Author: PAVACA

BFA in Piano; BFA in Music Education; MA in Leadership. Retired professional musician and soprano, teacher, composer, accompanist/coach. General Editor of Imagination-Building: The Memoirs of John Douglas Forbes (1910 - 2018), First Professor of the Darden School of the University of Virginia. Writes under the names of: M.E. Forbes; M.E.C. Forbes; PAVACA.

The HHS Gave the “Go-Ahead” to Use an H5N1″Vaccine”— But the AMA Just Issued New CPT Codes for an H5N8 “Vaccine”

The above image is of mass vaccination against smallpox in Paris in 1905. (Courtesy, Getty Images.)

Today’s post will trace what ** may be ** a “sleight-of-hand” that started out with Xavier Becerra, the Secretary of the United States government Department of Health and Human Services, giving the “Go-Ahead” for the use of the H5N1 Avian Influenza “vaccine”, AUDENZ, in anticipation of a potential “bird flu pandemic” in the United States; but, which since has been “transformed” into the American Medical Association just issuing new CPT codes for an Avian Influenza “vaccine” for a different strain, called H5N8. Meanwhile, the CDC / FDA / United States government, are all sending out warnings related to the H5N1 strain. Stay with Yours Truly, it gets even better — “Mais, mon Dieu!” — the twists and turns! This post is a kind of “snapshot” of the situation — it is an evolving issue.

For purposes of today’s post, the trail begins here: www.ernst.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/fowl_play_squeal.pdf, the letter that Sen. Jodi Ernst (R-Iowa) sent to USDA Secretary Tom Vilsack on 14 February 2024. In this letter, Sen. Ernst demands answers regarding United States government funding of what appears to be Gain-of-Function research experiments on Avian Influenza viruses; which experiments involve a scientist linked to the Chinese Communist Party. Yours Truly can find to date, no response from Sec. Vilsack to Sen. Ernst. A screenshot of Page 1 of her letter is below:

Yours Truly now turns to this: www.aha.org/news/headline/2024-07-23-hhs-broadens-emergency-declaration-facilitate-response-bird-flu-other-viruses-pandemic-potential, “HHS broadens emergency declaration to facilitate response to bird flu, other viruses with pandemic potential”, dated 23 July 2024, which “expanded” the 2013 amendment to the Federal Food, Drugs, and Cosmetics Act to now include “other viruses” that may have “pandemic potential.” The document, from HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra, specifically mentions three types of Avian Influenza strains: H1N1 (from 2009); H7N9 (from the 2013 amendment);, and H5N1 (from the 24 March 2024 USDA statement regarding H5N1 infections in dairy cows in Kansas and in Texas.) https://public-inspection.federalregister.com/2024-16247.pdf. Below is a screenshot from the AHA (American Hospital Association) press release:

And, for reference, here is the Congressional Research Service Legal Sidebar document related to what the HHS Secretary can “declare” under the PREP Act (including removing liability options), updated 21 July 2023: https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/LSB/LSB10730, “The PREP Act and COVID-19, Part 2: The PREP Act Declaration for COVID-19 Countermeasures.”

This was followed by a tweet from Robert Kennedy, Jr.: https://twitter.com/RobertKennedyJr/status/1816905031653675473, a screenshot of which follows:

Meanwhile, the USDA had already issued a press release regarding how dairy farmers can apply to receive expanded livestock assistance to compensate for milk production lost due to their cows infected with H5N1: www.usda.gov/media/press-releases/2024/06/27/usda-begin-accepting-applications-expanded-emergency-livestock, “USDA to Begin Accepting Applications for Expanded Emergency Livestock Assistance Program to Help Dairy Producers Offset Milk Loss Due to H5N1”, dated 27 June 2024.

Which was followed, in turn, by a CDC release regarding the government’s response to the current H5N1 Avian Influenza situation: www,cdc,gov/bird-flu/spotlights/h5n1-response-07262024.html; a screenshot from the release is below:

So, it would appear that the HHS gave the “go-ahead” for a kind of “EUA” regarding the use of the protein-subunit H5N1 “vaccine”, AUDENZ (a supply is already in the National Vaccine Stockpile); and, for the increased production of this “vaccine.” What follows is a “closer look” at AUDENZ. Yours Truly will begin with the FDA-issued Fact Sheet for healthcare providers for this “vaccine”: www.fda.gov/media/135020/download; three screenshots from the document are below. The first screenshot shows clearly that there was no Placebo group (Control/saline group) in at least two clinical trials for AUDENZ. The second screenshot shows clearly that no Toxicology studies were performed for AUDENZ. The third screenshot is Page 10 of the Fact Sheet.

Note this language in the first screenshot: “In both Studies 1 and 2, all SAEs appeared unrelated to study treatment.” This indicates at least two important details: One, that Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) did occur during at least two clinical trials of AUDENZ; and, Two, that these Serious Adverse Events were not considered to be related to the clinical trials for AUDENZ. This is the same type of language that Pfizer-BioNTech used regarding Serious Adverse Events that occurred during the (shortened and data-compromised) clinical trials for the company’s “flagship” COVID-19 modRNA “vaccine” BNT162b2. Note also that a “complete dose series” for AUDENZ is two separate doses of 0.5mL each, for all age groups age six months and up. AUDENZ uses an adjuvant (an ingredient that facilities the activities of the injectable) called MF59. MF59 is a squalene-based, oil-in-water adjuvant. The Safety Data Sheet for MF59 is here: https://file.medchemexpress.com/batch_PDF/HY-153206/MF59-SDS-MedChemExpress.pdf. The product is listed as “Not a hazardous product or mixture” in section 2.2 of this document. However, reading further down the same document, one finds all sorts of contradictory information in the sections on “First Aid Measures”, on “Handling and Storage”, on “Exposure Controls”, and more.

Note also the list of reported adverse events in section 6.2 of Page 10, above. These are same types of adverse events reactions to the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, BNT162b2, in the post-authorization report that this company gave to the FDA on 30 April 2021; and in reports to VAERS; and, which are listed within the FDA-issued Fact Sheet for Healthcare Providers for the “2023-2024 Formula COVID-19 Vaccine” by Pfizer-BioNTech (www.phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/reissue_5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf; www.openvaers.com/; www.fda.gov/media/167211/download?attachment. Very troubling are the listings in section 6.2 of Page 10 above in the AUDENZ fact sheet for “convulsions”; “demyelination”; “encephalitis”; and, “Guillain-Barre’ syndrome.”

A blog post by Dr. Jessica Rose, PhD, on 27 June 2024, presents a summary of clinical trial for AUDENZ (NCT02839440), in which she proves that the fatality rate is 1/200 chances for AUDENZ: https://jessicar.substack.com/p/1200-chance-of-death-in-context-of, “1/200 chance of death in context of new bird flu injection – 5 times higher than placebo according to clinical trial.” NCT02839440 did have a Placebo control group, (Scroll down the blog post to the discussion of this clinical trial for AUDENZ.)

To date, Yours Truly can find no exact set of CPT Codes for AUDENZ. The closest item found is here: www.hhs.gov/guidance/document/flu-shot-coding-0; the listing is “Q2039 Influenza virus vaccination otherwise specified.”

AUDENZ is produced by CSL Seqirus, part of the much-larger CSL multinational drug company. Following is a JPG of the list of CSL offices and locations, sourced from: www.csl.com/:

The United States government awarded CSL Seqirus a contract to produce millions of doses of an Avian Influenza “vaccine” in May 2024: www.cslseqirus.us/news/csl-seqirus-announces-us-government-award-in-response-to-avian-influenza. The “vaccine” will be manufactured by the CSL Seqirus facility at Holly Springs, North Carolina. This facility was built in partnership with BARDA (Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority), a department of the United States government. The Avian Influenza “vaccine” that this facility will manufacture is “cell-based”, as opposed to “egg-based”; with a six-month “turnaround” for production: www.csl.com/we-are-csl/our-business-and-products/csl-seqirus/csl-seqirus-manufacturing-technologies. Below are two images from the article related to this facility:

Note that whatever Avian Influenza cell-based “vaccine” from the CSL Seqirus facility at Holly Springs will use the MF59 adjuvant. (By the way, MF59 is trademarked by Novartis AG, which was acquired by CSL.)

So far, it appears that the H5N1 strain of Avian Influenza is the one that the United States government is focused upon. However, here’s where the trail veers to another path.

Please refer back to the American Hospital Association press release above in today’s post. Note this language: “The amendment now applies to pandemic influenza A viruses and others with pandemic potential, such as the current H5N1 strain of bird flu…” (Italics, Yours Truly) In Yours Truly’s opinion, this is “a hole big enough to drive a truck through” — or, perhaps, another strain of Avian Influenza.

The following article beings to “lift the curtain” on what ** may ** really be going on — which, again in Yours Truly’s opinion, appears to be a kind of “sleight-of-hand”: www.naturalnews.com/2024-07-26-fda-grant-eua-mrna-bird-flu-vaccines.html, “Pandemic 2.0 ready to go: FDA to grant emergency use authorization (EUA) to mRNA bird flu shots, just like what happened with COVID“, by Ethan Huff. And, “right out of the gate”, the article begins with this:

But, wasn’t the “upcoming potential bird flu pandemic” supposed to be the H5N1 strain that the government is warning about? Where does the H5N8 strain come in? According to Wikipedia, the H5N8 strain of Avian Influenza is “is typically not associated with humans.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Influenza_A_virus_subtype_H5N8. Very few humans have contracted a case of H5N8; this virus strain predominates among wild birds. However, the mortality rate among wild birds infected with H5N8 is “at least 75%”, again according to the Wikipedia article above.

Now, turning to the American Medical Association’s issuing new CPT Codes for the use of an H5N8 “vaccine.” One media outlet that Yours Truly found has this: https://revcycleintelligence.com/news/ama-updates-cpt-code-set-for-avian-influenza-vaccines, dated 22 July 2024. Below is a screenshot from the article, with the new CPT codes:

Note that the American Medical Association owns the rights for the CPT codes. This means that the AMA gets a “royalty payment” every time a CPT code is used. The AMA notice regarding the CPT codes for H5N8 is here: www.ama-assn.org/press-center/press-releases/ama-announces-cpt-update-avian-influenza-vaccines, dated 19 July 2024. Below is a screenshot from the notice:

What’s going on here? The picture is, to say the least, somewhat “murky.” There are, however, a few potential clues. Among them is this: www.pennmedicine.org/news/news-releases/2024/may/penn-researchers-develop-experimental-mrna-avian-flu-vaccine, dated 23 May 2024. Note on the screenshot, below, from the article, the language regarding “a specific type of the H5N1 virus”; and, that animals other than wild birds were being used for the experiments:

Here is another clue, from 5 June 2024: www.idsociety.org/science-speaks-blog/u.s.-orders-4.8-million-doses-of-a-cell-based-adjuvanted-h5-vaccine-for-avian-flu-preparedness#/+/0/publishedDate_na_dt/desc/, by Daniel R. Lucey, MD, PhH, FIDSA. Below is a screenshot from this article:

Note the language regarding “pre-pandemic vaccine that is well-matched to the H5 of the currently circulating H5N1 strain,…” (bolding, Yours Truly)

A third clue is here: https://twitter.com/RenzTom/status/1816110256843264368; a screenshot of part of his tweet is below:

And, a fourth clue is here: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05874713, a clinical trial that appears to be in the “wrapping-up” stages regarding testing an mRNA-based H5N8 “vaccine.” Below is a screenshot from the Clinical Trials webpage for this clinical trial:

Note the very low test subject enrollment (480 persons); the presence of the MF59 adjuvant in the H5N8 “vaccine” candidate used in the clinical trial; and, a “two-dose” series of “primary run” injections of the “vaccine” candidate, followed by a “booster shot” on Day 209 for the H5N8 “vaccine” candidate.

There are three other clinical trials of an H5N8 “vaccine” listed on the https://clinicaltrials.gov/ website: NCT02624219 (Completed); NCT05975840 (Active); and, NCT03014310 (Completed.) All of these clinical trials were/are Phase I or Phase I/II. None of them have a Placebo/saline control group. Each of them have fewer than 600 subjects (NCT02624219 had 275 test subjects.) Two of these three other clinical trials have the NIAID as the Sponsor.

What does all this mean? Is it possible that the current H5N1 “Avian Influenza infecting cattle, cows, and domesticated pets, in addition to poultry” situation, while it is indeed occurring, is also a sort of “Look, squirrel!” to distract from something that may be more dangerous?: from, perhaps, Gain-of-Function experiments on the H5N8 strain of the Avian Influenza (recall that this strain has a 75%+ mortality rate among the wild birds that it infects); plus, perhaps. the development of “vaccines” for this “perhaps-enhanced” H5N8 strain, which may include the millions of doses of an “Avian Influenza cell-based vaccine” that will be manufactured at the CSL Seqirus facility in North Carolina? In other words, “Pandemic 2.0”?

Good Energy, Peace, Respect: PAVACA

The 2024-2025 Formula COVID-19 “Vaccines”: Injection Dose #10

The above is a vintage image of mass vaccination. (Courtesy Google Images.)

This series on the disaster of the COVID-19 virus itself, and of the COVID-19 “vaccines”, is dedicated to the memory of Yours Truly’s cousin Bill, who “died suddenly and unexpectedly” in September 2023.

The origination of today’s post begins here: www.dossier.today/p/double-digits-biden-admin-tells-americans, “Double Digits: Biden Admin tells Americans that it’s soon time for their 10th Covid shot“, by Jordan Schachtel, 13 June 2024. (Mr. Schachtel wrote about the ninth COVID-19 “vaccine” injection here: www.dossier.today/p/dose-number-nine-cdc-panel-green, “Dose number NINE: CDC panel green lights yet another Covid mRNA shot“, 29 February 2024. The CDC recommended that persons over age 65 take another “booster shot” of either the Pfizer-BioNTech or of the Moderna “2023-2024 Formula COVID-19 Vaccine” of these manufacturers.) A person age 65 or older, if that person adhered to every CDC recommendation regarding taking a COVID-19 “vaccine” injection since December 2020 (when the FDA granted first Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) to Pfizer-BioNTech and to Moderna for these companies’ “flagship” modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” (BNT162b2 by Pfizer-BioNTech; and, mRNA-1273 by Moderna), would have taken injection number nine starting on 28 February 2024.

Today’s post is long. There is a large amount of information to “unpack.” Stay with me here.

Below is an image from the FDA’s 13 June “updated” authorization announcement for the “2024-2025 Formula COVID-19 Vaccine”, the TENTH injection dose of the modRNA “vaccine” formula: www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/updated-covid-19-vaccines-use-united-states-beginning-fall-2024.

Note the language regarding the “selection of a specific JN.1 lineage SARS-CoV-2 strain…” More about that later.

The trail behind the 5 June 2024 FDA announcement begins with the VRBPAC Briefing Document for the meeting held on 28 June 2022: www.fda.gov/media/159452/download, “FDA Briefing Document Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee Meeting June 28, 2022.” It was at this meeting that the FDA “codified” the types of “strain composition recommendations” that the agency would use regarding “new versions” of COVID-19 “vaccines.” Yours Truly presents page 17, page 18, and page 19 of this document:

It appears that the FDA simply decided that it would be permissible for the agency to authorize a new COVID-19 “vaccine” strain composition along what, in Yours Truly’s opinion, may be called “very flexible” options. For example, the Pfizer-BioNTech XBB.1.5 COVID-19 “vaccine”, which was FDA authorized in the fall of 2023, had test results only from mouse testing prior to FDA authorization. Following are: The link to the Pfizer-BioNTech slide presentation about this “vaccine” to the CDC’s ACIP committee (Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices) meeting of 12 September 2023; and, an image of slide CC4 from this presentation. First, the presentation: www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2023-09-12/10-COVID-Modjarrad-508.pdf.

Second, slide CC-4 from the above presentation:

The XBB.1.5. Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 “vaccine” had only been given as a single injection to humans in the company’s clinical trial; a clinical trial which had only just begun prior to the ACIP meeting. Slide CC-5 of the presentation, the start of the company’s human trial of this “vaccine”, is below:

Slide CC-6 of the presentation has to do with the mouse studies of this “vaccine”, which were of longer duration.

Notwithstanding the above, the FDA authorized the use of the company’s XBB.1.5 COVID-19 “vaccine” on 11 September 2023 (in Yours Truly’s opinion, it appears that the ACIP meeting of 12 September 2023 was a “catch-up” formality.) It also appears (again, in Yours Truly’s opinion), that the FDA used a very loose interpretation of “Option 4” on page 18 of the FDA Briefing Document above in granting the EUA for this “vaccine”.

** Now, on to the latest “new version” of the COVID-19 “vaccines”, the “2024-2025 Formula COVID-19 Vaccines”, that the FDA authorized in June 2024.

The following linked items are important regarding background information related to this situation and to the FDA: First, the FDA document, stating that the agency would “align” its COVID-19 “vaccine” antigen composition to the recommendations of the World Health Organization’s TAG-CO-VAC recommendations: www.fda.gov/media/179139/download (the TAG-CO-VAC recommendation for the “2024-2025 Formula COVID-19 Vaccines” was to use the JN.1 strain); second, the FDA document regarding “considerations and recommendations” for the “2024-2025 Formula COVID-19 Vaccine” composition: www.fda.gov/media/179145/download; third, the FDA announcement of the 5 June meeting of its VRBPAC committee (Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee.): www.fda.gov/advisory-committees/advisory-committee-calendar/vaccines-and-related-biological-products-advisory-committee-june-5-2024-meeting-announcement. From this last link, chick on “Event Materials” to see the slide presentations and other items that were discussed at this meeting.

Two important items from the “Event Materials” list: the FDA Briefing Document; and the VRBPAC roster for this meeting. First, the FDA Briefing Document: www.fda.gov/media/179003/download; and, second, the VRBPAC roster for this meeting: www.fda.gov/media/179225/download. The roster for the 5 June 2024 meeting has some “familiar” members and speakers: Paul Offit, MD; and Peter Marks, MD (director of CBER [Center for Biologics Evaluation the Research of the FDA]); and, among the “Temporary Voting Members”, are: Bruce Gellin, M.D., M. PH., the Chief of Global Public Health Strategy for the Rockefeller Foundation; and, Melinda Wharton, M.D., M. PH., Associate Director of Vaccine Policy of the CDC. (Italics mine)

The VRBPAC members voted unanimously to endorse the Pfizer-BioNTech, the Moderna, and the Novavax “2024-2025 Formula COVID-19 Vaccine” by these companies, based on the presentations of these companies’ representatives at the meeting. Yours Truly can find no registered human clinical trials performed in advance of the 5 June VRBPAC meeting by Pfizer-BioNTech, or by Moderna, or by Novavax, for any “2024-2025 Formula COVID-19 Vaccine”; that would indicate that any “clinical trials” were performed in these companies’ facilities on mice; and that any “human trials” were also performed in these companies’ facilities, prior to the meeting. The FDA then issued the agency’s original announcement of 7 June 2024: www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-roundup-june-7-2024; and, a screenshot from this announcement:

Note in particular “…the selection of a specific JN.1 lineage SARS-CoV-2 strain (e.g., JN.1. or KP.2) and expressed a strong preference for JN.1.” Here’s where it starts to “get interesting.”

First, on 12 April 2024 (well ahead of the 5 June VRBPAC meeting), Pfizer-BioNTech issues a statement regarding the company’s “taking reservations” for the coming “2024-2025 Formula COVID-19 Vaccine” (also, see the Pfizer-BioNTech presentation at the 5 June meeting, linked above): www.cvdvaccine-us.com/reservation. This is followed, after the meeting, by Moderna filing an application with the FDA for a “vaccine” to target the JN.1. COVID-19 strain (also, see the Moderna presentation at the 5 June meeting, linked above): https://investors.modernatx.com/news/news-details/2024/Moderna-Files-FDA-Application-for-the-JN.1-Targeting-COVID-19-Vaccine/default.aspx; then, Novavax files with the FDA for that company’s version (also, see the Novavax presentation at the 5 June meeting, linked above): https://ir.novavax.com/press-releases/2024-06-14-Novavax-Submits-Application-to-U-S-FDA-for-Updated-Protein-based-2024-2025-Formula-COVID-19-Vaccine.

But then, “something happens”, and the FDA suddenly makes a large “about-face” and switches its “2024-2025 Formula COVID-19 Vaccine” choice to the KP.2 strain on 13 June 2024: www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/updated-covid-19-vaccines-use-united-states-beginning-fall-2024. This is the “second” announcement, which was cited at the beginning of today’s post.

What was it that happened? Part of the answer lies in the fact that the NIH and Moderna co-own the patents (and, therefore, share the royalties) for the Moderna “flagship” modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, mRNA-1273. This agreement would extend to “descendant clone COVID-19 vaccines” by Moderna. www.citizen.org/article/modernas-mrna-1273-vaccine-patent-landscape/. The NIH’s Dale and Betty Bumpers Vaccine Research Center (part of NIAID — which Dr. Anthony Fauci led from November 1984 until his retirement in December 2022) and Moderna co-developed mRNA-1273. https://covid19.nih.gov/news-and-stories/nih-vaccine-research-center; a screenshot from the article is below:

The other part of the answer is that Moderna was already developing a KP.2 strain COVID-19 “vaccine” for 2024-2025. This, and the FDA’s decision to shift away from the JN.1 strain to the KP.2 strain, are described in this post at Sasha Latypova’s blog: https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/all-roads-lead-to-resilience, “All Roads lead to Resilience. FDA is removing competitors for the Pentagon & CIA’s baby…Moderna”, 23 June 2024.

The FDA’s “about-face” announcement regarding the switch from the JN.1 strain to the KP.2 strain was also covered here: www.contagionlive.com/view/fda-advises-manufacturers-to-consider-kp-2-strain-for-covid-19-vaccines, 14 June 2024, by Sophia Abene. Below is a screenshot from this article:

However, there’s yet another detail in play here, regarding the FDA’s switch, “based on evaluation of the most recent circulating strains of COVID-19”, from JN.1 to KP.2 — the CIA and the Pentagon. Here is a screenshot from Sasha Latypova’s Substack article:

Here is the report, linked from the Latypova blog article cited above, that describes the CIA-linked company, “National Resilience”, or “Resilience”, that manufactures the RNA for the Moderna modRNA line of COVID-19 Omicron “vaccines”: https://unlimitedhangout.com/2022/08/investigative-reports/rna-for-modernas-omicron-booster-manufactured-by-cia-linked-company/, by Whitney Webb, 17 August 2022. Below is a screenshot image from this blog article:

And here is story on this “interesting development”, from Resilience: www.businesswire.com/news/home/20210908005443/en/Resilience-to-Manufacture-mRNA-for-Moderna’s-COVID-19-Vaccine, 8 September 2021. Note that per this “multi-year contract”, Resilience manufactures the mRNA for the Moderna COVID-19 “vaccines” at this Canadian facility. Resilience was founded in 2020.

But wait, there’s more! Resilience lists multiple “partners”, such as the Mayo Clinic. The company also, apparently, has a “partnership” with the United States Army’s Joint Program Executive Office for Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Defense https://resilience.com/learn/partnerships. Below is a screenshot from this website:

The website link in the screenshot above is broken. Here is the Army’s website on this: wwwt2.army.mil/T2-Laboratories/Designated-Laboratories/Joint-Program-Executive-Office-for-Chemical-Biological-Radiological-and-Nuclear-Defense/. Note: this link may or may not work. One will need to do a search for “Joint Program Executive Office for Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Defense” to see links to this department of the United States Army. One such link: https://globalbiodefense.com/directory/name/joint-program-executive-office-for-chemical-biological-defense-jpeo-cbd/.

It appears, then, in Yours Truly’s opinion, that the FDA was perhaps “reminded” of the”details” regarding the NIH-Moderna co-ownership (and royalties – sharing) agreement related to Moderna’s modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”; and, the role of the CIA-Pentagon-National Resilience (aka Resilience) in manufacturing the mRNA used in the Moderna COVID-19 Omicron “booster vaccines” — and the KP.2. strain is indeed a “descendant strain” in the Omicron lineage (as is the JN.1 strain.) Hence, the FDA’s 2024-2025 COVID-19 “vaccine” strain “sudden switch” announcement of 13 June 2024, only one week after the agency gave the nod to the JN.1 strain.

In Yours Truly’s opinion, it is statistically, medically, and ethically impossible for a new vaccine (let alone any COVID-19 “vaccine”) to be developed; tested (on lab animals, then on human subjects); the test data thoroughly collated and analyzed for “safety and efficacy” on both lab animals and on human subjects; then, which data is presented to the CDC / FDA for consideration; then, these agencies doing their own “due diligence” research; then, and only then, being granted an EUA by the FDA; then, and only then, manufactured for use in humans — in a time span of fewer than three to five years, let alone within a time span of only a few months. It appears, again in Yours Truly’s opinion, that the CDC and the FDA are playing “fast and loose” with the health and safety of the people who choose (or will be “mandated”) to take the “2024-2025 Formula COVID-19 Vaccine.” And, also, that “other entities” are in play here to perhaps “influence” decision making by these agencies.

All of above is in addition to the fact that the COVID-19 “vaccines” (actually, gene therapy injections) have caused, are causing, and will cause, multiple health issues, serious adverse reactions, and deaths, in those who are “vaccinated.” Just two of the most recent discoveries: One, the COVID-19 “vaccines” can cause brain damage, an article by Dr. William Makis: www.globalresearch.ca/brain-damage-covid-19-mrna-vaccines/5861012, “Brain Damage Caused by COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines”, 26 June 2024. Below is a screenshot from Dr. Makis’ article:

The second most recent discovery, that the COVID-19 “vaccines” reduce life expectancy (even in “all-cause” analysis) among COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons, by Dr. Peter A. McCullough: https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/breaking-publication-a-critical-analysis, “BREAKING Publication — A Critical Analysis of All-Cause Deaths during COVID-19 Vaccination in an Italian Province”, 1 July 2024. The peer-reviewed paper is here: https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12071343, “A Critical Analysis of All-Cause Deaths during COVID-19 Vaccination in an Italian Province”, Marco Alessandria, et al., published 30 June 2024. Below is a screenshot from the Conclusions section of this paper:

In Yours Truly’ opinion, it is apparent at “half a glance” that the COVID-19 “vaccines” (actually, gene therapy injections) must be completely withdrawn for human use until these products have been fully investigated, and then re-designed, before being re-introduced for human use; and, that there is no “co-ownership” or sharing of royalties between a government agency and a COVID-19 “vaccine” manufacturer; and, that there is no involvement of the United States military in the development or manufacture of such products.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA


The AMA EdHub: Window to “Establishment Medicine”

The above image is from the Textbook of Anatomy and Physiology, by Kimber, Gray, and Stackpole. Published by The Macmillan Company; eleventh edition, 1944. (Image courtesy of Laurel Leaf Farm.)

This post, part of a series on the disaster of COVID-19 and the COVID-19 “vaccines”, is dedicated to the memory of Yours Truly’s cousin Bill, who “died suddenly and unexpectedly” in September 2023. Today’s offering will speak to what might be called a “tangential” issue: the American Medical Association (the AMA.) Yours Truly will make it clear at the outset that today’s post is not to be construed as a “hit piece” on the AMA; also, that there are likely many members of the AMA who are not “beholden” to blindly accept everything that the AMA publishes. The point of today’s piece, in one’s opinion, is that the current AMA apparently sees itself as a sort of “arm” of “establishment medicine” (in other words, of the FDA and the CDC); in addition to becoming an organization that advocates what may be called “medico-political” viewpoints. First, before discussing the AMA Edhub, some items about the organization:

It is fair to posit that the American Medical Association (also referred to as the AMA) is the largest and most powerful medical doctor organization in the United States. The AMA has also become, arguably, the most powerful medical organization lobbyist in the United States House of Representatives and the United States Senate.

The American Medical Association was founded in 1847. In the year 2022, it had 271,660 members, and $493,147,829 in revenue (per Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Medical_Association). Further information on the history of the organization is found here: www.ama-assn.org/about/ama-history. The AMA does not publish a membership directory as of the year 2021: https://myama.my.site.com/s/article/Does-the-AMA-have-a-member-directory, stating the following: “The privacy of our customers’ [presumably, this means “members'”] data is something we take very seriously.” On the other hand, the 2022 census of the Federation of State Medical Boards listed a total of 1,044,734 licensed physicians in the United States (www.fsmb.org/advocacy/news-releases/fsmb-physician-census-identifies—1044734-licensed-physicians-in-u.s/). This means that 26% (271,660) of the licensed physicians in the United States belong to the AMA. (Side note: members of the AMA have “exclusive discounts” towards purchasing new Mercedes-Benz and Volvo cars: www.ama-assn.org/member-benefits/personal-member-benefits-discounts/auto-transportation-discounts).

The American Medical Association is a “heavy-spender” lobbyist to the United States federal government, spending at least $15 million per year in this effort since 1998: www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/american-medical-association/ (this article also has a history of the AMA, the organization’s views on healthcare policies, and so forth); in the year 2022 alone, the AMA spent $21,060,000 on federal government lobbying, per Open Secrets: www.opensecrets.org. A screenshot of the Influence Watch report on the AMA is below. Note that the AMA owns the exclusive rights to the medical expenditure reimbursement codes system for Medicare and Medicaid (the CPT codes.) This entails the payments of “rights and royalties” to the AMA. For further information, please refer to: https://microwize.com/why-do-i-have-to-pay-a-fee-to-use-cpt-code/, 14 December 2022.

The AMA, as can be inferred from the above screenshot, is also involved with the FDA and the CDC. Two examples: the AMA’s lobbying efforts with these agencies regarding advocacy for COVID-19 programs of various types, along with other advocacy efforts: www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/public-health/covid-19-amas-recent-and-ongoing-advocacy-efforts (1 June 2022 report); www.ama-assn.org/topics/coronavirus-vaccines; and, www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/public-health/covid-19-2019-novel-coronavirus-resource-center-physicians (updated 17 April 2024.)

The AMA has a “membership dues schedule”, ranging from $20 for a 1-year medical student membership, through a $420 per year dues fee for a “Regular practice” physician who belongs to the AMA. And, there are other types of membership available (corporate and e-membership.) www.amanet.org/membership/. There are other types of corporate and institutional memberships available through the AMA Foundation, also called the “Roundtable.” (https://amafoundation.org/donors/corporate-donors/). A screenshot of the “Silver Level” corporate donor list to the AMA is below (the “Silver Level” requires a $30,000 contribution to the AMA Foundation, presumably paid each year by each donor company):

Two other areas of AMA effort are in physician Continuing Education and in publishing. Members of the AMA who are licensed medical doctors can fulfill their Continuing Education accreditation through courses offered by the organization. These courses are offered via various methods: www.ama-assn.org/topics/contuning-medical-education. The AMA also publishes a journal, known as JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association): https://jamanetwork.com/. The website is open-access, and there are hundreds of peer-reviewed articles from thirteen different JAMA specialty journals available for public reading for several months after articles are published. As might be expected, the AMA advocates for what might be called “establishment medicine” — for example, championing FDA-authorized or FDA-approved treatments and drugs for COVID-19 infection.

Yours Truly will include part of the Abstract (below) of a recent paper published in JAMA, regarding people who mistrust “establishment medicine” (in other words, they may mistrust FDA-authorized or FDA-approved) treatments for COVID-19. This paper, in Yours Truly’s opinion, demonstrates the AMA’s official attitude towards those who question or refuse “establishment medicine” treatment of COVID1-19 and pursue other, alternative treatments — that these people are “being misled” by “misinformation” and may use that “misinformation” to avoid “health-promoting behaviors.” The paper is found here: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama-health-forum/fullarticle/2809985, “Misinformation, Trust, and Use of Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19”, Roy H. Perlis, MD, et al., published 29 September 2023. Dr. Perlis is Associate Editor of JAMA Network Open.

It appears that the AMA is “leading the charge” on “medico-political” topics, such as “climate change”, DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion), “equity of access to care” for illegal immigrants, “gender equity”, and more.

This leads to the AMA EdHub discussion.

The AMA EdHub website features online courses and Continuing Education (CME) fulfillment modules for physician members (https://edhub.ama-assn.org). These courses and modules are presented in various ways: webinars; video and/or audio courses; papers to be read; and so on. One does not have to be a member of the AMA in order to access and read many of the courses and modules; in fact, the AMA states that, “The AMA EdHub is open to anyone.” (https://education.ama-assn.org/help/, the “FAQ’s” section); interested persons simply open an account. However, only licensed physicians who belong to the AMA can fulfill their CME credits using the AMA EdHub. https:///edhub.ama-assn.org/pages/ama-cme, section “Target Audience“; and, www.ama-assn.org/member-benefits/personal-member-benefits-discounts/ama-ed-hub-member-benefits.

On other hand, the AMA EdHub provides a good “snapshot” of the current modes of thought in “establishment medicine”, as well as current trends in treatment and in the teaching of medical school students, among other topics. For example, there are CME modules and online courses related to DEI; to “anti-racism in medicine”; “equitable patient care”; and other what may be termed “medico-political” topics areas. Here is a link to one such example, a CME module: https://edhub.ama-assn.org/clinical-problem-solvers-antiracism-podcast/audio-player/18843339, “Episode 23 – Anti-Blackness, Anti-Fatness, and Food Shaming”, 9 January 2024. This somewhat over one hour audio module (with a Transcript that can be read) can be used, after the physician takes the Quiz, to earn one CME credit. The Learning Objectives listed for this module are: “1. Explain how anti-fatness and food shaming culture in the US is rooted in anti-Blackness 2. Describe the intersection of policing and the court systems with anti-fatness and food shaming 3. Identify ways to navigate clinical interactions with patients while respecting them and affirming their experiences with food and fatness.”

The AMA Edhub also has a department devoted to “health equity” — https://edhub.ama-assn.org/ama-center-health-equity. From the main page of the link: “Education from AMA Center for Health Equity AMA’s online education to empower individuals ad organizations, in healthcare and beyond, in advancing racial justice and equity.”

It appears that one area of particular emphasis in the AMA Center for Health Equity has to do with “gun violence prevention” — through “education” of medical students, practicing physicians, and patients — and working with the United States Congress. Here is a link to a recent video CME fulfillment presentation from the AMA Center for Health Equity: https://edhub.ama-assn.org/ama-center-health-equity/video-player/18867531, “Prioritizing Equity: Embracing Public Safety and Health for Improved Firearms Violence Prevention“, 2 April 2024. This video presentation has a Transcript that can be read. It appears, from reading the Transcript, that the AMA’s position on “gun violence prevention” goes beyond working through the criminal justice system. According to Dr. Megan Ranney, MD, one of the speakers interviewed on the video, “…it’s about separating someone from the potential to access a firearm at that moment of desperation, anger, impulsivity, hopelessness.” Dr. Ranney also states that, “…the amount of violence that youth are exposed to in urban neighborhoods far outstrips the amount of violence that people are exposed to in the military.” (Italics added)

The AMA EdHub has other areas of interest that offer online CME courses for AMA physician members, among them: promoting “race-conscious” admissions to higher education, including to medical schools: and, courses from The Fenway Institute, an organization that advocates for LGBTQIA+ and Transgender issues and persons. Here are links to examples of these AMA EdHub areas of interest: https://edhub.ama-assn.org/ama-center-health-equity/audio-player/18868328, 2 April 2024; “The SCOTUS Affirmative Action Ruling The Cost to the Physician Workforce and Historically Minoritized Communities (with a Transcript that can be read); and, https://edhub.ama-assn.org/fenway-institute-edu/video-player/18638799, 2 September 2021, “Affirming Care for People with Intersex Traits.”

In Yours Truly’s opinion, understanding the AMA EdHub is an important part in understanding how the AMA works to influence healthcare treatment practices, healthcare policies; and the United States Congress, through the AMA’s lobbying efforts.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

The Elephant in the Room: Shedding of the COVID-19 Virus Itself and of the COVID-19 “Vaccines”

The above image is courtesy of Google Images.

This series on the COVID-19 virus and the COVID-19 “vaccines” is dedicated to the memory of Yours Truly’s cousin Bill, who “died suddenly and unexpectedly” in September 2023.

Human beings shed items from their bodies every day: hair (and dandruff); tears; nasal mucus when blowing the nose or in sneezing; saliva; urine and feces; dead skin cells; sweat — among other things. They also shed particles of viruses — for example, of the “common cold” virus. They shed particles of vaccines — for example, of the Zaire ebolavirus vaccine, ERVEBO (www.fda.gov/media/133748/download, the Package Insert for ERVEBO; please refer to section 12.3 Pharmacokinetics, subsection Shedding). Today’s post will discuss the shedding of the COVID-19 virus itself, and of the COVID-19 “vaccines” (including the “2023-2024 Formula COVID-19 Vaccines.”) For purposes of today’s presentation, the trail begins with some details about how the COVID-19 virus itself works. Note: the knowledge base of exactly what is contained in the mRNA and spike protein of the original Wuhan Hu1 SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) virus; and, exactly what is contained in the modRNA and the other elements within the COVID-19 “vaccines”, is an evolving situation.

The following article, published on www.statnews.com/ on 10 April 2020 (before any COVID-19 “vaccine” had been authorized or approved for use), is about how the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself enters into human cells via the ACE2 receptors www.statnews.com/2020/04/10/coronavirus-ace-2-receptor/, “The coronavirus sneaks into cells through a key receptor. Could targeting it lead to a treatment?”, by Kate Sheridan.) From the article: “In a healthy person, the ACE2 receptor chops up two forms of a protein called angiotensin to keep blood pressure stable, among other things. SARS and the novel coronavirus, however, use the receptors to infiltrate cells,…The virus can latch onto ACE2 and sneak inside, replicating itself inside the cell and then wreaking havoc throughout the body.” According to Wikipedia, ACE2 receptor cells, found in the intestines, kidney, testes, gallbladder, and heart, regulate blood pressure in the body. However, the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein damages the endothelium by “downregulating” the ACE2 receptor ability. The endothelium is a layer of cells lining the interior surfaces of blood vessels and of lymphatic vessels.

A paper in Nature was published on 10 May 2021 of a study of 31 SARS-CoV-2-infected patients in Italy. The data were collected between November 2019 (from seven healthy controls) and from 31 COVID-19 infected patients (hospitalized), prior to publication in May 2021. The treatments administered to the infected patients were Tocilizumab (an immunosuppressant drug), and Anakinra (a drug that treats Rheumatoid Arthritis), as no COVID-19 “vaccine” had yet been authorized or approved for use. The paper is found here: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33972535/, “Identification and characterization of a SARS-CoV-2 specific CD8+T cell response with immunodominant features”; Pia Kvistborg, et al. (click on the DOI link for the full paper.) The authors of the paper were investigating the connection between the COVID-19 virus and its effects specifically on the CD8+ cells of the human body. What they found was quite interesting: the COVID-19 virus itself does indeed target many of the epitopes related to the CD8+ cells of the human immune system (an epitope is part of an antigen that is “recognized” by the immune system via antibodies, B cells, and T cells.)

Another paper, published on 31 July 2023, investigated the effects of the SARS-CoV-2 virus on the CD4 cells of the human body (https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84790, “SARS-CoV-2 uses CD4 to infect T helper lymphocytes”, Marcelo A. Mori, et al. Among the findings of this paper is that the SARS-CoV-2 virus attacks the ACE2 receptors of the CD4 lymphocyte cells.

Therefore, it was known as early as April 2020 that the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) virus itself attacks and damages important cells and mechanisms of the body of an infected person. What about the COVID-19 “vaccines?” It may be assumed that, since the COVID-19 “vaccines” contain the mRNA and spike protein elements of the original Wuhan Hu1 virus, these same elements are also contained in the COVID-19 “vaccines” — in addition to lab-engineered modifications to the mRNA, plus lipid nanoparticles and certain excipients (for lists of the excipients, please see: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnma.2022.08.003, “Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2), Moderna (mRNA-1273) COVID-19 vaccines and hypersensitivity reactions”, Hannah N. Haq, et al., published 29 October 2022.) In the “Trougakos, et al. paper” of 20 April 2022, it was presented that the COVID-19 “vaccines” bind the spike protein to the ACE2 receptors in the body and contribute to what the paper calls “vaccination-related AEs” (Adverse Events.) The paper is found here: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2022.04.007, “Adverse effects of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines” the spike hypothesis”, Ioannis P. Trougakos, et al. Figure 1 from the paper, below, shows how the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) in the COVID-19 “vaccines” move the spike protein and its modRNA around in the cell structure of the “vaccinated” person’s body. Note the “Furin cleavage-S1 shedding” on the figure:

Yours Truly now turns to “The Elephant in the Room” — the phenomena of shedding of the COVID-19 virus itself; and the shedding of elements of the COVID-19 “vaccines.” The first aspect, the shedding of the COVID-19 virus itself, is presented and discussed here: https://wmcresearch.substack.com/p/new-onset-autoantibodies-after-any, “New Onset Autoantibodies After Any Exposure to the Spike Protein of SARS-CoV-2”, by Walter M Chesnut. This article discusses, among other items, a paper published in February 2024, https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.15.24302857, “Prevalent and persistent new-onset autoantibodies in mild to severe COVID-19”, Peter Nilsson, et al. Yours Truly presents Figure 1 from this paper, an example of epitope mapping in neuro-COVID patients:

An autoantibody is an antibody made by the immune system that can attack one (or more) of the body’s own proteins; Graves’ Disease is an example of a condition induced by autoantibodies.

The Cleveland Clinic recognized, in 2022, that elements of the COVID-19 virus can be shed into the air: https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/21214-coronavirus-covid-19, “Coronavirus, COVID-19”, dated 3 January 2022. In this article, people were warned away from “close contact” with COVID-19 infected persons. “Close contact”, in the article, was defined as, “…being within 6 feet of an infected person from a cumulative total of 15 minutes or more over a 24-hour period.” The article also states that the virus can be spread via “respiratory droplets released into the air when an infected person coughs, sneezes, talks, sings or breathes near you.” (Yours Truly is aware that the “stay 6 feet away rule” is arbitrary, considering that aerosols [sneezes, for example] travel a lot farther than six feet and also at quite high speeds.)

So, it is known that the COVID-19 virus itself can be shed by an infected person into the air, and by an infected person onto another person. What about the shedding of elements and particles of the COVID-19 “vaccines” by a “vaccinated” person? This aspect is fueling new research that is being studied, compiled, and published (again, another piece of the evolving knowledge base regarding the virus and the “vaccines.”) For purposes of today’s post, Yours Truly will present the current findings of two such researchers: Dr. Ana Mihalcea, MD, PhD; and Dr. Pierre Kory, MD, co-founder of COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC); a paper co-authored by Stephanie Seneff, PhD; and a paper co-authored Jessica Rose, PhD, and Peter A. McCullough, MD, et al.

Dr. Mihalcea has conducted several darkfield microscopic investigations into the shedding of COVID-19 “vaccine” elements and particles from “vaccinated” persons. One of her blog articles about her findings is here: https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/darkfield-live-blood-analysis-c19, “Darkfield Live Blood Analysis C19 Unvaccinated Blood. C19 Vax Shedding And Environmental Exposure Has Not Slowed Down”, published 23 January 2024. The image below is from her blood analysis of an “unvaccinated” person who was in close contact with a COVID-19 “vaccinated” person. Note the presence of unusual structures in this person’s blood:

Another of Dr. Mihalcea’s articles on her findings is here: https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/environmental-filaments-uv-light, “Flourescent Filaments Coming Out of C19 Vaccinated Individuals Skin Glowing Under UV Light: Darkfield Microscopy”, published 28 January 2024. This article discusses what appear to be filaments of luciferase that were “shed” from COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons onto their skin. For further reference regarding the presence of luciferase in the COVID-19 “vaccines,” please see: www.nature.com/articles/s41541-023-00751-6, “Effect of mRNA-LNP components of two globally-marketed COVID-19 vaccines on efficacy and stability”, Lizhou Zhang, et al. Section Results of this paper discusses the experiments with the firefly luciferase contained in the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 “vaccine” LNP, ALC-0315, as compared to the firefly luciferase contained in the Moderna COVID-19 “vaccine” LNP, SM-102.

Dr. Pierre Kory is investigating the COVID-19 “vaccines” shedding phenomenon and is writing about it in his Substack. Here is his compendium post on the issue: https://pierrekorymedicalmusings.com/p/mrna-vaccine-shedding-of-spike-protein, “mRNA Vaccine Shedding Of Spike Protein: State Of the Scientific and Clinical Evidence”, published 20 February 2024. There is a searchable PDF of the report here: https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Shedding-of-COVID-mRNA-Vaccines-A-review-of-evidence-2024-02-03.pdf. Yours Truly urges interested persons to read through this report, especially starting on Page 15, SUMMARY OBSERVATIONS OF OVER 1000 CLINICAL REPORTS OF SHEDDING; and continuing on Page 23, CLINICAL GUIDANCE. The entire report has many “clickable” underlined hyperlinks to documents, other reports, clinical trials, and so on. His COVID-19 “vaccines” shedding series begins here: https://pierrekorymedicalmusings.com/p/shedding-of-covid-mrna-vaccine-components, “”Shedding” of Covid mRNA Vaccine Components and Products From The Vaccinated to the Unvaccinated – Part 1″, published 1 November 2023 (there are links to the other eight parts of the series at the end of Part 1.)

Stephanie Seneff, PhD, and Greg Nigh published a paper in May 2021 on multiple possible “unintended consequences” of the COVID-19 “vaccines.” The paper is found here: International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research 2(1), May 10, 2021, pages 38 – 79, “Worse Than the Disease? Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of the mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19.” Yours Truly presents part of page 62 of the paper:

Yours Truly now turns to the peer-reviewed paper published in Cureus on 24 January 2024, and which paper was suddenly retracted by Cureus on 26 February 2024: www.cureus.com/articles/203052-covid-19-mrna-vaccines-lessons-learned-from-the-registrational-trials-and-global-vaccination-campaign#1/, “COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: Lessons Learned from the Registrational Trials and Global Vaccination Campaign”, M. Nathaniel Mead, Russ Wolfinger, Jessica Rose, Kris Denhaerynck, Steve Kirsch, Peter A. McCullough. (Cureus and its parent company, Springer / Nature have since been sued for $250 million in damages by Steve Kirsch on behalf of himself and the other co-authors of the paper, as it was not retracted by the authors themselves; nor was it retracted with their consent.) The paper presents and discusses the flawed, incomplete, and data-manipulated COVID-19 “vaccine” clinical trials. It also states the following, per the screenshot from the paper, below:

So, now it is known that both the COVID-19 virus itself, and elements of the COVID-19 “vaccines”, do shed. What are people, “vaccinated” and, especially, “unvaccinated” people, to do — stay away from others, including “vaccinated” friends and family? Go back to wearing the (mostly useless, except for certain healthcare settings, etc.) masks, the disposable gloves, the washing of clothes in hot water, etc.? Go back to “self-limiting” exposure to places like grocery stores, healthcare providers’ offices, and so on? Avoid all “unnecessary” travel? Are all people supposed to consider themselves to be COVID-19 “vaccinated,” either via injection or via shedding of COVID-19 “vaccine” elements by “vaccinated” persons?

The following is not professional medical or healthcare advice — they are only ideas and possible suggestions. In addition, since the investigation of COVID-19 virus shedding and COVID-19 “vaccines” shedding is an another evolving aspect of the entire situation, Yours Truly is not, and cautions against, “leaping to certain conclusions,” although ongoing research is uncovering important things; therefore, the following are presented as personal opinions for all people, “vaccinated” and “unvaccinated”, to consider:

It is important to make sure that one’s own general health and natural immune system are brought up to, and maintained, in the best shape possible: to avoid / prevent infection by the COVID-19 virus itself, and / or to be impacted by shedding of the COVID-19 virus from infected persons; and / or to be impacted by the shedding of COVID-19 “vaccines” elements by “vaccinated” persons. This could possibly include dietary changes, vitamins and supplements as needed, and so on. Note: Speak with a healthcare provider regarding possible interactions between certain supplements and any prescription drugs that a person may be taking: for example, Nattokinase can interact with prescription blood thinners or with aspirin.

It is important that regular mild to moderate exercise, especially walking, be undertaken for 30 minutes a day, at least five days of the week. This could also include activities such as gardening, Yoga, and so on.

It is important that techniques to reduce stress and eliminate unnecessary stressors be part of one’s life and practiced daily.

It is important to have and keep a positive connection to the Almighty God, or to whatever Benevolent Divine Force that one believes in.

It is important to follow a COVID-19 prevention / treatment / spike protein detox program — by COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons; by “unvaccinated” persons; and/or, by persons who have been infected by COVID-19 and have recovered — such as the programs outlined, for example, at COVID-19 Critical Care (FLCCC Alliance https://covid19criticalcare.com/); or, through working with a medical professional who believes in such a program; or, through working with a reputable Naturopathic Doctor, herbalist, Traditional Chinese Medicine or Ayurvedic Medicine practitioner.

It is important that COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons do their own due diligence regarding the dangers of the COVID-19 “vaccines”, and decide for themselves whether or not to continue taking them.

It may be prudent, if a person feels “coming down with” an illness, or doesn’t feel “up to par,” to politely decline attendance at activities or events that were previously planned, in order to stay home and take care of oneself, and/or to seek medical care.

For some further information on the truth about the COVID-19 virus itself, and about the COVID-19 “vaccines”, please see:

www.theqtree.com/2024/02/01/an-open-letter-to-medical-professionals-who-took-the-covid-19-vaccines/

www.theqtree.com/2023/12/14/pavacas-top-12-list-of-damages-the-covid-19-vaccines-can-do-to-the-recipient/

www.theqtree.com/2024/01/04/the-deagel-report-u-s-population-reduction-of-68-5-by-2025/

www.theqtree.com/2023/11/29/the-covid-19-vaccines-pave-the-way-for-turbo-cancers-and-a-note-on-the-virus-itself/

“Speak the truth in humility to all people.” (Sioux proverb)

“And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.” John 8:32 (NKJV)

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

An Open Letter to Medical Professionals Who Took the COVID-19 “Vaccines”

The above image is a photo from the article, “The new COVID boosters: What doctors and patients need to know”, published online by the Association of American Medical Colleges on 14 September 2023 (www.aamc.org/news/new-covid-boosters-what-doctors-and-patients-need-to-know).

This series of posts regarding the ongoing issues of COVID-19 and the COVID-19 “vaccines” is dedicated to the memory of Yours Truly’s cousin Bill, who passed away “suddenly and unexpectedly” in September 2023. Today’s post is addressed to medical professionals who had any COVID-19 “vaccines” (in reality, gene therapy injections) injected into their bodies since 11 December 2020. This post is not “accusatory” in nature: Yours Truly is curious. One will make it clear at the outset that there are vaccines and other injectables that are useful: For examples, the Rabies vaccine and the injectable form of Heparin. One will also make it clear that the following questions regarding the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” are not “tin-foil hat” or “conspiracy theory” in nature — all of them are based on the writings and researching of medical doctors and scientists who want to find out the truth about these particular “vaccines.” There are many other questions that must be asked; Yours Truly is presenting a few of the most important ones from a personal point of view in today’s post.

Dear COVID-19 “Vaccinated” Medical Professional:

With all due respect for your education and expertise, there now must be serious questions raised concerning the COVID-19 “vaccines” that were rushed into use in the United States and all over the world. These questions are especially important given the increasing numbers of reports of COVID-19 “vaccine”-induced injuries, illnesses, disabilities, and deaths, among those who have taken, and/or continue to take, these “vaccines.”

The first question that must be raised is: Are you aware that the FDA knew, back on 30 April 2021, that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” by Pfizer-BioNTech, BNT162b2, is involved in the inducement of over 1,200 types of medical diseases and conditions? Here is the document that Pfizer-BioNTech gave to the FDA on that date: https://phmpt.org/document/5-3-6-postmarketing-experience.pdf, 5.3.6 CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-AUTHORIZATION ADVERSE EVENT REPORTS OF PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) RECEIVED THROUGH 28-FEB-2021. Please see page 30 of this report, APPENDIX 1. LIST OF ADVERSE EVENTS OF SPECIAL INTEREST. The report is also found here: https://phmpt.org/document/5-3-6-postmarketing-experience.pdf. The document is FDA time-stamped 30 April 2021. Yours Truly will point out that this report covers only between 11 December 2020 (the date of the initial EUA granted by the FDA for BNT162b2 to be used in the United States) and 28 February 2021. The list of Adverse Events of Special Interest begins with 1p36 deletion syndrome; other diseases, disorders, and events mentioned include: Cardiac arrest; Cerebral thrombosis; Demyelination; Guillain-Barre syndrome; hepatic disorders; immune system disorders; pulmonary disorders; Myocarditis; neurological disorders; and, Pericarditis; among many others.

The second question that must be raised is: Are you aware that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” made by Pfizer-BioNTech (these include BNT162b2; this company’s previous “booster” COVID-19 “vaccines”; and this company’s current “2023-2024 Formula COVID-19 Vaccine”) contain two dangerous lipid nanoparticles, ALC-0159 and ALC-0315, both of which are for research use only? Here are the Safety Data Sheets for these lipid nanoparticles: For ALC-0159: https://cdn.caymanchem.com/cdn/msds/34336m.pdf; and, for ALC-0315: https://cdn.caymanchem.com/cdn/msds/34337m.pdf. On page one of each of these Safety Data Sheets, there is the following language: “Application of the substance / the mixture This product is for research use – Not for human or veterinary diagnostic or therapeutic use.” In addition, are you aware that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” made by Moderna (these include mRNA-1273; this company’s previous COVID-19 “booster vaccines”; and this company’s current “2023-2024 Formula COVID-19 Vaccine”) contain the dangerous lipid nanoparticle, SM-102, which is for research purposes only? Here is the Safety Data Sheet for this lipid nanoparticle: https://cdn.caymanchem.com/cdn/msds/33474m.pdf. On page one of this Safety Data Sheet, there is the exact same language in the section “Application of the substance / the mixture” as is listed for ALC-0159 and for ALC-0315 in their respective Safety Data Sheets: “This product is for research use – Not for human or veterinary diagnostic or therapeutic use.” (As an aside, ALC-0149 and ALC-0315 are described only by their chemical component names in the FDA-issued Fact Sheet for the Pfizer-BioNTech “2023-2024 Formula COVID-19 Vaccine”: www.fda.gov/media/167211/download; please see under section 11 DESCRIPTION. However, ALC-0159 and ALC-0315 are called by their proper names in the FDA document, www.fda.gov/media/172019/download, Emergency use Authorization (EUA) for an Unapproved Product Review Memorandum, dated 23 June 2023, section 7.1 Chemistry Manufacturing and Control (CMC) Information.)

The third question that must be raised is: Are you aware that the COVID-19 “vaccines” can, and do, “shed” components of these products from “vaccinated” persons to un-“vaccinated” persons? Dr. Pierre Kory has an extensive series of articles on his blog relating to this phenomenon: https://pierrekorymedicalmusings.com/; please see Part One of this series: https://medicalmusings.com/p/shedding-of-covid-mrna-vaccine-components, published 1 November 2023.

The fourth question that must be asked is: Are you aware that the COVID-19 “vaccines” can, and do, damage the blood vessels, heart tissue, and lung tissue, of persons who have these “vaccines” in their bodies? Please refer to: https://doctors4covidethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/causality-article.pdf, “Vascular and organ damage induced by mRNA vaccines: irrefutable proof of causality”, Michael Palmer, MD, and Sucharit Bhakdi, MD. Yours Truly presents page nine of this paper, which is self-explanatory:

The fifth question that must be asked is: Are you aware that the modRNA Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 “vaccine”, BNT162b2, changes the DNA of the LINE-1 Human Liver7 cell line? Please refer to: https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44030073, “Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line”, Yang De Marinis, et al. Yours Truly presents two images from this paper: The first, of DNA expression induced in BNT162b2-treated Human Liver7 cells in LINE-1; the second, of DNA amplicons induced by BNT162b2-treated Human Liver7 cells in LINE-1.

Also, please refer to this document, given by Pfizer-BioNTech to the FDA on 21 January 2021 and FDA time-stamped on that date, which can be found here: https://icandecide.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/125742_S1_M2_26_pharmkin-tabulated-summary.pdf, BNT162b2 2.6.5 Pharmacokinetics Tabulated Summary, regarding BNT162b2. Yours Truly present page seven of this report:

Notice the heavy accumulation of BNT162b2 in the livers of the Wistar lab rats that were used in this experiment conducted by Pfizer-BioNTech. This was the same BNT162b2 Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” that was later injected into human patients (with ingredients amounts calibrated for human use.)

Yours Truly will note that the CDC changed the definitions of “vaccine” and “vaccination” in 2021, after the rollout of the COVID-19 “vaccines” (gene therapy injections.) One suspects that this was done to “shoe-horn in” these products under the aegis of “vaccines.” Please refer to: www.johnlocke.org/the-cdc-changed-its-definitions-of-vaccine-and-vaccination-and-keeps-changing-its-definition-of-fully-vaccinated/. However, the FDA states clearly, on page four of the Fact Sheet for Healthcare Providers for the administration of the “2023-2024 Formula COVID-19 Vaccine” by Pfizer-BioNTech, that this product is to prevent coronavirus disease (COVID-19), not to “protect against serious illness from COVID-19”, as the CDC states. Please refer to: www.fda.gov/media/167211/download, page four, under section 1 EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION; and to www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/stay-up-to-date.html under What You Need to Know.

Finally, there is this paper, published on 24 January 2024: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.52876, “COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: Lessons Learned from the Registrational Trials and Global Vaccination Campaign”, M. Nathaniel Mead, Peter A. McCullough, et al. Yours Truly presents part of the Abstract of this paper:

Yours Truly sincerely asks that COVID-19 “vaccinated” medical professionals make every effort to investigate these “vaccines”, and to understand the very real risks and dangers of putting them into the human body. For further information, please see: www.theqtree.com/2024/01/04/the-deagel-report-u-s-population-reduction-of-68-5-by-2025/.

Sincerely, with Good Energy, Peace, and Respect, PAVACA

PAVACA: BFA (2), Carnegie-Mellon University; MA, Duquesne University. Reading and writing about COVID-19 and the COVID-19 “vaccines” since March 2020. Also interested in Pharmacy and in the impacts of Big Pharma. General Editor of Imagination-Building: The Memoirs of John Douglas Forbes (1910 – 2018), First Professor of the Darden School of the University of Virginia, available at www.amazon.com/, www.barnesandnoble.com/, and www.authorhouse.com/.

The Deagel Report: U.S. Population Reduction of 68.5% by 2025

The above image is from the “Deagel Population 2025 Forecast Report” of June 2020. It is available here: https://web.archive.org/web/20200629112402/http://www.deagel.com/country/forecast.aspx. In this post, Yours Truly will offer some aspects and thoughts into this alarming report. This is not a full-on analysis; it is, rather, the start of a discussion. Please bear with me here. (And, yes, there’s a connection to labs in Ukraine.)

The trail begins with a link that was posted by a fellow-denizen of The Q Tree: https://expose-news.com/2023/12/24/deagels-depopulation-forecast-confirmed-by-pfizer/. The “bottom line” of the Deagel Corporation 2020 population forecast report, for the United States, is a population reduction of 68.5% by 2025. The is also a predicted stunning drop in the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) for the country. The figures for these are the ones on the above image.

In Yours Truly’s opinion, if anything like the above predictions indeed come to pass, the consequences for life in the United States would be widespread and profound. Entirely aside from (and not at all to minimize this damage) the incalculable and deep emotional/psychological effects that such a loss of lives would bring in its train, there are also literally the innumerable negative effects on every aspect of daily living that would also develop. Who would be available to fix the car? Who would be available to put on a new roof? What about farmers, food production and transportation, grocery stores? What about going to the doctor, the dentist, the hospital? What about every aspect of education and schooling? Another question needs to be asked: Are the millions of mostly-uneducated, mostly-unskilled, illegal “migrants” that have been swarming into the United States for the past three years supposed to fill these jobs?

In “raw numbers”, the current population of the United States is 340,909,166, per www.worldometers.info. If the 68.5% Deagle Report population reduction prediction is applied, the calculation is: 340,909,166 x .685 = 233,522,788 “eliminated” by 2025. In “raw numbers”, 340,909,166 – 233,522,788 = 107,386,388 remaining United States population by 2025. Another, non-Deagel, figure is also in play here: the “official” CDC figure of 11 May 2023, which states that 81.4% of the United States population has had at least one injection of a COVID-19 “vaccine” — in other words, 270,227,181 persons (https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#vaccinations_vacc-people-booster-percent-pop5.) It is possible that the Deagel Report (written in 2020) did not take into consideration a potential enormous influx of illegal “migrants” into the United States between 2021 and now.

The Expose article cited above discusses the effects of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” on pregnant women and their unborn children. The article cites the Charles River lab analyses of the 44 female Wistar lab rats involved in the Pfizer-BioNTech experiments with the company’s “flagship” modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, BNT162b2 (bear in mind that this is the “vaccine” that was used in the United States from December 2020 until May 2023, when the FDA quietly withdrew it from use, substituting the said company’s “2023 – 2024 Formula COVID-19 Vaccine”, what may be termed a “descendant clone vaccine” of BNT162b2.) In the Wistar lab rat study, 22 of the rats were injected with BNT162b2; the other 22, the control group, were injected with saline solution. The rats were put into “cohabitation” with male rats in order to get them pregnant. The pregnant rats were then carefully followed in the lab. Almost all of the pregnant rats gave birth. After nursing and weaning the pups, all of the mothers and their pups (except for a few who were already “sacrificed”) were euthanized and examined. The results were detailed in a report that was given to the FDA early in 2021. A “scientific paper” was published on the study and the results: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2021.05.007, “Lack of effects on female fertility and prenatal and postnatal offspring in rats with BNT162b2, a mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine”, Christopher J. Bowman, et al. This “scientific paper” claims that there were NO deleterious effects on the Wistar lab rats that were injected with BNT162b2. HOWEVER, as seen in an image from the “paper”, the results show otherwise. IN ADDITION, the 10 co-authors of this “paper” WERE ALL AFFILIATED WITH PFIZER-BIONTECH.

In Yours Truly’s opinion, the “conclusions” of this “paper” fly in the face of the compiled data on the Wistar lab rats BNT162b2 experiment performed by Pfizer-BioNTech, the full data set being given to the FDA in 2021. Below is an image from the full data set (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/125742_S1_M2_26_pharmkin-tabulated-summary.pdf):

It is obvious, from the above image, that BNT162b2 literally “targets” the ovaries, in addition to the spleen. Recall, also, that there are two dangerous lipid nanoparticles (ALC-0159 and ALC-0315) in this “vaccine”, in addition to the PRRARSV “backdoor key” code that was likely inserted. These lipid nanoparticles and the PRRARSV code both work to facilitate the rapid distribution of the modRNA of the “vaccine” throughout the recipient’s body; and, to facilitate entry of the “vaccine” ingredients into every cell of the recipient’s body.

While The Expose article cited above is concerned with the negative effects that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” have on pregnant women, their unborn children, and on female fertility in general, there are other alarming “signals” that these “vaccines” are causing what is being termed “excess deaths”: for example, https://twitter.com/EthicalSkeptic/status/1740975673462972607; and, the rise in what is termed “turbo-cancers”, as presented by Yours Truly in a post: www.theqtree.com/2023/11/29/the-covid-19-vaccines-pave-the-way-for-turbo-cancers-and-a-note-on-the-virus-itself/. Finally, there is the information that Pfizer-BioNTech gave to the FDA on 30 April 2021, listing the over 1,200 types of negative effects that BNT162b2 had on persons who took it after the FDA, in December 2020, granted the initial EUA for this modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” to be used in the United States: www.phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/reissue_5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf (please see page 30 of this report, Appendix 1. List of Adverse Events Reports of Special Interest.)

Following are four articles that address the Deagel Report and the Deagel Corporation (www.deagel.com), a “minor branch” of United States military intelligence: https://loveworldsat.org/the-deagel-corporation-thomas-malthus-overpopulation-and-the-club-of-rome/; https://expose-news.com/2023/07/23/deagel-cia-dod-rockefeller-depopulation/, of 4 April 2021; https://greatgameindia.com/deagel-intelligence-depopulation-covid-19/, of 7 July 2023; and, https://expose-news.com/2023/08/06/cia-deagel-2025-depopulation-on-target/. Of particular interest is this last one — and here is the link to labs in Ukraine, funded by the United States Department of Defense. One: The Department of Defense has been sending money to Ukraine since at least 2012 for biomedical (weapons) research; Two: The Department of Defense has been sending these monies via what appear to be various contractors and sub-contractors; Three: There was a large increase of funding and contracts awarded for the Ukraine labs by the Department of Defense starting in 2017. For example: On 16 May 2018, $12,955.791 was awarded to “CBEP UKRAINE PROJECT (SCIENTIFIC ENGAGEMENT AND FACILITY…” (www.usaspending.gov/award/CONT_AWD_0004_9700_HDTRA108D0007_9700. This was followed on 21 September 2018 with an award of $21,796,198 for “BIOLOGICAL THREAT REDUCTION IN URKAINE – SCIENCE..” Three other contractors / sub-contractors who received award grants are: Labyrinth Global Health, Inc. (www.labyrinthgh.com/; Biosafe Engineering, LLC (https://biosafeeng.com/, an award in 2019 of $795,995 for “Tissue digesters for Kyiv and Odessa ILD”); and, Black and Veatch Special Projects Corp. (www.bv.com/), which began receiving Department of Defense sub-contract awards in 2012. Examples of these awards follow:

(Yours Truly is not, for purposes of this post, discussing NIH / NIAID funding for SARS-CoV-2 research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, the Baric Lab at UNC Chapel Hill, and at other labs: today’s post regards United States Department of Defense funding for biological (weapons) research, especially in Ukraine.)

Yours Truly is not a statistician, actuarial, or medical professional; one is a concerned citizen. However, it does appear that the United States government was indeed involved in funding, and financially supporting, via the Department of Defense, contractors and sub-contractors in the construction and research activities of biological (weapons) labs in Ukraine. (This is aside from the fact that the NIH / NIAID were, and still are, funding research into COVID-19 “vaccines.”) It is clear that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” literally “target” the organs and functions of the bodies of those who took / still take, these “vaccines.” It is a fact that the FDA in the United States knew, back in April 2021, that these “vaccines” have over 1,2000 types of negative effects on the bodies of people who take them — including cancer and death — but that this agency still recommends that people continue to take these “vaccines”, in the form of the “2023-2024 Formula COVID-19 Vaccine”, which is itself a “descendant clone vaccine” of the original BNT162b2 (and, in the “2023-2024 Formula COVID-19 Vaccine” by Moderna, a “descendant clone vaccine” of that company’s “flagship” modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, mRNA-1273.)

In Yours Truly’s opinion, both the Deagel Corporation and the United States Department of Defense have many questions to answer about their knowledge of, and/or involvement with, the entire COVID-19 disaster. For example: What, exactly, did the Deagel Corporation know between November 2019 and June 2020 about COVID-19 which influenced the company’s 2020 report that forecasts a 68.5% population reduction in the United States by 2025? Another example: What exact communications did the United States Department of Defense have with Pfizer-BioNTech and with Moderna related to these companies’ development of BNT162b2 and of mRNA-1273?

What are unknown, because no one can really predict the future with complete certainty, are the effects of some “wild cards”: of “vaccinated” people refusing to take any more COVID-19 “vaccines”, and not allowing their children to have them; of “vaccinated” people following a protocol to try and mitigate / eliminate the poisons of these “vaccines” they have in their bodies; and, the continuing spread of the truth about these dangerous and deadly “vaccines.”

Yours Truly will make it clear that one is not an “anti-vaxxer.” There are some vaccines, such as the Tetanus vaccine, that are valuable. However, the COVID-19 “vaccines” are proving to be NOT “safe and effective.”

“And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.” (John 8:32, KJV)

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

PAVACA’s Top 12 List of Damages the COVID-19 “Vaccines” Can Do to the “Vaccine” Recipient

The above is an image of Father Christmas from a vintage postcard.

The following may be a bit “heavy” — please regard it as a kind of rich “Christmas Pudding” of COVID-19 “vaccine” knowledge base. Not a “lump of coal!”

Just in time for Christmas, Yours Truly presents a list of what she considers to be the “Top 12” types of damage that the COVID-19 “vaccines” can do to the body of the “vaccine” recipient. This list has been gathered from the 1600+ hours of investigating “all things COVID-19” that Yours Truly has done since March 2020. Therefore, it is only her opinion. People who read through the report that Pfizer-BioNTech gave to the FDA on 30 April 2021, regarding the over 1,000 serious adverse events medical conditions that the company’s COVID-19 “vaccine”, BNT162b2, caused in persons who took this “vaccine” IN FEWER THAN THREE MONTHS after the FDA granted the initial EUA for this “vaccine” in December 2020 for its use in the United States, may come up with “Top Lists” of their own. The report can be found here: https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/reissue_5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf, BNT162b2 5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization Adverse Events Reports. The APPENDIX 1. LIST OF ADVERSE EVENTS OF SPECIAL INTEREST, found at the end of the report, lists these serious adverse events conditions reports that BNT162b2 caused in “vaccinated” persons.

However, what is NOT opinion is that the FDA then knew, on 30 April 2021, that the Pfizer-BioNTech “flagship” COVID-19 “vaccine” BNT162b2 (actually, an untried gene therapy injection), was capable of damaging the body of the “vaccine” recipient in over 1,000 different ways, including the ways on Yours Truly’s “Top 12 List..” However, instead of performing its regulatory (and moral and ethical) obligations to immediately pull BNT162b2 off the market and out of use until the situation could be further investigated, the FDA chose to CONTINUE the EUA that it granted in December 2020 for BNT162b2. Not only that, but the FDA went ahead and granted “full approval” for the use of the European version of BNT162b2, called COMIRNATY, in the United States. Not only that, but the FDA granted EUA’s for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 “bivalent vaccine” to be used in the United States. Finally, in the spring of 2023, the FDA quietly stopped all use of BNT162b2 in the United States — in Yours Truly’s opinion, after mounting reports of serious adverse events, including deaths, being caused by this “vaccine” were beginning to circulate widely and to be confirmed by professional researchers and by doctors — and substituted the use of the Pfizer-BioNTech (and the Moderna) “booster vaccines” for the Omicron variant. In the summer of 2023, the FDA granted EUA’s for both the Pfizer-BioNTech and for the Moderna “2023-2024 Formula COVID-19 Vaccine”, which had only been tested on mice.

Here is Yours Truly’s “Top 12 List”: The first nine, from the APPENDIX 1. cited above:

Death: neonatal and Sudden unexplained death in epilepsy (page 3 and page 8); Myocarditis and Pericarditis (page 6 and page 7); Stroke (Cerebral artery embolism page 2; Cerebral thrombosis, page 2); Thrombotic Stroke (page 9), among other types; THIRTY different types of Autoimmune disorders (page 2); FORTY different types of Herpes disorders (page 4 and page 5); THIRTY-PLUS different types of Liver disorders (page 4); TWENTY-FIVE different types of Immune System disorders (page 5); SIXTEEN different types of Neurological (brain and/or central nervous system) disorders (page 6); and, COVID-19 and COVID-19 Pneumonia (page 3).

As an example, here is a handy-dandy image of page 4 of the APPENDIX 1., with Yours Truly’s notes:

To round out the “Top 12 List” of COVID-19 “vaccine” damage to the body of the recipient, there are these three:

One: Heart tissue and lung tissue damage / destruction: Please refer to: https://doctors4covidethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/causality-article.pdf, by Michael Palmer, MD, and Sucharit Bhakdi, MD; Two: Fetal / Neonatal disorders, including 1p36 deletion syndrome (also listed on page 1 of the APPENDIX 1.): Please refer to the following regarding 1p36 deletion syndrome: https://medlineplus.gov/genetics/condition/1p36-deletion-syndrome/ (more on this condition below); and, Three: Cancer induced with the assistance of the SV40 cancer promoter DNA that has been recently discovered in the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 “vaccines” (more on this below): Please refer to the following: https://osf.io/preprints/osf/mjc97, “DNA fragments detected in monovalent and bivalent Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA COVID-19 vaccines from Ontario, Canada: Exploratory dose response relationship with serious adverse events”, David Speicher, Jessica Rose, Kevin McKernan, et al. From lines 94-95 of this paper: “McKernan, et al., found SV40 promoter-enhancer-ori [DNA], and SV40 polyA signal sequences in the Pfizer vaccines.” The SV40 promoter-enhancer DNA is also in the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 “vaccines” that were used in the United States: https://rumble.com/v3r1pqf-vaccine-adulteration-wkevin-mckernan-byram-bridle-chris-martenson-steve-kir.html, beginning at 3:32 in the video. Please also refer to the letter of December 2023 from Florida Surgeon General, Dr. Joseph Ladapo, to the directors of the FDA and the CDC: www.floridahealth.gov/about/_documents/12-06-2023-DOH-Letter-to-FDA-RFI-on-COVID-19-Vaccines.pdf. Yours Truly will posit that, since the modRNA + its spike protein and the “Process 2” manufacturing method for the current “2023-2024 Formula COVID-19 Vaccine” by this company in use in the United States are both based on its original “vaccine” formulations (BNT162b2 and the “booster and bivalent vaccines”), it appears that this opens up the possibility that the SV40 promoter-enhancer DNA is present in this “vaccine” also. Important: The SV40 promoter-enhancer DNA in the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 “vaccines” is not the entire code, only a part of it. In and of itself, this “partial code” likely would not cause cancer; however, it can be involved in the general damage / destruction that the COVID-19 “vaccines” do to the “vaccine” recipient’s body, which can, in turn, be involved in the onset of cancer, or the re-emergence of cancer already in remission, in that person’s body. In addition, Pfizer-BioNTech DID NOT TELL the Canadian health authorities, nor, apparently, the FDA in the United States, about the SV40 issue.

About the 1p36 deletion syndrome caused by the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”: This is particularly troubling, since it effects UNBORN children and THE SPERM AND THE EGGS OF THE “VACCINATED” PARENTS. 1p36 deletion syndrome is a multi-faceted condition that negatively affects fetal development. Infants born with this condition have severe intellectual difficulties; weak muscle tone; have vision, hearing, and heart issues; and either do not speak, or can only speak a limited vocabulary; among other things. Please refer to the MedlinePlus link, above, for further information. It has been proven that large amounts of the dangerous lipid nanoparticles AND the enhanced spike protein + its modRNA in the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 “vaccine” migrate to, and lodge in, two important areas of the recipient’s body — the OVARIES and the TESTES. Please refer to the image below, directly from Pfizer-BioNTech, on page 8 of a document that the company gave to the FDA on 21 January 2021. The document is called BNT162b2 2.6.5 Pharmacokinetics Tabulated Summary. It is available through https://phmpt.org/.

Please also refer to this graphic, which shows what the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” do in the pregnant mother’s body and in the body her unborn child or her nursling child (this is from a CDC presentation):

1p36 deletion syndrome is “...caused by a deletion of genetic material from a specific region in the short (p) arm of chromosome 1…Most cases of 1p36 deletion syndrome are not inherited.” (per the MedlinePlus link, above.) Think about that.

Three “Christmas Bonuses” to to along with the “Top 12 List”: One: The COVID-19 “vaccines” can, and do, cause onset of psychosis in “vaccinated” persons. Please refer to the following: https://doi.org/10.24869/psyd.2022.377, “First Episode of Psychosis Following the COVID-19 Vaccination — A Case Series”, Tonka Borovina, et al.; Two: The risk of mortality increases for the “vaccinated” person for each injection they take of a COVID-19 “vaccine.” Please refer to the following: www.theburningplatform.com/2023/12/10/newly-leaked-data-shows-just-how-dangerous-the-covid-vaccines-are/; and, Three: The damage / destruction of the “vaccine” recipient’s immune system and connections to what is called “turbo-cancers” that this induces. Please refer to the following: https://jessicar.substack.com/p/igg4-and-cancer-a-mechanism-of-action; and, to https://vigilantnews.com/post/turbo-cancer-death-from-turbo-cancers-were-in-trouble-says-dr-ryan-cole/.

A final note on the current “2023-2024 Formula COVID-19 Vaccines” by both Pfizer-BioNTech and by Moderna: These apparently do include the ingredients (although in smaller amounts) of the original modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” made by each company (BNT162b2 by Pfizer-BioNTech; and, mRNA-1273 by Moderna), with additional elements of the Omicron XBB 1.5 variant lineage. Please refer to the following: www.fda.gov/media/167211/download, page 39 (Pfizer-BioNTech); www.fda.gov/media/167208/download, page 34 (Moderna); and, https://covid19.nih.gov/covid-19-vaccines.

As an aside, in case readers hear someone “congratulating themselves” for their taking either the Novavax or the Johnson & Johnson (Janssen) COVID-19 “vaccines”, because they believed that somehow these “vaccines” are “safer” than those of Pfizer-BioNTech or of Moderna: The Novavax COVID-19 “vaccine” uses the same modRNA + its spike protein as in the Pfizer-BioNTech and the Moderna COVID-19 “vaccines.” The difference with the Novavax COVID-19 “vaccine” is that the SARS-CoV-2 virus is “marinated” in an insect culture, with the resulting modRNA “harvested” and mixed with “adjuvants” made from soap tree bark; this “vaccine” also uses lipid nanoparticles (LNPs.). The Johnson & Johnson (Janssen) COVID-19 “vaccine” was removed from use (revoked) in the United States by the FDA in May 2023. However, persons who took this “vaccine” prior to May 2023, are at risk for Thrombosis and Thrombocytopenia, as listed on the “black letter warning” area on the (revoked) FDA Fact Sheet for Healthcare Providers for this “vaccine.” Please refer to the following: for the Novavax COVID-19 “vaccine”: www.fda.gov/media/159897/download, page 33; www.hackensackmeridianhealth.org/en/healthu/2022/08/09/novavax-vaccine-how-its-different-and-how-it-works; and, for the Johnson & Johnson (Janssen) revoked COVID-19 “vaccine”: www.fda.gov/media/146304/download, page 1.

Yours Truly will make it clear she believes that COVID-19, in its variants forms, is still a threat to health. Since one is a concerned citizen, not a healthcare practitioner, one can only offer the following thoughts:

First: it is of primary importance that all people have, and maintain, the best level of personal health and immunity that is possible; “un-vaccinated” people have a primary responsibility here to themselves. Second: It is of primary importance that all “un-vaccinated” people follow a protocol for prophylaxis against COVID-19, such as those outlined at https://covid19criticalcare.com/, and including judicious exposure to sunlight and daily mild to moderate exercise. Third: It is of primary importance that all people follow “common sense” approaches, such as washing the hands, and staying away from sick people if possible. Fourth: It is of importance that “vaccinated” people know about various protocols to try and mitigate the dangerous effects of the COVID-19 “vaccines” at work in their bodies; https://covid19criticalcare.com/treatment-protocols/. Fifth: It is of great importance to have and keep a positive connection with a Supreme Being.

“Then will you know the truth, and the truth shall set you free.” John 8:32

It is past time, in Yours Truly’s opinion, to bring to justice those who were/are involved in the development and manufacture of the COVID-19 “vaccines”; and those in the FDA / CDC / AMA, and other medical agencies and organizations, who either know, should have known, or knew of, the dangers of these “vaccines” — but still continue to push them. Some examples: Albert Bourla, DVM (CEO of Pfizer Inc.); Stephane Bancel (CEO of Moderna); Alex Gorsky (CEO of Johnson & Johnson until 2022); Anthony Fauci, MD (former head of the NIAID); Francis Collins, MD (former head of the NIH); Janet Woodcock, MD (former Acting Commissioner of the FDA); Rochelle Walensky, MD (former Director of the CDC); Peter Daszak, CEO of EcoHealth Alliance; Robert Califf, MD (current Commissioner of the FDA); Mandy Cohen, MD (current Director of the CDC); Jesse M. Ehrenfeld, MD, (current head of the AMA); and, Ralph Baric, PhD, of the Baric Lab at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

A link to a another of Yours Truly’s pieces on COVID-19 and the COVID-19 “vaccines”, that has a compilation: www.theqtree.com/2023/11/29/the-covid-19-vaccines-pave-the-way-for-turbo-cancers-and-a-note-on-the-virus-itself/

Best wishes for a good Christmas 2023 and New Year 2024. Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

The COVID-19 “Vaccines” Pave the Way for Turbo-Cancers: And a Note on the Virus Itself

The above chart listing is from a Pfizer-BioNTech document obtained via FOIA, showing the IgG binding results of a few of the C4591001 human test subjects for the company’s “flagship” COVID-19 “vaccine”, BNT162b2. The document was given to the FDA on 19 September 2020. BNT162b2 was granted the initial EUA for use in the United States in December 2020.

This series on the disaster of COVID-19 and the COVID-19 “vaccines” is dedicated to Yours Truly’s cousin Bill, who “died suddenly and unexpectedly” in September 2023.

Today’s offering will present and discuss some aspects of the emergence of “turbo-cancers” that appear in people who get injections of the COVID-19 “vaccines” (actually, gene therapy shots.) Today’s presentation is not an “magnum opus” compilation, but rather an adjunct to more understanding of the issue. It will not discuss the presence of the SV40 cancer promoter code that was discovered recently in the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” — that is an issue to be addressed in another post. What will be presented today is the role of IgG4-engendered cancer onset and/or relapse due to “vaccination” by the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.”

Without “wearying by recitals”, the story begins with a short presentation on the Ig system of the human body. This system consists of five different Ig cell types: IgM; IgD; IgA; IgE, and IgG. IgA and IgG cells can be divided into subclasses. What are called “subclass switches” within the IgA class and IgG class are regulated via interaction with the T cells of the human body. The Ig system is basically an infection-fighter system. It needs to be in balance in order for this work to be successfully performed. Imbalances of the Ig system can result in the incidence of various medical disease conditions, such as autoimmune diseases and asthma. Some people have inherited imbalances of their Ig system. Today’s offering will confine itself to the IgG class.

The IgG class of cells can be divided into four separate subclasses: IgG1; IgG2; IgG3; and IgG4. Robert H. Pointer wrote the following regarding the IgG class in general: “Firstly, IgG neutralizes pathogens such as viruses and bacteria by binding to key pathogen surface proteins and preventing interaction of the pathogen with host cells. In doing so, the antibody [of the IgG cell] neutralizes the ability of the pathogen to enter host cells and replicate.” (Encyclopedia of Immunology, Second Edition, 1998, “Immunoglobulin G” chapter; bolding is mine.)

Please read those two sentences above by Prof. Pointer again. Now look again at the chart at the top of today’s offering, which shows the high binding ability of the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, BNT162b2, to the cells of the human subjects who took this “vaccine” in the C4591001 clinical trial of said “vaccine.” This is the same BNT162b2 “vaccine” formula that was granted the initial EUA by the FDA in December 2020 for use in the United States. It is also the same BNT162b2 “vaccine” formula (under both the name, “Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine” and under the name, “COMIRNATY”) that was used in the United States until the spring of 2023, at which time it was removed from use in this country and was substituted with the “2023-2024 Formula COVID-19 Vaccine” by the same company. BNT162b2 is still used in other countries. It appears that two of the main goals of BNT162b2 (a modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”) were, and are (both in the BNT162b2 “vaccine”, AND in the basic formulation of the current “2023-2024 Formula COVID-19 Vaccine”), to evade the “vaccine” recipient’s natural IgG class cells’ “detection and fight” capability; and, to compromise the “vaccine” recipient’s natural IgG class cells’ ability to DENY ACCESS to the “vaccine” into the cells of the recipient’s body (this, via the use of the lipid nanoparticles ALC-0159 and ALC-0315 in these “vaccines.”),

Yours Truly now turns to https://jessicar.substack.com/p/igg4-and-cancer-a-mechanism-of-action, “IgG4 and cancer – a mechanism of action for cancer relapse and onset”, published on 30 December 2022. Dr. Rose describes how IgG4 class cells can, by “class switching” (also called “Fab Arm Exchange”) due to chronic exposure to an antigen, literally “turn around” their normal antibody function of tumor suppression into tumor progression. Dr. Rose then goes on to discuss this phenomenon in light of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” and how these injections introduce “highly immunogenic protein” into the body of the “vaccine” recipient, which then induces “continuous antigen stimulation by the injectables’ contents and their by-products” (Italics mine.) She ends her article with: “My take home message: This could be potentiating relapses of cancers previously in remission and also new and rare cancer appearances.” In my opinion, this is particularly troubling, since nobody really knows how long the modRNA, the spike protein, and the ALC-0159 and ALC-0315 lipid nanoparticles remain in the “vaccine” recipient’s body; especially if that “vaccine” recipient continues to get modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine booster shots” to “complete a catch-up series”, or the “2023-2024 Formula COVID-19 Vaccine” made by Pfizer-BioNTech and also by Moderna.

We now turn to the work of Dr. Ryan Cole, the pathologist. He has been sounding the alarm over the presence of turbo-cancers in his modRNA COVID-19 “vaccinated” patients for over a year (and for which, he is now fighting the “professional misconduct charges” that were served against him by the Washington State medical licensing board. Please refer to https://vigilantnews.com/post/turbo-death-from-turbo-cancers-were-in-trouble-says-dr-ryan-cole, from 10 October 2023. Dr. Cole makes it clear that the “vaccines” do not actually cause cancer; they “cause immune suppression. They cause a disruption and a dysregulation of your immune system that normally is what would fight cancer.” (Another way, in my opinion, of saying the IgG4 “class switch” induced by the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” that turns this class of cells’ normal function of fighting tumors into, instead, allowing tumors to grow.)

The “Vidarsson paper” from 2014 describes the IgG subclasses, what they do, and what can happen when one or more of these subclasses are either deficient or increased too much: www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2014.00520/full, “IgG subclasses and allotypes: from structure to effector functions”, Gestur Vidarsson et al. Please see the section “IgG4” about how the IgG4 subclass works; and the section “IgG4 Fab Arm Exchange.”

IgG4 cells will also change in the unborn child and in its pregnant mother due to modRNA COVID-19 “vaccination.” Here is a graphic showing these changes:

The above graphic is from here: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.01.538955, “Diverging maternal and infant cord antibody functions from SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination in pregnancy”, Emily H. Adhikari, et al. From the Introduction: “After mRNA vaccination [of the pregnant mother], the primary form of immunity transferred to the fetus is antibodies, specifically IgG.” (Bolding mine)

Two blog posts by Igor Chudov provide more information. The first is from 21 October 2022: www.igor-chudov.com/p/cancer-rates-are-increasing-and-may, “Cancer Rates are Increasing — and May Get Much Worse.” In this post, Mr. Chudov discusses the 9-sigma increase in cancer rates in the United States and a similar rise in the UK. At the time of this post (a little over one year ago), there was suspicion regarding the reason why the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” were engendering an increase in cancer diagnoses: the suspicions rested on the use of the “faux” pseudouridine in the “vaccines”; the discovery of “loose DNA” in the “vaccines”; and the genotoxicity of the spike protein itself. By December, 2022, Mr. Chudov was on the trail of the IgG4-induced immune system damage engendered by the “vaccines”: www.igor-chudov.com/p/booster-caused-immune-tolerance-explains, “Booster-Caused IgG4 Immune Tolerance Explains Excess Mortality and “Chronic Covid.” Here, the following paper was referenced regarding the IgG4 “class switch”: www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciimmunol.ade2798, “Class switch towards non-inflammatory, spike-specific IgG4 antibodies after repeated SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination”, Pascal Irrgang et al. (In other words, a “class switch” to the “tolerate but don’t clear” IgG4 cells.) The latest post by Mr. Chudov on the issue, that is very specific, is from 26 November 2023: www.igor-chudov.com/p/hyperprogressive-cancers-due-to-covid, “‘Hyperprogressive’ Cancers Due to COVID-Vaccine-Caused IgG4 Antibodies.” The take away from this post: “…IgG4 drives malignancy and aggressiveness of the real-life cancers they observed.” Here is a graphic from Mr. Chudov’s post, taken from this paper: https://jitc.bmj.com/content/8/2/e000661, “An immune evasion mechanism with IgG4 playing an essential role in cancer and implication for immunotherapy”, Hui Wang et al.

Finally, there is this: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2023.111015, “Potential health risks of mRNA-based vaccine therapy: A hypothesis”, by K. Acevedo-Whitehouse and R. Bruno, published on 25 January 2023. It appears that an important key to understanding the mechanisms of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” that can induce sufficient immune system suppression in the “vaccinated” person’s body it that these “vaccines” employ N1-methylpseudouridine. (This ingredient “evades” the body’s natural “immune system defense mechanism.”) The paper also discusses “other contaminants” in the “vaccines” that “…could further alter immune recognition and deregulate immune signalling pathways,…it is not unreasonable to assume that mRNA-based vaccines could induce sustained inflammation and a persistent anti-viral cellular state in various tissues.” (Italics mine) Yours Truly is including a graphic from the paper of what the synthetic RNA “vaccines” do to the cells of the “vaccine” recipient:

Now, as to the COVID-19 virus itself: There are elements within the virus itself that can cause immune system damage; that can change, damage, or destroy B-cells and CD-class cells in the body of the person who contracts a case of the virus; and may have other elements that can pave the way for cancer tumor onset or relapse. Yours Truly refers to this paper, from September 2020 (this was when BNT162b2 was in “clinical trials”): https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abc8511, “Deep immune profiling of COVID-19 patients reveals distinct immunotypes with therapeutic implications”, Divij Matthew et al. Prof. Matthew and his colleagues demonstrate concerning changes in B-cells and CD8 cells in certain COVID-19 infected patients. Certain immunotypes among the patients studied were more affected than others. From the Abstract: “Whereas immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels reportedly drop slightly ~8 weeks after symptom onset (24, 25), recovered patients maintain high spike protein-specific IgG titers (6, 26).” (Bolding mine)

Another view of the toxic properties of the COVID-19 virus itself, especially regarding the inducement of cancer, is here: https://wmcresearch.substack.com/p/sars-cov-2-the-spike-protein-and, “SARS-CoV-2, the Spike Protein and Oncogenesis”, published on 2 November 2023. Walter M. Chesnut discusses his conclusion that the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself, plus its spike protein, change ALL the following body functions: DNA Repair; Cell Division; Apoptosis (natural cell death); Cellular Differentiation; and Cell-Cell Contact/Communication.

So, if the COVID-19 virus itself and its spike protein have properties that can engender the circumstances for cancer tumor onset, growth, and/or relapse, what makes the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” even more dangerous in this regard? One will point to the use of the ALC-0159 and ALC-0315 lipid nanoparticles in these “vaccines”, which facilitate entry of the “vaccine” ingredients to every cell of the recipient’s body; and, to the use of the N1-methylpseudouridine in these “vaccines” which “evade” the natural “enemy detection and destruction” processes of the “vaccine” recipient’s body.

In Yours Truly’s opinion, it took time, effort, and detailed investigation, to lab-create the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) virus itself and its spike protein; and, it took time, effort, and detailed investigation, to lab-create and assemble the ingredients (including the COVID-19 virus itself, and its spike protein) that were, and are, present in the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.” The FDA knew, back in the summer of 2020, and certainly on 30 April 2021, how dangerous the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” BNT162b2 was, and is. Please refer to: www.phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/reissue_5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf, FDA time-stamped on 30 April 2021. In fact, the FDA, on that date, knew that at least one IgG4 “class switch” condition was occurring in BNT162b2 “vaccinated” persons — Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (an IgG4 autoimmune disease), listed on page 38 of the report.

Of course, cancer can, and does, occur for other reasons than being engendered by COVID-19 “vaccination” or infection. There are many contributing factors — from genetic predisposition to smoking to accumulated immune system dysfunction, among others. However, while it can be fairly argued that the COVID-19 virus itself, with its spike protein, AND the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” based on said virus and its spike protein can, and do, engender cancer tumor growth and/or relapse — the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” are more dangerous in this regard. One can posit that it may be valuable for people to learn about family members have/had cancer; what history of cancer “runs in the family”, if any; about family members who have/had immune system issues; and so on. It is absolutely valuable for all people to be in, and remain in, the best physical shape and the best mental-health shape possible. It is absolutely valuable to follow a COVID-19 prevention/prophylaxis protocol.

The compendium post regarding the COVID-19 virus and the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, for further reference: www.theqtree.com/2023/11/20/the-covid-19-vaccines-are-dangerous-and-a-caveat-about-the-virus-itself/

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

The COVID-19 “Vaccines” are Dangerous — And a Caveat about the Virus Itself

The painting is by Albert Touchemolin of French army recruits getting vaccinated against smallpox, circa 1895.

This series of posts regarding COVID-19 and the COVID-19 “vaccines” is dedicated to the memory of Yours Truly’s cousin Bill, who “died suddenly and unexpectedly” in September, 2023.

The reader will find a compendium of papers, articles, and posts about the COVID-19 virus itself, and about the mRNA (modRNA) COVID-19 “vaccines”, at the end of this post. However, before the compendium begins, Yours Truly will present some information concerning what may be called “COVID-19 vaccination by proxy” — in other words, COVID-19 “vaccine shedding.” (By the way, Yours Truly has accumulated over 1,600 hours over the past 3 1/2 years in studying “everything COVID-19” — from reading over 100 papers to poring over Pfizer-BioNTech documents obtained through FOIA to watching dozens of hours of testimony and interviews. While this does not make Yours Truly an expert on the matter, it does furnish information that can be shared.)

Human beings “shed” certain things every day — examples are: sweat; tears; dead skin particles; hair; saliva (including by coughing); and aerosols (sneezing.) Certain things that human beings “shed” every day can also carry elements or germs — examples are: cold or flu germs; and bacteria of various types. Human beings who have been “vaccinated” with mRNA (modRNA) COVID-19 “vaccines” can “shed” elements of these “vaccines.”

Dr. Pierre Kory has a series on his Substack website regarding the “shedding” of elements from the COVID-19 modRNA “vaccines.” The series begins with this article: https://pierrekorymedicalmusings.com/p/shedding-of-covid-mrna-vaccine-components

There is another Substack website devoted to this topic: https://vaccinatedbyproxy.substack.com/, which leads to this article: https://vaccinatedbyproxy.substack.com/p/shedding-is-real.

There is no paper that Yours Truly has found as of yet which gives a definitive answer regarding how long the elements of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” are active in the body of the “vaccine” recipient. The longest study so far indicates that the modRNA and the spike protein are active in the “vaccine” recipient’s body for 180 days post-injection. There is anecdotal evidence of modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”-induced damage lingering as long as two years post-injection. On the other hand, assuming that a person decides to get the “latest COVID-19 vaccine booster shot”, that “starts the clock again” for that at-least 180-day period. For “un-vaccinated” people who decide to get the injections, there is a separate “vaccination” protocol to get them “caught up.” For immuno-compromised people, there is a separate “vaccination” protocol to “keep them up-to-date” due to their condition(s.) All these things complicate the at-least 180-day “possible COVID-19 vaccine shedding” window. www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/hcp/imz/child-adolescent.html and www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/hcp/imz/adult.html. In both cases, scroll down the page to “COVID-19 vaccination” and from there, click on “Routine vaccination” and “Special situations.”

Of course, nobody is suggesting that people (including “un-vaccinated” people) just avoid being around other human beings. How, then, do people (including “un-vaccinated” people who decide to remain so) cope with the possibility that a “vaccinated” person can “shed” elements of the “vaccine?” In Yours Truly’s opinion, this boils down to things such as: hand-washing; following a COVID-19 “vaccine” mitigation protocol like the ones outlined at FLCCC (https://covid19criticalcare.com/); regular mild to moderate exercise; stress reduction; having a positive connection with a Higher Power or Supreme Being; taking individually-appropriate daily amounts of vitamin C, vitamin D, Zinc, Quercetin, NAC, nattokinase and/or lumbrokinase; and having a supply of Ivermectin or Hydroxycholorquine on hand (to add to the above vitamins and supplements) in case one gets symptoms of the virus. Note: Individuals should speak with their healthcare provider before making any changes to vitamin, supplement, and/or herbal use (increasing, decreasing, starting, or stopping; this is in addition to letting them know of Ivermectin and/or Hydroxychloroquine use.)

Now, regarding the COVID-19 virus itself: Here, Yours Truly turns to one particular website, that of Walter M Chesnut: https://wmcresearch.substack.com/. Mr. Chesnut is an independent researcher into the COVID-19 virus and the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.” (Lest anyone question Mr. Chesnut’s “bona fides”, let it be stated that he co-authored a paper with the late Dr. Luc Montagnier.) From reading the articles that Mr. Chesnut contributes to his Substack, it is becoming increasingly clear that that the COVID-19 itself is a lab-created, “cobbled together” mixture of protein fragments and DNA insertions from various types of animals, combined with lab experimentation on how these elements induce changes to, or destruction of, body tissues and mechanisms. From there, these “ingredients” were mixed with the dangerous lipid nanoparticles ALC-1059 and ALC-0315, plus other items (such as the SV40 cancer promoter code from the African Green Monkey), and manufactured (using the infamous “Process 2” method) to be marketed as the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.” Whereas, the COVID-19 virus itself can have a real and negative impact on the person who contracts a case of it — in my opinion, the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” are, by definition, much more dangerous than a case of the virus itself.

And now, to any healthcare professionals who are reading this post, Yours Truly asks, with all respect, the following: Did you do your due diligence to investigate the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” before you recommended them to your patients? Do you have any understanding of the dangers of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” in terms of the “vaccine”-induced illnesses, disabilities, and deaths they engender? Do you have any understanding of the danger that you yourself, and anyone else you know (family, friends, patients, colleagues) are in if these “vaccines” are in your body or in theirs? Yours Truly is not an “anti-vaxxer.” There are vaccines, such as the Tetanus vaccine, that are valuable. However, it is becoming manifestly clear that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” are not “safe and effective.”

The compendium follows. It is not exhaustive. It can be regarded as a start for people who are interested in learning the truth of the COVID-19 virus itself, and of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.”

“Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.” (John 8:32)

www.theqtree.com/2023/10/06/pavacas-first-post/ “Gaslighting in the Era of COVID-19”

www.theqtree.com/2023/10/10/tuesday-10-10-2023-covid-19-vaccines-and-psychosis-yes-virginia-it-happens/

www.theqtree.com/2023/10/28/the-covid-19-virus-and-the-modrna-covid-19-vaccines-induce-accelerated-aging/

www.theqtree.com/2023/11/06/the-infamous-process-2-manufacturing-method-for-the-pfizer-biontech-moderna-covid-19-vaccines/

https://marica1776.wordpress.com/2023/06/28/a-certain-type-of-recipe/

https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.701501 “SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines Based on the Spike Glycoprotein and Implications of New Viral Variants” Daniel Martinez-Flores, et al.

https://doi.org/10.1002/iid3.807 “Adverse events following COVID-19 mRNA vaccines: A systematic review of cardiovascular complication, thrombosis, and thrombocytopenia” Farah Yasmin, et al.

https://kirschsubstack.com/ Steve Kirsch’s Substack: information and statistics related to COVID-19 “vaccine”-induced illnesses, disabilities, and deaths.

https://substack.com/@rwmalonemd Dr. Robert Malone’s Substack.

https://substack.com/@petermcculloughmd Dr. Robert McCullough’s Substack.

https://jessicar.substack.com/ Dr. Jessica Rose’s Substack.

https://pierrekorymedicalmusings.substack.com/ Dr. Pierre Kory’s Substack.

https://wmcresearch.substack.com/ Walter M. Chesnut’s Substack.

www.phinancetechnologies.com/HumanityProjects/Humanity Projects.asp The area of Ed Dowd’s website devoted to statistics related to the damage caused by the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.”

www.youtube.com/watch?v=lEWHhrHiiTY The testimony of Prof. Dr. Phillip Buckhaults before the South Carolina Senate regarding plasmid DNA contamination in the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine.” (Note: this link may have already been disabled; in which case, one will need to do an internet search to find the video.)

www.phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/reissue_5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf This report, given by Pfizer-BioNTech to the FDA, contains an “Appendix” at the end which lists over 1,000 medical diseases or conditions that were reported to have been observed in people who took the company’s modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, BNT162b2 (the one used in the United States until the spring of this year, and the basic “ingredients” of which are present in all later versions of the company’s modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.”)

Peace, Good Energy, Respect, PAVACA

The Infamous “Process 2” Manufacturing Method for the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “Vaccines”

The image above is a still from Just Imagine, a 1930 movie about what life in New York City would be like in the year 1980.

This series of pieces on the disaster of COVID-19 (the virus and the modRNA “vaccines” for said virus) is dedicated to the memory of Yours Truly’s cousin Bill, who “died suddenly and unexpectedly” in September, 2023. May he rest in eternal Peace.

Three prefatory notes: One, that what is presented here is only “scratching the surface” regarding the substitution of “Process 2” for the original “Process 1” manufacturing method for the Pfizer-BioNTech “flagship” COVID-19 “vaccine”, BNT162b2; Two, the exact and complete details of “Process 2” are likely a “trade secret” to the company (except that a full description may be in a document given by said company to the FDA, and which was “redacted out” in case it ever got published under FOIA); and, Three, that every Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 “vaccine” since October, 2020, has been made using “Process 2” — including the “latest” version, the “2023-2024 Formula” version for use against the (now basically obsolete) XBB.1.5 Omicron variant.

The trail in regards a discussion of the sudden change from the original “Process 1” to the substituted “Process 2” for BNT162b2 can potentially begin in several places; for purposes of today’s presentation, it will begin here: www.bmj.com/content/378/bmj.o1731/rr-2, a letter to the British Medical Journal by Josh Guetzkow, a senior lecturer at Hebrew University in Jerusalem, in response to the BMJ article, “Covid-19: Researchers face wait for patient level data from Pfizer and Moderna vaccine trials.” Prof. Guetzkow points out that the initial clinical trials doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, BNT162b2, were made using what was called “Process 1”, from May to October, 2020; but that the company suddenly changed to a new method, called “Process 2” [by 29 October 2020.] He also points out that the “Process 2” batches of BNT162b2 were found to have “…substantially lower mRNA integrity.” It appears that “substantially lower mRNA integrity” includes evidence of what may be termed “fragments” of DNA appearing in these “vaccines”, where they should never be.

Please bear with Yours Truly, this may get a little “technical”, but it is necessary to the whole.

So, what exactly happened by October 2020 that led Pfizer-BioNTech to change to “Process 2” for BNT162b2? One hint is found on Page 54 of the “Protocol Amendment 9, 29 October 2020” document that the company gave to the FDA (www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMoa2034577; scroll down to “Protocol PDF” and click to get the entire document):

Another hint is found on Page 3 of the same document:

It would appear, then, that Pfizer-BioNTech decided, sometime between 1 May and 1 October 2020, to, One: add an “additional exploratory objective” to the C4591001 clinical study of BNT162b2;, and, Two, to support “increased supply” (of BNT162b2, presumably after securing Emergency Use Authorizations from the European Union medicines regulatory agency and from the FDA in the United States to use the “vaccine”, which did happen) — both, by changing from “Process 1” to “Process 2” to manufacture the product. Prof. Guetzkow states that there appears to be no analysis of comparisons between using these two methods. It is also, from what Yours Truly has been able to find, not known exactly when “Process 1” was stopped as a manufacturing method for BNT162b2 and “Process 2” was approved as the sole method.

We now turn to Page 4 of the FDA-issued “Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for an Unapproved Product Review Memorandum” of 23 June 2023, related to the EUA the agency granted for the use of the Pfizer-BioNTech “2023-2024 Formula” COVID-19 “vaccine” on people ages 6 months to 5 years old in the United States (www.fda.gov/media/172019/download.) Page 4, in Yours Truly’s opinion, is a tacit admission that this “vaccine” is indeed made according to “Process 2”:

Finally, there is the following hint in the description of the manufacturing process for the Pfizer-BioNTech “vaccine” against meningitis, called PENBRAYA, in the 11 DESCRIPTION section of the company-issued document (https://labeling.pfizer.com/ShowLabeling.aspx?id=19937):

The work of Dr. Kevin McKernan, Dr. Jessica Rose, and other researchers, has shown that there are numerous serious issues with the integrity of the process of manufacturing BNT162b2 — the “Process 2” that was used to make billions of doses of this Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” — and which process is being used to manufacture the company’s latest modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, the “2023-2024 Formula.” These two scientists, along with other colleagues, published a paper on this situation last month. It can be found here: www.researchgate.net/publication/374870815. The paper also has some more details of the “Process 2” method — and, by the way, also stating that Moderna also came up with a similar process for its modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.”

One suspects that the integrity problems with the manufacturing of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” is a subject that will have much more investigation. This is aside from the accumulating evidence that the ingredients of said “vaccines” are themselves dangerous.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA