Health Friday Open Thread 1.10.2025: p53, SV40, the COVID-19 “Vaccines”, and Cancer: With a Note on the Virus Itself

The above free vintage image of a medical doctor performing an exam on the larynx of a patient is courtesy of Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. Since today’s post speaks of the disaster of the COVID-19 virus itself, and of the COVID-19 BTI (aka the “vaccines”), it is dedicated to the memory of Yours Truly’s COVID-19 “fully vaccinated and boosted” late brother, Sam; to her late cousin, Bill; and, to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have passed away from the negative effects, direct or indirect, of the COVID-19 “vaccines” that they had in their bodies.

There are Important Wolf Moon Notifications, the Rules of our late, good Wheatie, and certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here.

This week’s Health Friday post concerns the ingredients and mechanisms of the COVID-19 BTI in the inducement of cancer in “vaccinated” persons. There is also a role to play here for the COVID-19 virus itself.

Yours Truly begins with examples of studies that prove the COVID-19 BTI (aka the “vaccines”) induce cancer: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2022.113008. “Innate immune suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes, and MicroRNAs”. Stephanie Seneff, Peter A. McCullough, et al., June 2022. Below are Table 6 and Table 7 from this paper:

And, from this paper: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9876036/, “Potential health risks of mRNA-based vaccine therapy: A hypothesis”, K Acevedo-Whitehouse and R Bruno, 25 January 2023. Below are two screenshots from the paper:

Another paper, which details damage in the “vaccinated” person’s body to the p53 tumor suppressor protein, plus damage to / interference with, the type I Interferon response (also called type I IFN response), is here: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.50703, “SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination and the Multi-Hit Hypothesis of Oncogenesis”, R.P. Angues and Y.P. Bustos, 17 December 2023. Below is the salient graphic from this paper:

**** Note that cancer can be fostered and/or metastasized by either COVID-19 “vaccination”, or by the COVID-19 virus itself. More on that later on in today’s post.

And, to “tie it all together” regarding the confirmation of the presence of “loose DNA” and the SV40 African Green Monkey cancer promoter gene piece in the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, this paper, by three high school students who worked in an FDA-supervised lab in Maryland: https://jhss.scholasticahq.com/article/127890-a-rapid-detection-method-of-replication-competent-plasmid-dna-from-covid-19-mrna-vaccines-for-quality-control, TJ Wang, A Kim, K Kim, 29 December 2024. The Wang, Kim, and Kim paper is further discussed here: https://blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/exclusive-fda-lab-uncovers-excess, “EXCLUSIVE: FDA lab uncovers excess DNA contamination in COVID-19 vaccines”, 2 January 2025. By the way, the Wang, Kim, and Kim paper was peer-reviewed prior to publication.

One important item that links all of the above is what the COVID-19 “vaccines” do to the p53 protein in the human body. P53 (also called TP53, or Tumor Protein 53) prevents the formation of cancer in the body. Please see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P53. The modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” manufactured by Pfizer-BioNTech damage the p53 in the “vaccinated” person’s body, (which then interferes with and/or “disables”, the ability of p53 to “detect” and prevent the formation of cancer tumors in the “vaccinated” person’s body) via the SV40 African Green Monkey cancer promoter gene code piece that is present in this company’s modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.“

Scientific researchers have been experimenting for years with the SV40 cancer promoter and its interaction to interfere with and/or to suppress, the p53 tumor suppressor protein. Here are examples of published papers on the topic:

One: https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.19.4.2746. “New Insights into the Mechanism of Inhibition of p53 by Simian Virus 40 Large T Antigen”, Hilary M. Sheppard, et al., April 1999. Below are two images from this paper:

Note that the “monkey – human” amino acid percentage of “identicalness” of p53 is much higher than that of the “mouse – human” percentage.

The “Hudson, Colvin” paper from 2016 details how SV40 suppresses p53, allowing tumors to form and grow: https://doi.org/10.1093/ilar/ilw001, “Transgenic Mouse Models of SV40-Induced Cancer”, Amanda L. Hudson, Emily K. Colvin, 31 March 2016. Below are images from this paper:

And, the Drayman, et al., 2016 paper: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5288138/, “p53 elevation in human cells halt SV40 infection by inhibiting T-ag expression”, Nir Drayman, et al., 21 July 2016. Below is Figure 7 from this paper:

The point here is that the p53 tumor suppressor does a good job of preventing SV40 cancer promoter cells from infecting the body and establishing oncogenic (cancer tumor) cells. And, that this knowledge has been around for some time.

Which brings one back to the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 BTI (aka the “vaccines”), and the discovery of “loose DNA” and of amounts of the SV40 cancer promoter gene code piece in these injectables. It is inconceivable that Pfizer-BioNTech did not know of the ability of the p53 protein in the human body to detect SV40 and then to prevent it from establishing oncogenic cells. It is also, in Yours Truly’s opinion, inconceivable that Pfizer-BioNTech can try to explain away this discovery by some kind of “Oops, we’re sorry, we didn’t mean to leave that stuff in the formulation of the product” hyperbole. The “loose DNA” (and, by extension, the SV40 cancer promoter gene code piece) are present in all the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” made by this company in the summer of 2020, when Pfizer-BioNTech “suddenly” switched the manufacturing process for BNT162b2 from the original “Process 1” method (not using an “extracts of E. coli bath” in the process), to the “Process 2” method (using an “extracts of E. coli bath” in the process) for use in the BNT162b2 (truncated and data-falsified) “clinical trials” going on at that time for this injectable; and which “Process 2” method has been used to manufacture the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” by this company since. Please also see here: www.theqtree.com/2023/11/06/the-infamous-process-2-manufacturing-method-for-the-pfizer-biontech-modrna-covid-19-vaccines/; the actual documentation that the company provided to the FDA regarding this change of manufacturing process is detailed.

Another piece to this situation is the fact that the modRNA COVID-19 BTI (aka the “vaccines”) contain dangerous lipid nanoparticles that quickly spread the contents (and, by extension, the mechanisms) of this injectables throughout the “vaccinated” person’s body. In addition, these lipid nanoparticles (ALC-0159 and ALC-0315 in the Pfizer-BioNTech BTI; and, SM-102 in the Moderna BTI) are specifically developed to evade the body’s natural “are you a friend or a foe” detection and elimination mechanisms. This is in addition to other excipients (adjuvants) in these injectables, such as PEG2000-DMG. Yours Truly has written extensively on these items and how they work to undermine / interfere with, the “vaccinated” body’s natural immune processes. Finally, there is the N1-Methylpseudouridine in BOTH the Pfizer-BioNTech AND the Moderna COVID-19 BTI. This lab-created compound was specifically developed to replace (remove) the natural Uridine RNA in the “vaccinated” body with “fake Uridine” plus a form of methane. In the specific case of N1-Methylpseudouridine, the consequences to the “vaccinated” body, BOTH in the physical AND in the psychological aspects, is profoundly negative. These are all aside from the addition of the SV40 cancer promoter in the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 “vaccines.”

Going back to the graphic from the “Angues and Bustos” paper regarding the fact that BOTH the COVID-19 itself, AND the COVID-19 BTI (aka the “vaccines”) can cause cancer. Below is a repeat of the graphic:

Notice the Impaired type I IFN response (type I Interferon) on the lower right of the graphic. This is another ingredient / mechanism of the COVID-19 virus itself (likely) AND of the COVID-19 BTI (definitely), the workings of which have also been studied and known for years. An example of a paper that speaks to this is here: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4666791/, “The Type I Interferons: Basic Concepts and Clinical Relevance in Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases”, Consuelo M Lopez-Padilla, Timothy B Niewold, PMC published 15 January 2017. Two images from this paper are below:

Please also see: https://wmcresearch.substack.com/p/a-unifying-theory-of-covid-19-pathogenesis, “A Unifying Theory of COVID-19 Pathogenesis, Combining Senescent, Cardiovascular, Oncogenic and Neurodegenerative Pathologies”, 4 April 2022.

Three points here, in Yours Truly’s opinion, regarding those who lab-created the COVID-19 virus itself, and those who lab-created the COVID-19 BTI (aka the “vaccines”): One: they knew exactly what things would: interfere with the body’s type I Interferon responses; interfere with and/or destroy elements of the body’s natural immune system (CD4 – CD8 cells, IgG3 cells, and so on); evade or interfere with, the body’s natural p53 tumor suppressor response to detect and eliminate the SV40 cancer promoter that would be present in the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 BTI; cross the Blood-Brain Barrier; and more. Two: they made sure that the COVID-19 virus itself is not “just another flu virus”, but, rather, a bioweapon that was lab-created from years of stunningly-detailed research and experimentation to wreak as much potential damage as possible on the person who contracts an infection of the virus itself. And, Three: they made sure that this created bioweapon virus would be the foundation of the COVID-19 “vaccines”; while, at the same time, limiting or denying access to simple and effective items that can successfully counteract the virus itself, such as Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, Zinc, Vitamin D, and Quercetin.

While it is true that the survival rate for non-COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons who contract a COVID-19 virus itself infection and recover is 99% for ages 0 to 65 years, and between 94% – 95% for ages 65 and above, an infection from the COVID-19 virus itself can still potentially damage the body. However, those who lab-created the COVID-19 virus itself did not reckon completely with the human body’s natural immune system’s ability to detect, fight off, and eliminate this bioweapon. In Yours Truly’s opinion, the COVID-19 “vaccines” were lab-created to “finish the job” in this regard: injections which were then “mandated” for people to take, to “keep themselves and others safe from the virus.” With the disastrous results that are now presenting worldwide.

There are several items that can support / supplement the p53 of the body. Here are some examples:

Green tea compound: www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/02/210212094113.htm, “Green tea compound aids p53, ‘guardian of the genome’ and tumor suppressor”, Chunyu Wang, et al., 12 February 2021.

Capsaicin: https://jeccr.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13046-016-0417-9, “Reactivation of mutant p53 by capsaicin, the major constituent of peppers”, Gabriella D’Orazi, et al., 6 September 2016.

Phenethyl isothiocyanate in the diet: www.nature.com/articles/cdd201648, “Reactivation of mutant p53 by a dietary-related compound phenethyl isothiocyanate inhibits tumor growth”, M Aggarwal, et al., 3 June 2016. This compound is also called “PEITC.” Natural sources of phenethyl include broccoli, watercress, cabbage, turnips, and radishes. More information can be found here: www.sciencedirect.com/topics/chemistry/phenethyl-isothiocyanate.

Finally, there is the phenomenon of shedding of the COVID-19 virus itself, and of the COVID-19 “vaccines.” It is not known at this time exactly what ingredients of these are shed. What IS known is that it is indeed happening, and that this shedding is negatively affecting the health of the people who are “shed upon.” A comprehensive article that explains this issue is here: https://pierrekorymedicalmusings.com/p/newly-published-study-shows-shedding, “Newly Published Study Shows Shedding of Covid mRNA Vaccine Products”. Pierre Kory, MD, 9 December 2024.

It is of the utmost importance that all people have, and maintain, the highest degree possible of general health; and, in particular, the health of their natural immune system.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

FLASH! Sunday 12 January 2025: ADDENDUM: Please see below, copied (and expanded here) from the main discussion thread today:

“WOLF MOON AND ALL — KEVIN McKERNAN FOUND THE MOAD REGARDING THE PFIZER-BIONTECH COVID-19 “VACCINES” AND TURBO-CANCERS:

The following is a “quick and dirty” summary. Yours Truly will append a “Flash! News” addendum to the body of the Health Friday post of two ago on the p53 cancer tumor suppressor gene and how SV40 interferes with it.

Summary:

One: Dr. Kevin McKernan ran the gene sequence from the cancer tumor biopsies and compared them to the gene sequence in the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 “vaccine.” There was a match. He also found traces of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 “vaccines” in the cancer tumors.

Two: At least one sequence match was made a year AFTER the patient had been COVID-19 vaxxed.

The article that talks about this: https://slaynews.com/news/top-scientist-sounds-alarm-traces-covid-vaccines-found-cancer-tumors/, “Top Scientist Sounds Alarm as Traces of Covid ‘vaccines’ Found in Cancer Tumors”, by Frank Bergman, 11 January 2025. There is a video in the article of an interview with COVID researcher John Beaudoin on this situation.

Screenshot from the above article:

There’s only one way that this can happen, IMO — it’s the SV40 African Green Monkey cancer promoter gene code piece that’s in the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 “vaccines.” The SV40 promoter interferes with the body’s p53 cancer suppressor protein.”

Yours Truly will amplify on the above.

First: IN ADDITION to SV40 interfering with the p53 cancer suppressor protein in the COVID-19 “vaccinated” person’s body, there is ALSO the damage / destruction of the crucial immune system IgG3 “fight it off” cells, instead fostering the increase of IgG4 “tolerate but never clear” cells. This “class switch” affects the entire body, “depressing” the natural immune “are you a friend or foe” mechanisms.

Second: The N1-Methylpseudouridine in the Pfizer-BioNTech AND in the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 BTI (aka the “vaccines”) replaces the RNA of the natural Uridine in the “vaccinated” person’s body. This ALSO interferes with / damages, the multiple body-brain interactions and mechanisms that natural Uridine regulates.

Third: There is ALSO the phenomenon of COVID-19 “vaccine” shedding by “vaccinated” persons to consider in this scenario. There are increasing reports of the negative effects that the ingredients (and, by extension, the mechanisms) of the COVID-19 “vaccines” do to non-“vaccinated” persons via this shedding. There is, in Yours Truly’s opinion, real potential for the SV40 cancer promoter that is in the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 “vaccines” to be shed from persons who have taken this “vaccine” onto other people, including onto non-“vaccinated” persons.

Below are two other screenshots from the Slay News article:

Links to two other articles from Slay News that are germane to the 11 January article: https://slaynews.com/news/top-surgeon-warns-aggressive-cancers-mutating-covid-vaxxed/, 27 October 2024 (with a video by British cancer surgeon, Dr. James Royle); and, https://slaynews.com/news/renowned-oncologist-evil-covid-vaccines-caused-turbo-cancer-explosion/, 17 December 2024 (an interview with British oncologist, Dr. Angus Dalgleish.)

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday Open Thread 12.27.2024: Year-End Wrap Up Edition

The above image of a year-end wrap up countdown is courtesy of The Productive Woman and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series related to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. Since today’s post mentions the COVID-19 virus itself, and the COVID-19 BTI (Bioweapon Toxic Injections, aka the “vaccines”), it is dedicated to the memory of Yours Truly’s “fully vaccinated and boosted” late brother, Sam; to her late cousin Bill; and, to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have passed away from the negative effects of the COVID-19 “vaccines” that they had in their bodies.

There are Important Wolf Moon Notifications, the Rules of our late, good Wheatie, and certain caveats by Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. These are linked here. The discussion is not limited to what is presented in today’s post: It is an Open Thread.

Yours Truly will begin the Health Friday 2024 Year-End Wrap Up Edition with these:

And, many people who did “shut up and obey” are starting to realize that they have likely permanently damaged their bodies (and brains) via the multiple negative effects of the COVID-19 BTI (Bioweapon Toxin Injections, aka the COVID-19 “vaccines”) that they had put into their bodies.

And, continues with these:

https://kirschsubstack.com/p/a-summary-of-the-evidence-against, “A Summary of the evidence against the COVID vaccines”, by Steve Kirsch, 6 January 2024.

www.theqtree.com/2024/11/01/health-friday-open-thread-11-1-2024-the-covid-19-vaccines-information-file-part-one/

www.theqtree.com/2024/12/20/health-friday-holiday-exchange-open-thread-12020.2024/.

And, some new information to help round out the year 2024:

From Steve Kirsch’s blog: https://kirschsubstack.com/p/the-cfr-from-the-pfizer-trial-show. “The CFR from the Pfizer trial show the vaccines make you 14X more likely to die from COVID”, 24 December 2024. Mr. Kirsch performed a statistical analysis of the Supplementary Table S4 of this 2021 paper: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2110345, “Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months”, Philip R. Dormitzer, M.D., Ph.D., et al, published 15 September 2021. There are over 25 authors of this paper. Most of them are affiliated with Pfizer-BioNTech, the developer (along with several other entities, such as the United States Department of Defense, United States Army) and manufacturer (along with the United States Department of Defense, United States Army) of BNT162b2. Apparently, the CDC never performed its own analysis of the data presented in the paper. Mr. Kirsch performed the first real analysis. Here is his conclusion (from his blog post):

CFR = Case Fatality Rate. Below is the Supplementary Table S4 from the paper:

Note that “Unblinding” means that Pfizer-BioNTech offered to give BNT162b2 injections to “Blinded” subjects in the C4591001 clinical trial. Most of the “Unblinded” participants accepted the offer and took the injections. This also means that data collected from the “Blinded” subjects after they took the injections is potentially compromised. However, even with this caveat, the data on the Supplementary Table S4 confirm that persons who took BNT162b2 had adverse events that the “Placebo” (“Blinded”) group did not have.

From Mole at Substack, an important post regarding “educated hesitancy” about “new drugs and novel vaccines”: https://mole.substack.com/p/c-and-c-today-new-peer-reviewed-study, “C&C today: new peer-reviewed study tears jabs a new one”, 23 December 2024. The paper referred to is here: https://journals.sagepub.com/10.1077/09246479241292008. “Pharmaceutical product recall and educated hesitancy towards new drugs and novel vaccines”, Peter Rhodes and Peter I Perry, 6 November 2024. Below is a graphic from this paper, followed by the Conclusion:

Then, two blog posts from Nick Hunt (Daily Sceptic): https://dailysceptic.org/2024/10/08/the-hidden-report-that-shows-up-to-40-more-heart-conditions-in-the-vaccinated/; and, https://dailysceptic.org/2024/12/11/revealed-the-full-hidden-pfizer-report-that-shows-heart-conditions-in-the-vaccinated-getting-worse-over-time/. Mr. Hunt was able to procure a copy of this confidential Pfizer-BioNTech report of March 2024. It is here: https://dailysceptic.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/06-C4591021-interim5-report-body.pdf. In Yours Truly’s opinion, this Interim Report by Pfizer-BioNTech given for the European Union Post-Authorization Study for BNT162b2 is dynamite. The statistics related to cardiovascular events begins on page 119 of the report. **** Note: It is important to also recognize, per the statistics in this report, that the COVID-19 virus itself can, and does, cause multiple types of adverse events in and of itself. However, in the vast majority of the statistical tables in this report, the incidence of adverse events reported among the COVID-19 “vaccinated”, especially as regards cardiovascular events, is higher. Below is page 119 of the Pfizer-BioNTech report:

And, to finish the 2024 wrap-up, the link to Katherine Watt’s Substack blog, Bailiwick News, listing and detailing the multiple signed (and, in some cases, also not redacted) agreements between the United States Department of Defense, United States Army, regarding the development, manufacturing, and distribution for administration, of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 BTI (Bioweapon Toxin Injection, aka COVID-19 “vaccine”) BNT162b2: https://bailiwicknews.com/p/on-contracts-consortium-agreement. “On contracts: consortium agreement; base agreement; technical direction letter-statement of work; project agreement”, 9 December 2024 (repost of her 28 April 2023 post.) The post is long and very detailed. It is worth reading through. There is much information in the documents that blows the lid off the cooperation between the Defense Department / United States Army, and Pfizer-BioNTech. This is, in Yours Truly’s opinion, a chain of documents that must be brought to the attention of both Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., (as the incoming Secretary of Health and Human Services); and, incoming President of the United States Donald J. Trump, on 20 January 2025, after President Trump is inaugurated the 47th President of the United States.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

Yours Truly urges all readers to build and maintain the highest possible degree of general health, and also the health of their natural immune systems. One also urges all readers who may be COVID-19 “vaccinated” to seriously consider investigating, and following, a COVID-19 “vaccine” detoxification / mitigation protocol, such as the ones listed on the FLCCC website: https://covid19criticalcare.com/.

Yours Truly wishes all readers a healthy New Year 2025! Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday Open Thread: Holiday Exchange Edition 12.20.2024

The above free image of a Christmas gift exchange is courtesy of Google Images.

Health Friday is a series of posts related to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. The discussion is not limited to what is presented today: It is an Open Thread.

There are Important Wolf Moon Notifications, the Rules of the our late, good Wheatie, and certain caveats by Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here.

Today’s Health Friday is a Holiday Exchange for ideas, recipes, “life hacks”, “this is what my grandmother did when the family had a cold”, exercise hints, and so on, related to building and maintaining sound general health and a strong immune system. Advice and information from readers regarding items from Western medicine, Homeopathy, Naturopathic Medicine, Herbal medicines, Chinese medicine, Ayurvedic medicine, folk and traditional medicine, “Let thy food be thy medicine” recipes, personal experiences, “these are what I take on a daily basis”, books and articles, and the like — all are welcome. So, grab a cup of coffee or tea, come on over by the Christmas tree, and let’s exchange health ideas gifts!

To start the exchange rolling, Yours Truly provides the following:

“My Aunt Mary’s Daily Tonic“

Ingredients: 1 Tablespoon apple cider vinegar; 1 Tablespoon honey; 2 teaspoons lemon juice; a sprinkle of cinnamon; 1/3 cup very hot (not boiling) water.

Method: Muddle the apple cider vinegar, the honey, the lemon juice, and the cinnamon in a glass. Add the very hot water and stir gently. Drink as soon as it cools down just a little. (Please don’t “quaff” the mixture — take it in sips. I think cider vinegar tonic is tough to take all at once!)

My late Aunt Mary drank this tonic for decades. She believed that it “cleaned the intestines.” Well, it must have been beneficial for her — she lived to be 96 years old. I will say that I change the amounts of the first three ingredients when I prepare the mixture to: 2 teaspoons apple cider vinegar; 2 teaspoons honey; 1 teaspoon lemon juice (the cinnamon amount and the water amount remain the same.) I suspect that this tonic is / was, probably used by many other people, and is known by various names. My Aunt Mary also used a fabulous, easy recipe for baked salmon and peas (her mother was from County Mayo), which I remember eating but I don’t have the recipe. She firmly believed that eating salmon could cure or prevent many diseases.

Websites:

https://covid19criticalcare.com/get-started/ (this is the Resources links page for FLCCC.)

Free ebook on COVID-19 “vaccine” toxicity: https://doctors4covidethics.org/mrna-vaccine-toxicity/ (this free ebook is available in English, and in several other languages.)

For Ivermectin: https://reynoldmeds.com/

https://ivermectin.com/

Ivermectin Dosage Chart:

For comprehensive COVID-19 spike detox:

https://dspiked.com/ NOTE: This product contains Shilijit (Shilijat) and also Ginko Biloba. Both of these can cause significant interactions with prescription drugs for diabetes, for blood clotting, and for other health issues. Please search www.webmd.com/ for Shilijat and for Ginko Biloba, and read the “Side Effects“, “Precautions“, and “Interactions” sections for these items.

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/ (Click on “Dr. McCullough Link Tree” at the top of the main web page for information on health products.)

https://covid19criticalcare.com/treatment-protocols/

Books:

Where There is No Doctor: A Village Health Care Handbook, David Werner, et al. (any edition.)

Where There is No Dentist, Murray Dickson.

Vintage editions of Baby and Child Care, (very vintage editions are called The Common Sense Book of Baby and Child Care) by Dr. Benjamin Spock, MD. (Yours Truly used a vintage edition of this book “back in the day.” I recall that there were some interesting practical suggestions, such as, how to make “emergency baby formula” if someone with an infant was stranded somewhere and waiting for evacuation and/or had no access to either a doctor or to baby supplies.)

Yours Truly sends warm Holiday Greetings to one and all. Here’s to healthy, strong New Year 2025!

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

The 2024-2025 Formula COVID-19 “Vaccines”: Injection Dose #10

The above is a vintage image of mass vaccination. (Courtesy Google Images.)

This series on the disaster of the COVID-19 virus itself, and of the COVID-19 “vaccines”, is dedicated to the memory of Yours Truly’s cousin Bill, who “died suddenly and unexpectedly” in September 2023.

The origination of today’s post begins here: www.dossier.today/p/double-digits-biden-admin-tells-americans, “Double Digits: Biden Admin tells Americans that it’s soon time for their 10th Covid shot“, by Jordan Schachtel, 13 June 2024. (Mr. Schachtel wrote about the ninth COVID-19 “vaccine” injection here: www.dossier.today/p/dose-number-nine-cdc-panel-green, “Dose number NINE: CDC panel green lights yet another Covid mRNA shot“, 29 February 2024. The CDC recommended that persons over age 65 take another “booster shot” of either the Pfizer-BioNTech or of the Moderna “2023-2024 Formula COVID-19 Vaccine” of these manufacturers.) A person age 65 or older, if that person adhered to every CDC recommendation regarding taking a COVID-19 “vaccine” injection since December 2020 (when the FDA granted first Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) to Pfizer-BioNTech and to Moderna for these companies’ “flagship” modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” (BNT162b2 by Pfizer-BioNTech; and, mRNA-1273 by Moderna), would have taken injection number nine starting on 28 February 2024.

Today’s post is long. There is a large amount of information to “unpack.” Stay with me here.

Below is an image from the FDA’s 13 June “updated” authorization announcement for the “2024-2025 Formula COVID-19 Vaccine”, the TENTH injection dose of the modRNA “vaccine” formula: www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/updated-covid-19-vaccines-use-united-states-beginning-fall-2024.

Note the language regarding the “selection of a specific JN.1 lineage SARS-CoV-2 strain…” More about that later.

The trail behind the 5 June 2024 FDA announcement begins with the VRBPAC Briefing Document for the meeting held on 28 June 2022: www.fda.gov/media/159452/download, “FDA Briefing Document Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee Meeting June 28, 2022.” It was at this meeting that the FDA “codified” the types of “strain composition recommendations” that the agency would use regarding “new versions” of COVID-19 “vaccines.” Yours Truly presents page 17, page 18, and page 19 of this document:

It appears that the FDA simply decided that it would be permissible for the agency to authorize a new COVID-19 “vaccine” strain composition along what, in Yours Truly’s opinion, may be called “very flexible” options. For example, the Pfizer-BioNTech XBB.1.5 COVID-19 “vaccine”, which was FDA authorized in the fall of 2023, had test results only from mouse testing prior to FDA authorization. Following are: The link to the Pfizer-BioNTech slide presentation about this “vaccine” to the CDC’s ACIP committee (Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices) meeting of 12 September 2023; and, an image of slide CC4 from this presentation. First, the presentation: www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2023-09-12/10-COVID-Modjarrad-508.pdf.

Second, slide CC-4 from the above presentation:

The XBB.1.5. Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 “vaccine” had only been given as a single injection to humans in the company’s clinical trial; a clinical trial which had only just begun prior to the ACIP meeting. Slide CC-5 of the presentation, the start of the company’s human trial of this “vaccine”, is below:

Slide CC-6 of the presentation has to do with the mouse studies of this “vaccine”, which were of longer duration.

Notwithstanding the above, the FDA authorized the use of the company’s XBB.1.5 COVID-19 “vaccine” on 11 September 2023 (in Yours Truly’s opinion, it appears that the ACIP meeting of 12 September 2023 was a “catch-up” formality.) It also appears (again, in Yours Truly’s opinion), that the FDA used a very loose interpretation of “Option 4” on page 18 of the FDA Briefing Document above in granting the EUA for this “vaccine”.

** Now, on to the latest “new version” of the COVID-19 “vaccines”, the “2024-2025 Formula COVID-19 Vaccines”, that the FDA authorized in June 2024.

The following linked items are important regarding background information related to this situation and to the FDA: First, the FDA document, stating that the agency would “align” its COVID-19 “vaccine” antigen composition to the recommendations of the World Health Organization’s TAG-CO-VAC recommendations: www.fda.gov/media/179139/download (the TAG-CO-VAC recommendation for the “2024-2025 Formula COVID-19 Vaccines” was to use the JN.1 strain); second, the FDA document regarding “considerations and recommendations” for the “2024-2025 Formula COVID-19 Vaccine” composition: www.fda.gov/media/179145/download; third, the FDA announcement of the 5 June meeting of its VRBPAC committee (Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee.): www.fda.gov/advisory-committees/advisory-committee-calendar/vaccines-and-related-biological-products-advisory-committee-june-5-2024-meeting-announcement. From this last link, chick on “Event Materials” to see the slide presentations and other items that were discussed at this meeting.

Two important items from the “Event Materials” list: the FDA Briefing Document; and the VRBPAC roster for this meeting. First, the FDA Briefing Document: www.fda.gov/media/179003/download; and, second, the VRBPAC roster for this meeting: www.fda.gov/media/179225/download. The roster for the 5 June 2024 meeting has some “familiar” members and speakers: Paul Offit, MD; and Peter Marks, MD (director of CBER [Center for Biologics Evaluation the Research of the FDA]); and, among the “Temporary Voting Members”, are: Bruce Gellin, M.D., M. PH., the Chief of Global Public Health Strategy for the Rockefeller Foundation; and, Melinda Wharton, M.D., M. PH., Associate Director of Vaccine Policy of the CDC. (Italics mine)

The VRBPAC members voted unanimously to endorse the Pfizer-BioNTech, the Moderna, and the Novavax “2024-2025 Formula COVID-19 Vaccine” by these companies, based on the presentations of these companies’ representatives at the meeting. Yours Truly can find no registered human clinical trials performed in advance of the 5 June VRBPAC meeting by Pfizer-BioNTech, or by Moderna, or by Novavax, for any “2024-2025 Formula COVID-19 Vaccine”; that would indicate that any “clinical trials” were performed in these companies’ facilities on mice; and that any “human trials” were also performed in these companies’ facilities, prior to the meeting. The FDA then issued the agency’s original announcement of 7 June 2024: www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-roundup-june-7-2024; and, a screenshot from this announcement:

Note in particular “…the selection of a specific JN.1 lineage SARS-CoV-2 strain (e.g., JN.1. or KP.2) and expressed a strong preference for JN.1.” Here’s where it starts to “get interesting.”

First, on 12 April 2024 (well ahead of the 5 June VRBPAC meeting), Pfizer-BioNTech issues a statement regarding the company’s “taking reservations” for the coming “2024-2025 Formula COVID-19 Vaccine” (also, see the Pfizer-BioNTech presentation at the 5 June meeting, linked above): www.cvdvaccine-us.com/reservation. This is followed, after the meeting, by Moderna filing an application with the FDA for a “vaccine” to target the JN.1. COVID-19 strain (also, see the Moderna presentation at the 5 June meeting, linked above): https://investors.modernatx.com/news/news-details/2024/Moderna-Files-FDA-Application-for-the-JN.1-Targeting-COVID-19-Vaccine/default.aspx; then, Novavax files with the FDA for that company’s version (also, see the Novavax presentation at the 5 June meeting, linked above): https://ir.novavax.com/press-releases/2024-06-14-Novavax-Submits-Application-to-U-S-FDA-for-Updated-Protein-based-2024-2025-Formula-COVID-19-Vaccine.

But then, “something happens”, and the FDA suddenly makes a large “about-face” and switches its “2024-2025 Formula COVID-19 Vaccine” choice to the KP.2 strain on 13 June 2024: www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/updated-covid-19-vaccines-use-united-states-beginning-fall-2024. This is the “second” announcement, which was cited at the beginning of today’s post.

What was it that happened? Part of the answer lies in the fact that the NIH and Moderna co-own the patents (and, therefore, share the royalties) for the Moderna “flagship” modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, mRNA-1273. This agreement would extend to “descendant clone COVID-19 vaccines” by Moderna. www.citizen.org/article/modernas-mrna-1273-vaccine-patent-landscape/. The NIH’s Dale and Betty Bumpers Vaccine Research Center (part of NIAID — which Dr. Anthony Fauci led from November 1984 until his retirement in December 2022) and Moderna co-developed mRNA-1273. https://covid19.nih.gov/news-and-stories/nih-vaccine-research-center; a screenshot from the article is below:

The other part of the answer is that Moderna was already developing a KP.2 strain COVID-19 “vaccine” for 2024-2025. This, and the FDA’s decision to shift away from the JN.1 strain to the KP.2 strain, are described in this post at Sasha Latypova’s blog: https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/all-roads-lead-to-resilience, “All Roads lead to Resilience. FDA is removing competitors for the Pentagon & CIA’s baby…Moderna”, 23 June 2024.

The FDA’s “about-face” announcement regarding the switch from the JN.1 strain to the KP.2 strain was also covered here: www.contagionlive.com/view/fda-advises-manufacturers-to-consider-kp-2-strain-for-covid-19-vaccines, 14 June 2024, by Sophia Abene. Below is a screenshot from this article:

However, there’s yet another detail in play here, regarding the FDA’s switch, “based on evaluation of the most recent circulating strains of COVID-19”, from JN.1 to KP.2 — the CIA and the Pentagon. Here is a screenshot from Sasha Latypova’s Substack article:

Here is the report, linked from the Latypova blog article cited above, that describes the CIA-linked company, “National Resilience”, or “Resilience”, that manufactures the RNA for the Moderna modRNA line of COVID-19 Omicron “vaccines”: https://unlimitedhangout.com/2022/08/investigative-reports/rna-for-modernas-omicron-booster-manufactured-by-cia-linked-company/, by Whitney Webb, 17 August 2022. Below is a screenshot image from this blog article:

And here is story on this “interesting development”, from Resilience: www.businesswire.com/news/home/20210908005443/en/Resilience-to-Manufacture-mRNA-for-Moderna’s-COVID-19-Vaccine, 8 September 2021. Note that per this “multi-year contract”, Resilience manufactures the mRNA for the Moderna COVID-19 “vaccines” at this Canadian facility. Resilience was founded in 2020.

But wait, there’s more! Resilience lists multiple “partners”, such as the Mayo Clinic. The company also, apparently, has a “partnership” with the United States Army’s Joint Program Executive Office for Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Defense https://resilience.com/learn/partnerships. Below is a screenshot from this website:

The website link in the screenshot above is broken. Here is the Army’s website on this: wwwt2.army.mil/T2-Laboratories/Designated-Laboratories/Joint-Program-Executive-Office-for-Chemical-Biological-Radiological-and-Nuclear-Defense/. Note: this link may or may not work. One will need to do a search for “Joint Program Executive Office for Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Defense” to see links to this department of the United States Army. One such link: https://globalbiodefense.com/directory/name/joint-program-executive-office-for-chemical-biological-defense-jpeo-cbd/.

It appears, then, in Yours Truly’s opinion, that the FDA was perhaps “reminded” of the”details” regarding the NIH-Moderna co-ownership (and royalties – sharing) agreement related to Moderna’s modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”; and, the role of the CIA-Pentagon-National Resilience (aka Resilience) in manufacturing the mRNA used in the Moderna COVID-19 Omicron “booster vaccines” — and the KP.2. strain is indeed a “descendant strain” in the Omicron lineage (as is the JN.1 strain.) Hence, the FDA’s 2024-2025 COVID-19 “vaccine” strain “sudden switch” announcement of 13 June 2024, only one week after the agency gave the nod to the JN.1 strain.

In Yours Truly’s opinion, it is statistically, medically, and ethically impossible for a new vaccine (let alone any COVID-19 “vaccine”) to be developed; tested (on lab animals, then on human subjects); the test data thoroughly collated and analyzed for “safety and efficacy” on both lab animals and on human subjects; then, which data is presented to the CDC / FDA for consideration; then, these agencies doing their own “due diligence” research; then, and only then, being granted an EUA by the FDA; then, and only then, manufactured for use in humans — in a time span of fewer than three to five years, let alone within a time span of only a few months. It appears, again in Yours Truly’s opinion, that the CDC and the FDA are playing “fast and loose” with the health and safety of the people who choose (or will be “mandated”) to take the “2024-2025 Formula COVID-19 Vaccine.” And, also, that “other entities” are in play here to perhaps “influence” decision making by these agencies.

All of above is in addition to the fact that the COVID-19 “vaccines” (actually, gene therapy injections) have caused, are causing, and will cause, multiple health issues, serious adverse reactions, and deaths, in those who are “vaccinated.” Just two of the most recent discoveries: One, the COVID-19 “vaccines” can cause brain damage, an article by Dr. William Makis: www.globalresearch.ca/brain-damage-covid-19-mrna-vaccines/5861012, “Brain Damage Caused by COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines”, 26 June 2024. Below is a screenshot from Dr. Makis’ article:

The second most recent discovery, that the COVID-19 “vaccines” reduce life expectancy (even in “all-cause” analysis) among COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons, by Dr. Peter A. McCullough: https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/breaking-publication-a-critical-analysis, “BREAKING Publication — A Critical Analysis of All-Cause Deaths during COVID-19 Vaccination in an Italian Province”, 1 July 2024. The peer-reviewed paper is here: https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12071343, “A Critical Analysis of All-Cause Deaths during COVID-19 Vaccination in an Italian Province”, Marco Alessandria, et al., published 30 June 2024. Below is a screenshot from the Conclusions section of this paper:

In Yours Truly’ opinion, it is apparent at “half a glance” that the COVID-19 “vaccines” (actually, gene therapy injections) must be completely withdrawn for human use until these products have been fully investigated, and then re-designed, before being re-introduced for human use; and, that there is no “co-ownership” or sharing of royalties between a government agency and a COVID-19 “vaccine” manufacturer; and, that there is no involvement of the United States military in the development or manufacture of such products.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

The AMA EdHub: Window to “Establishment Medicine”

The above image is from the Textbook of Anatomy and Physiology, by Kimber, Gray, and Stackpole. Published by The Macmillan Company; eleventh edition, 1944. (Image courtesy of Laurel Leaf Farm.)

This post, part of a series on the disaster of COVID-19 and the COVID-19 “vaccines”, is dedicated to the memory of Yours Truly’s cousin Bill, who “died suddenly and unexpectedly” in September 2023. Today’s offering will speak to what might be called a “tangential” issue: the American Medical Association (the AMA.) Yours Truly will make it clear at the outset that today’s post is not to be construed as a “hit piece” on the AMA; also, that there are likely many members of the AMA who are not “beholden” to blindly accept everything that the AMA publishes. The point of today’s piece, in one’s opinion, is that the current AMA apparently sees itself as a sort of “arm” of “establishment medicine” (in other words, of the FDA and the CDC); in addition to becoming an organization that advocates what may be called “medico-political” viewpoints. First, before discussing the AMA Edhub, some items about the organization:

It is fair to posit that the American Medical Association (also referred to as the AMA) is the largest and most powerful medical doctor organization in the United States. The AMA has also become, arguably, the most powerful medical organization lobbyist in the United States House of Representatives and the United States Senate.

The American Medical Association was founded in 1847. In the year 2022, it had 271,660 members, and $493,147,829 in revenue (per Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Medical_Association). Further information on the history of the organization is found here: www.ama-assn.org/about/ama-history. The AMA does not publish a membership directory as of the year 2021: https://myama.my.site.com/s/article/Does-the-AMA-have-a-member-directory, stating the following: “The privacy of our customers’ [presumably, this means “members'”] data is something we take very seriously.” On the other hand, the 2022 census of the Federation of State Medical Boards listed a total of 1,044,734 licensed physicians in the United States (www.fsmb.org/advocacy/news-releases/fsmb-physician-census-identifies—1044734-licensed-physicians-in-u.s/). This means that 26% (271,660) of the licensed physicians in the United States belong to the AMA. (Side note: members of the AMA have “exclusive discounts” towards purchasing new Mercedes-Benz and Volvo cars: www.ama-assn.org/member-benefits/personal-member-benefits-discounts/auto-transportation-discounts).

The American Medical Association is a “heavy-spender” lobbyist to the United States federal government, spending at least $15 million per year in this effort since 1998: www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/american-medical-association/ (this article also has a history of the AMA, the organization’s views on healthcare policies, and so forth); in the year 2022 alone, the AMA spent $21,060,000 on federal government lobbying, per Open Secrets: www.opensecrets.org. A screenshot of the Influence Watch report on the AMA is below. Note that the AMA owns the exclusive rights to the medical expenditure reimbursement codes system for Medicare and Medicaid (the CPT codes.) This entails the payments of “rights and royalties” to the AMA. For further information, please refer to: https://microwize.com/why-do-i-have-to-pay-a-fee-to-use-cpt-code/, 14 December 2022.

The AMA, as can be inferred from the above screenshot, is also involved with the FDA and the CDC. Two examples: the AMA’s lobbying efforts with these agencies regarding advocacy for COVID-19 programs of various types, along with other advocacy efforts: www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/public-health/covid-19-amas-recent-and-ongoing-advocacy-efforts (1 June 2022 report); www.ama-assn.org/topics/coronavirus-vaccines; and, www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/public-health/covid-19-2019-novel-coronavirus-resource-center-physicians (updated 17 April 2024.)

The AMA has a “membership dues schedule”, ranging from $20 for a 1-year medical student membership, through a $420 per year dues fee for a “Regular practice” physician who belongs to the AMA. And, there are other types of membership available (corporate and e-membership.) www.amanet.org/membership/. There are other types of corporate and institutional memberships available through the AMA Foundation, also called the “Roundtable.” (https://amafoundation.org/donors/corporate-donors/). A screenshot of the “Silver Level” corporate donor list to the AMA is below (the “Silver Level” requires a $30,000 contribution to the AMA Foundation, presumably paid each year by each donor company):

Two other areas of AMA effort are in physician Continuing Education and in publishing. Members of the AMA who are licensed medical doctors can fulfill their Continuing Education accreditation through courses offered by the organization. These courses are offered via various methods: www.ama-assn.org/topics/contuning-medical-education. The AMA also publishes a journal, known as JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association): https://jamanetwork.com/. The website is open-access, and there are hundreds of peer-reviewed articles from thirteen different JAMA specialty journals available for public reading for several months after articles are published. As might be expected, the AMA advocates for what might be called “establishment medicine” — for example, championing FDA-authorized or FDA-approved treatments and drugs for COVID-19 infection.

Yours Truly will include part of the Abstract (below) of a recent paper published in JAMA, regarding people who mistrust “establishment medicine” (in other words, they may mistrust FDA-authorized or FDA-approved) treatments for COVID-19. This paper, in Yours Truly’s opinion, demonstrates the AMA’s official attitude towards those who question or refuse “establishment medicine” treatment of COVID1-19 and pursue other, alternative treatments — that these people are “being misled” by “misinformation” and may use that “misinformation” to avoid “health-promoting behaviors.” The paper is found here: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama-health-forum/fullarticle/2809985, “Misinformation, Trust, and Use of Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19”, Roy H. Perlis, MD, et al., published 29 September 2023. Dr. Perlis is Associate Editor of JAMA Network Open.

It appears that the AMA is “leading the charge” on “medico-political” topics, such as “climate change”, DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion), “equity of access to care” for illegal immigrants, “gender equity”, and more.

This leads to the AMA EdHub discussion.

The AMA EdHub website features online courses and Continuing Education (CME) fulfillment modules for physician members (https://edhub.ama-assn.org). These courses and modules are presented in various ways: webinars; video and/or audio courses; papers to be read; and so on. One does not have to be a member of the AMA in order to access and read many of the courses and modules; in fact, the AMA states that, “The AMA EdHub is open to anyone.” (https://education.ama-assn.org/help/, the “FAQ’s” section); interested persons simply open an account. However, only licensed physicians who belong to the AMA can fulfill their CME credits using the AMA EdHub. https:///edhub.ama-assn.org/pages/ama-cme, section “Target Audience“; and, www.ama-assn.org/member-benefits/personal-member-benefits-discounts/ama-ed-hub-member-benefits.

On other hand, the AMA EdHub provides a good “snapshot” of the current modes of thought in “establishment medicine”, as well as current trends in treatment and in the teaching of medical school students, among other topics. For example, there are CME modules and online courses related to DEI; to “anti-racism in medicine”; “equitable patient care”; and other what may be termed “medico-political” topics areas. Here is a link to one such example, a CME module: https://edhub.ama-assn.org/clinical-problem-solvers-antiracism-podcast/audio-player/18843339, “Episode 23 – Anti-Blackness, Anti-Fatness, and Food Shaming”, 9 January 2024. This somewhat over one hour audio module (with a Transcript that can be read) can be used, after the physician takes the Quiz, to earn one CME credit. The Learning Objectives listed for this module are: “1. Explain how anti-fatness and food shaming culture in the US is rooted in anti-Blackness 2. Describe the intersection of policing and the court systems with anti-fatness and food shaming 3. Identify ways to navigate clinical interactions with patients while respecting them and affirming their experiences with food and fatness.”

The AMA Edhub also has a department devoted to “health equity” — https://edhub.ama-assn.org/ama-center-health-equity. From the main page of the link: “Education from AMA Center for Health Equity AMA’s online education to empower individuals ad organizations, in healthcare and beyond, in advancing racial justice and equity.”

It appears that one area of particular emphasis in the AMA Center for Health Equity has to do with “gun violence prevention” — through “education” of medical students, practicing physicians, and patients — and working with the United States Congress. Here is a link to a recent video CME fulfillment presentation from the AMA Center for Health Equity: https://edhub.ama-assn.org/ama-center-health-equity/video-player/18867531, “Prioritizing Equity: Embracing Public Safety and Health for Improved Firearms Violence Prevention“, 2 April 2024. This video presentation has a Transcript that can be read. It appears, from reading the Transcript, that the AMA’s position on “gun violence prevention” goes beyond working through the criminal justice system. According to Dr. Megan Ranney, MD, one of the speakers interviewed on the video, “…it’s about separating someone from the potential to access a firearm at that moment of desperation, anger, impulsivity, hopelessness.” Dr. Ranney also states that, “…the amount of violence that youth are exposed to in urban neighborhoods far outstrips the amount of violence that people are exposed to in the military.” (Italics added)

The AMA EdHub has other areas of interest that offer online CME courses for AMA physician members, among them: promoting “race-conscious” admissions to higher education, including to medical schools: and, courses from The Fenway Institute, an organization that advocates for LGBTQIA+ and Transgender issues and persons. Here are links to examples of these AMA EdHub areas of interest: https://edhub.ama-assn.org/ama-center-health-equity/audio-player/18868328, 2 April 2024; “The SCOTUS Affirmative Action Ruling The Cost to the Physician Workforce and Historically Minoritized Communities (with a Transcript that can be read); and, https://edhub.ama-assn.org/fenway-institute-edu/video-player/18638799, 2 September 2021, “Affirming Care for People with Intersex Traits.”

In Yours Truly’s opinion, understanding the AMA EdHub is an important part in understanding how the AMA works to influence healthcare treatment practices, healthcare policies; and the United States Congress, through the AMA’s lobbying efforts.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Dear KMAG: 20240311 Joe Biden Didn’t Win ❀ Open Topic

Joe Biden didn’t win. This is our Real President:

AND our beautiful REALFLOTUS.

This Stormwatch Monday Open Thread remains open – VERY OPEN – a place for everybody to post whatever they feel they would like to tell the White Hats, and the rest of the MAGA/KAG/KMAG world (with KMAG being a bit of both).

And yes, it’s Monday…again.

But we WILL get through it!

We will always remember Wheatie,

Pray for Trump,

Yet have fun,

and HOLD ON when things get crazy!

We will follow the RULES of civility that Wheatie left for us:

Wheatie’s Rules:

No food fights.
No running with scissors.
If you bring snacks, bring enough for everyone.

And while we engage in vigorous free speech, we will remember Wheatie’s advice on civility, non-violence, and site unity:

“We’re on the same side here so let’s not engage in friendly fire.”

“Let’s not give the odious Internet Censors a reason to shut down this precious haven that Wolf has created for us.”

If this site gets shut down, please remember various ways to get back in touch with the rest of the gang:

Our backup site, The Q Tree 579486807, https://theqtree579486807.wordpress.com/
Our old alternative site, The U Tree, where civility is not a requirement
Our Gab Group, which is located at https://gab.com/groups/4178
Our various sister sites, listed in the Blogroll in the sidebar

Our beloved country is under Occupation by hostile forces.

Daily outrage and epic phuckery abound.

We can give in to despair…or we can be defiant and fight back in any way that we can.

Joe Biden didn’t win.

And we will keep saying Joe Biden didn’t win until we get His Fraudulency out of our White House.

Wolfie’s Wheatie’s Word of the Week:

williwaw

noun

A violent gust of cold wind blowing seaward from a mountainous coast, especially in the Straits of Magellan.
A sudden gust of wind; a squall.
A whirlwind, or whirlwind squall, encountered in the Straits of Magellan.

Used in a sentence

We had ourselves a righteous williwaw here a while back, with March seeming to come in like a lion, blowing down dead branches everywhere.

MUSIC!

How about some more bluegrass? Heck yeah!

THE STUFF

First, some explanation…..

Because of major fixes in key aspects of my health, I am now able to spend enough time on upcoming posts that they don’t all have to be identical placeholders. I can’t count on being here to do a bang-up Monday daily every week, because between healthcare appointments, healthcare scheduling, critical exercise to keep me healthy, home duties, minor crises, and unexpected crap, I can’t go much further than placeholders, done in advance, but I can do a batch of them that are not identical, and that is now the plan. I’m going to create several months of placeholders while I have a moment of moderately good health, and make minor modifications to all of them.

Each one will have a new word of the week, a new music video, and a new “feature” of some kind (often including interesting clickbait) for “the stuff”. I can create these well ahead of time, without waiting for the news.

I have to strike while the iron is hot. I now understand that my health is not guaranteed to be this good for longer than whatever time God chooses, so I will put the time to good use.

I know that God wants me working on this site, and not other “stuff” that is trying to drag me away. The other “stuff” has a purpose, too, but apparently this is more important. So be it.

Some of the features are going to be math and science videos that I find interesting – like this one!

Don’t feel like you can’t argue with or criticize either the science, math or history in anything that I post. That’s exactly what you SHOULD do!!!

I will also keep the Wheatie Warrior digital game artwork picture for the featured image. People seem to prefer that to the AI images. It’s comforting to y’all.

Just sayin’!

And remember…….

Until victory, have faith!

And trust the big plan, too!

And as always….

ENJOY THE SHOW

W

Dear KMAG: 20240304 Joe Biden Didn’t Win ❀ Open Topic

Joe Biden didn’t win. This is our Real President: