. And I was definitely NOT following them.
Then it struck me. These blogs may have been used to support a PLAUSIBLE DOXXING PATH. They were not influence – these people are WELL beyond attempting influence at this point. I think they want things to LOOK like influence while trying to find paths to discredit.
The other side knows exactly who I am. They have worked very skillfully to try to degrade my effectiveness in various ways, both online and in real life. At some point I’ll get into the details, but for now, let’s just stick to the hack.
Once I realized that I didn’t follow these blogs, and that they were likely a hack of some kind, I added a Sidebar Text Widget to explain that people would be seeing blogs I didn’t actually follow. I was going to suggest it was a HACK. But THEN, thinking best not to overreact, I cut back the explanation to just the following – saying that I didn’t follow all these blogs.

After I posted THAT, this is what my sidebar looked like:

Yes. It was back to normal. I had definitely been HACKED at some level. It was possible that the hack was limited in some fashion. SO – I opened up the Text Widget and changed it to THIS:

Well, THAT provoked THIS reaction from the hackers:

I made sure I took pictures, and then refreshed the browser. Back to normal:

And guess what? Just now, they’ve changed it BACK to the insult, while I’m in the process of editing this post.

THAT is a clue to the hack. They do this stuff while I’m either working on the site, or adding a post. Intercepted token, perhaps? Oh, CIA! You’re so CHINA!
So – the bottom line is that we’re over the target. But I’ll probably remove the widget.
Say goodbye to our friends! Stefan Halper, the architect of Watergate:

Cankles – the architect of the attacks on Brett Kavanaugh:

And CHINA, the architect of EVIL:

I keep telling these people to just leave me alone. And EVERY TIME they fail to take my advice. But – that’s OK. It’s like Q says.
These people are….. yeah.
Win a penny. Lose a buck.
PS – I think I just realized something even MORE damaging to the other side. THIS is not just about me. It’s a GENERAL HACK that they use to INFLUENCE people by making them believe that people who influence them follow other people who they don’t really follow.
Isn’t that an amazing social engineering hack? They are using HACKED FOLLOW LISTS to deceive us about who follows who – who LOOKS to who. Who RESPECTS who.
And you KNOW – you just KNOW – that the Facebook empire is using this technique to modify Americans OUT THE WAZOO.

I need to ask a question:

HOW MUCH HAVE THEY BEEN MODIFYING THE TREEHOUSE?
And another:
How do I know I’m seeing the same Treehouse everybody else is seeing?
Answer:
I don’t. It will be interesting to see if WordPress fixes their follow lists. Or not.

Interesting.

Coburn_Laughing — **“And then he says ‘Yeah, but it’s a COPPER penny!'”**

The Timelines Always Get Them

One of the greatest things I ever learned from Sundance over at The Last Refuge is this:

the timelines always get them

I will keep this simple, so the “aha” is easy to see.
This is my prior article on the conspiracy against Brett Kavanaugh:

Here is a link to said prior post on the conspiracy against Brett Kavanaugh. You can come back to it – it’s not needed to understand the following, although it helps fill in details.
Now, here is an article about the obscure (in my opinion) Mark Judge book that uses a very interestingly “barely camouflaged” version of Brett Kavanaugh’s name as somebody likely to be assumed to be Dr. Ford’s assailant. The name was changed to “Bart O’Cavanaugh”, if I remember the spelling correctly. C or K.
Note that this is not normally an expensive book – but it’s hard to get now, and hence the inflated price.
I will confess making a joke that this “rare book” was “worth something for a reason”.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2018/09/19/brett-kavanaugh-mark-judge-georgetown-prep-book/1357739002/
The book is listed here as being published in 2005.
2005, you say? Yes! 2005!
Question! Where does that fit on the Brett Kavanaugh career TIMELINE?
Glad you asked!
Here is a convenient Wall Street Journal article about – well – just look!

https://www.wsj.com/articles/timeline-brett-kavanaughs-rise-to-supreme-court-nominee-1531255425
Allow me to call attention to this part of it:

At this point, if you haven’t, you can go back to that link above to my prior post.
And now, to spell it all out, here is a comment I did on this on The Treehouse.
This was in response to Cari Kelemen (ParteaGirl) saying that she thought this claim was political from the very beginning.

The fact that Christine Ford made her claims- NOT to a law enforcement official- but to a POLITICIAN first tells me this was politically motivated from the get-go.

— Cari Kelemen (@KelemenCari) September 22, 2018

wolfmoon1776 says:

September 22, 2018 at 1:53 am

Absolutely. And I think the get-go goes WAY BACK.
Look at that Mark Judge book that conflates Kavanaugh’s name with (IMO) somebody else’s crime:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2018/09/19/brett-kavanaugh-mark-judge-georgetown-prep-book/1357739002/
The year is 2005. This book seems like a loser – the only thing it really seems good for is what it’s doing now. And remember – Hillary and her friends run the publishing industry. That part of the media is VERY Democrat. They use book deals as payoffs ALL THE TIME.
Look at the TIMELINE of Kavanaugh’s career here. Notice what’s going on around 2005?
https://www.wsj.com/articles/timeline-brett-kavanaughs-rise-to-supreme-court-nominee-1531255425
I think that the SEEDS of DISCREDITING HIM were sown in 2005.
THAT explains the NATURE of the LAWYERED UP statements of Judge and others.
The way CIA does a lot of this stuff is by suggestion. So I’m not saying that Judge KNEW at the time what was going on. But he may realize it now, and THAT is useful, just like the REAL PERP is unlikely to counter her story in any meaningful way that removes all doubt.
“Useful guilt keeps people quiet and lets things unfold according to a predictable script.”
An important lawfare principle.
I think this case is NASTY and may be a true conspiracy against Brett Kavanaugh.

I have been reminded by fellow Treepers that Dr. Ford is at legal risk if she either testifies OR if the letter is entered as evidence. Aren’t these things making sense now? Doesn’t CHI-FI / SPY-FI and her rather unorthodox way of “whoops” accidentally making this known, which was “kinds sorta not legally binding”, make sense now?
Indeed, isn’t everything making sense now?
W

JamesCoburncafescene — **“Bart O’Cavanaugh? This must be that ‘Fake News’ from the future they told me about.”**

Dear MAGA: Open Topic 20180920

This intermittently re-posted open thread will be VERY OPEN – a place for the various MAGA, Treeper and Q communities to post whatever they feel they would like to tell the White Hats, and the rest of the MAGA world. We ask that people NOT duplicate material posted to the Treehouse open threads. Don’t cross-post, please. We expect things that are more relevant to the Q community to show up here.
Say what you want, comment on what other people said, comment on people’s comments. Keep it civil. Treehouse rules, but expect lots of QAnon.
W

The Q Tree

I have decided to create a special BRANCH where those who are both Treepers (posters at The Conservative Treehouse, a.k.a. The Last Refuge, a.k.a. CTH, a.k.a. TCTH, a.k.a. https://theconservativetreehouse.com) and followers of the QAnon movement (Q-tards – whatever they want to call us) can discuss QAnon topics in peace and harmony.
I will work out the rules as we go, though I will err toward Free Speech within the limits of UNIMPEDED RESEARCH (very important) and productive discussion. Growth will be slow. Please be patient. I have never done anything like this before.
Part of my motivation is to keep QAnon fans in the orbit of CTH, and to help keep QAnon posting OFF of CTH. There is a strategic reason for this. Sometimes I will explain why I do things. Other times I will not. People are welcome to try to guess why I say things – this is ALWAYS a good exercise in understanding – something Q is trying to teach us. Why would I want to draw QAnon posting away from CTH?
I have no connection to Q other than a desire to understand Q. As Q says, there is only Q, although Q+ appears sometimes. When I call myself W, it is homage to Q – nothing more.
-Wolf

PS – can you guess what WQTH stands for? Yes! Easy! I wanted SHORT, SWEET, and most of all EASY TO REMEMBER.

M	T	W	T	F	S	S
1	2	3	4	5	6	7
8	9	10	11	12	13	14
15	16	17	18	19	20	21
22	23	24	25	26	27	28
29	30	31