Author: PAVACA

Health Friday 11.13.2026 Open Thread: The COVID-19 Bioweapon “Vaccines” and Dementia: Part Three, Section A

The free word cloud image of brain conditions for today’s offering header is courtesy of Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: AI-generated items in today’s offering will be cited as such. If readers wish to post AI-generated items in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.

This mini series is dedicated to the memory of Yours Truly’s late brother, Samuel R. Lewis (24 November 1948 – 29 October 2024.) May he rest in eternal Peace. Love you, Sam. Miss you.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Part One of this mini series is here: https://www.theqtree.com/2026/10/30/health-friday-10-30-2026-open-thread-the-covid-19-bioweapon-vaccines-and-dementia-part-one/; Part Two is here: https://www.theqtree.com/2026/11/06/health-friday-11-6-2026-open-thread-the-covid-19-bioweapon-vaccines-and-dementia-part-two/.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

The COVID-19 Bioweapon “Vaccines” and Dementia: Part Three, Section A

This section will discuss several Patents related to the Weissman-Kariko Patent for N1-methylpseudouridine granted on 13 July 2021 (the N1-methylpseudouridine formulation that is used in the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines”; this Patent was applied for on 31 July 2017.) In no way is today’s offering to be construed as a “hit piece” on either Dr. Kariko or Dr. Sahin.

The Patents discussed in today’s offering are those held by Dr. Katalin Kariko, PhD, and/or by Dr. Ugur Sahin, MD. Dr. Kariko is on the faculty of the University of Pennsylvania, and is also a Senior Vice President of BioNTech. Dr. Sahin is CEO of BioNTech (also known as BioNTechSE), the German co-partner of PfizerUSA (Dr. Albert Bourla, DVM, is CEO of said co-partner.) Dr. Kariko’s biography, per the University of Pennsylvania’s Perelman School of Medicine, is here: https://www.pennmedicine.org/providers/katalin-kariko. Other websites that detail Dr. Kariko’s biography include https://www.nobelprize.org/. Biographies about Dr. Sahin include https://www.biontech.com/us/en/home/about/board-members.html, “Ugur Sahin.”

Dr. Ugur Sahin holds multiple US Patents related to the development of “cancer vaccines” for humans, all of which Patents involve the manipulation of RNA, and/or of immune system cells (CD4 – CD8), and/or the use of E. coli as a “culturing base” for a “cancer vaccine”, and so on. One example of Dr. Sahin’s Patents: https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2013143555A1/en, 26 March 2012, ceased 26 September 2014, “Rna formulation for immunotherapy”. This “cancer vaccine” invention utilizes several types of cationic lipid nanoparticles (DOPE; DOTMA; DOTAP; DOPC); the purpose of this “cancer vaccine” invention is, among other results, to vastly increase RNA expression in the lung, liver, and spleen; and, said “cancer vaccine” is to be used as a therapeutic treatment and/or as as prophylactic (Claim 1 through Claim 32.) Another example: https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2017059902A1/en, 13 April 2017, ceased 7 April 2018, another “cancer vaccine”; this is the E. coli “culturing base” Patent (Claim 14.) Yours Truly regards these Patents as “steps along the path” toward the Patent that is discussed below.

Dr. Katalin Kariko had been turned down for various research grants in the United States after previously working with Dr. Drew Weissman (also of the University of Pennsylvania.) She then went to Germany in 2013 to work with Dr. Sahin at BioNTech, while keeping her position at UPenn.

The Ugur – Kariko collaboration produced this Patent: https://patents.google.com/patent/EP3341026B1/en, “Method for reducing immunogenicity of adenosine rna”, 24 August 2016; Ugur Sahin and Katalin Kariko, inventors. This Patent is crucial in understanding the evolution of using N1-methylpseudouridine to eliminate the RNA of Uridine — which compound and mechanism is included in the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine” formulas from the original BNT162b2 onward (which bioweapon “vaccine” was then approved by the FDA under the brand name COMIRNATY.) Exhibits from Patent EP3341026B1 are below, followed by Yours Truly’s comments. First, the Title and Date summary:

Claim 1 and Claim 2:

From the Summary:

From Brief Description of the Drawings, and the Figure 2:

From the Detailed Description:

Note following in the above, among other items: the entirety of Claim 1 and of Claim 2 (the elimination of Uridine and its replacement with a lab-created fake compound that has the same sequence configuration as that of the eliminated Uridine); section 0008, the substitution of / elimination of, Uridine; section 0053, the deliberate increase of adenosine (more on adenosine, below); section 0069, the listing of N1-methylpseudouridine; and, section 0102, the engineered-in potential for the cell’s genome to be altered by the transfected RNA.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Adenosine

Adenosine is one of the “building blocks” of RNA: https://www.genscript.com/biology-glossary/12348/adenosine-monophosphate. Adenosine is important to the regulation and proper functioning of multiple areas and mechanisms of the body: https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/adenosine, “Adenosine Receptors in Neurology and Psychiatry”, Jiang-Fan Chen, et al.; 2014. Pullquote from this citation: “…adenosine contributes critically to homeostasis and neuromodulatory control of a variety of normal and abnormal brain functions…” — among them: sleep; cognition; and, neuroinflammation. Please see the screenshot, below, of a portion of this article: https://www.news-medical.net/health/What-is-Adenosine.aspx, Ananya Mandal, MD; Last Update 11 November 2026:

Refer back to Claim 1 of the Patent EP3341026B1, cited above with exhibits — in which adenosine in the “invention” is increased by at least 20%. A Yandex search of “what happens when adenosine is increased by 20%” yielded multiple results, a short Summary of which is imaged below:

Some of the above-listed references: One: increased inflammation: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2568887/, “Adenosine receptors: therapeutic aspects for inflammatory and immune diseases”, Gyorgy Hasko, et al.; 16 October 2008;

Two: increased cancer potential: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/1401, which led to this paper: https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/21/14/5089, “The Adenosine System at the Crossroads of Intestinal Inflammation and Neoplasia”, Vanessa D’Antongiovanni, et al.; 18 July 2020; and,

Three: increased potential for neurological disorders: https://selfhacked.com/blog/adenosine-health-effects/, “Adenosine: Sleep, Receptors, Effects + 3 Ways to Increase”, Joe Cohen, B.S; 15 December 2020. A screenshot from the Cohen article is below:

**** What we have here is a Patent, EP3341026B1, invented by Katalin Kariko, PhD, and Ugur Sahin, MD, which Patent belongs to BioNTech SE (and is in force until August 2036): that is, in Yours Truly’s opinion, the template for the Weissman-Kariko Patent for N1-methylpseudouridine (which Patent application was made in 2017, granted in 2021, AND which Patent is the basis for the N1-methylpseudouridine in the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine” BNT162b2) — but also, Yours Truly believes, is part of the template for BNT162b2 itself. This is the same BNT162b2 that was then approved by the FDA under the brand name COMIRNATY. The same COMIRNATY that is the “2026-2027 latest variant booster COVID-19 vaccine” which was approved by the FDA on 27 August 2026 — an FDA approval that was granted with no human trials having been performed: the only “studies” that were conducted by Pfizer-BioNTech were performed on a few lab mice. Confirmation regarding this last: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-fda-approves-new-pfizer, “BREAKING: FDA Approves New Pfizer and Moderna XFG mRNA COVID Shots Based on Data From Just 8 – 10 Mice”, Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 27 August 2026.

To be continued in Part Three, Section B.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA1

(Intellectual Property Disclaimer and Notice: Except for linked URLs and other items in today’s offering that are available on the Internet, the ideas and/or opinions above are by PAVACA1. Credit must be given to PAVACA1 if ideas and/or opinions in today’s offering are used by other blog writers; by podcasters; or in print or social media.)

Health Friday 11.6.2026 Open Thread: The COVID-19 Bioweapon “Vaccines” and Dementia: Part Two

The free word cloud image of brain conditions for today’s offering header is courtesy of Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: AI-generated items will be cited as such. If readers wish to post AI-generated items to today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.

This mini series is dedicated to the memory of Yours Truly’s late brother, Samuel R. Lewis, Jr. (24 November 1948 – 29 October 2024). May he rest in eternal Peace. Love you, Sam. Miss you.

Part One of this series is here: https://www.theqtree.com/2026/10/30/health-friday-10-30-2026-open-thread-the-covid-19-bioweapon-vaccines-and-dementia-part-one/.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

The COVID-19 Bioweapon “Vaccines” and Dementia: Part Two

Today’s offering is a deeper dive into certain aspects of dementia and how the modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” have a role to play in inducing this condition, including the role of the N1-methylpseudouridine in these “vaccines.” There are screenshots and images from articles and scientific papers to illustrate the major point: THE modRNA COVID-19 BIOWEAPON “VACCINES” DESTROY THE RNA OF THE BODY’S URIDINE, AND ALSO NEGATIVELY AFFECT CERTAIN CRUCIAL CELLS IN THE BRAIN. To begin, please see the following screenshots from this article: https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/glial-cells-function, “How do glial cells function in the body?”, Zia Sherrell, MPH, 23 June 2025. Glial cells are found in the brain and the spinal cord; they make up approximately one-half of total volume of these areas:

There are four types of glial cells: Astrocytes, Oligodendrocytes, Microglia, and, Ependymal cells. Glial cells are adversely affected by neuroinflammation and/or demyelination (eroding/destruction of the “sheath” that protects cells or coverings of cells) https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12839156, “Neuroinflammation: Mechanisms, Interactions, and Therapeutic Implications”, Mario Garcia-Dominguez, et al. Please see section 3.4 of this paper, below:

Both “Inflammation” and “Demyelination” are listed in the Appendix 1. Adverse Events of Special Interest section of https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf, “BNT162b2 5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization Adverse Event Reports”, given to the FDA by Pfizer-BioNTech, and FDA date-stamped 30 April 2021. “Inflammation” is listed on Page 34 of the report (Page 5 of the Appendix 1. section); “Demyelination” is listed on Page 32 of the report (Page 3 of the Appendix 1. section.)

Glial cells are involved in the development of dementia: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12909748/, “Glial cells in dementia: From cellular dysfunction to therapeutic frontiers”, Hassan Jubair; 16 February 2026. Please see the screenshots from this paper, below. They begin with a portion of the Introduction; followed by Figure 1; then, a portion of the discussion on glial cells in VaD (Vascular Dementia); and, finally, Figure 4:

Recall that the modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” cross the Blood-Brain Barrier and attack the brain. This would include exposing the brain’s glial cells to attack.

**** The modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” negatively affect the composition of glial cells in the brain: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.03.02.482639v1.full, “Decoding COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Immunometabolism in Central Nervous System: human brain normal glial and glioma cells by Raman imaging”, H. Abramsczyk, et al., March 2022. Please see the following, below, from the Abstract of this article. Note that the changes observed in normal glial cells are similar to those seen in glial tumor cells:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

And now, to Uridine:

Uridine has multiple positive effects on the brain, including cell growth and protection: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40120-020-00227-y, “Neurogenerative and Neuroprotective Effects of Uridine / Choline-Enriched Multinutrient Dietary Intervention for Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Narrative Review”, Barry S. Baumel, et al.; 26 December 2020. Note: Part of this article promotes a specialized “brain nutrition drink”, called Souvenaid (Nutricia.) The subsection Uridine from this article is below:

Uridine also has the capacity to assist in certain areas of nerve growth in the brain: https://pubmed.ncbi.nim.nih.gov/15939540/, “Uridine enhances neurite outgrowth in nerve growth factor – differentiated PC12 [corrected]”, AM Pooler, et al.; 2005. The Abstract from this paper is below. Please “mentally bookmark” the term PC12:

N1-METHYLPSEUDOURIDINE, WHICH DESTROYS THE BODY’S URIDINE RNA, IS IN COMIRNATY, SPIKEVAX, AND mNEXSPIKE: https://www.jk-sci.com/blogs/resource-center/modified-nucleotides-for-mrna-therapeutics-and-vaccines, 11 October 2026. mNEXSPIKE, as it is also a modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine” (although utilizing “only” the N-terminal domain of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein), includes N1-Methylpseudouridine as a “modified nucleotide” ingredient of this injectable. Please see section 2.1 from the above article, following:

The N1-methylpseudouridine in the modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” by Pfizer-BioNTech and by Moderna destroys the RNA in the body’s Uridine — Uridine being crucial for not only the regulation of multiple body mechanisms and process, including learning and memory; but also, that it plays an important role in the body’s immune system. Thus, Uridine’s destruction and replacement with N1-methylpseudouridine is essential for COVID-19 modRNA injectables to spread through the “vaccinated” person’s body, including to the brain: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aaz6893, “Impact of mRNA chemistry and manufacturing processes on innate immune activation”, Jennifer Nelson, et al.; 24 June 2020. Note: Jennifer Nelson and the other co-authors of this paper are employees of Moderna. Please see a portion of the Discussion section from the paper, below:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Part Two of this series discusses aspects of the possibilities of “What happened?” regarding the decline in my late brother’s cognitive / emotional health after he started taking the modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines.” The next segment, Part Three, will discuss the Patents which detail the invention of N1-methylpseudouridine as it is used in the modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” by Pfizer-BioNTech and by Moderna.

It is my opinion that it is the combination of damage plus negative effects wrought by the mechanism of the N1-methylpseudouridine in these “vaccines” which is driving changes in cognitive processing; negative changes in behavior; increasing diagnoses of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), of dementia, and of Alzheimer’s disease — in modRNA COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons; and, is also involved in the predictions of an increase in diagnoses of cognitive / emotional conditions, including dementia, in persons around the globe — the vast majority of whom are modRNA COVID-19 “vaccinated.” This is aside from (and not to minimize in any way) neurological negative effects resulting from cardiovascular damage (for example, stroke) or from Central Nervous System damage (for example, Multiple Sclerosis) that are also induced by these “vaccines.”

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA1

(Intellectual Property Disclaimer and Notice: With the exception of linked URLs and other items above that are available on the Internet, the ideas and/or opinions in today’s offering are by PAVACA1 (M.E. Forbes, aka M.E.C. Forbes.) Credit must be given to PAVACA1 if ideas and/or opinions in today’s offering are used by other blog writers; by podcasters; or in print or social media.)

Health Friday 10.30.2026 Open Thread: The COVID-19 Bioweapon “Vaccines” and Dementia: Part One

The free word cloud image of brain diseases for today’s offering header is courtesy of Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: AI-generated items in today’s offering will be cited as such. If readers wish to post AI-generated items in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Today’s offering is dedicated to the memory of Yours Truly’s brother, Samuel R. Lewis, Jr. (24 November 1948 – 29 October 2024.) May he rest in eternal Peace. Love you, Sam. Miss you.

For previous posts regarding what happened to my late brother, after he was “fully vaccinated and boosted” with COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” beginning in early 2021, please see: https://www.theqtree.com/2024/10/18/health-friday-10-18-2024-special-edition-neurological-effects-of-the-covid-19-vaccines-physical-and-psychological/; and, https://www.theqtree.com/2025/10/31/health-friday-10-31-2025-echoes/. Today’s offering is Part One regarding a deeper dive into the negative effects of these “vaccines” related to post-“vaccination” development of dementia.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

The COVID-19 Bioweapon “Vaccines” and Dementia: Part One

First: It is crucially important for readers of this post to understand that there is no “OFF switch” in the COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines.” None. Nobody knows exactly how long the ingredients and mechanisms of these injectables work in the body and brain of the “vaccinated” person. The longest time frame that has been found so far is at least 3 1/2 years post-final COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccination” injection: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-peer-reviewed-study-finds-51c, “BREAKING: Peer-Reviewed Study Finds mRNA, SV40, and Spike Protein Can Persist in Humans for At Least 3.5 Years After COVID-19 “Vaccination””, Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 9 July 2026 (note: there are AI-generated images in this article.) Nobody knows exactly if repeated injections of a COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine” start the “timing clock” over again, in terms of potential for future adverse events each time a “booster shot” is taken — or, if each new “booster shot” taken simply adds more time to the already-existing “timing clock.”

Very alarmingly, there is this article: https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/new-dementia-cases-projected-more-double-globally-2050, “New Dementia Cases To More Than Double Globally By 2050”, Tyler Durden, 14 October 2026. The paper is here: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaneurology/article-abstract/2854983, “Incidence of All-Cause Dementia A Meta-Analysis”, Ashleigh S. Vella, PhD, et al.; 12 October 2026. Note: the full article is only available via subscription, institutional access, or payment. The screenshots below are from the “public view” sections of the paper; from the Key Points section (“Question” and “Findings”), and from the Abstract section (“Main Outcomes and Measures” and “Results.”) Note that there no mention regarding the role that the COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” have in this scenario. This is what would be expected from Establishment Medicine (for example, the AMA.) Note also that the meta-analysis is for the year 2023 — two years after the worldwide rollout of these “vaccines”:

And, from the Zero Hedge article cited above, this screenshot with more details from the JAMA Network paper; note, again, there is no mention by either JAMA or by the CDC of the role of the COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” in inducing dementia. While the other suggestions to avoid or lessen the chance of developing dementia are all good and worthy, there is no suggestion about avoiding these “vaccines.” Note also the reference to the “target age group” of age 55 and older; this is a prime “target age group” for being “recommended” to take said “vaccines”:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

It has taken Yours Truly the better part of the last two years to begin to come to terms with the health decline and death of my brother. One has done more research into what I believe to be a prime aspect of what happened to him: the modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” that he took, beginning in early 2021: and, a particular ingredient in these “vaccines” (which, by the way, is present in every “descendant variant” modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine” by Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2, approved by the FDA as COMIRNATY); and, by Moderna (mRNA-1273, approved by the FDA as SPIKEVAX; and, mRNA-1283, approved by the FDA as mNEXSPIKE), including the “latest 2026-2027 booster shot version” of these “vaccines” now on the market.)

The short summary: based on the 6 1/2+ years that Yours Truly has been researching and writing about the COVID-19 disaster, one is convinced that the N1-methylpseudouridine contained in the modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” — the “vaccines” that my brother took — destroyed the RNA in his body’s Uridine; the Uridine that would have, under normal circumstances, have detected these “vaccines” as “enemy invaders” and have signaled his immune system to eliminate them from his body. However, since his Uridine was destroyed, then replaced with N1-methylpseudouridine; in addition to the fact that these “vaccines” cross the Blood-Brain Barrier and directly attack the brain — the ingredients and mechanisms of these “vaccines” induced mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in my brother’s brain, which eventually precipitated the decline of his physical and mental health, leading to the diagnosis of “sudden-onset dementia” while he was under care in a nursing home for complications from a fall; which, compounded with the pneumonia that followed, led to his death.

Yours Truly starts with screenshots from this article (https://www.brandeis.edu/magazine/2020/fall/inquiry/vaccine.html, “On the Cusp of a COVID-19 Vaccine”, by Lawrence Goodman) from Dr. Drew Weissman, MD, PhD, the co-inventor (with Katalin Kariko) of the N1-methylpseudouridine found in the Pfizer-BioNTech and in the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines”:

And, right there, in Yours Truly’s opinion, is a large part of the “no OFF switch” that was deliberately added to the modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” — the N1-methylpseudouridine that DESTROYS the body’s natural Uridine and replaces it with the Weissman / Kariko’s lab-created chemical compound. And, by the way, for which invention, they were awarded the 2023 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine (https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/2023/press-release/, 2 October 2023.)

The catastrophically negative effects the of N1-methylpseudouridine in these “vaccines” are body-wide. In addition to destroying the RNA of the Uridine in the body and replacing it with the Weissman/Kariko lab-created chemical compound above, this same compound also functions as a “facilitator” in introducing the other ingredients of the “vaccines” into every cell of the “vaccinated” person’s body. The “facilitator” role is accomplished through evasion of the body’s natural immune system, which, under normal circumstances, would “recognize” the modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine” as an “enemy invader”: and immediately alert the body’s immune system “fighter cells” (IgG3, CD4, CD8, among others) to surround, break down, and eliminate the “enemy invader.”

**** N1-methylpseudouridine is used to “enhance” the immune-destroying mechanisms of the COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines”: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-66879-2_reference.pdf, “N1-methylpseudouridine enhances immunogenicity of RNA/lipid nanoparticle vaccines targeting SARS-CoV-2 spike and the model antigen ovalbumin”, Hiva Azizi, et al., 14 August 2026. Please see the following from the Introduction of this paper, below:

What we have here is a chemical compound — N1-methylpseudouridine — that was created over a number of years by Dr. Drew Weissman and Katalin Kariko; a chemical compound that was then added to the ingredients of the modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” manufactured by Pfizer-BioNTech and by Moderna; and, which chemical compound is present in the “descendant SARS-CoV-2 variants booster vaccines” that are manufactured by the above companies. The purpose of this chemical compound in the modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” is to evade the “vaccinated” body’s natural immune system, which, under normal circumstances, would recognize the “vaccines” as an “enemy invader”, and then signal the immune system to break down and eliminate said “enemy invader.” This evasion is accomplished by the destruction of the RNA in the Uridine in the “vaccinated” person’s body, and its replacement with N1-methylpseudouridine. The effects of this evasion are reflected in every area of the “vaccinated” person’s body, including the brain.

What happened to my late brother, induced by repeated injections of modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines”, was incremental — until the accumulation of incremental damage was more than the body and brain could deal with. Think of the millions of “vaccinated” persons who are at risk for incremental, accumulated damage induced from the injections they took of BNT162b2 (COMIRNATY) or mRNA-1273 (SPIKEVAX) or mRNA-1283 (mNEXSPIKE.)

To be continued in Part Two.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA1

(Intellectual Property Disclaimer and Notice: Except for the linked URLs and other items in today’s offering that are available on the Internet, the ideas and/or opinions above are by PAVACA1. Credit must be given to PAVACA1 if ideas and/or opinions in today’s offering are used by other blog writers; by podcasters; or in print or social media.)

Health Friday 10.23.2026 Open Thread: The AMA and “Ethics of AI in Health Care”

The free word cloud image of Ethics is courtesy of Dreamstime and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: AI-generated items in today’s offering will be cited as such. If readers wish to post AI-generated items in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

The AMA and “Ethics of AI in Health Care”

Today’s offering discusses the newest “innovation” of the American Medical Association (AMA): a new Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) devoted to AI and health care. The new journal’s website is here: https://jamanetwork.com/channels/ai, “JAMA+ AI.” Please see the opening statement by founding editor of JAMA+ AI, Dr. Roy H. Perlis, MD, MSc, from the above-linked website:

The AMA has offered CME (Continuing Medical Education) courses for some time now that are related to the use of artificial intelligence / “large language models” / “machine learning” in healthcare, via its website (https://www.ama-assn.org/.) As of spring 2027, the new “JAMA+ AI” journal will officially begin. The incoming editor of the new journal, Dr. Roy H. Perlis, MD, MSc, was just named as the Director of the Bakar Computational Health Sciences Institute at the University of California, San Francisco. Dr. Perlis is already associated with Massachusetts General Hospital and the Harvard Medical School (https://medschool.ucsf.edu/news/announcing-roy-h-perlis-md-msc-director-bakar-computational-health-sciences-institute, 29 September 2026.)

However, there are already articles appearing on JAMA related to the new journal, to using AI in multiple areas of healthcare providing, and more. Three examples of such articles: first, https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2855492, “Engaging With Medical Evidence in the Age of AI”, Rohan Khera, MD, MS, et al., 15 October 2026; second, https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2855491, “Clinician Use of an Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Clinical Information Platform”, Vishal R. Patel, MD, MPH, et al., 15 October 2026; and, third, https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama-health-forum/fullarticle/2855161, “Avoiding a 2-Tier AI Ecosystem in Health Care”, Brett Moran, MD, et al., 16 October 2026. Following are two screenshots from the article by Khera, et al.:

Note the mention of heavy (“disproportionate”) use by “newly-minted” physicians. Following are three screenshots from the Patel, et al., article:

Note, in the Table above, the four areas under subcategory “Clinical decision-making”; the five areas under the subcategory “Clinical knowledge”; and, the “Guidelines” area under the subcategory “Evidence.”

Finally, two screenshots from the Moran, et al., article:

All of the above bring up questions, among them:

How will Medical Doctors — Physician Assistants — Osteopaths (they are licensed as doctors of osteopathy [DOs]; they can diagnose, prescribe, and create treatment plans for patients, as do medical doctors [MDs]; DOs have the rights and privileges that MDs enjoy) — Nurse Practitioners, and other licensed healthcare professionals who diagnose, prescribe, order tests, and create treatment plans — be trained to use AI-generated information as an adjunct to their work, as opposed to using AI-generated information as the template basis of their work?

What about the proposal, outlined above in the Moran, et al., article, regarding the implementation of a “government-wide AI watchdog and information-sharing platform” under the control of CMS, for example?

Can such an “AI watchdog and information-sharing platform” become a “one size fits all” approach to patient encounters and patient care? If so, what does this do to the individual healthcare provider’s ability to, for example, prescribe a drug for an “off-label” use to treat a particular patient?

What would such an “AI watchdog” framework do to care provided in hospital or nursing home settings?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

The use of AI-generated systems for use in healthcare settings is increasing rapidly over the entire spectrum of medicine. It is Yours Truly’s opinion that, while AI-generated information systems may eventually become a tool to assist the provider in assessing and treating a patient, they should not be used as a template for a “one size fits all, follow the steps outlined on the AI-generated program and stay with that” approach.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA1

(Intellectual Property Disclaimer and Notice: Except for the linked URLs and other items in today’s offering that are available on the Internet, the ideas and/or opinions above are by PAVACA1, Credit must be given to PAVACA1 if ideas and/or opinions of today’s offering are used by other blog writers; by podcasters; or, in print or social media.)

Health Friday 10.16.2026 Open Thread: NUVAXOVID, the Novavax COVID-19 Bioweapon “Vaccine”: Part Two

The image of Spodoptera frugiperda (fall armyworm) for today’s offering header is courtesy of Wikipedia. Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: AI-generated items in today’s offering will be cited as such. If readers wish to post AI-generated items in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.

For previous information on NUVAXOVID, please see Part One of this series, here: https://www.theqtree.com/2026/10/02/health-friday-10-2-2026-open-thread-nuvaxovid-the-novavax-covid-19-bioweapon-vaccine-part-one/.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

NUVAXOVID, the Novavax COVID-19 Bioweapon “Vaccine”: Part Two

This article will discuss a sampling of more “details” from the Package Insert for Healthcare Providers for NUVAXOVID; followed by a presentation of the Patent for this injectable. The Package Insert for NUVAXOVID is here: https://www.fda.gov/media/186544/download. Let’s look at this statement on page 5, under the footnotes for section 6 ADVERSE REACTIONS:

**** In other words: it appears that there were TWO DIFFERENT manufacturing processes for the NUVAXOVID used in the clinical trials listed above the footnotes (seven clinical trials in all) — shades of the “Process 1” and “Process 2” manufacturing methods used by Pfizer-BioNTech for BNT162b2.

Study 1 (NCT04611802), which Yours Truly will call the first “NUVAXOVID Process 1 study” was conducted in the United States, Mexico, and Puerto Rico; Study 2 (NCT04583995), using the “NUVAXOVID Process 2 study”) was conducted in the United Kingdom; Study 3 (NCT04533300), another “NUVAXOVID Process 2 study”) was performed in South Africa; and, Study 4 (NCT 02368988), the final “NUVAXOVID Process 2 study”) was performed in the United States and Australia. Studies 1, 5, 6, and 7 used the “NUVAXOVID Process 1” manufacturing method. Information regarding the changes to the manufacturing processes for NUVAXOVID is found in this document, beginning on page 23 and continuing through page 31: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/assessment-report/nuvaxovid-epar-public-report_en.pdf, 4 January 2022. A screenshot of a portion of page 23 is below:

What follows, through page 31 of this document, is a “public-view description” of the multiple changes to the manufacturing process for NUVAXOVID: changes that occurred while clinical studies were ongoing; changes that occurred due to the “vaccine” (NVX-CoV2373, the “other name” for NUVAXOVID) being manufactured by at least two different entities in two different countries; changes that resulted in different types of formulations; and more. Were the human study subjects in the seven studies listed above informed that the NUVAXOVID (NVX-CoV2373) that was injected into them could have been manufactured in, for example, Japan or India? That the composition of the formulation that was injected into them could be different from one human study subject to another? Did the study subjects have to sign off on the above?

Looking “further afield” regarding the (at least two; perhaps, more?) manufacturing processes for NUVAXOVID, Yours Truly found this: https://www.mci.edu/en/news-filter-en/228-researchernews/4068-nuvaxovid-new-vaccine-explained, ” Nuvaxovid – the new subunit SARS-CoV-2 vaccine”, Carmen Nussbaumer, 28 February 2022 (Innsbruck, Austria.) A screenshot of the section, “What comprises the Nuvaxovid vaccine?” is below. This article confirms that the spike protein is the basis for NUVAXOVID. It also confirms that the spike protein is “inserted” into a virus created from the Spodoptera frugiperda Sf9 cell line, which is then introduced into the body — thus, two different viruses are used: the manipulated “baculovirus” that is inserted into the Sf9 insect cells + the spike protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.:

The Package Insert for Healthcare Providers for NUVAXOVID (link above) appears to focus on Study 1 (NCT04611802, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04611802), which was conducted in the United States, Mexico, and Puerto Rico. On page 8 of the Fact Sheet, for example, there is a breakdown of the types and percentages of study subjects affected by adverse reactions to NUVAXOVID. The figures on page 8 are, in Yours Truly’s opinion, revealing: one sees that the numbers of Study 1 subjects who had adverse reactions to this “vaccine” far outweigh the numbers of Study 1 subjects who were given the saline solution placebo injections. A screenshot of a portion of page is below:

Grade 3 adverse reactions include those which interfere with normal daily activities; which cause a high degree of pain; and so on. Grade 4 adverse reactions include those which require Emergency Room visits or hospitalization; which indicate tissue death (necrosis); and more. One more detail in the Package Insert for Healthcare Providers for NUVAXOVID: on page 42, the (“official”, per the Package Insert) manufacturer of this “vaccine” is Sanofi (also known as Sanofi-Pasteur.) A screenshot of page 42 is below:

Sanofi has a website devoted to NUVAXOVID: https://www.nuvaxovid.com/. This website states that the product does not contain SARS-CoV-2:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

The information regarding the differences in manufacturing processes among what Yours Truly will call the “NUVAXOVID Process 1” and the “NUVAXOVID Process 2” led one to look up the Patent for NUVAXOVID: https://patents.google.com/patent/US11253586B2/en, “Coronavirus vaccine formulations”. A screenshot of the Title and Date Summary of the Patent is below:

A screenshot of Claim 1 is below:

Which, by the way, appears to confirm that: the SARS-CoV-2 virus is NOT found in nature; that the spike protein of this virus is the foundation for NUVAXOVID; and, that elements of the spike protein were modified for use in the “vaccine” (modRNA.) Which also appears to contradict the statement on the Sanofi-sponsored NUVAXOVID website (link above, and image from the website) that there is no SARS-CoV-2 in the product.

Some other details from the Patent: One: Fig. 4 and Fig. 5, regarding two SARS-CoV-2 polypeptides (BV2365 and BV2373) which bind well to the ACE2 receptor enzymes in the body. These receptors are crucial for controlling blood pressure, wound healing, and inflammation (https://www.asbmb.org/asbmb-today/science/051620/what-is-the-ace-2-receptor, 16 May 2020.) Apparently, the inventors of NUVAXOVID spent time and effort in manipulating BV2365 and BV2373 to get the results they wanted: SARS-CoV-2 virus elements that would bind as completely as possible to the ACE2 receptors in the body. Two: there are several types of “detergents” that can be used (“in embodiments” is the language in the Patent) in NUVAXOVID to “scrub clean” the surface of body cells to assist the “vaccine’s” entry into these cells. Two such detergents are NP-9 and polysorbate 80 (PS80.) PS80 was one chosen for the U.S. version of this “vaccine” (see the Package Insert [link above], section 11 DESCRIPTION.)

**** The combination of the spike protein elements + PS80 make up the nanoparticle used in NUVAXOVID (Claim 6): it appears that the PS80 surfactant detergent “scrubs clean” the surface of the ACE2 receptors; so that the manipulated BV2365 and BV2373 enzymes from the spike protein can gain entry into these receptors: therefore interfering with their normal functions of controlling blood pressure, wound healing, inflammation, and other processes. In addition, the PS80 + spike protein which makes up the nanoparticle for NUVAXOVID allows the spike protein to be “mainlined” into every cell in the body.

But wait, there’s more! Reading through more of the Patent, it is apparent that: One: other forms of CoV (coronavirus) elements can be used (MERS, SARS-CoV), either alone OR IN COMBINATION with the spike protein from SARS-CoV-2, in NUVAXOVID; Two: it appears that the BV2373 enzyme from the SARS-CoV-2 virus is the “prime instigator” used in the “vaccine”; Three: that the “vaccine” is formulated to specifically attack the CD4 – CD8 cells of the body; Four: that ALUMINUM salts can also be used as an adjuvant in the “vaccine”; Five: that the use of the Matrix-M adjuvant (made from the soapbark tree) in the “vaccine” MAY LEAVE TRACE ELEMENTS of the manufacturing process for this adjuvant; and, Six: that the Matrix-M adjuvant can comprise AS MUCH AS 85% of the “vaccine” formulation. Note: adjuvants are used in “vaccines” to increase the response in body of the “vaccinated” person.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

**** What we have now is the following: A COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine”, called NUVAXOVID. This “vaccine”: may include not only the spike protein from the SARS-CoV-2 virus, but ALSO elements from other coronaviruses (MERS, or SARS-CoV, or others); which may include one OR more detergents (NP-9, PS80. or others); which may include UP TO 85% of a lab-created compound called Matrix-M, an adjuvant, lab-created from elements of the soapbark tree; which MAY also include aluminum salts as an adjuvant; which includes a “baculovirus” that is lab-created from the Sf9 cells of Spodoptera frugiperda (fall armyworm), a voracious crop destroyer insect; which is manufactured under “partnership” with Sanofi, or with FUJIFILM (Japan), or in India (the latter two locations were where the NUVAXOVID used in clinical trials were manufactured; it is unknown if these two locations are still being used to manufacture the “vaccine”); which is a “vaccine” that CROSSES THE BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER, in addition to entering into every cell of the “vaccinated” body; which allows the PS80 + spike protein nanoparticle in NUVAXOVID to be “mainlined” into every cell in the body; and, which contains at least one chemical compound — methyl-alpha-D-mannopyranoside) that is “Not for drug or household use” (https://www.tcichemicals.com/OP/en/p/M0368; click on “Safety & Regulations” tab; then click “Safety Data Sheet (SDS)” in English); and, finally, that the FDA-issued Package Insert for Healthcare Providers only contains the information that Novavax has given to the FDA. NUVAXOVID is a modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine.” It is NOT a “safer alternative” to COMIRNATY, to SPIKEVAX, to mNEXSPIKE, or to any other COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine.” In fact, NUVAXOVID, in Yours Truly’s opinion, could be slightly more dangerous than the other COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” — because the nanoparticle used in this “vaccine” is made up of a detergent + the elements of the SARS-CoV-2 virus spike protein itself (manipulated with Sf9 insect “baculovirus”.)

The FDA has granted full approval for this “vaccine.” Who, reading the information in today’s offering, along with that in Part One of the NUVAXOVID series, would allow this product to be injected into their body — or into the body of their child?

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA1

(Intellectual Property Disclaimer and Notice: Except for the linked URLs and other items that are available on the Internet, the ideas and/or opinions in today’s offering are by PAVACA1 (M.E. Forbes, aka M.E.C. Forbes.) Credit must be given to PAVACA1 if ideas and/or opinions in today’s offering are used by other blog writers; by podcasters; or in print or social media.)

Health Friday 10.9.2026 Open Thread: The AMA Wants Americans to Take More Poison “Vaccines”

The vintage image of a doctor’s office sign for today’s offering header is courtesy of iStock and Google Images. Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: AI-generated items in today’s offering will be cited as such. If readers wish to post AI-generated items in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The AMA Wants Americans to Take More Poison “Vaccines” Note: AMA stands for the American Medical Association, a private organization founded in 1847. The AMA currently has approximately 270,000 members (https://www.ama-assn.org/.) The organization has a large and powerful lobbying presence on Capitol Hill. The subject of today’s offering is a JAMA Learning interview (Journal of the American Medical Association) by JAMA Deputy Editor, Preeti Malani, MD, MPH, with former Director of the CDC Rochelle Wolansky, MD, MPH. Please see: https://edhub.ama-assn.org/jn-learning/audio-player/19096301, “Influenza, RSV, and COVID-19 Vaccines: Effectiveness, Safety, and Trust in 2026.” Note that Dr. Wolansky, as Director of the CDC from 20 January 2021 until 30 June 2023, was one of the prime figures in the implementation of Operation Warp Speed; she resigned from the CDC after the COVID-19 pandemic was declared ended on 11 May 2023 (https://archive.cdc.gov/.) Dr. Wolansky is currently a professor at the Harvard University School of Medicine. The following are four items from the Transcript of Dr. Malani’s interview with Dr. Wolansky:

The copyrighted items above are from the American Medical Association, and are available on the Internet.

Dr. Wolansky is a co-author of the following report, produced by the AMA in conjunction with the Vaccine Integrity Project (https://vax.integrity.cidrap.umn.edu), itself a division of CIDRAP (Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy, https://cidrap.umn.edu.) It appears, in Yours Truly’s opinion, that the Vaccine Integrity Project views itself as an “ACIP / CDC replacement vaccine recommendations organization”, since the actual ACIP group was disbanded by Federal Judge Brian E. Murphy earlier this year, and that there is no current ACIP roster past 24 July 2026 (https://www.cdc.gov/acip/membership/roster-archive.html.) The Vaccine Integrity Project, in conjunction with the AMA, released its’ “independent vaccine evidence” report on 2 September 2026: https://www.ama-assn.org/press-center/ama-press-releases/ama-vaccine-integrity-center-unveil-independent-vaccine-evidence. The summary of the “recommendations” of this “ACIP / CDC replacement vaccine recommendations organization” is here: https://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/vip-reviews-highlights.pdf; which “recommendations” are, of course, that all Americans continue to take: the RSV “vaccine” the COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” the influenza vaccines (see above regarding Dr. Wolanky’s enthusiastic endorsement of mRNA-1010 (mFLUSIVA). Translation: Establishment Medicine (the AMA; the Vaccine Integrity Project; the American Academy of Pediatrics; the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists — all prime examples) is continuing to “recommend” that Americans continue to “follow the science”, to “listen to the trusted messengers”, and have more of the above injectable poisons put into their bodies.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Hulscher, et al., have just published a paper on Zenodo which proves that CHILDREN who take COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” are at higher risk for developing anxiety / autism / ADHD / needing Special Education services: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-study-covid-19-vaccination-9fd. “BREAKING STUDY: COVID-19 “Vaccination” of Children Linked to AUTISM, ADHD, ANXIETY, and SPECIAL-ED Use”, Nicholas Hulscher, MPH, 5 October 2026. Note: there is an AI-generated image in this article. Please see the screenshots, below, from the Hulscher piece:

The paper is found here: https://zenodo.org/records/23165256, “Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in COVID-19 Vaccinated Versus Unvaccinated U.S. Children: Analysis of the National Health Interview Survey 2022 – 2024”, Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, John Catanzano, NMD, PhD, et al.; 5 October 2026. Please see the screenshot of the Conclusions of this paper, below:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Americans must educate themselves regarding the dangers of the injectables that they are “recommended” to take, or for injectables that are “recommended” for their children. Demand to see the healthcare provider Package Insert for the injectable, NOT the “dumbed-down” Information Sheet for Patients and Caregivers for the product. Read the healthcare provider Package Insert. Ask the healthcare provider to clarify or explain any questions. Ask WHY the injectable is being “recommended” for the patient. Yes, there are circumstances where an injectable drug may be indicated or necessary — however, the patient has the right to ask the reasoning behind the indication. In Yours Truly’s opinion, the “good old days” of blindly rolling up the sleeve and “taking the shot” are finished.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA1

(Intellectual Property Disclaimer and Notice: Except for the linked URLs and other items available on the Internet in today’s offering, the ideas and/or opinions above are by PAVACA1 (M.E. Forbes, aka M.E.C. Forbes.) Credit must be given to PAVACA1 if ideas and/or opinions in today’s offering are used by other blog writers; by podcasters; or in print or social media.)

Health Friday 10.2.2026 Open Thread: NUVAXOVID, the Novavax COVID-19 Bioweapon “Vaccine”: Part One

The image of Spodoptera frugiperda (fall armyworm) for today’s offering header is courtesy of Wikipedia.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: AI-generated items in today’s offering will be cited as such. If readers wish to post AI-generated item in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

NUVAXOVID, the Novavax COVID-19 Bioweapon “Vaccine”: Part One

Yours Truly has written many times regarding the modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines”, BNT162b2 (now COMIRNATY, by Pfizer-BioNTech); and, mRNA-1273 (SPIKEVAX) and mRNA-1283 (mNEXSPIKE), by Moderna. Today’s offering concerns NUVAXOVID, the mRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine” by Novavax. One will state at the outset that NUVAXOVID is not a “safer” COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine.” In Yours Truly’s opinion, there IS NO “SAFE” or “SAFER” COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine” — no matter what “delivery platform technology” is used. This includes modRNA-based, mRNA-based, saRNA-based, “protein subunit” based, “inactivated”, or any other platform technology. Any COVID-19 “vaccine” that is based on the SARS-CoV-2 virus (no matter if the entire spike protein is used, or part of the spike protein is used, in the product). Why? Because of the following, among other reasons: First, the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein itself, which was developed to invade the lungs and to attack the ACE2 receptors of the body (in the heart, intestines, and kidney, among other locations); and, Second, the other ingredients that these “vaccines” contain, among them: dangerous nanoparticles (ALC-0159; ALC-0315; SM-102); N1-methylpseudouridine; antibiotics; detergents; SV40; “loose” DNA fragments; — and, in the case of NUVAXOVID, insect matter from an invasive crop destroyer insect. By the way, NUVAXOVID utilizes the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 — and has deletions / alterations that were introduced into it — thus making this “vaccine” a modRNA-based injectable.

Spodoptera frugiperda (fall armyworm) is found all over the globe. This pest, swarming in large numbers and eating every part of the crop, can destroy entire fields of, for example, corn, in days. Please see: https://www.sygenta.com/agriculture/crop-production/pest-disease-management/billion-dollar-problem, “A billion dollar problem”, August 2024. A screenshot from this article is below:

The “culturing bath” for the modRNA mixture used in NUVAXOVID is lab-created from elements derived from Spodoptera frugiperda. This, in itself, in Yours Truly’s opinion, makes the final product suspect from the start. Such a “culturing bath” has its own potential risks and issues. Such a “culturing bath” is NOT “safer” or “better” than the E. coli-derived ones used by Pfizer-BioNTech and by Moderna for their COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine” products.

Yours Truly now turns to the FDA-issued Package Insert for Healthcare Providers for NUVAXOVID: https://www.fda.gov/files/vaccines,blood&biologics/published/Package-Insert-and-Patient-Package-Insert-NUVAXOVID.pdf. The healthcare providers Package Insert will be discussed first. Please see the following screenshots from this document. Note the admission, in section 5.2, that this “vaccine” can cause myocarditis / pericarditis; the dismissive language in section 6.2; the “potential benefits outweigh the potential risk”-type of argument in section 8.2; and the enormous amount of “adjuvant” used per injection of NUVAXOVID, compared to the amount of modRNA per injection:

Also: Pages 11 – 14 et seq. in the healthcare provider Package Insert — the Adverse Reactions sections — consistently has clearly dismissive language regarding adverse reactions reported as being “not causative.”

So far, what we see from the healthcare provider Package Insert is: that NUVAXOVID can cause heart issues; that postmarketing “vaccine”-induced issues can be dismissed under “not sufficient causal relationship” to having taken the “vaccine”; that, apparently, no animal (non-human) studies were performed to investigate whether or not NUVAXOVID elements are excreted in breast milk; that the “potential benefits outweigh potential risks” canard regarding taking COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” somehow applies to human lactation; and, that the ** published ** ingredients list of NUVAXOVID reads like a “laundry list” of chemicals plus a dose of crop-destroying insect residue plus a hefty dose of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.

Let’s look at some of the ingredients listed in section 11 DESCRIPTION of this “vaccine”: One: the “rS” spike protein used in NUVAXOVID is the full-length S protein; and, the “vaccine” attacks both the B-lymphocyte and the T-lymphocyte immune mechanisms. Please see: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8897963/, “Editorial: First Approval of the Protein-Based Adjuvanted Nuvaxovid (NVX-CoV2373) Novavax Vaccine for SARS-CoV-2 Could Increase Vaccine Uptake and Provide Immune Protection from Viral Variants”, Dinah V. Parums, MD, PhD, March 2022. Two: the lab-creation of the Sf9 Spodoptera frugiperda insect cell line used for the “culturing bath” for NUVAXOVID apparently only requires a BSL-1 laboratory level (thus making the process of culturing insect cell lines for use in “vaccines” faster and cheaper.) Please see: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392062088_The_Bioengineering_of_Insect_Cell_Lines_for_Biotherapeutics_and_Vaccine_Production_An_Updated_Review, Michal Sulek, Angieszka Szuster-Ciesielska, May 2025. (The title of the paper is the same as the URL.) Three: a few of the other ingredients in NUVAXOVID: potassium dihydrogen phosphate, a potassium salt that is used in fertilizer (https://pubchem.ncbi.nim.nih.gov/compound/Monobasic-potassium-phosphate); and, disodium hydrogen phosphate heptahydrate, a chemical compound that is not for food or drug use: https://www.biosynth.com/Files/MSDS/FS/32/MSDS_FS32721_7000_EN.pdf; see section 1; and, polysorbate 80, a surfactant (a type of detergent) used in soaps and cosmetics.

Adding these into the summary of what NUVAXOVID contains, we now have, citing only the items above: The full-length SARS-CoV-2 spike protein + residue from the “culturing bath” that is lab-created from the Sf9 elements of the Spodoptera frugiperda (fall armyworm) + a potassium salt that is used in fertilizer + a chemical compound that is not to be used in food or drugs + a detergent. Then, there is the “Matrix-M” adjuvant used in this “vaccine”, made of “Fraction A” and “Fraction C” from the soapbark tree (Quillaja saponaria Molina.) Matrix-M is the largest amount of any ingredient in NUVAXOVID — 50mcg in the injection. Please see: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/drug-delivery/articles/10.3389/fddev.2023.1279710/full, “Biodistribution of the saponin-based adjuvant Matrix-M (TM) following intramuscular injection in mice”, Cecilia Carnrot, et al., 5 November 2023. Note: every author of this paper is affiliated with Novavax AB (Sweden), or with Novavax Inc., Gaithersburg, MD. An image of Figure 3 (biodistribution) of this paper is below. Apologies for the length of the image:

Note the accumulations of the Matrix-M adjuvant COMBINED WITH THE SARS-CoV-2 SPIKE PROTEIN (the dark blue dots on the above image) in areas of the body. Note that NUVAXOVID crosses the Blood-Brain Barrier and enters the brain. Note that many of the accumulations INCREASE over the timeframe biodistribution period.

Let’s look at the Information for Patients and Caregivers section of the FDA Package Insert, which begins on Page 44 of the document. Yours Truly is including two images from this section of the Package Insert:

Note the FDA “bafflegab” regarding the presence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in NUVAXOVID. The “vaccine” is BASED ON THE SARS-CoV-2 VIRUS. The “XFG variant”, which is the “official” SARS-CoV-2 variant used in the “vaccine”, IS “DESCENDED” FROM THE ORIGINAL WUHAN HU1 SARS-CoV-2 VIRUS VIA THE OMICRON LINEAGE. The FDA “bafflegab” is like saying, for example, “Well, I don’t have any German blood in me, since my German ancestors came to the United States 150 years ago.” Of course the DNA of one’s ancestors is present in the bloodline, even if in smaller amounts. And, note the complete lack of information regarding the “other ingredients” listed for NUVAXOVID. Unless the patient / caregiver looks up information on the chemicals listed, they won’t know, for example, that disodium hydrogen phosphate heptahydrate is not for food or drug use (see above in today’s offering.) Yours Truly will again state: NUVAXOVID is NOT a “safer” modRNA-based COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine.”

To be continued with a deeper dive into the modRNA details, and more, of NUVAXOVID, in Part Two.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA1

(Intellectual Property Disclaimer and Notice: Except for the linked URLs and other items available on the Internet in today’s offering, the ideas and/or opinions above are by PAVACA1 (M.E. Forbes, aka M.E.C. Forbes.) Credit must be given to PAVACA1 if ideas and/or opinions from today’s offering are used by other blog writers; by podcasters; or in print or social media.)

Health Friday 9.25.2026 Open Thread: Dismantle Them. Salt The Ground. Start All Over Again. Do It Right Next Time: Part Two

The free image of the trumpets of the Battle of Jericho for today’s offering header is courtesy of Shutterstock and Google Images. Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: AI-generated items in today’s offering will be cited as such. If readers wish to post AI-generated items in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Dismantle Them. Salt the Ground. Start All Over Again. Do It Right Next Time: Part Two

Part One is here: https://www.theqtree.com/2026/09/18/health-friday-9-18-2026-open-thread-dismantle-them-salt-the-ground-start-all-over-again-do-it-right-next-time-part-one/.

The focus of today’s offering regards the continuing issues and situations with respect to: One: non-modRNA-based “vaccines”; Two: the “revolving door” between the FDA and Big Pharma / Big Donors; and, Three: medical lobbyists and Establishment Medicine organizations keeping the “vaccine religion” going. What follows are what may be called “snapshots” of each area.

One: non-modRNA-based vaccines: Please see: https://kirschsubstack.com/p/a-list-of-evidence-consistent-with, “A list of evidence consistent with the hypothesis that “vaccines cause autism””, 12 September 2026. There are 30 items on the list. Two examples from the list: Number 17: “Aluminum concentration in the brains of autistic kids are among the highest measured (Exley 2017 study.) The title of the Exley, et al. paper: “Aluminum in brain tissue in autism”, Christopher Exley, et al.; Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology, Volume 46, March 2018, Pages 76 – 82; and, Number 31: “Vaccines cause autism in baby monkeys. What is different about people that it wouldn’t also cause autism in people?” Please see the screenshot from the Kirsch article regarding Number 31, below:

The paper referenced above is found here: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/45185677_Influence_of_pediatric_vaccines_on_amygdala_growth_and_opioid_ligand_binding_in_rhesus_macaque_infants_A_pilot_study, BJ Lopresti, et al.; 30 June 2010 (the title of the paper is the same as the URL). A screenshot of the Conclusions section of this paper is below:

Granted, the study concerned the effects on infant macaque monkeys. However, the vaccines used were ones approved for human use. In Yours Truly’s opinion, even if thimerosal (mercury compound) were completely removed from all vaccines, there possibility still remains that negative effects could occur due to the other ingredients.

Two: the “revolving door” between NIH / NIAID: Here is a prime example of this “revolving door”: Mark Raza, the former chief counsel for the FDA, and who had just left that agency — was immediately hired by a very large Big Pharma-connected law firm. Please see: https://aaronsiri.substack.com/p/the-revolving-door-the-media-wont, “The Revolving Door the Media Won’t Expose”, 15 September 2026. Also, please see:

And, here is the story from the law firm: https://www.mondaq.com/pressrelease/208152/hogan-lovells-cadwalader-welcomes-former-fda-chief-counsel-mark-raza-to-expanding-pharmaceuticals-and-biotechnology-practice, 9 September 2026 (the article title is the same as the URL.) Please a screenshot from this article, below:

Note the mention of hiring numerous other FDA former employees, in addition to now having Mr. Raza on their roster.

But wait, there’s more! Please see: https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/the-fda-is-a-criminal-cia-handled, “THE FDA IS A CRIMINAL CIA-HANDLED “HEALTH” AGENCY: Former FDA Chief Counsel Now Hired By Major BigPharma Law Firm”, 13 September 2026. In this article, there is a list of former FDA employees who now work for Big Pharma (or are connected with Big Pharma.) Examples from this list: Dr. Peter Marks, MD (former CBER director, FDA) —> now working for Big Pharma company, Eli Lilly; Mark McClellan (former FDA employee tasked with regulating Johnson & Johnson) —> now a board member of Johnson & Johnson; Dr. Scott Gottlieb, MD (former FDA commissioner in charge of regulating PfizerUSA) —> now on the board of directors for PfizerUSA; Dr. Stephen Hahn, MD (former FDA commissioner in charge of regulating Moderna) —> now Chief Medical Officer of Flagship Pioneering, the venture capital firm that bankrolls Moderna drug and “vaccine” development.

Three: medical lobbying and Establishment Medicine keeping the “vaccine religion” going: First, regarding medical lobbying: Pharmaceutical companies and Establishment Medicine (the American Medical Association [AMA]; the American Academy of Pediatrics {AAP]; and other similar medical professional organizations) have a “vested interest” in wielding influence in both chambers of the US federal government. Contributing to political campaigns for members of the House and the Senate can, so to speak, produce results that benefit these companies and professional medical organizations. For example, this 2023 article, from the AMA: https://www.ama-assn.org/about/leadership/how-does-ama-influence-public-policy, 22 August 2023. Which leads to this, from June 2026: https://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/ama-adocacy-impact-report.pdf. Please see the screenshots from this latter link, below. Note especially the claim in the first screenshot about how 73% of Americans “trust the AMA more than the CDC on vaccines”:

Followed by a screenshot, from the same link above, regarding the AMA’s political action committee, AMPAC:

AstraZeneca, another Big Pharma company (maker of FLUMIST©, SEROQUEL©, NEXIUM©, and many other drugs) also has a lobbying department: https://www.astrazeneca-us.com/sustainability/political-contributions. Click on “Federal & State Lobbying” down the main page. Yours Truly then clicked on the company’s lobbying report for the 4th quarter of 2025: https://www.astrazeneca-us.com/content/dam/az-us/Documents/PoliticalContributions/2026/AstraZeneca-LD2-Q4-filed.pdf, filed on 20 January 2026. The total for this lobbying division for the 4th quarter of 2025 was $670,000. Please see the screenshot, below, from this latter link:

Finally, regarding the ongoing, aggressive efforts by Establishment Medicine to “keep the “vaccine” train going”: Please see: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/why-do-pediatricians-blast-babies, “Why Do Pediatricians Blast Babies with Multiple Vaccines on Same Visit?”, Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH, 12 September 2026. There is a video interview with Dr. McCullough, along with a text summary.

The “vaccines” that are currently “recommended” for children from age 0 (birth) to through age 4 years:

Age 0 (birth): HepB

Age 2 months: DTap; IPV (polio); Hib; HepB; PCV (pneumococcal); Rotavirus

Age 6 months: DTap; IPV; HepB; PCV; Rotavirus; COVID-19

Age 12-15 months: MMR; Varicella (chickenpox); Hib booster; PCV booster; HepA; Influenza

Age 15-18 months: DTap booster; Influenza

Age 18-23 months: HepA 2nd dose; Influenza

Age 4 years: DTap booster; IPV booster; MMR booster; Varicella booster; Influenza

How can the still-forming and still-immature immune system of a child from birth until about age 7 years handle all of these antigens, especially if multiple injections of “vaccines” are administered in one healthcare visit?

There are incentives for healthcare professionals to administer the HPV “vaccine”: https://www.hpviq.org/incentives/types-of-incentives. And, consider this, a paper from 2021: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360815265_Vaccine_Practice_Payment_Schedules_Create_Perverse_Incentives_for_Unnecessary_Medical_Procedures_-_at_What_Cost_to_Patients, James Lyons-Weiler, Paul Thomas, March 2021 (the title of the paper is the same as the URL). Please see the screenshot of the Abstract of the paper, below:

It is Yours Truly’s opinion that people must educate themselves regarding: the medicines that they take; the “vaccines” that are “recommended” for themselves and their children; the ongoing efforts to gaslight the general public by Big Pharma and Establishment Medicine; the lobbying of local, state, and federal elected officials by Big Pharma; and, the current state of affairs at the FDA / CDC.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA1

(Intellectual Property Disclaimer and Notice: Except for the linked URLs and other items available on the Internet in today’s offering, the ideas and/or opinions in today’s offering are by PAVACA1. Credit must be given to PAVACA1 if ideas and/or opinions in today’s offering are used by other blog writers; by podcasters; or in print or social media.)

Health Friday 9.18.2026 Open Thread: Dismantle Them. Salt The Ground. Start All Over Again. Do It Right Next Time: Part One

The free image of the trumpets of the Battle of Jericho is courtesy of Shutterstock and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats by Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: AI-generated items in today’s offering are cited as such. If readers wish to post AI-generated items in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Dismantle Them. Salt The Ground. Start All Over Again. Do It Right Next Time: Part One.

This is about completely dismantling the CDC, the FDA, NIH, and NIAID; and rebuilding them following a new format: that of actually serving the health of the American public. Up until 4 August 2026, this “edifice” named above had evolved into a funds-funneling vehicle for dangerous Gain-of-Function experiments in laboratories ranging from: Dr. Ralph Baric’s lab at UNC Chapel Hill (development of the SARS-CoV-2 “template” virus); to Dr. Zheng-li Shi’s laboratory at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (where the SARS-CoV-2 “template virus” was being “enhanced” prior to its being released in late fall 2019); to Dr. Peter Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance (Gain-of-Function experiments funding via “grants” from NIH / NIAID); to NIAID and Moderna entering into an agreement (in 2015) to co-develop, co-own the Patents for, and share in the royalty payments for the use of, mRNA-1273 (SPIKEVAX), and of mRNA-1345 (mRESVIA.)

What does dismantling this “edifice” involve? Among many other aspects, in Yours Truly’s opinion: firing all current employees; stopping the funding applications for new research projects; stopping all current funding in place for approved research projects; cutting all ties to, and involvement with, pharmaceutical companies regarding development and manufacture of drugs and injectables; and, RESCINDING the agreement signed between the United States Department of Defense and NIH / NIAID. This agreement was signed between the United States Department of War (signature by Dr. Robert Kadlec, MD, as representative, on 4 August 2026), and the NIH / NIAID (signature by Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, director of NIH, on 5 August 2026), that ceded future development of injectable medicines (including influenza and COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines”), in addition to other drugs, from NIH / NIAID to the Department of War; and, in addition, with NIH / NIAID providing “data and information”, along with to up to $2 Billion dollars in funding. (https://www.theqtree.com/2026/09/11/health-friday-9-11-2026-open-thread-25th-anniversary-of-9-11-nih-and-the-department-of-war-just-signed-a-new-agreement/.)

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

The focus of today’s offering is the now-proven fact that the modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” (gene therapy injections) can cause cancer in “vaccinated” persons via THREE OF THE INGREDIENTS IN THESE “VACCINES.” Note: the appelation “lipid nanoparticle(s)” and the acronym “LNP(s)” are used interchangeably.

The first and second ingredients in the modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” (gene therapy injections) that cause cancer: the spike protein; and, the SV40 cancer promoter gene code piece. Please see: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-study-pfizer-covid-19-vaccine, “BREAKING STUDY: Pfizer COVID-19 “Vaccine” Plasmid DNA Found Inside Lethal Turbo Cancer of the Heart”, Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 9 September 2026. The deceased was a 35-year-old male, with no personal or family history of cancer, who took the “primary series” of two injections of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine”, BNT162b2, in April and May 2021. 170 days after the second injection, the patient was diagnosed with a “large tumor” in the left atrium of his heart, and that had already metastasized to the brain. Despite numerous surgeries, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy, the patient ultimately passed away 675 days after the initial diagnosis. Please see the screenshots from the Hulscher article, below:

Look at the above again: The SV40 cancer promoter-enhancer was NOT found to be present. What WAS found to be present were “vaccine” spike protein fragments. This confirms that the spike protein in the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” can cause cancer. This is aside from the fact that the SV40 cancer promoter-enhancer gene code piece is ALSO in the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines.” Please see: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/17-ways-mrna-shots-may-cause-cancer, “17 Ways mRNA Shots May Cause Cancer, According to Over 100 Studies”, Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 24 June 2025.

**** This makes two ingredients (out of the three) which these modRNA-based injectables contain that can (and do) cause cancer. The paper that is referenced in the Hulscher article is here: https://zenodo.org/records/22677693, “Fatal Cardiac Intimal Sarcoma in a 35-Year-Old Male Following COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination: Plasmic DNA Fragments Encoding the S-Protein Detected in Tumor Tissue”, Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH, et al., 9 September 2026. Note: The paper is a preprint. Interested readers should consider archiving, printing out, or otherwise saving it, in the event the paper is later Withdrawn, Retracted, or Reissued with New Conclusions due to pressure brought on Zenodo by outside entities, or due to pressure brought onto the paper’s authors. In addition, it is now proven that the modRNA, the spike protein, and the SV40 cancer promoter-enhancer gene code piece can be found in “vaccinated” persons for at least 3.5 years after injection: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-peer-reviewed-study-finds-51c, “BREAKING: Peer-Reviewed Study Finds mRNA, SV40, and Spike Protein Can Persist in Humans for At Least 3.5 Years After COVID-19 “Vaccination””, Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 9 July 2026. The paper referred to in this article is found here: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.2026.0351, “Persistence of Vaccine mRNA, Plasmid DNA, Spike Protein, and Genomic Dysregulation Over 3.5 Years Post-COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination”, Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, et al., epublished 31 July 2026. Yours Truly discussed this paper in the following post: https://www.theqtree.com/2026/09/04/health-friday-9-4-2026-open-thread-countermeasures-and-precautions-an-opinion-piece/.

The third ingredient in the modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” that can cause cancer is now proven — cancer caused by the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) within these “vaccines.” Please see: https://jessicar.substack.com/p/causal-role-of-lnp-induced-inflammation, “Causal role of LNP-induced inflammation in cancer metastasis in mice”, Jessica Rose, PhD, 3 September 2026. Please the screenshots, below, from Dr. Rose’s article:

So, to examine a couple of things: First, what are neutrophils? The short answer is, they are a type of white blood cell. Please see: https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/body/22313-neutrophils; a screenshot from this article is below:

Second, the Pharmacokinetics Tabulated Summary report that Pfizer-BioNTech gave to the FDA early in 2021 (https://icandecide.org/wp-content/uploads/125742_S1_M2_26_pharmkin-tabulated-summary.pdf, regarding the biodistribution of BNT162b2 in the Wistar lab rats experiments and the related amounts of the lipid nanoparticles ALC-0159 and ALC-0315. Please see the screenshots from this report, below:

The paper referred to by Dr. Rose in her article is here: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2026.103039, “Lipid nanoparticle used in mRNA vaccine promotes metastasis in mouse model via mt-DNA-induced neutrophil activation and NETosis”, Binhan Wang, et al., 28 March 2026. Note: the full article is restricted-access via institutions or via article purchase. The following screenshot is from the ScienceDirect “public viewing sections” page of the paper:

So, it appears that multiple types of lipid nanoparticles were used in the Binhan Wang, et al., experiments. Note: some combination of the above LNPs (DSPC and DMG-PEG2000) are found in both the Pfizer-BioNTech and the Moderna 2026-2027 modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines.” SM-102, another LNP, is used in the Moderna “vaccines” (the ALC-0259 and ALC-0315 LNPs are used in the Pfizer-BioNTech “vaccines.”)

Please refer again to Page 7 of the Pharmacokinetics Tabulated Summary for BNT162b2 above, the huge accumulation of lipid nanoparticles AT THE INJECTION SITE of the Wistar lab rats. This argues that there is a similar accumulation of lipid nanoparticles AT THE INJECTION SITE for humans who take these “vaccines”: which would then also trigger the cascade of neutrophil activity for “vaccinated” persons, also STARTING AT THE INJECTION SITE WITH CELL DEATH. For another report on the Binhan Wang paper, and how important it is, please see: https://www.newstarget.com/2026-09-07-study-lipid-nanoparticle-mrna-vacines-promote-tumor-html, “Study finds Lipid Nanoparticle in mRNA Vaccines Could Promote Tumor Metatasis in Mice”, Morgan S. Verity, 7 September 2026.

**** And, there is another aspect of this situation: the fact that modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” SHED ONTO OTHER PEOPLE, including onto non-COVID-19 “vaccinated” people (https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/covid-19-vaccine-shedding-experiences, “What We’ve Learned from Over a Thousand Vaccine Shedding Reports”, 7 January 2024.) It is already known that, for example, mRNA-4157, the modRNA-based “individualized cancer vaccine” being developed by Moderna, requires female clinical study subjects to either be taking birth control starting BEFORE they begin participation in the study, AND to continue taking birth control for several months AFTER they complete participation; or, to be beyond childbearing age. This means that Moderna tacitly admits that mRNA-4157 CAN SHED. Please see: https://www.theqtree.com/2026/08/28/health-friday-8-28-2026-open-thread-mrna-4157-v940-also-known-as-intismeran-by-team-merck-and-moderna/.

It is past time, in Yours Truly’s opinion, for the American public to demand, first, that the entire “edifice” of the CDC / FDA / NIH / NIAID be completely dismantled and rebuilt as entities that will actually respond to, and safeguard the health of, the citizens of the United States; and, second, that the August 2026 agreement between NIH / NIAID and the United States Department of Defense be completely rescinded.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA1

(Intellectual Property Disclaimer and Notice: Except for linked URLs and other items available on the Internet, the ideas and/or opinions in today’s offering are by PAVACA1 (M.E. Forbes, aka M.E.C. Forbes.) Credit must be given to PAVACA1 if ideas and/or opinions in today’s offering are used by other blog writers; by podcasters; or in print or social media.)

Health Friday 9.11.2026 Open Thread: 25th Anniversary of 9/11; NIH and the Department of War Just Signed a New Agreement

The free image of 9/11 Never Forget is courtesy of Magnific and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: AI-generated items in today’s offering will be cited as such. If readers with to post AI-generated items in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Today, 11 September 2026, is the 25th anniversary of 9/11/2001. Never forget. May the innocent souls who perished in these attacks rest in eternal Peace. May the innocent people who survived these attacks, but died later from their injuries or 9/11 attack-related illnesses, rest in eternal Peace. May those who survived these attacks, but live with 9/11 attack-related injuries or illnesses, continue to find proper treatment and compensation for their suffering.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Yours Truly writes today regarding a different type of attack: an attack, in my opinion, on the freedoms that Americans are guaranteed under the Constitution. This attack is in the form of an agreement, signed in August 2026, between the National Institutes of Health — and the United States Department of War. Thanks to 2nd Smartest Guy In The World: https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/breaking-department-of-war-to-play, “BREAKING: Department of War To Play Larger Role In U.S. Biodefense & Pandemic Preparedness Under New Agreement With NIH”, 5 September 2026. Thanks also to Jon Fleetwood: https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/nih-hands-up-to-2-billion-in-future, “NIH Hands Up to $2 Billion in Future Pandemic, Other Emergency Projects to Pentagon Funding Vehicles GAO Still Cannot Track”, 6 September 2026.

The signed agreement is here: https://media.defense.gov/2026/Sep/04/2003992359/-1/-1/0/INTERAGENCY-AGREEMENT-NIH-AND-DOW-REDACTED.PDF. It was signed by NIH director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, MD, PhD, on 5 August 2026; and, by Dr. Robert Kadlec, MD, Assistant Secretary of War for Nuclear Deterrence, Chemical, and Biological Defense Policy and Programs (OASW ND – CBD), on 4 August 2026. The agreement runs for 10 years, until 2036. Dr. Kadlec spent 26 years in the United States Air Force. He was also the lead “architect” of Operation Warp Speed (https://www.acq.osd.mil/ncdbp/leadership/bio-kadlec.html.)

**** It appears that it was the NIH that requested this agreement be drawn up. It appears that the full agreement has not been finalized yet. Please see the screenshots from the signed document, below. Discussion will follow:

Department of War (OASW ND – CBD — Dr. Kadlec) responsibilities in the agreement:

NIH – NIAID (Dr. Bhattacharya, director, NIH; Dr. John H. Powers III, MD, Acting Director, NIAID) responsibilities in the agreement. Note particularly the first item:

The current Acting Director of NIAID is Dr. John H. Powers III, MD; he was appointed to this position by NIH in June, 2026. Dr. Powers is also Deputy Director of NIAID. His biography is below, from https://www.niaid.nih.gov/about/director:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

The American public, as of early 2026, was starting to wake up to the following facts: One, that NIH / NIAID had been funding dangerous Gain-of-Function research on deadly pathogens for years — experiments performed in the United States and at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Communist China; Two, that NIH / NIAID hid the information about these experiments from the American public for years; Three, that at least one high-ranking NIAID employee — Dr. David Morens — had destroyed numerous communications related to these experiments; Four, that Dr. Morens destroyed these communications based on either the knowledge and approval of, or on the after-the-fact approval of, Dr. Anthony Fauci, former director of NIAID; Five, that Dr. Fauci consistently lied to Congress in his appearances there to testify about these experiments; Six; that Dr. Fauci was granted a pre-emptive Presidential pardon for any “crimes committed relating to his activities at NIAID” between 2014 and December 2025 by then-President Biden; Seven, that Dr. Fauci pled the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution in response to every question posed to him during his Senate committee appearance in July 2026; Eight, that the COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” are, in fact, dangerous and deadly; Nine, that the American public is beginning to refuse to take modRNA-platform based “vaccines”, including the COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines”; and, Ten, the American public is beginning to realize that these “vaccines” can, and do, induce or aggravate multiple types of illnesses, injuries, and disabilities — and can, and do, cause death — in people who take them. It is also now known that NIH / NIAID and Moderna had signed an agreement regarding co-development of, co-ownership of the Patent for, and sharing of royalty payments for use of, the modRNA-based COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine”, mRNA-1273 and its “descendant” COVID-19 “vaccines” (SPIKEVAX and mNEXSPIKE.) This agreement is still in force. It is also now known that the then-Department of Defense (now Department of War) had signed cooperative agreements with Pfizer-BioNTech regarding that company’s development and implementation of, the modRNA-based COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine”, BNT162b2 (COMIRNATY) — agreements that involved the United States Army in various aspects.

The American public is starting to push back on the use of these “vaccines.” The American public is starting to realize that NIAID, under Dr. Anthony Fauci, was funding Gain-of-Function virus research — research that ultimately resulted in the lab-creation of the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) virus. And what does NIH / NIAID do? NIH signs an agreement in August, 2026 — and said agreement is NOT in the public’s eye until almost a month later — to transfer up to $2 Billion dollars to the Department of War for the funding of MORE Gain-of-Function experiments with modRNA-based platforms — in other words, shifting Gain-of-Function research from NIH / NIAID over to the Departent of War. This funding transfer includes paying Department of War personnel. What happens as the direct result of this signed agreement, in Yours Truly’s opinion, is the merging of NIH / NIAID with the Department of War — with NIH / NIAID as the “silent / funding” partner. No “draft agreement” was put before the American public to read. No “public comment period” before the agreement was drawn up and signed. It can be assumed that HHS Sec. Kennedy, Jr., either knew of this agreement and approved it; or, that he was presented with the signed agreement after the fact, and it was made clear that he could do nothing about it.

Does this mean that the Department of War will, in the future, lab-create the “next latest version” of COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” in conjunction with Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, and Novavax? That the Department of War will, in the future, lab-create the “next latest version” of influenza “vaccines” in conjunction with Big Pharma companies? That NIH / NIAID will, in the future, do “pass back and forth” processes with the Department of War related to the future development of these “vaccines”? Does it mean that NIH / NIAID will, in the future, be answerable to the Department of War, and not to the American people? What happens to the “advisory roles” of the CDC’s ACIP panel, and to the FDA’s VRBPAC panel? — Are they, in the future, going to he under the control of the Department of War? DID DR. JAY BHATTACHARYA ACTUALLY UNDERSTAND WHAT HE WAS SIGNING?

**** It appears that NIH is already moving projects over to the Department of War. Please see: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-02799-3, “Revealed: inside the US & military’s plan to tap huge sums from the NIH”, Max Kozlov, 4 September 2026 (correction 5 September 2026). Most of this article is behind a restricted-access wall. Screenshots from the “general public view” section of the article are below:

The X post by Dr. Bhattacharya has to be read to be believed:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

The United States military, via the Department of War (formerly, the Department of Defense) has been working in collaboration with Big Pharma and with the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) for decades; in particular, regarding HHS, working with the FDA / HHS / NIH /NIAID. Katherine Watt, the retired paralegal who closed her Substack earlier this year, wrote extensively about these collaborations. One such collection of her writings, regarding chemical / biological / “vaccines” aspects, is in PDF form, here: https://bailiwicknewsarchives.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/biological-agents-vaccines-chemical-and-biological-warfare-law.pdf.

It appears, in Yours Truly’s opinion, that the collaboration between the Department of War and HHS (NIH /NIAID) has, through the agreement signed between Dr. Robert Kadlec and Dr. Jay Bhattacharya in August, 2026, been taken to a new, and dangerous level: that of NIH / NIAID transferring Gain-of-Function and modRNA-platform “vaccines”development to the Department of War, along with also transferring up to $2 Billion dollars in funding for such activities. This, in Yours Truly’s opinion, is unprecedented. The taxpayers of the United States were not apprised of this situation. It appears that one person — Dr. Robert Kadlec, MD, of the Department of War — is literally now in charge of modRNA-platform “vaccine” development for deployment in BOTH civilians and the military; and, one person — Dr. John H. Powers III, MD — current Acting Director of NIAID — will literally be in charge of funneling NIH / NIAID funds, data, and other research information, to the Department of War; while, at the same time, himself reporting to NIH director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya.

There are many crucial questions about this situation that MUST IMMEDIATELY be answered — with the answers GIVEN TO THE AMERICAN PUBLIC. Among them:

**** The NIH is the “requesting agency.” Exactly when was the first “request” made to the Department of War? What person(s), exactly, at NIH, made the “request”? To what person(s) at the Department of War?

**** Was HHS Sec. Kennedy, Jr., consulted before the first “request” from NIH to the Department of War? If so, when was he consulted? If so, did Sec. Kennedy, Jr., approve the first “request” from NIH to the Department of War? If not, did NIH go ahead anyway?

**** Is Pete Hegseth, Department of War secretary, involved in this situation? If so, what type(s) of involvement? Is Sec. Hegseth in contact with Dr. Robert Kadlec, MD? Is Sec. Hegseth in contact with Dr. Jay Bhattacharya of NIH? Is he in contact with both?

**** Did President Donald Trump47 know of the new agreement between NIH and the Department of War? If so, was he consulted on this situation? If so, did he, as Commander-in-Chief, approve it?

**** Is / was, Dr. Erica Schwartz, MD, Rear Adm. (ret.), the current director of the CDC, involved in any way regarding the NIH / DOW agreement? Dr. Schwartz was an important “enforcer” of the COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine” mandate on the U.S. military.

**** Has, in fact, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) been “merged into” the Department of War in any way whatsoever?

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA1

(Intellectual Property Disclaimer and Notice: Except for the linked URLs and other items available on the Internet, the ideas and/or opinions in today’s offering are by PAVACA1 (M.E Forbes, aka M.E.C. Forbes.) Credit must be given to PAVACA1 if ideas and/or ideas from today’s offering are used by other blog writers; by podcasters; or in print or social media.)