Health Friday Open Thread 2.7.2025: Lack of True “Informed Consent” and the COVID-19 “Vaccines”

The above vintage image of vaccine vials and vaccine syringes is courtesy of Shutterstock and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s post speaks to the disaster of the COVID-19 BTI (Bioweapon Toxin Injections, aka the “vaccines”), Yours Truly dedicates it to the memory of all persons, or whatever age or location, who have passed away from the negative effects (direct or indirect) of the the COVID-19 “vaccines”, no matter whether the deceased were COVID-19 “vaccinated” or not.

A special note for today’s post: Of your charity, please pray for the repose of the soul of our good DePat (Deplorable Patriot), Susan P. Sampson. Her Funeral Mass is to be held tomorrow, Saturday 8 February, at the St. Roch Roman Catholic Church in St. Louis, Missouri, at 10AM Central Standard Time. Of your charity, please pray for the repose of the soul of Yours Truly’s “fully vaccinated and boosted” brother, Sam. His Memorial Service is to be held tomorrow, Saturday 8 February, at the Peeples Valley Baptist Church in Cartersville, Georgia, at 2PM Eastern Standard Time. Thank you.

Requiem aeterna dona eis, Domine; et Lux Perpetua luceat eis. Requiescant in pace. Amen.

However, the discussion is not limited to what is presented today: It is an Open Thread.

There are Important Wolf Moon Notifications, the Rules of our late, good Wheatie, and certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here.

Today’s post begins here: https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/labeling-deceits-and-omissions-and, “Labeling deceits and omissions, and fake informed consent for vaccines and other legalized biological and chemical weapons.”, by Katherine Watt, 29 January 2025. In this post, Ms. Watt describes the lack of transparency and honesty in several areas of these topics, among them: One, in the labeling of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”; and, Two, in the lack of detailed informed consent documents for people who want to take (or are “mandated” to take) injections of the COVID-19 modRNA “vaccines.” Ms. Watt traces this trail of lies and deceit back at least 1902. Below are some screenshots from her article related to the COVID-19 “vaccines”:

Ms. Watt makes it clear that “our betters” do NOT want the people who took / who continue to take, the COVID-19 “vaccines” to really know what is in the “modRNA” of the injections.

There is another issue regarding the lack of true informed consent regarding the COVID-19 “vaccines” — the fact that the FDA has made it virtually impossible for COVID-19 “vaccinated” people who become “vaccine”-injured, acquire an illness after being “vaccinated”, or even die from the negative effects of these bioweapon injectables, to be able to sue the “vaccines” manufacturers, those who administer these “vaccines”, entities who “require” or “mandate” the taking of these ‘vaccines”, or agencies of the Federal government who push these “vaccines.” The FDA has done this by making BOTH the Emergency Use Authorization AND “full approval” applicable to the COVID-19 “vaccines” in use, thereby “insulating” the above entities and persons from liability.

For example: the “2024-2025 COVID-19 Vaccine” by Pfizer-BioNTech and by Moderna. The FDA issued the following on 22 August 2024: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-and-authorizes-updated-mrna-covid-19-vaccines-better-protect-against-currently, “FDA Approves and Authorizes Updated mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines to Better Protect Against Currently Circulating Variants”. Below are screenshots from this announcement:

Next screenshot:

Followed by:

Finally:

The FDA approved the use of COMIRNATY (Pfizer-BioNTech) in people OVER 11 YEARS OF AGE. The FDA also authorized the use of “Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine (2024-2025 Formula” to be used in people FROM 6 MONTHS THROUGH 11 YEARS OF AGE. Also — notice that the COMIRNATY approval was granted to the GERMAN partner of PfizerUSA (BioNTech Manufacturing GmbH); and that the “Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine (2024-2025 Formula” authorization was granted to Pfizer Inc.

But wait, there’s more! Under the “magic” of legalese and bureaucratic obfuscation, here are the links to the websites that the FDA and Xavier Becerra (then-head of HHS) used to perform the “sleight of hand” to grant EXEMPTION FROM LIABILITY to the makers of the “2024-2025 Formula COVID-19 Vaccines” for BOTH the “approved” AND the “authorized” formulations of these injectables. It’s all under the PREP Act:

One: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/12/11/2024-29108/12th-amendment-to-declaration-under-the-public-readiness-and-emergency-preparedness-act-for-medical. “12th Amendment to the Declaration Under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act for Medical Countermeasures Against COVID-19”, 11 December 2024.

Two: https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/mcm-legal-regulatory-and-policy-framework/emergency-use-authorization.

Regarding a current “Informed Consent” document for the general public, Yours Truly found the following from a search that began here: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/vis/index.html, which eventually (via being “redirected” from other CDC websites that are now shut down with the “The page you are looking for doesn’t exist”-type error messages) led to this: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/current-vis/covid-19.htmlCDC_AAref_Val=https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/vis/vis-statements/covid-19.html. It turns out that the “Informed Consent” handouts for patients / caregivers appear to be basically a “Pablum” version of government and/or “vaccine” manufacturer misinformation, disinformation, and downright lies, about the COVID-19 BTI (Bioweapon Toxin Injections, aka the “vaccines”) that the patient is going to have injected into their body (or that parents / guardians are going to have injected into the body of a minor child.)

Let’s look at some screenshots of this FDA-issued Fact Sheet for recipients and caregivers for the EUA-granted “Pfizer-BioNTech 2024-2025 Formula COVID-19 Vaccine” for children 6 months of age to 11 years of age, as an example. The FDA document is found here: https://www.fda.gov/media/167212/download.

Screenshot One:

The COVID-19 pandemic Public Health Emergency declaration in the United States was ended on 11 May 2023: https://archive.cdc.gov/www_cdc_gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/your-health/end-of-phe.html. There is no “currently a pandemic of COVID-19”, per the CDC itself.

Screenshot Two:

The COVID-19 “vaccines” do not “prevent” an infection of COVID-19. In fact, COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons have a much higher chance of coming down with COVID-19. Please see: https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/breaking-sixth-study-confirms-negative, “BREAKING — Sixth Study Confirms Negative Efficacy of COVID-19 mRNA Injections”, by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 4 February 2025. The only items, in Yours Truly’s opinion, in the screenshot above that might prompt a medical professional to stop and question whether or not the child should take a COVID-19 “vaccine” would be: an allergy to PEG-2000DMG (one of the lipid nanoparticles in the “vaccine”) or to any of the ingredients of the “vaccine”; a history of myocarditis and/or pericarditis; or has a bleeding disorder. On the other hand, in fact, pregnant women are “encouraged” to take a COVID-19 “vaccine”; and, that immunocompromised persons are “permitted” to take an “extra dose” of a COVID-19 “vaccine.”

Screenshot Three:

So much important information and disclosures regarding the ACTUAL “safety record” of the COVID-19 “vaccines” (for example, the data at https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data); the ACTUAL “clinical trials” data that, for example, Pfizer-BioNTech gave to the FDA regarding the serious Adverse Events reports on BNT162b2; and other items, are missing. The OpenVAERS link takes one to the “Red Boxes” Adverse Events reports and statistics for the COVID-19 “vaccines.” Recall that VAERS receives fewer than 10% of reports of Adverse Events.

How many parents / guardians would go through with having their child (children) COVID-19 “vaccinated” if they knew, for example, that the ingredients and mechanisms of these bioweapon toxin injections change the DNA in their body? Please see: https://doctors4covidethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/causality-article.pdf, Slide 14.

Screenshot Four:

Which, again, mention nothing of the ACTUAL data as reported at OpenVAERS. Instead, there appears to be a strong effort to minimize the ACTUAL potential for serious Adverse Events to occur after taking a COVID-19 “vaccine.”

Yours Truly was able to find a “Consent Document” for persons over age 18 to read and to sign prior to taking a COVID-19 “vaccine”: https://www.gannon.edu/media/gannon-university/content-assets/documents/health-center/GannonUniversity-ScreeningAndConsentForCovid-19Vaccine.pdf. But, even here, there is no presentation of the ACTUAL data from, for example, OpenVAERS regarding serious Adverse Events reports about the COVID-19 “vaccines.” How many persons over age 18 would take a COVID-19 “vaccine” if they were told in advance that these bioweapon toxin injections cross the Blood-Brain Barrier and can induce multiple types of neurological damage? Below are images of the “Consent Document”:

Please also see: https://www.theqtree.com/2024/10/18/health-friday-10-18-2024-special-edition-neurological-effects-of-the-covid-19-vaccines-physical-and-psychological/.

How many persons would take a “2024-2025 Formula COVID-19 Vaccine”, or have such a “vaccine” injected into their child (children), under ANY circumstances, if they knew in advance that these bioweapon toxin injections were either ONLY “tested” on lab mice; or, were “approved” and/or “authorized” based on “manufacturing and nonclinical data”? For this last is exactly what happened with the “2024-2025 Formula COVID-19 Vaccines.” Please refer back to the FDA announcement of 22 August 2024 further up in this post. Here is the salient portion of this announcement as it regards this “2024-2025 Formula”:

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday 1.31.2025 Open Thread: HHS Gaslighting and Propaganda to Increase “Vaccines” Uptake

The above still image of Charles Boyer and Ingrid Bergman from the 1944 film, Gaslight, is courtesy of Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s post speaks to the disaster of the COVID-19 BTI (Bioweapon Toxin Injections, aka the “vaccines”), Yours Truly dedicates it to the memory of all persons, of whatever age or location, who have passed away from the negative effects (direct or indirect) of the COVID-19 “vaccines”, no matter whether the deceased were COVID-19 “vaccinated” or not. However, the discussion is not limited to what is presented here: It is an Open Thread.

There are Important Wolf Moon Notifications, the Rules of our late, good Wheatie, and certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here.

Yours Truly begins here: https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/the-evidence-is-clear-its-time-to, “The Evidence Is Clear: It’s Time to Permanently Ban the COVID-19 mRNA Injections”, by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, Epidemiologist, and Administrator of the McCullough Foundation, 18 January 2025. There is a video of an interview with Mr. Hulscher by Luiza Asyamova, along with links and graphics from numerous scientific papers, in this article. One of these linked papers is this: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14269255, “COVID-19 spike protein pathogenicity research library”, Dr. Martin Wulcher, Erik Sass, et al., 3 December 2024 (also found here: https://zenodo.org/records/14269255). There are over four hundred papers listed in this particular compilation.

Yours Truly will focus on one other linked item in the Nicolas Hulscher article cited above, regarding the activities of the United States Department of Health and Human Services to increase uptake of the COVID-19 “vaccines.” The first example is here: https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/the-us-hhs-risk-less-do-more-propaganda, “The U.S. HHS “Risk Less. Do More.” Vaccine Propaganda Campaign”, by Nicolas Hulscher, 19 December 2024. Below are two screenshots regarding the HHS campaign:

HHS launched this propaganda campaign a few months ago, under then-Secretary of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra. The agency has already released over 80 videos on its You Tube channels, among many other gaslighting / propaganda items, to “convince” Americans to get the COVID-19 BTI (Bioweapon Toxin Injections, aka the “vaccines”); the influenza virus “vaccines”; and the RSV (Respiratory Syncytial Virus) “vaccines.”

The agency, apparently, was already “alarmed” over the “lack of vaccine uptake” among Americans. Please see here: https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/americas-compliance-with-federal, “America’s Compliance with Federal Vaccine Recommendations as Collapsed”, by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 24 November 2024. The CDC’s MMWR (Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report) article regarding this issue is here: https://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7346a1, “Influenza, COVID-19, and Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccination Coverage Among Adults — United States, Fall 2024”, Jennifer L. Kriss, et al., 21 November 2024. The salient graphic from this article is below:

Turning to the HHS gaslighting / propaganda campaign, here is the “About the Campaign” webpage: https://www.hhs.gov/risk-less-do-more/about-campaign/index.html. Interested persons scroll down the page to find the “Navigate to:” section, and clicks on the “+” sign to redirect to various other gaslighting / propaganda items and links. Here is one such link: https://www.hhs.gov/risk-less-do-more/flu-covid-19-rsv-facts/index.html; please see the image below from this webpage, the “FAQ” statement regarding the COVID-19 “vaccines”:

Which is filled with, in YoursTruly’s opinion, misinformation, disinformation, and outright falsehoods (for example, not mentioning and even dismissing the increasing cases of serious adverse reactions from taking a COVID-19 BTI (the “vaccines”).)

But wait, there’s more! Here is the portion of the HHS gaslighting / propaganda website for medical professionals: https://www.hhs.gov/risk-less-do-more/for-health-care-providers/index.html. In this part of the HHS gaslighting / propaganda effort, one can read through the various “Use these on your “vaccine-hesitant” patients” techniques to “convince” them to agree to having one of the above “vaccines” injected into them. Below are examples from the “Discussion Guides” section of https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/talking-your-patients.pdf, “Talking to Your Patients About Flu, COVID-19, and RSV Vaccines” from the HHS gaslighting / propaganda website. Below are examples culled from this section: the first, how the physician is to “initiate” the gaslighting / propaganda discussion with a patient: and, the second, how the physician can “steer” the conversation if the patient is “vaccine-hesitant”:

Note that the image of the “patient” is that of an elderly male. There are similar “Discussion Guides” for the flu “vaccines” and for the RSV “vaccines.”

Yours Truly will also note the following regarding the above HHS gaslighting / propaganda campaign materials: One: The use of an “elderly male patient” in the example “discussion” with the physician. The CMS (Center for Medicare/Medicaid Services) is involved up their eyeballs in the campaign, due to the payments that CMS receives from every injection of a COVID-19 “vaccine”, an influenza “vaccine”, and/or an RSV “vaccine.” Please see here: https://www.cms.gov/medicare/payment/covid-19/coding-covid-19-vaccine-shots, updated 2 January 2025. And, Two: The AMA gets a “royalty payment” from every CPT code that is used for medical procedures or treatment billing, including injections of “vaccines” such as the ones listed above. This is because the AMA owns the rights to use the CPT codes. Please see here: https://www.ama-assn.org/practice-management/cpt/big-changes-will-streamline-cpt-coding-immunization, 5 January 2024. The “new, all-inclusive” CPT code for any “vaccine” injection administration is 90480.

So far, all of the above has applied to persons over age 18. What about persons under age 18? For this, Yours Truly turns to the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) “Redbook” post of 20 November 2024, found here: https://publications.aap.org/redbook/pages/Immunization-Schedules. “Immunization Schedules for 2025” PDF, subtitled “Child and Adolescent Immunization Schedule by Age.” These mirror the CDC Child and Adolescent Immunization Schedule, found here: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/imz-schedules/child-adolescent-age.html, 21 November 2024. These are CDC recommended immunization schedules; they are not the law. However, many state legislatures in the United States have adopted this recommended immunization schedule and turned it into state law for children who wish to attend school (public, but in some areas, also private or even home-school situations) within their state. For example, here is the link to the required “vaccines” schedule that children must take if they wish to got to public school in North Carolina: https://immunization.dph.ncdhhs.gov/schools/k-12.htm, “K-12 School Requirements – NC Immunization Branch”, 23 August 2024.

So, it would appear that the Department of Health and Human Services is engaged in a full-on gaslighting / propaganda campaign to “convince” American adults to take the COVID-19 “vaccines”; while, at the same time, the CDC immunization schedule for children and adolescents (which clearly indicates that the COVID-19 “vaccines”, along with the other “vaccines” on the schedule, are NOT law, but are recommended), have been added into state public school “vaccination schedules” statutes, thus making these recommendations the law of the state. Adults are free to refuse and and all recommended “vaccines”, but persons under age 18 are, in effect, required to take them if they wish to attend public school.

Then, there is the phenomenon of potential COVID-19 “vaccine” shedding. If adults who take a COVID-19 “vaccine” can potentially shed the ingredients of these injectables onto other persons, it would follow that children and adolescents who take these injectables can potentially shed the ingredients. And what about persons under age 18 who are immunocompromised? It is now known that the COVID-19 “vaccines” damage or destroy the natural immune system of the “vaccinated” person. The immune systems of the immunocompromised are already at risk; it can be fairly argued that taking a COVID-19 “vaccine” could put the already-at-risk natural immune system of these persons at further risk.

For more information regarding gaslighting and COVID-19, please see: https://www.theqtree.com/2023/10/06/pavacas-first-post/, “Friday, 10.6.2023 — Gaslighting in the Era of COVID-19”.

For more information regarding the potential for COVID-19 “vaccine” shedding, please see: https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/covid-19-vaccine-shedding-experiences, “What We’ve Learned from Over a Thousand Vaccine Shedding Reports”, by A Midwestern Doctor, 7 January 2024.

Nota Bene #1, 27 January 2025: The HHS, CDC, and NIH have been enjoined by the new Trump administration from publishing further updates to healthcare policies, procedures, or information, until further notice: https://brownstone.org/articles/the-big-freeze-at-hhs-cdc-and-nih/, by Jeffrey Tucker, 25 January 2025; also, please see here: https://www.statnews.com/2025/01/22/trump-administration-orders-health-communications-pause-cdc-hhs-fda/, “Trump administration freezes many health agency reports and posts”, 22 January 2025.

However, the other links above in today’s post are still active (at least until today 30 January 2025); it appears that the Trump administration order is not retroactive to 20 January 2025. Therefore, the “Discussion Guides”, the handouts, the billing / coding information, and so on, listed in today’s post, are likely still being used.

Nota Bene #2, 29 January 2025: A new paper has just been published by Peter A. McCullough, MD, Mary Talley Bowden, MD, et al., regarding a renewed demand to have ALL the COVID-19 “vaccines” withdrawn from the market immediately: https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/breaking-peer-reviewed-study-finds-5f1, “BREAKING — Peer-Reviewed Study Finds Irrefutable Evidence Supporting Immediate Market Withdrawal of COVID-19 “Vaccines””, by Nicolas Hulscher, 28 January 2025. The article is found here: https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/review-of-calls-for-market-removal-of-covid-19-vaccines-intensify-risks-far-outweigh-theoretical-benefits/, “Review of Calls for Market Removal of COVID-19 Vaccines Intensify: Risks Far Outweigh Theoretical Benefits.” Science, Public Health Policy and the Law. 2025, Jan28; v6.2019-2025. A screenshot of the Abstract is below:

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE. Yours Truly believes that the confirmation of Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., as the new Secretary of Health and Human Services needs to happen as soon as possible: so he can end the HHS gaslighting/propaganda efforts, to start.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday Open Thread 1.17.2025: A Letter to Incoming President Donald J. Trump and to Incoming HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

The above free image of a handwritten letter from 1889 is courtesy of Colourbox and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As this post speaks of the disasters of COVID-19 and of the COVID-19 BTI (Bioweapon Toxin Injections, aka the “vaccines”), it is dedicated to the memory of Yours Truly’s “fully vaccinated and boosted” late brother, Sam; to her late cousin, Bill; and to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have passed away from the negative effects (direct or indirect) of the COVID-19 “vaccines” they had in the their bodies. However, the discussion is not limited to what is presented today: It is an Open Thread.

There are Important Wolf Moon Notifications, the Rules of our late, good Wheatie, and certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here.

Herewith, the letter:

Dear Incoming President Donald J. Trump and Incoming Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.:

Greetings. This letter is from an independent researcher who has been writing about the COVID-19 virus and the COVID-19 “vaccines” for over four years.

The COVID-19 virus is, by now, a part of human life on this planet. It will continue to mutate and infect humans. The failed COVID-19 “vaccines” were developed and mandated for use on humans to “prevent” infection by this virus. The COVID-19 “vaccines” are not “safe and effective” as they are claimed to be by the CDC, the FDA, and many medical organizations. In fact, these injectables induce thousands of types of medical conditions; can aggravate existing medical conditions; re-establish previously-controlled medical conditions; induce COVID-19 infection; and more, among those who have COVID-19 “vaccines” in their bodies. For further information, please see the Appendix 1. List of Adverse Events of Special Interest section of the following document, given to the FDA by Pfizer-BioNTech on 30 April 2021, regarding the company’s modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” BNT162b2: https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf, “5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports of PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) Received Through 28-Feb-2021.”

It is now known that the COVID-19 virus was a lab-created biological weapon (bioweapon); and that the COVID-19 “vaccines” are lab-created and -enhanced biological weapons (bioweapons.) There were, and are, numerous entities and persons involved in the creation of this virus and these “vaccines” that must now be brought to justice for their activities. Among these activities was the deliberate withholding of vital information from you, President Trump, as then-President of United States, during “Operation Warp Speed”, which was part of the White House Coronavirus Task Force in your first administration. Please refer to: https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/2024.12.04-SSCP-FINAL-REPORT-ANS.pdf, “After Action Review of the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Lessons Learned and a Path Forward”, by the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, Chairman Brad Wenstrup, for more information regarding the development of the COVID-19 virus and of the COVID-19 “vaccines.”

To gain more knowledge regarding the disaster of the COVID-19 virus and the COVID-19 “vaccines”, please refer to: https://kirschsubstack.com/p/game-over-medicare-data-shows-the, “GAME OVER: Medicare data shows the COVID vaccines increase your risk of dying”, by Steve Kirsch, 2 February 2023; and, also:

https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/covid-19-vaccine-shedding-experiences “What We’ve Learned from Over a Thousand Vaccine Shedding Reports”, by A Midwestern Doctor, 7 January 2024 (detailing the phenomenon of COVID-19 “vaccine” shedding, and how such shedding affects people); and, also:

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/63-peer-reviewed-studies-link-covid, “63 Peer-Reviewed Studies Link COVID-19 ‘Vaccination’ to the Emergence of Vaccine-Resistant Viral Variants”, by Nicolas Hulscher, 3 January 2025. Please see the image below from this paper:

The following website lists links to contracts between the United States government and Pfizer-BioNTech related to the COVID-19 issue: www.keionline.org/covid-contracts, “COVID-19 Contracts.” These contracts involve the Department of Defense; the Department of Health and Human Services; the Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response (ASPR); the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA); the National Institutes of Health (NIH); and the National Institute for Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID.) There are also links to contracts between the United States government and other companies related to COVID-19. These include companies such as, Glaxo-Smith-Kline; Johnson & Johnson; Moderna; and Novavax, among many others.

The following paper details how the dangerous lipid nanoparticles in the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” spread the ingredients of these “vaccines” throughout the body, inducing changes body-wide, particularly in the heart: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-024-02528-1, “Nanocarrier imaging at single-cell resolution across entire mouse bodies with deep learning”, Hendrik Dietz, et al., 14 January 2025. Please see the image of the Abstract from this paper, below:

Please also see the image below, from the blog post by Dr. Jessica Rose, PhD, which discusses the above paper (https://jessicar.substack.com/p/lnp-spike-mrna-induction-of-changes, “LNP spike mRNA induction of changes in proteins related to vasculature formation and maintenance (collagen) in the heart”, 15 January 2025):

And, regarding holding entities and persons to account for their roles in the double disaster of the lab-created COVID-19 and of the lab-created and -enhanced COVID-19 “vaccines”, please see: www.theqtree.com/2024/11/15/health-friday-11-15-2024-open-thread-hold-them-accountable-edition/, by PAVACA.

President Trump and Mr. Kennedy, Jr.: The double disaster of the lab-created bioweapon called the COVID-19 virus, and the disaster of the lab-created and -enhanced bioweapons called the COVID-19 “vaccines”, must not ever be allowed to occur again. The entities and persons involved in the creation of this double disaster must be held accountable. In addition: The use of the COVID-19 “vaccines” must be stopped immediately, for all age groups, until complete, detailed, and proper clinical trials are held regarding these products, with all data fully collected, analyzed, and published for the public to see. And, President Trump: Mr. President, it is also incredibly important that those who deliberately withheld from you, or minimized to you, information that you needed to know during “Operation Warp Speed” in your previous administration, be held accountable.

It is also imperative that all medical professional organizations, state medical licensing boards, and specialty medical certification granting organizations, which currently require their applicants, licensees, and certification holders, to be COVID-19 “vaccinated”, to use only FDA-approved prophylactics and/or treatments for COVID-19, and to urge these products on their patients, be enjoined to end these requirements. Furthermore, access to, and use of, prophylactic and/or treatment options for COVID-19 that are safe and effective, such as, Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, Quercetin, Zinc, and Vitamin D, must become available to all persons, including to persons with COVID-19 infection, whether they are hospitalized or not. In addition, medical professionals who choose to treat patients with the products listed above must not become subject to “professional discipline” protocols, or to have their License to Practice Medicine and/or their specialty medicine certifications restricted or revoked.

With Peace, Good Energy, and great Respect, from an independent COVID-19 researcher,

PAVACA

Health Friday Open Thread 1.10.2025: p53, SV40, the COVID-19 “Vaccines”, and Cancer: With a Note on the Virus Itself

The above free vintage image of a medical doctor performing an exam on the larynx of a patient is courtesy of Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. Since today’s post speaks of the disaster of the COVID-19 virus itself, and of the COVID-19 BTI (aka the “vaccines”), it is dedicated to the memory of Yours Truly’s COVID-19 “fully vaccinated and boosted” late brother, Sam; to her late cousin, Bill; and, to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have passed away from the negative effects, direct or indirect, of the COVID-19 “vaccines” that they had in their bodies.

There are Important Wolf Moon Notifications, the Rules of our late, good Wheatie, and certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here.

This week’s Health Friday post concerns the ingredients and mechanisms of the COVID-19 BTI in the inducement of cancer in “vaccinated” persons. There is also a role to play here for the COVID-19 virus itself.

Yours Truly begins with examples of studies that prove the COVID-19 BTI (aka the “vaccines”) induce cancer: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2022.113008. “Innate immune suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes, and MicroRNAs”. Stephanie Seneff, Peter A. McCullough, et al., June 2022. Below are Table 6 and Table 7 from this paper:

And, from this paper: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9876036/, “Potential health risks of mRNA-based vaccine therapy: A hypothesis”, K Acevedo-Whitehouse and R Bruno, 25 January 2023. Below are two screenshots from the paper:

Another paper, which details damage in the “vaccinated” person’s body to the p53 tumor suppressor protein, plus damage to / interference with, the type I Interferon response (also called type I IFN response), is here: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.50703, “SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination and the Multi-Hit Hypothesis of Oncogenesis”, R.P. Angues and Y.P. Bustos, 17 December 2023. Below is the salient graphic from this paper:

**** Note that cancer can be fostered and/or metastasized by either COVID-19 “vaccination”, or by the COVID-19 virus itself. More on that later on in today’s post.

And, to “tie it all together” regarding the confirmation of the presence of “loose DNA” and the SV40 African Green Monkey cancer promoter gene piece in the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, this paper, by three high school students who worked in an FDA-supervised lab in Maryland: https://jhss.scholasticahq.com/article/127890-a-rapid-detection-method-of-replication-competent-plasmid-dna-from-covid-19-mrna-vaccines-for-quality-control, TJ Wang, A Kim, K Kim, 29 December 2024. The Wang, Kim, and Kim paper is further discussed here: https://blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/exclusive-fda-lab-uncovers-excess, “EXCLUSIVE: FDA lab uncovers excess DNA contamination in COVID-19 vaccines”, 2 January 2025. By the way, the Wang, Kim, and Kim paper was peer-reviewed prior to publication.

One important item that links all of the above is what the COVID-19 “vaccines” do to the p53 protein in the human body. P53 (also called TP53, or Tumor Protein 53) prevents the formation of cancer in the body. Please see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P53. The modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” manufactured by Pfizer-BioNTech damage the p53 in the “vaccinated” person’s body, (which then interferes with and/or “disables”, the ability of p53 to “detect” and prevent the formation of cancer tumors in the “vaccinated” person’s body) via the SV40 African Green Monkey cancer promoter gene code piece that is present in this company’s modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.“

Scientific researchers have been experimenting for years with the SV40 cancer promoter and its interaction to interfere with and/or to suppress, the p53 tumor suppressor protein. Here are examples of published papers on the topic:

One: https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.19.4.2746. “New Insights into the Mechanism of Inhibition of p53 by Simian Virus 40 Large T Antigen”, Hilary M. Sheppard, et al., April 1999. Below are two images from this paper:

Note that the “monkey – human” amino acid percentage of “identicalness” of p53 is much higher than that of the “mouse – human” percentage.

The “Hudson, Colvin” paper from 2016 details how SV40 suppresses p53, allowing tumors to form and grow: https://doi.org/10.1093/ilar/ilw001, “Transgenic Mouse Models of SV40-Induced Cancer”, Amanda L. Hudson, Emily K. Colvin, 31 March 2016. Below are images from this paper:

And, the Drayman, et al., 2016 paper: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5288138/, “p53 elevation in human cells halt SV40 infection by inhibiting T-ag expression”, Nir Drayman, et al., 21 July 2016. Below is Figure 7 from this paper:

The point here is that the p53 tumor suppressor does a good job of preventing SV40 cancer promoter cells from infecting the body and establishing oncogenic (cancer tumor) cells. And, that this knowledge has been around for some time.

Which brings one back to the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 BTI (aka the “vaccines”), and the discovery of “loose DNA” and of amounts of the SV40 cancer promoter gene code piece in these injectables. It is inconceivable that Pfizer-BioNTech did not know of the ability of the p53 protein in the human body to detect SV40 and then to prevent it from establishing oncogenic cells. It is also, in Yours Truly’s opinion, inconceivable that Pfizer-BioNTech can try to explain away this discovery by some kind of “Oops, we’re sorry, we didn’t mean to leave that stuff in the formulation of the product” hyperbole. The “loose DNA” (and, by extension, the SV40 cancer promoter gene code piece) are present in all the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” made by this company in the summer of 2020, when Pfizer-BioNTech “suddenly” switched the manufacturing process for BNT162b2 from the original “Process 1” method (not using an “extracts of E. coli bath” in the process), to the “Process 2” method (using an “extracts of E. coli bath” in the process) for use in the BNT162b2 (truncated and data-falsified) “clinical trials” going on at that time for this injectable; and which “Process 2” method has been used to manufacture the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” by this company since. Please also see here: www.theqtree.com/2023/11/06/the-infamous-process-2-manufacturing-method-for-the-pfizer-biontech-modrna-covid-19-vaccines/; the actual documentation that the company provided to the FDA regarding this change of manufacturing process is detailed.

Another piece to this situation is the fact that the modRNA COVID-19 BTI (aka the “vaccines”) contain dangerous lipid nanoparticles that quickly spread the contents (and, by extension, the mechanisms) of this injectables throughout the “vaccinated” person’s body. In addition, these lipid nanoparticles (ALC-0159 and ALC-0315 in the Pfizer-BioNTech BTI; and, SM-102 in the Moderna BTI) are specifically developed to evade the body’s natural “are you a friend or a foe” detection and elimination mechanisms. This is in addition to other excipients (adjuvants) in these injectables, such as PEG2000-DMG. Yours Truly has written extensively on these items and how they work to undermine / interfere with, the “vaccinated” body’s natural immune processes. Finally, there is the N1-Methylpseudouridine in BOTH the Pfizer-BioNTech AND the Moderna COVID-19 BTI. This lab-created compound was specifically developed to replace (remove) the natural Uridine RNA in the “vaccinated” body with “fake Uridine” plus a form of methane. In the specific case of N1-Methylpseudouridine, the consequences to the “vaccinated” body, BOTH in the physical AND in the psychological aspects, is profoundly negative. These are all aside from the addition of the SV40 cancer promoter in the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 “vaccines.”

Going back to the graphic from the “Angues and Bustos” paper regarding the fact that BOTH the COVID-19 itself, AND the COVID-19 BTI (aka the “vaccines”) can cause cancer. Below is a repeat of the graphic:

Notice the Impaired type I IFN response (type I Interferon) on the lower right of the graphic. This is another ingredient / mechanism of the COVID-19 virus itself (likely) AND of the COVID-19 BTI (definitely), the workings of which have also been studied and known for years. An example of a paper that speaks to this is here: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4666791/, “The Type I Interferons: Basic Concepts and Clinical Relevance in Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases”, Consuelo M Lopez-Padilla, Timothy B Niewold, PMC published 15 January 2017. Two images from this paper are below:

Please also see: https://wmcresearch.substack.com/p/a-unifying-theory-of-covid-19-pathogenesis, “A Unifying Theory of COVID-19 Pathogenesis, Combining Senescent, Cardiovascular, Oncogenic and Neurodegenerative Pathologies”, 4 April 2022.

Three points here, in Yours Truly’s opinion, regarding those who lab-created the COVID-19 virus itself, and those who lab-created the COVID-19 BTI (aka the “vaccines”): One: they knew exactly what things would: interfere with the body’s type I Interferon responses; interfere with and/or destroy elements of the body’s natural immune system (CD4 – CD8 cells, IgG3 cells, and so on); evade or interfere with, the body’s natural p53 tumor suppressor response to detect and eliminate the SV40 cancer promoter that would be present in the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 BTI; cross the Blood-Brain Barrier; and more. Two: they made sure that the COVID-19 virus itself is not “just another flu virus”, but, rather, a bioweapon that was lab-created from years of stunningly-detailed research and experimentation to wreak as much potential damage as possible on the person who contracts an infection of the virus itself. And, Three: they made sure that this created bioweapon virus would be the foundation of the COVID-19 “vaccines”; while, at the same time, limiting or denying access to simple and effective items that can successfully counteract the virus itself, such as Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, Zinc, Vitamin D, and Quercetin.

While it is true that the survival rate for non-COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons who contract a COVID-19 virus itself infection and recover is 99% for ages 0 to 65 years, and between 94% – 95% for ages 65 and above, an infection from the COVID-19 virus itself can still potentially damage the body. However, those who lab-created the COVID-19 virus itself did not reckon completely with the human body’s natural immune system’s ability to detect, fight off, and eliminate this bioweapon. In Yours Truly’s opinion, the COVID-19 “vaccines” were lab-created to “finish the job” in this regard: injections which were then “mandated” for people to take, to “keep themselves and others safe from the virus.” With the disastrous results that are now presenting worldwide.

There are several items that can support / supplement the p53 of the body. Here are some examples:

Green tea compound: www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/02/210212094113.htm, “Green tea compound aids p53, ‘guardian of the genome’ and tumor suppressor”, Chunyu Wang, et al., 12 February 2021.

Capsaicin: https://jeccr.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13046-016-0417-9, “Reactivation of mutant p53 by capsaicin, the major constituent of peppers”, Gabriella D’Orazi, et al., 6 September 2016.

Phenethyl isothiocyanate in the diet: www.nature.com/articles/cdd201648, “Reactivation of mutant p53 by a dietary-related compound phenethyl isothiocyanate inhibits tumor growth”, M Aggarwal, et al., 3 June 2016. This compound is also called “PEITC.” Natural sources of phenethyl include broccoli, watercress, cabbage, turnips, and radishes. More information can be found here: www.sciencedirect.com/topics/chemistry/phenethyl-isothiocyanate.

Finally, there is the phenomenon of shedding of the COVID-19 virus itself, and of the COVID-19 “vaccines.” It is not known at this time exactly what ingredients of these are shed. What IS known is that it is indeed happening, and that this shedding is negatively affecting the health of the people who are “shed upon.” A comprehensive article that explains this issue is here: https://pierrekorymedicalmusings.com/p/newly-published-study-shows-shedding, “Newly Published Study Shows Shedding of Covid mRNA Vaccine Products”. Pierre Kory, MD, 9 December 2024.

It is of the utmost importance that all people have, and maintain, the highest degree possible of general health; and, in particular, the health of their natural immune system.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

FLASH! Sunday 12 January 2025: ADDENDUM: Please see below, copied (and expanded here) from the main discussion thread today:

“WOLF MOON AND ALL — KEVIN McKERNAN FOUND THE MOAD REGARDING THE PFIZER-BIONTECH COVID-19 “VACCINES” AND TURBO-CANCERS:

The following is a “quick and dirty” summary. Yours Truly will append a “Flash! News” addendum to the body of the Health Friday post of two ago on the p53 cancer tumor suppressor gene and how SV40 interferes with it.

Summary:

One: Dr. Kevin McKernan ran the gene sequence from the cancer tumor biopsies and compared them to the gene sequence in the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 “vaccine.” There was a match. He also found traces of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 “vaccines” in the cancer tumors.

Two: At least one sequence match was made a year AFTER the patient had been COVID-19 vaxxed.

The article that talks about this: https://slaynews.com/news/top-scientist-sounds-alarm-traces-covid-vaccines-found-cancer-tumors/, “Top Scientist Sounds Alarm as Traces of Covid ‘vaccines’ Found in Cancer Tumors”, by Frank Bergman, 11 January 2025. There is a video in the article of an interview with COVID researcher John Beaudoin on this situation.

Screenshot from the above article:

There’s only one way that this can happen, IMO — it’s the SV40 African Green Monkey cancer promoter gene code piece that’s in the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 “vaccines.” The SV40 promoter interferes with the body’s p53 cancer suppressor protein.”

Yours Truly will amplify on the above.

First: IN ADDITION to SV40 interfering with the p53 cancer suppressor protein in the COVID-19 “vaccinated” person’s body, there is ALSO the damage / destruction of the crucial immune system IgG3 “fight it off” cells, instead fostering the increase of IgG4 “tolerate but never clear” cells. This “class switch” affects the entire body, “depressing” the natural immune “are you a friend or foe” mechanisms.

Second: The N1-Methylpseudouridine in the Pfizer-BioNTech AND in the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 BTI (aka the “vaccines”) replaces the RNA of the natural Uridine in the “vaccinated” person’s body. This ALSO interferes with / damages, the multiple body-brain interactions and mechanisms that natural Uridine regulates.

Third: There is ALSO the phenomenon of COVID-19 “vaccine” shedding by “vaccinated” persons to consider in this scenario. There are increasing reports of the negative effects that the ingredients (and, by extension, the mechanisms) of the COVID-19 “vaccines” do to non-“vaccinated” persons via this shedding. There is, in Yours Truly’s opinion, real potential for the SV40 cancer promoter that is in the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 “vaccines” to be shed from persons who have taken this “vaccine” onto other people, including onto non-“vaccinated” persons.

Below are two other screenshots from the Slay News article:

Links to two other articles from Slay News that are germane to the 11 January article: https://slaynews.com/news/top-surgeon-warns-aggressive-cancers-mutating-covid-vaxxed/, 27 October 2024 (with a video by British cancer surgeon, Dr. James Royle); and, https://slaynews.com/news/renowned-oncologist-evil-covid-vaccines-caused-turbo-cancer-explosion/, 17 December 2024 (an interview with British oncologist, Dr. Angus Dalgleish.)

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday Open Thread 12.27.2024: Year-End Wrap Up Edition

The above image of a year-end wrap up countdown is courtesy of The Productive Woman and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series related to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. Since today’s post mentions the COVID-19 virus itself, and the COVID-19 BTI (Bioweapon Toxic Injections, aka the “vaccines”), it is dedicated to the memory of Yours Truly’s “fully vaccinated and boosted” late brother, Sam; to her late cousin Bill; and, to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have passed away from the negative effects of the COVID-19 “vaccines” that they had in their bodies.

There are Important Wolf Moon Notifications, the Rules of our late, good Wheatie, and certain caveats by Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. These are linked here. The discussion is not limited to what is presented in today’s post: It is an Open Thread.

Yours Truly will begin the Health Friday 2024 Year-End Wrap Up Edition with these:

And, many people who did “shut up and obey” are starting to realize that they have likely permanently damaged their bodies (and brains) via the multiple negative effects of the COVID-19 BTI (Bioweapon Toxin Injections, aka the COVID-19 “vaccines”) that they had put into their bodies.

And, continues with these:

https://kirschsubstack.com/p/a-summary-of-the-evidence-against, “A Summary of the evidence against the COVID vaccines”, by Steve Kirsch, 6 January 2024.

www.theqtree.com/2024/11/01/health-friday-open-thread-11-1-2024-the-covid-19-vaccines-information-file-part-one/

www.theqtree.com/2024/12/20/health-friday-holiday-exchange-open-thread-12020.2024/.

And, some new information to help round out the year 2024:

From Steve Kirsch’s blog: https://kirschsubstack.com/p/the-cfr-from-the-pfizer-trial-show. “The CFR from the Pfizer trial show the vaccines make you 14X more likely to die from COVID”, 24 December 2024. Mr. Kirsch performed a statistical analysis of the Supplementary Table S4 of this 2021 paper: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2110345, “Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months”, Philip R. Dormitzer, M.D., Ph.D., et al, published 15 September 2021. There are over 25 authors of this paper. Most of them are affiliated with Pfizer-BioNTech, the developer (along with several other entities, such as the United States Department of Defense, United States Army) and manufacturer (along with the United States Department of Defense, United States Army) of BNT162b2. Apparently, the CDC never performed its own analysis of the data presented in the paper. Mr. Kirsch performed the first real analysis. Here is his conclusion (from his blog post):

CFR = Case Fatality Rate. Below is the Supplementary Table S4 from the paper:

Note that “Unblinding” means that Pfizer-BioNTech offered to give BNT162b2 injections to “Blinded” subjects in the C4591001 clinical trial. Most of the “Unblinded” participants accepted the offer and took the injections. This also means that data collected from the “Blinded” subjects after they took the injections is potentially compromised. However, even with this caveat, the data on the Supplementary Table S4 confirm that persons who took BNT162b2 had adverse events that the “Placebo” (“Blinded”) group did not have.

From Mole at Substack, an important post regarding “educated hesitancy” about “new drugs and novel vaccines”: https://mole.substack.com/p/c-and-c-today-new-peer-reviewed-study, “C&C today: new peer-reviewed study tears jabs a new one”, 23 December 2024. The paper referred to is here: https://journals.sagepub.com/10.1077/09246479241292008. “Pharmaceutical product recall and educated hesitancy towards new drugs and novel vaccines”, Peter Rhodes and Peter I Perry, 6 November 2024. Below is a graphic from this paper, followed by the Conclusion:

Then, two blog posts from Nick Hunt (Daily Sceptic): https://dailysceptic.org/2024/10/08/the-hidden-report-that-shows-up-to-40-more-heart-conditions-in-the-vaccinated/; and, https://dailysceptic.org/2024/12/11/revealed-the-full-hidden-pfizer-report-that-shows-heart-conditions-in-the-vaccinated-getting-worse-over-time/. Mr. Hunt was able to procure a copy of this confidential Pfizer-BioNTech report of March 2024. It is here: https://dailysceptic.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/06-C4591021-interim5-report-body.pdf. In Yours Truly’s opinion, this Interim Report by Pfizer-BioNTech given for the European Union Post-Authorization Study for BNT162b2 is dynamite. The statistics related to cardiovascular events begins on page 119 of the report. **** Note: It is important to also recognize, per the statistics in this report, that the COVID-19 virus itself can, and does, cause multiple types of adverse events in and of itself. However, in the vast majority of the statistical tables in this report, the incidence of adverse events reported among the COVID-19 “vaccinated”, especially as regards cardiovascular events, is higher. Below is page 119 of the Pfizer-BioNTech report:

And, to finish the 2024 wrap-up, the link to Katherine Watt’s Substack blog, Bailiwick News, listing and detailing the multiple signed (and, in some cases, also not redacted) agreements between the United States Department of Defense, United States Army, regarding the development, manufacturing, and distribution for administration, of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 BTI (Bioweapon Toxin Injection, aka COVID-19 “vaccine”) BNT162b2: https://bailiwicknews.com/p/on-contracts-consortium-agreement. “On contracts: consortium agreement; base agreement; technical direction letter-statement of work; project agreement”, 9 December 2024 (repost of her 28 April 2023 post.) The post is long and very detailed. It is worth reading through. There is much information in the documents that blows the lid off the cooperation between the Defense Department / United States Army, and Pfizer-BioNTech. This is, in Yours Truly’s opinion, a chain of documents that must be brought to the attention of both Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., (as the incoming Secretary of Health and Human Services); and, incoming President of the United States Donald J. Trump, on 20 January 2025, after President Trump is inaugurated the 47th President of the United States.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

Yours Truly urges all readers to build and maintain the highest possible degree of general health, and also the health of their natural immune systems. One also urges all readers who may be COVID-19 “vaccinated” to seriously consider investigating, and following, a COVID-19 “vaccine” detoxification / mitigation protocol, such as the ones listed on the FLCCC website: https://covid19criticalcare.com/.

Yours Truly wishes all readers a healthy New Year 2025! Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

STOP PRESS: New Study Confirms the Shedding of the COVID-19 BTI (Bioweapon Toxin Injections, aka the COVID-19 “Vaccines”)

The above royalty-free image of vintage vaccine vials and syringes is courtesy of Shutterstock and Google Images.

This post is a STOP PRESS offering. It details what is, in Yours Truly’s opinion, indisputable confirmation that the ingredients (and, by extension, the mechanisms) of the COVID-19 BTI (Bioweapon Toxin Injections, aka the COVID-19 “vaccines”) do indeed shed onto other persons, including onto non-“vaccinated” persons; and, that this shedding can result in multiple negative effects.

Since this post relates to the COVID-19 BTI (the COVID-19 “vaccines”), it is dedicated to the memory of Yours Truly’s COVID-19 “vaccinated” brother, Sam, and to her cousin, Bill; and, to all persons who have passed away as a result (direct or indirect) of the COVID-19 BTI they have taken.

There are Important Wolf Moon Notifications, the Rules of our late, good Wheatie, and certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. The discussion is not limited to what is presented in this post.

There. Must. Be. Justice.

Yours Truly begins with the following blog post by Dr. Pierre Kory: https://pierrekorymedicalmusings.com/p/newly-published-study-shows-shedding, “Newly-Published Study Shows Shedding Of Covid mRNA Vaccine Products”, 9 December 2024. The study referred to is here: https://doi.org/10.56098/tp99wn15, “Menstrual Abnormalities Strongly Associated with Proximity to COVID-19 Vaccinated Individuals”, Sue E. Peters, PhD, James A. Thorp, MD, et al., 7 December 2024. This paper is HUGELY important as regards not only proof that the COVID-19 BTI (the COVID-19 “vaccines”) do indeed shed, but ALSO that there are multiple negative effects of this shedding for females who are in their childbearing years. Several screenshots from the paper are below, starting with the Abstract:

Then, a diagram of the non-COVID-19 “vaccinated” subgroup of females in the study:

Followed by a table listing the menstrual abnormalities reported among the non-COVID-19 “vaccinated” females who were in close proximity to COVID1-19 “vaccinated” persons:

Finally, the Conclusion of the paper:

The “exposure radius” for the cohort set of non-COVID-19 “vaccinated” females was 6 feet (or shorter) to COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons. These females reported the same types of menstrual issues that have been reported by COVID-19 “vaccinated” females.

Dr. Kory cites another paper, by independent researcher Helene Banoun, from 2023, which is also important to the situation. It is here: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241310514, “mRNA: Vaccine or Gene Therapy? The Safety Regulatory Issues”, Helene Banoun, 21 June 2023.

There is now MUCH more than meets the eye regarding the shedding of the COVID-19 BTI (the COVID-19 “vaccines”), as found here (and also cited by Dr. Kory): www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/covid-19-vaccine-shedding-experiences, “What We’ve Learned from Over a Thousand Vaccine Shedding Reports”, by A Midwestern Doctor.

Back to the blog post by Dr. Pierre Kory: It is long and detailed, but Dr. Kory and A Midwestern Doctor have compiled an enormous amount of information about the COVID-19 BTI shedding phenomenon. Dr. Kory’s post has a list of chapters that have organized the material. Following are some screenshots from his post:

The above screenshot is from the Peters, Thorp, et al., paper cited above, listing items related to the development and implementation of the COVID-19 BTI (the COVID-19 “vaccines”.) It is important to understand that the Pfizer-BioNTech “clinical trial” (C4591001) was stopped at six months, in order for the company to give the data collected up to that point to the FDA in the fall of 2020. [Yours Truly: The six month timeframe was between late April (the start of the “clinical trial”) and late October-early November of 2020.] This was done by Pfizer-BioNTech so that their “flagship” COVID-19 BTI (“vaccine”), BNT162b2, could get through the “review process” by the FDA prior to securing that agency’s initial EUA for the use of BNT162b2 in the United States (this initial EUA was granted by the FDA on 11 December 2020.) [Yours Truly: C4591001 was “resumed” after the initial EUA was granted, under various “subsection trials” listed on clinicaltrials.gov/.] It is important to understand that Pfizer-BioNTech KNEW that shedding of BNT162b2 could occur — which is why the company asked that subjects in the C4591001 clinical trial report any exposure to pregnant females, or to the partner of a pregnant female “prior to the time of conception” (translation: the company ALSO KNEW that the fertility of MALES can be damaged by BNT162b2.)

Dr. Kory and A Midwestern Doctor did a thorough job of collating and organizing the details of the over 1,000 reports they received regarding shedding of the COVID-19 BTI (the COVID-19 “vaccines”.) What follows is a description of some of these details.

**** It appears that the most common “avenue” for COVID-19 BTI shedding is via spike protein “carried” by exosomes of the “vaccinated” person’s body. That’s right — exosomes, that “shuttle service” within the human body. Please see: www.theqtree.com/2024/12/13/the-dna-in-the-pfizer-biontech-modrna-covid-19-bioweapon-toxin-injections-aka-the-vaccines/. A screenshot from this post, regarding exosomes, is below:

The exosomes that “shuttle” the COVID-19 BTI spike protein can be exhaled; they can be on the surface of the skin; and, they can be “transferred” during sexual intercourse.

**** The post by Dr. Kory contains several sections in addition to the Chapters section. Some of the sections include:

“Evidence For Person-to-Person Shedding“

“Routes of Exposure” (exhalation; hugging [non-sexual]; sexual intercourse; skin-to-skin)

“Most Common Symptoms” of COVID-19 BTI (the “vaccines”) shedding: in females: menstrual abnormalities, including pregnancy termination; other types of gynecological issues; in men: groin pain; in general: headache; tinnitus; nose bleeds; painless bruising; dizziness; brain fog; immune-suppression symptoms; Shingles; skin rashes

“Less Frequent Symptoms“: Atrial fibrillation; muscle pain; seizures; insomnia; vision / eye problems, including microclots to the eyes.

“Rarer Symptoms“: blood clots; cancers; and, anxiety, among them.

**** Below is a screenshot of the graphic from Dr. Kory’s post, listing the symptoms:

**** Dr. Kory adds an important caveat, the “Clinical Guidance” section of his post. A screenshot from this section is below:

Yours Truly has written about the importance for non-COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons to NOT make themselves into “hermits”, to NOT stay away from “vaccinated” friends and family, and so on. On the other hand, in addition to the above from Dr. Kory, it may be worthwhile to wash the hands frequently; and, to consider using disposable gloves when putting gas into the car, or perhaps in a healthcare setting, and the like. It is also imperative for people to have, and to maintain, their general health and the health of their immune system at the best level possible.

**** And, continuing from there, part of the “Protection Strategies” section:

Yours Truly here. Now that it is confirmed that the COVID-19 BTI (the COVID-19 “vaccines”) do indeed shed, and can shed onto non-“vaccinated” persons, questions arise: Does this mean that any of the N1-Methylpseudouridine in the COVID-19 BTI can also shed via the “shuttle service” of the exosomes? What about the lipid nanoparticles in these injectables? And, since nobody really knows how long the COVID-19 BTI work in the body of the “vaccinated” person, how long does this shedding continue? What about shedding among COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons — are they constantly exposing other “vaccinated” persons to the ingredients (and mechanisms) of these injectables?

And, there is this, from Sasha Latypova: https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/robert-malones-limited-hangout-confession, 11 December 2024. A screenshot of the post’s title is below:

For more information regarding the shedding of the COVID-19 BTI (the COVID-19 “vaccines”), please see: www.theqtree.com/2024/03/25/the-elephant-in-the-room-shedding-of-both-the-covid-19-virus-itself-and-the-covid-19-vaccines/.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday Open Thread 12.13.2024: The DNA in the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 Bioweapon Toxin Injections (aka the COVID-19 “Vaccines”)

The above free vintage image of DNA strands is courtesy of Shutterstock via Google Images.

Health Friday is a series of posts related to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. Since today’s post is related to the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, it is dedicated to the memory of Yours Truly’s COVID-19 “vaccinated” late brother, Sam, and to her late cousin Bill; and to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have passed away from the negative effects (direct or indirect) of the COVID-19 “vaccines” that they took.

There are Important Wolf Moon Notifications, the Rules of our late, good Wheatie, and certain Yours Truly caveats, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. The discussion today is not limited to what is presented below: It is an Open Thread.

Above all — There. Must. Be. Justice.

To Begin: Yours Truly will now change the name of the COVID-19 “vaccines” to reflect what they really are — dangerous and deadly bioweapons injections:

COVID-19 Bioweapon Toxin Injections (COVID-19 BTI). They are NOT “vaccines.” The FDA, the CDC, and the makers of these injections/injectables KNOW THIS. If Yours Truly refers to these injectables as “vaccines”, it is for “convenience-recognition” only, e.g., as in scientific papers or in media headlines.

Today’s post is a confirmation and an amplification regarding the discovery of large amounts of “free” DNA residue in vials of the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 modRNA BTI, BNT162b2. The trail begins here: https://jessicar.substack.com/p/a-new-paper-confirms-presence-of, A new paper confirms presence of DNA in COVID-19 shot vials, settles issues pertaining to DNA quantification models, shows spike persistence and exosomal shuttling (shedding), by Jessica Rose, PhD., 4 December 2024. Yours Truly will address this article and the paper that it cites, in addition to some earlier papers by other researchers on the topic. The “weave” of today’s post is somewhat dense — the depth of the perfidy behind BNT162b2 is wide and deep. Please bear with me.

The paper to which Dr. Rose refers is here: https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/biontech-rna-based-covid-19-injections-contain-large-amounts-of-residual-dna-including-an-sv40-promoter-enhancer-sequence/, Ulrike Kammerer et al., 3 December 2024. Read the paper’s title again — there are TWO types of DNA elements in the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 BTI, BNT162b2: what may be called “loose” DNA, plus an SV40 African Green Monkey cancer promoter-enhancer genome code sequence. The salient graphics regarding this from the paper are below:

The Kammerer, et al., paper is hugely important. The multitude of tests and assays that were performed on the samples from the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 BTI vials is not only incredibly thorough; it is also stunning. Several earlier hypotheses (and evidence from previous scientific papers and articles) regarding these injectables are now confirmed:

One: More of the ingredients of the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 BTI are confirmed — “loose” DNA; the SV40 African Green Monkey cancer promoter-enhancer genome code sequence; the presence of HEK293 cells (aborted fetal cells); the presence of the antibiotic, Neomycin (a drug that treats bacterial infections); and, ORI replicons in the plasmids in the injectable. ORI replicons are the things that “teach” the “vaccinated” person’s body to make copies of the spike protein — in other words, a type of self-amplifying modRNA mechanism is introduced into the body. Plasmids are tiny DNA molecules that are inside a cell; plasmids are not chromosomal DNA and can independently reproduce themselves. An image of plasmids inside a cell is below (courtesy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasmid):

Two: The amount of “loose” DNA in BNT162b2 is well above EMA (European Medicines Agency) limits. A screenshot of Figure 2. section D, of the Kammerer, et al., paper, below, clearly shows this:

Three: The presence of the DNA plasmids and of the SV40 African Green Monkey cancer promoter-enhancer gene code sequence were NOT disclosed to the FDA by Pfizer-BioNTech prior to that agency’s granting of the initial EUA for BNT162b2 on 11 December 2020 for this injectable’s use in the United States. The salient statement from the Kammerer, et al., paper, on this is below:

Yours Truly will note that the FDA also granted “full approval” of BNT162b2 in 2022, under the brand name COMIRNATY, and its “descendant clone” modRNA COVID-19 BTIs, including all “new formula” injections {such as the 2024-2025 COMIRNATY COVID-19 modRNA BTI.)

Four: There is a distinct possibility that BNT162b2 can “shed” from “vaccinated” persons onto other persons, via exosomal secretion. From the Discussion section of the Kammerer, et al., paper, below:

The COVID-19 modRNA BTIs are “shuttled” throughout the body of the person who takes these injectables. This “shuttling”, in part, is performed by exosomes. Exosomes are tiny elements that are formed by lipid bilayers and function as a kind of “shuttle service” within the body, carrying proteins, lipids, and other items to and from body organs, including to the skin. Please refer to: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35436552/, “Innate immune suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes, and MicroRNAs”, Stephanie Seneff, et al., 15 April 2022.

Scientific researchers have been experimenting with SV40 African Green Monkey cancer promoter-enchancer gene code since at least 1997. Please see: https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.71.1.427-436.1997, “Direct modulation of simian virus 40 late gene expression by thyroid hormone and its receptor”, Fengrong Zuo, Tod Gulick, et al. Below is a graphic of the SV40 gene code experiment, followed by a portion of the Discussion section of this paper:

Research has been performed regarding SV40-induced cancers, via “methylation.” Please refer to: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.cr.7290295, “Epigenetic changes in virus associated human cancers”, Hsin Pai Li, et al., 1 April 2005.

Two papers by Kevin McKernan have researched much of the information that the Kammerer, et al., paper has confirmed. One McKernan paper is here: https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/b9t7m, “Sequencing of bivalent Moderna and Pfizer mRNA vaccines reveals nanogram to microgram quantities of expression vector dsDNA per dose”, Kevin McKernan, et al., 10 April 2023. A graphic from this paper is below:

Please note that there are two separate SV40 elements in this graphic: the SV40 enhancer and the SV40 “signal” in the poly-A “tail” of BNT162b2.

The other McKernan paper is here, regarding DNA fragments in BOTH the Pfizer-BioNTech AND in the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 BTIs: https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/mjc97, “DNA fragments detected in monovalent and bivalent Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA COVID-19 vaccines from Ontario, Canada: Exploratory dose relationship with serious adverse events”, Kevin McKernan, et al., 19 October 2023.

Yours Truly now turns to the “primary source document” for BNT162b2, the International Patent declaration document for this injectable. It is found here: https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2021213945A1/en, published on 28 October 2021. Note: The patent number in the Kammerer, et al., paper (WO2021214204) is a another identifier for this patent. It is difficult to access the actual patent document by using this identifier on a search — the above Google URL is easy to find. Another patent number for BNT162b2, WO2021213924, is similarly difficult to find. Yours Truly suspects that these other patent documents and information were “subsumed” into WO2021213945A1.

Yours Truly found listed in the above document, among many other items:

One: That BNT162b2 targets the “vaccinated” person’s CD 4 and CD8 cells. Please see the screenshot, below, from the International Patent declaration:

Two: That BNT162b2 uses ** either ** N1-Methylpseudouridine, or pseudouridine, or 5-methyl-uridine, to replace the natural Uridine in the “vaccinated” person’s body. Please see the screenshot, below, from the International Patent declaration:

The reason why, in Yours Truly’s opinion, there are THREE different types of “fake” Uridine that can be used in BNT262b2 is because Pfizer-BioNTech wanted to have “maximum leeway” to choose any of these three types for use in various formulations and/or lots of BNT162b2. That’s why the words “in one embodiment” are used throughout the patent document. This “leeway” would also theoretically apply to any “descendant clone” modRNA COVID-19 BTI made by this company.

**** Three: Regarding the Kammerer, et al., paper: These researchers used “Sequence ID 16” (SEQ ID 16) in the BNT162b2 International Patent declaration as the basis for their tests and assays regarding the presence of “loose” DNA and the presence of the SV40 African Green Monkey cancer promoter-enhancer gene code piece. Below is a screenshot of the mention of this sequence, and the BNT162b2 patent that was used, by Kammerer, et al.

Yours Truly read through the patent document and found the only area that appears to match SEQ ID 16. A screenshot of this, from the patent document, is below:

From here, Yours Truly found a long list of the actual spike protein gene codes (S protein) in SEQ ID 16. This sequence begins with “hAg-Kozak“, which is important as regards “loose” DNA and the SV40 cancer promoter gene piece code. Please see the screenshot of the hAg-Kozak code, followed by a portion of the spike protein codes, below:

The hAg-Kozak codes are a kind of nucleic acid “pattern” that functions as a “protein initiation site” in mRNA applications (paraphrased from the hAg-Kozak entry at Wikipedia.)

Finally, a screenshot follows of the FI element and Poly-A tail gene codes in SEQ ID 16:

Recall that the Poly-A tail is the “signal” for the SV40 cancer promoter gene code piece in the McKernan paper, cited above.

Our gracious host, Wolf Moon, points out that the FI element is this, per the link here: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/65e702542f2b3bd5107cd85f/FOI_22-1116_-_attachment.pdf:

FI element (nucleotides 3864 to 4158): The 3′-UTR is a combination of two sequence elements derived from the “amino terminal enhancer of split” (AES) mRNA (called F) and the mitochondrial encoded 12S ribosomal RNA (called I). These were identified by an ex vivo selection process for sequences that confer RNA stability and augment total protein expression9

Wolf Moon continues: “So basically these are gene sequences that were found to work well as linkers which enhance production of the desired target (the spike protein), and are thus tacked onto the sequence for the spike. IMO they are a lot like the SV40 sequence for DNA, but they work at the mRNA level.”

Further discussion of the TWO separate SV40 cancer promoter elements in BNT162b2 are found in another item cited by the Kammerer, et al., paper: https://anandamide.substack.com/p/pfizer-and-moderna-bivalent-vaccines, “Pfizer and Moderna bivalent vaccines contain 20 – 35% expression vector and are transformation competent in E. coli”, 8 March 2023. A screenshot of their assessment of the SV40 cancer promoter and “signal” placements in BNT162b2 is below:

In Yours Truly’s opinion: What we have here was / is NOT a case of Pfizer-BioNTech saying, “Oops, forgot to remove the loose DNA from BNT162b2 before it was / is put into the vials”; NOR was it / is it, a case of, “Oops, forgot to remove the SV40 elements from the product before it was / is put into the vials.” Instead, it is deliberate inclusion of BOTH the “loose” DNA AND of the SV40 African Green Monkey cancer promoter-enhancer gene code piece into BNT162b2. It says it right there in the International Patent declaration for BNT162b2, the SEQ ID 16 listings. Since BNT162b2 is the basis for the “descendant clone” COVID-19 modRNA BTI by this company, plus the fact that all of these products are manufactured using the “Process 2” method (“marinating” the ingredients of the injectable in E. coli), Yours Truly will posit that it can be assumed that “loose” DNA and the SV40 promoter-enhancer gene codes are present in these “descendant clone” injectables, even if they are present in lesser amounts.

For more information regarding the “shedding” of modRNA COVID-19 BTI, please see: www.theqtree.com/2024/03/25/the-elephant-in-the-room-shedding-of-both-the-covid-19-virus-itself-and-the-covid-19-vaccines/.

For more information on the Process 2 manufacturing method that Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna use to produce BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 respectively (and their respective “descendant clone” modRNA COVID-19 BTI), please see: www.theqtree.com/2023/11/06/the-infamous-process-2-manufacturing-method-for-the-pfizer-biontech-moderna-covid-19-vaccines/.

IT IS TIME TO STOP ALL USE OF BNT162b2 (COMIRNATY), OF mRNA-1273 (SPIKEVAX), AND THEIR “2024-2025 FORMULA COVID-19 VACCINES” IMMEDIATELY.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday Open Thread 12.6.2024: The Immune System after COVID-19 “Vaccination”; and a Note on the Virus Itself

The above image is courtesy of a Substack post by Jessica Rose, PhD: https://jessicar.substack.com/p/the-immunological-mechanism-of-action, “The immunological mechanism of action for lost immunity, a shift to tolerance (and autoimmunity?) from the shots”, 27 December 2022.

Health Friday is a series of posts related to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. Since today’s post is related to the COVID-19 virus itself, and to the COVID-19 “vaccines”, it is dedicated to the memory of Yours Truly’s COVID-19 “vaccinated” late brother, Sam, and to her late cousin, Bill; and to all people, of any age or location, who have passed away from the negative effects (direct or indirect) of the COVID-19 “vaccines” that they took. The discussion today is not limited to what is presented in the post: It is an Open Thread.

Today’s Health Friday post is about what the COVID-19 “vaccines” do to the “vaccinated” person’s natural immune system. It is also about what the COVID-19 virus itself does to a person’s natural immune system. The bottom lines are: One: the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” severely damage or even destroy the natural immune system of the person who takes these “vaccines”, with the damage or destruction increasing with each additional injection of them. Two: the COVID-19 virus itself can damage the natural immune system. Three: it is more possible to repair and support the immune system of a person who is non-COVID-19 “vaccinated.”

Yours Truly begins with these: first, https://x.com/tpvsean/status/1862616283738501504. Two screenshots of this tweet are below:

And, this: https://x.com/leejohnson/status/1862619457706770458. Two screenshots of this tweet are below:

Actually, Yours Truly respectfully disagrees with the title of the above book: in her opinion, it should read: Bill Gates I Want to Kill Three-Quarters of You, and Control the Survivors.

There. Must. Be. Justice.

There are several aspects that make up today’s post. *** Yours Truly is firmly convinced that the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself was designed and lab-created, AND the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” were / are designed and lab-created, as bioweapons. These lab-created bioweapons attack the immune system of the human body; damage and/or destroy important components of the immune system of the human body; and, in the case of the modRNA “vaccines”, keep this damage and/or destruction going for an indefinite period of time in the “vaccinated” person’s body. Also — Yours Truly will present evidence that — wait for it — the pangolin-CoV MP789 virus genome is an integral part of the situation.

To begin: The 5.3.6 Postmarketing Experience document that Pfizer-BioNTech submitted to the FDA on 30 April 2021: https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf, 5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports of PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Received Through 28-Feb-2021. Below are two screenshots from the Appendix 1: List of Adverse Events of Special Interest section of this document:

The above are autoimmune and immune-mediated medical conditions that were reported in the first two months after the rollout of the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” BNT162b2 among persons who took this “vaccine” during that period. Notes: BNT162b2 is the basis of all subsequent formulations of the COVID-19 “vaccine” injectables by this company (since 2022, marketed under the brand name COMIRNATY); and, there are other listings of autoimmune and immune-mediated conditions in the Appendix 1. of the above report.

Yours Truly now turns to a 2021 paper by Stephanie Seneff, PhD: https://doi.org/10.56098/ijvtpr.v2i1.23, “Worse Than the Disease? Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of the mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19”, 10 May 2021. Dr. Seneff points out that only the spike protein was used for the modRNA in the Pfizer-BioNTech and in the Moderna COVID-19 “vaccines” (BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273, respectively.) A screenshot from this paper is below, listing the “firsts” regarding the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”:

Dr. Seneff references a 2020 paper by Lu, et al., regarding an important discovery about the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7429369/, “A COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Encoding SARS-CoV-2 Like Particles Induces a Strong Antiviral-like Response in Mice.” The authors make it clear that there are three separate-but-important components in the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself: the membrane (M); the envelope (E); and, the spike protein (S). Another screenshot from the Seneff paper is below, regarding this issue:

Why is it important to know that Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna chose only the spike protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself as the basis for their respective modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”? Yours Truly hypothesizes that, in so doing, it was then possible for them to create a modRNA that would have the most potential to damage the persons taking these respective modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.” The Lu, et al., 2020 paper, cited above, also describes how the authors created various “prototype” COVID-19 “vaccines.” These “prototype vaccines” were lab-produced using various ingredients — one of which was — wait for it — N1-Methylpseudouridine; as well as one “prototype vaccine” that used Uridine. The authors concluded that N1-Methylpseudouridine was “superior” in creating “neutralizing antibodies.” Please refer to Figure 1. and its description underneath from this paper, where N1-Methylpseudouridine is used in the “Lane 5 proto-type vaccine” of the experiments. In Yours Truly’ opinion, it is within the realm of possibility that Pfizer-BioNTech, or Moderna, or both, knew of the Lu, et al., research.

Below are screenshots of section 11 Description of the Pfizer-BioNTech (COMIRNATY) “2024-2025 Formula COVID-19 vaccine”; and, of section 11 Description of the Moderna (SPIKEVAX) “2024-2025 Formula COVID-19 vaccine.” There is no mention in either one of the membrane or of the envelope of the original Wuhan Hu1 SARS-CoV-2 virus; there is only the mention of the spike protein:

The modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” damage and/or destroy crucial IgG3 immune system cells in the “vaccinated” person’s body (the “fight it off” element), and instead foster the increase of IgG4 immune system cells (the “tolerate but never clear” element). Please refer to the Jessica Rose, PhD, post at the top of today’s post. Below is another figure from her post, from the Supplementary Materials of this 2022 paper (cited in the post): www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciimmunol.ade2798, “Class switch toward noninflammatory, spike-specific IgG4 antibodies after repeated SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination”, Pascal Irrgang, et al., 22 December 2022. This image, from Figure 2: Figure S1 of the paper, clearly shows the decimation of IgG3 (“fight it off”) immune system cells, and the increase of IgG4 (“tolerate it”) immune system cells, after repeated modRNA COVID-19 “vaccinations”:

And, also from the Irrgang, et al., paper:

Those who are COVID-19 “vaccinated”, especially if they take repeated injections of these “vaccines”, are the slowest to “clear” a COVID-19 infection: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9258747/, “Duration of Shedding of Culturable Virus in SARS-CoV-2 Omicron (BA.1) Infection”, Julie Boucau, Ph.D., et al., published in the New England Journal of Medicine, 21 July 2022. The salient figure from this Letter to the Editor is below:

Please refer to the second and third column percentages. These “tell the tale.”

Yours Truly has written extensively regarding the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, some of their ingredients, and what damage these injectables do to the body and brain of the “vaccinated” person. Please refer to: www.theqtree.com/2024/11/08/health-friday-11-8-2024-open-thread-the-insidious-n1-methylpseudouridine-in-the-modrna-covid-19-vaccines/; www.theqtree.com/2024/11/01/health-friday-open-thread-11-1-2024-the-covid-19-information-file-part-one/; and, www.theqtree.com/2024/10/18/health-friday-10-18-2024-special-edition-neurological-effects-of-the-covid-19-vaccines-physical-and-psychological/, for examples. These “vaccines” contain, among other ingredients, the following that assist in the mechanisms of said injectables: the lab-created lipid nanoparticles ALC-0159, ALC-0315, SM-102, and PEG2000-DMG, which spread the “vaccines” to every cell of the “vaccinated” person’s body; and, N1-Methylpseudouridine (present in both the Pfizer-BioNTech and in the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”), which replaces the natural Uridine of the “vaccinated” person’s body with a lab-created combination of “fake Uridine” plus a form of methane. Recall that natural Uridine is an incredibly important RNA which assists or manages many bodily functions — including brain functions and emotions.

This leads to the next part of today’s post: the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself, which is the foundation of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.”

The lab-created SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) virus itself attacks the body (and brain) of a person infected with this virus in several ways. One way is that the virus “attaches” itself to the ACE2 receptor cells of the body. ACE2 stands for “angiotensin-converting enzyme 2” cells. What these cells do is discussed here: www.cas.org/recources/cas-insights/ace2-covid-19-target, by Angela Zhou, 15 December 2022. A screenshot of this article is below:

The spike protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself dysregulates (“downregulates”) the functions of the ACE2 receptor cells in the body of the infected person: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.04.409144, “SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Impairs Endothelial Function via Downregulation of ACE2”, Yuyang Lei, et al., 4 December 2020. “Endothelial function” is the range of functions of the vascular endothelium. Endothelial cells release elements that control the opening and closing of the arteries.

Also, the COVID-19 virus itself “mimics” the proteolytic activation of human ENaC cells: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58603. “SARS-CoV-2 strategically mimics proteolytic activation of human ENaC”, Praveen Anand, et al., 26 May 2020. ENaC stands for “Epithelial sodium channel” (an ion channel); this element has an important role in kidney function, the immune system, and vasculature. “Proteolysis” has to do with protein breakdown in the body.

The SARS-CoV-2 virus itself attacks, damages, and/or destroys, the CD4 cells of the human body. Please refer to: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.25.20200329, “SARS-CoV-2 uses CD4 to infect T helper lymphocytes”, Natalia S Brunetti, et al.; paper published in 2020, version of record 31 July 2023. A screenshot of the Abstract from this paper is below:

Note that damaged CD4 cells are a component in HIV infection; also, note again that, since the original SARS-CoV-2 virus itself is the foundation for the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” by Pfizer-BioNTech and by Moderna, the “attack and damage” elements and mechanisms described above are present in said “vaccines.”

For further information regarding how the spike protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself works in the human body, please refer to the ongoing research of Walter M Chesnut: https://wmcresearch.substack.com/.

And now, another visit with our shy, nocturnal scaly anteater, the Pangolin:

Yours Truly has written about this mammal, and of how the PRRARSV (or RRAR or RRARSV, depending on which scientific paper one reads) genome code in the original SARS-CoV-2 virus itself was lab-manipulated from the pangolin-CoV MP789 to include this code; for example: www.theqtree.com/2024/11/22/health-friday-11-22-2024-open-thread-lets-talk-about-prrarsv-the-backdoor-key/. It appears that the pangolin-CoV MP789 genome code was “mixed in” with the bat-CoV RaTG13 genome code in the lab experiments that created SARS-CoV-2. However, Yours Truly has discovered something else about pangolin-CoV MP789: It “binds” better to human ACE2 receptor cells, compared to the bat-CoV RaTG13!

The story behind this discovery begins here: www.crick.ac.uk/news/2021-02-05_pangolin-coronavirus-could-jump-to-humans. This article led to the following link: www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-21006-9, “Structure and binding properties of Pangolin-CoV spike glycoprotein inform the evolution of SARS-CoV-2”, Antoni G. Wrobel, et al., 5 February 2021. A screenshot from the Discussion section of this paper is below:

It would appear, then, that the pangolin-CoV MP789 genome has much more to do with the lab-creation of the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself (and, by extension, the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”) than at first meets the eye. This is not to discount the use of genome code elements from the bat-CoV RaTG13 in the lab-creation process of the virus itself; nor to discount the other coronavirus code elements that were “mixed in” from monkey, civet, and other animal coronaviruses. In Yours Truly’s opinion, those who lab-created the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself were searching for a genome code that could most effectively attack and compromise human ACE2 receptor cells and the mechanisms of these cells. They found what they were looking for in the pangolin-CoV MP789 genome code. However, it is crucial to understand that those who lab-created the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself did not also add N1-Methylpseudouridine to it — this compound was added to the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.” And therein, again in Yours Truly’s opinion, lies an important difference between the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) virus itself, and the presence of this virus in the modRNA-COVID-19 “vaccines.” It is the difference between a non-COVID-19 ” vaccinated” person being infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself and recovering (even if there are complications), because the natural Uridine in the non-COVID-19″vaccinated” person’s body is still operative to help regulate many body functions and mechanisms that can assist in recovery; whereas, in the COVID-19 “vaccinated” person’s body, the natural Uridine has been replaced with N1-Methylpseudouridine (thereby literally erasing the potential for natural Uridine to work.)

Is it, then, a foregone conclusion that the natural immune system of the COVID-19 “vaccinated” person is so severely damaged, or even destroyed, especially with that person taking more and more injections of these “vaccines”, that there is no hope for any possible repair or restoration of it? In the case of the RNA of Uridine being replaced by N1-Methylpseudouridine, some things can be done to supplement the body: consuming Uridine-containing foods, such as beets, goat cheese, walnuts, and broccoli. There is some promising research on the use of a compound, called 5-FU, to help repair Uridine RNA: https://doi.org/10.3389/frnar.2023.1248236, “RNA damage: the forgotten target of clinical compounds”, by Nicole Simms and John R.P. Knight. In the case of damaged CD4 cells, there are natural methods to increase the body’s healthy CD4 cell count. Please refer to: www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/how-to-boost-cd4-count-naturally, by Charlotte Lillis, 16 July 2024. Supplementation with Vitamin D, multivitamins, and probiotics are mentioned in this article.

Finally, Yours Truly firmly believes that the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself is not “just another virus” or “just another flu virus.” Au contraire: this virus itself was lab-created from a “palette” of animal coronaviruses (the pangolin-CoV MP789 in particular, with the bat-CoV RaTG13 close behind) to be as damaging as possible, even deadly, to the human body — in other words, a bioweapon. Yes, a non-COVID-19 “vaccinated” person may become infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself, and recover well; however, there may be “residual damage” from the virus itself remaining for some period of time in their body. There is also the phenomenon of “COVID-19 vaccine shedding” from COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons onto others, including onto non-COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons, to consider: as these “vaccines” contain elements in them that make this virus, as well as the “vaccines” themselves, more dangerous and/or deadly. Does this mean that non-COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons should avoid contact with other persons, especially COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons? No — what it does mean, however, is that it is imperative to have, and maintain, the highest possible degree of health of the body’s natural immune system.

There. Must. Be. Justice.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Placeholder Open Thread 11.27.2024: PRRARSV Part 2: Pangolin Addenda Edition

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is vintage-laboratory-work-stockcake.jpg

The above free vintage image of a scientist at work is courtesy of StockCake and Google Images.

As Gail Combs is apparently still in “locked out” mode for publishing posts (via WordPress, or **some other entity**), our host, Wolf Moon, gave the go-ahead for Yours Truly to do a Placeholder Open Thread for today. I am indebted to our host for this opportunity, as further information has surfaced regarding the role of the pangolin-CoV MP789 virus in the lab-creation of the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) virus itself. Since today’s post concerns the COVID-19 virus itself, and the COVID-19 “vaccines”, it is dedicated to the memory of Yours Truly’s COVID-19 “vaccinated” brother Sam, and to her cousin Bill; and to all persons, of whatever age and location, who have passed away from the negative effects of the COVID-19 “vaccines” that they had in their bodies. However, the discussion is not limited to what is presented here: It is an Open Thread. Bear with me: there are a couple of surprising details coming up. There is a General Summary at the end of the post.

There are Important Wolf Moon Notifications, the Rules of our late, good Wheatie, and certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here.

To Begin: What will be called the “Part 1 Presentation” of the role of the PRRARSV genome code of the pangolin-CoV MP789 in the lab-creation of the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself is here: www.theqtree.com/2024/11/22/health-friday-11-22-2024-open-thread-lets-talk-about-prrarsv-the-backdoor-key/. Yours Truly presented evidence that: One: the pangolin-CoV MP789 virus genome code has “an uncanny similarity” to the PRRARSV genome code that was inserted into the genome code of the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself; Two: that this insertion occurred during the lab-creation process for the genome code of the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself; Three: that this insertion is at or very near the S1-S2 furin cleavage site in the genome code of the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself; Four: that the bat-coronavirus RaTG13 coronavirus also has a role to play in the lab-creation of the genome code of the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself, although the pangolin-CoV MP789 coronavirus genome code has more “areas of similarity” to the SARS-CoV-2 virus genome code; and, Five: that taxpayer-funded Gain-of-Function experiments were {most likely] used to perform all of the above, and most likely, at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

In 2020, the year after the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself was beginning to ravage the world, and when COVID-19 “vaccines” had not yet been granted Emergency Use Authorizations by the FDA in the United States, by the EMA (European Medicines Agency), or by other agencies, a plethora of scientific papers and articles were written and published: papers and articles in which the researchers attempted to pinpoint exactly how the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself came into being. Many of these papers and articles examined the role(s) that various animal coronaviruses may have played in the emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself: for examples, by “natural evolution”; or, by “recombination” of coronavirus genomes among animals via cross-infection; or, by a “sudden appearance.” These investigations and their published results pre-date the confirmation within the past 18 months that Gain-of-Function experiments at lab facilities, most notably the Wuhan Institute of Virology, were the foundation of the lab-created disaster called the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself (links to Congressional reports on this situation are in the “Part 1 Presentation” Health Friday post, see above.) One such year 2020 scientific paper is the “Dimonaco, et al.” paper: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7823979/, “Computational Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-Like Coronavirus Diversity in Human, Bat and Pangolin Populations”, Nicholas J. Dimonaco, et al., 30 December 2020. A screenshot of the Abstract of this paper is below:

The Health Friday post cited above discusses Yours Truly’s hypothesis that the pangolin-CoV MP789 coronavirus genome code was chosen, along with the important but actually less-similar bat coronavirus RaTG13 genome code, as the main virus genome that were used to create the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself genome. Today’s post, in Yours Truly’s opinion, presents evidence that “clinches the deal” on the choice of the pangolin-CoV MP789 genome code as the primary one for insertion into the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself genome code — however, the evidence comes from a surprising source.

The trail to this source begins here, an article by Stella Paul: https://brownstone.org/articles/why-are-hospitals-still-using-remdesivir/, 30 May 2023. The Paul article, in turn, was linked from this Vigilant Fox article: https://vigilantfox.news/p/9-shocking-covid-truths-theyll-never, 23 November 2024. This, in turn, led first, to here: www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-updates/know-your-treatment-options-covid-19 (this article has no mention whatsoever of effective alternate treatment options for COVID-19, such as Ivermectin or Hydroxycholoquine); which, then, led to here: www.fda.gov/drugs/emergency-preparedness-drugs/coronavirus-covid-19-drugs. Which, in this last link, led to: mention of a “new” COVID-19 “pre-exposure” treatment drug that can only be used under certain circumstances, such as in persons with already-compromised immune systems; and only can be administered by infusion (IV): PEMGARDA, a monoclonal antibody treatment that also functions as an antiviral.

This is the link to the FDA-issued document for healthcare professionals for PEMGARDA: www.fda.gov/media/177067/download (note: PEMGARDA is also called Pemivibart in this document.) There have been no studies performed for PEMGARDA regarding carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, or impairment of fertility (section 13 Nonclinical Toxicology of the FDA document.) Persons who have been prescribed PEMGARDA need to take the infusion (IV) of the drug every 3 months (page 15 of the FDA document.) Also, PEMGARDA is not to be used as a “substitute” for COVID-19 “vaccination” (page 15 of the FDA document.) More details from the section Limitations of Authorized Use of the FDA document are below:

There is a slew of other warnings (including Black Box warnings), cautions, and restrictions regarding PEMGARDA in the FDA document.

Here is a screenshot of section 12.4 Mechanism of Action of the FDA document on PEMGARDA (aka Pemivibart):

**** And now, for the pangolin-CoV connection: This is found in the FDA document on PEMGARDA, Table 2. Yours Truly is including screenshots of Table 2., below. Please look at the screenshots carefully. There are seven screenshots. This is the list of SARS-CoV-2 variants that PEMGARDA is ** allegedly ** supposed to help “guard against.” The bottom line here is: Virtually every SARS-CoV-2 variant is derived from a pangolin-CoV genome code (most likely that of pangolin-CoV MP789) that was “blended in” along with the bat-CoV RaTG13 genome code in the lab-creation of the original SARS-CoV-virus itself. The giveaway is “Pango lineage” at the top of the variants columns. (Note: due to screenshot size constraints, some of the variant lists are broken up: however, EVERY variant column clearly states Pango lineage at the top left.)

The question that comes to mind is: Why is PEMGARDA being promoted as a “pre-exposure prophylaxis” against a COVID-19 infection in immunocompromised persons; or, for that matter, for any person, COVID-19 “vaccinated” or not? The answer is that the FDA still does not recognize, authorize, or recommend, the use of Ivermectin, Hydroxycholorquine, Zinc, Quercetin, Vitamin D, or other “non-FDA-authorized or approved” drugs or treatments for prophylaxis for COVID-19 infection; or for COVID-19 infection treatment. While there may be need for PEMGARDA to be used for certain patients in narrow circumstances, it is Yours Truly’s opinion that it is vastly less expensive and effective to use Ivermectin, Hydroxycholorquine, Zinc, Quercetin, and Vitamin D in the large majority of situations to prevent infection by COVID-19.

Then, there is the issue of what Yours Truly will call “Universal Immune System Compromise from COVID-19 Vaccination.” It is her firm opinion that any person who has ever taken a COVID-19 “vaccine” has a compromised immune system. This is due to the ingredients and the mechanisms of the COVID-19 “vaccines” themselves; in which the critical IgG3 “fight it off” immune system cells of the “vaccinated” person are damaged and/or destroyed, and the growth of IgG4 “tolerate but never clear” cells is increased. This process increases with each successive COVID-19 “vaccine booster” injection (which would include injections of the “latest version” of said “vaccines.”) Please see: https://jessicar.substack.com/p/igg4-cd4s-and-why-the-lnpmrna-platform, “IgG4, CD4s and why the LNP/mRNA platform should be prohibited”, by Jessica Rose, Ph.D., 14 August 2023.

PEMGARDA (aka Pemivibart) is an expensive drug. For example, below is a screenshot from www.patientpower.info/ regarding the cost per treatment for PEMGARDA. This is the non-insurance covered cost:

Recall that the FDA document on PEMGARDA cited above states that persons who are prescribed to take this drug need to repeat the treatment every 3 months.

General Summary: One: Yours Truly presented the first of the hypothesis regarding the use of the pangolin-CoV MP789 in the lab-creation of the original SARS-CoV-2 virus itself (the original Wuhan Hu1 COVID-19 virus itself) in the Health Friday post of 15 November 2024. Two: there is a large amount of scientific papers and articles published in 2020, with researchers investigating various hypotheses regarding a “combination” of animal coronaviruses in nature that produced the original SARS-CoV-2 virus itself. This research was performed prior to the confirmation that the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself was the product of Gain-of-Function lab-creation, most likely at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, using coronaviruses from various animals, including the bat-CoV RaTG13 and the pangolin-CoV MP789. Four: the pangolin-CoV MP789 virus genome has the “closest overall match similarity” to the genome of the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself. Five: there is a new FDA “pre-exposure prophylaxis and antiviral” drug, PEMGARDA, that is administered by infusion (IV) only, and only for certain types of immunocompromised persons. Six: the FDA-issued Fact Sheet for PEMGARDA clearly shows, in Table 2. of the document, that the SARS-CoV-2 variants that PEMGARDA is to “guard against” are virtually all derived from what the document states is “Pango lineage.” Seven: the FDA still does not recognize, authorize, or approve, of the use of Ivermectin, Hydroxycholorquine, and other effective alternatives for COVID-19 infection prevention or treatment.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday 11.22.2024 Open Thread: Let’s Talk About PRRARSV, the “Backdoor Key”

The above free vintage image of a lock being picked is courtesy of Google Images.

Health Friday is a series related to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. Since today’s offering is related to the COVID-19 disaster — the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) virus itself; and, to the COVID-19 “vaccines” — it is dedicated to the memory of Yours Truly’s “vaccinated” late brother Sam, and her late cousin Bill; and to all persons of any age who have died as a result of either an infection from the COVID-19 virus itself, or to the negative effects (direct or indirect) of the COVID-19 “vaccines” that they took. However, the discussion is not limited to what is presented today: It is an Open Thread.

There are Important Wolf Moon Notifications, the Rules of our late, good Wheatie, and certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here.

Today’s post includes several “puzzle pieces.” Each one is integral to the whole. Please bear with me. There is a General Summary at the end of the post.

To Begin: A post from our host, Wolf Moon: www.theqtree.com/2023/05/01/pfizer-and-moderna-vaccines-both-contain-the-prrarsv-key-to-the-cell-nucleus/. This post is one of several on the topic of the “PRRARSV Backdoor Key” that is present in both the Pfizer-BioNTech and in the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.” One of the papers cited in the post is “the Mehedi paper”, found here: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1073789. “Nuclear translocation of spike mRNA is a novel feature of SARS-CoV-2”, Masfique Mehedi, et al., 26 January 2023. This paper proves that the PRRARSV code in the SARS-CoV-2 virus genome is only there, and not in either the SARS-CoV virus genome or the MERS-CoV virus genome. There are links to other important papers in the Wolf Moon post. Yours Truly is grateful to our host for doing serious investigation into this subject.

There has been speculation that the PRRARSV code may be related to snake venom. This also has been discussed by our good host in other of his posts on the subject. While Yours Truly believes that some type of snake venom that contains all or some of the PRRARSV code may be in play, she has an additional hypothesis on the PRRARSV code presence in the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” — and in the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself.

And, Now: May I present — the Pangolin (PAN-go-lin.)

Pangolins are shy, nocturnal mammals that are covered with scales; they are also called “scaly anteaters.” They resemble anteaters in body shape and length; however, Pangolins are covered with hard, keratin-like scales from the head to the tip of the tail. During the day, they remain in their burrows; at night, they emerge to hunt for and eat ants and termites. Their living habitat ranges from areas in Africa to India to southern Asia. As their meat, scales, and other body parts, are consumed as exotic foods, or are used in folk and traditional medicine in certain areas of the world, the Pangolin is listed as an endangered species. It is illegal to hunt or trap Pangolins, or to keep them as pets. However, because of their meat, scales, and other body parts, Pangolins are among the most-trafficked animals in the world (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pangolin.)

The above image of a Pangolin is courtesy of the International Fund for Animal Welfare and Goggle Images.

Pangolins, like other animals, have coronaviruses. And here is where the story gets interesting. One such Pangolin coronavirus is “pangolin-CoV MP789.” It appears that the RBD (Receptor Binding Domain) is this virus has an “uncanny” similarity to the RBD of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. In fact, it is been posited that the RBD of the SARS-CoV-2 virus resulted from a “recombination” of those of the bat-CoV RaTG13 virus and the pangolin-CoV MP789 virus. Below is Figure 1 of the “Morales-Espinosa, et al. paper” on this subject:

The “Morales-Espinosa, et al. paper” is found here: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7450963/, “The receptor binding domain of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is the result of an ancestral recombination between the bat-CoV RatG13 and the pangolin-CoV MP789”, Rosario Morales-Espinosa, et al., 27 August 2020.

There is a plethora of scientific papers, articles, and scientific/medical blog posts related to the “probable” or “hypothetical” or “uncanny” similarity between Pangolin-CoV and SARS-CoV-2. Yours Truly will provide a sampling, below. Most of these papers, articles, and blog posts were written between 2020 and late 2022.

One: A scientific article by researchers in the CCP: www.cell.com/current-biology/pdf/S0960-9822(20)30360-2.pdf, “Probable Pangolin Origin of SARS-CoV-2 Associated with COVID-19 outbreak”, Tao Zhang, et al., 6 April 2020. A screenshot of part of the Conclusion of this article is below:

Two: Another 2020 paper, this one with an important mention in the Results section regarding the very high similarity of the S proteins in the pangolin-CoV genome and the SARS-CoV-2 genome: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008421, “Are pangolins the intermediate host of the 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2)?”, by Ping Liu, et al., 14 May 2020. A screenshot of the section of the Results is below:

Three: Another scientific paper from 2020: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.0707.184374. “Single source of pangolin CoVs with a near identical spike RBD to SARS-CoV-2”, Chan, Y.A., and Zhan, S.H., 31 October 2020. A screenshot from this paper is below:

Four: A scientific blog post: https://blog.3ds.com/brands/biovia/decoding-the-sars-cov-2-genome-origin/, “Decoding the SARS-CoV-2 Genomes—Origin”, by Niranjani Iyer, 6 April 2020. A screenshot from the post is below:

Recall that it is only recently that the “the SARS-CoV-2 virus came from nature”, “the SARS-CoV-2 virus came from the ‘wet markets’ in Wuhan” claims have been proven incorrect. While there are still scientific papers and articles being published to “prove” the “came from nature” claims, what these papers and articles do not seem to explore, in Yours Truly’s opinion, are the Gain-of-Function experiments with various coronaviruses (including the pangolin-CoVs) that took place at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in the process of lab-creating the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself. These Gain-of-Function experiments used elements found in nature (bat coronaviruses, civet coronaviruses, pangolin coronaviruses, rabbit coronaviruses, monkey coronaviruses, etc.) to “build” the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself. Here, for example, is a 2022 scientific article regarding the claims that the virus came from nature: www.science.org/content/article/evidence-suggests-pandemic-came-nature-not-lab-panel-says, “Evidence suggests pandemic came from nature, not a lab, panel says”, 10 October 2022, by Jon Cohen.

Which leads into the discussion of the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s experiments with pangolin coronaviruses.

In May 2024, the NIH finally admitted that the agency funded Gain-of-Function research at the WIV: https://nypost.com/2024/05/16/us-news/nih-director-admits-taxpayers-funded-gain-of-function-research-in-wuhan-four-years-after-covid-pandemic-began/, by Josh Christenson.

Here is the June 2023 report from the ODNI (Office of the Director of National Intelligence) regarding the Wuhan Institute of Virology and its activities: www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/assessments/Report-on-Potential-Links-Between-the-Wuhan-Institute-of-Virology-and-the-Origins-of-COVID-19-20230623.pdf. Two screenshots from the Report are below:

It is obvious that the Wuhan Institute of Virology conducted coronavirus experiments with bats, civets, monkeys, and pangolins, in the process of creating the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Which leads to the next discussion, regarding PRRARSV and the furin cleavage site in the SARS-CoV-2 virus genome. Bear with Yours Truly here: this is an important piece of the puzzle.

PRRARSV is located at the S1-S2 furin cleavage site on the SARS-CoV-2 virus genome, from a scientific paper in September 2020: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118056, “Structural features of coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 spike protein: Targets for vaccination”. by Ariane Sternberg and Cord Naujokat, 15 September 2020. A screenshot from section 2 of this paper is below:

The redoubtable Walter M Chesnut expands on this, and how PRRARSV assists in the translocation of the modRNA spike protein in the SARS-CoV-2 virus into every cell in the human body: https://wmcresearch.substack.com/p/prrarsv-the-furin-cleavage-site-a. “PRRARSV—The Furin Cleavage Site: A Nuclear Localization Signal that Translocates the Spike and its mRNA to the Nucleus Inducing H3.3 histone Deposition and Rapid Aging”, 10 April 2023. Below is the National Cancer Institute definition of a histone (www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms/def/histone):

In other words, the PRRARSV present in the SARS-CoV-2 virus enters the cell, assists the spike protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus to enter the nucleus of the cell, and interferes with the H3.3 histone in the DNA of the cell.

But wait, there’s more about histone3.3! it interacts with the human body at the mitochondrial level: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc/2014.06.050, “Post-translational modification and mitochondrial relocalization of histone H3 during apoptosis induced by staurosporine”, Hasan Koc, et al., 18 July 2014. Staurosporine is a “protein kinase inhibitor”: www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/staurosporine. Please refer back to the blog post by Mr. Chesnut — it appears that PRRARSV has a role in aging the human body at the mitochondrial level. See also: www.theqtree.com/2023/10/28/the-covid-19-virus-and-the-modrna-covid-19-vaccines-induce-accelerated-aging/.

There are four “inserts” that were introduced into the SARs-CoV-2 virus genome during the process that lab-created the SARS-CoV-2 virus. These four “inserts” were first isolated and described in the “Pradhan paper” from 2020. This paper was Retracted and suppressed almost as soon as it appeared. However, it can be found here: https://medicalveritas/org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Pradhan-et-al-Coronavirus-HIV-paper.pdf. A screenshot of Table 1. from the paper is below. The “PRRAR” code is “Insert 4”:

In addition, Figure 2. of this paper has the SARS-CoV-2 virus genome spelled out, with the position of each of the four “inserts.”

This leads to further proof that the PRRARSV code is indeed part of the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself. For example: https://jessicar.substack.com/p/it-turns-out-that-the-prrarsv-motif, “It turns out that the “PRRRARSV” motif is more than a furin-cleavage site”, 1 October 2022. Dr. Rose performed her own analysis of the PRRARSV code in the SARS-CoV-2 virus genome. She proves that the PRRARSV code is indeed the fourth “insert” into the virus genome. A screenshot of her analysis is below:

What does this all mean? It means the following:

General Summary:

One: The Pangolin, a shy, nocturnal mammal that is covered in keratin-like scales and eats ants and termites, also is prone to having a coronavirus, called pangolin-CoV. This virus has a genome code that is “quite similar” in some ways to the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself genome code. One of these “similarities” is a genome code called “RRSV” or “PRRAR”, depending on the research paper on the topic.

Two: There are four “unique inserts” in the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself genome. The fourth “insert” is the PRRARSV code. The PRRARSV code interferes with the important H3.3 histone in the DNA of every cell in the body of the person who is infected by SARS-CoV-2 (the COVID-19 virus) or who is infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself.

Three: The PRRARSV code was possibly derived from experiments with a type of snake venom; unless otherwise proven, it certainly was derived from experiments with the pangolin-CoV genome code.

Four: The experiments with the PRRARSV code were conducted at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in the process of the lab-creation of the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself.

Five: Since the COVID-19 “vaccines” use the Wuhan Hu1 SARS-CoV-2 virus itself as the basis for these injectables, the PRRARSV code is therefore present in these “vaccines.” This means that all persons who have ever taken a COVID-19 “vaccine” have been exposed to the PRRARSV code. To date, nobody knows exactly how long the ingredients and mechanisms of the COVID-19 “vaccines” remain at work in the “vaccinated” person’s body. In fact, the COVID-19 “vaccines” are designed to trick the “vaccinated” person’s body into thinking it has a COVID-19 virus infection, forcing the “vaccinated” person’s body to make large amounts of antibodies to fight off the “fake COVID-19 infection”: www.brandeis.edu/magazine/2020/fall/inquiry/vaccine.html, “On the cusp of a COVID-19 Vaccine”, by Lawrence Goodman. A screenshot from the article is below, quoting Dr. Drew Weissman of the University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine:

Six: Un-vaccinated” persons who contract a COVID-19 virus itself infection, and are therefore exposed to the PRRARSV code, can still mitigate and/or defeat the effects of the damage done by the virus itself if the person has a healthy immune system. On the other hand, COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons, in addition to being exposed to the PRRARSV code present in the “vaccines”, are also exposed to the other ingredients in the “vaccines”, such as N1-Methylpseudourdine. N1-Methylpseudouridine replaces the natural Uridine in the “vaccinated” person’s body, and also evades the natural immune system components and mechanisms in the COVID-19 “vaccinated” person’s body. COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons therefore have their natural immune systems damaged or destroyed, making it difficult or even impossible to mitigate and/or defeat the damage done by the “vaccines.”

Yours Truly will posit, based on the research and writing that she has been engaged in about the COVID-19 virus itself, and the COVID-19 “vaccines”, since March 2020: that any un-“vaccinated” person, of any age, who has had a COVID-19 virus itself infection; or, any person, of any age, who has had a COVID-19 “vaccine” put into their body — has been injured by the negative effects of the virus itself, or by the negative effects of the “vaccines.” In addition, COVID-19 virus itself infected persons, and COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons, have died from the effects of the infection or the “vaccine.” One will also say that the COVID-19 “vaccines” have added ingredients and mechanisms that make these injectables more dangerous and deadly than the COVID-19 virus itself. Finally, the outcomes of infection by the COVID-19 virus itself, and the negative outcomes from taking the COVID-19 “vaccines”, were, and are, planned and intentional.

It is now, in Yours Truly’s opinion, imperative that all persons make it their business to have and to maintain their natural immune system in the best possible condition.

It is now time to bring to account all of the multiple agencies, scientists, and other entities involvement (including the United States military) in the development of the lab-created SARS-CoV-2 virus itself: of the COVID-19 “vaccines”; and in the processes that resulted in the granting of Emergency Use Authorization and/or Full Approval of these “vaccines” without proper protocol adherence to rigorous testing and clinical trials for the said “vaccines.” It is now time to stop all further use of any COVID-19 “vaccine” until the above accountability is fully undertaken and finished, It is now time for all government agencies, medical organizations, and medical practitioners to recognize that Ivermectin and Hydroxycholoquine are inexpensive and vastly effective treatments for COVID-19 infection and for COVID-19 infection prophylaxis. It is now time to stop the use of Paxlovid and Remdesivir as “officially approved” treatment for COVID-19 infection, as both of these drugs have significant negative side effects, including a high “rebound COVID infection” rate for Paxlovid, and kidney damage and/or death for Remdesivir; and to substitute the use of Ivermectin or Hydroxycholoquine.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA