The Spike Protein’s Purpose Betrayed By Its Own Superiority

TL;DR – you MUST listen to a short podcast of a scientist revealing the latest research on the spike protein vaccines. The VACCINE ITSELF (not just the spike protein – the mRNA vaccine itself) is persistent and is not only concentrating in ovaries – THE VACCINE ITSELF IS EXCRETED – e.g., in breast milk. Meaning – “shedding” of *VACCINE ITSELF* is real. And then it gets worse. That COVID researcher, Bing Liu, who was murdered? He was a member of one of the first groups to discover the “snake protein” analogy – LONG BEFORE THE VACCINES WERE RELEASED.


The Snake Protein – whoops – I mean Spike Protein – it’s all blowing up now.

The information is coming so fast I can barely get it into here before some NEW thing blows up.

Let’s start here.

BIG THANKS to DP for putting me on this trail.

That link is to an interview HERE:

https://omny.fm/shows/on-point-with-alex-pierson/new-peer-reviewed-study-on-covid-19-vaccines-sugge

This is really worth listening to. The doctor WARNS that what he’s going to say is a bit scary.

This is 9 minutes and 11 seconds you NEED TO HEAR.

This leads to his point about concentration in the ovaries.

Follow the above tweet to THIS tweet:

Which retweets THIS tweet:

https://twitter.com/cov19treatments/status/1398971745483251716

And you can look at the animal data.

Observe how it persists for a long time. Look how it concentrates in the ovaries over that long period of time. Those numbers are SHOCKER and HUGE and stand out like a SORE THUMB.

THEY KNEW.

This same tweet is just a gold mine in the replies. Let’s start off with the SNAKE protein. You remember my last post about that?


Spike Protein = Spike Protein ≈ Snake Protein

Using Principles of Protein Equivalence and Analogy as Predictive Tools for Coronavirus Understanding Surely you’ve heard of the BROWN RECLUSE SPIDER. The brown recluse is related to several other recluses, and a couple of other families of spiders, that all have a similar venom – a protein called sphingomyelinase D. This is an enzyme that …


OMG, I was so much righter than I thought. Look at this REPLY to the tweet above.

Let’s just blow up those images.

First, some snake protein motifs in the spike protein (direct evidence). There is also correlation to rabies neurotoxin.

This comes from a French lab and was received in April of 2020.

Reçu le : 2020-04-16
Accepté le : 2020-04-18
Publié le : 2020-06-05
DOI : https://doi.org/10.5802/crbiol.8

ARCHIVE: https://archive.is/THeQ7

The second, referenced tweet, brings in Bing Liu, the murdered researcher.

Who was actually one of TWO murdered COVID-19 researchers:

LINK: https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/05/17/new-pandemic-two-trailblazing-covid-19-researchers-dead-in-month/

ARCHIVE: https://archive.is/CgoeH

So what was this Bing guy’s lab working on?

Here is a sample:

This means they discovered the SNAKE PROTEIN ANALOGY. Before May 2020 was out. Bing was killed on May 2, 2020.

That comes from THIS paper, sent for review on May 26, 2020.

https://www.pnas.org/content/117/41/25254

Here is an archive of the paper, just in case:

https://archive.is/VdjE9

The author of the tweet, “alberto silva”, archived a tweet showing that he figured this out in November of 2020, before the vaccines were released.

ARCHIVE: https://archive.is/OfcuG


OK? Look – I’m sorry – this is such extreme bullshit, that I am finally starting to understand WHY “people” are pulling out all the stops here.

They have a PLAN.

They have an AGENDA.

I suspect that Bing Liu was mouthing off about the protein analogy in ways that threatened the WHOLE SPIKE PROTEIN VACCINES – or more likely the REAL PURPOSES of the vaccines.

Sure, there was money involved, but I think there was also a lot of AGENDA.

I mean – let’s just say that I know a certain researcher who didn’t die in a lab accident that used MK to pull it off, which lab accident was very convenient to both money and agenda, and would have been even more convenient had both injured parties DIED.

And now we’ve got what looks like TWO MK murders – one of a COVID researcher who spotted the problems with the full spike protein vaccines – the second an Army doctor connected to the origins of the pandemic in Wuhan. In these cases, MK was likely used on third-party violence-prone individuals.

This is WAY bigger than Fauci. And THAT is likely why the Democrat media is setting Fauci on fire.

It’s a FIREBREAK. It’s a CUOMO KISSING SCANDAL DIVERSION.

It’s WAY, WAY, WAY bigger than Fauci.

DO NOT SETTLE FOR FAUCI.

THIS BRINGS DOWN THE WHOLE CABAL.

I am not kidding.

W

PS – From this information, one can see how luciferase actually matters – it’s used to report on WHERE THE VACCINE GOES in the crucial hidden data on the vaccines. This is potentially another reason why “luciferase disinformation” was distributed to vaccine opponents, through a variety of means, including early information about the Moderna vaccine itself, which was not true, but served as attractive chaff to keep opponents from discovering the REAL problems with and purposes of the vaccines. There are multiple reasons why this was done, but one of them is obvious now – obscuring THIS critical work. In any case, it may be possible to use the distribution of disinformation to vaccine opponents as a way to figure out who in the industry KNEW what was being covered up.


References

Deplorable Patriot’s tip that put me onto this stuff:

LINK: https://www.theqtree.com/2021/05/30/dear-kmag-20210530-open-topic/#comment-746375

Tweet on spike protein problem study:

LINK: https://twitter.com/pc_432/status/1399087077392674817

Alex Pierson interview with immunologist about spike protein:

https://omny.fm/shows/on-point-with-alex-pierson/new-peer-reviewed-study-on-covid-19-vaccines-sugge

Tweet on ovarian concentration:

LINK: https://twitter.com/pc_432/status/1399087079393415168

Tweet with ovarian concentration data:

LINK: https://twitter.com/cov19treatments/status/1398971745483251716

Tweet on spike protein / snake protein correlation:

LINK: https://twitter.com/amicocolorido/status/1399105106562457600

Earlier Tweet on spike protein / snake protein correlation (Nov. 3, 2020):

LINK: https://twitter.com/amicocolorido/status/1323671478395699200

Thread reader archive of spike protein / snake protein tweet:

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1323671478395699200.html

Article on murdered COVID researchers:

Archive of article on murdered COVID researchers:

https://archive.is/CgoeH

Snake protein correlation first identified in this paper:

https://comptes-rendus.academie-sciences.fr/biologies/item/CRBIOL_2020__343_1_33_0/

Archive of snake protein paper 1:

https://archive.is/THeQ7

Snake protein correlation also first identified in this paper:

https://www.pnas.org/content/117/41/25254

Archive of snake protein paper 2:

https://archive.is/VdjE9

Archive of tweet showing understanding of problem and murder by November 2020:

https://archive.is/OfcuG

5 5 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
79 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
wheatietoo

I’ve been wondering why they called them “spike proteins”.

Why did they used the word, ‘spike’?

Was it a reference to spikes on a graph or something?

Sorry, this is probably a stoopid question.
 😔 

cthulhu

As I understand it, viruses are genetic material wrapped in a protein coat. Now, if this were all they were, nothing would ever be exposed to the genetic material until it was all flushed from the body. So the protein coat has “decorations” on it — partially to ensure that it can pass as “friendly” while the organism’s immune system looks for it, and partially to interact with the the organism’s victim cells.

A corona virus is called that because it looks like it’s wearing a “crown” of such decorations — some to deflect and some to attack. The spike protein is the attack, and actually physically elongates to shove its way through a cell’s defenses.

cthulhu

Here’s a pic (if it works) —

comment image

cthulhu

Here’s another shot (if it works) —

comment image

Mind you, when we’re talking about a virus’ proteins, we are talking about an individual protein molecule — not a slab of steak. In addition, these are complicated proteins and not something like cornstarch:

static.molinstincts.com/compound_3d/Cornstarch-3D-structure-CT1087471098.png

The structure looks more like

comment image

(That is, in fact, a diagram of the A chain of C-19 from https://www.rcsb.org/structure/7bz5 .)

wheatietoo

 The spike protein is the attack, and actually physically elongates to shove its way through a cell’s defenses.

Ah, so it’s like the spike protein is virus’s offensive weapon that it uses to penetrate the organism’s cells.

Thanks, Coothie.
 😊 

cthulhu

Yep….and what Wolf noted early on is that the protein alone can do damage even without the virus being attached to it.

Sort of like a home invasion robbery can start with kicking down your door…..but if something kicks down your door and doesn’t invade your home, you still have been damaged.

kalbokalbs

Sorta like HCQ opens up Covid for Zinc to zap it. Along with whatever other vitamins and minerals we may be taking.

cthulhu

Only slightly similar, in that there is a way for stuff from the outside to get inside.

HCQ is like checking the outside wall of your laundry room, using a stud finder to find studs, drilling a hole between, and installing a duct vent with damper for your dryer exhaust.

Spike protein is like starting at your mail slot (the ACE2 receptor), and hacking your way in with a chainsaw.

kalbokalbs

Thanks for the clarification.

cthulhu

And, no — it’s not a stupid question. It’s a basic question, which makes it necessary to interpret many things….but it’s far from obvious when people go around assuming.

slowcreekno

The spike is like a tent spike or the sharp tip of a spear.

From a description I saw, the spike protein attaches itself to the sites on the cells known as the ACE2 receptors, and once it attaches, it folds over, and the sharp tip breaches the cell membrane, by poking a hole in it, then the rest of the virus can follow along into the cell.

wheatietoo

Thanks, Slowcreek. 😊 

cthulhu

Let’s see how well this one works —

https://phil.cdc.gov//PHIL_Images/23313/23313.tif

cthulhu

OK, so here’s the entire spike glycoprotein (it’s a protein that has sugar in it).

comment image

….if it works.

cthulhu

And here’s a model that is intended to be 3D printed.

comment image

The lower flat is the surface of the virus. The extended red/brown thing on a stalk is the extended spike protein (not the quiescent version above). The upper surface is the target cell’s wall. And the teal structure is the human ACE2 receptor of the target.

The spike protein’s function for the virus is to rip its way into a cell by means of an ACE2 gateway. The spike protein, however, can cause damage on its own.

Tonawanda

May God have mercy on us all.

Tonawanda

The practical implications are breath-taking in so many respects.

singingsoul1

Ovaries affected in women in the US and other places except china. I read the are saying their population should have three kids. How convenient (S)

singingsoul1

Evil that is all I can say

Deplorable Patriot

Dr. Merritt on one of the videos went through all the genetically different groups and the percentages that would be effected. I don’t remember what she said about the Chinese, but there was another group that was immune that was REALLY interesting in the larger scheme of things. It’s not politically correct to talk about this group, though.

Gail Combs

For those wondering…

Bungarus genera  = Kraits snakes found in ASIA.

Kraits

Kraits (Bungarus) are distributed through Asia and they consist of 12 species of which the principal ones are B. candidus or Malayan krait, B. fasciatus or banded krait, B. caeruleus or common krait, B. multicinctus or Chinese krait, and B. niger or greater black krait (Chippaux, 2006; Warrell, 2010b). Of these, the common krait, B. caeruleus, is found in Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, India, and Pakistan. It is reputed to be the deadliest in Sri Lanka (Kularatne, 2001). Krait venom contains β-bungarotoxin, a presynaptic blocker which causes muscle paralysis as the sole clinical manifestation. The common krait is a nocturnal terrestrial snake living close to human dwellings and the bites happen mostly at night where people sleep on the floor in mud huts. Very often the victims are unaware of the bite. Abdominal pain and progressive muscle paralysis occurs, causing respiratory failure in about 50% of cases….

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/immunology-and-microbiology/bungarus

Concerned Virginian

Wolf Moon
Fantastic post, thank you!
It would appear that Dr. Anthony “Fauci-Mengele” was a “useful tool” to the Cabal / World Domination masters in this situation; and now that he’s been “outed” by Sen. Dr. Rand Paul, “Fauci-Mengele” will be discarded.
To this end, one may assume that the medical and research communities were sitting on / hiding, the knowledge about the spike proteins — and, at the same time, the Big Pharma companies ALSO had knowledge and ignored it / hid it, while working on their “vaccines”.
And in making sure that the information was kept from / hidden from, REALPOTUS 45 Donald Trump — they used their “point man”, “Fauci-Mengele”.

And not only this —
It would appear that the CCP”Fauci-Mengele” virus “vaccines” also contain elements that are comparable to snake venom that has neurological implications.
So the “vaccines” carry within them elements that interfere with / compromise, among other things: brain function; fertility for both males and females; breast milk of women who get the “vaccine” prior to giving birth; cardiac function. And that the spike proteins, once injected into the recipient’s bloodstream, remain in the “host” for the rest of the recipient’s life.

Last edited 3 months ago by Concerned Virginian
Deplorable Patriot

Okay, so it’s the PURIFIED spike protein that’s injected that’s the issue, not the one in the bug that we all got last year that took extra servings of red meat for recovery?

Concerned Virginian

It could be a select form of lab-created synthetic spike protein, made more toxic via GOF research, that’s within the “vaccines”.

Gail Combs

PHARMACEUTICS JOURNAL Special Issue “Self-Organizing Nanovectors for Drug Delivery”
Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 April 2019).

Special Issue Editors

Prof. Dr. Giuseppe De Rosa 

Guest Editor

Department of Pharmacy, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, via Domenico Montesano 49, 80131 Naples, Italy

Interests: drug delivery; nanomedicine; drug targeting; liposomes; self-assembling nanoparticles; systemic delivery; brain delivery; wound healing

Prof. Dr. Pietro Matricardi 

Guest Editor

Department of Drug Chemistry and Technologies, Faculty of Pharmacy and Medicine, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy

Interests: polysaccharide; hydrogels; nanohydrogels; drug delivery; tissue engineering

….

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Nanomedicines have been largely investigated as a useful tool for drug delivery and drug targeting. Despite the vast amount of literature on this subject and the growing number of formulations on the market or in clinical trials, the success rate of nanomedicines from bench to bed side is still low. Among the proposed approaches aiming to facilitate the technology transfer of nanomedicines, biomaterials and formulations able to spontaneously form nanoscale systems are very attractive. In this context, lipids and polymers have been largely proposed for the delivery of nucleic acids; polypeptides have been studied as building materials for drug delivery systems; inorganic or polymeric biomaterials have been combined to assemble in hybrid nanosystems, by mixing two or more components or by layer-by-layer strategy. Finally, formulations prepared by self-emulsifying have been proposed, especially for oral administration. All these approaches do not require high energy for the preparation and should be easy to transfer to large scale production with limited costs of production.

The aim of this Special Issue is to highlight the most recent innovations in the field of self-assembling and self-emulsifying delivery systems, thus providing an updated landscape of the state-of-art in the field, focusing both on the biomaterials and the applications.

Prof. Giuseppe De Rosa

Dr. Pietro Matricardi

Guest Editors

ITALY AGAIN!!!

One of the papers of interest in the Journal.

Latest Advances in the Development of Eukaryotic Vaults as Targeted Drug Delivery Systems

Pharmaceutics 201911(7), 300; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics11070300 – 28 Jun 2019

Cited by 8 | Viewed by 1480

Abstract 

The use of smart drug delivery systems (DDSs) is one of the most promising approaches to overcome some of the drawbacks of drug-based therapies, such as improper biodistribution and lack of specific targeting. Some of the most attractive candidates as DDSs are naturally occurring, self-assembling protein nanoparticles, such as viruses, virus-like particles, ferritin cages, bacterial microcompartments, or eukaryotic vaults. Vaults are large ribonucleoprotein nanoparticles present in almost all eukaryotic cells. Expression in different cell factories of recombinant versions of the “major vault protein” (MVP) results in the production of recombinant vaults indistinguishable from native counterparts. Such recombinant vaults can encapsulate virtually any cargo protein, and they can be specifically targeted by engineering the C-terminus of MVP monomer. These properties, together with nanometric size, a lumen large enough to accommodate cargo molecules, biodegradability, biocompatibility and no immunogenicity, has raised the interest in vaults as smart DDSs. In this work we provide an overview of eukaryotic vaults as a new, self-assembling protein-based DDS, focusing in the latest advances in the production and purification of this platform, its application in nanomedicine, and the current preclinical and clinical assays going on based on this nanovehicle.

comment image

Deplorable Patriot

I do think what’s hopeful with all of these physicians and researchers speaking up is that there will be pressure for the antidote. There has to be one. Judy Mikovitz is right, IMO. This would not be happening if the “elite” didn’t know how to reverse it.

gil00

They always protect themselves first.

Deplorable Patriot

What’s really maddening, though, is that it took something like this for so many to question modern medicine and its “wisdom.”

Drives me crazy sometimes.

Gail Combs

“Modern Medicine’ is a DIRECT DESCENDANT of NAZI WAR CRIMINAL MEDICAL EXPERIMENTS!!!

(I certainly do not believe they hung all those doctors — operation paper clip anyone?)

Rockerfeller Foundation – History of pharmaceutical interests

In the early half of the 20th century, petrochemical giants organized a coup on the medical research facilities, hospitals and universities. The Rockefeller family sponsored research and donated sums to universities and medical schools which had drug based research. They further extended this policy to foreign universities and medical schools where research was drug based through their “International Education Board”. Establishments and research which were were not drug based were refused funding and soon dissolved in favor of the lucrative pharmaceutical industry. In 1939 a “Drug Trust” alliance was formed by the Rockefeller empire and the German chemical company IG Farben (Bayer). After World War Two, IG Farben was dismantled but later emerged as separate corporations within the alliance. Well known companies included General MillsKelloggNestleBristol-Myers SquibbProcter and GambleRoche and Hoechst (Sanofi-Aventis). The Rockefeller empire, in tandem with Chase Manhattan Bank (now JP Morgan Chase), owns over half of the pharmaceutical interests in the United States. It is the largest drug manufacturing combine in the world. Since WWII, the pharmaceutical industry has steadily netted increasing profits to become the world’s second largest manufacturing industry; [3][4] after the arms industry.

The Rockefeller Foundation was originally set up in 1904 as the General Education Fund. The RF was later formed in 1910 and issued a charter in 1913 with the help of Rockefeller millions. Subsequently, the foundation placed it’s own “nominees” in federal health agencies and set the stage for the “reeducation” of the public. A compilation of magazine advertising reveals that as far back as 1948, larger American drug companies spent a total sum of $1,104,224,374 for advertising. Of this sum, Rockefeller-Morgan interests (which went entirely to Rockefeller after Morgan’s death) controlled about 80%. [5] See also AMA.

IG Farben & Auschwitz

Auschwitz was the largest mass extermination factory in human history. However, few people are aware that Auschwitz was a 100% subsidiary of IG Farben. On April 14, 1941, in Ludwigshafen, Otto Armbrust, the IG Farben board member responsible for the Auschwitz project, stated to board colleagues:

“our new friendship with the SS is a blessing. We have determined all measures integrating the concentration camps to benefit our company.”

Thousands of prisoners died during human experiments, drug and vaccine testing. Before longtime Bayer employee and SS Auschwitz doctor Helmut Vetter was executed for administering fatal infections, he wrote to his bosses at Bayer headquarters:

“I have thrown myself into my work wholeheartedly. Especially as I have the opportunity to test our new preparations. I feel like I am in paradise.”

After WWII, IG Farben attempted to shake its abominable image through corporate restructuring and renaming. So great has been their success that the public has no idea that it many of the men responsible for such atrocities, were able to carry on their work even after the collapse of the Nazi regime. Namely, a medical paradigm that relies almost exclusively highly toxic drugs. Such men were in control of the large chemical and pharmaceutical companies, both well before and after Hitler. The Nuremberg Tribunal convicted 24 IG Farben board members and executives on the basis of mass murder, slavery and other crimes. Incredibly, most of them had been released by 1951 and continued to consult with German corporations. The Nuremberg Tribunal dissolved IG Farben into Bayer, Hoechst and BASF, each company 20 times as large as IG Farben in 1944. For almost three decades after WWII, BASF, Bayer and Hoechst (Aventis) filled their highest position, chairman of the board, with former members of the Nazi regime. Bayer has been sued by survivors of medical experiments such as Eva Kor who, along with her sister, survived experiments at the hands of Dr. Josef Mengele.[6] See also Bayer.

And from Pub Med NIH National Library of medicine
Our prescription drugs kill us in large numbers
Abstract

Our prescription drugs are the third leading cause of death after heart disease and cancer in the United States and Europe. Around half of those who die have taken their drugs correctly; the other half die because of errors, such as too high a dose or use of a drug despite contraindications. Our drug agencies are not particularly helpful, as they rely on fake fixes, which are a long list of warnings, precautions, and contraindications for each drug, although they know that no doctor can possibly master all of these. Major reasons for the many drug deaths are impotent drug regulation, widespread crime that includes corruption of the scientific evidence about drugs and bribery of doctors, and lies in drug marketing, which is as harmful as tobacco marketing and, therefore, should be banned. We should take far fewer drugs, and patients should carefully study the package inserts of the drugs their doctors prescribe for them and independent information sources about drugs such as Cochrane reviews, which will make it easier for them to say “no thanks”.

Dr. Jason Fung: Financial Conflicts of Interests and the End of Evidence-Based Medicine

Deplorable Patriot

Oh, believe me. I know. It started with the Flexner Report in about 1909. The [CB] worked to put quack status on all alternative forms of medical practice and therapeutics.

Last edited 3 months ago by Deplorable Patriot
Gail Combs

You need to write that history up for the rest of us. I only know the bits and pieces I have stumbled across.

Deplorable Patriot

Oesteopathy, chiropractic, nature path, traditional medicines were all targeted. IIRC, it was the 1909 Flexner Report. I have a personal connection to the history of it in a former life. Believe it or not, Robert Brookings was involved which might be how he came to the attention of the [CB] before WWI and the War Industries Board.

I’ve got a number of things cooking away from the site, but I can see what I can do.

Gail Combs

ThanQ!!!  🤗 

Deplorable Patriot

Self correction. The report was published in 1910 and done at the behest of the Rockefellers, Andrew Carnegie, et. al. The American system afterwards was set up, yes, to reflect the German methods that developed in the later 19th century. (This in part led to WWII, but that’s a story for another time.)

https://www.cancertutor.com/flexner-report/

If you’ve ever wondered how modern-day medicine got to where it is today, you should begin by learning about Abraham Flexner. He’s probably one of the most influential men no one has ever heard of.

In 1910 he published the book-length report Medical Education in the United States and Canada which is now known as the Flexner Report. And, the rest, as they say, is history.

Abraham Flexner was not a doctor, but this school teacher and educational theorist from Louisville, Kentucky, has had a more significant impact on modern medicine than just about anyone else.

Though institutions such as Johns Hopkins were already implementing “modern principles” into their work, most medical schools had yet to subscribe to these paradigms.

So what Flexner did was to attempt to align medical education under a set of norms that emphasized laboratory research and the patenting of medicine — both of which would serve to further enrich the estates of the entrepreneurs who funded Flexner’s 1910 report: John Rockefeller, Andrew Carnegie, and others.

Sounds like a win-win, right? … Well, not exactly.

In fact, chances are that if Flexner had not submitted his report that audited medical schools in the United States and Canada, we would not have a society heavily biased in favor of many inhumane and unnatural medical practices that we have today.

Should there have been more accountability for medical practitioners in North America? Probably. Should that accountability come from the oil industry and others who saw the domination of medicine as another way to amass wealth? That seems to be a conflict of interest, to put it mildly.

Dr. Thomas P. Duffy in the Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine offered this analysis of Flexner’s approach:

“There was maldevelopment in the structure of medical education in America in the aftermath of the Flexner Report. The profession’s infatuation with the hyper-rational world of German medicine created an excellence in science that was not balanced by a comparable excellence in clinical caring. Flexner’s corpus was all nerves without the life blood of caring. Osler’s warning that the ideals of medicine would change as ‘teacher and student chased each other down the fascinating road of research, forgetful of those wider interests to which a hospital must minister’ has proven prescient and wise.”

But isn’t this sort of what you’d expect when an evil genius — all intellect, no compassion — like Rockefeller determines the future of medical education and care?

Of course, it’s not just the research that modern medicine is after. While notoriety for the latest “breakthroughs” certainly drives most medicine, money is the ultimate determiner of access and availability of treatments.

And getting back to the connection between the robber barons and medicine, why did Rockefeller et al have such an interest in medical education? One possible reason could’ve been their interest in peddling pharmaceuticals that began as byproducts of oil refinement.

Health journalist S.D. Wells notes in the eBook 25 Amazing (and Disturbing) Facts About the Hidden History of Medicine, “Five score and two years ago, a man named Abraham Flexner was hired by John D. Rockefeller to evaluate the effectiveness of therapies being taught by medical colleges and institutions, with the ultimate goal of dominating control over pharmaceuticals.

“With partnerships including Andrew Carnegie and JP Morgan, a new “doorkeeper” would exist to influence legislative bodies on state and federal levels to create regulations and licensing “red tape” that strictly promoted drug medicine while stifling and shutting down alternative, inexpensive natural remedies. Those medical colleges and institutions that did not submit to this superpower of regulation were crushed and put out of business.

“The Flexner report was conveniently titled Medical Education in the United States and Canada and the 22 page control ‘mechanism’ was more or less a teamsters union, and medical schools in the U.S. were cut in half by the Flexner Report in less than 15 years, from 160 to 80, and then down below 70 by World War II. This concentrated control is the direct cause of the majority of problems with health care today.”

Flexner elevated the importance of medical research to a status of near infallibility as he helped import and institute German educational methods in the teaching of medicine.

This brought many needed improvements to medical students’ practical field experience through hands-on learning, but it also built in a strong bias in favor of empirical science (i.e. pharmaceutical drugs) to the exclusion of whole-patient care or any of the more natural treatment options.

Sound familiar? Have you ever experienced this in your journey of medical care? A doctor who threw you a bottle of science while only skimming the surface of your overall health?

Flexner helped pave the way for a medical monopoly that persists to this day. Modern medicine has become such a systemic force that none of this is really shocking to you, right? Of course, drugs are patented. Of course, they’re expensive and controlled by a select group of companies and government agencies. Of course, we can’t use plants as medicine. That’s quackery!

I first came across the using industrial chemicals as part of treatment in a Eustace Mullins book. IIRC, it’s titled Murder by Injection. There A LOT of disturbing information there.

The reason I know about this is in working for one of the medical schools here, the Flexner Report and its aftermath was a big historic milestone in one of the schools as being when they got their act together. (The other one was rated much higher then.) It’s also when the oesteopathy schools took a hit and closed. I’ve seen references to that being about the time chiropractic was labeled “quackery” as well as herbal medicines being witchcraft.

It has to be all related. The cancer site I quote claims it was all the robber barons after centralized profit, which is true on its own right, but I suspect there were larger forces at work.

Last edited 3 months ago by Deplorable Patriot
Deplorable Patriot

And once again, it was sort of a publicity stunt that started the whole mess.

Deplorable Patriot

I’m not sure I would pin this on Operation Paperclip. A lot of the people who made Rockefellerian medicine happen were here already. A lot of Nobel Prize winners escaped Europe between the wars. The facade was pretty much established by the 1930s.

Concerned Virginian

“PCR is not able to differentiate the two — disease and vaccine —”
You’re on to something there.

Brave and Free

I have a question Wolf. So where do the unvaccinated stand in all this?

Linda

That may be why I didn’t have a bad case. I live in western Oregon and everyone here takes vitamin D simply because we have so many rainy days out of the year.

kalbokalbs

Zinc. Is 40mg-50mg still the upper thresh hold?

IIRC, Front Line Docs are a higher daily, but I don’t recall if it was 60mg or 75mg. Perhaps this for treating Covid. Not a preventive.

Presently I am taking 40mg zinc daily.

Gail Combs

Zinc can be toxic.

I take daily ~25 mg via various supplements (Multi vit + zinc/cacium/magnesium)

If I feel a cold/flu I up that by adding a 50 mg tablet washed down with green tea (an ionophore)

Since I am a big meat eater I figure I get enough other zinc from my food.

PubMed: Zinc toxicity

kalbokalbs

Thanks Gail.

Looks like I need to, and will draw down.

cthulhu

I should probably cut it back a bit. I’m doing about 60 mg/day.

cthulhu

I used to do zero until flu season, than 60 through flu season, then zero once those case rates fell…..but I’ve been at max since about March, 2020.

Part of it is that I have seasonal allergies (and photic sneeze reflex) and a constant productive cough and I’ve been worried about government/social overreaction to natural non-contagious conditions, so I’ve been doing actual biochemical responses to social threats……which is not healthy.

bflyjesusgrl

All research I see says 50mg zinc is limit. Hint, be sure to get extra copper somewhere, as too much zinc will deplete copper stores. I take this because my multi and thyroid supplement also contain zinc. $5

Now Foods
Zinc (from L-OptiZinc® Monomethionine)30 mg 200%
Copper (from Copper Amino Acid Chelate)0.3 mg 15%

kalbokalbs

Good to know. Thank you!

Just looked at the stuff I am taking. Each seems to have copper in addition to zinc…

Last edited 3 months ago by kalbokalbs
bflyjesusgrl

YW, glad you’re getting the extra copper! I’ve learned to scrutizine all supllement ingredients carefully, I was od’ing on C and minerals without realizing it, causing unnecessary problems. Also, knowing when to take is important….before/after meals, 4hrs before/after other medicine, in combo w/other supplements….all those details matter too. I got a pharmacy going on here, LOL! 😝

bflyjesusgrl

Because supplementing with large amounts of zinc (such as 30 mg per day or more) may potentially lead to copper deficiency, most doctors recommend taking 2 to 3 mg of copper per day along with zinc.
Can’t find exact ratio, but am seeing 15:1, 30:2, 50:3 in supplements.

Grandmaintexas

Meanwhile, the Chinese are allowing their population to have three kids.

https://www.outkick.com/china-3-children/

cthulhu

Vaguely on point — https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=242559 .

Karl is talking about dating apps giving you a “badge” if you’ve been vaxxed with contraceptive.

Deplorable Patriot

Those sites are meat markets dressed up into a psych profile.

Although, it will be helpful in the future to know who is and who is not if kids are desired.

[…] I CAN tell you that magnets DO NOT stick to COVID swab sites (AS IF!). What I cannot tell you is that you or your children will definitely be able to have children, if you got an mRNA vaccine for COVID-19. […]

scott467

I searched the last couple Covid threads (and the last several daily threads) and did not see any reference to this info, at least one of the tweets below is dated June 1st:

https://dailyheadlines.net/just-in-vaccine-researcher-weve-made-a-big-mistake/?utm_source=Mailer-DH&utm_medium=email&utm_content=subscriber_id:31729702&utm_campaign=DH.net%206-1%206p

For over a year, the American people and everyone else all over the world has been told to “listen to the scientists”, right?

We have been told that we need to trust the “settled science” and those in charge about the virus, but what if they made a mistake?
Listen, they are people who put their pants on one leg at a time just like the rest of us and they are completely capable of making a mistake. However, knowing what I do know about those in charge it may not be a mistake at all but planned out and made to look like a slip-up.

At any rate, this is going to blow your mind what one pro-vaccine researcher has discovered about the COVID-19 vaccine.

Meet Dr. Byram Bridle, a viral immunologist and associate professor at the University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada.

Dr. Bridle describes himself as pro-vaccine so I am not putting any words in his mouth at all. However, even though he is pro-vaccine sometimes the research shows that things have potentially gone awry. In newly discovered research he was able to see about the experimental COVID-19 vaccines even he had to admit that what was found was “scary.”

In a collaboration between Dr. Bridle, other international scientists, and the Japanese regulatory agency, new cutting-edge and peer-reviewed research has made a horrifying discovery about the spike protein used in the experimental jabs.

In an interview with Canadian broadcaster Alex Pierson, Dr. Bridle relayed his findings.

Here’s the interview

The wheels are about to fall off this thing, if this 10 min interview yesterday, with Dr Byram Bridle (viral immunologist at U. Guelph’s Dept of Pathobiology) is any indicator…https://t.co/cCnBszt5If

— Cindi Borax (@cindasana) May 28, 2021

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sis1Sddzbqk&feature=emb_imp_woyt

.

Dr. Bridle: mRNA (Pfizer, Moderna) adenoviral (JNJ AZ) generated SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein travels to the brain, heart, lungs and causes damage and bleeding, goes into breast milk, ovaries, harming maternal-fetal.”We did’nt realize it was so dangerous.” https://t.co/mRogIM42ob

— COVID-19 Evidence-Based Clinical Response Panel (@cov19treatments) May 31, 2021

.

Dr. Byram Bridle, an Associate Professor on Viral Immunology at the University of Guelph – Shocking…. pic.twitter.com/WYkDrBKMN7

— Wittgenstein (@wittgenstein78) May 28, 2021

.

“A big mistake… we thought spike protein was a great target antigen… not a pathogenic protein… we are inadvertently inoculating people with a toxin, can cause cardi-vascular damage, infertility.”

Prof. Byram Bridle, Viral Immunology Uof Guelphhttps://t.co/ttI98qletT

— Dr Peter Moloney Foundation (@DrPeterMoloney) May 28, 2021

https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/13.0.1/svg/1f6a8.svg

.

ALERTE GÉNÉRALE https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/13.0.1/svg/1f6a8.svg

Pr Byram Bridle, PhD “A big mistake… we thought spike protein was a great target antigen… not a pathogenic protein… we are inadvertently inoculating people with a toxin, can cause cardi-vascular damage, infertility.” https://t.co/C56vseb0Kc

— Marie Fourage https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/13.0.1/svg/1f353.svghttps://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/13.0.1/svg/1f353.svghttps://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/13.0.1/svg/1f353.svg (@MarieFourage) May 31, 2021

.

Dr Byram Bridle, Professor of Viral Immunolog: The spike protein in the covid vaccines is a very dangerous toxin. This 7 minute video can save your life, your childrens’ lives and your grandchildren’s lives.https://t.co/0kw7Ztv1q9

— Ossi Tiihonen (@OssiTiihonen) June 1, 2021

Last edited 3 months ago by scott467
Gail Combs

Dr Bridle and his comment was mentioned elsewhere but I do not recall seeing the video so THANQ!

scott467

I think most medical professionals are going to have a hard time accepting that the vaccines are a product of intentional deception for genocidal purposes.

Until they can no longer deny it.

And when that finally happens, it should be the good doctors who recognized the Covid schemes and the vaccine problems early and who are on record trying to warn the public, who lead the charge against all the corrupt doctors who just went along with the schemes and collected their $$$.

The good doctors will be able to spot the bad doctors, see through their BS excuses, in ways that the regular public would be fooled by fast talk and medical lingo.

The good doctors will spot that kind of deception easily.

If they have any hope of restoring confidence in the profession, the good doctors are going to have to play a big role in exposing the bad doctors.

[…] The Spike Protein’s Purpose Betrayed By Its Own Superiority […]

[…] when this information got out, the CRITICS were in the catbird seat, and the INDUSTRY which oddly tolerated these results, was in […]

trackback

[…] The Spike Protein’s Purpose Betrayed By Its Own Superiority […]

[…] The Spike Protein’s Purpose Betrayed By Its Own Superiority […]