0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
289 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Pat Frederick

except for that little bone thrown to the Dems to have at least some talking points…it does not conclude POTUS committed a crime but it does not exonerate him either. Mueller left that to the AG to determine. total weasel move!!
AG says no obstruction tho…

Kalbo

Me thinks Dershowitz is playing both sides of the Faux News commentator game.
While quite slow, I really don’t accept much of anything Dershowitz or Judge Nap say.
Both are paid shills to entertain viewers with their legal brilliance.
Dopes they are IMHO.

michaelh

Dershowitz to his credit knows where the smart money is 🙂 No other liberal was willing to stand up and there was no collusion. He may be a paid shill but he’s a smart one, if he wants to cash in his chips now I’m fine with that.

Kalbo

IIRC, a lawyer? 🙂

rayzorbak

Daugn……
Your Hubby would be correct

ForGodandCountry

comment image

Roberta
Roberta

I believe credit is due to Jeff Carlson #marketwork

Marica

ABC!!!

Marica
Pat Frederick

really?
still would like to read the unredacted second scope memo he gave Mueller…

Curry Worsham

tom f

Both Mr. Rosenstein and Mr. Sessions have played their roles magnificently.
Wow!

Marica

yes Tom!! Yes they have!!😊😊

Roberta

Anyone with energy to check SD? I recall he opined that Brian Cates did not have a clue.

Shebythesea

Like

singingsoul

tom f
“Both Mr. Rosenstein and Mr. Sessions have played their roles magnificently.
Wow!”
______________________________
How so..???
How quick we forget it was Rosenstein who wrote the letter to firer Comey and after that it was he who hired the special council for no reason.
It was Rosenstein who let Mueller run a muck. To me Rosenstein is not a white hat unless he had a change of heart when his pans were on fire? Still that does not make him a white hat. He ruined a lot of lives with his buddy Mueller and his cabal of black hats.
Unless we name it what it is and was we will make the mistakes over and over. These corrupt lawyers should never work in the profession again.

Kalbo

RR may have been brought in line by President Trump or someone on his staff, but not buying he started out as a white hat.

Curry Worsham

Coulter is either running extraordinary interference or she needs to go away to the funny farm.

ForGodandCountry

Yep. Not a single one. /s
Stupid attention whore.

singingsoul

ForGodandCountry
“Yep. Not a single one. /s
Stupid attention whore.”
_____________________________________
Menopause does that to some people. She might want to take B6 stay off booze and caffein .

rf121

Hey. Quit bad mouthing whores. They at least provide a useful service.

TheseTruths

If by “extraordinary interference” you mean she’s somehow working for our side, I don’t buy it. I’m more inclined to believe Q’s posts about Romney and wire payments. Someone needs to find evidence of whatever is going on with Coulter. She’s gone to the enemy’s camp.

Curry Worsham

Agreed. Operative word: “somehow”.

GA/FL

THIS – Coulter is in the Romney/Ryan/McMullin camp.

GA/FL

Exactly!

Sylvia Avery

She has apparently simply lost her mind. Or sold her soul. Or has become addicted to attention, good or bad.
Whatever. It’s a mystery.

Curry Worsham

She needs to get on the same meds as Beck.

Sylvia Avery

Yes, they appear to be helping Beck!!! She needs to ask who his doctor is.

GA/FL

Reply to Coulter says it all:
Donnicia Pepper @DonniciaP
Replying to @AnnCoulter
Just be quiet Ann. Today is a great day for all americans. Try being one.

GA/FL

This one is good too:
“Ann is ambien tweeting”

MysticRose80

Look, Ann:

While you’re still griping about “MUH WALL”, the rest of us are celebrating the vindication of our President.

JasonD

To be fair, that could also be ineterpreted favourably, since PDJT has the best record re election promises…
Not a fan of hers – but her performance on Bill Maher prior to election was FUNNY 😂

TheseTruths

The report says Mueller did not determine whether there was obstruction of justice and that it is up to the AG to decide that, and that Barr and Rosenstein have determined there was none. So I expect the Dems in Congress to launch their own investigation into that. Does anyone know if they can be stopped from doing that?
An innocent American (Trump) was accused and hounded. Now a report comes out exonerating him, and Dems want to get their hands on every piece of evidence used during the investigation so THEY can make their own determination. This is not justice. The proper channels were followed, and it should be over. Again, can they be stopped?

TheseTruths

Yes, as I stated in my post. My point is that the Dems will keep pushing for investigations and information, and I’m wondering if they can be stopped and if so, who would stop them. It’s easy for us to say, “See, it says so, right there in the report,” but they are like zombies that just keep coming.

ForGodandCountry

It’s counter-intuitive….
We don’t want them to stop. We want THEM to prove to everyone how thoroughly bat-shit crazy and irrational they are, and they are doing a damn good job of it.

TheseTruths

They need to be prevented from getting their hands on any materials that were used in the investigation or any background reports produced during the investigation. Enough is enough. It feels like an assault.

Sylvia Avery

I don’t think they are going to be able to get their hands on the investigative material. Legally, the DOJ is not able to release that.
But they’ll try, knowing they aren’t entitled to it and then they will howl and scream and shake their fists at the sky and claim COVER UP! It’s all a show.

huskerheart

Or Double jepordy…

Roberta

Procedure…meticulous procedure.
I keep circling back to Q’s question re Mueller’s background and what branch of the service.

trumpismine

Let the dimwits keep looking and get another black eye.
In the meantime VSGPOTUS Trump is gonna be after the their a$$es.
Pursue Mr. President!

GA/FL

Can’t wait for the COUNTER-PUNCH!!!!!

Marica

Good one!! I gotta promote that !! BRB!

GA/FL

The Mueller Investigation made a LOT of money for a LOT of lawyers.
Each of those subpoena recipients, warrant targets and witnesses had to have a lawyer…..
https://twitter.com/MAGAPILL/status/1109506114666852355

coosmama
Curry Worsham

Exactly.

Curry Worsham

ForGodandCountry
phoenixRising

That tweet from Acosta PROVES he is not a reporter, journalist…
AG said there was NO OBSTRUCTION …

michaelh

A new Acosta meme, I have in my hands an exoneration memo, but nowhere in this stack of papers does it say “Trump is exonerated”

TheseTruths

This Acosta tweet is the kind of thing I referred to above. The Dems will be screaming now to get the full Mueller report and all accompanying evidence so THEY can find obstruction. It doesn’t matter to them that a Trump-appointed AG says there was none.
I want them stopped. I hope DECLAS is coming soon and that it will show exactly who was behind the dossier/FISA scheme and the criminal election interference by Americans (not Russians). I also hope indictments are coming soon. The rank-and-file Left base needs to be shown how they’ve been deceived.

andrew1979

i agree with you 100%
i have alao been worried thw whole time about this very thing in a way.
so with patience we have endured but itz ti e for the rope spool to end. the time for leverage stoxking up is over. time foe truth. cold and hard and crystal clear.

Marica

Jan Phillips

Yes!!! Love it, Marica!!

ForGodandCountry
Curry Worsham

Democrats: “Move on” (.org)

nikkichico7

….. 😎👍

que to the 1 minute mark if you prefer .. 🐮

Marica
Curry Worsham

Evuh.

GA/FL

Besides Trump and his Campaign’s innocence – the 2 years have produced ample hard proof of many Obama/Clinton/Holder/Lynch/Comey/Yates crimes from Spygate to FISAgate and much, much MOAR!
I will never forgive them
for the loss of Seal Team Six,
for Benghazi,
for Open Borders and floods of drugs, criminal illegals, human trafficking,
for the Green Schemes money laundering,
for IRS and other agencies attacking conservatives,
for Obamacare
and especially for trying to steal the 2016 and
for committing fraud in the 2018 election and
for trying to undermine and remove President Trump…
….there is so much…
List of Obama administration abuses of power and lawbreaking – http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2011/06/president-barack-obamas-complete-list.html
Timeline of Sedition and Treason: http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2017/12/a-timeline-of-treason-how-fbi.html
O administration was corrupt – https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/may/21/obama-administration-was-corrupt/

Volgarian8301

LIGHT. THEM. UP!!!!😆🤣💥💣💯 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Yes, I was shouting 🍿🍻🇺🇸

Sue Mcdonald

Not a smidgeon of scandal ,not one scintilla not even a whiff, oh Lawdy Lawdy how the chickens have come home to roost! that evil narcissist’s day is arriving quickly.

Curry Worsham

JasonD

You seem to be in a good mood, Curry?
That crow that “people” OT wanted to serve you appears to have been removed from the menu? 😎

Curry Worsham

Hey Jason! How ya doing?
It’s election night all over again!
That plate-o-crow got slid back and forth across the table several times as I recall.

JasonD

Yup, no doubt it’s still somewhere in the centre – no one ready to claim it yet 😂

Marica

Get em Sarah!!

Curry Worsham

[0] Delta Marica!

Marica

Curry!!! HAHAHA!!🤣🤣🤣🤣😎

ForGodandCountry

comment image

Pat Frederick

I want to send a “congratulatory” email to the President but not sure of the wording. I mean we all knew he was innocent all along…and saying congrats makes it almost seem like he beat a rap, you know?
any thoughts on how to say it?

Jan Phillips

He will know what you mean, Pat. Just speak from your heart! I was so happy yesterday, I wrote “congratulations” to the President!!

Pat Frederick

thanks Jan…I just did!!
I encourage everyone to do so!

Sylvia Avery

Pat, I just love you. What a nice thought. I’m going to send him an email, too. Great idea!

Spab

Mr. President, it looks like it was a vast Leftwing conspiracy. I think that will cover it.

Marica

drillerelite

comment image

Marica
Curry Worsham

Start with a patriot pardon!

Curry Worsham

Sweet.

singingsoul

What I like to know where is justice for the President and his family?
Where is justice for all the people whose financial capital was depleted by having to hirer a lawyer?
Where is justice for the American people who voted for President Trump?
All of this Russian scheme was created by Hilary , her team, lawless FBI, agents from another country and not least the DOJ.
All people who have been sucked into this KGB tactic lawless cabal need to be made whole and we need to be made whole because this kind of communist tactics cannot stand in a free society.
By the way Mueller is no hero he and his cabal need to shamed .
The media as is needs to be disbanded.
We need justice real justice so this never happens again.

RAC

The FISA corruption hasn’t been sorted out yet. When that is outed as a scam will it not show that muellers investigation was without basis and bogus ? Could the victims then sue for compensation maybe.

Jan Phillips

Amen, singingsoul!!

Plain Jane

The fat lady hasn’t yet sung. This is the beginning, IMHO.

PeteC

What time is it now Mouseketeers??? DECLAS time!!!

Curry Worsham

D-E-C-L-A-S S-I-F-Y-E

sallyal

I had to read it in “song”. Lol

Curry Worsham

Declassify, Declassify
We’ll never let ’em off, we’ll hang ’em high
High, high, high

Marica

THis might be a repeat– But too funny to check..

ForGodandCountry

comment image

SteveInCO · Thermonuclear MAGA

One wishes they’d do that…instead they’ll still be around tomorrow.

Curry Worsham

I say to you this afternoon, the day of the Meuller Report, the day President Trump was completely vindicated…

Gil

Im still not doing great, but this is a great day, finally.
I love me some 45.
Now he needs to bring the pain.
Love to you all.

Pat Frederick

take care of yourself!!!

Sylvia Avery

Gil, I missed you. Are you sick? I’m sorry you’re not doing well but glad you checked in. Just sent up a prayer for you.

Curry Worsham

Rosenstein stayed on to give Barr absolute credibility on obstruction.
Suck it up, Dems.

Marica

KAG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

phoenixRising

phoenixRising

TheseTruths

Disclaimer: I’m not trying to throw cold water on things, and I’m thrilled at the Barr report today.😀 That said, wouldn’t it be possible to obstruct justice by impeding an investigation, whatever its final result?
Of course Pres. Trump did not do that, but it is what the Dems will try to find evidence of.
__________________________________________________________
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/obstruction_of_justice
18 U.S.C. § 1503 defines “obstruction of justice” as an act that “corruptly or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice.”
Overview
Someone obstructs justice when that person has a specific intent to obstruct or interfere with a judicial proceeding. For a person to be convicted of obstructing justice, that person must not only have the specific intent to obstruct the proceeding, but that person must know (1) that a proceeding was actually pending at the time; and (2) there must be a connection between the endeavor to obstruct justice and the proceeding, and the person must have knowledge of this connection.
§ 1503 applies only to federal judicial proceedings. Under 18 U.S.C. § 1505, however, a defendant can be convicted of obstruction of justice by obstructing a pending proceeding before Congress or a federal administrative agency. A pending proceeding could include an informal investigation by an executive agency.

Sylvia Avery

I’m not a legal expert, for sure.
But I think Congress will be working a dry well. In the end, it is up to the DOJ to bring charges. All Congress could do if they WERE to find evidence is to refer charges to the DOJ who has already declined to make an indictment.

phoenixRising

Ding! Ding!
We have a winnah!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Sylvia Avery

Shortly after than I heard Mark Levin talking about Congress having NO authority to conduct criminal investigations and that there was no probably cause for obstruction.
Of course we all know reality doesn’t exist in Dim world and they will grandstand, posture, and shriek and fling poo like monkeys calling for things they know full well they can’t ever get.

Sylvia Avery

*probable not probably
I do actually proofread before hitting send, usually, but gosh you’d never know it. I hate it when that happens (which is all too often).

A Fortiori

Sylvia – I agree with Mark Levin: the conduct of criminal investigations is an Executive branch function. Neither the Legislative branch nor the Judicial branch can take it upon themselves to do this.
The only exception is that the House may conduct an impeachment proceeding.

Curry Worsham

Let’s see what two crack lawyers have to say about it:
JAY SEKULOW: As to the obstruction, Wolf, the key there is that the attorney general and the deputy attorney general made the conclusion that you don’t have obstruction when there’s no underlying crime. I think that we’ve said from the outset that this was a situation where there was no collusion, there was no obstruction, and now we have the weight of the Department of Justice agreeing with us.
WOLF BLITZER: Very important, though, I want to get your reaction to one line in this letter. They quote the special counsel, Robert Mueller, as saying, as far as obstruction of justice, quote, “While this report does not conclude that the president committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.” What’s your reaction to that?
GIULIANI: Yes, but then if you go on to the next two paragraphs, Wolf, the attorney general does kind of a brilliant analysis of it. He says that he and deputy attorney general Rod Rosenstein have concluded that the evidence is not sufficient to establish the president committed obstruction of justice. Then he goes even further and points out that basically under settled law, it’s almost impossible to have obstruction of justice if there’s no underlying crime. A brilliant lawyer-like analysis. Then he concludes with a very strong statement, “in cataloging the president’s actions, many of which took place in public view, the report identifies no actions that in our judgment,” that’s Rosenstein and Barr, “constitute obstructive conduct.”

TheseTruths

Great. Thanks for posting that.

A Fortiori

In my view, it is quite clear that a President cannot be considered to obstruct justice for exercising his official duties and/or acting in a manner specifically authorized by the Constitution.
Thus, by way of example, the President can pardon anyone, for any reason, for any and all actions taken prior to the pardon. He may do this even if the person was obviously guilty, or if the crime has not come to light and the person has not been charged, or anywhere in between.
The President also may fire anyone in the executive branch, at any time, for any reason or no reason. The President may direct the activities of executive branch personnel, including federal prosecutors and/or investigative personnel. The President may classify information is such a way as to preclude its disclosure in a criminal trial. While any or all of these activities may interfere with a criminal investigation and/or prosecution, they clearly fall within the President’s duties and thus may not be characterized as obstruction of Justice.
Yes, a President could obstruct justice by, for example, corruptly tampering with evidence, but the valid exercise of a President’s constitutional duties cannot be a crime.

grandmaintexas

I have to tell you, I briefly looked at comments OT, and came skedaddling back here as fast as I could. Some comments are downright worthy of Ann Coulter when she’s having a hot flash.

Marica
Sylvia Avery

Oh yeah, baby! I’m ready!

phoenixRising

TheseTruths

“This was an illegal takedown that failed, and hopefully somebody’s going to be looking at the other side.’
Preach it, Mr. President! Those seemingly casual words should strike fear into the hearts of a lot of people.

phoenixRising
Marica

another 2 good to check!! Brad!!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

phoenixRising

phoenixRising

TheseTruths

I love Sperr’s suggestion that Pres. Trump hold a national address. The more we hear from Pres. Trump the better, and I think the networks have to air it. At any rate, they would have to talk about it and they would have to cover what HE said.

phoenixRising
phoenixRising

GA/FL

Heh-heh

Sylvia Avery

Oh, just turned on FOX and Shannon Bream has Mark Levin on by phone to discuss the report.

Sylvia Avery

Levin is ripping Mueller apart. No probably cause much less any case on obstruction of justice.

Sylvia Avery

*probable
sheesh

Sylvia Avery

Levin on the Congress:
Congress doesn’t have criminal investigative powers. They have no right to the investigative materials underpinning the report.

TheseTruths

It’s good to see that. It is the answer I was seeking above.

Sylvia Avery

Oh good, I do think that answers the question.
But hold on tight because this bunch of crapweasels will do anything and try anything whether they have the authority or not. We know they are going to put on a show and try to keep this circus going.

andrew1979

crapweasles. the who.e lot of them.
(insert wolf here doing silk impression) uuh huuh that’s right!

GA/FL
Sylvia Avery

Yes, Mollie has been right on this and strong on this from the get-go.

SingularZoe

Now this is interesting about Hemmingway.

phoenixRising

comment image

GA/FL

THREAD

kea
Sylvia Avery

Great article. Loved this part:
“…Schadenfreude is an unlovely emotion, one it behooves us to renounce, especially in the midst of Lent. But I suspect we’ll be seeing a lot of it abroad in the coming weeks and months as the beady eyes of the FBI swivel away from Donald Trump onto those who have spent the last two and a half years trying to destroy him.”
https://spectator.us/undo-2016-election-mueller/

GA/FL

QUOTE:
“The question is, however, what comes next? Last May in these virtual pages, writing about the efforts of Devin Nunes, then Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, to get to the bottom of the skullduggery that instigated the Mueller investigation, I wrote that
‘What is being exposed is the biggest political scandal in the history of the United States: the effort by highly placed — exactly how highly placed we still do not know — members of one administration to mobilize the intelligence services and police power of the state to spy upon and destroy first the candidacy and then, when that didn’t work, the administration of a political rival.’
John Brennan, James Clapper, James Comey, Sally Yates, Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, John McCain, Christopher Steele, Glenn Simpson, and others did their best to undo the results of the 2016 election.
DON’T FORGET the ring-leaders Øbama and H>illary.
It was all done at their behest and direction.
No doubt, Valerie Jarrett and Tom Donohue (Chamber of Commerce head) and $0r0$ are in the thick of it.

Sylvia Avery

Yes, Even with all the celebrating, I’m seeing a lot of two things:
The public needs to know how this got started and was allowed to go on like this; we need to investigate the investigators.
And, media complicity and corruption. They have a lot to answer for and some are beginning to call that out. Finally.

SteveInCO · Thermonuclear MAGA

Shadenfruede?
Hell, I think a lot of us have schadenböners!

Sylvia Avery

LOL, um, speak for yourself! I’m searching for a gender appropriate equivalent, but….

SteveInCO · Thermonuclear MAGA

Oh, it’s figurative, not literal–I got the term from a female, in fact.

Sylvia Avery

🙂

phoenixRising
phoenixRising

Sylvia Avery

Gosh, no kidding. Excellent point. Devin Nunes has stood strong and dignified in the face of unbelievable heat. Good man.

phoenixRising

Sylvia Avery

Holy crap. That’s a lot of money.
She should be the most enthusiastic booster of capitalism in the USA. She has parlayed very modest skill into an incredibly well paying career, and she has done it in TV which is a medium where appearance is critical and where again she has very modest gifts. She has been profoundly blessed. And I doubt she even realizes it.
She disgusts me.

grandmaintexas

Lol. You always know how to close a comment!!

SteveInCO · Thermonuclear MAGA

Shovel ready!!

Sylvia Avery

Mos’ def.

andrew1979

look up her “path” to success. she was recruited at some point and brought into the fold.
stanford. oxford england… the cia route

Sylvia Avery

Ugh. Another one of those.

trumpismine

No wonder she was crying

coosmama

Having a hard time with the answer… https://reddit.app.link/Bn2OntiqkV

drillerelite

Sad but true I reckon

GA/FL

Remember this?
http://www.nationalmemo.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/2016-01-21-national-review-against-trump-cover-640.jpg
Glenn Beck
David Boaz
Brent Bozell
Mona Charen
Ben Domenech – married Meghan McCain
Erik Erikson
Steven Hayward
Mark Helprin
Bill Kristol
Yuval Levin
Dana Loesch
Andrew McCarthy
David McIntosh
Michael Medved
Ed Meese
Russell Moore
Michael Mukasey
Katie Pavlich
John Podhoretz
RR Reno
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas

Sylvia Avery

Such madness. Glad to see a number of those have changed their tune.
I spit on those who cling to their stupid elitist or Globalist ideology and reject our VSG.

Spab

Whatever happened to Cal Thomas? He has not seemed to prosper during the Trump Presidency. Several others on that list are a disappointment but particularly Russell Moore, a minister, for whom, I no longer have any respect.

sallyal

He still does a weekly column over at Town Hall. Not completely on the Trump train but does not seem to be NTer anymore.

kea

LOL Went2MichiganNotMoscow LOL

Sylvia Avery

What a great tweet!!!!

kea

So I’m reading the comments on BB. Now the 2020 dims I mean Dems want to ‘release the full Mueller report’ because well Trump.

SteveInCO · Thermonuclear MAGA

From what I understand…it has been released, at least to some people.

Cuppa Covfefe

Bolshevik Burnout is having a bad hair day…

kea

SteveInCO · Thermonuclear MAGA

Her campaign aircraft wasn’t called “Broomstick One” for nothing!

Sylvia Avery

Giggle snort.
I know that is disgusting but sometimes I can’t help it.

Wolf Moon | Threat to Demonocracy

comment image

kea

Throw some water on it!!!!!!

singingsoul

kea
“Throw some water on it!!!!!!”
___________________________________
Holy Water!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

nikkichico7

🤨👍‼️💦💧💦💧💦💧💦💧💦💧💦💧💦💧‼️

Sylvia Avery

She wears it like it was made just for her. It is kind of creepy how well it suits her.

Wolf Moon | Threat to Demonocracy

Exactly! “It’s her!”

Cuppa Covfefe

Well, she IS a witch, and she does have a coven, so there’s that…
Billary’s campaign song shouldn’t have been “Yesterday’s Gone”, but rather, “Rhiannon”…

…Rhiannon rings like a bell through the night and
Wouldn’t you love to love her?
Takes to the sky like a bird in flight and
Who will be her lover?
All your life you’ve never seen
A woman taken by the wind
Would you stay if she promised you heaven?
Will you ever win?
She is like a cat in the dark and then
She is the darkness
She rules her life like a fine skylark and when
The sky is starless
All your life you’ve never seen
A woman taken by the wind
Would you stay if she promised you heaven?
Will you ever win?
Will you ever win?
Rhiannon
Rhiannon
Rhiannon
Rhiannon …

Sylvia Avery

You make me laugh, CC.
(And I enjoy your taste in music, too!)

Cuppa Covfefe

Thanks (blush). I really liked that song before I really looked at the words (I thought she was singing “Vienna”, which had me a tad confused). The bass line is great (and won’t go out of my head now). Just wish today’s music was as good!
Here’s a tune for the RINOs, the DEMONcRATs, and Hill-the-BEAST’s crew (as sung by Dandy Don Meredith, RIP):

Sylvia Avery

Good choice.
I have been singing this one to myself all day…
Why can’t you just get it through your head?
It’s over now.
Go away.
So far away.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LA7YYub-IUY

phoenixRising

Trump “Totally Exonerated”, Calls For Investigation Into “Illegal Takedown That Failed”
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-03-24/lawmakers-recieve-mueller-findings

Sylvia Avery

NEW YORK — Breaking news:
I enjoyed reading this piece, linked below:
“Donald J. Trump won the presidency, fair and square.
He does not occupy the Oval Office due to an elaborate plot involving the KGB, the Kremlin, Russian Federation President Vladimir Putin, or the ghosts of Ethel and Julius Rosenberg. Instead, he won the old-fashioned way: He followed the rules and out-foxed and out-worked Democratic Party nominee Hillary Clinton.
Hillary, in turn, appeared at only 63 rallies in the final 99 days of the 2016 general-election campaign (versus 132 for Trump), as Gateway Pundit’s Joe Hoft calculated. She addressed, on average, 1,734 people at each of these rallies (versus 7,297 for Trump). Hillary barely made it to Michigan and never managed to find Wisconsin on a map of the USA.
Trump triumphed. Hillary tanked. And the Democrats cannot blame Moscow for the fact that their queen wears no crown….
The lack of impending indictments strongly suggests that there was no Russian collusion, and this nearly three-year, three-ring circus was a holistic waste of time and money.
This decision did not emerge from a panel of Federalist Society attorneys nor legal experts at George Mason University’s Antonin Scalia School of Law. Rather, this is the considered judgment of Deep State denizen Robert Mueller and the most partisan, pro-Clinton, hardcore-Democrat gang of attorneys ever mustered in one place.
If there’s any cabal that would have left no stone unthrown to neutralize Donald J. Trump, this was it. And the best they could do about Russian collusion was to reach this conclusion:
Never mind!”
Full article here:
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/deroy-murdock-mueller-report-quashes-lefts-top-excuse-for-hillarys-2016-loss-trump-won-fair-and-square

RAC

comment image
No one
Believes your sh!t anymore
There’s no collusion
It’s a delusion

Wolf Moon | Threat to Demonocracy

Nadler. COMMUNIST.

pgroup

Over on reddit, he’s called Nadless.

drillerelite

So I keep hearing that Mueller has found that there was no Russian collusion in the 2016 election, they’re talking just between Trump and Russia right? I mean, was Mueller supposed to find out if [anybody] worked with Russia to influence the election [(Hillary)] or just if Trump’s team did?

sallyal

Just Trump and team. There are now widespread calls for an investigation of the genesis of the investigation.

SteveInCO · Thermonuclear MAGA

Just how widespread? If even “normies” are behind that push…then this will “force” such an investigation and maybe even HRC and BHO will get caught up in it.

sallyal

Well many people on the right, over at Fox anyway. We can hope the Barr will follow through.

rf121

I listened to Fox on the radio driving home today. Saying they were “on the right” would be a stretch for many of the guests. Which is why I rarely watch/listen any more. But when you’re driving through west Kansas….

sallyal

I rarely watch. Occasionally I listen in the car but mostly just read on the Fox site. And agree it is hard to call many (most?) of the anchors “on the right” many, many of the guests and contributors are or at least are neocons. Most of them along with many R senators and representatives are calling for a new investigation.

drillerelite

Well I had my hopes. It’s ok, I’m sure it’s all going to be exposed soon regardless

RAC

Good point, was he biased against PDJT or just incompetent in regards to missing out on the Hag.

RAC

Sorry moderator, spelled my email wrong on that last post.

RAC

It was a reply to drillerelite. Think this keyboard has had too much coffee spilled into it over time, tends to glue the keys lol.

RAC

Ha ha unbelievable !!! Just posted blaming my keyboard and it did it again. One more time and it’s heading for the bin.

Kalbo

My take is it was focused on Trump and his campaign. WITH language that allowed SC to pursue tangents they may uncover.
IF SC was honest, I believe SC would have pursued podesta, hildabeast, Comey, McCabe, Rosenstein, FISA fiasco…
Perhaps SC either ignored all of this or was stopped by RR, as DoJ/ Huber, someone is investigating podesta, hildabeast, Comey, McCabe, Rosenstein, FISA fiasco…
Hoping for the latter.
And, no, I don’t believe SC office was honest in any manner. Dishonest snakes, everyone of them!

drillerelite

Agreed!

andrew1979

on firstcblush i did not like the wkrding of “neither the presidemt or any other american” which i guess you could say EVERYONE in america was exonerated….
however my belief and everyone else knows this too – the crime was not with russia. it was u,kraine, britain, australia, new zealand, canada (also have a part in U1), and a bunch of other countries and bad actors in middle east, turkwy, etc. AND plenty of people and agencies in our own country – those are all the traitors.
russia was not involved except for rheir “normal” shenanigans.

phoenixRising

has a way with words, doesn’t she !

SteveInCO · Thermonuclear MAGA

Excessively diplomatic, by my standards.

Plain Jane

Hahaha. Mine also.

phoenixRising

Good meme… circulate it………………..comment image

Roberta

What a wonderful day!
I believe these are arguably the two most important sentences in AG Barr’s Sunday letter to Congress:
“…[DAG] Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed during the [SC]’s investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.Our determination was made without regard to, and is not based on, constitutional considerations that surround the indictment and criminal prosecution of a sitting president.”
https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/democrats.judiciary.house.gov/files/documents/AG%20March%2024%202019%20Letter%20to%20House%20and%20Senate%20Judiciary%20Committees.pdf

PeteC

The Left will now live in total “denial”! I will be organizing a new Twelve Step program for them—Collusion Anonymous.
Step One—“Admitted that I was powerless over Donald Trump, that my life had become unmanageable.”
Step Two—“Came to believe that a power greater than myself [Donald Trump] could restore me to sanity.”
Step Three—“Made a decision to turn my will and life over to the care of Donald Trump, as I understand him.”
Step Four—“Made a searching and fearless moral inventory of myself…and found I had none.”

Wolf Moon | Threat to Demonocracy

Br’er WOLF tips his hat to Br’er POSSUM, who SAVED Br’er LION by throwing himself into the BRIAR PATCH, where he found Br’er BALD EAGLE and Br’er BARRED OWL, who made Br’er MULE tell the truth about Br’er LION, who DID NOT HAVE SEX WITH BR’ER BEAR OR BR’ER PANDA BEAR.
THE END.
OH WAIT – DID SISTA MOON BAT HAVE SEX WITH THOSE BEARS???!!! 😮 😮 😮

Elizabeth Carter

Wolfmoon, I have been giggling about the Trump opposition wanting to take President Trump on in SDNY. SDNY is President Trump’s most familiar territory. I keep thinking about Br’er Rabbit begging Br’er Wolf not to throw him in the Briar Patch. President Trump can take down the whole SDNY in short order!!! LOL

Wolf Moon | Threat to Demonocracy

Yup. He cleaned out Washington DOJ.
“NEXT?”
I imagine a LOT of dirt on SDNY is about to come out.

Elizabeth Carter

More Popcorn

Jan Phillips

Elizabeth, that was great!!!

Jan Phillips

Wolfie, who is Br’er BALD EAGLE? Oh I just thought! Matthew Whitaker!! Got it! Hahaha!! And SISTA MOON BAT? There are so many. I haven’t figured that one out!

Jan Phillips

Let’s see. SISTA MOON BAT must be Hillary, right? Since she may have had dealings with Br’er BEAR and Br’er PANDA, but Br’er LION was EXONERATED!

Harry Lime

Prescriptions in Hollywood must be going through the roof…comment image

GA/FL

nikkichico7

Fire at will Sir … 🤨👍❤️🇺🇸❤️‼️‼️‼️
https://youtu.be/5NsGkVCWjtccomment image

nikkichico7

Must find better YouTube clip … the one posted cuts off the music with a commercial so so sorry …☹️ ..

Performed at the 911 Memorial ..

nikkichico7

… 🧐 … ❓ … 🙄😑🤚 … I have no idea how that happened … 🙁 … here 👇🏻 ..
https://www.dreamstime.com/stock-photo-bald-eagle-flying-american-flag-north-american-bald-eagle-flying-american-flag-patriotic-concept-image99155869

Jan Phillips

Beautiful, Nikki!!

rayzorbak

What did Will do?
Why “fire” at Will?
And WHO is Will?
🙂

nikkichico7

😂‼️ .. bwahahahahaha … I have no idea ..

TradeBait

I. Can’t. Stop. Laughing.
Thanks for posting the letter, Wolf. Going forward, anybody who takes anything that the MSM says seriously about anything has rocks for brains. It is no longer about guiding the gullible, uneducated or non-political. Just point out the truth consistently and move on because a lot of people prefer to live as slaves.

Wolf Moon | Threat to Demonocracy

Yup – the MSM has just shot its credibility in BOTH FEET!
(And you can thank DAUGHN for getting this up! Wolfie was away tending to the back 40 today! 😉 )

TradeBait

lol. Hope it was enjoyable. Being outside is good.
Thank you, DAUGHN!

nikkichico7

Thank you Daughn … God bless you sweetie … 🙂❤️‼️🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸❤️

Jan Phillips

Yes, Daughn! Thank you!!

Cuppa Covfefe

Nothing like freshly planted (finished) Honey-Do’s 🙂
(Spring has sprung,
The grass is riz,
Oh lookee here,
It’s another list 🙂 )…

Sylvia Avery

Good man, Wolf. Happy wife, happy life.

TheseTruths

The video compilations of the media are priceless.

GA/FL

BREAKING….

GA/FL

All four Trump advisers cleared!

pgroup

Flynn should be immediately pardoned. The prosecutor should be told that Manafort will be pardoned if he is not released on bail.
And the screaming idiots? F ’em.

Deplorable Patriot

Manafort’s convictions preceded the election efforts. However, I do think he will be pardoned.

Linda
sallyal

Awesome.

Sylvia Avery

I love Wyatt. Perfectly said!!! Hang on, kids!

Wolf Moon | Threat to Demonocracy

comment image

Harry Lime

So many sad and unhinged reactions to look forward to this week…it’s gonna be fabulous! And the memes…I can only imagine what our creative army of meme-makers will come up with in the weeks to come!comment image

Roberta

Someone, please, tell me there is no merit in a certain pundit’s assertion that Team Mueller “punted” the “decision” on obstruction because they were intentionally colluding with the impeachment agenda.
(I went over there just to see if there was a presser with POTUS…and intend to watch it elsewhere!)

phoenixRising

TheseTruths

I saw a clip of Alan Dershowitz with Shannon Bream. He was heavily criticizing Mueller for leaving that door partly open. He said it’s the same thing Comey did with the Hillary investigation. Prosecutors should either find evidence of a crime or not. They are not supposed to say there might be evidence and not make a decision about whether to refer for prosecution.

Roberta

yup…that is where I am at & why I asked if ANYONE here can lend credence to Mr Gloom & Doom….sigh

Sylvia Avery

Well, it is a theory.
I went OT to read the piece in question. I think he’s saying that Mueller left a little wiggle room in his findings for political purposes rather than nailing it down as he could have and should have.
I’m just not going to worry about it for now, anyway. The haters are gonna hate. I think PDJT has the whip hand and the wind at his back right now, so they can amuse themselves with their impeachment games but I don’t think they’ll be able to do much with it.
They might be better served in watching their backs.

Roberta

In the case of SD, I believe he is simply ignoring correct process (see phoenix’s link) because his confirmation bias is ironclad that he cannot see or think straight.

Sylvia Avery

You may be right on the money with that assessment.

Roberta

And bless you for having the intestinal fortitude to go there.

Wolf Moon | Threat to Demonocracy

Roberta – in *MY* opinion, Mueller, Rosenstein and Weissmann WERE colluding with the impeachment agenda, and fully intended to create bogus indictments of the Trump kids, in particular to try to “brazen out” the Veselnitskaya FRAMING of Donald Trump, Jr. This could have allowed Mueller to control the evidence of Russian involvement there, so that – as his DOWN SIDE, they could protect Loretta Lynch and others, and particularly all those in the Deep State / DNC who were colluding with Russia on Uranium One, etc. The UP SIDE would have been to build a “pre-impeachment narrative” up to the 2020 election, and then LEAVE THE QUESTION HANGING for the election.
I believe BARR came in and called BULLSHIT on the evidence against Don Jr., likely saying that the evidence looked equally good (actually greater, but assume he played his hand lightly) that somebody was SETTING UP Don Jr. Since Matt Whitaker had cut off the fishing expedition, that was all they had. Weissmann left DISCREDITED – his prize indictments on the cutting room floor. Mueller had to wrap up what they had – NOTHING. BUT – and this is key – no proof HERE that Mueller and Rosey would have done EXACTLY what we know they would have done, if Barr had not come in, and ROSENSTEIN would have rendered the verdict on proceeding with Weissmann’s bullshit indictments (which I’m SURE he would have).
The LAWFARE GANG is very careful to do as LITTLE which is OBVIOUSLY ILLEGAL as possible.
Thus, I believe that Mueller punted – not to the Dems, but to TRUMP. It was the only thing he could do.
NO “Don Junior suspicion leverage field goal” for Team Black Hat. Instead, they had to punt, and TRUMP now has the ball.

Roberta

Thank you for this alternative perspective. I trust you experience and analysis. And thus, because of Logic 101, I rest easy…no point in debating/conversing about something that can/will be solved once we have the evidence/facts. And for that we must wait. And perhaps never receive hard data…

andrew1979

roberta – my opinion is also tnat the fact is tjis was a co,plete sham from the beginning. part of the problem with the thojght pattern of a lot of people including sd is they appear to still be existing in the world thaf thwy thought they were living in. and all these counter moves and strategies.
truth is, that world is all fake. the whole wor.d we live in has been set up to be nothing more than an obfuscation operation for the global evil to keep us dumb and under their thumb.
now that time is over for people to be living in the fantasy. the paradigm is now shifted and truth must ne the prder of the day. leverage now is nothing more than simply more rocks to throw. it is time for them to step forward with “it all” and expose every last detail to the world – not just us – the entire world. the jig is up and there will be no more pretense of “normalcy” because that in fact a contrived state.
if we go back to their game it is not a win. we must expose it all and close ot down and peoples feelings be damned.

ladypenquin

The Left will go to their graves with lies spewing from their mouths – look at John McCain. Our side shouldn’t give in to the chatter.
POTUS has moved onto the next phase in his plan – note that he has remarked on the “investigators should be investigated” – he’s talking about Obama’s DOJ/FBI. Bet this has already been going on – all those documents, all those threads to pull…
And I believe when those threads have been pulled, they’re going to unravel back years, long before 2015-2016. Ultimately, it will be a matter of what can be revealed without shaking the foundation of the country. I think POTUS does care about an internal implosion, though he also knows if it’s not fixed this can happen again. In fact, there would never be another non-Democrat elected to the presidency.

Deplorable Patriot

I agree, LP. This is STEP ONE of the Obama people’s takedown. This is not the war, this is one battle, and the time is right to make the move, meaning the Trump people cleaned out the roadblocks. The next goal is the FISA court, both to prove the Obama people used it illegally, and that the whole set up is constitutionally just wrong. The FISA court was a cabal installed safeguard. It’s one of the many that needs to be exposed and removed for the future.
No victory laps here, just entertainment.

GA/FL

Talking points received: “Barr was handpicked

TheseTruths

Isn’t anyone a president appoints “handpicked”? He has to pick them to appoint them.

michaelh

Whoa – LOGIC! Be careful where you point that thing, might hurt someone

Chimpy

I thought it was usually random.

SteveInCO · Thermonuclear MAGA

Ouija board.

Sylvia Avery

Oh daughn, I’ve been ebullient. I’m getting a little tired. Not tired of winning, no no never that but I may have to quiet down with a nice cup of tea and put my feet up.

A Fortiori

Not yet. But we have stood our ground and studied our opponent. We have weathered the best attack they could muster. We have planned and we have prepared. And now that they are spent, we know they cannot win. We will savor this moment briefly. Then, we will cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war. THAT will be fun.

Sylvia Avery

Yes. Exactly so.

Marica

Jordan, Devin and Gaetz getting in on the fun?!!!

Marica
Marica

This tweet From Corey Lynn–was real shenanigans–I like and twitter said “no longer existed” I liked and twitter unliked it like 5 times! I copied to clipboard and brought it here– Should be a treasure trove for us all!

michaelh
phoenixRising
phoenixRising
michaelh

Sorry I’m late. I had to get enough popcorn for everybody.comment image

phoenixRising

thanks Michael,
I was worried we would run out… oohhh, it’s buttered ! yummy……..

trackback

[…] wolfmoon1776March 24, 2019 at 19:47 EBr’er WOLF tips his hat to Br’er POSSUM, who SAVED Br’er LION by throwing himself into the BRIAR PATCH, where he found Br’er BALD EAGLE and Br’er BARRED OWL, who made Br’er MULE tell the truth about Br’er LION, who DID NOT HAVE SEX WITH BR’ER BEAR OR BR’ER PANDA BEAR.THE END.OH WAIT – DID SISTA MOON BAT HAVE SEX WITH THOSE BEARS???!!!   Liked by 15 peopleReply […]

Gail Combs

One problem the Democrats are going to run into is the protection of privacy BY the CONSTITUTION and BYLAW!
This is essentially a law AGAINST the use of LAWFARE where a person’s life can be ruined by bringing about a bogus ‘investigation’ and leaking it to the press thereby ‘CONVICTING via the MEDIA’ even though there has been no wrong doing.
Remember that AG Sessions would not even tell Congress whether or not an investigation was being conducted because to do so would violate DOJ regulations based on the Privacy Act.
From my notes:
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION et al. v . NELSON et al.
certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit

….In two cases decided over 30 years ago, this Court referred broadly to a constitutional privacy “interest in avoiding disclosure of personal matters.” Whalen v. Roe , 429 U. S. 589 ; Nixo n v. Administrator of General Services , 433 U. S. 425 . In Whalen, the Court upheld a New York law permitting the collection of names and addresses of persons prescribed dangerous drugs, finding that the statute’s “security provisions,” which protected against “public disclosure” of patient information, 462 U. S., at 600–601, were sufficient to protect a privacy interest…..
…… In addition to being reasonable in light of the Government interests at stake, SF–85 and Form 42 are also subject to substantial protections against disclosure to the public. Whalen and Nixon recognized that a “statutory or regulatory duty to avoid unwarranted disclosures” generally allays privacy concerns created by government “accumulation” of “personal information” for “public purposes.” Whalen , supra, at 605. Respondents attack only the Government’s collection of information, and here, as in Whalen and Nixon , the information collected is shielded by statute from unwarranted disclosure. The Privacy Act—which allows the Government to maintain only those records “relevant and necessary to accomplish” a purpose authorized by law, 5 U. S. C. §552a(e)(1); requires written consent before the Government may disclose an individual’s records, §552a(b); and imposes criminal liability for willful violations of its nondisclosure obligations, §552a(i)(1)—“evidence[s] a proper concern” for individual privacy. Whalen , supra , at 605; Nixon , supra , at 458–459. Respondents’ claim that the statutory exceptions to the Privacy Act’s disclosure bar, see §§552a(b)(1)–(12), leave its protections too porous to supply a meaningful check against unwarranted disclosures. But that argument rests on an incorrect reading of Whalen, Nixon, and the Privacy Act. Pp. 19–23.

28 CFR 600.9(b) – Notification and reports by the Attorney General

The notification requirement in paragraph (a)(1) of this section may be tolled by the Attorney General upon a finding that legitimate investigative or privacy concerns require confidentiality. At such time as confidentiality is no longer needed, the notification will be provided….

Cliff Notes for the Process of Criminal Justice
https://twitter.com/jerome_corsi/status/986676401385459712https://www.cliffsnotes.com/study-guides/criminal-justice/the-criminal-justice-system/the-process-of-criminal-justice
….

§ 600.9 Notification and reports by the Attorney General.
(a) The Attorney General will notify the Chairman and Ranking Minority Member of the Judiciary Committees of each House of Congress, with an explanation for each action
(1) Upon appointing a Special Counsel;
(2) Upon removing any Special Counsel; and
(3) Upon conclusion of the Special Counsels investigation, including, to the extent consistent with applicable law, a description and explanation of instances (if any) in which the Attorney General concluded that a proposed action by a Special Counsel was so inappropriate or unwarranted under established Departmental practices that it should not be pursued.
(b) The notification requirement in paragraph (a)(1) of this section may be tolled by the Attorney General upon a finding that legitimate investigative or privacy concerns require confidentiality. At such time as confidentiality is no longer needed, the notification will be provided.
(c) The Attorney General may determine that public release of these reports would be in the public interest, to the extent that release would comply with applicable legal restrictions. All other releases of information by any Department of Justice employee, including the Special Counsel and staff, concerning matters handled by Special Counsels shall be governed by the generally applicable Departmental guidelines concerning public comment with respect to any criminal investigation, and relevant law.
28 CFR Part 600 – GENERAL POWERS OF SPECIAL COUNSEL
§ 600.4 Jurisdiction.
(a)Original jurisdiction. The jurisdiction of a Special Counsel shall be established by the Attorney General. The Special Counsel will be provided with a specific factual statement of the matter to be investigated. The jurisdiction of a Special Counsel shall also include the authority to investigate and prosecute federal crimes committed in the course of, and with intent to interfere with, the Special Counsel’s investigation, such as perjury, obstruction of justice, destruction of evidence, and intimidation of witnesses; and to conduct appeals arising out of the matter being investigated and/or prosecuted.
(b)Additional jurisdiction. If in the course of his or her investigation the Special Counsel concludes that additional jurisdiction beyond that specified in his or her original jurisdiction is necessary in order to fully investigate and resolve the matters assigned, or to investigate new matters that come to light in the course of his or her investigation, he or she shall consult with the Attorney General, who will determine whether to include the additional matters within the Special Counsel’s jurisdiction or assign them elsewhere.
(c)Civil and administrative jurisdiction. If in the course of his or her investigation the Special Counsel determines that administrative remedies, civil sanctions or other governmental action outside the criminal justice system might be appropriate, he or she shall consult with the Attorney General with respect to the appropriate component to take any necessary action. A Special Counsel shall not have civil or administrative authority unless specifically granted such jurisdiction by the Attorney General.

Gail Combs

Executive Privilege, the Candid Interchange [Doctrine] and the Public Good – Miller Center

[…]During the presidency of Dwight D. Eisenhower, executive privilege underwent three major developments.[…]
The second development in the use of executive privilege became known as the candid interchange doctrine. In an attempt to shield the executive branch from the bullying investigative tactics of Senator joseph r. mccarthy, President Eisenhower directed that executive privilege be applied to all communications and conversations between executive branch employees; without the assurance of confidentiality, he claimed, they could not be completely candid. This doctrine marked a tremendous change in the scope of executive privilege, extending it from the president and the president’s top advisers to the myriad offices and agencies that make up the executive branch.[…]”
[…]Eisenhower wrote:

“Because it is essential to efficient and effective administration that employees of the Executive Branch be in a position to be completely candid in advising each other on official matters, and because it is not in the public interest that any of their conversations or communications, or any documents or reproductions, concerning such advice be disclosed.”

Kitrosser identifies this “candor rationale” as a new justification for executive privilege. The candor rationale means “it is basically up to the president to say, ‘Well, you can’t get that information because it would inhibit people from speaking candidly.’” For the first time, the candid interchange doctrine was expounded as a core principle behind executive privilege. Eisenhower took a stand, in Rozell’s words, upon “the notion that the president has the right to candid internal deliberations and that private advisers should not have to fear public disclosure of every utterance.” Eisenhower was the first to justify executive privilege primarily upon the candid interchange doctrine, and made the boldest statement tying the doctrine to the public interest.[…]pg 11
Page 15 — The Institutionalization of the Candor Rationale
Page 27-28 — The Supreme Court limited executive privilege but gave the highest judicial sanction to the presumptive confidentiality, the candid interchange doctrine was called “fundamental to the operation of Government.”[…]
An internal memorandum in the Ford White House explained that the “present mood” would necessitate a shift away from “traditional practice.”95 In October 1974, after pardoning his predecessor, President Ford became the first and only sitting president to testify before a congressional inquiry, which was investigating the pardon. However, the shift really never took place and despite its newfound unpopularity, executive privilege has persisted in practice. […]
Did the decision in United States v. Nixon finally solve the fundamental dilemma of balancing the secrecy that is necessary for good government with the political accountability necessary for democracy?
The simple answer is no – argument over the scope of executive privilege continues. But the basic position taken by Eisenhower in 1954, claiming presumptive confidentiality for deliberations within the executive, has been accepted as American law. The current debate about executive privilege centers on how far presumptive confidentiality ought to extend. But the major issues were created and resolved in those first twenty years of modern executive privilege.

>
>>>>>>>>
FISA COURT and FBI

Rule 13. Correction of Misstatement or Omission; Disclosure of Non-Compliance.
(a) Correction ofMaterial Facts. Ifthe government discovers that a submission to the Court contained a misstatement or omission of material fact, the government, in writing, must immediately inform the Judge to whom the submission was made of:
(1) the misstatement or omission;
(2) any necessary correction;
(3) the facts and circumstances relevant to the misstatement or omission;
(4) any modifications the government has made or proposes to make in how it will implement any authority or approval granted by the Court; and
(5) how the government proposes to dispose of or treat any information obtained as a result of the misstatement or omission.
(b) Disclosure ofNon-Compliance. If the government discovers that any authority or approval granted by the Court has been implemented in a manner that did not comply with the Court’s authorization or approval or with applicable law, the government, in writing, must immediately inform the Judge to whom the submission was made of:
(1) the non-compliance;
(2) the facts and circumstances relevant to the non-compliance;
(3) any modifications the government has made or proposes to make in how it will implement any authority or approval granted by the Court; and
(4) how the government proposes to dispose of or treat any information obtained as a result ofthe non-compliance.
http://www.fisc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/FISC%20Rules%20of%20Procedure.pdf

Gail Combs

Here are some other laws of interest…
18 U.S. Code § 2383 – Rebellion or insurrection
Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
>>>>>>>
President Trump is CLEARLY within his rights as president to use the National Guard as he sees fit. Remember in December 2017 he declared a state of emergency for human trafficking and human rights abuse.
Understanding the Posse Comitatus Act and the Insurrection Act
State Defense Force Publication Center,19819

Title 10 Duty
The War Powers Clause of the Constitution grants the federal government plenary authority to raise military forces and to employ such forces, including mobilized (sometimes referred to as “federalized”) National Guard units, under federal control and at federal expense for national defense purposes.
….When in state active duty or Title 32 status, National Guard forces remain under the operational, tactical and administrative control of the Governor and the state government. This authority is reposed in the Governor, as commander in chief, and executed by the Adjutant General, as the state’s senior military commander.
By contrast, Title 10 military forces (active duty, reserve and “federalized” National Guard forces) are under the exclusive control of the President and the federal government and are beyond the access, control or supervision of the Governor even when operating within his or her state.
Each of these operational statuses carries significant operational, fiscal, force management and legal advantages or disadvantages that call for conscious decisions about how the National Guard should be employed domestically….
Sections 332 and 333 make it clear that it is up to the President to determine when and where to use federal troops to enforce the laws.…”

USSC Ruled in 1990 that the 1989 ruling by a Federal appeals court, which upheld a four-year-old Federal law known as the Montgomery Amendment. That law removed the governors’ longstanding power under Federal law to withhold their consent for orders summoning National Guard units to active duty in the absence of a national emergency.
“Honduras”. Trafficking in Persons Report 2008. U.S. Department of State (June 4, 2008).

Honduras is principally a source and transit country for women, girls, and boys trafficked for sexual exploitation…
Honduran women and children are trafficked to Guatemala, El Salvador, Mexico, and the United States for sexual exploitation. Most foreign victims of commercial sexual exploitation in Honduras are from neighboring countries; some are economic migrants en route to the United States who are victimized by traffickers. Internal child labor and forced child labor for violent criminal gangs are serious concerns.

>>>>>>>>>
Remember the activists and journalists currently under surviellance that are coaching illegals on how to CIRCUMVENT US IMMIGRATION LAWS???
8 US Code 1324:

(a) Criminal penalties
(1)
(A) Any person who—
(i) knowing that a person is an alien, brings to or attempts to bring to the United States in any manner whatsoever such person at a place other than a designated port of entry or place other than as designated by the Commissioner, regardless of whether such alien has received prior official authorization to come to, enter, or reside in the United States and regardless of any future official action which may be taken with respect to such alien;
(ii) knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, transports, or moves or attempts to transport or move such alien within the United States by means of transportation or otherwise, in furtherance of such violation of law;
(iii) knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, conceals, harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, such alien in any place, including any building or any means of transportation;
(iv) encourages or induces an alien to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such coming to, entry, or residence is or will be in violation of law; or
(v)
(I) engages in any conspiracy to commit any of the preceding acts, or
(II) aids or abets the commission of any of the preceding acts,
shall be punished as provided in subparagraph (B).
(B) A person who violates subparagraph (A) shall, for each alien in respect to whom such a violation occurs—
(i) in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(i) or (v)(I) or in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(ii), (iii), or (iv) in which the offense was done for the purpose of commercial advantage or private financial gain, be fined under title 18, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both;
(ii) in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(ii), (iii), (iv), or (v)(II), be fined under title 18, imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both;
(iii) in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(i), (ii), (iii), (iv), or (v) during and in relation to which the person causes serious bodily injury (as defined in section 1365 of title 18) to, or places in jeopardy the life of, any person, be fined under title 18, imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both; and
(iv) in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(i), (ii), (iii), (iv), or (v) resulting in the death of any person, be punished by death or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, fined under title 18, or both.

Albert Cox

Reblogged this on ALBERT COX.