“We do not believe any group of men adequate enough or wise enough to operate without scrutiny or without criticism. We know that the only way to avoid error is to detect it, that the only way to detect it is to be free to inquire. We know that in secrecy error undetected will flourish and subvert.” –J. Robert Oppenheimer
The above image (also the header image) of a vintage Rolodex in today’s offering is courtesy of Google Images.
Health Friday is a series devoted to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s offering speaks to the disaster of COVID-19, Yours Truly dedicates it to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have passed away from either the negative effects of a COVID-19 virus infection; or, from the negative effects of the COVID-19 “vaccines” that they had in their body.
There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none, except perhaps for AI-generated images within linked URLs. If readers wish to post AI-generated content in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.
Vaccines, Amen, by Attorney Aaron Siri. Attorney Siri is involved with https://phmpt.org/ (Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency, one of the organizations that have forced the release of thousands of documents on the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” via FOIA lawsuits.)
The Courage to Face COVID-19: Preventing Hospitalization and Death While Battling the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex, by John Leake and Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH. Mr Leake and Dr. McCullough are involved with https://www.thefocalpoints.com/, a website that focuses on, among other topics, disseminating the real truth about the COVID-19 “vaccines”, the role of Bio Pharma in promoting the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, and more.
Information Compendium sitesrelated to COVID-19:
From Children’s Health Defense: https://www.covidindex.science/, via Dr. Brian Hooker, PhD, Chief Scientific Officer of CHD. This is a searchable index of thousands of items.
Preventing Cancer: The ROOT Protocols. https://doi.org/10.71189/JIM/2025/V01N04A02, by Paul Marik, MD, and Justus Hope, MD. Both of these medical doctors are involved with Independent Medical Alliance https://imahealth.org/ (formerly FLCCC.) Interested readers must register with the Journal of Independent Medicine (the journal of Independent Medical Alliance) in order to view the entire paper. A story on The ROOT Protocols is here: https://imahealth.substack.com/cp/178752784, 12 November 2025.
Dr. Jessica Rose and Dr. Kevin McKernan have just finished a new project which reveals the truth behind the inclusion of N1-Methylpseudouridine, in both the Pfizer-BioNTech and the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”; and, of the inclusion of a gene code piece from the African Green Monkey cancer promoter, SV40, in the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”: https://jessicar.substack.com/p/we-know-exactly-how-and-why-the-dna. “We now exactly how and why the DNA is in the Moderna and Pfizer vials”, 15 November 2025. Please see the screenshots from this article, below;
Three:
A new study, by Alain R. Thierry, et al., reveals that 100% of COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons have microclots in their blood; and, that COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons who present with symptoms of “Long COVID” also have microclots: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-study-anomalous-amyloid, “Breaking Study: Anomalous Amyloid Microclots Found in 100% of the COVID-19 Vaccinated”, Nicolas Hulscher, 17 November 2025. Please see the screenshots from this article, below:
The scientific paper referred to in the Hulscher article is here: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.70613, “Circulating Microclots Are Structurally Associated With Neutraphil Extracurricular Traps and Their Amounts Are Elevated in Long COVID Patients”, Alain R. Thierry, et al., 2 October 2025. Note the use of the word, “circulating.” This means that the microclots in the blood of the COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons are moving around inside the body. The Abstract from this paper is below:
The COVID-19 “vaccines” — all of them — if, for no other reason, must be immediately removed from use, from the market, and removed from any immunization schedule (especially the Immunization Schedules of the CDC), because of the evidence presented in the Thierry, et al., paper regarding circulating microclots in the blood of COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons, and in the blood of COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons who present with symptoms of “Long COVID.” There is no other acceptable option at this point.
THERE. MUST. BE. ACCOUNTABILITY.
THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.
THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.
Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA
(Intellectual Property Notice: With the exception of cited published scientific papers and publicly-available blogs and other websites, the ideas and conclusions in today’s post are by PAVACA. Proper credit must be given to PAVACA if other blog writers, podcasters, social media posts, or print media, use the ideas or conclusions in today’s post.)
The free header stock image of a nursing home is courtesy of Vecteezy and Google Images.
Health Friday is a series devoted to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics.
There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none, except possibly that which is contained in URL links in today’s post. If readers wish to add AI-generated content to today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.
Please take a moment and remember our good GA/FL (Georgia Sibyl Swink Smith), who passed away on 8 October 2025. The time, energy, and ingenunity that GA/FL invested into decades of taking care of her late daughter, “Sally Q” Smith, after the latter’s diagnosis of Friedreich’s Ataxia at the age of 14, was amazing and inspiring. Sally Q passed away from the effects of this condition on 10 May 2025. Georgia was a devout Christian. May she and her daughter rest in eternal Peace. GA/FL will be sorely missed.
Yours Truly comes from a birth family that, on both sides, had a horror of having to go into “a home” (“a home” was “code” for a nursing home or care facility.) Grandparents, aunts, uncles — even one’s own father — vigorously preferred to remain at home, no matter what, and stay away from congregate living of any kind. Only as a last resort, did my maternal grandmother have to go to live at a nursing home. I think she had a premonition that she would not “come out alive” from the facility. She was correct. My own brother was discharged from the hospital to a nursing home, but that, too, was under “last resort” circumstances; he, also, did not “come out alive” from the facility. In both the cases of my maternal grandmother and of my brother, there were extremely serious medical conditions which excluded their ever living at their own homes again.
Nursing homes and care / rehabilitation facilities in the United States are inspected by the state health agencies where these are located. CMS (Medicare / Medicaid) will step in if a nursing home or care facility fails to meet state inspection standards, or if complaints are filed with either the state health department or CMS regarding a nursing home or care / rehabilitation facility. Please see: https://www.cms.gov/medicare/health-safety-standards/enforcement/nursing-home-enforcement, last updated 21 April 2025.
Nursing homes and care / rehabilitation facilities in the United States were especially negatively affected by the COVID-19 disaster. During the “lockdown” period, these places became off-limits to family and friends of the residents / patients. Untold numbers of these residents / patients died alone. Untold numbers of residents / patients were injected with the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, whether they consented to this or not. According to data complied by the CDC, residents / patients of these facilities had increased risk of death if they were “vaccinated” against COVID-19: https://kirschsubstack.com/p/cdc-nursing-home-data-the-vaccine, “CDC Nursing Home Data: The vaccine increased the risk of the elderly dying from COVID”, Steve Kirsch, 5 September 2023. Please see the screenshots from this article, below:
The AMA (American Medical Association), on the other hand, made it clear, also in 2023, that deaths among the COVID-19 “vaccinated” simply underscored the “need” for persons to get a COVID-19 “vaccine booster shot”: https://www.ama-assn.org/public-health/infectious-diseases/why-covid-19-deaths-among-vaccinated-show-boosters-matter, Cynthia Cos, et al., 7 March 2023. Please see the screenshots from this article, below, in which Dr. Elaine Choi (a member of the AMA) is “explaining” why COVID-19 “vaccine booster shots” are a good thing, even though “vaccinated” persons were then dying from COVID:
Currently, the AMA, among other professional medical organizations, is speaking out regarding what they term the “new restrictions against COVID-19 vaccination” that were put into place by HHS Sec. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., earlier this year. One example of such “speaking out” is here: https://www.chiefhealthexecutive.com/view/defending-vaccines-ama-nursing-leaders-speak-out, Ron Southwick, 22 September 2025. There is a video embedded in the article; two screenshots from the article’s text are below:
Note the old (and misinformation) canard about “if you’re young and healthy, get a COVID-19 vaccine so your grandparents won’t get COVID” from Mensik Kennedy.
Steve Kirsch posted an article this week on his Substack blog regarding the Japan CMRR data, which proves that the more COVID-19 “vaccine” injections a person takes, the more risk that person has of dying:https://kirschsubstack.com/p/japan-cmrr-data-website-shows-clear, “Japan CMRR data website shows clear mortality increase caused by COVID shot”, 20 October 2025. Please see the screenshot from his article, below. (Note: CMRR = Cumulative Mortality Risk Ratio.) The first screenshot is of the general summary chart:
The second screenshot is from the Kirsch KCOR analysis of the Japan data, along with text summary;
Applying all of the above to persons who, for whatever reason, are residents / patients in nursing homes or care / rehabilitation facilities: How do these people, if they do NOT want to take a COVID-19 “vaccine” injection, make their decision clear to the staff, including to the medical staff? How are these people assured, that if they do NOT want to take a COVID-19 “vaccine” injection, and there is an outbreak of COVID at the facility, that they will have access to Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, Vitamin D, Zinc, and other alternative treatments for prevention or treatment of a COVID infection? How are these people assured, if they do NOT want to take a COVID-19 “vaccine” injection, that they will NOT be moved into a “segregated area” of the facility; or, worse yet, be told (or, their family / guardian be told) that the resident / patient “has to find another facility?” The issue is compounded by the fact that almost all nursing homes and care / rehabilitation facilities receive CMS funding or payments of some kind. Also, there is the “Next Generation Gold Standard” of “evidence-based COVID-19 vaccination” guidelines that were announced and implemented by HHS / NIH / CDC / FDA earlier this year. These guidelines “recommend” that persons age 65 and older get a COVID-19 “booster shot” TWICE a year. What does this mean for the person living in a nursing home in, for example, Alabama, (a facility that receives CMS funding or payments) — a person who is competent to make their own decisions, and who decides to refuse to take a COVID-19 “vaccine” injection? What if that person refuses because of religious belief? What if the person refuses because the “vaccine” contains elements lab-recreated from aborted fetal blood cell lines (the HEK293 lines?) Does the facility then “have the right”, because of the “new guidelines” in the “Evidence-Based Approach to COVID-19 Vaccination” that have been implemented, to override the person’s decision and give the injection anyway? Does the facility now “have the right” to tell the person’s children / guardian that they need to “find another facility” to take the person? Please see: https://www.hhs.gov/press-room/hhs-nih-announce-generation-gold-standard.html; also, https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsb2506929, “An Evidence-Based Approach to COVID-19 Vaccination”, Martin Makary, MD, MPH, and Vinay Prasad, MD, MPH. Dr. Makary is the Commissioner of the FDA; Dr. Prasad is the Director of the CBER Division of the FDA. Please see the screenshot of Figure 3 from this NEJM paper, below:
In addition, please see the age 65 and older immunization schedule recommendations for other injectables on the chart above — Influenza; RSV; pneumonia; Monkeypox; Herpes Zoster (“Shingles”); Hepatitis A and Hepatitis B; and more.
There is now supposed to be “Shared Clinical Decision-Making” between patient and healthcare provider regarding the COVID-19 “vaccines” for persons age 19 and above. Does that also apply across the board to persons living in nursing homes or care / rehabilitation facilities who are competent, but the facility they reside or stay in is also receiving CMS and/or Medicare-Medicaid payments?
There are multiple “Notes” sections regarding the administration of the other “vaccines” listed above in persons age 65 and older (and, in some cases, age 60 and older.) These “Notes” are found here: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/imz-schedules/adult-notes.html#note-covid-19; please scroll down this webpage and click on the topic to read about, such as, “Influenza vaccination.” There are multiple “vaccines” that are considered to be “routine”, such as the influenza “vaccine”, the RSV “vaccine”, and so on. What if a person living in a nursing home or care / rehabilitation facility decides to refuse all of these “routine” injectables, or decides to take only one or two? What happened to “Shared Clinical Decision-Making” in regards to this? Especially in light of new research that proves, for example, that the pneumonia “vaccines” actually increase the risk of contracting pneumonia and dying from said infection? Please see: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-223-million-person-study, “BREAKING: 2.23 Million Person Study Finds Pneumococcal Vaccines Increase Risk of Pneumonia and Death”, Nicolas Hulscher, 22 October 2025.
And, what about the COVID-19 “vaccinated” personnel (administration staff; doctors; nurses; CNAs / PCAs; facility maintenance staff; kitchen staff, etc.) who work at these nursing homes or care / rehab facilities? What about the “downstream Medical Tsunami” of negative effects on them of the “vaccines” that they took, which will present at some point, if not already? What about potential staff loss / turnover?
And, what about the vast majority of the adultchildren of these residents / patients, who are themselvesalso COVID-19 “vaccinated” — including the adult children who have already taken multiple injections of these “vaccines?” What about the “downstream Medical Tsunami” of negative effects on them of the COVID-19 “vaccines” that they took, which will present at some point, if not already?
And, what about the potential for another “pandemic emergency” being declared (including from some type of Avian Influenza outbreak) that “mandates” another round of “lockdowns”, which would effect nursing homes or care / rehab facilities?
In Yours Truly’s opinion, these are all things that need to be brought into the daylight and discussed. They represent another “ripple effect” aspect of the ongoing disaster of COVID-19.
THERE. MUST. BE. ACCOUNTABILITY.
THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.
THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.
Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA
(Intellectual Property Disclaimer: With the exception of links to published scientific papers, website articles, and other items in the public domain, the ideas and conclusions in this post are by PAVACA. Proper credit must be given if ideas or conclusions of this post are used by other blog writers, or on social media, or in print media. Thank you.)
The free vintage header image for today’s offering of human chromosomes as drawn by hand is courtesy of iStock and Google Images.
Health Friday is a series devoted to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. Today’s offering is dedicated to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have suffered injuries, illnesses, or disabilities resulting from an infection of the COVID-19 virus itself, or from having been injected with the COVID-19 “vaccines”; and, to those who have died from either an infection of the COVID-19 virus itself, or from the negative effects of the COVID-19 “vaccines” that they had taken.
There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. These are linked here. Note 1: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none, except possibly for some items embedded in linked URLS. If readers wish to add AI-generated content to today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Note 2: Starting with today’s offering, there will be an “Intellectual Property” notice at the end of the post. This is because Yours Truly has noticed that another blog has apparently modified and used certain information in a Health Friday post on their own blog without giving credit to Yours Truly. Thank you.
Yours Truly posted Part One of the LINE-1 and Chromosome 19 situation regarding the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” here: https://www.theqtree.com/2025/09/25/health-friday-9-5-2025-open-thread-human-line-1-chromosomes-and-the-modrna-covid-19-vaccines-part-one/. Part One discussed the (permanent) alteration to the LINE-1 human cell line that was designed into the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.” Part Two will discuss the alteration to the human Chromosome 19 (along with alteration to other human chromosomes) that were ALSO designed into the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.” To begin Part Two, here is a “refresher” on the paper that was published by Ralph Baric, PhD, of the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, on “Synthetic Genomics.” This paper has multiple graphics that display his “templates” for lab-creating synthetic viruses that are “programmed” to alter the DNA, the cells, and the chromosomes of humans: https://www.jcvi.org/stes/default/files/assets/projects/synthetic-genomics-options-for-governance/Baric-Synthetic-Viral-Genomics.pdf, “Synthetic Viral Genomics: Risks and Benefits for Science and Society”, Ralph S. Baric, PhD, 2006. Screenshots of a few of the graphics in this paper are below:
Note the phrase, “…reverse genetics and directed evolution.” Keep this phrase in mind for later in today’s offering.
And now, Yours Truly presents Part Two, beginning with human Chromosome 19, one of the 23 pairs of chromosomes that make up the human chromosome “map.” Below is an image of human Chromosome 19, per Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chromosome_19.) One of the two parts of the chromosome pair is from the father; the other is from the mother:
Then, a description of a set of conditions called 19p13.13 Deletion Syndrome:
A short discussion of other types of conditions related to human Chromosome 19 issues:
And, human Chromosome 19 in relation to Cancers:
Below is a screenshot of the Chromosome 19 Disease Map that was published in 1997 (https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/gte.1997.1.145, “Disease genes and chromosomes: disease maps of the human genome. Chromosome 19”, by F Gilbert):
There has been more research since 1997 into human Chromosome 19 and its relationship to diseases and health conditions. An example is here: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91924-7, “Mutant p53 and chromosome 19 microRNA cluster overexpression regulate cancer testis antigen expression and cellular transformation in hepatocellular carcinoma”, Goodwin G. Jinesh, et al., 16 June 2021. Two screenshots from the Introduction of this paper are below:
Take a look again at the 1997 graphic above, and note the areas of human Chromosome 19q.13, q.13.2, q13.32, and q13.34 on the Disease Map that influence the body. An interesting paper from 2018 regarding human Chromosome 19 and what occurs when there is dysregulation is here: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6112826/, “Cancer and the junkyard chromosome: how repeat DNA sequence on chromosome 19 influences risk of malignant disease”, Anne M. Rose, 10 August 2018. Two screenshots from this paper are below. The point here is that human Chromosome 19 is a “rich and fertile ground” for those who wish to experiment with how to alter certain areas of the chromosome, such as the p area or the q area; both of these chromosome 19 areas influence multiple organs and functions of the human body:
**** It appears, then, that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” interact with both the p53 protein AND human chromosome 19 to induce cancers in “vaccinated” persons; and, that the SV40 African Green Monkey cancer promoter gene code piece that is ALSO in the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” is also involved regarding the inducement of cancer in “vaccinated” persons.
Which brings Yours Truly to this, a paper proving the first DIRECT evidence of human Chromosome 19 being altered by the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, which then induce Stage IV bladder cancer: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-study-first-direct-evidence, “BREAKING STUDY: First Direct Evidence of mRNA “Vaccine” Genomic Integration Identified in Stage IV Cancer Patient”, Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 15 September 2025. Please see the screenshot from this article, below:
Note regarding the above: the sequences identified which induced the Stage IV bladder cancer in the patient were contained within the Spike protein (S protein) of the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” that she took, not from within the Nucleocapsid protein (N protein.)
The young woman in question took THREE injections of the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” (mRNA-1273) during 2021 (the “primary series” plus one “booster shot.”) She was diagnosed with Stage IV bladder cancer within twelve months.
The paper is on the preprint server, Zenodo: https://zenodo.org/records/17122912, “Genomic Integration and Molecular Dysregulation in Aggressive Stage IV Bladder Cancer Following COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination”, John A. Catanzano, Nicolas Hulscher, Peter A. McCullough, 15 September 2025. Please see the following screenshots from this paper; first, Table 1. from the Case Presentation. Table 1. outlines the exact “drivers” and “pathways” that established the bladder cancer in the previously-healthy 31-year-old patient after she took the three Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” injections:
Second, from the Case Presentation in the paper. Please note the mention that numerous human Chromosome 19 alterations induced by the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” EXACTLY MATCH the same Open Reading Frame (ORF) sequences in the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” (BNT162b2):
Which means that the alterations to human Chromosome 19 in BOTH the Moderna AND the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” occur within the Open Reading Frame of the spike protein (S protein.) This chromosome altering capability is thus then present in all “descendant modRNA COVID-19 vaccines” from these companies, including the “2025-2026 version” of Pfizer-BioNTech (COMIRNATY) and of Moderna (SPIKEVAX), since said “descendant COVID-19 vaccines” all employ the S protein from the original COMIRNATY or SPIKEVAX injectables.
From the Discussion section of the paper. Please read the screenshot below carefully. This is a description of how the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” induce TURBO-CANCER:
**** What we have here is proof that the oncogenic driver known as human Chromosome 3q26.32, Gene PIK3CA — was included in the modRNA of the Moderna COVID-19 “vaccine” mRNA-1273. Please see the Catanzano, et al., paper cited above: the Table 1., and the Discussion screenshots; and, also, the OMIM Phenotype – Gene Relationships table cited further down in today’s offering (though the OMIM table refers to colorectal cancer, PIK3CA is a driver for other cancers, also.
**** However, there is another element in play here: the Wuhan Hu1 virus itself (aka the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself / the COVID-19 virus itself) ALSO targets and attacks human Chromosomes: in particular, Chromosomes 3, 6, 12, 19, and 21. Please see this paper from December 2020, regarding a study performed on patients in the UK who were sick from the COVID-19 virus itself: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-03065-y, “Genetic mechanisms of critical illness in COVID-19”, Erola Pairo-Castineira, et al., 11 December 2020. Two screenshots from this paper are below; first, from the general introduction:
Compare the references to human Chromosome 19p13.2 and human Chromosome 19p13.3 in the Liebert Chromosome 19 Disease Map graphic above in today’s offering. This is proof that those who lab-created the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) virus itself , and those who lab-created the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, did experiment with human Chromosome 19 in order to include aberrations to areas of this chromosome that could result in negative health outcomes BOTH for persons infected with the virus itself, and for persons who took the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.”
And, Table 1 from the above paper:
Note: 11 December 2020 was the date of the initial Emergency Use Authorization for the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” BNT162b2 to be used in the United States. Given that it takes months for a scientific paper to be researched, written, and published, one can assume that the Pairo-Castineira, et al., paper, was begun several months before the 11 December 2020 publish date. Note: There are FOUR identified areas on human Chromosome 6 that are attacked by the COVID-19 virus itself.
This paper, from 2014, describes the multiple health conditions and diseases that are associated with alterations to / deletions involving, human Chromosome 6: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2013.08.001, “The Human Proteome Organization Chromosome 6 Consortium: Integrating Chromosome-centric and biology/disease driven strategies”, P.A. Keown, et al., 4 April 2014. Please see the screenshot, below, from the Introduction of this paper:
From https://www.storymd.com/, the “Ideogram of human chromosome 6“, which lists the multiple health conditions and diseases associated with aberrations of / alterations to / deletions of, parts of human Chromosome 6. The ideogram is courtesy of the Office of Biological and Environmental Research of the U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge National Laboratory:
Yours Truly firmly believes that, since human Chromosome 6 is also attacked by the SARS-CoV2 (COVID-19) virus itself; and, since the COVID-19 virus itself is the foundational element within all of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” — that these “vaccines”, once injected into the body, can and will attack the human Chromosome 6 of the “vaccinated” person’s body, along with attacking human Chromosomes 3, 12, 19, and 21.
Yours Truly firmly believes that those who lab-created the COVID-19 virus itself, and the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, experimented with human Chromosomes 3, 6, 12, 19, and 21, in order to introduce aberrations / mechanisms into them that could induce or aggravate health conditions and/or diseases that would not otherwise appear in healthy persons, then included the results of these experiments in both the virus itself, and in the modRNA “vaccines.
Yours Truly firmly believes that those who lab-created the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” then added the dangerous lipid nanoparticles (ALC-0159, ALC-0315, SM-102), and N1-Methylpseudouridine, to these “vaccines” to evade the human body’s immune system, to damage / destroy the human body’s immune system, and to damage / destroy the human body’s ability to detect and eliminate “enemy elements”, in order to force the “vaccinated” body to be defenseless to the negative effects of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.” Thus, there are reports of, for example, Diabetes Mellitus resulting from modRNA COVID-19 “vaccination” by the Pfizer-BioNTech “vaccine”, BNT162b2, in this document: https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf, APPENDIX 1. LIST OF ADVERSE EVENTS OF SPECIAL INTEREST section.
FLASH! Yours Truly has just found more proof, in her opinion, regarding the experiments on human Chromosomes by those who lab-created the COVID-19 virus itself, and by those who lab-created the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”. Please see, first: https://www.theburningplatform.com/2025/10/16/8300-spike-in-colon-cancer-that-just-means-the-jabs-are-working/, “8300% SPIKE IN COLON CANCER — THAT JUST MEANS THE JABS ARE WORKING”, by Camus. A screenshot from this article is below:
The Burning Platform article is based on the recent research by Dr. Jessica Rose, PhD, of VAERS reports of colon cancer since 2021 (rollout of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.”) She posted a blog article regarding her analysis, here: https://jessicar.substack.com/p/colon-cancer-on-the-rise-since-2021, 7 September 2025. The huge increase in colon cancer since 2021, per the VAERS reports, appears to be in children under age 18.
Please refer to the human Chromosome Disease Maps, and the screenshots from the 2020 paper of COVID-19 infected persons in the UK, above in today’s offering, regarding human Chromosome 3 and human Chromosome 19.
BOTH human Chromosome 3 AND human Chromosome 19 (among other chromosomes) show up on the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man listing for #114500 COLORECTAL CANCER: CRC Phenotype – Gene Relationships: https://www.omim.org/entry/114500. The human Chromosomes that correlate to the COVID-19 virus itself, and therefore to the COVID-19 modRNA “vaccines”, are:
human Chromosome 3p22.1 Gene: CTNNB1 Colorectal cancer, somatic
human Chromosome 3q26.32 Gene: PIK3CA Colorectal cancer, somatic
human Chromosome 19q13.33 Gene: BAX Colorectal cancer, somatic
NONE of the above are inherited “predispositions.”
The OMIM table is below:
In Yours Truly’s opinion, there is no possible way that the detailed, precise experiments that had to have been performed with human Chromosomes 3, 6, 12, 19, and 21, in the lab-creation of the COVID-19 virus itself, and in the lab-creation of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, could have been accomplished just during the years 2019 – 2020. This is a process that would need several years of work, at the least.
Questions: What kind of POMC (Pieces of Human Excrement) would lab-create a virus, let alone a modRNA “vaccine”, that would induce colon cancer in anyone, let alone in children? What kind of medical professional would inject this type of “vaccine” into children? What kind of government agency would “recommend” that this type of “vaccine” be injected into anyone, let alone into children? What kind of “professional medical organization” (such as, the American Academy of Pediatrics) would “recommend” that this type of “vaccine” be injected into children?
IT IS OF UTMOST IMPORTANCE THAT ALL PERSONS BUILD AND MAINTAIN THEIR NATURAL IMMUNE SYSTEM TO BE IN THE BEST HEALTH POSSIBLE.
THE COVID-19 “VACCINES” — ALL OF THEM — MUST BE REMOVED FROM THE MARKET AND FROM USE. NOW.
THE ARRESTS OF THOSE WHO WERE / ARE INVOLVED IN THE ABOVE ACTIVITIES REGARDING THE LAB-CREATION OF THE COVID-19 VIRUS ITSELF, AND OF THE modRNA COVID-19 “VACCINES”, MUST START. NOW.
THERE. MUST. BE. ACCOUNTABILITY.
THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.
THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.
Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA
Intellectual Property Disclaimer: With the exception of links to scientific papers, public-domain scientific research or information websites, and news / media / Substack outlets that are on the internet, the contents of the above article are the ideas and/or conclusions of the writer, PAVACA. Proper credit must be given to the writer (PAVACA) if the ideas and/or conclusions in the above article are used by any other blog author or writer, or by persons on social media and/or on podcasts, or by persons using print media. Thank you.
Joe Biden never won. This is our Real President – 45, 46, 47.
AND our beautiful REALFLOTUS.
This Stormwatch Monday Open Thread remains open – VERY OPEN – a place for everybody to post whatever they feel they would like to tell the White Hats, and the rest of the MAGA/KAG/KMAG world (with KMAG being a bit of both).
Our various sister sites, listed in the Blogroll in the sidebar
Our beloved country is under Occupation by hostile forces.
Daily outrage and epic phuckery abound.
We can give in to despair…or we can be defiant and fight back in any way that we can.
Joe Biden didn’t win.
And we will keep saying Joe Biden didn’t win until we get His Fraudulency out of our White House.
Wolfie’s Wheatie’s Word of the Week:
bobstay
noun
rope used on ships to steady the bowsprit
a rope or chain used to steady the bowsprit of a ship
a rope or chain to confine the bowsprit of a ship downward to the stem or cutwater
a strong rope or chain rigging running from the end of the bowsprit to the ship’s stem or cutwater
a part of the rigging of a sailing boat or ship that counters the upward tension on the bowsprit from the jibs and forestay
Used in a sentence
A bobstay may run directly from the stem to the bowsprit, or it may run to a dolphin striker, a spar projecting downward, which is then held to the bowsprit or jibboom by a martingale stay.
Shown in a picture
Shown in a very brief video
MUSIC!
In honor of today’s “stuff” (see below) we have this reaction video!
THE STUFF
This brilliant idea from 2020 may be one of the simplest and best proofs that COVID-19 came from a laboratory. Note that the idea could not get published until much later – after the “vaccines” were a done deal. This delay of publication is much like what happened to the very early discovery that simple OTC antihistamines protected highly vulnerable people from death by COVID, which was “sat on” by the journals until it missed the chance to save millions of lives.
This is not common knowledge. Professor Nikolai Petrovski, vaccine inventor in South Australia, just a few weeks into the Pandemic, new confidently that the virus was probably man made.
To the amazement of Dr Drew in this podcast from 10 x months ago, who thought it was new… pic.twitter.com/3XrDneeb7m
This is not common knowledge. Professor Nikolai Petrovski, vaccine inventor in South Australia, just a few weeks into the Pandemic, new confidently that the virus was probably man made. To the amazement of Dr Drew in this podcast from 10 x months ago, who thought it was new research, Nikolai Petrovski discusses how in “The first few week of 2020, when the viral sequence was first released” he was only “modelling the virus to build a vaccine”. The other clip is from an AMPS seminar held just over a year ago, which works in well with the DR Drew clip. “If it’s come from an animal source, then there should be an animal out there who’s ACE2 binds better to the virus than Human ACE2, [but] rather than finding some exotic animal at the top of the list, we found Humans”[and it was] so well human adapted. “It took a long time to get published, because the narrative was, that [it] was not an acceptable question to be asking.”
"In silico comparison of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein-ACE2 binding affinities across species and implications for virus origin". – Nikolai Petrovskyhttps://t.co/l4BQb6nRm9
The free image of an example of a theatrical set piece is courtesy of Study.com/ and Google Images.
Health Friday is a series devoted to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s offering speaks to the disaster of COVID-19, it is dedicated to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have suffered illness, injury, disability, or death from either an infection of the COVID-19 virus itself; or, from illness, injury, disability, or death, induced by the COVID-19 “vaccines” that were injected into their body.
There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for AI-generated content; to the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post AI-generated content in the discussion thread of today’s offering, they must cite their source. Thank you.
Today’s offering follows a different path.
In the performing arts world, a “set piece” is a detailed design for a production. Set pieces are designed for plays, for musical theater productions, for movies, for dance or ballet productions, for opera and other large Classical music productions, and so on. Set pieces can be elaborate, or they can be “bare-bones” simple. Sometimes, there are multiple set pieces created for the production; sometimes, there are only one or two set pieces; sometimes, set pieces are built on revolving stage areas and are “rotated” according to the scene or act in the production; sometimes, extra items, such as water (in pools, as waterfalls, etc.) are incorporated into a set piece (think Esther Williams swimming movies); and so on. However, the set piece (or, set pieces) all serve to help the framework of the production and the intention behind the plot, script, or and/or music of the work. And, set pieces are designed — in almost all cases, they are not “thrown together” at the last minute; one exception is the performance of pure “improv” (improvisation; many improv performances use props only, not set pieces.)
Examples of performing arts “set pieces” of various types are below:
From Giacomo Puccini’s opera, Tosca, the final scene, in which Tosca leaps to her death from the parapets of the Castel Sant’Angelo to escape capture after she killed her tormentor, Baron Scarpia. Courtesy of the Metropolitan Opera, 2024-2025 season:
Yours Truly will note that the “other side” of the Castel Sant’Angelo set piece has multiple layers of foam pads, trained stage technicians, and first-aid personnel on hand to make quite sure that the singer playing Tosca lands safely. The “leap scene” rehearsal related to the Metropolitan Opera 2024 – 2025 season production is on video, here: https://www.facebook.com/MetOpera/videos/puccini-tosca-jump-rehearsal/568495235373588/.
An example of a water “set piece” from the Esther Williams 1952 movie, Million Dollar Mermaid. Courtesy loveletterstooldhollywood.blogspot.com/:
A set piece from a performance of Samuel Becket’s stage play, Waiting for Godot. Courtesy of Wikipedia:
“Set Pieces” in the COVID-19 disaster:
In the COVID-19 disaster, there have been well-designed, elaborate “set pieces” employed, such as: the “mandating” of lockdowns; the “universal masking”; the deliberate withholding of important information from then-President Donald Trump 45 regarding the ingredients and mechanisms of the COVID-19 “vaccines” in development during “Operation Warp Speed; the subsequent rollout of the COVID-19 “vaccines”; the marginalizing and ostracizing of those who had any reservations about the “safety and efficacy” of these “vaccines”; the persecution / prosecution / loss of medical licenses, of those who began to investigate and to write about the dangers and deadliness of these “vaccines” — for only a few examples. These “set pieces” affected millions of people, who were coerced and/or gaslighted-frightened into being “actors” (such as, standing six feet away from other persons; “following the science” and taking multiple injections of COVID-19 “vaccines”.) Others were labelled as “anti-vaxxers” because they refused to take the “vaccines.” All were, at the same time, also forced to be “spectators” (watching their children suffer from not being able to attend school during the “lockdowns”; losing jobs, family relationships, friends, and colleagues; watching COVID-19 “vaccinated” loved ones, friends, and colleagues begin to succumb to COVID-19 “vaccine”-induced injuries, illnesses, disabilities, or death.)
It appears that new “set pieces” regarding the COVID-19 “vaccines” in the United States are being created and put into place. One such new “set piece” involves, among other items, the 19 September 2025 ACIP “recommendation” that COVID-19 “vaccine” administration be restricted to persons age 65 and over; and, to persons who are deemed to be at “high risk of severe complications from a COVID-19 infection”, as per the FDA’s “new approach”, outlined here: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsb2506929, “An Evidence-Based Approach to Covid-19 Vaccination”, Martin Makary, MD MPH, and Vinay Prasad, MD, MPH, published 20 May 2025. Figure 2 from this “opinion piece”, which lists the populations of Americans at “high risk”, and should therefore take a COVID-19 “vaccine”, is below. Note: the age 65 and older category is already “assumed” to be a high risk:
However, “individual decision-making” runs counter to what “Establishment Medicine” organizations, such as the AMA, advises physicians to do. For example, in the AMA podcast interview with Sean O’Leary, MD, published 30 April 2025, found here: https://edhub.ama-assn-org/jn-learning/audio-player/18969411, “Strategies for Talking With Parents About Vaccines.” This audio interview is a must-listen. Dr. O’Leary describes the AMA “talking points” regarding pushing “vaccination” for young children (including newborns) along the lines of “presumptive” (“your child is due now to have X vaccines”) discussion with parents, as opposed to “participatory” (“what do you think about vaccination?”) discussion with parents. Dr. O’Leary makes it clear that “presumptive” discussion results in more agreement from the parents to have their young children “vaccinated.” Dr. O’Leary also speaks about “pre-bunking”, the process of minimizing / dismissing “vaccine misinformation” or “vaccine disinformation” from “anti-vaxxers”; instead, the physician is urged to “steer” the “vaccine”-hesitant or “vaccine”-questioning parent to “trusted websites” like the ones from the AAP (American Academy of Pediatrics, which endorses “vaccination” of all kinds for children, including from birth, and including the COVID-19 “vaccines.”) In fact, the American Academy of Pediatrics https://www.aap.org/ has issued its own “recommended childhood vaccine schedule”, in contravention to the revised Childhood Immunization Schedule of the CDC. Below are screenshots of the “AAP recommended vaccines”, the “AAP recommended vaccination schedule”, and, the “AAP recommended vaccination schedule by medical condition”, below:
Note that the COVID-19 “vaccines” are “recommended” by the AAP for all children ages 6 months and older — for healthy children; for immunocompromised children; and, for children with heart disease, and other medical conditions.
Another “set piece” was added this week: the email from Jack Leeming, an “editor” at the journal Nature, that he sent to selected blog authors at Substack. These blog authors work every day to investigate and write about the dangers and deadliness of the COVID-19 “vaccines.” Among the blog authors contacted by Jack Leeming are: Sasha Latypova; Alex Berenson; and, Dr. Peter A. McCulloug, MD. In this email, Leeming is requesting their “input” before Nature publishes a “hit piece” on them. Apparently, this “hit piece” will try to do the following:
Defame Substack blog authors who are doing all they can to spread the actual truth about the dangers and deadliness of the COVID-19 “vaccines”;
Pressure Substack into imposing “content moderation” (translation: censorship) of these blogs;
Pressure Substack into “de-monetizing” these blogs.
Pressure Substack into showcasing “COVID-19 vaccine friendly” blogs.
Sasha Latypova wrote about the email she received from Leeming. Please see: https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/journal-nature-is-planning-a-hit, “Journal Nature is planning a hit piece about me. This is my response to their “request for comment.””, 1 October 2025. A screenshot of Leeming’s email to her, via her blog article, is below:
Ms. Latypova’s reply, which is also in her article, takes Leeming and his email apart. A portion of her reply is in the screenshot below:
All of the above begs the questions: Who (and/or What) are in the “Control Booth” regarding the “set pieces” of the COVID-19 disaster? Who (and/or What) are telling those in the “Control Booth” what to do?
THE COVID-19 “VACCINES” — ALL OF THEM — MUST BE REMOVED FROM THE MARKET AND FROM USE. NOW.
The header image of smallpox vaccination in Paris in 1905 used in today’s offering is courtesy of Alamy and Google Images.
Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s offering speaks of the disaster of COVID-19, Yours Truly dedicates it to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have suffered injuries, illnesses, or disabilities, either COVID-19 “vaccine”-induced, or as the result of a COVID-19 infection; and, to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have passed away either from the negative effects of the COVID-19 “vaccines” they had in their bodies, or as the result of a COVID-19 infection.
There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none, except for AI-generated images that may be included in links in today’s offering. If readers wish to add any AI-generated content to the discussion thread today, they must cite their source. Thank you.
“Clean Sweep.” This means completely dismantling the FDA (the Food and Drug Administration); the NIH (the National Institutes of Health); and, the NIAID (the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases), all of which are divisions of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) — and completely rebuilding them from the top down. Why “Clean Sweep” for these divisions? Because it is becoming more apparent by the week that they are more devoted to using “career” medical bureaucrats/officials, many of whom are “holdovers” from the “Collins / Fauci era” in the NIH and NIAID; they are more devoted to injecting American citizens with the proven-dangerous, proven-deadly COVID-19 “vaccines” than they are to approving readily-available, cheap drugs (such as, Ivermectin) and other therapeutics (such as, Zinc) to prevent or to treat COVID-19 infection; and, they are more devoted to pushing through injectables via “Fast Track” or “accelerated approval” methods, rather than taking the time to fully test and analyze test data. “Completely rebuilding them from the top down” means establishing entirely redesigned divisions that are fully devoted to the betterment of the public health.
Yours Truly presents a transcript of the op-ed published in the Washington Post on 12 August 2025 by Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, the current Director of the NIH (National Institutes of Health); the op-ed appears here: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinons/2025/08/12/nih-mrna-vaccines-jay-bhattacharya/, “Jay Bhattacharya: Why the NIH is pivoting away from mRNA vaccines”, 12 August 2025. Yours Truly provides her personal commentary, which will appear in Bold and surrounded in brackets. (The Washington Post op-ed is behind a paywall; Yours Truly is indebted to Shannon Joy, whose X tweet has the entire article: https://xcancel.com/ShannonJoy/status/1956140133474034025.) Note: Yours Truly will make it clear that the commentary is done with all due respect to Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, MD.
The transcript: “The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ decision to wind down its mRNA vaccine development activities marks a necessary pivot in how we steward public health innovation in vaccines. The right path requires us to consider the inherent strengths and weaknesses of a technology as well as any alternatives, along with public attitudes and experience with the technology. The mRNA platform is promising technology. I do not dispute its potential. In the future, it may yet deliver breakthroughs in treating diseases such as cancer, and HHS is continuing to invest in ongoing research in oncology and other complex diseases.”
[YT: First of all, if HHS is truly going to “wind down” mRNA vaccine development, why is Moderna being allowed to progress to Phase 3 clinical trials of its modRNA “vaccine” against CMV (Cytomegalovirus), mRNA-1647? This “vaccine” contains six different mRNA sequences, two different antigens, the dangerous lipid nanoparticle SM-102 (the same LNP that is in the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, SPIKEVAX), and apparently targets both the IgG immune system cells and the CD4-CD8 cells of the body. Please see: https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.01603-23, “Characterization of humoral and cellular immunologic responses to an mRNA-based human cytomegalovirus vaccine from a phase 1 trial of healthy adults”, Kai Wu, et al.; J Virol. 2024 Mar 25;18(4):e01603-23. Please refer to Fig. 2 and Fig.4. Secondly, the current modRNA (aka mRNA) COVID-19 “vaccines” have demonstrated that they do not have “inherent strengths”: in fact, they only have what may be called “inherent dangers.” These “inherent dangers” include: altering of the LINE1 Human Liver cell line; replacement of natural Uridine RNA with the lab-created N1-Methylpseudouridine; crossing the Blood-Brain Barrier to attack areas of the brain that are not protected by this barrier (for example, the Pituitary Gland); causing autoimmune attack on heart tissue via aggregation of lymphocytes induced by the COVID-19 “vaccines” in that organ; and, causing infiltration of lymphocytes in lung tissue. Regarding the DNA alteration, and heart and lung damage, caused by the COVID-19 “vaccines”, please see: https://doctors4covidethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/causality-article.pdf, “Vascular and organ damage induced by mRNA vaccines: irrefutable proof of causality”, Michael Palmer, MD, and Sucharit Bhakdi, MD, Slide 9 through Slide 14. Thirdly, why on Earth is oncology (cancer study, diagnosis, and treatment) included in the phrase “and other complex diseases?” Yours Truly calls this a writing mistake; however, one believes someone should have proofread the op-ed for “context or syntax” issues before publication.]
“But as a vaccine intended for broad public use, especially during a public health emergency, the platform has failed a crucial test: earning public trust. No matter how elegant the science, a platform that lacks credibility among the people it seeks to protect cannot fulfill its public health mission.”
[YT: The “public trust” for the COVID-19 “vaccines” was destroyed when it was proven that hundreds of persons who took these injectables passed away from immediate heart attacks induced by them just after being injected; when “vaccinated” persons began to present with myocarditis or pericarditis after being injected; when stillbirths and miscarriages began to be reported among pregnant women who had been injected; and much, much more. And, by the way, the initial modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” rollout in December 2020 was intended for the elderly and for healthcare workers; it was when the “COVID-19 health emergency” was declared in March 2021 that the “vaccines” began to be “mandated” for all persons. “Elegant science?” Does “elegant science” include the kind of “science” that was rushed through the initial EUAs for the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” without proper testing and data analyses?]
“It is critical to understand the development of the mRNA coronavirus vaccines in the context of the very successful Operation Warp Speed launched during the first Trump administration.”
[YT: Does “the development of the mRNA coronavirus vaccines” include the fact that neither Pfizer-BioNTech, nor Moderna, had never previously brought a successful mRNA injectable to market prior to “Operation Warp Speed?” And that Dr. Albert Bourla, DVM, the CEO of PfizerUSA, admitted on video that he had been “convinced” by Pfizer scientists to use the then-new and unproven mRNA technology in a COVID-19 “vaccine?” (10 March 2022, “Albert Bourla on why mRNA technology was “counterintuitive” to producing an effective vaccine”, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9_YRw7jBF4.)]
“Operation Warp Speed represented a paradigm shift in how the government should invest in new technologies and solutions and embrace strategic investments in public-private partnerships, innovation in trial design and removal of bureaucratic red tape to allow parallel rather than sequential vaccine development. It produced a new vaccine in record time and also helped develop a successful monoclonal antibody.”
[YT: Really? “Embrace strategic partnerships in public-private partnerships?” What about that “public-private partnership” document between the NIAID and Moderna, which includes development of RNA-based vaccines, and that was filed with the SEC in 2015, several years BEFORE the COVID-19 disaster? That “partnership” is still going on, with patent-ownership sharing, royalty payments sharing, “partnering” in developing new COVID-19 “vaccines”, and so on, until at least 2041. “Innovation in trial design?” — Meaning the “Next Gold Generation Standard”, announced in May 2025, in which lab testing with animals using humane, safe protocols, then progressing to better and safer human-subject testing, may well be replaced with “Petri-dish testing” only” for new “vaccines”? “Parallel vaccine development?” — Meaning that “Universal Vaccine” that’s touted in the “Next Gold Generation Standard?”]
“Unfortunately, the Biden administration did not manage public trust in the coronavirus vaccines, largely because it chose a strategy of mandates rather than a risk-based approach and did not properly acknowledge Americans’ growing concerns regarding safety and effectiveness.”
[YT: So, “risk-based approach?” Like the “risk populations chart” in the “opinion piece” that Dr.Martin Makary and Dr. Vinay Prasad published in the New England Journal of Medicine in May 2025 (https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsb2506929, “An Evidence-Based Approach to Covid-19 Vaccination”— a chart in which, for example, even healthy pregnant women are considered to be at “risk” for “severe complications from COVID-19” and should get COVID-19 “vaccinated?” And what about the statements about how the “known and potential benefits of the for COVID-19 vaccines outweigh the known and potential risks?” — like the one here: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/planning/children/6-things-to-know.html, “6 Things to Know about COVID-19 Vaccination for Children.“]
“Consider the data: In a late 2024 Pew Research Center survey, 60 percent of American adults reported no intention of getting an updated coronavirus mRNA vaccine despite the Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s advice that nearly all adults receive yet another dose. As of late April 2025 (the latest data published reported by the CDC), only 13 percent of children between the ages of 6 months and 17 years had received an updated coronavirus vaccine, even though the Biden-era CDC had placed the vaccine on the childhood immunization schedule.”
[YT: It appears that the real reason behind why “only 13 percent of children between the ages of 6 months and 17 years had received an updated coronavirus vaccine” is that their parents or guardians have concluded that these “vaccines” are more dangerous than helpful. And how did these adults come to this conclusion? Because of the news spreading that these “vaccines” cause myocarditis / pericarditis in children; because of the news spreading that these “vaccines” do not prevent COVID-19 infection, but instead actually damage the “vaccinated” person’s immune system, making it vulnerable to COVID-19 infection; and so on. In Yours Truly’s opinion, the COVID-19 “vaccines” have no place in the CDC Childhood Immunization Schedule whatever — due to the foregoing and other reasons.]
“In 2021, the Biden administration’s HHS spent nearly a billion dollars on a campaign supporting the coronavirus vaccine, the most expensive pharmaceutical campaign in history. The government spent the money on a vast number of TV, radio and internet spots, which misinformed the American public that the vaccine would protect them from contracting and spreading covid. Nevertheless, just a few years later, less than half the U.S. adult population will heed the CDC’s guidance. Some outlets have blamed the poor coronavirus mRNA vaccine uptake on poor messaging or “anti-vax” counter-messaging. But the Biden administration made suppression of speech — and a mandate for all on the vaccines — into a priority.”
[YT: Perhaps Dr. Bhattacharya should look at the FDA Package Insert for the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, COMIRNATY (Pfizer-BioNTech), section 1 INDICATIONS AND USAGE. The Package Insert is here: https://www.fda.gov/media/151707/download. Notice that the FDA officially states that COMIRNATY is “to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19.)” Is the FDA “spreading misinformation?”
“The failure was thus not a communications problem. It is a trust problem due to the Biden administration’s scientific overreach, public pressure and, frankly, arrogance.”
[YT: Does this mean that “the new FDA”, and the “Next Generation Gold Standard”, and the “accelerated approval” of “vaccines” that may be lab-created in Petri-dishes will somehow magically restore public trust?]
“In addition to the trust problem, the mRNA technology has special biological features that make it different from other vaccines in that it (ideally) instructs our cells to produce proteins that subsequently invoke an immune response. To do so with complete confidence about vaccine safety and efficacy requires an exact understanding of dosage, biodistribution and off-target effects. Unfortunately, we fall short in all three. We lack clarity on how much antigen each mRNA molecule produces, where in the body the mRNA product winds up, how long it stays in the body, and whether unintended proteins are created.”
[YT: Unfortunately, this paragraph, in Yours Truly’s opinion, “has more holes than a Swiss cheese.” First: the mRNA “vaccines” do instruct the cells of the “vaccinated” person to “invoke an immune response”: that “response”, among other things, causes multiple types of autoimmune attack within the COVID-19 “vaccinated” person’s body — for example, in the heart (please refer above to the article by Doctors For COVID Ethics.) Second: Perhaps Dr. Bhattacharya would like to read this report, which Pfizer-BioNTech gave to the FDA in January 2021, regarding the biodistribution of BNT162b2 (FDA-approved in 2022 as COMIRNATY.) The report is here: https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/125742_S1_M2_pharmkin-tabulated-summary.pdf, “MODULE 2.6.5. PHARMACOKINETICS TABULATED SUMMARY.” Yours Truly has included images of Page 7 and Page 8 of this report, which are the Biodistribution Tables for BNT162b2. (The BNT162b2 used in this experiment is the same one that was granted the initial FDA for use in the United States in December 2020.) Third: Stephanie Seneff, PhD, and Greg Nigh, wrote back in 2021 about the unintended consequences of the mRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” creating “unintended proteins.” Their paper is here: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Worse-Than-the-Disease-Reviewing-Some-Possible-of-Seneff-Nigh/, “Worse Than the Disease? Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of the mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19”, 16 June 2021, International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research 2(1), May 10,2021 Page 389 – 430. The point is: there is an “exact understanding” of multiple aspects regarding the mRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” already.]
“From a regulatory perspective, getting approval for a vaccine with such inherent uncertainties should be difficult.”
[YT: Agreed— except that the “new FDA” is doing exactly that already (such as the recent FDA “approval” without any human trials testing of the “2025-2026 Formula COVID-19 Vaccines” by Pfizer-BioNTech, by Moderna, and by Novavax.)]
“Still, I do not believe the mRNA vaccines caused either mass harm on the one hand or saved 14 million lives on the other. Those estimates swing wildly based on speculative modeling, not concrete evidence. A recent modeling study conluded that the global coronavirus vaccination campaign saved 2.5 million lives from 2020 to 2024, mainly among the elderly.”
[YT: “Still I do not believe the mRNA vaccines caused either mass harm…” Really, Dr. Bhattacharya? Did you read through the OpenVAERS website? (https://openvaers.com/) Have you read through the thousands of actual reports of persons who took a COVID-19 “vaccine” and then either died from the injection, or had serious medical issues afterwards from the injection? Are you saying that these reports are “wildly based on speculative modeling?” Are you saying that these reports are not “concrete evidence?” Are you dismissing the extensive work of Ed Dowd, who analyzes statistical reports of claims from insurance companies, claims that have skyrocketed since the COVID-19 “vaccine” rollout in 2021? https://phinancetechnologies.com/, then click on the “Our Projects” PDF brochure on the webpage to find the “Current Projects” section, then click on any of the green arrows.]
“The scientific controversy over the vaccine’s effect on mortality rages on. Science isn’t propaganda agenda. It’s humility.”
[YT: Real science is truth. There isn’t a “controversy” about the “vaccine’s effect on mortality” — the COVID-19 “vaccines” have increased mortality across the board and across the world. Have you read Steve Kirsch’s Substack, Dr. Bhattacharya? (https://kirschsubstack.com/). Mr. Kirsch’s Substack has many articles that quote studies which show that the COVID-19 “vaccines” increase mortality across the board. However, since Mr. Kirsch is not a medical professional, that removes him from “credibility” in the medical professional world, as far as the NIH is concerned? It doesn’t matter that Mr. Kirsch makes his living from collecting and analyzing data (financial and medical)?]
“And when public health officials stopped communicating with humility, we lost much of the public, an absolute necessity for any vaccine platform.”
[YT: Actually: It’s when public health officials withheld the truth about the dangers and the deadliness of the COVID-19 “vaccines” (which the FDA knew about back in early 2021 — please see here: https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf, “5.3.6 CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-AUTHORIZATION ADVERSE EVENT REPORTS OF PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) RECEIVED THROUGH 28-FEB-2021.” Please go to the APPENDIX 1. LIST OF ADVERSE EVENTS OF SPECIAL INTEREST section.) — and the public had to find out the truth themselves — that public health officials “lost much of the public.”]
“I am not here to litigate the past. I am here to chart a better path forward. That is why the NIH, under the leadership of HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., is investing in new vaccine technologies based on whole-virus inactivated vaccines, which offer a broader immune response and have a longer track record of safety and public acceptance.”
[YT: So, here, apparently, is the “kernel” of the op-ed. Dr. Bhattacharya is not interested in anything related to how dangerous and deadly the current types of COVID-19 “vaccines” have been, and still are. “Let bygones be bygones and just move on” seems to the situation. Not so fast, Doctor. And that “whole-virus inactivated vaccine” scheme that is central to the “Next Generation Gold Standard?” The “Universal Vaccine?” Which, according to the “Next Generation Gold Standard” ethos, may be developed in Petri-dishes in federal government-based facilities only? And the PATENT for which “Universal Vaccine” is owned by the current Acting Director of NIAID, Dr. Jeffery Taubenberger? (https://www.techtransfer.nih.gov/tech/tab-3388)]
“We are continuing the Operation Warp Speed model of investing in technology with the most potential to help Americans.”
[YT: And, will this “continued” Operation Warp Speed model again be done in such a way that important information is deliberately withheld from President Trump47, as was the case with the original Operation Warp Speed in President Trump’s first term?]
“We will move forward with scientific rigor, transparency, and humility. At the NIH, we will fund promising research based not on hype, but on evidence. And I will continue to use my platform to communicate candidly in public conversations where debate and disagreement are welcomed.”
[YT: “Humility” is always a good thing. So is TRUTH.]
“We are entering a new era of public health, grounded not in wishful thinking or performative consensus, but in open inquiry and respect for the American people’s intelligence. The only to rebuild trust is to earn it — one honest conversation at a time.”
[YT: The “one honest conversation at a time” must include the honest admission by the NIH / NIAID / FDA / CDC, that the entire COVID-19 “vaccine” disaster could have been prevented through FDA approval of using re-purposed items to prevent or to treat COVID-19 infection: Ivermectin, Hydroxycholorquine, Doxycycline, Zinc and Vitamin D supplementation. There are plenty of peer-reviewed, published scientific papers which prove that these work. Instead, the FDA, TO THIS DAY, still refuses to approve the use of these items to prevent or to treat COVID-19. Can you explain why this is still the case, Dr. Bhattacharya?]
The free header image for today’s offering is courtesy of Shutterstock and Google Images.
Health Friday is a series devoted to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s offering is related, in part, to the disaster of the COVID-19 “vaccines”, Yours Truly dedicates it to all persons who have contracted injures, illnesses, or disabilities, induced or aggravated by the COVID-19 “vaccines” that were injected into their bodies; and, to the memory of all persons who have passed away from the negative effects of the COVID-19 “vaccines” that were injected into their bodies.
There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none, except for perhaps AI-generated images in any of the linked URLs below. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.
There are two sections to today’s Special Report offering: the first section, regarding the now-proven linkage of COVID-19 “vaccine boosters” to increases in cancer and in general mortality; the second section, regarding what appears to be the potential emergence of the “next plandemic” in Communist China. Please bear with Yours Truly: one does not want to “weary by recitals”, as the Duc de Saint-Simon once wrote — but there is a lot of information, multiple screenshots, and so on. The evolving knowledge regarding the disaster called COVID-19 (the virus itself, and the “vaccines”) is gaining speed with each passing day. This evolving knowledge base is important to understand in light of the developments regarding the new information about the “Chikungunya outbreak” currently in China, and which is apparently spreading to other countries (shades of the original COVID-19 virus itself outbreak in China.)
First section, the linkage between COVID-19 “booster vaccines” with increases in cancer and in general mortality. COVID-19 “vaccine boosters” means any injection of a “latest version” of a COVID-19 “vaccine.” This includes the FDA- approved 2025-2026 “new formula COVID-19 vaccine versions” of the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, COMIRNATY; of the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, SPIKEVAX; and, of the Novavax COVID-19 “vaccine”, NUVAXOVID.
Yours Truly begins here: https://slaynews.com/news/renowned-oncologist-sounds-alarm-cancer-deaths-now-surging-among-covid-boosted/, “Renowned Oncologist Sounds Alarm: Cancer Deaths Are Now Surging Among Covid-Boosted”, by Frank Bergman, 6 August 2025. There is an embedded video statement by Prof. Dr. Angus Dalgleish (St. George’s, University of London.) Dr. Dalgleish warns, in no uncertain terms, that it is the suppression of T-cell immune cells in the body of the COVID-19 “vaccine boosted” that is causing the surge of cancer among these persons. Please see the screenshot from the Slay News article, below:
The paper referenced above is here: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-6899448/v2, “Factors contributing to the sharp rise in excess mortality in Japan since 2021”, Atsushi Takahashi, 17 July 2025. This paper is a pre-print. Please see the screenshots from this paper, below. They are: portions of the Results section; Figure 4; and, Figure 9:
The identifier names are those of the Prefectures in Japan that were studied. Even with taking other factors into consideration (examples: the size and population of the various Prefectures; the number of adults in age brackets in the Prefectures; whether or not a Prefecture was “rural” in character and location, as compared to “urban”), it is clear that the increase in mortality is tied to an increased amount of COVID-19 “vaccine boosters” that were administered.
The peer-reviewed paper on the Japan study is here: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17122006, “Repeated COVID-19 Vaccination as a Poor Prognostic Factor in Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective, Single-Center Cohort Study”, Makoto Abue, et al., 16 June 2025.
Yours Truly has written extensively for the board here regarding the damage / destruction of the natural immune system of the person who takes COVID-19 “vaccines.” These injectables were designed to attack, damage / destroy the CD4 – CD8 immune system cells. These injectables were designed to attack, damage / destroy the IgG3 immune system “fighter” cells, while at the same time, fostering the increase of IgG4 immune system “tolerate and never clear” cells. This damage / destruction increases with each injection of a modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, including injections of the “latest formula version” of said “vaccines”, which includes the “2025-2026 Formula versions” of said “vaccines” (COMIRNATY [Pfizer-BioNTech]; SPIKEVAX [Moderna]; and, NUVAXOVID[Novavax.])
The “Seneff and Nigh” paper of 10 May 2021 discusses how “immune system imprinting” in the the body of persons who take the COVID-19 “vaccines” have the potential to result in what the authors call “unintended consequences.” The paper is available here: https://dpbh.nv.gov/uploadedFiles/dpbhnvgov/content/Boards/BOH/Meetings/2021/SENEFF-1.PDF, “Worse Than the Disease? Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of the mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19”, Stephanie Seneff and Greg Nigh; International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research 2(1), May 10, 2021, Page 38-79. Please see the screenshots from this article, below. They are: the Abstract; the “Unprecedented” box; and, Figure 2.
Second section, regarding the potential for the “next plandemic” to come from Communist China. This has to do with the current emergence of mosquito-borne Chikungunya infections in several areas of China, which has resulted in various government-enforced measures. There is also an ** interesting connection ** to the United States involved in this situation.
What is Chikungunya? It is a virus transmitted by the bite of an infected female mosquito of (usually) the Aedes aegypti or the Aedes albopictus species. (As an aside: female mosquitos of these species can also transmit Dengue fever via bites.) The virus that is transmitted causes joint pain and fever; these can progress to severe. Most people infected with Chikungunya, however, make a full recovery. The virus is an RNA alphavirus. Please see: https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/25083-chikungunya; there is a screenshot from this article, below:
Two recent articles regarding the Chikungunya outbreak in China: the first, here: https://jessicar.substack.com/p/the-new-pending-plandemic-is-it-scheduled, “The new pending “plandemic” — is it scheduled for November?”, by Jessica Rose, PhD, 12 August 2025. Dr. Rose makes it clear that the “alphavirus + saRNA-LNP platform” (self-amplifying RNA + lipid nanoparticles “vaccine” platform) is based on the VEEV alphavirus (Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis Virus.) Please see the screenshots from her article, below:
**** Note the mention of immune system issues that are induced in persons who are COVID-19 “vaccinated”, and how this can potentially severely complicate any infection by Chikungunya.
The second article is here: https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/psyop-25-scamdemic-update-chinese, “PSYOP-25 SCAMDEMIC UPDATE: Chinese Authorities Mandating Blood Tests, Releasing Lab Mosquitoes to Fight Chikungunya Outbreak”, 13 August 2025. Please see the screenshots from this article, below:
The founder of the “mosquito lab” in Guangzhou is Dr. Zhiyong Xi. Please see the screenshot below from the above link:
Which work, at least in part, is being funded by NIAID (division of NIH — both divisions part of HHS.)
Which begs the following questions: WHY is Dr. Zhiyong XI still doing mosquito research in the United States if he founded a mosquito study lab in Communist China? WHY is Dr. Zhiyong Xi’s research at Michigan State University being funded, at least in part, by the NIH / NIAID?
There are two “FDA-approved vaccines” against Chikungunya: IXCHIQ, and VIMKUNYA. BOTH of these “vaccines” were FDA-approved under “accelerated approval” methods. Please see the screenshots, below, from the Package Inserts for these injectables. First, from the Package Insert for IXCHIQ (https://ixchiqhcp.com/PI-new.pdf):
Note the presence of Aluminum Hydroxide as an adjuvant in VIMKUNYA.
NOTE THAT THE “EXACT MECHANISM OF PROTECTION’ HAS NOT BEEN DETERMINED FOR EITHER IXCHIQ OR FOR VIMKUNYA. In other words, the United States government (via the FDA) is fine with injecting people with these “vaccines” WITHOUT THE FDA KNOWING THE EXACT MECHANISMS OF PROTECTION FOR EITHER OF THEM. What are the “CHIKV-specific immune responses” that these injectables supposedly elicit?
And, by the way, both IXCHIQ and VIMKUNYA can be “shed” onto newborn children if the expectant mother is sick with a virus (this is called viremia) at the time of delivery. A pregnant female who takes either one of the above “vaccines” runs the risk of contracting “viral viremia.” Neither IXCHIQ, nor VIMKUNYA have had proper testing for potential effects on pregnant females, their fetuses, or their newborns (section 8.1 Pregnancy in either Package Insert.)
All of the above begs the following questions: Does HHS Sec. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., know about these Chikujgunya “vaccines”? Does he know that the FDA approved them under “accelerated approval” methods? Does he understand that the FDA does NOT know the “exact mechanism of protection” for either IXCHIQ or VIMKUNYA? Does Dr. Martin Makary (FDA Commissioner) know about this situation? Do either Sec. Kennedy, Jr., or Dr. Makary know that “career FDA types” in the CBER division signed the FDA Approval Letters for IXCHIQ (signed by R. Douglas Pratt, MD, 6 August 2025) and for VIMKUNYA (signed by David C. Kaslow, MD, 14 February 2025)?
Yours Truly will again emphasize that it is critically important for all persons, whether COVID-19 “vaccinated” or not, to follow some type of COVID-19 spike protein mitigation / prophylaxis protocol. It is also critically important that all persons, whether COVID-19 “vaccinated” or not, to do all they can to build and maintain their general health, and the health of their immune system, so as to be in the best shape possible.
The header image of the pituitary gland and the influence it has on the human body is courtesy of https://www.123rf.com/ and Google Images.
Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s offering speaks to the disaster of the COVID-19 “vaccines” (Bioweapon Toxin Injections), Yours Truly dedicates it to the memory of all persons, of whatever age or location, who have passed away from the negative, toxic effects of the the COVID-19 “vaccines” that they had injected into their body.
There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note One: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, the only AI-generated content are images that may be embedded in certain of the linked items in today’s post. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Note Two: the format of today’s offering will be a combination of “in-text” links, with other items having numerical identifiers such as would be used in a scientific research article or paper. Citations related to the numerical identifiers will be listed at the end of the post. Thank you.
Today’s offering regards more information on the negative effects that the COVID-19 “vaccines” have on the human brain. The trail begins here:
Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi: Because Of mRNA Vaccines, The Brains Of Billions Of People Are Not Working Anymore.
"The mRNA vaccines cause the destruction of brain cells. Obviously. And that is what we are now experiencing. We're seeing — I'm afraid to say BILLIONS OF PEOPLE — whose… pic.twitter.com/pvgpBRjsj7
Recall that Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, MD, a medical microbiologist who is involved with the Doctors for COVID Ethics organization (https://doctors4covidethics.org/), and who is a dual citizen of Thailand and of Germany, was put on trial in Germany for his anti-COVID-19 “vaccine” stance. The court returned a verdict of Not Guilty in May 2023. The prosecutor’s appeal of Dr. Bhakdi’s Not Guilty verdict, an appeal that was to go to court in February 2025, was postponed [1]. More on the story related to the tweet by Dr. Bhakdi is here: https://slaynews.com/news/renowned-microbiologist-mrna-vaccines-destroyed-brains-billions-people/, “Renowned Microbiologist: mRNA ‘Vaccines’ ‘Destroyed the Brains’ of ‘Billions of People'”, by Frank Bergman, 14 July 2025.
Today’s offering speaks to the negative effects of the COVID-19 “vaccines” on the human brain having to do with two small, but very important, glands located in the brain: the pituitary gland and the pineal gland.
The pituitary gland, a small, pea-shaped gland,is found in the human brain near the hypothalamus. The pituitary gland secretes several hormones that are important to various body functions. The pineal gland, another small gland, is found in the center area of the human brain. The pineal gland, among other functions, secretes melatonin, a hormone that is important for the body’s circadian rhythm and for proper sleep. The pituitary gland, the pineal gland, and the hypothalamus are components of the endocrine system of the human body. Please see the screenshots below: the first is about the pituitary gland [2]; the second is about the pineal gland [3]; and the third is from an article on the pineal gland that includes a discussion about the endocrine system [4]:
The ingredients (and, therefore, the mechanisms) of the COVID-19 “vaccines”, once injected into the body, quickly spread, via the dangerous lipid nanoparticles “rapid delivery system” compounds that are contained in these injectables, to every area of the human body, including to the brain. Yours Truly has written and posted about these lab-created compounds. They are: ALC-0159 and ALC-0315 in the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” (all of them); and, SM-102 in the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” (all of them.) It is now known that the COVID-19 “vaccines” cross the Blood-Brain Barrier of the human body and do damage to the brain. Once inside the brain, these “vaccines” can, and do, induce multiple problems ranging from Central Nervous System damage, to stroke, to cognitive impairment, to Alzheimer’s disease, and more. The Ota, et al., 2025 paper demonstrates that the COVID-19 spike protein (the foundation ingredient of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”) enters the cerebral arteries [5]. Please see a screenshot from this paper, below:
The Roh, et al. paper, from 2024, demonstrates that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” can induce Alzheimer’s disease [6]. Please see a screenshot from the Abstract of this paper, below:
A compilation of articles regarding how the COVID-19 “vaccines” enter the human brain and induce damage is here: https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/vaids-bombshell-the-covid-vaccine, “VAIDS BOMBSHELL: “The ‘Covid Vaccine’ is a CHEMICAL LOBOTOMY. A recent study of 558,017 Koreans found that the mRNA shots Increase the Risk of Cognitive Impairment +137.7% & Alzheimer’s disease +22.5”, 23 July 2025. There are numerous links in this article to previous posts in this Substack which discuss brain issues after COVID-19 “vaccination.” The Ota, et al., paper is also mentioned.
There is another aspect of the issue regarding how the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” enter into every area (and, therefore, into the cells of these areas) of the “vaccinated” human body. This is the fact that the PRRARSV gene code piece from the Pangolin MP789 coronavirus is present in BOTH the Pfizer-BioNTech and the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” (all of them.) This particular gene code piece has a 90%+ compatibility to the human genome code. In the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, PRRARSV functions as a “backdoor key” to facilitate entry into every cell in the “vaccinated” person’s body. Both our host, Wolf Moon, and Yours Truly has written about this situation here, for examples: https://www.theqtree.com/2023/05/01/pfizer-and-moderna-vaccines-both-contain-prrarsv-key-to-the-cell-nucleus/; and, https://www.theqtree.com/2024/11/27/placeholder-open-thread-11-27-2024-prrarsv-part-2-pangolin-edition/.
Back to the pituitary gland and the pineal gland of the human brain. Dr. Michele Ross, PhD, discusses the four areas of the brain that are not specifically protected by the Blood-Brain Barrier. Please see a screenshot from her article [7], below:
The modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” enter and damage the pituitary gland, one of the glands that is not specifically protected by the human Blood-Brain Barrier. The Taieb and Mounira paper from 2024 discusses this issue [8]. Two screenshots from their paper are below; the first is from the Abstract; the second is the Figure 2:
Another paper, by Verrienti, et al., from 2024, is a review of effects on the pituitary gland after COVID-19 “vaccination”[9]. Please see the screenshots from this paper, below. The first is the Conclusions section; the second is the Figure 1.
************ And now, to what may appear to be a minor point, but actually is, in Yours Truly’s opinion, an important aspect of the types of damage that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” do to the pineal gland of the human brain:these injectables interfere with the ADAMTS3 enzyme (a protein), part of the adamalysin family of enzymes. The influences of the ADAMTS enzymes in the human body range from functions in the brain, to correct growth of the lymphatic vessels, and more. Please see the screenshot from the Wikipedia entry on ADAMTS [10], below:
One member of the ADAMTS family is ADAMTS3. This enzyme (protein) is involved with, among other functions, the proper regulating of the brain’s cortex(the cerebral cortex, the outer “covering” of the brain.) Please see the screenshot from the Wikipedia entry on ADAMTS3 [11], below:
Pay special attention to the mention of Reelin. This protein is essential to the lamination of the cerebral cortex (lamination of the cerebral cortex appears like “multiple folds.”) When Reelin is decreased during the human aging process, brain function is negatively affected. When Reelin is decreased at other times in the human lifespan, the result can be Schizophrenia and other neurological conditions. Please see the screenshot from the Sighild Lemarchant article of 2017 [12], below:
The Cleveland Clinic article on the cerebral cortex starts with the following [13]:
************ And here is the “tie-in” to the COVID-19 spike protein and the brain: the spike protein of this virus interferes with the functioning of ADAMTS3. The Seabra Rodrigues Dias, et al., 2022 paper discusses what COVID-19 does to disrupt the work of the ADAMTS enzymes in the body [14]. Please see the screenshots from this paper, below. The first is a portion of section 2.5 Adamalysin expression in COVID-19 patients; the second is the Table 2. of body areas and functions that ADAMTS3 influences:
************ It is Yours Truly’s considered opinion that, since the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” (and the COVID-19 virus itself) contain elements that accelerate the aging of the entire body, down to the mitochondrial level, they also accelerate aging of the Reelin function in the brain related to ADAMTS3. This accelerated aging of the Reelin function can “leave the door open” for the development of cognitive impairment, of dementia, of Alzheimer’s disease, and other neurological / psychological conditions. Please see: https://www.theqtree.com/2023/10/28/the-covid-19-virus-and-the-modrna-covid-19-vaccines-induce-accelerated-aging/.
Yours Truly will point out that, while the COVID-19 virus itself does not contain the lab-created compound N1-Methylpseudouridine, nor the dangerous lipid nanoparticles ALC-0159, ALC-0315, or SM-102 — the COVID-19 virus itselfdoes contain the PRRARSV “backdoor key”, and it also appears to contain elements that interfere with ADAMTS enzymes (proteins) in the body, including ADAMTS3 and the function of the Reelin protein in the brain. In my opinion, these facts may contribute to the incidence of “Long COVID” in non-COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons who contract an infection of the COVID-19 virus itself, recover from it, but then can present with symptoms of “Long COVID.” This is aside from COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons who can also present with symptoms of “Long COVID.” These “Long COVID” symptoms may present as neurological and/or psychological issues (either new-onset, or aggravation of previously-diagnosed conditions.)
TO CONCLUDE: It is Yours Truly’s considered opinion that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” were designed to damage, to injure, and/or to destroy, the human body. This damage, injury, and/or destruction includes every organ and area of the body of a person who has taken any injection of modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.” This damage, injury, and/or destruction begins the moment that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” is injected into the body. The modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” contain a lab-created compound, N1-Methylpseudouridine, that replaces the natural Uridine in the “vaccinated” person’s body with a “fake” Uridine combined with a type of methane. Natural Uridine plays crucial roles in multiple types of brain function, in mood regulation, and in the regulation of the “gut-brain axis” functions of the body. N1-Methylpseudouridine has no role in the body beyond replacing natural Uridine, thus weakening the “vaccinated” person’s body natural immune system against the other ingredients and mechanisms of the “vaccines.” The modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” contain dangerous lab-created lipid nanoparticles, which quickly spread the ingredients (and, therefore, the mechanisms) of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” throughout the body of the “vaccinated” person, including crossing the Blood-Brain Barrier and entering the brain. The modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” induce multiple types of damage and injury to the brain, including to the areas of the brain that are not specifically protected by the Blood-Brain Barrier, such as the pituitary gland and the pineal gland. The modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” contain elements that interfere with the important ADAMTS3 enzyme (protein) of the body; a protein that plays critical roles in multiple areas, including the proper regulation of the cerebral cortex covering of the brain. The spike protein in the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” interfere with the proper function of the Reelin protein in the brain as it relates to ADAMTS3. The modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” also contain the PRRARSV gene code piece from the Pangolin MP789 coronavirus; PRRARSV acts as a “backdoor key” that facilities the entry of the COVID-19 spike protein in the modRNA “vaccines” to enter the nucleus of every cell in the “vaccinated” person’s body. [The above are aside from the fact that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” also contain a SV40 cancer promoter gene code piece from the African Green Monkey.] The COVID-19 virus itself contains the PRRARSV gene code piece; and, it also appears to contain elements that interfere with the important ADAMTS3 enzyme of the body.In addition, there is the now-known phenomenon of COVID-19 “vaccine” spike protein “shedding” from “vaccinated” persons onto other persons, including onto non-COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons. It is Yours Truly’s considered opinion that this “shedding” can also potentially result in negative neurological effects, among other negative effects, in non-COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons. Yours Truly is NOT advocating that non-COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons avoid all contact with persons who may be COVID-19 “vaccinated”: but, instead, to be following a prophylatic COVID-19 spike protein protocol. In addition, ALL persons who have ever taken a COVID-19 “vaccine”, and ALL non-COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons who have been infected with COVID-19 and recovered, ALSO need to be following a COVID-19 spike protein mitigation / reduction protocol.
************Yours Truly will state the following:It is past time for all COVID-19 “vaccines” to be taken off the market, and to be completely removed from use; to have all COVID-19 “vaccines” completely removed from any and all “recommendation lists” issued by any government agency, any private or non-governmental agency or organization, any hospital, clinic, pharmacy, nursing home or care facility, and any school board or educational facility; to have all COVID-19 “vaccine” inventories that are used on human beings reduced to zero; to retain only those COVID-19 “vaccine” vials that will be used for complete analysis and data compilation regarding the exact ingredients in these injectables and the sources of these ingredients, with the resulting information and data analyses made public; and, to hold to full account those who created the COVID-19 virus itself and the COVID-19 “vaccines.”
[5] Ota N., Itani M., Aoki T., Sakurai A., Fujisawa T., Okada Y., Noda K., Arakawa Y., Tokuda S., Tanikawa R. Expression of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in cerebral Arteries: Implications for hemhorrhagic stroke Post-mRNA vaccination. J Clinical Neuroscience. Volume 136, June 2025 111223.
[6] Jae Hoon Roh, Inha Jung, Yunsun Suh, Min-Ho Kim, A potential asssociation between COVID-19 vaccination and development of Alzheimer’s disease, QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, Volume 117, Issue 10, October 2024, Pages 709-716, https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcae103.
[8] Taieb A, Mounira EE. Pilot Findings on SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine-Induced Pituitary Diseases: A Mini Review from Diagnosis to Pathophysiology. Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Nov 24; 10(12):2004. doi.10.3390/vaccines10122004. PMID: 36560413; PMCID: PMC9786744.
[9] Verrienti, M., Picciola, V., Ambrosio, M.R. et al. Pituitary and COVID-19 vaccination: a systematic review. Pituitary27, 970-985 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/S11102-024-01402-2.
[12] Relevance of the Proteolytic Processing of Reelin by ADAMTS-3 in Brain Functions. Sighild Lemarchant. Journal of Neuroscience 19 July 2017, 37 (29) 6814-6815; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1077-17.2017.
[14] “Adamalysins in COVID-19 — Potential mechanisms behind exacerbating the disease” Ivo Ricardo de Seabra Rodrigues Dias, Zhijian Cao, Hang Fai Kwok. J Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy. Vol. 150, June 2022, 112970.
Antique London’s photographs: Goldsmith Hall, The Assay Office
The above free vintage image of a laboratory is courtesy of iStock and Google Images.
Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics.
There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are found here. NOTE: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post anything in the discussion thread for today that is AI-generated, they must cite their source. Thank you.
Yours Truly discussed several items in the above announcement in Part One, referred to above. Part Two is a further discussion of items related to the BPL-1357 intranasal “universal virus vaccine”, a “cornerstone” of the “Generation Gold Standard” program. The primary focus of PartTwo will be on the “adjuvant” for BPL-1357, a compound called ALFQ. However, before the presentation, there is this short paper, from January 2025: https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.188, “593. Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 1 Study of the Safety of BPL-1357, A BPL-Inactivated, Whole-Virus, Universal Influenza Vaccine”, Jeffery Taubenberger, Matthew J. Memoli, et al., 29 January 2025. A screenshot of the Background section of the Abstract of this paper is below:
Note the description of BPL-1357: It is to cover several types of Avian Influenza viruses. Nothing about covering coronaviruses. Why was there a ‘challenge” with Influenza A type viruses, and nothing about “challenges” with Influenza virus types B or C (https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/viruses-types.html.) How can BPL-1357 be considered a “Universal Vaccine” if it is only covers Avian Influenza viruses? How does this paper “stack up” vis-a-vis the HHS / NIH “Generation Gold Standard” announcement?
Lovelace Biomedical Research Institute was founded in 1947 in Albuquerque, New Mexico. The institute joined Touro University in 2022. (https://www.lovelacebiomedical.org/, and Wikipedia.)
And, more on ALF (aka Army Liposome Formulation) is here: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7412170/, “Army Liposome Formulation (ALF) Family of Vaccine Adjuvants”, Carl R Alving, et al, 7 August 2020. Please see the screenshot from this paper, below:
Note the reference to HIV-1. More on this later in today’s post.
ALFQ contains a TLR4 agonist. What is TLR4? Also known as CD284, it is a “key activator of the innate immune response”, per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toll-like_receptor_4. An agonist is an agent that interacts with a particular cellular receptor, and produces an observable positive response.
The other component of ALFQ is QS21. What is QS21? It is a vaccine adjuvant derived from the soapbark tree (Quillaja saponaria.) QS21 is used in the Novavax COVID-19 “vaccine” as an adjuvant, as part of the company’s “Matrix-M” ingredient.
QS21 has been studied for some time. Here is an article, from the John Innes Centre, that describes the history of QS21: https://www.jic.ac.uk/advances/the-quest-for-qs-21/, Winter 2020-2021. Please see a screenshot from this article, below:
Yours Truly now presents some “interesting information.” One is not making any judgements or opinions; the reader may make their own. This has to do with the HIV-1 reference above in the post. The first item is this: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-410X(00)00415-1, “QS21 promotes an adjuvant effect allowing for reduced antigen dose during HIV-1 envelope subunit immunization in humans”, Thomas G. Evans, et al., 28 February 2001. A screenshot of the Abstract of this paper is below:
The second item is here: https://worldcouncilforhealth.substack.com/cp/162703289, “BOMBSHELL: HIV Contamination Found In Moderna’s Covid Shot”, 2 May 2025. There are actually two bombshells here: two separate molecules related to HIV-1 were found in the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” — gp145 and gp120.Please see the screenshots from the World Council for Health article, below:
The graphic created by Dr. McKernan, from the above article, showing where the gp145 HIV-1 molecule is in the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” sequence:
Regarding the gp120 HIV-1 molecule in the Moderna mRNA-1273 modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, it was the famous (or, infamous) “Pradhan, et al., paper” from January 2020 which showed that there were gp120 HIV-1 molecules in the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) virus itself.The “Pradhan, et al., paper” was Withdrawn shortly after its publication, and is now difficult to find. Yours Truly was able to locate the paper here: https://academia.edu/79020098/Uncanny_similarity_of_unique_inserts_in_the_2019_nCoV_spike-protein_to_HIV_1_gp_120_and_Gag?f_ri-170, “Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike protein to HIV-1 gp120 and Gag”, Prashant Pradhan, et al., 31 January 2020. A screenshot from the paper is below:
Recall that in January 2020, there were no COVID-19 “vaccines” in use anywhere. Note also that the gp120 HIV-1 molecule is present in the COVID-19 virus itself spike protein. Did the Pfizer-BioNTech developers of BNT162b2 remove any or all of the four HIV-1 related inserts in the COVID-19 spike protein (found by Pradhan, et al.) in the process of working on their “vaccine”? Why did Moderna leave the gp120 HIV-1 molecule (and also, it turns out, the gp145 HIV-1 molecule) in that company’s modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, mRNA-1273?
And, there is the involvement of the United States Army in HIV research (this is in addition to the Army’s developing the “adjuvant”, ALFQ): https://hivresearch.org/hiv-research/alf-adjuvants. This is the Military HIV Research Program.
Yours Truly will reiterate that one is not making judgements or opinions here; readers will make their own. However, the following needs to be said: the gp120 molecule in HIV-1 attacks the body’s CD4 cells. Please see this paper, from 2010: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20088758/, “The GP120 molecule of HIV-1 and its interaction with T cells”, V Yoon, et al., 2010. A screenshot of the Abstract of this paper is below:
Also: the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself attacks the body’s CD4 cells: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84790, “SARS-CoV-2 uses CD4 to infect T helper lymphocytes”, Natalia S Brunetti, et al., 31 July 2023. A screenshot of the Abstract of this paper is below:
And, there is this paper: https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.596631, “Sharing CD4+ T cell Loss: When COVID-19 and HIV Collide on Immune System”, Jean-Pierre Routy, et al., 14 December 2020. Note that this paper was published just a few days after the initial EUAs were granted by the FDA for BNT162b2 and for mRNA-1273 in the United States (11 December 2020); therefore, the research into writing the Routy, et al., paper must have been accomplished at least a few months prior to December 2020. A screenshot of the opening statement of the paper is below:
Yours Truly will ask a question that perhaps is “inconvenient”, but needs to be asked: Is any potential connection between the presence of the gp120 HIV-1 molecule in the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself, AND its potential presence in the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, AND its potential presence in the Novavax COVID-19 “vaccine” (which uses the original SARS-CoV-2 virus itself spike protein as a foundation), AND the confirmed presence of BOTH the gp120 HIV-1 molecule and the gp145 HIV-1 molecule in the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” — with the multiple serious Adverse Events reports of autoimmune / immune-mediated, and related conditions, that are in the Appendix 1: List of Adverse Events of Special Interest section of this report: ttps://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf?
Another “inconvenient” question posed by Yours Truly: What, if anything, did Dr. Anthony Fauci, Dr. Francis Collins, Dr. Deborah Birx, Dr. Robert Redfield, and Dr. Janet Woodcock know about the presence of the gp120 HIV-1 molecule in the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself spike protein, AND in the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” mRNA-1273?
What will be done to make absolutely sure that there is NO molecule whatsoever related to HIV-1 present in the “Universal Vaccine” candidates BPL-1357 and BPL-24910, or in any other “Universal Vaccine” candidates? What will be done to hold accountable the people who allowed the gp120 HIV-1 molecule to be present in the original SARS-CoV-2 virus itself? What will be done to investigate the potential presence of the gp120 HIV-1 molecule in the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”? What will be done to hold accountable the people who allowed HIV-1 molecules gp120 AND gp145 to be present in the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”?
The above vintage image of the United States Congress in session is courtesy of the Library of Congress and Google Images.
Health Friday is a series devoted to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s post speaks of the disaster of the lab-created bioweapons called COVID-19 — the COVID-19 virus itself; and, the COVID-19 “vaccines” — Yours Truly dedicates it to the memory of all persons, of whatever age or location, who have passed away from the negative effects of these bioweapons.
There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. NOTE: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If anyone wishes to post AI-generated content to today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.
The PREP Act (also called PREPA) is a “License to Kill“, in the words of Sasha Latypova (https://sashalatypova.substack.com/.) The PREP Act removes accountability, liability, and transparency from the activities of the Health and Human Services Department of the United States Federal Government under the provisions of the Act. The PREP Act allows: unlimited research, development, and use of COVID-19 “countermeasures”, including, but not limited to, “vaccine” development and use; “respiratory devices” development and use (think ventilators); prescription drugs use (think Paxlovid and Remdesivir); “mandated” uses of masking, of “social distancing”, and even of “lockdowns”; the “mandated” administration of COVID-19 “vaccines”, including to newborn babies, to persons under the age of 18, to persons who wish to attend school or to work; and much more. The PREP Act allows the United States Federal government and its associated departments (including Health and Human Services and the United States Defense Department) to literally use American citizens as “human lab rats” in the administration and use of dangerous, deadly, COVID-19 “countermeasures” which are not “safe and effective”; but which, instead, damage and/or destroy the bodies and minds of the persons who take the COVID-19 “vaccines” and/or drugs such as Remdesivir. The PREP Act uses taxpayer monies, private research grants, collaboration with scientific labs all across the United States (think the Baric Lab at UNC, Chapel Hill), and with foreign labs (think the Wuhan Institute of Virology) to pursue the provisions of the PREP Act.
Yours Truly begins here: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/12/11/2024-29108/12th-amendment-to-declaration-under-the-public-readiness-and-emergency-preparedness-act-for-medical, “12th Amendment to Declaration Under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act for Medical Countermeasures Against COVID-19”, signed by then-Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, 11 December 2024. This 12th Amendment extends the PREP Act (also called PREPA) “emergency status” of COVID-19, along with all medical countermeasures used against COVID-19 (including development and use of “vaccines”, “respiratory devices”, and so on) — until 31 December 2029 (in other words, until after the 2028 General Election and into the Presidential administration that takes over on 20 January 2029.) It also means that, even though the “official” COVID-19 “state of emergency” ended in May 2023, the “virus emergency status” has not been ended. It also means that legal liability for any person, any medical professional, any drug manufacturer, any hospital / clinic / care facility, and supplier, and so on, that fall under the provisions of the 12th Amendment — are legally exempt from any and all liability. It also means that, while the current Health and Human Services Secretary can sign a document that rescinds and/or modifies the 12th Amendment, it must take an act of Congress to repeal the PREP Act.
Per Katherine Watt (paralegal and professional researcher), the two separate actions mentioned above are discussed here: https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/repealing-prep-act-and-terminating, “Repealing PREP Act and terminating HHS Secretary determinations and declarations issued under PREP Act are two different things.”, 4 April 2025. Please see the screenshots from her article, below:
It appears that the various States of the United States have little room to challenge the provisions of the PREP Act. However, a recent case before the North Carolina Supreme Court, regarding a person under age 18 who was given a COVID-19 “vaccine” without consent, was decided in favor of the plaintiff: https://thefocalpoints.com/p/give-it-to-him-anyway-teen-given, “Give It to Him Anyway”: Teen Given COVID-19 mRNA Shot Without Consent — State Supreme Court Says Family Can Sue”, by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 24 March 2025. Please see the screenshot from the Hulscher article, below:
A lower court in North Carolina ruled that the family could not sue the school system, due to the “liability provisions” of the PREP Act. However, the North Carolina Supreme Court overruled the lower court, stating that the family can indeed sue:
Before turning to the final aspect of today’s offering, Yours Truly will expand the mention of Sasha Latypova above in the post. Ms. Latypova, a native of Ukraine, was trained in medical and pharmaceutical technology. She owned and ran several companies in this area. She worked with Pfizer-BioNTech and other drug manufacturers in medical technology. She is therefore a person with deep experience, in Yours Truly’s opinion, regarding the workings of these industries. After moving to the United States and subsequently retiring from these endeavors, Ms. Latypova began to research and write on how the medical technology and the pharmaceutical industries have now become entities that serve their shareholders and the government, not the patients they claim to serve. Regarding the PREP Act, here is one of her blog posts: https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/prep-act-license-to-kill-must, “PREP Act Brief: “License to Kill” must be repealed.”, 21 April 2025. This article is densely-written and detailed. Below are a couple of screenshots from her post. Note: There are numerous hyperlinked information sources embedded in the article:
Please also see this post, an interview between Ms. Latypova and Ms. Watt (Bailiwick News) regarding the PREP Act: https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/interview-with-the-former-feds-foundation, “Interview with the Former Feds Foundation: Katherine Watt and I discuss PREP Act as an act of treason.”, 25 April 2025.
Finally, there is this blog article from “Spartacus”: https://iceni.substack.com/cp/162062988, “Declaration of Sovereignty Pt. 1”, 24 April 2025 (this is a cross-post from the Mole substack website.) This post is long and intense; it traces the “Profane Myth of COVID-19.” A screenshot of part of this post is below:
It is the PREP Act which, in significant amounts, has placed the United States in the position where the country is today: just under 70% of the population has taken at least one injection of a dangerous, deadly COVID-19 “vaccine” (these injectables are NOT “safe and effective”, and mounting evidence proves this); the country is just beginning to emerge from the economic devastation and chaos of the “COVID lockdowns” period; and, the Medical Tsunami of COVID-19 “vaccine”-induced injuries, illnesses, disabilities, and deaths, which is starting to present among the “vaccinated.” There are many persons involved in the above who must now be held accountable; not the least of which are those who knew how dangerous and potentially deadly the COVID-19 “vaccines” are while working with “Operation Warp Speed”, and who withheld this information from then-President Donald Trump.
