Hillary’s Purple Revolution

Site rules stolen from our good friend PAVACA

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s post, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Do not forget to LABEL AI articles, video and such.

The Color Revolution Blues (AI music)
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/2115185202570092544/vid/avc1/824×1464/4fJaRSmRCDIkZUqU.mp4

The video shows in the draft but not in the preview so I included the URL.

Short 2 year old clip from Glen Beck.

May thanks to eilert, Gudthots, TheseTruths, and others who brought this to the Q tree. I am putting much of it in an article to preserve it in an easy to find place.

H/T barkerjim for last weeks C&C that sums up a lot of this mess. I have stolen a lot of the article because Jeff Childers does such a bang up job of summarizing what has been happening here and around the globe.

☕️ THE WATCHLIST☙ Saturday, October 31, 2026 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠

🔥🔥🔥

Here we go again. You would not be blamed for a sneaking suspicion that the left is up to something on a global scale. Deep staters conspiring in the US. Black bloc protestors without demands burning French town halls. Brazil stealing an election and its candidate fleeing across a bridge to Argentina on foot after midnight. Missile defense trucks deployed to chic Palm Beach around Mar-a-Lago. Now this. Headline from Fox, this morning: “Polish president turns plane around after ‘coup’ at nation’s top court.”…

🔥 It looks like Poland’s left is speed-running the Brazil experience…

In short, the communists found a way to capture a country by occupying its Supreme Court. This took years to accomplish in Brazil. It looks like the globalists just tried to do the same thing in one night in Poland while the President was out of town…

🔥 On Wednesday, the Palm Beach Post reported, “Surface-to-air missile systems added at Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach.”…

🔥 There’s a lot more kindling. Data professionals have dubbed this month “Black October” due to a global rash of cyberattacks. (It is also Cybersecurity Awareness Month, so.) Two days ago, the Military Times reported that the Pentagon is treating a string of freezer failures at US military commissaries, the on-base grocery stores, as a suspected Iranian hack. Fort Huachuca’s Facebook page said its freezer “went into defrost mode where it heated up all the food.” In a copycat attack on French grocery freezers at around the same time, some units got so hot they caught fire… [Good reason NOT to have smart appliances –GC]

🔥 The global unrest is due to everyone being more nervous than a long-tailed cat in a room full of rocking chairs…

But what everyone is really thinking is that the U.S. midterm elections are now just three days away. Even here, in my usually placid blue Alachua County, where progressives run everything and normally don’t bother, things are heating up…

What do we make of all this? Pessimists on X are predicting a coordinated global attack. Their theory is that globalist forces that lost their USAID grants see Tuesday as the last chance to stop the counter-revolution before the money never comes back. They have plenty of silliness to work with. Democrats are promising chaos

The No Kings brigades have been ominously quiet this summer and election season. But the No Kings website wants activists to be ready for “mass nonviolent action in rapid response” if officials “refuse to certify valid results.” In South Carolina this week, California’s oily governor slid into election denial even before the ballots, saying, “Trump is not screwing around. This guy’s trying to rig the election before a single vote is cast. The only way he can win is if he rigs the election.”

The LA Times reported that more than 20 Democratic attorneys general have already drafted “emergency lawsuits and temporary restraining orders” ready to file “at a moment’s notice.” Colorado’s Phil Weiser said, “We’re not going to be reacting in real time… We are going to be following through on plans we’ve made.”

Earlier this month, the Hill headlined, “Inside the Democratic effort to fight any Trump disruption of midterms.” According to the story, House Democrats have wargamed “roughly 150 different scenarios” and held more than 15 “shadow hearings,” which sounds totally democratic. Washington Governor Bob Ferguson offered county auditors plainclothes National Guard members to “inconspicuously monitor ballot drop boxes.” (Armed ICE agents near a polling place are intimidation, but undercover troops at the drop box are just neighborly.)…

None of this sounds like people confident of their blue wave. Democrats say they’re going to win in a landslide. They’ve also pre-drafted 150 lawsuits, just in case they do.

So what do we make of it all?…

In short, don’t count on knowing who won the House on election night. It might not be the kind of painful interlude that Polish folks are facing, but they aren’t going to keep all those lawsuits in a drawer. The courts should plan to cancel all their scheduled vacations, stock up on energy drinks, and maybe pre-order Costco Thanksgiving meals.

The French are packing board games. Americans should pack patience…

Here is the compilation in no particular order. And yes it is LONG. On a side note for future reference: DataRepublican’s Substack

These are two goods tweet on how to take back our country.

Nick Solheim @NickSolheim
People keep asking what “10,000 Stephen Millers” actually means. Let me tell you, because it’s simpler than the headline.

Stephen Miller started as a junior staffer in a Senate office. He wasn’t famous. He wasn’t connected. He stayed for years, learned the policy cold, worked harder than everyone around him, and was loyal to his boss and the mission. That’s how a junior staffer becomes an assistant to the president.

It’s not enough to just create right-wing staff. You have to make them humble, loyal, and willing to work harder and later than everyone else.

Since 2021, American Moment has trained several thousand young conservatives. Every semester, a small class of paid fellows learns how Washington actually works: how decisions get made, how paper moves, how to staff a principal, how to show up prepared. Our alumni now work across the administration and on Capitol Hill.

Elections change who sits in the big chairs. They don’t change who writes the memos, staffs the meetings, and implements their principal’s decisions — unless you build the people who do.

The other side understood this a long time ago. They built institutions to train and place their people, and they are now openly threatening ours for doing the same.

We’re going to keep building anyway. If you’re a young conservative who wants to serve — really serve, not just post — we will train you, we will help you get hired, and we will stand behind you when it gets hard.

Personnel is policy. Build the personnel, and the policy follows.

I really like this guy. He often appears on Rich Does Politics.

Interesting videos. Please note, no human has an exclusive on Truth so I watch different view points and then form my own opinions. Tom Luongo mentions in another video that Alex Krainer does not like Trump and that he comes from a very different back ground than us, Communist Yugoslavia.

Matt Ehret (Canadian) and Alex Krainer: The Clash of the Two Systems from USA 1776 to China Today (1 hr 17 minutes)

Promethean Action Q&A (2 hrs)

43 minute – 51:30 promethean action about Data republican

59 minutes Sun Yat-Sen

1hr 5min Nevil Singham conntected to City of London

1:07:30 APAX Capitol Brits owns data base for Democrat party

1:22:30 1600 Ret Generals & Pentagon Insiders – Memo to POTUS NOT to use insurrection act to quell Political Violence.

2:01:00 Carroll Quigley

Tulsi Gabbard’s full speech from Turning Point USA: My warning to all Americans (23 minutes)

DataRepublican: https://x.com/DataRepublican She is presenting new evidence as she uncovers it.

Now you know why they were collecting data on over 600,000 Trump supporters under Biden. If you put together what Slotkin, Susan Rice, Jake Sullivan, Jack Smith and company were doing, you can see the whole plan. Obama’s Goal is to DESTROY the whole MAGA movement so it NEVER rises again Through lawfare, intimidation, persecution. Buy a MAGA hat and you are on the list. Work for the Trump administration –>go to jail

The Color Revolution in Our Midst

America is currently in the midst of a color revolution designed to overthrow our Constitutional form of government. The only way to stop it is awareness.

(This is going to be a lengthy article, but please bear with me because I believe we all need to understand what is happening in the shadows.)

If you are not already aware of the treasure trove* of seditionist materials that @DataRepublican has uncovered, please stop now and review them, or at least listen to this audio describing the seditionist plot in the seditionists’ own words. Please come back to this article after you listen.

****************

Are you back?

Great, thanks.

THAT, friends, is what a color revolution sounds like.

However, if we are all going to fight this rebellion with our own words and deeds, we need the knowledge to be able to spot exactly what the fight looks like. To that end, I am writing this article to educate American patriots on what a color revolution actually is, what its key strategies consist of, and how those strategies relate to what we are seeing being unleashed in the USA today.

What is a Color Revolution?

Wikipedia defines a “color revolution” as follows:

“[Color revolutions] are a series of often non-violent protests and accompanying (attempted or successful) changes of government and society taking place in post-Soviet states (particularly Georgia, Ukraine, and Kyrgyzstan) and the former Yugoslavia during the 21st century. The aim of the color revolutions is to establish Western-style democracies. They were primarily triggered by election results widely viewed as falsified. The color revolutions are marked by the use of the internet as a method of communication, as well as a strong role of non-governmental organizations [(“NGOs”)] in the protests.”

USAID and the CIA were instrumental in fomenting the color revolutions in Serbia (the “Bulldozer Revolution,” 2000), Georgia (the “Rose Revolution,” 2003), Ukraine (the “Orange Revolution,” 2004-2005), Kyrgyzstan (the “Tulip Revolution,” 2005), Lebanon (the “Cedar Revolution”, 2005), Belarus (the “Jeans Revolution,” 2006), Ukraine again (the “Revolution of Dignity,” 2013-2014) and Armenia (the “Velvet Revolution,” 2018). These are only the ones we know about publicly, and there are also suspicions that similar U.S. governmental actions took place in the “Arab Spring” of 2010 to 2012.

While the main government players in all of this on the U.S. side were the CIA and USAID, “non-profit” NGOs like the National Endowment for Democracy (“NED,” directly congressionally funded), the National Democratic Institute (“NDI,” funded by grants from USAID, the Department of State and NED), the International Republican Institute (“IRI,” similarly funded by grants from USAID, the Department of State and NED), Freedom House (also similarly funded by grants from USAID, the Department of State and NED), and a plethora of other NGOs (many funded by George Soros’s infamous Open Society network) have done most of the dirty work.

Understanding the role of NGOs in all of this is crucial—NGOs provide a way for U.S. taxpayer dollars to fund foreign policy actions that are difficult to track and often run counter to the intent of a majority of American voters.

These NGOs all have one thing in common—they are all vocally dedicated to “protecting democracy.” However, when examining their track record of fomenting revolution, it’s arguable that many of the regimes they overthrew were, in fact, democratically elected (at least to standards no more corrupt than America’s 2020 Presidential election). This is particularly true with respect to the Revolution of Dignity and the overthrow of Ukraine’s democratically-elected President, Viktor Yanukovych. Far be it for me to uphold ex-Soviet oligarchs, but it appears that the devotion of these NGOs to “democracy” is actually to “democracies we approve of.”

We will come back to the NGOs.

How Do Color Revolutions Work?

There are numerous academic treatises on the features of color revolutions, but my personal research suggests that they rely upon six lines of attack:

1. Funding.

Those U.S. NGOs you see listed above operate by funding other NGOs and individuals inside the targeted nation. Dark U.S. money becomes even darker money inside the targeted nation. These organizations build parallel structures that can operate outside national control and coordinate/sustain protest capacity at a tightly-organized, high level.

2. Training.

The well-funded NGOs and individuals then engage in highly structured activist training programs. Often pyramidal in nature (i.e., “train the trainers”), these programs cover branding, the processing of parallel vote counts, actions that erode the legitimacy of existing governmental institutions and maintaining ostensibly nonviolent discipline to maximize activist legitimacy.

3. Narrative and Symbolism.

The narrative of government illegitimacy must be pushed and repeated over and over and over. Complicit media sources are essential to creating and sustaining this narrative (often with cash changing hands to publish a particular story). Very basic symbolism is also vital. The name “color revolution” itself refers to the use of an inspiring color to unify the activists and present a constant reminder of the surge of activism engulfing the country via clothing, signs and banners—the “Orange Revolution” is a perfect example. Logos, slogans, hashtags and similarly pithy symbolic expressions are essential in delegitimizing the targeted regime and present regime change as the only “democratic” outcome.

4. Electoral Trigger.

A big part of the dark money is used to deploy “independent” election monitors, create fake pre-election polling and fake exit polling, and rapidly publicize perceived “irregularities” to create a clear trigger for mass protests. NGO networks then convert the disputed vote into sustained mass street action. While the architects of color revolutions consistently highlight the “non-violent” nature of their protests, certain groups are designated to engage in covert (i.e., masked) violent action, and other groups are essentially sent to the slaughter in hopes that the government will violently crack down and create martyrs. (Although this name pre-dates color revolutions, such deliberate martyrdom is what I call the “Horst Wessel Strategy.”)

5. Elite pressure.

This is the process of relying on outside agents of high legitimacy to create public statements of support for the protestors and activists, create targeted sanctions or incentives for the current government to step down, and to quietly engage with military, bureaucratic, and business elites in the targeted government. The aim is to isolate the current government internationally and signal that cooperation with the old regime carries higher costs than accommodation with the protesters.

6. Defection of Security Forces and Military.

One of the main purposes of all of the above is to convince a nation’s military and security/police forces that they are a part of an illegitimate regime and that the only moral choice is to defect to the opposition. Ramping up violent protests such that these people must choose between firing on their own countrymen or defecting is a fundamental tenet of color revolutions, supposed “non-violent” practices notwithstanding. In high-trust societies where the military is well-respected, this is perhaps the most important tool in the color revolutionary’s tool box. When the military and police defect, the color revolution is over, and it wins.

These are the tools the U.S. government and its well-funded network of NGOs have been using for decades to foment the overthrow of disfavored national governments, all without approval or knowledge of the electorate. Then Donald Trump dismantled USAID, and it all stopped.

Or did it? All those ex-USAID employees had to go find something to do, and boy oh boy did they ever.

Our American Color Revolution

Hopefully by now you are already seeing the parallels between our overseas color revolutions and what we are seeing and experiencing in the USA in 2026.

USAID? Note how many of the videos and audios that @DataRepublican posted involve ex-USAID employees who know their color revolution toolbox cold.

NGOs? All of the actions @DataRepublican has uncovered involve NGOs with specific, compartmentalized, plausibly deniable roles: the United Democracy Alliance; 50501; Indivisible; National Security Leaders for America (this one is particularly troubling as it has ~1,600 former military, intelligence and State Department officials behind it); and many more. Some are still relying on funding they derived from U.S. taxpayers before President Trump shut it all down. George Soros funds many of them. Foreign power funding? Maybe—money laundering is a thing.

It’s the NGOs.

It’s always the NGOs.

Democracy? Sure, sure, sure. Those NGO plotters are all there to “protect our democracy.” In reality, they are there to overthrow any democratically-elected American they disapprove of, just like happened to some of the democratically-elected regimes we overthrew off our shores. To these people, “democracy” means the right of unelected bureaucrats and well-funded NGOs to control our national destiny. In reality, “democracy” is the very last thing they want.

As to the color revolution toolbox, the similarities to what we are seeing now are simply undeniable:

Funding? Do I even need to explain this one? The NGOs fomenting insurrection in the USA are incredibly well-funded, many by George Soros’ network.

Training? Since 2020 we have seen so many examples of training programs for Antifa and similar groups, all NGO funded. These training programs are designed to train protestors on how to effectively foment civil unrest and, at times, violence. For example, Indivisible’s “One Million Rising” project focuses on training to be able to analyze “pillars of support” for the Trump Administration (business, labor, faith, civil service, law enforcement, etc.) and tactics to weaken them. Specific examples include pressuring local sheriffs not to cooperate with ICE, “Signs of Solidarity” campaigns targeting businesses, and sustained local campaigns against lawful Trump Administration actions. Sign-up language for such training has included “Let’s get organized. Let’s stop Trump.” Indivisible materials state the goal of mobilizing people “to defeat MAGA” and disrupt policy through noncooperation and active protest. (This effort has received up to $7,600,000 in Soros funding, by the way.)

Narrative and Symbolism? Again, do I really need to elaborate? The legacy media cannot report on election integrity without stating that Donald Trump’s complaints about the 2020 election are “baseless.” We are awash in stories about how the Trump Administration’s efforts to ensure election integrity are instead a nefarious plot to steal the midterm elections. Today, the Washington Post—obviously in a hurried and desperate effort to get out in front of the revelations from @DataRepublican—published an anonymously-sourced article favorably describing the coup efforts she uncovered. If you read this article, it does not talk about a coup conspiracy. Instead it talks about a bunch of well-meaning, patriotic, anonymous ex-national security officials simply trying to protect America from the evil dictator Trump destroying “our democracy.” This article itself is straight out of the color revolution toolbox—it is propaganda designed to condition a populace to accept illegitimate actions. The Washington Post is part of the plot. As to symbolism, do “No Kings” and the “Resistance” mean anything to you? Again, these slogans/symbols are straight out of the color revolution toolbox.

Electoral Trigger? When you listen to the videos and audios released by @DataRepublican, the plotters consistently speak of the midterms as being the trigger for action. Again, these ex-USAID diplomats could not possibly speak more clearly in their intent to overthrow the Trump Presidency via the color revolution tactics they learned in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. (Oh yeah, as to the trigger creating useful idiot martyrs, do the names Renée Good and Alex Pretti ring a bell?)

Elite Pressure? While we see European Union nations constantly decrying Trump—which is actually part of the plot—the twist in a domestic color revolution is that the elite pressure will come directly from Democrat governors. The uncovered plot relies on the idea that rampant street protests will result in a crisis in legitimacy via Trump needing to invoke the Insurrection Act, such that Democrat and RINO governors declare themselves the only legitimate U.S. authority, up to and including reaching out to foreign powers for recognition. (Geez, that kind of feels like the Confederacy asking Queen Victoria to acknowledge their sovereignty, doesn’t it?) The final step here will be to overthrow the Constitution as we know it—they said so.

Defection of Security Forces and Military? This is another one I feel like I really do not need to explain. Seditious Six, anyone? This feature of the domestic color revolution has been in plain sight for quite some time. Our nation’s survival really depends on this not working. Given the institutional resistance to Department of War reforms from some of the senior military brass and the cabal of senior, unelected bureaucrats in the Senior Executive Service who have trashed their oaths via passive resistance to the electoral will of the American people, this is a real issue of concern. If the plotters can turn some of the generals and bureaucrats actively against their Commander-in-Chief, we are in real trouble. Fortunately, I think this is the weak point of the plot and why it will ultimately fail. Our military ranks are still filled almost totally with patriots who will honor their oath to the Constitution.

The plot is afoot. It’s real. It’s here. A color revolution is currently being attempted in the USA by the same people who so adroitly manipulated the fates of millions of Eastern Europeans and Central Asians some twenty years ago.

What Can We Do?

My X feed is awash with concerned patriots asking this same question. All of us—everyone of us—can do these three things:

1. Pray.

2. Call your Congressman/woman and Senators and demand an investigation. Light up the switchboards. MAKE THEM pay attention.

3. Tell everyone you know. Make them listen to this shocking audio, if nothing else. The time is past caring if midwit Cousin Susie or face tattoo Nephew Timmy will cut you off because you support our President. Make them listen. The time is late. Our nation and our freedoms are at risk.

One more thing—for some of us, the answer is to be prepared. Most of you know what I mean, I’ll leave it there.

This modern American Gunpowder Plot cannot and will not succeed.

*In case you doubt the veracity of @DataRepublican‘s materials, here is how she obtained them. Some doofus involved in the plot used an AI agent to record and archive everything that went on, all the way back to 2023, and them stupidly let the agent archive them in a publicly available Google Drive. DR got a tip as to the URL. Further, the man President Trump appointed to play a key role in USAID and shut it down (Pete Marocco) publicly vouched for their authenticity. Here is the link where he said so.

…

This is how you know my recordings are real and they’re scared. Washington Post already doing counter-messaging. “A small group of U.S. national security officials has been discreetly advising state governments and congressional lawmakers on how to prepare for the possibility that the Trump administration will attempt to interfere in November’s midterm elections, according to people involved in the effort. The group includes about 10 current and former officials with experience in the Defense Department, some of whom have previously focused on countering authoritarianism abroad.”

Part I of the Sedition files for the planned Midterm ‘Colour Revolution’ Coup

THE ILLEGITIMACY PLAYBOOK / THE DEMOCRACY FILES: A PRIMER 

I will be using this thread to track all drops, so bookmark it.

I spent most of yesterday backing everything (now 312 gigabytes) up in various sources and getting the materials out to others. I also produced an AI video (below) to explain the whole thing to others are not on 𝕏 – feel free to distribute. 

Here’s the primer:

USAID, the foreign aid agency, had a democracy office. Inside the agency, it was called DRG. 

Officially, DRG administered “democracy assistance.” They’d go inside countries they thought were sliding into authoritarianism and help the opposition there. That assistance included election monitoring, judicary support, independent media, and civil society building. 

You may have heard the term “color revolution.” The model comes from Serbia in 2000, where trained student activists brought down Milosevic with the help of Western governments, after sustained protests. With the help of USAID’s democracy office, this model was implemented in many other countries to topple governments: Georgia’s “Rose Revolution” in 2003, Ukraine’s “Orange Revolution” in 2004, and many more. 

Then last year, DOGE shut down USAID. But the USAID democracy office didn’t stop. They formed a group called the Democracy Renewal Group, the same initials as their office (USAID Democracy, Human Rights, Governance). Their goal: apply their own playbook to the United States itself. 

This goal became a plan, called Renew American Democracy (RAD). It invoked the “4 B’s” framework. Block – use lawfare and protests to make life harder for the Trump administration. Bridge & Belong – control dialogue and win people over. The final and most important B is Build. Build means redesigning the American government itself, and the crisis is the opening. 

In their own words: 

“We can take that breakdown moment and leverage it for a big structural reform, you know, refounding moment.” – Danielle Reiff, DRG lead.

Calls show DRG working alongside DSA on ideas of creating a different government, one that does away with the Constitution itself. 

DRG does not run the Block operations. They hand it to UDA, the United Democracy Alliance. One organizer calls it a “huge galaxy”: lawsuits, street protests, non-cooperation. They list No Kings, Indivisible, MoveOn, 50501, and many other mega-activist NGOs among their members. 

Another organizer calls UDA Erica Chenoweth’s project. Chenoweth is the Harvard professor behind the three-and-half-percent rule of regime change: get that share of a country’s populace onto the streets, and historically, the movement wins. 

The UDA is very “hush-hush.” They have no website, no roster, no filings. 

Then come the red lines: things the Trump administration could do, such as calling the Insurrection Act on protesters, that would mean that the federal government, in their words, “crosses the threshold into illegitimacy.” Nobody voted on those lines. There was no public debate. These red lines were developed within secretive working groups, and in a paper addressed to governors and staff. 

In the words of Reiff/DRG: 

“So that if there is a red line crossed in terms of a Constitutional crisis, like everyone’s already pre-organized. And so Mike Smith actually said, he goes, oh, you guys have the day after tomorrow plan.” 

Cross a line, and the paper’s options include states refusing to lend their resources to federal officials, and governors convening what it calls a “Third Continential Congress.” 

Running the UDA’s Insurrection Act working group: Rear Admiral Mike Smith (RET) of National Security Leaders of America (NSL4A). NSL4A is also credited with operationalizing UDA, the blocking operations. NSL4A consists of about 1,600 ex-officers, spies, diplomats. They’re turning red lines into indicators and running a situation room to monitor them throughout the midterms and beyond. 

The NSL4A’s lawyers told them to stop recording meetings in case of subpoenas. But the rest of the network continued to record. DRG works in conjunction with Renew to Thrive (R2T), which ended up accidentally publishing 400+ calls and thousands of documents. These calls and documents were never meant for our eyes, but it’s them, on tape. 

Thousands of NGOs and billions of dollars are involved in this endeavor. Most of them believe they’re saving democracy. The problem is that people who spent their careers deciding when other countries’ governments had lost their legitimacy wrote that test for ours, in private, and planned for what comes after. 

Who decides when your government is legitimate?

Part II of the Sedition files for the planned Midterm ‘Colour Revolution’ Coup

THE DEMOCRACY FILES, PART 2: WHEN AND HOW TO DECLARE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ILLEGITIMATE 🚨 Some questioned whether a group of 200 ex-USAID officials could actually pull off their ambitions to rewrite the Constitution.

Here, they describe exactly how it works. They aren’t working alone. The videos all come from Renew to Thrive (R2T) group and associates.

Danielle Reiff and Paul Zeitz play key roles within R2T.

R2T sits inside a much, much larger umbrella called United Democracy Alliance (UDA), which is an extremely hush-hush control plane of leaders from major “blocking” NGOs such as 50501 and Indivisible fulfilling various functions. UDA decides when protests get deployed, timelines, how to respond, all that.

R2T’s role within UDA is concerned with “the day after tomorrow” – in other words, their function is to conceive what a rewritten American government will look like after the rest of UDA fulfills its purpose. As will be shown, Erica Chenoworth is credited with conceiving UDA in the first place under the Horizons “Big Tent” initiative.

Note here that National Security Leaders for America (NSL4A) is credited for operationalizing UDA. NSL4A is a group of 1,600 ex-military, intelligence, and diplomatic officials. They are led by Rear Admiral Michael E. Smith (Ret). NSL4A also played a key role in the “illegal orders” messaging which targeted Pete Hegseth. Zeitz is also a member of NSL4A.

It must be emphasized that the choice of a military-oriented organization to coordinate NGOs across domestic protests is an interesting one all in itself – especially in an umbrella conceived by a regime change expert like Chenoworth.

You will have a hard time finding any mentions of UDA in the public. They are extremely hush-hush and selective who they talk to.

Mike Smith himself makes a personal appearance in other calls, coordinating Insurrection Act exercises and roleplaying with R2G as one of the participants.

As the audio transcript shows, they have outlined a sequence of “redlines” in which case the federal government should be declared illegitimate. Invoking the Insurrection Act against “peaceful” protesters is one of the most discussed redlines. I will post the illegitimate criteria below, but basically, almost any effective pushback against NGOs is a measure of illegitimacy according to them.

Important to understand:

The audio shows they shopped this idea around governors, but the reality is that governors do not have to explicitly sign on to the pact to play their role in the coup. All they have to do is refuse troops in their state and let UDA / R2G do the work of dissolving the federal government.

….

Part III of the Sedition files for the planned Midterm ‘Colour Revolution’ Coup

THE DEMOCRACY FILES, PART 3: AMERICA GETS THE FOREIGN-INTERVENTION TREATMENT https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/svg/1f6a8.svg

At what point does this become foreign interference of our elections? 

To back up: the main group that Danielle Reiff and the other ex-USAID workers belongs to, Renew To Thrive (R2T) / Renew American Democracy (RAD) have an explicit strategy document. That strategy outlines “preparing for the worst” which includes the Insurrection Act or “election meltdown,” and their goal is to get “structural reform” in place by that – a polite way of saying our Constitutional Republic has to be overhauled. 

In July 2026, R2T/RAD invited foreign state actors to share experience with the American community, for the express purpose of operationalizing their expertise right here in the United States. All actors had experience in international community assisted transitions (I’ll let you figure out what that is a code word for). 

The disturbing part, though, is that all of the foreign actors’ recommendations were implemented right here in America. 

You may have seen news headlines like: 

– Restore trust in processes

– Increased election security, increased legal presence at polls

– Democratic officials hold tabletop exercises

– Judges prepare for post-election challenges

To be clear, this video doesn’t prove that this meeting specifically caused this cascade of escalations. But what it shows is that the democracy-promotion playbook the U.S. spent decades exporting, with situation rooms, observers at every polling place, prebunking and litigation paired with street mobilization, is now being run on America’s own election. The same people are running it, and they’re taking advice from the foreign actors the U.S. once backed. 

Now when you look at officials talking about independent watchdogs or tabletop exercises… know that it’s because they are now treating the United States midterms exactly the same as they’d treat elections in a third world country. 

And I think more than a small part of them are hoping that it does become a self-fulfilling prophecy as it has in so many of those countries. (For context, my book Unelected documents that so-called “election meltdowns” are precursors to transitions of power via color revolution.)

…

Natalie Winters:

BLOCKADE AND RIOT: How Soros & Gates-Backed Activists Are Already Training For A Contested Election

“We are collectively ready to enforce our election results if and as needed.”
That was Free DC executive director Keya Chatterjee’s pledge after Washington’s June primary. Now the anti-Trump organizing group is recruiting activists to rehearse election protests ahead of the midterms.
Its September 26 training promises to revisit “election enforcement” and includes:
“interactive role play of protest scenarios.”
The announcement follows preparations in which DC organizers developed a contingency for intersection blockades, a march to the Capitol and a coordinated withdrawal from work, school and shopping if primary results were seriously contested or tampered with.
Free DC has institutional backing for its organizing. Its fiscal hosts are Community Change and Community Change Action. Community Change’s disclosed supporters include Open Society Policy Center, Pivotal Ventures and Pritzker Family Foundation. On Free DC’s advisory council sits the head of an organization that has run political scenario exercises involving hundreds of groups.
Funders: 
Blockades were already on the table
The earlier election contingency laid out a sequence for taking the dispute into the streets.
Movement trainer Daniel Hunter, writing about DC’s June election preparations, described:
“morning intersection blockades, a midday march to the Capitol, evening gatherings”
The accompanying call:
“no work, no school, no shopping”
Organizers planned to revive tactics from their May Day demonstrations if the election went seriously wrong. Hunter described the contingency as nonviolent non-cooperation and reported that it was never activated. Organizers also prepared to explain why a slow ranked-choice count did not mean an election had been stolen…

More donors are listed in the rest of the article. They need to be investigated.

THE DEMOCRACY FILES / ILLEGITIMACY PLAYBOOK, PART 7: THE SECRET MEGA-ALLIANCE WAITING FOR A RED LINE TO BE CROSSED https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/svg/1f6a8.svg

What do you call a mega-alliance that: 

• Covers hundreds, if not thousands, of protest organizations

• Covers all the lawfare-related organizations

• Liasions with governors when a Constitutional crisis is crossed

• Consults federal workers on how to block emergency efforts

• Runs a situation room for the midterms and beyond

• Is credited to regime change expert and professor Erica Chenoweth

• Is operationalized by National Security Leaders for America, an organization of 1,600 retired officers, spies, and diplomats

• … and determines the “red lines” for mobilization of the above? 

Meet the United Democracy Alliance (UDA). 

UDA is the secret alliance behind the messaging we saw this week: 

• JB Pritzker’s warning that states will “strongly resist” 

• Governor Newsom’s office declaring a “CODE RED” 

• Norm Eisen talking about “war rooms” 

• Slotkin predicting a “national security incident”

You will not find any mentions of the United Democracy Alliance (UDA) on the web. It is a mega-alliance of resistance NGOs ready to deploy on a moment’s notice, monitoring every action President Trump takes and monitoring every polling place. 

We only can put together the pieces by recordings. Some key quotes: 

• “if there’s a moment where there’s a constitutional crisis, like one of the UDA four red lines, if they get crossed… governors then become the kind of lead anchor for political power.” (Zeitz, Aug 6)

• “the big, big, big, big, big tent that’s being organized in the blocking community so that if there is a red line crossed in terms of a constitutional crisis, like, everybody’s already pre-organized.” (Reiff, Aug 5)

• “We are also starting to consult federal workers on how to do some blocking inside the govt agencies during emergency situations” (Eric Manton, Zoom chat, Aug 6)

According to 

@JeffClarkUS

 , the last point above about federal workers conspiring to block emergency responses may violate serious statutes. More on federal workers involvement in Drop 8. 

Compilation of recordings below:

Gavin Newsom Caught on Hidden Camera Saying the DSA is the Future of the Democrat Party (VIDEO)

UNDERCOVER: GAVIN NEWSOM SAYS THE DSA IS “GOING TO BE DOMINANT” AND “MAINSTREAM” IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY!

“The DSA, the energy and the desire and demand for bold change, not incremental change, is very much going to be dominant. I mean, that’s going to be a mainstream Democratic movement. Absolutely. No question about that.”
That’s California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a likely 2028 presidential candidate, speaking to an undercover journalist while campaigning in New Hampshire.
Asked by a “younger voter” who said “we don’t want Kamala Harris, we want more democratic socialist policies”:
“No one is arguing to manage the status quo and fail more efficiently.”
“You can’t play in the margins anymore. The system’s broken. It’s completely unbalanced, and we can’t manage the decline. We have to completely reimagine.”

The Gateway Pundit:
So the people who want to abolish the Senate and the Presidency, open jails, and defund the police are going to be the dominant wing of the Democrat Party?
Good to know, good to know.

Looks like McCarthy was correct!

…

DataRepublican analysis of this:

Governor Newsom on 17 October: “The whole – the system’s broken. It’s completely unbalanced. And you can’t – we can’t manage the decline. We have to completely reimagine.”

Then within the files, I see very similar language: “The system is broken — and it cannot fix itself.”

Does that mean the specific ex-USAID workers we’ve been tracking are controlling Newsom? No. But as you’ve seen throughout these files, every individual in the ecosystem belongs to multiple NGOs and alliances. They network constantly. They attend each other’s conferences. They form coalitions on similar projects. They give each other feedback. That’s how they develop a hive mind.

The proposed methods may differ from group to group, but they are all converging on one goal: America governance must be rewritten from top down, and soon.

Home Rule Act in DC was the Blueprint for the Insurrection Act

Trump used DC and the Home Rule Act, as the blueprint for every crime-ridden city in the nation. This is psychological normalization for the Insurrection Act. DC was essentially a soft-launch of the Insurrection Act, so the public could see that the concept works, and have trust in the US MIL.

At some point, the Insurrection Act will be invoked, so the US MIL can assist law enforcement and carry out arrests on US soil, secure and safeguard the nation, and restore law and order in blue cities/states that refuse to enforce federal law and harbor illegals/criminals from the federal government (sanctuary cities). [I agree – GC]

And for those claiming that the Dems “want” Trump to invoke the Insurrection Act… you are mistaken. The Insurrection Act is quite literally the thing they fear most, because the Dems know that means the US MIL can conduct arrests on US soil, and they REALLY don’t want that.

I think that some Dems are crazy enough to think Canada and the UN will step in. Also Remember the 16 year plan. The US military was SUPPOSED to be de-fanged by now and controlled by the Cabal. That is why Slutkin et al were calling on the US Military to revolt.

TheseTruths October 31, 2026 13:29

WATCH: Hidden Camera Video Exposes Sen. Elissa Slotkin Outlining Democrats’ ‘Signature Cases’ for January Lawfare if They Win Midterms

Michigan Democrat Sen. Elissa Slotkin was recorded in an undercover video laying out a concrete plan for what Democrats intend to do if they regain a congressional majority in the midterms, describing preselected “signature cases” of alleged corruption that they would pursue in every committee starting in January.
The clip, obtained by Townhall and posted Friday on the outlet’s X account, was filmed Thursday at a Michigan campaign event where Slotkin was appearing in support of congressional candidate Sean McCann.
During the exchange, an undercover reporter expressed concern that Democrats might be “too nice” and pressed Slotkin on prosecutions against the Trump administration and its allies.
Slotkin responded that she was “with you” and outlined the plan.
“We have a list of, like, the ‘signature cases.’ So the things where it’s, like, so egregious, such a violation of law, such a corruption case… and we will have, in every committee, there will be the ‘signature cases’ where we hold people accountable.”
Slotkin added that these would be the matters “that people identify with.”
➡️ The senator specifically named the White House ballroom project in the East Wing, the reflecting pool renovation on the National Mall, and “$200 million in, you know, from the Defense Department” as examples.
“So that’s what you’ll see basically in January.”

Eilert

…Normen Eisen and Marc Elias already have their Color Revolution ducks lined up.

OTH POTUS is already on to them

DataRepublican (small r)

@DataRepublican

🚨🚨 THE DEMOCRACY FILES / THE INSURRECTION PLAYBOOK, PART 12: IS NORM EISEN CALLING THE SHOTS? 🚨

First, sorry for the absence of drops; I had to go on a last minute trip to DC and back.

@nataliegwinters has been releasing many drops adjacent to the Democracy Files, including materials on ESRN and Norm Eisen.

The Democracy Files, while significant, are told through the lenses of a mid-to-high level operatives group of ex-USAID workers, a group called DRG (Democracy Renewal Group). DRG, in these videos, collaborate with other groups, receive briefings from others such as Rear Admiral Mike Smith (RET), participate in and host working groups, and so forth.

But DRG are not the shot-callers. They explicitly do not decide when a mass protest has to happen. They do not have a final say in what has to occur before mass mobilization occurs. Erica Chenoweth isn’t personally secretly running things. Mike Smith is a high level operational leader, not a shot-caller.

So who calls the shots?

Put together the Democracy Files and Winters’ drops, and a larger hierarchical picture emerges: ESRN, Election Safeguards Response Network, which is mentioned in @nataliegwinters reporting. The Democracy Files heavily suggests that ESRN is who ultimately calls the shots when it is time to mobilize United Democracy Alliance (UDA).

And that particular trail leads directly to none other than Norm Eisen.

Now, this does not mean Eisen is the unilateral mastermind. Most likely, that belongs to yet another mysterious small coalition of elites – we can only speculate on who else is in that club; ESRN is financed under State Democracy Defenders Action, EIN 93-1524544.

But Eisen’s hands are on a great many levers, and we can reasonably infer he is one of the key decision-making figures.

5:51 PM · Oct 31, 2026

Norm Eisen is the executive chair of State Democracy Defenders Fund, a coalition which includes people such as @BillKristol . Their tax form lists Sayer Lagalle as “ESRN Director.”

There’s no such thing as an organic nationwide protest. That has been debunked for once and for all.

….

@pepesgrandma Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻@pepesgrandma

Oct 31

Have you ever considered they meant just Democracy Alliance. The same folks that ran the first coup attempt?

…

eilert 

BTW This is her latetest post (Part 13) documenting the Color Revolution:

@DataRepublican

🚨🚨 DEMOCRACY FILES / THE ILLEGITIMACY PLAYBOOK, PART 13: THE NEW FOUNDING 🚨

The “democracy” ecosystem is mostly decentralized. There’s competition sometimes (as this drop will show). But when a direction has been set by funders, actors converge towards a common goal.

And that goal is: American government must be rewritten from scratch, and soon.

RAD, the project of ex-USAID workers we’ve been tracing in the Democracy Files, represents one plan. PolicyLink represents another plan.

What is PolicyLink?

Towards the end of UNELECTED, I write about PolicyLink – a highly connected NGO which receives more than $50 million annually in funding. There, I describe its “soul work” – engineering the human soul to create a renewed democracy. That’s not an exaggeration; that’s how they describe it, in their own words.

PolicyLink appears again in the Democracy Files. Here, you can see PolicyLink personnel use the same language we’ve seen in prior drops: founders, a new founding, redesigning the federal government.

PolicyLink has over $100 million in assets and receives its funding from all the usual suspects – Rockefeller, Open Society, Ford, Gates, etc. It has worked closely with Democratic administrations in setting policy.

RAD and PolicyLink compete for the same funders and the same space. But they say the same thing: a “new founding,” drafted by people no one elected, ready “before the window opens.”

RAD is perhaps simply more honest about how that window will open.

More about PolicyLink’s “soul work,” which is covered in UNELECTED – thanks to @SKDoubleDub33 and @iamlisalogan for finding this:

The big picture and its history is all covered in UNELECTED. Buy it here:

Unelected by Jennica Pounds & Joshua Lisec 

How the NGO-Administrative Complex Seized Power—And How to Get It Back 

$200 billion for Ukraine. $50 billion a year for USAID. $9 billion for resettling refugees. Meanwhile, Americans struggle to earn a living, buy a home, and start a family. The welfare state works for everyone but employed citizens trying their best to make ends meet and pay their taxes on time. Why are the world’s most generous people financially abused by their own government?

As one scandal after another breaks, there is one question that becomes harder and harder to ignore: How did the American government and a vast network of NGOs become the vehicle for funneling American middle-class wealth to the rest of the world? The surprising answer is not financial, but philosophical, the little-known yet centuries-old ideology called supranationalism. From George Soros through George W. Bush, from the 17th century Treaty of Westphalia through the rise of President Donald Trump, a clear timeline emerges for how everyday Americans became the number-one mark for a global ruling class intent on redistributing their resources. Barricading its backroom dealmaking behind federal departments, nonprofits and NGOs, and charitable foundations whose names we all know yet whose operations will still shock and horrify, this NGO-Administrative Complex has perfected the art of converting U.S. taxpayer money into instant-access welfare for the rest of the world. This is the story of how this machine was built, how it runs, and how it can finally be dismantled.

Drawing on Jennica Pounds’ receipt-backed analysis trusted by millions on X at @DataRepublican, together with page-turning narratives of New York Times best-selling author Joshua Lisec, Unelected maps the money, names the gatekeepers, and rug-pulls the unelected networks running the show from behind dated logos and sappy slogans to impoverish us all and usher in a new world order in which every American city is destined to become another Minneapolis.

TRANSCRIPT

On Saturday, Benny Johnson asked Donald Trump to give a final message to Republicans before the Tuesday midterms.

And the final message for Republicans.

“Just be smart, be strong, love your country, and just keep going on the same path that we’re on, and we’re going to make this country greater than ever before. “

Now, compare what the president said to what Senator Alyssa Slatkin said last month at the Carnegie Endowment.

“President Trump thinks America is unremarkable. mediocre and in decline. He thinks America is the Titanic and he’s charging the passengers for a seat on the lifeboat.”

Slatkin’s remarks are not delusional. Her full Carnegie speech is a confession about what she has planned for 2027 and how she and her cohorts have test run a color revolution playbook in Hungary and are now running it in Poland. And she wasn’t alone on that Carnegie stage. Sitting next to her was a woman who has played a central role in trying to bring down Donald Trump on behalf of London.

I’m Susan Kokinda and today I’m going to look at Slatkin’s post-midterm plans, how it ties to the playbook being run in Poland, and how the political earthquake that hit Slutkin’s home state of Michigan tears it all up. So listen to Slutkin’s full quotes on September 30th where she seems to be completely unbothered by reality.

“President Trump thinks America is unremarkable, mediocre, and in decline. He believes we are not exceptional in our role in the world and we never were. And now with AI, we are headed for inevitable destruction. His vision for our country in this term is quite literally the opposite of make America great again. Instead, he believes America never again is going to be great. Only someone with these beliefs can so fundamentally destroy our laws, our known, our norms, and our spirit. And because he believes we’re broken beyond repair, he’s just going to get his. He’s going to cash out and get his cut for himself, his family, and his loyalists.”

Now, unless you live in the world of CNN news feeds or Bluesky posts, that is just bizarre. It’s not Donald Trump who believes we are broken beyond repair. It’s the newly emergent socialist wing of Slutkin’s own party, which thinks that America is in decline and that it was never exceptional, so we should trash our entire form of government and become like Cuba. The rest of her speech described how to stop the authoritarian Trump in 2027 with hearings run by a hoped for Democratic Congress.

And her partner on stage, Anne Applebaum, who we will return to in a minute, was positively nostalgic for a rerun of the January 6th show trial.

“The use and purpose of congressional investigations, explorations. We had one after January the 6, which I thought was excellent actually. It was very well run. There were excellent witnesses. It was even timed and organized in a way that was constructed for television. They really thought it through. “

So, that’s the form. What will be the content of these hearings? Slutkin let that all out in a very unguarded response when caught on an undercover video on October 29th.

“I’m worried that we’re going to be too nice. What are we going to do to hold the Trump regime and its collaborators . responsible? I’m talking prosecutions Nuremberg level. What what are we going to do? So basically assuming we win both houses, even if we just win one, we’ll have a list of signature cases. So the things where it’s so egregious, such a violation of law, such a corruption case, like and we will have in every committee, there will be the signature cases that we where we hold people accountable. I just went to Hungary. I went over to Budapest in Hungary cuz they just got rid of their authoritarian leader after 16 years. And I’m like, how did you handle 16 years of corruption? We don’t have that much, but we have so much. and they did these signature cases and they’re ones that people identify with like the east wing of the ball [room] of the white house, you know, the ballroom or the reflecting pool or $200 million from the defense department. So that’s what you’ll see basically [in] January. “

The signature cases she named a privately funded ballroom and the reflecting pool. So, while Donald Trump rebuilds the American economy, the Democrats will be running hearings about a paint job. But that is exactly how the color revolution playbooks work. And that playbook is only deployed against leaders like Donald Trump who challenge the globalist system.

Now, Slutkin and Applebaum are pros at using that playbook. And last week, it was unleashed in Poland where they both have connections. Before giving that Carnegie speech, Alyssa Slutkin had taken a little field trip.

“At the beginning of this month, I got to visit Poland and Hungary, our NATO allies. In the past six months, Hungary has quite literally taken the playbook to fight an authoritarian, the people’s playbook, if you will, and dusted it off to make it more relevant for the 21st century. In Poland, they called this plan the iron broom, cleaning the place up. “

And this past weekend, the next chapter in the Polish playbook was activated. On Friday, the pro-EU prime minister of Poland, Donald Tusk, moved against the constitutional tribunal, the country’s highest court. Its president was suspended and police surrounded the building. Now, Poland’s president, Carol Naraki, a Trump ally, turned his plane around and returned to Poland to defend the court. The EU has sided with Tusk. Tusk’s opponents have called it a coup, and President Trump’s ambassador in Warsaw saw it for what it was. He said, “We appear to be witnessing an unprecedented confrontation over the government’s use of state power and the independence and authority of a constitutional institution.” Now, who stepped up to defend Tusk’s actions to the world? Poland’s foreign minister, Rodisloff Sakorski. Now, Sakorski isn’t just Poland’s foreign minister. He is also Anne Applebaum’s husband. The woman sitting across from Slatkin at Carnegie is married to the man defending the power grab and she even mentioned it from the stage.

“So, some of you know I live part of the time in Poland. I’ve spent a lot of time in Hungary. “

So, let’s look at this couple. Starting with him. Sakorski fled Poland to Britain in 1982, went to Oxford where he hung out with the likes of future British prime ministers David Cameron and Boris Johnson. He became a British citizen in 1987, but he gave it up in 2006 when he became Poland’s defense minister. Now for his wife. Applebaum is American born, but her career was made in London. She was a Marshall scholar at the London School of Economics. She wrote for a string of British newspapers and ran a disinformation program at the LSE. Her US outlets are the Washington Post and the Atlantic. And then there’s her role in the Integrity Initiative. An operation which was exposed in the British [House of] Commons, in 2018 for receiving nearly 2 million pounds this financial year from the British Foreign Office.

My co-host Barbara Boyd has tracked this British operation for years. It runs what it calls clusters. Journalists, academics, foreign office people who get activated directly through British embassies whenever London needs a narrative pushed.

Applebaum, then working for the Washington Post, was in one of those clusters along with Sir Andrew Wood of Orbus Business Intelligence. The firm founded by Christopher Steel, the British intelligence agent who launched Russiagate. So, let that sink in. The person helping write Slutkin’s midterm playbook is an identified British agent of influence with ties to Russiagate and her husband is the face of that playbook as it unfolds in Warsaw. So, the script is written when Congress launch signature case hearings timed for television and swing the iron broom. But in Slutkin’s home state of Michigan, someone is rewriting the script.

Let’s go back to Carnegie where Slutkin promised a brand new movement.

“What we know here in the US is that a new coalition is needed that crosses party lines to win in 2028. Insiders in Washington need to accept that it’s no longer Democrat versus Republicans or moderates versus progressives. “

Well, Senator, your coalition arrived on Sunday morning. It just didn’t show up where you expected. Two days before the midterms at Perfecting Church in Detroit, Democratic Congresswoman Haley Stevens stood next to Republican Senate candidate Mike Rogers. Then she endorsed him.

“My vote for Senate, I am just one vote, as is every Michigander. My vote for Senate is going to be with Mike Rogers. And I will tell you why. Because we have to stand with country. We can’t stand with hate.”

Stevens had been narrowly defeated by Abdul El Sayed in the August primary. Then she dutifully fell on her sword and endorsed the Democratic Socialists chosen candidate. So what changed? She had asked El Sayed to disavow an outside ad blaming your high grocery bill on foreign aid to Israel. An ad so blatantly anti-Semitic that even CNN commentators were shocked by it. El Sayed refused and then dis-invited Stevens from weekend campaign events. That’s when she endorsed Rogers.

But Steven’s bombshell endorsement of Rogers isn’t going to deter Slutkin’s attempt to build her new coalition based on the narrative that corruption is the cause of high prices. Or in the case of El Sayed, it’s the Jews. Here’s how Slutkin explained it.

“We need to make clear to the public that corruption at the top is taking money directly out of their pockets. When Trump gains, you lose. Take as an example how your electricity bills keep climbing. That’s because AI companies are building data centers that guzzle power and President Trump is giving them tax breaks to do it.”

Notice what’s missing. Not one word about Trump’s initiatives to compel the SI companies to produce their own electricity and add it to the grid. Not one word about decades of shutdown plants, choked off pipelines, and green mandates that left the grid unable to deal with either foreign energy shocks or with new industry. She does the same thing with healthcare, ignoring how Obamacare wrecked what was left of our health care system and how the president is taking on big pharma and big health to try and fix it. But reality doesn’t fit into the anti-authoritarian playbook.

“But connecting that to corruption, political corruption, financial corruption is the way that we make it relevant to them. “

Make it relevant to them. Them is you. Find what people feel, attach a villain to it, and run it on television. That’s not economics. It’s the Color Revolution Playbook being run by a CIA trained senator and a card carrying British agent of influence. Meanwhile, the Trump administration is reversing decades of free trade industrial collapse. This past month alone, the president and his team announced billions in new and expanded factories that will rebuild the middle class. And even before many of those jobs come online, the initial revival of our economy has dropped child poverty and Hispanic poverty to the lowest levels on record. Those aren’t signature cases. Those are the actual receipts of a reviving American economy.

So on Tuesday, you have a choice between two playbooks. One was written in London and is being run again in Warsaw. It runs on hearings timed for television and an iron broom for anyone in the way. The other is the one Donald Trump gave Benny Johnson on Saturday night. Be smart, be strong, love your country, and make America greater than before.