The Attack on Tucker Carlson is Classic Weissmann DOJ/FBI Treachery

I knew there was something wrong with the “NSA” spying on Tucker Carlson. NSA spying is traditionally SO deep and so quiet that nobody ever knows anything about it. That’s the way they operate. Big, deep, huge, silent, and NEVER give even a HINT of the magnitude, or the IDEA that it might be abused.

Blowing that on a journalist? Yeah, right.

Even a guy like Tucker.

NSA spying is designed to put all the data in a black hole, out of which any of it ONLY emerges if truly needed. It’s an interesting way to deal with the appearance and disappearance of evidence over time.

IF the cops are honest, and IF they are never conquered, THEN they can hold all our secrets in a black box and ONLY retrieve them if authorized. That’s the basic principle.

We can argue about that all we want, but not today. Just accept it as a REALITY. OK? It’s real. THAT is how the IC deals with the “moving real-time problem”. SAVE it all – sort it out later – LOOK AT IT in an outward-facing way ONLY if authorized.

That’s just the WAY IT IS.

So when we get this story – this NARRATIVE – about the NSA “suddenly” spying on Tucker Carlson – and then we get a story about them releasing information – NAH. It violates two things that I KNOW about an agency which has kept track of me my entire life – FOR GOOD REASONS.

ONE.

The NSA spies on ALL OF US – ALWAYS – ALL THE TIME – EVERYTHING. It’s all saved. There is no NEED to order some special spying on Tucker Carlson. That’s not how it works.

They have all my data. They have all Tucker’s data. It’s a done deal.

The narrative that they “started” spying on him, or even that they spied on him in some special way, is all wrong. It’s bullshit. Whoever came to him was either in on the op to influence Tucker, OR they are a pawn or cut-out in the operation – possibly a true and excellent friend of Tucker – but ANY implication that special spying was done on him is bullshit.

Now the NSA can’t go and deny this, because the TRUTH is untouchable.

Somebody on the other side knows that. An ASSHOLE named Andrew Weissmann.

But we’ll get to him in a minute.

TWO.

NSA does not go around “leaking” stuff, because to do so endangers their mission, their collection, and everything they live for. I’m not saying they don’t care – I’m saying that leaking – the creation of the slightest crack in their “defensive truth” – is not part of the “caring”.

We barely got any information about their HEAD GUY – Admiral Mike Rogers – going to a FISA JUDGE and saying that DOJ and FBI were abusing their data in shocking ways.

THAT is the kind of “leak” that sometimes emerges from NSA. As in, it’s about the NSA.

You know. Like SNOWDEN – a CIA operation.

NSA? They don’t go leaking about journalists. They don’t even leak about ME to counter my ratting out what I know but cannot prove about NSA. They don’t even leak about former NSA whistleblowers.

I’ve been a pain in NSA’s ass my whole life. I’m not going to divulge what they may have done to influence me, but one thing I can tell you is that they did not leak JACK. ZERO. NADA.

SILENCE IS THEIR PRIMARY WEAPON.

SO.

I believe that Tucker is the victim of a multi-pronged discreditation operation as part of a SET-UP to a media-government hit job. I think that Tucker did the EXACT right thing going public with us. I think that NSA data about him WAS and IS going to be used in a hit job on him. But this is NOT an NSA “leak”. Its ABUSE of NSA data.

It’s somebody ELSE doing the leaking.

I think that Tucker was UNMASKED exactly like Trump was – by rogue elements in DOJ, FBI, and/or the Biden administration. I think somebody OTHER that NSA illicitly unmasked and grabbed his *NSA* data, and BLAMECASTED to NSA. Knowing full well – I am sure – that NSA would be stuck holding the bag, with a stupid response full of careful denials that look guilty as hell, and even more, that NSA will be too professional to “respond in kind”.

Now at first, I was just “pretty sure” of the above. I didn’t have what I though was “proof”.

NOT UNTIL TODAY.

Just watch this video, and who is in it.

ANDREW WEISSMANN. The sack of shit behind the MUELLER HOAX.

LINK: https://rumble.com/vjo527-msnbc-says-tucker-is-un-american-for-complaining-about-being-spied-on.html?mref=23gga&

There are very few people who CAN and WILL call out a dirty prosecutor like Andrew Weissmann for being the slimeball that he is, but The Last Refuge is one of them, and that is why that blog has been relentlessly marginalized by media assets of DOJ and FBI. If there is one thing I learned from Sundance, it is the centrality of Andrew Weissmann to the corruption in Washington – and in particular the DOJ and FBI.

Weissmann is HOLDER-LEVEL.

As soon as I saw WEISSMANN in this thing, I knew what this was – the SAME as when DOJ and FBI went after Trump.

This is MORE DOJ / FBI hoaxing and cover-up.

This is a PHONY INTEL WRAP-UP SMEAR – just like what they did to Trump. And they’re doubling the hit job by using NSA for cover.

Andrew Weissmann should be in PRISON – not out on the street talking to fake conservative Nicollle Walllace. Indeed, he WOULD be in prison, if there was real justice in Washington.

But there is not.

I’m sorry, to all you hopeful people, but I’m not waiting for Durham to do anything here.

But now we know.

Weissmann is back, and like DEMON, he will be causing trouble. THIS is just the beginning.

Unless, of course, somebody decides to actually do their job in Washington.

W

ANDREW WEISSMANN LOVES A FACADE – IT’S HOW TO SPOT HIM AT WORK

Snopes Racing to Help Adam Schiff on Pedo Rumors

Just sayin’.

Here is its, more fully. If you go there now, you can probably still see it.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/wd40-ad/

When is reporting on leftist DEFENSE a form of wrap-up smear? Well, probably when something is so damaging to the left, they actually have to defend on it. Whatever.

For the record, Schiff is married and his wife is “not unattractive”. She’s named Eve, and supposedly they get a lot of jokes about the “Adam and Eve” thing.

LINK: https://wagcenter.com/politics-wags/eve-schiff-5-facts-adam-schiffs-wife/

Also, for the record, it’s a bit of karma that the left’s cynical pushing of the right’s REAL rumors of REAL Democrat pedophilia (you know – the tacky, sordid, normal, kind, like HERE) “over the edge” into “crazy, unbelievable, pizzagate” territory should now come back to bite Schiff – if these rumors are NOT true, but whatever.

TIME WOUNDS ALL HEELS.

Seriously – THE NEWS is THE NEWS now. So as SNOPES accidentally TWISTS THE KNIFE on Adam Schiff, WE REPORT and YOU DECIDE.

Personally, I think it’s incredibly stupid for them to aggressively defend on this unless Schiff is guilty. But then when it comes to stupid AND evil, the left excels, trying to hide the LATTER under the FORMER so often, we simply expect it.

For the record, I believe that something is up with Schiff, but I have no idea what it ACTUALLY is. Could be more along the lines of corruption involving China and the Long Beach port. I do suspect that he likes money and power more than little boys, but you never know.


How did I stumble onto this?

Pat Frederick posted an excellent meme this morning, here: https://wqth.wordpress.com/2019/11/24/dear-kmag-20191124-open-topic/comment-page-1/#comment-320409

credit: https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/saturday-funnies-ii

Way too funny. Would have gotten in trouble back in 1964, unless it was in PLAYBOY, and even then – probably trouble.

pgroup spotted it:

Just for the record, the WD 40 ad is a great fake. Notice the ” -” missing from the name. The product we all know and love is named WD-40.

pgroup, https://wqth.wordpress.com/2019/11/24/dear-kmag-20191124-open-topic/comment-page-1/#comment-320440

You can actually go to WD-40’s site, and they debunk a lot of myths, but NOT this ad in particular, that I can find. Maybe a more diligent search would find this particular ad. Seems like a weaponized omission to me – make people search their site more deeply. AH, NUMBERS.

LINK: https://www.wd40.com/myths-legends-fun-facts/

But anyway, when I “googled” using NOT GOOGLE, the SNOPES entry was already showing not merely the Schiff defense right through in the text, but even the ANTI-TRUMP.

If you look at the TOP ITEM (from Snopes), you can see the ANTI-TRUMP, and PRO-CHICOM stuff just leaking right through:

Nov 12, 2014 Is a 1964 WD-40 Ad Full of Sexual Innuendo? … Hundreds of fake account admins and 1,929 Facebook advertising violations only begin to tell the story of the Epoch Times-linked, pro-Trump empire …

search result: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=wd+40+ad+fake&ia=web

This had the effect of reminding me of how, during the Trump campaign – particularly the PRIMARIES, there was an INCREDIBLE amount of MALICIOUS ADS targeting Donald Trump on INCESTUOUS PEDOPHILIA. Yes. NASTY. Pictures of Businessman Trump with his daughter Ivanka, insinuating very ugly stuff.

Remember those ads? They were too cringey to even take screenshots, although I wish I had. I was not as versed in the art of DISARMING psychological malware to STUDY THE BOMB back then.

Kinda like THIS, only in salacious ad form. I think they led to a lot of sites like these:

  • https://www.cheatsheet.com/entertainment/donald-and-ivanka-trump-moments-that-totally-weird-us-out.html/
  • https://www.metro.us/president-trump/donald-and-ivanka-trump-awkward-photos
  • https://www.therichest.com/shocking/15-photos-ivanka-trump-doesnt-want-the-world-to-see/
  • https://www.cheatsheet.com/health-fitness/disturbing-things-never-knew-ivankas-relationship-donald-trump.html/

They were EVERYWHERE, and a lot of them went past ad blockers and privacy software, because they were FORCED onto conservative websites and blogs by Soviet CIA front companies that specialize in nasty politics by malicious ads.

Yeah.

SO…..

Is Adam Schiff a pedophile? And is he still beating his lovely wife?

DON’T ASK ME. ASK SNOPES.

W