STANTIFA – Why ANTIFA Must Be Shut Down Where It Started – In Our Universities

NOTE: This is an old, unfinished article from LAST SUMMER, which dug into some troubling aspects of the origins of ANTIFA in America, and particularly the roots in academia. It is FAR from complete, and I have no desire to finish it, but I decided to publish what is there, RIGHT NOW, as ANTIFA is being declared a terrorist organization, because I believe researchers looking into ANTIFA will benefit.

ANTIFA is being HELPED by academics, and those incubator institutions and “bad shepherd” academics need to answer for what they created. THIS will help us return freedom of thought to universities, IMO, because the radical student footsoldiers of uniform leftist thought and mind control will lose their backing by Marxist and crypto-Marxist professors and administrators.

Some editorial comments are added in bold.


Whether one considers my neologism of “STANTIFA” to come from ANTIFA-encouraging, “Stef”-Halper-producing, “Two-Door”-Ford-backing STANFORD UNIVERSITY, or the notorious and frankly dubious ANTIFA-defending professor STANISLAV VYSOTSKY – who may have actually GIVEN BIRTH to Portland ANTIFA – it is all about what falls out of the following video.

EDIT: A video which was apparently REMOVED by ANTIFA-backing YouTube Menshevik Susan Wojcicki and her clan of crypto-radical enablers of the radical left.

Gabriel Nadales: I’m a former Antifa member and enough is enough — Antifa must be stopped

https://youtu.be/ojoOlwmKTGc

If you don’t have time for the video, consider this summary from the video’s page on YouTube.

EDIT: Fortunately, I kept this transcript:

The video showing Quillette reporter Andy Ngo being savagely attacked by Antifa at a demonstration in Portland, Oregon, last weekend has rocked the nation. The footage of masked thugs beating him with blunt objects and throwing “milkshakes” allegedly filled with quick-drying cement is shocking to many. But I’m not surprised by this horrific behavior—I was once behind the mask.

PORTLAND POLICE SEEK OTHERS TAKING PART IN VIOLENT ANTIFA ASSAULTS, AS MORE DETAILS OF ATTACKS REVEALED 

I first became involved in Antifa in 2010 while I was in high school, and over the course of two years I participated in several demonstrations throughout Southern California. Although I never hurt anyone, I yelled obscenities, I destroyed property and I am ashamed of my actions. While I walked away from the movement over seven years ago, I have been following its growth and today’s Antifa members are far more brutal, thuggish and bold than anything I experienced.  How did it get to this?

Antifa has been encouraged and allowed to thrive on our college and university campuses. Police are often forced to work with their hands behind their backs, as we saw from the footage of Ngo’s attack, and administrators have failed to hold those who commit acts of violence and intimidation accountable. We are now seeing it spill over into our communities.  Antifa will only grow more aggressive if it is not stopped, and we must target it where is has found fertile ground—our college and university campuses.  The seeds of this violence have been planted and are encouraged by leftist professors in the classroom.

Over the last few years, there has been a growing trend of extremist professors advocating for violence and intimidation to force leftist ideology onto society. Examples can be found from coast-to-coast:

Mark Bray, a visiting scholar at Dartmouth College, is a staunch defendant of Antifa’s use of violence and even wrote “Anti-Fa: The Anti-Fascist Handbook,” in which he claims that ‘violence is a “legitimate response” to groups with incendiary views.’ 

— Then there is Assistant Professor Stanislav Vysotsky at University of Wisconsin – Whitewater who writes in an op-ed that: “On America’s Streets, Antifa’s Militant Anti-fascism Isn’t Terrorism – It’s Self-defense.” 

— Professors at Purdue and Stanford Universities, have worked to create a “Campus Antifascist Network” (CAN) to bring together “anyone committed to fighting fascism.” 

— Unsurprisingly, students are following the guidance of their teachers. Just a few weeks ago, Campus Reform reported that the Autonomous Student Network at the University of Texas Austin threatened to doxx incoming first-year students if they join Young Conservatives of Texas or Turning Point USA chapters. 

Make no mistake, Antifa’s violence is being fueled by professors in the classroom who incite their students to enact political violence against others. That is not preparing the next generation of leaders, it’s preparing the next generation of thugs. Universities ca……

Gabriel Nadales, alleged former ANTIFA member

There is more in the video, and I encourage you to watch and read it (the text appears as captions IN the video).

The above video finally prompted me to make this post, rather than just make comments to the effect of what you are about to read, as I have been doing.

I have been sitting on some explosive research which – in my opinion – backs up what this person is saying – that university “professors” are the ones who are actually behind ANTIFA. In fact, I believe there is circumstantial evidence that Portland ANTIFA was actually ginned up by the very same communists who are pushing the propaganda meme of:

  • “Trump supporter” equals
  • “white & nationalist” equals
  • “white nationalist” equals
  • “white supremacist

It’s a rather cunning meme, and to see this meme being PUSHED into the American law enforcement community by an ALLEGED CRIMINOLOGIST is – quite frankly – shocking.

Speaking of law enforcement, there is ANOTHER THING which pushed me to make this post – today’s news about an ANTIFA fire-bomber “martyring” himself at an ICE facility, and now being LAUDED by ANTIFA THUGS.

https://twitter.com/generalissima_/status/1150216298413953024

[EDIT: Tweet gone but residue stuck in WordPress – saving as an image in case the above remainder is lost.]

There is a lot of breaking news about Willem van Spronsen, and before I get on with this, I call on ALL HONEST RESEARCHERS to begin looking for connections of him to any of the following:

  • Russian expats and descendants in Washington State
  • Known communists or “red diaper” families
  • European ANTIFA and other global anarchists
  • Portland ANTIFA
  • Stanislav Vysotsky or his various contacts in ANTIFA or academia
  • Professors, grad students, and other potential Seattle-area “ANTIFA creators” starting in 2006 – particularly in 2007-2010 – until the present time
  • “Friends” who encouraged van Spronsen’s martyrdom complex, possibly by regular phone calls of consistent length

You will understand WHY I am suggesting these things, by the END of this post.

The fact that ANTIFA is now clearly being ginned up to “defend open borders” – the same open borders that are being rushed by RUSSIA-CHINA-CUBA-VENEZUELA-backed migrants – tells me that this is INTERNATIONAL – that ANTIFA in America has OVERSEAS ORIGINS.

Mandy and I have discussed the appearance of ANTIFA in America, and I expounded on two theories of it – (1) that the German, Stalinist, KPD-connected ANTIFA of the 1930’s never really went away, and (2) that it died out after World War II, and was ginned up anew in the United States. In that discussion, I postulated that European anarchists may have provided some form of continuity and encouragement to the early movement in America. Indeed, one frequently sees pictures of VIOLENT EUROPEAN ANTIFA being posted either mistakenly, or as a kind of disinformation, in discussions of American ANTIFA.

If that sub-theory of European ANTIFA providing a bridge is correct, then violent ANTIFA activist Willem van Spronsen seems like a potential fit.


AND – if Willem van Spronsen was a LINK between Soviet / Communist backers of ANTIFA and its origins in the United States – as in maybe Willem van Spronsen was a WITNESS or POTENTIAL WITNESS – well, sure would be convenient for those backers if he DIED. Right? And maybe was a martyr for the cause at the same time?

You starting to see this?


So let’s begin. The discussion will take two parts. The first part centers on ANTIFA violence in general, and Willem van Spronsen in particular. The second part concerns Portland ANTIFA, its origins, and its close relationship with Stanislav Vysotsky.


Part I – ANTIFA Violence and Willem van Spronsen

https://twitter.com/Oathkeepers/status/1150210709621547014

https://www.theepochtimes.com/69-year-old-anti-fascist-dies-after-attacking-immigrant-detention-facility-on-eve-of-planned-deportations_3001511.html

https://ussanews.com/News1/2019/07/14/confirmed-terrorist-who-was-killed-attacking-migrant-detention-center-was-affiliated-with-antifa/

LINK: https://bigleaguepolitics.com/confirmed-terrorist-who-was-killed-attacking-migrant-detention-center-was-affiliated-with-antifa/

LINK: https://iotwreport.com/dope-killed-attacking-ice-detention-center-was-antifa/

LINK: https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/07/13/armed-activist-hurling-molotov-cocktails-at-ice-facility-shot-killed-by-police/?like_comment=7187379

LINK: https://linxonline.co.pierce.wa.us/linxweb/Case/CriminalCase.cfm?cause_num=18-1-02480-5

LINK: https://pugetsoundanarchists.org/we-are-the-fire-that-will-melt-ice-rest-in-power-will-van-spronsen-olympia-wa/

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/IwAen

LINK: https://ninetymilesfromtyranny.blogspot.com/2019/07/grand-jury-indicts-portland-antifa-who.html

LINK: https://defensemaven.io/bluelivesmatter/news/grand-jury-indicts-portland-antifa-who-beat-elderly-man-with-weapon-58-XZD-16kmd-Qypmuh2xg/?replyPage=1

LINK: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/07/tacoma-ice-facility-terror-attacker-ided-as-antifa-activist/

LINK: https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/crime/tacoma-police-armed-man-throwing-incendiary-devices-shot-outside-ice-detention-center/?amp=1&__twitter_impression=true


Part II – Portland ANTIFA and Stanislav Vysotsky

THIS is the article that really woke me up to the fact that “ANTIFA professors” were a far deeper problem than just Eric Clanton swinging a bike lock.

https://www.wweek.com/portland/article-11048-anti-fascist-front.html

Because this article – excellent journalism, I might add – received IMMEDIATE push-back from ANTIFA and allied socialist forces, when it appeared, I am frankly surprised it’s still around. Since it will very likely be pulled down soon by leftists, once I expose it, I have made sure to locate an archived copy:

https://archive.fo/NL6rt

While this article provides an EXCELLENT window into ANTIFA and its enemies in late 2009, the real importance, is that it demonstrates how closely current ANTIFA defender Stanislav Vysotsky was working with the group when it was still quite young:

Rose City Antifa was founded in 2007, when anti-racists organized to shut down a meeting of the neo-Nazi Hammerskin Nation set for the Sherwood Elks Lodge (see “Skin Cancer,” WW, Oct. 3, 2007). The group posts cards and fliers at the Red Black Cafe, the Black Rose Collective Bookstore and other places where anarchists and the far-left gather, but its total membership is unknown.

On Saturday, Sept. 19, the group set up a recruitment table at a punk concert in North Portland benefiting the volunteer group Portland Books to Prisoners. Stanislav Vysotsky, a Willamette University sociology professor who studies anti-racist groups, was at the table laying out anti-fascist literature next to a sign that said “Rose City Antifa.”

Vysotsky denied he’s a member of the group. But he defended its tactics in an interview with WW.

Vysotsky says publicly outing one’s enemies—including publishing their home addresses and pressuring their employers to fire them—is a widely accepted practice by progressive social movements. (It’s also used by the right wing, which publishes addresses of abortion doctors on far-right websites.)

“The strategy is to shut them down.” Vysotsky says. “Someone can’t be active if they are out looking for a job, and homes are their base of operation. If you put yourself in the shoes of a movement member, there is very much a logic to this.”

https://www.wweek.com/portland/article-11048-anti-fascist-front.html

My impression, reading this article, is that it was simply good, balanced, old-school journalism, digging for small facts and larger issues on both sides of the natural controversy of the story.

And – clearly – that was going to get it in trouble.

The Willamette Weekly article, published on September 22, 2009, received a published response, two days later, on September 24.

http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2009/09/394348.shtml

Again, just in case this gets taken down, there is an archived version here:

https://archive.fo/61wmH

I simply let these articles stand for themselves. It is obvious that the reporter of the first article, at the time of the reporting AND the writing, was at least motivated to ASK if Stanislav Vysotsky was in fact a member of Rose City ANTIFA, taking note of (and clearly refusing to spike) the fact that Vysotsky was seeming to help the group hand out flyers.

Let the facts speak for themselves.

Sadly, I can only get a limited amount of information about Vysotsky and his academic writings. I don’t have the massive academic resources of a professor (it’s all very “pay to play”), nor do I have the commercial information resources of a journalist. I pretty much have the same thing as you all – an increasingly censored internet, controlled by the leftists who control SEARCH.

However, I am going to share whatever solid information I CAN get, in hopes that others with more resources take up the case. There is enough here to see that:

Portland, we have a problem.

For starters, Vysotsky’s curriculum vitae is – quite frankly – damning, in terms of his time in Portland. Timeline his arrival and academic history, and you will see the rise of ANTIFA in Portland correlating very strongly with those things.

https://uww.academia.edu/StanislavVysotsky/CurriculumVitae

Because there is some risk that it will be taken down, I have preserved the evidence as images:

There is also a true wealth of academic references. Because I refuse to buy into the bizarre alternative universe of “ANTIFA-think” propaganda as academia, which gerrymanders reality into an assortment of racial and historical grievances (which just happen to advance Soviet communism in America, but please don’t notice THAT), you won’t even see me arguing with “Vysotsky-think”, other than to state the following:

  • it is ALARMING that Stalinist thinking is being uploaded into CRIMINOLOGY
  • I suspect Vysotsky’s writings may ORIGINATE this thinking in academia
  • the primary effect looks like NORMALIZATION of “ANTIFA-think” in ACADEMIA
  • the secondary effect looks like NORMALIZATION of “ANTIFA-think” in NEWS

The latter point comes from the fact that Vysotsky gets interviewed by the news media, and the result is a bizarre framing of radical leftist talking points as “news”. Or, if not news, opinion.

https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/.premium-antifa-in-america-militant-anti-fascism-isn-t-terrorism-it-s-self-defense-1.7425726

About which, I apparently wasn’t the only person thinking it might need to be archived:

https://archive.fo/LyrEB

I really don’t have to say anything here. There are people who buy into this stuff, and to me it’s just as contorted and nonsensical as the ginned-up opposite of the national socialists.

Socialists – national socialists – anarchists – international socialists – democratic socialists – WHATEVER. I let them speak for themselves. and I really don’t need to do much more.

READ THE ARTICLE. NORMALIZATION OF RADICALIZATION.


So THERE YOU HAVE IT.

Now – this is not all the information we have. There is MUCH more on Stanislav Vysotsky’s background that is, quite frankly, very damning, but we lack the resources to get a SECOND SOURCE VALIDATION which would pin things down. Thus, we encourage journalists with MORE RESOURCES to publish what THEY have, and we may then chose to VALIDATE if our information agrees.

ANTIFA did not form in a vacuum. DIG DEEPER.

W

Top 10 Reasons I Believe the Clinton 1994 Crime Bill Was a Masterpiece of Communist Revolutionary Subversion

I have wanted to get this article out, but I was stuck on “number 10”. Sure, I could come up with TEN. EASY. But I needed a good one for NUMBER 10. I mean, I needed a REALLY GOOD ONE.

And our blessed President, Donald J. Trump, VSG, just gave it to me today.

Stick around for it.


Once you see this stuff, you cannot unsee it. This is Q on steroids. You follow this, and it shows that everything Q has been telling us is the straight dope.

That “16-year plan to destroy America”? OMG – it was part of a much larger and longer plan. The exact length is not important. What is important is the 8 years of Bill and Hillary Clinton, leading up to 9/11. THAT is significant. They fit into Q’s 16-year plan like a prequel.

The key is CLOWARD-PIVEN.

OK – let’s begin.

That part is actually important. Cloward-Piven depends on SURPRISE. This is why it’s not a form of legitimate government. It’s a form of subversion.

OK – now we REALLY begin.

1. Trump saved a ton of money and gutted lots of unworking CRAP by overhauling the Clinton sabotage

That right there is a sign that we are dealing with highly intentional Cloward-Piven waste.

Now, THIS part is what I call “classic” Cloward-Piven. This is just a special case, like special relativity is to general relativity. It’s all about economics, public services, overuse of them, getting people onto welfare rolls, etc. In this case, we’re talking about “things that waste money” more generally. We are talking about OBVIOUS MONEY STUFF. This is the Cloward-Piven stuff that we KNOW about. Money-related.

It turns out that Richard Cloward and Frances Piven reacted to the outing of their strategy, and to the various COUNTERMEASURES against it, by looking for NEW ways to make it work again. OPEN BORDERS is one of them.

Basically, when people put measures in place to LIMIT overuse of public services encouraged by Alinskyites like Cloward and Piven, THEY came up with the idea of OVERWHELMING with sheer numbers – hence OPEN BORDERS.

Starting to see why the Dem radicals are so adamant on refusing to give an inch on Trump’s Wall? He’s unmasking the Cloward-Piven radicals, folks.

Starting to see why Nancy Pelosi ran hidden progressive Danny O’Connor against WALL supporter Troy Balderson?

Hey – Trump Unmasking is FUN!

However, it gets worse. I believe that Cloward and Piven themselves helped the Clintons design a lot of very bad stuff into the 1994 Crime Bill. Some of it will come out in the next nine reasons. This other stuff is LIKE standard Cloward-Piven in its effects, but it goes WAY beyond it.

PS – if this “Wall” stuff is giving you a funny feeling about Bill and Hillary sounding “pro-borders” at any point in their miserable radical lives, then let me solve that little mystery right now. They LIED all the way through.

2. Joe “Handy-Man” Biden was the “author” of the Clinton crime bill

Yes – that would be CAUGHT plagiarist Joe Biden as the “author”.

Yes – this would be the SAME Joe Biden who was the “author” of the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990.

That would be the same Joe Biden who lied to us about “get a shotgun” when the Commie Cabal tried to take our guns after the Sandy Hook “sketchy propaganda-augmented psychological event”.

Enjoy his lies MOCKED, after Red Diaper Sergey and the Wocommie Sisters YouTube Faction helped their fellow radicals spread Biden’s propaganda.

The fact is, Joe Biden has been an integral straight man for an enormous amount of cabal shenanigans. His constant, repeated involvement in these things is very sketchy.

There is also another reason Biden is a suspect – I will get to that later.

3. There had been a giant federal crime bill only 4 years earlier.

Yes – the same one that included Joe Biden’s Gun Free School Zones Act of 1990. That would have been under GHWB, by the way, so if you think he was innocent of the plans – well – not very likely.

Why did we need another crime bill? AH – there is the rub.

4. The Clintons used their own misguided Waco raid as justification for the crime bill, and particularly the “assault weapon ban”

The disastrous Waco raid was planned LONG BEFORE the Clintons arrived in Washington, and possibly even before they began officially campaigning.

Years ago, I was shocked to learn from some witness (the article is long gone – I have never been able to find it again) that Hillary had been intensely interested in the Branch Davidian group very early – while (in the opinion of the witness) there was no real reason for her to be interested. This came out in the scandal after the failed raid.

Well, it makes sense now, if we accept that she had a LONG TERM PLAN.

Hillary needed a communist propaganda event to justify the Clinton crime bill, which had many LARGER purposes, including gun confiscation. A CULT with GUNS makes a VERY handy target for a MASS PSYCHOLOGICAL EVENT.

The problem was, just like everything else that Hillary touched, disaster ensued, not always in the way that the radicals planned.

4. Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven THEMSELVES were very likely involved in the bill’s design, or had influence on it

This is the most astounding part, if it’s true. All I can tell you is this – Cloward and Piven THEMSELVES were involved in the DESIGN and SIGNINGS of AT LEAST two other bills – one of those in 1993 and the other one in 1996 – thereby bracketing the crime bill.

The first bill was Motor Voter – obviously designed to help Democrat electoral cheating. The second was Welfare Reform in 1996. Clearly they were making sure that Welfare Reform didn’t damage their Alinsky welfare ABUSE models TOO MUCH.

Can you IMAGINE including these radical theorists in the design of ANY bills? This is how people build back doors into systems – get some RINGERS on the inside. And Cloward and Piven were TOP SHELF ringers.

It is very important to realize that Cloward and Piven were IDOLS of the Clinton entourage, as well as Obama’s mentors. They had INFLUENCE in the Bill Clinton administration. And their MODEL works on SURPRISE – on being DISHONEST about ABUSING systems through Alinsky tactics.

But it gets worse.

5. Under generalized Cloward-Piven revolutionary objectives, throwing more black people into prison would be a FEATURE, not a BUG

This is the part that freaked me out when I realized it. This kind of sabotage cannot be done from OUTSIDE the system – one has to get INSIDE. Which is exactly what the Clintons did.

The Clintons used their 1994 crime bill to SET UP the justification for something that would become the Black Lives Matter movement. They used that bill to foment the basis for communist revolution with a strong racial component.

This was exactly Stalin’s plan, by the way. To exacerbate American race problems into a revolution or civil war.

Remember when Hillary was “confronted” by BLM activists after Bernie gave up his microphone so pathetically? Remember Hillary showing some kind of middling “resolve”, and gently debating them?

FAKE! It was absolutely scripted, just like everything else she does.

Just like I think her zinger about “Holder, not Booker, they all look the same” in a sarcastic tone mocking Republicans, was scripted. NO WAY. The moderator wasn’t a natural deceiver, and read the wrong name with clear deliberation and knowledge. I spotted that one. SCRIPTED. Just like all the little kids. Just like her debate questions. Just like everything else she does. Utterly scripted.

The kicker here is that there is no way the CLINTONS get blamed for this – except that Hillary went JUST A WEE BIT overboard with “superpredators“.

The problem with “superpredators” is that it left an easy way to connect HER to the Clinton crime bill and the INTENDED effect of mass incarceration of blacks.

So finally – WHY would the Clintons want this to happen? NOT merely to build up revolutionary grievance. They would also want it for – DRUMROLL – standard Cloward-Piven effects. Mass incarceration is EXPENSIVE – it will build up the system debts – overload it – break it – and bring about the communist revolution. She WANTED it.

6. Under generalized Cloward-Piven revolutionary objectives, 100,000 more police on the streets works WITH mass incarceration to help create the other side of BLM

Look at it. Right there. The other side of the future confrontation of BLM, and the Clintons set it up, while looking like they were solving the problem.

More police, more criminals, and make them each other’s enemy.

Look like you’re solving it, when you’re actually making it worse.

Now part of this is NARRATIVE CONTROL. The normal effect of incarceration and REAL NEWS is to make people change their behavior.

The radicals knew how to prevent those police from working – the gangsta rap movement and elements of hip-hop lifestyle that GLORIFIED sex, violence and basic criminality. The radicals used CULTURAL MARXISM to keep the 100,000 extra police from having any social effect. Which means MORE CLOWARD-PIVEN spending with NO EFFECT.

See how that works? Cultural Marxism is VERY effective.

7. Bill Cooper’s leak and what we know today MATCH, showing that the Clinton crime bill was part of their plan. Future proves past.

OK – this meme is a bit of a “Bill Cooper remix” joke, but not really.

This is a long story. Dig in if you have the time, and will enable you to see so much about what is going on.

There was a military leaker / whistle-blower named Bill Cooper who shook the “conspiracy theory” world during the Clinton administration. He ended up being killed shortly before 9/11, but don’t let that part get in the way. He casually mentioned a bunch of stuff about UFOs AND intentional military UFO disinformation projects, that sounded a lot like what we heard from others, but ignore that for now. He even talked about a kind of “depopulation agenda” (my words) that sounds a heck of a lot like the entire current UN policy and the Clintons’ actions – both Bill and Hillary – and the Clinton Foundation’s interests, but again – put that aside for the moment.

The thing that was most profound and relevant from Bill Cooper, for what we are talking about right now – the Clinton crime bill – was an almost exact description of what the Democrats did LATER with “assault weapons”.

Here is a larger version of the same section:

So you see here an outline of what has since become very obvious.

Bill Cooper actually explained something I could never explain – the fact that Bill Clinton and the Red Chinese seemed to be doing the OPPOSITE of what Bill Clinton was saying publicly on “assault weapons”.

In 1993 and 1994, Bill and Hillary Clinton were publicly saying that “assault weapons” were bad, bad, bad. But if you were part of the gun world then, you would have seen the OPPOSITE in reality.

CHINA – with the blessing of the Clintons, began DUMPING all their old SKS and AK-47 rifles INTO the United States, at dirt-cheap prices, as a way to begin financing their military modernization. This continued for the ENTIRE 8 years of Bill Clinton. Not only that – the Clinton DOJ used FBI informants to hand these things out like CANDY to everybody they could talk into one, using arguably bogus private sales – the EXACT THING which Democrats rail against now.

“WHY?” – in Hillary’s cackling voice – one might ask.

Well, Bill Cooper seems to have an answer. And his ANSWER was published BEFORE it happened.

If you’re interested in Bill Cooper, here is a long (2 hour) interview, back when CNN was still a very reasonable non-government network. Remember – he eavesdropped a lot of things, and he realized that he himself was fed disinformation to test for leaks. He was trying to figure it all out – not always successfully. So stay skeptical, but look for places where it looks solid, or CLOSE to the facts.

8. Democrat policies on crime and domestic security after 1994 always chose and continue to choose the expensive and freedom-encroaching over the effective.

Notice how even left-wing BBC was seeing that – in 2016 – the 1994 Clinton crime bill was STILL problematic.

But more importantly, note the PRICE TAG. THIRTY BILLION!

Note that the price tag of the Border Security bill that was passed under Obama was over 45 BILLION – 50% more than the 30 BILLION for the 1994 Clinton Crime Bill.

And yet you hardly even REMEMBER that bill under Obama – right? And yet, if anything, our illegal immigration problems are WORSE today than they were under Obama, despite re-spending 50% MORE. Right?

See how that works? The Obama border security package was NOT EFFECTIVE – or they could MAKE it ineffective (with things like DACA), and THAT is why they passed it.

MORE MONEY – NO EFFECT – YEAH, BABY – DEMS ARE GOOD TO GO!

Think about how the Democrats will ALWAYS vote for bloated packages which do nothing, but for a measly 5.7 billion for an actual wall – NO WAY.

Just think about it. One might say that they have stuck to the plan.

It’s called CLOWARD-PIVEN.

The whole point of Democrat policy since 1994 has been to FOLLOW THE PLAN started by the 1994 crime bill.

9. Democrat leadership was strangely quiet and absent on the First Step Act.

Whoops! No black people? Just wait until Trump gets out of this signing to a presser with THE PEOPLE.

The people you will NOT see associated with this thing are (1) the Democrat leadership, and (2) the TDS media.

Think about that. Trump, GOP, and renegade Dems – largely BLACK – supported criminal justice reform. NOT the “governmedia”. NOT the Democrat-media complex.

At first you might think the ABSENCE of Schumer and Pelosi would simply be out of embarrassment. But the fact is, President Trump NEVER blamed the need for an overhaul on the Democrats OR the Clintons. It would have been SO EASY to keep the Dems away from First Step, but Trump never did. Not once.

Oh, that Unmaking Trump is SO CLEVER.

It would have been VERY easy for the Democrat leadership to make political hay out of the First Step Act – to claim some of the glory for it. Trump would have let them.

But they didn’t. NOT one bit. And yet the BLACK FOLKS were all over it.

Listen to Trump call it “bipartisan”.

Think about that. Black folks want something, and the DEMOCRAT LEADERSHIP doesn’t want to have any part of it.

And let’s dig deeper on THAT – because it takes us to the very heart of this thing.

Something very odd went on here. BLACK support for Trump overhauling the Clinton bill went 100% across the board from KANYE….

https://twitter.com/kanyewest/status/1080199325295071233

….to VAN FRIGGIN’ JONES!!!

Yes – THAT Van Jones….

Notice that commie Jones took a lot of heat for his honesty about Trump.

THAT is significant.

The great IRONY here is that, in trying to turn the humiliation and discipline of “Menshevik” Van Jones for siding with Trump, into some kind of lesson for liberals to “stay on the Plantation at all times”, what WaPo actually did is document how the left preserves the efficacy of Cloward-Piven operations. This is where media discipline and solidarity are so critical to communist operations.

ONE IS A STRAY. TWO IS A SLAVE REVOLT. Know who to return to the fold (Van Jones), and who must be crushed (Kanye West), because the latter will escape again, or not return when offered safety, and THAT breeds rebellion.

It is only because Van Jones is still valuable to the left, and because it is too risky to drive him over to Kanye-land, AND because there are ENOUGH black voices ready to criticize him from the Plantation, that Van Jones was not completely demolished.

But the fact is, the MEDIA and the DEMOCRAT LEADERSHIP just had one of their MAIN ARTILLERY BATTERIES knocked out by Trump – thanks to Kanye West and Kim Kardashian. With help from Van Jones.

The Democrats are NOT about helping black Americans. They are about using blacks. Until somebody BETTER to use comes along.

10. They just don’t care about crime.

President Trump has finally hammered home the most important point of my Top Ten – and he did it today.

THEY DON’T ACTUALLY CARE ABOUT CRIME.

Just listen to it. He hammers it home.

Trump is talking about the BORDER, but if what he says is true – and I absolutely believe it – then it means that these Democrats never cared about crime when they created the 1994 Clinton crime bill.

They cared about REVOLUTION.

So go back in time. WHY did they have this crime bill that Trump had to FIX after decades of trouble caused by it?

BECAUSE IT WAS SUPPOSED TO CAUSE THE TROUBLE.

Who were the TOP people associated with the 1994 Clinton crime bill?

Biden, Schumer, and THE CLINTONS.

Epilogue

I love the way the old FBI show of the 1960’s had an “Epilogue” at the end, where they talked about the results of the crime and the investigation.

Usually it’s punishment.

This time, it’s not.

Not yet.

W

2019 is the 25 year anniversary of 1994.