“We do not believe any group of men adequate enough or wise enough to operate without scrutiny or without criticism. We know that the only way to avoid error is to detect it, that the only way to detect it is to be free to inquire. We know that in secrecy error undetected will flourish and subvert.” –J. Robert Oppenheimer
There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.
Do not forget to LABEL AI articles, video and such.
I often bring up history because before a problem can be solved the source has to be known. Here are comments from a few days ago and videos.
I’m so tired of hearing “Our grandparents could buy a house on one salary, but now we can’t even afford rent on two!” Yeah, because Grandma wasn’t blowin’ half her paycheck on $12 iced coffee and avocado toast, that’s why! Back then, if they wanted coffee, they made it at home. With grounds so strong it could remove rust. You didn’t drink it… you survived it. And Grandma wasn’t out there “brunchin’.” You think she had time for brunch? No! She was at home, cooking something called whatever’s left in the house. And don’t even bring up Uber Eats. These people today are crying about money while living in a 4-bedroom house with two SUVs, six streaming services, and matching sleeve tattoos. You think Grandpa had a tattoo? Yeah it said “Korea, 1951.” And it came with nightmares, not realitic shading. Oh, don’t even get me started on the kids. “We can’t make ends meet, but Brayden needs the new iPhone!” No, he doesn’t! You’re giving an $1100 phone to a kid who still eats glue and boogers. When we were kids, the family phone hung on the wall. It had a cord long enough to jump rope with, and if you wanted privacy, you had to go stand in the pantry. And somehow, we survived. And the TV? There was one. One. It was in the living room, and Dad controlled it. If he wanted to watch bowling, guess what? You liked bowling. Now every room’s got a 65-inch screen, the baby’s got an iPad, and you’re sitting there wondering why you can’t afford rent. Because you’re living like rappers, that’s why! Grandpa wasn’t out here leasing Teslas and buying $12 smoothies called “Detox Sunrise.” He was driving a truck that sounded like thunder and smelled like oil and cigarettes. They lived within their means. Whatever Grandpa’s paycheck bought, that’s what they had. They didn’t try to keep up with the Joneses. They were just trying to keep the fed and a roof over their heads. So yeah, Grandpa could buy a house on one salary. But he also didn’t have 47 subscriptions and emotional-support crystals. He had one support system, Grandma, who told him to suck it up and mow the yard. Now folks are broke, tired, and stressed… and it’s not because of inflation… it’s because y’all keep ordering tacos from DoorDash like you’re royalty. Wake up and smell the truth! https://nitter.poast.org/REMASCULATE/status/1982577768375128516
All of this is true. And the resistance to that truth is unbelievably strong.
The current younger generations were mostly raised by people who didn’t teach them that, in order to have the things their parents had attained, they would have to suffer through lean times and struggle, FIRST.
These kids thought they would graduate high school or go to college, and then immediately make the same type of money their parents made after 25 years in the work force. The kids thought they would live in a four-bedroom, three-bath house when they left their parent’s home, not the run-down apartment in the sketchy part of town their parents started out in.
Posts like the above get a bunch of meaningless statistics thrown at them, but no reality. That reality is, Starbucks really should be a treat, dinner should be at home every night with the occasional dinner out as a treat, your first car should cost $5000 max (cash for clunkers eliminated the $1000 beater), professional nails and $100 hairstyles should be for your wedding but no other time. You get a new $100 flip phone every 3-5 years, and have a subscription to Amazon Prime for free shipping and entertainment. You scrape and save and ten years after you get your first job, you put a down payment on a starter home, 1200 square feet, 3 bedrooms and a bath-and-a-half. It needs a little work; but you’re willing to spend your weekends on fixing it up, so you can barbeque in a backyard you own.
I’m 60 years old, and the above is basically my story, and that of most other people I know. I consider myself Gen X; I was born right at the very beginning of it.
Gen X people were made so self-sufficient and tough by circumstances (we are the latch-key generation; nobody took care of us) that it didn’t occur to us that we’d have to explain how to grow up and be tough to our kids. We assumed they would get it like we did. They didn’t. It’s our fault, but we really didn’t know. The school system and society took them and turned them into socialist cream puffs.
And Scott brought these to the discussion.
Trump’s HIDDEN Asia Strategy: Reversing 40 Years of American Decline
Barbara Boyd explains how Donald Trump’s recent three-day trip to Asia could reverse 40 years of outsourcing and cultural decay. She highlights ignored or misrepresented coverage by mainstream media, focusing on the significant trade and defense agreements Trump has made with countries like Japan, South Korea, and Thailand. These agreements aim to rebuild America’s productive base through advanced manufacturing, critical minerals processing, modern nuclear energy, and streamlined defense strategies. Boyd also discusses a renewed Monroe Doctrine and Trump’s approach to ending international conflicts, emphasizing a strategic shift towards fortifying the Western hemisphere and fostering economic revival.
Trump Ended 100 Years of British Control, Will 2026 Undo It All?
In this episode, Susan Kokinda discusses Mark Carney’s admission that the globalist world order has ended, highlighting Donald Trump’s significant breakthroughs in Asia that sidestepped the British Imperial system. Kokinda emphasizes that Trump’s greatest challenge lies not abroad but within the U.S., where many Republicans fail to grasp or oppose his economic nationalism. She details the key deals Trump made in Asia, his strategy against the global elite, and the necessity for a new Republican coalition that supports his vision. Kokinda calls for support and education through Promethean Action to build this coalition and secure Trump’s accomplishments against domestic and international resistance.
Another Promethean Action video, their Thursday Question & Answer had an interesting tidbit at 1hr 20 mins.
Rough Transcript of one question and answer:
[QUESTION from Scott:]
The next question is going to be just trying to get a more general [and] a clearer understanding of what we mean by the institutional network of British imperial control. I think this is a historical issue that you’re going to have to spend the time to really see and [to] develop the historical thread. But I want to take this question because I think this resonates in the minds of all of our supporters. My request, if you please, is for a more detailed explanation and definition of the institutional network of British imperial control.
I think the first thing you really have to get in your head is this is not some new thing. This is a historical thread that has been developing for at minimum hundreds of years. Okay.
Explanation [or] definition of the institutional network of British imperial control so often referenced in your commentary. It seems essential that we understand precisely who and what constitutes this control as such knowledge could empower us to challenge these networks through public awareness, outcry or even targeted boycots. Ultimately, there are human faces behind these institutions. So, I say, let the unmasking begin.
Thank you, Scott, for your thoughtful insight and for your question.
So, Barbara and Bruce, your thoughts on the institutional networks of British control. I think we already give a lot and we already unmask a lot, but Bruce and Barbara, your thoughts.
Barbara Boyd: Well, there are two elements here and I’ll emphasize one which is not really thought about or talked about by other people which is when the Round Table formed itself and what they basically said is that we’re the third iteration of the British Empire. They formed themselves around British universities namely Cambridge and Oxford and the University of London, the London School of Economics [Founded by the Fabians with funding from Lord Rothschild.] Their idea was what they call soft power.What kind of way of teaching people how to think do we propose to do? And theirentire philosophical premise has been that human beings are no better than animals. That basically we are not in any way associated with the creative force of God or obligated while on this earth to forward God’s creation.
It’s two completely different worldviews of what human beings are. And they set out to corrupt every educational feature of the United States to make that the reigning philosophical view of what men and women are. That’s point one. Soft power institutions through the universities.
And I and most people at that, because they tend to think that all the secret gatherings of things like the Bilderberg Society or the Trilateral Commission or you know the Mount Peleran Society are where it’s at. Those consensus institutions are important but this whole idea of how do you think is what they call cognitive warfare.
The second aspect of it is of course central banking, you know and that includes the Federal Reserve, that includes most of Wall Street and that includes the Bank of England, the Bank of Canada and the institutions which are associated with that like BIS and the International Monetary Fund. So that’s how I’d start. But the real challenge here is to think about what do these people who we can identify in these networks, how do they think of human beings and what type of ideology are they trying to sell? And you know very, very critical stuff comes out of the Mount Pellerin Society for example which really featured libertarianism coming into the United States as a targeted strategy against the American system. There are other things which I could say but I’ll let Bruce follow up.
Bruce Director: I think Barbara, you hit the right point. And I think the only way to really grasp this is to look at it historically. And this requires a lot of thinking. I referenced it earlier in terms of the history of the United States from 1763 on basically as a spear point of mankind’s fight to free itself once and for all from the imperial system. The British Empire is not the first empire in the world. The British Empire draws its lineage continuously all the way back through the Venetian Empire, the Roman Empire, the Babylonian Empire, Persian Empire, and so on and so forth. It’s a structure of sin as Pope John Paul II would have called it. And man has struggled against this for thousands of years. The United States became the first constitutional republic, a first nation state that was organized around a different idea. Not that that idea was new, but that the constitution of a nation committed to that was new and we’ve survived because we’ve maintained that fight against the British Empire. So to put the names and places on these things you really have to do it from the standpoint of history and I refer people to the books that Bob Ingram has written and Graham Lowry. Will Worse has a book out which are all available on the connections I guess through the Prometheian action website. So, you actually learn about American history. And I hope that as we enter the 2026, which is the 250th anniversary of the founding of the United States of the Declaration of Independence, that this subject of real American history be studied and understood by a broad swath of our citizenry. I’m quite happy that President Trump has decided to make this a real focus and we at Prometheian Action are going to do our part to bring out this element of our history which used to be well known but in the post World War II period has been obscured basically by the institutions that Barbara talked about.
……
None of what has happened during the last century and more has been by chance and I would like to enlarge on the information from Barbara and Bruce. This is from my old notes.🤓
…When and where did all this culture manipulation start?
In the late 1800s and early 1900s, psychology as a medical field really took off. While the original intent of it may or may not have been to heal people’s minds, it quickly became apparent that psychological techniques could also be used to manipulate and control people…
As the story goes, the Tavistock Clinic was formed in 1920 in London, England to research and treat victims of shell shock that occurred during the first World War….
Through the research and treatment of trauma based mental disorders, psychiatrists discovered that trauma could be used to control people’s minds. Trauma could be used on micro and macro levels.
On a micro level, people could be brought into a clinical setting and exposed to trauma, drugs (LSD) and other psychological techniques, creating a mind-controlled person. The Tavistock program led to the CIA’s MK Ultra program...
On a macro level, it was discovered trauma could be used effectively on the masses as well, constantly pushing fear on the general public through the media, with periodic traumatic events leading to a population that is mind controlled through fear...
GEE, that sounds like the Covid Plannedemic to me!
Late 1800s ??? Enter John D Rockefeller and his buddies.
John Dewey [who was a Fabian – GC] got his education in the new psychology under G. Stanley Hall at John Hopkins University. In 1887, at the tender age of 28, Dewey felt that he knew enough about psychology to be able to write a textbook on the subject, entitled fittingly Psychology.
In 1894, Dewey was appointed head of the department of philosophy, psychology and education at the University of Chicago which had been established two years earlier by a gift from John D. Rockefeller.In 1896, Dewey created his famous experimental Laboratory School where he could test the effects of the new psychology on real live children.
Dewey’s philosophy had evolved from Hegelian idealism to socialist materialism, and the purpose of the school was to show how education could be changed to produce little socialists and collectivists instead of little capitalists and individualists. It was expected that these little socialists, when they became voting adults, would dutifully change the American economic system into a socialist one.
In order to do so he analyzed the traditional curriculum that sustained the capitalist, individualistic system and found whathe believed was the sustaining linchpin — that is, the key element that held the entire system together: high literacy. To Dewey, the greatest obstacle to socialism was the private mind that seeks knowledge in order to exercise its own private judgment and intellectual authority.High literacy gave the individual the means to seek knowledge independently. It gave individuals the means to stand on their own two feet and think for themselves. This was detrimental to the “social spirit” needed to bring about a collectivist society….
An 1845 resolution to the New York Medical Association by Dr. Nathan S. Davis, calling for a national medical convention, led to the establishment of the American Medical Association (AMA) in 1847.
The Effective Strategy That Eliminated Natural Medicine
Naturopathic-based herbal medicine was the norm, and Rockefeller set out to shift the medical industry toward using oil-derived pharmaceuticals. To this end, the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research was established in 1901…
“The fortunes of Carnegie, Morgan and Rockefeller financed surgery, radiation and synthetic drugs. They were to become the economic foundations of the new medical economy… The oiligarchy birthed entire medical industries from their own research centers and then sold their own products from their own petrochemical companies as the ‘cure.’”
John D. Rockefeller wanted to gain control of education, including the medical education systems. He did that with the help of Fred Gates. Fred Gates was a Baptist pastor, who left that post to become secretary of the American Baptist Education Society. Rockefeller was a devout Baptist himself, so the two were destined to meet. Rockefeller donated $600,000 to the Baptist-based Chicago University, under the suggestion of Fred Gates. (Now known as the University of Chicago Medical Center.)
In 1901 the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research was founded. One of the names on the board of the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research was Simon Flexner. It was Simon Flexner’s brother, Abraham Flexnor, who had one of the biggest hands in medical education reform. (Interestingly, Abraham Flexner was born in Kentucky, one of the largest growers and suppliers of hemp during WWII.)
Abraham Flexner was on the staff of the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
“As mentioned previously, the Rockefeller and Carnegie foundations traditionally worked together almost as one in the furtherance of their mutual goals, and this certainly was no exception. The Flexner brothers represented the lens that brought both the Rockefeller and the Carnegie fortunes into sharp focus on the unsuspecting and thoroughly vulnerable medical profession.” (He Who Pays The Piper – Creation of the Modern Medical (drug) Establishment; G. Edward Griffin)….
Rockefeller was not content with controlling the minds of kids in school. He then went after Child Rearing practices.
Past research into the mental hygiene movement in Canada and the United States has tended to view it in isolation from co-temporary projects funded by Rockefeller philanthropy, such as mass communications research. The mental hygiene campaign aimed to modify adult-child relations by reducing the influence parents and teachers held over children’s personality development; the central aim of mass communications research was the development of conformity of opinion. One a project of social engineering, the other of social control, the two projects combined appear to have possessed considerable potential to work in concert to shift weight in the socializing matrix from families and schools to the media at the outset of the post-World War II baby boom….
In this article, I argue that Rockefeller philanthropy fundamentally controlled psychological discourse concerning child-rearing and pedagogical practices in post-World War II Canada and the United States. The philanthropy’s officers were, in essence, funding support for a particular psychological approach to matters concerning children so extensively and effectively that they in effect shaped the consensus for the “modern” child-rearing philosophy typified by Blatz and Laycock in Canada and Arnold Gesell and Benjamin Spock in the United States. Philanthropic funding supported the proponents of “mental hygiene,” providing them with institutional bases to legitimate their ideals of child rearing, and forums to present these, while marginalizing alternate ideals and alternate research into parenting and pedagogical practices by lack of funding. As a result, literature of the post-World War II period gives the appearance of almost universal expert support for “modern” child-rearing methods when, in truth, it reflects almost universal authority over child-rearing expertise by Rockefeller philanthropy….
And then the Rockefellers went after mothers. Feminism was a creation of the Rockefellers.
….People do not realize that feminism is mass indoctrination because they cannot identify the perpetrator, the means or the motive. Recently Aaron Russo, the producer of Bette Middler’s movies and “America: From Freedom to Fascism” identified all three confirming what I have been saying. (See this shocking 14 minute interview excerpt) While trying to recruit Russo for the CFR, Nicholas Rockefeller told him that his family foundation created women’s liberation using mass media control as part of a long-term plan to enslave humanity. He admitted they want to “chip us.” Google “Rockefeller Foundation” and “Women’s Studies” and you’ll get a half million citations. The hidden goal of feminism is to destroy the family, which interferes with state brainwashing of the young. Side benefits include depopulation and widening the tax base. Displacing men in the role of providers also destabilizes the family. A drastic paradigm shift is required to make sense of the world. The Rockefellers are part of the private central banking cartel that also controls media, defence, pharmaceutical and other cartels. To protect their monopoly of credit and wealth, they are instituting a world police state (“world government”) using the bogus 9-11 attack and endless war as a pretext. Rockefeller told Russo about this plan a year before 9-11…..
…Probably you are not aware that most major women organizations in America were funded by Rockefeller Foundation who claims in their website, “By funding a strategic mix of organizations, institutions, and projects; the Foundation is fostering smart globalization.” Most feminist “Women Studies” funding comes from big foundations like Rockefeller Foundation, Ford Foundation, Carnegie Foundation etc and of course USAID, UNIFEM and UN….
Behind the façade of “women’s rights”, Feminism teaches that heterosexual roles (wife, mother etc) are socially constructed by MEN and oppressive to WOMEN. This underscores the fact that feminism was created to destabilize the society and undermine the institution of family. Aaron Russo says, the two key reasons given by Nicholas Rockefeller were
Before women’s lib we couldn’t tax half of the population
Can indoctrinate kids in school at early ages. When there is no male figure in the family, kids start seeing the State as their family who provide and protect.
American feminist icon Gloria Steinem, (an ex CIA agent) proudly claims in one of her own books that CIA funded Ms Magazine with the stated goal of breaking up the families and taxing women. (Divide and conquer policy)
Nearly one in three American children is living with a parent who is divorced, separated or never-married. A study by the Pew Research Center highlights rapidly changing notions of the American family where 4 in 10 say marriage is becoming obsolete in US.
Years after the so called ‘feminist movement’, now America is facing the consequences. President Mr. Barack Obama on father’s day is calling for stable families….
AND THE CHURCH AND COMMUNITY SUPPORT SYSTEM WERE ALSO DESTROYED.
…This transformation was the result of organized plans developed by a group of highly powerful “though unelected” financial and industrial executives who wanted to drastically change agricultural practices in the US to better serve their collective corporate financial agenda. This group, called the Committee for Economic Development, wasofficially established in 1942as a sister organization to the Council on Foreign Relations….
Their plan was so effective and so faithfully executed by its operatives in the US government thatby 1974 the CED couldn’t help but congratulate itself in another agricultural report called“A New US Farm Policy for Changing World Food Needs”for the efficiency of the tactics they employed to drive farmers from their land.
The human cost of CED’s plans were exacting and enormous.CED’s plans resulted in widespread social upheaval throughout rural America, ripping apart the fabric of its society destroying its local economies. They also resulted in a massive migration to larger cities….
US churches as a political force for the people was attacked.
Most churches in America have organized as “501c3 tax-exempt religious organizations.” This is a fairly recent trend that has only been going on for about fifty years. Churches were only added to section 501c3 of the tax code in 1954. We can thank Sen. Lyndon B. Johnson for that. Johnson was no ally of the church. As part of his political agenda, Johnson had it in mind to silence the church and eliminate the significant influence the church had always had on shaping “public policy.”
Although Johnson proffered this as a “favor” to churches, the favor also came with strings attached (more like shackles). One need not look far to see the devastating effects 501c3 acceptance has had to the church, and the consequent restrictions placed upon any 501c3 church. 501c3 churches are prohibited from addressing, in any tangible way, the vital issues of the day.
For a 501c3 church to openly speak out, or organize in opposition to, anything that the government declares “legal,” even if it is immoral (e.g. abortion, homosexuality, etc.), that church will jeopardize its tax exempt status. The 501c3 has had a “chilling effect” upon the free speech rights of the church. LBJ was a shrewd and cunning politician who seemed to well-appreciate how easily many of the clergy would sell out….
It was all about gaining control and indoctrinating America’s children. America’s future.
Once mothers were removed from the home and the caring for their children, the next step was to gain control of the daycares. That was what all the trumped up charges against daycares was all about. Problem — Reaction – Solution — Got to create the problem to get people to hand over more control of their lives. In this case control of their children.
The trumped up charges against Daycares. Ironic that REAL abuse was occurring elsewhere by the Cabal and was completely covered up.
But it was in the United States that the majority of the sex abuse hysteria cases occurred, and many innocent people remain in prison there.
In a case that was virtually forgotten when the first edition of “Victims of Memory” was published, three innocent people Gerald “Tooky” Amirault, now 41, his sister Cheryl LaFave, 37, and his mother, Violet Amirault, 71 were found guilty of horrendous sexual abuse and sentenced to prison in Massachusetts. Because I have become particularly well-acquainted with this situation, and another that relates to it, I hope I can help raise public awareness of these cases… The clear presumption was that the day-care providers were guilty, that these children had been so terrorized and abused that the leading questions were justified, and that to subject them to normal courtroom procedures would be to “retraumatize” them. It did not seem to occur to anyone that the children were being psychologically traumatized by the Department of Social Services, the police, and the court, and that they might sustain life-long psychic scars as a result.
Logic, in fact, had little to do with the trial. Children said that they had told their teachers they were going to a magic room, even though no teacher had heard of such a room. They told stories of attacks by a robot, being forced to eat a frog Miss Vi had killed, and being molested by clowns and lobsters. One boy told how he had been tied naked to a tree in the school yard in front of all the teachers and children. Though the teachers denied the incident, and no other child verified it, Amirault was found guilty of other offenses this child recounted —
how Tooky had raped him with a thick pointed stick which looked like a gun, for instance. [FOOTNOTE: During Tooky’s trial, the boy asserted that he had been hung upside down from the tree and forced to eat white pills; at Vi and Cheryl’s trial, however, he claimed to be right-side up and did not recall eating pills.] Even the accused man’s nickname, which derived from the sound his mother made when she chucked him under the chin as an infant, came to sound sinister and revolting in Hardoon’s mouth. “Yes, and what else did Tooky do to you?”
After a 13-day deliberation, the jury returned a guilty verdict. The following year, in a separate trial, his mother and sister were also convicted. For more than seven years, they have all languished in jail, losing subsequent appeals and repeatedly being denied parole….
The following article is very good and goes into implanting false memories in the children.
“In the Little Rascals day-care-abuse case in North Carolina, one mother told reporters that it took 10 months before her child was able to “reveal” the molestation. No one at the time considered the idea that the child might have been remarkably courageous to persist in telling the truth for so long.” Carol Tavris 1
Summary:
In excess of 90 children accused a total of 20 adults with 429 instances of child sexual abuse in a day care center in Edenton NC. Among the alleged perpetrators were the sheriff and mayor. Allegations included a baby killed with a hand gun, a child being hung upside down from a tree and being set on fire. Nobody in town noticed a baby missing. Needless to say, charges were never laid against the mayor or sheriff.
Robin Byrum, Darlene Harris, Elizabeth “Betsy” Kelly, Robert “Bob” Kelly, Scott Willard Privott, Shelly Stone, and Dawn Wilson were charged with engaging in various sexual activities with children in the Kellys’ day care in 1989. Bob Kelly and Dawn Wilson were found guilty of multiple charges of child sex abuse and given long sentences. Betsy Kelly and Willard Privott pleaded “no contest” and were released. The charges against the other three were dropped. Convictions were overturned on appeal and new trials ordered. The cases were finally settled in 1999 when all charges were dropped against Kelley.
The Cases:
These charges relate to the Little Rascal’s Day Care in Edenton. It is perhaps the second most famous day care ritual abuse case in North America (after the McMartin Preschool in CA.) The PBS program Frontline has produced a series of three powerful documentary episodes on this case, called Innocence Lost. 2 It showed that the various ingredients of a typical MVMO abuse case were present in Edenton:
no physical evidence that any actual abuse or killing happened.
hysteria by the parents, investigators and general public.
lack of evidence which would have been present if the children had actually been abused.
the alleged abuse happened even as parents were coming to and fro during the day; nobody noticed anything strange at the day care center.
the children initially denied that anything “funny” happened at the day care; but the interviewers did not believe the children.
after months of extensive interviewing, using what are now known to be manipulative, suggestive techniques, children started to disclose abuse events. This was assisted by communications among parents who also grilled their children
all of the documentation and tapes of the children’s initial interviews were lost or destroyed.
testimony described a long string of physically impossible or highly improbable events
nobody seems to have asked the logical question: how could 7 to 20 adults form a conspiracy and abuse children hundreds of times, without any child complaining or without any parent noticing something amiss?
Some of the children’s disclosures included:
being taken to the back room of a store and sexually abused. There is a very wide opening between the back room and the rest of the store, so that any sexual abuse would have been perpetrated in the full view of customers.
being taken on board a space ship and flown into outer space where they were abused.
seeing a large fish tank where sharks were trained.
being taken on board a ship into the ocean and abused while trained sharks swam around the boat.
During the winter of 1988-1989, Edenton police attended a Satanic Ritual Abuse (SRA) seminar. The first allegation of abuse followed shortly afterwards. One theory is that the first mention of abuse followed the accidental hitting of a child at the day care; another story has the first allegation following intensive questioning of a child by his mother under the guidance of a SRA course attendee.
As in other MVMO cases, the children initially denied abuse at the school. However, after repeated interrogations, they started to reveal sexual and then ritual abuse. Children were criticized or rewarded in accordance with the abuse content of their stories……
“… When it comes to public provisions for children and families, the United States compares poorly with other advanced industrial nations such as France, Sweden, and Denmark.…”
True danger lies in the notion that the state should decide if you are parenting your kids correctly.
…Scotland wants to treat all families as potentially abusive and appoint a “named person” (that is, a guardian) as soon as the child is born and up through age 18 to oversee the parenting. This “shadow parent” would be empowered by the government under the Children and Young People (Scotland) Act, which will take effect in 2016.
It is based on the idea that a person who has been named by the state, touched on the shoulder, has a superior authority and insight to others. Those who have been ‘named’ are seen as better qualified to ‘safeguard’ the wellbeing of a whole nation’s children. Therefore, concern for children’s wellbeing becomes a state-appointed position.
…This is a new kind of parenting-by-surveillance…
And finally some comments from our Dear D-Pat. I do miss her so!
There’s more to it, to be honest. One of the questions a lot of new moms get from pediatricians is “does your child have his or her own room” or what are the sleeping arrangements. Frankly, that’s none of their business, but they are instructed to push separate sleeping quarters. One woman I know got trounced by her pediatrician for admitting that they did a family bed at the time. (her kids are older now, so I doubt that’s the case any more.) The push for that, as well as daycare, etc., is to play with the emotional development of children. Cultures that live in one common space don’t usually have issues with emotionally unstable kids.
As a supplement to your post, Henry Makow presented some of the tactics used according to one of the people controlling one of the media vehicles. He also talks about Aaron Russo’s interview with a much younger and more civilized Alex Jones where he talks about his friendship with one of the Rockefellers and their plans for all humans.
Myrna Blyth was the editor in chief of “Ladies Home Journal” from 1981 to 2002. In her book /”Spin Sisters”/ (2004) she says the media sold women “a career in exactly the same drum banging way that the Happy Homemaker had been sold to their mothers.” (38)
The Illuminati undermined women’s natural loving instincts using the following mantras:
1. *Men can no longer be trusted.* Using the “Lifetime Network” as an example, Blyth concluded “all men are 1) unfaithful rats 2) abusive monsters 3) dishonest scumbags, or 4) all of the above. Women on the other hand were…ubervictims [or] flinty achievers who triumph despite the cavemen who…want to keep them in their place.” (62-63)
2. *Women are victims by virtue of their sex.* Blyth says the media sends “one message loud and clear. Because we are women, we remain victims in our private lives, at work, in society as a whole.” (156) Thus women must have a sense of grievance, entitlement and rebellion. The same tactic was used to manipulate Jews, Blacks, workers and gays. (See my “Victim as Moral Zombie”)
3. *Women should be selfish.* “Liberation and narcissism have merged,” Blyth says. Leisure now means, “time for yourself, spent alone, or perhaps with one’s girlfriends but definitely without spouse and kids…Endless articles preached the new feminist gospel, that indulging yourself is an important part of being a healthy, well adjusted woman.” (65)
4. *Sex is not reserved for love and marriage.* Magazines like Glamour and Cosmopolitan urge young women to “put out on their first date,” ogle men openly” and be an athlete in bed. There is no discussion of marriage or family. (160) Such women will not be able to trust any man enough to surrender themselves.
5. *Self-fulfillment lies in career success and not husband and family.* “The social rewards of holding down a job are critical to one’s sense of dignity and self worth,” Betty Friedan pontificated. In fact, “most work is deeply ordinary,” Blyth observes (35-36). (I’m not saying women can’t have jobs, only they shouldn’t be tricked out of having families if they want them.)
Thus many women are schizophrenic as they attempt to reconcile their natural instincts with a constant exhortation to do the opposite. The wreckage — broken families and dysfunctional people — is strewn everywhere.
At the same time, Playboy Magazine etc. aimed a similar message at men. You don’t need to get married to have sex. Marriage and children are a bore.
Today we see the results of a century plus campaign WAR against the USA. It is amazing we even have any well adjusted children!
