SkyFall

“Fiat justitia ruat caelum.”

“Let justice be done though the heavens fall.” 


 
It’s not every day when Q makes reference to the same great legal, moral, and religious principle that this darn blog is named after (well – more like dedicated to – see the “Q” image below), so you can bet your last dollar this is going to be a special post!

Drew_family_crest
From the Wikipedia entry for the Latin phrase “Fiat justitia ruat caelum.”

We are approaching the moment we’ve been waiting for.  So EXPECT SOME EXCITEMENT.
How do we know that?  From today’s Q post – henceforth to be known as the SKYFALL POST.  It’s a long one, so I’ve broken it up into 3 images, in the anticipated reading order, from inside out, and from top down.
Here you go.
We begin with PART ONE – a REFERENCED post from September 10, 2018.  In case it’s not obvious, that was the day before the 17th anniversary of 9/11.
Q_SkyFall_Post_1
Next, today’s comments on that post, beneath the referenced post.  This will be referred to as PART TWO.
Q_SkyFall_Post_2
Finally, PART THREE – a medium-length post referencing the second post.
Q_SkyFall_Post_3
Let’s look at all three parts more closely.


 
PART ONE makes no ifs, ands or buts – Rod Rosenstein is soon to be OUT in one way or another.  He will resign, be recused, or REMOVED – not stating who has the honors of the latter, but there seem like several candidates to me.
The big deal, however, is the idea that declassification shows that HUSSEIN – if I can call it that – activated .gov to treat Candidate Donald J. Trump like a SPY and apparently pipe updates to the Situation Room.  HOLY DANGER TO THE REPUBLIC, BATMAN!
Think about it. THIS is what is freaking people out. I can imagine it. And – while I would rather hear what OTHER people think of this, and not contaminate them by saying the following is certain, I must admit to believing that “the psychologically predicted inability to say no to the First Black President” is a LARGE portion of what is happening here.  And an additional trouble being that POTUS44, D of FBI, and D of CIA, were all either communists, borderline communists, or former communists.
Not a good situation.  Can you imagine if BUSH had done this to OBAMA?  Yikes.
Q also says that the FULL FISA “brings down the house [White House]” – presumably Obama’s White House.  THAT could be very interesting.


 
PART TWO is short and sweet and plain as day:

Step 1: Read the 1st sentence re: [RR]
Step 2: Read the NYT article re: [RR] wear wire
Attempts to BAIT POTUS to FIRE to cross RED LINE will FAIL.
FISA DECLAS WILL BRING THE HOUSE DOWN.
Q

This part spells out what is happening right now – and it is much like I suspected.
The first “Step” re: Rod Rosenstein points back to the fact that he will be “hitting the road” in one way or another, due to information in the unredacted FISA information.
The second Step points to the NYT article, possibly leaked by Andy “Las Vegas” McCabe, which tried to insinuate that Rod Rosenstein talked about wearing a wire – possibly seriously – possibly sarcastically.  While I believe the main point of the NYT article was to paint “25th Amendment” in a serious light (thus being the beneficiary of the recent “chaos narrative”), it should also be noted that the NYT article seems to want to prompt “action” of some kind regarding “Radium Rod”.  Q then talks back to that “call for action” in no uncertain terms:

Attempts to BAIT POTUS to FIRE to cross RED LINE will FAIL.

Excellent.  So the VSGPOTUS is apparently onto their scheme, and is NOT falling for their tricks.

GOOD.

Finally, a repeated punch to the face of the Obama White House – that FISA declassification will BRING IT DOWN.
Now – is “red line screaming” Chucky Schumer starting to make sense?  My read is that he knows the result of declassification will be a GOP lock on the White House for DECADES, barring a CLEANUP of the Democrat party.  And we know where THAT would leave Dirty Communist Chucky Schumer.


 
PART THREE is basically saying exactly why things are happening the way they are happening.

DECLAS of FISA = [RR] self-incrimination.
[RR] in charge of DECLAS.
Due to massive CONFLICT OF INTEREST IG HOROWITZ was TASKED to final review [speed].
[PREVENT LEFT ‘ENDANGER’ SOURCES & METHODS + MUELLER INTERFERENCE NARRATIVE]
IT WILL ALL COME OUT.
POTUS will not be BAITED TO FIRE when the release itself will FORCE RESIGNATION/TERMINATION [RR].
UK/AUS (+ OTHERS) MUST LEARN THE TRUE DEFINITION OF ‘ALLY’.
[RR] PREVENTED [FORCE] FROM SIGNING NEW FISA‘s.
ALL SIGNERS ARE CURRENTLY UNDER GJ INVESTIGATION.
MCCABE MEMOS [NYT [RR] ARTICLE][PROVE] THE RATS ARE PANICKING.
2018 WILL BE GLORIOUS.
PREPARE FOR ‘SKY IS FALLING’ WEEK.
Q

The KEY point is that declassification will be done via the ONE PROVEN HONEST FORCE in DOJ – the OIG – meaning Horowitz.
I say that, because “they” (dishonest Holder DOJ forces) “finalized” the OIG report on FBI abuses that was WHITEWASHED by the “executive summary” that sounded like it was talking about a different report.
Now we’re seeing why Trump performed a maneuver that had us all wondering what he was doing:
(1)  Ordered complete declassification
(2)  Panicked Radium Rod and the Obama Gang by FAKING that he could do it himself
(3)  Seeded rumors of Sessions / SCOTUS on recusal and unrecusal, stoking the fires
(4)  “Reversed course”, and suddenly “punted a touchdown” to the OIG.
See how that works?
“Br’er Sessions” just ran into the briar patch of recusal which ROD ROSENSTEIN had avoided.  On the other side of that briar patch, under the watchful eyes of SCOTUS, Br’er Sessions THROWS the FISA to eligible recipient Horowitz.  Rosenstein can’t touch it.
BYE-BYE, RADIUM ROD.
Q also mentions that UK and AUS allies are in for some heat.  Yeah.  Can’t wait to see what that is, but it certainly explains some things I’ve been wondering about.
Q says that ALL signers of the FISA are under Grand Jury investigation.  BOOM!  That is a big deal.  Will any survive?  Wait and see.
Q mentions McCabe memos being the source of the NYT article RE Radium Rod talking about “wearing a wire”, and says that the perps are panicking.
Two final statements:

2018 WILL BE GLORIOUS.
PREPARE FOR ‘SKY IS FALLING’ WEEK.
Q

A glorious 2018 is good.
But WHAT does ‘Sky is Falling’ Week mean?  How do we prepare for it?
Let’s hear YOUR thoughts!
W

Coburn_Uniform
“Q? Military intelligence? Why, I would know nothing about that. Are you sure you’re OK, Maggie? You seem nervous. I assure you there’s nothing out of the ordinary.”

Fiat justitia ruat caelum.

The Lawfare Playbook Is Already Written

I just had a profound realization over at the Treehouse.
And that’s not counting the fact that the scenario I describe probably solves the Kavanaugh case via Ed Whelan’s findings. THAT is just one of many.
THE PLAYBOOK OF PERSONAL DESTRUCTION BY CRIMINAL LAWFARE HAS ALREADY BEEN WRITTEN FOR EVERY SINGLE TRUMP SCOTUS NOMINEE, JUST AS IT HAS BEEN FOR EVERY OTHER ENEMY OF THE DEEP STATE.
JUST AS IT WAS FOR TRUMP.
THESE ARE NOT “ONE-OFFS”.  THEY WERE PREPARED LONG AGO.
I believe I understand what is going on with Kavanaugh’s accuser.  This is based on the fact that a MORE LIKELY PERPETRATOR was found – a (still) lecherous drinker who grew up in a house that fits the accuser’s party description perfectly.
I have copied my posts of REALIZATION as follows.  Watch how my thought progresses.  Check my earlier Twitter for the lead-up.  Even a few days ago, I was beginning to see how it comes together, piece by piece.


 
wolfmoon1776 says:

 
I believe that we are on the path to the truth, and that it passes through this man. In fact, if this was ever REALLY investigated, I think Garrett would be the top suspect. I think we have a perp who is being ingloriously defended by a liar. This is Democrat CIA playbook. I’ve been in a script like this. I know how it works. The guilty party is supposed to shut up and let the miscarriage work out the way the Dems want.
The Dems write these lawfare scripts based on the idea that people behave predictably in complex cases to protect themselves, and trust me – they do. I behaved predictably – but I never forgot what really happened.
I’m sorry – at this point it’s a MESS. This is why we need Rule of Law, etc. But when the Democrats decide to mud-wrestle, instead of rule of law, we cannot back down. We fight back, out in the open, until the truth is found.
They want to do it this way? Then their accuser GOES DOWN THIS WAY.
Democrats turned it into a kangaroo court. REMEMBER THAT IN NOVEMBER.
People want to end this kind of mud-slinging? Then VOTE THEM OUT. It is the ONLY WAY.

Like

jetstream says:
Curious as to what you mean:
“I think we have a perp who is being ingloriously defended by a liar.”
Agree that the Democrat’s kangaroo court of manipulated public opinion obliterates Rule of Law. No one should be persecuted by accusation and innuendo without a proper investigation and evidence. Sorry to hear you went through such an experience.

Liked by you

 
Thank you. You just solved this. Digging into that solves this.
Here is how it works. Diagramming this out makes me even more certain this is what happened.
ABCD are four acquaintances.
A commits a petty semi-forgotten crime against B. A few people know about it, but it dies.
C and D know the others. C *may* know about the crime. D does NOT.
Years pass.
B obtains motive against D. If D had done to B what A did to her, D would be destroyed.
Now – something interesting happens.
C has written a book which may or may not share motive. It somewhat describes the crime, but not completely. It uses D’s name – almost – for A’s.
Note that this is very suspicious now, and resembles long-range discreditation operations I’m familiar with. This book has little reason to exist, IMO. Its greatest attribute is taking out Kavanaugh. Do the math. Seriously. Cause-effect reversal can crack cases.
The time arrives to discredit D. B lies about the crime and says D did it, not A.
A’s crime is protected by B’s lie that D is the perpetrator, and not A. As long as A stays quiet, no problem. As long as C stays quiet, no problem.
This is particularly true if C got money for the book and was compromised somehow in the process, such as being informed about things that make him an accessory before the fact.
I think it’s a conspiracy, with the word of 3 against 1. It’s beautiful. An almost perfect crime. But the crowd beat it.
Appendix:
I believe that the reason we see the same “playbook plays” over and over is that the plays are ALREADY CONSTRUCTED. They are already written. This fits with the discred ops that were prepared against me. They seemed to have been prepared YEARS in advance.
So what I am saying is that similar conspiracies have been prepared for EVERY one of the Republican SCOTUS nominees. I am not kidding.
Doesn’t that explain a lot?

Like


 
This is all based upon a Twitter thread that starts with THIS tweet:
https://twitter.com/EdWhelanEPPC/status/1042893987747713024
and which is summarized by a link in this tweet:
https://twitter.com/Baba9773/status/1042930048062435330
https://twitter.com/Baba9773/status/1042930048062435330
Direct link here:
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1042893987747713024.html
I have a variety of tweets surrounding these tweets that explain more fully why I think Whelan has something here – OTHER evidence that falls in line with his thinking.  Just check my timeline around the above tweets.


 
It is my opinion that:
1. Judge Kavanaugh should be confirmed.
2. The FBI should be ORDERED to investigate a case of CONSPIRACY against Judge Kavanaugh.  (Note:  The FBI’s prior rejection of the case was somewhat according to script (figure this out to follow me here – this is weaponized psychological relief – a pattern in this case and others that provides predictable behaviors), and thus there needs to be an internal investigation at FBI surrounding their part in this.  Somebody is helping.)
3. A special counsel should be launched to investigate CIA/DNC political frauds, crimes, and conspiracies, based on results of this case, Spygate, Watergate (induced conspiracy), Halper/Reagan, and any other similar conspiracies, including leverage operations against private institutions and individuals.  This will include murder of witnesses and attempted murder of witnesses.
Actually, we may need a few special counsels.


 
W

JamesCoburncafescene
Wolf Moon enjoying the headlines that are coming.

Q's Parascope

we-are-qanon
When people say “we are Q“, I find it immensely satisfying to consider the reality of that statement, and not to simply brush it off.  To look at the totality of our elaboration of Q posts into a movement, and consider how we might do it better.
Clearly, understanding Q helps us do it better.  And what – actually – IS that understanding?
It is that vibrant, moving, shifting, intelligent sum of our understandings, changing itself.  Thus, I find that people’s own INDIVIDUAL VIEWS of Q actually help CONSTITUTE what “Q” – the larger Q, so to speak – thinks.  And the CHANGE in that sum comes from SELF-AWARENESS and INTER-AWARENESS of the parts.
Simple, in the end.  But let’s not just think – let’s DO.
para59r had an interesting point of view on Q, from the comments on my first REAL post here, that I thought I would share, so that others could discuss.  I find myself in strong agreement with many of the points made.
An image of the original post, and then the text (for those who use text reader devices) is provided.
IMAGE:
para59r_opinion
TEXT:

In Q’s case being absolute could mean exposure. Ever notice that his proofs can only run so far. That his drops are are just a tad off from someone elses? He needs the validation but can’t really afford it. Does it really bother anyone that his bombs don’t seem to have the desired effect when neither do ours.
Trust Sessions, Trust Wray is not really the point. It’s trust the VSG in the White House who has trusted Sessions, and has trusted Wray.
If we remember back far enough at one point the Tree House thought Mueller was a good idea. Times change, fog clears and when it does we get ourselves back in order and push on. Some though might seem still to far out on the flank, still running with the old plan, or working with a copy we don’t have, seemingly out of touch but they’re watching from their lofty heights and laying down what fire they can as we saps in the trenches grind on toward the objective.
Q’s a phantom force and just like an army we have a certain antipathy for the air force, their objectives vs ours. They’re carving up a larger swath of land taking the battle deep in unwinnable territory to soften the enemy’s support, to disrupt what they can, as opposed to our closer more defined objectives, where the battle grinds on and success is measured daily in meters and yards, but its all the same war and were all on the same side.

I find this to be a great BRIDGE to several important points about the Q strategy, and even the larger POTUS strategy.  Some of these points I find validating in themselves, BECAUSE they are so strategic, and maybe even optimally so.  If we were NOT doing them, we would want to be doing them.
But rather than point them out myself, I think it’s worth challenging readers to identify them and discuss.
What think Q?
W

JamesCoburncafescene
Wolf Moon reads about battles others have been in, will be in, and are fighting at this very moment, and realizes that the battle is everywhere, whether he likes it or not.  Even in the peaceful cafe.