The Clot Shot, The Explanation Thereof, And The Faucist-Lysenkoist CDC That Pretends Not To Understand

I. The Clot Shot

First things first.

Nobody would be calling ALL of the various full-length stabilized SARS-CoV-2 S1 subunit spike protein vaccines “the clot shot” if there weren’t some clear and obvious problems with the full-length stabilized SARS-CoV-2 S1 subunit spike protein ITSELF.

We already know that clotting dysfunction is key to COVID-19 pathogenicity. SO – it’s not exactly a surprise that the spike protein itself, and likewise the S1 subunit of that protein – a.k.a. THE BUSINESS END – are themselves pathogenic.


Spike Protein S1 Subunit as Direct Lung Pathogen



In the above example, the S1 subunit of the spike protein was basically 100% lethal to humanized mice when applied to their lungs.

And when they looked at the mice, the damage was basically the same as the damage from COVID-19.

Just sayin’.

So let me now TEST you, and see if you’re more of a scientist than Fauci’s protege Rochelle Alinsky – WHOOPS – I mean Rochelle Walensky – who heads the CDC for Fauci to maintain control of it.

If you give a SPIKE PROTEIN VACCINE to somebody, and they have symptoms of COVID-19 during the next few days, or even during the next two weeks, which scenario is more likely?

(A) – The person just happened to get real COVID-19, and THAT spike protein did BAD THINGS.

(B) – The spike protein you put inside the person did BAD THINGS.

Do you see how science works?

It’s a lot like common sense, only it’s applied to fancy stuff.

I want you to meet some great scientists here. These are people with very little scientific authority, but they simply practiced science, instead of repeating what authorities told them.

(1) – The CNA who would not accept “super-spreader” myths

This guy was one of the first people to administer the Pfizer vaccine to nursing home residents.

He was shocked that his nursing home residents would die shortly after being vaccinated – after having survived for months BEFORE the vaccine – in a way that was clearly related to their being vaccinated with the Pfizer vaccine.

Nursing home management would NOT admit to the obvious connection – and created a mythical “super-spreader” to explain the deaths.

This man is a HERO.

The first 10 minutes of the video is this man working up the courage of conscience – to SPEAK THE TRUTH. If you just want to hear what he needed to say, you can jump to 10 minutes and you will hear the SCIENCE.





(2) – From Physician’s Assistant to VAERS Whistleblower

This lady, a hospital physician’s assistant, started out as a “COVID training true believer”, but she began observing what the shots were doing in her hospital. From there, she began encountering resistance to “doing the right thing”.

Now, in retrospect, you can see everybody in the system avoiding responsibility – not just for the problem, but for even reporting it.

A fantastic interview by Del Bigtree’s Highwire show.



(3) – Doctor Discovers Disseminated Clotting in Most Vaccinated Patients

We covered this just recently, HERE.

This doctor discovered not only that “the jab” was leading to loss of wind (reduced effort tolerance) in too many of his patients – a whopping 62% of all his patients were showing signs of microscopic clotting – similar to COVID-19 – after vaccination.

LINK:  https(colon)//www.bitchute(dot)com/video/A6GbcUl6blpJ/

Bibliography of our own Spike Protein Suspicions

Now – this site has also not been negligent in reporting on the problems of the “clot shot”, as you can see from the following bibliography.

Thus, you will see that we were READY when a good explanation of the clot shot arose.

II. The Explanation

I want to start by thanking barkerjim for posting a comment with a link that leads to a very recent paper (pre-peer-review, of course) that explains the clot shot. He found the link HERE on Denninger’s Market Ticker site.

The order of the finding:

Denninger Comment:

Q Tree Comment:

Ecosophia Comment:

Preprint Paper:

I will include the entirety of the anonymous comment on the Ecosophy blog.

Spike Protein Clotting Mechanism

Date: 2021-10-14 06:10 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Preprint posted today. This is potentially a bombshell paper.

SARS-CoV-2 spike protein induces abnormal inflammatory blood clots neutralized by fibrin immunotherapy

“Here we report that the Spike protein from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) binds to the blood coagulation factor fibrinogen and induces structurally abnormal blood clots with heightened proinflammatory activity. SARS-CoV-2 Spike virions enhanced fibrin-mediated microglia activation and induced fibrinogen-dependent lung pathology. COVID-19 patients had fibrin autoantibodies that persisted long after acute infection.”

“The central structural component of blood clots, and a key regulator of inflammation in disease, is insoluble fibrin, which is derived from the blood coagulation factor fibrinogen and is deposited in tissues at sites of vascular damage (10, 11). Hypercoagulability in COVID-19 is associated with inflammation and the formation of fibrin clots resistant to degradation despite adequate anticoagulation (3-5). Extensive fibrin deposits are detected locally in inflamed lung and brain tissues from COVID-19 patients, sometimes without evidence of direct viral infection at autopsy (1, 8, 12-14). The high prevalence of thrombotic events with these unique hypercoagulability features suggests an as yet unknown mechanism of abnormal blood clot formation in COVID-19. We set out to determine how blood clots form in COVID-19 and to identify therapies to combat the deleterious effects of abnormal coagulation occurring in acute and convalescent stages of disease.”

“Since hypercoagulability in COVID-19 patients has features distinct from those of other inflammatory diseases, we hypothesized that SARS-CoV-2 directly affects the structural and functional properties of blood clots. Incubation of SARS-CoV-2 recombinant trimeric spike protein (Spike) with healthy donor plasma increased fibrin polymerization (Fig. 1A). Spike strikingly altered the fibrin clot structure resulting in thinner fibers with a rough appearance and increased clot density as shown by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Fig. 1B, fig. S1), identifying direct effects of SARS-CoV-2 Spike on fibrin clot architecture. Consistent with these structural changes, a solid-phase binding assay revealed binding of Spike to both fibrinogen and fibrin (Kd 5.3 μM and 0.4 μM, respectively) (Fig. 1C). Fibrinogen immunoprecipitated with full-length recombinant trimeric Spike, and studies with deletion mutants identified an interaction with the S2 domain of Spike (Fig. 1D, fig. S2).”

“Intravenous administration of Spike PVs in wild-type (WT) mice induced extensive fibrin deposition in the lung (Fig. 2A). (…) Fibrin deposition was associated with activated endothelium in the lung, and gene expression analysis revealed increased expression of endothelial and inflammatory markers in Spike PV-injected mice (…) consistent with findings of SARS-CoV-2 toxicity to endothelial cells (19). (…) Mice genetically-deficient in fibrinogen (Fgα–/– mice), which express all other blood proteins except fibrinogen and are protected from autoimmune and inflammatory conditions (11), did not exhibit lung pathology following Spike PV challenge (Fig. 2E, fig. S5).”

“Fibrinogen is causally linked to the activation of macrophages and microglia in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases in the brain and periphery (11, 21). Fibrin is a driver of microglia-induced cognitive dysfunction (22) and is associated with perivascular-activated microglia and macrophages in brains of COVID-19 patients even without signs of infection (12).”

“A surge of autoantibody production against diverse immune targets have been detected in COVID-19 patients (25). To determine whether COVID-19 patients develop autoantibodies
against abnormal blood clots, we tested autoantibody responses to fibrin. (…) We tested longitudinally collected serum samples ranging from acute to convalescent disease stages from 54 COVID-19 asymptomatic, mild, and severe disease patients requiring
admission to the intensive care units (table S3). Fibrin autoantibodies were abundant in all three groups of COVID-19 patients and persisted during the convalescent stage, but were scarce in healthy donor controls or in subjects with non-COVID respiratory illnesses (Fig. 4A, B).”

“In summary, we find that SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein enhances the formation of highly
inflammatory clots that are neutralized by a fibrin-targeting monoclonal antibody. Our data shed
new light on the enigmatic coagulopathy found in COVID-19 revealing a causal role for fibrinogen
in thromboinflammation – even independent of active viral replication. The high incidence of clotting complications in COVID-19 has been attributed to systemic inflammation (3), vascular damage including abnormal levels of circulating coagulation proteins (1, 26), genetic susceptibility to tissue factor and complement genes (27), and prothrombotic autoantibodies (28). Our findings now show that coagulopathy is not merely a consequence of inflammation. Rather, the interaction of SARS-CoV-2 Spike with fibrinogen and fibrin results in abnormal blood clot formation that in turn drives inflammation.”


Assuming the results are correct – and I can see little reason to doubt them though replication is always important – this really starts to put the puzzle pieces together. I’m frankly amazed that it took so long to figure this out.

In less-scientific language:

1. The spike protein binds directly to fibrinogen, the protein precursor of fibrin which forms blood clots.

2. This binding causes the fibrinogen to polymerize to form fibrin strands, thus forming clots.

3. Spike binding to fibrin in clots also changes the clot structure and renders it resistant to degradation.

4. Fibrin induces immune inflammation. This is usually adaptive because clotting occurs at sites of injury. It is dangerous when it occurs in response to diffuse and extensive spike-mediated micro-clotting. This helps to explain the runaway immune-mediated inflammatory response characteristic of severe Covid-19.

5. Spike *alone* (in the absence of an infectious virus) induces fibrin deposition and inflammation in the lungs of mice. However, mice lacking the gene for fibrinogen exhibited no pathology upon spike exposure, demonstrating that the fibrinogen-spike interaction is necessary and sufficient for spike-induced pathology.

6. Fibrin induces cognitive dysfunction via immune inflammation in the brain.

7. Many recovered Covid-19 patients have abundant autoantibodies against fibrin – independent of disease severity – while these autoantibodies are rare in unexposed people. This indicates both that spike-mediated fibrin formation is occurring in the course of actual human infection, and that autoreactive antibodies are formed which may play a role in chronic/long-haul symptoms or prolonged clotting problems.

8. A fibrin-targeting monoclonal antibody greatly reduced inflammation, suggesting a potential new route for disease treatment.

The paper never uses the word “vaccine” – a glaring and clearly intentional omission – but it should be obvious based on these findings that instructing the body to produce large amounts of spike protein on multiple occasions is a dangerous prospect, and it also explains those autopsy revelations of bodies full of clots.

One caveat: The coordinating author is working with a start-up company to develop treatments based on reducing fibrin-mediated inflammation, so there is clearly some commercial interest here that could be influencing objectivity. On the other hand, it is often the entrepreneurial think-outside-the-box types who end up making groundbreaking discoveries.

Mark L

[ BOOM!!! ]

This is AMAZING and powerful work.

Remember that scientific paper that we started this article with?

NOW we know exactly how that happens. See how the SCIENCE is all connecting together?

The commenter on Ecosophia makes TWO critical points.

POINT ONE is that vaccines are never mentioned. That is how this work will eventually be published. The Rochelle Alinsky CDC could STOP the paper as potentially causing “vaccine hesitancy” if the authors mentioned vaccines, but by throwing no stones, none bounce back.

The CDC will still likely DELAY this from being published for as long as they can. But by avoiding mention of vaccines, the paper cannot be scuttled on the grounds that it “might cause vaccine hesitancy”, which is the FALSE IMPERATIVE that the CDC socialists use to control science and force vaccines on us as a social sabotage. Instead, the READER can make the connections and understand the implications for vaccines.

Do you see why PREPUBLICATION COMMUNICATIONS (like this one) are now so important?

POINT TWO is that it’s JUST THE SPIKE PROTEIN – NOT THE VIRUS AS A WHOLE – that causes the problems. And it’s been PROVEN. And it’s been PROVEN that THIS is the mechanism of the problems induced by the spike protein.

The moniker of “CLOT SHOT” is literally proven to be correct.

This is a BOMBSHELL because it indicts the entire concept of full-length spike protein vaccines as fundamentally flawed. It indicts mRNA vaccines as even more flawed than antigen, because the amount of toxic spike protein is unregulated. (Notice that I’ve been saying this all along.) It doesn’t necessarily say that other types of vaccines (like RBD subunit antigen vaccines) are any safer than spike protein antigen vaccines, but they MIGHT BE.

Something even BETTER here, than just the fibrinogen mechanism, is the way that this EXPLAINS (point 4 above) what one nurse practitioner observed – that COVID strikes PRE-EXISTING INFLAMMATION. Both the WHY of some people having severe COVID and others not, and the LOCATION of those issues, is explained by fibrin’s ties to pre-existing inflammation. We now have a mechanism which we already know follows that rule, because that’s how fibrin works.

This also explains why antihistamines work to save people from severe COVID. Antihistamines are generally useful against severe inflammation by pathogenic substances which cause inflammatory reactions. It’s why they administer benadryl as a general emergency antiinflammatory for purposes like anaphylaxis prevention.

The Zyrtec Rebellion

Everybody underestimates Spain. The last letter in “PIGS” is far less of an insult than an error. Years ago, when I was at a conference, and Japanese industrial spies were getting me drunk (it was a great red wine), I decided that I had to give them SOMETHING for their time and effort, if only …

And yet the CDC has WARNED people against taking antihistamines with the vaccine – when this work LITERALLY PROVES WHY THAT IS A GOOD STRATEGY – just as it is a good strategy to take antihistamines to protect against severe COVID.

Like I said, this study proves THAT we were right, and WHY we were right.

And why is CDC so WRONG – time and time again?

This is a breaker of logjams. The insistence on the use of a fundamentally flawed vaccine is CRIMINAL.

Mandates are bad enough, but over a vaccine, the very principle of which is scientifically proven as DANGEROUS?

If mandates continue, these people need to be in JAIL. If they RESIST, they need to be OVERTHROWN.

In short, THIS.

Mandating this fundamentally dangerous vaccine is so wrong on so many levels.

This is a EUGENIC VACCINE if there ever was one. It’s almost DESIGNED to finish off people who are not 100% healthy.

How can this be right? Seriously. How can this be right?

We can no longer tolerate these people who pretend not to know.

III. The Faucist-Lysenkoist CDC That Pretends Not To Understand

I start this section by thanking three people – Sundance, Aubergine, and Trumpismine – who helped me to see what is going on here.

SUNDANCE informed me of the “Mamet Principle” – that liberals pretend not to know things

AUBERGINE formulated her wonderful Razor – that it is dangerous to dismiss such pretense as mere stupidity, when it might be the product of malice or guile.

TRUMPISMINE turned me on to the Wikipedia definition of Lysenkoism, which contained enough detail that I was able to connect the goals of old Lysenkoism to the actions of the left today.

The so-called Mamet Principle is a paraphrase of a repeated point by David Mamet, which Sundance encapsulated as a principle. This has been discussed and exemplified many times, both here and on CTH.

In asking WHY liberals “pretend not to know things”, we now understand that Hanlon’s Razor is an EXCUSE – that it’s COVER – and that it’s NOT because they’re STUPID, but rather because they’re smart and evil.

The best and most concise description is a reworking of Hanlon’s Razor by our own Aubergine.

So what if we apply this to Saint Fauci of Antibodies?

Anthony Fauci has a literal MAGICIAN’S POWER to make people focus on the WRONG THING. His skills of EVASION are absolutely outstanding. I love to call it “antibody hypnosis”, because that is exactly what it seems like.


You even hear his voice when you read that – don’t you? That gravelly, reassuring voice.

It’s VERY intentional.

Focusing on ONE WRONG THING – or even ONE RIGHT THING – is a technique of misdirection, but it is one of the BEST ways of pretending not to know things.

“Let’s only talk about this.”

Rand Paul knows all about it. He has gone many rounds with the Fauci critter.

But it’s not just Fauci.

His protege in CDC, who gives Fauci effective control of medical science, is every bit as bad.

It even includes Rand Paul’s colleagues in Congress.

The man behind the launch of censorship. Is this guy even AMERICAN?

What a PUTZ.

ANYWAY, this is where I started to figure things out.

This WEIRD LOVE of the radical left for brutal, aggressive, stupid, uncaring science – where does it come from?

I did not expect the answer that I found, with the help of Trumpismine and Wikipedia.



It’s very helpful to read this, including this part:

Marxism–Leninism postulated “universal and immutable laws of history” (historical materialism and dialectical materialism), which assumed unavoidable large-scale change at the collective level of societies.[5]Collectivism was a key feature of Marxism; Darwin’s concept of a random mutation in an individual being able to propagate and transform subsequent generations was at odds with the ideology, and was perceived as having a strong liberal inclination.[6] Marxist–Leninist theorists presented Lysenkoism as a new branch of biology, arguing that “dialectic method shows that development is carried out in a dual form: evolutionary and revolutionary.” Darwin was attributed with discovering “only the evolutionary” path, while Michurin and Lysenko were presented as making a “great step forward” toward the discovery of a “revolutionary” path of biologic development.[7]

Most people brought up in mainstream, establishment, Western science use the term Lysenkoism without really understanding the political angle of it. We understand it merely as “politics being imposed on scientists in the Soviet Union, which set back Soviet biological science by decades.”

Yes, that’s true, but it’s not ALL of the truth. The more you know about it, the more it looks EXACTLY like “Woke Science”.

As an aside, clearly it makes sense WHY China (and to a lesser extent Russia) would want to promote Lysenkoism in the United States, as part of their own interests. “China First” and “Russia First” by socialist and ex-socialist means are unlikely to be pretty. “Fuck the other guy up so he can’t win” is a valid technique in a corrupt world.

But it goes deeper.

Lysenkoism is far less about being STUPID, than about being REVOLUTIONARY. That is a critical idea. That quality of being revolutionary makes mistakes, and when it does, it’s generally STUPID. But when it does NOT make mistakes, it’s generally EVIL.

Let me repeat what I said, earlier about Lysenkoism.


Wolf Moon

Wolf Moon Online Admin Coyote Reply to  trumpismine October 18, 2021 02:36


You know what? This is actually really interesting reading.

In a WEIRD WAY – Lysenko was “right”, in that he maniacally predicted EXACTLY what the communists are doing NOW with gene therapy. His assertion of a “genetic dialectic” – of the “evolutionary” in conflict with the “revolutionary” – is actually what we’re seeing RIGHT NOW with the “natural evolution” crowd (US) versus the commie-forced gene therapy crowd (THEM).

Marxist–Leninist theorists presented Lysenkoism as a new branch of biology, arguing that “dialectic method shows that development is carried out in a dual form: evolutionary and revolutionary.” Darwin was attributed with discovering “only the evolutionary” path, while Michurin and Lysenko were presented as making a “great step forward” toward the discovery of a “revolutionary” path of biologic development.[7]

It was just total hubris and pathological commie science – a lot like what we see from Fauci, Gates and Walensky – but it “anticipated” what WOULD come eventually through science – that someday WE would have the power to do the things – and make the mistakes – that we are making now.

So in many ways these people ARE the intellectual inheritors of Lysenkoism!!!

Lysenko’s mistake was claiming that things WERE what they merely COULD BE through greater understanding.

Imagine some person coming BEFORE Galileo and trying to FORCE heliocentrism in their country – killing, jailing, ousting, and attacking the geocentrists.

In a sense, that was Lysenko, who attacked natural evolution.

Natural processes are “evolution”.

Genetic modification is “revolution”.

The dude was a NUT, trying to assert that the NATURAL was both, when it’s almost all ONE. But if he would have simply said “We must become revolutionary in genetics, which is merely evolutionary now”, then he would have been like the Lenin of biology, and he would likely be admired today by all these crazy leftists and depoppers, instead of an old Soviet embarrassment.

But ALL OF THAT comes back and tells me that these people are the modern recapitulation of Lysenkoist THOUGHT, but using the GAINS of actual evolutionary understanding.

The nutbaggery we see NOW with the communist jab-maniacs, is just like Lysenko’s assertions, only MORE REAL because they have MORE TECH.


Soviet science, and Lysenko in particular, were characterized by a kind of VIRTUE SIGNALING, and that is what we are seeing now on universities, only it tends to be about peripheral things, like race, diversity, gender – whatever is in leftist vogue.

But NOW, in our phony socialist “pandemic”, we are seeing the virtue signals rise to levels that affect the practice of science itself. It’s starting at GOALS, but very soon, it will get a bit like CLIMATE LYSENKOISM, where people CHANGE DATA, HIDE DATA, DROP EVIDENCE, and basically act like MAINSTREAM MEDIA JOURNALISTS, who are in a continuous state of covering things up by omission, distraction, and promotion of contradicting narratives.

That is NOT GOOD.

I think that we are now seeing with publications like the one featured in this article, is some PUSH-BACK by scientists who realize where things are headed – a VERY BAD place. They are GETTING THE TRUTH OUT.

We need to help promote awareness of science that CDC and the communist infiltration are going to hide.


On August 7, 1948, at the end of a week-long session organised by Lysenko and approved by Stalin,[14] the V.I. Lenin Academy of Agricultural Sciences announced that from that point on Lysenkoism would be taught as “the only correct theory.” Soviet scientists were forced to denounce any work that contradicted Lysenko.[19] Criticism of Lysenko was denounced as “bourgeois” or “fascist,” and analogous “non-bourgeois” theories also flourished in other fields such as linguistics and art in the Soviet academy at this time. Perhaps the only opponents of Lysenkoism during Stalin’s lifetime to escape liquidation were from the small community of Soviet nuclear physicists: as Tony Judt has observed, “It is significant that Stalin left his nuclear physicists alone and never presumed to second guess their calculations. Stalin may well have been mad but he was not stupid.”[20]

Faucism-Lysenkoism is real. And it’s HERE.

5 4 votes
Article Rating
Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments


I had been wondering when this post would show up….


You’re always careful to leave space around our cherished contributors, but that only leaves weird opportunities for your own posts.


which is why they need to get rid of the “unvaccinated”…

we are the control group that annihilates their bogus claims and exposes their nefarious deadly criminal intent.


“which is why they need to get rid of the “unvaccinated”…”


I have a ‘No rid’ clause in my contract, says so plain as day… 👍😁


I am reminded of the distinction between “botulism” and “botulism toxin”.

There is an infectious organism — with botulism, it’s the Clostridium botulinum bacterium. In order to reproduce and cause its disease, it produces a toxin — but that toxin produces many of the disease symptoms on its own (and can even be harnessed to keep Comrade Pelosi looking vaguely human).

To thwart this malady, you must pause the effects of the toxin while hammering the actual organism. Instead, all mRNA “vaxxines” for COVID hijack the human body to produce more toxin while IGNORING the organism.

The punishments for perpetrating this will need to serve as a warning for a thousand years — it’s going to have to be as far beyond Nuremberg as Nuremberg was beyond previous postwar exercises.


they are also very good at GASLIGHTING….

the liar’s go-to method of manipulation & abusive mind control.


the liar’s go-to defense mechanism to avoid accountability.

Last edited 1 year ago by smiley2

It should be noted that Sarah Hoyt is advocating #teamheadsonpikes .


WE have the link! Spread it to all you care about 🙏 


Working on it { what a pleasure }.


Epic thread post, Wolf!
 👏  😍  👍 
Thank you!

1. The spike protein binds directly to fibrinogen, the protein precursor of fibrin which forms blood clots.

2. This binding causes the fibrinogen to polymerize to form fibrin strands, thus forming clots.

3. Spike binding to fibrin in clots also changes the clot structure and renders it resistant to degradation.

This explains the foot-long clots they are finding in some of the vax victims.

This whole thing is just ghastly!

It is the worst Crime Against Humanity ever perpetrated, in the history of this planet.


Of course they do. If they’re proven to know, then they can be proven to be guilty of the worse mass murder in history.


If Fauci pretends not knowing the he is incompetent. Being incompetent has never save anyone. It was his business to know and he failed. Either way the Nuremberg code applies.


We have a friend who got a clot almost the entire length of his leg. Older guy, but not overweight, very active, no problems of this sort ever. And what did the hospital tell him? Oh, it’s probably just because you’ve been working from home. Right.


Wow! Excellent! So much evil “just” built into that spike protein.


Apologies if this is a stupid question. If they find something that will dissolve the fibrin stuff, will that fix up the long haulers and also repair the jabbed people?


Thank you, Wolf! I saw these articles yesterday and knew you would be able to explain them.

They are murdering us as fast as they can.

Nuremberg 2.0 cannot come quickly enough.


In Germany they are trying to get to the Nuremberg code but Judges are not taking the cases. I saw something like that at Reinhard Fuellmich they were talking about the problem.
The Judicial has been failing all over. People are afraid to loose their jobs.
They hoocked everyone on a good life style and it is hard to give up. Best to have Judges who have nothing to loose.


One would think Germany learned something but memories see fleeting. They do not connect the dots that if they do not enforce the laws then they are no better than Nazis.

Cuppa Covfefe

Have a look at (if you haven’t already). There’s TONS of articles there that cover things the YSM/MCM are hiding…


Thank you will look 🙂

Concerned Virginian

Wolf Moon
Profound thanks for the work you have done to collate all this material and to connect the dots.
One can just about bet the farm that Fauci, Baric, Daszak, Shi, and possibly Lin-Fa Wang, KNEW about the full effects of the spike protein, since they were ALL heavily involved with the whole Gain-of-Function situation. Hence the lies and Oscar-nomination worthy evasions / spinning from Fauci (Walensky isn’t as good an actor here).

Baric is feeling the heat and possibly sweating that he’s got a Nuremberg II target on his back. Here’s the link to the CYA / denial article he put out in July of this year on his involvement with the GoF research:
(the meat of the article is posted before the “to continue reading, subscribe” paywall)

The following posits can be made: that Fauci, Baric, Daszak, Shi, and possibly Lin-Fa Wang, KNEW that the Gain-of-Function research that was performed at UNC (Baric’s lab, with Shi as co-worker), NUS (Duke University Medical School, Singapore, Wang), EcoHealth Alliance (Daszak), Shi (Wuhan Lab) — included using bat neurovirus toxins ALONG WITH other bat virus elements;

that they ALSO knew that immune-system destruction elements from the HIV/AIDS virus were being introduced into the research (immune system markers collapse shown in the HIV/AIDS immune system markers blood tests performed by Dr. Nathan Thompson on his healthy patient after this person got “fully vaccinated”);

that the resulting created chimera combo-virus that was released from the Wuhan Lab into the world in late 2019, the ORIGINAL “COVID-19” virus, would result in complications and / or deaths from infection from this virus, INCLUDING the compromising of the neurological, cardiac, and pulmonary systems of the infected person, EVEN AFTER the infection person recovered (“long-haul COVID”, now a RECOGNIZED condition);

that Fauci, Baric, and possibly Daszak and Shi, KNEW, OR SHOULD HAVE KNOWN, that these elements, PLUS the living organisms Polypodium Hydriforme or Hydra Vulgaris (per the findings of Dr. Madej and Dr. Zalewsky), were included in the formulation of the “vaccines” for the virus;

that Fauci, Daszak, BOURLA (Pfizer), BANCEL (Moderna), GORSKY (Johnson & Johnson) KNEW, OR SHOULD HAVE KNOWN, that the “vaccines” would include all the above elements, PLUS the resulting degradation of the body’s immune system that would result from taking them. In the case of Pfizer, Moderna, and J&J (and the other “vaccine” producers, like AstraZeneca), the fixation is on making $$$ Trillions of dollars.

One believes to have IVM, HCQ, antihistamines (the non-drowsy or “children’s” version for those with some issues with heart or dizziness), D3, Zinc, Doxycycline or Azithromycin on hand is essential.

SOME ** entity ** (person or persons) is behind ALL of this situation. This ** entity ** took advantage of Fauci’s fixation on getting a “vaccine” for HIV/AIDS. Took advantage of Baric’s fixation on being the “vaccine savior of the world.” Took advantage of Daszak’s fixation on being the “supreme head of all research” via EcoHealth. Took advantage of Dictator Xi’s fixation on Communist China subjugating the rest of the world to be slave-drones to Beijing. WHO IS THIS ** ENTITY **?

Last edited 1 year ago by RDS
Valerie Curren

Excellent drawing together of so many of the threads–Thank you!


Wonderful, informative post, Wolf!

Might this, then, be a treatment for covid and/or vaxx injury?


This is a natural fibrinolytic. Maybe this could be a treatment, too? It’s called nattokinase.


Well, part of the reason I am so partial to “natural” and herbal remedies is there are generally FAR fewer side effects and contraindications. There are some, of course, but way less than pharmaceuticals. Nattokinase is derived from a food source. If you wouldn’t have a bad reaction to the food, then the derivative is unlikely to hurt you.

When a person is at death’s door, I think it is time to throw the kitchen sink at the illness.



And you know, ivermectin and HCQ were both derived from naturally occurring sources.

God gave us what we need in most cases. We just have to find it.


Lol, I am!

Sylvia Avery

😘 😘 😘




Just checked, they sell that on ebay.


I just got some for my arsenal from a local health supplier.


An enzyme from silk worms.
Dissolves scar tissue.

I’ve used it in this blend for years.

Also helps dissolve mucus, so handy for sinus gunk.
Best stories I’ve read about it are people with massive damage from accidents that took handfuls for days and had very accelerated recoveries.

comment image


Cool, thanks! I will look into it.

Valerie Curren

Another Amazing Post! Thank you. Shared on Gab here:


I want to meet the “Genius” of a scientist, who came up with the idea to use the spike protein as a vaccine, the very protein which facilitates the entry of the virus into the cell, which is necessary to replicate itself.

What a GENIUS!!


Pffft2 (@45wonyuge) Tweeted:


The media are nothing but regurgitation tools. No reason or thinking involved!


The amazing thing is that anybody could survive four clot-shots…

…for long…


Really! No gas chambers this time yet.

SteveInCO · Thermonuclear MAGA

We talk here a lot about Pfizer and Moderna, but as I understand it the Johnson & Johnson vaccine is NOT an mRNA vaccine and works more like “traditional” vaccines. (However, even according to the CDC it involves the spike protein.)

Is it as bad? Worse?

Last edited 1 year ago by SteveInCO · Thermonuclear MAGA

My understanding is that J&J IS an mRNA “vaxxine”. The major difference being that Pfizer and Moderna use a synthesized lipid carrier for the mRNA, and J&J uses a neutralized adenovirus.

And, again, the whole mRNA to have the body make uncontrolled amounts of complete spike proteins is just…..SMFH….

SteveInCO · Thermonuclear MAGA

If it is, then clearly my question’s premise was incorrect.

However, it is widely believed not to be…and the “official” links claim it’s not.

Have we a link establishing that it is an mRNA vaccine?

SteveInCO · Thermonuclear MAGA


I just found a page that claims it works by teaching your body to make the spike protein, same as the mRNA vaxxes.

It just doesn’t use mRNA to do so (assuming this page is not a lie).


“The Johnson & Johnson shot uses a weakened common cold virus, called an adenovirus, as a vehicle to deliver a single coronavirus gene into human cells. That gene then provides the instructions for making the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.”

Sure looks like it is. Here’s the page for the quote:

SteveInCO · Thermonuclear MAGA

The paper thin legal distinction is that it’s not mRNA, it’s DNA.



*Shrugs off site outage*

Actually, it is significant. DNA makes proteins; mRNA transfers information to DNA. Somewhat key in the unc link is “into human cells”, rather than, “into the nucleus of human cells.”

It retains the unholy fixation on synthesizing complete spike proteins, however — and only spike proteins.

SteveInCO · Thermonuclear MAGA

I’m aware of the technical distinction. The effect of the vaccines is basically the same (spike proteins made *by the recipient’s body*, so you were wrong in detail but not in spirit.

Concerned Virginian

The Johnson & Johnson adenovirus DNA “delivery system” that’s used in its “vaccine” is simply another way to get the spike protein into the cells of the recipient.


All three give the blueprints (DNA) to a cell to make spike protein. J&J just gets DNA in; Pfizer and Moderna load information to make blueprints (mRNA) into the cell’s nucleus, where it causes the DNA to be made in the cells, which then makes the protein.


OK, here’s something more on point:

“The Johnson & Johnson vaccine is not an mRNA vaccine (like Pfizer and Moderna). All three vaccines deliver genetic material to your cells: mRNA vaccines deliver mRNA, and Johnson & Johnson delivers DNA. Another difference is the delivery method used – either a little enclosure made of fat surrounds the genetic material, or in the case of Johnson & Johnson, an adenovirus carries it. But the end result is the same: both the mRNA vaccines and the Johnson & Johnson vaccine help your body to develop antibodies against the coronavirus spike protein.”

SteveInCO · Thermonuclear MAGA

Was replying to this when the site took a gigantic…fecal dump.

Exemption letters mentioning mRNA vaccines and only mRNA vaccines would leave one open to a demand to take J&J jabs.

I know someone who was willing to knuckle under and take J&J, but once I pointed this out about it bringing DNA with it, he said, in essence, “oh shit.” So much for that as a fallback.

SteveInCO · Thermonuclear MAGA

I have to follow their process for requesting the exemption.

Once it is refused, then it’s time for the lawyers.

SteveInCO · Thermonuclear MAGA

Neutron hammers.

SteveInCO · Thermonuclear MAGA

A better vaccine?

What would be the best proportion of saline in water?

Easy peasy. 😀

SteveInCO · Thermonuclear MAGA

Yes, and seriously, I agree with you.

It could be worse…if it was, I’d have joked about KCl.

SteveInCO · Thermonuclear MAGA

And on that note I significantly revised my draft the other night. Mostly reordering things in a more sensible fashion.

SteveInCO · Thermonuclear MAGA

I have found that just going back and rereading a couple of weeks later (which in this case I don’t have the luxury of doing) helps you see a lot of stuff you thought was clear…but isn’t.

Even two days helps!

SteveInCO · Thermonuclear MAGA

So that last one COULD be better than the others…I suppose. With emphasis on COULD.


Except the sinovac seems to have hot lots.

Deplorable Patriot

Boss, Gab, please.


comment image


If they only knew…


White House Announces They are Eager, Prepared and Staged to Start Vaccinating Children 5 to 11 As Soon as Political Health Agencies Give Permission
comment image


The Biden administration announced they have prepared the U.S. healthcare system to aggressively, with as much force and speed as possible, drive the childhood vaccination program. Leveraging existing partnerships and financial dependencies on government spending, the White House expressed confidence. They do not anticipate any compliance issues with a forceful national rollout:

WHITE HOUSE – “The Administration has procured enough vaccine to support vaccination for the country’s 28 million children ages 5-11 years old. If authorized by the FDA and recommended by the CDC, the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine for 5-11 year olds will be a dose and formula specifically for this age group. The vaccine will have packaging available in smaller configurations that will make it easier for physicians’ offices and other smaller, community-based providers to offer the vaccine to kids and their families. 


comment image


Btw, in reply to the well written OP….

History repeats itself. “The end justifies the means” is a signature mark of evil incarnate, a calling card of the class of individual you highlight here.


That is a great article. He and his wife were forced to take the “horse dewormer” because Walmart wouldn’t fill his prescription. Both got better in 6-8 hours.


science vs Science

comment image


[…] MoonOffline Author Wolf Reply to  Aubergine October 20, 2021 […]

Gail Combs

I am moving this over here so it is captured.

holly08( holly08)

 Reply to  RDS
 January 3, 2023 18:01

Excellent point. The things that trigger my immune system like a cold, environmental toxins, or stress are temporary and my body can recover.

The spike protein’s effects are continuous so the body’s in a constant state of inflammation, eventually destroying it through disease.

My Reply to  holly08
 January 3, 2023 18:29

I think that is the reason for Long Haulers. I had continuous ‘Asthma’ for over a year until I got a dose of Moxidectin and goat spit.
I NEVER had Asthma before that although I have severe allergies.
Think about what that means. In my case it would seem the Moxidectin (or Ivermectin) CLEAR THE INFECTION!!
Moxidectin and Ivermectin Inhibit SARS-CoV-2 Replication in Vero E6 Cells but Not in Human Primary Bronchial Epithelial Cells
Epub 2021 Oct 11. It is out of the Netherlands.
There is a bit of outright lying in this. Often a necessity to get published and to get further funding. So READ BETWEEN THE LINES.


Antiviral therapies are urgently needed to treat and limit the development of severe COVID-19 disease. Ivermectin, a broad-spectrum anti-parasitic agent, has been shown to have anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity in Vero cells at a concentration of 5 μM. These limited in vitro results triggered the investigation of ivermectin as a treatment option to alleviate COVID-19 disease.

 👉 However, in April 2021, the World Health Organization stated the following: “The current evidence on the use of ivermectin to treat COVID-19 patients is inconclusive.” 😡 

It is speculated that the in vivo concentration of ivermectin is too low to exert a strong antiviral effect.

Here, we performed a head-to-head comparison of the antiviral activity of ivermectin and the structurally related, but metabolically more stable moxidectin in multiple in vitro models of SARS-CoV-2 infection, including physiologically relevant human respiratory epithelial cells. Both moxidectin and ivermectin exhibited antiviral activity in Vero E6 cells. Subsequent experiments revealed that  👉 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘀𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱𝘀 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗱𝗼𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗹𝘆 𝗮𝗰𝘁 𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗽𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘃𝗶𝗿𝘂𝘀 𝗰𝗲𝗹𝗹 𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗿𝘆. 🤗 


Surprisingly, however, in human-airway-derived cell models, both moxidectin and ivermectin failed to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 infection, even at concentrations of 10 μM. These disappointing results call for a word of caution in the interpretation of anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity of drugs solely based on their activity in Vero cells. Altogether, these findings suggest that even using a high-dose regimen of ivermectin, or switching to another drug in the same class, is unlikely to be useful for treatment of SARS-CoV-2 in humans

Vero cell (redirected from Vero E6 cells)

A lineage of cells used in cell cultures and isolated from kidney epithelial cells of the African green monkey (Cercopithecus aethiops).