Tag: Dr David Martin

Saved From The Frankenvax

How a Psycho Vaccine Marrying the Infamous COVID Spike Protein to HIV’s Neurotoxic gp41 Was [Allegedly] Canned by a Mere Testing SNAFU

How Australia Dodged The First Mad Vax Bullet of the WEF Scamdemic / Plannedemic

How Science Monetization and Corruption Has Broken All Vaccine Safety Mechanisms and Made Sneaky Liars Out of Scientists

Mood Music

Intro – Prepare To Be Shocked

This is one of the craziest stories your either never heard, or barely heard. I am certain of the following. Nobody ever spelled out to you how NUTS this failed vaccine really was. This absolutely bonkers vaccine, that was almost used on all Australians.

AND MAY STILL BE.

The fact that nobody even followed this story, shows that the captured corporate media is absolutely not doing its job. Either THAT, or their job is to help deceive us.

And you know where my money is on that.

Surely, in the past, both journalists and scientists might have said something to the effect of “Hey – marrying a cardiovascular pathogenic bat virus spike protein and a neurotoxic AIDS protein in a vaccine to prevent a cold seems a little weird.”

BUT NO. NOT NOW.

And yet, some of us, few as we might be, might still have some questions.

We assume – ASSUME – as in ASS / U / ME – that all people in all of science are acting in all of our best interests all the time.

I have been completely broken of this spell, and I can tell you – what I can see now is not pretty.

I need to prepare you for what I’m about to tell you.

State of Corruption of Vaccine Science

First, a fantastic interview of Dr. Robert Malone by Tucker Carlson. It’s very folksy and long – a bit over an hour – but it will absolutely cure you of any idea that science in 2022 has not been almost totally corrupted by money, power, and SECRET AGENDAS.

This guy Malone is as close to a Moderna insider / honest outsider as you’re gonna get, and he clearly sees the dirty play from the Moderna point of view.

Hat tips to FG&C and GA/FL for keeping this video in play. Gail has been pumping this video, too. EVERYBODY need to watch this.

LINK: https://rumble.com/vuo2uu-dr.-robert-malone-on-tucker-carlson-today-feb-10-2022.html

In fact, I suspect that there is some relationship between this interview dropping that the following “factoid”.

Indeed, let’s just save that tweet as an image, in case Twitter decides Jack is becoming too much of a liability.

One of the biggest BOOMS dropped in the video, IMO, is the fact that Robert Malone WARNED the FDA about the toxicity of the spike protein, and they SHRUGGED IT OFF.

Yes. Malone gave them documentation, as asked, and they came back to him and said everything was OK. And THAT is when he started to think something was very wrong.

We’re about to do it AGAIN – only I’m not the first – I’m just rediscovering an obvious “why the heck are they doing THAT” point.

But we’ll get to that in a minute. We need to broaden our list of corrupt suspects.

You see, corporate “science” isn’t the only bad actor here. What about governments that conspire with the corporations to “mandate” their products for a mutual PAYOFF?

It turns out that both Justin Trudeau and the Canadian government have a very large incentive in mandating the broken, dubious, and just plain BAD Moderna and Pfizer “vaccines”.

LINK: https://rumble.com/vupkuv-breaking-criminal-canadian-monopoly-dr.-david-martin-exposes-why-trudeau-wo.html

When you realize that Justin Trudeau is not only following his mandate madness for WEFfian ideological reasons, and for Papa Fidel power, but also for CASTRO CASH, you understand what’s REALLY going on.

SO – now that you realize THESE PEOPLE care more about other things, than they care about us, the following will make more sense.

The Frankenvax That Almost Was

So just today, FG&C posted THIS TWEET which made me go WTF…..

Basically, an Australian COVID vaccine that falsely triggers AIDS / HIV tests was recalled. The vaccine was NOT sent out for use by the public, because it gave people positive AIDS tests.

GREAT, but…..

  • WHY did the vaccine do this? And by the way….
  • Didn’t this happen BEFORE – like over a year ago?
  • I could have SWORN this happened before.
  • Is this OLD NEWS or a DIFFERENT VACCINE?
  • Or did they bring the SAME vaccine BACK?
  • Or even worse….. AND logic…..

You see, I remember something just like this bit of news, over a year ago. It was some vaccine from an Australian university that accidentally triggered AIDS tests.

Well, when I looked closer at this, it turned out to be THE SAME NEWS. Meaning that this recent tweet was just OLD NEWS.

HOWEVER – I happen to know a lot more now, a year later, so I dug DEEPER and FOUND MORE.

And now I want to explain to you, exactly what is going on.

Because this monster AIN’T DEAD.

VolksWackcine 451

Let’s begin by looking at the actual announcement that all this news came from. The paragraph in BOLD is the critical one. If you’re going to TL;DR past all the rest, read THAT paragraph.

Update on The University of Queensland COVID-19 vaccine

11 Dec 2020

Friday, 11th December, 2020: The University of Queensland (UQ) and CSL today announce that the Phase 1 trial of the UQ-CSL v451 COVID-19 vaccine has shown that it elicits a robust response towards the virus and has a strong safety profile. There were no serious adverse events or safety concerns reported in the 216 trial participants. However, following consultation with the Australian Government, CSL will not progress the vaccine candidate to Phase 2/3 clinical trials.

The University of Queensland commenced a Phase 1 trial of their COVID-19 vaccine candidate – v451 – in July 2020, to assess safety and immunogenicity in healthy volunteers. CSL was working towards taking responsibility for the Phase 2/3 clinical trial and large-scale manufacture of the vaccine, upon completion of successful trials.

The Phase 1 data also showed the generation of antibodies directed towards fragments of a protein (gp41), which is a component used to stabilise the vaccine. Trial participants were fully informed of the possibility of a partial immune response to this component, but it was unexpected that the levels induced would interfere with certain HIV tests.

There is no possibility the vaccine causes infection, and routine follow up tests confirmed there is no HIV virus present.

With advice from experts, CSL and UQ have worked through the implications that this issue presents to rolling out the vaccine into broad populations. It is generally agreed that significant changes would need to be made to well-established HIV testing procedures in the healthcare setting to accommodate rollout of this vaccine. Therefore, CSL and the Australian Government have agreed vaccine development will not proceed to Phase 2/3 trials.

The Phase 1 trial will continue, where further analysis of the data will show how long the antibodies persist, with studies so far showing that levels are already falling. The University of Queensland plans to submit the full data for peer review publication.

UQ Vice-Chancellor, Professor Deborah Terry, said while the outcome was disappointing, she was immensely proud of the UQ team who had shouldered a heavy burden of responsibility while the world watched on. “I also want to thank our many partners, our donors – including the Federal and Queensland Government – and of course the 216 Queenslanders who so willingly volunteered for the Phase 1 trials.”

UQ vaccine co-lead, Professor Paul Young, said that although it was possible to re-engineer the vaccine, the team did not have the luxury of time needed. “Doing so would set back development by another 12 or so months, and while this is a tough decision to take, the urgent need for a vaccine has to be everyone’s priority.”

“I said at the start of vaccine development that there were no guarantees, but what is really encouraging is that the core technology approach we used has passed the major clinical test. It is a safe and well-tolerated vaccine, producing the strong virus-neutralising effect that we were hoping to see.

So we will continue to push forward and we are confident that with further work the Molecular Clamp technology will be a robust platform for future vaccine development here in Australia and to meet future biosecurity needs.

Dr Andrew Nash, Chief Scientific Officer for CSL said “This outcome highlights the risk of failure associated with early vaccine development, and the rigorous assessment involved in making decisions as to what discoveries advance.”

“This project has only been made possible by the innovative science developed by world-class scientists at The University of Queensland and the strong collaboration between our organisations, and many others, over the last 10 months. CSL and Seqirus are committed to continuing our work to protect the Australian population against COVID-19. Manufacture of approximately 30 million doses of the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine candidate is underway, with first doses planned for release to Australia early next year. In addition, CSL has agreed at the request of the Australian Government to manufacture an additional 20 million doses.”

UQ and CSL acknowledge the support of the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) in partnering to enable the rapid development of the vaccine candidate through clinical trials.

– ENDS –

LINK: https://www.csl.com/news/2020/20201211-update-on-the-university-of-queensland-covid-19-vaccine

WOLF AGAIN.

So what they’re saying is that this vaccine – which uses the HIV protein gp41 – sets off HIV tests. And THAT made the test unacceptable to move forward. The remaining phase II and phase III trials were cancelled, while the phase I trials continued to finish collecting data.

And WHILE they say that the phase I testing showed that the vaccine was safe and effective, if you look more closely, they only tested it on 216 people.

We KNOW from the Moderna and Pfizer tests, that even after HUGE phase II and phase III trials, using thousands or tens of thousands of participants, there are serious side effects that are STILL not discovered until actual roll-out to the public, when millions receive the shot.

And that does NOT include long-term effects. We know NOW that this determination can be critical in many cases.

And one more point for the record. As you can see by the statement at the end of the press release, this vaccine was supported by the Bill Gates organization CEPI.

Yeah, that CEPI, and THAT Bill Gates.

Like I say, CEPI is how Gates gets TWO VOTES, and GAVI is how he gets THREE.

So the bottom line – this vaccine was killed because it set off AIDS tests.

But let’s dig a little deeper into that.

So What’s With HIV and the COVID Vaccines?

When I first heard about this particular Australian vaccine (UQ-CSL v451, or v451 hereafter) triggering HIV tests, my immediate thought was that this might be proof that the Indian researchers were CORRECT – that the spike protein really contained those four inserts from HIV, and that THIS was setting off tests for HIV.

Later, I heard that – no – there was actually some segment of HIV protein being used in the v451 vaccine INTENTIONALLY. Thus, the whole problem seemed stupid, the use of the HIV protein seemed short-sighted, and I promptly forgot about it. No smoking gun – just a stink bomb.

However, a year’s time changed all that.

Think how different the perspective is now.

  • virus almost certainly came out of a biowarfare lab in China with PLA/NIH ties
  • Fauci, Dazsak and minions now known to have LIED about origins
  • Fauci gang also lied when pooh-poohing the Indian HIV insert hypothesis
  • mRNA vaccines seem to be producing immune deficiency, a.k.a. “VAIDS”
  • there are working hypotheses now which explain immune deficiency
  • Fauci’s history with HIV mirrors current history with COVID – lies and hidden agenda
  • Fauci seems to be obsessed with immunodeficiency and vaccines
  • Fauci promoted bad killer drugs as treatments in both cases (AZT, remdesivir)
  • Fauci seems to have an agenda clearly counter to truth as we know it, and is likely serving something beyond the increasing “fake” science which the public believes is operant in the world, but which is very likely a “reduced set” intended to deceive us

Thus, with all that WEIRD background, it NOW seems a bit “par for the course” that somebody in that world would want to bring HIV into the COVID equation.

But is that a good idea?

Now – before I go talking about why this might be a BAD idea, I want to give you plenty of references as to why they SAY it was a good idea.

Let’s start with a good explanation of why the false positives occurred. This article includes a lot of information on the v451 vaccine itself.

LINK: https://theconversation.com/how-did-the-university-of-queensland-csl-vaccine-fail-due-to-false-positive-hiv-tests-a-vaccine-expert-explains-151911

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/duxjK

The article mentions, without too much detail, that the HIV protein is part of a “molecular clamp” – a trimeric molecular “holder” of spike protein molecules. This holder allows three molecules of any attached spike-type protein to stay locked into a rigid, parallel conformation, which will remain in the desirable pre-fusion (with a cell) configuration, and not change into the useless post-fusion configuration.

The article also links to a scientific paper on the technology:

LINK: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC7672035/

Front Immunol. 2020; 11: 592370. Published online 2020 Nov 4. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.592370 PMCID: PMC7672035 PMID: 33250897

Rapid Response Subunit Vaccine Design in the Absence of Structural Information

Danushka K. Wijesundara, 1 , 2 Michael S. Avumegah, 1 , 2 Julia Lackenby, 1 , 2 Naphak Modhiran, 1 , 3 Ariel Isaacs, 1 Paul R. Young, 1 , 2 , 3 Daniel Watterson, 1 , 2 , 3 , * and Keith J. Chappell 1 , 2 , 3 , *

ABSTRACT

Prior to 2020, the threat of a novel viral pandemic was omnipresent but largely ignored. Just 12 months prior to the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic our team received funding from the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) to establish and validate a rapid response pipeline for subunit vaccine development based on our proprietary Molecular Clamp platform. Throughout the course of 2019 we conducted two mock tests of our system for rapid antigen production against two potential, emerging viral pathogens, Achimota paramyxovirus and Wenzhou mammarenavirus. For each virus we expressed a small panel of recombinant variants of the membrane fusion protein and screened for expression level, product homogeneity, and the presence of the expected trimeric pre-fusion conformation. Lessons learned from this exercise paved the way for our response to COVID-19, for which our candidate antigen is currently in phase I clinical trial.

Here is part of a really good graphic from the paper.

You can see how it’s possible to produce a spike protein with the “molecular clamp” attached, and then simply let this recombinant construction TRIMERIZE (form a triple, side to side) around the three molecular clamps, and thereby stabilize the three spike protein molecules next to each other.

This is a bit like a “motif” within an actual virus, where spike proteins, sticking out next to each other, protect each other’s sides. THAT is the basic idea of this thing.

Remember how Novavax assembles a bunch of spikes via modified ass ends into a kind of antigenic cloved apple, to create a kind of fake virus? Same very basic principle.

Indeed, the molecular clamp is even a bit like TWO motifs, since gp41 serves a somewhat similar purpose in the HIV virus, being the root of a stalk to an attack mechanism.

HIV-1 fusion process. It involves both subunits of the envelope spike complex. Notably, gp41 is shown in green with its transmembrane region buried in the virion membrane, both segments of heptad repeats (CHR closer to the virus and NHR closer to the host cell) before and after conformational changes, and the N-terminal end of the ectodomain in gray. In the last two panels pointed out by the red arrows, gp41 is observed following penetration of the host cell and following a conformational change resulting in the six-helix bundle which brings the viral and cell membranes into close proximity.

So – in a very real sense – this whole “vaccine” thingie is a literal marriage of HIV and coronavirus – the simplest possible one.

And they didn’t tell you ANY of this shit – did they?

So all of that WORKS, but the problem is that antibodies don’t just form to the attached spike protein – they ALSO form to the “molecular clamp”, meaning to the gp41 protein.

And what does that mean?

An AIDS Vaccine in Disguise?

The people who made the v451 vaccine say they didn’t expect there to be so much antibody response to the gp41 parts of the vaccine, thus triggering HIV tests.

You know what?

I don’t believe them.

I think they were gaslighting us all along.

Part of this is due to the fact that I’ve seen gp41 named numerous times as a potential basis for subunit vaccines against HIV. In fact, in one reference, I saw it named as THE BEST HOPE for an AIDS vaccine.

They didn’t mention that? LOL. OH, REALLY.

So WHY would anybody be using gp41 as part of an antigen, and not expect it to generate antibodies?

In fact, one might almost look at this v451 vaccine and regard it as an HIV vaccine, with spike proteins tacked onto gp41 as a kind of “nasty adjuvant” to initiate the immune response to the HIV protein.

Seriously – which is the real target here – COVID or HIV? Or BOTH?

This looks to me like a perfect example of…..

WAIT FOR IT….

“REVERSO”.

But let’s just set that aside for now, and pretend that the thing which COULD be a vaccine for EITHER ONE of the two things they stuck in it, is REALLY a vaccine for the fakey-fake cold that we don’t need a vaccine for, and NOT a vaccine for the sexual disease that stands in the way of Luciferian scum creating their polyamorous sexual paradise of literal epic random phuckery.

OMG, these people have just lied, and lied, and lied again. And they will KEEP lying.

But we’ll pretend they’re not lying, for just a little while longer.

So if we have an actual COVID vaccine here…..

…..is it a good idea to include the HIV gp41 protein subunit?

Well, after what we’ve seen with the spike protein, I was thinking maybe it wouldn’t be.

And it turns out, I wasn’t the first person who thought of this.

Doorless Carp’s Suspicious Cat In A Box

When I went looking for the toxicity of the gp41 protein, one of the first things that came up was some guy or gal who appears to have been actively suppressed on Twitter, eventually banned to Gab, and whose substack article on the topic has only two likes – ONE OF THEM MINE.

Doesn’t mean the article’s not important. And I think it’s about to get a few more hits.

LINK: https://doorlesscarp953.substack.com/p/update-on-the-university-of-queensland

Update on The University of Queensland COVID-19 vaccine. “..trial did not give trial participants HIV”, just a neurotoxic glycoprotein

11 Dec 2020

DoorlessCarp Feb 11

This is a wonderful article that is simply SKEPTICAL of the entire “it was pulled because of triggering AIDS tests” reasoning.

DoorlessCarp read the same press release I cited above, and pokes and prods it from the point of view of somebody who knows a heck of a lot about HIV and AIDS, and doesn’t buy what (s)he’s reading in that press release. Something doesn’t sniff right to “them”, and “they” spell out the issues.

I will attempt to summarize DoorlessCarp’s concerns (noted as “DLC” hereafter).

First, DLC admits to actually being led to the problem by one of those Fake News “straw man fact checks”, which attempt to either “debunk” facts or mislead scandals by setting up an adjacent strawman and knocking it down. OBSERVE.

“Fact check: An Australian vaccine trial did not give trial participants HIV”

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-hiv-idUSKBN28R2WT

LOL. No. The truth they’re protecting is that the “COVID vaccine” gave them HIV antibodies, and it was very likely the whole point.

To quote DLC about the Aussie vaccine researchers: “I wouldn’t let these clowns dispense aspirin, let alone design fast tracked vaccines.“

DLC then makes this statement, noting that there is a curious skew between the reality of HIV testing and the idea that there is some kind of a problem here.

Interesting rapid response to the effect that antibody only HIV tests have long since been debunked as a diagnostic tool on their own due to cross reactivity from other antibodies. They don’t tell you anything useful.

DLC then quotes extensively from this letter which explains why HIV testing via antibodies is actually a rather horrible mishmash of false positives and negatives, ultimately requiring a clinical diagnosis and “validation by lifestyle facts”.

Which leads to the next section, which I quote:

So what was the real reason for pulling the Australian trial, was it the gp41 toxicity?

The antibody problem raises more questions than it answers as spike S2 has homology to P24, GP41 and GP120.

This is dark stuff, P24 has been ported straight across from HIVs capsid to the spike protein. Here’s the proof, at least as far as what specific antibodies are telling us, which don’t lie:

What is p24 antigen?

“One distinctive HIV antigen is a viral protein called p24, a structural protein that makes up most of the HIV viral core, or ‘capsid’. High levels of p24 are present in the blood serum of newly infected individuals during the short period between infection and seroconversion, making p24 antigen assays useful in diagnosing primary HIV infection.”

https://www.aidsmap.com/about-hiv/faq/what-p24-antigen

This section makes the following points:

  • suspects the real reason for pulling the vaccine was the toxicity of gp41
  • notes that the spike protein already has potentially dangerous homologies to three HIV proteins, p24, gp41 and gp120
  • p24 is basically the nucleocapsid protein of HIV
  • p24 tends to be detected early in the AIDS process, before antibodies to it form

DLC then cites several papers demonstrating that there is already a lot of understanding of antibody cross-talk between the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and either (1) original SARS-CoV proteins, and (2) HIV-1 proteins.

In the latter case, there is specific interaction with gp41.

References given:

The SARS CoV-2 spike directed non-neutralizing polyclonal antibodies cross-react with Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) gp41 (Dec. 2021)

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1567576921008237?via%3Dihub

Cros-reactivity of SARS-CoV-2 with HIV chemiluminescent assay leading to false-positive results (2020)

https://jcp.bmj.com/content/74/9/614#request-permissions

DLC then lays the hammer down on the fact that gp41 is responsible for the dementia of AIDS.

I’m including the whole thing here.

Pathology:

Accumulation of β-Amyloid Precursor Protein in Axons Correlates with CNS Expression of SIV gp41 (2002)

“In this study, a strong association (p = 0.005) was identified between elevated axonal β-APP levels and the amount of SIV gp41 present in white matter, implicating HIV/SIV gp41 as a mediator of axonal damage.“

https://academic.oup.com/jnen/article/61/1/85/2916415

For those who don’t know, beta amyloid is associated with several degenerative neurological disorders:

Amyloid-β and Parkinson’s disease (2018)

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30377818/

Beta-amyloid 42 accumulation in the lumbar spinal cord motor neurons of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients (2004)

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0969996105000276?via%3Dihub

Alzheimer’s Disease and the β-Amyloid Peptide (2010)

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2813509/

They knew this way back in 1999:

Mechanisms and Structural Determinants of HIV-1 Coat Protein, gp41-Induced Neurotoxicity (1999)

Abstract

Of the individuals with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection, 20–30% will develop the neurological complication of HIV-associated dementia (HAD). The mechanisms underlying HAD are unknown; however, indirect immunologically mediated mechanisms are theorized to play a role. Recently, the HIV-1 coat protein gp41 has been implicated as a major mediator of HAD through induction of neurocytokines and subsequent neuronal cell death. Using primary mixed cortical cultures from neuronal nitric oxide synthase (NOS) null (nNOS−/−) mice and immunological NOS null (iNOS−/−) mice, we establish iNOS-derived NO as a major mediator of gp41 neurotoxicity. Neurotoxicity elicited by gp41 is markedly attenuated in iNOS−/− cultures compared with wild-type and nNOS−/− cultures. The NOS inhibitor l-nitroarginine methyl ester is neuroprotective in wild-type and nNOS−/− cultures, confirming the role of iNOS-derived NO in gp41 neurotoxicity. Confirming that iNOS−/− cultures lack iNOS, gp41 did not induce iNOS in iNOS−/− cultures, but it markedly induced iNOS in wild-type and nNOS−/− cultures. We elucidate the region of gp41 that is critical for iNOS induction and neuronal cell death by monitoring iNOS induction with overlapping peptides spanning gp41. We show that the N-terminal region of gp41, which we designate as the neurotoxic domain, induces iNOS protein activity and iNOS-dependent neurotoxicity at picomolar concentrations in a manner similar to recombinant gp41 protein. Our experiments suggest that gp41 is eliciting the induction of iNOS through potential cell surface receptors or binding sites because the induction of iNOS is dose dependent and saturable and occurs at physiologically relevant concentrations. These data confirm that the induction of iNOS by gp41 and the production of NO are primary mediators of neuronal damage and identify a neurotoxic domain of gp41 that may play an important role in HAD.

Keywords: HIV-1, HIV-associated dementia, neurotoxicity, gp41, immunological nitric oxide synthase, nitric oxide

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6782354/

DLC’s concluding remark:

“Off to Moderna we go”

Insist that love drive the clown car – Pam Grout

Yeah, I kinda get this sentiment.

And I quote again:

“I wouldn’t let these clowns dispense aspirin, let alone design fast tracked vaccines.“

Is gp41 a danger? It may well be. And nobody is asking the question, because (IMO) the neural pathogenic initiator that gp41 is, was passed off as a “molecular clamp” instead of the REAL ANTIGEN.

If they’re going to resurrect this weirdo COVID-HIV vaccine – and YES, they’re thinking about it – then there needs to be some examination FIRST of what the HELL is going on.

So What The Heck Is Going On Here?

When I was a young lad in the old days of science, there was lying, misrepresentation, and thievery, but it was on a much smaller scale.

We used to joke very cynically, back in the ’70’s, that every natural product being synthesized in a laboratory cured cancer, because we all knew that was not true.

We knew that these substances were really being synthesized merely because the molecules were a synthetic challenge, and a way for professors to make a name for themselves in synthetic chemistry. Almost NONE of these substances would EVER be used to treat cancer, and most would wash out very soon upon investigation. Almost none of them would ever even LEAD to a useful cancer drug. But LYING about their importance was how people got money for their labs. Every structurally interesting new molecule was always the next savior – until it wasn’t.

I used to think that the people giving out the money were fools about this, but not any more. I am beginning to think that the “givers” have always been just as corrupt as the “takers” – they’re just the “insiders” who turn on the spigots for their fellow “outsiders”.

I have no reason to think that vaccines are any different.

I think that a false crisis was used as a massive MONEY-BOMB – a global pile-on of the giddiest and most corrupt kind.

Probably the biggest one in 20 years.

I think that an AIDS vaccine was passed off as a COVID vaccine, by plausibly passing off the natural function of the HIV subunit as a new tool for other things, because – well – it IS such a new tool – just like every new interesting molecule MIGHT actually be some amazing new drug that cures cancer.

They lie skillfully, and they lie with truth, and it’s almost impossible to PROVE that the secondary “oh by the way” was actually the primary motivation.

We have changed from white lies that everybody understood WERE lies, to much more devious lies where scientists engage in fooling not just the public, but even other scientists.

I do think we have to wake up now. We can no longer afford the luxury of pretending not to know.

If I have to thank Joe Biden and his puppetmasters, including his “handler” Obama, for anything, it is for WAKING ME UP with these stupid mandates.

Nothing worked so well, to show us that the NEW WORLD ORDER is a direct threat to humanity, and needs to be stopped.

Science can be good again. But it must never, ever, abandon TRUTH.

And here we are.

W

Five* Studies Showing the Potential or Actual Superiority of Disease-Conferred Immunity in COVID-19

*And One Study Showing How Much of a SCAM Fauci’s Beloved Remdesivir Actually Was

The old wisdom of science and medicine, from when I was a kid, has never been disproved. Stated simply:

Disease-conferred immunity in the recovered is always superior to any form of vaccination.

This is why, when we were kids, most scientists and doctors were “unimpressed” by the idea of moving to vaccines for the three main childhood diseases, which diseases themselves provide LIFELONG IMMUNITY against three illnesses that are MUCH ROUGHER on adults.

Why go to a lesser immunity? The diseases are mild in children. The outcomes are excellent. The immunity is SOLID.

Now you can push around the edges of this generality, and find examples where individuals DON’T get good immunity from a “first case” of a disease, and catch it again, whereas some other person gets life-long immunity from a vaccine. Nonetheless, the generality holds at the statistical level, and has always held, because it is LOGICAL.

The whole point of vaccination is to provoke a SUFFICIENT DEFENSE by a LESSER ASSAULT than the disease being prevented.

Thus, for the generality of the old wisdom to be violated, logic, math, and basic biology have to be overturned.

Which is not hard with Democrat minds.

Democrats want to believe things that are politically expedient but simply untrue. I wish I could say the same accusation cannot be leveled against our side, but I can’t. Nevertheless, I find that I can gently correct our side with actual scientific logic, whereas the other side demands “authority”, which they instantly deny to any person or organization that disagrees with them. It’s a solid defense, but it’s not a REAL defense.

In any case, communism is “politics as religion”, and thus it can lead to articles of hope and faith that are held in violation of common sense and widely agreed simple facts – even the most basic science that can be proven at home by anybody.

Thus, the much more solid and honest wisdom of 1960s and 1970s medicine and science began to disappear as the Soviets and Maoists began chipping away at it. By now, it’s in real trouble.

With the COVID hoax, I pretty much thought science was done for. Surprisingly, in the wake of the hoax’s general failure to convince EVERYBODY that up is down and vice versa, we are seeing more and more of the sheepish scientists and doctors who initially went along with things, turning around and disagreeing – although very gently – with the COVID madness.

I would like to show you SIX important points that are now known from scientific studies. You will not see the Bidenistas and Bidenazis trumpeting any of these.

What these points do, is basically show why we don’t need COVID vaccines, nor a particular bad drug called remdesivir.

Indeed, in my opinion, all of these things call into question the entire COVID response, and appear to make it some kind of scam – likely by the World Economic Forum.

I believe that the scam is for global population control, the latter meaning both control of people and control of reproduction.

I’ll explain that at the end, but a bit along the way, too.

PS – thanks to Wheatie for the above image, to RF121 for the link to 4 of these papers, and to Wheatie again for information about the Rockefeller Foundation censoring “misinformation” through Red Jen and Actor Vivek.

Six Points, To The Point

1 – Disease-conferred immunity appears to be 6.72 TIMES as strong as immunity from the COVID vaccines

2 – mRNA vaccines cause spike protein to begin circulating in the bloodstream almost immediately

3 – The antibodies raised by COVID vaccines show pre-existing “memory” immunity to COVID and the vaccines

4 – 99% of those infected by C19 show fast, specific, and effective (“robust”) antibody response

5 – For 2-shot vaccines, shot 1 needlessly elicits memory antibodies, but shot 2 dangerously elicits prompt antibodies

6 – Remdesivir does NOT work against COVID, but it does lengthen time in the hospital

OK, people. Let me break down THOSE items with fuller descriptions.

Six Points, Explained

1 – Disease-conferred immunity appears to be 6.72 TIMES as strong as immunity from the COVID vaccines

Yeah, gotta love those insignificant digits. SEVEN WILL DO – roughly.

This is from an Israeli study that looked at all the people getting infected right now. You will recall that almost all Israelis are vaccinated, yet all of a sudden, people are getting it again – which means that most of them have to be (and in fact WERE) vaccinated.

It turns out that, among the people who are getting COVID in Israel right now, are a few people who had it already – but VERY few of them. If you do the numbers, then it’s clear that catching the disease provides better protection than the vaccine. This is hardly unexpected – like I said – this was old school predictable knowledge back in the 1960s and 1970s.

Stated differently: “Catch a cold one year, you probably won’t catch it again next year, or the year after.”

COMMON. WISDOM.

The number may be a quibble – earlier estimates were actually HIGHER than a factor of 7. So this is a conservative estimate.

But let me repeat what I said. This is exactly what we expect from colds and flu bugs. EXACTLY.

Bottom line, they tried to take something that we already knew, and repackage it as something new and scary. Now, it’s easy to see that this was all about keeping and gaining power over us.

Ref 1 – https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-07-16-covid-infection-creates-real-immunity-vaccines-destroy.html

Ref 1 Archive – https://archive.fo/RsHxy

Ref 2 – https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/309762

Ref 2 Archive – https://archive.fo/lHQ7Q

2 – mRNA vaccines cause spike protein to begin circulating in the bloodstream almost immediately

This is actually one of FOUR papers cited in a frontline doctor organizational email, which was then explained in the now-famous video by Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi.

If you have NOT seen this video, you should watch it. If you have seen it, then what you will be reading here (the next 4 points) is what he’s talking about, but related more directly to each of the 4 papers.

The email that describes the 4 papers will be included as an appendix. It describes the significance of the 4 papers, but I am restating that significance in my own terms, here, from my own perspective.

In my opinion, this first point shows exactly why the mRNA vaccines are so problematic, and were never a good idea. Not only is there a ton of vaccine migration PROVEN by the Pfizer leaked documents – there is massive spike protein circulation in the bloodstream. This spike protein activity circulating throughout the body is clearly the cause of all the problems associated with the vaccine.

In my opinion, it’s not a mistake. I believe the manipulated purpose of the vaccines was in fact incremental population reduction by flushing very early pregnancies on a huge but statistically significant scale.

SHAME on you, WEFFEN SS ghouls.

Ref 1 – https://principia-scientific.com/four-new-discoveries-about-safety-and-efficacy-of-covid-vaccines/

Ref 1 Archive – https://web.archive.org/web/20210717172112/https://principia-scientific.com/four-new-discoveries-about-safety-and-efficacy-of-covid-vaccines/

Ref 2 – https://jamesfetzer.org/2021/07/letter-to-physicians-four-new-scientific-discoveries-regarding-the-safety-and-efficacy-of-covid-19-vaccines/

Ref 2 Archive – https://archive.fo/HdzvF

Ref 3 – https://tube.doctors4covidethics.org/videos/watch/7ca43fab-fa9d-46e6-ac7a-a0c739d9e277

3 – The antibodies raised by COVID vaccines show pre-existing “memory” immunity to COVID and the vaccines

This is a SMOKING GUN. What this means is that all the health authorities LIED to us about a lack of pre-existing immunity. The vaccines are immunizing people to something they are already somewhat or even completely immune to.

Read that again. “Asymptomatic cases” = “basically already almost completely immune”.

Remember early in 2020, when a lone, old, distinguished professor of immunology in Europe dared to publish online a STATEMENT (no way could he get it into a journal) that only pre-existing immunity could explain what we were seeing clinically with COVID-19, and his letter was then censored everywhere?

He is proven COMPLETELY RIGHT in this paper.

Now that we can carefully study new infections with COVID-19, it turns out that people are responding to the disease as “something they’ve seen before”. Yes – it’s THAT similar to the other weak beta coronaviruses.

As many have said, the disease was not actually novel. It was JUST NOVEL ENOUGH. Just novel enough, thanks to gain of function, to win the race for the seasonal best-seller. It’s like a new paperback romance that breaks no new ground as either literature or love-porn, but simply puts tiny tweaks on something everybody has seen before.

Fifty Shades of Nonfluenza.

I repeat. This was a WEAPONIZED COLD – a “new” cold – and THEY KNEW IT.

This was an ECONOMIC ASSAULT on the world. And likely by the World Economic Forum.

Which incidentally sponsored Event 201.

You FUCKERS.

4 – 99% of those infected by C19 show fast, specific, and effective (“robust”) antibody response

The point here was that EVERYBODY who gets COVID-19 – including those who barely have any symptoms or NONE AT ALL – get excellent antibody response – and they SHOW IT. The antibodies may go away, leaving the strong and effective MEMORY antibodies on standby, but the system is soon primed and ready to go.

Which then raises the question – in combination with the prior points…..

Wouldn’t most healthy people just want to get the DISEASE instead of the vaccine? They get better immunity, proven, even if they have ZERO symptoms.

We were SNOOKERED.

This goes back to something that the Fake News media and Fake Medicine CDC hid from us.

When antibody tests first became available, there was an apparent hesitation by authorities (particularly in blue states) to release results. HOWEVER, there were several “blooper” releases of information from hospitals and doctors – at least one of which was forced into disavowing their own prior statement.

What they were finding was double-digit numbers of people who already had antibodies to COVID-19. At that point, the antibody tests were SUPPOSED TO BE unique for COVID-19, and NOT for the prior beta coronaviruses. But yet, they showed antibodies for 30% of people or HIGHER. Later, authorities (including CDC) badmouthed the antibody tests as being flawed because they were picking up antibodies to “other coronaviruses”.

NOW it is completely possible to see what they were trying not to admit. Between prior exposure to both COVID-19 itself and strains of the other 4 weak beta coronaviruses, people were ALREADY IMMUNE.

OLD ANTIBODIES WORKED ON COVID-19.

You see what I’m saying? They would rather falsely “admit” that the tests were “not working”, than to truly admit that the tests worked TOO WELL, and most of us were already immune to COVID-19 to varying degrees. Why? Because that would eliminate the FEAR.

They reframed the PROTECTIVE cross-strain immunity as a test problem, rather than a natural immunity blessing.

It was all about the election. It was all about government control.

It was all a LIE and a HOAX.

5 – For 2-shot vaccines, shot 1 needlessly elicits memory antibodies, but shot 2 dangerously elicits prompt antibodies

This part is actually rather interesting. This is a point that Dr. Bhakdi makes late in his video. The first vaccine shot is NEEDLESS but HARMLESS. Well – more or less. Most people are actually IMMUNE TO THE VACCINE.

Yeah, I want you to read that again.

They can reframe reality – I WILL REFRAME IT BACK.

When you inject somebody with a needless vaccine to which they are already immune, the people simply have an immune response to the assault. Yeah, you can call it a booster, or whatever, but the point is that you have caused the immune memory to replay an old tape and pump out antibodies that work IN GENERAL on your new COVID strain. Vaccine. Whatever.

But the second injection, coming shortly thereafter, is potentially WORSE than NEEDLESS. With two injections, the first kicks up fresh antibodies to spike protein. The second infects YOUR cells and makes them a target of those antibodies.

This is why we saw all those people DIE after their second injection.

THEY. DID. NOT. NEED. THAT. SECOND. INJECTION.

Yeah, this will be a good fight in science – AND the courtroom.

Frankly, I think there need to be lawsuits here, for anybody who would have had a normal contraindication to a second shot, which IMO should have been ALL diabetics, cardiovascular patients, etc. In fact, many of those folks should not have gotten a first shot, because IMO the people that COVID didn’t kill in spring of 2020 were mostly immune, INCLUDING diabetics.

They didn’t need the vaccine. And the vaccine – especially the second shot – killed them.

And hey! If it had been ok to criticize vaccines earlier on social media and not get kicked off, we might have discovered this earlier, and saved a few lives! And dollars!

But no, we live in a fully Orwellian world, where Polish pink diaper that censors people telling the truth about vaccines gets AWARDS for protecting free speech.

Ref 1 – https://tennesseestar.com/2021/04/20/youtube-ceo-honored-with-free-expression-award-as-big-tech-silences-conservatives/

Ref 1 Archive – https://archive.fo/KYGch

6 – Remdesivir does NOT work against COVID, but it does lengthen time in the hospital

This is just “sweet revenge” as Ted Nugent called it. KARMA.

Now I have to admit that I was just as fooled as Trump on this. Fauci – what a scammer.

I saw in the very earliest results that remdesivir was WORSE than not working – it was removing people’s kidneys faster than COVID was. AYE-YI-YI. Bad stuff.

And yet Fauci had the BRASS ASS to go on national television and call remdesivir the “GOLD STANDARD” after that performance. Sheesh! Trust me – Trump saw it, too. This was CLASSIC “you have to show them”.

Admittedly, to some extent, this was “fighting the fear”, and you can see why the POTUS has to take part. But who was generating the fear?

Yeah. Much easier to see the controlling characteristics of the hoax NOW.

Anyway, scientifically, the problem is, there is no point in giving people an antiviral like remdesivir AFTER the virus has already created devastation. You have to deliver the antiviral EARLY – exactly like Dr. Zelenko realized very early on.

Doesn’t matter what KIND of an antiviral – even a piss-poor one, or an atypical one, like hydroxychloroquine, is going to WORK if it gets there EARLY. Late – it simply doesn’t matter.

Now the thing is, remdesivir has to be INJECTED. It could only be used in a HOSPITAL setting – or at least, so they said. I disagreed. People inject stuff in SUBWAYS. Let’s get SMART here.

Well, as a CHUMP HONEST SCIENTIST, my thought was, why not simply administer remdesivir early, by injection, at a lower and safer dose, on an outpatient basis, upon diagnosis? In the doctor’s office, or at a specialist. Nothing worse than a blood draw. Same time that people are being given hydroxychloroquine, or regeneron. It would actually WORK then.

WELL, you see, this paper does more than just prove that remdesivir doesn’t work. I proves WHY they never did the logical thing with it.

Administer it early and effectively, and you don’t SELL AS MUCH. Administer it late and desperately, and you sell a TON of it. And it’s expensive as HELL.

Oh. My. God. I was such a chump. I assumed they would do the right thing if they knew what that was.

The pharmaceutical industry, at this point, is CRAVEN. THEY JUST SELL PRODUCT.

Ref 1 – https://gab.com/rixstep/posts/106604239491038171

Rixstep
@rixstep
··
Trump 2020

Y’all remember how Fauci bullshitted Trump about remdesivir – how he lied about moving the goal posts? Helps if you know the full story about it, but here’s new evidence that the shit’s actually harmful.

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2781959

Remdesivir, Survival, and Length of Hospital Stay in US Veterans With COVID-19

This cohort study assesses the association of remdesivir treatment with 30-day survival and length of hospital stay among US veterans hospitalized with COVID-19…

jamanetwork.com

View Link Feed

2 likes
1 comment
5 reposts

Ref 2 – https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2781959

Summary

In my opinion, it is now time to call this crap out.

This is one of the most needless vaccines ever – one of the worst outcomes for a vaccine ever – no matter which one – and it is BECAUSE COVID-19 is fundamentally a case where there should not BE a vaccine for most people.

This is a case that was KNOWN not to be very amenable to a vaccine. It was only by a FEAR PSYCHOLOGY OPERATION that we were scammed into accepting the idea that we needed a really badly performing COLD VACCINE.

It’s a MONEYMAKER for industry – their PAWN MOTIVE – and a CONTROL AGENT for various levels of government – their PAWN MOTIVE. Ultimately, it’s about a global effort to gain control – most likely being mediated through the World Economic Forum, since almost all the guilty parties are either “partners” like Google/Alphabet or “organizations” like the Rockefeller Foundation.

Ref 1 – https://www.weforum.org/organizations/the-rockefeller-foundation

Ref 1 Archive – https://archive.fo/vDTby

And THAT is where we find the really basic motivation for the COVID hoax – as a PLATFORM of human control.

Once I realized that Bill Gates created Windows not as an operating system, but as a PLATFORM to change human behavior into a path he created, I realized the power of creating PLATFORMS. It’s a GOD THING.

WEF gets this concept deeply.

Ref 2 – https://www.weforum.org/platforms

Ref 2 Archive – https://archive.fo/YCE1S

You see, the mandatory vaccine platform is basically “The Island” where the entire planet is “The Island”. The people in control are liars, they can inject you with whatever they want, and they then have power of life and death over you, because they lie with impunity.

To start with, I believe the globalist scum are introducing a kind of limited, very incremental contraceptive.

Just like Bill Gates slipped and told us.

The Spike Protein’s Purpose Betrayed By Its Own Superiority

TL;DR – you MUST listen to a short podcast of a scientist revealing the latest research on the spike protein vaccines. The VACCINE ITSELF (not just the spike protein – the mRNA vaccine itself) is persistent and is not only concentrating in ovaries – THE VACCINE ITSELF IS EXCRETED – e.g., in breast milk. Meaning …

Is The Abortion Vaccine Right For You?

“When the people have any power to object to a socialist solution, a deniable 5% fait accompli is always more desirable to socialists than a negotiated 50% solution, because they can always negotiate on the remaining 95%.” -Wolf Moon When I first heard about a case of a miscarriage by a pregnant doctor, due to …

Spike Protein = Spike Protein ≈ Snake Protein

Using Principles of Protein Equivalence and Analogy as Predictive Tools for Coronavirus Understanding Surely you’ve heard of the BROWN RECLUSE SPIDER. The brown recluse is related to several other recluses, and a couple of other families of spiders, that all have a similar venom – a protein called sphingomyelinase D. This is an enzyme that …

Now – if you followed that patent history work that Dr. David “Bowtie” Martin did on the coronavirus and vaccines, then you realize that they’ve been aware of the spike protein for TWENTY YEARS. Its CONTRACEPTIVE activities had to have been known – likely from before understanding of the spike protein per se, when coronaviruses were just viruses which caused potentially contraceptive symptoms in some patients.

This is a no-brainer, people. We have been manipulated.

W

John Fink and James Coburn discuss case in a scene from the film ‘The Carey Treatment’, 1972. (Photo by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer/Getty Images)

Appendix: The Letter

Letter to Physicians: Four New Scientific Discoveries Regarding the Safety and Efficacy of COVID-19 Vaccines

By Doctors for COVID Ethics

SCIENTISTS CONCLUDE THE BENEFIT OF COVID-19 VACCINATION IS “HIGHLY DOUBTFUL” BUT VACCINE INJURY IS “WELL SUBSTANTIATED”

Doctors for Covid Ethics has sent the following letter to tens of thousands of doctors in Europe, summarising four recent scientific findings critical to the COVID-19 vaccination program. The letter explains each finding as it relates to the biology of COVID-19 vaccines, including interactions with the immune system.

Taken together, the letter warns that these new pieces of evidence force all physicians administering COVID-19 vaccines to re-evaluate the merits of COVID-19 vaccination, in the interests of their own ethical standing, and their patients’ safety and health.

A video explanation of the underlying immunology by Professor Sucharit Bhakdi MD is here, with German subtitles here.

*

Dear Colleague:

Four recent scientific discoveries are herewith brought to your urgent attention. They alter the entire landscape of the COVID-19 pandemic, and they force us to reassess the merits of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2.

Summary

Rapid and efficient memory-type immune responses occur reliably in virtually all unvaccinated individuals who are exposed to SARS-CoV-2. The effectiveness of further boosting the immune response through vaccination is therefore highly doubtful. Vaccination may instead aggravate disease through antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE).

Discovery 1: SARS-CoV-2 spike protein circulates shortly after vaccination

SARS-CoV-2 proteins were measured in longitudinal plasma samples collected from 13 participants who received two doses of Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccine [1]. With 11 of the 13, the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein was detected in the blood within only one day after the first vaccine injection.

Significance. Spike protein molecules were produced within cells that are in contact with the bloodstream—mostly endothelial cells—and released into the circulation. This means that a) the immune system will attack those endothelial cells, and b) the circulating spike protein molecules will activate thrombocytes. Both effects will promote blood clotting. This explains the many clotting-related adverse events—stroke, heart attack, venous thrombosis—that are being reported after vaccination.

Discovery 2: Rapid, memory-type antibody response after vaccination

Several studies have demonstrated that circulating SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG and IgA antibodies became detectable within 1-2 weeks after application of mRNA vaccines [1–3].

Significance. Rapid production of IgG and IgA always indicates a secondary, memory-type response that is elicited through re-stimulation of pre-existing immune cells. Primary immune responses to novel antigens take longer to evolve and initially produce IgM antibodies, which is then followed by the isotype switch to IgG and IgA.

A certain amount of IgM was indeed detected alongside IgG and IgA in some studies [1,4]. Importantly, however, IgG rose faster than IgM [4], which confirms that the early IgG response was indeed of the memory type. This memory response indicates pre-existing, cross-reactive immunity due to previous infection with ordinary respiratory human coronavirus strains. The delayed IgM response most likely represents a primary response to novel epitopes which are specific to SARS-CoV-2.

Memory-type responses have also been documented with respect to T-cell-mediated immunity [5–7]. Overall, these findings indicate that our immune system efficiently recognizes SARS-CoV-2 as “known” even on first contact. Severe cases of the disease thus cannot be ascribed to lacking immunity. Instead, severe cases might very well be caused or aggravated by pre-existing immunity through antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE, see below).

Discovery 3: SARS-CoV-2 elicits robust adaptive immune responses regardless of disease severity

Serum antibody profiles were reported for 203 individuals following SARS-CoV-2 infection [8]. 202 (>99%) of the participants exhibited SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies. With 193 individuals (95%), these antibodies prevented SARS-CoV-2 infection in cell culture and also inhibited binding of the spike protein to the ACE2 receptor. Furthermore, CD8+ T-cell responses specific for SARS-CoV-2 were clear and quantifiable in 95 of 106 (90%) HLA-A2-positive individuals.

Significance. This study confirms the above assertion that the immune response to initial contact with SARS-CoV-2 is of the memory type. In addition, it shows that this reaction occurs with almost all individuals, and particularly also with those who experience no manifest clinical symptoms.

The goal of the vaccination is to stimulate production of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2, but we now know that such antibodies can and will be rapidly generated by everyone upon the slightest viral challenge, even without vaccination.

Severe lung infections always take many days to develop, which means that if the antibodies generated by the memory response are needed, they will arrive on time. Therefore, vaccination is unlikely to provide significant benefit with respect to the prevention of severe lung infection.

Discovery 4: Rapid increase of spike protein antibodies after the second injection of mRNA vaccines

IgG and IgA antibody titres were monitored before vaccination and after the first and the second injection of mRNA vaccines [3]. Antibody titres rose with some delay after the first injection, then plateaued, but rose again very shortly after the second injection.

Significance. Even though the antibody response to the first injection is of the memory type, the small time lag after the injection may mitigate adverse reactions, because the abundance of spike protein on the cells in the blood vessel walls and in other tissues may have already passed its peak when the antibodies arrive.

The situation changes dramatically with the second injection. Then the spikes are produced and protrude into the bloodstream that is already swarming with both reactive lymphocytes and antibodies. The antibodies will cause the complement system [9,10] and also neutrophil granulocytes to attack the spike protein-bearing cells. The possible consequences of all-out self-attack by the immune system are frightening.

Antibody-dependent enhancement of disease

As described, memory-type immune responses ensure the rapid rise of antibody titres after initial exposure to SARS-CoV-2, rendering the benefit of vaccine-induced antibody response exceedingly doubtful. Regardless, we should not assume that high antibody titres against SARS-CoV-2 will always improve the clinical outcome. With several virus families—in particular with Dengue virus, but also with coronaviruses—antibodies can aggravate rather than mitigate disease. This occurs because certain cells of the immune system take up antibody-tagged microbes and destroy them. If a virus particle to which antibodies have bound is taken up by such a cell, but it then manages to evade destruction, it may instead start to multiply within the cell. Overall, the antibody will then have enhanced the replication of the virus. Clinically, this antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) can cause a hyperinflammatory response (a “cytokine storm”) that will amplify the damage to the lungs, liver and other organs of our body.

Attempts to develop vaccines to the original SARS virus, which is closely related to SARS-CoV-2, repeatedly failed due to ADE. The vaccines did induce antibodies, but when the vaccinated animals were subsequently infected with the virus, they became more ill than the unvaccinated controls (see e.g. [11]). The possibility of ADE was not adequately addressed in the clinical trials on any of the COVID-19 vaccines. It is therefore prudent to avoid the danger of inducing ADE through vaccination and instead rely on proven forms of treatment [12] for dealing with clinically severe COVID-19 disease.

Conclusion

The collective findings discussed above clearly show that the benefits of vaccination are highly doubtful. In contrast, the harm the vaccines do is very well substantiated, with more than 15.000 vaccination-associated deaths now documented in the EU drug adverse events database (EudraVigilance), and over 7.000 more deaths within the UK and the US [13].

ALL PHYSICIANS MUST RECONSIDER THE ETHICAL ISSUES SURROUNDING COVID-19 VACCINATION.

*

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

Notes

1. Ogata, A.F. et al. (2021) Circulating SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Antigen Detected in the Plasma of mRNA-1273 Vaccine Recipients. Clin. Infect. Dis. -:x-x

2. Amanat, F. et al. (2021) SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination induces functionally diverse antibodies to NTD, RBD and S2. Cell -:x-x

3. Wisnewski, A.V. et al. (2021) Human IgG and IgA responses to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. PLoS One 16:e0249499

4. Qu, J. et al. (2020) Profile of Immunoglobulin G and IgM Antibodies Against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Clin. Infect. Dis. 71:2255-2258

5. Le Bert, N. et al. (2020) SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell immunity in cases of COVID-19 and SARS, and uninfected controls. Nature 584:457-462

6. Grifoni, A. et al. (2020) Targets of T Cell Responses to SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus in Humans with COVID-19 Disease and Unexposed Individuals. Cell 181:1489-1501.e15

7. Gallais, F. et al. (2021) Intrafamilial Exposure to SARS-CoV-2 Associated with Cellular Immune Response without Seroconversion. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 27:x-x

8. Nielsen, S.S. et al. (2021) SARS-CoV-2 elicits robust adaptive immune responses regardless of disease severity. EBioMedicine 68:103410

9. Magro, C.M. et al. (2020) Docked severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 proteins within the cutaneous and subcutaneous microvasculature and their role in the pathogenesis of severe coronavirus disease 2019. Hum. Pathol. 106:106-116

10. Magro, C.M. et al. (2021) Severe COVID-19: A multifaceted viral vasculopathy syndrome. Annals of diagnostic pathology 50:151645

11. Tseng, C. et al. (2012) Immunization with SARS coronavirus vaccines leads to pulmonary immunopathology on challenge with the SARS virus. PLoS One 7:e35421

12. McCullough, P.A. et al. (2021) Pathophysiological Basis and Rationale for Early Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Infection. Am. J. Med. 134:16-22

13. Johnson, L. (2021) Official Vaccine Injury and Fatality Data: EU, UK and US.