Health Friday 7.11.2025 Open Thread: Establishment Medicine Declares War on HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

The above free image of physicians conferring is courtesy of LovePik and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s offering speaks to the disaster of the COVID-19 “vaccines”, Yours Truly dedicates it to all those persons, of whatever age or location, who have come down with “vaccine”-induced injuries, illnesses, or disabilities, as a result of the COVID-19 “vaccines” (Bioweapon Toxin Injections) that they had put into their bodies; and, also, to all those persons, of whatever age or location, who have passed away from the negative effects of the COVID-19 “vaccines” that they had put into their bodies.

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in today’s discussion thread, they, must cite their source. Thank you.

Yours Truly has written extensively on this board regarding what she calls Establishment Medicine. Establishment Medicine can be found in multiple areas, among them: The teaching of “consensus-centered” medicine (otherwise known as “the science is settled” medicine) in medical schools (this appears to be the approach in medical education currently); the “suggestion” or “advice” that physicians who choose a specialty in which to practice (for example, Internal Medicine) “need” to become board-credentialed by a private medical credentialing board (for example, credentialing through ABIM (the American Board of Internal Medicine, https://www.abim.org/); physician membership in the American Medical Association https://www.ama-assn.org/; and, “adherence” to the “recommendations” of the “routine vaccination schedules” of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC, https://www.cdc.gov/); and, the “endorsed vaccination schedule” of the American Academy of Pediatrics (https://www.aap.org/); the “routine guidance” of the FDA (Food and Drug Administration, https://www.fda.gov/); and, the “rules” and “regulations” of the State Medical Licensing Board in the state in which the physician resides, and which physician’s License to Practice Medicine must be secured prior to starting medical practice, and which License must be renewed after a certain period of time). Yours Truly will make it clear at the outset that there are many caring, perceptive physicians — in hospitals, in medical clinics, in stand-alone private physicians’ offices, and so on — who likely do not blindly ascribe to the “diktats” of Establishment Medicine. Perhaps there are physicians among this number who understand that the COVID-19 “vaccines” are dangerous and deadly. Perhaps there are physicians among this number who observing that their COVID-19 “vaccinated” loved ones, patients, or colleagues are presenting with COVID-19 “vaccine”-induced injuries, etc. Perhaps there are physicians among this number who would prefer to speak the truth about the COVID-19 “vaccines”, but refrain, due to concerns that they could be “disciplined”, or lose their License to Practice Medicine, by their state Medical Licensing Board.

Until very recently, all was going well for Establishment Medicine — its control over the health of the American public was “unchallengeable” — then, two important things happened: One, that the American public in general began to realize the dangers and deadliness of the COVID-19 “vaccines”; and, Two, the confirmation of Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., as the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) of the new administration under the forty-seventh President of the United States, Donald J. Trump, a few months ago.

On 9 June 2025, the seventeen then-current members of the CDC’s ACIP committee (Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices) were fired by Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. (https://www.hhs.gov/press-room/hhs-restores-public-trust-vaccines-acip.html, “HHS Takes Bold Step to Restore Public Trust in Vaccines by Reconstituting ACIP”, 9 June 2025.) Please see the screenshot from this announcement, below:

The reason? — Corruption of the ACIP committee members. The United States Congress reported on this corruption back in 2000: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/decades-of-corruption-congressional, “DECADES OF CORRUPTION: Congressional Report Confirms CDC’s ACIP Has Been Compromised Since the 1990s”, by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 10 June 2025. Please see the screenshot from this article, below:

One of the most-compromised (now former) members of the ACIP committee was Dr. Paul Offit.

And, of course, there was a large outcry from all over Establishment Medicine. One example: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/rfk-jr-removes-members-cdc-immunization-advisory-committee-acip/, “RFK Jr. removes every member of CDC vaccine advisory committee”, 10 June 2025. Please see the screenshot from this article, below, and keep it in mind for later on regarding today’s offering:

The ACIP Adult Immunization Schedule that was issued in May 2025 is found here (the actual CDC website no longer lists this schedule): https://www.dph.ncdhhs.gov/news/press-releases/2025/06/03/cdc-updates-covid-19-vaccine-schedule. The ACIP Adult Immunization Schedule that was issued in May 2025 has several changes; among them, the previous CDC “recommendation” that all pregnant women get COVID-19 “vaccinated.” The May 2025 schedule, instead, encourages “shared clinical decisions” between the physician and the pregnant patient. And this is where “the rest of the story” begins.

The outcry against the immunization schedule changes by Establishment Medicine was instant, loud, and immense. For example, this: https://www.pharmacist.com/APhA-Press-Releases/apha-withholds-enforsement-of-acip-adult-immunization-schedule. Please see a screenshot from this article, below:

Then, on 9 June 2025, when HHS Secretary Kennedy, Jr., fired the seventeen then-current ACIP members, he replaced them with eight new members: Dr. Joseph Hibbeln, MD, ABNP, CAPT USPHS (Ret.); Martin Kullorff, PhD; Retself Levi, PhD; Robert W. Malone, MD; Cody Meissner, MD; James Pagano, MD, FACEP; Vicky Pebsworth, PhD, RN; and, Michael Ross, MD. Their biographies are here: https://www.cdc.gov/acip/membership/roster.html. (Dr. Ross withdrew from the ACIP committee due to “financial holdings” reasons.) Establishment Medicine countered with hue and cry that none of these medical professionals were “experienced in vaccines”, and so on.

The June ACIP meeting was held on 25-27 June 2025, with the now-seven new members in attendance. Even while the meeting was going on, Establishment Medicine was “sounding the alarm” over the new committee and what they would do. Please see: https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/adult-non-flu-vaccines/vaccine-public-health-advocates-warn-fallout-acip-meeting, “Vaccine, public health advocates warn of fallout from ACIP meeting”, by Chris Dall, MA, 27 June 2025. Please see the screenshots from this article, below:

In fact, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) issued this statement: https://publications.aap.org/aapnews/news/32529/AAP-will-continue-to-publish-its-own-vaccine, “AAP will continue to publish its own vaccine recommendations after CDC advisers sow distrust”, by Melissa Jenco, 26 June 2025. Please the screenshot from this article, below:

Keep the above statement from the AAP in mind, as it is pertinent what happened in early July 2025. It appears that, while Establishment Medicine was making statements about how they opposed the new ACIP members, the new ACIP vaccine schedules and the new CDC policies, they were also making behind-the-scenes preparations for suing HHS Secretary Kennedy, Jr. And, in fact, this is what occurred: on 2 July 2025, several Establishment Medicine groups filed suit against HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., to force HHS to reinstate the former ACIP recommended vaccine schedules: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-medical-cartel-sues-rfk, “BREAKING: Medical Cartel Sues RFK Jr. for Pulling COVID Shot Recommendations for Kids and Pregnant Women”, by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 7 July 2025. Please see the screenshots from this article, below:

Note: The blue hyperlinks in the Hulscher article (one needs to go The Focal Points website for the Hulscher article link) lead to scientific articles about the dangers of the COVID-19 “vaccines”, and to the AAP, et al., lawsuit against Secretary Kennedy, Jr.

The AAP statement regarding the lawsuit, here, https://publications.aap.org/aapnews/news/32580, “AAP suing HHS over vaccine policy”, 7 July 2025, also has the link to the filed lawsuit against Secretary Kennedy, Jr. Please see the screenshot below from the AAP statement:

Screenshots of portions of the forty-two page lawsuit document are below:

Another link to the entire lawsuit document is here: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/25992348-aap-et-al-v-rfk-et-al-filed-complaint/.

In other words, in Yours Truly’s opinion, the AAP and the other medical organizations listed in the screenshot above want to force Secretary Kennedy, Jr., to “go back to the good old days” of the “old ACIP and the old CDC” — the same entities that “recommended” the dangerous, deadly COVID-19 “vaccines” without first demanding complete, detailed, and analyzed data from “clinical trials” for these injectables. Back to the “good old days” when every state legislature, every pharmacy, every medical clinic, every hospital, and almost every licensed physician, blindly followed the CDC “recommendations” regarding vaccinations of children and of adults. Back to the “good old days” of “the science is settled” — and those physicians who boldly told the truth, and continue to tell the truth, about the dangers and deadliness of the COVID-19 “vaccines” (for example, Dr. Peter A. McCullough, MD; Dr. Ryan Cole, MD; Dr. Pierre Kory, MD; Dr. Charles Hoffe, MD; and, Dr. Robert Malone, MD) were belittled; were marginalized by their medical specialty organizations; were fired from their jobs; were prosecuted by their Medical Specialty licensing organizations; were prosecuted by their state Medical Licensing Boards — were “disciplined” by these Boards, or had their License to Practice Medicine “restricted”, or even revoked, by these Boards. Back to the “good old days” when Establishment Medicine was the sole arbiter of health in the United States.

In Yours Truly’s opinion, the lawsuit by Establishment Medicine against HHS Secretary Kennedy, Jr., is the culmination of months of negative reactions regarding his nomination as the new HHS Secretary; regarding his confirmation for the position; regarding what appear to be some ambiguous and/or conflicting statements he has made since his confirmation; and certainly regarding his actions as HHS Secretary to attempt to rein in the tyranny of Establishment Medicine in HHS decisions. In some ways, the AAP, et al., lawsuit against Sec. Kennedy, Jr., may be similar to liberal “Judicial Establishment” actions against President Donald Trump 47 regarding blocking his efforts to deport illegal aliens in the United States.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday 6.27.2025 Open Thread: The American Medical Association and the Second Amendment

The above free vintage image of the United States Bill of Rights is courtesy of Ebay and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series on Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics.

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-content to the discussion thread of today’s offering, they must cite their source. Thank you.

The Second Amendment of the Bill of Rights of the Constitution of the United States of America:

The above image of the language of the Second Amendment is courtesy of Fine Art American and Google Images.

The Second Amendment was ratified on 15 December 1791. Since that date, there have been numerous attempts to “revise”, to “clarify”, to hobble, to limit, and even to erase, the Second Amendment. There are now hundreds of “gun laws” on the books. There is an entire agency of the federal government, the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) that prospective firearms owners must submit to, and clear, before a firearm can be purchased.

The American Medical Association (the AMA), the largest and most influential physicians’ professional organization in the United States, has, for some years, been involved in initiatives and activities related to treating firearms ownership as a “health issue.” In Yours Truly’s opinion, the AMA appears to be getting more aggressive in these initiatives and activities.

The focus of today’s post is on two items: One, a recent CME (Continuing Medical Education) course offering by the AMA; and, Two, a 2016 article that includes, as an author, one of the physicians who is involved with the CME course offering.

Yours Truly begins with the CME course offering, found online here: https://edhub.ama-assn.org/science-medicine-public-health/video-player/18910731, “Health Care Strategies for Firearm Injury Prevention”, 11 September 2024. There is a video embedded for the CME course; there is also a “Read Transcript” link. Yours Truly believes that reading the Transcript is the better way to glean the course content.

In summary: One: it appears that the AMA officially termed firearms violence as a “public health crisis.” Two: it appears that the AMA is calling for “universal screening” of all patients by physicians for firearms ownership, for potential health and/or psychological issues that would limit or even remove such ownership. Such “universal screening” would occur as part of the “routine questions” that the physician asks the patient during an exam (for example: “Do you smoke?”; “Do you own a firearm?” would be added.) Three: it appears that the AMA endorses “lethal means counseling” for those patients who “fit” criteria under point Two, above. Screenshots that are relevant to these points, taken from the CME course Transcript, from physician panelists involved in the CME, are below. The first screenshot is from a statement by Dr. Willie Underwood, MD; the second screenshot is from a statement by Dr. Chethan Sathya, MD; and, the third and fourth screenshots are from a statement by Dr. Katherine Hoops, MD:

The last screenshot above (the second from the statement by Dr. Hoops) regards the use of ERPO (Extreme Risk Protection Orders) laws that multiple states have passed and implement. What appears to be going on in terms of the AMA is to encourage the discussion of ERPO with patients and/or their families, if the physician (the clinician) believes that the patient is at risk for harming himself/herself, or others.

It appears that the CME course content mentions nothing about the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms.

Yours Truly now turns to a 2016 paper by Dr. Marian E. Betz, MD, et al. Dr. Betz is also one of the panel members for the AMA CME course “round table”, cited above. The paper is found here: https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M15-2905, “Yes, You Can: Physicians, Patients, and Firearms”, Marian E. Betz, et al., 17 May 2016. This paper covers several topics, including “parameters” for physicians to follow in speaking with patients regarding firearms ownership and “safe storage”; criteria for physicians to follow to “classify” whether or not a patient is “at risk” for harming themselves or others with firearms; various types of “safe storage” options for firearms; and, “strategies” for physicians to follow when speaking with patients about firearms. Two screenshots from the paper are below:

Dr. Betz, et al., also discussed the ways a physician can obtain information from a patient regarding firearms ownership; and, that physicians, under the Affordable Care Act, can disclose information regarding the patient’s possible risk of harming himself/herself or others to the authorities. Please the screenshots from the paper, below:

Yours Truly will make it clear that the Second Amendment is a protected right in the United States of America; that responsible firearms ownership and responsible firearms use are a given; that there may be certain circumstances in which firearms ownership and use may be restricted for the owner (and which restrictions must be lifted when the circumstances have been resolved); that firearms be kept away from criminals. However, it appears, in Yours Truly’s opinion, that the American Medical Association would prefer that firearms ownership and responsible use be, not under the aegis of the Second Amendment — but, rather, through the “approval”, “supervision”, and “discretion” of physicians.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday 4.11.2025 Open Thread: The New Paper Detailing the Cardiovascular Dangers of the COVID-19 “Vaccines”

The above free vintage image of a hand-drawn heart is courtesy of VectorStock and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information regarding Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s post speaks to the disaster of the COVID-19 “vaccines”, Yours Truly dedicates it to the memory of all persons, of whatever age or location, who have passed away from the negative effects of these lab-created bioweapons.

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. NOTE: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for any AI-generated content. To the best of my knowledge and belief, there is none. Also: Readers who wish to post anything in the discussion thread of today’s post that is AI-generated, must cite their source. Thank you.

Today’s offering is part of a “mini-series” devoted to a single topic and/or scientific paper. Yours Truly presents a new paper confirming the increased risk for stroke, heart attack, and other cardiovascular serious events, after COVID-19 “vaccination.”

One begins here: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-85-million-person-study, “BREAKING: 85-Million-Person Study Finds Increased Risks of Stroke, Heart Attack, Coronary Artery Disease, and Arrhythmia Following COVID-19 Vaccination”, by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 7 April 2025. The new paper cited in his article is found here: https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpvm.ijpvm_260_24, “COVID-19 Vaccination and Cardiovascular Events: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Multivariate Meta-Analysis of Preventive Benefits and Risks”, Raheleh Karimi, et al., 14 March 2025. (A discussion on how Bayesian Multivariate Meta-Analysis models work is here: https://bookdown.org/MathiasHarrer/Doing_Meta_Analysis_in_R/bayesian-ma.html.) Two screenshots from the Hulscher article follow: One is from the paper; the other is his statistical analysis:

Note: The AstraZeneca viral vector DNA COVID-19 “vaccine” uses a “delivery platform” similar to that of the Johnson & Johnson (Janssen) viral vector DNA COVID-19 “vaccine” that was used in the United States from 2021 until it was discontinued in 2023 (https://www.yalemedicine.org/news/coronavirus-vaccine-blood-clots, 17 May 2023.) However, the this “vaccine” (under the brand name, Janssen) is still in use in many other countries around the world (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_COVID-19_vaccines_authorizations#Janssen; scroll down the page to “Janssen.”)

The Karimi, et al., paper, in Yours Truly’s opinion, if one is reading it correctly, while being detailed and using sophisticated models for its conclusions, appears to endorse COVID-19 “vaccination” as a way to reduce the incidence of stroke: and, also, the authors appear to state that multiple injections of a COVID-19 “vaccine” reduce the potential for cardiovascular damage. Yours Truly believes that the paper’s authors have ignored a couple of important items: First, the fact that cardiovascular damage induced from COVID-19 “vaccination” can be incremental and cumulative over time. Please see: https://doctors4covidethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/causality-article.pdf, “Vascular and organ damage induced by mRNA vaccines: irrefutable proof of causality”, Michael Palmer, MD, and Sucharit Bhakdi, MD; refer to Slide 8 through Slide 11 of this article. And, Second, there is the paper published this year, based on the Yale LISTEN Study. Please see: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.18.25322379, “Immunological and Antigenic Signature Associated with Chronic Illnesses after COVID-19 Vaccination”, Akiko Iwasaki, et al. This paper clearly demonstrates that the spike protein in the COVID-19 modRNA “vaccines” (and, therefore, the potential for “vaccine”-induced damage) is present in the “vaccinated” person’s body for as long as, if not longer than, 709 days post-injection.

The following is the Conclusions section of the Karimi, et al., paper. It is astonishing to read that the authors appear to believe that the COVID-19 “vaccines” are “safe and effective” — just that persons with known (or suspected) cardiovascular issues should be tested before they are offered the opportunity to take one of these “vaccines”:

Why on Earth would a person (with cardiovascular issues or not) agree to have a COVID-19 “vaccine” that can cause (or aggravate) cardiovascular issues injected into their body? Why are cardiologists recommending that patients with heart conditions take COVID-19 “vaccines”? Please see: https://www.rush.edu/news/cardiologists-recommend-covid-19-vaccine-heart-patients, “Cardiologists Recommend COVID-19 Vaccine for Heart Patients Doctors say the vaccine can help prevent further heart and health complications”, copyright 2025 Rush University Medical Center (Chicago, Illinois.) Are these cardiologists not aware of the Palmer and Sucharit article cited above? Are they not aware that the FDA knew back in April 2021, that the COVID-19 “vaccines” can, and do, cause numerous types of heart and cardiovascular serious adverse effects in COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons? Please see the Appendix 1. List of Adverse Events of Special Interest section of this report, which Pfizer-BioNTech gave to the FDA in April 2021 regarding the company’s “flagship” modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, BNT162b2: https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf. Scroll through the pages of the Appendix 1. to see the various types of heart and cardiovascular serious adverse events that were reported in persons who took this “vaccine.” For example, here is Page 2 of the Appendix 1. Note the multiple serious adverse events that were reported regarding cardiovascular conditions.

And there are many more types of cardiovascular serious adverse events reported in the Appendix 1. There are listings under “Coronary”; under “Thrombo”- (for example, Thrombocytopenia; and, under “Vascular” — among others.

The information regarding how dangerous and deadly the COVID-19 “vaccines” are is increasing from a “trickle” to a “torrent.” Why are physicians still recommending these injections? Why are these injections still listed on the CDC Child and Adolescent Immunization Schedule?

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

DEAR MAGA: Open Thread 20250318 ❀ Tuesday Placeholder ❀ Cholesterol and Statins

We continue to mourn the untimely passing of our beloved compatriot DePat, known in real life as Susie Sampson, and also as author Patricia Holden.

Until we have a dedicated author for the Tuesday daily open thread, I will be posting “placeholders” like this one, which may or may not be spiced up with additional content.

Gudthots will take DePat’s old Thursday daily open thread.

Please notify me in advance if you would like to post anything in lieu of the Tuesday placeholder. We welcome all content – the topic doesn’t matter.

W

Cholesterol and Statins

by Gail Combs

Since many of us on the Qtree are older I wanted to document my adventures with the medical establishment. Hopefully my digging will help others avoid harmful drugs by providing the information you need to make an informed decision.

My Labs came back:

LDL = 114(H)

HDL = 98(H)

The Doc wanted to put me on STATINS and my answer was HELL NO!

What I found incredible is the lack of knowledge of the three doctors I have encountered so far. The first, despite my telling her I had a major problem with losing potassium, put me on a high level of Prednisone WITHOUT mentioning the fact I might have to take addition potassium (K) to offset the additional loss of K from the drug. This is well documented in the literature.

In the follow-up visit, not only was a statin recommended but the connection between chronic inflammation (my asthma) and higher cholesterol levels was completely ignored.

Don’t Worry About Cholesterol; Inflammation Is Your Biggest Problem — The Liver Doctor

As I mentioned, the vast majority of cholesterol in your body was made in your liver. Cholesterol production increases when the body is under stress: emotional stress can cause elevated cholesterol because the stress hormone cortisol is made out of cholesterol. Physical stress on the body can also elevate cholesterol. Because cholesterol helps to repair and heal your body, you will produce more if there is a great deal of inflammation occurring in your body. So all those factors above that raise inflammation, can raise your cholesterol too.

Therefore the cure for elevated cholesterol can be quite simple –lower the inflammation and you’ll also lower the cholesterol.

Seems the research community is FINALLY looking into Cholesterol, inflammation and immunity.

Manuscript Submission Deadline 29 April 2025. This Research Topic is still accepting articles.

Background

Cholesterol metabolism and immune response are closely linked. Cholesterol is critical for the synthesis of lipid rafts, which activate receptors involved in antigen recognition, influences the production of NET and modulates the activation and polarization of macrophages. Oxysterols in turn regulate macrophage activation, migration, and cytokine production. While the immune response modulates the expression of genes involved in the synthesis, absorption and efflux of cholesterol. Cholesterol accumulation in immune cells promotes proinflammatory immune responses creating a vicious cycle that sustains immune inflammation. High-density lipoproteins (HDL) are typically reduced during inflammation, when reverse cholesterol transport is impaired, thus promoting hyperactivation of TLR2 and TLR4 by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and other microbial products, resulting in inhibition of stress-induced activating transcription (ATF) 3 and enhanced production of cytokines by macrophages. Further endangering an already delicate balance, HDL proinflammatory subfractions with lower content of apoA-1, antioxidant enzymes, and L-CAT, are produced, and further fuel inflammation.

Alterations in the biochemical network between cholesterol, inflammation and immunity are emerging as a pathogenetic mechanism of numerous human disorders, among which atherosclerosis, cardiovascular diseases and their complications, metabolic diseases and diabetes, infectious diseases and sepsis, autoimmune and auto-multiinflammatory disorders, acquired and congenital hypo-immune diseases, and cancer….

So the Cabal’s bio-weapon, SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, is likely to raise cholesterol levels given the body’s response to the spike protein is inflammation and in many cases chronic inflammation known as Long Covid.

Be aware of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein: There is more than meets the eye

Abstract

….other papers showed that the spike protein by itself (without being part of the corona virus) can damage endothelial cells and disrupt the blood-brain barrier. These findings may be even more relevant to the pathogenesis of long-COVID syndrome that may affect as many as 50% of those infected with SARS-CoV-2. In COVID-19, a response to oxidative stress is required by increasing anti-oxidant enzymes. In this regard, it is known that polyphenols are natural anti-oxidants with multiple health effects. Hence, there are even more reasons to intervene with the use of anti-oxidant compounds, such as luteolin, in addition to available vaccines and anti-inflammatory drugs to prevent the harmful actions of the spike protein.

As a side note:

Luteolin, a flavonoid with potentials for cancer prevention and therapy

Abstract

Luteolin, 3′,4′,5,7-tetrahydroxyflavone, is a common flavonoid that exists in many types of plants including fruits, vegetables, and medicinal herbs. Plants rich in luteolin have been used in Chinese traditional medicine for treating various diseases such as hypertension, inflammatory disorders, and cancer. Having multiple biological effects such as anti-inflammation, anti-allergy and anticancer, luteolin functions as either an antioxidant or a pro-oxidant biochemically…. Vegetables and fruits such as celery, parsley, broccoli, onion leaves, carrots, peppers, cabbages, apple skins, and chrysanthemum flowers are luteolin rich….

Next I want to get into the vilification of cholesterol and it’s history. The following is a great article and well worth reading. This is just a sample.

Is Your Cholesterol Level Really ‘High’? Tearing Down the Cholesterol Myth

The mean would be 224 so my LDL is actually on the very low end of the scale! And even if the chart is actually looking at the combined amount of LDL + HDL, then my 114+98 = 212 is still lower than average.
From the article:

This same range of cholesterol levels has been seen in people who do have heart disease and people who do not have heart disease, as documented by Professor Brisson using data from the Framingham Study – which is one of the largest studies ever done in it.

Since the Framingham Study, other studies have also confirmed that people WITH heart disease have the same cholesterol levels as people WITHOUT heart disease.

For example, in the UK, the typical person who has a heart attack tends to have the same cholesterol level that is seen for healthy middle-aged and older people in the general population. Something that is not unique to the UK.

A study published in the Lancet, included 5,754 patients from Australia and New Zealand who had already had a heart attack. The average cholesterol level of this group of people was around 220 mg/dl (5.7 mmol/l). Data from the WHO Global Infobase shows that around the same time, the average cholesterol level for the general population was also 220 mg/dl (5.7 mmol/l).

So people who suffered a heart attack had the same average cholesterol level as the general healthy population.

How Ancel Keys Brainwashed the Masses Into Fearing Meat (He’s Wrong)

How Ancel Keys FAKED IT!

CORRUPTION

Reducing meat intake and cholesterol hurts sex hormone production. This is why we have the least masculine men in history today.

Sperm counts are at all time lows

Testosterone is at all time lows

Mental toughness is at all time lows

This is a direct and explicit consequence of the shift to eating garbage.

Processed food is INHUMANE. It’s the fastest way to kill off our population, which it looks like these people are trying to do.

The Real Research Has Been Buried

One of the most comprehensive studies on heart disease was COMPLETELY buried.

Data from the Minnesota Coronary Experiment was unearthed in 2017 after 40 years of sitting dormant.

Ancel Keys, the progenitor of the diet-heart hypothesis, was the lead on the study. It was one of the most comprehensive to date: randomized, controlled and 9,400 participants.

Subjects were in mental health institutions or nursing homes, which helped to ensure the dietary guidelines were followed to a tee for 56 months.

The control group continued to eat a diet high in saturated fats and animal fats. The intervention group ate a serum cholesterol lowering diet that replaced saturated fat with vegetable oils (from corn oil and corn oil polyunsaturated margarine).

Results:

The intervention group had a 14% reduction in cholesterol

But this didn’t reduce death rate. There was a 22% HIGHER risk of death for each 30 mg/dL reduction in cholesterol….

A Sharyl Attkisson clip of 9 minutes, giving some history. In 2004, recommended cholesterol levels were lowered based on a study by doctors connected to the drug manufacturers. When this conflict of interest was pointed out the FDA ignored it. And then the recommended levels were lowered even further in 2013. Half of the ‘advisors’ recommending the levels were compensated by the Drug manufacturers. And then there is the American Heart Association who develops the standards and its relationship to the drug manufacturers.

What is worse, is not only are statins a money waster, they are also very bad for you.

The Truth about Statin Drugs

Since their introduction in the 1980s, statin drugs have been almost universally hailed as “wonder drugs” by medical authorities around the world. The global market for statins was $16 billion in 2016, and approximately 40 million Americans (that’s one in every five adults!) takes a statin….

Dangers of Statin Drugs: What You Haven’t Been Told About Popular Cholesterol-Lowering Medicines

Why Statins are Bad for You…Really Bad

As you know, we have seen statin cholesterol drugs do really bad things to stem cells in culture. On the other end of that spectrum, we’ve also seen high triglycerides due to metabolic syndrome hurt stem cells. One of our patients who was instructed to get off statin drugs before her stem cell procedure recently sent this article by MIT professor Dr. Stefanie Seneff, which is so well done and does such a great job of explaining why statins are bad for you, I had to share. It is also so scientifically dense; I thought a quick summary would be helpful for my readers. Here goes:

Statins have tiny health benefits that are way over played. My comments-Basically, you get about the same cardiac protective effect from a square or two of dark chocolate a day.

Statins decrease cholesterol by blocking an important enzyme pathway, yet cholesterol is needed for the normal health functioning of all cells. In particular, cholesterol is a key component of all healthy cell membranes.

Cholesterol is also needed to make vitamin D3, sex hormones, and steroid hormones.

The brain is only 2% of the body’s total weight, but houses 25% of the body’s cholesterol.

LDL cholesterol is what we have been trained to believe is “bad” cholesterol, when in fact it’s an important transport container for many key items.

The outer shell of the LDL transport container is vulnerable to attack by high blood sugars, so in patients with poor blood sugar control (metabolic syndrome) these important transport containers for key nutrients get gummed up by these extra sugars in the blood.

These “gummed up” LDL containers get attacked by cells of the body in the walls of blood vessels which lead to “plaques” that clog arteries.

Artificially lowering cholesterol by statin drugs causes the LDL transport containers to have too little protection. The function of these containers would normally be to transport excess blood sugars from the liver as fat and get rid of this throughout the body. However, these cholesterol deficient containers can’t perform this important function, magnifying the bad effects of excess sugar consumption. This is what makes high fructose corn syrup so dangerous, as fructose as a sugar is ten times more efficient in gumming up the LDL transport system.

This damaged sugar to fat transport system due to a lowered cholesterol level also results in too much fructose in the blood stream (which would normally be converted to fat in the liver and transported by the LDL transport system). This excess blood sugar causes damage to the proteins in the blood.

Co-enzyme Q10 synthesis is hampered by the blockage of the cholesterol enzyme pathway and this is needed to run cells and muscles. This can result in problems in the batteries of the cells and muscles (mitochondria).

Since the muscles can’t use CoQ10, they decide instead to use all of that extra fructose in the blood serum, which is now in plentiful (and damaging) supply because statins block it’s conversion into fat by the liver and it’s transport out of the liver by the LDL containers. When they do this, it’s without oxygen, so it’s anaerobic and lactic acid builds up, causing painful muscles.

The muscles do process the fructose, but they do so in a really inefficient way, requiring 19 times more energy to get the same muscle output-causing a sense of fatigue.

This alternative fuel system for the muscles leads to damaged muscle cells. After several years of lactic acid build-up due to statin use (the equivalent of being forced to run a constant marathon), the muscles “give out”. This author believes that this leads to a higher rate of severe muscle disorders like rhambdomyolysis as well as kidney failure (due to the renal system processing all of these muscle break down products). The author also believes that these muscle breakdown products can lead to nerve damage. She believes that this nerve damage can lead to a higher incidence of severe diseases such as ALS. My comments: These claims will take intensive study to see if they hold up.

The lack of cholesterol in the system eventually results in the heart and other tissues becoming dependent on an alternate fuel supply-sugar. There is also impaired uptake of glucose by the cells, which leads to the higher prevalence of diabetes that shows up in statin studies.

Cholesterol is critical for normal brain function. As mentioned already, the brain contains a lot of cholesterol as it makes up the important covering of the nerves (myelin sheath). Think of this as like the plastic covering of a wire, which insulates the wire and allows it to conduct electricity. This would explain the common reports of memory loss in patients taking statin drugs. A recent study that involved careful manual labeling of statin side effects from large studies showed a higher degree of neurological disorders in patients taking statins. These include neuropathy, parasthesia and neuralgia, and debilitating neurological diseases, ALS and Parkinson’s disease.

Longer life in one study that followed patients for 17 years was associated with higher cholesterol levels and full function of the enzymes that statin drugs inhibit. The author concludes that statins are a great way to fast track aging.

This author belives that eating foods rich in cholesterol and sulfur (like eggs) and sun exposure are ways to increase your cholesterol sulfate levels which can help clear arteries, not block them.

The upshot? Dr. Seneff believes that these statin side effects will eventually cause the recall of the drug class. Is she right? All I can say is that much of the science she explains makes sense and that we’ve seen what statin drugs can do to cells in culture and it isn’t pretty!

From: Cuppa Covfefe(@guest_1428881) March 7, 2025 21:01

Statins can cause issues with the mitochondrial respiratory chain… lots of conflicts, interactions, and contra-indications when mito issues exist or are suspected…

-Gail

GC/wm

Health Friday 3.14.2025 Open Thread: Heart Issues After COVID-19 “Vaccination”: And About the Virus Itself

The above free image of heart shapes is courtesy of iStock and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s post speaks about the disaster of COVID-19 (the COVID-19 virus itself, and the COVID-19 “vaccines”), Yours Truly dedicates it to the memory of all persons, of whatever age or location, who have passed away from the negative effects of these lab-created bioweapons.

There are Important Wolf Moon Notifications; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. NOTE: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for any AI-generated content. To the best of my knowledge and belief, there is none. Also: if readers wish to post anything in the discussion thread for today’s offering that is AI-generated, they must cite their source.

Today’s post may be regarded as a “narrow-focus” offering, one of a “mini-series.” This first “narrow-focus” offering regards the inducement of cardiac issues after COVID-19 “vaccination”; and, the potential for cardiac issues also induced from an infection of the COVID-19 virus itself. Yours Truly begins here: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/new-study-fatal-malignant-cardiac, “NEW STUDY — Fatal Malignant Cardiac Tumors Following COVID-19 mRNA Injection”, by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 6 March 2025. The paper that is cited in the article is here: https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcr/ytaf009, “Heart-breaking tumours: a case series of malignant pericardial effusion”, Abdur Rahman Mirza, et al., 18 January 2025. The paper is also found here: https://academic.oup.com/ehjcr/article/9/3/ytaf009/7960074. Below are screenshots of the Introduction of the paper; followed by a screenshot of the graphic of the paper that traces the “journey of pericarditis”:

And, the final portion of the Discussion section of the paper:

Note the mention of “diagnostic bias” regarding whether or not a cardiac issue presents after the patient has been COVID-19 “vaccinated.” In Yours Truly’s opinion, the young physician who is the lead author of the cited paper has likely not studied how the COVID-19 “vaccines” affect the heart (for example, this article: https://doctors4covidethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/causality-article.pdf, “Vascular and organ damage induced by mRNA vaccines: irrefutable proof of causality”, Michael Palmer, MD, and Sucharit Bhakdi, MD); has likely not read the BNT162b2 5.3.6 Postmarketing Experience report that Pfizer-BioNTech gave to the FDA in April 2021 (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf); and, has likely not read any of the posts that Dr. Peter A. McCullough, MD, has on his website (https://www.thefocalpoints.com/.) One suspects that many other physicians have not read these items, either.

Turning to the Hulscher article on The Focal Points blog, cited above: It is known that the COVID-19 “vaccines” can, and do, cause pericarditis, a type of inflammation involving the heart (please refer to the BNT162b2 Postmarketing Experience report cited above, page 36 of the report, in the Appendix 1. List of Adverse Events of Special Interest section of said report.) The Cleveland Clinic has an article on pericarditis, found here: https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/17353-pericarditis. Below is a screenshot from the Cleveland Clinic article:

It is also known that the COVID-19 “vaccines” can, and do, cause myocarditis (another type of cardiac inflammation.) Both pericarditis and myocarditis can, and do, cause permanent damage to the heart. Both pericarditis and myocarditis can ultimately result in the death of the patient. However, the COVID-19 “vaccines” contain BOTH the ingredients of the original Wuhan Hu1 virus (SARS-CoV-2 virus, aka COVID-19 virus), AND lab “enhancements” (dangerous lipid nanoparticles; N1-methylpseudouridine; “loose DNA” from the manufacturing process; a piece of the SV40 African Green Monkey cancer promoter gene code) — that make the COVID-19 “vaccines” much more dangerous and/or deadly to the cardiac system of the “vaccinated” person. There is more new information on this situation (thank you to Valerie Curren): https://slaynews.com/news/epidemiologist-new-data-linking-covid-vaccines-global-heart-death-surge/, by Frank Bergman, 1 March 2025. The paper linked in the article is found here: https://doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v17.12.1039909, “Risk stratification for future cardiac arrest after COVID-19 vaccination”, Peter A. McCullough, MD, and Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 26 February 2025. Below are two screenshots from the paper: the Abstract; and, the McCullough Protocol for spike protein detoxification:

Note the clear statement that cardiac issues can appear years after the person is COVID-19 “vaccinated.”

And, the McCullough Protocol:

Yours Truly finds it ** interesting ** that the above paper was given a “Grade C” for “scientific quality” by the paper’s reviewers, none of whom are identified except by their initials.

**** However, malignant pericardial effusion is a form of cardiac cancer. It is not an inflammation. Below is a screenshot from the National Cancer Institute definition of this condition (https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms/def/malignant-pericardial-effusion):

Malignant pericardial effusion is the subject of the Mirza, et al., paper cited above in today’s post.

**** On the other hand, the COVID-19 virus itself can cause cardiac issues in persons who contract an infection of said virus. The following paper is from July 2020, well before any COVID-19 “vaccines” was granted an Emergency Use Authorization in any country: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41569-020-0413-9, “COVID-19 and cardiovascular disease: from basic mechanisms to clinical perspectives”, Masataka Nishiga, et al., 20 July 2020. This paper is a good source of information regarding how the COVID-19 virus itself works; and, how this virus can affect the cardiovascular system. A screenshot of the Abstract of the paper is below:

Another paper, also from 2020, well before any COVID-19 “vaccine” was granted an EUA, regards how the COVID-19 virus itself can affect the cardiovascular system: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7095524/, “COVID-19 and the cardiovascular system”, Yi-Tong Ma, et al., 5 March 2020. Yours Truly finds it ** interesting ** that the authors of this paper are affiliated with either the Wuhan Institute of Virology, or to medical facilities linked to the People’s Liberation Army (all CCP.) Below is a screenshot from the Background section of the paper:

The following article has more information on the ACE2 receptors in the human body: https://www.cas.org/resources/cas-insights/ace2-covid-19-target, “ACE2: Targeting a potentially important receptor in disease pathogensis”, by Angela Zhou, 15 December 2022. Below is a screenshot from this article:

The point here is that BOTH the COVID-19 virus itself (aka SARS-CoV-2), AND the COVID-19 “vaccines” (since these injectables contain SARS-CoV-2), target and attack the ACE2 receptor cells in the human body.

Yours Truly will again emphasize that the COVID-19 virus itself, AND the COVID-19 “vaccines”, were BOTH designed to cause as much damage to the human body as possible. They are BOTH lab-created bioweapons. The COVID-19 virus is not “just another type of virus.” The COVID-19 “vaccines” were designed to be capable of “shedding” elements of these injectables onto other persons (whether those persons are “vaccinated”, or not.) What is of utmost importance is that all people, “vaccinated” or not, must be doing all that is possible to have, and to maintain, the highest degree of personal health. The COVID-19 “vaccines” must be removed from use worldwide — now.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday 3.7.2025 Open Thread: The COVID-19 Information File, Part Two: The Virus Itself and the “Vaccines”

The above image of a vintage Rolodex is courtesy of CSA Images via Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s post speaks to the disaster of COVID-19 (the COVID-19 virus itself, and the COVID-19 “vaccines”), Yours Truly dedicates it to the memory of all persons, of whatever age or location, who have passed away from the negative effects of these lab-created bioweapons.

There are Important Wolf Moon Notifications; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here.

Today’s post is an “expanded edition” of the COVID-19 “Vaccines” Information File, Part One, found here: https://www.theqtree.com/2024/11/01/health-friday-open-thread-11-1-2024-the-covid-19-vaccines-information-file-part-one/. There are more items in the evolving information base about the lab-created bioweapons of the COVID-19 virus itself, and on the COVID-19 “vaccines.”

And now, Part Two of the COVID-19 Information File:

BOOKS: One: Cancer Care, Second Edition. By Dr. Paul E. Marik, MD, FCCM, FCCP (Dr. Marik is a co-founder of the FLCCC Alliance). This book is found on https://www.amazon.com/.

Two: The Doctors Book of Home Remedies, by the editors of Prevention Health Magazine Books, 1990 edition. This book is available online as used copies.

WEBSITE NAME CHANGES:

The FLCCC Alliance (formerly https://covid19criticalcare.com, also called FLCCC Alliance) is now Independent Medical Alliance: https://imahealth.org/.

Dr. Peter McCullough’s website (formerly https://petermcculloughmd@substack.com) is now https://www.thefocalpoints.com/.

COVID-19 VIRUS and COVID-19 “VACCINES” DETOX / MITIGATION PROTOCOLS:

https://imahealth.org/ (Independent Medical Alliance, formerly FLCCC); https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/ (AFLDS); https://www.mercola.com/ (Dr. Joseph Mercola, MD; must sign up to access); https://www.americaoutloud.com/ (Dr. Peter McCullough, MD’s, Wellness Company site.) Note: this is not an exhaustive list, and does not include herbal medicine, naturopathic medicine, homeopathic medicine, Ayurvedic medicine, Traditional Chinese Medicine, or other allopathic / osteopathic websites.

THE YALE “LISTEN” STUDY PAPER:

Yours Truly has written on the main discussion thread several times regarding this groundbreaking paper (the “Iwasaki et al. paper”) about COVID-19 “vaccine”-induced injuries presenting as long as 709 days after “vaccination.” Here is Steve Kirsch’s take on the paper: https://kirschsubstack.com/p/covid-vaccine-injury-study-published, “COVID vaccine injury study published on preprint server because the mainstream medical journals refused to publish it”, 19 February 2025. HOWEVER, Yours Truly has found that the original preprint paper has already been reissued in a “new” preprint version. The original version is found here: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.02.18.25322379v1, “Immunological and Antigenic Signatures Associated with Chronic Illnesses after COVID-19 Vaccination”, Akiko Iwasaki, et al., dated 18 February 2025. The “new” preprint version is found here: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.02.18.25322379v2.full, same title, Akiko Iwasaki, et al., dated 25 February 2025. Meanwhile, Dr. Pierre Kory, MD, has written a blog post regarding how the LISTEN study may be used as legal support for persons with COVID-19 “vaccine”-induced issues in lawsuits: https://pierrekorymedicalmusings.com/p/new-study-provides-legal-support, “New Study Provides Legal Support For The Vaccine Injured”, 21 February 2025. Dr. Kory has coined the term, “Post Covid Vaccination Syndrome”, or PVS, to describe the conditions and issues that COVID-19 “vaccinated” patients in his practice present.

MORE INFORMATION ON HOW THE COVID-19 “VACCINES” INCREASE THE IgG4 “TOLERATE BUT NEVER CLEAR” IMMUNE SYSTEM CELLS IN THE “VACCINATED” PERSON’S BODY:

Dr. Jessica Rose, PhD, (https://jessicar.substack.com/) has just published a paper in the Public Health Policy Journal on her new research. The paper is found here: https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/breakthrough-infection-signal-in-vaers-corroborates-igg4-increased-susceptibility-to-sars-cov-2/, 1 March 2025. The paper has the same title as the website URL. The paper has been reviewed by Dr. James Lyons-Weiler, PhD here: https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/clear-dose-response-signal-of-risk-of-exposure-to-covid-19-mrna-found-in-vaers-data/, 1 March 2025. The review has the same title as the website URL. Below is are two screenshots from Dr. Rose’s article. (NOTE: Dr. Rose uses the term “BTI” to mean “Breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 Infections.”)

And, from Dr. Lyons-Weiler’s review of Dr. Rose’s article:

A MIDWESTERN DOCTOR’S TAKE ON WHY THE FDA RUSHED THE COVID-19 “VACCINES” THROUGH THE PROCESS TO GET THEM AUTHORIZED FOR USE:

A Midwestern Doctor (https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/) has written an article regarding the “Why” behind the actions of the FDA: https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-did-the-fda-greenlight-the-covid. “Why Did The FDA Greenlight The COVID Vaccines?”, 2 March 2025.

SASHA LATYPOVA ON WHY THE COVID-19 “VACCINES” ARE REALLY GENE THERAPY SHOTS:

Ms. Latypova wrote the following article in response to a reader’s question: https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/are-covid-vaccines-gene-therapies, 28 February 2025. Below are several screenshots from this article:

The first screenshot is Ms. Latypova’s statement:

The following screenshot is from the 2015 FDA guidance document on gene therapies:

The following screenshots are via FOIA information that Judicial Watch sued the FDA for and won regarding the Pfizer-BioNTech “flagship” modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, BNT162b2:

COVID-19 BTI (Bioweapon Toxin Injections, aka the “vaccines”) AND ORAL COVID-19 “VACCINE” NEWS:

One: The European Commission has just approved the use of the self-amplifying RNA (saRNA) COVID-19 “vaccine”, KOSTAIVE, for use in the European Union / Scandinavia. Please see: https://defender.substack.com/p/europe-approval-self-amplifying-covid-mrna-vaccine-no-long-term-safety-data, “Inhumane, Reckless: Critics Weigh in on Europe’s Approval of Self-Amplifying COVID mRNA Vaccines”, by Suzanne Burdick, PhD, 23 February 2025. KOSTAIVE is the brand name of the injectable called ARCT-154, by Arcturus Therapeutics. This product was approved in Japan in November 2024 and is in use there. Below are two screenshots from the Defender article:

Please re-read the sentence above from Dr. Jablonowski regarding how an saRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” is “like being vaccinated every day for the rest of your life.” (Italics mine)

The Epar “package insert” information on KOSTAIVE is found here: https://www.ema.europra.eu/en/documents/product-information/kostaive-epar-product-information_en.pdf. Below are two screenshots from this document;

Note the last sentence — a total lie.

The MSDS Safety Sheet for the lipid nanoparticle ATX-126 is here: https://www.dcchemicals.com/msds/MSDS_DC57046.html. Below is a screenshot from this document:

AND NOW, REGARDING THE COVID-19 VIRUS ITSELF:

One of the blogs that Yours Truly reads regularly is that of Walter M Chesnut: https://wmcresearch.substack.com/. Mr. Chesnut has been performing solid research into the mechanisms of the spike protein of the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) virus itself for over 3 years. While it is not known for absolute certainty the actual ingredients of the lab-created bioweapon called the SARS-CoV-2 virus, Mr. Chesnut continues to find possible pieces of this puzzle. Here are two recent such blog articles of his. The first: https://wmcresearch.substack.com/p/turbocancers-a-secondary-manifestation, “Turbocancers: A Secondary Manifestation of the Extracellular Matrix (ECM)?” The second: https://wmcresearch.substack.com/p/the-spike-protein-and-iib3-understanding, “The Spike Protein and [alpha]IIb[beta]3: Understanding the Fibrous Clots from an Integrin-Mediated Perspective”, 24 February 2025. A screenshot from this article is below:

The point here is that the COVID-19 virus itself it NOT “just another virus.” It is a lab-created bioweapon that, in and of itself, can damage the infected person’s body. Combined with the “enhanced” ingredients found in the COVID-19 “vaccines” (lipid nanoparticles and N1-methylpseudouridine), this “foundational” bioweapon virus becomes extremely dangerous or even deadly. (NOTE: Yours Truly apologizes for the [alpha] and the [beta] in the title of the Chesnut article cited above. She is still in the WP “learning curve.”)

FLASH! UPDATE 6 MARCH: REGARDING THE “DISCOVERY” OF THE “NEW” BAT CORONAVIRUS, HKU5-CoV-2:

One: Dr. Peter McCullough discusses the situation here: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/new-wuhan-coronavirus-2025-measles, 6 March 2025. A screenshot from the post is below:

This “new” bat coronavirus was supposedly “discovered” by the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The first question this raises is: How many OTHER bat (or other) coronaviruses are in the “storage vaults” of the WIV to be “discovered” at some point? There is speculation all over the internet regarding HKU5-CoV-2 and if / when, it could infect humans. This “new” coronavirus apparently can use the same types of entry methods into the human body that SARS-CoV-2 and MERS do.

Two: But wait, there’s more! Another question is raised: What did / does, Pfizer-BioNTech know about HKU5-CoV-2? Because this company has been Phase 1 testing an “experimental” modRNA “Pandemic Influenza vaccine” since December 2023. The study is NCT06179446 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06179446), begun on 13 December 2023 and scheduled to finish the Phase 1 clinical trial on 26 August 2025. This “experimental” modRNA prophylactic “Pandemic Influenza vaccine” is called pdmFlu. The Pfizer-BioNTech product identifier number is PF-07985819, and the Study Identifier number is C5561001. According to the “Researcher View” of the Clinical Trials entry, as many as eight different formulas and/or dosage amounts will be given to the study participants (there are 160 registered study participants.) NCT06179446 has two separate “control groups”: One “control group” will receive injections of a “licensed influenza vaccine”; the other “control group” will receive a placebo.

The Consent Form issued by Pfizer-BioNTech that the study participants in C5561001 must sign is here: https://www.pfizerclinicaltrials.com/sites/default/files/2023-12/C5661001_Main_ICDv21NOV2023.pdf.

WHAT DID / DOES, PFIZER-BIONTECH KNOW ABOUT HKU5-CoV-2?

Three: And, by the way — RALPH BARIC has been experimenting with HKU5-CoV-2 SINCE AT LEAST 2014, funded by the NIH. One of his papers is here: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.articles/PMC7022341/, “Trypsin Treatment Unlocks Barrier for Zoonotic Bat Coronavirus Infection”, Ralph S. Baric, et al., 14 February 2020.

WHAT DOES / DID RALPH BARIC KNOW ABOUT HKU5-CoV-2?

PAGING ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday 2.14.2025 Open Thread: Special Valentine’s Day Edition — Dark Chocolate!

The above image is courtesy of See’s Chocolates and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. Today’s offering is a Special Edition in honor of Valentine’s Day. However, the discussion is not limited to what is presented here: It is an Open Thread.

There are Important Wolf Moon Notifications, the Rules of our late, good Wheatie, and certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here.

Yours Truly begins the exploration of the delicious, highly-desired, and — surprise! — nutritious, beneficial food known as Dark Chocolate, here: https://nutritionsource.hsph/harvard.edu/food-features/dark-chocolate/. Yes, dark chocolate has a long and “rich” (no pun intended) history. The ancient Mayans discovered chocolate (what we would call “dark chocolate”) and drank it as a bitter concoction that was sometimes mixed with herbs. From the Harvard article:

The Mayan culture actually used chocolate for currency and for trade. Only members of the royal family and of the nobility were permitted to drink or otherwise consume chocolate. Please see: https://www.newsweek.com/ancient-maya-used-chocolate-money-1001513, “Ancient Mayans Used Chocolate for Money”, 29 June 2018.

When the Spanish Conquistadors discovered what is now Mexico, they began to send chocolate back to Europe. At first, again, it was used there among royal and noble classes as a beverage or as a food item that was chewed. In fact, King Louis XIV of France would send for shipments of chocolate from Mexico for his Spanish-born Queen, Marie Therese, which were packed in roses and herbs to “keep them fresh.” Over time, the availability and consumption of dark chocolate began to increase among all levels of society.

Dark chocolate has several important health benefits. One example of an article that describes these benefits is here: https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/7-health-benefits-dark-chocolate, “7 Proven Health Benefits of Dark Chocolate — Healthline.”, 13 July 2022. The seven benefits:

Dark chocolate is packed with nutrition: A 100-gram bar of dark chocolate with 70% – 85% cocoa has, among other things, 11 grams of fiber and 66% of the daily recommended amount of iron.

Dark chocolate is a strong source of antioxidants, as it contains polyphenols (compounds found in plant foods) and flavanols (a subgroup of flavinoids.)

Dark chocolate can lower blood pressure and help blood flow in the body.

Dark chocolate raises the HDL (“good” cholesterol) level in the body, while also lowering the damage that some forms of LDL (“bad” cholesterol) can do to the body.

Dark chocolate may reduce the risk of heart disease, due to the lowering of the LDL damage as described above.

The flavanols in dark chocolate can help protect the skin from sun damage.

Dark chocolate may help to improve brain function in older persons, while at the same time, assisting in blood flow to the brain in younger persons.

However, there are a couple of negative aspects about dark chocolate of which consumers should be aware. The first is that Lead and/or Cadmium (heavy metals) can be added into the manufacturing process. Please see here: https://health.ucdavis.edu/blog/good-food/dark-chocolate-health-benefits-the-good-and-the-bad-to-this-sweet-treat/2023/02, 14 February 2023. There is an embedded link in this article to a Consumer Reports piece regarding high Lead and/or Cadmium levels that were found in certain brands of dark chocolate. The second drawback is that the same 100-gram bar of Dark Chocolate described above also contains about 43 grams of fat. Please see here: https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/dark-chocolate, “What are the benefits of dark chocolate?”, by Jamie Eske, 25 October 2023.

There are scientific papers published on Dark Chocolate. Here is an example: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9589144/, ‘Dark Chocolate: An overview of its biological activity, processing, and fortification approaches”, Sharmistha Samanta, et al., 15 October 2022. Below is the Abstract of the paper:

And, from the same paper, Figure 2, on the health benefits of Dark Chocolate:

Finally, a recipe, courtesy of Lorraine Elliott, for Dark Chocolate Energy Bars:

Yours Truly is not advocating that people consume Dark Chocolate as their principal source of antioxidants, fiber, and so on. On the other hand, the above facts may come in handy to rebut allegations along the lines of, “Well, Dark Chocolate is just fattening and can hurt your arteries” from persons who do not know the information in today’s offering. “Moderation is the key.”

Happy Valentine’s Day to all! Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday Open Thread 2.7.2025: Lack of True “Informed Consent” and the COVID-19 “Vaccines”

The above vintage image of vaccine vials and vaccine syringes is courtesy of Shutterstock and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s post speaks to the disaster of the COVID-19 BTI (Bioweapon Toxin Injections, aka the “vaccines”), Yours Truly dedicates it to the memory of all persons, or whatever age or location, who have passed away from the negative effects (direct or indirect) of the the COVID-19 “vaccines”, no matter whether the deceased were COVID-19 “vaccinated” or not.

A special note for today’s post: Of your charity, please pray for the repose of the soul of our good DePat (Deplorable Patriot), Susan P. Sampson. Her Funeral Mass is to be held tomorrow, Saturday 8 February, at the St. Roch Roman Catholic Church in St. Louis, Missouri, at 10AM Central Standard Time. Of your charity, please pray for the repose of the soul of Yours Truly’s “fully vaccinated and boosted” brother, Sam. His Memorial Service is to be held tomorrow, Saturday 8 February, at the Peeples Valley Baptist Church in Cartersville, Georgia, at 2PM Eastern Standard Time. Thank you.

Requiem aeterna dona eis, Domine; et Lux Perpetua luceat eis. Requiescant in pace. Amen.

However, the discussion is not limited to what is presented today: It is an Open Thread.

There are Important Wolf Moon Notifications, the Rules of our late, good Wheatie, and certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here.

Today’s post begins here: https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/labeling-deceits-and-omissions-and, “Labeling deceits and omissions, and fake informed consent for vaccines and other legalized biological and chemical weapons.”, by Katherine Watt, 29 January 2025. In this post, Ms. Watt describes the lack of transparency and honesty in several areas of these topics, among them: One, in the labeling of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”; and, Two, in the lack of detailed informed consent documents for people who want to take (or are “mandated” to take) injections of the COVID-19 modRNA “vaccines.” Ms. Watt traces this trail of lies and deceit back at least 1902. Below are some screenshots from her article related to the COVID-19 “vaccines”:

Ms. Watt makes it clear that “our betters” do NOT want the people who took / who continue to take, the COVID-19 “vaccines” to really know what is in the “modRNA” of the injections.

There is another issue regarding the lack of true informed consent regarding the COVID-19 “vaccines” — the fact that the FDA has made it virtually impossible for COVID-19 “vaccinated” people who become “vaccine”-injured, acquire an illness after being “vaccinated”, or even die from the negative effects of these bioweapon injectables, to be able to sue the “vaccines” manufacturers, those who administer these “vaccines”, entities who “require” or “mandate” the taking of these ‘vaccines”, or agencies of the Federal government who push these “vaccines.” The FDA has done this by making BOTH the Emergency Use Authorization AND “full approval” applicable to the COVID-19 “vaccines” in use, thereby “insulating” the above entities and persons from liability.

For example: the “2024-2025 COVID-19 Vaccine” by Pfizer-BioNTech and by Moderna. The FDA issued the following on 22 August 2024: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-and-authorizes-updated-mrna-covid-19-vaccines-better-protect-against-currently, “FDA Approves and Authorizes Updated mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines to Better Protect Against Currently Circulating Variants”. Below are screenshots from this announcement:

Next screenshot:

Followed by:

Finally:

The FDA approved the use of COMIRNATY (Pfizer-BioNTech) in people OVER 11 YEARS OF AGE. The FDA also authorized the use of “Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine (2024-2025 Formula” to be used in people FROM 6 MONTHS THROUGH 11 YEARS OF AGE. Also — notice that the COMIRNATY approval was granted to the GERMAN partner of PfizerUSA (BioNTech Manufacturing GmbH); and that the “Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine (2024-2025 Formula” authorization was granted to Pfizer Inc.

But wait, there’s more! Under the “magic” of legalese and bureaucratic obfuscation, here are the links to the websites that the FDA and Xavier Becerra (then-head of HHS) used to perform the “sleight of hand” to grant EXEMPTION FROM LIABILITY to the makers of the “2024-2025 Formula COVID-19 Vaccines” for BOTH the “approved” AND the “authorized” formulations of these injectables. It’s all under the PREP Act:

One: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/12/11/2024-29108/12th-amendment-to-declaration-under-the-public-readiness-and-emergency-preparedness-act-for-medical. “12th Amendment to the Declaration Under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act for Medical Countermeasures Against COVID-19”, 11 December 2024.

Two: https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/mcm-legal-regulatory-and-policy-framework/emergency-use-authorization.

Regarding a current “Informed Consent” document for the general public, Yours Truly found the following from a search that began here: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/vis/index.html, which eventually (via being “redirected” from other CDC websites that are now shut down with the “The page you are looking for doesn’t exist”-type error messages) led to this: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/current-vis/covid-19.htmlCDC_AAref_Val=https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/vis/vis-statements/covid-19.html. It turns out that the “Informed Consent” handouts for patients / caregivers appear to be basically a “Pablum” version of government and/or “vaccine” manufacturer misinformation, disinformation, and downright lies, about the COVID-19 BTI (Bioweapon Toxin Injections, aka the “vaccines”) that the patient is going to have injected into their body (or that parents / guardians are going to have injected into the body of a minor child.)

Let’s look at some screenshots of this FDA-issued Fact Sheet for recipients and caregivers for the EUA-granted “Pfizer-BioNTech 2024-2025 Formula COVID-19 Vaccine” for children 6 months of age to 11 years of age, as an example. The FDA document is found here: https://www.fda.gov/media/167212/download.

Screenshot One:

The COVID-19 pandemic Public Health Emergency declaration in the United States was ended on 11 May 2023: https://archive.cdc.gov/www_cdc_gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/your-health/end-of-phe.html. There is no “currently a pandemic of COVID-19”, per the CDC itself.

Screenshot Two:

The COVID-19 “vaccines” do not “prevent” an infection of COVID-19. In fact, COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons have a much higher chance of coming down with COVID-19. Please see: https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/breaking-sixth-study-confirms-negative, “BREAKING — Sixth Study Confirms Negative Efficacy of COVID-19 mRNA Injections”, by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 4 February 2025. The only items, in Yours Truly’s opinion, in the screenshot above that might prompt a medical professional to stop and question whether or not the child should take a COVID-19 “vaccine” would be: an allergy to PEG-2000DMG (one of the lipid nanoparticles in the “vaccine”) or to any of the ingredients of the “vaccine”; a history of myocarditis and/or pericarditis; or has a bleeding disorder. On the other hand, in fact, pregnant women are “encouraged” to take a COVID-19 “vaccine”; and, that immunocompromised persons are “permitted” to take an “extra dose” of a COVID-19 “vaccine.”

Screenshot Three:

So much important information and disclosures regarding the ACTUAL “safety record” of the COVID-19 “vaccines” (for example, the data at https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data); the ACTUAL “clinical trials” data that, for example, Pfizer-BioNTech gave to the FDA regarding the serious Adverse Events reports on BNT162b2; and other items, are missing. The OpenVAERS link takes one to the “Red Boxes” Adverse Events reports and statistics for the COVID-19 “vaccines.” Recall that VAERS receives fewer than 10% of reports of Adverse Events.

How many parents / guardians would go through with having their child (children) COVID-19 “vaccinated” if they knew, for example, that the ingredients and mechanisms of these bioweapon toxin injections change the DNA in their body? Please see: https://doctors4covidethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/causality-article.pdf, Slide 14.

Screenshot Four:

Which, again, mention nothing of the ACTUAL data as reported at OpenVAERS. Instead, there appears to be a strong effort to minimize the ACTUAL potential for serious Adverse Events to occur after taking a COVID-19 “vaccine.”

Yours Truly was able to find a “Consent Document” for persons over age 18 to read and to sign prior to taking a COVID-19 “vaccine”: https://www.gannon.edu/media/gannon-university/content-assets/documents/health-center/GannonUniversity-ScreeningAndConsentForCovid-19Vaccine.pdf. But, even here, there is no presentation of the ACTUAL data from, for example, OpenVAERS regarding serious Adverse Events reports about the COVID-19 “vaccines.” How many persons over age 18 would take a COVID-19 “vaccine” if they were told in advance that these bioweapon toxin injections cross the Blood-Brain Barrier and can induce multiple types of neurological damage? Below are images of the “Consent Document”:

Please also see: https://www.theqtree.com/2024/10/18/health-friday-10-18-2024-special-edition-neurological-effects-of-the-covid-19-vaccines-physical-and-psychological/.

How many persons would take a “2024-2025 Formula COVID-19 Vaccine”, or have such a “vaccine” injected into their child (children), under ANY circumstances, if they knew in advance that these bioweapon toxin injections were either ONLY “tested” on lab mice; or, were “approved” and/or “authorized” based on “manufacturing and nonclinical data”? For this last is exactly what happened with the “2024-2025 Formula COVID-19 Vaccines.” Please refer back to the FDA announcement of 22 August 2024 further up in this post. Here is the salient portion of this announcement as it regards this “2024-2025 Formula”:

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday 1.31.2025 Open Thread: HHS Gaslighting and Propaganda to Increase “Vaccines” Uptake

The above still image of Charles Boyer and Ingrid Bergman from the 1944 film, Gaslight, is courtesy of Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s post speaks to the disaster of the COVID-19 BTI (Bioweapon Toxin Injections, aka the “vaccines”), Yours Truly dedicates it to the memory of all persons, of whatever age or location, who have passed away from the negative effects (direct or indirect) of the COVID-19 “vaccines”, no matter whether the deceased were COVID-19 “vaccinated” or not. However, the discussion is not limited to what is presented here: It is an Open Thread.

There are Important Wolf Moon Notifications, the Rules of our late, good Wheatie, and certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here.

Yours Truly begins here: https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/the-evidence-is-clear-its-time-to, “The Evidence Is Clear: It’s Time to Permanently Ban the COVID-19 mRNA Injections”, by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, Epidemiologist, and Administrator of the McCullough Foundation, 18 January 2025. There is a video of an interview with Mr. Hulscher by Luiza Asyamova, along with links and graphics from numerous scientific papers, in this article. One of these linked papers is this: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14269255, “COVID-19 spike protein pathogenicity research library”, Dr. Martin Wulcher, Erik Sass, et al., 3 December 2024 (also found here: https://zenodo.org/records/14269255). There are over four hundred papers listed in this particular compilation.

Yours Truly will focus on one other linked item in the Nicolas Hulscher article cited above, regarding the activities of the United States Department of Health and Human Services to increase uptake of the COVID-19 “vaccines.” The first example is here: https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/the-us-hhs-risk-less-do-more-propaganda, “The U.S. HHS “Risk Less. Do More.” Vaccine Propaganda Campaign”, by Nicolas Hulscher, 19 December 2024. Below are two screenshots regarding the HHS campaign:

HHS launched this propaganda campaign a few months ago, under then-Secretary of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra. The agency has already released over 80 videos on its You Tube channels, among many other gaslighting / propaganda items, to “convince” Americans to get the COVID-19 BTI (Bioweapon Toxin Injections, aka the “vaccines”); the influenza virus “vaccines”; and the RSV (Respiratory Syncytial Virus) “vaccines.”

The agency, apparently, was already “alarmed” over the “lack of vaccine uptake” among Americans. Please see here: https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/americas-compliance-with-federal, “America’s Compliance with Federal Vaccine Recommendations as Collapsed”, by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 24 November 2024. The CDC’s MMWR (Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report) article regarding this issue is here: https://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7346a1, “Influenza, COVID-19, and Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccination Coverage Among Adults — United States, Fall 2024”, Jennifer L. Kriss, et al., 21 November 2024. The salient graphic from this article is below:

Turning to the HHS gaslighting / propaganda campaign, here is the “About the Campaign” webpage: https://www.hhs.gov/risk-less-do-more/about-campaign/index.html. Interested persons scroll down the page to find the “Navigate to:” section, and clicks on the “+” sign to redirect to various other gaslighting / propaganda items and links. Here is one such link: https://www.hhs.gov/risk-less-do-more/flu-covid-19-rsv-facts/index.html; please see the image below from this webpage, the “FAQ” statement regarding the COVID-19 “vaccines”:

Which is filled with, in YoursTruly’s opinion, misinformation, disinformation, and outright falsehoods (for example, not mentioning and even dismissing the increasing cases of serious adverse reactions from taking a COVID-19 BTI (the “vaccines”).)

But wait, there’s more! Here is the portion of the HHS gaslighting / propaganda website for medical professionals: https://www.hhs.gov/risk-less-do-more/for-health-care-providers/index.html. In this part of the HHS gaslighting / propaganda effort, one can read through the various “Use these on your “vaccine-hesitant” patients” techniques to “convince” them to agree to having one of the above “vaccines” injected into them. Below are examples from the “Discussion Guides” section of https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/talking-your-patients.pdf, “Talking to Your Patients About Flu, COVID-19, and RSV Vaccines” from the HHS gaslighting / propaganda website. Below are examples culled from this section: the first, how the physician is to “initiate” the gaslighting / propaganda discussion with a patient: and, the second, how the physician can “steer” the conversation if the patient is “vaccine-hesitant”:

Note that the image of the “patient” is that of an elderly male. There are similar “Discussion Guides” for the flu “vaccines” and for the RSV “vaccines.”

Yours Truly will also note the following regarding the above HHS gaslighting / propaganda campaign materials: One: The use of an “elderly male patient” in the example “discussion” with the physician. The CMS (Center for Medicare/Medicaid Services) is involved up their eyeballs in the campaign, due to the payments that CMS receives from every injection of a COVID-19 “vaccine”, an influenza “vaccine”, and/or an RSV “vaccine.” Please see here: https://www.cms.gov/medicare/payment/covid-19/coding-covid-19-vaccine-shots, updated 2 January 2025. And, Two: The AMA gets a “royalty payment” from every CPT code that is used for medical procedures or treatment billing, including injections of “vaccines” such as the ones listed above. This is because the AMA owns the rights to use the CPT codes. Please see here: https://www.ama-assn.org/practice-management/cpt/big-changes-will-streamline-cpt-coding-immunization, 5 January 2024. The “new, all-inclusive” CPT code for any “vaccine” injection administration is 90480.

So far, all of the above has applied to persons over age 18. What about persons under age 18? For this, Yours Truly turns to the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) “Redbook” post of 20 November 2024, found here: https://publications.aap.org/redbook/pages/Immunization-Schedules. “Immunization Schedules for 2025” PDF, subtitled “Child and Adolescent Immunization Schedule by Age.” These mirror the CDC Child and Adolescent Immunization Schedule, found here: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/imz-schedules/child-adolescent-age.html, 21 November 2024. These are CDC recommended immunization schedules; they are not the law. However, many state legislatures in the United States have adopted this recommended immunization schedule and turned it into state law for children who wish to attend school (public, but in some areas, also private or even home-school situations) within their state. For example, here is the link to the required “vaccines” schedule that children must take if they wish to got to public school in North Carolina: https://immunization.dph.ncdhhs.gov/schools/k-12.htm, “K-12 School Requirements – NC Immunization Branch”, 23 August 2024.

So, it would appear that the Department of Health and Human Services is engaged in a full-on gaslighting / propaganda campaign to “convince” American adults to take the COVID-19 “vaccines”; while, at the same time, the CDC immunization schedule for children and adolescents (which clearly indicates that the COVID-19 “vaccines”, along with the other “vaccines” on the schedule, are NOT law, but are recommended), have been added into state public school “vaccination schedules” statutes, thus making these recommendations the law of the state. Adults are free to refuse and and all recommended “vaccines”, but persons under age 18 are, in effect, required to take them if they wish to attend public school.

Then, there is the phenomenon of potential COVID-19 “vaccine” shedding. If adults who take a COVID-19 “vaccine” can potentially shed the ingredients of these injectables onto other persons, it would follow that children and adolescents who take these injectables can potentially shed the ingredients. And what about persons under age 18 who are immunocompromised? It is now known that the COVID-19 “vaccines” damage or destroy the natural immune system of the “vaccinated” person. The immune systems of the immunocompromised are already at risk; it can be fairly argued that taking a COVID-19 “vaccine” could put the already-at-risk natural immune system of these persons at further risk.

For more information regarding gaslighting and COVID-19, please see: https://www.theqtree.com/2023/10/06/pavacas-first-post/, “Friday, 10.6.2023 — Gaslighting in the Era of COVID-19”.

For more information regarding the potential for COVID-19 “vaccine” shedding, please see: https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/covid-19-vaccine-shedding-experiences, “What We’ve Learned from Over a Thousand Vaccine Shedding Reports”, by A Midwestern Doctor, 7 January 2024.

Nota Bene #1, 27 January 2025: The HHS, CDC, and NIH have been enjoined by the new Trump administration from publishing further updates to healthcare policies, procedures, or information, until further notice: https://brownstone.org/articles/the-big-freeze-at-hhs-cdc-and-nih/, by Jeffrey Tucker, 25 January 2025; also, please see here: https://www.statnews.com/2025/01/22/trump-administration-orders-health-communications-pause-cdc-hhs-fda/, “Trump administration freezes many health agency reports and posts”, 22 January 2025.

However, the other links above in today’s post are still active (at least until today 30 January 2025); it appears that the Trump administration order is not retroactive to 20 January 2025. Therefore, the “Discussion Guides”, the handouts, the billing / coding information, and so on, listed in today’s post, are likely still being used.

Nota Bene #2, 29 January 2025: A new paper has just been published by Peter A. McCullough, MD, Mary Talley Bowden, MD, et al., regarding a renewed demand to have ALL the COVID-19 “vaccines” withdrawn from the market immediately: https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/breaking-peer-reviewed-study-finds-5f1, “BREAKING — Peer-Reviewed Study Finds Irrefutable Evidence Supporting Immediate Market Withdrawal of COVID-19 “Vaccines””, by Nicolas Hulscher, 28 January 2025. The article is found here: https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/review-of-calls-for-market-removal-of-covid-19-vaccines-intensify-risks-far-outweigh-theoretical-benefits/, “Review of Calls for Market Removal of COVID-19 Vaccines Intensify: Risks Far Outweigh Theoretical Benefits.” Science, Public Health Policy and the Law. 2025, Jan28; v6.2019-2025. A screenshot of the Abstract is below:

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE. Yours Truly believes that the confirmation of Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., as the new Secretary of Health and Human Services needs to happen as soon as possible: so he can end the HHS gaslighting/propaganda efforts, to start.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday Open Thread 1.17.2025: A Letter to Incoming President Donald J. Trump and to Incoming HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

The above free image of a handwritten letter from 1889 is courtesy of Colourbox and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As this post speaks of the disasters of COVID-19 and of the COVID-19 BTI (Bioweapon Toxin Injections, aka the “vaccines”), it is dedicated to the memory of Yours Truly’s “fully vaccinated and boosted” late brother, Sam; to her late cousin, Bill; and to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have passed away from the negative effects (direct or indirect) of the COVID-19 “vaccines” they had in the their bodies. However, the discussion is not limited to what is presented today: It is an Open Thread.

There are Important Wolf Moon Notifications, the Rules of our late, good Wheatie, and certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here.

Herewith, the letter:

Dear Incoming President Donald J. Trump and Incoming Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.:

Greetings. This letter is from an independent researcher who has been writing about the COVID-19 virus and the COVID-19 “vaccines” for over four years.

The COVID-19 virus is, by now, a part of human life on this planet. It will continue to mutate and infect humans. The failed COVID-19 “vaccines” were developed and mandated for use on humans to “prevent” infection by this virus. The COVID-19 “vaccines” are not “safe and effective” as they are claimed to be by the CDC, the FDA, and many medical organizations. In fact, these injectables induce thousands of types of medical conditions; can aggravate existing medical conditions; re-establish previously-controlled medical conditions; induce COVID-19 infection; and more, among those who have COVID-19 “vaccines” in their bodies. For further information, please see the Appendix 1. List of Adverse Events of Special Interest section of the following document, given to the FDA by Pfizer-BioNTech on 30 April 2021, regarding the company’s modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” BNT162b2: https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf, “5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports of PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) Received Through 28-Feb-2021.”

It is now known that the COVID-19 virus was a lab-created biological weapon (bioweapon); and that the COVID-19 “vaccines” are lab-created and -enhanced biological weapons (bioweapons.) There were, and are, numerous entities and persons involved in the creation of this virus and these “vaccines” that must now be brought to justice for their activities. Among these activities was the deliberate withholding of vital information from you, President Trump, as then-President of United States, during “Operation Warp Speed”, which was part of the White House Coronavirus Task Force in your first administration. Please refer to: https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/2024.12.04-SSCP-FINAL-REPORT-ANS.pdf, “After Action Review of the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Lessons Learned and a Path Forward”, by the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, Chairman Brad Wenstrup, for more information regarding the development of the COVID-19 virus and of the COVID-19 “vaccines.”

To gain more knowledge regarding the disaster of the COVID-19 virus and the COVID-19 “vaccines”, please refer to: https://kirschsubstack.com/p/game-over-medicare-data-shows-the, “GAME OVER: Medicare data shows the COVID vaccines increase your risk of dying”, by Steve Kirsch, 2 February 2023; and, also:

https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/covid-19-vaccine-shedding-experiences “What We’ve Learned from Over a Thousand Vaccine Shedding Reports”, by A Midwestern Doctor, 7 January 2024 (detailing the phenomenon of COVID-19 “vaccine” shedding, and how such shedding affects people); and, also:

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/63-peer-reviewed-studies-link-covid, “63 Peer-Reviewed Studies Link COVID-19 ‘Vaccination’ to the Emergence of Vaccine-Resistant Viral Variants”, by Nicolas Hulscher, 3 January 2025. Please see the image below from this paper:

The following website lists links to contracts between the United States government and Pfizer-BioNTech related to the COVID-19 issue: www.keionline.org/covid-contracts, “COVID-19 Contracts.” These contracts involve the Department of Defense; the Department of Health and Human Services; the Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response (ASPR); the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA); the National Institutes of Health (NIH); and the National Institute for Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID.) There are also links to contracts between the United States government and other companies related to COVID-19. These include companies such as, Glaxo-Smith-Kline; Johnson & Johnson; Moderna; and Novavax, among many others.

The following paper details how the dangerous lipid nanoparticles in the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” spread the ingredients of these “vaccines” throughout the body, inducing changes body-wide, particularly in the heart: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-024-02528-1, “Nanocarrier imaging at single-cell resolution across entire mouse bodies with deep learning”, Hendrik Dietz, et al., 14 January 2025. Please see the image of the Abstract from this paper, below:

Please also see the image below, from the blog post by Dr. Jessica Rose, PhD, which discusses the above paper (https://jessicar.substack.com/p/lnp-spike-mrna-induction-of-changes, “LNP spike mRNA induction of changes in proteins related to vasculature formation and maintenance (collagen) in the heart”, 15 January 2025):

And, regarding holding entities and persons to account for their roles in the double disaster of the lab-created COVID-19 and of the lab-created and -enhanced COVID-19 “vaccines”, please see: www.theqtree.com/2024/11/15/health-friday-11-15-2024-open-thread-hold-them-accountable-edition/, by PAVACA.

President Trump and Mr. Kennedy, Jr.: The double disaster of the lab-created bioweapon called the COVID-19 virus, and the disaster of the lab-created and -enhanced bioweapons called the COVID-19 “vaccines”, must not ever be allowed to occur again. The entities and persons involved in the creation of this double disaster must be held accountable. In addition: The use of the COVID-19 “vaccines” must be stopped immediately, for all age groups, until complete, detailed, and proper clinical trials are held regarding these products, with all data fully collected, analyzed, and published for the public to see. And, President Trump: Mr. President, it is also incredibly important that those who deliberately withheld from you, or minimized to you, information that you needed to know during “Operation Warp Speed” in your previous administration, be held accountable.

It is also imperative that all medical professional organizations, state medical licensing boards, and specialty medical certification granting organizations, which currently require their applicants, licensees, and certification holders, to be COVID-19 “vaccinated”, to use only FDA-approved prophylactics and/or treatments for COVID-19, and to urge these products on their patients, be enjoined to end these requirements. Furthermore, access to, and use of, prophylactic and/or treatment options for COVID-19 that are safe and effective, such as, Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, Quercetin, Zinc, and Vitamin D, must become available to all persons, including to persons with COVID-19 infection, whether they are hospitalized or not. In addition, medical professionals who choose to treat patients with the products listed above must not become subject to “professional discipline” protocols, or to have their License to Practice Medicine and/or their specialty medicine certifications restricted or revoked.

With Peace, Good Energy, and great Respect, from an independent COVID-19 researcher,

PAVACA