Health Friday 8.15.2025 Open Thread: Special Report Edition

The free header image for today’s offering is courtesy of Shutterstock and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s offering is related, in part, to the disaster of the COVID-19 “vaccines”, Yours Truly dedicates it to all persons who have contracted injures, illnesses, or disabilities, induced or aggravated by the COVID-19 “vaccines” that were injected into their bodies; and, to the memory of all persons who have passed away from the negative effects of the COVID-19 “vaccines” that were injected into their bodies.

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none, except for perhaps AI-generated images in any of the linked URLs below. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.

There are two sections to today’s Special Report offering: the first section, regarding the now-proven linkage of COVID-19 “vaccine boosters” to increases in cancer and in general mortality; the second section, regarding what appears to be the potential emergence of the “next plandemic” in Communist China. Please bear with Yours Truly: one does not want to “weary by recitals”, as the Duc de Saint-Simon once wrote — but there is a lot of information, multiple screenshots, and so on. The evolving knowledge regarding the disaster called COVID-19 (the virus itself, and the “vaccines”) is gaining speed with each passing day. This evolving knowledge base is important to understand in light of the developments regarding the new information about the “Chikungunya outbreak” currently in China, and which is apparently spreading to other countries (shades of the original COVID-19 virus itself outbreak in China.)

First section, the linkage between COVID-19 “booster vaccines” with increases in cancer and in general mortality. COVID-19 “vaccine boosters” means any injection of a “latest version” of a COVID-19 “vaccine.” This includes the FDA- approved 2025-2026 “new formula COVID-19 vaccine versions” of the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, COMIRNATY; of the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, SPIKEVAX; and, of the Novavax COVID-19 “vaccine”, NUVAXOVID.

Yours Truly begins here: https://slaynews.com/news/renowned-oncologist-sounds-alarm-cancer-deaths-now-surging-among-covid-boosted/, “Renowned Oncologist Sounds Alarm: Cancer Deaths Are Now Surging Among Covid-Boosted”, by Frank Bergman, 6 August 2025. There is an embedded video statement by Prof. Dr. Angus Dalgleish (St. George’s, University of London.) Dr. Dalgleish warns, in no uncertain terms, that it is the suppression of T-cell immune cells in the body of the COVID-19 “vaccine boosted” that is causing the surge of cancer among these persons. Please see the screenshot from the Slay News article, below:

There is another study from Japan, which also confirms that repeated COVID-19 “vaccine boosters” cause increases in mortality. Please see: https://slaynews.com/news/official-japanese-data-confirms-covid-vaccines-caused-worsening-excess-death-surge/, by Frank Bergman, 1 August 2025 (the article title is the same as the URL.) Please see the screenshots from this article, below:

The paper referenced above is here: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-6899448/v2, “Factors contributing to the sharp rise in excess mortality in Japan since 2021”, Atsushi Takahashi, 17 July 2025. This paper is a pre-print. Please see the screenshots from this paper, below. They are: portions of the Results section; Figure 4; and, Figure 9:

The identifier names are those of the Prefectures in Japan that were studied. Even with taking other factors into consideration (examples: the size and population of the various Prefectures; the number of adults in age brackets in the Prefectures; whether or not a Prefecture was “rural” in character and location, as compared to “urban”), it is clear that the increase in mortality is tied to an increased amount of COVID-19 “vaccine boosters” that were administered.

There is a Commentary to this paper, to be seen here: https://jxiv.jst.go.jp/index.php/jxiv/preprint/view/1398/, “Commentary: Immune imprinting and spike protein toxicity — rethinking COVID-19 vaccinesty: rethinking COVID-19 vaccines”, Yasuhiko Kamikubo; Takahashi, Atsushi, 2025. This Commentary is in a mixture of English and Japanese. The English translation (no figures included) is here: https://jxiv.jst.go.jp/index.php/jxiv/preprint/view/1398/3679.

The above items confirm this article, written in July 2025: https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/coronavirus/covid-boosters-correlate-worse-survival-rates-cancer-third-most-deaths, “COVID boosters correlate with worse survival rates for cancer with third-most deaths: study”, by Greg Piper, 9 July 2025. Please see the screenshots from this article, which relates to a study in Japan regarding survival rates among COVID-19 “vaccine boosted” pancreatic cancer patients, below:

The peer-reviewed paper on the Japan study is here: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17122006, “Repeated COVID-19 Vaccination as a Poor Prognostic Factor in Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective, Single-Center Cohort Study”, Makoto Abue, et al., 16 June 2025.

Yours Truly has written extensively for the board here regarding the damage / destruction of the natural immune system of the person who takes COVID-19 “vaccines.” These injectables were designed to attack, damage / destroy the CD4 – CD8 immune system cells. These injectables were designed to attack, damage / destroy the IgG3 immune system “fighter” cells, while at the same time, fostering the increase of IgG4 immune system “tolerate and never clear” cells. This damage / destruction increases with each injection of a modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, including injections of the “latest formula version” of said “vaccines”, which includes the “2025-2026 Formula versions” of said “vaccines” (COMIRNATY [Pfizer-BioNTech]; SPIKEVAX [Moderna]; and, NUVAXOVID [Novavax.])

The “Seneff and Nigh” paper of 10 May 2021 discusses how “immune system imprinting” in the the body of persons who take the COVID-19 “vaccines” have the potential to result in what the authors call “unintended consequences.” The paper is available here: https://dpbh.nv.gov/uploadedFiles/dpbhnvgov/content/Boards/BOH/Meetings/2021/SENEFF-1.PDF, “Worse Than the Disease? Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of the mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19”, Stephanie Seneff and Greg Nigh; International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research 2(1), May 10, 2021, Page 38-79. Please see the screenshots from this article, below. They are: the Abstract; the “Unprecedented” box; and, Figure 2.

Further information regarding the “class switch” between IgG3 cells and IgG4 cells resulting from COVID-19 “vaccination” is here: https://jessicar.substack.com/p/the-immunological-mechanism-of-action, “The immunological mechanism of action for lost immunity, a shift to tolerance (and autoimmunity?) from the shots”, by Jessica Rose, PhD, 22 December 2022. Please also see: https://www.theqtree.com/2025/04/04/health-friday-4-4-2025-open-thread-the-covid-19-vaccines-decimate-the-igg-immune-system-cells/; and, https://www.theqtree.com/2024/12/06/health-friday-open-thread-12-6-2024-the-immune-system-after-covid-19-vaccination-and-a-note-on-the-virus-itself/.

Second section, regarding the potential for the “next plandemic” to come from Communist China. This has to do with the current emergence of mosquito-borne Chikungunya infections in several areas of China, which has resulted in various government-enforced measures. There is also an ** interesting connection ** to the United States involved in this situation.

What is Chikungunya? It is a virus transmitted by the bite of an infected female mosquito of (usually) the Aedes aegypti or the Aedes albopictus species. (As an aside: female mosquitos of these species can also transmit Dengue fever via bites.) The virus that is transmitted causes joint pain and fever; these can progress to severe. Most people infected with Chikungunya, however, make a full recovery. The virus is an RNA alphavirus. Please see: https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/25083-chikungunya; there is a screenshot from this article, below:

Another source of information regarding Chikungunya is here: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/chikungunya; please see the screenshot from this article, below:

Two recent articles regarding the Chikungunya outbreak in China: the first, here: https://jessicar.substack.com/p/the-new-pending-plandemic-is-it-scheduled, “The new pending “plandemic” — is it scheduled for November?”, by Jessica Rose, PhD, 12 August 2025. Dr. Rose makes it clear that the “alphavirus + saRNA-LNP platform” (self-amplifying RNA + lipid nanoparticles “vaccine” platform) is based on the VEEV alphavirus (Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis Virus.) Please see the screenshots from her article, below:

**** Note the mention of immune system issues that are induced in persons who are COVID-19 “vaccinated”, and how this can potentially severely complicate any infection by Chikungunya.

The second article is here: https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/psyop-25-scamdemic-update-chinese, “PSYOP-25 SCAMDEMIC UPDATE: Chinese Authorities Mandating Blood Tests, Releasing Lab Mosquitoes to Fight Chikungunya Outbreak”, 13 August 2025. Please see the screenshots from this article, below:

The founder of the “mosquito lab” in Guangzhou is Dr. Zhiyong Xi. Please see the screenshot below from the above link:

Let’s look at Dr. Zhiyong Xi. https://archive.md/b5xWD:

He is still a professor at Michigan State University in the United States: https://directory.natsci.msu.edu/Directory/Profiles/Person/101715, “Zhiyong Xi”:

And here is a portion of the work that Dr. Zhiyong Xi is doing at Michigan State University, via https://scholars.msu.edu/scholar/8639/ZHIYONG_XI:

Which work, at least in part, is being funded by NIAID (division of NIH — both divisions part of HHS.)

Which begs the following questions: WHY is Dr. Zhiyong XI still doing mosquito research in the United States if he founded a mosquito study lab in Communist China? WHY is Dr. Zhiyong Xi’s research at Michigan State University being funded, at least in part, by the NIH / NIAID?

There are two “FDA-approved vaccines” against Chikungunya: IXCHIQ, and VIMKUNYA. BOTH of these “vaccines” were FDA-approved under “accelerated approval” methods. Please see the screenshots, below, from the Package Inserts for these injectables. First, from the Package Insert for IXCHIQ (https://ixchiqhcp.com/PI-new.pdf):

And, from the Package Insert for VIMKUNYA (https://bavariannordic.io/uploads/Vimkunya-pi.pdf):

Note the presence of Aluminum Hydroxide as an adjuvant in VIMKUNYA.

NOTE THAT THE “EXACT MECHANISM OF PROTECTION’ HAS NOT BEEN DETERMINED FOR EITHER IXCHIQ OR FOR VIMKUNYA. In other words, the United States government (via the FDA) is fine with injecting people with these “vaccines” WITHOUT THE FDA KNOWING THE EXACT MECHANISMS OF PROTECTION FOR EITHER OF THEM. What are the “CHIKV-specific immune responses” that these injectables supposedly elicit?

And, by the way, both IXCHIQ and VIMKUNYA can be “shed” onto newborn children if the expectant mother is sick with a virus (this is called viremia) at the time of delivery. A pregnant female who takes either one of the above “vaccines” runs the risk of contracting “viral viremia.” Neither IXCHIQ, nor VIMKUNYA have had proper testing for potential effects on pregnant females, their fetuses, or their newborns (section 8.1 Pregnancy in either Package Insert.)

All of the above begs the following questions: Does HHS Sec. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., know about these Chikujgunya “vaccines”? Does he know that the FDA approved them under “accelerated approval” methods? Does he understand that the FDA does NOT know the “exact mechanism of protection” for either IXCHIQ or VIMKUNYA? Does Dr. Martin Makary (FDA Commissioner) know about this situation? Do either Sec. Kennedy, Jr., or Dr. Makary know that “career FDA types” in the CBER division signed the FDA Approval Letters for IXCHIQ (signed by R. Douglas Pratt, MD, 6 August 2025) and for VIMKUNYA (signed by David C. Kaslow, MD, 14 February 2025)?

Yours Truly will again emphasize that it is critically important for all persons, whether COVID-19 “vaccinated” or not, to follow some type of COVID-19 spike protein mitigation / prophylaxis protocol. It is also critically important that all persons, whether COVID-19 “vaccinated” or not, to do all they can to build and maintain their general health, and the health of their immune system, so as to be in the best shape possible.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday 7.25.2025 Open Thread: More on the COVID-19 “Vaccines” and What They Do to the Human Brain

The header image of the pituitary gland and the influence it has on the human body is courtesy of https://www.123rf.com/ and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s offering speaks to the disaster of the COVID-19 “vaccines” (Bioweapon Toxin Injections), Yours Truly dedicates it to the memory of all persons, of whatever age or location, who have passed away from the negative, toxic effects of the the COVID-19 “vaccines” that they had injected into their body.

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note One: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, the only AI-generated content are images that may be embedded in certain of the linked items in today’s post. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Note Two: the format of today’s offering will be a combination of “in-text” links, with other items having numerical identifiers such as would be used in a scientific research article or paper. Citations related to the numerical identifiers will be listed at the end of the post. Thank you.

Today’s offering regards more information on the negative effects that the COVID-19 “vaccines” have on the human brain. The trail begins here:

Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi: Because Of mRNA Vaccines, The Brains Of Billions Of People Are Not Working Anymore.

"The mRNA vaccines cause the destruction of brain cells. Obviously. And that is what we are now experiencing. We're seeing — I'm afraid to say BILLIONS OF PEOPLE — whose… pic.twitter.com/pvgpBRjsj7
— Camus (@newstart_2024) July 11, 2025

Recall that Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, MD, a medical microbiologist who is involved with the Doctors for COVID Ethics organization (https://doctors4covidethics.org/), and who is a dual citizen of Thailand and of Germany, was put on trial in Germany for his anti-COVID-19 “vaccine” stance. The court returned a verdict of Not Guilty in May 2023. The prosecutor’s appeal of Dr. Bhakdi’s Not Guilty verdict, an appeal that was to go to court in February 2025, was postponed [1]. More on the story related to the tweet by Dr. Bhakdi is here: https://slaynews.com/news/renowned-microbiologist-mrna-vaccines-destroyed-brains-billions-people/, “Renowned Microbiologist: mRNA ‘Vaccines’ ‘Destroyed the Brains’ of ‘Billions of People'”, by Frank Bergman, 14 July 2025.

Yours Truly has written extensively on this board about some of the negative effects of the COVID-19 “vaccines” on the brain of the “vaccinated” person. These articles are found here: https://www.theqtree.com/2024/10/18/health-friday-10-18-2024-special-edition-effects-of-the-covid-19-vaccines-physical-and-neurological/; https://www.theqtree.com/2024/11/08/health-friday-11-0-2024-open-thread-the-insidious-n1-methylpseudouridine-in-the-modrna-covid-19-vaccines/; and, https://www.theqtree.com/2025/03/21/health-friday-3-21-2025-open-thread-more-on-the-n1-methylpseudouridine-in-the-modrna-covid-19-vaccines/.

Today’s offering speaks to the negative effects of the COVID-19 “vaccines” on the human brain having to do with two small, but very important, glands located in the brain: the pituitary gland and the pineal gland.

The pituitary gland, a small, pea-shaped gland,is found in the human brain near the hypothalamus. The pituitary gland secretes several hormones that are important to various body functions. The pineal gland, another small gland, is found in the center area of the human brain. The pineal gland, among other functions, secretes melatonin, a hormone that is important for the body’s circadian rhythm and for proper sleep. The pituitary gland, the pineal gland, and the hypothalamus are components of the endocrine system of the human body. Please see the screenshots below: the first is about the pituitary gland [2]; the second is about the pineal gland [3]; and the third is from an article on the pineal gland that includes a discussion about the endocrine system [4]:

The ingredients (and, therefore, the mechanisms) of the COVID-19 “vaccines”, once injected into the body, quickly spread, via the dangerous lipid nanoparticles “rapid delivery system” compounds that are contained in these injectables, to every area of the human body, including to the brain. Yours Truly has written and posted about these lab-created compounds. They are: ALC-0159 and ALC-0315 in the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” (all of them); and, SM-102 in the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” (all of them.) It is now known that the COVID-19 “vaccines” cross the Blood-Brain Barrier of the human body and do damage to the brain. Once inside the brain, these “vaccines” can, and do, induce multiple problems ranging from Central Nervous System damage, to stroke, to cognitive impairment, to Alzheimer’s disease, and more. The Ota, et al., 2025 paper demonstrates that the COVID-19 spike protein (the foundation ingredient of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”) enters the cerebral arteries [5]. Please see a screenshot from this paper, below:

The Roh, et al. paper, from 2024, demonstrates that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” can induce Alzheimer’s disease [6]. Please see a screenshot from the Abstract of this paper, below:

A compilation of articles regarding how the COVID-19 “vaccines” enter the human brain and induce damage is here: https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/vaids-bombshell-the-covid-vaccine, “VAIDS BOMBSHELL: “The ‘Covid Vaccine’ is a CHEMICAL LOBOTOMY. A recent study of 558,017 Koreans found that the mRNA shots Increase the Risk of Cognitive Impairment +137.7% & Alzheimer’s disease +22.5”, 23 July 2025. There are numerous links in this article to previous posts in this Substack which discuss brain issues after COVID-19 “vaccination.” The Ota, et al., paper is also mentioned.

There is another aspect of the issue regarding how the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” enter into every area (and, therefore, into the cells of these areas) of the “vaccinated” human body. This is the fact that the PRRARSV gene code piece from the Pangolin MP789 coronavirus is present in BOTH the Pfizer-BioNTech and the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” (all of them.) This particular gene code piece has a 90%+ compatibility to the human genome code. In the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, PRRARSV functions as a “backdoor key” to facilitate entry into every cell in the “vaccinated” person’s body. Both our host, Wolf Moon, and Yours Truly has written about this situation here, for examples: https://www.theqtree.com/2023/05/01/pfizer-and-moderna-vaccines-both-contain-prrarsv-key-to-the-cell-nucleus/; and, https://www.theqtree.com/2024/11/27/placeholder-open-thread-11-27-2024-prrarsv-part-2-pangolin-edition/.

Back to the pituitary gland and the pineal gland of the human brain. Dr. Michele Ross, PhD, discusses the four areas of the brain that are not specifically protected by the Blood-Brain Barrier. Please see a screenshot from her article [7], below:

The modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” enter and damage the pituitary gland, one of the glands that is not specifically protected by the human Blood-Brain Barrier. The Taieb and Mounira paper from 2024 discusses this issue [8]. Two screenshots from their paper are below; the first is from the Abstract; the second is the Figure 2:

Another paper, by Verrienti, et al., from 2024, is a review of effects on the pituitary gland after COVID-19 “vaccination”[9]. Please see the screenshots from this paper, below. The first is the Conclusions section; the second is the Figure 1.

************ And now, to what may appear to be a minor point, but actually is, in Yours Truly’s opinion, an important aspect of the types of damage that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” do to the pineal gland of the human brain: these injectables interfere with the ADAMTS3 enzyme (a protein), part of the adamalysin family of enzymes. The influences of the ADAMTS enzymes in the human body range from functions in the brain, to correct growth of the lymphatic vessels, and more. Please see the screenshot from the Wikipedia entry on ADAMTS [10], below:

One member of the ADAMTS family is ADAMTS3. This enzyme (protein) is involved with, among other functions, the proper regulating of the brain’s cortex (the cerebral cortex, the outer “covering” of the brain.) Please see the screenshot from the Wikipedia entry on ADAMTS3 [11], below:

Pay special attention to the mention of Reelin. This protein is essential to the lamination of the cerebral cortex (lamination of the cerebral cortex appears like “multiple folds.”) When Reelin is decreased during the human aging process, brain function is negatively affected. When Reelin is decreased at other times in the human lifespan, the result can be Schizophrenia and other neurological conditions. Please see the screenshot from the Sighild Lemarchant article of 2017 [12], below:

The Cleveland Clinic article on the cerebral cortex starts with the following [13]:

************ And here is the “tie-in” to the COVID-19 spike protein and the brain: the spike protein of this virus interferes with the functioning of ADAMTS3. The Seabra Rodrigues Dias, et al., 2022 paper discusses what COVID-19 does to disrupt the work of the ADAMTS enzymes in the body [14]. Please see the screenshots from this paper, below. The first is a portion of section 2.5 Adamalysin expression in COVID-19 patients; the second is the Table 2. of body areas and functions that ADAMTS3 influences:

************ It is Yours Truly’s considered opinion that, since the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” (and the COVID-19 virus itself) contain elements that accelerate the aging of the entire body, down to the mitochondrial level, they also accelerate aging of the Reelin function in the brain related to ADAMTS3. This accelerated aging of the Reelin function can “leave the door open” for the development of cognitive impairment, of dementia, of Alzheimer’s disease, and other neurological / psychological conditions. Please see: https://www.theqtree.com/2023/10/28/the-covid-19-virus-and-the-modrna-covid-19-vaccines-induce-accelerated-aging/.

Yours Truly will point out that, while the COVID-19 virus itself does not contain the lab-created compound N1-Methylpseudouridine, nor the dangerous lipid nanoparticles ALC-0159, ALC-0315, or SM-102 — the COVID-19 virus itself does contain the PRRARSV “backdoor key”, and it also appears to contain elements that interfere with ADAMTS enzymes (proteins) in the body, including ADAMTS3 and the function of the Reelin protein in the brain. In my opinion, these facts may contribute to the incidence of “Long COVID” in non-COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons who contract an infection of the COVID-19 virus itself, recover from it, but then can present with symptoms of “Long COVID.” This is aside from COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons who can also present with symptoms of “Long COVID.” These “Long COVID” symptoms may present as neurological and/or psychological issues (either new-onset, or aggravation of previously-diagnosed conditions.)

TO CONCLUDE: It is Yours Truly’s considered opinion that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” were designed to damage, to injure, and/or to destroy, the human body. This damage, injury, and/or destruction includes every organ and area of the body of a person who has taken any injection of modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.” This damage, injury, and/or destruction begins the moment that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” is injected into the body. The modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” contain a lab-created compound, N1-Methylpseudouridine, that replaces the natural Uridine in the “vaccinated” person’s body with a “fake” Uridine combined with a type of methane. Natural Uridine plays crucial roles in multiple types of brain function, in mood regulation, and in the regulation of the “gut-brain axis” functions of the body. N1-Methylpseudouridine has no role in the body beyond replacing natural Uridine, thus weakening the “vaccinated” person’s body natural immune system against the other ingredients and mechanisms of the “vaccines.” The modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” contain dangerous lab-created lipid nanoparticles, which quickly spread the ingredients (and, therefore, the mechanisms) of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” throughout the body of the “vaccinated” person, including crossing the Blood-Brain Barrier and entering the brain. The modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” induce multiple types of damage and injury to the brain, including to the areas of the brain that are not specifically protected by the Blood-Brain Barrier, such as the pituitary gland and the pineal gland. The modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” contain elements that interfere with the important ADAMTS3 enzyme (protein) of the body; a protein that plays critical roles in multiple areas, including the proper regulation of the cerebral cortex covering of the brain. The spike protein in the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” interfere with the proper function of the Reelin protein in the brain as it relates to ADAMTS3. The modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” also contain the PRRARSV gene code piece from the Pangolin MP789 coronavirus; PRRARSV acts as a “backdoor key” that facilities the entry of the COVID-19 spike protein in the modRNA “vaccines” to enter the nucleus of every cell in the “vaccinated” person’s body. [The above are aside from the fact that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” also contain a SV40 cancer promoter gene code piece from the African Green Monkey.] The COVID-19 virus itself contains the PRRARSV gene code piece; and, it also appears to contain elements that interfere with the important ADAMTS3 enzyme of the body. In addition, there is the now-known phenomenon of COVID-19 “vaccine” spike protein “shedding” from “vaccinated” persons onto other persons, including onto non-COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons. It is Yours Truly’s considered opinion that this “shedding” can also potentially result in negative neurological effects, among other negative effects, in non-COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons. Yours Truly is NOT advocating that non-COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons avoid all contact with persons who may be COVID-19 “vaccinated”: but, instead, to be following a prophylatic COVID-19 spike protein protocol. In addition, ALL persons who have ever taken a COVID-19 “vaccine”, and ALL non-COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons who have been infected with COVID-19 and recovered, ALSO need to be following a COVID-19 spike protein mitigation / reduction protocol.

************ Yours Truly will state the following: It is past time for all COVID-19 “vaccines” to be taken off the market, and to be completely removed from use; to have all COVID-19 “vaccines” completely removed from any and all “recommendation lists” issued by any government agency, any private or non-governmental agency or organization, any hospital, clinic, pharmacy, nursing home or care facility, and any school board or educational facility; to have all COVID-19 “vaccine” inventories that are used on human beings reduced to zero; to retain only those COVID-19 “vaccine” vials that will be used for complete analysis and data compilation regarding the exact ingredients in these injectables and the sources of these ingredients, with the resulting information and data analyses made public; and, to hold to full account those who created the COVID-19 virus itself and the COVID-19 “vaccines.”

THERE. MUST. BE. ACCOUNTABILITY.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.

Citations:

[1] “Timeline: Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi Case”. https://doctors4covidethics.org/timeline-of-the-events/

[2] “Pituitary Gland: What It Is, Function & Anatomy”. Last reviewed on 04/04/2022/ https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/body/21459-pituitary-gland.

[3] “5 Functions of the Pineal Gland”. Neel Duggal, medically reviewed by Avi Varna, MD, MPH, AAHIVS, FAAFP. Updated December 20, 2022. https://www.healthline.com/health/pineal-gland-function.

[4] “Pineal gland”. Last reviewed on 06/22/2022. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/body/23334-pineal-gland.

[5] Ota N., Itani M., Aoki T., Sakurai A., Fujisawa T., Okada Y., Noda K., Arakawa Y., Tokuda S., Tanikawa R. Expression of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in cerebral Arteries: Implications for hemhorrhagic stroke Post-mRNA vaccination. J Clinical Neuroscience. Volume 136, June 2025 111223.

[6] Jae Hoon Roh, Inha Jung, Yunsun Suh, Min-Ho Kim, A potential asssociation between COVID-19 vaccination and development of Alzheimer’s disease, QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, Volume 117, Issue 10, October 2024, Pages 709-716, https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcae103.

[7] “4 Parts of the Brain Not Protected by the Blood-Brain Barrier”, Michele Ross, Phd. n.d. https://drmicheleross.com/brain-not-protected-blood-barrier/.

[8] Taieb A, Mounira EE. Pilot Findings on SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine-Induced Pituitary Diseases: A Mini Review from Diagnosis to Pathophysiology. Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Nov 24; 10(12):2004. doi.10.3390/vaccines10122004. PMID: 36560413; PMCID: PMC9786744.

[9] Verrienti, M., Picciola, V., Ambrosio, M.R. et al. Pituitary and COVID-19 vaccination: a systematic review. Pituitary 27, 970-985 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/S11102-024-01402-2.

[10] “ADAMTS”. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ADAMTS.

[11] “ADAMTS3”. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ADAMTS3.

[12] Relevance of the Proteolytic Processing of Reelin by ADAMTS-3 in Brain Functions. Sighild Lemarchant. Journal of Neuroscience 19 July 2017, 37 (29) 6814-6815; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1077-17.2017.

[13] “Cerebral Cortex”. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/articles/23073-cerebral-cortex. Last reviewed on 05/23/2022.

[14] “Adamalysins in COVID-19 — Potential mechanisms behind exacerbating the disease” Ivo Ricardo de Seabra Rodrigues Dias, Zhijian Cao, Hang Fai Kwok. J Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy. Vol. 150, June 2022, 112970.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday 7.18.2025 Open Thread: Moderna, the FDA, and the NIH/NIAID

The header image for today’s post is courtesy of iStock and Google Images.

The phrase to keep in mind when reading today’s post is: Follow the money.

Today’s post begins here: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/fda-commits-grave-betrayal-fully, “FDA Commits Grave Betrayal: Fully Approves Deadly Genetic Injections for Infants”, by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 11 July 2025. There is an embedded video interview with Mr. Hulscher in this article. This article and interview regard the FDA “full approval” on 10 July 2025 of the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, SPIKEVAX, to be used on infants and young children from age 6 months to 11 years old. A screenshot of a portion of the Table 2. from this article is below, showing the amounts of “loose” DNA in this “vaccine”:

The published scientific paper that is linked in the above Hulscher article is here: https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/review-of-calls-for-market-removal-of-covid-19-vaccines-intensify-risks-far-outweigh-theoretical-benefits/, “Review: Calls for Market Removal of COVID-19 Vaccines Intensify as Risks Far Outweigh Theoretical Benefits”, Nicolas Hulscher, Mary Bowden, Peter A. MCullough, 28 January 2025.

Yours Truly now turns to a crucial component of the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” situation: the “tied to the hip” relationship that this company has with the NIAID (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases), part of the NIH (National Institutes of Health.) Both the NIAID and the NIH are institutes of the federal government Department of Health and Human Services (HHS.) Katherine Watt, of Bailiwick News, has studied and written about the “coziness” between Big Pharma entities such as Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna with federal government agencies, such as the FDA. Please see: https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/why-pfizer-and-moderna-and-fda-are, “Why Pfizer and Moderna and FDA are working toward government authorization to inject babies and small children”, 23 March 2022. Ms. Watt includes a statement made by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. in 2021, on this situation. Please see: https://wsau.com/2021/12/31/robert-f-kennedy-jr-explains-why-fauci-is-going-after-children/, by Meg Ellefson, 31 December 2021. A screenshot from the Bailiwick News article on this is below:

There are SEC filings and “Confidential Agreements” between Moderna, the FDA. and the NIAID, regarding the funding and development of mRNA “vaccines.” There are patent co-ownership and revenue-sharing agreements between Moderna and the NIAID. There is a Moderna – NIH Confidential Agreement that goes back to 2015.

The trail begins here: https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/moderna-make-milestone-payments-nih-covid-vaccine-2023-02-24/,”Moderna to make milestone payments to NIH for COVID vaccine”, 24 February 2023. Please see the screenshot from this article, below:

By the way, milestone payments would include payments for items such as, developing the “latest version” of a COVID-19 modRNA “vaccine” — for examples: the Moderna (SPIKEVAX) “2025-2026 COVID-19 Formula Vaccine” that was just “recommended” by the ACIP committee of the CDC; and, the FDA “full approval” of SPIKEVAX being used on infants and young children age 6 months to 11 years old, which “full approval” was granted on 10 July 2025. It appears that Moderna had attempted to “modify” or “avoid” certain types of sharing agreements stipulations, royalty payments to the HHS (via the NIAID), and HHS – Moderna co-owned patents agreements; and, for which, the company was taken to court by the HHS. The decision was rendered against Moderna, with an order to make a multi-million dollar “catch-up payment” to HHS -NIAID.

Another aspect of the trail is here: https://thehill.com/opinion/congress-blog/4533574-how-the-national-institutes-of-health-became-a-den-of-cronyism/, by Sen. Rand Paul, MD (R-KY), 15 March 2024. Please see the screenshot from this article, below:

Now, to the 2015 “Confidential Agreements” between Moderna and the NIH. The document is found here: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6935195-NIH-Moderna-Confidential-Agreements/, November 2015. This document has numerous “amendments” and “additions” that go through the year 2018 — and, the last of which appears to “cover” all items related to COVID-19 “vaccines”. On page 16 of the document, with special attention to page 19, start the CRADA stipulations (Cooperative Research and Development Agreement stipulations between Moderna and the NIH.) The language here has numerous Proprietary Information redactions; however, it appears to be broad enough to cover the later co-ownership by Moderna and the NIH of the SPIKEVAX patents and their Expiry Dates (more on these below.)

Here are page 19 and a portion of page 20 of the NIH/NIAID and Moderna CRADA agreement, below:

Recall that the director of the NIAID in 2015 was Dr. Anthony Fauci; and, the director of the NIH in 2015 was Dr. Francis Collins.

The third part of the trail is here, the SEC filing that details the NIH – Moderna agreements to share COVID-19 “vaccine” development, patents, and royalty payments for use of said “vaccines”, is found here: https://www.sec.gov/ix?=docs/Archives/edgar/data/1682852/000168285223000011/mrna-20221231.html, filed 31 December 2022.

Page 41 of this document names the “partners” that will be included in the agreements: DARPA; BARDA; and, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Page 43 of this document details the SPIKEVAX patents and Expiry Dates that will be co-owned by Moderna and the NIH. A screenshot of this page is below:

There is also a “vaccine mechanisms” series of sections in this agreement. A screenshot of one of these sections is below:

And, there is a section regarding the “Drug Design Studio” section of the SEC document. Please see the screenshot from this section, below:

On 7 July 2025, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., cancelled the 10 July meeting that was scheduled for the USPSTF committee of the HHS (United States Preventive Services Task Force committee.) If Sec. Kennedy, Jr., can do this, why can’t he do something to modify / rescind / cancel the NIH / NIAID – Moderna “Confidential Agreements”, the related royalty-sharing payments agreements, and the 31 December 2022 SEC filing? Is it because of the “SPIKEVAX Patents and Expiry Dates” agreement, the screenshot of which from the SEC filing is above, and which runs, in total, until 22 October 2041? Are his hands tied? “Inquiring minds want to know.”

FLASH ADDENDUM: Our good Gail Combs asked to have the following added to today’s offering, regarding the development of a new BLACK PLAGUE strain variation that was just done by scientist in Israel. Yours Truly is also adding another item related to other work developing BLACK PLAGUE strain variations.

ISRAELI scientists have just developed an mRNA-based BLACK PLAGUE (Yersinia Pestis, or Y. Pestis) vaccine, using a lab-modified gene and adding N1-Methylpseudouridine as the lipid nanoparticle “delivery system.” Please see: https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/cp/168494356, “Israel Engineers Mutant Plague — Puts Its Genes in mRNA Shot That Makes Human Cells Produce Virulence and Immune-Evasion ‘Black Death’ Proteins: Journal ‘Advanced Science'”, 16 July 2025. This is the “BLACK PLAGUE version” of the modRNA + N1-Methylpseudouridine COVID-19 “vaccines” — except that the “payload” is a lab-created genetically altered and more virulent version of the BLACK PLAGUE.

Recall that Yours Truly has written extensively about the mechanism of the N1-Methylpseudouridine used in the Pfizer-BioNTech and in the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” (there’s the connection to Moderna.) This lab-created compound ingredient replaces the natural Uridine in the COVID-19 “vaccinated” person’s body, kicking the door wide open for catastrophic immune system evasion by said “vaccine”: evasion that will occur throughout the body and also the brain. The connection to both Moderna and to Pfizer-BioNTech in regards the use of N1-Methylpseudouridine is that BOTH companies specifically included this lab-created chemical compound in their modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, the description of which inclusion IS IN THE PATENT DOCUMENTS THAT WERE FILED BY EACH COMPANY. This begs the question: Did the Israeli scientists pay either Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna for the “rights” to use this compound IN THEIR BLACK PLAGUE VARIATION “VACCINE” EXPERIMENTS?

The peer-reviewed paper that is referred to in the Jon Fleetwood article is here: https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202501286, “Novel Bivalent mRNA-LNP Vaccine for Highly Effective Protection Against Pneumonic Plague”, Dan Peer, et al., 25 April 2025. A screenshot from the Fleetwood article is below:

But wait, there’s more! The Fleetwood article links to a paper published in 2024 regarding research by the United States Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Chemical Biological Center in Gunpowder, Maryland, ALSO on lab-creating a variation of the BLACK PLAGUE. This variation was “cultured” in a “bath” of Escherichia coli (E. coli, the same type of “culturing material” that is used by both Pfizer-BioNTech and by Moderna to produce their respective modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.” The paper is here: https://doi.org/10.1099/acmi.0.000723.v3, “Towards a Yersinia Pestis lipid A recreated in an Escherichia coli scaffold genome”, Nathan D. McDonald, Erin E. Antoshak, 17 July 2024. A screenshot of the Abstract of this paper is below:

In Yours Truly’s opinion: The entire “let’s make a lab-created RNA + lipid nanoparticle vaccine” situation is out of control. The entire “let’s alter a gene or two from a deadly infectious disease and make a variation of this disease” situation is out of control.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday 7.11.2025 Open Thread: Establishment Medicine Declares War on HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

The above free image of physicians conferring is courtesy of LovePik and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s offering speaks to the disaster of the COVID-19 “vaccines”, Yours Truly dedicates it to all those persons, of whatever age or location, who have come down with “vaccine”-induced injuries, illnesses, or disabilities, as a result of the COVID-19 “vaccines” (Bioweapon Toxin Injections) that they had put into their bodies; and, also, to all those persons, of whatever age or location, who have passed away from the negative effects of the COVID-19 “vaccines” that they had put into their bodies.

Yours Truly has written extensively on this board regarding what she calls Establishment Medicine. Establishment Medicine can be found in multiple areas, among them: The teaching of “consensus-centered” medicine (otherwise known as “the science is settled” medicine) in medical schools (this appears to be the approach in medical education currently); the “suggestion” or “advice” that physicians who choose a specialty in which to practice (for example, Internal Medicine) “need” to become board-credentialed by a private medical credentialing board (for example, credentialing through ABIM (the American Board of Internal Medicine, https://www.abim.org/); physician membership in the American Medical Association https://www.ama-assn.org/; and, “adherence” to the “recommendations” of the “routine vaccination schedules” of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC, https://www.cdc.gov/); and, the “endorsed vaccination schedule” of the American Academy of Pediatrics (https://www.aap.org/); the “routine guidance” of the FDA (Food and Drug Administration, https://www.fda.gov/); and, the “rules” and “regulations” of the State Medical Licensing Board in the state in which the physician resides, and which physician’s License to Practice Medicine must be secured prior to starting medical practice, and which License must be renewed after a certain period of time). Yours Truly will make it clear at the outset that there are many caring, perceptive physicians — in hospitals, in medical clinics, in stand-alone private physicians’ offices, and so on — who likely do not blindly ascribe to the “diktats” of Establishment Medicine. Perhaps there are physicians among this number who understand that the COVID-19 “vaccines” are dangerous and deadly. Perhaps there are physicians among this number who observing that their COVID-19 “vaccinated” loved ones, patients, or colleagues are presenting with COVID-19 “vaccine”-induced injuries, etc. Perhaps there are physicians among this number who would prefer to speak the truth about the COVID-19 “vaccines”, but refrain, due to concerns that they could be “disciplined”, or lose their License to Practice Medicine, by their state Medical Licensing Board.

Until very recently, all was going well for Establishment Medicine — its control over the health of the American public was “unchallengeable” — then, two important things happened: One, that the American public in general began to realize the dangers and deadliness of the COVID-19 “vaccines”; and, Two, the confirmation of Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., as the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) of the new administration under the forty-seventh President of the United States, Donald J. Trump, a few months ago.

On 9 June 2025, the seventeen then-current members of the CDC’s ACIP committee (Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices) were fired by Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. (https://www.hhs.gov/press-room/hhs-restores-public-trust-vaccines-acip.html, “HHS Takes Bold Step to Restore Public Trust in Vaccines by Reconstituting ACIP”, 9 June 2025.) Please see the screenshot from this announcement, below:

The reason? — Corruption of the ACIP committee members. The United States Congress reported on this corruption back in 2000: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/decades-of-corruption-congressional, “DECADES OF CORRUPTION: Congressional Report Confirms CDC’s ACIP Has Been Compromised Since the 1990s”, by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 10 June 2025. Please see the screenshot from this article, below:

One of the most-compromised (now former) members of the ACIP committee was Dr. Paul Offit.

And, of course, there was a large outcry from all over Establishment Medicine. One example: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/rfk-jr-removes-members-cdc-immunization-advisory-committee-acip/, “RFK Jr. removes every member of CDC vaccine advisory committee”, 10 June 2025. Please see the screenshot from this article, below, and keep it in mind for later on regarding today’s offering:

The ACIP Adult Immunization Schedule that was issued in May 2025 is found here (the actual CDC website no longer lists this schedule): https://www.dph.ncdhhs.gov/news/press-releases/2025/06/03/cdc-updates-covid-19-vaccine-schedule. The ACIP Adult Immunization Schedule that was issued in May 2025 has several changes; among them, the previous CDC “recommendation” that all pregnant women get COVID-19 “vaccinated.” The May 2025 schedule, instead, encourages “shared clinical decisions” between the physician and the pregnant patient. And this is where “the rest of the story” begins.

The outcry against the immunization schedule changes by Establishment Medicine was instant, loud, and immense. For example, this: https://www.pharmacist.com/APhA-Press-Releases/apha-withholds-enforsement-of-acip-adult-immunization-schedule. Please see a screenshot from this article, below:

Then, on 9 June 2025, when HHS Secretary Kennedy, Jr., fired the seventeen then-current ACIP members, he replaced them with eight new members: Dr. Joseph Hibbeln, MD, ABNP, CAPT USPHS (Ret.); Martin Kullorff, PhD; Retself Levi, PhD; Robert W. Malone, MD; Cody Meissner, MD; James Pagano, MD, FACEP; Vicky Pebsworth, PhD, RN; and, Michael Ross, MD. Their biographies are here: https://www.cdc.gov/acip/membership/roster.html. (Dr. Ross withdrew from the ACIP committee due to “financial holdings” reasons.) Establishment Medicine countered with hue and cry that none of these medical professionals were “experienced in vaccines”, and so on.

The June ACIP meeting was held on 25-27 June 2025, with the now-seven new members in attendance. Even while the meeting was going on, Establishment Medicine was “sounding the alarm” over the new committee and what they would do. Please see: https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/adult-non-flu-vaccines/vaccine-public-health-advocates-warn-fallout-acip-meeting, “Vaccine, public health advocates warn of fallout from ACIP meeting”, by Chris Dall, MA, 27 June 2025. Please see the screenshots from this article, below:

In fact, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) issued this statement: https://publications.aap.org/aapnews/news/32529/AAP-will-continue-to-publish-its-own-vaccine, “AAP will continue to publish its own vaccine recommendations after CDC advisers sow distrust”, by Melissa Jenco, 26 June 2025. Please the screenshot from this article, below:

Keep the above statement from the AAP in mind, as it is pertinent what happened in early July 2025. It appears that, while Establishment Medicine was making statements about how they opposed the new ACIP members, the new ACIP vaccine schedules and the new CDC policies, they were also making behind-the-scenes preparations for suing HHS Secretary Kennedy, Jr. And, in fact, this is what occurred: on 2 July 2025, several Establishment Medicine groups filed suit against HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., to force HHS to reinstate the former ACIP recommended vaccine schedules: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-medical-cartel-sues-rfk, “BREAKING: Medical Cartel Sues RFK Jr. for Pulling COVID Shot Recommendations for Kids and Pregnant Women”, by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 7 July 2025. Please see the screenshots from this article, below:

Note: The blue hyperlinks in the Hulscher article (one needs to go The Focal Points website for the Hulscher article link) lead to scientific articles about the dangers of the COVID-19 “vaccines”, and to the AAP, et al., lawsuit against Secretary Kennedy, Jr.

The AAP statement regarding the lawsuit, here, https://publications.aap.org/aapnews/news/32580, “AAP suing HHS over vaccine policy”, 7 July 2025, also has the link to the filed lawsuit against Secretary Kennedy, Jr. Please see the screenshot below from the AAP statement:

Screenshots of portions of the forty-two page lawsuit document are below:

Another link to the entire lawsuit document is here: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/25992348-aap-et-al-v-rfk-et-al-filed-complaint/.

In other words, in Yours Truly’s opinion, the AAP and the other medical organizations listed in the screenshot above want to force Secretary Kennedy, Jr., to “go back to the good old days” of the “old ACIP and the old CDC” — the same entities that “recommended” the dangerous, deadly COVID-19 “vaccines” without first demanding complete, detailed, and analyzed data from “clinical trials” for these injectables. Back to the “good old days” when every state legislature, every pharmacy, every medical clinic, every hospital, and almost every licensed physician, blindly followed the CDC “recommendations” regarding vaccinations of children and of adults. Back to the “good old days” of “the science is settled” — and those physicians who boldly told the truth, and continue to tell the truth, about the dangers and deadliness of the COVID-19 “vaccines” (for example, Dr. Peter A. McCullough, MD; Dr. Ryan Cole, MD; Dr. Pierre Kory, MD; Dr. Charles Hoffe, MD; and, Dr. Robert Malone, MD) were belittled; were marginalized by their medical specialty organizations; were fired from their jobs; were prosecuted by their Medical Specialty licensing organizations; were prosecuted by their state Medical Licensing Boards — were “disciplined” by these Boards, or had their License to Practice Medicine “restricted”, or even revoked, by these Boards. Back to the “good old days” when Establishment Medicine was the sole arbiter of health in the United States.

In Yours Truly’s opinion, the lawsuit by Establishment Medicine against HHS Secretary Kennedy, Jr., is the culmination of months of negative reactions regarding his nomination as the new HHS Secretary; regarding his confirmation for the position; regarding what appear to be some ambiguous and/or conflicting statements he has made since his confirmation; and certainly regarding his actions as HHS Secretary to attempt to rein in the tyranny of Establishment Medicine in HHS decisions. In some ways, the AAP, et al., lawsuit against Sec. Kennedy, Jr., may be similar to liberal “Judicial Establishment” actions against President Donald Trump 47 regarding blocking his efforts to deport illegal aliens in the United States.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday 6.6.2025 Open Thread: TLR4, S1, and mRNA-1283 (mNEXSPIKE): A Scientific Gourmanderie

The above image of TLR Signalling Pathways is courtesy of BioFinder and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s offering is related to the disaster of the COVID-19 virus itself, and of the COVID-19 “vaccines”, Yours Truly dedicates it to the memory of all persons, of whatever age or location, who have passed away from the negative effects of these lab-created Biological Toxin Weapons.

And now, to the reader’s Edification Smorgasbord, a “feast of information” regarding just how dangerous and potentially deadly mRNA-1283 (mNEXSPIKE) is, Yours Truly offers the following Menu:

APPETIZER: WHAT IS TLR4?

TLR4 (aka Toll-like receptor 4) is a transmembrane protein that exists across a cell membrane. TLR4 functions as a kind of “sensing device” within the body. It detects foreign bacteria and viruses. When a foreign element is detected by TLR4, it begins to send messages to the natural immune system to activate the immune response. TLR4 is crucial to the correct functioning of the natural immune system. Please see the screenshots below for more information:

Citation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toll-like_receptor_4

Citation: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2007.05.016, “Toll-like receptors in inflammation, infection and cancer”, Keqiang Chen, et al., October 2007. Found via: https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/immunology-and-microbiology/tlr4.

FIRST COURSE: THE FDA APPROVES “mNEXSPIKE” IN MAY 2025:

The “newest version” COVID-19 “vaccine”, mRNA-1283 (aka mNEXSPIKE), was “fully approved” by the FDA on 30 May 2025. Yours Truly wrote about this situation here: https://www.theqtree.com/2025/06/01/stop-press-edition-hhs-secretary-robert-f-kennedy-needs-to-resign-now/. This “vaccine” claims to be “more effective” in “preventing” an infection of COVID-19. The claim is based on the fact that mRNA-1283 (aka mNEXSPIKE) uses “only” the S1 protein and the N sector of said S1 protein of the COVID-19 virus spike protein, as opposed to using the entire spike protein (as in mRNA-1273, the original “flagship” modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” by Moderna.) Please see: https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiaf022, “Safety and Immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Receptor-Binding Domain and N-Terminal Domain mRNA Vaccine”, Spyros Chalkias, et al., 15 April 2025 (most of the authors of this “informational paper” are either affiliated with Moderna, or are employees of Moderna.) A screenshot of the Background section of the Abstract of this paper is below:

At first glance, this “new development” by Moderna may appear to be a “positive” achievement. However, there are other issues that arise:

First, there is the fact that the S1 protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus contains both the RCB (Receptor-Binding Domain) AND the N-terminal domain of the virus. It is the RCB that allows the virus to “attach” itself , or to “dock” itself, to cells in the body — for example, to the ACE2 cell receptors; and, to TLR4 cells. The N-terminal domain is the “end part” of the S1 protein; it is a “free” group at the end of the protein, while, at the same time, it “initiates” a polypeptide chain.

Second, there is the fact that the S1 protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus interacts with TLR4 cells. Yours Truly begins with this: https://news-medical.net/news/20210510/Research-suggests-Pfizer-BioNTech-COVID-19-vaccine-reprograms-innate-innate-immune-responses.aspx, Sally Robertson, B.Sc., 10 May 2021. Please see the following screenshots from this article:

While the above article refers to the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” BNT162b2, the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” from Moderna, mRNA-1273, also targets the RBD, which interacts with TLR4 cells in the “vaccinated” person’s body. In addition, all of the modRNA “descendant clone” COVID-19 “vaccines” by both companies also use the RBD, there interacting with TLR4 cells in the “vaccinated / boosted” person’s body.

TLR4 cells are also present in multiple areas and organs of the body. The modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” will interact with these cells. This is due to the fact that the S1 protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus contains certain amino acids residues (numbers 1-1208) that interact with TLR4 cells. Please see: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.306187, “SARS-CoV-2 spike protein S1 subunit induces pro-inflammatory responses via toll-like receptor 4 signaling in murine and human macrophages”, Ken Shirato, Takako Kizaki, February 2021. A screenshot of the Abstract of this paper follows:

Regarding the S1 amino acids residues 1-1208 and TLR4, please see this paper, from 2020: https://europepmc.org/article/ppr/ppr170060, ” Structural characterization of a nanobody derived from a naive library that neutralizaes SARS-CoV-2″, M Dumoux, et al., 1 June 2020. Below are screenshots from the Methods section and from a portion of the Supplementary Table section of this paper (the Supplementary Table portion shows some of the gene code for the S1 1-1208 residues):

Further information regarding SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and its interaction with TLR4 is found here: https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1368946, “TLR2/4 are novel activating receptors for SARS-CoV-2 spike protein on NK cells”. Nadine Landolina, et al., 30 May 2024. “NK” stands for “Natural Killer” cells in the body. A screenshot from this paper is below:

Then, there is the issue of clinical trial used by the FDA to “justify” the “full approval” of mRNA-1283 (aka mNEXSPIKE), NCT05137236 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05137236.) There was NO Placebo Control Group in this study. The study participants (study subjects) were injected with the following Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”: mRNA-1273; OR, mRNA-1283; OR, mRNA-1283.211; OR, mRNA-1283.529. Why was there no Placebo Control Group? Assuming that the study subjects knew, in advance, they would be injected with any one of FOUR different variations of a modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, were they fine with that?

And, there is the “opinion piece” by Dr. Martin Makary (FDA Commissioner) and Dr. Vinay Prasad (new head of the FDA’s CBER division), regarding the “new approach” that the FDA will use for COVID-19 “vaccines.” Please see:

SECOND COURSE: WHAT DOES THE modRNA COVID-19 “VACCINE”, mNEXSPIKE, CONTAIN?

Please see the FDA-issued Fact Sheet for Healthcare Providers (aka the Package Insert) for mRNA-1283, mNEXSPIKE: https://www.fda.gov/media/186738/download. Below is a screenshot of section 11 Description, section 12 Clinical Pharmacology, and section 13 Nonclinical Toxicology of this document:

Which plainly states that mNEXSPIKE contains the same types of dangerous, deadly lipid nanoparticle and excipient that all the other modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” by Moderna contain: SM-102, and PEG2000-DMG. This means that mNEXSPIKE will be rapidly spread into every cell in the “vaccinated” person’s body. It is also clear that mNEXSPIKE has NOT been tested for mutation potential, cancer-inducement potential, or reproductive impairment potential.

Yours Truly then performed a search to ascertain whether or not mNEXSPIKE contains N1-methylpseudouridine. She has written extensively on this board about this lab-created “fake Uridine plus a form of methane”, which completely replaces the natural RNA in the Uridine in the body. Recall that natural Uridine is crucial to multiple body functions and mechanisms: regulation of mood, of learning and memory, and of “gut-brain connection” functions. Lo and behold, the US Patent for mRNA-1283 (aka mNEXSPIKE) does have language describing “various types” of pseudouridine, including N1-methylpseudouridine, are used in all of Moderna’s modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” — which would also include mNEXSPIKE. The US Patent for mRNA-1283 is found here (US 20240382581A1): https://patents.google.com/patent/US20240382581A1/en?q=(mRNA-1283)&oq=mRNA-1283, “Pan-human coronavirus vaccines”, ModernaTX, published 21 November 2024. Please see sections 0120, 0121, 0122, and 0123 of this document for descriptions of the “various types” of pseudouridine.

Lastly, there is the question as to whether mNEXSPIKE contains any saRNA (self-amplifying RNA) component. Yours Truly searched for information regarding this, since the IM dose (intramuscular injection dose) of this COVID-19 “vaccine” is a very small amount — 0.2mL. She found this, which appears to be a “dancing all around the truth” description of this “vaccine.” Please see: https://synapse.patsnap.com/article/what-is-mrna-1283-used-for?, 28 June 2024. A screenshot from this article is below:

Read the last sentence in the second paragraph above, especially “…a robust and durable immune response, potentially requiring fewer doses and offering longer-lasting immunity compares to other vaccines.” Sounds like a description of the saRNA H5N1 “vaccine”, KOSTAIVE, currently approved for use in the EU / Scandinavia, and in Japan; and, a version of which “vaccine” is to begin clinical trials in the United States (NCT06602531), under the name ARCT-2304.

DESSERT AND BEVERAGES: REACTIONS AND QUESTIONS:

First, this: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/maha-movement-flabbergasted-covid, “MAHA Movement Flabbergasted COVID-19 Vaccines Remain on Market”, Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH, 2 June 2025. There is an embedded interview with Dr. McCullough in this article, along with a linked copy of the “Kabuki Theater performance” regarding “stopping” the COVID-19 “vaccines” in the United States by Dr. Martin Makary (FDA), Dr. Jay Bhattacharya (NIH DIrector), and HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., on 27 May 2025. A screenshot from the McCullough article is below, giving his views on the current situation:

Second, this tweet, from Dr. William Makis: https://x.com/MakisMD/status/1930296443434348771, 4 June 2024. Two screenshots from his tweet are below: first, a statement from HHS Secretary Kennedy, Jr.; and, second, from Dr. Makis:

Questions, posed by Yours Truly: Why did the FDA “fully approve” a “new”, modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” that specifically targets person over age 65, and persons who “fit” a detailed list of “persons at risk of severe COVID-19 infection”, as complied by Dr. Martin Makary and Dr. Vinay Prasad? Why was there a “Kabuki Theater performance” on 27 May 2025 by Drs. Makary and Bhattacharya, along with HHS Secretary Kennedy, Jr., when it was obvious by that date that the FDA “full approval” of mNEXSPIKE was “a done deal”? Why did the FDA issue an Approval Letter to Moderna for mNEXSPIKE that has so many “caveats”, “requests for more information”, and an “order” for the company to perform a Phase 4 clinical study on the “vaccine” — a “vaccine” that the FDA had just “fully approved”? Please see: https://www.fda.gov/media/186740/download; and, the screenshot of Page 9 of this document, regarding the “order” for the Phase 4 study, below:

More questions, posed by Yours Truly: How many elderly persons are going to be pressured / cajoled / “mandated” (by the nursing home or care facility where they live), to take mNEXSPIKE? Will they be told that this injectable is “safer” than mRNA-1273, “because the dose is smaller”? What about persons who “fit” into the multiple categories of “persons at high risk for severe COVID-19 infection” according to Drs. Makary and Prasad? What pressure will these persons be subjected to in order to get them to agree to take mNEXSPIKE? Finally, will people be told the truth that mNEXSPIKE, just because it does not contain the S2 portion of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, is NOT “mRNA-1273 Lite” — but, rather, it is another version of a dangerous, potentially deadly modRNA COVID-19 ‘”vaccine”?

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

STOP PRESS EDITION: HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Needs to Get Control, or to Resign — Now.

The above image of a vintage vaccine vial and syringe is courtesy of Google Images.

This post is a STOP PRESS EDITION. It has to do with the FDA BLA (Biologics License Application) approval of the Moderna COVID-19 modRNA “vaccine” mRNA-1283. This “vaccine” was FDA-approved without any clinical trial in which there was a placebo control group. mRNA-1283 contains a “shorter portion” of the COVID-19 virus spike protein. This “vaccine” also contains elements of the H7N9 Avian Influenza strain that was used in Gain-of-Function experiments by Dr. Yoshihira Kawaoka, DVM, PhD, in 2013, along with other scientists, at the University of Wisconsin (Madison.)

Today’s offering is short and to the point. Special Thanks to our good duchess01, to https://www.thefocalpoints.com/, and to http://mole.substack.com/. Please refer to the following posts by Yours Truly for relevant background information regarding today’s offering: https://www.theqtree.com/2025/05/30/health-friday-5030-2025-open-thread-what-is-going-on-at-hhs-the-fda-and-the-cdc/; and, https://www.theqtree.com/2025/05/16/health-friday-open-thread-5-16-2025-about-that-universal-vaccine-theres-more-than-meets-the-eye-part-two/.

Please see the following breaking news outlets pieces regarding the FDA granting the BLA for the Moderna “newest COVID-19 “vaccine”, mRNA-1283: First, this one: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/cp/164898171, “BREAKING: FDA Goes Rogue — Approves Moderna’s Next-Gen COVID-19 mRNA Injection Without a Placebo-Controlled Trial”, Nicolas Hulscher, May 2025. Please see the screenshots from this article, below:

HOWEVER, there is another aspect to the mRNA-1283 modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” — this injectable appears to be a combination of BOTH the SARS-CoV-2 virus AND elements of the deadly H7N9 Avian Influenza virus. Please see: https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/cp/164803097, “FDA Approves Moderna COVID Jab Containing GOF Bird Flu Gene Segment That PCR Could Mistake for Infection”, 31 May 2025. The “bird flu gene segment” is from the Gain-of-Function experiments with the H7N9 Avian Influenza virus conducted by Dr. Yoshihiro Kawaoka, Ron Fouchier, and other scientists, under the aegis of the University of Wisconsin (Madison), where Dr. Kawaoka has his lab. These Gain-of-Function experiments were “outed” when serious lab accidents occurred; it appears that the experiments were then stopped. But not before Dr. Fouchier wrote this article: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1243325, “Gain-of-Function Experiments on H7N9”, 9 August 2013, in which Dr. Fouchier attempted to justify further Gain-of-Function experimentation.

Please see the following screenshot, below, from the Wikipedia entry on H7N9 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Influenza_A_virus_subtype_H7N9):

The archived article regarding the H7N9 experiments at the University of Wisconsin (Madison), is found here: https://archive.ph/LX7MP, “Study: Lab-derived H5N1 virus component binds to human receptors”, Robert Roos, 13 April 2013.

In Yours Truly’s opinion, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., the Secretary of Health and Human Services, is not doing his job. BOTH the FDA and the CDC have now “gone rogue” — first, with the “sleight-of-hand” regarding the CDC’s “new recommendations” about the COVID-19 “vaccines” (per Dr. Susan Monarez, PhD, the current Acting Director of the CDC, as of 30 May 2025); and, second, with the FDA (Dr. Martin Makary, Commissioner) granting approval of the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 + H7N9 gene pieces combination “vaccine”, mRNA-1283 (as of 31 May 2025.) It is time, in Yours Truly’s opinion, for Secretary Kennedy, Jr., to either get control of the FDA and CDC — after all, these agencies are part of HHS — or, to resign, and allow President Trump47 to find someone who will.

FLASH UPDATES! MORE ON THE “DIRTY BACKSTORY” RELATED TO THE FDA’s APPROVAL OF mRNA-1283 ON 30 MAY 2025:

ONE: The FDA’s Approval Letter to Moderna on 30 May 2025, regarding mRNA-1283: https://www.fda.gov/media/186740/download. Please see the screenshot of page nine of this document, below:

This is the PHASE 4 clinical study that Moderna is requested to perform for mRNA-1283, but which has NOT begun yet, nor has it ENROLLED any subjects yet.

TWO. This is the slide presentation for the CDC’s ACIP committee meeting for April 2025 related to the “2025-2026 COVID-19 Vaccines Formula” selections. Notice that there is NO vote that ACIP planned to take regarding mRNA-1283. Please see: https://www.cdc.gov/acip/downloads/slides-2025-04-15-16/05-Panagiotakopoulos-COVID-508.pdf. Below is a screenshot of the pertinent image from the slide presentation:

WHAT IS GOING ON HERE?

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday 5.30.2025 Open Thread: What is Going On at HHS, the FDA, and the CDC?

The above graphic is with thanks to https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/fda-recommends-more-mrna-shots-despite, “FDA Recommends More mRNA Booster Shots Despite New Study Showing Booster Failure — and Major Public Outcry”, by Nicolas Hulscher, 26 May 2025.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s offering has to do with the disaster of the COVID-19 “vaccines” (Bioweapon Toxin Injections), Yours Truly dedicates it to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have passed away due to the negative effects of the COVID-19 “vaccines” that they had injected into their bodies.

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to use any AI-generated material in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Yours Truly has been researching, reading about, and writing about, the COVID-19 disaster since March 2020. She had a sense, early in 2020 when the speculation about the development and use of a COVID-19 “vaccine”, that something was “off” in the hype regarding “how this will stop the spread” of the virus, “how this will prevent COVID-19 infection”, and so on. As it turns out, that “Suspicious Dog” feeling was the correct one — the COVID-19 “vaccines” have been, are now, and will be, a disaster. These injectables do not prevent COVID-19 infection. These injectables have injured, sickened, disabled, and even killed, millions of “vaccinated” persons all over the world. These “vaccines” will continue to injure, sicken, disable, and even kill, those who have them put into their body — not only because of the ingredients and mechanisms of these injectables, but now also because of the “new and improved” (not) faulty foundation of “lab-created antibody titer levels tests” that will be used in the development of the “latest mutation version” of the “vaccines”, instead of doing actual clinical trials with lab animals and/or with human subjects. I will make it clear at the start that today’s offering is not meant to “stir the pot.” There are, in my opinion, legitimate questions that need to be asked regarding certain recent news items.

There are several central elements of the current situation regarding the “2025-2026 COVID-19 Vaccine Formula”, and the actions of certain people and entities. One such entity is the FDA. The current Commissioner of the FDA is Dr. Martin Makary, MD, MPH, who is also a proponent of COVID-19 “vaccination” (including in pregnant women), and is himself “vaccinated.”

On 22 May 2025, the FDA’s VRBPAC (Vaccines and Related Biological Advisory Committee) members met to “consider” and then to “recommend” the “2025-2026 COVID-19 Vaccine Formula.” The committee voted unanimously, after “presentations” by Pfizer-BioNTech, by Moderna, and by Novavax, to “recommend” the “formulas” for the modRNA (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna) and the “inactivated protein” (Novavax) COVID-19 “vaccines.” Please see: https://www.contagionlive.com/view/fda-makes-recommendations-for-2025-2026-formula-for-covid-19-vaccines, 23 May 2025. A screenshot from this article is below:

These “vaccines” will be lab-developed, then lab-tested regarding the amount of “antibody titers” that “might” be “effective” in the “2025-2026 Formula COVID-19 Vaccines.” There will be no clinical trial testing of these “vaccines.” This protocol, outlined in the “Option 4” method, was adopted by the FDA on 28 June 2022. Please see the Briefing Document for this meeting: https://www.fda.gov/media/159452/download. “Option 4” is located on page 19. Please see the screenshot below:

Therefore, it appears that any person who takes an injection of the “2025-2026 Formula COVID-19 Vaccine” by Pfizer-BioNTech, by Moderna, or by Novavax, will be, in essence, a “human lab rat”, since these “vaccines” will only have been tested under “Petri-dish conditions” in a lab to confirm whether the “antibody titer amounts” expressed by the “vaccine” ingredients “might” be “effective” in humans.

There were over 95,000 public comments that were submitted to the FDA regarding the VRBPAC meeting of 22 May 2025, indicating a “major public outcry” against the “recommending” of more COVID-19 “vaccines.” Nonetheless, the VRBPAC members voted to endorse the “2025-2026 COVID-19 Vaccine” formulas, as described above, using the “Option 4” method. Please see: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/fda-recommends-more-mrna-shots-despite, “FDA Recommends More mRNA Booster Shots Despite New Study Showing Booster Failure — and Major Public Outcry”, Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 26 May 2025. Please see the screenshot from this article, below:

The phrase, “immunogenicity data” refers to the “Petri-dish lab experiments” as described above.

The image below is from the “opinion piece” written and published by Dr. Martin Makary and Dr. Vinay Prasad, MD, MPH. Dr. Prasad is another important person in the current situation regarding the HHS / FDA / CDC. As of 6 May 2025, Dr. Prasad is the new Director of the FDA’s CBER department (Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research.) The “opinion piece” was published on 20 May 2025, two days prior to the FDA’s VRBPAC meeting. Please see: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsb2506929. A screenshot of the combined Figure 2 and Figure 3 from the “opinion piece” are below:

Dr. Prasad made it clear, in a podcast, that the FDA will implement the elements outlined in the “opinion piece” as the “new framework” for COVID-19 “vaccination.” Please keep this in mind for later on in today’s offering.

The paper regarding the failure of COVID-19 “booster shots”, already online-published but will appear in a medical journal in June 2025, is found here: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127257, “Effect of the 2022 COVID-19 booster vaccination campaign in people aged 50 years in England: Regression discontinuity analysis in OpenSAFELY-TPP”, Andrea L. Schaffer, et al., journal Vaccine, Volume 59, 20 June 2025, 127257. The salient image from this paper is below:

Regarding the impact of COVID-19 “vaccination” on the lifetime supply of eggs in a female’s ovaries, it is now known that BOTH the modRNA AND the “inactivated” COVID-19 “vaccines” have a devastating impact on this egg supply. Please see: https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines/13040345, “Impact of mRNA and Inactivated COVID-19 Vaccines on Ovarian Reserve”, Enes Karaman, et al., 30 January 2025. This paper demonstrates that there is a 30% conception failure rate, and an overall loss of up to 60% of the lifetime egg supply in the female ovaries, both induced by COVID-19 “vaccination” in a female of child-bearing age.

Then, there is Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, MD, PhD, the new Director of the NIH (National Institutes of Health.) It appears that Dr. Bhattacharya may be “betting on both sides of the game” regarding COVID-19 and the COVID-19 “vaccines.” While it is true that Dr. Bhattacharya has stated that lockdowns, “mandated masking”, “social distancing”, and so on, are not real methods to deal with the virus, he also said this, in 2021, regarding the COVID-19 “vaccines”:

Link to the above: https://www.newsweek.com/stanford-doc-jay-bhattacharya-calls-vaccine-mandates-unethical-says-patients-can-choose-1611938. The above statement from Dr. Bhattacharya raises some questions: One, if COVID-19 is “basically a cold”, how can a “vaccine” protect against it? Two, if COVID-19 is “basically a cold”, why are there so many persons who have had a COVID-19 infection (either from the mechanisms of the COVID-19 “vaccines” themselves, or from the virus itself) and have since presented with symptoms of “Long COVID”? Three, if indeed a person who had a COVID-19 infection and recovered, is “protected against new disease”, why are people (COVID-19 “vaccinated” or not) still coming down with COVID-19 virus mutation infections?

Next is Susan Monarez PhD, the current Acting Director of the CDC. Previously, she had worked in the Department of Homeland Security with BARDA and with other HHS departments. Dr. Monarez is a “biosecurity expert” who has also endorsed the COVID-19 “vaccines.” Please see: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/24/health/cdc-director-monarez.html, “Trump Nominates Susan Monarez to Lead C.D.C.”, 24 March 2025. The pullquote from the article: “Monarez is a biosecurity expert who endorsed the Covid vaccines, and her selection may signal a growing impatience with anti-vaccine sentiment.”

And, finally, there is current HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., an attorney who founded the Children’s Health Defense organization (https://childrenshealthdefense.org/), and who has been an outspoken opponent of the COVID-19 “vaccines.”

And here begins Yours Truly’s presentation of the Kabuki theater going on at HHS / FDA / CDC:

On Tuesday 27 May 2025, HHS Secretary Kennedy, Jr., appeared in a video with Dr. Markary and Dr. Bhattacharya to announce that the COVID-19 “vaccines” that are “recommended” (in actual practice, they are called “routine”) by the CDC for healthy children under age 18, and for healthy pregnant women, would be removed from the CDC Immunization Schedules. Please see: https://x.com/bennyjohnson/status/1927374665745342535, a screenshot of which is below:

Where was Dr. Monarez, the Acting Director of the CDC? Why wasn’t she included in the video? An “announcement” of this importance would surely have required her to be included. To the best of Yours Truly’s knowledge and belief, neither Dr. Makary (FDA), nor Dr. Bhattacharya (FDA CBER), have the direct authority to remove vaccines from the CDC Immunization Schedules. The CDC is a separate departmental entity of HHS.

However: In reality, nothing has changed regarding the CDC Immunization Schedules. The CDC is still using the same 2025 Immunization Schedules that were issued on 21 November 2024. Please see: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/imz-schedules/index.html. The CDC is still “recommending” that pregnant women get COVID-19 “vaccinated”. Please see: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines-pregnancy/about/index.html. This “recommendation” was issued by the CDC on 17 June 2024.

The “elaborate costumes and dance of Kabuki theater” approach were on display during this video with Secretary Kennedy, Jr., Dr. Makary, and Dr. Bhattacharya. But it was a “performance.” And the audience suspended reality for the “performance.”

Yours Truly now turns to the blog article by Sasha Latypova, a former medical technology and pharmaceutical technology professional, about this “Kabuki theater performance” of 27 May: https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/eugenics-for-dummies-aka-hhss-evidence, “Eugenics for Dummies, aka HHS’s “Evidence-Based Approach” to covid shots.”, 29 May 2025. Please see the screenshots from her article, below:

It appears that, in reality, what has happened is that the current CDC Immunization Schedules have been neatly “absorbed into” the “new evidence-based approach to the COVID-19 vaccines” so-called “opinion piece” of Dr. Makary and Dr. Prasad (see the links to their “opinion piece”, above; and, also, the statement by Dr. Prasad that this “new approach” will be implemented at the FDA / CDC (so, it seems, they aren’t “opinions” at all.)

Further confirmation of the “Kabuki theater” element regarding the 27 May “announcement” by Secretary Kennedy, Jr., Dr. Makary, and Dr. Bhattacharya, comes from The Kingston Report: https://karenkingston.substack.com/cp/164733998, “Who’s Calling the Shots at HHS?”, 29 May 2025.

WHO IS IN CHARGE OF HHS? If Secretary Kennedy, Jr., can take the time to write letters to ask that ostriches in Canada are not “culled” due to a “possible” infection from Avian Influenza; if he can issue a directive to have titanium dioxide removed from candy (Skittles) — why did he participate in a “Kabuki theater performance” on 27 May regarding something incredibly important to the health of every American — the dangerous, deadly COVID-19 “vaccines”? Did he, or anyone else, at HHS, inform Dr. Monarez about the “change” in the CDC Immunization Schedules? If so, did she agree?

In Yours Truly’s opinion, there appears to be some sort of “issues” going on at HHS, the FDA, and the CDC. HHS Secretary Kennedy, Jr., needs to get to the bottom of all of them.

FLASH! AS OF TODAY, 30 MAY 2025: THE CDC HAS JUST ISSUED THE “NEW CHILDHOOD VACCINE IMMUNIZATION SCHEDULE” RELATED TO THE COVID-19 “VACCINES”:

It appears that Dr. Susan Monarez, PhD, has finally weighed in regarding the 27 May “announcement” (aka “Kabuki theater performance”) by HHS Secretary Kennedy, Jr., Dr. Makary, and Dr. Bhattacharya COVID-19 “vaccines” and the CDC Childhood Immunization Schedule. Please see Sasha Latypova’s presentation here: https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/cdc-issued-the-anticipated-updates, “CDC issued the anticipated updates to the children’s schedule for covid shots”, 30 May 2025.

HOWEVER, there’s some “catches” in the “updates.” Huge “catches.” These have to do with the CDC “definition” of what a “healthy child” means. In short summary: It will be the CDC who decides if a child meets their “criteria” for being a “healthy child” (meaning, the COVID-19 “vaccines” aren’t “necessary” or “recommended”); it will be the CDC’s “guidance” on this that will be in control of any discussion between a child’s parent(s)/guardians, and the clinician who can administer COVID-19 “vaccines”; there are no provisions that Yours Truly can see in the CDC “guidance” for exemptions on religious or other grounds; and, that ANY clinician who is cleared to administer COVID-19 “vaccines” will ultimately make the decision on whether or not to COVID-19 “vaccinate” a child who does not fit the CDC “criteria” for a “healthy child.” This includes clinicians who have never treated the child (in other words, a CVS pharmacist, for example.) Please see the screenshots below, from the Latypova article of today:

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday Open Thread 5.23.2025: The FDA’s EUA to Pfizer-BioNTech for BNT162b2 on 11 December 2020 Is Invalid

The above free vintage image of a vaccine vial and syringe is courtesy of iStock and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s offering is related to the COVID-19 biological toxin injections, aka the COVID-19 “vaccines”, Yours Truly dedicates it to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have been injured, made ill, become disabled, or have passed away, from the negative effects of these “vaccines” that they had in their body.

Yours Truly began writing about the results of the huge C4591001 clinical trial of the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, BNT162b2, on the board here back in 2023. I was reading through document after document that the company generated related to this clinical trial, documents that were released to the general public only after Pfizer-BioNTech, in partnership with the FDA, lost their case in federal court to keep all of the data about C4591001 sealed for 75 years, and they were then sued by Attorney Aaron Siri’s group, Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency (PHMPT.) Please see: https://www.biospace.com/non-profit-group-wins-transparency-lawsuit-over-fda-records-of-pfizer-vaccine-authorization, 7 January 2022. Note: regarding the Pfizer-BioNTech and the Moderna COVID-19 “vaccines”, “mRNA” and “modRNA” are interchangeable descriptive words for these injectables.

The FDA press release of 11 December 2020, announcing the agency’s granting of the EUA for the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” BNT162b2 is here: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-annoucenments/fda-takes-key-action-fight-against-covid-19-issuing-emergency-use-authorization-first-covid-19, “FDA Takes Key Action in Fight Against COVID-19 By Issuing Emergency Use Authorization for First COVID-19 Vaccine.” A screenshot from this press release is below:

Note the phrase, “Follows Thorough Evaluation…”. It is now known that this manifestly was NOT performed before the EUA was granted.

Regarding the invalidity of the 11 December 2020 EUA that was granted to Pfizer-BioNTech for BNT162b2 to be used “to prevent COVID-19 infection” in the United States: Yours Truly begins here: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/fda-authorization-of-pfizer-covid. “FDA VRBPAC December 11, 2020 Decision on Pfizer mRNA Found Invalid”, Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 17 May 2025. There are several screenshots from this article, below:

Regarding the delaying by the FDA and the CDC of important information regarding the incidence of myocarditis following COVID-19 “vaccination”, and these agencies (and, also, Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna) failing to issue Black Box Warnings about this on the Package Inserts for their modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” (BNT162b2 [Pfizer-BioNTech] and mRNA-1273 [Moderna]), please see: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/us-fda-and-cdc-delayed-health-advisory, “US FDA and CDC Delayed Health Advisory on COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Myocarditis for Months, Failed to Issue Black Box Warning for Years”, Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH, 18 May 2025. A screenshot from this article is below:

The above slide image is from the FDA’s VRBPAC meeting of 22 October 2020. This meeting was held seven weeks prior to the 11 December 2020 granting of the EUA for BNT162b2. The FDA therefore KNEW before 11 December 2020 that BNT162b2 could cause myocarditis — but went ahead and issue the EUA anyway.

Yours Truly has written extensively on the manufacturing process for BNT162b2, and on associated topics. Please see: https://www.theqtree.com/2023/11/06/the-infamous-process-2-manufacturing-method-for-the-pfizer-biontech-modrna-covid-19-vaccines/

Also: https://www.theqtree.com/2024/02/01/an-open-letter-to-medical-professionals-who-took-the-covid-19-vaccines/

And: https://www.theqtree.com/2024/11/15/health-friday-11-15-2024-open-thread-hold-them-accountable-edition/

The FDA’s VRBPAC members will meet on Thursday 22 May 2025 to make “recommendations” regarding the “2025-2026 COVID-19 Vaccine Formulas.” Public comment is accepted until 11:59PM on Friday 23 May. To submit comments electronically, please see: https://www.federalregister.gov/2025/05/08/2025-080803/vaccines-and-related-biological-products-advisory-committee-notice-of-meeting-establishment-of-a; scroll down this page to the section “Electronic Submissions.”

But wait, there’s more! The “new” leadership of the FDA and the CDC, Dr. Vinay Prasad and Dr. Martin Makary wrote an article which was just published in the New England Journal of Medicine: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsb2506929, “An Evidence-Based Approach to COVID-19 Vaccination”, Vinay Prasad, MD, MPH, and Martin A. Makary, MD, MPH, 20 May 2025. This article is NOT an “opinion piece” — Drs. Prasad and Makary make it clear that they are going to implement this “new approach” to COVID-19 “vaccination” through the FDA and the CDC.

In Yours Truly’s opinion, this “new approach” has many items to question. For example: the granting of FDA authorization for “new formula” COVID-19 “vaccines”, authorization based on lab-performed experiments on the “new formula” ingredients that produce certain numbers of “antibody titers” that might “correspond” to “effectiveness.” There would be no clinical trials at all, performed either on lab rats or on humans. This “lab-experiments with Petri dishes results” authorization method is outlined in “Option 4” of the FDA vaccine authorization / full approval guidelines that the agency adopted in 2022. This “lab-experiments with Petri dishes results” method will now be used for “new formula” COVID-19 “vaccines” for persons age 65 and over; and for persons under age 65 with compromised immune systems or who are part of “vulnerable” or “at risk” populations — such as, for example, pregnant women. Please see, regarding the “Option 4”: https://www.fda.gov/media/159452/download, “VRBPAC Briefing Document”, 28 June 2022. A screenshot of “Option 4” is below:

For another example: COVID-19 “vaccination” will still be “recommended” for pregnant women and for women who have just given birth. This flies in the face of the mounting, and published, evidence that COVID-19 “vaccination” during pregnancy can, and does, result in miscarriages, stillbirths, live births but the infant has medical issues, and so on. In addition, COVID-19 “vaccine” antibodies show up in the breast milk that “vaccinated” new mothers nurse their infants with.

Why do the FDA / CDC continue to ignore the evidence-based facts that Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, Zinc, and Vitamin D both prevent and treat COVID-19 infections?

Three screenshots from the Prasad and Makary article are below:

NOTE THE LAST SENTENCE OF THE ABOVE IMAGE: “Ultimately, these studies alone can provide reassurance that the American repeat-boosters-in-perpetuity strategy is evidence-based.”

Let’s take a look at the combined Figure 2 and Figure 3 image:

Which makes it plain, in Figure 2, that the COVID-19 “vaccines” will be “recommended” for people who “fit” the diagnosis parameters of multiple types of medical conditions, including pregnant women and women who have just given birth — in other words, these groups of people may well be subjected to multiple types of “convincing” strategies to get them to agree to take these “vaccines.” Who made the decisions on the types of “risk factors” for the “increased at-risk” groups?

And, there’s this tweet, from Dr. Martin Makary, of August 2023:

There is published, irrefutable evidence that the COVID-19 “vaccines” can cause death among the “vaccinated.” Please see: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/the-causal-link-between-covid-19, “The Causal Link Between COVID-19 Vaccination and Death”, Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 21 May 2025. There is an embedded interview between Mr. Hulscher and Dr. Idriss J. Aberkane, PhD, on this subject. A screenshot from the Hulscher article is below:

It appears to be unclear, in Yours Truly’s opinion, about where this “new approach to COVID-19 vaccination” fits in as regards the “Generation Gold Standard” that was announced a few weeks ago. Does the federal government control “new” COVID-19 “vaccine” development processes? Where does Big Pharma (Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, Novavax) come in? Is that what “Sponsor-Driven” clinical trials means (see the above image)?

However, here’s the real situation: In Yours Truly’s opinion, given that the initial EUA granted by the FDA to the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 on 11 December 2020 was invalid — that means, by extension, that every other EUA (and “Full Approval”) of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” is also invalid: which would include any “formula” that is “recommended” for the “2025-2026 COVID-19 Vaccine”. Which would also, in Yours Truly’s opinion, invalidate any “Full Approval” of the Novavax COVID-19 “vaccine”, since the foundation of that injectable is the same Wuhan Hu1 SARS-CoV-2 virus that was used as the foundation for BNT162b2.

FLASH! — Meanwhile, the FDA just granted “Full Approval” to the Novavax company’s injectable on 19 May 2025, under the name “NUVAXOVID”: https://ir.novavax.com/press-releases/2025-05-19-U-S-FDA-Approves-BLA-for-Novavax-COVID-19-Vaccine.

FLASH! 2 — The VRBPAC members voted unanimously today to “recommend” that the “2025-2026 COVID-19 Vaccine Formula” injectables contain the JN.1 Omicron variant of the original SARS-CoV-2 virus. This is the same strain that was “recommended” for the “2024-2025 COVID-19 Vaccine Formula” injectables. The decision today by VRBPAC will be implemented according to the Dr. Prasad and Dr. Makary “new approach” method, as outlined above in today’s post. This means that persons age 65 and older, and that persons under age 65 who fall into one of the “increased risk” categories (Figure 2, above in the post) will be “encouraged” to get “vaccinated.” The exact formulation of the “2025-2026 COVID-19 Vaccine Formula” for the Pfizer-BioNTech and the Moderna injectables will be based, as was their other COVID-19 “vaccines” on the modRNA (aka mRNA)-based platform. The Novavax (now called NUVAXOVID) “2025-2026 vaccine” product will be based on the company’s previous “inactivated protein”-based platform. It is unclear whether the NUVAXOVID “2025-2026 vaccine” product will be authorized for persons under age 65 and/or who have underlying “increased risk” conditions. Please see: https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/covid-19/fda-vaccine-advisers-recommend-sticking-jn1-strain-next-covid-vaccines, 22 May 2025; and, https://cen.acs.org/pharmaceuticals/vaccines/FDA39s-new-COVID-19-vaccine/103/web/2025/05?sc=230901_cenrssfeed_eng_latestnewsrss_cen, 22 May 2025. A screenshot from the C&EN / ACS article is below, highlighting items related to the Dr. Prasad and Dr. Makary “new approach” article:

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Dear KMAG: 20250519 Trump Won Three Times ❀ Open Topic

Joe Biden never won. This is our Real President – 45, 46, 47.

AND our beautiful REALFLOTUS.

This Stormwatch Monday Open Thread remains open – VERY OPEN – a place for everybody to post whatever they feel they would like to tell the White Hats, and the rest of the MAGA/KAG/KMAG world (with KMAG being a bit of both).

And yes, it’s Monday…again.

But we WILL get through it!

We will always remember Wheatie,

Pray for Trump,

Yet have fun,

and HOLD ON when things get crazy!

We will follow the RULES of civility that Wheatie left for us:

Wheatie’s Rules:

No food fights.
No running with scissors.
If you bring snacks, bring enough for everyone.

And while we engage in vigorous free speech, we will remember Wheatie’s advice on civility, non-violence, and site unity:

“We’re on the same side here so let’s not engage in friendly fire.”

“Let’s not give the odious Internet Censors a reason to shut down this precious haven that Wolf has created for us.”

If this site gets shut down, please remember various ways to get back in touch with the rest of the gang:

Our backup site, The Q Tree 579486807, https://theqtree579486807.wordpress.com/
Our old alternative site, The U Tree, where civility is not a requirement
Our Gab Group, which is located at https://gab.com/groups/4178
Our various sister sites, listed in the Blogroll in the sidebar

Our beloved country is under Occupation by hostile forces.

Daily outrage and epic phuckery abound.

We can give in to despair…or we can be defiant and fight back in any way that we can.

Joe Biden didn’t win.

And we will keep saying Joe Biden didn’t win until we get His Fraudulency out of our White House.

Wolfie’s Wheatie’s Word of the Week:

incompossible

adjective

incapable of coexisting
not capable of joint existence
incompatible
inconsistent
not mutually possible
mutually exclusive in logic

Used in a sentence

Leibniz’s well-known thesis that the actual world is just one among many possible worlds relies on the claim that some possibles are incompossible, meaning that they cannot belong to the same world.

LINK: http://philosophyfaculty.ucsd.edu/faculty/rutherford/papers/LeibnizCompossibility.pdf

Shown in a picture

Shown in a video

MUSIC!

Inconceivable! Incompossible! Incompostable!

THE STUFF

Question: Is mRNA vaccine technology incompossible with “gold standard” treatment, if it is not part of the “Generation Gold Standard” universal vaccine platform for “pandemic” viruses?

I remain surprised that nobody in public is talking about mRNA technology being EXCLUDED from the new vaccine platform being promoted by HHS and NIH.

Is this due to the fact that, if nobody ever talks about the elephant in the room, then nobody will talk about it when it leaves the room? If so, then strategic opportunities abound!

Next Question…..

Is autoimmune disease in COVID-vaccinated kids the end of the shots for kids? First, what’s happening…..

LINK: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-hhs-to-end-covid-19-vaccine

BREAKING: HHS to END COVID-19 Vaccine Recommendations for Kids & Pregnant Women

With over 600,000 estimated COVID shot deaths in the U.S., HHS moves to roll back CDC guidance—amid mounting criminal referrals, legislative efforts, and growing calls for a complete moratorium.

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

May 15, 2025

by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

According to the Wall Street Journal, the Trump administration—under the leadership of HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.—is preparing to end routine CDC recommendations that pregnant women, teenagers, and children receive COVID-19 vaccines. This decision, expected to be announced in the coming days, represents a long-overdue departure from current ill-advised CDC guidance, which still urges vaccination for everyone aged six months and older, including during pregnancy.

Well, take a look at this. Is this why?

TL;DR / BLUF – COVID vaccines, not COVID, cause autoimmune problems in kids, and they do it about 9 months later, on average, thus escaping scrutiny.

LINK: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/new-study-covid-19-vaccines-increase

More details…..

NEW STUDY: COVID-19 Vaccines Increase Risk of Long-Term Autoimmune Disease in Children — Not the Virus

A massive study of 493,705 children found a 23% increased risk of developing autoimmune disease after COVID-19 vaccination, with symptoms emerging about 9 months after injection.

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

May 16, 2025

by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

The study titled “Investigating the association between SARS-CoV-2 infection, COVID-19 vaccination, and autoimmune diseases in a pediatric population: a comprehensive analysis” was just published in the journal Pediatric Rheumatology:

Background

During the COVID-19 pandemic there were reports of an increased association between COVID 19 and various autoimmune diseases (AID) in adults. This study aims to investigate the incidence of AIDs in children before and during the pandemic and explores potential links to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

Methods

We analyzed 493,705 anonymized medical records from Maccabi Healthcare Services, Israel’s second-largest healthcare provider, to study AID incidence during 2014–2022. The study period was divided into three phases: two pre-pandemic phases of equal duration (A and B) and a pandemic phase (C).

Results

Of 4,596 (0.9%) patients diagnosed with an AID in the cohort, incidence rates were 0.9% for Group A (2014–2016), 1.0% for Group B (2017–2019), and 0.9% for Group C (2020–2022) (p = 0.13). Logistic regression showed no significant differences in overall autoimmune disease incidence between the pre-COVID and COVID periods. Notably, specific conditions like celiac disease showed reduced incidence in Group A (OR 0.8309, p = 0.0071) while arthritis was significantly more common in Groups A and B. Additionally, COVID-19 diagnosis was not significantly associated with increased autoimmune disease risk (HR 1.092, p = 0.491); however, receiving at least one COVID vaccine was linked to higher risk (HR 1.2323, p = 0.0033).

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that the overall incidence of new-onset autoimmune diseases in children remained relatively stable during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study indicates a potential association between COVID-19 vaccination and an increased risk of developing autoimmune diseases, necessitating further research to elucidate long-term effects in the pediatric population.

Suddenly the multiple cases of “sudden new autoimmune problems” among my vax-friendly liberal friends and neighbors make a lot of sense.

Is photonic quantum computing the way? Maybe so!

Don’t feel bad if this sounds complicated. Even the following 2021 explanation is not easy stuff.

LINK: https://physicsworld.com/a/programmable-photonic-chip-lights-up-quantum-computing/

Just sayin’!

And remember…….

Until victory, have faith!

And trust the big plan, too!

And as always….

ENJOY THE SHOW

W

Health Friday Open Thread 5.16.2025: About That “Universal Vaccine” — There’s More Than Meets the Eye, Part Two

Antique London’s photographs: Goldsmith Hall, The Assay Office

The above free vintage image of a laboratory is courtesy of iStock and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics.

Today’s offering is Part Two (of two) regarding the HHS / NIH announcement regarding the establishment of the “Generation Gold Standard” for future development and testing of vaccines in the United States. “Generation Gold Standard” includes the development and testing of a “Universal Vaccine Platform”, which will incorporate elements from various viruses, including coronaviruses (such as the SARS-CoV-2 virus, aka the COVID-19 virus.) Part One can be found here: https://www.theqtree.com/2025/05/09/health-friday-5-9-2025-about-that-universal-vaccine-theres-more-than-meets-the-eye-part-one/. The HHS / NIH announcement is found here: https://www.hhs.gov/press-room/hhs-nih-announces-generation-gold-standard.html, 1 May 2025. Please refer to the screenshot below:

Yours Truly discussed several items in the above announcement in Part One, referred to above. Part Two is a further discussion of items related to the BPL-1357 intranasal “universal virus vaccine”, a “cornerstone” of the “Generation Gold Standard” program. The primary focus of Part Two will be on the “adjuvant” for BPL-1357, a compound called ALFQ. However, before the presentation, there is this short paper, from January 2025: https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.188, “593. Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 1 Study of the Safety of BPL-1357, A BPL-Inactivated, Whole-Virus, Universal Influenza Vaccine”, Jeffery Taubenberger, Matthew J. Memoli, et al., 29 January 2025. A screenshot of the Background section of the Abstract of this paper is below:

Note the description of BPL-1357: It is to cover several types of Avian Influenza viruses. Nothing about covering coronaviruses. Why was there a ‘challenge” with Influenza A type viruses, and nothing about “challenges” with Influenza virus types B or C (https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/viruses-types.html.) How can BPL-1357 be considered a “Universal Vaccine” if it is only covers Avian Influenza viruses? How does this paper “stack up” vis-a-vis the HHS / NIH “Generation Gold Standard” announcement?

Then, there is the mysterious BPL-24910 (aka BPL-2491) vaccine, which is referred to in the HHS / NIH announcement, but of which there is no record at clinicaltrials.gov/, nor is much information available on the internet. Yours Truly was able to find a few items. The first one is here: https://www.ntd.com/health-officials-announce-new-effort-to-develop-universal-vaccines-targeting-multiple-virus-strains_1064264.html, by Zachary Stieber, 1 May 2025. Please see the screenshot from this article, below:

The NIAID awarded funds to a company called Lovelace Biomedical Research Institute for testing the toxicity of BPL-24910: https://www.usaspending.gov/award/CONT_AWD_75N93022F00001_7529_75N93021D00031_7529. Below are screenshots from this link:

Lovelace Biomedical Research Institute was founded in 1947 in Albuquerque, New Mexico. The institute joined Touro University in 2022. (https://www.lovelacebiomedical.org/, and Wikipedia.)

Now, on to the AFLQ “adjuvant” in BPL-1357:

ALFQ is a combination of two separate items: ALF plus QS21. ALF stands for monophosphoryl lipid A (aka 3D-PHAD.) It is also called “Army Liposome Formulation.” Please see the screenshot below, from https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-drug/def/monophosphoryl-lipid-a:

What is an endotoxin? Please see: https://www.britannica.com/science/endotoxin. A screenshot from the Britannica entry is below:

It is unclear which version of ALF is actually used in BPL-1357: the “LPS” version, or the “MPLA” version.

Then, there is 3D-PHAD. Please see below, from https://www.sigmaaldritch.com/:

And, more on ALF (aka Army Liposome Formulation) is here: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7412170/, “Army Liposome Formulation (ALF) Family of Vaccine Adjuvants”, Carl R Alving, et al, 7 August 2020. Please see the screenshot from this paper, below:

Note the reference to HIV-1. More on this later in today’s post.

ALFQ contains a TLR4 agonist. What is TLR4? Also known as CD284, it is a “key activator of the innate immune response”, per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toll-like_receptor_4. An agonist is an agent that interacts with a particular cellular receptor, and produces an observable positive response.

The other component of ALFQ is QS21. What is QS21? It is a vaccine adjuvant derived from the soapbark tree (Quillaja saponaria.) QS21 is used in the Novavax COVID-19 “vaccine” as an adjuvant, as part of the company’s “Matrix-M” ingredient.

QS21 has been studied for some time. Here is an article, from the John Innes Centre, that describes the history of QS21: https://www.jic.ac.uk/advances/the-quest-for-qs-21/, Winter 2020-2021. Please see a screenshot from this article, below:

Yours Truly now presents some “interesting information.” One is not making any judgements or opinions; the reader may make their own. This has to do with the HIV-1 reference above in the post. The first item is this: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-410X(00)00415-1, “QS21 promotes an adjuvant effect allowing for reduced antigen dose during HIV-1 envelope subunit immunization in humans”, Thomas G. Evans, et al., 28 February 2001. A screenshot of the Abstract of this paper is below:

The second item is here: https://worldcouncilforhealth.substack.com/cp/162703289, “BOMBSHELL: HIV Contamination Found In Moderna’s Covid Shot”, 2 May 2025. There are actually two bombshells here: two separate molecules related to HIV-1 were found in the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” — gp145 and gp120. Please see the screenshots from the World Council for Health article, below:

The graphic created by Dr. McKernan, from the above article, showing where the gp145 HIV-1 molecule is in the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” sequence:

Regarding the gp120 HIV-1 molecule in the Moderna mRNA-1273 modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, it was the famous (or, infamous) “Pradhan, et al., paper” from January 2020 which showed that there were gp120 HIV-1 molecules in the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) virus itself. The “Pradhan, et al., paper” was Withdrawn shortly after its publication, and is now difficult to find. Yours Truly was able to locate the paper here: https://academia.edu/79020098/Uncanny_similarity_of_unique_inserts_in_the_2019_nCoV_spike-protein_to_HIV_1_gp_120_and_Gag?f_ri-170, “Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike protein to HIV-1 gp120 and Gag”, Prashant Pradhan, et al., 31 January 2020. A screenshot from the paper is below:

Recall that in January 2020, there were no COVID-19 “vaccines” in use anywhere. Note also that the gp120 HIV-1 molecule is present in the COVID-19 virus itself spike protein. Did the Pfizer-BioNTech developers of BNT162b2 remove any or all of the four HIV-1 related inserts in the COVID-19 spike protein (found by Pradhan, et al.) in the process of working on their “vaccine”? Why did Moderna leave the gp120 HIV-1 molecule (and also, it turns out, the gp145 HIV-1 molecule) in that company’s modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, mRNA-1273?

And, there is the involvement of the United States Army in HIV research (this is in addition to the Army’s developing the “adjuvant”, ALFQ): https://hivresearch.org/hiv-research/alf-adjuvants. This is the Military HIV Research Program.

Yours Truly will reiterate that one is not making judgements or opinions here; readers will make their own. However, the following needs to be said: the gp120 molecule in HIV-1 attacks the body’s CD4 cells. Please see this paper, from 2010: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20088758/, “The GP120 molecule of HIV-1 and its interaction with T cells”, V Yoon, et al., 2010. A screenshot of the Abstract of this paper is below:

Also: the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself attacks the body’s CD4 cells: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84790, “SARS-CoV-2 uses CD4 to infect T helper lymphocytes”, Natalia S Brunetti, et al., 31 July 2023. A screenshot of the Abstract of this paper is below:

And, there is this paper: https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.596631, “Sharing CD4+ T cell Loss: When COVID-19 and HIV Collide on Immune System”, Jean-Pierre Routy, et al., 14 December 2020. Note that this paper was published just a few days after the initial EUAs were granted by the FDA for BNT162b2 and for mRNA-1273 in the United States (11 December 2020); therefore, the research into writing the Routy, et al., paper must have been accomplished at least a few months prior to December 2020. A screenshot of the opening statement of the paper is below:

Yours Truly will ask a question that perhaps is “inconvenient”, but needs to be asked: Is any potential connection between the presence of the gp120 HIV-1 molecule in the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself, AND its potential presence in the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, AND its potential presence in the Novavax COVID-19 “vaccine” (which uses the original SARS-CoV-2 virus itself spike protein as a foundation), AND the confirmed presence of BOTH the gp120 HIV-1 molecule and the gp145 HIV-1 molecule in the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” — with the multiple serious Adverse Events reports of autoimmune / immune-mediated, and related conditions, that are in the Appendix 1: List of Adverse Events of Special Interest section of this report: ttps://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf?

Another “inconvenient” question posed by Yours Truly: What, if anything, did Dr. Anthony Fauci, Dr. Francis Collins, Dr. Deborah Birx, Dr. Robert Redfield, and Dr. Janet Woodcock know about the presence of the gp120 HIV-1 molecule in the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself spike protein, AND in the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” mRNA-1273?

What will be done to make absolutely sure that there is NO molecule whatsoever related to HIV-1 present in the “Universal Vaccine” candidates BPL-1357 and BPL-24910, or in any other “Universal Vaccine” candidates? What will be done to hold accountable the people who allowed the gp120 HIV-1 molecule to be present in the original SARS-CoV-2 virus itself? What will be done to investigate the potential presence of the gp120 HIV-1 molecule in the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”? What will be done to hold accountable the people who allowed HIV-1 molecules gp120 AND gp145 to be present in the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”?

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA