“We do not believe any group of men adequate enough or wise enough to operate without scrutiny or without criticism. We know that the only way to avoid error is to detect it, that the only way to detect it is to be free to inquire. We know that in secrecy error undetected will flourish and subvert.” –J. Robert Oppenheimer
This intermittently re-posted open thread will be VERY OPEN – a place for the various MAGA, Treeper and Q communities to post whatever they feel they would like to tell the White Hats, and the rest of the MAGA world. We ask that people NOT duplicate material posted to the Treehouse open threads. Don’t cross-post, please. We expect things that are more relevant to the Q community to show up here.
Say what you want, comment on what other people said, comment on people’s comments. Keep it civil. Treehouse rules, but expect lots of QAnon.
W
It says right here that on the advice of Wheatietoo and Plain Jane, Wolf Moon is going to make me, James Coburn, the site mascot. You go, girls! Memes away! I could use a wardrobe upgrade.
When people say “we are Q“, I find it immensely satisfying to consider the reality of that statement, and not to simply brush it off. To look at the totality of our elaboration of Q posts into a movement, and consider how we might do it better.
Clearly, understanding Q helps us do it better. And what – actually – IS that understanding?
It is that vibrant, moving, shifting, intelligent sum of our understandings, changing itself. Thus, I find that people’s own INDIVIDUAL VIEWS of Q actually help CONSTITUTE what “Q” – the larger Q, so to speak – thinks. And the CHANGE in that sum comes from SELF-AWARENESS and INTER-AWARENESS of the parts.
Simple, in the end. But let’s not just think – let’s DO. para59r had an interesting point of view on Q, from the comments on my first REAL post here, that I thought I would share, so that others could discuss. I find myself in strong agreement with many of the points made.
An image of the original post, and then the text (for those who use text reader devices) is provided. IMAGE: TEXT:
In Q’s case being absolute could mean exposure. Ever notice that his proofs can only run so far. That his drops are are just a tad off from someone elses? He needs the validation but can’t really afford it. Does it really bother anyone that his bombs don’t seem to have the desired effect when neither do ours.
Trust Sessions, Trust Wray is not really the point. It’s trust the VSG in the White House who has trusted Sessions, and has trusted Wray.
If we remember back far enough at one point the Tree House thought Mueller was a good idea. Times change, fog clears and when it does we get ourselves back in order and push on. Some though might seem still to far out on the flank, still running with the old plan, or working with a copy we don’t have, seemingly out of touch but they’re watching from their lofty heights and laying down what fire they can as we saps in the trenches grind on toward the objective.
Q’s a phantom force and just like an army we have a certain antipathy for the air force, their objectives vs ours. They’re carving up a larger swath of land taking the battle deep in unwinnable territory to soften the enemy’s support, to disrupt what they can, as opposed to our closer more defined objectives, where the battle grinds on and success is measured daily in meters and yards, but its all the same war and were all on the same side.
I find this to be a great BRIDGE to several important points about the Q strategy, and even the larger POTUS strategy. Some of these points I find validating in themselves, BECAUSE they are so strategic, and maybe even optimally so. If we were NOT doing them, we would want to be doing them.
But rather than point them out myself, I think it’s worth challenging readers to identify them and discuss. What think Q?
W
Wolf Moon reads about battles others have been in, will be in, and are fighting at this very moment, and realizes that the battle is everywhere, whether he likes it or not. Even in the peaceful cafe.
>>3093831
No.
Highest classification.
Consider the vastness of space.
Q
People are already asking a lot of questions about this, and one of the theories (which actually makes a lot of sense) is that it was simply a bandwidth test. However, I think it may have also been a “believability test”, too. Probably for a variety of reasons.
Anyway, on Twitter, there was some discussion of it, and I’d like to bring my thoughts here. I’m not going to be too argumentative about them – this is all very speculative. But still, I want people to see my thoughts, which are likely going to be tamped down BIG-TIME on Twitter.
For this reason, I’ll present it as IMAGES first, of each tweet, which can’t be removed by Twitter. I’ll include the actual Tweets as an appendix. People can click on those and go to them, if they are still there.
Next, somebody responds with an earlier Q post on the topic.
Somebody responded to THAT with a “Got it!”
And THAT is where I jumped in.
My thoughts will be hidden on Twitter – nobody will see them. That’s why I’m bringing them here – to share with people who can appreciate them. Not necessarily agree. Just something to think about.
Here we go.
Hopefully that is clear. To put it more bluntly, Q sometimes misleads extremely well – especially the other side, but doesn’t just outright lie. I find it difficult to reconcile the idea that this is disinformation with Q’s normal style – particularly when science (in my opinion) agrees with the idea of pervasive life in the universe (which also, in my opinion, argues for God).
I then began expanding on that.
Nevertheless, I do think it was a bandwidth test.
Now I want to get into why Q’s final answer is even more convincing to me. When you see “AO”, that is my abbreviation for “Alpha and Omega”.
What I’m talking about there is an aspect of the “anthropic principle”, which basically says “isn’t it weird that the universe seems so suited for humans?”, and scaling it up to the “isn’t it weird that Star Trek is even possible?” level.
Many argue that the anthropic principle is a tautology anyway, and I certainly see that point. However, if one simply accepts the idea that the universe we experience is optimized toward intelligence for the reason of the tautology, then it becomes highly predictive at the same time, and the more and more we see it borne out, the more it tends to argue for intelligence as a kind of first principle of the universe.
Hmmmm. That sounds like something. Some old thought of mankind. Where is Descartes? Wake him up – he would be interested in this stuff.
Anyway, now it’s time to think of how mind-blowing all of THAT really is.
Great Awakening actually BEING a “great awakening”? Wow. Could be.
But now I don’t want to provoke arguments, so I’m going to let the people who are going pale in the face have an out. Here is where that starts.
Q has stated multiple times that “they” came to the chans for a reason. Being “first to be able to believe” freaky stuff is very likely part of that.
Now I wrap up with the “WHEW” post. “Hey there – don’t worry – maybe only a few believe me – I think that’s what they wanted.”
That will give people PROPER pause – easy to reject – easy to accept – your call.
There you have it. The moment I believed Q about aliens. I was only believing what I already believed, but I believed that Q was telling me the truth. I believe this may actually be the first moment of official public disclosure, so I took a picture.
W
“I wonder if this was why…. her turn…. interesting. I think there may be more to this story than what’s in this newspaper.”
PS – there is also – via YouTube – considerable DISINFORMATION about aliens. Because the YouTube Brin/Wojcicki Red Diaper Socialist Club targets me individually with certain types of disinformation via their product, and particularly about aliens, and because I’m aware of it, I have reconstructed the Hillary left’s agenda on that issue VERY clearly. It is definitely Satanic and atheistic, which is a bit of a contradiction in terms, but it’s 100% Cabal.
The message is BAD HUMANS who DESERVE CONTROL. BAD AMERICAN MILITARY which is EVIL and TRUMP. We need GOOD SOCIALISM.
That is not the Q message. THANK GOD.
Sensible answer on ETI was bona fides as far as I'm concerned. But I am surprised that Q was allowed to post first answer (Alone? No.) which is definitive, and to imply Roswell by classification. Q psy-op always stays in legal bounds. This means there is some disclosure EO now. pic.twitter.com/Qi0wArZWaa
This is not to say this is not also a bandwidth test – I'm sure it was. Everything Q does or says is multi-purpose like Trump – key aspect of comms – they are dense with information up to level of metaphor. I do not think Q would sacrifice trust unnecessarily on key items.
Getting the impression that Q references to years of preparation for Great Awakening includes many things. This level of information and paradigm shift for "normies" is clearly justification for what is going on. Those who can mull the mind-blowing things may want to get comfy.
Hope I'm not freaking anybody out. If most want to say bandwidth test and disinfo, great, but I'm hoping a few seed crystals are forming in a few people seeing what I'm saying, b/c it was probably intended. OK – time to go slap myself and get a drink. /end
