The free vintage header image of writing a letter for today’s offering is courtesy of Shutterstock and Google Images.
Health Friday is a series devoted to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post AI-generated content in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.
Today’s offering is dedicated to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have suffered negative consequences from an infection of the COVID-19 virus itself after recovering from the infection; to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have COVID-19 “vaccine”-induced injuries, illnesses, and/or disabilities; and, to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have passed away from either an infection of the COVID-19 virus itself, or from the negative effects of the COVID-19 “vaccines” they had in their body.
“Dr. Martin Makary, MD, MPH, Commissioner, United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD, 20993
Dear Dr. Martin Makary:
Greetings. This letter is in reference to certain questions that the writer poses regarding the FDA, under your leadership, still promoting the use of the COVID-19 “vaccines” (actually, mRNA gene therapies) in the United States. This includes the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” COMIRNATY, by Pfizer-BioNTech; the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” SPIKEVAX and NEXSPIKE, by Moderna; and, the “inactivated virus” COVID-19 “vaccine” NUVAXOVID, by Novavax. Thank you in advance for your attention. The questions follow:
Question One: Have you read through the report on BNT162b2 that Pfizer-BioNTech submitted to the FDA on 21 January 2021, regarding the Pharmacokinetics tests results for this modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” (which was subsequently approved by the FDA in 2022 under the name COMIRNATY)?
Would you please answer, in detail, your reasoning behind the continued FDA approval of COMIRNATY based on the results of this report? The report is found here: https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/125742_S1_M2_26_phramkin-tabulated-summary.pdf, “BNT162b2 2.6.5 Pharmacokinetics Tabulated Summary”, time-stamped by the FDA on 21 January 2021 at 23:22 (GMT), and starting with FDA CBER document identification number FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0013907. For your convenience, images of Page 7 and Page 8 of this report are below; first, Page 7:
And, Page 8:
The writer of this letter assumes that you understand that the BNT162b2 formulation used in the Wistar lab rats experiments above is the same formulation that the FDA granted the initial EUA to for use in the United States on 11 December 2020.
Question Two: Have you read through the Post-marketing Experience report on BNT162b2 that Pfizer-BioNTech submitted to the FDA on 30 April 2021? In particular, have you read through the APPENDIX 1. LIST OF ADVERSE EVENTS OF SPECIAL INTEREST section of this report, which begins on Page 30? The report is found here: https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf, “BNT162b2 5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization Adverse Event Reports”, time-stamped by the FDA on 30 April 2021 at 09:26 (GMT), starting with FDA CBER document identification number FDA-CBER-2021-0000054. The APPENDIX 1. section covers only those serious adverse events reports to Pfizer-BioNTech that were submitted between 11 December 2020 (the date that the FDA granted the initial EUA for BNT162b2 to be used in the United States), and 28 February 2021 — a period of fewer than 12 weeks. There are over 1,200 different listings of serious adverse events reports in the APPENDIX 1. section of the document.
Would you please answer, in detail, your reasoning behind the continuing FDA approval of COMIRNATY, given this document? Would you please answer, in detail, your reasoning why the FDA would simply accept this document without demanding an investigation of why there are so many different serious adverse events reports for BNT162b2? For you convenience, an image of Page one of the APPENDIX 1. section (Page 30 of the report document) is below:
The APPENDIX 1. section of the report runs from Page 30 to Page 38.
Question Three: Have you read the paper, published in the journal Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology on 15 September 2021, in which the authors prove that both the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” of Pfizer-BioNTech and of Moderna, and the viral vector COVID-19 “vaccines” (for example, of Janssen), cross the placenta of a COVID-19 “vaccinated” pregnant woman and enter into the body and brain of the fetus she is carrying? And, that, similarly, these “vaccines” also cross into the breast milk of the nursing mother who was “vaccinated”, therefore also entering into her nursling’s body and brain? The paper is found here: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.735394, “COVID-19 Vaccination in Pregnancy and Lactation: Current Research and Gaps in Understanding”, Lydia L. Shook, Parisa N. Fallah, Jason N. Silberman, Andrea G. Edlow, 15 September 2021. For your convenience, a screenshot of Figure 1 from the paper is below:
Which means, according to the graphic above from the paper, that the fetus and the nursling will get COVID-19 “vaccinated” along with the mother, due to the ingredients and mechanisms that cross into the placenta and/or the breast milk from the “vaccinated” mother. The natural immune systems of a fetus or of a nursling child are not mature enough, or strong enough, to handle the antibody-manufacturing demands of the COVID-19 “vaccines” that involuntarily enter their body and brain via the “vaccinated” mother.
Would you please describe, in detail, your reasoning for the FDA continuing to recommend COVID-19 “vaccination” of pregnant women, and/or breastfeeding mothers, based on the Frontiers In paper report?
Question Four: Are you aware that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” by Pfizer-BioNTech and by Moderna, contain N1-Methylpseudouridine, a lab-created compound, that replaces the natural RNA in the Uridine of the “vaccinated” person’s body with this compound? Are you aware that N1-Methylpseudouridine was specifically created and included in the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” because this lab-created compound facilitates the entry of the ingredients of these “vaccine” into every cell of the “vaccinated” person’s body? Are you aware that, by replacing the RNA of the natural Uridine in the “vaccinated” person’s body, the multiple beneficial functions of Uridine RNA are damaged or lost? Are you aware that, among the multiple beneficial functions of Uridine RNA include cognitive elements (learning, memory), and emotional/psychological elements (mood regulation?) Are you aware that N1-Methylpseudouridine is present in all COVID-19 “vaccines” by Pfizer-BioNTech? For your convenience, please see: https://www.theqtree.com/2024/11/08/health-friday-11-8-2024-open-thread-the-insidious-n1-methylpseudouridine-in-the-covid-19-vaccines/; and, https://www.theqtree.com/2025/03/21/health-friday-3-21-2025-open-thread-more-on-the-n1-methylpseudouridine-in-the-modrna-covid-19-vaccines/. The Patent Declaration by Pfizer-BioNTech for BNT162b2, which describes the inclusion of N1-Methylpseudouridine in this “vaccine”, and what it does, is found here: https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2021213945A1/en. For reference, the following screenshot is from this Patent Declaration:
Would you please explain, in detail, your reasoning behind why the FDA should continue to approve for use in the United States, an injectable (the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”) that specifically includes a lab-created compound (N1-Methylpseudouridine) which replaces natural Uridine RNA — and that this replacement is performed without the advance knowledge and consent of the person receiving this “vaccine?”
Question Five: The writer of this letter assumes that you, Dr. Makary, are aware that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” induce cardiovascular issues and conditions, such as, myocarditis and pericarditis. This would mean induction of these conditions by the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” (COMIRMATY); or, by the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” (SPIKEVAX.) The writer of this letter will focus on the Moderna product. The Package Insert for the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, SPIKEVAX, is found here: https://www.fda.gov/media/155675/download. For your convenience, screenshots of the the following portions of this document are below; first, the Warnings and Precautions section:
The writer of this letter notes that the Warnings and Precautions are not enclosed in a “Black Box Warning.” Why is this the case?
Then, from section 5.2 Myocarditis and Pericarditis:
And, from section 6.2 Postmarketing Experience:
There actually is information available regarding the potential for long-term sequelae of myocarditis or pericarditis after taking COVID-19 “vaccines.” It is here: https://doi.org/10.61577/ijcri.2025.100001, “Myocarditis after SARS-CoV-2 Infection and COVID-19 Vaccination: Epidemiology, outcomes, and new perspectives”, M. Nathaniel Mead, Jessica Rose, William Makis, Kirk Milhoan, Nicolas Hulscher, and Peter A. McCullough, 20 March 2025. For your convenience, a screenshot of the Abstract of this paper is below:
And, Figure 6 from the paper, VAERS reports of myocarditis after COVID-19 “vaccination”:
Would you please describe, in detail, your reasoning why the FDA needs to continue to promote the use of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” in the United States, for any age group, based on the paper above?
Finally, Question Six: Would you please describe, in detail, what medical school and/or Residency classes you took in which you learned that it was acceptable for patients to be given injections of an mRNA gene therapy treatment platform (in this case, the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”) without that injectable first having gone through a rigorous testing and analysis protocol beforehand?
Sincerely,
An independent COVID-19 researcher for the past five and a half years.”
The COVID-19 “vaccines” — ALL of them — must be removed from the market and from use. Now.
THERE. MUST. BE. ACCOUNTABILITY.
THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.
THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.
Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA