“Our movement is about replacing a failed and corrupt political establishment with a new government controlled by you, the American people.”

AND that will not happen until you BANN Lobbyists aka K street.
PASS the Read the Bill Act
OVER TURN the 10 Supreme Court Rulings That Turned Corporations Into People
And yes that is Mother Jones, but some times they are correct.

[QUOTE]
1809 (Bank of the United States v. Deveaux): In the early days of the republic, when state and federal courts were still working out their jurisdictions, the Bank of the United States—a precursor to the US Treasury—sued a Georgia tax collector named Peter Deveaux for property he had seized when the bank failed to pay state taxes. Deveaux argued that, because corporations weren’t people, they couldn’t sue in federal court. Chief Justice John Marshall agreed…..

1844 (Louisville, Cincinnati, and Charleston Railroad v. Letson):
….Marshall’s decision in Bank of the United States was unworkable because it put corporations outside the reach of the federal courts. Thirty-five years later, after hearing the Louisville, Cincinnati, and Charleston Railroad case, the Supreme Court shifted course, ruling that corporations were “citizens” of the states where they incorporated…. 

1853 (Marshall v. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad): The Supreme Court later upheld the notion that corporations were citizens, but only for the purposes of court jurisdiction; they did not have the same constitutional rights as actual people…..

1886 (County of Santa Clara v. Southern Pacific Railroad): Now that corporations were legally citizens, corporate attorneys worked to expand their rights….

1898 (Smyth v. Ames): Building on the Santa Clara decision, the court voided a Nebraska railroad tax, ruling that it was akin to the government taking a corporation’s property without due process….

1906 (Hale v. Henkel): Having blocked unlawful seizures of corporate property, the court went on to shield companies from other kinds of intrusion. Writing for the majority, Justice Henry Billings Brown found that corporations, like people, are protected from unreasonable searches and seizures…

👉🙄 1931 (Russian Volunteer Fleet v. United States): A Russian shipbuilder, Russian Volunteer Fleet, sued the US government, claiming that government officials had unlawfully seized property worth more than $4 million. The high court sided with the company, ruling that even foreign corporations are protected from unlawful government seizures under the Fifth Amendment…

  2010 (Citizens United v. FEC): In the run up to the 2008 election, the Federal Elections Commission blocked the conservative nonprofit Citizens United from airing a film about Hillary Clinton based on a law barring companies from using their funds for “electioneering communications” within 30 days of a primary or 60 days of a general election. The organization sued, arguing that, because people’s campaign donations are a protected form of speech (see Buckley v. Valeo) and corporations and people enjoy the same legal rights, the government can’t limit a corporation’s independent political donations. The Supreme Court agreed. The Citizens United ruling may be the most sweeping expansion of corporate personhood to date…. 
[UNQUOTE]

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

What The Founding Fathers Thought About Corporations
[QUOTE]
.…Corporations like the East India Trading Company were despised by the founding fathers and they were just one reason why they chose to revolt against England.

Corporations represented the moneyed interests much like they do today and they often wielded political power, sometimes to the point of governing a colony all by themselves like the Massachusetts Bay Company did.

But there is more evidence that the Revolutionary generation despised corporations. The East India Company was the largest corporation of its day and its dominance of trade angered the colonists so much, that they dumped the tea products it had on a ship into Boston Harbor which today is universally known as the Boston Tea Party. At the time, in Britain, large corporations funded elections generously and its stock was owned by nearly everyone in parliament. The founding fathers did not think much of these corporations that had great wealth and great influence in government. And that is precisely why they put restrictions upon them after the government was organized under the Constitution.
Back in the days of the Founding Fathers, corporations could only exist for 20-30 years and could only deal in one commodity.
After the nation’s founding, corporations were granted charters by the state as they are today. Unlike today, however, corporations were only permitted to exist 20 or 30 years and could only deal in one commodity, could not hold stock in other companies, and their property holdings were limited to what they needed to accomplish their business goals. And perhaps the most important facet of all this is that most states in the early days of the nation had laws on the books that made any political contribution by corporations a criminal offense….

In an 1802 letter to Secretary of State Albert Gallatin, Jefferson said,”

“If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their money, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them (around the banks), will deprive the people of their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.”

[UNQUOTE]

States also had the right to yank a corporate charter. So if States had kept their power over corporations then the Supreme Court could have KEPT THEIR NOSE OUT OF THE DISCUSSION!

Out of balance was it?

I agree. STAY PUT or look around for LOCAL places to visit on vacation. From state forests to local ‘attractions’ to flea markets and farmer’s markets. You would be surprised at what is available .

ALL states have websites like this: Things to Do in North Carolina – NC Attractions | VisitNC.com

I could not possibly like or agree with this more!

NEVER FORGET 𝕋ℍ𝔼𝕐 𝕃𝕀𝔼!

If they stole the 2020 election to install a brain dead clown, why ever would you think they are telling the truth about this?

The Communists have been LYING about being the ‘Majortiy’ ever since they called themselves the Bolsheviks.

Bolshevik is Russian for “One of the Majority” although they were NOT the majority.

On the 11 August 1903, the Russian Social Democratic Labour party met for their Second Party Congress. Held in a chapel on Tottenham Court Road in London, the members took a vote.

The result split the party into two factions: the Mensheviks (from menshinstvo – Russian for ‘minority’) and the Bolsheviks (from bolshinstvo – meaning ‘majority’). In reality, the Bolsheviks were a minority party led by Vladimir ILyich Ulyanov (Vladimir Lenin) and they would not have the majority until 1922.

https://www.historyhit.com/who-were-the-bolsheviks-and-how-did-they-rise-to-power/

Majority in 1922????

….The 1920s were a hard time for Russia. After the devastating Civil War and foreign intervention, agricultural crisis and failed economic reforms, the newly formed Soviet state needed significant, radical steps for future development. Collectivization was one such step.

Collectivization entailed major reforms of the agricultural sector in the Soviet Union. Starting in 1927, collectivization was aimed at consolidating individual peasant landholdings and labor into collective farms, so called “kolkhozes.” Workers there got no salaries, rather a share of what the kolkhoz produced—only for the needs of themselves and their families, nothing more….

Collectivization entailed major reforms of the agricultural sector in the Soviet Union. Starting in 1927, collectivization was aimed at consolidating individual peasant landholdings and labor into collective farms, so called “kolkhozes.” Workers there got no salaries, rather a share of what the kolkhoz produced—only for the needs of themselves and their families, nothing more.

Collectivization entailed major reforms of the agricultural sector in the Soviet Union. Starting in 1927, collectivization was aimed at consolidating individual peasant landholdings and labor into collective farms, so called “kolkhozes.” Workers there got no salaries, rather a share of what the kolkhoz produced—only for the needs of themselves and their families, nothing more.

👉Collectivization profoundly traumatized the peasantry. The forcible confiscation of meat and bread led to mutinies among the peasants. They even preferred to slaughter their cattle than hand it over to the collective farms. Sometimes the Soviet government had to bring in the army to suppress uprisings….

https://www.rbth.com/multimedia/history/2017/08/25/collectivization-in-the-ussr-how-the-russian-peasantry-was-smashed_828512

It looks like a hostage “proof-of-life” photo. Good grief.

“monetize their heritage”

Money is the key to all evil.

Actually, it would be 675, I think. Last year was a leap year, so 365 would actually be 366.

If there’s fake estrogen and progesterone in it, everyone should avoid it like the plague.

   

Joe Allen is the guy Bannon hired to keep track of Transhumanism.

You can search for “Joe Allen” “Transhumanism” and come up with a variety of articles he wrote that are published by various sites.

🙄 Guess the guy never heard of Migration as Jihad

Migration is part of the doctrine of jihad. Migration is so important that the Islamic calendar is based upon the Hijra, Mohammed’s migration from Mecca to Medina. Why? Because it was migration that lead to the creation of jihad in Medina.

There is a mass migration from Islamic lands to Kafir lands. It is the mission of Islam to bring the Sharia into power, everywhere. There is an ethical divide between Islam and the hated Kafir civilization. It is the purpose of Sharia to dominate the Kafir civilization. As Muslims immigrate, they immediately make Sharia demands.

OR Political Islam.  
“Political Islam is Islam’s ideology about unbelievers, kafirs. A rough estimate is that 270 million people have been killed by jihad.”— Bill Warner

….Totalitarianism is a political system of absolute power where the state has no limit to its authority and regulates most aspects of public and private life. There are no competing political parties since they would balance and limit authority. The critical element of totalitarianism is absolute power striving to rule in as many areas of life as possible.

Totalitarianism in Islamic Doctrine

Totalitarianism is found in the very name, Islam. Islam means submission, submission to the Koran and the Sunna of Mohammed. We see the basis for absolute power in Mohammed’s life. After he went to Medina, he became a jihadist and attacked his neighbors. When he arrived in Medina, it was half Jewish. In two years, there were no more Jews left in Medina. They were exiled, assassinated, enslaved and executed. Mohammed attacked the pagans of Arabia and the Jews. After Arabia submitted to Islam, Mohammed turned to Syria and attacked the Christians.

In the end, Political Islam will not tolerate opposition. Here is a sample of some of the Islamic political doctrine of absolute, total power:

Koran 2:193 Fight them [Kafirs] until there is no more discord and the religion of Allah reigns absolute, …

Here are two hadiths:

Muslim 001, 0031 Mohammed: “I have been ordered to wage war against mankind until they accept that there is no god but Allah and that they believe I am His prophet and accept all revelations spoken through me. …

Bukhari 4, 52, 196 Mohammed: “I have been directed to fight the Kafirs until every one of them admits, ‘There is only one god and that is Allah.’

This doctrine, based on Mohammed’s life, is that jihad will be waged against the Kafirs until they submit to Islam. This theory causes relentless pressure in all areas of life over centuries. The doctrine is not in full force at all times, it waxes and wanes, but the pressure to bring the Sharia into power never vanishes. Today the power of Islam is increasing over the globe due to jihad and migration.

After it enters a society, Islam rules given enough time. The result of Islamic political doctrine is that all power – political, cultural, and religious–becomes totally Islamic. The only exceptions occur when Islam is resisted by force, such as in Spain, the Balkans and at the Gates of Vienna….

https://www.politicalislam.com/political-islam-totalitarian-doctrine/

Of Course if you are in FAVOR of Totalitarian Government, Islam is the ‘religion’ for you!