Dear MAGA: 20190528 Open Topic

This TWO CATCH A THIEF TUESDAY open thread is VERY OPEN – a place for everybody to post whatever they feel they would like to tell the White Hats, and the rest of the MAGA world.

You can say what you want, comment on what other people said, and so on.

Free Speech is practiced here. ENJOY IT. Use it or lose it.

Keep it SOMEWHAT civil. They tried to FORCE fake Orwellian civility on us. In response, we CHOOSE true civility to defend our precious FREEDOM from THEM.

Our rules began with the civility of the Old Treehouse, later to become the Wolverinian Empire, and one might say that we have RESTORED THE OLD REPUBLIC – the early high-interaction model of the Treehouse – except of course that Q discussion is not only allowed but encouraged, and speech is considerably freer in other ways. Please feel free to argue and disagree with the board owner, as nicely as possible.

Please also consider the Important Guidelines, outlined here in the January 1st open thread. Let’s not give the odious Internet Censors a reason to shut down this precious haven.

Remember the 5 words that President Trump and Vice President Pence love to hear:




Our movement

Is about replacing

A failed


Political establishment

With a new government controlled

By you, the American People.

Candidate Donald J. Trump

Also remember Wheatie’s Rules:

  1. No food fights.
  2. No running with scissors.
  3. If you bring snacks, bring enough for everyone.

Remember what Q said about CANKLES and BEELZEBUBBA? Our TREASONOUS former White House landlords who HELPED the Chinese military for CASH?

I was trying to think what this meant.

Well, now I know what it DOES mean. DISINFORMATION.

The only reason I figured this out was DISCERNMENT, which involved first SKEPTICISM of social media, THANKS TO FAKE NEWS, and then trust in LOCAL MEDIA, which provides REAL NEWS.

The Democrats have been playing tricks on us. They are also FLAILING and hoping we don’t figure out what’s going on.

Let’s begin with the charge of the “doctored video”:

This is actually some rather extraordinary propaganda, and people need to keep an eye on the names of these reporters, because I suspect we’ll be seeing a lot more BULLSHIT from them.

First of all, let me just say that I found it weird as hell that the left suddenly announces this doctored video and then refuses to take it down, which is their usual tactic. That just seemed very unlikely.

Why are they leaving it up? To appear “fair”? To appear non-censorious? And then they take down that anti-MAGA HAT art on Facebook? I don’t get it. Something is weird about what they’re doing right now.

To me, they’re FLAILING. Jerking us one way, and then another. CONFUSION.

But then I actually saw both the “undoctored” and “doctored” videos on OAN, and was really confused, because I found the ALLEGEDLY DOCTORED ONE more understandable and less slurred than the ALLEGEDLY UNDOCTORED ONE. Also, there seemed to be weird lighting differences that made one of them more blue than the other.

Frankly, it looked to me like nothing more than THE POWER OF SUGGESTION and a FORMAT CHANGE of the video by somebody’s plain old video software doing normal video software stuff. Speed up? Slow down? It was MICROSCOPIC IF AT ALL. Who cares? It’s almost not noticeable, and actually BACKWARDS to me.

It seemed more like PROPAGANDA than reality.

And to top it off, a PRISTINE VIDEO of the entire incident captured ON TV by our wonderful Karli Bonne – who uses the lowest of all possible technology by taking PHONE PICTURES OF HER TELEVISION – shows that frigging Nancy Pelosi appeared DRUNK or DEMENTED in the original footage itself – as aired on TV – with absolutely no possibility of dirty tricks.

Allow me to record both Karli’s tweets AND screen shots, since they are constantly throwing this woman off Twitter for her HILARIOUS real-time recorded TV viewing, which mercilessly mocks the Soviet Fake News.





So – the charge that Pelosi’s behavior was just due to a SLOWED VIDEO was clearly bullshit. BUT – and this is key – the whole affair left me suspicious. And that was GOOD.

Because then I saw this tweet here, in a VIGOROUS discussion of Hillary’s health…..

Which I have now saved as a screenshot:

And also saved the images:

First THIS ONE, in which a woman appears to be assisting Hillary Clinton and gripping stuff in one hand that LOOKS like it could be an epi-pen……

Kinda like “ARE YOU OK, HILLARY?”

And then THIS ONE, in which Hillary looks like she has some kind of TERMINAL PALLOR AND EDEMA….

People HERE were thinking the broad on the LEFT was actually CHELSEA CLINTON, all fat and preggers. HOLD THAT THOUGHT. But Hillary – WOW. Not exactly a flattering pic.

Folks – this looked like an open-and-shut case of #HillaryHealth.

People online were questioning whether it was even HILLARY, and falling YET AGAIN for the infamous STUNT DOUBLE DISINFORMATION THEORY….

Take a look at that vigorous discussion HERE:

NOW – this all made me very suspicious. The old #HillaryHealth fight was FILLED with disinformation. At its height, Democrat shills covered up Hillary’s PILL-ROLLING TREMOR of her right index finger during Debate 1 with some theory about “secret scrolling” of hidden notes being shown to her on the podium.

Yeah – it can get that bad. One REALLY HAS TO DIG INTO THIS STUFF to find the truth.

So I blew up that second photo, and realized that the facial shape was really fairly unchanged, with just a lot of make-up on, and we were really dealing with apples and oranges. But still, she really looked a lot better in the speech photo, than she did in the parade photos.

The whole thing was starting to smell like the “power-of-suggestion disinformation” used against #HillaryHealth researchers back in the Parkinson’s days. BUT we still have to be careful.

Hillary really DID look bad in those two parade photos with the Tweet – which I suddenly suspected were DOCTORED.

I mean – COME ON – look at her! The woman looks like she has CANKLES OF THE FACE!

SO – off I go – happily – absolutely certain that this is a DOCTORED PHOTO of her – and looking for the originals.

So I start digging into search engines, and I find THIS photo:

What the heck???!!! She doesn’t look so bad here! Where did THIS picture come from?

This was a LOCAL reporter doing a story in Chappaqua. Let’s look more closely at that photo.

First of all, NO WAY is that Web Hubbell’s daughter! That is NOT Chelsea Clinton being towed along by CANKLES!

But then look at Granny Mao! She looks NOTHING like that terrible picture above!

SO – what I did next was to go looking for more pictures of Hillary from that parade, and I found a whole SLIDE-SHOW of them from this Tania Savayan gal. That slide-show was syndicated to a bunch of mainstream newspapers on the web.

I pulled out ALL the Hillary photos.

It was interesting, but try as I might, I could not find a bad image of Hillary in the slide show.

I then looked specifically back at the ORIGINAL ARTICLE in the LoHud. There, I found a VIDEO. You can see it below, scrolled to the “best” (meaning clearest) picture of Hillary.

Looking more closely:

I’m sorry – she just doesn’t look that bad in ANY of these “good” (clear) photos from the rally. Sure, a little sag, a little aging, a little “I’m going for a walk in the morning and yeah I’m not exactly looking like I just left the stylist.” But it just ain’t that bad.

Here is the ABSOLUTE WORST FRAME from that video, blown up. What I did was CATCH Hillary in the middle of speaking while walking, so that I could get the WORST POSSIBLE FACE.

I mean, I made this woman just look ILL. That’s right. “ILLARY!”

Compare that again to the “bad Hillary picture” from the tweet that started this:

To me, this picture was CHOSEN to make Hillary look BAD. It MAY be doctored, but why doctor pictures when SELECTION of bad frames from videos provides both WHATEVER YOU WANT and AUTHENTICITY AS WELL? Or maybe it’s just a bad still picture selected from a bunch of them.

The point is – NOT FLATTERING.

And we KNOW there were plenty of more flattering pictures available. No excuse to publish this one.

So who is this David Buchwald guy? Hey! He’s the guy in the picture with Cankles!

More closely….

His picture from Twitter….

Now – am I saying that he INTENTIONALLY tweeted out a USABLY BAD picture of Hillary?

Just like Q predicted?

Well, he followed THAT tweet with two retweets of other people’s LESS BAD photos of Hillary:

SO – if one analyzes the situation without any accounting for DECEPTION, then it just looks like AW SHUCKS he picked an unfortunate video grab and “some aide will require some discipline” or something like that. Because RETWEETS prove he “DINDU NUFFINS”.


BUT – if you realize that PUTTING his tweet in front of EXACTLY THE RIGHT PEOPLE means that the RIGHT PEOPLE are going to go “OMG – look at Hillary! POOR SICK HILLARY!”…….

Are you starting to see how this works?

We were SUCKERED, people. AS Q WARNED US.

That Q guy who knows ALL ABOUT TWITTER.

Are you starting to see why the incestuous relationship of Social Media and the DNC actually MATTERS?


I’m just going to leave it there.

Think about it.


0 0 votes
Article Rating
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments