The above graphic is with thanks to https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/fda-recommends-more-mrna-shots-despite, “FDA Recommends More mRNA Booster Shots Despite New Study Showing Booster Failure — and Major Public Outcry”, by Nicolas Hulscher, 26 May 2025.
Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s offering has to do with the disaster of the COVID-19 “vaccines” (Bioweapon Toxin Injections), Yours Truly dedicates it to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have passed away due to the negative effects of the COVID-19 “vaccines” that they had injected into their bodies.
There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to use any AI-generated material in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.
Yours Truly has been researching, reading about, and writing about, the COVID-19 disaster since March 2020. She had a sense, early in 2020 when the speculation about the development and use of a COVID-19 “vaccine”, that something was “off” in the hype regarding “how this will stop the spread” of the virus, “how this will prevent COVID-19 infection”, and so on. As it turns out, that “Suspicious Dog” feeling was the correct one — the COVID-19 “vaccines” have been, are now, and will be, a disaster. These injectables do not prevent COVID-19 infection. These injectables have injured, sickened, disabled, and even killed, millions of “vaccinated” persons all over the world. These “vaccines” will continue to injure, sicken, disable, and even kill, those who have them put into their body — not only because of the ingredients and mechanisms of these injectables, but now also because of the “new and improved” (not) faulty foundation of “lab-created antibody titer levels tests” that will be used in the development of the “latest mutation version” of the “vaccines”, instead of doing actual clinical trials with lab animals and/or with human subjects. I will make it clear at the start that today’s offering is not meant to “stir the pot.” There are, in my opinion, legitimate questions that need to be asked regarding certain recent news items.
There are several central elements of the current situation regarding the “2025-2026 COVID-19 Vaccine Formula”, and the actions of certain people and entities. One such entity is the FDA. The current Commissioner of the FDA is Dr. Martin Makary, MD, MPH, who is also a proponent of COVID-19 “vaccination” (including in pregnant women), and is himself “vaccinated.”
On 22 May 2025, the FDA’s VRBPAC (Vaccines and Related Biological Advisory Committee) members met to “consider” and then to “recommend” the “2025-2026 COVID-19 Vaccine Formula.” The committee voted unanimously, after “presentations” by Pfizer-BioNTech, by Moderna, and by Novavax, to “recommend” the “formulas” for the modRNA (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna) and the “inactivated protein” (Novavax) COVID-19 “vaccines.” Please see: https://www.contagionlive.com/view/fda-makes-recommendations-for-2025-2026-formula-for-covid-19-vaccines, 23 May 2025. A screenshot from this article is below:
These “vaccines” will be lab-developed, then lab-tested regarding the amount of “antibody titers” that “might” be “effective” in the “2025-2026 Formula COVID-19 Vaccines.” There will be no clinical trial testing of these “vaccines.” This protocol, outlined in the “Option 4” method, was adopted by the FDA on 28 June 2022. Please see the Briefing Document for this meeting: https://www.fda.gov/media/159452/download. “Option 4” is located on page 19. Please see the screenshot below:
Therefore, it appears that any person who takes an injection of the “2025-2026 Formula COVID-19 Vaccine” by Pfizer-BioNTech, by Moderna, or by Novavax, will be, in essence, a “human lab rat”, since these “vaccines” will only have been tested under “Petri-dish conditions” in a lab to confirm whether the “antibody titer amounts” expressed by the “vaccine” ingredients “might” be “effective” in humans.
There were over 95,000 public comments that were submitted to the FDA regarding the VRBPAC meeting of 22 May 2025, indicating a “major public outcry” against the “recommending” of more COVID-19 “vaccines.” Nonetheless, the VRBPAC members voted to endorse the “2025-2026 COVID-19 Vaccine” formulas, as described above, using the “Option 4” method. Please see: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/fda-recommends-more-mrna-shots-despite, “FDA Recommends More mRNA Booster Shots Despite New Study Showing Booster Failure — and Major Public Outcry”, Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 26 May 2025. Please see the screenshot from this article, below:
The phrase, “immunogenicity data” refers to the “Petri-dish lab experiments” as described above.
The image below is from the “opinion piece” written and published by Dr. Martin Makary and Dr. Vinay Prasad, MD, MPH. Dr. Prasad is another important person in the current situation regarding the HHS / FDA / CDC. As of 6 May 2025, Dr. Prasad is the new Director of the FDA’s CBER department (Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research.) The “opinion piece” was published on 20 May 2025, two days prior to the FDA’s VRBPAC meeting. Please see: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsb2506929. A screenshot of the combined Figure 2 and Figure 3 from the “opinion piece” are below:
Dr. Prasad made it clear, in a podcast, that the FDA will implement the elements outlined in the “opinion piece” as the “new framework” for COVID-19 “vaccination.” Please keep this in mind for later on in today’s offering.
The paper regarding the failure of COVID-19 “booster shots”, already online-published but will appear in a medical journal in June 2025, is found here: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127257, “Effect of the 2022 COVID-19 booster vaccination campaign in people aged 50 years in England: Regression discontinuity analysis in OpenSAFELY-TPP”, Andrea L. Schaffer, et al., journal Vaccine, Volume 59, 20 June 2025, 127257. The salient image from this paper is below:
Regarding the impact of COVID-19 “vaccination” on the lifetime supply of eggs in a female’s ovaries, it is now known that BOTH the modRNA AND the “inactivated” COVID-19 “vaccines” have a devastating impact on this egg supply. Please see: https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines/13040345, “Impact of mRNA and Inactivated COVID-19 Vaccines on Ovarian Reserve”, Enes Karaman, et al., 30 January 2025. This paper demonstrates that there is a 30% conception failure rate, and an overall loss of up to 60% of the lifetime egg supply in the female ovaries, both induced by COVID-19 “vaccination” in a female of child-bearing age.
Then, there is Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, MD, PhD, the new Director of the NIH (National Institutes of Health.) It appears that Dr. Bhattacharya may be “betting on both sides of the game” regarding COVID-19 and the COVID-19 “vaccines.” While it is true that Dr. Bhattacharya has stated that lockdowns, “mandated masking”, “social distancing”, and so on, are not real methods to deal with the virus, he also said this, in 2021, regarding the COVID-19 “vaccines”:
Link to the above: https://www.newsweek.com/stanford-doc-jay-bhattacharya-calls-vaccine-mandates-unethical-says-patients-can-choose-1611938. The above statement from Dr. Bhattacharya raises some questions: One, if COVID-19 is “basically a cold”, how can a “vaccine” protect against it? Two, if COVID-19 is “basically a cold”, why are there so many persons who have had a COVID-19 infection (either from the mechanisms of the COVID-19 “vaccines” themselves, or from the virus itself) and have since presented with symptoms of “Long COVID”? Three, if indeed a person who had a COVID-19 infection and recovered, is “protected against new disease”, why are people (COVID-19 “vaccinated” or not) still coming down with COVID-19 virus mutation infections?
Next is Susan Monarez PhD, the current Acting Director of the CDC. Previously, she had worked in the Department of Homeland Security with BARDA and with other HHS departments. Dr. Monarez is a “biosecurity expert” who has also endorsed the COVID-19 “vaccines.” Please see: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/24/health/cdc-director-monarez.html, “Trump Nominates Susan Monarez to Lead C.D.C.”, 24 March 2025. The pullquote from the article: “Monarez is a biosecurity expert who endorsed the Covid vaccines, and her selection may signal a growing impatience with anti-vaccine sentiment.”
And, finally, there is current HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., an attorney who founded the Children’s Health Defense organization (https://childrenshealthdefense.org/), and who has been an outspoken opponent of the COVID-19 “vaccines.”
And here begins Yours Truly’s presentation of the Kabuki theater going on at HHS / FDA / CDC:
On Tuesday 27 May 2025, HHS Secretary Kennedy, Jr., appeared in a video with Dr. Markary and Dr. Bhattacharya to announce that the COVID-19 “vaccines” that are “recommended” (in actual practice, they are called “routine”) by the CDC for healthy children under age 18, and for healthy pregnant women, would be removed from the CDC Immunization Schedules. Please see: https://x.com/bennyjohnson/status/1927374665745342535, a screenshot of which is below:
Where was Dr. Monarez, the Acting Director of the CDC? Why wasn’t she included in the video? An “announcement” of this importance would surely have required her to be included. To the best of Yours Truly’s knowledge and belief, neither Dr. Makary (FDA), nor Dr. Bhattacharya (FDA CBER), have the direct authority to remove vaccines from the CDC Immunization Schedules. The CDC is a separate departmental entity of HHS.
However: In reality, nothing has changed regarding the CDC Immunization Schedules. The CDC is still using the same 2025 Immunization Schedules that were issued on 21 November 2024. Please see: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/imz-schedules/index.html. The CDC is still “recommending” that pregnant women get COVID-19 “vaccinated”. Please see: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines-pregnancy/about/index.html. This “recommendation” was issued by the CDC on 17 June 2024.
The “elaborate costumes and dance of Kabuki theater” approach were on display during this video with Secretary Kennedy, Jr., Dr. Makary, and Dr. Bhattacharya. But it was a “performance.” And the audience suspended reality for the “performance.”
Yours Truly now turns to the blog article by Sasha Latypova, a former medical technology and pharmaceutical technology professional, about this “Kabuki theater performance” of 27 May: https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/eugenics-for-dummies-aka-hhss-evidence, “Eugenics for Dummies, aka HHS’s “Evidence-Based Approach” to covid shots.”, 29 May 2025. Please see the screenshots from her article, below:
It appears that, in reality, what has happened is that the current CDC Immunization Schedules have been neatly “absorbed into” the “new evidence-based approach to the COVID-19 vaccines” so-called “opinion piece” of Dr. Makary and Dr. Prasad (see the links to their “opinion piece”, above; and, also, the statement by Dr. Prasad that this “new approach” will be implemented at the FDA / CDC (so, it seems, they aren’t “opinions” at all.)
Further confirmation of the “Kabuki theater” element regarding the 27 May “announcement” by Secretary Kennedy, Jr., Dr. Makary, and Dr. Bhattacharya, comes from The Kingston Report: https://karenkingston.substack.com/cp/164733998, “Who’s Calling the Shots at HHS?”, 29 May 2025.
WHO IS IN CHARGE OF HHS? If Secretary Kennedy, Jr., can take the time to write letters to ask that ostriches in Canada are not “culled” due to a “possible” infection from Avian Influenza; if he can issue a directive to have titanium dioxide removed from candy (Skittles) — why did he participate in a “Kabuki theater performance” on 27 May regarding something incredibly important to the health of every American — the dangerous, deadly COVID-19 “vaccines”? Did he, or anyone else, at HHS, inform Dr. Monarez about the “change” in the CDC Immunization Schedules? If so, did she agree?
In Yours Truly’s opinion, there appears to be some sort of “issues” going on at HHS, the FDA, and the CDC. HHS Secretary Kennedy, Jr., needs to get to the bottom of all of them.
FLASH! AS OF TODAY, 30 MAY 2025: THE CDC HAS JUST ISSUED THE “NEW CHILDHOOD VACCINE IMMUNIZATION SCHEDULE” RELATED TO THE COVID-19 “VACCINES”:
It appears that Dr. Susan Monarez, PhD, has finally weighed in regarding the 27 May “announcement” (aka “Kabuki theater performance”) by HHS Secretary Kennedy, Jr., Dr. Makary, and Dr. Bhattacharya COVID-19 “vaccines” and the CDC Childhood Immunization Schedule. Please see Sasha Latypova’s presentation here: https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/cdc-issued-the-anticipated-updates, “CDC issued the anticipated updates to the children’s schedule for covid shots”, 30 May 2025.
HOWEVER, there’s some “catches” in the “updates.” Huge “catches.” These have to do with the CDC “definition” of what a “healthy child” means. In short summary: It will be the CDC who decides if a child meets their “criteria” for being a “healthy child” (meaning, the COVID-19 “vaccines” aren’t “necessary” or “recommended”); it will be the CDC’s “guidance” on this that will be in control of any discussion between a child’s parent(s)/guardians, and the clinician who can administer COVID-19 “vaccines”; there are no provisions that Yours Truly can see in the CDC “guidance” for exemptions on religious or other grounds; and, that ANY clinician who is cleared to administer COVID-19 “vaccines” will ultimately make the decision on whether or not to COVID-19 “vaccinate” a child who does not fit the CDC “criteria” for a “healthy child.” This includes clinicians who have never treated the child (in other words, a CVS pharmacist, for example.) Please see the screenshots below, from the Latypova article of today:
Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA