Dear MAGA: Open Topic 20181120

This NOW-DAILY  open thread is VERY OPEN – a place for everybody to post whatever they feel they would like to tell the White Hats, and the rest of the MAGA world.  We ask that people NOT duplicate material posted to the Treehouse open threads, unless it’s REALLY IMPORTANT.  We expect things that are more relevant to the Q community to show up here.

Say what you want, comment on what other people said, comment on people’s comments.  Keep it civil.  Treehouse rules, but expect lots of QAnon.

W

James Coburn reading a newspaper in a cafe in France in The Great Escape.
“Four Chan?  What on God’s green Earth is Four Chan?”
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
414 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
wheatietoo

Oh brother…Lindsey Graham is on Hannity right now; they’re discussing the Invasion at the border.
Lindsey says that he will be introducing a Bill in the next Congress…that will make illegals ineligible for Asylum, if they come here illegally.
The “next” Congress?
How about now, Lindsey…do it NOW!
There is no frigging way that the Dem-controlled House would ever pass a bill like that.
And Lindsey knows it.

singularZoe

Grandstanding, fake, in my opinion. I don’t trust him at all.

Linda

Yes, he’s making me question the good will I’ve had for him lately. Doing it later is the uniparty way. Doing it now might get something done.
Incidentally, I’ve FINALLY been banned from CTH. Not sure why it took so long, I haven’t commented since my comments to SD the other day (was that yesterday?) If he wanted to ban me, why not then? Why days later when I haven’t been commenting. Or did he come over here and read the discussion about that? (Ha ha ha, if he did).

wheatietoo

Lindsey even got all holier-than-thou in a tweet today, criticizing PDJT’s stance on the Prince MBS thing.
So I’m right there with you, in losing the ‘good will’ I’ve had recently for Lindsey.
He is going back to being a Uniparty weasel.

thinkthinkthink

Or he is playing a role on the behalf of MAGA.

wheatietoo

Yep, good question.
Q has said that we are “watching a movie”…so, yeah…Lindsey may be playing a role.

Sylvia Avery

Sorry, Linda. But at least you got to go out with a bang and not a whimper! Nice closing argument!

Deplorable Patriot

Yes, BUT, and this is a big part of the president’s needs, the Senate needs to fill all those judicial vacancies ASAP. The agenda may well be full.
Plus, if he introduces it in the next Congress, and the Dems in the House submarine, sink or vote down such a bill, it becomes a campaign issue.

Deplorable Patriot

Campaign issue for 2020.

wheatietoo

New Q posts, Wolfie…have you seen them?

Deplorable Patriot

It looks like it’s being filtered. May have to change emails again.

Deplorable Patriot

No validation email in either inbox or spam.

wheatietoo

Those are good points, D’ble Patriot.
Thanks.

Linda

Yay! 2 new Q posts. They’re not showing up yet on all the aggregators. I got them at this one: https://QNTMPKTS.KEYBASE.PUB
This is the first one:
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 6e0a05 No.3978190 📁
Nov 20 2018 21:42:33 (EST)
https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/417761-house-gop-to-hold-hearing-into-dojs-probe-of-clinton-foundation📁
[D]ec 5
D5
Nothing can stop what is coming.
Nothing.
This election was not about fixing the economy, trade, borders, military, protecting our children etc. all so another corrupt politician or ‘insider’ can simply undo it [band-aid].
This was not simply another 4-year election, but, a crossroads in the history of our civilization that will determine whether or not, WE, THE PEOPLE, reclaim control over our gov’t.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2qIXXafxCQ📁
Panic in DC.
Q
Here is the 2nd one:
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 6e0a05 No.3978509 📁
Nov 20 2018 22:00:31 (EST)
https://twitter.com/LisaMei62/status/1065067172429529088📁
TOGETHER WE WIN.
Attacks on WHITAKER will only intensify.
SENATE WAS THE TARGET.
53-47
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-senate-committees/senate-judiciary-chair-grassleys-move-to-leave-key-opening-idUSKCN1NL231📁
Q

Linda

Uh oh. I just got thrown into moderation. Probably because of the links in the Q posts. Help, Mr. Wolf!

wheatietoo

Q is back!
He linked to this tweet in one of new posts:
https://twitter.com/LisaMei62/status/1065067172429529088
.
Lisa Mei is getting barraged with “Q sent me” replies.
Heheh.
Well, good for her…I like Lisa Mei Crowley.
She posted this tweet afterward:
https://twitter.com/LisaMei62/status/1065080382448635906

wheatietoo

This was truncated out of her above tweet:comment image

wheatietoo

Q mentioning Whitaker…
This is going to piss of the Whitaker-haters over at that place we don’t go anymore.
Haaaa.

Linda

I’m glad you posted Qs posts via Lisa Mei, Wheatie. I posted both of them above and they are in moderation. Too many links I think.

wheatietoo

Wolf will prolly get them out soon…but I think he’s working on another blog-post right now.
🙂

Linda

No problem – you got the posts out there.

andrew1979

this reaction right here to why people of like minds work together for good!
no posing for a selfie, no like demands, no being pissed because not first… i love it.

Sylvia Avery

Maybe. But none of them read Q or bother to try to understand, so they may not know anything about it. Fools.

wheatietoo

And Q posted to the main board at Qresearch, instead of using his PatriotsFight board where no replies are allowed.
The Anons are going nuts…tons of replies to him, hitting all at once.
It’s fun to watch.
Another new Q-post:
______
Nov 20 2018
2496
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: df1a06 No.3979646
Nov 20 2018 23:04:59 (EST) NEW
Panic in DC
Did Whitaker remove [SC] ‘special articles’ inserted by [RR] re: expanded scope v2?
Was the scope narrowed to the original mandate assigned?
Item used when walking a dog?
Q
_______
Hmm…this one has a different ID-code number.
I’m sure the Anons will notice and mention it…there are so many replies happening there right now, it’s impossible to keep up.

Sylvia Avery

What does this mean? special articles? walking the dog??????
Oh, boy!

Linda

He just posted again:
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: df1a06 No.3979646 📁
Nov 20 2018 23:04:59 (EST)
Panic in DC
Did Whitaker remove [SC] ‘special articles’ inserted by [RR] re: expanded scope v2?
Was the scope narrowed to the original mandate assigned?
Item used when walking a dog?
Q

Linda

If Whitaker has already done that, that’s a real bombshell.

wheatietoo

This will serve as another Q-proof, when/if it becomes known ‘for sure’ that Whitaker has done this.
Will the Whitaker-haters see this Q post and use it to demand to know if Whitaker has done this?
It wouldn’t surprise me, since they don’t seem to care about hurting the White Hats.

wheatietoo

Heheh…I should’ve refreshed before I posted above.
Is Q saying that Whitaker has put Mueller on a “leash”?
What else could he be referring to…
A pooper-scooper?

SteveInCO

The pooper scooper is for Adam Schitt.

wheatietoo

Heheh.

Linda

Ha ha ha! Love how you think, Steve.

Deplorable Patriot

Item used when walking a dog?
Saw this and thought, “A $#@! bag?” Oh, wait. I think Q means a leash.

phoenixRising
SteveInCO

Well, Hooooleeeeee Schitt!
I was just able to comment on the Old Tree House.
I guess at some point they rescinded my ban.

wheatietoo

Uh oh…what did you do.
Did you roll a grenade into the place?

SteveInCO

Naah, I went to the bottom of the Kirsjen Nielsen thread and wrote “Sounds good. Let’s see what happens.”
I did this after successfully liking a (semi random) post.

wheatietoo

“Let’s see what happens.” <— Haaaa.
I see what you did there.
😀

SteveInCO

You caught that, eh?
Didn’t realize I’d done it myself…until I typed it over here.

SteveInCO

Speaking of grenades:
Someone–a retired FBI guy, in fact–told me he had gone to some sort of training, and the guy started off by writing:
B
KB
KFB
on the blackboard, and then saying, “There are three different kinds of explosions. ‘Boom!’ ‘Kaboom!!’ and ‘KaF*ckingBoom!!!'”
I don’t want BOOM. I want KAF*CKINGBOOM!

wheatietoo

Here, here…me too!

pjasond

I tried to like your comment “over there’ – nada. Just for fun, I liked as a blogger in the new Huber thread – before any comments – it worked!!!!!!!!!! Nah, not really excited, just messing with them.

SteveInCO

As I understand it, Q is saying something Big, Game Changing is going to happen on Dec 5?
Well, let’s hope so.

wheatietoo

Yes, let’s hope so.
Q has often used “D5” in his posts.
People have speculated about what that is a reference to:
— D5 = the highest level for an avalanche.
— D5 = Pres Trump, since the letter D is the 4th letter, so – 45.
Dec 5th is when Huber testifies before Congress.
Fireworks?
We can only hope…but wouldn’t it be glorious.

SteveInCO

OK, that supplies some context.
I, as of right now, doubt it could mean precisely that. There is simply NO WAY he could have predicted this months and months in advance. Unless the House scheduled this months and months in advance and told him about it. Which would imply the house committee chair (Nunes?) is in on it.

pjasond

Nunes was in the transition team, was he not. They moved out of Trump tower because of Spygate – do the math …
I think a detailed plan was formulated, Session, Nunes Giuliani, etc …

andrew1979

the numbers add up.

SteveInCO

In the transition team? They probably demanded he recuse himself.
OK, let’s assume for the sake of argument that Nunes scheduled the thing for December 5, and that’s what D5 has meant all along. That leads to two things:
1) the meeting HAS to have been scheduled before Q’s first use of D5. Which wasn’t necessarily clear back to Trump tower days (I’m thinking sometime in the last six-nine months, but someone well versed in Q lore can probably look it up). I’d have a very hard time believing Trump tower days, because it’s just humanly impossible to look two years ahead and know that you’ll be ready to do this on that date. Hell, a weather event could muck things up.
2) This much forewarning says this is a Big Deal. A BIG DEAL. Utterly game changing. Not just a typical testimony that leads to a couple of days noise on the TreeHouses, then nothing. Well, if that doesn’t happen, some guesses are going to look pretty silly.

pjasond

I am fine with silly since no one can see all the egg on my face already 🙂
If you find out as POTUS elect that the current admin is currently spying on you, what do you do. Nothing is not an option for DJT.
One of the guys I would want on my team is a heavy hitter, say a chairman of an oversight committee with extra power to inspect classified mat’l.
The long term coord is a stretch, but I am not ruling it out. My answer was in response to your point about Nunes – history says that it is possible, since he was on the trans team. What actually happened. Don’t know, but speculation is fun, and risk free.

SteveInCO

I am fine with silly since no one can see all the egg on my face already 🙂
Since you’re busy walking around upside down, the egg probably fell off and landed on the ceiling. 😀

Linda

It couldn’t have been planned that far back, Steve, since no one knew that Sessions would end up having to recuse himself, which is why he appointed Huber. They wouldn’t have known at that point that Huber would be involved – or would they? That would really be stretching it. I don’t recall when Q first started using D5, but I think it’s only been this year.

SteveInCO

Yes, precisely.

andrew1979

lets not get all carried away…yet 🙂
i want to know two things:
was ted stevens pretty much a good guy other than minimal palm greasing? the the minute if heard it pretty much live on cspan there is not one day that has passed without me replaying over the clip burned into my brain of ted stevens (rip) declaring that the internet is not juat a big truck you can keep dumping stuff on. the internet is in fact a series of tubes. and then all hell broke loose to shut this guy up… oh yeah in the year 2008 no less. they set him up. ne lost his reelection bid after being convicted. oops conviction overturned. dead within 2 years. he was c
targeted spied on fbi drummed up evidence… go to the wikipedia for ted stevens. whole thing is good but the sections under “TRIAL CONVICTION AND REVERSAL are worth it jjst to see the actions list of names etc. so just kind of a interesting character to revisit. he was hated by a lot of people.
and second – nunes tractor collection. is that real or a sears portrait studio backdrop? i will never forget nunes face when he met the press on that stairwell on that march day. looking kind of pale it seemed. frantic. he had news was he about to out trump and confirm trump as putins puppet? no. to the contrary he said some things that well… if you dare go to this link to read will amaze you to see the page still is there…
https://www.lawfareblog.com/what-heck-devin-nunes-talking-about-guide-perplexed
let me give you a salty preview of the brilliance contained within:
_____________________
Does any of this vindicate or validate Donald Trump’s claims that President Obama wiretapped him?
Answer: Not even close—even assuming that the most flamboyant version of Nunes’s comments are wholly true.
Trump did not wake up early on a Saturday morning and tweet that the NSA or FBI in the course of its normal foreign intelligence operations incidentally intercepted communications or data involving the Trump transition. He didn’t allege that communications were intercepted legally. And he didn’t allege either that the problem—if there is a problem—lay in the masking or unmasking of U.S. persons in lawful intelligence community reporting.
Trump alleged, rather, (1) that his own wires were tapped—with two p’s, no less, (2) that a specific facility in the United States (Trump Tower) and that he personally were specifically targeted for collection, (3) that the surveillance was illegal, (4) that it took place during the campaign, and (5) that it was all ordered by his predecessor, Barack Hussein Obama.
All of those claims appeared to be malicious lies when he made them. And nothing that Nunes is saying, even if it’s all true, supports any of them.
___________________
this next couple months is going to be good 🙂

singularZoe

Well, Andrew, I have been interested in Se. Stevens for a long time, but I could not access the Lawfare blog, it told me to wait “a moment” it was checking my browser. After I waited about 15 (doing something else) I gave up.

thinkthinkthink

We are going to see this come out…
https://twitter.com/mitchellvii/status/1064997606449922048

SteveInCO

Will it come out in such a way as to upend many of those oh-so-close squeaker victories? That HAS to happen before January 3, after that they’re seated Congresspukes and it’s too late to challenge them.

wheatietoo

Too late?
Well, we don’t know that.
We live in interesting times…and if we follow the lead of the Dems about ‘elections, then we can declare those ‘wins’ as….”Illegitimate!!!!11!!! – eleventy!!11!!!”
How do we know that those Dems who ‘won’ were not “colluding” with…Russians!
Or colluded with…illegals…who are foreigners too.

SteveInCO

Yes…but. The House and Senate would have to vote to remove the cheaters, once they are seated. Once seated, over in the House they become part of the democratic majority, which isn’t going to want to blunt its own power.
And the Yellow Stream Media will cover for them.

wheatietoo

If there is evidence that those races were won by fraudulent means…then the candidates who Lost, can demand another election.
Hopefully they will!
If the elections were proven to be ‘fraudulent’, then it is a Federal matter.
Let’s see what happens.
😀

pjasond

Why ever are you being so pessimistic? 🙂
One would swear that things haven’t been going swimmingly …. Oh right, never mind

SteveInCO

Actually pushing a voter fraud allegation that hard has never, in my lifetime actually happened. Trump is a gamechanger to be sure, but has he managed to change even this?

pjasond

I was pulling your leg – will have to improve on this, not one of my strengths 🙂

Sylvia Avery

Oh boy, I hope so!!!! I think I’d die with a smile on my face right then and there.

SteveInCO

Don’t, you’ll want to enjoy the fallout. Besides if you kick the bucket, who will I have to pick on?

andrew1979

this whole country – all of us – need a huuuuge timeout! the proverbial referees whiatle needs to blowand we need to stop and listen and take an introspective moment to adjust to the fact that things are going to need to change. we are not to go back. lessons need to be learned and explained. all will learn from this i can only hope.

thinkthinkthink
wheatietoo

Hah!
I love how our VSG President ‘kicks the nest’.
He’s having fun there.

Sylvia Avery

And he SCORES!

Sylvia Avery

Yes, he is. Deservedly so. And you know what? I’m having fun watching him! I love this man!

Linda

That’s not POTUS’ real account, thinkthinkthink.

thinkthinkthink

Woah. My bad. It was so in character I didn’t check. Lesson learned. Thank you Linda.

GA/FL

That isn’t the REAL @realDonaldTrump twitter feed.

thinkthinkthink

Huh.

SteveInCO

Interesting. (I gather she was being pushed as the main alternative to Pel*si.)
Maybe Trump is actually going to get the Rs to deliver her some votes.

thinkthinkthink

Just him offering to help may put a wet blanket on any moves to push her aside.

SteveInCO

Indeed. A bunch of Rs who might as well do it, since they know they can’t put whatsisname-it-ain’t-Jordan in there, is an effectively bottomless pool of votes.

churchmouse

But, wait. There’s more:

thinkthinkthink
wheatietoo

Love it!
That must be a touchdown…since the ref’s arms are up in the air?
Looks like Mueller on the ground. Heheh.

thinkthinkthink
thinkthinkthink

Problem solving when regular answers won’t work.

https://twitter.com/getongab/status/1065092768307900416

A Fortiori (@AFortiori16)

This does need further discussion. I am old enough to remember when Wisconsin Senator William Proxmire fought to prevent the consolidation of banks in the US into mega banks (they consolidated after he retired).
This crap, and Operation Choke Point (when the feds pressured banks to stop lending to gun manufacturers) is only possible with monopolies.

thinkthinkthink

Postal Service has a purpose in the minds of the framers of the Constitution.

SteveInCO

This is the first GOOD argument I’ve heard for keeping the Post Office.
As an aside, I’ll point out that just because Congress was authorized to run a post office, doesn’t mean it HAS to. Furthermore, I don’t see constitutional justification for Congress banning private competition either (which they did, for first class mail).

SteveInCO

I’m starting to look like a genius, even to “regular” people, for my curmudgeonly refusal to sign up for Faceborg and Twit-R.

wheatietoo

We may have to go back to snail mail, land lines and fax machines.
That’s pretty much all we had to work with, when we took the House in 1994.
I had a cellphone back then…but it was clunky and a lot of people didn’t have them yet.
This is why I have always been against ‘privatizing’ the US Postal System.
We already have private alternatives such as Fedex and UPS…we need to keep a means that makes it a Fed Crime to tamper with.

SteveInCO

Hah, that reminds me of something I read once.
Apparently, felons who are released from prison and can’t find a job because they’re felons (we need to do something about that, by the way–it encourages recidivism) sometimes will get so desperate they will deliberately commit a crime to go to prison.
Often, they’ll throw a brick through a post office window. A minor, relatively harmless act but it has a huge sentence on it. That way they go to the Federal penitentiary which is usually somewhat better than the state ones.

phoenixRising

SteveInCO

OK…It looks like my comment on the Old Tree House got deleted. And I couldn’t like someone’s post, either. Evidently someone over there noticed and said, “Oh schitt, he’s not supposed to be here.”

pjasond

Whew, the new normal is back. The old normal becoming normal again would have messed with you!! 🙂

thinkthinkthink

All over again.comment image

SteveInCO

This brings up a serious point.
Let’s assume there is A Plan.
I doubt that it could be full of exacting detail. That would require clairvoyance. After all, you don’t know how the enemy is going to respond. You also don’t know who on your team will turn on you (or for that matter, who on their team will decide they want a clear conscience and turn on them). Even a major hurricane hitting DC could fubar a precisely scheduled plan. Or how an election is going to turn out. Or the wrong person could die.
And let’s face it, you could get outmaneuvered somewhere and need to regroup (which is what I think the Sessions recusal was–and now we should be seeing the results of the regroup).
So I don’t think it is precisely scheduled, but I think it would have a lot of adapting and improvising.
Thus, most of the time it’s impossible to predict dates of events far in advance.

Sylvia Avery

I just love this graphic. I was thinking about it again today on my walk. Love it.

SteveInCO

Yeah, it should be immediately above JusticeWarrior at 11:47 PM.

wheatietoo

Wow…they deleted that post?
There is no legitimate reason for that post to have been deleted!
Well…other than the fact that you are one of ‘us’.
This means that they actually *are* lurking here and reading what we’re saying.
Hi Sundance.
waves

SteveInCO

Sundance:
Not because you banned me–I can understand you banning me–but because of the schitty way you’ve been treating other regulars at your site…I wave at you. With one finger. Guess which one.

thinkthinkthink