Remdesivir Is How We Bring Down The Temple of Faucism

I have been a poor and rotten servant of the Lord during my too long and too miserable life. I have made innocent women cry. I have led others astray. I have turned away from those in need in their time of need, and I have lied to myself and to God about why I did it.

But if I can save ONE person from pharmaceutical genocide, then I pray that person or a family member will put in a good word for me, and perhaps this sorry carcass of a believer can be given one more chance.

With that said, I begin doing the only thing I have ever been ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN was of some value to my fellow humans.

I will use REMDESIVIR to knock out the artillery that is pounding the only drugs saving people from the China Virus – IVERMECTIN and HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE.

It’s THAT much of a no-brainer.

It’s just hidden behind the media’s and the Biden administration’s smoke and mirrors.

The early success from hydroxychloroquine + azithromycin (HCQ + AZT) was dead easy to see in Didier Raoult’s initial communication. I could not “unsee” that success. This is how I knew that Fauci was either incompetent or a liar. I’ve explained it many times, but not today. I’m going to save your brain cells for the KILLER SHOT.

We can skip all that crap, and just let me show you TWO GRAPHS that prove hydroxychloroquine actually works.

See that jump in deaths? The one that falls back to the baseline of the graph? That is where a FAKE PAPER known as “the Lancetgate paper”, attacking hydroxychloroquine with phony data, was published to stop the use of HCQ in several countries, including Switzerland. The problem is that the Swiss are not stupid, and when they saw that withholding HCQ increased deaths, they simply reversed course.

It shows up in the data like a sore thumb. I call it “the Lancetgate effect”.

If you’re more of a graph-reader, then you may get something out of the next one.

France is the top graph. There are a LOT more deaths. This is because a communist bureaucrat married to some top politician sneakily BANNED hydroxychloroquine right before the pandemic hit

Here you can see how the data in Switzerland immediately jumped up to French levels with the Lancetgate effect. The general decline in France you see in the middle was due to the work of Didier Raoult, whose work with HCQ+AZT was gaining prominence, slowly, from the South of France, in Marseilles, but whose efforts suffered a momentary but delayed setback from Lancetgate, visible late in the Swiss increase.

Isn’t it wonderful how graphs can reflect what’s actually happening in science? Even in POLITICIZED science. This is why keeping commie mitts off the data is so important.

This was just the beginning. More and more data showed that HCQ worked, not perfectly, by any means, but pretty well, especially if given early.

Even more importantly, when the data didn’t support HCQ, community examination of the work invariably showed that there was NASTY, TRICKY, BIASED SCIENCE by those running the studies.

That was the big shocker for me. Some of the things they did to undercut hydroxychloroquine were downright VICIOUS. Almost MURDER. Not even human. Just KILLING PEOPLE to stop the drug. They literally overdosed people on their last legs with HCQ (which is actually hard to do), to try to undermine the drug.

And THAT will prepare you for what you are about to see.

What you are about to see is almost unbelievable.

I want to thank fellow QTreeper jamcooker and her dear daughter for bringing this video about the HORRORS of remdesivir to my attention.

I was not aware that many people were either as knowledgeable or more knowledgeable than I was, about how HORRIBLE a drug remdesivir really is.

The trouble is, I was lazy. I kept TELLING people remdesivir was bad, but I never went so far as to make speeches, or put together a video, or do ANY of the things that a REAL hero would do.

Nope. I was a lazy piece of shit.

I didn’t even do a dedicated blog post – when I KNEW it was killing people. Sure, I mentioned it a few times, but I never really committed.

But hey – I can do a blog post now. It’s not that hard.

So let’s just take a look at this video, and then I’ll fill you in with even more.

All the stuff I should have told you earlier.

Here is the LINK, so that you can send the video to other people.



All his talk about the kidney damage from remdesivir?

THAT is stuff that I knew. Let me explain that.

Remember THIS moment?

This was AFTER Fauci and the media went after HCQ, and after Trump for any mention of HCQ.

So when Fauci said remdesivir was the “gold standard of care”, I went and looked at the data.

The COMMENTS from other scientists said EXACTLY what I was seeing.

It was CRAP. There is NO WAY remdesivir was anywhere NEAR as good as HCQ. And HCQ wasn’t all THAT great. HCQ saved people from hospitalization and death, but it’s not like it cured the disease overnight.

I repeat. Remdesivir was CRAP. It was EMBARRASSING that Trump had to shill this stuff, just to keep our hopes up, because FAUCI was standing up for the INDUSTRY and NOT THE PEOPLE.

Some of why remdesivir wasn’t working, was because the drug was being administered too late, when there is very little virus to kill, and all the damage has been done. It’s like shooting a vary expensive GUN at the sound of a burglar’s car going over the horizon. It’s WORTHLESS.

But the data I saw was far worse than simply not working. As one commenter said, the only thing remdesivir seemed to be really good at, was making people need kidney transplants.

Trust me. HCQ at normal doses NEVER hurts people’s kidneys. Doesn’t even HURT ’em, much less destroy them.

Think about that.



No, it’s the OPPOSITE.

It was CLEAR to me at the time, that Fauci was a freaking LIAR.



Trump, Fauci Cheer Gilead’s Drug Results in Coronavirus Fight

Dr. Anthony Fauci makes remarks as President Donald Trump and Louisiana Gov. John Bel Edwards looks on

Dr. Anthony Fauci makes remarks as President Donald Trump and Louisiana Gov. John Bel Edwards looks on in the Oval Office on Wednesday. (Doug Mills/Getty Images)

By Newsmax Wires    |   Wednesday, 29 April 2020 12:53 PM

President Donald Trump hailed good news that a Gilead Sciences Inc. experimental antiviral drug might help fight the coronavirus, and infectious disease official Anthony Fauci said data shows it appears to help patients hospitalized with COVID-19.

Fauci said the early results of a closely watched clinical trial offered “quite good news” regarding a potential therapy made by the biotechnology company Gilead Sciences Inc.

“The data shows that remdesivir has a clear-cut, significant, positive effect in diminishing the time to recovery,” Fauci said.

An experimental drug for the coronavirus has a proven benefit, according to Dr. Anthony Fauci, the head of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

“The data shows that remdesivir has a clear-cut, significant, positive effect in diminishing the time to recovery,” Fauci said.


See how they did that?

Now, I could dig up that link to the data I saw, and show you that data myself, but I’ve got something MUCH better.

Some real, independent doctors did a real study on remdesivir, and they DESTROYED the narrative.

This is the NAIL in the coffin of remdesivir.

You don’t believe that guy in the video? Believe this.


Just listen to the conclusions of these researchers. Remdesivir is USELESS – except to make MONEY by keeping people in the hospital LONGER. I mean, getting a new kidney might take a little bit of time. Ya know?

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study of US veterans hospitalized with COVID-19, remdesivir treatment was not associated with improved survival but was associated with longer hospital stays. Routine use of remdesivir may be associated with increased use of hospital beds while not being associated with improvements in survival.

In any SANE world, they would not be administering this crap remdesivir ANY MORE to ANYONE.

It’s ESPECIALLY important to note that Fauci’s LIE about remdesivir diminishing time to recovery is DIRECTLY CONTRADICTED by the MAIN CONCLUSION of this study.

A study on veterans who did not DESERVE to be treated as they were by Tony Fauci.

Now – let’s end this on a PERSONAL note.

Remember that “overpass patriot lady” who they REFUSED to give ivermectin?

They KILLED HER with remdesivir.

And the only way that they can KILL old Trump supporters LEGALLY – while making MONEY on our dead bodies – is this way. Part of that is making sure we can’t get the alternatives.




Ivermectin LITERALLY SAVED INDIA and Fauci says there is no proof it works. When India was having a massive Delta outbreak, the Media LOVED to talk about India, India, India.

But now that Ivermectin has WIPED OUT COVID in India, the Media doesn’t want to talk about India.



Bill’s not wrong about that. There is a GREAT article on Gateway Pundit, about what happened in India with ivermectin. Their keystone province of Uttar Pradesh has been LIBERATED by ivermectin.

Look at the data in the article. The title on GP is a bit misleading – the disease isn’t GONE like smallpox, but DAMN – the numbers are IMPRESSIVE.

HUGE: Uttar Pradesh, India Announces State Is COVID-19 Free Proving the Effectiveness of “Deworming Drug” IVERMECTIN

September 15, 2021, 7:30am

by J H. 4500 Comments


But can we stop this assault on ivermectin?

Now it’s time to be very realistic. They do NOT give up.

They BEAT hydroxychloroquine into the GROUND with the media.

They did it to hydroxychloroquine before – they’re doing it to ivermectin right now.

Here is an EXCELLENT summary of how Fauci KNEW that hydroxychloroquine worked, and all the while he pushed the murderous moneymaker remdesivir. Do click the link below. This has a GREAT summary of Lancetgate, and links to many relevant reviews of what happened.


BUT – here is the problem.

In MY opinion, we cannot stop these horrible monsters by simply defending the good but imperfect treatments.


And the SOONER we do this, and the SOONER we THREATEN HOSPITALS into giving the TRULY SAFER DRUGS – not because they want to, but to keep from hemorrhaging their profits, then the SOONER we end this madness.




5 4 votes
Article Rating
Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments


Outstanding 👍

Gail Combs


Gail Combs

Wolfie SO ARE THE HOSPITAL ADMINS & PHARMACISTS who DENY PEOPLE the use of HCQ, Ivermectin… because they are not one of the CDC APPROVED medicines.

Remember off-label use is ROUTINE PRACTICE in medicine esp. with a new disease. Yet the whole western first world DENIED off-label use of promising drugs AND STILL DO!


Gail Combs

NUREMBERG II is getting closer and closer.



HCQ and IVM should be OTC – and available as both prophylaxis and early treatment.

Valerie Curren


Lefties will avoid like the plague lea ving patriots & conservative s ways to care for many others!


Any FDA that allows OTC acetaminophen (Tylenol) shouldn’t be able to ban ANYTHING, particularly drugs like HCQ and IVM which have far less of a death toll.

Gail Combs

Wolfie, please stay on line until I find that law. You need to add it to the article.

Gail Combs

OK I found a synopsis of the law:

Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act)—Authorizes the HHS secretary to issue a declaration that provides immunity from tort liability for claims of loss caused by countermeasures against diseases or other threats of public health emergencies. The act covers persons and entities involved in the manufacture, testing, distribution, administration, and use of covered countermeasures. A PREP Act declaration is different from and independent of other federal emergency declarations. A separate emergency declaration under Public Health Service Act Section 319 or another statute is not required for PREP Act immunities take effect.

HOWEVER what I remember is they could not hide behind that law if they KNOWINGLY DID HARM. That is the part I need to dig out.

Gail Combs

FOUND IT!!!  😊 


The Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act, 42 U.S.C. 247d-6d et. seq., authorizes the Secretary of Health and Human Services (the Secretary) to issue a declaration to provide liability protections to certain individuals and entities (Covered Persons) against any claim of loss caused by, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from, the manufacture, distribution, administration, or use of certain medical countermeasures (Covered Countermeasures), except for claims involving “willful misconduct,” as defined in the PREP Act. Such declarations are subject to amendment as circumstances warrant.

Valerie Curren

So how does the PREP Act define willful misconduct?

Valerie Curren



“Make the people who passed the law into VILLAINS. ALL of them. D and R.”


Now we’re cookin’ with guzzoline 👍😁

Gail Combs


Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 27fd5f No.2820100

Aug 31 2018 14:26:59 (EST)

What about the budget?
comment image
comment image

Why would CA ‘elected’ officials knowingly collapse the budget?
Who ‘elects’ CA officials?
comment image

Money to be made?
comment image

Why are CA & NY VITAL areas of control?
Think Ports.

Deplorable Patriot

Remember, that’s where they sent the hospital ships. Both were parked where the storm drain systems dump into the waterways.

And, the trafficking that could happen through those shipyards is considerable.


It finished killing my BIL’s sister. The used it on her along with a ventilator in ICU. Walked into the hospital with blood oxygen in the 80’s and flu like respiratory symptoms with a positive COVID test – but walked in. Left dead. It only took 5 days. 70 years old with no known issues other than 15-20 pounds overweight.

But my BIL and sister still think it was because she was unvaccinated. Fortunately, they live over 700 miles away and I don’t have to deal with them much. Trump supporters like so many, yet, they will not accept the truth. Sheeple.

Last edited 2 years ago by TradeBait2

There is sorrow enough in this world, without anyone else (the hospital’s crew) creating more.

My condolences for your family’s loss. It should never have happened. We work now to prevent this from ever happening again – at least in our lifetimes, and hopefully well beyond.

Regrettably, I suspect there will be many, many more losses, even on top of the unacceptable losses right now.

Propaganda WORKS. Even a wrongful, needless death isn’t enough to break the spell, for many.

AFAIK, there isn’t just *one* red-pill – it’s a series, and just when one thinks one has taken the last – BOOM! along comes another dose of reality.


My son from Michigan called telling me Emory Hospital in GA is full of unvacinated covid cases. He used to do research at Emory and knows people. A nurse told him that. They are no longer accepting regular patience.
I do not know what to believe. He also told me there has now a new virus variant emerged. He said he knows.
I do not know if he wants to scare me because I am not vaccinated he never lied to me before.
He said masks work and handwashing. Wearing gloves to stores help also. He warned not to change anything.


The LIE is with the term “unvaccinated”.

It seems that the VAST majority of new “cases” are deceitfully called “unvaccinated” SOLELY BECAUSE the definitions are controlled by the so-called “authorities”.

These charlatans call anyone who hasn’t had 14 days since the jab “unvaccinated” – even when they die on the spot!

Furthermore, these charlatans now say that when one hasn’t had another shot (or “booster”) within 90 days of their prior jab … then THESE PEOPLE are also termed “unvaccinated”.

They are playing LANGUAGE games – and moving the goalposts whenever they wish!

Btw, people who lie to THEMSELVES may appear to be telling the “truth” to YOU … but because they haven’t the guts to face themselves, they’re lying anyway.

Despite ALL the indictions that we truth-tellers look for, when trying to distinguish lie from truth.

Again – they are lying to THEMSELVES. This way, they can appear genuine to us. Problem is, they aren’t being genuine to themselves – but that’s THEIR problem, not ours.

I had to find this out the hard way.


True and one wonders why a nurse will tell this to my science son? She is a friend. That tells you, my husbands famous words, “question everything”.


Yes. Question everything!


True 🙂

Gail Combs

comment image

Gail Combs

WHERE does the nurse get her information? Remember that video yesterday of a hospital Admin saying they had to SCARE the unvaccinated into complying. So it is quite possible she is being TOLD A LIE by the hospital Admin in meetings.


She is a nurse in the Emory hospital.
I feel I cannot speak to my kids anymore they know everything better because of their education. I feel they are educated but are so narrow in their view. This is scary how can that be I did not raise them to be narrow minded. I am the opposite I want to know everything and question myself and take other views into consideration. They became ridged University made them ridged. The people they hang out with they are all like that. My son became this way in Michigan and since being married. Not saying it is his wife.

Last edited 2 years ago by singingsoul1
Gail Combs

Hopefully they will mellow with age. Also if thibg go as we hoe (Nuremberg II) they will have a HUGE wake up call.

TRY getting them to watch the Dr Jason Fung video:

There is also these paers & articles:

How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data


….A pooled weighted average of 1.97% (N = 7, 95%CI: 0.86–4.45) of scientists admitted to have fabricated, falsified or modified data or results at least once –a serious form of misconduct by any standard– and up to 33.7% admitted other questionable research practices. In surveys asking about the behaviour of colleagues, admission rates were 14.12%< (N = 12, 95% CI: 9.91–19.72) for falsification, and up to 72% for other questionable research practices. Meta-regression showed that self reports surveys, surveys using the words “falsification” or “fabrication”, and mailed surveys yielded lower percentages of misconduct. When these factors were controlled for, misconduct was reported more frequently by medical/pharmacological researchers than others.

Considering that these surveys ask sensitive questions and have other limitations, it appears likely that this is a conservative estimate of the true prevalence of scientific misconduct.

Why Most Published Research Findings Are False



There is increasing concern that most current published research findings are false. The probability that a research claim is true may depend on study power and bias, the number of other studies on the same question, and, importantly, the ratio of true to no relationships among the relationships probed in each scientific field. In this framework, a research finding is less likely to be true when the studies conducted in a field are smaller; when effect sizes are smaller; when there is a greater number and lesser preselection of tested relationships; where there is greater flexibility in designs, definitions, outcomes, and analytical modes; when there is greater financial and other interest and prejudice; and when more teams are involved in a scientific field in chase of statistical significance. Simulations show that for most study designs and settings, it is more likely for a research claim to be false than true. Moreover, for many current scientific fields, claimed research findings may often be simply accurate measures of the prevailing bias…..

Research Misconduct Identified by the US Food and Drug Administration:
Out of Sight, Out of Mind


Every year, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) inspects several hundred clinical sites performing biomedical research on human participants and occasionally finds evidence of substantial departures from good clinical practice and research misconduct. However, the FDA has no systematic method of communicating these findings to the scientific community, leaving open the possibility that research misconduct detected by a government agency goes unremarked in the peer-reviewed literature….


To identify published clinical trials in which an FDA inspection found significant evidence of objectionable conditions or practices, to describe violations, and to determine whether the violations are mentioned in the peer-reviewed literature.

Design and Setting

Cross-sectional analysis of publicly available documents, dated from January 1, 1998, to September 30, 2013, describing FDA inspections of clinical trial sites in which significant evidence of objectionable conditions or practices was found.

Results: Fifty-seven published clinical trials were identified for which an FDA inspection of a trial site had found significant evidence of 1 or more of the following problems:

falsification or submission of false information, 22 trials (39%);

problems with adverse events reporting, 14 trials (25%);

protocol violations, 42 trials (74%);

inadequate or inaccurate recordkeeping, 35 trials (61%);

failure to protect the safety of patients and/or issues with oversight or informed consent, 30 trials (53%);

and violations not otherwise categorized, 20 trials (35%).

Only 3 of the 78 publications (4%) that resulted from trials in which the FDA found significant violations mentioned the objectionable conditions or practices found during the inspection. No corrections, retractions, expressions of concern, or other comments acknowledging the key issues identified by the inspection were subsequently published.

Conclusions and Relevance

When the FDA finds significant departures from good clinical practice, those findings are seldom reflected in the peer-reviewed literature, even when there is evidence of data fabrication or other forms of research misconduct.

(Blogs are now performing the important tasks of scrutinizing papers and conclusions often finding gross mistakes.)

Editors In Chief of World’s Most Prestigious Medical Journals: “Much of the Scientific Literature, Perhaps HALF, May Simply Be Untrue”

… “It Is Simply No Longer Possible To Believe Much of the Clinical Research That Is Published”
Posted on June 1, 2015 by WashingtonsBlog
Corruption Is Destroying Basic Science

“Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine are the two most prestigious medical journals in the world.

It is therefore striking that their chief editors have both publicly written that corruption is undermining science.

The editor in chief of Lancet, Richard Horton, wrote:

Much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness. As one participant put it, “poor methods get results”. The Academy of Medical Sciences, Medical Research Council, and Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council have now put their reputational weight behind an investigation into these questionable research practices. The apparent endemicity [i.e. pervasiveness within the scientific culture] of bad research behaviour is alarming. In their quest for telling a compelling story, scientists too often sculpt data to fit their preferred theory of the world. Or they retrofit hypotheses to fit their data. Journal editors deserve their fair share of criticism too. We aid and abet the worst behaviours. Our acquiescence to the impact factor fuels an unhealthy competition to win a place in a select few journals. Our love of “significance” pollutes the literature with many a statistical fairy-tale….

Similarly, the editor in chief of the New England Journal of Medicine, Dr. Marcia Angell, wrote in 2009:

“We can no longer trust Drug company clinical trials”
(Original Article I quote below has vanished… imagine that!)

….It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine….

In fact, in October 2017, Angell went further – she published an article in the New York Review of books entitled, ‘Drug Companies and Doctors: A Story of Corruption.’ 

Drug Companies & Doctors: A Story of Corruption

In her must-read essay, Dr. Angell skewers drug companies, university medical departments, and medical groups which set the criteria for diagnosis and treatment as being rotten with corruption and conflicts of interest…

I have been collecting scientific mis-conduct information for years…


Thank you for all the info 🙂

Gail Combs

Hope it helps.




Great info!!


My son who went to college is the same. The two kids who went to work are sensible, thoughtful, and open-minded.

The university brain-washes them.


Yes that is it. To bad good minds waisted


Generally true. I had two go to college, but they were homeschooled. Both are independent thinkers. They had a few semesters where they went a bit haywire but got themselves right after logic and reason kicked back in.

The one who went to public school and work is a hippy and once they have been on that trajectory it is very hard to get them to think independently. They are lockstep with anything liberal, Left, and hedonistic.


You know, it’s funny but my youngest son is a Conservative hippie. Dreaded hair, hippie clothes, works outdoors because he hates the “system,” but a total Conservative. He’s as different as they come.


The nurse believes the lie that the “vaccine” is ineffective for fourteen days, and loses its effectiveness after three months. That’s all. She was probably in the bottom tenth of her graduating class. Not every medical person is very smart.


To funny 🙂


Believe me, there are plenty of nurses who get off on the drama…


Sadly obviously so

Valerie Curren

Sorry for your &your family’s loss 😢


So sorry….it’s murder by withholding treatment, or murder by ventilator…


I have friends like that. They cannot get off the mainline media train. It keeps them ignorant and stubborn.


Pulitzer to Wolf !

unnerving atrocity revealed.


can they avoid liability ?

legally ?


whatever happened to the legal concept of medical malpractice ??

Gail Combs

It was taken away by LAWYERS.

Afterall they wanted OH!Bummercare — GOVERNMENT Healthcare and the LAST THING they want is people to be able to SUE when they DELIBERATELY KILL DAD or MOM….

Think Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP) in the UK. (IIRC 1/3 of UK hospital deaths are due to malnutrition aka withdrawal of food and water = LCP)


not if a physician takes the Hippocratic Oath.


licensed physicians ALL have a duty of care.

Gail Combs


Gail Combs

That is it EXACTLY!!!

Obamacar was signed into law on March 23, 2010.

So there was TEN YEARS of brainwashing.

Remember it forced doctors into large hospitals and group practices or into retirement.

Gail Combs

I am not sure about OH!Bummercare, but I do know Hillary was very much behind the Food Safety Modernization act. An Act that handed over regulation of US farms to the WTO.



they ALL have a duty to their patients.

Gail Combs

NO THEY DON’T remember my Mom was an unwitting victim of US ZGovernment radiation experiments. A PAYING PATIENT and that SOB POS Doctor killed her ‘For Science’


…duty as well, first to student loans & then to the doctor’s lucre.


imo…it’s the intentional motive to conspire (collectively) to do harm (for profit) that’s the root of this.

there’s a criminality to this…in addition to med malpractice.

prove that criminality, and the malpractice is the glaring & damning result.

Last edited 2 years ago by smiley2
Gail Combs


And that is why I keep posting the Jason Fung video about financial conflicts of interest.


wonder who their individual med mal insurance carriers are ?

WHO insures them, individually ?

also wonder how many of them might be insured by the same carrier ?


The sign was that politicians in DC exempted from Obama care. Why?


That’s the guy at his kitchen table. They knew about the ventilators a year and a half ago.

Valerie Curren

Terri Schlindler Schaivo esque floodgates of Hell!!! 😠


They need to thin us out they do not have the money to keep paying SS and medicare. They squandered mismanaged the money people paid in. In the corporate world they would all sit behind bars for fraught. They lied and stole for the past 60 years on both sides of the parties. Those we send to DC are nothing more than liars manipulators con artists.
Decent people do not go into politics they are to honest.

Gail Combs

You are completely correct. that is why they have targeted Nursing Homes. “The Usless Eaters’




what did they know…


when did they know it.


“what did they know…
when did they know it.


They knew it all, and they knew it all along


have to prove that to sue them successfuly.


if they absolved themselves of ALL liabiity, in writing (somewhere), and the patient willingly agrees (no duress), then that patient has assumed the risks.


I am not a lawyer.

or a robot.

Last edited 2 years ago by smiley2
Gail Combs

You are correct Wolfie, there was a GOTTCHA Clause in the Law they are hiding behind. I put it up in the comments sometime this week. Now I just have to dig it out again.  🙄 




Remdesivir, developed through a UNC-Chapel Hill partnership, proves effective against COVID-19 in NIAID human clinical trials
“….Remdesivir was developed through an academic-corporate partnership between Gilead Sciences and the Baric Lab at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill’s Gillings School of Global Public Health. The biopharmaceutical company sought the talents of a research team led by William R. Kenan, Jr. Distinguished Professor of Epidemiology Ralph Baric, who has studied coronaviruses for more than 30 years and pioneered rapid-response approaches for the study of emerging viruses and the development of therapeutics.

“This is a game changer for the treatment of patients with COVID-19,” Baric said upon hearing the results of the clinical trial. “Remdesivir provides an effective treatment strategy for the many infected individuals around the globe.”….”


It is a SMALL Club and we ain’t in it!

Gail Combs



Two quacks.

Gail Combs


And the Bastard almost killed me with an earlier version of Covid-19.

I would not be at ALL surprised to find my friend and I were part of a Baric experiment since she is ‘Homeless’ and therefore seen as EASY PREY.


A homeless person with a friend willing to keep an eye on her and get her to the hospital. She also has wonky kidneys — a BIG PLUS???

Gail Combs

She was only in the emergency room but they did an IV and saline drip therefore it would be EASY to slip in ANYTHING they wanted.

Gail Combs

That is my first GO TO. Students in Barics lab and then in the Emergency room.


Raheem Kasam did some research into Baric’s education in the UK and was not impressed. He did not go to a noteworthy university and was surprised that he got as far as he did in this country.

Last edited 2 years ago by singingsoul1
Valerie Curren

Wonder if Someone will arrange a convenient accident?


….Remdesivir was developed through an academic-corporate partnership between Gilead Sciences and the Baric Lab


I think it’s nice that the lab is named after Ralphie boy.

Makes assigning accountability both easy and undeniable.

Cuppa Covfefe

Sounds like Faux-Xi needs a Baric-UNC enema…

Gail Combs

Wrapped in barbed wire.

Cuppa Covfefe

Talk about spiked protein 😮

Concerned Virginian

Gail Combs
Thank you!
It was BARIC and his lab at the Gillings Institute of Global Public Health at UNC that had DR. ZHENG-LI SHI there, who, working with BARIC, came up with the SARS-2 variant which SHI then took BACK to the Wuhan Lab — and spliced to a bat coronavirus to create COVID-19.
And it was FAUCI’s NIAID and COLLINS’ NIH who gave grants to BARIC and to his lab for the research.

need to be ARRESTED. Today.
SHI of course will never be extradited from Communist China by the United States. A Nuremberg II tribunal would be able to.

Gail Combs
Gail Combs


This is WHY Doctors are BANNED from using HCQ or Ivermectin. I will dig that out when I get a chance.


patients unwittingly might be signing away their rights when being admitted for “treatment”.

read the the fine print !

caveat emptor !

assumption of the risk


the duty of informed consent

failing to perform that duty is one of the elements of a med malpractice claim.

and then there’s also the conspiracy angle to this.

Last edited 2 years ago by smiley2

They are the opposite of informed.

They are deceived.

With malice aforethought.

For profit.

It’s the reason why the death penalty exists.

Gail Combs

October 1, 1946, 12 high-ranking Nazis are sentenced to death.


More than 70 years later, the prosecution of a 94-year-old former SS guard renews questions about how to assign blame for the Holocaust

“…Hanning had been charged with being an accessory to murder in the deaths of 170,000 people killed at the death camp while he served there from January 1943 to June 1944….”


I just spoke the truth, and I don’t know how that can be wrong.

If you willfully deceive someone, knowing it could kill them, and that person dies because of it, that’s murder.

Murder is a capital offense.

For a person in a position of authority to do it is even more egregious, because they have a higher duty and responsibility.

For an expert to do it is even worse, because being an expert, he is without excuse.

Being a doctor is worst of all, because doctors are entrusted with life and death decisions, and to willfully make decisions that result in death is a violation of everything being a doctor is about.

To do such a thing to dozens of people is a capital offense.

To do such a thing to hundreds is insane, more than any known serial killer I can think of.

To do such a thing to thousands is beyond heinous.

To do such a thing to millions is Hitlerian.

To do such a thing to the entire planet has never been accomplished in human history.

If that does not merit the death penalty, then what does?

Gail Combs

Most people are followers not leaders.

However depending on how high up a doctor is and how many patients he killed and how many HE DELIBERATELY DENIED HCQ or IVERMECTIN…

At minimum LOSS OF LICENCE and at least SOME jail time.

I do not know the comand structure but in each hospital and each medical practice group there is SOMEONE(s) who THREATENED TO FIRE DOCTORS, who THREATENED TO REMOVE THEIR LICENCES if they proscribed HCQ or Ivermectin.

THOSE are the BASTARDS that need to loose everything and spend years in jail.


who oversaw and approved this ?

within the hospitals where this occurred ?

vicarious liability


Wrongful Death

Criminal Negligence



Many do not know the truth. I do not know why.
Just like people eating bad diet and piles of sugar prepared foods are in denial that it is bad even when health goes south.


Some doctors believe that HCQ does not work. In the VA hospital my son works they early on did a study and found it did not help. Of course patience came way to late and true it did not help.
Doctors in hospitals are totally controlled by their system they work for and told what to use and what not. I am sure someone had an agenda for HCQ not to work.
Even in the scientific community they were told by their friends in science that HCQ did not work. They believe their friends more than me or what is available on the Internet. They are in the system. I have send info and am told why I listen to conspiracy doctors or scientists. I feel I waisted money on my kids education. The left got hold of them and brainwashed them a long time ago in Universities. Michigan University is especially bad.


In this study, the patients were elderly, had multiple comorbidities,it was late in the course of the disease, and to top it off, they gave the patients toxic doses of HCQ. It was doomed to fail by the very design of the study.


This is horrifying !


What the hell has happened to looking for solutions? They are all goosestepping for their medical group.

It’s heinous.


This comment is above all others; it is EXCELLENT.


Charges can still be, should be murder. Sentencing can wait.


Comey was in charge, too. Never forget that.


I had some time to consider what you’re saying, which I wanted to do, but I’m still not sure I really understand.

“Agree, but get real. Death penalty did not apply to MOST Nazis.”


I thought I was being real. With the Nazis, proving anything was difficult. A whole lot more Nazis would have been executed if the prosecutors had convincing evidence.

We live in a time of hyper surveillance, and everything is recorded. As DJT loves to say, “We have it all”, which is why Q could confidently say “no deals”.

So it seems like Nuremberg is a flawed model at best.

The simple truth is that the law is the law, and the law with regard to murder is very clear, with degrees and aggravating circumstances.

And if people have committed murder according to the Law, then they mus be prosecuted for murder, you can’t just let murderers go free if you have them dead to rights.

So then it becomes a matter of whether you seek the death penalty, and to my knowledge, premeditated murder is death penalty eligible, and why in the world wouldn’t an honest prosecutor seek the death penalty for what are literally crimes against humanity?

If it was you or me, would they go soft on us?

If the evidence exists for capital murder prosecution, they can’t just get a slap on the wrist, they have to be prosecuted like anyone else would be.

Equal Justice Under Law.

Or the entire exercise is a fraud.


“We need to scare these fuckers with talk they can’t take to treasonous FIB and go “WOE IS ME – I’M SCARED OF MEAN OLD TRUMP NEONAZIS! They want to HANG ME!””


What if they don’t scare, either because they have no credible reason to be scared, or because they’re psychopaths, or both?

I see our side project ‘panic’ on them regularly, but I never detect any panic at all, because what do they have to fear, if they control the entire apparatus of government, including law enforcement and all three branches of government, and the media, and the military?

If the the evidence shows that they committed capital crimes, and we only push for prison, won’t they still go to FIB and say “Woe is me, I’m scared of mean old Trump neonazis, they want to put me in prison!”?

Of course they will.

If we only push for a slap on the wrist, won’t they do the same?

Of course they will. There is no degree of punishment that will ever be ‘acceptable’ to the condemned.

If we push for ANYTHING that might inconvenience them in even the slightest way, won’t they use whatever force of government available to them to not be inconvenienced in any way?

If they’re going to play that game no matter what we do — and they are, and always have — then why not play to win, instead of playing to lose?

If someone is guilty of capital murder, and you have the evidence to prove it, but you only prosecute him for manslaughter, and he pleads down to jaywalking, what good is that?




I am. Isn’t every person we can name off the top of our heads, from the Hussein administration, the Clinton administration, the Bush administration and even many in the Trump administration not guilty of so many crimes they wouldn’t fit on this page?

Everyone you can name, from Red Jen (Propaganda Minister) to Hussein to Barr to JB to Merrick Garland to Wray to Brennan to Rice to Jarrett to CJ Roberts (and others) to nearly everyone on the Senate Select Intelligence Committee… none of what is going on right now happens without everyone working together, working the ASSES OFF to overthrow the most powerful nation on earth.

There are no accidents involved, nobody can even laughingly pretend like they don’t know what they are doing.

Our Founding Fathers would hang them ALL for a thousand times less than what they are doing right now, today, much less what they have done over the past 20+ years.


“Why are you helping FIB? Help ME.”


I’m not helping the FIB, the FIB is going to do whatever they’re going to do, they’re going to MAKE IT UP just like they did on January 6th.

So I don’t understand the point in trying not to provoke them, it’s like a fly trying not to provoke the spider.

The spider is going to eat you whenever he’s ready, and he doesn’t need a reason. You could be the most docile fly who ever flew, or the most apoplectic fly who ever railed at the kingdom of spiders, and the spider doesn’t care.

He’s just gonna eat you.

If you are in a war with something like that, like the Borg — it can’t be reasoned with, it can’t be bargained with, it can’t be placated — then what reason is there to hold back on anything?

What do you have to lose by throwing everything you have, including the kitchen sink, at it?

As for helping you, that is always what I am trying to do, but unlike the enemy who can coordinate their efforts, we can’t just pick up the phone and call each other to coordinate our approach.

And I can’t read minds! 😂


“Every time you talk about hanging these people, it helps FIB.”



They are Borg.

Borg is a bulldozer, and it’s going to bulldoze everything it wants to bulldoze, and Borg doesn’t care what the people in their path say or think about it, they just do it.

We’re not even ants to them.

Nobody is going to get the death penalty because I think they should. No criminal will ever even be disturbed from their fitful rest, much less arrested or prosecuted, because I think they ought to be.

And there are at least 10 million other people on the interwebs saying things a lot more harsh than anything that ever gets said here, by anyone.

The point is, whether we exercise our right to object to their tyranny, or whether we don’t exercise our right to object to their tyranny, they will do their tyranny.


“Help OUR SIDE.”


I’m trying, every day.

The enemy doesn’t care what the ants on the Interwebs say. Jen Psaki — who is a very bad woman, btw — isn’t sitting at her desk and reading my posts, and calling Chrissy Wray to have me investigated.

For one thing, if the FIB has any awareness of me at all, then it’s already a file the size of a NYC phone book.

Not because anybody cares, but because in a hyper surveillance state, the data is automatically collected on EVERYBODY.

The point I’m trying to make is that what we say here can’t possibly impact what anybody at the Legion of Doom is doing, we’re not even gnats to them.

But what we can do is motivate and edify each other, and the people who do read here.

I don’t know how promising to go easy on the Borg — who, if they decide to obliterate us, will do so for their own reasons, not for anything we have done or deserve — helps anything.

Our side always goes wobbly. I don’t know why. It’s some kind of psychological abuse effect, I think.

Somehow, somewhere deep inside abused people, they tend to believe that if they could only be a little nicer, or somehow not be so provocative, then the abuser wouldn’t have to beat them up every day.

The abuser is a monster, and there is nothing the victim can EVER do to appease the monster. The monster is going to abuse, because he is a MONSTER, not because the victim did anything wrong.

But most victims have a deep psychological need to rationalize or justify their abuse, for any number of potential reasons — often because if they didn’t, then they would have no excuse not to leave.

But leaving is scary too. Fear of the unknown, fear of being alone, fear of trading the devil you know for one that you don’t.

So as People, our learned (not natural) reaction is to give an inch, then a foot, then a yard, then a 100 yards, then a mile, and keep on giving, until we wind up in the ICU beaten 3/4 to death because we didn’t smile the right way or didn’t say the magic word or forgot to fold the bath towels the way the abuser likes them.

We’re like that, because we’re People.

Imagine living in a house with an abuser. Imagine the primary victim of abuse always relenting, always backing down, always giving in, always taking the punishment and blaming him or herself, always trying to please the Monster.

How does that affect the other people (usually children) in the house?

Does that edify and encourage them to stand up for themselves, or (usually) for their Mom?

Or does it condition them to the cycle of abuse, to grow up just like the abuse victim, or just like the Monster?

What good does backing down, or going easy on Monsters, ever do?

It dehumanizes the victim, it demoralizes the others in the family, and it emboldens the Monster.

Because from the Monster’s perspective, the victim deserves it. And by accepting the abuse, by trying ever harder to please the Monster, the victim validates the Monster’s point of view that the victim deserves to be abused. If they didn’t, they wouldn’t take it.

Because Monsters are real.

And because that’s how Monsters think.


“Prison is what these people DESERVE and need to consider not getting.”


The ones who deserve prison should get prison. I wouldn’t want anyone who deserves prison to get a harsher sentence than they deserve.

And if the evidence shows they are guilty of crimes against humanity, crimes which any reasonable person would have to know would result in the death or permanent disability of others, then the punishment has to fit the crime.

And if there is a public figure anyone here can name off the top of their head, who can honestly say they didn’t know that overthrowing the lawfully elected POTUS with the aid of foreign enemies and imposing a tyrannical and lawless government would not result in the obvious harm we see every single day to millions of Americans and billions of people around the world, WHO would that be?

Which member of the current administration, who you can name off the top of your head, is an innocent babe lost in the woods?


“Mid-level Nazis got mid-level sentences. “I was only following orders.”


Sure, but not if they committed capital crimes and the prosecutors had the evidence in electronic records, videotape, etc., etc.

They weren’t passing out mid-level sentences for anyone engaged in capital offense war crimes.

It was only for lack of evidence that people were not prosecuted or convicted, not because of some misguided altruism where we prove that we are better than the enemy by letting the guilty go free.

That demeans us, and it demeans their victims. It victimizes their victims again.

I’m not suggesting anyone should be treated more harshly than their crimes require.

But if the evidence is there, how can we look the victims in the eye, or their surviving family members, and give guilty people a free pass?

Or a light sentence for a capital crime?

In the early 1940s, evidence was hard to come by, and easily destroyed. It’s a miracle anybody was convicted.

But in the 21st century, people can’t FART without it being recorded at NSA headquarters, and in every other redundant tyrannical IC agency.

“We have it all”, that’s what DJT always says.

He can’t be saying it because of eyewitness testimony, certainly not exclusively.

He’s saying it because it’s almost impossible to do anything in this world without leaving a trail, if someone has a legitimate reason to follow it.

And it’s not even about what these people have done.

It’s about what they’re still DOING, right now, every day that goes by!

They haven’t STOPPED committing these crimes, much less asked for forgiveness or begged for mercy.

Should we be trying to cut them deals and preparing the way for light sentences?


“We need to start looking at REAL sentences for REAL mid-level Nazis.
I knew military people who were part of that post-1945 administration. They weren’t HANGING these people. 99% just got prison.”


Was that because it was the best they could do, or was it because the prosecutors had hearts of gold toward wayward psychopaths?

I’m not looking for or expecting anyone to be prosecuted above or beyond their crimes.

I’m just saying that in order for Equal Justice Under Law to exist, the punishment has to fit the crime, and they have to be prosecuted for the crimes which can be proven against them.

The difference between now and the 1940s is that a whole lot more people have evidence of their crimes against humanity recorded this time around.


“Now we need to make life REAL for Bidenazis.”


I’m all for it, but I would be surprised, shocked (truly), to discover that any of them even know we exist.


“Trust me, Wray will NEVER get the noose, no matter how this turns out.”


Not exactly George S. Patton style inspiration… 😂🤣😂

If Wray won’t, then neither will Brennan, or Barr, or Holder, or Clapper, or Hussein, or Clinton, or the heads of any other agencies or departments.

And if none of them will be convicted of their High Treason and crimes against humanity, then who will be?

Apparently the answer is ‘nobody’.

And if that is the answer, then what are we even doing?

What’s the point of persevering, if we determine beforehand that should we be so fortunate to win, the guilty will never be held accountable anyway?





How do we ‘deal’ with the proposed impossibility of justice, even if we somehow manage to win?

How do we rally anyone to seek victory, if our own leaders promise us that those who engaged in crimes against the Republic and against humanity will never face the justice any of us would face for crimes a hundred times lesser?

Does it motivate you, thinking about it?

Me either… 😂🤣😂


“Talk of excessive consequences for these crimes only helps the other side.”


I don’t want or seek excessive consequences for anyone’s crime.

I seek only justice.

I know for certain what would happen to me, if I did what these monsters have done.

Equal Justice Under Law.

One-tier justice system.

The same laws apply to everyone equally.

Or we don’t have a country.

If we go to the effort to save the Republic, and we somehow pull it off, shouldn’t we have a country to show for our efforts?

Won’t that demand justice?

No excessive consequences.

Just equal justice under law.

Let the punishment fit the crime.

And if the crime is capital, should not the punishment be also?

It would be for you, wouldn’t it?

It would be for all of us.

Why shouldn’t it be for those who actually did these crimes?

Because they’re in a different ‘class’ than us, so they’re allowed to commit capital crimes and get away with it?

Is that the country we’re trying to save?

Cui bono?


I’m nearly certain the penalty for mass-murder is more than prison.


I agree will full negligence. Specially if they were aware.


“patients unwittingly might be signing away their rights when being admitted for “treatment”.”


I suspect they won’t let you in the hospital unless you sign it.

Which is just as well, since your chances are far better outside the hospital than inside it.


signing under duress , if proven, will render the “agreement’ null & void.


“Don’t give up so easily. Make whoever voted for that law RESCIND IT.”


And let them take their place in history next to Dr. Joseph Mengele.

Gail Combs

Same treatment the Jan 6th Patriots are getting seems about right to me.

Gail Combs

Wolfie, I am NOT giving up.

Actually I want those FIVE DEMOCRAT GOVERNORS brought to justice too!

comment image

comment image

Gail Combs

I want to know WHO has the strings attached to their gonads… BECAUSE SOMEONE CERTAINLY DOES.


Gail Combs

THAT is why the hospital ships to NY and CA. It makes it OBVIOUS that putting covid positive in Nursing homes WAS INTENTIONAL MASS MURDER of the elderly.

Gail Combs

Nice dot connecting Wolfie.


No conscience means they have lost their humanity.


Red states should go in and arrest and detain hospital administers that allow this to happen, hold them in confinement until they can be tried while replacing them with people who are who are committed to saving patients.

Knowing what we know about the PREP act and HHS’s protocols should make this criminal in anyone’s book. Use whatever state laws to make it happen. State laws normally mirror Federal Law and the Feds are not serving in best interests of the people, there omission is commission of crime and States need to step in and assert their power.


In a fair and truthful world Wolf would get many prizes.

But more importantly, in the world to come, he will get the Prize he deserves despite his critical self-assessment, IMO.

And MO is based on a belief that good people are often far harsher on themselves than the Judge will be. The Judge already knows how bad we are.

At a certain age it is hard to get “better,” and at some point we have to accept ourselves for who we are. accept what we have done and NOT done, and accept that our genuine belief in the Truth will be sufficient.

To me, nothing else makes sense, and the words of Truth I read make the most sense when read in that light.


Wonderfully written.




Dr. votes no on Remdesivir

Only one study out of many showed any minor benefit from Remdesivir..

Gail Combs



He is good. I have been fallowing him for a while 🙂


They can be publicly named and take their place in history beside Joseph Mengele.


I think Bill Gaites is behind them .


Good group you have identified .
Maybe still some in the shadow we will never know.

Gail Combs

Wolfie, do not forget France Banned Over the Counter Chloroquine Days Before First Western Scientific Report on Pandemic
So it was a WORLD WIDE SCAM!

On Witmer:

Today, we found out that Michigan’s Democratic governor Gretchen Whitmer sent DTMNBN patients all throughout 

her state rather than sending them to the TFC Center in Detroit. The US taxpayers spent $660 million dollars building emergency field hospitals across the country, including one with 1,000…


Deplorable Patriot

Yes, many people knew about the plot. It was not supposed to be rolled out as early as it was. It was, apparently, decades in the making. And I’m not talking twenty years, but more like sixty. They had to wait until enough people no longer were witnesses to the Holocaust to give it a shot as well as build up blind trust in the medical system, and sow the idea of quackery around the physicians who go against protocols and the narrative.

This is just as much about psyops and psychological control as it is population reduction. The hubris, though, is blind to the reality that common sense and BS detectors are more widely spread in the population than they want to believe. The “A” math class in my high school class, the ones who took calculus, had sixteen in it by the time we got there. Both the valedictorian and the salutatorian are now raving liberal nutjobs, but the rest of us aren’t all. Okay, a couple of others are.

These people who want to be in control forget that they aren’t the only smart people around.

Deplorable Patriot

They did. And I have a feeling that not everyone at the Bilderberg, etc,, level was comfortable with it, and some were acting, essentially as double agents. There was a Daniel Estalin article once that described someone coming to him who was not happy.

This whole exercise is high stakes, and depends on the illusions we lived under for decades being maintained. Those illusions are what need to be destroyed and when full realization sets in what is going to put people in the hospital.

Deplorable Patriot


Gail Combs

Remember POTUS VSGDJT mentioning some very wealthy misguided people?

Deplorable Patriot

Oh, yes. As a member of that group he had to know things. If he was known to not participate, that, to them, would have been a big red flag.

Deplorable Patriot

Mental hospitals.

Gail Combs

Yes, they PLANNED this.

And as I have pointed out, I think the COLD 1960s, plus George Kukla and then Shakelton confirming the Milankovitch theory ==> 1974 CIA Report “A Study of Climatological Research as it Pertains to Intelligence Problems”

Pg 7

“… Since 1972 the grain crisis has intensified…. Since 1969 the storage of grain has decreased from 600 million metric tons to less than 100 million metric tons – a 30 day supply… many governments have gone to great lengths to hide their agricultural predicaments from other countries as well as from their own people.

pg 9

The archaeologists and climatotologists document a rather grim history… There is considerable evidence that these empires may not have been undone by barbarian invaders but by climatic change…. has tied several of these declines to specific global cool periods, major and minor, that affected global atmospheric circulation and brought wave upon wave of drought to formerly rich agricultural lands.

Refugees from these collapsing civilizations were often able to migrate to better lands… This would be of little comfort however,… The world is too densely populated and politically divided to accommodate mass migration…..

At the same time the CIA report came out in 1974, there was a United Nations World Population Conference, – Bucharest, 19-30 August, 1974

The KEY JUSTIFICATION for all that happened since then are:

“…considerable evidence that these empires may not have been undone by barbarian invaders but by climatic change….”

“….The world is too densely populated and politically divided to accommodate mass migration….”

That would scare the CRAP out of the Cabal…

comment image

Gail Combs

One of the nasty little points the ClimAstrologist NEVER MENTION is the earth is ACTUALLY STARVED of CO2 and the colder it gets the slower the plant growth. WORSE Trees and the C3 pathway foods we eat are limited to lower and lower elevations. (Now add in THE DROUGHT that is typical of a colder earth…)

It is CO2 STARVATION that is the real problem according to peer-reviewed papers:
Carbon starvation in glacial trees recovered from the La Brea tar pits, southern California


Royal Society: Carbon dioxide starvation, the development of C4 ecosystems


Impact of lower atmospheric carbon dioxide on tropical mountain ecosystems


Carbon-isotope values of bulk organic matter from high-altitude lakes on Mount Kenya and Mount Elgon, East Africa, were 10 to 14 per mil higher during glacial times than they are today. Compound-specific isotope analyses of leaf waxes and algal biomarkers show that organisms possessing CO2-concentrating mechanisms, including C4 grasses and freshwater algae, were primarily responsible for this large increase. Carbon limitation due to lower ambient CO2 partial pressures had a significant impact on the distribution of forest on the tropical mountains, in addition to climate. Hence, tree line elevation should not be used to infer palaeotemperatures.

…Compound-specific isotope analyses of leaf waxes and algal biomarkers show that organisms possessing CO2-concentrating mechanisms, including C4 grasses and freshwater algae..” means plants using C4 pathway and not the older C3 pathway used by trees.

Most of our food is C3 pathway.

As you go up a mountain , low CO2 partial pressure, and not temperature limits trees.


>>”These people who want to be in control forget that they aren’t the only smart people around.”<<

Not only that, but it’s been my experience that the vast majority of people who “want to be in control” are precisely the ones who SHOULDN’T be in control (of others).

I’ve never wanted to be in control of others … and the only times when I’ve had to be are when I knew that everyone else would screw things up..

People who WANT power should be disqualified from HAVING power just for that very reason – their desire to control / have power!

Deplorable Patriot


Cuppa Covfefe

I think Douglas Adams, in “The Restaurant at the End of the Universe” put it quite well:

“The major problem—one of the major problems, for there are several—one of the many major problems with governing people is that of whom you get to do it; or rather of who manages to get people to let them do it to them.

To summarize: it is a well-known fact that those people who must want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it.

To summarize the summary: anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job.”


Yes, Cuppa – I knew that my take on the matter MUST have been expressed beforehand … yet I found out myself.

Nice to see confirmation though!

Groucho Marx, too (I’d thought it was W.C. Fields):

Groucho Marx’s letter of resignation to the Friars’ Club:

“I don’t want to belong to any club that would accept me as one of its members.””

Cuppa Covfefe

And another one from the wildly expanded HHGTTG Trilogy 🙂

“A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.”
― Douglas Adams, Mostly Harmless

Valerie Curren

Immaturely I (mis)heard this gem “Humpington Post”. 😯


Looks like hanging is preferred.

My own feeling is that ANY doctor worth anything could see that Remdesivir was not working and stop giving it. They have the prescription pad.

Also, I REFUSE to accept that people with medical degrees are not as capable as I AM in finding and digesting information about Covid, but that is what is happening. They are lazy POS relying on being spoon-fed information from the AMA, CDC, FDA, etc. instead of doing the work of researching.

Fuck the medical establishment hacks who continue to mis-treat people with disdain. That includes the “rank and file” as some love to say. Their behavior is NOT EXCUSABLE.

Remember, one of the leading causes of death in America, after only heart disease and cancer, is MALPRACTICE. Medical people SUCK at their JOB.


Is Fauci slated to be dressed down by Rand Paul again? If so, perhaps an e-mail campaign to RP’s office outlining what you have shown here would be in order.

Rand Paul has clearly shown that he is onto Fauci’s lies, and this may just give him the ammo to go ballistic on Fauci ….

Gail Combs


There is PLENTY of evidence.

Gail Combs

AUGUST 22  👉 2005 👈 
Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread
Division of Viral and Rickettsial Diseases,  👉 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 👈  Atlanta, Georgia 30333, USA.


Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is caused by a newly discovered coronavirus (SARS-CoV). No effective prophylactic or post-exposure therapy is currently available.

Results: We report, however, that chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells. These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus, suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage. In addition to the well-known functions of chloroquine such as elevations of endosomal pH, the drug appears to interfere with terminal glycosylation of the cellular receptor, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. This may negatively influence the virus-receptor binding and abrogate the infection, with further ramifications by the elevation of vesicular pH, resulting in the inhibition of infection and spread of SARS CoV at clinically admissible concentrations.

Conclusion: Chloroquine is effective in preventing the spread of SARS CoV in cell culture. Favorable inhibition of virus spread was observed when the cells were either treated with chloroquine prior to or after SARS CoV infection. In addition, the indirect immunofluorescence assay described herein represents a simple and rapid method for screening SARS-CoV antiviral compounds.

NIH — COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines

…despite demonstrating antiviral activity in some in vitro systems, neither hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin nor hydroxychloroquine  👉 ALONE 👈  [The F,,,CKERS LEFT OUT ZINC!] reduced upper or lower respiratory tract viral loads or demonstrated clinical efficacy in a rhesus macaque model.6

The safety and efficacy of chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine with or without azithromycin and azithromycin  👉 ALONE 👈  have been evaluated in randomized clinical trials, observational studies, and/or single-arm studies. [This is where they were giving LETHAL DOSES!]


  • The COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel (the Panel) recommends against the use of chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine and/or azithromycin for the treatment of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients (AI) and in nonhospitalized patients (AIIa).


Hospitalized Patients

In a large randomized controlled platform  👉 trial of hospitalized patients 👈  in the United Kingdom (RECOVERY), hydroxychloroquine did not decrease 28-day mortality when compared to the usual standard of care.


Patients who were randomized to receive hydroxychloroquine had a longer median hospital stay than those who received the standard of care. In addition, among patients who were not on invasive mechanical ventilation at the time of randomization, those who received hydroxychloroquine were more likely to subsequently require intubation or die during hospitalization than those who received the standard of care….




Drug Availability

Hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, and azithromycin are not approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of COVID-19. Furthermore, the FDA Emergency Use Authorization for hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine was revoked in June 2020.

They INTENTIONALLY KILLED the HCQ + ZINC TRIALS!!! (Can’t find the article, but it said dropped due to lack of interest/finding volunteers)

Mortality outcomes with hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine in COVID-19 from an international collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials

…In March 2020, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued an Emergency Use Authorization of HCQ7 and the number of prescriptions and usage outside clinical studies skyrocketed8. In many countries, HCQ or CQ were listed in treatment guidelines for COVID-19 (including, e.g., China, Ireland, and the United States)9. In a New York City cohort of 1376 COVID-19 inpatients during March–April 2020, 59% received HCQ10. However, the FDA revoked the Emergency Use Authorization on June 15, 202011. At that point, two large randomized clinical trials (RCTs), RECOVERY and the WHO Solidarity trial, had stopped enrollment to their HCQ treatment arms12,13. An interim analysis of the RECOVERY trial showed no mortality benefit of HCQ…

Antiviral activity of Chloroquine against Human Coronavirus OC43 Infection in Newborn Mice

Chloroquine is a clinically approved drug effective against malaria, and it is known to elicit antiviral effects against several viruses, including SARS-CoV and HCoV-229E (71617).

7 —  👉 2001 👈 

Blau, D., and K. V. Holmes.2001. Human coronavirus HCoV-229E enters susceptible cells via the endocytic pathway, p. 193-197. In E. Lavi (ed.), The nidoviruses, coronaviruses and arteriviruses. Kluwer, New York, NY.

16 —  👉 2004 👈 

Keyaerts, E., L Vijgen, P. Maes, J. Neyts, and M. Van Ranst.2004. In vitro inhibition of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus by chloroquine. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.323:264-268.

17 —  👉 2008 👈 

Kono M., K. Tasumi, A. M. Imai, K. Saito, T. Kuriyama, and H. Shirasawa.2008. Inhibition of human coronavirus 229E infection in human epithelial lung cells (L132) by chloroquine: involvement of p38 MAPK and ERK. Antivir. Res.77:150-152.

Brave and Free

Great post Wolf, watched the videos yesterday. They knew what they were promoting was going to kill people. How the hell could they not have, there the “professionals”.
Not sure how the rest of the hospital administration responsibility will shakeout.
I am sure a fare amount knew too, but will hide behind just following the regs. and rules.
If there were hospital administration officials to come forward with what they were being told or more correctly bribed to say/do, that would hopefully encourage more people to come forward.


Besides all the info we glean from you(much appreciated) its so refreshing to hear such a heart felt testimony.
Great post Wolf !!
Keep em coming 😊 

Last edited 2 years ago by trumpismine

When we get older we make up for the foolish things we did when when we were young.


Always remember, dear Wolf, that we are all only playing with the cards we currently hold in our hand. We are doing the best we can until we get to draw more cards. Don’t get too down on yourself with hindsight.

Gail Combs


Researchers smell a rat, say expensive remdesivir getting ‘subtle push’ over HCQ in studies

…According to the researchers, HCQ appears to be courting greater scrutiny with respect to safety and efficacy, and risks associated with the much more expensive remdesivir seem to be getting played down. 

The fact that this may be driven by “political affiliation, profiteering, and other conflicts of interest cannot be ruled out at this stage”, they say in an article titled “Hydroxychloroquine and Remdesivir (RDV) in COVID-19: A critical analysis of recent events” and published in the July-September print issue of the quarterly journal.   

“Criticism of HCQ has been focused on safety (increased risk of adverse events and arrhythmias), followed by efficacy (lack of clinical or mortality benefit). However, there has been no acknowledgement of the high dose of HCQ given [during trials] when compared to the lower dose recommended by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR),” they write. 

“On the other hand, the lack of mortality benefit with RDV is being downplayed, and attempts to highlight a lack of new safety risks, despite observations to the contrary, are repeatedly made. It appears as if HCQ is being more closely scrutinised when compared to the lighter treatment given to RDV,” they add….

Gail Combs

India was also the first to analyze Covid-19 and say it was man made.

Is the Afghanistan MESS (in part) RETALIATION AGAINST INDIA???

China: Scientists slam Indian study that fueled coronavirus rumors
The Study: Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike protein to HIV-1 gp120 and Gag

…We found 4 insertions in the spike glycoprotein (S) which are unique to the 2019-nCoV and are not present in other coronaviruses. Importantly, amino acid residues in all the 4 inserts have identity or similarity to those in the HIV-1 gp120 or HIV-1 Gag. Interestingly, despite the inserts being discontinuous on the primary amino acid sequence, 3D-modelling of the 2019-nCoV suggests that they converge to constitute the receptor binding site. The finding of 4 unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV, all of which have identity /similarity to amino acid residues in key structural proteins of HIV-1 is unlikely to be fortuitous in nature….


AND GUESS WHO has been involved in HIV Research for 40+ years?

AND in Coronavirus Gain of Function – creating Chimeric Coronaviruses with China???????????

Chimeric means intentionally altered.


“Chimeric” means a combo of one species with another – like the part-man, part-animal characters in mythology (Lamia, Sphinx, Minotaur, etc.).

DDG “Chimera definition” (generic / unattributed)

“An organism, organ, or part consisting of two or more tissues of different genetic composition, produced as a result of organ transplant, grafting, or genetic engineering.”

“A substance, such as an antibody, created from the proteins or genes of two different species.”


I thought it meant ‘unnaturally occurring’

As in splicing HIV virus to a SARS virus to make it more virulent, unseasonal, targeting a specific demographic (elderly, obese, medicaid/medicare recipients, etc.

Last edited 2 years ago by GA/FL

Your take fits the definition, GA/FL.

“unnaturally occurring” -> artificially spliced.

Btw, tremendous job on that transcription of the video!

Ya done good!