Health Friday 7.17.2026 Open Thread: ER-100: SV40 Injected Into the Eyes to “Reverse Aging”, Part Two of Two

The free vintage image for the header of today’s offering is courtesy of ClipArt and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health,, and associated topics. There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats by Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: AI-generated items will be cited as such in today’s offering. If readers wish to post AI-generated items in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you. Note: As with Part One, today’s offering is not to be viewed as a “hit piece” on Dr. Sinclair, nor as a denigration on his work. This series is simply focused on aspects of one part of his work.

Part One of this series is here: https://www.theqtree.com/2026/07/10/health-friday-7-10-2026-open-thread-er-100-sv40-injected-into-the-eyes-to-reverse-aging-part-one/. Today’s offering is Part Two of two. There are several areas to cover.

First area: continuation of the presentation of WO/2020069373, the Patent (second Patent) template for ER-100, an “invention” by Dr. David Sinclair, PhD, of Harvard University, et al. The Patent is here: https://patentscope.wipo.net/search/en/WO2020069373. The Title of the Patent is: “WO2020069373 — CELLULAR REPROGRAMMING TO REVERSE AGING AND PROMOTE ORGAN AND TISSUE REGENERATION.”

Section 00542 and Section 00543: “TRE-human OSK – SV40 (SEQ ID NO. 105)” — the gene sequence.

Section 00544 and Section 00545: “EFS-human OSK-SV40 (SEQ ID No: 106)” — the gene sequence.

Section “Additional Embodiments”: there are 151 listings of additional embodiments (combinations) of the ER-100 template: Sections numbered 00578 through 00730.

The following are from the PDF of the Patent.

FIG. 3: circle schematic (vector map) showing the SV40 position. Please see below:

FIG. 7C: schematic of optic nerve crush performed on the lab mice to simulate an eye injury as part of the experiments to lab-create the ER-100 template. Please see the image, below:

FIG. 8A: image of “Regeneration Potential”. Please see below:

Second area: The initial (first) Patent regarding ER-100, also an “invention” of Dr. David A. Sinclair, et al. This patent is found here: https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docID=WO2020069339&_cid=P22-MRGI4D-39697-1. The Title of this Patent it: “MUTANT REVERSE TETRACYCLINE TRANSACTIVATORS FOR EXPRESSION OF GENES.” The International Filing Date for this Patent was 27 September 2019; the Publication Date was 2 April 2020. Inventors: Sinclair, David, A., et al. Patent Applicants: the President and Fellows of Harvard College, 17 Quincy St., Cambridge, MA, 02138.

The following are short summaries of some of the Claims listed in this Patent:

Claim Number 10: listing of SV40.

Claim Number 22 and Claim Number 23: “SV40-derived terminator sequence.”

Claim Number 30 “Pharmaceutical composition”, followed by Claim Number 33 (includes viruses and AAV); Claim Number 34 (includes SV40); Claim Number 44 (methods) — Claim Number 44 lists doxycyline as “promoting expression of the first transgene.”

Claim Number 45, Claim Number 46, Claim Number 47: 1st and 2nd engineered nucleic elements present in a virus.

**** Claim Number 48: “…wherein the method comprises withdrawing tetracycline.”

**** Claim Number 49: “therapeutically effective amount of [a]-[b] or [a]-[c] are administered to a subject in need thereof.” This refers back to Claim 1 of the Patent above, in which [a]-[b] = the G72 and the G12 positions in the rtTA3 of the composition (SEQ ID NO:11); and, [a]-[c] = the G12 and the F67 positions in the rtTA3 (SEQ ID NO:11.)

FIG. 8B: schematic of SV40 sequence added to TRE3G and presence of ftTA4 element. Please see below:

FIG. 9: circle schematic (vector map) of the “mutant” tetracycline (doxycycline) in the ER-100 composition at position 1000. Please see below (Yours Truly rotated the image which is in the Patent):

FIG. 13: circle schematic (vector map) of SV40 relative to promoter / terminator / editing sequences in the ER-100 composition. Please see below (Yours Truly rotated the image which is in the Patent):

Third area: the Clinical Trial (in recruiting) for ER-100: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07290244, “Evaluating ER-100 for Safety in People with Glaucoma or Non-Arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy (Optic Nerve Conditions.)” Study Start (Actual): 2026-03-02; Primary Completion (Estimated): 2027-05; Study Completion (Estimated): 2032-03; Enrollment (Estimated): 18; Phase: Phase 1. Yours Truly will be discussing items from the “Researcher View” of this clinical trial.

From the “Outcome Measures (Primary)” section: it appears that study subjects will take an 8-week course (56 days) of doxycycline, which is called an “Activation Period.” There are numerous tests that study subjects will take during this “Activation Period”, such as, “Safety Laboratory Tests”, blood tests of various types, etc.; “Changes in Baseline Intraocular Pressure” tests; “Changes in Visual Acuity” tests; among other tests. These tests will be repeated on Day 112 of the study.

From the “Outcome Measures (Secondary)” section: it appears that study subjects have “secondary measures” testing performed during the 56-day doxycycline “Activation Period”, and also repeated on Day 112 of the study, such as: “Change in Baseline in Humphrey Visual Field (HVF) Test Results”; Retinal Nerve Thickness tests; ER-100 viral shedding tests; tests to determine if ER-100 viral DNA has appeared in the aqueous humor of the eye; among others. Study subjects will be followed “for up to 5 years to monitor long-term health and vision outcomes.”

From the “Detailed Description” section: NCT07290244 will have two “study cohorts.” Within each cohort, a “sentinel” study subject will receive an initial dose of ER-100 in an eye. From there, various tests will be performed to investigate whether this dose was tolerated; if it was, the dose will be “approved” by “Data Safety Monitoring Board”, and the other study subjects in the same cohort will receive that dose of ER-100. It appears that increase, or reduction, of the ER-100 dose will also be under the aegis approval of this board.

From the “Intervention” section: this describes the makeup of ER-100. At no point in this section is there any mention of SV40: only the other three “Yamanaka factors” are mentioned (OCT-4; SOX-2; KLF-4.) There is no mention of SV40 being used to “swap out” the fourth “Yamanaka factor” (c-Myc.) Were the study subjects informed that there would be SV40 in the ER-100 dose that would be injected into their eye? https://www.lifebiosciences.com/life-biosciences-announces-first-patient-dosed-in-phase-1-trial-of-er-100-for-optic-neuropathies/, 9 June 2026.

Fourth area: the 2020 paper by David A. Sinclair, et al., the “template” for ER-100: https://ophed.com/system/files/2020/09/s41586-020-2975-4_SMALL.pdf, “Reprogramming to recover youthful epigenetic information and restore vision”, David A. Sinclair, et al.; 2 December 2020.

From the section, “Reset of ageing signatures rather than identity”, the following quotation: “Our first goal was to find a way to reset the epigenome without erasing cell identity. Among the genes expressing the Yamanka factors, Myc is an oncogene that reduces the lifespan of mice (20) and is not required for the initiation of cellular reprogramming (21). We therefore excluded MYC from out experiments…” Based on this, Yours Truly asks this question: If it is true that Myc is an oncogene, and that for this reason, it was excluded from the Sinclair experiments: then why was a known potential cancer promoter element — SV40 — included in the template formulation (composition) for ER-100? Please see below, again from the paper, in the Methods section, subsection “Production of adeno-associated viruses“:

Another quotation from the section cited above: “Next we tested the long-term safety of ectopically expressing OSK in vivo. To deliver and control OSK expression in mice, we engineered a dual adeno-associated virus (AAV) system under the tight control of a tetracycline response element (TRE) promoter (Fig. 1a).”

Referring back to the second Patent for the ER-100 template (WO/2020/069373, presented in Part One of this series), found here: https://patentscope.wipo.net/search/en/WO2020069373, from the Description:

Section 0047: AAV (adeno-associated viruses) may be used in compositions of ER-100. So can any of the recombinant viruses (herpes virus; vaccinia virus; alphavirus; and so on — “alone or in combination.”

Section 00221: list of recombinant viruses.

**** Section 00222 and Table 1.: list of recombinant AAV virus types; Table 1. is the list of AAV serotypes. AAV2 and AAV9 were the serotypes most used in the mice experiments for the December 2020 paper. AAV9 serotypes cross the Blood-Brain Barrier (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adeno_associated_virus.)

**** Section 00239, Section 00240, Table 2.: OSK (the Yamanaka Factors OCT-4, SOX-2, KFL-4) “…may be activated…in combination with activating an enhancer of reprogramming and/or inhibiting a barrier of reprogramming.” This sentence is highly significant, in light of the Table 2. Non-limiting strategies to enhance reprogramming. One of the “barriers to reprogramming” that would be inhibited is the p53 protein — the very protein that is the “master control” element in the human body to detect and suppress cancer cells. (https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-our-censored-study-showing, Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 19 December 2025; https://www.theqtree.com/author/pavaca1/, search “p53”.)

All of above is aside from the fact that Dr. Sinclair and his co-authors apparently had no issues with simulating eye injury effects in lab mice by crushing the optic nerve of the mice (under anesthesia); and, with simulating glaucoma effects in lab mice by injecting large amounts of microbeads into the eyes of the mice. After which, the mice were evaluated, then eventually euthanized for autopsy. Yours Truly will call these lab mice “Sinclair’s mice” (recall the phenomenon of “Fauci’s beagles” in the NIH-funded experiments with beagle puppies and sand flies: please see https://bfp.org/, the Beagle Freedom Project.)

Yours Truly is not making a case against therapeutic efforts that MAY BE helpful or conclusive in slowing down, stopping, or even reversing, medical conditions such as, certain eye diseases (whether or not these eye diseases are relating to the aging process): therapeutic efforts that MAY work. However, one also believes that therapeutic efforts which include inhibiting the body’s ability to detect and suppress cancer cells (such as, ER-100 containing elements that would inhibit the p53 cancer cell detector / suppressor protein); along with adding a known potential cancer promoter element (SV40) — is not the way to go. Similarly, why would a therapeutic effort need to include potentially using a recombinant virus (such as, ER-100 containing elements of, for example, the herpes virus [see Part One of this series])? If one is reading the December 2020 paper and the Patent WO/2020/069373 for the ER-100 template correctly; and the September 2019 Patent WO/2020/069339 for the “Mutant Reverse Tetracycline Transactivators” correctly — it appears that a tetracycline (doxycycline) is first added into, then removed from, the composition of ER-100, thus requiring a course of doxycyline to be taken by the patient (or, in the case of NCT07290244, the study subjects) to “activate” the “transgenes” in the composition. What happens after the 56-day course of doxycycline that the Clinical Trial NCT07290244 study subjects will take, in order to “activate” the ER-100 in the body? Does the ER-100 just keep working “on its own” inside the body after this course of doxycyline is completed? What happens if the ER-100 stops working, either during the clinical trial, or during the 5-year-follow period? What about the 5-year-long follow timeframe for the NCT07290244 study subjects in general?: Is this out of an “abundance of caution?” Or, is it, so to speak, to use the study subjects as a kind of “long-term human lab mouse study group since actual mice don’t live for 5 years” situation? Is it reasonable to ask: What recourse do the NCT07290244 study subjects have in the event that a serious adverse event occurs to them, either during the study period, or afterwards?

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA1

(Intellectual Property Disclaimer and Notice: Except for the linked URLs and other items available on the Internet, the ideas and/or opinions in today’s offering are by PAVACA1 (M.E. Forbes, aka M.E.C. Forbes.) Credit must be given to PAVACA if ideas and/or opinions in today’s offering are used by other blog writers; by podcasters; or in print or social media.)

Health Friday 7.10.2026 Open Thread: ER-100: SV40 Injected Into the Eyes to “Reverse Aging”, Part One of Two

The free image of an eye for the header of today’s offering is courtesy of ClipArt and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: AI-generated items in today’s offering will be cited as such. If readers wish to post AI-generated items in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank You.

ER-100: SV40 Injected into the Eyes to “Reverse Aging”: Part One of Two

There is a certain tenured PhD professor in genetics at Harvard University. His name is David A. Sinclair. He is a native of Australia. Dr. Sinclair, and his lab at Harvard, specialize in the study of what ages human beings. He also studies methods and ways to slow down, or even to stop, this aging process. He is the holder of numerous Patents in this regard. Please see: https://sinclair.hms.harvard.edu/people/david-sinclair. Dr. Sinclair is also the co-founder of a company called Life Biosciences. The company’s statement: “At Life Biosciences, we are on a mission to reverse age-related disease” (https://www.lifebiosciences.com/about-us/about-life-sciences/.) Today’s offering is not to be viewed in any way as a “hit piece” on Dr. Sinclair, or to denigrate his work: instead, it is to present another take on a certain project that he is working on.

Dr. Sinclair believes that he can reverse aging of the human eye (and also, by extension, the mechanisms of human eyesight.) He has been doing research on this subject since before the year 2020. This current year, 2026, Dr. Sinclair, via Life Biosciences, secured $80 Million dollars in funding to put his theories and research into action (https://allsci.com/news/funding/life-biosciences-secures-usd-80-million-series-d-to-advance-er-100-gene-therapy/, 9 April 2026.) The drug that would be used to reverse the aging of the human eye is called ER-100. It is injected into the eyes. ER-100 is immediately hailed as a “breakthrough” drug: including by the alternative COVID-19 treatment entity, Independent Medical Alliance (https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/dr-ryan-cole-and-independent-medical, “Dr. Ryan Cole and Independent Medical Alliance are now promoting an “immortality elixir” containing and known carcinogen, synthetic SV40!”, 26 June 2026.) Also, in January 2026, Life Biosciences secured an FDA clearance for the drug’s IND application for ER-100 (https://www.lifebiosciences.com/life-biosciences-announces-fda-clearance-of-ind-application-for-er-100-in-optic-neuropathies/, 28 January 2026. IND = Investigational New Drug.) Perhaps predictably, this announcement was heralded as a kind of “turning point” for the FDA: https://lifespan.io/life-bios-trial-is-the-fda-warming-to-rejuvenation/, “Life Bio’s Trial: Is the FDA Warming to Rejuvenation?”, Steve Hill, 8 April 2026.

However — the Life Biosciences press release, cited above, mentions only three of the four “Yamanaka factors” that ER-100 would be be utilizing. This is not a small point. And this is where the story gets interesting.

Dr. Shinya Yamanaka (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shinya_Yamanaka) discovered proteins, called Transcription Factors, which regulate / control “…the rate of transcription of genetic information from DNA to messenger RNA [mRNA], by binding to DNA sequences” (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcription_factor.) Dr. Yamanaka reduced the original number of Transcription Factors from twenty-four down to four: OCT-4; SOX-2; KLF-4; and, c-Myc. It is the c-Myc transcription factor that can “go rogue”, so to speak, and foster the growth of cancer cells: https://www.nature.com/articles/nrc904, “c-MYC: more than just a matter of life and death”, Stella Pelengaris, et al. A screenshot of the Abstract of this article is below:

What is SV40 — the element that has been proven to be in both the Pfizer-BioNTech and in the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines”? Please see:https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/91.2.119, “Cell and Molecular Biology of Simian Virus 40: Implications for Human Infections and Disease”, Janet S. Butel, John A. Lednicky; 20 January 1999. Following is a quotation from the Abstract of this paper: “Simian virus 40 (SV40), a polymavirus of rhesus macaque origin, was discovered in 1960 as a contaminent of polio vaccines that were distributed to millions of people from 1955 to early 1963. SV40 is a potent DNA tumor virus that induces tumors in rodents and transforms many types of cells in culture, including those of human origin.” (Bolding mine.)

Why is Yours Truly including a mention of SV40 here? Because SV40 is contained in ER-100. It is the “swapped-out” protein for the fourth Yamanaka Factor, c-Myc, discussed above. The following screenshot, below, is from the Latypova article on ER-100: a screenshot from the 2020 published paper by Dr. David Sinclair, et al. (which will be further discussed in Part Two.) It is also, in Yours Truly’s opinion, the reason why the Life Biosciences press release, cited above, mentions only three of the Yamanaka Factors — it is possible that the company does not want the public to know that SV40, a cancer-causing element, is contained in the drug: especially in light of the fact that more people are starting to realize that SV40 is in the modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” that they have in their bodies:

In other words: the poly(A) “signal” used in the modified AAV-TRE-OSK element in ER-100 is the SV40 poly(A) “signal.” AAV is “adeno-associated virus vector” element; TRE is the tetracycline-derived element; OSK is the acronym for the three Yamanaka Factors OCT-4, SOX-2, and KLF-4 elements. Thus far, then, ER-100 is comprised of AAV (with the SV40 poly(A) tail) + TRE + OSK-4 + SOX-2 + KLF-4. But this is not the entire story. Yours Truly now turns to the Patent “template” for ER-100, which was “invented” by Dr. David A. Sinclair, et al., Patent Number WO2020/069373, filed on 27 September 2019.

The Patent information for WO2020/069373 is found here: https://patentscope.wipo.net/search/en/WO2020069373. The Patent was filed using an international listing, as opposed to a US Patent listing. The International Filing Date was 27 September 2019. The Publication Date was 2 April 2020. The applicamts for the Patent were the President and Fellows of Harvard College, 17 Quincy St., Cambridge, MA, 02138. The funding for the research leading to the Patent was provided through NIAID grants R01AG019719, and R01DK100263. The Title of the Patent is: “1.WO2020069373 – CELLULAR REPROGRAMMING TO REVERSE AGING AND PROMOTE ORGAN AND TISSUE REGENERATION.” The following are Yours Truly’s summaries of some of the listings in the Description of the Patent:

Section 0002: Lists the NIAID grants that funded the “invention.”

Section 0018: mention of SV40: an “expression vector”, also as a “constitutive promoter.”

Section 0019: SV40 amounts used in the composition of the “invention.” These amounts range from AT LEAST 70%, up to 100% “in certain embodiments.”

Section 0033: the “invention” will contain a tetracycline (example: doxycyline.)

Section 0034: the “invention” may include TRE (a Tetracycline Reverse Element (a promoter.))

Section 0035: areas of the body where the “invention” can be used. Examples: eye; ear; nose; mouth; bone; breast; lung; pancreas; cardiac muscle; liver; skin; heart; intestine; testis; ovary.

**** Section 0047: the “compositions” of the “invention” may include “any of the recombinant viruses” (e.g. alphavirus; vaccinia virus; herpes virus; AAV; etc.)

Section 0074: types of ocular diseases the “invention” can be used for.

Section 00109: description of the Gain-of-Function techniques used to produce the “invention.” Section 00100 and Section 00111 further describe the Gain-of-Function techniques used.

Section 00133: the “invention” can also use a “tetracycline-controlled transactivator” called MUTANT REVERSE TETRACYCLINE.

Section 00200: the “invention” will use a nanoparticle called NANOPLASMID. (For more information on NANOPLASMID, please see: https://www.aldevron.com/custom-manufacturing/nanoplasmid/faq.)

Section 00263: start of listings of the “engineered nucleic acids”, “engineered cells”, “engineered proteins”, and “chemical agents” that the “invention” will use to induce “expression” of the OCT-4, KFL-4, and/or the SOX-2 factors cells.

Section 00294: start of discussion and listings of the various cationic lipids that the “invention” will use in “certain embodiments.” Examples: Lipofectin (DOTMA + DOPE); DOTMA separately; DOSPA; DDAB, etc.

Now, from the above, thus far, ER-100 is comprised of: AAV (with the SV40 poly(A) tail) + TRE (Tetracycline Reverse Element promoter) + OSK-4 + SOX-2 + KFL-4 + possibly “any of the recombinant viruses (Section 0047) + a MUTANT REVERSE TETRACYCLINE TRANSACTIVATOR FOR EXPRESSION OF GENES (Section 00133) + NANOPLASMID (Section 00200) + a cationic lipid (Section 00294.)

It also appears, in Yours Truly’s opinion, that ER-100 for use to “reverse aging in the eye” may be only the first application of Dr. Sinclair’s “invention.” It appears that the “certain embodiments” of his “invention” can potentially be used to “reverse the aging” of many areas and organs of the human body.

To be continued in Part Two.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA1

(Intellectual Disclaimer and Notice: Except for the linked URLs and other items in today’s offering that are available on the Internet, the ideas and/or opinions in today’s offering are by PAVACA1 (M.E. Forbes, aka M.E.C. Forbes.) Credit must be given to PAVACA if ideas and/or opinions in today’s offering are used by other blog writers; by podcasters; or in print or social media.)

Health Friday 7.3.2026 Open Thread: Health Freedom: An Opinion Piece

The word cloud image of Good Health for today’s offering header is courtesy of Dreamstime and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: AI-generated items in today’s offering will be cited. If readers wish to post AI-generated items in today’s discussion thread, the must cite their source. Thank you.

Health Freedom

Guard Your Health Freedom: The federal government will not do this for you, or for your family. Nor will the American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, or the Federal Judiciary. In fact, the federal government (via the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the United States military’s biological weapons development and procurement divisions (DARPA and military research labs), and both the House of Representatives and the Senate (funding these activities) are doing all they can to continue the imposition of the COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” (gene-therapy injections) on the citizens of the United States of America.

Example: https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/hhs-awards-moderna-314-million-for, “HHS Awards Moderna $314 Million for Adult and Pediatric COVID-19 Vaccines: SAM.gov”, 28 June 2026. These awards were granted to Moderna through the CDC Office of Acquisition Services. The awards contracts were granted on 3 June 2026. The awards numbers and amounts are:

Pediatric: Award Number 75D30126D21000 for $285,044,250.

Adult: Award Number 75D30126D21003 for $29,183,000.

Example: https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/cdc-awards-pfizer-12-billion-for, “CDC Awards Pfizer $1.2 Billion for More COVID Vaccines: SAM.gov”, 11 June 2026. These awards were granted to Pfizer (PfizerUSA / Pfizer-BioNTech) through the CDC Office of Acquisition Services. The awards contracts were granted on 3 June 2026. The awards numbers and amounts are:

Pediatric: Award Number 75D3012621001 for $735,720,598.

Adult: Award Number 75D30126D21004 for $505, 272, 000.

The CDC Office of Acquisition Services is located at 1600 Clifton Rd., Atlanta, GA, 30333. The most current (as of 20 June 2024) organization chart for the CDC’s Office of Financial Resources (of which the Office of Acquisition Services is part) is listed here: https://www.cdc.gov/about/media/pdfs/ofr-org-chart.pdf. There are NO EMPLOYEE NAMES associated with ANY of the offices listed on this chart. None of the awards contracts listed above have any contract details, other than the date of the awards, the company name that is the awardee, and the contract number. These awards are examples of how the current HHS is operating. So much for “oversight” and “transparency” in the current HHS. Who exactly signed the awards documents for HHS? Who signed the acceptance documents at Pfizer (PfizerUSA / Pfizer-BioNTech) and at Moderna? Did HHS Sec. Kennedy, Jr., know about these awards in advance and signed off on them? Was he told after the fact and then signed off on them? A screenshot of one of the “information pages” for one of these awards is below. My apologies for the length of the screenshot — one has to see this to believe it:

Who is Jariya Taylor, the “Primary Point of Contact” for this award? Apparently, via Internet search, this person is a “Procurement Officer” with the CDC Office of Acquisition Services. Who is Chad Turner, the “Alternative Point of Contact” for this award? Apparently, via Internet search, this person is also a “Procurement Officer” with the CDC Office of Acquisition Services. How long have they worked for the CDC? What are their qualifications to be “Procurement Officers”? Are these employees the exact ones who signed the awards documents for HHS / CDC for the Pfizer (PfizerUSA / Pfizer-BioNTech) and the Moderna awards? Why does the award state, “Inactive” at the top of the document? What happened to the money? Who at Pfizer (PfizerUSA / Pfizer-BioNTech) “solicited” this award? Or, did the CDC, via Jariya Taylor and Chad Turner, reach out to the company to “be aware of an opportunity (award)”? Does the reader see how the game is played between Big Pharma, the CDC — and all using taxpayer monies?

Another point: How do the CDC awards to Moderna for their 2026-2027 modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” (gene-therapy injections) square with THIS story?: https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/misc-emerging-topics/moderna-chief-company-won-t-invest-new-late-stage-vaccine-trials, “Moderna chief: Company won’t invest in new late-stage vaccine trials”, Stephanie Soucheray, MA, 26 January 2026. Moderna CEO, Stephane Bancel, made these remarks at the WEF summit in Davos in January. Direct quotation from the article, from Mr. Bancel: “You cannot make a return on investment if you don’t have access to the U.S. market.” Direct quotation from the article: “He [Mr. Bancel] said the vaccine market in the United States is much smaller as more anti-vaccine guidelines have become the norm.” If that is so, then WHY did the CDC “create the opportunity” to award Moderna $314 Million to develop and market the company’s 2026 – 2027 modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” (gene-therapy injections)?

Example: HHS Sec. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., wrote and issued a “new” charter for the CDC’s ACIP panel (Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices) in April 2026. This was after Federal Brian E. Murphy disbanded the former ACIP panel, every recommendation made by this panel from June 2025 to March 2026, and re-instituted the old CDC Childhood and Adolescent Immunization Schedule that has a total of 72 “vaccine” injections to be administered to children age 0 up to age 18. HHS Sec. Kennedy, Jr., is an attorney. However, it appears that he was not either informed of, or paying attention to, the minutiae of drawing up federal regulations. The result is that the “new” ACIP charter was quietly withdrawn in May 2026 (https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/vaccines/121349, “HHS Withdraws New Rules for CDC Vaccine Panel”, Terrence Rudd, 19 May 2026); and, replaced it with yet another “new” ACIP panel charter (https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/childhood-vaccines/new-acip-charter-could-allow-rfk-jr-further-restrict-vaccine-access-critics-say, Liz Szabo, MA, 26 June 2026.)

Meanwhile, the re-instituted old CDC Childhood and Adolescent “vaccination” schedule — the one that “recommends” 72 total “vaccine” injections in children age 0 to age 18 — is here: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/imz-schedules/child-adolescent-age.html. There is a mealy-mouthed “we’re sorry, but we have to do this because a Federal Judge ordered us to” CDC “excuse” on this webpage, above the immunization schedule hyperlink. And, recalling that it was the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) which sued HHS and won, via the “ruling” of Federal Judge Brian E. Murphy in March 2026 — take a look at the current CDC VFC Vaccine Price List: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines-for-children/pdfs/2026/06/Pediatric-VFC-Vaccine-Price-List-06-16-2026.pdf. Pediatricians who inject children with the “vaccines” on the VFC List will get compensated according to the Price List (via the billing codes they send to the patients’ insurance company, and/or to CMS.) The ruling by Judge Murphy is discussed here: https://www.risehealth.org/insights-articles/federal-judge-stops-hhs-cdc-vaccine-policy-overhaul/, Ilene MacDonald, 17 March 2026. The “Recommended Immunization Schedule” for children and adolescents that was issued by the American Academy of Pediatrics (which closely “mirrors” the old CDC immunization schedule) is here: https://downloads.aap.org/AAP/PDF/AAP-Immunization-Schedule.pdf.

The American Medical Association (AMA) has championed the development and use of the COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” since early 2021. The AMA is the most powerful medical organization lobby in both houses of Congress. The AMA devotes entire sections of its “guidance” to physicians to “combating misinformation” about these “vaccines” (in other words, fighting the spread of the real truth of the dangers and deadliness of these “vaccines”; training physicians on how to “convince” the “vaccine-hesitant” patient to agreeing to have these “vaccines” injected into them; and so on.) Two examples of AMA publications on these topics: https://www.ama-assn.org/public-health/infectious-diseases/covid-19-vaccines-guide-physicians (scroll down to the “Read now” link and click); and, https://www.ama-assn.org/topics/vaccines-vaccinations-immunizations.

And, more corroboration that Big Pharma and the federal government are intent on poisoning Americans with “vaccines” (especially American children): https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/democide-update-if-all-vaccines-are, “DEMOCIDE UPDATE: If ALL Vaccines are Unsafe and Ineffective, Then Why Are They Being Foisted on Humanity?”, 28 June 2026.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

The following is not intended to blame persons who were gaslighted, coerced, or “mandated” into taking the COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” (gene-therapy injections.) A multi-level, planned, extremely sophisticated, orchestrated program was implemented by governments and official entities all over the world, to ensure that the maximum number of persons on Earth would be injected with these “vaccines.” Please see: https://www.theqtree.com/2025/01/31/health-friday-1-31-2025-open-thread-hhs-gaslighting-and-propaganda-to-increase-vaccines-uptake/. However, the evidence is now a Tsunami of information proving that these “vaccines” (gene-therapy injections) are dangerous and deadly. Only one example: the rising incidence of “turbo cancer” among COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons:

Yours Truly thanks Brave and Free for this link.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

If a reader of today’s offering is a COVID-19 “vaccinated” medical professional / licensed healthcare provider: Stop “recommending”, let alone administering, these gene-therapy injections. Stop taking these “vaccines” yourself. Stop your family from taking them. Recognize that all COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons (including “vaccinated” medical professionals / healthcare providers) have had their natural immune system damaged or even destroyed by the ingredients and mechanisms of these “vaccines” (https://www.thefocalpoints.com/, by Dr. Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH; search “immune system”; https://jessicar.substack.com/, by Dr. Jessica Rose, PhD; search “class switch.”) Read the post-authorization report from Pfizer-BioNTech that the company gave to the FDA in early 2021 regarding the reports of over 1,200 medical conditions, diseases, and serious negative side effects (including death) in persons who were injected with BNT162b2 (FDA approved under the name COMIRNATY): https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf, date-stamped by the FDA on 30 April 2021. Have the courage to put yourself, COVID-19 “vaccinated” family, and COVID-19 “vaccinated” patients, on a protocol to try and mitigate / reduce the damage that the spike protein in these injections have already done to the body. One example of protocols to search: https://www.twc.health; The Wellness Company, Dr. Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH. Another example: https://imahealth.org/treatment-protocols/ (the Independent Medical Alliance website.) Other entities also provide COVID-19 spike protein detox items: search “COVID-19 spike protein detox protocol” on the Internet. There are certain foods that can assist in spike protein detoxification: for examples of these foods, and also for natural spike protein detox advice, please see: https://drwillcole.com/spike-protein-detox-functional-medicine/; and, https://www.417integrativemedicine.com/articles/the-role-of-nutrition-and-detoxification-in-spike-protein-removal. Note: Yours Truly is not endorsing any particular COVID-19 spike protein detox / removal protocol; I am merely listing some ideas for interested readers to search for themselves. The point is to find ways to safely detox/or remove the spike protein from the body; or, at the least, to minimize the spike protein’s negative effects.

If a reader of today’s offering who is not a medical professional, or a healthcare provider, but who is COVID-19 “vaccinated”: Stop taking the injections. Do not allow your family to be COVID-19 “vaccinated.” Recognize that the spike protein in these injections already in the body have damaged or destroyed the natural immune system; have damaged the heart muscle / cardiovascular system, and the lungs; have altered the DNA in the LINE1 liver cells; have crossed the Blood-Brain Barrier and damaged both the physical (Central Nervous System) and the psychological (learning, memory, and emotional control) mechanisms of the brain. Please see above for information regarding getting on a spike protein detox protocol. The same applies to COVID-19 “vaccinated” family members. For more information about the damage that these injections have done, please visit the links above; and, also, https://doctors4covidethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/causality-article.pdf, “Vascular and organ damage induced by mRNA vaccines: irrefutable proof of causality”, Michael Palmer, MD, and Sucharit Bhakdi, MD; https://www.theqtree.com/author/pavaca/ (search “LINE1”; “Blood-Brain Barrier”; and, “neurological.”)

For those who are not COVID-19 “vaccinated” (and also in those who are “vaccinated”), there is the potential for “shedding” from these “vaccines” from those who are “vaccinated”, onto other persons. Yours Truly has not advocated, nor is advocating, that the non-“vaccinated” live like “anchorites in the desert”: this is simply not possible. However, there is justifiable room for being cautious. It is up to the individual to determine what “being cautious” means. Having a healthy natural immune system is important. Taking care of health issues when they arise is important. Following a healthy diet and exercise program is important. Having Ivermectin and/or Hydroxycholorquine — Vitamin D — Quercetin — Zinc — among other items — on hand, and using them, is important. Please see: https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/covid-19-vaccine-shedding-experiences, 7 June 2024.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Good health is Health Freedom. The ability to decide what constitutes good health, and what to do to support and maintain good health, is Health Freedom. There are times when choosing this freedom comes with a price. The individual gets to decide if that price is worth paying. But how is this freedom affected when health is compromised? What if a person has a condition that negatively affects movement, or the heart, or the lungs, or the eyesight, or the emotional/psychological region — then what? In Yours Truly’s opinion, based on personal experience, the “then what?” becomes finding a balance between doing all one can to ameliorate / support the compromised area(s) — perhaps even finding ways to cure these, if that is a possibility; and strengthening the areas which are not compromised. One believes that a healthy natural immune system is an important key to the whole: along with inner determination, and a positive connection with a Higher Power / Supreme Being.

As the United States of America begins celebrations for the 250th anniversary of her founding, please, consider Health Freedom becoming a part of one’s life.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA1

(Intellectual Property Disclaimer and Notice: Except for linked URLs and other items in today’s offering that are available on the Internet, the ideas and/or opinions of today’s offering are by PAVACA (M.E. Forbes, aka M.E.C. Forbes.) Credit must be given to PAVACA1 if ideas and/or opinions of today’s offering are used by other blog writers; by podcasters; or in print or social media.)

Health Friday 6.26.2026 Open Thread: Black & Veatch: Biolabs Construction and Other “Special Projects”: Part Two

The free header image of the Black & Veatch company logo for today’s offering is courtesy of Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: AI-generated items in today’s offering will be cited as such. If readers wish to post AI-generated items in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Note Two: Apologies for the screenshots in today’s offering: Yours Truly believes that “a picture is worth a thousand words” applies in this case. Thank you for your understanding.

For the Part One article on Black & Veatch, please see: https://www.theqtree.com/2026/06/19/health-friday-6-19-2026-open-thread-black-veatch-biolabs-construction-and-other-special-projects-part-one/.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Black & Veatch: Biolabs Construction and Other “Special Projects”, Part Two (of two):

It is not easy to ferret out information regarding the “Special Projects” division of Black & Veatch. The company’s “Special Projects” division does not have a separate company website page. One must search through the listings via https://www.bv.com/en-US/projects, then “Filters”, then “Industries”, then “Federal agencies.” Yours Truly found, from a search at https://gsaelibrary.gsa.gov/:

Note that the address listed on the award page for Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp is different from the company’s headquarters address of 8400 Ward Pkwy., Kansas City, MO, 64114.

The above screenshot image lists a Contract Number of 4QRCA25DU511. Which then led to this: https://www.bv.com/en-US/who-we-serve/federal-agencies/government-contract-vehicles. Please see the screenshot, below, from this link:

The URL link above also contains a statement from Black & Veatch regarding the nature of the company’s “Special Projects Corp.” division. From this statement: “Black & Veatch has currently more than 50 contract vehicles with Federal agencies that enable our clients to access our services and solutions. These include numerous Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract vehicles for DoD and Federal Civilian agencies.” The acronym NAICS stands for “North American Industry Classification System” (https://www.census.gov/naics/.)

As an aside, Yours Truly also found this, a lawsuit against Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp., per https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/16631739/cabrera-v-black-and-veatch-special-projects-corporation/. Cabrera, et al., the plaintiffs, sued Black & Veatch Special Projects Corporation over a grant which was awarded to that company. The plaintiffs alleged that this contract violated the anti-terrorism laws. A screenshot from the lawsuit document is below:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Yours Truly raised a question in Part One of this series related to the Black & Veatch work building bioweapons labs in Ukraine, especially since there is evidence that bioweapons labs funds were also being used for constructing these facilities in the African country of Cameroon (under what appears to be under the guise of “veterinary laboratories.”) The question was: Is Black & Veatch (and, by extension, the United States government, via the military, doing this work in Cameroon as a “backup location” in case the Ukraine bioweapons labs were closed down or blown up? Well, it appears that there is another overseas country that may possibly be in consideration as a “backup location” — the Country of Georgia. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_(country))

The Black & Veatch involvement with the Country of Georgia is part of a $3.5 Billion dollar award under a contract with DTRA (Defense Threat Reduction Agency: https://www.dtra.mil.) The award number is: HDTRA125DE006. dated 22 August 2025. More information regarding this award is found here: https://sam.gov/opp/90c8cd127e0648849a79bec013305c86/view, which also lists the word “INACTIVE” on the award. Interesting. Especially since the award is also listed HERE: https://www.war.gov/News/Contracts/Contract/Article/4283984-contracts-for-aug-22-2025//, “Cooperative Threat Reduction Integrating Contract IV (CTRIC IV).”

What makes this apparently conflicting award information even more interesting is the statement on the award from Black & Veatch itself: https://www.bv.com/en-US/projects/bv-upgrades-disease-surveillance-and-pathogen-control-systems-for-the-country-of-georgia. Please see the screenshot regarding this, below:

Read the above statement carefully. Note the mentions of: “DTRA partner nations use EIDSS software to identify, track and mitigate the outbreak of infectious disease,…”; “securely digitize lab inventory of pathogen samples”; “addressing and fixing unexpected issues in the EIDSS software…”; and, “…to deliver a fully functional and updated EIDSS for use in their health systems and labs.” Look at the word, “labs.”

The Country of Georgia is part of the Trans-Caucasus region, an area that intersects with Russia, Turkey, Armenia, and Azerbaijan (https://www.britannica.com/place/Georgia.) The Country of Georgia is a former satellite state of the former USSR (the Soviet Union.) Per the Britannica entry cited above, the population of the Country of Georgia is considered to be healthy, with low incidence of tuberculosis and cancer. There are also numerous mineral springs health spas. These being so, why then is the United States Department of War so interested in providing the Country of Georgia with “uber-sophisticated”, military-grade software (at the least; and, possibly, infrastructure in addition) for “pathogen disease surveillance” to “track and mitigate the outbreak of infectious disease” — unless there are, perhaps, labs in the Country of Georgia in which “certain experiments” are being performed on pathogens that can cause disease? — Unless, perhaps, the Country of Georgia is also a kind of “backup location” (along with the African country, Cameroon) for bioweapons labs (and, possibly, research), in the event that the bioweapons labs in Ukraine are closed down, or blown up?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

There is, in Yours Truly’s opinion, yet another potential “backup bioweapons lab location” that was / is being run by the United States military, and with Black & Veatch as a “Special Projects” partner: this, one, in the Republic of Armenia. Armenia is located in Western Asia, in the Caucasus region. It is bounded by Turkey, the Country of Georgia, Azerbaijan, and Iran. Armenia, as the Country of Georgia, was a “satellite state” of the former USSR (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armenia.) The health status of the population of Armenia appears to be stable; healthcare facilities are available; and, life expectancy is around 75 years (https://ghsindex.org/country/armenia/; and, https://www.britannica.com/place/Armenia/Government-and-society; scroll down to “Health and welfare.”)

**** Nonetheless, Black & Veatch was involved with providing — via its “Special Projects” division — “diagnostics”, “equipment”, expertise”, and “help” related to fighting “bioterrorism”: https://www.bv.com/en-US/projects/diagnostics-equipment-expertise-help-combat-bioterrorism-and-proliferation, in the year 2012. This was, yet again, through the United States Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA.) Please see the screenshot, below:

Note the language above: “Coincidentally, just a few weeks later, the Armenian government began receiving reports of patients with symptoms resembling antrax from Gegharkunik province in eastern Armenia.”

The 11 March 2022 document released by DTRA details the BTR (Biological Threat Reduction) efforts for that fiscal year. Page two of this document specifically mentions Armenia: https://www.dtra.mil/Portals/61/Documents/Factsheets/CRS-Ukraine-Factsheet.pdf.

However, by the year 2022, the government of Armenia had decided that it was going to limit “cooperation” with the United States: https://eurasianet.org/armenia-limits-bioweapons-cooperation-with-us-amid-pressure, Ani Mejlumyan, 3 June 2022. Further, a 2025 article describes the “Pandora’s Box” of these bioweapons labs that “reckless leadership” in the country permitted to be installed: https://www.transcend.org/tms/2025/03/armenia-biological-laboratories-a-pandoras-box-unleashed-by-reckless-leadership/, Diran Noubar, 31 March 2025.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

In summary — It appears, in Yours Truly’s opinion, that Black & Veatch was / is deeply involved with the United States Department of War, the United States military, and the United States federal government in the design, construction, maintenance, and ongoing managing and monitoring activities of research and development laboratories all over the globe. It also appears that the company was / is deeply involved in the design, construction, maintenance, and ongoing managing and monitoring activities of bioweapons laboratories all over the globe. Black & Veatch is only one of the multiple NGOs (Non-Governmental Organizations) that were listed by former ODNI Director Tulsi Gabbard as being involved in the construction of bioweapons labs in her information release of 19 June 2026 (covered in Part One of this series.) This two-part series on Black & Veatch in the Health Friday offerings is literally the “tip of the iceberg” regarding the company’s involvement.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

(Intellectual Property Disclaimer and Notice: Except for the linked URLs and other items in today’s offering that are available on the Internet, the ideas and/or opinions of today’s offering are by PAVACA (M.E. Forbes, aka M.E.C. Forbes.) Credit must be given to PAVACA if the ideas and/or opinions in today’s offering are used by other blog writers; by podcasters; or in print or social media.)

Health Friday 6.19.2022 Open Thread: Black & Veatch: Biolabs Construction and Other “Special Projects”: Part One

The royalty-free image of the Black & Veatch company logo for today’s header is courtesy of Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: AI-generated items in today’s offering will be cited as such. If readers wish to post AI-generated items in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Black & Veatch: Biolabs Construction and Other “Special Projects”: Part One (of Two)

Yours Truly begins here: https://www.odni.gov/index.php/newsroom/press-releases/press-releases-2026/4163-pr-10-26, “DNI Gabbard Reveals Evidence of U.S. Taxpayer-Funded Global Biolab Program”, 12 June 2026. This report was released by outgoing Director of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard. A screenshot of a portion of page four of this press release is below:

The above is from this document: https://www.dni.gov/files/BIOLAB_Slides.pdf

Followed by this: https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/bombshell-tulsi-gabbard-declassified, “BOMBSHELL: DNI Tulsi Gabbard Declassified U.S. Funding of More Than 120 ILLEGAL Biolabs in Over 30 Countries”, 13 June 2026.

Yours Truly will focus on one entity listed on the image above: Black & Veatch. The company has been extensively written about on this board. For examples, please see: https://www.theqtree.com/2024/01/24/the-deagel-report-u-s-population-reduction-of-68-5-by-2025/ (by Yours Truly); https://www.theqtree.com/2022/03/09/dear-kag-20220329-open-thread/ (by our late, good DePat); and, https://www.theqtree.com/2025/06/05/kmag-20250625-open-topic-ngos/ (by the intrepid Gail Combs.)

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Black & Veatch is an NGO (Non-Governmental Organization) contractor. Their website is: https://www.bv.com/en-US. The company was founded 110 years ago (https://www.bv.com/en-US/about-us/history.) The current Chairman and CEO is Mario Azar. Mr. Azar, apparently, is a “true believer” — and a “prime mover” — in the principle of “de-carbonization”: https://www.bv.com/en-US/news/mario-azar-key-architect-of-black-and-veatch-power-transformation-joins, “Mario Azar, Key Architect of Black&Veatch Power Transformation, Joins Company’s Board of Directors”, 2 June 2021. The headquarters address for Black & Veatch is: 8400 Ward Pkwy, Kansas City, MO, 64114. More information from the company regarding its location and projects in Kansas City is here: https://www.bv.com/en-US/about-us/kansas-city. Black & Veatch has offices all over the world. The list of these office locations is here: https://www.bv.com/en-US/office-locations.

Black & Veatch offers an immense range of services for its clients — everything from project design conception, to materials procurement, to construction, to facilities monitoring, to security apparatus and monitoring installation, and more: https://www.bv.com/en-US/who-we-serve. Please see the screenshot, below, from the company:

It is the Projects section of the Black & Veatch website that Yours Truly finds very interesting: https://www.bv.com/en-US/projects. On the left hand side of the webpage, one goes to Filter by:; then, click on Solutions, then to See All; then, click on Strategic Advisory, then to go page two; then, click on the hyperlink CBEP Ukraine Phase II — BTRIC TO 1 | Black & Veatch. Which hyperlink takes one to: https://www.bv.com/en-US/projects/cbep-ukraine-phase-ii-btric-to-1. The company’s statement regarding this project is below:

Why does the project Location state: Ukraine; but the statement by the company says Cameroon Ministry of Health? Is Black & Veatch building bioweapons labs in both Ukraine AND in Cameroon? How does this square with THIS award granted by the United States by the then-Department of Defense (now the Department of War) to Black & Veatch — https://www.usaspending.gov/award/CONT_AWD_0004_9700 — for $77.9 Million dollars, granted on 12 September 2012? And for Black & Veatch work in Ukaine related to building the bioweapons labs that DNI Sec. Gabbard blew the whistle on? The story is covered both in Yours Truly’s Deagel Report link, above, and also here: https://expose-news.com/2023/08/06/cia-deagel-2025-depopulation-on-target/. It would appear that the United States (through its military) was funding Black & Veatch to build bioweapons labs in Ukraine from 2012 until recently.

But wait, there’s more! If one clicks on the hyperlink under “Related Awards Parent Award Unique Key” at the top of the page under CONT_AWD_0004_9700, cited above — one gets to ANOTHER awards page. This page lists an award that was granted to Black & Veatch by the then-United States Department of Defense (now the Department of War) on 8 September 2008 for a potential “obligated amount” of $393.3 Million dollars — with an “Ordering Period End Date” of 31 January 2013: which, apparently, conveniently “dovetails” with the OTHER award to Black & Veatch of 12 September 2012. If one goes to the “Orders Made Under This IDV” section of the 8 September 2008 grant, one finds more references to work in “Cameroon.” Also — if one clicks on the Page 2 of this section, at the very bottom of the “Base Transaction Description” list, there it is: BIOLOGICAL THREAT REDUCTION PROGRAM (BTRP) UKRAINE.

All the above begs the following questions: What exactly is going on here? Was / is Black & Veatch involved in building bioweapons labs in Ukraine AND in Cameroon? Why would Black & Veatch disguise work in Ukraine by referencing work in Cameroon? (Please see the company’s own statement, screenshot above in today’s offering.)

And, there’s even more! What about THIS award by the United States military to Black & Veatch, for $11.1 Million dollars, on 1 September 2021 and with a “Potential End Date” of 1 August 2025? And the award is for the National Vet Laboratory in Cameroon (at Douala; and, at the Garoua headquarters)? Please see the screenshot, below, from USA Spending. The award listing is here: https://www.usaspending.gov/award/CONT_AWD_HDTRA121F001_9700_HDTRA118D0003_9700:

Was / is, Cameroon being used as a “backup bioweapons labs location” in case the bioweapons labs in Ukraine were closed down and/or blown up? What is going on here?

To be continued in Part Two (of two.)

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

(Intellectual Property Disclaimer and Notice: Except for linked URLs and other items available on the Internet, the ideas and/or opinions in today’s offering are by PAVACA (M.E. Forbes, aka M.E.C. Forbes.) Credit must be given to PAVACA if ideas and/or opinions in today’s offering are used by other blog writers; by podcasters; or in print or social media.)

Health Friday 6.12.2026 Open Thread: “Noel des Enfants: COVID-19”

The image of Truth and Lies for the header of today’s offering is courtesy of Shutterstock and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

The COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” (in reality, dangerous and deadly gene-altering therapy injections) — which have now been proven to cause, to aggravate, or to re-establish a myriad of different types of medical conditions (physical and/or psychological conditions; including those which were under control or were in remission before the patient took any of these “vaccines”) — which have now been proven to cause or to aggravate these conditions as long as three and a half years post-injection — which render the “vaccinated” person to be a “ticking time bomb” of negative cardiac and lung issues — which interfere with and/or damage the p53 protein of the human body, the protein that detects cancer cells — which severely damage or even destroy the innate immune system of the human body, rendering it catastrophically vulnerable to all sorts of infections (including to COVID-19 infection) — which destroy up to 60% of the lifetime supply of eggs in the “vaccinated” female’s body — which induce myocarditis / pericarditis in children (and in adults) — are still being administered to millions of persons all over the world. These “vaccines” are still being pushed by the CDC and the FDA in the United States. These “vaccines” are still on the CDC’s Childhood and Adolescent Immunization Schedule. These “vaccines” are still on the CDC’s Adult Immunization Schedule. Those who are the main figures in the lab-creation of the COVID-19 bioweapon virus itself, and of the COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” (either in research, or in funding, or in suppression of the truth about these bioweapons) — Dr. Anthony Fauci; Dr. Francis Collins; Dr. Deborah Birx; Dr. Ralph Baric; Dr. Peter Daszak; Dr. Robert Redfield; Dr. Stephen Hahn; among others — have not been brought to justice. Please search the following sources for more information: https://jessicar.substack.com/; https://www.thefocalpoints.com/; https://www.theqtree.com/author/pavaca/; https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/imz-schedules/child-adolescent-age.html; https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/imz-schedules/adult-age.html.

Meanwhile, the COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” in the body of every person who ever took an injection of these products are quietly (and, sometimes, not quietly) doing their built-in work to render the body badly compromised to fight off infections; to be in a constant state of fighting off the “fake COVID-19 infection” that the “vaccines” induce in the body; to longer have a healthy cardiovascular system; to no longer have strong, clear lungs; to no longer be able to count on conceiving a child, let alone carrying the fetus to term and giving birth to a healthy infant; and much more. Please see: https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf; https://doctors4covidethics.org/wp-conent/uploads/2022/08/causality-article.pdf; https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/about-my-deathvax-injured-relative-5b9.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

“Noel des Enfants qui N’ont Plus de Maisons” (“Christmas of the Children who No Longer Have a Home”) is an art song written in December 1915 (during World War I) by the French composer, Claude Debussy. The French lyrics are below, followed by the English translation:

Yours Truly is deeply appreciative of, and thanks, https://www.melodietreasury.com/ for the above image of the original French lyrics and of the English translation of this song.

In order to put into context how this song applies to today’s offering, please listen to baritone John Brancy perform it with pianist Peter Dugan. Yours Truly is deeply appreciative of the musical talents of the performers, and thanks https://www.youtube.com/ for the opportunity to share their efforts. The song is under three minutes long:

Years ago, Yours Truly had the honor to accompany her voice teacher, baritone Edmund Najera, when he performed this song as part of a voice recital. Even decades later, when I hear this song, it brings chills down the spine. The raw emotions of anger, sorrow, loss, and fear in the original lyrics leap out of the vocal line and of the piano accompaniment music.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

What the world has suffered since late 2019 — and what still continues today — is not a war of bombs and of bullets: It is a war waged with fear and gaslighting; with a lab-created “virus” cobbled together from pieces of various animal coronaviruses, and named SARS-CoV-2; with needles and syringes. It is waged in healthcare clinics, hospitals, and pharmacies. It is the war of COVID-19: the bioweapon virus itself, and the bioweapon “vaccines.” It is a war waged using unquestioning acceptance of government statements that the COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” are “safe and effective” — when it has been conclusively proven that they are not. It is a war waged using unquestioning compliance with “mandates” or “requirements” or “recommendations” by employers, by school systems, by healthcare providers, that people who wish to access these entities be COVID-19 “vaccinated.” It is waged in the laboratories of Pfizer-BioNTech, of Moderna, of Novovax, and of other entities, which lab-create and manufacture these “vaccines.” It is a war waged through the marginalizing, the silencing, the loss of jobs, the loss of Licenses to Practice Medicine, and the “de-platforming” of those who dare to question the official narratives; of those who dare to present solid evidence that these “vaccines” are dangerous and deadly to those who take them; of those who dare to treat COVID-19 infected persons — or to offer alternative (and safe) prophylactic COVID-19 protocols — using “off-label” drugs, and/or alternative therapeutic vitamins and supplements. It is waged through the enormous financial grants by government funders (NIH, NIAID), and by private funders (Gates Foundation, CEPI, GAVI) to those who lab-create these “vaccines.” A stunning, recent example of the “silencing” of those who dare to present evidence that the “vaccines” are NOT “safe and effective” is written about here: https://worldcouncilforhealth.substack.com/p/one-of-the-greatest-manipulations (the death by suicide of COVID-19 “vaccine” dangers statistician, Christine Cotton.) Meanwhile, the induced, aggravated, or re-established illnesses, injuries, and disabilities in “vaccinated” people, continues. The deaths that result from these “vaccines” being injected into human beings continues.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Yours Truly presents a “modern-day” version that she wrote of the lyrics for “Noel des Enfants.” The English language version and the French language version are below:

As in the original lyrics by M. Debussy, the story is told through the experiences of children. However, in Yours Truly’s opinion, the lyrics can also be a story as told by adults — illness; death; loss of loved ones; a sense of helplessness. A sense — a realization — that, despite the assurances from government (World War I was supposed to be “the war to end all wars”; the COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” were supposed to “stop the spread” and be “safe and effective”) — these “assurances” were lies: and that people are paying the price for believing the lies.

(Notes: One: Apologies for the layout — one is not a professional editor; and, Two: while the original Claude Debussy lyrics and piano accompaniment are considered to be “In the public domain” in the United States (per Wikipedia search regarding Public Domain items in the United States), Yours Truly personally would not attempt to use the French translation of the new lyrics that I wrote to replace, or substitute for, the original lyrics of the song.)

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

THERE IS NO PLACE IN THE HUMAN BODY FOR AN mRNA, A modRNA, AN saRNA, OR A taRNA PRODUCT OF ANY KIND. THIS INCLUDES THE COVID-19 BIOWEAPON “VACCINES.”

THERE MUST BE MUCH MORE RESEARCH INTO THESE PLATFORMS. THERE MUST BE COMPLETE AND DETAILED ANALYSES OF RESEARCH RESULTS DATA ON THESE PLATFORMS. THERE MUST BE COMPLETE AND RIGOROUS TESTING OF THESE PLATFORMS. THE RESULTS MUST CLEARLY INDICATE THAT THESE PLATFORMS ARE “SAFE AND EFFECTIVE” FOR USE IN HUMAN BEINGS. THE RESULTS MUST BE MADE PUBLIC. ONLY THEN, CAN PRODUCTS THAT USE THESE PLATFORMS BE ALLOWED TO APPLY FOR FDA AUTHORIZATION OR APPROVAL.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

(Intellectual Property Disclaimer and Notice: Except for URL’s and other items available on the Internet, the ideas and/or opinions in today’s offering are by PAVACA (M.E. Forbes / M.E.C. Forbes.) Proper credit must be given to PAVACA if ideas and/or opinions in today’s offering are used by other blog writers; by podcasters; or in print or social media.)

Health Friday 6.5.2026 Open Thread: Betrayal by the FDA?

The vintage image of FDA items is courtesy of Hillerman Film and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. There are Important Notifications by our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: AI-generated items in today’s offering will be cited as such. If readers, wish to post AI-generated items in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Betrayal by the FDA?

Yours Truly begins here: https://www.thekingstonreport.com/p/fda-drops-placebo-controlled-trial, “FDA Drops Placebo-Controlled Trial Requirement for NEW mRNA Vaccines”, Karen Kingston, 28 May 2026. Please see the screenshot from this article, below:

The “vaccine” that the FDA will meeting about regarding review of the BLA application from Moderna of, is none other than mRNA-1010, the company’s modRNA influenza “vaccine” that is other component of the company’s “holy grail vaccine” — mRNA-1083 (mCOMBRIAX.) mCOMBRIAX is a “combo-vaccine” of mRNA-1010 plus mRNA-1283 (mNEXSPIKE, Moderna’s modRNA “lite” COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine.) . mCOMBRIAX is already approved for use in the European Union. Yours Truly exposed the situation regarding mRNA-1083 (mCOMBRIAX), and the maneuvering by Moderna to get the product FDA-approved for use in the United States: first, mRNA-1010 (mCOMBRIAX): https://www.theqtree.com/2026/02/27/health-friday-2-27-2026-open-thread-modernas-mrna-1010-and-the-end-run-around-hhs-secretary-kennedy-jr-part-one/; https://www.theqtree.com/2026/03/06/health-friday-3-6-2026-open-thread-modernas-mrna-1010-and-the-end-run-around-hhs-secretary-keenedy-jr-part-two/. Second, Yours Truly exposed mNEXSPIKE (mRNA-1283; the other component of mRNA-1083, mCOMBRIAX): https://www.theqtree.com/2026/03/13/health-friday-3-13-2026-open-thread-meet-modernas-mrna-1283-mnexspike-the-other-component-of-mrna-1083-mcombriax-part-one/; https://www.theqtree.com/2026/03/20/health-friday-3-20-2026-open-thread-meet-modernas-mrna-1283-mnexspike-the-other-component-of-mrna-1083-mcombriax-part-two/. The “TD;LR” of the above links this screenshot from this source (the European Medicines Agency Assessment and Recommendation report on mCOMBRIAX, found here: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/assessment-report/mcombriax-epar-public-assessment-report_en.pdf, 26 February 2026):

The “TD;LR” summary of the mRNA-1010 situation in the United States: Moderna is desperate to get FDA approval for this modRNA “influenza vaccine”, so the company can proceed to finish getting mCOMBRIAX also FDA-approved. The backstory on this situation is outlined here: https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/articles/pfizer-vs-moderna-mrna-patent-strategies-and-pipelines/, updated 2 April 2026. A screenshot from this article is below:

However, Moderna has ALREADY applied for a Patent for mRNA-1010: https://patents.google.com/patent/EP4274607A1/en; title: “Seasonal rna influenza virus vaccines.” The Patent application was submitted on 10 January 2022. The current Status of the application is “Pending.” By the way, the Patent claims state that as many as SEVEN different types of influenza virus strains can be used in the formulation of mRNA-1010. Also notice that the Patent application was filed back in January 2022: this means that the laboratory work to perform the experiments, aggregate data, analyze the data, and so on, was begun years before the application submission.

However, Moderna has ALREADY applied for a Trade Mark (TM) for mRNA-1010, under the brand name mFLUSIVA. The application was submitted on 27 February 2026: https://uspto.report/TM/99674080. **** It was on 26 February 2026 that the European Medicines Agency (cited above) recommended the use of mCOMBRIAX (mFLUSIVA + mNEXSPIKE combination “vaccine”) in the European Union.

The VRBPAC panel of the FDA will meet on 18 June 2026 to consider the use of mRNA-1010 (mFLUSIVA) in the United States: https://www.fda.gov/advisory-committees/advisory-committee-calendar/vaccines-and-related-biological-products-advisory-committee-june-18-2026-meeting-announcement. The current member roster of the VRBPAC panel is listed here: https://www.fda.gov/advisory-committees/vaccines-and-related-biological-products-advisory-committee; current roster as of 19 May 2026. The Chair position is “Vacant.” This meeting appears to be the “meeting with outside experts” that the Kingston Report is referring to (cited above.)

It appears that, in Yours Truly’s opinion, Moderna is performing “all the right moves” in order to ensure that mRNA-1010 (mFLUSIVA) is approved by the FDA for use in the United States as soon as possible. This includes, apparently, maneuvering to have Dr. Vinay Prasad (who refused the BLA application for mRNA-1010 in February 2026) removed from his position at the FDA. Per the Kingston Report, cited above:

This “FDA meeting with Moderna” was the “Type A” meeting that Yours Truly wrote about in the Health Friday posts cited above.

Does the reader see how the game is played by Big Pharma? It appears that Moderna will not allow anyone to interfere with the company’s goal of getting mRNA-1010 (mFLUSIVA) through the FDA approval process and have the injectable ready for the United States 2026-2027 “flu season market”; and, also, that Moderna will not allow anyone to interfere with the company’s goal of getting mRNA-1083 (mCOMBRIAX) through the FDA approval process and have the injectable ready for the United States market as soon as possible.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

(Intellectual Property Disclaimer and Notice: Except for linked URLs and other items in today’s offering that are available on the Internet, the ideas and/or opinions of today’s offering are by PAVACA. Credit must be given to PAVACA if the ideas and/or opinions of today’s offering are used by other blog writers; by podcasters; or in print or social media.)

Health Friday 5.29.2026 Open Thread: Some Interesting Items

The header image for today’s offering is courtesy of Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: there is AI-generated material in The Focal Points and the 2nd Smartest Guy In The World articles in today’s offering. If readers wish to post AI-generated material in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you. Special thanks to our “sister blog”, https://www.marica1776.com/, for some of the items in today’s offering.

A personal note: On this date in 1947, a man named Samuel, and a woman named Catherine, were married at 10:30AM in a church ceremony in Pittsburgh, PA. It was a Thursday. They left right after the wedding breakfast for their two-and-a-half day honeymoon at Niagara Falls, NY. Samuel had to be back at work the following Monday as a pharmacist’s apprentice while finishing his studies at Pharmacy school; and, Catherine also had to be back at work the following Monday as a secretary. They set up housekeeping in their first home: a two-room apartment (with a shared bathroom) in a reconverted old house in the Shadyside section of Pittsburgh. Samuel and Catherine were Yours Truly’s parents. I believe they’re having a wonderful time together in the next world. Love you, Daddy and Mother. Miss you. Thank you — Thank you.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Some Interesting Items from the plethora of news out there:

Ebola:

**** From The Focal Points: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/nih-ebola-expert-under-fbi-investigation, “NIH Ebola Expert Under FBI Investigation for Smuggling Pathogens Into America From the Congo”, Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 20 May 2026. It appears that Dr. Vincent Munster, returning from a trip to the Democratic Republic of the Congo (and accompanied by another NIH employee), was detained at the airport when returning to the United States for attempting to bring undeclared dangerous pathogens back in his luggage. Dr. Munster’s lab at the NIH “specialized” in the study of, and experimentation with, the Ebola virus. He is also one of the co-authors of the rejected 2018 DEFUSE proposal — along with Dr. Peter Daszak AND Dr. Ralph Baric. Please see the article for more information. There is also an interview with Mr. Hulscher that is included. (Yours Truly: One wonders if the situation with Dr. Munster could be a “data point” in the “sudden resignation” of the now-former Acting Director of the NIAID — Dr. Jeffery Taubenberger, the Fauci acolyte and “inventor” of the “Universal Influenza Vaccine” in 2020 [while Dr. Taubenberger was working at the NIH]: https://www.usnews.com/news/health-news/articles/2026-05-22.acting-niaid-chief-steps-down-amid-ebola-hantavirus-concerns.)

**** Again, from The Focal Points: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/the-bedrock-of-containment-why-sanitation, “The Bedrock of Containment: Why Sanitation is the Key to Controlling Ebola”. Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH, 25 May 2026. The scientific paper referred to in the article is here: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8240-9. “Hygiene programming during outbreaks: a qualitative case study of the humanitarian response during the Ebola outbreak in Liberia”; Alexandra Czerniewska and Sian White. 2020.

**** And, last but not least, the involvement in Ebola virus experiments by the now-fired (“retired” for “no reason disclosed”) and disgraced “Eminence Grise” of the COVID-19 disaster: Dr. Ralph Baric, PhD; experiments that used Gain-of-Function techniques. Dr. Baric authored the following papers: the first, at approximately the same time that the 2014 Ebola outbreak was raging; the second, in 2024: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4241145/, “Host genetic diversity enables Ebola hemorrhagic fever pathogenesis and resistance”; Ralph Baric, PhD, et al. 30 October 2014; and, https://doi.org/1016/j.celrep.2024.114127, “Mapping of susceptibility loci for Ebola virus pathogenesis in mice”; Ralph Baric, PhD, et al. 28 May 2024.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Ticks:

**** From The Focal Points: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/study-tick-borne-alpha-gal-syndrome, “STUDY: Tick-Borne Alpha-Gal Syndrome Incidence Skyrocketed 9,800% in the U.S. Since 2013”, Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 22 May 2026. Please see the screenshot, below, from his article:

**** From 2nd Smartest Guy In The World: https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/lyme-and-lone-star-bioweapon-diseases-33d, “LYME & LONE STAR BIOWEAPON DISEASES UPDATE: “This Tick Thing is Nuts” & Since 2013 Alpha-Gal Syndrome Incidence Skyrocketed 9,800%”, 24 May 2026. This article quotes the Hulscher post cited above, and also includes more information from other sources.

**** “And now, for something completely different”: the “contrarian view” from Sasha Latypova: https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/trick-ticks-fear-porn-to-cover-up, “Weaponized Ticks!!!, a mini review”, 25 May 2026. Ms. Latypova argues that Alpha-Gal Syndrome is actually caused by immune system damage induced by vaccines.

Yours Truly will weigh in on the latter: One: there has been a huge increase in reported diagnoses of Alpha-Gal Syndrome since the rollout of the COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” in 2021. Two: the COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” induce or aggravate multiple types of immune and/or autoimmune disorders: see https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf, regarding BNT162b2 (COMIRNATY), FDA date-stamped 30 April 2021; scroll down to the Appendix 1. List of Adverse Events of Special Interest section of this report. “Autoimmune disorder”; “Complement factor C1 decreased”; Complement factor C2 decreased”; Complement factor C3 decreased”; Complement factor C4 decreased” are among the listings. The Complement factors C1 to C4 are crucial proteins in the innate immune system. Decreases / deficiencies in any or all of these complement factors will create dysfunction / malfunction of the innate immune system, inducing conditions ranging from angioedema to recurrent infections to neurological conditions, and more. Three: Please see: https://www.annalallergy.org/article/S1081-1206(23)00002-9/fulltext, “Alpha-Gal Syndrome is an immunoparasitologic disease”, John C. Carlson, MD, PhD, April 2023. Four: there may well also be the involvement of other types of “vaccines” (in other words, non-COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines”) in damage to the innate immune system.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

MAiD: It appears that the use of this “assisted suicide” protocol in Canada is “expanding”:

Inflammatory bowel disease is treatable and manageable: https://www.cdc.gov/inflammatory-bowel-disease/living-with/index.html. By the way, “Inflammatory bowel disease” is ALSO LISTED in the Appendix 1. section of the BNT162b2 (COMIRNATY) report cited above: it can therefore be an adverse event of the COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines.” Note: some media outlets (for example, https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/germany-and-canada-go-full-1984-daily), state that the man (in his 40s) suffered from Crohn’s Disease, mental health issues, and substance abuse issues — all of which are treatable and manageable: and is ALSO LISTED as an adverse event of the COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines”, per the BNT162b2 (COMIRNATY) report cited above.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

And, last but not least, THIS insanity, in OREGON:

A petition is now the November ballot in Oregon that, if passed, would criminalize the killing of any animal (including fish and other marine life) for food; would ban pest and insect control; would criminalize and ban the teaching of these practices; and more. Enough signatures have been obtained to put this madness up for a vote:

The original KATU story is here: https://katu.com/news/local/people-for-the-elimination-of-animal-cruelty-exemption-controversial-petition-aims-criminalize-ban-hunting-fishing-pest-control-oregon, Victor Park, 16 February 2026. Please see the screenshot, below, from the article:

Reference links for the Complement C1 – C4 decrease / deficiency discussion above:

C1: https://www.creative-biolabs.com/complement-therapeutics/complement-therapeutic-target-c1-complex-introduction.htm

C2: https://rarediseases.info.nih.gov/diseases/1452/complement-2-deficiency

C3 and C4: https://www.southtees.nhs.uk/services/pathology/tests/complement-c3-and-c4

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

(Intellectual Disclaimer and Notice: Except for the linked URLs and other items in today’s offering that are found on the internet, the ideas and/or opinions in today’s offering are by PAVACA. Credit must be given to PAVACA if ideas and/or opinions in today’s offering are used by other blog writers; by podcasters; or in print or social media.)

Health Friday 5.22.2026 Open Thread: Dr. Ralph Baric Is Summarily Retired: Do Not Let His Activities Be Swept Under The Rug

The header image of Justice for today’s offering is courtesy of Mammoth Memory Art and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: AI-generated items in today’s offering will be cited as such. If readers wish to post AI-generated items in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.

It is time — in fact, is it past time — to bring Dr. Ralph Baric, PhD, to account. His activities must be be swept under the rug, now that the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, has forced him to retire in June of this year.

Yours Truly brings the following as “preliminaries”: https://merylnass.substack.com/p/today-ralph-baric-was-forcibly-retired, “Today, Ralph Baric was forcibly retired. Let’s examine his career and his central role in the COVID disaster”, Meryl Nass, MD, 12 May 2026. Dr. Nass, who lives in Maine, was suspended from her License to Practice Medicine in 2023 by the Maine Board of Licensure in Medicine — for prescribing Ivermectin to treat COVID-19. https://merylnass.substack.com/p/dr-meryl-nass-on-professional-cancellation, 20 December 2023. Her License to Practice Medicine was “License Suspension for Discipline”, with “Suspended Until: Open End Date.” This means that Dr. Nass (a physician with over 40 years’ experience) cannot practice medicine in Maine until she admits “wrongdoing” to the Licensure board; that she takes “re-education” courses; that she agrees to have her work monitored; and, that she “shows remorse” — all of which she refuses to do. Her case is a prime example of what Establishment Medicine will do to punish licensed physicians who dare to treat COVID-19 with repurposed drugs (such as, Ivermectin.)

Another example of punishment / censorship regarding speaking the truth about COVID-19: apparently, YouTube has removed the video of the testimony by Dr. Phillip Buckhaults, PhD, to the South Carolina Senate in September 2023 about his findings of “loose DNA” in the modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines.” The video can be found now on Bing: https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/relatedvideo?q=phillipbuckhaults&mid=233876F7E5EB5FE09654233876F7E5EB5FE09654&ajaxhist=0. Dr. Buckhault’s statement is here: https://www.scstatehouse.gov/CommitteeInfo/SenateMedicalAffairsCommittee/PandemicPreparedness/Phillip-Buckhaults-Sc-Senate-09122023-final.pdf.

Why are the above important? They illustrate the breadth and depth of Establishment Medicine and of media “cancellation” / censorship of those who dare to tell the truth about the COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines”, and of those who dare to treat COVID-19 with prescription drugs / therapeutics that are not on the “FDA-approved” list.

Why are the above important? They illustrate one aspect of the myriad “ripple effects” of the results of the work of one scientist — Dr. Ralph Baric, PhD, (being forcibly retired in June 2026) of the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill: the scientist who was the Master Designer of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The scientist who invented the “No See’m” method for hiding insertions / changes in virus gene codes in order to lab-create “new virus gene codes” of spliced-in or deleted code pieces. The scientist who taught multiple other scientists how to lab-create coronaviruses via his “Synthetic Genomics” paper that was published in 2006. The scientist who obtained the Patent for his “invention” of the SARS-CoV-2 virus template — Patent Number US9884895B2 — in March 2015: which Patent was obtained months before Dr. Baric (with Dr. Zheng-li Shi) published the infamous “Circulating Bat Coronavirus” paper in November 2015. The scientist who was a prime “acolyte” of Dr. Anthony Fauci in working on lab-created coronaviruses — with NIH/NIAID grants money from Dr. Fauci that began in the mid-1980s. The scientist who had deep ties with the Wuhan Institute of Virology and Dr. Shi. The scientist who had deep ties with Dr. Peter Daszak and EcoHealth Alliance. Yours Truly’s Health Friday six part series, The Baric Files, discusses the above, and traces Dr. Baric’s research journey (https://www.theqtree.com/author/pavaca; search “The Baric Files.”) One of the recurring themes of The Baric Files is the repeated Gain-of-Function experiments that Dr. Baric performed, literally over decades (beginning in the mid-1980s), related to animal coronaviruses. The March 2020 Patent for his “invention” of the SARS-CoV-2 virus template, the November 2020 “Circulating Bat Coronaviruses” paper, and other items, reflect the Gain-of-Function approach in his research. Keep this mind when reading onward:

In Yours Truly’ opinion: It appears that Dr. Ralph Baric, PhD, was involved in continuing Gain-of-Function research on coronaviruses, even after the general pause on that type of research in the United States was implemented in 2014. It also appears that Dr. Ralph Baric, PhD, engaged in continuing Gain-of-Function research as described in the DEFUSE proposal made by Dr. Peter Daszak (with Dr. Baric as a co-contributer) in 2018 to the United States military, which proposal was turned down. And, in both circumstances, it appears that Dr. Baric misled officials regarding the nature of the work that he was continuing to perform (Gain-of-Function experiments.)

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

On (or, perhaps, before) 6 May 2026, an HHS Action Referral Memorandum, Notice of Suspension and Proposed Debarment of Ralph Baric, PhD, was sent to Dr. Baric via email and by Certified Mail – Return Receipt Requested. There appears to be no actual “sent date” listed on the HHS document; it can be assumed that it was sent between 15 April 2026 (the date of the NIH ROI evidence items list in the document), and 6 May 2026; link is below. The Notice was signed by HHS employee Jennifer D. Johnson, Suspension and Debarment Official and Deputy Assistant Secretary of Acquisitions: https://www.science.org/cms/asset/8669-dc85-416d-bc3a-f4600-bd2cc70/hhssuspensionandproposeddebarmentofralphbaricphd_05.06.2026_r.pdf. Apparently, Dr. Baric furnished a copy of the Notice to the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS.) Two screenshots from the final page of the Notice are below:

Dr. Baric stated that he would fight the HHS Notice: https://bioethics.com/archives/102651, “Virologist accused to starting COVID-19 will fight U.S. ban on funding”, 12 May 2026.

But, something else happened: Dr. Baric was apparently summarily “retired” from the Gillings School of Global Public Health of the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill on 12 May 2026. The action was done under the aegis of Dr. Nancy Messonnier, MD, (Dean of the Gillings School since 2022); and a message was emailed to Gillings School faculty and staff on 12 May. https://www.theassemblync.com/news/education/higher-education/unc-coronavirus-researcher-ralph-baric-retires/, Karie Dean, 12 May 2026. His “retirement” is official as of 1 June 2026. (Yes, it’s that Dr. Nancy Messonnier, MD: sister of Rod Rosenstein. She was the “chief architect” of the COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine” rollout and imposition campaign. https://sph.unc.edu/adv_profile/nancy-messonnier-md/.)

So, despite the accolades about Dr. Baric by Dr. Messonnier and Maria Gallo in the email above as reported in The Assembly, why does the full tweet above have the phrase, “Messonnier and Gallo’s message did not cite a reason for Baric’s retirement.”?

**** However, several other things also took place prior to the HHS Notice going to Dr. Baric on 6 May 2026:

One — An appeal to the North Carolina Supreme Court to consider the public records lawsuit against the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill; a lawsuit to force the university to release the 5,205 pages of records related to Dr. Baric’s research into creating the COVID-19 virus that UNC refuses to make public, although over 130.000 pages had been released in response to the earlier lawsuit: https://www.carolinajournal.com/top-nc-court-urged-to-take-public-records-case-linked-to-covid-unc/, 29 January 2026; Two — an investigative report, by US Right to Know, regarding NIH files that reveal there was “broader” coronavirus Gain-of-Function research (“engineering”) going on well before COVID-19: https://usrtk.org/covid-19-origins/nih-files-reveal-broader-coronavirus-engineering-research-before-covid-19/, Lewis Kamb, 9 March 2026; Three — an investigative report from Real Clear Investigations regarding the decades-long cover-up of Dr. Baric’s Gain-of-Function coronavirus experiments at his lab at UNC Chapel Hill: cover-up that involves the NIH (Dr. Francis Collins); the NIAID (Dr. Anthony Fauci); and UNC itself (the university’s Chancellor; personnel in the UNC public relations division; and others): https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2026/04/28/covid_cover-up_campaign_to_hide_star_researcher_ralph_barics_ties_to_global_pandemic_1179562.html, Paul D. Thacker, 28 April 2026; and, Four — changes in the top administration of Dr. Baric’s gargantuan antiviral treatment research and development company, READDI (run under the aegis of the Eshelman School of Pharmacy of the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill), changes made on 27 April 2026: https://readdi.org/stories/angela-kashuba-named-readdi-interim-ceo/. Recall that Yours Truly wrote about READDI in the six part Health Friday series, The Baric Files. READDI was established via funds from a grant from NIAID to Dr. Baric for approximately $65 Million dollars in May 2022: https://www.theqtree.com/2026/01/23/health-friday-1-23-2026-open-thread-the-baric-files-part-six-ralph-baric-phd-the-master-designer-of-the-sars-cov-2-virus-recent-efforts-and-news-items/.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

**** Per the Carolina Journal article cited above, Lee H. Roberts, the Chancellor of the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, is still refusing to fully cooperate with demands to release the withheld 5,205 remaining documents related to Dr. Baric’s activities in the origins of COVID-19. Why?

**** Why does it feel as if Dr. Nancy Messonnier, MD, Dean of the Gillings School of Global Public Health at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, “threw Dr. Ralph Baric, PhD, under the bus” and summarily “retired” him on 12 May 2026? It is almost impossible that Dr. Messonnier had not heard of Dr. Baric or of his Gain-of-Function experiments on coronaviruses prior to becoming Dean; or, if not before taking the job, then certainly, at some point after her becoming Dean. Why did she suddenly “retire” him?

**** What about Dr. Boyd Yount, PhD, and Dr. Sudhakar Agnihothram, PhD, the CO-INVENTORS of the 2015 SARS-CoV-2 virus “template” Patent along with Dr. Ralph Baric, Patent Number US9884895B2? Dr. Yount is still employed by the Gillings School of Global Public Health at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill (https://sph.unc.edu/adv_profile/boyd-yount-jr/.) Dr. Agnihothram left UNC and has been working at the FDA since at least 2021 — in the CBER division (Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research): https://www.linkedin.com/in/sudhakar-agnihothram-8195309. Why aren’t these two co-inventors being investigated for their activities alongside Dr. Baric? Why is Dr. Sudhakar Agnihothram, PhD, serving as a speaker at CBER conferences and meetings?: https://www.fda.gov/media/186566/download; scroll down the page to “FDA CBER PARTICIPANTS.” Surely, the FDA knows that Dr. Agnihothrom would likely be biased towards approving COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines.”

Dr. Ralph Baric, PhD; and his co-inventors of the SARS-CoV-2 virus “template” Patent US9884895B2, must all be investigated. Thoroughly. And held to account. Their “invention” was undoubtedly used by Dr. Zheng-li Shi at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, starting in late November 2015, in her experiments to further develop the SARS-CoV-2 virus. This was the (potentially “unfinished”) virus that was “somehow leaked” from her lab at the WIV in the late fall of 2019, and which was subsequently named “COVID-19”: https://www.theqtree.com/2026/01/09/health-friday-1-9-2026-open-thread-the-baric-files-part-four-ecohealth-alliance-wuhan-institute-of-technology-dr-zheng-li-shi-the-template-virus/. Dr. Baric used the bat coronavirus SHC014, which Dr. Shi was working on at her lab at WIV, and samples of which virus she sent to him, in his SARS-CoV-2 virus “template” Patent, US9884895B2. Please see below, from the Detailed Description of the Invention section of the Patent (the SHC014 virus labelled “WiV1 S”):

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Why is Dr. Ralph Baric, PhD, in particular, still being “protected” for his activities in lab-creating the COVID-19 virus “template”? What is contained in the 5,205 pages of documents that the University of North Carolina still refuses to release? Does the University of North Carolina believe that, by apparently forcing Dr. Baric into retirement, the school has “shut the door” on further investigation into his activities?

DR. RALPH BARIC, PhD, MUST BE BROUGHT TO ACCOUNT, ALONG WITH HIS SARS-CoV-2 VIRUS “TEMPLATE” CO-INVENTORS.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

(Intellectual Property Disclaimer and Notice: Except for linked URLs and other items available on the internet, the ideas and/or opinions of today’s offering are by PAVACA. Credit must be given to PAVACA for ideas and/or opinions of today’s offering that are used by other blog writers, by podcasters, or in print or social media.)

Health Friday 5.15.2026 Open Thread: MV Hondius, Hantavirus, and the End Game

The free header image of the Andes Mountains for today’s offering is courtesy of Shutterstock and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: AI-generated items in today’s offering will be cited as such. If readers wish to post AI-generated items to today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Today’s offering is not an elegant, “gardens of Versailles”-type layout. There are many items to consider. This is an evolving situation: details, news items, and so on, multiply by the day. There are a few relevant screenshots / images below. Yours Truly’s opinion is:

Those who **planned** for the COVID-19 bioweapon virus itself, followed by the COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines”, to perform the task of immediately/within a short amount of time, culling the population of the Earth down to a “manageable” number of approximately 500 million persons (per the late Ted Turner) — and, finding that this task was not performed “properly” — have resorted to a “Plan B”: using an outbreak of the Andes Hantavirus (ANDV) on the MV Hondius as the excuse to generate a new “plandemic”, complete with gaslighting/fear operations, calls for “masking”, “lockdowns”, “vaccination”, and more. There may be other new”plandemic” measures in the wings. This new “plandemic” takes advantage of the weakened / destroyed immune systems in persons who are “vaccinated” with COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines.” Many of the same actors in the COVID-19 disaster are involved with this Andes Hantavirus (ANDV) new “plandemic” rollout: the WHO; the CDC; USAMRIID; Fort Detrick; Big Pharma; Big Donors (Gates Foundation) — among others.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

By now, the news regarding the Andes Hantavirus (ANDV) outbreak on the cruise ship MV Hondius has spread around the entire internet. A summary of important information on this situation can be found here: https://science.org/content/article/cruise-ship-s-hantavirus-outbreak-puts-researchers-uncharted-territory, 5 May 2026; and, https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/psyop-26-scamdemic-emergency-alert — which leads to these:

From The Hill: https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/5869488-cdc-hantavirus-outbreak-low-emergency-cdc/; which then led to this: https://nypost.com/2026/05/08/world-news/cdc-classifies-hantavirus-outbreak-as-a-level-3-emergency-response-report/, Zoe Hassan and Chris Bradford; which now leads to this: the official CDC HAN (Health Alert Network) notice: https://www.cdc.gov/han/php/notices/han00528.htm, “2026 Multi-country Hantavirus Cluster Linked to Cruise Ship”, 8 May 2026. If it is true that the CDC considers this Hantavirus outbreak to be a “Level 3 emergency” (the lowest level), then WHY does the HAN notice cited above have THIS?:

If readers suspect that the above sounds like a “rerun” of the COVID-19 virus PPE (Personal Protection Equipment) CDC recommendations — that is correct.

WHY, if it is the case that the Hantavirus outbreak on the MV Hondius is so concerning, did the WHO (World Health Organization) facilitate the IMMEDIATE RELEASE of the passengers from the ship to be “assessed” when the vessel docked at the Canary Islands? https://armageddonprose.substack.com/p/who-inexplicably-immediately-releases, “WHO Inexplicably, Immediately Releases All Passengers on Hantavirus Cruise Ship Without Quarantine”, 8 May 2026. The video announcement about this situation by Dr. Tedros Ghebreyesus, Director General of the WHO, is below:

Especially since it can take as long as 42 days post-exposure to the Andes Hantavirus (ANDV) for symptoms to appear? If readers are “starting to smell a rat”, that would be correct. If readers’ “interior antennae” are starting to register, “This feels like the start of the COVID lockdowns and “mandates” again, but now it’s Hantavirus”, that also would be correct.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

There is, currently, one vaccine against Hantavirus, an “inactivated” injectable called Hantavax (per Wikipedia.) It is only available for use in South Korea. Hantavax is not approved for use in other countries. There are, however, numerous “vaccines” against Hantavirus that are in development. Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, of The McCullough Foundation, notes that thirteen Hantavirus “vaccines” are currently under investigation: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/why-ivermectin-and-hydroxychloroquine, “Why Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine Could Work for Hantavirus”, 8 May 2026. Per Mr. Hulscher’s 6 May 2026 article on this situation, there are: 6 DNA-based “vaccines” (USAMRIID); 3 mRNA-based “vaccines” (Moderna; Communist China; Canada); 2 “viral vector vaccines” (UK; Canada); 1 “inactivated vaccine” (the Hantavax injectable, South Korea, in use there only); 1 “protein subunit vaccine” (Canada.) Note that the majority of the Hantavirus “vaccines” in development are under the aegis of the US Army (USAMRIID) — which indicates that the Department of War is involved. (https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/the-vaccine-cartel-and-us-army-are, Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 6 May 2026.)

The “situational briefing” from neodrop.ai on the current Hantavirus situation is here: https://neodrop.ai/feed/10x3geiL3Sz, “Hantavirus Global Situational Briefing — May 9, 2026.” Below, from the article, is the graphic regarding the “pipeline” of Hantavirus “vaccines” and antivirals in development:

Yours Truly found the USAMRIID Hantavirus “vaccine” clinical trial: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04333459, “Safety and Immunogenicity of a Hantaan Virus DNA Vaccine and a Puumala Virus DNA Vaccine, For the Prevention of Hemorrhagic Fever With Renal Syndrome.” Per the Clinical Trials website, NCT04333459 is “Unknown status. Last known status: Recruiting.” The Study Start was 23 August 2021; the Study Completion (Estimated) was to be 31 December 2023. The Puumala virus (PUUV) is another form of Hantavirus; it infects persons in Scandinavia, Russia, and other countries.

BUT — the clinical study NCT03443459, which led this THIS paper: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11570633/, “Phase 1 clinical trial of Hantaan and Puumala virus DNA vaccines delivered by needle-free injection”, Jay W Hooper, et al.; 17 November 2024: which study and paper were funded by USAMRIID, and conducted by USAMRIID personnel (Hooper, et al., above): is ACTUALLY a paper about an EARLIER study, NCT02776761 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02776761, “A Single-blind Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of a Hantaan Puumala Virus DNA Vaccine”), which ended on 27 September 2017. Digging into the details for NCT02776761, it appears that Jay W Hooper owns two Patents for Hantavirus and for Puumala “vaccines”: US8183358B2 and US7217812B2, both of which were assigned to USAMRIID. However, it appears that the Patent for US7217812B2 is “Status: Expired – Lifetime” as of 2 October 2021. If this is the case, why does it appear that this Patent “vaccine” formulation for the Puumala virus used in the clinical trial NCT04333459? This, however, did not stop Mr. Hooper from publishing yet another paper on the same topic: https://academic.oup.com/jid/article/229/1/30/7209758, “Safety and Immunogenicity of an Andes Virus DNA Vaccine by Needle-Free Injection: A Randomized, Controlled Phase I Study”; Jay W Hooper, et al. 28 June 2023. Except that, for this paper, there was also funding via HHS / NIH: Grant number HHS 272201300016I. Which indicates involvement with HHS grants funding and US military funding for biolab work at Fort Detrick.

HOWEVER — and this is a big HOWEVER — there IS a modRNA-based “Hantavirus vaccine” that has gone beyond “development”: a lab-created “vaccine” was PATENTED in 2025 by researchers at the University of Texas, Austin. A “vaccine” that’s ready to be “tested” and either granted an EUA from the FDA, or be “approved” by the FDA. The team of researchers at the University of Texas, Austin, was led by Dr. Jason McLellan, PhD (who may, in Yours Truly’s opinion, be considered as “The Successor to Ralph Baric” in terms of using Gain-of-Function experiments to lab-create viruses and “vaccine” templates.) Dr. McLellan’s Gain-of-Function based research on the COVID-19 virus spike protein was used by Pfizer-BioNTech, by Moderna, and by Novavax, in the development of these companies’ COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jason_McLellan

Yours Truly dug into Dr. McLellan’s modRNA-based Hantavirus “vaccine” Patent. The Patent document is here: https://patents.google.com/patent/US20250127870A1/en, “mRNA Vaccines Against Hantavirus”, published 24 April 2025. The first application for this Patent was filed on 15 September 2022. Current status is “Pending.” The Patent may be summarized as the “invention” of a Gain-of-Function produced, modRNA-platform based “vaccine” that has an artificial “cleavage area” between the Gn and Gc proteins, which proteins are used as the “antigens” for the “vaccine.”

But it goes much deeper than just the above. The “meat” of the descriptions of the multiple ingredients and combinations for this “Hantavirus vaccine” are found along the left side of the Patent Description list (not the “Claims” list, which is on the right side of the document.) The Description list is numbered. Without going too far “into the weeds”, some of the more striking Description items on the list follow. If readers think that the Patent for BNT162b2 describes a “witches’ brew”, this “Hantavirus Vaccine” Patent, in Yours Truly’s’ opinion, goes far beyond (Bolding is mine):

#0019: Adenosine is replaced with N6-methyladenosine (also known as “m6a”) “to evade the host innate immunity and improve the translation.” [of the other ingredients of the “vaccine.”] Adenosine is one of the four “building blocks” of RNA. Please see: https://www.alidabio.com/blog-post/m6a_minor_modification_major_impact/, by Zachary Miles.)

#0033: Confirms the use of the Andes Hantavirus (ANDV) as the basis for the “vaccine.”

#0041: Formulation list of adjuvants: this list includes dozens of types of adjuvants that can be used in the “Hantavirus vaccine.” One such adjuvant, JVRS-100, is a cationic lipid DNA compound; another adjuvant is Cholera toxin. A screenshot of part of the adjuvants list is below:

#0046 and #0049: The “Hantavirus vaccine” can be used as a “primary” and as a “booster” injectable.

#0047: Routes of administration: can used as an injectable, an intranasal, etc.

#0048: The “Hantavirus vaccine” can contain AZT (zidovudine), used in treating HIV/AIDS.

#0057: This section of the Description is the “justification” for using Gain-of-Function.

#0092: IRES Sequences. This is important. IRES = internal ribosome entry site. Ribosomes are combinations of RNA and proteins. Ribosomes are where protein synthesis occurs in a cell. https://www.genome.gov/genetics-glossary/Ribosome. One of the main goals of the “Hantavirus vaccine” is to “hijack” and change / replace RNA in the body of the person who takes this “vaccine.” In this “Hantavirus vaccine”, some of the IRES Sequences that can be used come from: the Coxsackie virus (CVB3); the Polio virus (PV); Foot and Mouth Disease virus (FMDVD); Simian Immune Deficiency viruses (SIV.)

#00128: from the Pharmaceutical Compositions section: This “Hantavirus vaccine” can be administered to humans / non-human primates / mammals / birds and poultry.

#0159: This “Hantavirus vaccine” can be used in “Multi-Dose & Repeat Dose Administration.”

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Yours Truly turns to the “lockstep, orchestrated gaslighting and fear COVID-19 virus campaign redone as Hantavirus” situation that is unfolding. Please see: https://maninamerica.substack.com/p/cp/197274890, “Hantavirus, Plandemics & Pre-Made Vaccines…Do You See It?”, 11 May 2026. The writer describes the various methods and actors being used to create a new “plandemic” of Hantavirus. Please also see: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/virus-in-the-dust-exposing-the-fabricated, “Virus in the Dust: Exposing the Fabricated Contagion of Andes Hantavirus”, Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH, 10 May 2026.

HOWEVER — and this is another BIG HOWEVER — there is something ELSE in play here: the COVID-19 modRNA bioweapon “vaccines”, the damage / destruction these do to the immune system of the “vaccinated” person, and the documented THOUSANDS of serious adverse side effects and events (including death) from these “vaccines.”

Look at Page 33 (Page 4 of the Appendix 1. List of Adverse Events of Special Interest section) of https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf, “BNT162b2 5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization Adverse Event Reports“, given by Pfizer-BioNTech to the FDA on 30 April 2021. Please see the screenshot below, part of Page 33:

There it is: “Hantavirus pulmonary infection;…” This is NOT a Hantavirus infection WITHOUT lung involvement. Such NON-pulmonary Hantavirus infections CAN occur. The symptoms include: fever, chills, headache, GI symptoms — but NO cardio-pulmonary symptoms (https://www.azdhs.gov/documents/preparedness/epidemiology-disease-control/investigation-manual/vectorborne/hantavirus-protocol.pdf.) A screenshot from this article is below:

Does this mean that some BNT162b2 (approved by the FDA under the name COMIRNATY) “vaccinated” person(s) traveled to a place where the Andes Hantavirus (ANDV) is found, stayed there, had close / prolonged contact with infected rat droppings/saliva, or with a person there who was already infected with the Andes Hantavirus, THEN got positive test results for this virus?

OR — does it mean that BNT162b2 has elements of the Andes Hantavirus (ANDV) INCLUDED in the formulation?

OR — does it mean that the husband and wife who were bird-watching in Argentina, in a place where infected rats are prone to be, THEN the husband boards the MV Hondius, shows symptoms of ANDV infection and dies onboard, AND whose wife (who was NOT on board) ALSO becomes ill with ANDV infection and dies onshore, AND who were both COVID-19 “vaccinated” (therefore, their immune systems were badly damaged by said “vaccinations”) — had some kind of “activation” of ANDV infectious elements that were present in their COVID-19 “vaccinated” bodies: an “activation” which occurred while they were bird watching?

OR — is USAMRIID somehow involved here?:

OR — is it some combination of all of the above?

Jikkyleaks thinks that USAMRIID “seeded” the virus on board the MV Hondius. A further discussion of the entire situation, including what Jikkyleaks tweeted, is on Dr. Jessica Rose’s blog: https://jessicar.substack.com/p/is-andv-hanta-natural-spillover-or, “Is ANDV hanta natural spillover or lab design?”, 13 May 2026.

And, WHY did the captain of the MV Hondius permit the body of the husband who DIED of an ANDV infection ON BOARD the vessel to REMAIN on board for TWO WEEKS, until it was offloaded, instead of performing a respectful, but IMMEDIATE, burial at sea? Why did the captain of the MV Hondius permit the body of the German woman who DIED of an ANDV infection CAUGHT ON BOARD to REMAIN on board for EIGHT DAYS? Again, WHY was there no respectful, but IMMEDIATE, burial at sea of this deceased woman’s body? No matter what “morgue-like” conditions these bodies were held in on board the MV Hondius, the corpses potentially exposing MULTIPLE persons on the ship to ANDV infection (think enclosed air-circulation system).

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

The following articles are, in Yours Truly’s opinion, must-read items. The information in these articles point in the same general direction: there may be a new “plandemic” on the horizon (Andes Hantavirus [ANDV]); combined with “the usual suspects” rushing to, at the same time, implement some combination of COVID-19 disaster-style “lockdowns”, “masking”, “vaccines” development (and potential “mandated vaccination” schemes), plus control of information and coordination with compliant media to gaslight/frighten the general public:

From Kit Knightly: https://www.theburningplatform.com/2026/05/13/hantavirus-a-pendemic-treaty-wake-up-call/. Mr. Knightly calls attention to the fact that the WHO does not yet have a “worldwide pandemic treaty” signed and locked into place. The paper cited by Mr. Knightly, which discusses the very low risk of Andes Hantavirus (ANDV) being transmitted person-to-person, is here: https://academic.oup.com/jid/article-pdf/226/8/1362/46542793/jiab461.pdf, “Evidence for Human-to-Human Transmission of Hantavirus: A Systemic Review”; Joao Toledo, et al. 15 October 2022. The paper is also found here: https://watermark02.silverchair.com/jiab461.pdf. Mr. Knightly makes the same recommendation that Yours Truly does: Interested persons should download this paper before it is taken away. A screenshot from the paper is below:

From Dr. Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/source-of-contagion-hantavirus-andv, “Source of Contagion, Hantavirus ANDV, on MV Hondius: Rodent Excreta, Possibly Infected Corpses on Board for 22 Days”, 14 May 2026. There is a video interview with Dr. McCullough in the article.

USAMRIID is involved in the Andes Hantavirus / ANDV situation up to the eyeballs and beyond: https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/hantavirus-genome-was-built-from, “Hantavirus Genome Was Built From Human Blood at U.S. Military Biolab Fort Detrick Using Incomplete Computer Assembly and Reference Genome ‘Fill-Ins'”, 13 May 2026.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Which brings Yours Truly to one final item: the nomination of Dr. Erica Schwartz, MD, MPH, JD, as the next Director of the CDC. Dr. Schwartz, while serving in the U.S. Coast Guard as a physician, was also instrumental in the enforcement of the “military mandate” for all U.S. military personnel to be COVID-19 “vaccinated.” She is also called “the queen of vaccines.” If confirmed, Dr. Schwartz would be in a position to sign off on a CDC “recommendation” for an Andes Hantavirus (ANDV) and/or Puumala virus (PUUV) “vaccine” to be used on the general public in the United States. (https://www.theqtree.com/2026/05/08/health-friday-5-8-2026-open-thread-two-establishment-medicine-nominees-an-opinion-piece/)

Individual awareness and self-education, in Yours Truly’s opinion, are important aspects to the totality of the Andes Hantavirus (ANDV) / MV Hondius situation.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

(Intellectual Disclaimer and Notice: With the exception of linked URLs and other items available on the Internet, the ideas and/or opinions in today’s offering are by PAVACA. Credit must be given to PAVACA if ideas and/or opinions in today’s offering are used by other blog writers, podcasters, or in print or social media.)