9/11 Truth-Fest

Have bookmarked all the videos to watch later. Just some thoughts on red-pilling etc.

People often want definitive evidence of a comprehensive alternative explanation before they will reject the validity of the explanation they do accept. “If it wasn’t this, then what was it?” This is why and how the concepts of reasonable doubt and presumption of innocence have been gamed out of existence. If the person didn’t do it, then who did? Or, if the person didn’t do exactly that, then what exactly did he do?

This is why trials do not seek the truth as a result, but seek a socially accepted result. Guilt or innocence is not determined in any objective sense (except coincidentally) but only in a purely formal sense which is wrongly assumed to be objective truth.

I read Posner’s book, and Bugliosi’s book, and assorted other lone gunmen books, along with Lane’s book, and was 100% convinced Oswald was the lone gunman. Worse, I considered it preposterous that any other explanation made sense.

Then years later I watched the original interviews Lane had conducted of eyewitnesses to the assassination, interviews conducted shortly after the assassination. I did not know they existed. Watching was like getting struck by lightening. It was not possible for these ordinary citizens to be telling the truth, and for the lone gunman story to also be true. And they were telling the truth.

I went back to watch the Firing Line interview Buckley did with Lane. Buckley was my hero back then, and I watched Firing Line faithfully. Watching the interview years later was to be confronted by my abject naïvete, inexperience, and simple minded psychology back then. I was embarrassed and ashamed by Buckley. Buckley avoided all factual aspects of the matter, and instead focused purely on character assassination. Buckley’s “argument” was that Lane was a communist. Lane OTOH focused on the facts and ignored the personal attack.

How influential was my initial watching of this episode on my later confidence in Posner and Bugliosi? Without my realizing it, how much was my mind “set” by the Buckley interview?

9-11 was similar. I very carefully read the Popular Mechanics article and that was it. My mind was “set.” (I read a lot else, but that was the “foundation” prism).

One thing DID bother me, that Barbara Olson died on one of the flights. Her death was far from proof of anything, but it stayed with me. If Olson’s death was arranged, how could all of 9-11 be on the up and up?

Hillary is all about revenge, and it struck me as just too amazingly “lucky” for Hillary to coincidentally get her spectacularly terrifying revenge. Wolf posted a compelling explanation (based on facts and research) as to how Olson’s death was arranged, an astonishing piece of detective work, and persuasive to me 100%

My mind about 9-11 was opened by my open-minded research into the assassination. If the JFK official narrative was corrupt brainwashing, what was not? The Olson murder was not the key, but was corroboration of the dozens of facts I had found undermining the official 9-11 narrative.

Bush reading a story to little children at some point took on a whole new meaning, just as Sadie’s posting of the tarot card immediately converted my thoughts on falling man. The brazenness is just part of ongoing operations.

There is no comprehensive explanation available to us for what REALLY took place, or is taking place. That, too, is part of ongoing operations. What we have amounts to much more than reasonable doubt. We know the official narratives are false. The explanation for the falsity allows us to logically infer that something very evil is happening, and has been happening for a very long time. It also allows us practically to assume the worse about what is happening, and that may be the best we will ever do in knowing what is actually going on, although justice and knowledge would be very sweet.