Dear KMAG: 20190826 Open Topic

Carville….
DO NOT FORGET HIS PARTNER STANLEY GREENBERG!
THIS GUY IS OUR HIDDEN ENEMY
DATA DUMP from my notes. (old links again)
Facts do make it easier to win arguments. Unfortunately, most people have the attention span of one sound-bite…
In advertising it is called the The seven second rule: “Their whole message is all given in the 1st 7 seconds – the prospects’ problem, their solution, their guarantee, and the cost. They have supporting evidence that follows…” —
*http://www.relevancesells.com/2010/03/24/the-1st-7-seconds-rule-for-newspaper-ads/
This is why the warmists use attention grabbers like Hansen’s flooded NYC. It gets people’s attention within that critical seven seconds. It is also why we have in general been losing the PR war on Global Warming. We are amateurs and they have hired top professionals like Stan Greenburg, husband of Ms. DeLauro (D) CT who gave the USA the Food (un-Safe) Modernization Act of 2010.
It helps to research the opposition especially since most people have never heard of Stan Greenberg.

Whether you want to win your election, lead your country, increase your bottom line, or change the world, Greenberg Quinlan Rosner can help you find the answer,” GQRR states on its website *http://www.gqrr.com/

Stanley Greenberg
*http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Stanley_Greenberg
Greenberg’s work for private sector organizations – including major corporations, trade associations and public interest organizations – focuses on managing change and reform…. Greenberg has conducted extensive research in Europe (particularly Great Britain, Germany and France), Central and South America (Argentina and Brazil), and Africa (South Africa). He specializes in research on globalization, international trade, corporate consolidation, technology and the Internet. For organizations, Greenberg has helped manage and frame a number of issues – including education, school financing, American identity, the economy, environmental regulation, international trade, managed care, biotechnology, copyrights, privacy and the Internet….
Greenberg has advised a broad range of political campaigns, including those of President Bill Clinton and Vice-President Al Gore, Senators Chris Dodd, Joe Lieberman and Jeff Bingaman; Governor Jim Florio and gubernatorial candidate, Andy Young; former Vice-President Walter Mondale; and a number of candidates for the U.S. Congress. For many years, he served as principal polling advisor to the Democratic National Committee.
Greenberg works jointly on private sector projects with prominent Republican pollsters in the United States – including Fred Steeper (pollster to former President Bush), Bill McInturff and Linda DiVall – to bring a bi-partisan focus to public issues….

From another source:

Greenberg provides strategic advice and research for leaders, companies, campaigns, and NGOs trying to advance their issues in tumultuous times.
His political work has included serving as lead pollster and strategist to the campaigns of President Bill Clinton, British Prime Minister Tony Blair, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak, Bolivian president Gonzalo Sanchez de Lozada, and South African president Nelson Mandela….
[Old wording was: “As a hired gun strategist, Greenberg—a seasoned pollster and political consultant—has seen it all. In his memoir, he recounts his work with President Bill Clinton, British Prime Minister Tony Blair, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak, Bolivian president Gonzalo Sanchez de Lozada, and South African president Nelson Mandela.” – GC]
Greenberg has been described as “the father of modern polling techniques,” “the De Niro of all political consultants,” and “an unrivaled international ‘guru’.” Esquire Magazine named him one of the most important people of the 21st century. The New York Times writes that Greenberg “acts as a sort of people’s truth squad,” while Republican pollster Frank Luntz says “Stan Greenberg scares the hell out of me. He doesn’t just have a finger on the people’s pulse; he’s got an IV injected into it. He’s the best.”
“…He is also a strategic consultant to the Climate Center of the Natural Resources Defense Council on its multi-year campaign on global warming….
*http://www.dl21c.org/fbevent/616

Greenberg writes for the Democratic Strategist:
*http://www.thedemocraticstrategist.org/
And also formed Democracy Corps:
*http://archive.democracycorps.com/
And is linked to the London School of Economics (Fabian) Third Way philosophy
*http://www.democracycorps.com/Search/?areas%5B0%5D=jtags&searchword=third+way
(note the Carville Greeburg logo at the top)
(Check out what the “Third Way” actually is and you will find the UK’s Tony Blair, The USA Clintons, and the WTO Pascal Lamy all behind the LSE “Third Way” —
*http://nord.twu.net/acl/research/thirdway.html
Greenberg, Carville, Shrum directed Campaigns in 60 countries link
Globalization and middle class prosperity by Stan Greenberg
*http://www.thedemocraticstrategist.org/archives/premiere/greenberg.php
Even the democratic Underground doesn’t like Greenberg Carville Shrum “Regarding Carville and dirty politics“ —
*http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364×2710072#2710135

More on Rosa Delauro and hubby, They sort of reminds me of vampires…
Weathiest Members Of Congress [Adecade or so ago]
John Kerrey (D) $900 Million
{Side Note: John Kerry met his wife Teresa Heinz at an Earth Day rally, and they married a year after her husband, Sen John Heinz [of ketchup fame], died. Teresa inherited control of the Heinz charitable trust, and completely changed its focus from its previous charity work to environmental causes. She is chairman of the trust now, and she is an AGW believer. Teresa is a billionaire, so if it seems that John Kerry is a sock puppet, now you know why……
  Herb Kohl (D) $315 Million
  Jay Rockefeller (D) $275 Million
  Nancy Pelosi (D) $268 Million

…Moving fast……The Clintons amassed nearly $169 million in the past 10 years of “public service”.
Working for the Clintons isn’t bad either…..
But the entry that really sent my Democratic strategist friend ballistic was the one for Rep. Rosa DeLauro, the Connecticut Democrat. La Rosa–tied for #48 on the Richest list–gets the lion’s share of her wealth from her husband–Clintonista pollster and campaign strategist Stan Greenberg. Says Roll Call, “DeLauro’s primary asset is a 67-percent stake in Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research Inc., a Washington-based firm run by her husband, Democratic pollster Stan Greenberg. Her share in the company nets the Representative $5 million to $25 million. She has a partial stake in two other polling/consulting firms. The first is Greenberg Research, of which she and her husband own 100 percent, and Sun Surveys, in which she owns a 60 percent stake. Neither of these is as lucrative as Greenberg Quinlan Rosner, however.”
My bud the political warhorse snorted, “Hell, she first ran for Congress she didn’t have a dime–I was one of her biggest contributors. And Stan Greenberg, who worked for me back when he was starting out, used to have holes in his socks!” Noting that Congressional wealth is usually closer to the higher than to the lower estimates on the disclosure forms, my dour Democrat gasped, “That means they’re making around $50 million! These people shouldn’t be running Democratic campaigns!”
So, if you want to know why the national Democrats seem, in this campaign, to have a tin ear where touching the hearts and minds of the working stiffs is concerned, think about this: the three partners in the Democracy Corps–Greenberg, James Carville, and Kerry’s chief message-shaper Bob Shrum–are all multimillionaires. And yet their counsel–proferred in an endless series of free Democracy Corps memos distributed to the party elite well before and during the presidential primaries, whose content (or lack of it) they helped shape–is taken as gospel by Democratic liberals feverish for victory. Well, as the old Texas populist Maury Maverick Jr. used to say, “a liberal is a power junkie without the power.” 
*http://www.mlive.com/forums/farmington/index.ssf?artid=624

I wonder where those millions amassed “during public service” came from, don’t you???  Perhaps from corporations interested in manipulating the public and instituting Corporate favorable law?