Tag: COVID-19 “vaccines”

Health Friday Open Thread 12.6.2024: The Immune System after COVID-19 “Vaccination”; and a Note on the Virus Itself

The above image is courtesy of a Substack post by Jessica Rose, PhD: https://jessicar.substack.com/p/the-immunological-mechanism-of-action, “The immunological mechanism of action for lost immunity, a shift to tolerance (and autoimmunity?) from the shots”, 27 December 2022.

Health Friday is a series of posts related to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. Since today’s post is related to the COVID-19 virus itself, and to the COVID-19 “vaccines”, it is dedicated to the memory of Yours Truly’s COVID-19 “vaccinated” late brother, Sam, and to her late cousin, Bill; and to all people, of any age or location, who have passed away from the negative effects (direct or indirect) of the COVID-19 “vaccines” that they took. The discussion today is not limited to what is presented in the post: It is an Open Thread.

Today’s Health Friday post is about what the COVID-19 “vaccines” do to the “vaccinated” person’s natural immune system. It is also about what the COVID-19 virus itself does to a person’s natural immune system. The bottom lines are: One: the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” severely damage or even destroy the natural immune system of the person who takes these “vaccines”, with the damage or destruction increasing with each additional injection of them. Two: the COVID-19 virus itself can damage the natural immune system. Three: it is more possible to repair and support the immune system of a person who is non-COVID-19 “vaccinated.”

Yours Truly begins with these: first, https://x.com/tpvsean/status/1862616283738501504. Two screenshots of this tweet are below:

And, this: https://x.com/leejohnson/status/1862619457706770458. Two screenshots of this tweet are below:

Actually, Yours Truly respectfully disagrees with the title of the above book: in her opinion, it should read: Bill Gates I Want to Kill Three-Quarters of You, and Control the Survivors.

There. Must. Be. Justice.

There are several aspects that make up today’s post. *** Yours Truly is firmly convinced that the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself was designed and lab-created, AND the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” were / are designed and lab-created, as bioweapons. These lab-created bioweapons attack the immune system of the human body; damage and/or destroy important components of the immune system of the human body; and, in the case of the modRNA “vaccines”, keep this damage and/or destruction going for an indefinite period of time in the “vaccinated” person’s body. Also — Yours Truly will present evidence that — wait for it — the pangolin-CoV MP789 virus genome is an integral part of the situation.

To begin: The 5.3.6 Postmarketing Experience document that Pfizer-BioNTech submitted to the FDA on 30 April 2021: https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf, 5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports of PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Received Through 28-Feb-2021. Below are two screenshots from the Appendix 1: List of Adverse Events of Special Interest section of this document:

The above are autoimmune and immune-mediated medical conditions that were reported in the first two months after the rollout of the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” BNT162b2 among persons who took this “vaccine” during that period. Notes: BNT162b2 is the basis of all subsequent formulations of the COVID-19 “vaccine” injectables by this company (since 2022, marketed under the brand name COMIRNATY); and, there are other listings of autoimmune and immune-mediated conditions in the Appendix 1. of the above report.

Yours Truly now turns to a 2021 paper by Stephanie Seneff, PhD: https://doi.org/10.56098/ijvtpr.v2i1.23, “Worse Than the Disease? Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of the mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19”, 10 May 2021. Dr. Seneff points out that only the spike protein was used for the modRNA in the Pfizer-BioNTech and in the Moderna COVID-19 “vaccines” (BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273, respectively.) A screenshot from this paper is below, listing the “firsts” regarding the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”:

Dr. Seneff references a 2020 paper by Lu, et al., regarding an important discovery about the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7429369/, “A COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Encoding SARS-CoV-2 Like Particles Induces a Strong Antiviral-like Response in Mice.” The authors make it clear that there are three separate-but-important components in the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself: the membrane (M); the envelope (E); and, the spike protein (S). Another screenshot from the Seneff paper is below, regarding this issue:

Why is it important to know that Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna chose only the spike protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself as the basis for their respective modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”? Yours Truly hypothesizes that, in so doing, it was then possible for them to create a modRNA that would have the most potential to damage the persons taking these respective modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.” The Lu, et al., 2020 paper, cited above, also describes how the authors created various “prototype” COVID-19 “vaccines.” These “prototype vaccines” were lab-produced using various ingredients — one of which was — wait for it — N1-Methylpseudouridine; as well as one “prototype vaccine” that used Uridine. The authors concluded that N1-Methylpseudouridine was “superior” in creating “neutralizing antibodies.” Please refer to Figure 1. and its description underneath from this paper, where N1-Methylpseudouridine is used in the “Lane 5 proto-type vaccine” of the experiments. In Yours Truly’ opinion, it is within the realm of possibility that Pfizer-BioNTech, or Moderna, or both, knew of the Lu, et al., research.

Below are screenshots of section 11 Description of the Pfizer-BioNTech (COMIRNATY) “2024-2025 Formula COVID-19 vaccine”; and, of section 11 Description of the Moderna (SPIKEVAX) “2024-2025 Formula COVID-19 vaccine.” There is no mention in either one of the membrane or of the envelope of the original Wuhan Hu1 SARS-CoV-2 virus; there is only the mention of the spike protein:

The modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” damage and/or destroy crucial IgG3 immune system cells in the “vaccinated” person’s body (the “fight it off” element), and instead foster the increase of IgG4 immune system cells (the “tolerate but never clear” element). Please refer to the Jessica Rose, PhD, post at the top of today’s post. Below is another figure from her post, from the Supplementary Materials of this 2022 paper (cited in the post): www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciimmunol.ade2798, “Class switch toward noninflammatory, spike-specific IgG4 antibodies after repeated SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination”, Pascal Irrgang, et al., 22 December 2022. This image, from Figure 2: Figure S1 of the paper, clearly shows the decimation of IgG3 (“fight it off”) immune system cells, and the increase of IgG4 (“tolerate it”) immune system cells, after repeated modRNA COVID-19 “vaccinations”:

And, also from the Irrgang, et al., paper:

Those who are COVID-19 “vaccinated”, especially if they take repeated injections of these “vaccines”, are the slowest to “clear” a COVID-19 infection: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9258747/, “Duration of Shedding of Culturable Virus in SARS-CoV-2 Omicron (BA.1) Infection”, Julie Boucau, Ph.D., et al., published in the New England Journal of Medicine, 21 July 2022. The salient figure from this Letter to the Editor is below:

Please refer to the second and third column percentages. These “tell the tale.”

Yours Truly has written extensively regarding the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, some of their ingredients, and what damage these injectables do to the body and brain of the “vaccinated” person. Please refer to: www.theqtree.com/2024/11/08/health-friday-11-8-2024-open-thread-the-insidious-n1-methylpseudouridine-in-the-modrna-covid-19-vaccines/; www.theqtree.com/2024/11/01/health-friday-open-thread-11-1-2024-the-covid-19-information-file-part-one/; and, www.theqtree.com/2024/10/18/health-friday-10-18-2024-special-edition-neurological-effects-of-the-covid-19-vaccines-physical-and-psychological/, for examples. These “vaccines” contain, among other ingredients, the following that assist in the mechanisms of said injectables: the lab-created lipid nanoparticles ALC-0159, ALC-0315, SM-102, and PEG2000-DMG, which spread the “vaccines” to every cell of the “vaccinated” person’s body; and, N1-Methylpseudouridine (present in both the Pfizer-BioNTech and in the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”), which replaces the natural Uridine of the “vaccinated” person’s body with a lab-created combination of “fake Uridine” plus a form of methane. Recall that natural Uridine is an incredibly important RNA which assists or manages many bodily functions — including brain functions and emotions.

This leads to the next part of today’s post: the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself, which is the foundation of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.”

The lab-created SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) virus itself attacks the body (and brain) of a person infected with this virus in several ways. One way is that the virus “attaches” itself to the ACE2 receptor cells of the body. ACE2 stands for “angiotensin-converting enzyme 2” cells. What these cells do is discussed here: www.cas.org/recources/cas-insights/ace2-covid-19-target, by Angela Zhou, 15 December 2022. A screenshot of this article is below:

The spike protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself dysregulates (“downregulates”) the functions of the ACE2 receptor cells in the body of the infected person: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.04.409144, “SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Impairs Endothelial Function via Downregulation of ACE2”, Yuyang Lei, et al., 4 December 2020. “Endothelial function” is the range of functions of the vascular endothelium. Endothelial cells release elements that control the opening and closing of the arteries.

Also, the COVID-19 virus itself “mimics” the proteolytic activation of human ENaC cells: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58603. “SARS-CoV-2 strategically mimics proteolytic activation of human ENaC”, Praveen Anand, et al., 26 May 2020. ENaC stands for “Epithelial sodium channel” (an ion channel); this element has an important role in kidney function, the immune system, and vasculature. “Proteolysis” has to do with protein breakdown in the body.

The SARS-CoV-2 virus itself attacks, damages, and/or destroys, the CD4 cells of the human body. Please refer to: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.25.20200329, “SARS-CoV-2 uses CD4 to infect T helper lymphocytes”, Natalia S Brunetti, et al.; paper published in 2020, version of record 31 July 2023. A screenshot of the Abstract from this paper is below:

Note that damaged CD4 cells are a component in HIV infection; also, note again that, since the original SARS-CoV-2 virus itself is the foundation for the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” by Pfizer-BioNTech and by Moderna, the “attack and damage” elements and mechanisms described above are present in said “vaccines.”

For further information regarding how the spike protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself works in the human body, please refer to the ongoing research of Walter M Chesnut: https://wmcresearch.substack.com/.

And now, another visit with our shy, nocturnal scaly anteater, the Pangolin:

Yours Truly has written about this mammal, and of how the PRRARSV (or RRAR or RRARSV, depending on which scientific paper one reads) genome code in the original SARS-CoV-2 virus itself was lab-manipulated from the pangolin-CoV MP789 to include this code; for example: www.theqtree.com/2024/11/22/health-friday-11-22-2024-open-thread-lets-talk-about-prrarsv-the-backdoor-key/. It appears that the pangolin-CoV MP789 genome code was “mixed in” with the bat-CoV RaTG13 genome code in the lab experiments that created SARS-CoV-2. However, Yours Truly has discovered something else about pangolin-CoV MP789: It “binds” better to human ACE2 receptor cells, compared to the bat-CoV RaTG13!

The story behind this discovery begins here: www.crick.ac.uk/news/2021-02-05_pangolin-coronavirus-could-jump-to-humans. This article led to the following link: www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-21006-9, “Structure and binding properties of Pangolin-CoV spike glycoprotein inform the evolution of SARS-CoV-2”, Antoni G. Wrobel, et al., 5 February 2021. A screenshot from the Discussion section of this paper is below:

It would appear, then, that the pangolin-CoV MP789 genome has much more to do with the lab-creation of the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself (and, by extension, the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”) than at first meets the eye. This is not to discount the use of genome code elements from the bat-CoV RaTG13 in the lab-creation process of the virus itself; nor to discount the other coronavirus code elements that were “mixed in” from monkey, civet, and other animal coronaviruses. In Yours Truly’s opinion, those who lab-created the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself were searching for a genome code that could most effectively attack and compromise human ACE2 receptor cells and the mechanisms of these cells. They found what they were looking for in the pangolin-CoV MP789 genome code. However, it is crucial to understand that those who lab-created the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself did not also add N1-Methylpseudouridine to it — this compound was added to the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.” And therein, again in Yours Truly’s opinion, lies an important difference between the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) virus itself, and the presence of this virus in the modRNA-COVID-19 “vaccines.” It is the difference between a non-COVID-19 ” vaccinated” person being infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself and recovering (even if there are complications), because the natural Uridine in the non-COVID-19″vaccinated” person’s body is still operative to help regulate many body functions and mechanisms that can assist in recovery; whereas, in the COVID-19 “vaccinated” person’s body, the natural Uridine has been replaced with N1-Methylpseudouridine (thereby literally erasing the potential for natural Uridine to work.)

Is it, then, a foregone conclusion that the natural immune system of the COVID-19 “vaccinated” person is so severely damaged, or even destroyed, especially with that person taking more and more injections of these “vaccines”, that there is no hope for any possible repair or restoration of it? In the case of the RNA of Uridine being replaced by N1-Methylpseudouridine, some things can be done to supplement the body: consuming Uridine-containing foods, such as beets, goat cheese, walnuts, and broccoli. There is some promising research on the use of a compound, called 5-FU, to help repair Uridine RNA: https://doi.org/10.3389/frnar.2023.1248236, “RNA damage: the forgotten target of clinical compounds”, by Nicole Simms and John R.P. Knight. In the case of damaged CD4 cells, there are natural methods to increase the body’s healthy CD4 cell count. Please refer to: www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/how-to-boost-cd4-count-naturally, by Charlotte Lillis, 16 July 2024. Supplementation with Vitamin D, multivitamins, and probiotics are mentioned in this article.

Finally, Yours Truly firmly believes that the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself is not “just another virus” or “just another flu virus.” Au contraire: this virus itself was lab-created from a “palette” of animal coronaviruses (the pangolin-CoV MP789 in particular, with the bat-CoV RaTG13 close behind) to be as damaging as possible, even deadly, to the human body — in other words, a bioweapon. Yes, a non-COVID-19 “vaccinated” person may become infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself, and recover well; however, there may be “residual damage” from the virus itself remaining for some period of time in their body. There is also the phenomenon of “COVID-19 vaccine shedding” from COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons onto others, including onto non-COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons, to consider: as these “vaccines” contain elements in them that make this virus, as well as the “vaccines” themselves, more dangerous and/or deadly. Does this mean that non-COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons should avoid contact with other persons, especially COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons? No — what it does mean, however, is that it is imperative to have, and maintain, the highest possible degree of health of the body’s natural immune system.

There. Must. Be. Justice.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday 11.22.2024 Open Thread: Let’s Talk About PRRARSV, the “Backdoor Key”

The above free vintage image of a lock being picked is courtesy of Google Images.

Health Friday is a series related to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. Since today’s offering is related to the COVID-19 disaster — the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) virus itself; and, to the COVID-19 “vaccines” — it is dedicated to the memory of Yours Truly’s “vaccinated” late brother Sam, and her late cousin Bill; and to all persons of any age who have died as a result of either an infection from the COVID-19 virus itself, or to the negative effects (direct or indirect) of the COVID-19 “vaccines” that they took. However, the discussion is not limited to what is presented today: It is an Open Thread.

There are Important Wolf Moon Notifications, the Rules of our late, good Wheatie, and certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here.

Today’s post includes several “puzzle pieces.” Each one is integral to the whole. Please bear with me. There is a General Summary at the end of the post.

To Begin: A post from our host, Wolf Moon: www.theqtree.com/2023/05/01/pfizer-and-moderna-vaccines-both-contain-the-prrarsv-key-to-the-cell-nucleus/. This post is one of several on the topic of the “PRRARSV Backdoor Key” that is present in both the Pfizer-BioNTech and in the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.” One of the papers cited in the post is “the Mehedi paper”, found here: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1073789. “Nuclear translocation of spike mRNA is a novel feature of SARS-CoV-2”, Masfique Mehedi, et al., 26 January 2023. This paper proves that the PRRARSV code in the SARS-CoV-2 virus genome is only there, and not in either the SARS-CoV virus genome or the MERS-CoV virus genome. There are links to other important papers in the Wolf Moon post. Yours Truly is grateful to our host for doing serious investigation into this subject.

There has been speculation that the PRRARSV code may be related to snake venom. This also has been discussed by our good host in other of his posts on the subject. While Yours Truly believes that some type of snake venom that contains all or some of the PRRARSV code may be in play, she has an additional hypothesis on the PRRARSV code presence in the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” — and in the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself.

And, Now: May I present — the Pangolin (PAN-go-lin.)

Pangolins are shy, nocturnal mammals that are covered with scales; they are also called “scaly anteaters.” They resemble anteaters in body shape and length; however, Pangolins are covered with hard, keratin-like scales from the head to the tip of the tail. During the day, they remain in their burrows; at night, they emerge to hunt for and eat ants and termites. Their living habitat ranges from areas in Africa to India to southern Asia. As their meat, scales, and other body parts, are consumed as exotic foods, or are used in folk and traditional medicine in certain areas of the world, the Pangolin is listed as an endangered species. It is illegal to hunt or trap Pangolins, or to keep them as pets. However, because of their meat, scales, and other body parts, Pangolins are among the most-trafficked animals in the world (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pangolin.)

The above image of a Pangolin is courtesy of the International Fund for Animal Welfare and Goggle Images.

Pangolins, like other animals, have coronaviruses. And here is where the story gets interesting. One such Pangolin coronavirus is “pangolin-CoV MP789.” It appears that the RBD (Receptor Binding Domain) is this virus has an “uncanny” similarity to the RBD of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. In fact, it is been posited that the RBD of the SARS-CoV-2 virus resulted from a “recombination” of those of the bat-CoV RaTG13 virus and the pangolin-CoV MP789 virus. Below is Figure 1 of the “Morales-Espinosa, et al. paper” on this subject:

The “Morales-Espinosa, et al. paper” is found here: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7450963/, “The receptor binding domain of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is the result of an ancestral recombination between the bat-CoV RatG13 and the pangolin-CoV MP789”, Rosario Morales-Espinosa, et al., 27 August 2020.

There is a plethora of scientific papers, articles, and scientific/medical blog posts related to the “probable” or “hypothetical” or “uncanny” similarity between Pangolin-CoV and SARS-CoV-2. Yours Truly will provide a sampling, below. Most of these papers, articles, and blog posts were written between 2020 and late 2022.

One: A scientific article by researchers in the CCP: www.cell.com/current-biology/pdf/S0960-9822(20)30360-2.pdf, “Probable Pangolin Origin of SARS-CoV-2 Associated with COVID-19 outbreak”, Tao Zhang, et al., 6 April 2020. A screenshot of part of the Conclusion of this article is below:

Two: Another 2020 paper, this one with an important mention in the Results section regarding the very high similarity of the S proteins in the pangolin-CoV genome and the SARS-CoV-2 genome: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008421, “Are pangolins the intermediate host of the 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2)?”, by Ping Liu, et al., 14 May 2020. A screenshot of the section of the Results is below:

Three: Another scientific paper from 2020: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.0707.184374. “Single source of pangolin CoVs with a near identical spike RBD to SARS-CoV-2”, Chan, Y.A., and Zhan, S.H., 31 October 2020. A screenshot from this paper is below:

Four: A scientific blog post: https://blog.3ds.com/brands/biovia/decoding-the-sars-cov-2-genome-origin/, “Decoding the SARS-CoV-2 Genomes—Origin”, by Niranjani Iyer, 6 April 2020. A screenshot from the post is below:

Recall that it is only recently that the “the SARS-CoV-2 virus came from nature”, “the SARS-CoV-2 virus came from the ‘wet markets’ in Wuhan” claims have been proven incorrect. While there are still scientific papers and articles being published to “prove” the “came from nature” claims, what these papers and articles do not seem to explore, in Yours Truly’s opinion, are the Gain-of-Function experiments with various coronaviruses (including the pangolin-CoVs) that took place at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in the process of lab-creating the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself. These Gain-of-Function experiments used elements found in nature (bat coronaviruses, civet coronaviruses, pangolin coronaviruses, rabbit coronaviruses, monkey coronaviruses, etc.) to “build” the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself. Here, for example, is a 2022 scientific article regarding the claims that the virus came from nature: www.science.org/content/article/evidence-suggests-pandemic-came-nature-not-lab-panel-says, “Evidence suggests pandemic came from nature, not a lab, panel says”, 10 October 2022, by Jon Cohen.

Which leads into the discussion of the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s experiments with pangolin coronaviruses.

In May 2024, the NIH finally admitted that the agency funded Gain-of-Function research at the WIV: https://nypost.com/2024/05/16/us-news/nih-director-admits-taxpayers-funded-gain-of-function-research-in-wuhan-four-years-after-covid-pandemic-began/, by Josh Christenson.

Here is the June 2023 report from the ODNI (Office of the Director of National Intelligence) regarding the Wuhan Institute of Virology and its activities: www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/assessments/Report-on-Potential-Links-Between-the-Wuhan-Institute-of-Virology-and-the-Origins-of-COVID-19-20230623.pdf. Two screenshots from the Report are below:

It is obvious that the Wuhan Institute of Virology conducted coronavirus experiments with bats, civets, monkeys, and pangolins, in the process of creating the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Which leads to the next discussion, regarding PRRARSV and the furin cleavage site in the SARS-CoV-2 virus genome. Bear with Yours Truly here: this is an important piece of the puzzle.

PRRARSV is located at the S1-S2 furin cleavage site on the SARS-CoV-2 virus genome, from a scientific paper in September 2020: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118056, “Structural features of coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 spike protein: Targets for vaccination”. by Ariane Sternberg and Cord Naujokat, 15 September 2020. A screenshot from section 2 of this paper is below:

The redoubtable Walter M Chesnut expands on this, and how PRRARSV assists in the translocation of the modRNA spike protein in the SARS-CoV-2 virus into every cell in the human body: https://wmcresearch.substack.com/p/prrarsv-the-furin-cleavage-site-a. “PRRARSV—The Furin Cleavage Site: A Nuclear Localization Signal that Translocates the Spike and its mRNA to the Nucleus Inducing H3.3 histone Deposition and Rapid Aging”, 10 April 2023. Below is the National Cancer Institute definition of a histone (www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms/def/histone):

In other words, the PRRARSV present in the SARS-CoV-2 virus enters the cell, assists the spike protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus to enter the nucleus of the cell, and interferes with the H3.3 histone in the DNA of the cell.

But wait, there’s more about histone3.3! it interacts with the human body at the mitochondrial level: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc/2014.06.050, “Post-translational modification and mitochondrial relocalization of histone H3 during apoptosis induced by staurosporine”, Hasan Koc, et al., 18 July 2014. Staurosporine is a “protein kinase inhibitor”: www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/staurosporine. Please refer back to the blog post by Mr. Chesnut — it appears that PRRARSV has a role in aging the human body at the mitochondrial level. See also: www.theqtree.com/2023/10/28/the-covid-19-virus-and-the-modrna-covid-19-vaccines-induce-accelerated-aging/.

There are four “inserts” that were introduced into the SARs-CoV-2 virus genome during the process that lab-created the SARS-CoV-2 virus. These four “inserts” were first isolated and described in the “Pradhan paper” from 2020. This paper was Retracted and suppressed almost as soon as it appeared. However, it can be found here: https://medicalveritas/org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Pradhan-et-al-Coronavirus-HIV-paper.pdf. A screenshot of Table 1. from the paper is below. The “PRRAR” code is “Insert 4”:

In addition, Figure 2. of this paper has the SARS-CoV-2 virus genome spelled out, with the position of each of the four “inserts.”

This leads to further proof that the PRRARSV code is indeed part of the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself. For example: https://jessicar.substack.com/p/it-turns-out-that-the-prrarsv-motif, “It turns out that the “PRRRARSV” motif is more than a furin-cleavage site”, 1 October 2022. Dr. Rose performed her own analysis of the PRRARSV code in the SARS-CoV-2 virus genome. She proves that the PRRARSV code is indeed the fourth “insert” into the virus genome. A screenshot of her analysis is below:

What does this all mean? It means the following:

General Summary:

One: The Pangolin, a shy, nocturnal mammal that is covered in keratin-like scales and eats ants and termites, also is prone to having a coronavirus, called pangolin-CoV. This virus has a genome code that is “quite similar” in some ways to the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself genome code. One of these “similarities” is a genome code called “RRSV” or “PRRAR”, depending on the research paper on the topic.

Two: There are four “unique inserts” in the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself genome. The fourth “insert” is the PRRARSV code. The PRRARSV code interferes with the important H3.3 histone in the DNA of every cell in the body of the person who is infected by SARS-CoV-2 (the COVID-19 virus) or who is infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself.

Three: The PRRARSV code was possibly derived from experiments with a type of snake venom; unless otherwise proven, it certainly was derived from experiments with the pangolin-CoV genome code.

Four: The experiments with the PRRARSV code were conducted at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in the process of the lab-creation of the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself.

Five: Since the COVID-19 “vaccines” use the Wuhan Hu1 SARS-CoV-2 virus itself as the basis for these injectables, the PRRARSV code is therefore present in these “vaccines.” This means that all persons who have ever taken a COVID-19 “vaccine” have been exposed to the PRRARSV code. To date, nobody knows exactly how long the ingredients and mechanisms of the COVID-19 “vaccines” remain at work in the “vaccinated” person’s body. In fact, the COVID-19 “vaccines” are designed to trick the “vaccinated” person’s body into thinking it has a COVID-19 virus infection, forcing the “vaccinated” person’s body to make large amounts of antibodies to fight off the “fake COVID-19 infection”: www.brandeis.edu/magazine/2020/fall/inquiry/vaccine.html, “On the cusp of a COVID-19 Vaccine”, by Lawrence Goodman. A screenshot from the article is below, quoting Dr. Drew Weissman of the University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine:

Six: Un-vaccinated” persons who contract a COVID-19 virus itself infection, and are therefore exposed to the PRRARSV code, can still mitigate and/or defeat the effects of the damage done by the virus itself if the person has a healthy immune system. On the other hand, COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons, in addition to being exposed to the PRRARSV code present in the “vaccines”, are also exposed to the other ingredients in the “vaccines”, such as N1-Methylpseudourdine. N1-Methylpseudouridine replaces the natural Uridine in the “vaccinated” person’s body, and also evades the natural immune system components and mechanisms in the COVID-19 “vaccinated” person’s body. COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons therefore have their natural immune systems damaged or destroyed, making it difficult or even impossible to mitigate and/or defeat the damage done by the “vaccines.”

Yours Truly will posit, based on the research and writing that she has been engaged in about the COVID-19 virus itself, and the COVID-19 “vaccines”, since March 2020: that any un-“vaccinated” person, of any age, who has had a COVID-19 virus itself infection; or, any person, of any age, who has had a COVID-19 “vaccine” put into their body — has been injured by the negative effects of the virus itself, or by the negative effects of the “vaccines.” In addition, COVID-19 virus itself infected persons, and COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons, have died from the effects of the infection or the “vaccine.” One will also say that the COVID-19 “vaccines” have added ingredients and mechanisms that make these injectables more dangerous and deadly than the COVID-19 virus itself. Finally, the outcomes of infection by the COVID-19 virus itself, and the negative outcomes from taking the COVID-19 “vaccines”, were, and are, planned and intentional.

It is now, in Yours Truly’s opinion, imperative that all persons make it their business to have and to maintain their natural immune system in the best possible condition.

It is now time to bring to account all of the multiple agencies, scientists, and other entities involvement (including the United States military) in the development of the lab-created SARS-CoV-2 virus itself: of the COVID-19 “vaccines”; and in the processes that resulted in the granting of Emergency Use Authorization and/or Full Approval of these “vaccines” without proper protocol adherence to rigorous testing and clinical trials for the said “vaccines.” It is now time to stop all further use of any COVID-19 “vaccine” until the above accountability is fully undertaken and finished, It is now time for all government agencies, medical organizations, and medical practitioners to recognize that Ivermectin and Hydroxycholoquine are inexpensive and vastly effective treatments for COVID-19 infection and for COVID-19 infection prophylaxis. It is now time to stop the use of Paxlovid and Remdesivir as “officially approved” treatment for COVID-19 infection, as both of these drugs have significant negative side effects, including a high “rebound COVID infection” rate for Paxlovid, and kidney damage and/or death for Remdesivir; and to substitute the use of Ivermectin or Hydroxycholoquine.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday 11.15.2024 Open Thread: Hold Them Accountable Edition

The above free image of Justice is courtesy of Pixabay and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series of posts devoted to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. However, the discussion is not limited to what is presented in today’s offering: It is an Open Thread.

As today’s Health Friday post is related to the COVID-19 disaster (the virus itself, and the COVID-19 “vaccines”; and, to the governmental and Big Pharma tyranny over the lives and livelihoods of millions of people “in the name of Science” related to the COVID-19 disaster), it is dedicated to the memory of Yours Truly’s COVID-19 “vaccinated” late brother Sam, and her late cousin Bill; and to the memory of all other persons of any age who have passed away since 11 December 2020, either directly or indirectly, due to the COVID-19 “vaccines” they have taken. May they rest in eternal Peace.

There are Important Wolf Moon Notifications, the Rules of our late, good Wheatie, and certain caveats by Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware, and which are all linked here.

Donald Trump was just overwhelmingly re-elected to be the next President of the United States. It appears that he will appoint Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., to be Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services. Mr. Kennedy, Jr., has vowed to end the “stranglehold” that the FDA, the CDC, Big Pharma, and “Establishment Medicine” have imposed on the American people for decades. It also appears that he plans to re-organize the FDA into an agency that actually does its job in protecting the health of the American people. One of his efforts, in Yours Truly’s opinion, needs to be investigating the exact “reorganization” changes that the FDA began to implement within that agency on 1 October 2024: www.fda.gov/about-fda/fda-organization/fda-modernization-efforts-establishing-unified-human-foods-program-new-model-field-operations-and.

Yours Truly begins with these: https://kirschsubstack.com/p/unburdened-by-what-has-been. “My MAHA “to do” list (unburdened by what has been)”, by Steve Kirsch, 9 November 2024; https://revolver.news/2024/11/big-pharma-in-big-panic-after-historic-trump-victory/, 7 November 2024; and. https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/big-pharma-is-literally-shaking-in, “Big Pharma is literally shaking in their boots, preparing for unleashing of RFK Jr on them…”, 6 November 2024.

In addition, there is much to be accomplished regarding holding multiple persons, agencies, and other entities accountable for the damage that has already been done to the general public health of Americans, in addition to the health of people all over the world, due to the COVID-19 disaster. While Yours Truly is not advocating a “re-do” of the French Revolution, there must be ways to hold these multiple persons, agencies, and other entities to account. Please see www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/new-data-exposes-the-corruption-behind, “New Data Exposes the Corruption Behind the COVID Response”, 12 November 2024. A screenshot of the start of this blog post is below:

The following Lists barely scratch the surface:

List One: Dr. Anthony Fauci (former head of the NIAID); Dr. Francis Collins (former head of NIH); Dr. Deborah Birx (White House Coronavirus response team under then-President Trump); Dr, Stephen Hahn (former Commissioner of the FDA); Dr. Robert Califf (current Commissioner of the FDA); Dr. Robert Redfield and Dr. Rochelle Walensky (former Directors of the CDC); Dr. Mandy Cohen (current Director of the CDC); Ralph Baric, Ph.D. (UNC, Chapel Hill); Peter Daszak, Ph.D. (EcoHealth Alliance); and, Dr. Eric Rubin (VRBPAC committee, FDA “We’re never gonna know if it’s effective unless we start giving it” — related to the committee’s recommendation to give the COVID-19 “vaccines” to children.) If Dr. Zheng-li Shi (Wuhan Institute of Virology) can be extradited from Communist China, that would be a good addition to the list.

Regarding Dr. Robert Redfield: He was the Director of the CDC when that agency drafted “regulations” for establishing COVID-19 “quarantine camps” for the “un-vaccinated”: https://brownstoneinstitute.org/articles/the-cdc-planned-quarantine-camps-nationwide/, by Jeffrey A. Tucker, 7 November 2024. A screenshot from the article is below:

The above article contains a link to the archived CDC document.

Regarding Dr. Anthony Fauci: Please watch the short video clip of leaked testimony from a Congressional hearing in which Dr. Fauci spoke. Listen to his comments. Listen to them again. At 0:23 in the clip, Dr. Fauci states: “And it’s been proven that when you make it difficult for people in their lives, they lose their ideological bullshit and they get vaccinated.” (Bolding mine). The video clip is here: https://x.com/LisaLu/status/1855788234392932353.

List Two: Albert Bourla, DVM (CEO of PfizerUSA); Stephane Bancel (CEO of Moderna); Alex Gorsky (former CEO of Johnson & Johnson.)

List Three: Alex Azar (former), and Xavier Becerra (current), Secretaries of the Department of Health and Human Services; Kathy Hochul, Governor of New York; Tom Wolf, former Governor of Pennsylvania; Gretchen Whitmer, Governor of Michigan.

List Four: United States Department of Defense Secretaries Patrick M. Shanahan, Mark Esper, Christoper C. Miller (former, 2018-2021); and, Lloyd Austin (current). United States Army Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark A. Milley, Gen. James C. McConville (2015 through August 2023); and, Gen. Randy A. George (current.) These, all in relation to the United States Defense Department’s and the United States Army’s previous and (likely) current involvement in the development, manufacture, and distribution of the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”; and, to the forced “mandate” that all US military personnel be COVID-19 “vaccinated.” www.documentcloud.com/downloads/22028603-pfizer-base-agreement, July 2018; www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/pfizer-inc-covid-19-vaccine-contract.pdf, 21 July 2021; www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/4022.

List Five: Bill Gates; Kelly L. Moore, MD, MPH (director of https://immunize.org/); Mark Green (former), and Samantha Power (current), Administrators of the United States Agency for International Development (www.usaid.gov/; also via https://usaidmomentum.org/.)

Readers are invited to add names to these lists, and/or to create other lists.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday 11.8.2024 Open Thread: The Insidious N1-Methylpseudouridine in the modRNA COVID-19 “Vaccines”

The above free vintage image of DNA/RNA and lab equipment is courtesy of Google Images.

Health Friday is a series that discusses Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. Today’s post goes down several “rabbit holes”; Yours Truly believes they are all relevant to the core observation of the piece. There are multiple screenshots, and also a General Summary at the end. The discussion today is not limited to what is presented here: It is an Open Thread. As the post involves items related to the COVID-19 modRNA “vaccines”, it is dedicated to the memory of Yours Truly’s “fully vaccinated and boosted” brother Sam, who passed away last week due to complications from, among other things, “sudden-onset dementia”; and, to the memory of her cousin Bill, who “died suddenly and unexpectedly” in September 2023. May they rest in eternal Peace.

There are Important Wolf Moon Notifications, the Rules of our late, good Wheatie, and caveat items from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. These are all linked here.

Today’s post is about one of the ingredients of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”: a lab-synthesized version N1-Methylpseudouridine.

To begin: Once upon a time, a very long time ago (say, about 2.7 billion years ago), an organism domain evolved into being on the Earth. The name of this organism is Archaea. It is a “middle-position” domain between the domains of Eukaryotes and of Bacteria. Archaea gradually evolved into multiple types of Phyla (a position between Kingdom and Class in taxonomic rank.) Archaea are a large part of what is called microbiota (a “range” of microorganisms that include Archaea, bacteria, fungi, and viruses.) Archaea are literally “all over the place”, including in the human gut microbiome, the plankton in the waters of the Earth, and in the Earth’s soil. Archaea can “communicate” with each other through a kind of “cross-talk.” The various types of this microorganism can exist in all kinds of places and in conditions of extreme heat or extreme cold. Archaea are a kind of “recycling center” for carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur, depending on where it lives. Methanogen Archaea “…play an important role in the decay of organic matter…”, such as would be seen in a swamp. (Remember this for later in the post.) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archaea. Below is an image of some types of Archaea:

More information about Archaea and what it does is here: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1578729/, “The origin and evolution of Archaea: a state of the art”, by Simonetta Gribaldo and Celine Bochier-Armanet, 9 May 2006. A portion of the Introduction of this paper is below:

Again, remember the reference to methanogensis related to Archaea for further down in today’s post.

Then, there is Uridine.

Uridine is an RNA component that is manufactured by the Liver in the human body. It is either synthesized from foods that contain Uridine in the RNA of the food; or, if the body is not taking in sufficient food sources, Uridine production shifts to the adipose tissues (fat tissues) of the body. The importance of Uridine presence in the human body cannot be over-emphasized. Uridine crosses the Blood-Brain Barrier and helps to regulate mood, dopamine release, and other functions of the brain; It can help to mitigate Alzheimer’s Disease; it helps to regulate body temperature and circadian rhythm; it helps in tumor decrease; it has profound positive effects on the Central Nervous System; and more: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10937367/, “Uridine and its role in metabolic diseases, tumors, and neurodegenerative diseases”, Yueyuan Yang, et al., 28 February 2024. Food sources of Uridine include beer; Brewer’s Yeast; beets; tomatoes; goat’s milk and cheese; organ meats (liver, etc.); fish; molasses; and, walnuts: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uridine; and, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21401985/, “Uridine function in the central nervous system”, Juliana Kardos, et al., 2011. Below is the Abstract from the Kardos, et al., paper:

More on what Uridine does to help the brain: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40120-020-00227-y, “Potential Neurogenerative and Neuroprotective Effects of Uridine/Choline-Enriched Multinutrient Dietary Intervention for Mild Cognitive Impairment”, Barry S. Samuel, et al., December 2020; https://coverthree.com/blogs/brain-health/uridine, “Uridine: The Elixir of Cognitive Enhancement”; https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nutr-080508-141059, “Use of Phosphate Precursors to Promote Synaptogenesis”, Mehmet Cansev, et al., May 2009; www.theqtree.com/2024/10/18/health-friday-10-18-2024-special-edition-neurological-effects-of-the-covid-19-vaccines-physical-and-psychological/; and, www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecule-biology/uridine (a list of various topics on Uridine); via the “Uridine” topic on the list just referenced, a screenshot below from the book, Nutritional and Herbal Therapies for Children and Adolescents, by George M. Kapalka (2010):

Here is an image of the chemical construction Uridine, per https://en.wikipedia.org.wiki/Uridine:

And now, to Pseudouridine:

Natural Pseudouridine (as opposed to the lab-created versions) appears in the RNA of the human body. It is a “by-product” of RNA mechanisms in the body. It is also found in yeast and in E. coli (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudouridine.) If one or more of the mechanisms involved in the creation of Pseudouridine become “aberrant”, this can contribute to the onset of cancer or to certain types of genetic disorders (www.cell.com/trends/pharmacological-sciences/fulltext/S0165-6147(22)00058-X. “Decoding pseudouridine: an emerging target for therapeutic development”, Jonas Cerneckis, et al., June 2022. The Abstract of the Cerneckis, et al., paper, is below:

Below is an image of the chemical construction of Pseudouridine, per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudouridine:

The exact mechanisms and consequences of Pseudouridine are a fairly recent “hot topic” for research, including in the fields of gene therapy and vaccine development. In fact, several COVID-19 “vaccines” have been developed that use Pseudouridine as an ingredient; however, it appeared that this element was lacking in “efficiency” regarding its ability to replace Uridine in the body; and, in fact, Pseudouridine, in this context, created “unintended proteins.” (www.science.org/content/article/mrna-vaccines-may-make-unintended-proteins-there-s-no-evidence-harm. “mRNA vaccines may make unintended proteins, but there’s no evidence of harm”, by Gretchen Vogel. The use of Pseudouridine in the COVID-19 “vaccines” was superseded by the use of the element that is the main topic of today’s post: N1-Methylpseudouridine.

The trail regarding N-1 Methylpseudouridine starts at the presentation in today’s article about Archaea. This element actually has natural sources: https://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/97619/does-n-1-methyl-pseudouridine-occur-naturally-in-any-rna; see the screenshot, below:

Recall that Archaea has various manifestations, including ones that are called Methanogens. Naturally-occurring N1-Methylpseudouridine is found in the soil: one type, Streptomyces lincolnensis (Nebraska origin), forms the basis for the antibiotic lincomycin: www.drugs.com/mtm/lincomycin.html. (Note: this antibiotic is used for severe cases of bacterial infections in persons who are allergic to penicillin.) Lincomycin has a “sister” drug, clindamycin. (https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/aem.02091-18, “TetR-Type Regulator of Lincomycin Biosynthesis in Streptomyces lincolnensis“, Yurong Xu, et al., 13 December 2018.)

Below is an image of the chemical construction of N-1 Methylpseudouridine per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N1-Methylpseudouridine:

When ruminating animals (cows, for example) take in N1-Methylpseudouridine from the grass that grows in soil that has Archaea producing this element, it passes through the animal’s body and is released; as solid waste, or as gas (that “cow methane” that the environmentalists are so upset about.) The human body, in its evolved wisdom, “recognizes” that naturally-occurring N1- Methylpseudouridine is not Uridine, and usually will eliminate it. However, this is not the case regarding the type of N1-Methylpseudouridine in the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” by Pfizer-BioNTech and by Moderna: In these injectables, the element not only is a “lab-synthesized and enhanced” form; in this form, it is deliberately included in the “vaccines” to replace the natural Uridine in the body of the “vaccinated” person. This Uridine replacement is done for two reasons: One, to “increase” the utilization of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” in the “vaccinated” persons’ body; and, Two, to evade and/or destroy the “vaccinated” person’s body’s natural capability to “recognize” the foreign element and to eliminate it. Yours Truly will repeat this: The natural Uridine RNA of the “vaccinated” person’s body is replaced with the “lab-synthesized and enhanced” version of N-1 Methylpseudouridine in the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.”

Please refer back in today’s post regarding the multiple beneficial activities of natural Uridine in the human body. These multiple beneficial activities are either depleted or completely replaced by the “lab-synthesized and enhanced” version of N-1 Methylpseudouridine in the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” — in order for the ingredients and mechanisms of these injectables to work in the “vaccinated” person’s body.

Experiments using various “lab-synthesized and enhanced” forms of N1-Methylpseudouridine have been in process for some time. An important paper that describes this type of experimentation is here: https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.2402, “Concise Review: Application of In Vitro Transcribed Messenger RNA for Cellular Engineering and Reprogramming: Progress and Challenges”, Andreas Behring et al., 2 June 2016. Below are three screenshots from this paper, beginning with a portion of the section Protein Synthesis in Cells:

Followed by Table 1 of the above paper, listing the natural immune system responses when “foreign RNA” is detected in the human body (the numbered links lead to various papers):

And, followed by a portion of the section Modifications of the Synthetic mRNAs from the Behring, et al., paper:

Note the mention of “100% replacement” of Uridine.

The type of N1-Methylpseudouridine used in the Pfizer-BioNTech and in the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” is a “lab-synthesized and enhanced and turbo-charged” version. It is called N1-Methylpseudouridine-5′-Triphosphate. Below is the entry from one commercial lab where this version can be purchased (the N-1081 is the catalog number at TriLink Biotech for the compound):

Below is a screenshot of the chemical construction of this version of N1-Methylpseudouridine used in the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, sold by New England Biolabs:

Where was this “lab-synthesized and enhanced and turbo-charged” version of N1-Methylpseudouridine inserted in the modRNA of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein for use in the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”? On both ends of the RBD (Receptor Binding Domain) area of the SARS-CoV-2 virus spike protein (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC80433204, “Modifications in an Emergency: The Role of N1-Methylpseudouridine in COVID-19 Vaccines”, Kellie D. Nance, Jordan L. Meier, 6 April 2021. This important paper describes the process of how this ingredient truncates the body’s natural immune mechanisms and processes that would normally “recognize” this element as a “foreign RNA” and eliminate it. Below is a screenshot from the paper of the location on the RBD section of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein where this “foreign RNA” was inserted (the light pink areas mark the beginning and end of the insertion):

And, from the above paper, a screenshot of the entire SARS-CoV-2 virus spike protein code as used by Pfizer-BioNTech for the company’s “flagship” modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, BNT162b2. The areas that were used to “insert” the coding sequence changes for the synthesized, enhanced, and “turbo-charged” version of N1-Methylpseudouridine are marked in pink:

The use of forms of N1-Methylpseudouridine is being touted as “the best approach” for inclusion in mRNA products. This is because N1-Methylpseudouridine “does a better job” of replacing the natural Uridine in the “vaccinated” person’s body: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17249-1, “N1-methyl-pseudouridine is incorporated with higher fidelity than pseudouridine in synthetic RNAs”, Jennifer Ong, et al., July 2022. However, there are problems with this situation; among them, the evidence that “frameshifting” is induced: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.36710.40005, “Ribosomal frameshifting and misreading of mRNAs in COVID-19 vaccines produce “off-target” proteins and immune responses eliciting safety concerns: Comment on UK study by Mulroney et al.”, David M Wiseman, Jessica Rose, et al., December 2023. The National Cancer Institute defines “ribosomal frameshifting” as follows, below (www.cancer.gov/publication/dictionaries/genetics-dictionary/def/frameshift-mutation):

In other words, a kind of “unintended consequence” from using things like “lab-synthesized and enhanced and turbo-charged” forms of N1-Methylpseudouridine in modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.” Dr. Peter McCullough’s important take on this issue is here: https://doi.org/10.1002/prp2.1218, “Long-lasting, biochemically modified mRNA, and its frameshifted recombinant spike proteins in human tissues and circulation after COVID-19 vaccination”, Peter A. McCullough, et al., 12 June 2024. Below is a screenshot of a portion of this paper:

In other words, the frameshifting induced in the COVID-19 “vaccinated” person’s body via the use of synthesized, enhanced, and “turbo-charged” N1-Methylpseudouridine in the injectable is pervasive and long-lasting.

To summarize the above: N1-Methylpseudouridine, as it is used in the “synthesized, enhanced, and turbo-charged” form found in the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, replaces the body’s natural Uridine (by 100%) in the “vaccinated” person’s body; it assists in the evasion of the body’s natural immune system by these “vaccines”; it assists in the mechanisms of action of these”vaccines” in the body; and it negates the multiple beneficial effects that natural Uridine provides for the body. It replaces the body’s natural Uridine with a combination of what is basically an element (Pseudouridine) that is, at best, a “by-product” of RNA and can cause cancer, plus a “turbo-charged” methylation of Pseudouridine. Yes, a form of methane. Recall that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” cross the Blood-Brain Barrier and enter the brain of the “vaccinated” person’s body. Recall that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” are spread throughout the “vaccinated” person’s body via the dangerous lipid nanoparticles present in these “vaccines.” The result, in Yours Truly’s opinion, is a recipe for disaster. It is inconceivable that the scientists at Pfizer-BioNTech and at Moderna did not know how Uridine works, and how important it is for the human body. In Yours Truly’s opinion, the replacement of Uridine with the “lab-synthesized, enhanced, and turbo-charged” version of N1-Methylpseudouridine was “acceptable” in order to use the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” as a vehicle for human cellular modification and “reprogramming”, in addition to assisting in the mechanisms of these “vaccines.”

To the best of Yours Truly’s knowledge so far, Uridine RNA that has been replaced by the N1-Methylpseudouridine form described in today’s post does not “regenerate” in the “vaccinated” person’s body. It may help to Uridine-rich foods (see above in the post), perhaps along with taking a Uridine supplement (the use of Uridine supplementation, in Yours Truly’s opinion, would need to be discussed with a healthcare professional); and for the COVID-19 “vaccinated” person to at least consider refusing to take any further injections of modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.”

General Summary: The modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” manufactured by Pfizer-BioNTech and by Moderna contain a “lab-synthesized, enhanced and turbo-charged” version of an element that occurs in the microorganism domain called Archaea. This Archaean element is called N1-Methylpseudouridine. The version in the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” is called N1-Methylpseudouridine-5′-Triphosphate. Once inside the “vaccinated” person’s body, this ingredient replaces an important RNA component in the human body, called Uridine. Uridine has multiple beneficial benefits and mechanisms in the human body. It is found in the RNA of various foods, such as beets, goat’s milk and cheese, walnuts, and in beer. N1-Methylpseudouridine-5′-Triphosphate appears to have no natural benefits for the human body; its use in the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” is as a vehicle for human cellular modification and “reprogramming”; and, to assist in the mechanisms of these “vaccines.”

UPDATE, Friday 8 November 2024: At the suggestion of SteveInCO, the following comment from Aubergine is included regarding natural assistance for Uridine production in the body (two screenshots, below). Thank you, Aubergine!

Salads with goat cheese and walnuts can work. So can raw broccoli spread with a mixture of goat cheese, a little pepper, and a little Balsamic vinegar.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday Open Thread 11.1.2024: The COVID-19 “Vaccines” Information File, Part One

40283

The above vintage image of a Rolodex is courtesy of CSA Images via Google Images.

Today’s Health Friday is a very Special Edition.

God Bless You, my brother Sam — 24 November 1948 – 29 October 2024.

Requiescat in pace aeterna, et Lux Perpetua luceat tibi. You are now with your beloved wife in the next world. Have a wonderful new life together there. “Till we all meet again.”

There are Important Wolf Moon Notifications, the Rules of our late, good Wheatie, and caveat items from Yours Truly, all linked here, of which readers should be aware. The discussion today is not limited to what is presented below — it is an Open Thread.

Health Friday today is a list of links to various scientific papers and articles, blog posts, and other items, regarding the COVID-19 “vaccines” injections (gene therapy injections.) Today’s list is not exhaustive; it is part of an ongoing project. The discoveries that reveal more of the truth about these dangerous and deadly injections, and the items that are published about these discoveries, are increasing by the month. Readers may know some of the information presented below already; other items may be new. And, while the fact is that the COVID-19 “vaccines” have been, and are, inducing injuries, illnesses, disabilities, and deaths in “vaccinated” people all over the planet — there are things that they can do to mitigate, reduce, or perhaps even eliminate, the damage that these “vaccines” have done, and are doing, to their bodies (these links are at the end of The List, Part One.) In addition, in Yours Truly’s opinion, there is one important item that COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons need to at least consider: Do not take any more COVID-19 “vaccine” injections; and, Do not allow these injections to be given to minor children.

The list, Part One:

Three books,: Two, by Naomi Wolf, Ph.D., and Amy Kelly: The Pfizer Papers: Pfizer’s Crimes Against Humanity; and, The Moderna Papers: Moderna’s Crimes Against Humanity. Search by title at https://books.google.com/; and, the third, by Dr. Pierre Kory, MD: The War on Ivermectin: The Medicine that Saved Millions and Could Have Ended the Pandemic; available at www.amazon.com/.

Blog posts: https://kirschsubstack.com/p/a-summary-of-the-evidence-against, A summary of the evidence against the COVID-19 “vaccines”, by Steve Kirsch, 6 January 2024. This blog post, in itself, is an extensive compilation of links.

https://kirschsubstack.com/p/the-covid-vaccine-all-risk-no-benefit, The COVID-19 “vaccines” are all risk and no benefit, by Steve Kirsch, 4 October 2024. A blog post about the results of the Czech Republic data on persons there who were COVID-19 “vaccinated.”

Documents:

https://icandecide.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/125742_S1_M2_26_pharmkin-tabulated-summary.pdf, BNT162b2 Module 2.6.5. Pharmacokinetics Tabulated Summary, FDA time-stamped 21 January 2021. The agency knew, as of this date, that the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, BNT162b2, spreads throughout the body of the “vaccinated” person. However, the agency had already granted the initial EUA for this injectable to be used in the United States. This report should have been the signal to the FDA that all use of BNT162b2 needed to be suspended, pending further investigation and testing. The FDA did nothing of the kind: in fact, the agency granted “full approval” of BNT162b2, under the name COMIRNATY. Please see Page 7 and Page 8 of this report, below, which shows the whole-body biodistribution of BNT162b2:

www.phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/reissue_5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf, BNT162b2 5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization Adverse Event Reports, FDA time-stamped 30 April 2021. This report, given by Pfizer-BioNTech to the agency, contains an Appendix 1. List of Adverse Events of Special Interest at the end of the report. The Appendix 1. lists over 1,200 different types of adverse events medical conditions and illnesses, including death, resulting in persons who took BNT162b2 between 11 December 2020 (the date on which this “vaccine” was granted the initial EUA by the FDA for use in the United States) and 28 February 2021. The FDA knew about this on 30 April 2021. This report should have been another signal for the agency to suspend all use of BNT162b2 pending further investigation and testing, but the FDA did nothing to stop the continuing rollout of this injectable.

Scientific papers and/or articles:

The Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” cross the Blood-Brain Barrier and negatively affect the cells of the “vaccinated” person’s brain. Below is section 4. Conclusions of the paper by H. Abramczyk, et al. (https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.02.482639, “Decoding COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Immunometabolism in Central Nervous System: human brain normal glial and glioma cells by Raman imaging”, 2022):

The COVID-19 “vaccines” damage the lungs, the cardiovascular system, and the heart of the person who takes these “vaccines.” Please see the slides in this 2022 article: https://doctors4covidethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/causality-article.pdf, “Vascular and organ damage induced by mRNA vaccines: irrefutable proof of causality”, by Michael Palmer, MD, and Sucharit Bhakdi, MD. Below, for example, is Slide 10 from the article, showing lymphocytes lining the aorta prior to aortic rupture in a COVID-19 “vaccinated” person (from the autopsy):

The Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” change the DNA of the person who takes these injectables. This is the “Markus Alden, et al” 2022 paper (https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44030073, “Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line”, Markus Alden, et al., February 2022.) The DNA that is reverse transcribed is the LINE-1 of the human liver cell line Huh7.

The Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” replace the RNA in Uridine, an important component produced by the liver, in persons who take these injectables. This is done by the mechanism of the N-1 Methylpseudouridine that is added to these “vaccines.” (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32090264, “N1-Methylpseudouridine substitution enhances the performance of synthetic mRNA switches in cells”, Callum JC Parr, et al., April 2020.) Uridine helps to regulate mood, among other functions. In addition to the Parr, et al., paper above, there is also this, regarding negative neurological effects induced by the COVID-19 “vaccines”: www.theqtree.com/2024/10/18/health-friday-10-18-2024-special-edition-neurological-effects-of-the-covid-19-vaccines-physical-and-psychological/.

Children who take the COVID-19 “vaccines” are SIX TIMES more likely to die: www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/children-6-times-more-likely-to-die, “Children 6 Times More Likely to Die after Covid ‘Vaccine'”, 7 October 2024. Alex Berenson, the investigative journalist, weighed in on this https://x.com/AlexBerenson/status/1841528774417928403:

The paper referred to: https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-024-02329-3. “The association between COVID-19 vaccine/infection and new-onset asthma in children–based on the global TriNetX database”, Chia-Chi Lung, et al., (June 2024.) This study is actually a “two-fer”: First, the COVID-19 “vaccines” induce new-onset asthma in children; and, second, children are at risk of dying from the COVID-19 “vaccines.”

There are DNA “fragments” in the COVID-19 “vaccines”; and, there is a piece from the gene code of the SV40 cancer promoter from the African Green Monkey in the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.“ The “McKernan, et al. paper” describes both of these negative effects. Below is a screenshot of a portion of the Introduction of this paper:

The “McKernan, et al.” paper: www.researchgate.net/publication/374870815, “DNA fragments detected in monovalent and bivalent Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA COVID-19 vaccines from Ontario, Canada: Exploratory dose response relationship with serious adverse events.”, Kevin McKernan, David Jeremiah Speicher, et al. (2023.)

**** The “placement” of the SV40 cancer promoter gene piece in the polyA tail of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, in Yours Truly’s opinion, was deliberate. The following quotation is from an article by Marwan Alsarraj in August 2023: “In mRNA therapeutics, the poly(A) tail drives the efficacy of the mRNA molecules…” The article: www.bioradiations.com/polya-tails-in-mrna-based-therapeutics-823/, “Poly(A) Tails: A Critical Quality Attribute in mRNA-based Therapeutics”, 8 August 2023. Below is a screenshot from this article:

**** In Yours Truly’s opinion, the “closed loop” produced by the interactions of the poly(A) tail and the “translation proteins” means that the changes that the COVID-19 “vaccines” make to the DNA (via the SV40 cancer promoter gene piece in these “vaccines”) and to the RNA (via the N-1 Methylpseudouridine in these “vaccines”) of COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons can likely be permanent.

The COVID-19 “vaccines” can induce cancer, including what is called “turbo-cancer” in “vaccinated” persons; they can also induce “re-establishment” of previously under control or even previously cured cancers in “vaccinated” persons. The “vaccines” do this, among other ways, via the mechanisms of the SV40 cancer promoter gene (see above); and, the damage the “vaccines” do to the p53 cancer tumor suppressor protein in the body. Please see: www.theqtree.com/2023/11/29/the-covid-19-vaccines-pave-the-way-for-turbo-cancers-and-a-note-on-the-virus-itself/. Please also see: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.50703, “SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination and the Multi-Hit Hypothesis of Oncogenesis”, Raquel Valdes Angues and Yolanda Perea Bustos, (2023.) Below is a screenshot from the Review section of this paper:

In addition, please watch the video linked to this tweet (a presentation by British surgeon Dr. James Royle): https://x.com/SaiKate108/status/1851199741276602449. At 1:42 in the video, Dr. Royle describes what he sees in COVID-19 “vaccinated” patients who present with cancer: “…out of the blue, [the] liver [is] filled with large, round tumor masses.” Please refer up in today’s post at the Pfizer-BioNTech biodistribution amounts of BNT162b2 (Page 7 of the company’s Pharmacokinetics Tabulated Summary report): the accumulation of the dangerous lipid nanoparticles carrying the modRNA of this “vaccine” is 24.3mcg per gram (or mL) in the livers of the lab rats 48 hours after BNT162b2 was injected into them. Notice that the amount had steadily increased post-injection before it was measured at 48 hours post-injection. Also, note that BNT162b2 is the basis for all other modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” manufactured by this company. **** In Yours Truly’s opinion, the liver was “targeted” as a major accumulation area for the lipid nanoparticles and for the other ingredients of BNT162b2, due to the number of body mechanisms and functions it regulates or assists in regulating. Please the Introduction, below, of the NIH StatPearls book, Physiology, Liver, by Arjun Kalra, et al. (StatPearls Publishing, January 2024):

Selected Blog and Website List: https://pierrekorymedicalmusings.com/ ( Dr. Pierre Kory, MD); https://jessicar.substack.com/ (Jessica Rose, Ph.D.); https://kirschsubstack.com/ (Steve Kirsch); https://merylnass.substack.com/ (Dr. Meryl Nass, MD); https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/ (Dr. Peter McCullough, MD); https://makismd.substack.com/ (Dr. William Makis, MD); https://mole.substack.com/; www.coffeeandcovid.com/; https://phinancetechologies.com/HumanityProjects/Humanity Projects.asp (Ed Dowd’s website: statistics. Click on the “Our Projects” PDF brochure and then on “Current Projects”); www.theqtree.com/; www.igor-chudov.com/ (Igor Chudov); www.midwesterndoctor.com/; www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/; https://sashalatypova.substack.com/; https://doctors4covidethics.org/; https://dailyclout.io/ (Naomi Wolf, Ph.D.) Note: Some of the blogs or websites have “paid subscription only access” to certain articles.

COVID-19 virus and COVID-19 “vaccine” detox / mitigation protocols: https://covid19criticalcare.com/ (FLCCC Alliance); https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/ (AFLDS); www.mercola.com/ (Dr. Joseph Mercola, MD; must sign up to access); www.americaoutloud.shop (Dr. Peter McCullough’s Wellness Company site.) Note: this is not an exhaustive list, and does not include herbal medicine, natural medicine, or other allopathic / osteopathic / homeopathic medicine sites.

Yours Truly has been researching, reading, and writing about the COVID-19 virus and the COVID-19 “vaccines” since March 2020. What readers find in the Health Friday posts are opinions and hypotheses based on this research and reading: it is not medical advice.

The uncovering of the truth about the dangerous, deadly COVID-19 “vaccines” is an ongoing, evolving issue. It is Yours Truly’s considered opinion that, with some exceptions, any person who has taken any COVID-19 “vaccine” since 11 December 2020 is at risk for adverse events, including COVID-19 “vaccine”-induced illness, injury, disability, or even death from these injectables. The COVID-19 “vaccines” have proven to not be “safe and effective.” Those who developed these injectables, knowing (or even suspecting) that they were not, and are not, “safe and effective”; and those who “mandated” their use, who coerced people into getting them, and who continue to push them, must be held accountable.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday Open Thread 10.25.2024: The Diblasi, et al., Paper: Undeclared Chemical Elements Found in the COVID-19 “Vaccines”

Detail of a partially blurred periodic table of the elements. Focus on Carbon.

The above image of part of the Periodic Table is courtesy of Google Images.

Today’s post is part of Health Friday, a series devoted to issues related to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. The discussion is not limited to what is presented here: It is an Open Thread.

There are Important Wolf Moon Notifications, the Rules of our late, good Wheatie, caveat items from Yours Truly, and other information that readers should know. They are all linked here. Since today’s post is related to the COVID-19 “vaccines” injectables (gene therapy injections), it is dedicated to the memory of Yours Truly’s cousin Bill, who “died suddenly and unexpectedly” in September 2023.

The post today is not an exhaustive interpretation of the “Diblasi, et al. paper.” In fact, the paper raises many other questions that demand answers: several sets of questions (from Yours Truly) are listed in the post. Yours Truly is also aware that a certain person is attempting online to “debunk” this paper, to the point of labeling it as a “hoax”; one finds it difficult to agree with such a conclusion. Stay with me, a certain amount of “preliminary” items are presented in the post to assist in the general framework. There is a General Summary at the end of the post.

The trail, for today’s purposes, begins with an X tweet by “toobaffled”: https://x.com/toobaffled/status/1847639454468755728. Below is a screenshot of the tweet:

The tweet leads to this link: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/undeclared-chamicals-heavy-metals-covid-vaccines/, 55 Undeclared Chemical Elements — Including Heavy Metals — Found in COVID Vaccines, by Brenda Baletti, Ph.D., 15 October 2024. This, in turn, led to the “Diblasi, et al. paper”: https://doi.org/10.56098/mt1njj52, At Least 55 Undeclared Chemical Elements Found in COVID-19 Vaccines from AstraZeneca, CanSino, Moderna, Pfizer, Sinopharm and Sputnik V, with Precise ICP-MS, Lorena Diblasi, Martin Monteverde, David Nonis, Marcela Sangorrin, 11 October 2024 (International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, Vol. 3 No.2 (2024): Injuries, Causes, and Treatments, Part 2.)

The Abstract of the paper:

Note that the there was a total of 62 undeclared chemical elements found, all told, in the COVID-19 “vaccines” injectables (gene therapy injections) that were tested by the authors. Note also that the COVID-19 “vaccines” (gene therapy injections, hereafter termed GTI) that were tested comprised various “platforms”: modRNA (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna; viral vector (AstraZeneca/Oxford, CanSino Biologics, and Sputnik V), and whole inactivated virus (Sinopharm.) (All “platform” descriptions, per Wikipedia.)

The Samples List of the “vaccines” tested, from the paper:

Below are the results for the Moderna “vaccine” samples, from the paper; note that, as of October 2022, 37.50% of COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons in the United States had taken at least one dose of this “vaccine” (mRNA-1273/SPIKEVAX.) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_vaccination_in_the_United_States

The results for the Pfizer-BioNTech “vaccine” samples, from the paper; note that, as of October 2022, 59.43% of COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons in the United States had taken at least one dose of this “vaccine” (BNT162b2/COMIRNATY.) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_vaccination_in_the_United_States

Given that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 “vaccine” (GTI) has the higher percentage of persons who were “vaccinated” with it, Yours Truly will restrict the discussion as it relates to this post to the results of the Pfizer-BioNTech tests. In addition, results of six isotope types (chemical element types) from the last two assay dates — 3/11/2023 and 3/1/2024, are underlined by Yours Truly. These six are: Lithium (Li); Aluminum (Al); Vanadium (V); Chromium (Cr); Arsenic (As); and, Barium (Ba.)

For reference, below is a definition of “Isotope” from the online Kids Britannica (https://kids.britannica.com/students/article/isotope/628327):

The higher the number of protons and neutrons in a chemical element, the more “mass” the chemical element has.

Yours Truly will remind readers that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 “vaccines” (GTI) cross the Blood-Brain Barrier, in addition to accumulating in organs and areas throughout the body of the person who takes this “vaccine.” Please see Page 7 and Page 8 of the company’s report on the biodistribution of their COVID-19 “vaccine” injectable BNT162b2 (now COMIRNATY), below:

Proceeding now to the underlined chemical elements items in the last two assays of BNT162b2 / COMIRNATY, from the Diblasi, et al., paper. Note: sections of information regarding this chemical element (Arsenic), and the other five underlined chemical elements in the last two assays of this “vaccine”, are from the Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) online entries; other sources of information for each one will be text-hyperlinked. First, Lithium (Li):

Lithium (Li) effects on the body: cognitive dulling, kidney dysfunction, and others: www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/326516.

Aluminum (Al):

Aluminum (Al) effects on the body: neurological toxicity, encephalopathy, among others: https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2017.0653, “The Health Effects of Aluminum Exposure”, Katrin Klotz, et al.

Vanadium (V):

Vanadium (V) effects on the body: nervous system issues, kidney damage: www.webmd.com/vitamins/ai/ingredientmono-749/vanadium.

Chromium (Cr):

Chromium (Cr) effects on the body: can negatively affect the liver, kidneys, skin, lungs; and, can cause cancer: www.atsdr.cdc.gov/csem/chromium_physiologic_effects_of_chromium_exposure.html.

Arsenic (As):

Arsenic (As) effects on the body: negatively affects multiple organs: brain, heart, liver, kidneys, and skin: www.atsdr.cdc.gov/csem/arsenic/physiologic_effects.html.

And, Barium (Ba):

Barium (Ba) effects on the body: this can damage the kidneys and lungs; it may also cause “reproductive harm”: https://nj.gov/health/eoh/rtkweb/documents/fs/0180.pdf.

Lithium, Aluminum, Vanadium, and Chromium are metals of various degrees of hardness (“heavy metals.”) Arsenic is a “semi-metal.” Barium is a “soft, alkaline earth metal.” (All, per Wikipedia.)

Questions that arise, first set: Why are there so many chemical elements in BNT162b2/COMIRNATY? Why did Pfizer-BioNTech not “declare” almost all of them? Were each of the chemical elements that the company added to BNT162b2/COMIRMATY separately tested for toxicity prior to inclusion in the product? Was there some sort of “collusion” among the developers of the various COVID-19 “vaccines” (GTIs) that were tested along the lines of, “You put ABC chemical elements into your product, we’ll put XYZ chemical elements into our product, and we’ll see how it goes”? Why does it appear that the amounts of these chemical elements reduce, increase, or “disappear” from the products from one test assay to another of the same “vaccine”? Does that have to do with the other technologies that seem to be in these “vaccines” — other technologies such as, “self-assembling” items? Or, such as, a kind of “incubation period” that is “built into” the product? If either, or both, of these are the case, what does that mean to the mechanisms of these “vaccines” once they are injected into the human body? What about COVID-19 “vaccine shedding” www.theatree.com/2024/03/25/the-elephant-in-the-room-shedding-of-both-the-covid-19-virus-itself-and-the-covid-19-vaccines/? For examples, Ruthenium and Lead are absorbed by the skin; and, Arsenic can be absorbed by the skin.

For an important comparison: One other item, the ICP-MS test results for the Russian COVID-19 “vaccine” (GTI), Sputnik V. Recall that this “vaccine” is made of the whole inactivated virus of SARS-CoV-2; it is the only “vaccine” that was tested that was based on this. Below are the test results:

Yours Truly included the Sputnik V test results because this COVID-19 “vaccine” is not modRNA-based. And yet, look at the test results for this product. The same six chemical elements that Yours Truly underlined in the BNT162b2/COMIRNATY test results are ALSO in Sputnik V: Lithium; Aluminum; Vanadium; Chromium; Arsenic; and Barium. Even if Aluminum is discounted (since various forms of Aluminum are used as “excipients / adjuvants” for COVID-19 “vaccines” injectables (GTIs), that leaves the other five chemical elements as being present in both products.

Questions that arise, second set: What does this mean? Could it possibly mean that the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) virus itself had chemical elements “lab-included” while it was being lab-created at the Wuhan Institute of Virology? If this is so, what about the other chemical elements on the test results list?

A paper published in 2023 (but using data from patients infected by the COVID-19 virus itself, and/or the SARS-CoV-2 virus, from before any COVID-19 “vaccine” was in use, or just after BNT162b2 was first authorized for use), gives, in Yours Truly’s opinion, a clue https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.115419, “Individual blood concentrations of persistent organic pollutants and chemical elements, and COVID-19: A prospective cohort study in Barcelona”, Miquel Porta, et al., 4 February 2023. The cohort patients in this study were infected with the COVID-19 virus itself, or the SARS-CoV-2 virus, between mid-February 2020 and 24 January 2021. Below are two screenshots from this paper:

The Porta, et al., paper lists in the Tables the pollutants and chemical elements that were found in the COVID-19 virus itself infected patients. Among them: Lead (Pb); Arsenic; Cadmium (Cd); Mercury (Hg); Thallium (Tl); Bismuth; (Bi) Molybdenum; (Mo) Iron (Fe); Zinc (Zn); Cobalt; (Co) Chromium; Tantalum (Ta); and, Ruthenium (Ru).

The Porta, et al., paper lists in the Tables the pollutants and chemical elements that were found in the SARS-CoV-2 infected patients. Among them: Ruthenium; Tantalum; Lead; DDT; and, Thallium.

“Lifestyle” factors, such as smoking (current, past, stopped) are accounted for in the Porta, et al., study. Even removing pollutants that would be found in cigarette smoke (naphthalene and Cadmium among them), that leaves chemical elements such as Ruthenium, Tantalum, and Thallium that were found in the blood of the patients in the Porta, et al., study. And, that the presence of these chemical elements was persistent — lingering after the infection was resolved. By the way, Ruthenium and Thallium are radioactive. Barium is a “radiographic contrast agent” (in, for example, the “barium milkshake” test.)

Questions that arise, third set: What about the other chemical elements found in the various COVID-19 “vaccines”, per the Diblasi, et al., study? Were these “lab-included” into the “excipients / adjuvants” used in these “vaccines”? Were these “lab-included” into the Wuhan Hu1 SARS-COV-2 samples that were used by the companies developing and/or manufacturing these “vaccines” (samples that presumably, at least the start of the pandemic, came from the WIV? Did these companies decide of themselves to include them?

The COVID-19 “vaccines” injectables (GTIs) contain: the modRNA (lab-enhanced from the Wuhan Hu1 SARS-CoV-2 virus) in the COVID-19 “vaccine” injectables that use this platform; the SV40 African Green Monkey cancer promoter gene piece in the Pfizer-BioNTech “vaccine” injectables (https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/mjc97, “DNA fragments detected in monovalent and bivalent Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA COVID-19 vaccines from Ontario, Canada: Exploratory dose response relationship with serious adverse events”, David J. Speicher, et al., 19 October 2023; DNA fragments in both the Pfizer-BioNTech and in the Moderna COVID-19 “vaccine” injectables (see paper cited above); dangerous lipid nanoparticles (ALC-0159, ALC-0315 in the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 “vaccine” injectables; SM-102 in the Moderna COVID-19 injectables); polyethylene glycol “excipients / adjuvants” (PEG2000-DMG); and, numerous chemical elements, including heavy metals (Vanadium; Chromium); radioactive elements (Thallium); Arsenic; Ruthenium; and, Lithium. These are the ingredients that COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons age 18 and older have in their bodies. These are the ingredients that adults allow their children to be COVID-19 “vaccinated” with. No one knows exactly how long the COVID-19 “vaccines” work inside the body of the “vaccinated” person.

What about the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself? Yours Truly opines that this may contain, among other items: mixed RNA/mRNA coronavirus elements and pieces from various animal sources (bats; monkeys; civets; pangolins); Chromium; Cobalt; Zinc; Arsenic; Molybdenum; Ruthenium; Cadmium; Gold (Au); Thallium; and, Lead. There are heavy metals among these.

“Chelation” is a method used to remove heavy metals from the body. The use of chelation is controversial. Physicians can prescribe certain medications to assist in removing heavy metals from the body. An article on a heavy metal “detox diet” is here: www.healthline.com/health/heavy-metal-detox, “Heavy Metal Detox Diet”, by Kiara Anthony, 13 September 2023.

(There is controversy about whether the SARS-CoV-2 virus has a spike protein: https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/does-spike-protein-exist-part-1, 15 October 2024. Yours Truly does not propose to delve into this aspect at the moment.)

Questions that arise, fourth set: What, if anything, did Dr. Anthony Fauci know about the inclusion of numerous chemical elements into the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 “vaccine” injectables? What did Dr. Francis Collins (Dr. Fauci’s superior at the NIH) know? What did Albert Bourla (CEO of PfizerUSA) know? What did Dr. Deborah Birx know? What did the FDA know? What did the CDC know?

Meanwhile, there is this: https://x.com/UngaTheGreat/status/1848791880395362460; a screenshot of the tweet is below:

En Fin: At what point will people, horrified at the deaths, disabilities, illnesses, and injuries, being inflicted on their COVID-19 “vaccinated” family members, friends, and colleagues, realize that “they’ve been had”? At what point will people realize that the “official narrative” of, “the COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective” means that these injectables are NOT safe; and, that “effective” means the amount of damage these injectables have done/continue to do, to the bodies of the “vaccinated”? At what point do people realize that the “official narrative” of, “the known and potential risks outweigh the known and potential risks” of the COVID-19 “vaccines” was, and is, a lie? — and that the COVID-19 “vaccines” are “all risk and no benefit”? (https://kirschsubstack.com/p/the-covid-vaccine-all-risk-no-benefit, by Steve Kirsch, 4 October 2024.)

General Summary: It is now known (per the Diblasi et al., paper) that the COVID-19 “vaccines” (GTIs) contain numerous chemical elements, some of which are radioactive, and others of which are metals and/or “rare Earth” elements. It is now known that the COVID-19 virus itself likely contains chemical elements, at least three of which (Chromium, Thallium, and Lead) are heavy metals; and that at least one of which (Thallium) is radioactive. It is now known that (per the Porta, et al. paper) that these chemical elements are persistent in the body of a person who was infected with the COVID-19 virus itself but who has recovered. It is now known that chemical elements are found in the modRNA-based and in the whole inactivated virus-based COVID-19 “vaccine” (GTI) injectables. There are many questions that arise from these discoveries that demand answers.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday 10.18.2024: Special Edition: Neurological Effects of the COVID-19 “Vaccines”– Physical and Psychological

The above word-cloud image about memory loss is courtesy of Google Images.

This post is part of Health Friday, a series devoted to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. Today’s offering, a Special Edition, is in honor of Yours Truly’s “fully vaccinated and boosted” brother, who was just diagnosed with “sudden-onset dementia.” Yours Truly will make it clear that one is not a medical doctor; one is not treating my brother; and, this post is a “narrative primer” on negative neurological effects from the COVID-19 “vaccines”, the Pfizer-BioNTech COMIRNATY (BNT162b2) modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” in particular.

There are Important Wolf Moon Notifications; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain extra items that readers should be familiar with. They are all linked here.

For purposes of today’s post, the trail begins here: https://mole.substack.com/p/who-monkey-pox-is-side-effect-of-covid/comments, “WHO: Monkeypox Is ‘Side Effect’ of Covid ‘Vaccine'”, 12 October 2024.

The World Health Organization (WHO) has a website, www.vigiaccess.org/, that lists “side effects” reported in persons who took COVID-19 “vaccines.” The Mole article describes how the VigiAccess search was performed to find “Monkeypox” as a “side effect” of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 “vaccine”, BNT162b2. A screenshot of the search protocol is below:

Yours Truly performed a VigiAccess search for reported memory problems (dementia is considered to be a form of “memory impairment.”) This is what I did:

Went to www.vigiaccess.com/

Clicked on “Search database”

Typed “BioNTech” into the Search box

Clicked on “Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine” on the list that came up

Clicked “OK” on the “Dialog” box

Under “Reported potential side effects”, I clicked on “Nervous system disorders” — and found a long list. A screenshot of a portion of this list shows “Memory impairment”:

These are only the reported cases of conditions that are considered to be “side effects” of BNT162b2. It can be argued that there are many multiples more “side effects” cases from BNT162b2 that are not reported for some reason. Yours Truly also performed searches on the VigiAccess list under “Psychiatric disorders”, and under “Metabolism and nutrition disorders”, as certain other details were given to one in phone conversations related to the situation which raised interest.

The balance of today’s post will be presented in a “quasi-scientific paper” form. With the exceptions of some in-line references, scientific paper, blog and/or article citations will be numbered in the text with [“number”], and listed at the end of the post. Hypotheses and opinions of Yours Truly (H/O) will be delineated by Bold text with Italics. A General Summary will be included at the end of the post.

First: A Short Narrative Summary of What Occurs When a Person is Injected with the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA “Vaccine” COMIRNATY: The “vaccine” here is the 2024-2025 Formula COMIRNATY COVID-19 “vaccine” (which, by the way, contains elements of BNT162b2, the original Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine.”) Each “vaccine” dose is either supplied in a single-dose vial, with the dose to be administered withdrawn for injection; or, is in a pre-filled syringe ready for administration. (H/O) Upon “vaccination”, the person’s body immediately sends an “enemy detected” signal to the brain. The person’s body may react from fainting to chills to nausea, among other physical responses: see Sections 5.1 and 5.2 of the COMIRNATY 2024-2025 Fact Sheet, below [1]:

The lipid nanoparticles in the “vaccine” quickly begin to spread the contents of the injection throughout the “vaccinated” person’s body. This process is called biodistribution. Images of page 7 and page 8 of the January 2021 Pfizer-BioNTech Pharmacokinetics Tabulated Summary of the company’s modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, BNT162b2, are below [2]. Yours Truly will again emphasize that BNT162b2 is the basis for all of the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, including the COMIRNATY 2024-2025 Formula.

Note the accumulations in the Brain, the Liver, and the Large Intestine.

Note the accumulations in the Pituitary Gland, the Thymus Gland, and the Small Intestine. The intestines produce 90% of the body’s Serotonin. Serotonin is a neurotransmitter that is involved in the emotional / psychological / cognitive processes of the brain (per Wikipedia.)

Why is there accumulation of BNT162b2 in the Pituitary Gland? This small organ, called the “master gland” of the body, produces or directs many important hormones. Together with the hypothalamus, the pituitary gland work together to serve as the “brain’s central command center to control vital bodily functions”, according to Yours Truly’s online search at the Cleveland Clinic. These functions include breathing, stress response, reproduction, blood pressure, and more. (H/O): BNT162b2 and/or COMIRNATY is a “vaccine” to supposedly “prevent” a COVID-19 virus infection, not to work like a sort of pituitary gland treatment vehicle.

At least one of the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) in COMIRNATY, ALC-0159 (but listed under its chemical component name), affects the thymus gland of the “vaccinated” person’s body. The thymus gland is “the primary lymphoid organ of the immune system” (per Wikipedia). The Abstract of a paper [3] that explains how ALC-0159 and other PEG-based LNPs work in the body is below:

While the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) in COMIRNATY are spreading the ingredients of this “vaccine” throughout the “vaccinated” person’s body, the “vaccine” is using the PRRARSV “backdoor key” (an element which is only in the SARS-CoV-2 virus; and therefore, by extension, the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”) to facilitate entry of the “vaccine” ingredients into every cell in the “vaccinated” person’s body [4},[5]. (H/O) At the same time, the ingredients and mechanisms of COMIRNATY (BNT162b2) are beginning to work on inducing accelerated aging in the “vaccinated” person’s body, all the way down to the mitochondrial level [6]. Dao-Fu Dai, et al., wrote a paper in 2014 on how oxidative stress affects the mitochondria and the aging process [7].

N1-Methylpseudouridine is present in all versions of COMIRNATY (BNT162b2), starting with the “original version” of this “vaccine”, BNT162b2. N1-Methylpseudouridine is a synthetic form of Uridine. Uridine is an important nucleoside for neurological processes, for the central nervous system, and other body processes. It is found only in RNA. Below is the Abstract of the Yueyuan Yang, et al., paper that the mechanism of Uridine in the body [8]:

The importance of Uridine cannot be minimized. This RNA element is produced in the Liver. Uridine helps to regulate mood; it also assists in the release of dopamine in the brain. Dopamine is a neurotransmitter that “affects emotions, behavior, and movement” (per WebMD.)

The purpose of N1-Methylpseudouridine in COMIRNATY is twofold: One, to “supersede” / “overwrite” the mechanisms of the natural Uridine in the “vaccinated” person’s body; and, Two, to enhance the mechanism of COMIRNATY in “mRNA switches in cells” of the “vaccinated” person’s body (Callum JC Parr, et al.) [9]. Below is the Abstract of this paper:

Yours Truly will blow the lid off the deliberate inclusion of N1-Methylpseudouridine in BNT162b2 (COMIRNATY.) This chemical was specifically added to the “vaccine” to replace the processes of natural Uridine; and, to evade the body’s natural immune system’s “enemy detection and elimination” elements and mechanisms. Below are screenshots from the Global Patent for BNT162b2, 28 October 2021 [10}:

Note that this appears to be a tacit admission that Gain-of-Function experiments were performed to create the modRNA in BNT162b2.

Note that this appears to be an admission that self-amplifying RNA (saRNA) can be used in Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 “vaccines.”

In addition to the “replacing” of uridine with N1-Methylspeudouridine in the body of the person “vaccinated” with COMIRNATY, the DNA of that person’s body is also being changed; please see Slide 14 of this article for a graphic of how the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” change the DNA.

Meanwhile, the newly-COMIRNATY-“vaccinated” person’s body, having “detected” an “enemy within the gates” (the “vaccine”), is sending out “all-out effort” signals to the body’s natural immune system to manufacture large amounts of cells to “fight off” the “detected enemy.” These natural immune system cells include CD4 cells, CD8 cells, IgG3 cells, and lymphocytes. However, the ingredients and mechanisms of the “vaccine” hamper, damage, and/literally destroy these natural immune system cells, via the “class switch” [11]; while, at the same time, inducing oxidative stress and cell death at the mitochondrial level all over within the “vaccinated” person’s body; and, also, inducing a state (of a still-unknown timeframe) of “faux SARS-CoV-2 infection” in the “vaccinated” person’s body [12]. A screenshot from this University of Maryland Medical System is below; note the last sentence:

The “rationale” behind the development and use of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” is that the human body is not capable, of itself, to detect and “fight off” an infection by the SARS-CoV-2 virus; the body must have “assistance” in the form of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” and their mechanisms. (H/O) However, it can be fairly argued that, given the multiple Adverse Events reports regarding COMIRNATY to VAERS and to VigiAccess, that this “vaccines” needs much more thorough R&D processes, testing on lab animals and then on humans, and extensive data collection and analyses, before this “rationale” can be fully proven. Pfizer-BioNTech rushed BNT162b2 into production, into securing the initial Emergency Use Authorization from the FDA in December 2020, and into this modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” being used on the general public, before any of the above were fully undertaken. Pfizer-BioNTech and the FDA knew, back in April 2021, that BNT62b2 could, and did, cause hundreds of serious Adverse Events [13].

Second: Physical Neurological Effects of the COVID-19 “Vaccines”: These negative effects are somewhat “easier” to identify, as they can present with unmistakable symptoms. From the Appendix 1. List of Adverse Events of Special Interest in the 5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis document on BNT162b2 that was cited above, some examples: Page 2: Brain stem embolism; Brain stem mycoplasmal (encephalitis); Central nervous system lupus; Cerebellar artery thrombosis; Cerebral venous thrombosis. Page 3: Demyelination; Embolic stroke; Encephalitis autoimmune; Encephalitis post-immunisation. Page 4: Epilepsy; Epileptic psychosis; Grey matter heterotopia; Guillain-Barre syndrome. Page 5: IIIrd nerve paralysis; Immune-mediated encephalitis; IVth nerve paresis. Page 6: Meningitis; Multiple sclerosis; Neuritis; Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder; Neuropsychiatric lupus. Page 9: Thrombotic stroke; XIth nerve paralysis.

Bell’s Palsy is also reported after BNT162b2 “vaccination” [14].

In other words, COMIRNATY (and BNT162b2) damage multiple mechanisms and processes of the brain that result in physical medical conditions and/or illnesses. This “vaccine” damages the sheath coverings of the nerves, including of the spinal cord (Demyelination.) This “vaccine” causes brain inflammations of various types (Encephalitis.) This “vaccine” causes stroke. This “vaccine” causes nerve paralysis. And more. (H/O) This “vaccine” can also potentially aggravate existing physical neurological conditions and/or illnesses, including ones that were under control before the patient was COVID-19 vaccinated.”

There is also what may be considered a “hybrid” condition, since it involves both physical and psychological symptoms, and since can be brought on by either an infection by the COVID-19 virus itself, or by COVID-19 “vaccination”: Long COVID (also called Long Vax.) Long COVID appears to be an “overraction of the immune system” [15]. Physical symptoms include blood pressure swings, fatigue, and “brain fog.” Psychological symptoms include depression, anxiety, and even PTSD [16]. The FLCCC Alliance has articles on Long COVID / Long Vax.

Third: Psychological Effects of the COVID-19 “Vaccines”: The Blood-Brain Barrier (BBB) consists of “closely-spaced cells” that act as a protective barrier to keep many substances from reaching the brain. Below is the National Cancer Institute definition of the Blood-Brain Barrier [17]:

However, COMIRNATY (and the BNT162b2 before it) were specifically developed to cross the Blood-Brain Barrier and to damage glial cells of the brain, down to the mitochondrial level [18]. A screenshot of section 4. Conclusions of this paper is below:

Recall that COMIRNATY (and the BNT162b2 before it) contain the lipid nanoparticle, ALC-0159. This lipid nanoparticle, one of the four within the “vaccine”, assists in the spread of the “vaccine” to all areas of the “vaccinated” person’s body, including into the brain.

Does the crossing of the Blood-Brain Barrier by COMIRNATY (and the BNT162b2 before it) also affect the psychological processes of the brain? The answer is, Yes: and, most likely, via the use of the N1-Methylpseudouridine in this “vaccine.” Recall that natural uridine, (which is one of the nucleosides that make up the RNA of the body) is produced by the liver. Uridine influences the brain by assisting in regulating mood, behavior, movement, and more. N1-Methylpseudouridine was deliberately included in COMIRNATY (and the BNT162b2 before it) to replace the natural uridine in the “vaccinated” person’s body with a created “faux uridine” (see the screenshots from the BNT162b2 Global Patent document, above in the post.) This chemical was chosen because it was “more effective” than the other two chemicals listed in the Global Patent documentation screenshot above in the post.

The Roh, et al., paper of 28 May 2024 traced a potential association between COVID-19 “vaccination” and the onset of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and also of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) [19]. A screenshot from this paper is below:

While there is not yet a proven association between MCI and the onset of dementia, the potential is higher for onset of dementia in persons who have MCI [20].

At the same time, there is documented proof that COVID-19 “vaccination” can cause psychosis. Examples of papers published on this topic are: the “Aljeshi paper” [21]; the “Borodina, et al., paper” [22];, the “Lazarevna, et al.” paper [23]; the “Morz paper” [24]; and, the “Laxmi and Grover paper” (psychosis diagnosed months after COVID-19 “vaccination” [25].

Yours Truly will again emphasize that one is not a medical doctor; nor am I treating my brother. (H/O) However, I believe there is sufficient evidence to at least consider the possibility that COMIRNATY (BNT162b2) modRNA COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons are at risk of numerous negative effects to the brain, both physical and psychological, induced by this “vaccine”; AND, since it is unknown exactly how long the elements and mechanisms of COMIRNATY (BNT162b2) work in the “vaccinated” person’s body, the possibility also exists that the potential for any physical or psychological neurological negative effects from this “vaccine” may actually increase with additional injections of COMIRNATY (BNT162b2.)

General Summary: One: The Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” COMIRNATY (and, the company’s modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” BNT162b2 before it) can induce multiple negative physical and psychological neurological side effects and/or Adverse Events conditions in persons who take these “vaccines.” Two: COMIRNATY (and BNT162b2) contain dangerous lipid nanoparticles, among them, ALC-0159, which quickly spread the ingredients of this “vaccine” throughout the “vaccinated” person’s body, including to the brain, the intestines, and the pituitary gland. Three: COMIRNATY (and BNT162b2) contain the lab-created chemical, N1-Methylpseudouridine, which replaces the natural Uridine in the “vaccinated” person’s RNA. Four: Pfizer-BioNTech included N1-Methylpseudouridine in the formulation COMIRNATY (and BNT162b2) and stated this in the company’s Global Patent documentation for this “vaccine.” Five: Pfizer-BioNTech tacitly admitted that Gain-of-Function experiments were performed in the development of BNT162b2, per the Global Patent documentation for this “vaccine.” Six: Pfizer-BioNTech admitted that self-amplifying RNA (saRNA) can be used in COVID-19 “vaccines”, per the Global Patent documentation for this “vaccine.”

In addition, the following may be of interest: One: A blog article by Alex Swanson, M.S., on uridine, 30 November 2020; and, Two: The FLCCC protocol on recovering from COVID-19 “vaccination.”

The list of citations follows. Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

[1] www.fda.gov/media/151707/download, Full Prescribing Information for COMIRNATYR (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) suspension for injection, for intramuscular use 2024-2025 Formula

[2] https://icandecide.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/125742_S1_M2_26_pharmkin-tabulated-summary.pdf, BNT162b2 2.6.5 Pharmacokinetics Tabulated Summary, FDA-time stamped 21 January 2021

[3] https://doi.org/10.1038/s41541-023-00788-z, Polyethylene glycol (PEG)-associated immune responses triggered by clinically relevant lipid nanoparticles in rats, Haiyang Wang, et al., 2 Nov. 2023

[4] www.thailandmedical.news/news/breaking-u-s-nih-study-finds-that-sars-cov-2-spike-proteins-and-mrnas-can-translocate-into-the-nucleus-of-host-cells-unlike-any-other-coronaviruses, 1 Oct. 2022

[5] https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.09.27.509633, Nuclear translocation of spike mRNA and protein is a novel pathogenic feature of SARS-CoV-2, Sarah Sattar, et al., 27 Sept. 2022

[6] www.theqtree.com/2023/10/28/the-covid-19-virus-and-the-modrna-covid-19-vaccines-induce-accelerated-aging/

[7] https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-2395-3-6, Mitochondrial oxidative stress in aging and healthspan, Dao-Fu Dai, et al., 2014

[8] www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10937367/, Uridine and its role in metabolic diseases, tumors, and neurodegenerative diseases, Yueyuan Yang, et al., 29 Feb. 2024

[9] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32090264/, N1-Methylpseudouridine substitution enhances the performance of synthetic mRNA switches in cells, Callum JC Parr, et al., 6 Apr. 2020

[10] https://patents.google.com/WO2021213945A1/en, CORONAVIRUS VACCINE Global Patent document, 28 Oct. 2021

[11] https://jessicar.substack.com/p/igg4-cd4s-and-why-the-lnp-mrna-platform, IgG4s, CD4s and why the LNP/mRNA platform should be prohibited, 14 Aug. 2023

[12] www.umms.org/coronavirus/covid-vaccine/mrna, Understanding the COVID Vaccine and mRNA, 30 Sept. 2022 (NOTE: This link no longer works as of 17 October 2024. There is a new link: www.umms.org/health-services/covid-19/about-the-vaccines.)

[13] www.phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/reissue_5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf, BNT162b2 5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization Adverse Event Reports; please see Appendix 1. List of Adverse Events of Special Interest. FDA time stamped 30 Apr. 2021

[14] https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00451-5, Bell’s palsy following vaccination with mRNA (BNT162b2) and inactivated (CoronaVac) SARS-CoV-2 vaccines: a case series and nested case-control study, Eric Yuk Fai Wan, PhD, et al. 16 Aug. 2021

[15] www.science.org/content/article/rare-link-between-coronavirus-vaccines-and-long-covid-illness-starts-gain-acceptance, Gretchen Vogel and Jennifer Couzin-Frankel, 3 July 2023

[16] www.nhsinform.scot/long-term-effects-of-covid-19-long-covid/about-long-covid/signs-and-symptoms-of-long-covid/

[17] www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms/def/blood-brain-barrier

[18] https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.02.482639, Decoding COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Immunometabolism in Central Nervous System: human brain normal glial and glioma cells by Raman imaging, H. Abramczyk, et al., 2 Mar. 2022

[19] https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcae103, A potential association between COVID-19 vaccination and development of alzheimer’s disease, Jee Hoon Roh, et al., 28 May 2024

[20] www.alz.org/alzheimers-dementia/what-is-dementia/related_conditions/mild-cognitive-impairment

[21] www.psychiatrist.com/pcc/psychosis-associated-covid-19-vaccination/, Abdulsamad A. Aljeshi, et al. Case report and disucssion, read-only, 17 Feb. 2022

[22] https://doi.org/10.24869/psyd.2022.377, First Episode of Psychosis Following the COVID-19 Vaccination – A Case Series, Tonka Borodina, et al., 18 May 2022

[23] https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1360338, New-onset psychosis following COVID-19 vaccination: a systematic review, Marija Lazarevna, et al., 11 Apr. 2024

[24] https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10101651, A Case Report: Multifocal Necrotizing Encephalitis and Myocarditis after BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccination against COVID-19, Michael Morz, 1 Oct. 2022

[25] https://doi.org/10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_607_22, Unmasking of schizophrenia following COVID-19 vaccination, Laxmi, Raj; Grover, Sandeep, Mar. 2023

Health Friday Open Thread 10.04.2024: Self-Amplifying RNA (saRNA) — A Primer on How to Amplify a Disaster

The above image of lab equipment is courtesy of Google Images and Public Domain Pictures.

Today’s offering for Health Friday concerns what is called self-amplifying RNA (saRNA.) As the presentation includes discussion of saRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, this post is dedicated to the memory of Yours Truly’s cousin Bill, who “died suddenly and unexpectedly” in September 2023.

Readers already know about the Important Wolf Moon Notifications, the importance of Civil Discussion, the Rules of our late, good Wheatie, and the caveats regarding Health Friday posts by Yours Truly. Links to these items can be found here. NOTE: Since this post is detailed and there are multiple areas to cover, Yours Truly has added Summaries of certain sections, and a General Summary at the end.

Before one begins: It is well known that the modRNA and the viral vector COVID-19 “vaccines” currently in use have been, and are, a disaster on multiple fronts. Not only do they induce literally thousands of negative medical and psychological effects in the bodies of those who took them and who take them now; these “vaccines” also cause death. The numbers of COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons presenting with COVID-19 “vaccine”-induced illnesses, injuries, disabilities, or “died suddenly and unexpectedly” are increasing by the month. Nobody knows exactly how long, or in what amount, the elements and mechanisms of the COVID-19 “vaccines” work in the “vaccinated” person’s body: what IS known, is that whatever “protection” is conferred by these “vaccines” is short-lived, while, at the same time, the “vaccine” mechanisms linger on in the body for an indeterminate period of time. Yours Truly has written extensively for this board regarding this situation. For further information, please see websites such as these: https://kirschsubstack.com/ (Steve Kirsch); https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/ (Peter McCullough, MD); and, https://phinancetechnologies.com/HumanityProjects/Projects.htm#Nav_ExcessDeaths (Ed Dowd, statistician.)

At the same time, the development of new types of COVID-19 “vaccines”, as well as new types of “vaccine delivery” (intranasal, oral, and aerosol, for examples) goes on apace. One of the “newest” types of COVID-19 “vaccines” uses what is called self-amplifying RNA, or saRNA.

The concept of saRNA is the use of a small amount of RNA (or mRNA) in an injectable. Once introduced into the body of the patient, the saRNA theoretically goes to work, “re-creating itself.” (Think RNA or mRNA being turned into a “Xerox copier” inside the “vaccinated” person’s body.) The “goal” of saRNA is for the agent to “re-create itself” inside the “vaccinated” person’s body for a certain amount of time and in some amount. The patient’s body is “instructed” by the saRNA to “recognize” and produce antibodies against certain “enemies”, such as viruses. The theory is that a smaller amount of saRNA initially introduced into the body, followed by the “Xerox copier effect”, then followed by “instructing” the body to “recognize” and fight off certain “enemies”, will make saRNA a “more effective use” of mRNA in injectables.

Basically, saRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” turn the “vaccinated” person’s body into a “Xerox copier” (which, apparently, the “vaccinated” person’s body CANNOT stop, slow down, or mitigate) for the ingredients (and, by extension, the mechanisms) of the saRNA “vaccine.” Today’s post is a primer about saRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.”

The trail begins here, with these: www.science.org/content/blog-post/first-self-amplifying-mrna-vaccine, “The First Self-Amplifying mRNA Vaccine”, 25 January 2024, by Derek Lowe; https://jessicar.substack.com/p/why-we-cant-move-forward-with-self. “Why we can’t move forward with self-amplifying RNA technology”, by Jessica Rose, PhD, 7 September 2024; www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/japans-plan-to-destroy-the-world, by Daniel Nagase, MD, 10 September 2024; and, www.freethink.com/health/sarna-vaccines, “World’s first “self-amplifying” vaccine approved in Japan”, by Kristin Houser, 16 December 2023. Please look at any or all of these to gain information about saRNA “vaccines.”

In addition, there is Dr. Robert Malone’s take: please see: https://x.com/newstart_2024/status/1840796021166600635. Below are screenshots of his remarks:

There are “pros and cons” regarding the use of saRNA in injectables. Below, from an article that discusses these, via www.promegaconnections.com/how-do-self-amplifying-vaccines-work/, by Jordan Nutting, 6 February 2024:

****** Summary: In other words, saRNA injectables **may**, at some point down the road, have **some** benefits. In the meantime — NONE of these types of injectables (GEMCOVAC, Kostaive) have been SUFFICIENTLY AND THOROUGHLY INVESTIGATED AND TESTED FOR USE ON HUMANS. But they are being approved ANYWAY, and are being injected into the bodies of unsuspecting persons who buy into the “Look, this shot has less mRNA than the ones you took before, and it’ll work better!” hype.

Here is a graphic depicting how saRNA works in the body of the person who is “vaccinated” with an saRNA injectable, via this “cheerleader” article: www.genscript.com/the-future-of-vaccination-unleashing-the-power-of-self-amplifying-rna-technology.html, by Dr. Zhen Sun, Editor, 9 May 2024.

****** Look closely at the above graphic. It appears that the basic schema of saRNA is a “double-layer” of saRNA “replicons” that create a “subgenomic RNA.” This, in turn, creates the “Xerox copier” response which forces the body of the saRNA “vaccinated” person to endlessly produce immune system response — and for “at least” as long as 28 days after such “vaccination.”

Please see this paper regarding a discussion of saRNA “vaccine” design: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2023.05.007, “Rise of the RNA machines — self-amplification in RNA vaccine design”, Jerome D.G. Comes, et al., 14 June 2023. Below is the Abstract of this paper:

Another “cheerleader” article about saRNA “vaccines” is here: www.technologyreview.com/2024/02/1087536/the-next-generation-of-mrna-vaccines-is-on-its-way/, by Cassandra Willyard, February 2024. Below is a portion of the article:

Note the language about “,…at least in theory” advantage of saRNA “vaccines.” Also note the last sentence — saRNA can “persist for a month.” In fact, nobody really knows how long saRNA elements will “persist” in the body of the person who takes this type of “vaccine” — NO long-term clinical trial or study has been performed using this technology.

On 28 November 2023, the Japanese Government approved the use of the saRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, ARCT-154 (also called LUNAR-COVID-19 and Kostaive) for “active immunization” (translation: “prevention”) against COVID-19 for persons age 18 and older. Kostaive was developed by CSL / Arcturus (remember this company? Yours Truly took the lid off it here: www.theqtree.com/2024/08/02/the-hhs-gave-the-go-ahead-to-use-an-h5n1-vaccine-but-the-ama-just-issued-new-cpt-codes-for-an-h5n8-vaccine/.) This “vaccine” was to have supplies ready for administration by physicians or hospitals by mid-December 2023.

CSL / Arcturus, the Japanese government, and media outlets were quick to herald this “first-ever saRNA COVID-19 “vaccine.” Except — there already was an saRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” approved and in use, since 2022, in India: GEMCOVAC. Perhaps what CSL / Arcturus, the Japanese government, and media outlets should have mentioned the fact that Kostaive is modRNA-based from the J.1. Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant (along with other “familiar” manufacturing methods, see below in today’s post); whereas GEMCOVAC based on an “ancestral variant” (in other words, the Beta variant) of the original Wuhan Hu1 SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Before Yours Truly presents information on Kostaive, she will first discuss GEMOCOVAC. This is in order to present further background information on saRNA technology as applied in COVID-19 “vaccines.” Stay with me — this is all germane to the situation:

Looking at GEMCOVAC, one can get the beginning of a picture of how saRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” work. The “latest version” of this “vaccine” is called GEMCOVAC-OM. Below is a portion of the SmPC pdf for this product (https://gemcovac.com; scroll down the page to GEMCOVAC-OM SmPC (pdf) and click “Download”):

The BA.1. Omicron variant of SARS-Co-V-2 is the basis for this “vaccine.” It is not strictly modRNA (however, recall that ALL of the “descendant variants” of the original Wuhan Hu1 SARS-CoV-2 virus contain elements of that original lab-created virus).

Of the excipients (in other words, the adjuvants): per Wikipedia, DOTAP (1,2-Dioleoyl-3-trimethylammonium propane) is a chemical used in fabric softeners, but also is used as a lipid nanoparticle in vaccines. Squalene: below is Page 1 of the FisherScientific MSDS Safety Data Sheet for this chemical (www.fishersci.com/):

Continuing: for polysorbate 80, again from Fisher Scientific, Page 1 of the MSDS Safety Data Sheet:

And, here is the Mechanism of Action for GEMCOVAC-OM, from the Package Insert (see the link above):

Note the language, “…which is reported to interact with host cells receptors (ACE-2.)” (Italics mine.) The developer and manufacturer (GENNOVA) of this “vaccine” can’t exactly quantify how the product works.

Yours Truly now turns to Kostaive, (ARCT-154) the saRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” that was approved by the Japanese government in November 2023.

The announcement regarding the Japanese government’s approval of Kostaive is here: www.meiji-seika-pharma.com/pressrelease/2023/detail/pdf/231128_01.pdf, of 28 November 2023. Below is a screenshot from the press release:

Note the language in the above regarding “…the potential for extended duration of protection while using lower doses of mRNA compared to existing mRNA vaccines.” (Italics mine) Again, nobody knows exactly how long this “extended duration” period is; nobody knows exactly how much “Xerox copying” of the altered mRNA in Kostaive occurs during this period in the “vaccinated” person’s body; and, nobody knows exactly what effects this “Xerox copying” of the altered mRNA in Kostaive will have in the “vaccinated” person’s body. In other words, anyone who takes Kostaive, or any saRNA “vaccine”, in Yours Truly’s opinion, is being used a “human lab rat” — just as people were used / are still being used, as “human lab rats” for the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.”

And, here is the Report of the Deliberation Results (which contains the information about Kostaive that led to its approval) from the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare: www.pmda.go.jp/files/000269813.pdf. This report is an interesting read. There are numerous “blacked-out” areas, reminding one of the blacked-out areas in certain publicly-released Pfizer-BioNTech reports that the company gave to the FDA regarding that company’s modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” BNT162b2. HOWEVER, section 2.1 Active Substance for Kostaive states that this saRNA “vaccine” contains elements from the original Wuhan Hu1 SARS-CoV-2 virus, plus elements from the Omicron variant strain. More information on this is found on Page 4 of the document. Below is a portion of this page:

Looking at the above, starting with the D614G mutation, the Abstract from the Zhang, et al. paper on this (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19808-4, “SARS-CoV-2 spike-protein D614G mutation increases virion spike density and infectivity”, Lizhou Zhang, et al., 26 November 2020. The paper was researched and published before any COVID-19 “vaccine” was authorized for use):

In other words, the D614G element causes the SARS-CoV-2 virus to be more infective.

Looking at V987P, part of the section Full-Length S Glycoprotein Vaccines from this paper: https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021/701501, “SARs-CoV-2 Vaccines Based on the Spike Glycoprotein and Implications of New Viral Variants”, Daniel Martinez-Flores, et al., 11 July 2021):

In other words, if V987P was “good enough” for Pfizer-BioNTech and for Moderna to use in their modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, it apparently was “good enough” to be used in Kostaive.

The K986P protein used in Kostaive: please see here: www.rcsb.org/structure/6zp1. This viral protein, along with V987P above, are BOTH on the Arg S1/S2 cleavage site on the SARS-CoV-2 virus genome. (FURIN CLEAVAGE SITE, anyone?)

The R682G, R683S, and R685S proteins used in Kostaive: please see here: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-32665-7, “Omicron SARS-CoV-2 mutations stabilize spike-up RBD conformation and lead to a non-RBM-binding monoclonal antibody escape”, Zhennan Zhao, et al., 24 August 2022. If appears that these proteins help to create a “one-RBD-up conformation.” Below is a portion of the Abstract of this paper:

In other words, these proteins increase the immune system attack from the Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variants by making Omicron “stick better” to the ACE2 receptor cells in the human body.

****** Summary: It appears, then, that Kostaive contains one protein from the original Wuhan Hu1 SARS-CoV-2 virus genome (D614G); two proteins from the “ancestral line” of the SARS-CoV-2 virus (K986P and V987P); and three proteins of the Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant (R682G, R683S, and R685S.) See below in the post for more information on these items.

One more ingredient of Kostaive, mRNA-2105: This ingredient is derived from the Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis virus (VEEV.) Below is section 4.R.1. of the Deliberations Results document discussing this:

The question that immediately occurs regarding the above: How can Arcturus (the manufacturer of Kostaive) state that mRNA-2105 cannot be “incorporated into host cell DNA”? How is Arcturus absolutely sure that there is zero reverse transcription potential or ability in Kostaive? This is similar to the same statements from Pfizer-BioNTech about BNT162b2 “cannot change the DNA of the vaccinated individual” — which has been proven to be false (please see: here, Slide 14.)

****** Summary of the above: What Yours Truly is getting at here is that Kostaive appears to be the end-product of: ONE: a lab-created mixture of the dangerous D614G element from the original Wuhan Hu1 SARS-CoV-2 virus, plus, various elements of earlier SARS-CoV-2 mutations; TWO: NO long-term clinical trials, NO safety studies for Toxicity, use on pregnant women, etc.; THREE: the “Process 2”-type manufacturing method (“culturing” the lab-enhanced mRNA for the “vaccine” in a “bath” of E. coli); FOUR: using lipid nanoparticles, one of which (ATX-126) has never been used before in an injectable); FIVE: what appears to be a “pro-forma” Deliberation Results document on Kostaive that raises more questions than it answers; and, SIX: approval by the Japanese government for use on humans without a thorough investigation of the above. Related to point SIX: below is the list of Approval Conditions that were imposed along the approval of Kostaive for use in Japan, from the Deliberations Results document:

By the way, these Approval Conditions read very much like the ones that the FDA imposed on Pfizer-BioNTech along with that agency’s EUA for BNT162b2.

Regarding Kostaive itself, more particulars:

The ingredients of Kostaive are listed in section 2.2 Vaccine Product of the report. A screenshot of this section is below:

Kostaive contains at least three separate types of LNPs (lipid nanoparticles): ATX-126; DSPC; and, PEG2000-DMG. Below is a portion of the MSDS Safety Data Sheet for ATX-126:

Section 2.2.3 of the Deliberation Results document for Kostaive discusses the manufacturing process for Kostaive. It appears that Kostaive ALSO “switched” from a “Process A” manufacturing method over to a “Process B” manufacturing method. (Recall that the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 was “switched” from its “Process 1” manufacturing method over to a “Process 2” manufacturing method):

One more item from the Deliberation Results document for Kostaive, again on the ATX-126 lipid nanoparticle used in this “vaccine.” It confirms that this “novel excipient” (adjuvant) has not been used before in a “vaccine.”

Yours Truly will again emphasize that other sections of the Deliberation Results document on Kostaive make it clear that NO studies were performed for numerous items, such as Toxicity, potential for impairment of reproduction, and so on. By the way, buried in the document is a “passing reference mention” that the “Process B” manufacturing method for this “vaccine” uses E. coli as the “culturing medium” for the “enhanced” mRNA in the product. (The “Process 2” manufacturing method for BNT162b2 and its “descendant” COVID-19 “vaccines” also uses E. coli.) It also appears that the use of Kostaive on pregnant women in clinical trials was “inconclusive”; this “vaccine” should be taken by pregnant women only if the situation so warrants.

Also: Kostaive is to be taken as a “primary series” of two separate injections, 28 days apart; with a “booster” taken about three months later. The question that arises is: If it is true that the saRNA in Kostaive is active, including installing numberless “Xerox copiers” of itself in the “vaccinated” person’s body for AT LEAST 28 days AFTER the initial injection, WHY is there a need for ANOTHER injection around Day 28? And a “booster” after that?

****** BUT — AND THIS IS A HUGE BUT — TAKE ANOTHER LOOK AT SECTION 2.2.1 OF THE DELIBERATION RESULTS DOCUMENT FOR KOSTAIVE:

Look at the “active ingredient” item, “zapomeran.” What is zapomeran? It is a “drug” that contains the RNA of the Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis Virus (VEEV or VEE) in an saRNA form. It is ALSO manufactured by ARCTURUS (CSL.) It is unclear if it is being used in other types of COVID-19 “vaccines” other than Kostaive. Please see: https://synapse.patsnap.com/drug/510bcf7ef75649278b284a94663c69f6. Scroll down the page to R&D Status to see that zapomeran has already been approved in the EU; Norway; Iceland; and Liechtenstein; but in what final form it is used, is also unclear. NOTE 1: It has been impossible to find a complete list of ingredients for zapomeran. One would not be surprised to learn that the names Kostaive and zapomeran may, in some respects, be “interchangeable.” NOTE 2: It is not easy to find information on zapomeran. Yours Truly has encountered “504 Bad Gateway” error messages when going back to recheck a couple of the links to zapomeran in this post.

Looking further into VEEV (or VEE), there is this article: https://ceh.vetmed.ucdavis.edu/health-topics/venezuelan-equine-encephalitis-vee, by Amy Young, 28 August 2020. This virus can affect horses, donkeys, or zebras. VEEV is transmitted to these animals by infected mosquitos that bite them. It can cause severe disease or death by infecting the brain and the central nervous system. Humans who contract VEEV can also become severely ill and can also die from it. Another paper, discussing the RNA of VEEV (VEE),by Sarah E. Hickson and Jennifer L. Hyde, is here.

As an aside: zapomeran (under the name “ARCT-154-06”) was granted a “deferral” for use on children from birth to 18 years of age in the European Union for the “prevention” of COVID-19 infection in JUNE 2023: www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/pip-decision/p-0204-2023-ema-decision-5-june-2023-agreement-paediatric-investigation-plan-granting-deferral-zapomeran-emea-003349-pip01-22_en.pdf. This means that the use of zapomeran (in whatever form) is restricted to persons age 18 and older.

AND HERE IS THE JAPANESE NIHS LISTING FOR ZAPOMERAN: https://jpdb.nihs.go.jp/jan/DetailList_en?submit-all_alpSearch&keyword=Zapomeran. Below is a screenshot of the listing (scroll down past the genome sequences listings):

****** VERY IMPORTANT: The SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins in zapomeran are the same ones that are in Kostaive. These were discussed above in the post. Turning to the nsP proteins (non-structural proteins) in zapomeran (hyperlinks to papers are embedded), as these elements are also apparently contained in Kostaive:

nsP1: this non-structural protein suppresses the immune system; Katharina Schubert, et al.

nsP2: this non-structural protein is a “delivery vehicle” for SARS-CoV-2 proteins; Ninge Zheng, et al.

nsP3: this non-structural protein is a “vital component in the replication of SARS-CoV-2”; Sofia Lemark, et al.

nsP4: this non-structural protein is the largest one. It is a Rotavirus enterotoxin that causes diarrhea, can cause severe diarrhea, and particularly affects young children; Judith M. Hall, et al.

****** SUMMARY: IT APPEARS, THEN, THAT KOSTAIVE CONTAINS ZAPOMERAN, WHICH INCLUDES THE VENEZUELAN EQUINE ENCEPHALITIS RNA; PLUS, SIX LAB-ENHANCED/LAB-ISOLATED GENOME CODES OF SARS-CoV-2; AND, FOUR NON-STRUCTURAL PROTEINS, ONE OF WHICH IS A ROTAVIRUS TOXIN. KOSTAIVE ALSO CONTAINS DANGEROUS LIPID NANOPARTICLES (SUCH AS ATX-126.) THESE ARE ALL PRESENT IN THIS saRNA COVID-19 “VACCINE” PRODUCT. RECALL THAT LIPID NANOPARTICLES WILL HELP TO SPREAD A “VACCINE” THROUGHOUT THE ‘VACCINATED” PERSON’S BODY, INCLUDING CROSSING THE BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER.

Why on Earth is a COVID-19 “vaccine” that contains the RNA of an equine brain inflammation virus (a virus that comes from infected mosquitos that bite equine animals) being used on humans? A “vaccine” that is engineered to create an unknown number of “Xerox copiers” of the “vaccine” elements into the body of the “vaccinated” person? A “vaccine” that contains six apparently lab-enhanced/lab-isolated genome codes from the SARS-CoV-2 virus or its variants? What does an equine brain inflammation virus have in common with SARS-CoV-2? What if a person who has already taken, say, five or six injections of a modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” decides to take Kostaive? Could an saRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” somehow “interact” with the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” elements already in that person’s body?

****** GENERAL SUMMARY: saRNA “vaccines” for COVID-19 are already being used (GEMCOVAC in India); and are being approved for use (Kostaive in Japan.) The technology for saRNA is not fully developed and not fully tested; the COVID-19 “vaccines” that use saRNA contain “lab-enhanced”/”lab-isolated” genome codes of the SARS-CoV-2 virus or its variants; saRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” contain lipid nanoparticles — and, in the case of Kostaive, an LNP (ATX-126) that has never been used before in an injectable; that no studies have been performed on saRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” regarding Toxicity, the effects on reproductive potential, and so on; and, that Kostaive contains the RNA of the Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis Virus. And yet, these products are being hailed as “the vaccines of the future.” And, the people taking them are again being used as “human lab rats.”

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday Open Thread 9.27.2024: Another Scientific Paper Is Under Attack For Telling The Truth About The COVID-19 “Vaccines”

The above image from an old medical-scientific journal is from PeopleImages, via Google Images.

This post is part of Health Friday, a series of offerings related to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. The discussion is not limited to what is presented today; it is an Open Thread. However, since this presentation is about a COVID-19 “vaccine”, the post is dedicated to the memory of Yours Truly’s cousin Bill, who died “suddenly and unexpectedly” in September 2023.

To begin, there are Important Wolf Moon Notifications, with a couple of extra items:

Free Speech is practiced here: “Use it or lose it.”

The following are alternate Q Tree sites for certain circumstances:

The U Tree is for “argue it out” interactions. There is a “Featured” article at this site for use as a “Rescue Thread.”

The “third site”, in case the above two are inaccessible.

Civil discussion is practiced here. The excellent and timely Rules of our late, good Wheatie prevail:

One: No food fights.

Two: No running with scissors.

Three: If you bring snacks, bring enough for everyone.

Please follow the added Guidelines from Wolf Moon. Please do not give the modern-day version of Cato the Elder the opportunity to show “enmity” to the board.

The extra items: What Yours Truly presents in this series, as in her other blog posts to this board, is not medical advice — the are opinions and hypotheses based on her over 4 1/2 years (and continuing) of reading about, researching out, and writing about “all things COVID”, Big Pharma, and other health topics. Readers are encouraged to consult a healthcare practitioner regarding health concerns or conditions.

The Health Friday post today concerns the impending Retraction of a peer-reviewed and published paper that details long-term COVID-19 “vaccine”-induced injuries in North India. The paper was submitted to Springer for review and publishing on 9 January 2024; it was accepted (it had passed the peer-review process); and it was published on 13 May 2024. Here is a free-access version (to read the entire paper on Springer, one has to either access through an institution, or to pay for a copy): www.qeios.com/read/JK7IBA/pdf, “Long-Term Safety Analysis of the BBV152 Coronavirus Vaccine in Adolescents and Adults: Findings from a 1-Year Prospective Study in North India”, Upinder Kaur, et al., 13 May 2024. The study was conducted at Banaras Hindu University in India. BBV152 is another name for the COVAXIN COVID-19 “vaccine”, developed by Bharat BIotech of India in cooperation with Indian Council on Medical Research (ICMR) – National Institute of Virology. ICMR receives “royalty payments” for each dose of COVAXIN that is administered, as does Bharat Biotech (Sound familiar? — as in, the co-development, co-ownership of patents, and sharing of “royalty payments” between the NIAID and Moderna for the modRNA COVID-19, mRNA-1273?)

For purposes of today’s offering, the trail begins here: https://blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/breaking-journal-pressured-to-retract, 23 September 2024. Dr. Demasi has a PhD in Rheumatology from the University of Adelaide (Australia.)

The Kaur, et al., paper referenced above was published by Springer on 13 May 2024. Almost immediately, the attacks began on the paper, the authors, and the publisher — with articles like this one: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/1-in-3-covaxin-recipients-hit-by-adverse-events-study/articleshow/110187284.cms, “1 in 3 Covaxin recipients hit by adverse events: Study”, 17 May 2024. On 18 May 2024, the ICMR demanded that Springer retract the paper (Yours Truly: nothing like causing panic in a government agency when the truth is published about a “vaccine” that the agency is pushing as “safe and effective,” especially when that agency is also getting “royalty payments” for the use of the “vaccine”, is there?). But, the attack on Springer and the authors didn’t end there. In July 2024, Bharat Biotech filed a lawsuit against Springer and the authors (some of the authors are students), demanding retraction of the paper and the payment of damages to Bharat Biotech of $600,000 US dollars (50 million Indian rupees.) In addition, the lawsuit accused the paper’s authors of defamation against the company, included with a demand for separate damages to be paid to the company for defamation. Despite sworn statements from the authors that no defamation was intended or written into the paper; and, despite the fact that Nitin Joshi, the editor of the Springer journal (Drug Safety) in which the study appeared, was one of the reviewers who approved the study for publishing, it was Joshi who notified the authors on 28 August 2024 that he was going to have the paper retracted. He confirmed this decision in an email to the authors on 17 September. However, as the defamation lawsuit is now in court, the study is still available on the internet.

What is BBV152/COVAXIN? It is an “inactivated whole virion vaccine” (whole virus vaccine) for “active immunization” against COVID-19. It is not an mRNA-based/modRNA-based COVID-19 “vaccine”, although it does use an “ancestral wave strain” of the original Wuhan Hu1 SARS-CoV-2 virus (in other words, a strain from the Wuhan Hu1 virus that occurred before the Beta, Delta, or Omicron strains.) The Package Insert for COVAXIN is here: www.bharatbiotech.com/images/covaxin/covaxin-pack-insert.pdf. Below is an image from the Package Insert:

Per Wikipedia, 363,774,435 persons in India had been “vaccinated” with at least one dose of COVAXIN as of 4 March 2023.

However, the COVAXIN Package Insert does not actually describe how the “vaccine” works (the “Mechanism of Action.”) Yours Truly found something along the lines of the necessary information here: www.clinicaltrialsarena.com/projects/covaxin-bbv152-for-the-treatment-of-covid-19/?cf-view&cf-closed, “COVAXIN (BBV152) for the Treatment of Covid-19, India”, 28 June 2022. Below is a screenshot from this article:

But, COVAXIN has been hailed by the Indian government about being “the first indigenous COVID-19 vaccine in India” (www.bharatbiotech.com/covaxin.html.) Why is ViroVax involved? (More on this later in the post.) Back to the Package Insert for COVAXIN. Below is a screenshot of the ingredients used in this “vaccine”:

Looking further into the ingredients list, starting with the NIV-2020-770 strain of SARS-CoV-2: please refer to this paper: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7825810/, “Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, BBV152: a double-blind, randomised Phase 1 trial”, Krishna Mohan Vadrevu, et al., May 2021. It appears that NIV-2020-770 (the “inactivated whole virion”) is part of the Asp614Gly variant chain of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The Asp614Gly variant itself is apparently part of the “ancestral wave” of the original Wuhan Hu1 SARS-CoV-2 virus; and, it is “not as serious” as the Beta or the Delta waves of the virus. Please refer to this article: www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/langlo/PIIS2214-109X(22)00199-1.pdf, Vol.10, July 2022, a Comment “Decoding the next SARS-CoV-2 variant”, by Jeremy Nel and WD Francois Venter. Below is a screenshot of a portion from the Comment:

Thus, BBV152/COVAXIN cannot be considered to be one of the “most recent” types of COVID-19 “vaccines”, as it does not include any elements before the Beta, Delta, or Omicron variants.

The Aluminium Hydroxide Gel in the ingredients (it is an “excipient” [“adjuvant]”): this is also called “Algel-IMDG” and “Alhydroxiqium-II” — in other words, it is a hydrogel. It was invented by ViroVax LLC of Lawrence, Kansas, under the aegis of the EpscoR Idea Foundation (part of the National Science Foundation in the United States), and with funding by the NIAID. This is the ViroVax / United States government connection. Here is a screenshot from an article by the EpscoR Idea Foundation on this “success story” (www.epscorideafoundation.org/success-stories/kansas-adjuvant-developed-with-nih-funding-enhances-efficacy-of-indias-covid-19-vaccine):

Note that Alhydroxiqium-II targets the lymph nodes of the person who takes COVAXIN. So, while this excipient is not exactly a lipid nanoparticle (LNP), it, in Yours Truly’s opinion, basically functions like an LNP in targeting the lymph nodes for delivery of the “vaccine payload” of COVAXIN; and, by “stimulating” the “vaccinated” person’s natural immune system to go and “search” for invading pathogens. By the way, Aluminium Hydroxide Gel is not to be used in foods, drugs pesticides, or “biocidal” products — see the screenshot below, from the search on Fisher Scientific (ThermoFisher) about this chemical, Page 1:

HOWEVER, it appears that FisherScientific had a “change of heart” since December 2021 regarding the “Uses advised against” for Aluminium Hydroxide — below is their MSDS Safety Sheet as of February 2024, Page 1:

Here is another source for an MSDS Safety Sheet, this one specifically for Aluminium Hydroxide Gel: www.oxfordlabfinechem.com/msds/ALUMINIUMHYDROXIDEGEL.pdf. Please see section 3 Hazards Identification; and section 11 Toxicological Information Special Remarks on Other Toxic Effects on Humans. Below is part of the Special Remarks portion of section 11:

The TLR7/8 excipient (adjuvant) in COVAXIN: This one is used in immunotherapy, including in the treatment of HIV-1. Please see: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1033448, “Novel TLR7/8 agonists promote activation of HIV-1 latent reservoirs and human T and NK cells”, Yangyang Li, et al., 26 January 2023. This begs the question, Why is an HIV-1 immunotherapy treatment element being used in a COVID-19 “vaccine?” This also, in Yours Truly’s opinion, removes any consideration of COVAXIN to be labeled a “vaccine” — it is actually a gene therapy/immunotherapy injectable.

And, the 2-Phenoxyethanol excipient (adjuvant) in COVAXIN. Below is a screenshot portion of the Fisher Scientific (ThermoFisher) MSDS Safety Sheet for this chemical, Page 1:

The Kaur, et al., paper, goes into detail regarding the types of reported serious adverse events that affected the study subject pool who took COVAXIN. Three pages of the Supplementary Table 1. from the paper are below. Note that these are details from subjects one year after “vaccination” with COVAXIN. Note also that another paper from December 2020 (by different authors) shows that the S1 protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself crosses the Blood-Brain Barrier.

If Yours Truly is reading about this situation correctly, it appears that one of the “problems” with the Kaur, et al., paper, is that the subject pool of COVAXIN-“vaccinated” persons in North India who reported serious adverse events following “vaccination” to the study authors was “small.” One has to ask: How many COVAXIN-“vaccine”-induced serious adverse events would need to be reported before they would be considered “relevant” by the Indian government and by Bharat BioTech? — say, a “minimum” of 3 million adverse events reports? Is it “within acceptable limits” that COVAXIN-“vaccinated” persons in North India suffer a stroke or a heart attack after “vaccination” with this product? Is this another situation of “the known and potential benefits outweigh the known and potential risks” of taking a COVID-19 “vaccine”, which is the “official” position of the CDC and the FDA in the United States?

Yours Truly has gone into detail regarding the situation with BBV152/COVAXIN for several reasons: First, to enumerate the multiple potentials for “vaccine”-induced serious adverse effects from this COVID-19 “vaccine” product; Second, to highlight the persecution of the authors of a paper who sought to study and write about these potentials; Third, to highlight the persecution of the journal that peer-reviewed, approved, and published the paper; Fourth, to bring to light the involvement of the United States government (via the NSF and the NIAID) in the funding and development of an ingredient (excipient/adjuvant) in this “vaccine” intended for use in a foreign country; and, Fifth, to again emphasize how important it is that consumers “do their own due diligence” regarding information on drugs and/or injectables that they put into their bodies.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday Open Thread 9.20.2024: Double-Expose’ Edition

The above is a vintage image of Dr. Edward Jenner administering the first smallpox vaccination (inoculation) to James Phipps, 14 May 1796. Courtesy of www.sciencemuseum.org.uk/.

Today’s post, as it relates to the disaster of COVID-19 and the COVID-19 “vaccines”, is dedicated by Yours Truly in memory of her cousin Bill, who died “suddenly and unexpectedly” in September 2023. However, the discussion is not limited to what is presented here: it is an Open Thread.

There are two separate, although connected (Big Pharma), parts to today’s offering. Each part is of itself an expose’. This post is a long one, but important. Please, take a cup of coffee or tea; or, if it’s an appropriate time of the day, perhaps a “wee dram” of something like chilled D.O.M. Benedictine with a twist of lemon peel, and settle in for reading.

Readers already know the caveats regarding civil discussion on this board; of the alternate sites in case the main board is not accessible (here and here); and, that what Yours Truly presents on Health Friday is not medical advice, but opinions and/or hypotheses from ongoing research on COVID-19, Big Pharma, and other health topics.

“Quick, down-and-dirty summary” of today’s post:

One: Pfizer-BioNTech has begun a new enterprise, PfrizerForAllTM, which apparently seeks to completely circumvent / marginalize, in-person consumer contact with pharmacies; to “funnel” in-person consumer contact with healthcare practitioners to “Pfizer-affiliated” professionals; and, to “redirect” the dissemination of information about the COVID-19 “vaccines” to that provided by Pfizer-BioNTech.

Two: That the FDA approval of the very dangerous and deadly Smallpox “vaccine”, ACAM2000, for use also as a “prevention” for Mpox, is the result of a complex mixture of Big Pharma influence + FDA review of the Biologics License Applicaion for this use of ACAM2000 that is, in Yours Truly’s opinion, “a foregone conclusion despite serious reservations”, to say the least + Gain-of-Function experiments on the Mpox virus. There is also a potential tie-in to “an expanded biodefense role.”

Yours Truly has tried to avoid making today’s post read like a scientific paper; however, there is a lot of information that is relevant to each Expose’. Note: Mpox is now the “official” name for monkeypox.

Expose’ One: It appears that Pfizer-BioNTech is creating new ways to increase the company’s consumer operations (and, therefore, potential profit lines.) Pfizer-BioNTech has just launched PfizerForAllTM — a direct sell-to-consumer business that will provide online access to healthcare providers (online [virtual], or affiliated healthcare providers encounters [for example, to get a COVID-19 “vaccination”]); plus, “delivered to your door” prescription drugs and “easier access” to other company products, such as their COVID-19 “test kits.”

The story begins here: https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/pfizers-vaccine-business-is-so-pfucked, 7 September 2024. From the blog article, below:

Pfizer-BioNTech filed a Trademark Application in May 2024 for this new PfizerForAllTM program https://endpts.com/pfizer-submits-trademark-application-that-suggests-it-could-be-launching-a-direct-to-patient-program/, 13 May 2024, by Nicole De Feudis. (One must be a subscriber in order to read the entire article.) It appears that the application was approved: the company officially launched the program on 27 August 2024 (from the article on www.businesswire.com/, Pfizer Launches PfizerForAllTM, a Digital Platform that Helps Simplify Access to Healthcare (www.pfizerforall.com/.) From the article:

In other words, in Yours Truly’s opinion, Pfizer-BioNTech, not happy with the company’s portfolio loss due to falling consumer acceptance of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” offered, and due to the failure of the company’s clinical trial of its “combo” modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” + influenza “vaccine”, a corporate decision was made to find a way to go straight to the consumer and make it “so easy” to get access to the “vaccines”, plus other Pfizer products. Translation: banish “vaccine” hesitancy / “vaccine” refusal, by doing what may be called “straight to the consumer medical psy-op.” Again, from the Latypova article:

Dr. Peter McCullough’s take on the Pfizer-BioNTech move is here: https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/pfizer-launches-pfizerforall, 14 September 2024. Below is a portion of his article:

The lawsuit that Pfizer-BioNTech settled in 2009 was over the use of the company’s drug, Bextra, in “off-label” situations. The scope of the settlement is described here: www.justice.gov/, “Justice Department Announces Largest Health Care Fraud Settlement in Its History”, 1 November 2023. A portion of the announcement is below:

This lawsuit was the starting point for FDA changes to its “regulations” regarding the use of prescription drugs in “off-label” situations. The latest FDA changes are summarized here: www.sidley.com/en/insights/newsupdates/2023/11/fda-s-latest-off-label-guidance, 1 November 2023. It appears, in a nutshell, that drug manufacturers can be held responsible (liable) for “off-label” use of their products, even if they already comply with the “new” FDA “regulations.” (Think of this in light of the use of, for example, Ivermectin or Hydroxychloroquine to prevent or to treat COVID-19 — these uses, arguably, are “off-label” for these drugs.)

By the way, PfizerForAllTM is working with UpScript Health and Alto Pharmacy regarding access to healthcare services and filling prescriptions. Guess what? UpScript Health lists Pfizer as a “partner” on the company’s “About” page of their website: www.upscripthealth.com/about/. And, there’s more — Alto Pharmacy, the online prescription drug company, has a couple of interesting members on their Board of Advisors: Alex Azar (HHS head under then-President Trump); and, Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel (he who helped to write the “ObamaCare” bill; he who advocated for people to take their own lives at age 75 “to make room for the younger generation”, and more): www.alto.com/our-company. Dr. Emanuel is also involved with the Center for American Progress (Soros-connected: www.americanprogress.org/c3-our-supporters/); The Aspen Institute; and, he is Co-Director of the Healthcare Transformation Institute (HTI) at the University of Pennsylvania. Below is the Mission statement of HTI (https://hti.upenn.edu/mission/):

Note 1: the “objective” to transform the behavior of physicians and other healthcare providers. (Italics, mine.) Note 2: the “imagifashion” hyperlink, apparently, after getting past the “fake Latin language” on the main page, takes one to a clothing/accessories company in California: https://nilah.la-studioweb.com/contact-us/. (??)

Regarding Alto Pharmacy, please see here: www.fiercehealthcare.com/health-tech/track-soon-hit-1b-revenue-alto-pharmacy-tapped-amazon-exec-its-next-phase-growth, 17 August 2022. Here’s what one needs to know about the “mission” of Jamie Karraker and Matt Gemache-Asselin, the company’s co-founders:

This statement really frosts Yours Truly. My late father was a Registered Pharmacist for 57 years, who: kept his pharmacy very clean and neat (one was part of the crew that swept the floors and cleaned the display shelves starting when she was 10 years old); made it a point to know about all of his patients and to TALK with with then they came to have prescriptions filled or refilled; worked out deals with his suppliers to get extra samples of OTC products to give to his patients who had lost their steel mill jobs when the mills left Pittsburgh in the late 1970s-early 1980s, and, who paid for their prescriptions with his own money at times, etc., — finds the language, “…brick-and-mortar terrible experience…” in the above statement not only to be personally insulting to the memory of her father: but, also, degrading to those “brick-and-mortar” pharmacists who do their job to keep their stores clean and organized.

Expose’ Two: This regards the FDA just “approving” the “expanded use” of the dangerous and deadly Smallpox “vaccine”, ACAM2000, for the “prevention” of Monkeypox (now called “Mpox.”) The FDA issued this “approval” on 29 August 2024. The trail on this begins here: https://mole.substack.com/p/acam2000-package-insert-warning-death, 14 September 2024.

To gain more understanding of Smallpox and inoculation / vaccination against Smallpox, please see: www.sciencemuseum.org.uk/objects-and-stories/medicine/smallpox-and-story-vaccination. Both Smallpox (variola) and Mpox (mpox virus) are members of the genus Orthopoxvirus. Whereas, a disease condition that would equate to Smallpox goes at least as far back as to China around 3000BC, Mpox was first discovered in 1958 (all, per Wikipedia search.) Dr. Edward Jenner, an English physician, noticed that milkmaids were immune from Smallpox infection; he deduced that the Cowpox infections that they sustained had made them immune to the other type of infection. Dr. Jenner administered the first “inoculation” of Cowpox virus (to prevent Smallpox) to a child, James Phipps, on 14 May 1796. Another source of information is here: wwwnc.cdc.gov/travel/yellowbook/2024/infections-diseases/smallpox-and-other-orthopoxvirus-associated-infections. Further details are found here, in the article, Edward Jenner and the history of smallpox and vaccination, January 2005. A screenshot of a portion of this article is below:

About ACAM2000: it is manufactured by Emergent BioSolutions, headquartered in Gaithersburg, MD. The FDA approved ACAM2000 for use for the prevention of Smallpox in August, 2007. It contains vaccinia, a live virus ingredient used in modern Smallpox vaccines. The vaccinia used in ACAM2000 is a replicating version. The vaccine is cultured in a mixture of African Green Monkey kidney cells (sound familiar? — as in, perhaps, SV40 African Green Monkey cancer promoter gene splice that was found in the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” by Dr. Kevin McKernan?). ACAM2000 was originally only intended for use to prevent Smallpox — until its use was “suddenly expanded” on 29 August 2024 by the FDA to include prevention of Mpox (more on that later in the post.) Since then, articles such as this one have appeared (https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/fda-acam2000-mpox-vaccine-warning-death-unvaccinated/, 17 September 2024, by Suzanne Burdick, Ph.D.; and, social media has been posting items like this one: https://x.com/toastontheside/status/1835921932841062412. This tweet references the FDA-issued handout for patients and/or caregivers regarding ACAM2000. The FDA handout is found here: www.fda.gov/media/75800/download. FDA handout documents for patients and/or caregivers are likely to have, in Yours Truly’s opinion, “sanitized” information and “pablum-like” assurances regarding the “safety and efficacy” of the drug or injectable. The FDA handout for ACAM2000, however, is different: when one reads the handout, one gets a distinct impression that this “vaccine” is highly dangerous. Below is a screenshot portion of the FDA patient/caregiver handout for ACAM2000:

Note that there is NO MENTION of the other FDA-approved Mpox vaccine, JYNNEOS, which is arguably “safer” for the patient (see further down in the presentation regarding JYNNEOS.)

The Fact Sheet for Healthcare Providers for ACAM2000 is here: www.fda.gov/media/75792/download. The document gives a much more comprehensive picture of the dangers of this “vaccine.” Yours Truly will highlight a few of the items in this document which show how dangerous and deadly this vaccine is, beginning with two images from page 1 of the Fact Sheet: the Black Box Warning; and, the Warnings and Precautions:

Remember, this dangerous and deadly “vaccine” is now approved for persons “at risk for Mpox”, in addition to persons at risk for Smallpox (this disease was eradicated in 1980.)

And, from Section 6 Adverse Reactions portion of the Fact Sheet for ACAM2000:

Continuing with Section 11 Description from the Fact Sheet for ACAM2000:

And, from Section 17 Patient Counseling Information of the Fact Sheet for ACAM2000, two portions:

Note several items from the above screenshots: One, that the “vaccine” must be given to the recipient via 15 separate jabs with a bifurcated needle; Two, there are MULTIPLE adverse reactions potential for persons taking this “vaccine”; Three, that persons who contract a Smallpox infection from a person “vaccinated” with ACAM2000 can die of the infection they contract; Four, that the ACAM2000-“vaccinated” person must stay away from pregnant women, household members, persons with eczema, etc., for a period of time after “vaccination”; among many other issues.

Yours Truly will again recall to the reader’s mind that ACAM2000 is now FDA-approved for PREVENTIVE USE among persons who are at risk for Mpox. From what Yours Truly has read about it, Mpox is, for all intents and purposes, likely to be a LESS-DANGEROUS form of Orthopoxvirus, compared to another form of the same Genus, variola (Smallpox virus.) [HOWEVER, see the presentation answering Question Two, further below in the post.] There is a vaccine that was previously FDA-APPROVED for the prevention of Mpox — JYNNEOS, manufactured by Bavarian-Nordic. This vaccine also uses the vaccinia virus as the foundation; but, JYNNEOS is cultured in a mixture of chicken embryo cells; and, although it also has live vaccinia, it is a NON-replicating version. JYNNEOS was also originally FDA-approved for the prevention of Smallpox. In Yours Truly’s opinion, even though JYNNEOS does indeed have potential for serious adverse reactions (for example, cardiac issues), this vaccine appears to be much less dangerous and deadly compared to ACAM2000. The FDA Fact Sheet for Healthcare Providers for JYNNEOS is here: www.fda.gov/131078/download.

Two questions arise immediately: First, what is about ACAM2000 that makes it so dangerous?; and, Second, why did the FDA suddenly approve the use of ACAM2000 for the prevention of Mpox in August 2024?

As to the first question: ACAM2000 is the “descendant Smallpox vaccine” from the older Dryvax Smallpox vaccine, which was manufactured by Wyeth. ACAM2000 replaced Dryvax in August 2007, after FDA approval. The Package Insert (archived version) for Dryvax is here: https://biotech.law.lsu.edu/blaw/bt/smallpox/dryvax_label.htm. Below are two screenshots from the Package Insert for Dryvax:

Note that the inoculation process for Dryvax consisted of 2 or 3 punctures for the initial (primary) vaccination; and that 15 punctures were used for revaccination. However, ACAM2000 requires 15 punctures for the initial vaccination. Why 15 punctures for the initial vaccination? It would appear, in Yours Truly’s opinion, that requiring 15 punctures for the initial vaccination with ACAM2000 exposes the patient to more of the ingredients of the vaccine (think the Moderna COVID-19 modRNA “vaccines” all having more than 3 times the “mcg payload” of lab-enhanced SARS-CoV-2 spike protein PER INJECTION, as compared to the “mcg payload” of the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.” [Which is NOT to say that the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA “vaccines” are somehow “safer” than those of Moderna. THEY ARE NOT.])

Yours Truly turns to section 8.1 of the FDA Fact Sheet for Healthcare Providers for ACAM2000 (link above.) This “vaccine” is particularly dangerous to pregnant women, to women who wish to become pregnant, and to a fetus carried by a pregnant woman (whether or not she is “vaccinated” with ACAM2000, since persons “vaccinated” with this product will “shed” ingredients [from the forming / formed pustule, or the scab from the pustule, etc.], onto other persons who come into contact with the “vaccinated” person.) Below is section 8.1:

It would also appear that there is inherent danger due to the fact that ACAM2000 uses a live, replicating vaccinia (another Orthopoxvirus that is “weaker” than variola [the Smallpox virus], and which is used to make modern-day Smallpox / Mpox vaccines), as compared to the live, NON-replicating vaccinia that is used the JYNNEOS Smallpox / Mpox vaccine. Once inoculated (vaccinated) with ACAM2000, the vaccinia produces a kind of “mini-infection” in the patient, affecting the area around the inoculation site, along with the lymph nodes in the same area. Vaccinia may also appear in the blood of the patient. There is also the issue of “self-inoculation” by the ACAM2000-“vaccinated” patient (from scratching or “picking at” the scab that forms after the “mini-infection” pustule forms on the skin, and also when this pustule begins to clear); and for other reasons — the FDA Fact Sheet section 17 Patient Counseling Information for ACAM2000 discusses this. In addition, there is the varying amount of vaccinia concentration that is produced in the patient after ACAM2000 inoculation; see below from section 11 Description of the FDA Fact Sheet for Healthcare Providers:

In other words, there are many areas about the ingredients and mechanisms of ACAM2000 that raise the risk of complications, including death, for the patient who takes this “vaccine”, for pregnant women and their fetuses, for women who wish to become pregnant, for persons who are immunocompromised, and for persons who are NOT “vaccinated” with ACAM2000, during the multiple “danger zone” weeks after ACAM2000 inoculation.

Turning to the second question, concerning the FDA approval in August 2024 for ACAM2000 to be used as an Mpox “vaccine”: this situation is complex. It involves Big Pharma, the WHO, and, what to Yours Truly “smells like” Gain-of-Function research, among other items.

Yours Truly will begin with Emergent BioSolutions, the company that produces ACAM2000. Emergent BioSolutions, a “global enterprise” with headquarters in Gaithersburg, MD, was established in 1998. Its first project was to partner with the United States Defense Department to supply the Anthrax vaccine that was administered to members of the military (www.emergentbiosolutions.com/about-us/.) The current CEO of the company is Joseph C. Papa. Mr. Papa’s most-recent position was CEO of Bausch + Lomb, another large Big Pharma company. Mr. Papa, apparently, is a “mover and shaker” in the pharmaceutical industry. However, it is also apparent that Baush + Lomb was in financial trouble when he left it to become CEO of Emergent BioSolutions. In fact, Bausch + Lomb is “exploring” selling off some of its pharmaceutical assets, due to “significant debt load” (https://finance.yahoo.com/news/bausch-lomb-explores-sale-amid-112230409.html.) Perhaps, the company’s Post-IPO debt funding was not enough: www.crunchbase.com/organization/bausch-lomb/company_financials; scroll down to “Investors.” Mr. Papa has Bachelor’s and Doctorate degrees in Pharmacy; his career includes working with many Big Pharma companies (Novartis, Cardinal Health, and Watson Pharmaceuticals, among others.) Please see his entry in Wikipedia; and, here: https://waterstreet.com/people/papa-joseph. Water Street (Water Street Healthcare Partners) is an investment company that has a portfolio worth approximately $6Billion spread across healthcare services companies, medical diagnostics companies, and pharmaceutical/life sciences companies (https://waterstreet.com/companies.)

Mr. Papa was hired on 21 February 2024 by Emergent BioSolutions to facilitate the financial turnaround of the company. Below is a screenshot of the company’s financials from September 2023 to September 2024, via Crunchbase. It appears that Mr. Papa, a “mover and shaker” in the Big Pharma world, is working hard:

Also, via Crunchbase, a snapshot of Emergent BioSolution’s funders:

Which leads to this: https://investors.emergentbiosolutions.com/news-releases/news-release-details/emergent-biosolutions-acam2000r-smallpox-and-mpox-vaccinia, “Emergent BioSolutions’ ACAM2000R (Smallpox and Mpox (Vaccinia) Vaccine, Live) Receives U.S. FDA Approval for Mpox Indication; Public Health Mpox Outbreak Continues Across Africa and Other Regions”, 29 August 2024. The announcement follows this, from the WHO: www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/mpox, 17 August 2024. A screenshot of a portion of article is below:

Which also follows the WHO declaration of an “Mpox Public Health Emergency” in Africa: https://investors.emergentbiosolutions.com/news-releases/news-release-details/emergent-biosolutions-responds-mpox-public-health-emergency, 19 August 2024.

It appears that now, Mpox is being “re-classified” as another, although serious, sexually-transmitted disease that can infect any sexually-active person; and, that Mpox has apparently “made the leap” from monkeys to other animals (rodents and even to domesticated dogs), and to between animals and humans. This leads to another aspect of the situation: Yours Truly’s suspicion that there have been / are ongoing, Gain-of-Function experiments on Mpox.

Here is the “fast and dirty” summary on Gain-of-Function experiments with Mpox:

One: Up until 22 August 2024, the FDA had only ONE approved “vaccine” for Mpox: JYNNEOS. However, on that same day, the FDA conducted a “review” of the BLA Application (Biologics License Application) for ACAM2000 to have approval as a “vaccine” for Mpox. This application was approved on 29 August 2024 (www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-roundup-august-30-2024.) Please see: www.fda.gov/media/181552/download for the BLA review. The FDA reviewers, apparently, had some “reservations” about ACAM2000 — see the screenshot below:

Despite the multiple reviewer comments regarding the BLA for ACAM2000, the FDA approved it anyway for Mpox “prevention.” In fact, look at THIS, from section 11.2 of the ACAM2000 BLA document, below:

Two, the Gain-of-Function issue regarding Mpox: First, the CDC connection:

The CDC has a”working relationship” with countries all over the world, including African countries: www.cdc.gov/global-health/about/index.html. The NIH has an entire department, the Fogarty International Center, part of the agency’s “global outreach.” Here is the agency’s link to the “Sub-Saharan African Region”: www.fic.nih.gov/WorldRegions/Pages/SubSaharanAfrica.aspx.

The “Fauci connection” related to his article regarding the role of the NIAID “…in preparing for an expanded “biodefense” role”, April 2022: www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/expanded-biodefense-role-national-institutes-health. The NCJ Number is 194395. Below is the Abstract:

The CDC has an updated report on the incidence of Clade II infections of Mpox, an outbreak that originated in Central Africa (more on Clade II of Mpox further down in today’s post): www.cdc.gov/, “Clade II Mpox Outbreak Originating in Central Africa”, 13 September 2024. Per this article, there are no Clade I Mpox infections in the United States at this time; however, there are 2466 reported cases of Clade II Mpox infections, with 7 deaths. There are also, per the CDC report, cases of Clade II of Mpox literally all over the world at this time.

Here is an example of Gain-of-Function experiments with the Clade II of Mpox. This paper is about a study conducted at Kansas State University in which pigs were exposed to the Clade II of Mpox to see if they would get sick, and then take various blood and biological samples and test them. Sure enough, the pigs contracted Mpox. Please see: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11168330/, “Experimental inoculation of pigs with monkeypox virus results in productive infection and transmission to sentinels”, Emily Mantlo, et al., 7 May 2024. “Sentinels” were the pigs who were not injected with the Clade II Mpox, but were put in the same cages as those pigs who were. The “sentinel” pigs also came down with Mpox (in other words, animal-to-animal transmission of the virus.) Below are the Ethics Statement and the Funding Statement for this study:

Note that the study was conducted in BSL-3 labs at KSU; that tissue-processing was performed at CDC BSL-2 facilities; and, that, apparently, college students were working in the BSL-3 labs in the study. This indicates that Gain-of-Function experiments with the Clade II of Mpox were being performed; that lower-level biosafety labs were used; and, that college students were involved (how much close supervision was provided by KSU?)

Yours Truly now turns to the alarms being sounded regarding this Gain-of-Function research on Mpox, beginning here: www.science.org/content/article/house-republicans-fault-nih-for-evasive-answers-on-risky-monkeypox-virus-study, 11 June 2024. This is followed by: https://usrtk.org/risky-research/fauci-institute-hid-mpox-gain-of-function-plans/, 11 June 2024, by Emily Kopp. A screenshot from the USTRK article is below:

The link to the Congressional report is here.

So, Gain-of-Function experiments are being performed using the Mpox virus; experiments funded by the NIH. A very dangerous, deadly Smallpox “vaccine”, ACAM2000, was suddenly FDA-approved for the “prevention” of Mpox. The “definition” of who is “at risk” for an Mpox infection has been “expanded” to include all persons who are sexually active. The Clade II of Mpox (the one that is the subject of the Gain-of-Function experiments) is now infecting people all over the planet, including in the United States. And more. Cui bono? How many of the general public will line up for an injection of ACAM2000 because the CDC / FDA / AMA / Establishment Medicine, will issue a warning due to “increasing numbers of infections being reported of Mpox?” How many healthcare professionals will be “mandated” into taking ACAM2000 “to protect themselves and the patients they care for?” (Again, JYNNEOS was already approved for Mpox “vaccination”, and it is ** potentially ** a “safer” alternative “vaccine.”) How many more Gain-of-Function experiments will be conducted, not in facilities like the Wuhan Institute of Virology or the Baric Lab at UNC Chapel Hill — but at places like the BSL-3 Ag Lab at Kansas State University (a facility where, arguably, one would expect research on, say, equine viruses, not Clade II Mpox experiments on pigs)? How much more Gain-of-Function experimentation will be hidden and/or “obscured” from public knowledge, let alone from Congress?

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA