“We do not believe any group of men adequate enough or wise enough to operate without scrutiny or without criticism. We know that the only way to avoid error is to detect it, that the only way to detect it is to be free to inquire. We know that in secrecy error undetected will flourish and subvert.” –J. Robert Oppenheimer
This thread is for RANDOM – and I mean RANDOM Q / QAnon / Great Awakening information. If it’s not related to Q, please use the latest “Dear MAGA” thread. This thread is designed as a general clearing-house for Q-related information.
WIDE OPEN. Have at it!
W
This intermittently re-posted open thread will be VERY OPEN – a place for the various MAGA, Treeper and Q communities to post whatever they feel they would like to tell the White Hats, and the rest of the MAGA world. We ask that people NOT duplicate material posted to the Treehouse open threads. Don’t cross-post, please. We expect things that are more relevant to the Q community to show up here.
Say what you want, comment on what other people said, comment on people’s comments. Keep it civil. Treehouse rules, but expect lots of QAnon.
W
When people say “we are Q“, I find it immensely satisfying to consider the reality of that statement, and not to simply brush it off. To look at the totality of our elaboration of Q posts into a movement, and consider how we might do it better.
Clearly, understanding Q helps us do it better. And what – actually – IS that understanding?
It is that vibrant, moving, shifting, intelligent sum of our understandings, changing itself. Thus, I find that people’s own INDIVIDUAL VIEWS of Q actually help CONSTITUTE what “Q” – the larger Q, so to speak – thinks. And the CHANGE in that sum comes from SELF-AWARENESS and INTER-AWARENESS of the parts.
Simple, in the end. But let’s not just think – let’s DO.
para59r had an interesting point of view on Q, from the comments on my first REAL post here, that I thought I would share, so that others could discuss. I find myself in strong agreement with many of the points made.
An image of the original post, and then the text (for those who use text reader devices) is provided.
IMAGE:
TEXT:
In Q’s case being absolute could mean exposure. Ever notice that his proofs can only run so far. That his drops are are just a tad off from someone elses? He needs the validation but can’t really afford it. Does it really bother anyone that his bombs don’t seem to have the desired effect when neither do ours.
Trust Sessions, Trust Wray is not really the point. It’s trust the VSG in the White House who has trusted Sessions, and has trusted Wray.
If we remember back far enough at one point the Tree House thought Mueller was a good idea. Times change, fog clears and when it does we get ourselves back in order and push on. Some though might seem still to far out on the flank, still running with the old plan, or working with a copy we don’t have, seemingly out of touch but they’re watching from their lofty heights and laying down what fire they can as we saps in the trenches grind on toward the objective.
Q’s a phantom force and just like an army we have a certain antipathy for the air force, their objectives vs ours. They’re carving up a larger swath of land taking the battle deep in unwinnable territory to soften the enemy’s support, to disrupt what they can, as opposed to our closer more defined objectives, where the battle grinds on and success is measured daily in meters and yards, but its all the same war and were all on the same side.
I find this to be a great BRIDGE to several important points about the Q strategy, and even the larger POTUS strategy. Some of these points I find validating in themselves, BECAUSE they are so strategic, and maybe even optimally so. If we were NOT doing them, we would want to be doing them.
But rather than point them out myself, I think it’s worth challenging readers to identify them and discuss.
What think Q?
W
Q had a “Q&A” today, and one of the questions was – at least from my point of view – a bit unexpected. OK – VERY unexpected.
Anonymous ID: 5948d8 No.3093831
Q
Are we alone ?
Roswell ?
People are already asking a lot of questions about this, and one of the theories (which actually makes a lot of sense) is that it was simply a bandwidth test. However, I think it may have also been a “believability test”, too. Probably for a variety of reasons.
Anyway, on Twitter, there was some discussion of it, and I’d like to bring my thoughts here. I’m not going to be too argumentative about them – this is all very speculative. But still, I want people to see my thoughts, which are likely going to be tamped down BIG-TIME on Twitter.
For this reason, I’ll present it as IMAGES first, of each tweet, which can’t be removed by Twitter. I’ll include the actual Tweets as an appendix. People can click on those and go to them, if they are still there.
Next, somebody responds with an earlier Q post on the topic.
Somebody responded to THAT with a “Got it!”
And THAT is where I jumped in.
My thoughts will be hidden on Twitter – nobody will see them. That’s why I’m bringing them here – to share with people who can appreciate them. Not necessarily agree. Just something to think about.
Here we go.
Hopefully that is clear. To put it more bluntly, Q sometimes misleads extremely well – especially the other side, but doesn’t just outright lie. I find it difficult to reconcile the idea that this is disinformation with Q’s normal style – particularly when science (in my opinion) agrees with the idea of pervasive life in the universe (which also, in my opinion, argues for God).
I then began expanding on that.
Nevertheless, I do think it was a bandwidth test.
Now I want to get into why Q’s final answer is even more convincing to me. When you see “AO”, that is my abbreviation for “Alpha and Omega”.
What I’m talking about there is an aspect of the “anthropic principle”, which basically says “isn’t it weird that the universe seems so suited for humans?”, and scaling it up to the “isn’t it weird that Star Trek is even possible?” level.
Many argue that the anthropic principle is a tautology anyway, and I certainly see that point. However, if one simply accepts the idea that the universe we experience is optimized toward intelligence for the reason of the tautology, then it becomes highly predictive at the same time, and the more and more we see it borne out, the more it tends to argue for intelligence as a kind of first principle of the universe.
Hmmmm. That sounds like something. Some old thought of mankind. Where is Descartes? Wake him up – he would be interested in this stuff.
Anyway, now it’s time to think of how mind-blowing all of THAT really is.
Great Awakening actually BEING a “great awakening”? Wow. Could be.
But now I don’t want to provoke arguments, so I’m going to let the people who are going pale in the face have an out. Here is where that starts.
Q has stated multiple times that “they” came to the chans for a reason. Being “first to be able to believe” freaky stuff is very likely part of that.
Now I wrap up with the “WHEW” post. “Hey there – don’t worry – maybe only a few believe me – I think that’s what they wanted.”
That will give people PROPER pause – easy to reject – easy to accept – your call.
There you have it. The moment I believed Q about aliens. I was only believing what I already believed, but I believed that Q was telling me the truth. I believe this may actually be the first moment of official public disclosure, so I took a picture.
W
PS – there is also – via YouTube – considerable DISINFORMATION about aliens. Because the YouTube Brin/Wojcicki Red Diaper Socialist Club targets me individually with certain types of disinformation via their product, and particularly about aliens, and because I’m aware of it, I have reconstructed the Hillary left’s agenda on that issue VERY clearly. It is definitely Satanic and atheistic, which is a bit of a contradiction in terms, but it’s 100% Cabal.
The message is BAD HUMANS who DESERVE CONTROL. BAD AMERICAN MILITARY which is EVIL and TRUMP. We need GOOD SOCIALISM.
That is not the Q message. THANK GOD.
https://twitter.com/LisaMei62/status/1042609439579271170
https://twitter.com/Iron_Surfer/status/1042614631632527360
FIN
Treeper Johnny Bravo had a great question yesterday:
Right here is the Q post in question:
Before getting into that, it’s worth looking at the Q post right BEFORE that one, which may or may not be related:
Treeper RAC then asked this excellent question:
To which I responded:
Followed by this graphic:
From this page:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Justices_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
You know what I’m thinking now? I think that the reason for THESE POSTS:
…is that Radium Rod Rosenstein was trying to SET UP POTUS with some kind of OBSTRUCTION BS on behalf of Munster Mueller. THAT would correlate with the post in question about Sessions. So YES – I think this is about SESSIONS and ROSENSTEIN.
POTUS is doing the right thing. DO NOT MEET THE GUY. DO NOT TALK TO THE GUY. He’s just another crooked lawyer trying to talk his way out of justice. Another COMEY TRICK.
NOW – let’s look at that tweet, line by line:
PANIC IN DC
SESSIONS CLAS LETTER TO SC JUSTICES 1&2 RE: RECUSAL, UNRECUSAL, AND CLARITY RE: CONFLICTS BASED ON UNCLASSIFIED MATERIAL [TODAY].
HIGHEST COURT AUTHORITY APPROVAL
Q
Very simple. To me, the proper interpretation of the post (and I have not looked at anybody else on this) is as follows:
Based on what is ALREADY declassified, Jeff Sessions believes that he has reason to request that Rosenstein be FORCED to recuse, that he himself (Sessions) can be UNRECUSED, and that this was APPROVED BY SCOTUS.
If this is true, this is BOMBSHELL. It also matches THIS Q POST:
This means that Sessions went into the [KILL BOX], otherwise know as the “briar patch” – and is now ]free[. So “Br’er Sessions” (or “Br’er Fox”) just ran through the briar patch of recusal, where Mueller the Mule and all his non-recusing corruptoids could not go.
Genius. If THIS is what really happened, it’s genius.
W
I’m curious where people go for their QAnon information.
My favorite destination continues to be qanon.pub.
I find that its web behavior is fairly fast and responsive. It includes certain Q “replies” that are not found in all Q sites, and the filter works reasonably well. It seems like a good balance of capabilities. I like the simplicity.
Another site that I tried before – very similar – is qanonposts.com.
The numbering system is a bit different – not unexpected – and the web interface behaves a bit differently. I keep it as a back up, because when qanon.pub went down, I realized this stuff is all at risk of being undermined by the Socialist Cabal.
In fact, it will likely pay to have MULTIPLE BACK-UPS.
One very interesting site that somebody told me about, is qmap.pub.
This one is a bit more full-featured. I like it, and again, keep it as a backup. Note that this one has some nice flashy banner news at the top.
Has anybody tried the new VOAT replacement for /r/greatawakening?
That link is: https://voat.co/v/theawakening
There is also a link to an 8chan board for refugees:
https://8ch.net/patriotsawoken/catalog.html
I have not been to that site, but I have been to another one on 8chan – the base Q site mentioned in a Q post as being the “fountainhead”:
Link: https://8ch.net/patriotsfight/catalog.html
That site is easily recognized by the “patriots fight” image:
It’s a bit “busy” and hard to figure out – the fresh posts seem to be at the bottom. There is an “expand” feature that I find very useful.
While I don’t go to this one often, I make sure that I have a link to it, and that I’m PRACTICED using it, because I take Q’s warning about major shutdowns to come VERY seriously.
Please feel free to add links to your favorite Q sites in the comments, and to explain why you like them. I may try to feature more in-depth looks at some of them. Thanks!
W
The “Panic in DC” posts by QAnon have to be my absolute favorites lately. If you don’t know what I’m talking about, well, here you go. THIS was the latest group:
The first time I really paid much attention to these was on 9/11 this year, when the following stream of posts appeared. These were impossible to ignore.
That stream really told me something – that QAnon was actually “getting the scoops” before the fake news media. In fact, Q was getting the scoops INSTEAD OF the fake news media. THIS is when I realized that it really might be possible to just make the fake news media less and less relevant.
Here are a few more examples:
Last but not least, this GEM, where the “Panic in DC” posts themselves are discussed:
“PANIC IN DC” statements start a FIRE?
Twelve moves ahead.
Suicide watch.
Q
WOW. Pretty serious stuff. But nevertheless, just incredibly interesting.
Your thoughts?
W
I have decided to create a special BRANCH where those who are both Treepers (posters at The Conservative Treehouse, a.k.a. The Last Refuge, a.k.a. CTH, a.k.a. TCTH, a.k.a. https://theconservativetreehouse.com) and followers of the QAnon movement (Q-tards – whatever they want to call us) can discuss QAnon topics in peace and harmony.
I will work out the rules as we go, though I will err toward Free Speech within the limits of UNIMPEDED RESEARCH (very important) and productive discussion. Growth will be slow. Please be patient. I have never done anything like this before.
Part of my motivation is to keep QAnon fans in the orbit of CTH, and to help keep QAnon posting OFF of CTH. There is a strategic reason for this. Sometimes I will explain why I do things. Other times I will not. People are welcome to try to guess why I say things – this is ALWAYS a good exercise in understanding – something Q is trying to teach us. Why would I want to draw QAnon posting away from CTH?
I have no connection to Q other than a desire to understand Q. As Q says, there is only Q, although Q+ appears sometimes. When I call myself W, it is homage to Q – nothing more.
-Wolf
PS – can you guess what WQTH stands for? Yes! Easy! I wanted SHORT, SWEET, and most of all EASY TO REMEMBER.