The free word cloud image of brain diseases for today’s offering header is courtesy of Google Images.
Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: AI-generated items in today’s offering will be cited as such. If readers wish to post AI-generated items in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.
Today’s offering is dedicated to the memory of Yours Truly’s brother, Samuel R. Lewis, Jr. (24 November 1948 – 29 October 2024.) May he rest in eternal Peace. Love you, Sam. Miss you.
For previous posts regarding what happened to my late brother, after he was “fully vaccinated and boosted” with COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” beginning in early 2021, please see: https://www.theqtree.com/2024/10/18/health-friday-10-18-2024-special-edition-neurological-effects-of-the-covid-19-vaccines-physical-and-psychological/; and, https://www.theqtree.com/2025/10/31/health-friday-10-31-2025-echoes/. Today’s offering is Part One regarding a deeper dive into the negative effects of these “vaccines” related to post-“vaccination” development of dementia.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The COVID-19 Bioweapon “Vaccines” and Dementia: Part One
First: It is crucially important for readers of this post to understand that there is no “OFF switch” in the COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines.” None. Nobody knows exactly how long the ingredients and mechanisms of these injectables work in the body and brain of the “vaccinated” person. The longest time frame that has been found so far is at least 3 1/2 years post-final COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccination” injection: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-peer-reviewed-study-finds-51c, “BREAKING: Peer-Reviewed Study Finds mRNA, SV40, and Spike Protein Can Persist in Humans for At Least 3.5 Years After COVID-19 “Vaccination””, Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 9 July 2026 (note: there are AI-generated images in this article.) Nobody knows exactly if repeated injections of a COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine” start the “timing clock” over again, in terms of potential for future adverse events each time a “booster shot” is taken — or, if each new “booster shot” taken simply adds more time to the already-existing “timing clock.”
Very alarmingly, there is this article: https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/new-dementia-cases-projected-more-double-globally-2050, “New Dementia Cases To More Than Double Globally By 2050”, Tyler Durden, 14 October 2026. The paper is here: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaneurology/article-abstract/2854983, “Incidence of All-Cause Dementia A Meta-Analysis”, Ashleigh S. Vella, PhD, et al.; 12 October 2026. Note: the full article is only available via subscription, institutional access, or payment. The screenshots below are from the “public view” sections of the paper; from the Key Points section (“Question” and “Findings”), and from the Abstract section (“Main Outcomes and Measures” and “Results.”) Note that there no mention regarding the role that the COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” have in this scenario. This is what would be expected from Establishment Medicine (for example, the AMA.) Note also that the meta-analysis is for the year 2023 — two years after the worldwide rollout of these “vaccines”:
And, from the Zero Hedge article cited above, this screenshot with more details from the JAMA Network paper; note, again, there is no mention by either JAMA or by the CDC of the role of the COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” in inducing dementia. While the other suggestions to avoid or lessen the chance of developing dementia are all good and worthy, there is no suggestion about avoiding these “vaccines.” Note also the reference to the “target age group” of age 55 and older; this is a prime “target age group” for being “recommended” to take said “vaccines”:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
It has taken Yours Truly the better part of the last two years to begin to come to terms with the health decline and death of my brother. One has done more research into what I believe to be a prime aspect of what happened to him: the modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” that he took, beginning in early 2021: and, a particular ingredient in these “vaccines” (which, by the way, is present in every “descendant variant” modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine” by Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2, approved by the FDA as COMIRNATY); and, by Moderna (mRNA-1273, approved by the FDA as SPIKEVAX; and, mRNA-1283, approved by the FDA as mNEXSPIKE), including the “latest 2026-2027 booster shot version” of these “vaccines” now on the market.)
The short summary: based on the 6 1/2+ years that Yours Truly has been researching and writing about the COVID-19 disaster, one is convinced that the N1-methylpseudouridine contained in the modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” — the “vaccines” that my brother took — destroyed the RNA in his body’s Uridine; the Uridine that would have, under normal circumstances, have detected these “vaccines” as “enemy invaders” and have signaled his immune system to eliminate them from his body. However, since his Uridine was destroyed, then replaced with N1-methylpseudouridine; in addition to the fact that these “vaccines” cross the Blood-Brain Barrier and directly attack the brain — the ingredients and mechanisms of these “vaccines” induced mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in my brother’s brain, which eventually precipitated the decline of his physical and mental health, leading to the diagnosis of “sudden-onset dementia” while he was under care in a nursing home for complications from a fall; which, compounded with the pneumonia that followed, led to his death.
Yours Truly starts with screenshots from this article (https://www.brandeis.edu/magazine/2020/fall/inquiry/vaccine.html, “On the Cusp of a COVID-19 Vaccine”, by Lawrence Goodman) from Dr. Drew Weissman, MD, PhD, the co-inventor (with Katalin Kariko) of the N1-methylpseudouridine found in the Pfizer-BioNTech and in the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines”:
And, right there, in Yours Truly’s opinion, is a large part of the “no OFF switch” that was deliberately added to the modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” — the N1-methylpseudouridine that DESTROYS the body’s natural Uridine and replaces it with the Weissman / Kariko’s lab-created chemical compound. And, by the way, for which invention, they were awarded the 2023 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine (https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/2023/press-release/, 2 October 2023.)
The catastrophically negative effects the of N1-methylpseudouridine in these “vaccines” are body-wide. In addition to destroying the RNA of the Uridine in the body and replacing it with the Weissman/Kariko lab-created chemical compound above, this same compound also functions as a “facilitator” in introducing the other ingredients of the “vaccines” into every cell of the “vaccinated” person’s body. The “facilitator” role is accomplished through evasion of the body’s natural immune system, which, under normal circumstances, would “recognize” the modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine” as an “enemy invader”: and immediately alert the body’s immune system “fighter cells” (IgG3, CD4, CD8, among others) to surround, break down, and eliminate the “enemy invader.”
**** N1-methylpseudouridine is used to “enhance” the immune-destroying mechanisms of the COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines”: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-66879-2_reference.pdf, “N1-methylpseudouridine enhances immunogenicity of RNA/lipid nanoparticle vaccines targeting SARS-CoV-2 spike and the model antigen ovalbumin”, Hiva Azizi, et al., 14 August 2026. Please see the following from the Introduction of this paper, below:
What we have here is a chemical compound — N1-methylpseudouridine — that was created over a number of years by Dr. Drew Weissman and Katalin Kariko; a chemical compound that was then added to the ingredients of the modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” manufactured by Pfizer-BioNTech and by Moderna; and, which chemical compound is present in the “descendant SARS-CoV-2 variants booster vaccines” that are manufactured by the above companies. The purpose of this chemical compound in the modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” is to evade the “vaccinated” body’s natural immune system, which, under normal circumstances, would recognize the “vaccines” as an “enemy invader”, and then signal the immune system to break down and eliminate said “enemy invader.” This evasion is accomplished by the destruction of the RNA in the Uridine in the “vaccinated” person’s body, and its replacement with N1-methylpseudouridine. The effects of this evasion are reflected in every area of the “vaccinated” person’s body, including the brain.
What happened to my late brother, induced by repeated injections of modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines”, was incremental — until the accumulation of incremental damage was more than the body and brain could deal with. Think of the millions of “vaccinated” persons who are at risk for incremental, accumulated damage induced from the injections they took of BNT162b2 (COMIRNATY) or mRNA-1273 (SPIKEVAX) or mRNA-1283 (mNEXSPIKE.)
To be continued in Part Two.
Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA1
(Intellectual Property Disclaimer and Notice: Except for the linked URLs and other items in today’s offering that are available on the Internet, the ideas and/or opinions above are by PAVACA1. Credit must be given to PAVACA1 if ideas and/or opinions in today’s offering are used by other blog writers; by podcasters; or in print or social media.)
My heart breaks at the great loss of vitality and life caused by this horror.
May your quest for understanding also bring you peace.
About the $6+ billion crypto hack yesterday, this X post is from the official account of the exchange (Binance) where the hack occurred:
.
.
Full text:
“Binance’s initial investigation suggests that the security incident may involve a compromised DevOps engineer’s laptop, which allowed an attacker to gain access to a service container and submit unauthorized withdrawal transactions. We have found no evidence of any wallet private key leak. We will share a detailed technical post-mortem once the investigation is complete and the facts are fully verified.
The estimated total impact sits at around $6.3B. We have worked with blockchain partners to freeze affected assets, with ~$3 billion frozen on-chain so far.
Binance will cover all losses from the SAFU fund and the company’s funds. User funds are safe. We will also publish an updated Proof of Reserves once the remediation is complete.
As an immediate precaution, Binance has:
– temporarily suspended deposits and withdrawals while security checks are completed;
– revoked the affected address authorisation;
– engaged law enforcement and blockchain intelligence partners to trace and recover funds.
Our teams are working around the clock to resolve this issue safely and thoroughly. We are working closely with our law enforcement partners to confirm the identity of these criminals and bring them to justice.
Please rely only on official Binance channels for updates. Please feel free to contact Binance Customer Support if you have any further questions.”
Bill Melugin (yesterday):
What if We’re Building Too Many Houses?https://www.breitbart.com/economy/2026/10/28/breitbart-business-digest-what-if-were-building-too-many-houses/
The Myth of the Housing Shortage
There are few ideas in American economic policy that enjoy more universal acceptance than the notion that the United States is suffering from a severe housing shortage. From the Brookings Institution to the Urban Institute, from Freddie Mac to Harvard’s Joint Center for Housing Studies, the experts are practically unanimous: America has failed to build enough homes.
:
:
The Coming Collapse in Housing Demand:
:
Under the Census Bureau’s low-immigration scenario, the population peaks much sooner—at approximately 346 million in 2043 — and begins declining thereafter, falling to 319 million by 2100.
That scenario looks increasingly plausible given the popularity of immigration restrictions.
Indeed, the Congressional Budget Office’s latest demographic forecast, incorporating lower immigration and fertility assumptions, projects that population growth will reach zero by 2056, with annual deaths exceeding births beginning in 2030. That’s just thirty years from now.
:
:
The War on ZoningYet housing advocates want sweeping changes to America’s communities, particularly the elimination of zoning restrictions that limit residential density. Their argument is that density restrictions artificially constrain supply, driving up prices.
But this overlooks why those restrictions exist. Americans pay substantial premiums to live in low-density neighborhoods with large lots, quiet streets, privacy, and predictable surroundings. Zoning helps preserve these valuable amenities.
Indeed, economic research finds that households have measurable preferences for lower residential density. Zoning also provides something particularly important when purchasing an expensive, long-lived asset: protection against uncertainty.
A family purchasing a home in a neighborhood with density restrictions pays for the reasonable expectation that the character of that neighborhood will remain relatively stable. Those protections are capitalized into property values. Eliminating them can destroy something homeowners have already paid for.
Housing economists often treat the premium associated with restrictive zoning as evidence of an economic distortion. But part of that premium represents genuine value that buyers willingly purchase.
In many ways, zoning restrictions are a rare example of localism and populism triumphing over special interests. The real estate agents, the home builders, and the mortgage lenders would love to see housing supply freed from restrictive zoning. The folks who don’t want it are the people who buy and own homes.
There is something deeply short-sighted about proposing potentially irreversible changes to established communities in response to a housing shortage that demographic trends suggest may already be fading.
Before we tear up zoning laws to accommodate millions of supposedly missing homes, perhaps we should ask whether those homes will actually be needed.
The greatest housing mistake of the next generation may turn out to be building too much, not too little.